The Myth of the Right-Wing Extremist

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

Neither man nor angel can discern
Hypocrisy, the only evil that walks
John Milton, Paradise Lost

The Anglosphere stands transfixed by an elusive bogeyman: ‘right-wing extremism.’ And more than any other nation at the present time, the United Kingdom seems to be in the grip of a media-engineered moral panic bordering on paranoid hysteria. This same country, it should be recalled, banned Richard Spencer in June because he had the temerity to advocate for the founding of a White nation on lines similar to those of the State of Israel. Spencer also dared to suggest an ideal of racial self-improvement. In the view of the British Home Office, then under the authority of Theresa May (now Prime Minister), if Spencer continued making such suggestions on British soil it would not be “conducive to the public good.” Furthermore, and without any self-awareness of its own hyperbolic unreason, the same department claimed that Spencer’s positions amounted to the “fomenting” of “serious criminal acts,” “terrorist acts,” and “inter-community violence in the UK.” Spencer, according to this narrative, is an ‘extremist.’

Given such an assessment, one might expect that the aftermath of an average NPI conference would be a veritable war zone. One imagines minorities fleeing the disintegrating streets of Washington D.C., pursued by radicalized and frenzied militants in trendy three piece suits. All, presumably, against a cacophony of explosions and the distant drone of an Aryan war chant.

Like many forms of madness, this strain of political dementia has its darkly humorous aspects. However, the political and cultural expressions of this socially-engineered panic are no laughing matter. In many cases, the legislative actions undertaken in such contexts are oppressive, tyrannical, and a dire threat to our most cherished freedoms. The myth of the ‘right-wing extremist’ is ultimately a rather calculated tool, regularly employed with the sole aim of stifling White voices.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

The myth is built on a foundation of disingenuousness and moral perversion. Ever-amplified, the myth of right-wing extremism is regularly and artificially boosted by government and media, while violence arising directly from Leftist terrorists, or indirectly from Leftist pet projects such as mass immigration, prompts only silence, evasion, or logically gymnastic apologia.

Even a cursory glance at the relevant statistics reveals a stunning neglect of the Leftist threat both historically and in contemporary contexts. According to a 2001 report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy, Leftist extremists were “responsible for three-fourths of the officially designated acts of terrorism in America in the 1980s. From an international perspective, of the 13,858 people who died between 1988 and 1998 in attacks committed by the 10 most active terrorist groups in the world, 74 percent were killed by Leftist organizations.” (Editor’s note: At the November, 2016 NPI conference it was leftist antifas who assaulted Aryan Gondola, the cameraman for Emily Youcis, while shouting “die, die, die.” Many attendees were afraid to leave the building during breaks for fear of similar assaults and with the expectation that the police would do nothing. Sam Dickson recounts several other assaults by leftists at this event. And at last year’s NPI conference, an attendee was also assaulted by an antifa.  Despite an arrest, no charges were filed.)

Hypocrisy is rampant. While affable, and clearly non-violent, figures like Richard Spencer receive continent-wide banning orders, highly volatile groups like Black Lives Matter are indulged with fawning press coverage, and treated with kid gloves by government, academia, and law enforcement. This despite the fact that while BLM may posture as having a purely political and community-based agenda, the same can also be said of those Black Leftist groups of the 1970s that gave rise to terrorist groups like the Black Liberation Army and the Republic of New Afrika. By indulging Black agitation, feeding Leftist paranoia about ‘rigged’ elections, and stoking a panic over the ‘extreme right’ folk devil, the media-government symbiont is stirring a witch’s brew of anti-White resentment that gives moral justification for anti-White violence and threatens to erupt at any moment.

In just one example of what can happen when these ingredients are brought together, one might consider what happened when the Black Liberation Army (1970–1981) joined forces with Leftist terror group the ‘Weather Underground’ (1969–1985), the brainchild of Jewish radicals John Jacobs, Eleanor Raskin, Mark Rudd, David Gilbert, and Kathy Boudin. In October 1981, in the village of Nyack, NY, Boudin and several Black associates, fuelled by a joint desire for ‘class war’ and the ‘appropriation’ of White wealth, robbed an armored Brink’s truck of $1.6 million. In the process, they murdered one Brink’s guard and critically injured two others. The 2001 report commissioned by the Department of Energy further recalls that, “At a police roadblock five miles from the robbery, they killed two police officers and wounded a third.”

In order to shed light on the hypocrisy underpinning the myth of the right-wing extremist, and while not advocating violence in any form or from any quarter, the aftermath of the events described above need to be placed in some kind of comparative context. In particular, it should be noted that even this single act alone, perpetrated by the alliance known as the May 19th  Communist Organization (M19CO), exceeded in violence the entire criminal career of a group known as The Order, also active in the 1980s. The media and judicial treatment of both groups in the aftermath of their respective criminal activities is incredibly telling.

Kathy Boudin, who was heavily involved and present during the Brink’s robbery, is now an adjunct professor at Columbia University, having previously enjoyed a stint as Scheinberg Scholar-in-Residence at New York University School of Law. Mark Rudd wasn’t involved in the Brink’s robbery, but was heavily implicated in the attempted bombing of a servicemen’s ball in March 1970, a prospect that was only averted because the device exploded prematurely, killing its manufacturers — Jewish Marxist terrorists Terry Robbins and Ted Gold, along with Diana Oughton, the non-Jewish girlfriend of Weather Underground co-founder (and now retired professor of education at the University of Illinois–Chicago) Bill Ayers. Rudd went on to be a mathematics instructor at Central New Mexico Community College and is now retired. Eleanor Raskin is now an adjunct instructor at Albany Law School, and an administrative law judge at the New York State Public Service Commission. Other notable Weather Underground figures include Naomi Jaffe, a Jewish former undergraduate student of Herbert Marcuse who participated in the infamous Flint, Michigan War Council (1969) that plotted a series of bombings and murders, including those targeting judges and congressmen. Jaffe currently lives comfortably in New York where she directs an organization devoted to women’s issues and ‘anti-racism.’

Nor should we neglect to mention the later years of the Black terrorists. An excellent example is the early Black Panther Party leader Eldridge Cleaver. Cleaver, a compulsive criminal, once advocated raping White women as “an insurrectionary act,” and, having followed his own advice, remarked that “it delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the white man’s law … defiling his women.” He derided what he called “white pigs,” and added “we encourage people to kill them.” Cleaver died a free man in 1998. An extremist and criminal by any definition of those terms, he was never banned from entering Europe, and even lived in Paris during the 1970s, after his vision of living in Africa ended in an ignominious departure from Algiers.

Rather than being subject to serious media critique, during their heyday both Cleaver and the Black Panther Party were the darlings of liberal intellectuals. For example, the composer and conductor Leonard Bernstein is just one member of the Left-liberal cultural elite known to have held Manhattan fund-raisers for them. Posthumously Cleaver would receive fawning academic tributes, the most absurdly bucolic emerging from a Professor Richard Rose of the University of La Verne, who described Cleaver as a “gentle spirit.” One is reminded of similar sentiments recently expressed after the death of Fidel Castro, a figure who ended a speech marking the 40th anniversary of the Cuban Revolution with the words: “Socialism or death!”

Perhaps more important than the benign fates of these anti-White Leftist terrorists is the fact that their legacy has been one of rose-tinted recollection, white-washing, and ideological triumph. These terrorists produced a political theory that sought to pose every one of their criminal acts as an ‘anti-imperialist,’ ‘anti-racist’ struggle; and they were the first to articulate the formulation of White guilt-inducement known as ‘White privilege.’ Their comfort in middle age and beyond is a reflection of the victory of the ideas they conceived in their youth; ideas that led to the theft of millions of dollars, at least seven major bombings, and the deaths of innocents.

Expressed in simple terms, these terrorists and their contemporaries are triumphant because they convinced society, or at least its most influential elements, to adopt their terminology, their ideology, and their moral schema. Expressed in more complex terms, we might refer to the teachings of Kathy Boudin’s mentor, Herbert Marcuse, who wrote that:

Once a specific morality is firmly established as a norm of social behavior, it is not only introjected — it also operates as a norm of ‘organic’ behaviour; the organism receives and reacts to certain stimuli and ‘ignores’ and repels others in accord with the introjected morality.[1]

The meagre judicial treatment of these terrorist figures, and their comfortable later lives, are thus both a sign and a symptom of the corruption of social morals and norms. The moral norms that currently prevail preclude a rational response to ‘stimuli’ like Leftist terrorism.

In the context of a society given over to a corrupted sense of morality, one would expect responses to vary not according to scale of violence and the extent of threat, but according to disturbances to the introjected moral schema. Rationality is dispensed with. In such a society, extremely violent Islamic terror can evoke less intense responses than threats from and toward abstract protagonists. We are all familiar with the side-stepping of Muslim bombings and beheadings in favor of public handwringing over ‘shared values’ and the putative need to guard against ‘hate.’ Note how the debate is lifted from emergency rooms and placed in the philosopher’s chair. Equipped with this understanding, we should not feel any sense of surprise that the fates of the ‘Weathermen’ contrast sharply with those of The Order, a smaller, less lethal, and less influential group whose members were afforded quite different treatment by the media, government, universities, and judiciary.

By espousing an ideology with White identity at its core, as opposed to the anti-White ideology of M19CO, The Order was in direct conflict not only with the law but also with the prevailing moral schema. Its fate would reflect that. The group’s leader, Robert Mathews, was surrounded by the FBI in December 1984. A decision was taken to fire incendiary rounds into the home Mathews had barricaded himself in, resulting in him being burned alive. Of the remaining members, David Lane was sentenced to 190 consecutive years in prison, his main crime being that he denied the civil rights of Alan Berg, a Jewish talk show host. Lane was subjected to long periods of solitary confinement before dying in prison in 2007. Bruce Pierce was handed a similar fate, having been sentenced to 252 years on the same charges, dying in prison in 2010. Richard Scutari was given a 60-year prison sentence in 1986 and remains incarcerated.

On a cultural level, matters are much the same. David Lane’s ‘Fourteen Words,’ impelling the survival of Whites and their progeny, cannot be articulated in public without punishing consequences. In stark contrast, the ‘White Privilege’ meme, concocted by the Weathermen, Black radicals, and their New Left associates, saturates every aspect of contemporary culture and politics.

To be clear, the argument presented here is not that the right-wing extremist is entirely mythic or fictional because figures committing crime in the name of White identity have never existed. They have existed, but the facts tell us that they are both extremely rare and often very much disengaged from the heart of the movement. Despite recurrent breathless claims, such as Kurt Eichenwald’s Newsweek article claiming that right-wing extremists are more dangerous than ISIS, the reality is far different.  FBI agent Michael German, who spent years undercover with White identity groups and is certainly no friend of our ideas, has remarked that “There are millions of racists in the United States. There are hundreds of thousands of people who are with organized white supremacist groups. Very few actually commit acts of violence.”

The argument presented here is rather that the myth of the “right-wing extremist” is always greater than the sum of his parts, whereas the Leftist extremist is always somehow less than the sum of his. Furthermore, because it is moral infraction more than violent threat that lies at its heart, the myth of the right-wing extremist envelopes even the most non-belligerent advocate of contrarian ideologies. The violent Leftist, the anarchist, the Black ‘liberationist,’ on the other hand, is forever a ‘gentle spirit.’

Disinformation is crucial to the maintenance of the myth. The Southern Poverty Law Center is one of the world’s leading producers of propaganda in this regard, primarily through its Intelligence Report and Year in Hate and Extremism. In the words of Alexander Cockburn, SPLC President Morris Dees “has raised an endowment of close to $100 million [now $302.8 million], with which he’s done little, by frightening elderly liberals that the heirs of Adolf Hitler are about to march down Main Street, lynching blacks and putting Jews into ovens. The fund raising of Dees and the richly rewarded efforts of terror mongers like Leonard Zeskind offer a dreadfully distorted view of American political realities.”

Such distortion is a defining feature of the myth of the right-wing extremist. Faced with increasing violence from immigrants and ethnic minorities, interested parties in government, the media, and academia have been forced to heighten the level of distortion still further, in order to maintain the pretense that a greater threat emanates from the Right.

In recent weeks, Spencer-free Britain has had its introjected morality triggered continually by wave upon wave of engineered ‘news.’ The Guardian, a bastion of Left-liberal elite smugness, has been at the forefront in provoking a falsehood-fuelled social panic about the Right. In late November it led with a piece claiming that “a top counter-terrorism officer has said police fear the threat of far-right violence is growing and poses a similar danger to communities as other forms of extremism.”

In actual fact, the officer in question responded to loaded questions in the wake of the death of murdered MP Jo Cox with only cautious and non-committal statements on the Right, and stated that “currently just under 10% of all Prevent [a government ‘anti-extremism’ education program] referrals relate to the extreme right-wing.” It is understood that these involved teenagers engaging in stickering and handing out pamphlets. Far from posing a “similar danger to communities as other forms of extremism,” the officer further elaborated that “the overriding threat remains from Daesh-inspired groups,” that is to say, groups derived predominantly from the Guardian’s much-cherished immigrant populations.

Faced with a White identity movement that remains, frustratingly for its opponents, law-abiding and peaceful, we can expect an elaboration on existing tactics. The meaning and definition of words like ‘terrorism’ and ‘extremism’ will themselves be expanded to encompass non-violent entities and individuals in an effort to drag them into hastily constructed spheres of illegality and, thus, deeper social opprobrium and even prison sentences. The banning of Richard Spencer from the UK as an ‘extremist’ is an excellent case in this regard. Another is the prison sentence given to Joshua Bonehill for harassing a Jewish MP on social media.

The phenomena outlined above should be sufficient for us to dispense with any lingering hopes that the political and cultural contest we are engaged in is governed by ‘fairness.’ In this Great Game, the rules are constantly changing, the goal always elusive. I often feel that our victory will not be in the form of a majestic sweep to power, but will instead resemble the achievement of a victor marked by his powers of will and endurance. In this scenario, we drag ourselves over the finish line with bloodied fingertips.

Despite the purity of our intentions, the merit of our cause, and the honor in our motivations, I fear that there will be sacrifices along the way. There will be more smears, more falsehoods, more libels, and more oppressions. Glory will come to he who can shoulder them and move ever forward.

I opened with Milton. I’ll close with him:

Awake, arise, or be for ever fallen

[1] Herbert Marcuse, ‘Essay on Liberation,’ 1969.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

31 Comments to "The Myth of the Right-Wing Extremist"

  1. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    December 16, 2016 - 10:11 am | Permalink

    Well said, Andrew. Our racial enemies, and their beguiled minions are circling for the kill. Double standards don’t mean a thing to them, they are in the cat bird’s seat and know it. Their lock on the money spigots, the media, and the ‘popular’ mindset gives them immense power, for now. Their unnatural dystopian world will eventually come unglued, and who survives to pick up the pieces is yet to be determined. But, I wouldn’t bet against an ultimate White racial-political resurgence, no matter how bleak the current picture.

  2. Lothar von Trotha's Gravatar Lothar von Trotha
    December 16, 2016 - 10:48 am | Permalink

    All too true. It occurs to me that the archetype of the anti-government crazed loner, the Michigan militia man, the “White terrorists” that we always hear have killed more people than Moslems since 9/11 serve as a stand-in for the Cossacks in the Pale of Settlement. Even the Jewish historian Peter Novick noted as much when discussing the “pavement punditry” taking over the American Historical Association. Unlike with other populist movements, Richard Hofstadter and other “pavement pundits” despised the Silverites, William Jennings Bryan and the 1890’s Populists, because they blamed “New York speculators” for the Panic of 1893. Those “evil benighted rednecks” might have been Ukranian serfs moments before in these people’s minds. It’s that Suß Oppenheimer fear all over again, and everything that’s being done to our society seems to be designed to preclude such things from ever happening again by disuniting us demographically and by deconstructing the “whiteness” that unites us.

    When you do see 60’s radicals in films, it is of course solely as the selfless fighters against racism, the upholders of basic decency against the bigoted redneck Southerners who want to just lynch blacks because they hate melanin. No Greenwich Village townhouse explosions, none of the genital crabs-laden orgies that Mark Rudd described, none of his parents despising the “goyische kopf,” no discussions of murdering every White baby on the planet (, none of Bernadine Dohrn praising the Manson family murders thus:

    “Dig it!” she exclaimed. “First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them. They even shoved a fork into the victim’s stomach! Wild!”

    It really is shocking how blatant the Jewish involvement in SDS was, sometimes it seems like no one but George Lincoln Rockwell and Richard Nixon ever really understood what was going on.

    “What outraged me and my comrades so much about Columbia, along with its hypocrisy, was the air of genteel civility. Or should I say gentile? Despite the presence of so many Jews in the faculty and among the students … the place was dripping with goyishness.” – Mark Rudd

    This article is a goldmine:

    Peter Novick does a very good job of showing how Herbert Gutman and others riled up the schwartzes in the 60’s, leading to violent campus takeovers and universities bending the knee to institute ethnic studies and gender studies programs, which quickly became detached from the slightest academic standards. Eventually, Gutman got shouted down and excluded by the black golem he’d created. A young Jewish historian named Robert Starobin tried to deliver a lecture to Black Panthers and was shouted down so bad that he ended up committing suicide from the humiliation.

    The quotations from some black activists about “certain White people seem to understand what it’s like to be black” are golden. From Novick:

    “The black historian Nell Painter, arguing that black and white historians had quite different sensibilities, acknowledged that ‘not all whites hold what I’m calling ‘white’ views; Lawrence Levine and Herbert Gutman, for instance, are able to think about history in what I’d call ‘black’ ways. It was this group of historians, who whatever their race, ‘thought black,’ who were representative of the new style and focus in black history.”

    Gutman, George Rawick, Lucy Davidowicz, Leon Litwack,the coincidences just keep adding up, same as with so many of the Freedom Riders who just happened to come from New York, same as all those “Lithuanian” activists in South Africa.

    How many people understand that MLK was a mouthpiece for Stanley Levison? Why was he chosen over black nationalists? What happened with Marcus Garvey? Why did the media just happen to start filming when the Bull Connor types started suppressing riots that already broke out, making it appear as if “black man being attacked by dogs and fired hosed for no reason” was the real issue? I see academic books today celebrating blacks breaking store windows and stealing televisions during the Watts Riots, since they were “excluded from our consumer nation” and wanted to “transgress borders of white supremacy.”

    This combination of obfuscation and delusion about what happened in the 60’s, and where it’s leading, walks right up to the present with fears of “violent Trump supporters” and the “forces of bigotry that Trump’s campaign has unleashed” while ignoring the riots in Chicago and elsewhere, Mexican and Communist flags being waved as illegal aliens get cheered for attacking American citizens. The price of these lies stacking on top of other lies and the power that holds them all in place has to constitute the most execrable and insidious plan of nation-wrecking ever hatched in the dark recesses of a neurotic mind, it’s painful to think about the potential in the trajectory of the West without these people vs. the trajectory it’s presently on.

    Hollywood loves to put out movies about the most salacious examples of “the evil crazed Nazi” stereotype, and they’ll even have the characters saying sensible things right before committing some kind of act of mindless violence, not to imply that “the Nazis” have no points but that those points must always come with violence. It’s more intelligent than simply having the characters calling Jews “Christ-Killers” or something, because it actually innoculates people from being persuaded by very good arguments about disproportionate Jewish influence in media, academia, entertainment, finance, etc.

    • December 18, 2016 - 6:55 am | Permalink

      Good point about associating truth with fanaticism in the fantasy world of Jews and film. Reminds me of infants in Brave New World given electric shocks when they handle their nice picture books.
      Many of the supposedly indicative memes of US history seem to have been manufactured, including the Salem Witch Trials, Wounded Knee, Lizzie Borden’s axe murders, Mark Twain’s life, Jack London’s life, and Sharon Tate/ Charles Manson et al. (Latter made up to damage hippies). I recommend though his site isn’t very transparent. The ones I list are at the less important end of a large spectrum. Even if you don’t agree, Mathis’s technique of family tree research with image analysis is notable as a new field of Internet research.

  3. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    December 16, 2016 - 11:42 am | Permalink

    Another quality article. These lying hypocritical scumbags think they are clever. The lying Jew media loves to lie by omitting the inherent hypocrisy.

  4. December 16, 2016 - 1:09 pm | Permalink

    This is well-written, and a good survey of the rather small US part in the world. But it’s all simply a part of Jewish parasitism, fraud and anti-white hostility. Why not mention that Theresa May is just another fanatical ‘Jew’, unqualified in any way for public office in Britain? Why not mention the Jew handlers of blacks in the US? What about Jew promotion of wars which genuine Americans seem unable to realise are crimes from which Jews think they benefit? Why not discuss Jewish anti-white lies, such as the ‘Holohoax’? Why not discuss how it happens that thugs are given fake academic positions? Why not discuss Jewish paper money? And media control? Why not discuss the perversion of ‘left’ and ‘socialism’ from something aiming at decency, to Jew supremacist lies? Why not discuss US ad campaigns, always showing whites as criminals, not blacks, as criminals? Please, please climb over the next barrier;- please get a higher view over the Jewish infestation; and then discuss it.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      December 17, 2016 - 6:03 am | Permalink

      Rerevisionist, your comment has given newbies reading here an indisputable overview of the Jewish infestation laying over the next barrier. Infestations, an apt example being intestinal parasites are not difficult to treat, however they often feed for years undetected, purged only after the damage they’ve caused becomes apparent due to the hosts failing health. The parasites eating away at the weakening Western body have spread into all of its vital organs, but I (naively?) expect that the climactic is approaching fast and the West will rise like Lazarus.

      • December 17, 2016 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

        It’s a difficult issue; how honest? There are innumerable people recommending caution and semi-silence; and they have a point, because all brainwashing by repetition of lies succeeds on a proportion of any populations, lasting seemingly until death. I take the view that at least some people should be as clear as they can be, on the outspoken end of the distribution, including allowance for the likely discovery in the future of as-yet undetected Jewish crimes and frauds, for example in Russia when it was the USSR.
        …. May I just make one point, which may help immunize you to some extent. Try to include at least one subject which Jews do not want to be examined. In my case I include nuclear scepticism; but this needs some confidence and skill and research. But others could include: Truth about Jews pushing immigration invasions, Slav girls used as prostitutes in Israel, true accounts of Jewish mass murders, financial frauds, and of course 9/11, World War 2, and the Holohoax, though you have to know the subjects. Many Jew-aware sites do this, either by design, or simply as a result of Darwinian survival. See my list of sites.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      December 19, 2016 - 2:05 am | Permalink

      “This is well-written, and a good survey of the rather small US part in the world. But it’s all simply a part of Jewish parasitism, fraud and anti-white hostility. Why not mention that Theresa May is just another fanatical ‘Jew’, unqualified in any way for public office in Britain? Why not mention the Jew handlers of blacks in the US? What about Jew promotion of wars which genuine Americans seem unable to realise are crimes from which Jews think they benefit? […]”

      Rerevisionist, I don’t understand what you’re getting at. Previous articles on the occidental observer (including articles written by Joyce) have addressed all of the topics you mention, in depth. What is it that you want?

  5. RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
    December 16, 2016 - 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Great writing…, IMO you have quite the talent.

    For precisely the reasons mentioned above, when a rabbi asks Richard Spencer if he would be willing to sit down and “study Torah”,

    instead of praising the rabbi for being a Zionist, Genetic Semi-Isolationist, up-breeding Jew…,
    should have attacked him fiercely by starting with a scathing line of questioning asking him to admit publically the Jewish oligarchic possession of…, Western banks, media, resource companies, etc…

    After all, when a Jew wants to “sit down and study Torah”, you just know it will lead only to more trouble for Richard (assassination attempt, framing, etc.).

    The Jew must not be cuckolded so as to make WNists look good, the must be attacked to give a sense of certainty and bravery to other WNists who encounter similar instances of Jewish subterfuge.

    The only time a Jew should be “given a pass” is when they score perfect on ALL points of truth (Holocaust lie, overrepresented mass ownership and obfuscation of ALMOST ALL Western Infrastructural Nodal Points, Talmudic calls to White genocide, etc.) with respect to the agenda that they are covertly orchestrating.

    Likewise, because Whites are in danger of literally being slaughtered, en mass, in the near future by these Jew underpinned leftists, Whites must start making headlines by putting Jews in their rightful place, not by cucking them by trying to show how Whites are the ones in who are in fact the ones who hold the moral high ground.

    These people have no limits in depravity, malice, immorality and guile. One can not reason with them. No amount of cucking will shield us from their wrath.

  6. December 16, 2016 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

    These same points are also true about the Chinese Communist Party. The liberal media goes on and on about Nazism, but Chinese Communism killed far more people: the deaths of all the two European world wars combined. Liberals make nice with this government and they make elaborate economical theories to justify their support for the Communist Party and their trade relations with them. The liberals are financing and strengthening tyrants. Trump is right now challenging this liberal order which supports the Chinese Communist Party. Trump has been able to expose, consciously or not, the fact that liberals are supporting the Communists and making up excuses for this. The liberals want the Chinese Communists to take over. They are handing the world to tyrants. I am curious what Jewish motivations are for this, but I guess that it may have to do something with Communism. After all, Chinese Communism originated in the Marxism-Leninism of the Jewish-controlled Soviet Union.

  7. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 16, 2016 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Running on Empty (1988) is loosely based on Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.

  8. John's Gravatar John
    December 16, 2016 - 9:38 pm | Permalink

    Every time someone calls the “far right’s” positions extreme or calls us Nazis, I wonder if they’re even aware of most of the history of western countries and their laws. Up until 1952, Asians were kept out of the US by law and even after that was changed the law still kept out most non-whites until the Jews’ new law took effect in 1968. We used to sterilize people with serious hereditary diseases, had homes for unwed mothers, put homos in jail and abortion and porn were illegal etc. And these things were considered reasonable and right and I still consider them all reasonable and right.

  9. Kartoffelsalat's Gravatar Kartoffelsalat
    December 16, 2016 - 10:14 pm | Permalink

    The reality is the ruling class are trying very hard to deny reality that the races are not equal exactly what Spencer brings out.

    This denial of reality and efforts aimed at silencing the truth is the real issue hence villains are white as in Hollywood films , controlled by you know who, – interestingly Germans and the English make the perfect bad guys.

    Whether it is Germany where Turks commit more crimes and are a social burden or France with Arabs and Africans or the UK with its Pakistanis and Indians or America with its Blacks and Mexicans the truth is uncomfortable for the likes of Merkel and May.

    This is how the Soviet Union used to operate. Is it not George Orwell who wrote 1984 with the tormented Winston Smith?

  10. Martin's Gravatar Martin
    December 17, 2016 - 8:48 am | Permalink

    I would like to see more attention to how “Southern Poverty Law Center”-like organizations operates in white nations, and how all media conglomerates use those organizations as some sort of expert authority.

    Recently in wake of Richard Spencers media nuke, it’s hard to find any US MSM piece that does not reference to how “SPLC” has branded the person/organization. This is considered adding weight to the narrative and the concept is that the receiver of the message, as reader or viewer, are to understand that experts says this – so you better believe it.

    The same method is deployed in all suffering white nations. Those organizations exclusively pose as concerned objective citizens. The swedish variant of SPLC is “Expo”, which in its early days openly gave thanks to ADL for funding. Nowadays, those links are under the radar but funding is channeled in various ways from the usual suspects.

    It’s not like the MSM is ever going to examine those “hate watch” organizations, or explain how and why those are an expert authority. Here I am inserting a rhetorical ‘Why?’

    Plot twist: Is the disinformation from those organizations part in impacting MSM ratings so badly, that it could be considered fueling alternative media and therefor should be remained untouched?

    • protorenaissance's Gravatar protorenaissance
      December 18, 2016 - 12:48 am | Permalink

      Suddenly I saw a new phenomenon,a fashion to always include in comments to main stream media sites as authoritative sources some statistic as idiotic as the ones they fabricate at SPLC..No matter what the subject is at hand,the authority of SPLC would be evoked.If the subject is regarding pain in the groin-as SPLC asserted 7 out of 10 average working-age martians are in fact severely homophobic and potentially anti semitic.Adding SPLC slightly invented quotes would help that stellar reputation of their organization to be really everywhere. What fun!

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      December 19, 2016 - 6:57 am | Permalink

      I’ve noticed the “I am the authority figure complex” as well. The real question is where does the SPLC get its funding?

      • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
        December 22, 2016 - 4:01 am | Permalink

        With all due respect, that is really no question at all. The SPLC gets it’s funding entirely from private sponsors, who, I am prepared to bet, are almost exclusively Jewish. I will assume without fear of contradictory evidence that the vast majority of those – if not all of them – are in the top 1% wealth / income bracket across the United States, and are individuals for whom absolute “discretion” is as essential to their normal business modus operandi as it is to their donating habits. I have every right to assume this, as to the best of my knowledge and research the SPLC Board chooses as a standard organisational policy NOT to publish anywhere at any time either the identity of any of it’s sponsors, or any of the amounts or frequencies with which those amounts are given.

        I hope we’re a little past the point here of not knowing that Jews fund Jews.

  11. Scott Comin's Gravatar Scott Comin
    December 17, 2016 - 9:08 am | Permalink

    First century Christians come to mind. Our battle will most surely be won by character not confrontation, although I could be wrong. Research shows non-violent movements are twice as successful as violent ones. Can’t remember where I read that. God bless all those courageous white europeans who were imprisoned by pathological narcissists.

    • December 18, 2016 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

      I agree. I myself keep pushing boundaries. When 1 year ago I first spoke like we do in this site, it was in an Albanian language website. I had sent those same opinions to my Jewish ex-friends. My Albanian friends at the website told me “wait that at any moment a police car will come to lift you”. That never happened, and I keep pushing boundaries. The point is, we all must keep pushing boundaries stronger, and take more action. Jews are exterminating us. Can it get more alarming?

  12. December 17, 2016 - 10:42 am | Permalink

    Applaud Mr. Joyce for this article, especially because the last quote (“Awake, arise, or be for ever fallen”) was really good!
    Dandy conservative politicians like Mrs. May in Britain or Mr. Trump in America can be our hope (but should they?).
    Very long years have we entrusted our vote in great rightwingers like Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan or the greatest of all rightwingers, The Amazing Donald.
    Ambiguous rhetoric, empty promises and mass immigration are the results of these popular votes.
    Nicer, even more submissive “conservative” behaviour will not help us.
    Callous determination and uncompromising resistance will do the job.
    Evasion is difficult, because the Left-liberal cultural elite is supported (with good reason) by powerful capitalist and jewish interest groups.
    “Dissuade and Divide” is the successful strategy of these elites.
    Terrains that have been our homeland since time immemorial (Europe) and newfound lands like North America and Australia are at stake, whose loss would endanger all our race.
    Retrace your history, and find the keys where your ancestors lost them!
    Oily politicians (including The Donald) will not save the gluttonous, phlegmatic plebs.
    Lobster and other submarine delicacies’ culinary fate is the crustacean analogy to our self-inflicted predicament.
    Lodgers of different races are flooding our countries, but despair not:
    Peak oil will help us in our return to a saner world.
    Ordinary minions may not notice it, but fossil fuels are running out in the next decades.
    Evil elites know this and want to smother and divide us with mass immigration, before we can rise.
    The coming revolutions will be ignited by energy devolution!

  13. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    December 17, 2016 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

    Excellent points are raised in this article.
    However, as ever, I am troubled by the left/right labels. These days “right” seems to mean, questioning why things should change. “Left” seems to mean wanting things to change. Both are meaningless, as is “extremist”. I’ve often asked people what is “right wing” or “extremist” about opposing immigration in times of unemployment, regardless of the origin of the immigrant. Alternatively, I have posed the question as what is right wing or extreme to be more concerned about the unemployed in this city, than an unknown person in a foreign country?
    The blank stares and mindless canned clichés not related to the question have convinced me, quite simply, that these people are incapable of coherent thought. Left, schmeft, they are brain dead. They have been programmed to think the billions in Africa and Asia have a concern about White people being mean to them.

    • December 17, 2016 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

      I’ve been this for years as a problem, along with differences in US and British English. I collected a lot of questions, and put together a guide to disentangling them, here . I like to think this may be some help in finding good answers to deceptive questions.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      December 18, 2016 - 2:41 am | Permalink

      This definition of left vs. right— the right preferring the status quo, the left wanting change– is quite old. It is a left-wing view of the difference between left and right.

      Basically, the left sees things as follows:

      1. Society oppresses the individual— it oppresses minorities, it oppresses women, it oppresses homosexuals, etc. The left thus wants to overcome this oppression; in other words, the left wants change.

      2. But right-wingers don’t want to help minorities, don’t want to help women, don’t want to help homosexuals. etc. So right-wingers want the oppression of minorities, women, etc. to continue. In other words, the right prefers the status quo.

  14. tadzio308's Gravatar tadzio308
    December 17, 2016 - 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Charges against Bill Ayers were dropped due to doubts by government attorneys about the admissibility of some evidence because of alleged government misconduct. The case was broomed by the bureaucracy. Later administrations have not resuscitated the case.

    The entire matter should be reopened in light of subsequent court rulings and a thorough review of the original [political] decision to not prosecute. There are ample precedents as in the relentless pursuit of charges against the so-called killers of the ‘civil rights’ activist New York Jews in Mississippi during which multiple legal precedents were tossed in the waste bin.

    When Jeff Sessions is sworn in he should be bombarded with demands that the case be reopened. If nothing else it could subject the criminal Ayers to the expense and aggravation of a prosecution. He does not deserve a carefree senility. Never forget. Never forgive.

  15. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    December 17, 2016 - 8:59 pm | Permalink

    Europe and the Isles is the millennial home of the ethnostates founded by members White race.

    I don’t believe either the myth of evolution or the ‘Out of Africa’ genesis and one reason is that archaeology has found that the oldest human settlements, artefact and mounds in Europe (as in much of the world) yields skeletons that are identifiably ‘Caucasian’.

    To advocate for the right of White nations to their ethnostates and homelands in the lands of their millennial civilisations is considered by the Judaic Supremacy as a ‘hatecrime’. Thus Theresa May (a bought and paid for ZOGbot) has it that advocacy of White nation rights is ‘not conducive to the public good’.

    And she brazenly maintains this in the face of the ongoing crimes against the British schoolgirls of Rotherham: “industrial scale” child grooming and rape by Muslim men of Kashmiri, Pakistani ethnicity. It is the ZOGbot Political Elites who are responsible for standing down Law enforcement, the civil authorities and the health authorities of the UK across the North and enabling these crimes against the native Britons.

  16. December 17, 2016 - 9:07 pm | Permalink

    Just read. Bloomberg notoriously publicizes the perks of the idyllic life of childless couples, targeted at Whites. On the other hand, they celebrate the birth rates of invaders. It’s only Whites who are detested by Jews.

  17. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    December 18, 2016 - 12:15 am | Permalink

    Gary Yarbrough of the Order was recently denied parole again because of his beliefs and now has early onset Parkinsons for which he is being denied treatment.
    His address is: Gary Yarbrough #09883-016,
    US Prisoner, Max.
    PO Box 8500
    CO. 81226-8500

  18. Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
    December 18, 2016 - 6:12 am | Permalink

    Well done to Dr. Joyce for exposing the shockingly different fates of leftwing and rightwing “extremists”. There were also reports that Marxist Terrorist Ayers paid for Obama’s college education, though I can’t remember the references now. May I just repeat part of Lothar von Trotha’s comment:
    “The price of these lies stacking on top of other lies and the power that holds them all in place has to constitute the most execrable and insidious plan of nation-wrecking ever hatched in the dark recesses of a neurotic mind. It’s painful to think about the potential in the trajectory of the West without these people vs. the trajectory it’s presently on.”

  19. gibbon's Gravatar gibbon
    December 18, 2016 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    People on the Right reject the idear that ‘America’ is an idear.. but I think I will dissent.

    I now believe ‘America’ is an idear.

    And because it is an idear, people around the world no longer need to come to America to have ‘America’ as an idear.
    It’s like democracy as an idear. To have democracy, you don’t have to come to the US to practice democracy. You can implement the idear of democracy in your own country.

    Idears are portable and transferable. Idears are not fixed in one place. It’s like some mountain in Tibet is fixed in that place, but Buddhism is an idear, and you don’t have to go to Tibet to be a Buddhist. You can be a Buddhist anywhere. You can even take that idear into outer-space.

    So, let us say there is the United States as a fixed nation with its distinct history, heritage, and culture. It is about power and history within a fixed territory.

    In contrast, there is ‘America’ as an idear, and it is universal and can be transported or transposed to anyone, anywhere, anytime.

    So, our message to all the people around the world is that they don’t have to come to the United States to partake in the idear of America.

    They can have it at home. And what is this big idear of ‘America’ they can have in their own home nation?

    The American Idear is as follows: pig out on junk food, obsess over video games, twerk, listen to rap, worship black athletes, indulge in hedonism, promote slut culture, celebrate militarism, drink soda and burp, get tattoos on ass, push interracism, hail Zionism, watch trash TV, break down barrier between mainstream culture(even for kids) and pornography, praise homos and trannies, enforce PC, destabilize national borders, allow mass invasion, cook up hate hoaxes about KKK and neo-nazis, flip oit over micro-aggressions, spread fears of blonde rapists, promote cuck attitudes among the men, declare your folks to be ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’, and blame ‘Russia’ for everything.

    Yes, that is ‘America’ as an Idear in the Current Year. And any people in any nation can practice those ‘idears’ and be ‘American’ without coming to America.

    So, save your money on that plane ticket.
    Just stay in your country and embrace the IDEAR of ‘America’.

    We should devise a American Idear Kit as universal formula for the world and sell it all over. Or even hand it out for free. It’d be like a Chemistry Kit. Ameristry Kit.

    It’d be like handing out the New Testament or Mormon Book. After all, you don’t have to go to Utah to be a Mormon. You can be a Mormon in Mexico or India. And you don’t need to be in the territory of the United States to have your idear of ‘America’.

  20. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    December 18, 2016 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

    In the field of political science— which is dominated by leftists— they don’t use the term “right-wing extremist”, they use the term “right-wing authoritarian.”

    They regularly churn out books and articles on “right-wing authoritarianism.” (According to them there is no such thing as left-wing authoritarianism.)

  21. Eoghan Roe's Gravatar Eoghan Roe
    December 21, 2016 - 10:19 am | Permalink

    If there are, as Michael German (the FBI agent quoted above) says, “millions of racists” (or to use the less pejorative term, ‘white nationalists’) they certainly don’t make their presence felt at street level the way leftists do. I’m certainly not suggesting they emulate the violence or illegality of the Left, but the brutal truth is that if they want to succeed in their struggle, white nationalists need to get in their enemies’ faces the way the left gets in theirs. The fact that they don’t do so communicates both a lack of conviction and a lack of courage to their enemies. Say what you will about the lefties, but generally they’re the ones with the energy and dogged tenacity. Granted their street warriors are often bankrolled by the likes of Soros, but that in itself is a testament to a recognition on the part of the oligarchs that street confrontation works.

    Dr Joyce alludes to Leonard Bernstein’s party for the Black Panthers – an event Tom Wolfe wrote about very entertainingly in a two part book ‘Radical Chic and Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers”. The second part of the book deals with the ‘Mau-Mauing’ black activists engaged in against civil servants in the late 1960s and early 1970s. ‘Mau-Mauing’ translated as ‘agressively confronting in person those in authority’. As Wolfe’ book made clear, this very personal approach to political activism seriously unsettled those on the receiving end of it. Since “right-wing” whites rarely engage in this type of activity, it’s no surprise they don’t get listened to, and are despised as shiftless laggards who naively rely on politicians to do their fighting for them.

Comments are closed.