Given the record of frosty relations with Prime Minister Netanyahu, President Obama’s parting shot at Israel comes as no surprise. After years of standing up for Israel at the UN Security Council, the US has abstained from a resolution that, among other things, “reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace.” The resolution was framed by the US as intended to salvage the last vestiges of hope for a two-state solution in a situation where, as US UN Ambassador Samantha Power noted in her speech following the vote, there are 590,000 Israelis living on the West Bank. She also noted that Israel’s Netanyahu’s claim to still be pursuing a two-state solution contradicts his stated policy of being the most pro-settlement government in Israel’s history.
As a hard leftist, Obama, like other Social Justice Warriors, could not possibly support Israel’s ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and oppression of the Palestinians in good conscience. The same thing has happened with other parties of the left, notably the Labour Party in the UK. In taking this position, Obama is out of step with the predominantly Jewish donor class of the Democrats and with Democrat politicians, many of whom condemned the resolution, likely with the understanding that they must still deal with AIPAC if they want to be reelected. But it is unlikely that his action will be condemned by a very substantial percentage of the Democrat Party’s base — only a bare majority of Democrats favor Israel (53%), compared to 23% for Palestinians.
The fact that Obama did this a month before leaving office is a powerful statement of the power of the Israel Lobby and pro-Israel sentiment in American politics. It would have been suicide for him to have done this prior to the 2012 election.
Donald Trump is in a much different position. After the vote, Trump tweeted:
As to the U.N., things will be different after Jan. 20th.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 23, 2016
Should this position disturb those of us on the Alt Right who see Trump as a president who would carve out an America First foreign policy, turn back the immigration onslaught, and fashion a nationalist trade policy? I think not, for the following reasons.
During the campaign, Trump did several things not at all to the liking of the Israel Lobby, including his statement to the Republican Jewish Coalition that he was not beholden to their donations and his statement that he would be neutral in dealing with Israel and the Palestinians. However, Trump mended the fences in his well-received AIPAC speech, although he never appeased the #NeverTrump neocons who continued to denounce him from their perches in the mainstream conservative media. Nevertheless, since winning the presidency he has signaled strong support for Israel, appointing David Friedman, a hardline settlement-supporter and opponent of a two-state solution, as Ambassador to Israel. Trump has also promised to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, a move long sought by Israeli hard-liners. And he previously signaled that Israeli settlements are not an obstacle to peace.
Trump is not in Obama’s position. As president, he must govern with the cooperation of the mainstream Republican Party and its representatives in Congress. In the same poll cited above, Republicans favored Israel 79%–7%, implying that coming out against Israel would alienate a large majority of the GOP base just as he is beginning his term as president. A pro-Israel foreign policy is completely ensconced in the Republican Party. Following the vote, it was condemned by a chorus of Republican politicians and ex-politicians, including House Speaker Paul Ryan, senators Tom Cotton, and Lindsay Graham, Newt Gingrich, and Mike Huckabee, with nary a contrary voice.
I suggest that Trump is going to take a course much like that of Geert Wilders and other European nationalist politicians. In fact, Wilders, who was recently convicted of “insulting an ethnic group and inciting discrimination” for asking an audience if there should be fewer Muslims in the Netherlands, strongly condemned the resolution, writing on his Facebook page, “”Obama betrayed Israel. Thank God for Trump. My advise to my Israeli friends: ignore the UN and keep building more and more settlements.”
In other words, Wilders, like Trump, has carved out a position that favors Likud-like positions on Israel while at the same time is opposed to further Muslim colonization of the West. Trump has not backed down from his statements that he will attempt to have a moratorium on immigration from terrorism-producing countries (i.e., Muslim countries) and will not accept refugees from these countries without “extreme vetting” (which I take to mean such refugees would not be admitted to the U.S., since it is not possible to properly vet people from Third World countries, which, for a variety of reasons, tend not to have adequate record-keeping).
Although Geert Wilders‘ support for Israel has been long-standing and probably sincere (he lived in Israel for two years as a young man, working on a kibbutz, and has visited the country 40 times in the last 25 years), he has been unable to form a government and, given his recent conviction, he obviously has not achieved acceptance among elites in the Netherlands. However, his popularity is on the rise — he is now the most popular politician in the country, and his popularity increased following his conviction, to 36%, the highest of any party (but still far short of a majority). With the success of Trump and continued examples of Muslim terrorism, it is conceivable that he could actually win.
I can’t prove it, but it seems to me that a main motive of Wilders et al. is to provide cover from the left that is dominant in the media but also sympathetic to Israel and Jewish concerns generally. Trump has been viciously attacked by the mainstream media — not only the powerful left-leaning media, but also including the neoconservative media (which is nothing if not pro-Israel). And because attacks on people like Wilders and Trump tend to be framed in moral terms — a sense of moral righteousness is the opium of White people — many non-Jews in the mainstream right seek legitimacy and acceptance by supporting Jewish causes. After all Jews have successfully portrayed themselves as the ultimate victims and are well-known to be leaders in “anti-racist” causes throughout the West. Conservatives see this as an effective response to incessant charges from the left that Republicans, and especially Donald Trump, are basically White racists pretending to be dedicated to principles. This draws on moral capital that Jews have piled up via incessant media accounts of the Holocaust and media accounts portraying anti-Jewish attitudes as irrational ravings of uneducated, morally defective people.
It would be hard to exaggerate the sense of moral righteousness that allegiance to Israel elicits among many conservatives in the U.S. A good example is Sean Hannity, who was a strong supporter of Trump, particularly after Trump’s nomination. Hannity is a fanatic supporter of Israel. It would be difficult indeed to convey his adulation for Netanyahu and Israel. On a radio show earlier this year, fielding call-ins from Jews grateful for his support of Israel and “the Jewish people,” Hannity was quick to point out that his support for Israel was entirely a matter of moral principle—Israel was the good guy, a democratic state beset by Islamic terrorists. Hannity would doubtless agree with Wilders’ statement that “We [in the West] are all Israel.”
The left long ago realized the power of appeals to moral righteousness and its unique appeal to White people. (I have proposed that White people, and especially Northern Europeans, are uniquely prone to forming groups based on a sense of moral righteousness [as opposed to clan-type kinship connections], while ostracizing and vilifying those who stray from the moral consensus.) The right has been slow to reciprocate, often grounding their arguments in abstract principles like states’ rights, economic liberalism, and Constitutional arguments. Libertarianism grounded on abstract notions of human liberty is a paradigm. But grounding support for Israel in moral righteousness is increasingly threadbare given Israeli ethnic cleansing, apartheid, everyday oppression of the Palestinians, and regular outbursts of incredible brutality in Gaza. Nevertheless, by supporting the key Jewish concern of Israel, he is not only squarely within the Republican mainstream, he is also deflecting the “Trump as Hitler” mantras we see regularly in the mainstream media.
Politics, after all, is the art of the possible. For us as advocates of a White America, our first priorities should be domestic policy — ending the immigration onslaught first and foremost. If doing that is made easier by supporting Israel, so be it.
Finally, I suggest that Trump’s sympathy for Jews and Jewish concerns is real, but that he is well aware of Jewish power and the need to use Jewish power and their personal abilities to his advantage. An article in the Jerusalem Post by Michael Wilner from September adds considerable detail to Trump’s very long history of Jewish ties. For example:
THROUGHOUT MUCH of his adult life and childhood, at seemingly every significant juncture in his business career, Donald J. Trump has surrounded himself with members of a single minority group. … Trump seems to have something of an affirmative prejudice toward Jews.
They believe he considers Jews a group of rich, smart, successful and generally powerful deal makers – all traits which Trump himself aspires to, and has sought to emulate.
Beginning with his father Fred, Trump family has been deeply intertwined with Jews in the real estate business.
“He surrounds himself oddly enough with Jewish personnel, both then and now: his real estate lawyer is Jewish, his house counsel is Jewish, his controller is Jewish, his chief of staff, chief financial officer, executive vice president, his first executive vice president – I was his litigator for 15 years,” Jay Goldberg, who worked for Trump from 1990 to 2005, said in an interview.
“When we talk about the Jewish community and I really think about it, I can’t think of one Christian person on his senior staff,” said Goldberg, who will vote for Trump in November. “It’s amazing to me. It’s almost prejudice in favor of Jewish people.”
Only one author spent extensive time with Trump, however, and that was Tony Schwartz, who embedded himself in Trump’s life for 18 months as ghostwriter of The Art of the Deal.
Schwartz would often hear Trump talk about Jews – a group that he quintessentially characterized as shrewd accountants and lawyers, the writer said.
Asked whether he ever thought Trump defined him by his affiliation with a group, Schwartz said he felt at the time that Trump thought of him as a “smart hustler Jew” who would probably write a solid book.
“It’s preposterous to think that Donald Trump has a deep personal understanding of or affinity with the Jewish community in the fullest sense of what that means,” Schwartz said. “And the reason I say that is that ‘affinity’ or ‘connection’ or ‘empathy’ or ‘deep understanding’ are not part of his vocabulary.”
“The way I would describe his perception of Jews is that he thinks of them in very simple and very stereotypical terms,” Schwartz said in an interview. “My feeling was, ‘I figured out how to use Jews to my advantage.’”
“My feeling was, ‘I figured out how to use Jews to my advantage.’” I conclude that Trump is certainly not an anti-Semite, but it would be difficult to believe that he is naïve about Jews. I imagine him at business meetings and cocktail parties hearing Jews talk and very positively about immigration and multiculturalism as I often heard them talk back in my days as an academic. The fact that he has used Jews, as Schwartz says, to achieve his goals is no reason not to think that he understands that the goals of the mainstream Jewish community in America are far different from his. And he surely realizes that there was a tsunami of Jewish money funding his opponent in this election and that around 75% of Jews voted for Hillary. He understands that Jews are very powerful and influential in American life.
And given that, along with the attitudes of the GOP base, he is well-advised to chart a pro-Israel course while at the same time seeking to Make America Great Again by radically changing policies on the home front related to immigration and refugee policy first and foremost.
Richard Spencer’s Mom-gate
Joyeux Noёl: The Beginnings of WWI and the Christmas Truce of 1914
I agree with your assessment Professor.
Trump has simply copied”kosher” tactics from the European Nationalists. Before Wilders, the pro-Zionist Danish National Party already made political gains.
However, Trmup’s pro-Zionist stance can be dangerous. His intention to support the transfer of Israel’s capital from Tel Aviv will antagonise the muslim world. I hope Trump will backtract on this like Iran.
Nevertheless, Trump helps us. He has singlehandedly smashed political correctness and mass migration advocacy- weapons the enemy has used to ethnically cleanse Europeans. Now old certainities are gone – the ruling class are still in shock. Even a President Le Pen and an AfD in a coalition government are now distinct possibilities. I also see the beginning of end of high moral ground and external altruism that are distinct to the ruling class among North Europeans not the silent majority and have been used as tools for race replacement. Even Obama’s last minute cowardice defiant stance against the Lobby is a sign of changing times.
As an anti-Zionist Jew who strongly supports Trump I am concerned his vast ignorance on the Palestine Question.
Hillary was the same but Kerry’s speech yesterday was right on target. Having lived in Israel for a few years back in the 90s I can say it is the only country in the world where I’d vote Left over Right. This could be Trump’s undoing if it leads to a wider conflict.
“If the Jews already had their own state in which the majority of them were settled, then the Jewish question could be regarded as completely resolved today, also for the Jews themselves. The least amount of opposition to the ideas underlying the Nuremberg Laws have been shown by the Zionists, because they realize at once that these laws represent the only correct solution for the Jewish people as well. For each nation must have its own state as the outward expression of its particular nationhood.” – Dr. Bernhard Losener from an article published in the Nov. 1935 issue of Reichsverwaltungsblatt
Today, unlike Israel, Germany has no nationhood.
Without Britains support Israel could never have been created. It was a gentlemans agreement that the relationship would be mutually beneficial, they would conquer and safeguard the ‘holy land’ and the Jews would safeguard British interests in the Middle East.
See Commemorating British Casualties of Jewish Terrorism – Francis Carr Begbie; The Occidental Observer, Aug. 6th, 2015
Today, unlike Israel, Britains’ interests have shrunk to nothing and they’ve inherited the peoples they once ruled over turning merry old England into a multicultural cesspool.
The United States, Judaic Golem, committed bloody butchery at Dresden, Malmedy, Biscari, Canicatti, and those are only the infamous massacres.
Today, the U.S. unlike Israel, has a dilapidated infrastructure, over 65,000 homeless, a debased popular culture, failing education system , yet can afford to send Israel billions yearly in aid. Obama, a few months ago, guaranteed Israel a further 38 billion in military aid.
Even a casual knowledge of history, particularily pertaining to Israel, leads to only one conclusion, the Jews cannot be trusted. “Fool me once….”
I ask the Moderator’s indulgence.
(Mod. Note: Sorry, no indulgence for highly detailed historical revisionist arguments and discussions. TOO is not about historical revisionism. The site owner doesn’t want that here. Take it elsewhere.)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/dec/28/netanyahu-told-new-zealand-backing-un-vote-would-be-declaration-of-war
New Zealand set to join the axis of evil.
The reason for Netanyahu’s direct order to New Zealand is due to that country’s recent change of prime ministers; (((John Key))) was eased aside and replaced by Bill English.
Thank God for Prof. McDonald and TOO. I have no problem with Jews seeking to carve out a country of their own in the Middle Beast. Like any other group that fights for land-or has fought-it is an extremely common condition. When the Jews-or Zionists, if you will-wanted a piece of land inhabited by Arabs, they are free to fight for it ON THEIR OWN. We NEVER should have interfered or gotten involved in any way or form. Leave it alone, do not get entangled in the affairs of foreign powers, said George Washington and other Founders. Why should we have had any military involvement at all in the Middle Beast, except for situations like the Barbary Pirates?
The answer is the Military-Industrial-Corporate axis that uses the American War Machine and related assets, e.g., the CIA to further its business interests, disgusting them as National “Policy” for humanitarian motives.
Short term, horizon, gain and calculation, but nothing and no thought to long term consequences. At 68 years of age, traveling all my life, I am convinced that Isolationism is the best and only course for the United Socialist States of America. All gains by aggressive countries are likely to be temporary today, as the native population drains the conquerors of resources and blood.
The Middle Beast was in natural balance when the Sunnis (Iraq and Friends) and Shias (Iran) were killing and bleeding each other dry. We interrupted that. How many governments did the CIA cause to be overthrown in Iran, and what has it led to? What did Russia gain by expanding into Western Asia and East Europe? Cuba? Where is the value, net profit?
It is not too late. Stop taking sides with one country over another. Switzerland stayed prosperous and peaceful for being a refuge for money and safety of consequential people and their wealth. We could put Switzerland in the back seat.
Les American bears who adore Israel make me sick. I worry about a war with Iran.
So do I.
Are Iranians “white” ?
Said another way, are the eponymous Aryans Aryans?
And are the whites in the USA prepared to toss fellow whites to the the Israeli wolves?
Asked and answered: USA did the zionists’ dirty work in destroying white, Christian Germany in service to Jews.
Iranians are not white. Internet propaganda from Iranian euro-wannabes may have misled you but I assure you that autosomal DNA data completely contradicts this notion. Language=/=ancestry. Are English speaking Jamaicans white? Nope. Are Hungarians white? Yes, as any Slovene or Bavarian. In fact, Central Asian persian speakers—the Tajiks—have more of this “aryan” yamnaya-like ancestry than the chauvinistic Iranians who are largely comprised of peoples indigenous to the plateau(aryan tribes came out of what we call russia). I should point out that Avicenna and Rumi were both Tajiks, not Iranians. In fact, Iranians have many of the typical “Armenoid” tendencies we find so foreign and diametrically opposed to our own. It is those psycho-socio-cognitive traits that make us rightfully perceive southern Italians and jews as offwhites and—whaddayaknow—they happen to both be recent euro-near east hyrids. It’s not about pigmentation or even the classic Sicilian-Neapolitan nasal profile. :-) Spaniards and Portuguese may have skin that’s darker than the average southern Italian but they lack recent Armenoid-related ancestry from the Middle East(instead they are heavy on Neolithic farmer ancestry like southern French and North Italians). You will find that European/American tourists in Iberia don’t feel a certain discomfort they often do in Southern Italy or some Balkan regions(which have this armenoid-type ancestry). I oppose any armed conflict with Iran on many levels but not for any ancestrally-related reasons because let’s face it: they’re hell of a lot closer to Turks and Arab speakers of Iraq than to any genuine European. In fact, I really admire Iran’s attempts to stem the globalists’ attempts to make iraq and syria their outposts in the region.
I think Dr. MacDonald meant “putatively supporting Israel, so be it.” American taxpayers’ coerced support of Israel is THE problem. It’s brought us (in the U.S.) hatred from all over the world.
And hey, mod, if you’re open to considering an article from “gibbon,” I’m game too. Which e-mail address should we use?
——-
(Mod Note: “Hans”, there’s a “contact us” button at the top of the main TOO page, for submissions to the editor. I am not the editor, and have nothing to do with article submissions or similar editorial decisions. Hence, I’m NOT “open to considering an article from ‘gibbon'”, but merely made the point that article-length comments should be directed elsewhere, and will not be approved.)
“I figured out how to use Jews to my advantage.”
The only one I can think of that managed to “use the Jews to his advantage” was Joseph Stalin. And even that took 40 years and tens of millions of dead Gentiles.
WHITE GENOCIDE covered on Fox News with Megyn Kelly:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/12/27/professor-under-fire-for-white-genocide-tweet-blames-violent-racists-for-uproar.html
[Tuesday early evening- 6:30 Pacific]
george.j.ciccariello-maher@drexel.edu
get ready for prime-time. . .
Disappointing. Fox ran the same story that the rest of the Jewish media has been running, that the tweet was “satire,” and should not be taken literally. They showed only the first tweet re: White Genocide, ignoring the second tweet wherein Maher clarified his intent, doubling down saying that the massacre of whites in Haiti was a good thing. They also read Maher’s statement, in which he said he had been “harassed by white supremacists,” and that the response from Drexel “sets a frightening precedent,” that it “encourages harassment as an effective means to impact university policy.” In other words, the professor cried foul over having tactics frequently used by the Marxist left turned against him. Fox felt no obligation to address this, nor did it offer any commentary on Maher’s hypocrisy.
The segment can be found here: https://youtu.be/KEBBn3jJGgA?t=2514
Bibi plays the ‘two state solution’ game with the ZOGs to keep the Liberals singing kumbaya and supporting libtard Zionist causes and genocide.
The Organ-harvesting Rothschild Kapitol Of the NWO (ORKON) wipes the collective toochis with UN resolutions and kumbaya ‘two state solution’ Liberal politics. The g_d of ORKON is Gog of the Land of Magog. ORKON backs the Yinon Plan and gives the ZOGs their marching orders into the ZOG wars on the basis of the Yinon Plan.
Of cause Donald Trump has to handle a lot of problems at the same time. Therefore he puts minor things aside (for the moment) so that he has free hand on the important things.
One important thing he has already done: he has won the US election. And he has not won by money or by deception, but by speaking the truth. That has given hope to large parts of the world. That has given a strong feeling to the normal parts of all mankind all over the world: this time we are at the winning side.
The terror of supressing the truth, the terror of denying the right to live as a people for all people in the sake of the multikultireligion (that is the religion of bringing death to all people), all this deadly machinations are de-masked now.
Donald Trump has started a stampede or an avalanche and this will throw away the 1968-religion or multikultireligion. Even if there will be a short halt in the USA, the development will go on in Europe. If there will be a lower speed in Europe, than in will go forward in the USA.
Donald Trump has made things possible that are much greater than he himself as a person or as his position as the US-president: He has awakened the white race all over the world. Future things will follow according to the main rule of nature: to be or not to be, that is here the question.
Have the writers at TOO read the writings of Dr. Michael Scheuer? He ran the CIA’s Bin Laden Unit until 2004 when he resigned so he could publicly criticize our country’s foreign policy in the Middle East. He is well aware of the Jewish lobby corrupting our government; they have tried to get him fired on at least one occasion from his teaching position. He comes from a blue collar background and can explain Middle Eastern foreign policy quite well:http://non-intervention.com/2488/mr-trump-stop-being-an-ass-america-first-and-support-israel-are-polar-opposites/
Never has, never will be a politician that pleases everyone. What terrifies the left is obviously Trump, more importantly the people who voted for him. If Trump has to kiss ass to the Zionists, so be it; I want him to be a domestic president focusing on internal issues. No doubt Trump’s support for Israel will anger Muslims, but if he can keep them out of the US, that’s a win for me. I am concerned about his Jewish inner circle though. Trump is a means to an end. Besides that, the wicked witch didn’t get into office and flood us with refugees. God only knows who she would have appoint the Supreme Court. It’s interesting how a Jew marries Ivanka and a Jew marries Chelsea Clinton; Jews no how to weasel their way into the power structure.
The only kind of racism Trump can be accused of is his pro-Jewish racism.
This racism of Trump is real, but it is “kosher”, the leftist/liberal “fighters against racism” do not mind this kind of racism.
Trump supports an ethnocentric Jewish state with Jews-only migration and citizenship laws, 99,9% of migrants, that get Israeli citizenship, are Jews.
Non-Jewish Israelis have to pledge allegiance to the Jews in Israel.
A marriage between a Jew and a non-Jew cannot be registered in Israel.
Israel was created on the ethnically cleansed Palestinian land, it is protected by a big wall, which is build on the Palestinian land. Israel applies collective punishment to non-Jewish native Semites on the occupied territory.
Trump supports the further ethnic cleansing of Palestine from its native Semitic population, but he is not called a bigot and a racist because of his support of radical Zionism.
Trump is called a “racist” because he de facto promotes “Zionism light” for white Americans with a Christian background.
As we see, the word “racism” is just another fake term, which is used to prevent the white people with a Christian background from promoting their interests.
But the open pro-Jewish racism of Trump can be useful. It can help the Alt Right to deconstruct the term “racism”, because Trump is exposing the duplicity of these leftist/liberal “fighters against racism”, who do not mind his pro-Jewish racism.
In fact, an American politician has to be a pro-Jewish racist, otherwise he will be called an “Ant-Semite” and his political carrier will be finished.
And this makes the term “racism” meaningless, now it can be easily deconstructed, because the “fighters against racism” will never point their moral finger to the open pro-Jewish racism of Trump.
As someone who lives in New York City, where the seven deadly sins are rewarded – and goodness is neglected, battered, and refuted, I am sensitive to the accusation that moral righteousness is any sort of opiate. If anything, it is the ethical core of the theocentric, who now feel swindled, betrayed, and cheated by their own indoctrination of moral virtue. In Christianity such an ethos involves Loving the Other, regardless what forms the Other Takes. It is the underlying template not only of America – but England and the Occident – which were all essentially Christian based cultures. How painful to have spent one’s life fighting for civil rights, gay rights and against anti semitism, only to find i now am regarded as the enemy – a white heteronormative gentile – and that though i fought for Equality, those who have ascended now use their power as a tool of hatred – to auger further preferential treatment. When Does Love For the Other Become Destructive to Self? That is the question that the Occidental world is presently facing. But to say our moral integrity is an opiate is an incorrect allegation. For we are in pain and squealing. Those rewarded and anaesthetized by the perks of socialism and atheism are the “alleged” minorities – not to mention Gays and Jews – who seem to use the terms Homophobic and AntiSemitic as redemption tickets, coupons, and offensive banners to deflect self reflection and culpability. As I said, in New York the Seven Deadly Sins are rewarded – Pride, Greed, Lust, Gluttony, Sloth, etc. The moral are left with their inner integrity and the temptation of coveting – all that The Other has amorally acquired. Strange as a white person to go from being the Good Samaritan to the Battered and Bludgeoned curled up on the street, stretching out its hand in hope of help.
Sometimes our goodness is all we have left. But it begs the question of differentiating between feeling Priceless (in the eyes of God) and Worthless in terms of the political, social, and economic structure.
to auger further preferential treatment
au·ger
ˈôɡər/
noun
a tool with a helical bit for boring holes in wood.
a tool with a large helical bit for boring holes in the ground.
au·gur
ˈôɡər/
verb
1.
(of an event or circumstance) portend a good or bad outcome.
“the end of the Cold War seemed to augur well”
synonyms: bode, portend, herald, be a sign of, warn of, forewarn of, foreshadow, be an omen of, presage, indicate, signify, signal, promise, threaten, spell, denote; More
noun
1.
(in ancient Rome) a religious official who observed natural signs, especially the behavior of birds, interpreting these as an indication of divine approval or disapproval of a proposed action.
synonyms: bode, portend, herald, be a sign of, warn of, forewarn of, foreshadow, be an omen of, presage, indicate, signify, signal, promise, threaten, spell, denote; More
Big of you to point out the grave error of placing an “e” rather than u”.
thank you, Karen T!!!! finally, after living like a mouse, i feel as if the issues addressed in Trump’s victory permit me to come out of isolation to utter a meep – only to be chastised – by a presumable ally!!!! it is an example where critical thinking becomes prohibitive, destructive and an attempt to supersede. like a bad dad who asserts power by dominating and shaming. one of the things i admire about the jewish exclusivity, is how much they support and adore and nurture “their own,” while christian humanism, that aggrandizes its magnanimity by loving the other, (not each other), despises itself and criticizes its own. i have always lamented that whites or christians don’t support their intellectuals and artists in a like manner as our jewish neighbors…such neglect and belittlement contributes to a sort of cultural erosion – and instills a sense that, regardless how good our work, or how worthy, we don’t matter – we are disposable. our thoughts, our feelings, our experience, our lives, our works, our attempts to contribute to the cultural advancement – all of which – can be attacked and discarded due to a misspelled word. anyway, your perceptivity has endowed a sense of balance – and hope….thank you.
The old saying ‘No matter who you vote for the Government always gets in’ should be changed to ‘No matter who you vote for the Jews always get in’.
A “left’ government brings Jewish destruction of our culture, a ‘right’ government brings Jewish control of our foreign policy – with considerable overlap between the two. Now with Trump we merely have a Jewish ‘third way’.
Trump won’t make things better re the Jewish Problem – he will make things worse – but that’s good. Governments, of whatever persuasion, will never take action against their Jewish overlords. As in the past only a bottom-up popular revolt will do that, and Trump’s stupidity will bring that revolution a little bit closer.
We are not going to win this war by expecting our leaders, Trump included, to act for us. We must act for ourselves and that will only happen when Joe Public is so scared and so angry that he is ready to see where the blame lies and who the real enemy is. Our job is to prepare the ground for that inevitable day.
Alex Jones is taking a similar position on Israel. He calls out a few Zionist Jews and connects them with Globalism and destruction of the West but concludes that Whites should support Israel on settlements or whatever. Because “we’re all fighting radical Islam together.” I appreciate what a difficult road Trump has cut out for him on limiting immigration even with both Houses Republican. But you just can’t make a fair deal with Zionist supremacists. They’ll get what they want out of the relationship and we’ll get more BLM riots. Looks like he’s going to try just the same. Slippery slope.
He cannot do it alone, which it seems, is what conservative voters always expect. Instead, if a Republican voter keeps voting in people like Lindsay Graham, Jeff Flake, John McCain, Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan..do you have an hour? Then, they are not serious on the issue of stopping massive immigration, either legal or illegal. Again, President elect Trump, can not do it alone. He has to many traitors in is own party to contend with, who, as Pat Buchanan said, are worse than many people on the left.
(I have proposed that White people, and especially Northern Europeans, are uniquely prone to forming groups based on a sense of moral righteousness [as opposed to clan-type kinship connections], while ostracizing and vilifying those who stray from the moral consensus.
A grave error Professor Macdonald. Our clans and tribes were purposefully destroyed in the last three hundred years in the name of industrialisation and capitalism but the surnames and the family lore remains and Northern European people are still aware of the clan and the tribe they belong to within the framework of being Irish, Scottish, German, Welsh, Swedish, Danish etc.
In the Highlands for example, the destruction of our clans was seen as imperative for our Judeo-Norman and Hanoverian enemies and I’m left dumbstruck that while they understood the strength of Northern European clanship you would suggest the opposite is true! And you’re a Macdonald to boot!
Try do a little research on the marriages of Campbell Dukes to name but one sell-out family over the last several generations and you’ll be left in no doubt how the all powerful Tribe correctly identified the strength of the bonds of our tribal nature in Northern Europe and how that threatened their worldview.
According to a usually reliable Israeli news source, Wilders was investigated by the Netherlands’ Security Service for suspicion of collusion with Israel. No such Service anywhere, would ” risk ” such investigation, absent iron-clad evidence. Consider, additionally, the Jewishness of his mother and his lengthy stay on a kibbutz.
The predictable response of the owners (George Carlin’s term) of the US over the resolution is comical. Israel was granted membership to the UN on certain conditions, few of which have been met. All governments who fail to challenge Israel on those conditions are complicit in the ongoing mess in the Middle East. The reality is that there will never be peace until the Rothschild pet project, Israel, has achieved its Nile to Euphrates borders presented in the the 1930s.
As for Trump, he has shown himself to be every bit as much of a politician as the Bushes, Clintons, and Obama – tell the masses what they want to hear, then do whatever the owners tell you.
“In other words, Wilders, like Trump, has carved out a position that favors Likud-like positions on Israel while at the same time is opposed to further Muslim colonization of the West.”
In other words the Palestinian people are to be sacrificed on the Jews’ bloody altar of racial hatred in order to preserve ourselves. One would do well to remember that, to Jews, we are all a Palestinian people. Witness the Jews destruction of Western Civilization since the beginning of the twentieth century. Throw Jews a bone and they will add it to your grave.
Out of the mouths of babes: Take a look at a few of these Walt Disney shorts from the 1930s through the 1950s.
This is what children viewed in a bygone America. Compare these films with the dreck Disney Corp. produces for today’s children. Ask yourself, what does this change in “entertainment” mean for the future world view of today’s young white children? What has our culture lost and what has replaced that loss? Is it any wonder that Children must now be drugged into submission?
Jews are a racist people of blood, horror and hatred and their massive influence on this culture turns our people into mirrors of these neurotic psychopaths. Give Jews no quarter or suffer the consequences, as most assuredly they will never return the favor.
Imagine how preposterous such a discussion would be in relation to any other (white ) ethnic group. Even secular Jews really believe in the Chosen People concept.
“For us as advocates of a White America, our first priorities should be domestic policy — ending the immigration onslaught first and foremost. If doing that is made easier by supporting Israel, so be it.”
i’d love eludication on that second sentence… if in the sense you meant cater to israel’s every whim w/o complaint, (or they ruin your Christmas whining!!!, OY!), that kind of support?
hey, if 38BILLION, uncontested by the way…. isn’t enough inducement to stop the whining/shaming over a ‘betrayal’ which must be ‘avenged’ and get the present israeli gov from openly subsidizing HIAS, and them telling the house judiciary committee begging that they need more American tax dollars to bring in more 3rd worlders…………..exactly what amount would be? nothing is ever enough, nor will it ever be. this is not the reparations game…. it’s revenge. it’s dreidel.
They want revenge for the crimes they have committed against others.
I approach the position of Jews by applying the same test I would apply to any other minority group, namely, is the group or members of the group attempting to gain an advantage for their group which is achieved at the cost of disadvantaging the rest of the society they live in.
There is also the special case of Israel. Here I hold to the idea that the existence of the modern state of Israel is disadvantageous to the West because it both poisons relations between the West and the Muslim world and distorts the foreign policies of Western countries in a way which is to their disadvantage . I would not actively try to destroy Israel but I would want the UK and the rest of the West to withdraw any diplomatic, financial and military support from Israel.
Remember folks that Jews are the race without brakes. Trump’s support may just send them careening off a cliff.
Trump fully supports usuarious predatory Jewish capital. The US is being set up for foreclosure. That’s what his band of Larry the Liquidator crony appointments do best.
http://www.newnationalist.net/2016/12/18/trump-and-his-band-of-larry-the-liquidators/
Israel-fanboy Trump will give Israel wide license to do a wide range of deplorable things; that will bite Trump in the ass. Israel will be his biggest embarrassment. Israel will push the line, as far as, they can get away with, and Trump will be forced to become Israel’s leading critic, much to his dismay.
Have you heard Trump will be circumcised the day before the inauguration? A crack team of rabbis plan to suck the wound.
All of Trump’s adult children are either dating or married to a Zionist Jew. He is the ideal candidate for fixing this mess we have in Palestine without somebody calling him anti-semitics.
Trump is using the opposite strategy that Obama did, as opposed to using (and being used by) the banksters to get at the Zionists, Trump is using the Zionists to get at the banksters (the proverbial head of the Zionist snake). Though there a lot of grey area between the two there are divisions that can be exploited.
Sure. His Treasury secretary is hereditary Jew, usurer, rent- collector. Second generation Goldman Sachs. Worked for Soros. Bought Bank on public money and threw out 36000 homeowners. Perfect CV. It would be very difficult to find more rarefied @$^%$. And that creature would stop globalists activities and hurt his own tribe?
And his billionaire Education Secretary, who is funding organization, which declare, that children would be happy.. , not going to school, but working in coal mines.
There a lot more gems in Trump team. Actually his economic team is like came out of Ayn Rand novels.
It looks like Trump will treat Israel with special care and be forever-indulgent of Jewish concerns. Surprised?
Even though Washington will probably stay clear of sending US troops into Syria, Iran and the Palestinians are likely to remain subjugated pariahs. It’s the same old story. This is good news for Israel’s US-based war party. America’s foreign entanglements will continue to be dominated by pro-Israel hawks. The big unknown is Russia. Putin may inspire the best in Trump; namely, independence.
Trump will probably push back on illegal immigration but the Diversity Lobby in Calif/NY/Washington will howl and play hardball every step of the way. If Trump gets serious about enforcing immigration laws, he will be hounded and decried for being ‘racist’ without let-up. Anti-Trump memes and hate-rhetoric will flourish on TV. This corrosive diet will undermine Trump’s stature and effectiveness.
There’s no getting rid of anti-white voices and sentiment as long as the Zions control US television. Therefore, don’t expect Jewish power in America to diminish under Trump. As with the Clinton’s, Trump’s own daughter now sleeps with an Israeli and some of Trump’s grandchildren are Jewish. The fix is in.
Maybe I’m wrong about this, but no politician–including Trump–has sufficient clout to challenge the Zionist lobby anyway (even if they wanted to). It’s too late. The Zions are too embedded, too coordinated, and too highly-placed. They not only dominate both Parties but our entire cultural landscape. Zions have hit critical mass in Washington, Wall St. and Hollywood. And they’re not stepping down.
This is why ‘America First’ could become a fading mirage, reminiscent to what became of Obama’s political trajectory after he won the Nobel Peace Prize. One cannot serve two masters.
Thus the ‘special relationship’ between Washington and Israel is likely to remain undisturbed under Pres. Trump. This situation guarantees more of the same.
I too think Trump may be intending to ‘sacrifice’ the middle east in order to weaken the Jewish roadblock to immigration reform and appointment of pro-life justices. It is very hard to gauge the sincerity of Trump’s commitment to the positions that alienate Jews. Trump knew he had to position himself to the right of Obama on Israel. As it stands the NY Times is attacking him for being pro-Zionist at the same time they try to paint him as a racist/Nazi. That is difficult work for them and Trump knows it. Only time will tell what we get for our money. If Trump bails on his other promises we should make a royal stink rather than sigh and acquiesce. Fighting spirit is called for. Trump himself may be poised between defiance and acquiescence in a way that will reward his supporters for showing perseverance and energy.
Interesting speculation about Trump & the Jews Kevin. Virtually everything Trump purports to stand for domestically contravenes Jewry’s desires and machinations to date. Considering this, how his relationship plays out with them remains to be seen, but is likely to be most contentious, because rhetorically, at least, he appears to be upsetting their poison apple cart.
They are going to dog him unmercifully, and try to neutralize him at every turn, except on “Israel” of course. He may try to ‘play’ them and ‘use’ them, but “Goyim” rarely ever win at the game of trying to out-fox the Jews, especially when they are deeply ensconced in power, and they are not called out as Jews. Trump certainly has a long way to go in his dance of death with them. It’s going to be quite an engaging waltz, to be sure. The definitive future biography of Trump, once his political career has run its course, will, I suspect, most likely be entitled Trump and the Jews.
Here’s a theory: After WWII the country was ripe for the counter culture (via the pill) and the anti-Vietnam movement. These two developments could be played by the media to discredit Christian and WASP hegemony. Current Jewish hegemony is threatened by the excesses of Israel together with laws against criticizing. Intentionally or not, by giving Netanyahu and company the rope to hang themselves he could bring about the legitimation of criticism of both Israel and Jewish leadership by gentiles, including Christian leaders.
Perhaps you could explain a bit more clearly? Even if you count say 1965 as ‘After WWII’, I don’t see why commenting on US war crimes planned by Jews such as Kissinger ‘discredits Christian and WASP hegemony’, especially as there was no WASP hegemony – the USA was already under full Jew control. In any case it’s hard to see why criticism of Israel and Jews needs any legitimation.
I was thinking in terms of public perception. The hippies and New Left of the 60s-70s saw the war in Vietnam and sexual “repression” as products of a ruling WASP elite whose ideas were outmoded. They did not perceive a large Jewish influence in American culture or government. The counter-culture’s rejection of putatively Christian America stuck, and opened the floodgates for the tide of nihilism and cultural Marxism prominently championed by Jews. Criticism of Jews is still seen as disreputable with the sole exception of Israeli policy toward the Palestinians, which just beginning to become acceptable for non-Jewish writers. If Trump encourages Israel to throw caution to the winds the result could be rash actions by Israel that trigger a fresh wave of criticism and, taken together with indiscriminate charges of anti-Semitism in response, further legitimate gentile criticism of Jewish politics in general.
I agree with this notion. I believe the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths. Not all and maybe not the majority but a lot. Maybe I’m wrong but if you assume they are you’re never surprised and their actions make sense. Psychopaths have no off switch and given enough rope will hang themselves.
Kevin Macdonald’s optimistic second part seems to forget two elements. Wilders is a jew, through his mother’s Jewish-Indonesian lineage. He does not really oppose immigration and is a strong supporter of capitalism, which brought the former. Second, Trump is so surrounded by jews in his family, that he is almost one of them. Meaning that we misinterpreted both our strength and their behavior: when twelve months ago, Trump seemed to criticize the jews of the RJC, it was actually a jewish joke – allowed only to those of the tribe.
This means that we do not own the political circus. Over a period of three centuries in England and the US, “elections” in their many versions know just one long-term winner: world finance (and therefore jewry, in the marxian view of the jew). Elections provides them with the least-resistance path. When there’s a strong resistance inside, the Empire goes outside bombing ‘irresistible’ countries. That’s how you can turn people against themselves for profit’s sake: proof is, voters officially lose at least half of the times.
If we want to get rid of this, we have to pursue the goal of both German national-socialists and Eastern socialists, and to some extent, Southern Secessionists, which is isolation away from this system.
And how powerful isolationists really are, if Trump includes Goldman Sachs willingly or not in his cabinet? Don’t say “let us see in January”. We’d better not watch that.
The Israeli Zionists are behind the “Refugee crisis” and its Pro-Zionist groups that are funding the mass immigration to Europe and North America. They have done this to gain more sympathy and support for their Slow Genocide against Palestinians. Each time there is a Terror attack on European or American soil, it increases the Anti-Muslim views and sympathy for Israel. Gatestone Institute just came out with an article recently about the latest Terror attack in Germany, where the author states “Now Europeans feel what Israelis live with every day”.
The Gatestone Institute is owned by a Zionist Israel supporter, Nina Rosenwald, and chaired by Neo-con John Bolton. Their site spreads fear about the “invading” refugees, but it is never mentioned how Rosenwald supports the Refugees being funded into Europe. (they play both cards)
Netanyahu has been furious at Europe for turning more and more in favor of Palestinians over the last few years. Netanyahu is a Genius (an Evil one, but genius just the same), and is behind the planning and implementation of the Refugee crisis.
Suddenly, we start seeing all these Right wing Pro-Israel, anti-Muslim refugee Political figures, Like Trump, Wilders, and Le Pen. This is exactly what Israel was driving at and their purpose in creating a Refugee Crisis. It has served them very well, up to this point.
Trump was likely Israel’s (b)itch all along. And the “ALT RIGHT” was the group that has been used. So far, Trump isn’t doing anything about “immigration”. He may appoint a token person to investigate but when he gets in office NOTHING will be done about it. And Nothing will be done about Europe either.
Trump is already saber rattling against Iran, which is what Israel has wanted for a long time. So, Go ahead and support Israel all you want, but don’t ever expect to Bargain with Devil. Europe and “white America”, as you call it, are pretty much on their way to antiquity.
The ONLY way to stop any of this is to completely Turn against Israel.
The Gatestone Institute is intensely hostile to Islam, including the Muslim invasion of Europe.
Unsurprisingly, since muslims are behind the sharp rise in anti-Semitic atrocities in Europe including those in France which have spurred a mass exodus of French Jews to Israel.
That this is so is evidence of the backfiring of `Jewish support for multiculturalism.
“mass exodus” is certainly hyperbole. Many too, would cast doubt on the extent of anti-Semitic atrocities and indeed wonder whether the events aren’t also as phoney as the narrative.
The few that do leave are young and Israel needs blood for its army and brains/talent for its workforce. The old are encouraged to stay where they are. The hysteria is an excellent tool for eliciting funds for Israel and Jewish charities. Too old for Aliyah, but not to give freely.
Excellent article.
America must be careful that Trump is not pulling a “FW de Klerk” move on his supporters, it only leads to white destruction and murder.
There’s no argument to be made against KM’s first sentence here. I’m far less sure about his second, however. But given KM’s track record of moral leadership and intellectual heroism, I’m prepared to cut him, as Trump interpreter, far more slack than I’d ever cut Trump as a stand-alone.
I suppose, alas, that Trump won’t be offering a place in his cabinet to my newest heartthrob, Carl Paladino. What a pity!
Brilliant as usual, Pierre. If “gibbon” is going to submit an article, you should definitely submit one too.
Quote: a sense of moral righteousness is the opium of White people.
I agree with the above statement 100%.
I believe it is moral righteousness to stop white genocide.
Also moral righteousness to put the American flag above the Israeli flag.
I wish to give thanks to Prof Kevin MacDonald for teaching us on how moral righteousness is being used by our foes to control white folks.
Are the areas formerly German, such as East Prussia, German for centuries but now occupied by other ethnicities following WW2 – are these settlements illegal according to the UN? Should Russia and the Baltic republics be expelled from the Konigsberg area and Poland from Silesia etc? Should the Sudetenland Germans be allowed to reclaim their property? If not, why not?
The territorial forfeitures by Germany after WWll were imposed by the victors…Germany was guilty of waging aggression and this was the consequence. Of course this can be debated . What can’t be debated is that the Palestinians in 1948 were entirely blameless; they committed no acts of aggression against the jews or anyone else but saw their homeland expropriated and when they fought to defend it they were labelled terrorists.
While often stated, this leaves out an important point, namely, that while the specific post-war German borders may have been formulated by the four (or “Big Three”) victors of WW2, these borders were and are recognized by all European countries, and indeed all countries in the world.
There is not an entity in the world (that I’m aware of) that questions the validity of the current German borders.
Should it ever come to pass that Germans (as a country, as opposed to fringe groups) would even think of seriously questioning those borders, it is my guess that they would fairly quickly wake up one morning, look out the window and see a smoldering crater where (insert name of favorite German city) used to be. Just as a reality check.
Just the facts, Ma’am.
Addendum: It only now occurs to me that my preceding comment may actually have been misinterpreted by TOO “moderators” as supporting the notion of questioning the present German borders.
I wondered why they let this comment through.
——
(“Mod.” Note: “Amalekite”, moderation decisions here are not based on the moderators’ opinions or interpretation of the substance of the comment. This mod. may personally “agree” with many comments not approved. The objective of TOO is the criterion, in addition to removing comments which incite “flame wars” and engage in off-topic diversions. Long detailed screeds which try the patience of readers will also not be approved.)
(Mod. Note: “Gibbon”, if you’d like to submit an article to TOO, contact the editor, rather than submit such a long comment.)
Thank you for this, Moderator, and a belated Merry Christmas.
May I play the grinch for a moment to suggest that the utter OT-ness of everything gibbon has written makes me suspect him of being up to no good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znN3Tm36Vt8
The Liberal Paradox.
Liberalism is welcoming of very different and diverse cultures.
But those cultures are not liberal and undermines liberalism.
But liberalism must tolerate them in the name of liberalism.
But the more they are welcomed and tolerated, liberalism will die.
Lesson to be learned. Liberalism must exist only within national context. Lose the context, and it is dead. It is like every cell needs a membrane. Lose the membrane, the cell cannot contain the nucleus, and it will die.
Remember…. whenever Jews cook up some anti-white agenda or policy, they first try it on the Palestinians.
Jews said there is no such thing as ‘Palestinians’.
Jews pushed mass immigration on Palestine.
Jews dehumanized Palestinians.
Jews created a diverse coalition — US, Canada, Australia, EU nations, Saudis, Egypt, etc — to destroy Palestine.
Jews used American elite power to deny Palestinians their rights.
Now, Jews use the same tactics on whites.
So, all those whites who aided Jewish war on Palestinians were merely helping Jews prepare White Genocide.
Jewish War on Palestinians has been just a prelude to the main opera of Jewish War on Whites.
Whites need to understand this.
When whites cheer Jewish War on Palestinians. they think they are making friends with rich Jews.
In fact, Jews are just doing a test-run for the destruction of whites.
It’s like Russians learned the hard way. Russians aided the Nazi destruction of Poland, thinking that it would lead to German-Soviet peace and alliance. But Hitler’s destruction of Poland was just a test-run of his eventual planned destruction of Russia.
Jews are the new Nazis. They are Jewzis.