The big chill on free speech hits Britain

Francis Carr Begbie


It is a fair bet that any ‘media reform’ welcomed by Dr Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress, will be bad news for the defenders of free speech. So it is with his reaction to the British government’s groundbreaking new definition of anti-Semitism.

Kantor said:

We welcome the UK’s landmark decision to define anti-Semitism, particularly in the face of rising attacks against Jews. We must now look towards other European governments to follow the example set by the UK.

He is referring to the British government’s decision to adopt a “legally binding definition” which will be used by police forces, councils, universities and public bodies. This ratchets the law sharply in the direction of making Jews a legally protected group and placing them beyond criticism. It would certainly sharply curtail academic and journalistic discussion of Jewish group behaviour.

For if the ethnic agendas of this very powerful and ethnocentric group cannot be discussed, it would effectively end legitimate academic and journalistic inquiry on the matter. It would certainly curtail discussion of all unflattering examples of Jewish group behaviour such as those outlined in the Culture of Critique.

The definition drafted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition (IHRA) is broadly the same one contained in the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act that quietly went through the US senate. The aim seems to be to create a global standard on stifling free speech about Jewish power.

The definition itself is so open-ended as to be meaningless.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities. (italics added)

Clear as mud. But it is when you look under the hood that things get very disturbing.

The IHRA definition lists a number of specific examples of anti-Semitism it wishes to outlaw and these include:

—Making mendacious, dehumanising, demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective—such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

—Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

—Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

—Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

—Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

—Applying double standards by requiring of it a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

—Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

Taken to its natural conclusion, it is hard to think of any descriptions of specific Jewish ethnic behaviour not covered by these sweeping definitions. (Or indeed any article in TOO.)

Is pointing out Jewish ownership of the media off-limits? How much media ownership, media management, and creation of media content amounts to media control? What about the ethnic composition of the neoconservative movement and the reasons behind their enthusiasm for Middle East wars? Or how about how the drive for ‘open borders’ and how restrictions on free speech across the West are overwhelmingly pushed by Jewish organisations (i.e., Jewish collectives).

Or what about the corrupting role of Jewish finance in British politics?  Would it mean that it is no longer permissible to discuss the power of Jewish financial donations and the Jewish lobby in Britain broadly construed (e.g., the Conservative and Labour Friends of Israel) and how these are connected to the slavish pro-Israel sentiments of prime ministers such as Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Theresa May and?

If discussion of the Jewish ethnic dimension to these stories is labelled “hate speech” then they cannot be discussed at all.

There has been some criticism of this definition in the media but only to the extent that it would restrict debate about Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. (Using the word ‘apartheid’ to describe Israel will not henceforth be considered permissible.)  Of course there is no mention at all of how this affects White interests and restricts White advocates.

The establishment of the IHRA definition was first debated by the House of Commons Home Affairs select committee on anti-Semitism which produced its own report. It is a disturbing if illuminating document. Much of it is clearly aimed at demonising the left-wing Anti-Zionists who wrested control of the Labour Party from the Jewish lobby.

What was the evidence of anti-Semitism that the committee was so concerned about? John Mann MP,  Chair — and staunch Friend of Israel — read out an email he had received “[What] we DO not appreciate are the Zionists who use powerful connections to increase their own wealth—by war, dodgy business deals, political pressurisation, media mis-information and mis-direction, etc.”

What is especially interesting is the blithe disregard for truth. From start to finish the report is replete with questionable statements. On page 19 Item 42 it says ” The historical roots of antisemitism were based in religion, and we welcome recognition of this by the Archbishop of Canterbury when he gave oral evidence to the Committee in June, stating that “We had a shameful record until very recently, in historical terms”.65 England was the first European country to expel Jewish people (in 1290), with their exile lasting for 350 years.”

This one–sided and partial rendering of history, free of any details of the decidedly unflattering Jewish role in medieval financial exploitation in England, is typical. (See Andrew Joyce’s “Anthony Julius’ Trials of the Diaspora [Part 2]: “Medieval English Anti-Semitism.”) It is nothing less than dishonesty by omission.

Other examples of anti-Semitism under this definition, apparently, include any mention of the Haavara Transfer Agreement which was a collaboration between Jewish Zionists with the national socialist Germany to evacuate Jews to the Palestinian Mandate territories and the allegation that Jews were involved in the slave trade. Again both are undeniable historical facts but to state them out loud is, apparently, “unwise, offensive and provocative.” So the issue is not that the facts are wrong but that feelings were hurt.

This comes at a time of an unprecedented clampdown on dissidents in the UK. The number of nationalists and other defenders of White identity currently either being prosecuted or living with the threat of prosecution runs into the dozens across the country. Under Theresa May’s new hate speech legislation these people face heavy fines, disruptive control orders or prison sentences, more often than not for social media comments. It is increasingly common for the police to be acting with the support of the private Jewish surveillance and harassment organisation, the CST, with the Crown Prosecution Service giving active support.

The recent activity seems to have been orchestrated to roll out just after the conviction of Thomas Mair for the murder of Jo Cox MP. Within days of that event a young nationalist called Joshua Bonehill was dragged out of his cell to face a second trial for hurting the feelings of Luciana Berger MP. The charge was online “aggravated racial harassment” which dated to before his first conviction but he was convicted a second time and has now been given two years in addition to the three years and three months he was serving. It was a trial that was given huge coverage with much attention given to the feelings of Luciana Berger who said she “felt sick” when she read what Bonehill had written about her on his websites. The judge’s summing up remarks before sentencing, are here.

In Cambridge a young nationalist called Lawrence Burns is facing a maximum of seven years in prison for apparently forgetting to mark his Facebook group as private. He has never threatened anyone, has never planned violence but the police decided that “sharing racist views” on Facebook postings was enough to charge him on race hate charges. While alleging that he attempted to stir up racial hatred the Crown has produced no evidence of this or that anyone other than that his Facebook friends have viewed his page.

This week it was announced that the National Action street protest group are to be banned after being declared a terrorist group. None of their young activists have been convicted of terrorist offences, instead their main crime seems to have been outspoken “racism, anti-Semitism and homophobia”. Though outspoken in their criticism of Jewish influence, their actions have been limited to rallies as can be seen on their Youtube channel. Their website specifically does not endorse violence.

And in a new tactic, a satirical songerwriter and entertainer Alison Chabloz is in court this week being prosecuted privately by a group called the Campaign against anti-Semitism. She had complained to the police about receiving death threats and being harassed after she posted a provocative Youtube video. She was first told no action could be taken against her online tormentors. Then she was subjected to a police raid in which her computers were confiscated. Now she is being prosecuted privately at Westminster Magistrates Court on Thursday, December 15. She is accused of causing “gross offence”.

The adoption of the new definition of anti-Semitism was formally announced by Prime Minister Theresa May in a speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel.  She gushed about what she called a “groundbreaking step” in the fight to tackle anti-Semitism which she has made her personal crusade.

The question that nobody was asking her, was this payback for the huge amount of support she got from the organised Jewish community in her attempt to become Prime Minister? She is a longstanding Friend of Israel and spent the evening before her official appointment by the Queen at a private dinner at the home of the Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis. Even while Home Secretary it was Jewish demands for action against “hate speech” that were at the top of her priority list as this memorable speech when she was Home Secretary makes clear. She is certainly following through on that.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

100 Comments to "The big chill on free speech hits Britain"

  1. Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
    December 21, 2016 - 11:49 pm | Permalink

    [long text deleted]

    Your eyes are glazing over – incomplete by a mere thousand pages – but we’ll leave it at that.

    (Mod. Note: Mr Frey, your final phrase, the one above which was not deleted, is precisely why TOO is not a venue for in-depth discussions of details of WW2 historical revisionist topics. Please take these topics up in an appropriate venue, elsewhere.)

  2. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    December 20, 2016 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

    Meanwhile in France… Hervé Ryssen was sentenced last week (French link) to an additional 5 month prison term (as well as legal costs and reparations to the LICRA, LDH and SOS-Racisme) for his little book “Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism” (pdf link).

    I don’t know if his trial was an appeal hearing. I know Ryssen has been able to avoid prison so far. A prison sentence can sometimes be converted into community service.

    In France, in early 2015, the government was talking about changing the law so that charges of incitement to hate and discrimination would from now on be dealt with in a simple police court. But in the end, they didn’t change the law, and president Hollande will be replaced next May.

    I think changing the law would have allowed the Jews to sue more White people at a lower cost to the taxpayers. But maybe they worry their plans could backfire if everyone is made to realize that any criticism of our Jewish rulers is strictly verboten. And maybe not all the judges in the lower courts would go along with it? That is only my uninformed guess. Of course there is no public debate about it.

    The French revisionist Vincent Reynouard is currently a refugee in Britain to avoid jail. He will have to flee to some other country if Theresa May completely sells out to the Jews! Ryssen too has been told by a public prosecutor that he had better leave France.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      December 21, 2016 - 12:51 am | Permalink

      Thanks for this news, Armor, however unedifying it may be.

      I hold out little hope that the Jews’ control of France will be overturned or even lessened measurably at any time soon. Jewish influence there has been enormous for a very long time. If I’m not mistaken, an important early piece of thought crime legislation—prohibition of any investigation or even public suggestion that Dreyfus might have been quite as guilty as Esterhazy and the non-Jewish French officers who were almost certainly guilty, too—dates, I believe, from the period of the Third Republic, whose downfall in 1940 was lamented by virtually no one in France except for the Jews.

      • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
        December 21, 2016 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

        Pierre, after scrolling down from Armor’s valuable, informative post, I initially saw your name and INSTANTLY knew you would include Dreyfus and Esterhazy in your reply. Thanks for validating my premonition by line 6.
        Dreyfus translates into Threefeet and Esterhazy into Osterhaase or Easter Bunny.
        Dreyfus was charged in 1896 and released in 1906, under weighty public debate on ‘ anti-Semitism and militarism ‘.
        The Third Republic collapsed when the Germans arrived in Paris. France, exactly like Czechoslovakia, had more, better and heavier tanks at the outset of No 2; albeit poorly led. When younger, I wondered about the rapidity of the collapse of France, until I began to think more politically. The “socialist” {{{Blum}}} was Premier between ’36-’38, and had another stint from ’46-’47. I believe the French, unable to change things through rigged elections were not opposed to Germany cleaning house for them.
        PS My Colonel uncle, along with General Alexander von Falkenhausen, neighbors in Silesia and both avid linguists, headed the German Military Administration in Northern France and Belgium. Prior to that they were military advisors to Chiang Kai Check, hence Chiang’s German helmets, having been assigned there after their stint in Turkey for the same purpose. They abandoned Chiang after Hitler’s Anti-Comintern-Pact. While in Brussels, my uncle married an illegitimate daughter, Cecile Frossard, of one of their non {{{ }}} socialist leadership. Some time back you warned another commenter against doing foolish things, when ” a gorgeous gal enters the frame”. She was so gorgeous that she turned a staunch Nationalist into a mild Leftist, after which my father broke contact.
        This page has turned into a most valuable seminar.

    • PPight1931's Gravatar PPight1931
      December 21, 2016 - 5:19 am | Permalink

      Ryssen’s video “Satan in Hollywood” is a tour de force of Jewish Supremacist hate, bigotry and bias against Whites, ventilated through control of the movie production and distribution businesses. The youtube version (qj72mZ0qpI0) with English audio dubbing has been taken down though whether this was to protect Ryssen’s copyright or for other reasons I do not know. In any event it is surely war materiel for defending criminal cases brought against Whites accused of ‘hate’.

      The Chabloz case should be a cause celebre, but has been kicked into the long grass. Is this because it is sub judice? Apparently the substantive hearing is adjourned till March 2017. Since the private prosecution is being assisted by a charity (and therefore with UK taxpayer assistance), in the cause of balance one can only hope Chabloz receives donations and other monetary support to enable representation by an impartial Queen’s Counsel (or at least a very experienced junior) to match the QC acting ‘pro bono’ (sic) for the other side.

      John John Mann MP

      http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/161219/mann_john.htm

      “The Register of Members’ Financial Interests
      As at 19th December 2016”

      ‘Parliamentary Committee Against Antisemitism Foundation (PCAA)’ – is that a new name for the 1960s “Parliamentary Group of M.P.’s for World Government”?

      • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
        December 21, 2016 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

        As an apparent citizen of one of the Commonwealth countries, which share British court precedents and policies
        [ as also, often, the US ] you astonish me with your confidence in Queen’s Counsels. As you must know, The Law Society of England and Wales lost its independence and was placed under the supervision of The Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman, in Manchester; for altogether too many shenanigans.
        QC, to the best of my knowledge, is nothing more than literally a Conservative Party- favor. My QC lawyer made such a profitable mess of a simple and low dollar inheritance dispute, that I was obliged to sue him, after I read a four-page letter in which he sold me to the other side. The QC, defending him on behalf of the Law Society of Upper Canada, a nephew of another QC, still on the Supreme Court of Canada bench, made my rookie lawyer a job offer to his very upscale law-firm in the middle of my process, so I had to fire him as well. I prefer an imaginative, bright lawyer, not necessarily from the top of his class. Ask David Irving, who carried his own case v. that devious peasant Lipstadt.

  3. Florian's Gravatar Florian
    December 20, 2016 - 12:50 am | Permalink

    LIke America the real problem in the UK are the ruling class.

    The British artistocracy is already heavily Jewish due to money and so too is the politics.

    The elites in the UK are now converting to a barbaric religion like Simon Collis the British ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Collis

    Collis is not the first. Lady Evelyn Cobbold (Murray) the late Scottish artistocrat is another fool.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zainab_Cobbold

    According to rumors Princess Charles is secret convert. I see civil war in Britain soon.

  4. jonsey's Gravatar jonsey
    December 19, 2016 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    THIS IS INSANE. UTTERLY MAD. And what does it mean to be prosecuted privately? And by a group called Campaign against anti-semitism. Are these private witch hunts?

  5. Caryn Goddard's Gravatar Caryn Goddard
    December 19, 2016 - 12:14 am | Permalink

    As a revisionist, secular Jew I say the Brits have to overthrow their government, nothing else will change. We can complain from now for a trillion years but power only respects greater power. Since they are eliminating all free speech then physical revolution is all that remains.

  6. Gary's Gravatar Gary
    December 18, 2016 - 7:18 am | Permalink

    We still have folks living in planet utopia.

    Brexit didn’t change a thing neither did our Great Leader with his full deck of Jewish cards as in Goldman Sachs and Rothschild banksters plus useful clowns for the tribe like Bannon whom Limeys would call a Plastic Paddy. I am keeping an eye on the son-in-law whose daddy is a crook.

    Nothing will change unless on the political scene we confront the enemy like the way Kevin MacDonald has done.

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      December 18, 2016 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

      One can get killed for confronting to real enemy- the fake money hegemon.

  7. laura r's Gravatar laura r
    December 17, 2016 - 5:02 pm | Permalink

    ironic: 100s of thousands of jews have been fleeing europe since the recent islamic invasion. muslims are not their friends. the other jews are traitors to europe & themselves. any jew who supports muslim immigration is signing a death warrent.

    • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
      December 19, 2016 - 11:03 am | Permalink

      No, Jews are not “fleeing” from Muslims; they are PRETENDING to flee, PRETENDING to be victims, WHINING about non-existent “attacks”, just like the Muslims do, and SHRIEKING for “protection” from their own secret allies, as an excuse to bring in new laws threatening anyone who criticizes them OR THEIR MUSLIM ALLIES with prison, as Begbie’s article points out. And the reason the (((Feminists))) ignore Muslim gang-rapes is because the victims are only Goyim, never members of The Tribe.

      They are merely preparing to sneak off to their secret new hideout of “ANDINIA”, whence they will watch the WW3 and Fake Apocalypse they have created from the comfort and safety of their VAST ESTATES IN ANDINIA. See – “Zionists Set Their Sights on Patagonia” http://henrymakow.com/2016/01/zionists-set-their-sights.html
      – “Andinia Plan”
      http://www.savethemales.ca/001399.html
      – Hitler’s escape to Argentina

  8. Roger Buchanan's Gravatar Roger Buchanan
    December 17, 2016 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

    If you want to know who is in control in a society, look at who is not allowed to be criticized. In their craven frenzy to curry favor with the Jews at any cost, the politicians of the West are closing the safety valve of free speech. Having stopped this one way that people and groups were allowed to vent off their frustrations and rage, the politicians will eventually reap that which they have sown. The frustration and rage will build up to a point where it will explode into violence and revolution. Tin pot dictators never learn from history that you can’t hold down the White man for long. It doesn’t matter how many silly repressive laws you have on the books or how many fancy surveillance devices you have keeping track of the population, ways will always be found around them. The same people who they are trying to suppress are equally smart as them and will eventually prevail because the truth is on their side.

  9. Bon's Gravatar Bon
    December 17, 2016 - 12:17 pm | Permalink

    Your White male liberal Jew hugging friend or relative must not know any Jews. I’ve lived around and worked with Jews all my life. To know them is to dislike them.

    • December 17, 2016 - 5:31 pm | Permalink

      Over and again and again. Especially when Jews are in position of power, if you have choice, for God’s sake, don’t choose the Jew. Academic advisor, supervisor, whatever that is.

  10. Bon's Gravatar Bon
    December 17, 2016 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

    I wonder what will happen in Britain when the Jews and Muslins finally clash. Or will they? It seems as though they have united against the British for 60 years. After native Britons are finally destroyed the Muslims and Jews can fight it out among the ruins.

    • December 17, 2016 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

      They won’t. Occasionally there will happen events like in Toulouse, France. Most Jews live in self-imposed seclusion in their ghettos. A part of them will assimilate, a part will emigrate to Israel. The elite of them is already indistinguishable from the WASP elite, and will be around forever. It’s impossible to clash with this part of Jewry, they are the force.

    • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
      December 18, 2016 - 6:42 am | Permalink

      They will never clash, because they are one and the same, under different names. One day people will discover what even Muslims do not know: that their entire religion was created by wealthy 40-year-old Jewish Yemenite Cabbalah Sorceress & Slavetrader Khadija, who asked her 20-year-old employee Mohammed to marry her, later filling his head with occult visions and helping him write down his “new” religion based entirely upon the Jewish Talmud and Torah, though he did not realise it, because he was illiterate, and she was careful to pretend that Jews were also his victims, though few have ever been killed by Muslims at any time in history.

      It was her vast Jewish wealth, inherited from her Jewish father, which funded Mohammed’s army of conquest, wiping out whole countries full of Christians. After her death 25 years later, his Jewish adviser Abu Bakr offered him his 6-year-old Jewish daughter Aisha as his second wife, who reportedly poisoned him years later on the orders of her father, who wanted to rule in his stead, which he did. The point is that Jews and Muslims are natural allies, Jews having created Islam to do their bidding, and this explains the strange Unholy Alliance between modern Marxists and Muslims against Christians.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        December 18, 2016 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

        Just so.

        It was a truism to my parents and other Americans born before the Great War (i.e., World War I) that Marxism and Bolshevism were secular manifestations of Jewishness. In this as in so many other areas, the Memory Hole has been kept working on a 24-hour-a-day basis. (Alas, what had already been lost to my parents’ generational cohort was the awareness that Judaism was a tribal cult, not a religion at all. The only thing “sacred” to Jews, of course, was and is themselves.)

        As I have written elsewhere, even without knowledge of the temporal history of Islam’s vile confection in degeneracy, one ought to see that the fact that Muslims, like Jews, passionately hate Trinitarianism and its companion Christian dogma, the Incarnation, shows that Islam is the whore’s child of Judaism. Islam is a second prong on the Jewish fork, and its aim, to skewer the Cross and its followers, is the same as the aim of its Jewish manufacturers.

        In the assault on the white West, Jews and Muslims constitute a single army of invasion and occupation. Jews and Jews alone compose the officer corps—at least the preponderance of that corps that never ventures from impregnably fortified positions in the rear—and Muslims are the grunts, the cannon fodder, whether enlistees or draftees.

        Mr. Begbie, Dr. Joyce, and preeminently KM are quite right in seeing this coordinated (((Anglo-American))) attack on, not simply freedom, but rationality and clarity of speech and even thought as an alarming extension of the enemy’s power over us, its despised serfs and cattle.

        • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
          December 19, 2016 - 1:18 pm | Permalink

          You’re absolutely right to point out that Jews always manoeuvre themselves into the officer positions, just as those horrific eye-witness accounts in Thomas Goodrich’s book “Hellstorm”, where it was the Jewish Bolshevik officers who ordered and directed the Tatar & Mongol recruits dressed in Russian uniform to gang-rape helpless German women and children to death, enjoying their endless, ancient Hebrew revenge for imagined slights of a thousand years ago, as Pterodactyl mentioned elsewhere. It reminds me of Satan, and his insatiable lust for revenge against Christ, motivated by nothing more than the basest, most bitter, pathetic, ridiculous envy.

          There was a great quote by Buddy Holly:
          “Never bear a grudge. While you’re bearing the grudge, the other guy’s out dancing.”

      • PPight1931's Gravatar PPight1931
        December 21, 2016 - 4:19 am | Permalink

        From the horse’s chutzpah-mouth:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsJYGoRHA-U

        RT: “Conference of European Rabbis President Pinchas Goldschmidt says European Jews are ‘fighting alongside their Muslim brothers against Old Europe’.”

  11. December 16, 2016 - 11:03 am | Permalink

    What do you expect?
    Europeans are puppets of the Americans.
    A French Govt. minister my brother knew attended the first talks after WW2.The British invited the Americans who said that to get money the Europeans must obey.
    After two days the Europeans always did what the British said.
    The Russians left and later dropped the Iron Curtain to protect Eastern Europe.
    The Americans started the cold war to make the Jews richer and keep us poor.
    My brother’s friend was in SOE in WW2 and said that the only effective terrorists in France were controlled by the NKVD from London.
    I suppose they were sent home.

  12. Kartoffelsalat's Gravatar Kartoffelsalat
    December 16, 2016 - 8:07 am | Permalink

    The situation in the UK is pathetic.

    These are just symptoms of the total takeover by a hostile alien group who are not even British as in English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish but operate above the law. What these measures accomplish is twofold – they silence nationalists as well as those on the left critical of Netanyanhu and co.

    Meanwhile expect similar laws for muslims. They have tried to deflect the horrible crimes muslims committed in places like Rotherham by using Jimmy Saville and now the controlled media is busy with child abuse in football.

    What makes the so bad is self-hating leaders like May who doesn’t even look English. In Scotland I read Syrian “refugees” are being housing in preference and ahead of locals who have been waiting all thanks to Nicola Sturgeon and the communist unScottish non-National Party. These new measures make ethnic cleansing of the native English and Scots in their own homeland more easy while Netanyahu is busy deporting Africans to keep you know what ethnically pure.

    The UK needs a Trump who will stand up to this hostile group. Forget Farage or UKIP or Corbyn who is anti-Israel but pro-ethnic cleansing through muslims.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      December 16, 2016 - 7:00 pm | Permalink

      In addition to forgetting about Farage, UKIP and Corbyn, we may , most regrettably, also have to forget about Trump. His appointment of Friedman as US Ambassador to Israel is beyond the pale and directly opposite to his pre-election AIPAC speech where he announced his intended neutrality on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, qarnering some US Muslim support.
      It undoubtedly must have come naturally to Friedman to become a bankruptcy lawyer, and easily grasping his further specialty of representing creditors. He thinks a two-states solution is possible, with the remaining land just sufficing for a major mall parking-lot, as well as a single state solution as well as Israel’s right to annex and settle the West Bank. Versatility is what you want in a lawyer but not in a representative of the American electorate hobnobbing at the smoking volcano. He has equated liberal Jews to kapos. He has contributed to the illegal settlements, one of which was ordered removed by Israel’s Supreme Court, but simply ignored by his democratic Imperial Highness, in his land founded on the rule of law; etc., etc., etc. Jared’s convicted father also has a foundation funding these illegal and festering world problem settlements, and is/was a director on that board. Friedman is prepared, as yet another Israel-firster, to move the Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, which is against current State Department policy, and has to be re-affirmed semi-annually by signing a statement running counter to a 1995 law. He labeled State as anti-Semitic, which leaves one to wonder what side all of its hawks are on. One of his organizations also contributed millions to Trump’s campaign.
      Hitler had Speer redesign Berlin into Germania, to rule over an expanded Europe. Similarly Jerusalem is being re-designed with a Third Temple, brick by little political translucent appointments bricks, to rule, at minimum, over the West. For now.
      On Dec. 14, Haaretz led with the following: ” Israeli Arms Sales, Big Oil and the Mossad: Why is Azerbaijan Hosting a Hanukka Party at Trump Hotel ? The event was never formally announced and none of the hosts want to talk about it. A look at the hush-hush affair between a 95-percent Shi’ite
      Muslim country and major American Jewish organization “.
      Incomparably more significant is its reportage on the recent trip to Azerbaiyan [ the host of said party ] by Nentanyahu, his second, and the fact that three separate agreements have secured Israel’s use of four formerly Soviet air bases on northern Iran’s borders.
      [ Azerbaijan’s capital Baku, on the Caspian Sea, was among the top of Hitler’s oil hit-list ]. A perfect place from which to take Iran under cross-fire. Given Trump’s disdain for the Iran Agreement, and man-child McCain’s ditty, ” bomb-bomb-bomb Iran “, I am considering taking my Cold War back-yard nuke shelter out of mothballs, while others are at perfect liberty to continue to hope and pray for the Republican rendition of Camelot. While un-mothballing and for the following four or eight years I will hope to have been proven delusional. For now, I smell a game-plan.

      It is we, as usual, who will have to await Jihad’s retribution: one day with home-made suitcase nuclear devices or the all but unstoppable introduction of hoof and mouth disease, several steps up from throwing burning cigarettes into Colorado, California or Israeli forests: which would negate all of Trump’s new jobs, and then some.

      • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
        December 16, 2016 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

        I omitted to add the following from my Giraldi comment of Dec. 12, 2nd paragraph, which adds to my perception of smelling a game plan: ” Twice in the last two weeks, two Israeli fighters rocketed the military airport near Damascus, not far from the Palace”. [ Haaretz ]. On the day Israel attacks Iran from Israel and Azerbaiyan, it will ” by error ” [ as it did with Rachel Corey, UN schools, chicken farms, electric plants, sewage plants and countless other civil installations ] take out Assad’s Palace, family and government: finalizing its annexation of the Golan Heights and securing Cheney’s, Rothschild’s and Murdoch’s New Jersey-domiciled Genie oil, drilling there. Trump’s Ambassador will be aiding and abetting this crime and will remind Trump of his pact obligations even before the fact, so US troops will be sitting on the tarmac, engines reving. MSM will inform us of the necessity of this ” good and just war, keeping America safe, having destroyed Iran’s weapons of mass destruction “.

    • wolf's Gravatar wolf
      December 16, 2016 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

      May is a Jew too, she hates the British as much as Merkel hates Germans. (Merkel had a Jewish mother therefore is jewish as well

    • Colonel Bagelstein's Gravatar Colonel Bagelstein
      December 17, 2016 - 6:27 am | Permalink

      Scotland is in dire straights, economically and socially. The Scottish Negro Party are replacing the native Scots at an enormous rate, parts of Glasgow resemble somalia/pakistan/arabia. I was reading about Jewish involvement in the Russian revolution and the role of a character called Lenin who was a failed lawyer who represented some shoplifters before he was transformed into a Revolutionary, Nicola Sturgeon is a failed lawyer.

      • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
        December 18, 2016 - 6:34 am | Permalink

        Speaking of Scotland, I was shocked many years ago to discover that the Indian/Pakistani staff at the Bank of Scotland had subversively replaced the face of Robert the Bruce on the banknotes, inserting the face of a dwarf Indian/Pakistani actor, peering out from beneath his helmet. After lodging my small protest email about this to Alex Salmond, I was further shocked to learn that he had FORBIDDEN his own staff to use the term “Indigenous Scots”, after they protested that the rights of Indigenous Scots were being trampled upon by Third World Invaders. Political leaders are all in cahoots, all around the world. The NWO Illuminati are really just an International Sodomy Club, and it’s hard to understand why anyone would want to be a member.

    • Fred Bostock's Gravatar Fred Bostock
      December 18, 2016 - 4:40 am | Permalink

      yes, and soon as he appears the media go into overdrive to make him unelectable and a leper. And guess who’s behind it all….

  13. Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
    December 16, 2016 - 4:47 am | Permalink

    Here is a constituent letter to a British Member of Parliament written today:

    “I read with alarm the announcement that new legally binding measures are to be adopted to stifle freedom of speech, giving special status to one particular religious group which will make it a criminal act to criticize in any way. The United Nations has already given this special status to another religious group, making it a “crime” to criticize Islam in any way, and now the UK appears to be following the US in devising criminal penalties for anyone who criticizes a second religious group called Judaism.

    It is astonishing to remember that millions of British, American and Allied peoples died in World War II to rescue the Jewish people from Hitler, welcomed them as refugees, and allowed them the freedom to take a remarkable number of positions of high authority within the British government, legal system, financial, military, education, medical, social, business and land ownership, helped give them their own nation of Israel, give them £millions to protect their synagogues and schools from “terrorist attacks”, give more foreign aid to wealthy Israel than to any other nation on earth, and yet it seems this is not enough. According to Jewish academic Barbara Lerner, this same group has been at the forefront of opening the Gates of Britain and Europe to the Third World, welcoming millions of “refugees” to the UK while simultaneously denying them entry to Israel, protecting the ethnic, religious and cultural identity of their own people, while criticizing the West for trying to do the same.

    Why is any criticism of Jews considered “anti-semitic” and any criticism of Muslims “Islamophobic”, while no such labels exist for those who criticize Christians? Christians have also been the victims of mass genocides throughout history, continuing to this day in Islamic countries, yet their suffering is ignored, never even mentioned in history lessons or religious education at school, and they never launch legal action to punish and imprison anyone who dares to insult, criticize or offend them. Rather it is Christians, and only Christians, who are the victims of constant harassment by those trying to force them to abandon their religious beliefs to fit in with Socialist political ideas, and to desecrate their churches, which have graced this land for more than a thousand years, by allowing other religions to worship other gods there.

    Therefore, I appeal to you most earnestly to defend the democratic principles of freedom of speech and thought, and the freedom of the press, to freely criticize any group whatsoever, as they so freely criticize Christians.”

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      December 22, 2016 - 1:21 am | Permalink

      Why is any criticism of Jews considered “anti-semitic” and any criticism of Muslims “Islamophobic”, while no such labels exist for those who criticize Christians?
      The same reason that you can go to prison for saying the holocaust was fewer but no laws against exaggerating the number. Following proved exaggeration, no group or individual gets a single word of criticism – all that happens is the plaques are changed.

  14. Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
    December 16, 2016 - 2:38 am | Permalink

    What an excellent read – thank you Francis Carr Begbie.

    But be of good cheer – tis the season to be jolly after all. Appalling news though this may be, especially for us Brits, it’s been coming for a while and in a perverse way could actually be quite welcome.

    The Jewish elites work best when they remain under cover, pulling the strings from the shadows, getting their shabbos goy hirelings to take the rap when things go wrong. The fact that they are now imposing such blatantly pro-Jewish laws on us suggests to me they are running scared. (There’s also the chutzpah element to consider – they just can’t help showing off how powerful they are – but that’s another matter.)

    The Brexit and Trump votes scared the bejeesus out of our semitic masters on both sides of the Atlantic and they are feeding on that fear to double down on making it harder for real understanding of their role in our decline to surface in the wider public’s consciousness. My prediction is it won’t work – in fact the opposite effect is more likely.

    Criticism of Jews has been stifled in much of continental Europe for decades but Britain and the United States are tougher nuts to crack. The United States has its constitutional protection of freedom of speech, which forces the Jews to chip away around the edges, while Britain, though it lacks that written protection, nevertheless has a history of opposition to tyranny. We especially don’t like being told what to do by foreigners, as the European Union recently found out.

    My guess is that by making such an overt attempt to stifle criticism of Jews and Israel our alien hostile elite has in fact overplayed its hand. Open opposition is more likely, especially when people start being taken to court and charged with “anti-semitism” simply for expressing their beliefs. We Brits tend not to like that sort of thing.

    You only need to read the comments in the mainstream British media to see how widespread hatred of the establishment has become – a “hang ’em all” mentality has set in and doesn’t look like going away. It won’t take much to extend that mentality from the general establishment to the Jewish establishment and blatant censorship such as this makes that more likely as it positions Jewish power front and centre.

    We tend to look at the Jewish threat as if it is some sort of supernatural monster, impossible to defeat, but history tells us that isn’t true – they always go too far and patriotic people always bite back. In my opinion this latest move brings the day of outright rebellion a little bit closer, and that’s a good thing.

    But we should not just wait for it to happen, we should actively do whatever we can, as individuals and as a collective, to bring that day closer still. So I hereby resolve to do my bit to turn back the Jewish tide in 2017. My way is words: starting a blog, commenting more and writing patriotic fiction. And if ending up in court charged with “anti-semitism” is the result, well so be it – all publicity is good publicity. I think it’s time more of us stuck our heads above the parapet.

    So what are you going to do to make a difference in 2017? What is your talent and how can you use it to help rescue western civilisation? Think about it, then join with those who share your passion to make it happen.

    Have a very merry Christmas and a meaningful new year!

  15. December 15, 2016 - 11:44 pm | Permalink

    And all done on behalf of just 0.4% of the population, the totality of which would just about fill 4 large football stadiums. It baffles me why the mass of the population – of all classes – seem to remain oblivious to such in-your-face obvious power.

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      December 17, 2016 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

      >>>It baffles me why the mass of the population – of all classes – seem to remain oblivious to such in-your-face obvious power.>>>

      jews’ job is to make masses oblivious- by controlling information.

      There is nothing obvious about jew power- if it were obvious, it never would have come about in the first place. jew power is occult.

      • December 18, 2016 - 2:50 am | Permalink

        Agreed it IS occult; but – Post WWII – it has become so pervasive as to be ‘in-your-face obvious’ to even cursory honest research/inquiry. The problem, it seems to me, is that embarking on such inquiry very quickly reveals it to be dangerous to ones livelihood and a de-facto disqualification for a career in politics, education and the media. I suspect – and fervently hope – that an understand that fact is approaching critcal mass but I will not be holding my breath.

  16. Vehmgericht's Gravatar Vehmgericht
    December 15, 2016 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

    (Mod. Note: “Vehmgericht”, did you forget to preface your comment with a note that it was over-the-top sarcastic satire? No doubt some other TOO commenters would like to know.)

    ——–

    This is good news but only a first step. I would like to see this taken up in schools and corporate HR equality & diversity programmes.

    At the moment employees can feel isolated and vulnerable when reporting anti-semitic colleagues. Let’s get the message out that it’s OK to get help for our friends and workmates. Ideally we should be vetting at the pre-interview stage, checking FB, twitter, BDS or Momentum activity.

    Britain’s future as an open trading nation depends on stamping down on what has been called The Oldest Hatred. As the late great Christopher Hitchens noted it is also an infallible stigma of mental illness. Sufferers need our support, but the road to recovery lies through workplace and community education.

    Part of that could start right here on Occidental Observer, perhaps with the commissioning of a few pieces with a positive spin by community leaders and top opinion formers such as the Chief Rabbi or Melanie Phillips?

  17. John's Gravatar John
    December 15, 2016 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    Donald Trump made an excellent speech in Hershey Pennsylvania tonight. He mocked the media and CNN in particular and spoke against globalism saying peoples’ concerns are their family, city, state and country and he pointed out that there is no global flag or anthem. He also repeated the promises he made during the campaign. Good stuff!

  18. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 15, 2016 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

    I can still remember a time, not that long ago, when the promise was made by Jewish “authorities”, that they did not believe in a collective guilt of the German people for the crimes of the National Socialist Regime. It now seems, with the passing of more time, that they were not able to keep that promise.

  19. norm741's Gravatar norm741
    December 15, 2016 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Voltaire: “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise”

  20. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    December 15, 2016 - 11:25 am | Permalink

    The Jewish fashioned noose of Orwell’s ‘1984’ dystopia is indeed being constantly tightened around White peoples’ necks….everywhere. The internet revolution is endangering Jewry’s lock on the White psyche at this demographic tipping point juncture, and this is why they are removing the velvet glove to try to knuckle us under. Meanwhile, considering the critical situation, continued White somnolence about racial, political and ethnic reality is nothing short of astonishing. It could reasonably be asked, are we actually living in the Age of the White Dodo Bird ?

  21. Julius Brown's Gravatar Julius Brown
    December 15, 2016 - 8:53 am | Permalink

    One thing we know for sure: Jews always double-down.

    • December 16, 2016 - 12:07 am | Permalink

      Apparently Jews already have a lock on the minds of the gullible goyim majority. The problem is Jews are everywhere in the white equation, so one can hardly discuss any matters of culture, religion, economics or the media accurately without bringing up the subject of the Jews. Over the years, I have tried bringing up the subject of Jews in relation to these issues with very little success.

      Yet doing so, i.e. not talking about the 2000lb Star of David elephant squatting in the middle of one’s cultural living room, leaves the impression the problems are products of accident or stupidity, but these are merely the lies of omission favored by Jews.

      The idiot goyim see even the slightest reference to Jews, like saying the word itself, as some sort of obsession with the subject. Yet, as I always say, talking about global issues without mentioning Jews is like fish trying to talk about their polluted environment without mentioning water.

      Here is a prime example of the liberal thought process from a forty year old liberal, white male, Jew-hugger.

      “I don’t like you. Why? It’s because you’re racist and open about your racism. Our mom raised us to be against such things and I stand by the principles that she raised us with. The fact that you’ve turned her into a right wing lunatic isn’t something I’m happy about. The thing is we have extremely right wing religious views among my wife’s family. We have zero issues visiting with them. You know why? Because they’re smart enough to not talk about these political views that they know we disagree with in our presence. They have a social understanding that in social family situations, divisive political issues aren’t appropriate things to discuss. I’ve seen exactly zero evidence that you possess this social understanding, because every time we visit literally the first thing you do is bust out a martini and rip right into your theories about how the Jews run everything. It’s ALL you want to talk about, and I don’t even find your theories sort of interesting. Not even kind of. You then proceed to forward me emails about bullshit I have zero interest in, as if I care.”

      This classic ad hominem attack is a response to a number of specific issues mentioned in a previous e-mail. But in the typical fashion of Jewish programming for shutting down rational discourse, not one of these issues was addressed in his response. The evil I did to turn his mother into a “right wing” lunatic was to show her facts, he refers to as “theories.” Unlike her programmed son of a knee-jerk liberal, she read the evidence and came to her own “right wing”conclusions.

      Obviously he doesn’t care to hear anything that disagrees with those preconceived notions carefully implanted by the – dare I say it? – JEW media. Note how “smart people” do not discuss divisive political views? What this actually means in liberalese is that “smart people” do not openly disagree with liberal views, so how “smart” is that?

      For this terrible insensitivity I am labeled a social cretin. No doubt I would have no problem discussing my views with this individual as long as they marched lock-step with his. The “bullshit email” triggering this response was about Bill Clinton’s lead role in the Waco Massacre. Gee, just how much more openly “racist” and “right wing” can one be?

      Forty – Years – OLD

      So you see, in this individual’s view I am a racist, anti-Semitic alcoholic. I suppose all I’m missing to complete the image should be a few teeth, torn overalls, dirt under my fingernails and a red neck from working in the fields. As for martinis, I frequently “bust” them out to serve to my guests who invariably consume far more than myself. I find martinis an excellent lubricant for helping the less varnished truth slip from people.

      Other young men I have spoken with recently, ranging in age from nineteen to forty, have recently said much the same thing, albeit in less harsh terms, often identifying me as an “anti-Semite.” Of course I have been hearing this accusation for years.

      The slightest mention of Jews in less than glowing, loving terms will generate these types of labels. To date I have yet to personally meet an awakened, informed male below the age of fifty and there are precious few in that age group as well.

      While ignorance is tragic enough in itself, willful embracing of ignorance is pure, ugly stupidity. One cannot even begin showing such people evidence before the Jew’s media programming completely shuts down their minds.

      The most egregious example of this type of stupidity was discovered when I tried showing a peer of mine Denierbud’s video about the Hallowedhoax. After less than two minutes of viewing, he turned off the video stating angrily: “He’s talking down to me! I will not tolerate anyone talking down to me!” I was stunned as this particular aspect of the video he noted had never occurred to me.

      Worse I actually heard this again from another individual as well. Curiouser and curiouser, I don’t like the sound of the voice, so I refuse to listen to the message. Pointing out that Denierbud had no idea my friend was even alive and therefore could not possibly be “talking down to him,” fell on all three monkeys at once – he could not see, hear or speak any evil.

      I find the number one problem with males in this regard, typically stems from grossly bloated egos, but not always. An equation that might explain this phenomenon is “intellect is inversely proportionate to ego.”

      So these Talmudic legal acts are simply preemptive strikes to allay the Jews’ hardwired paranoia there might actually be a few people awakening to their pernicious presence.

      • John's Gravatar John
        December 16, 2016 - 11:00 pm | Permalink

        Arch, here’s the problem with your 40-year-old friend. He lacks this:

        http://i.imgur.com/565sWuO.jpg

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        December 21, 2016 - 1:17 am | Permalink

        Arch – You have to realise that most people do not think in a political way. They might be good at other things but lack the ability to work out what is going on in the world. They feel safe by following what the MSM tell them. This is why they are called ‘sheeple’. That is why the victory of Trump was so remarkable – the MSM lost their power for some reason – or lost it for half, as the other half still voted as the MSM told them to – for Hillary.

      • Andy_Patton's Gravatar Andy_Patton
        December 21, 2016 - 2:17 am | Permalink

        Arch, I have similar spats with my public sector, ‘liberal’, Judaized-Christian brother. He tells me, or rather his 60-year BBC/Times addled mind tells me, regularly, that all my right-wing associates should be SHOT, or at least thrown into jail, buggered and castrated by Islamic inmates! He has evidence that nowadays this happens often to ‘racist’ White prisoners, and just reported as suicides! ‘Cause we’re all about to shoot our kind-hearted SJW MPs, ’cause we’ve the SAME BOOK (Kemp’s March of the Titans) in our bookshelves, that Jo Cox’s killer had!

        We’re in a neo-Bolshevik Soviet era!

  22. Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
    December 15, 2016 - 8:42 am | Permalink

    I don’t understand how a Prime Minister can just make up a new law out of thin air and foist it on the British public without consulting Parliament. I don’t see how this has any validity in a democracy. Who gave her the power to do that? Is it some kind of Dictatorial Government by Executive Order, like Obama tried? It reminds me of the judges’ bogus claim to have the right to cancel Brexit, when they have no jurisdiction at all. It’s like the Emperor’s New Clothes.

    • December 15, 2016 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

      Reading through May’s cut-and-paste series of lies in her ‘speech’, the so-called ‘definition’ seems to be something to do with the EU, i.e. something they mostly say they’d adopted. I’m not sure it is a law. The British system allows ‘statutory instruments’ and ‘orders in council’. I’d guess their important uses are in such cases as undeclared wars, large-scale tax dodges, though I personally met them in planning disputes.
      —- NB it’s truly amazing to read the ‘sentencing remarks’ of ‘Mr Justice Spencer’. E.g. 18. In my judgment it is difficult to envisage a worse case than this of racially aggravated harassment of this kind (about Berger). Is he serious? It’s easy to imagine far worse cases, such as Jews killing Palestinians, Russians, Armenians, not to mention Britons, Germans, Vietnamese, Iraqis.
      —-Let’s not forget censorship of Jewish activities has existed at least since the time of Cromwell. It’s nothing new.

      • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
        December 16, 2016 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

        Yes, but where is Cromwell now ? The last I saw of him were three large, glossy photographs of his severed head, identifying wart and all, shown to me by the Headmaster Dr. Thomson, of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. His son, studying at Heidelberg, while I worked at United States Army in Europe HQ; Intelligence, there, invited me for Christmas ’64. At dinner I asked to sit in Cromwell’s former dining room chair, which he used while studying there, with OC carved on its back; his horse pistols hung in the entrance lobby. During dinner, Dr. Thomson told me, that a lawyer appeared at their gatekeeper’s quarters, asking whether they would accept Cromwell’s head in a glass case, since there were no heirs to the estate formerly in possession. The gatekeeper suggested, that he give it to Parliament. ” Oh, Sir, I tried that, but Parliament refused, stating, that he was too much a controversial figure yet “, replied the lawyer. Gatekeeper and lawyer approached Doctor Thomson, who graciously accepted this leftover of an alumnus. He had it photographed before he, the Chaplain and the gardener reburied it in a secret place on the premises. A plaque beside the entrance commemorates the reburial of the head, with fitting words. Cromwell had of course been beheaded by the Royalists who impaled it on a fence post, with a counter- hook atop.
        Where did you say Theresa went to college ? And what is the gatekeeper’s name ?.
        I sat on the kitchen chair on which Trotsky was butchered, I illegally sat on Martin Luther’s chair in Wittenberg and I sat on Cromwell’s chair. I guess I ‘m inclined to learn history from the bottom up.

      • Snipper's Gravatar Snipper
        December 17, 2016 - 5:13 am | Permalink

        It is my understanding that before Cromwell all Jews were bannished from England in perpetuity by the King 13h century law, does that law still stand.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      December 15, 2016 - 7:33 pm | Permalink

      With a smile: tradition plays a large role in Great Britain. Charles I, had a tradition to rule without parliament and preferred the secret judicial process of the Star Chambers, housed on the upper floors of Westminster. Promulgations, ukazes, Diktat, edicts, Theresa, what’s the difference ?

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        December 17, 2016 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

        The difference, perhaps, is that the judicial processes of the Star Chambers were to find treason/traitors to the King, among the nobility. Theresa is focused on the peasantry rooting out the treasonous political class.

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          December 18, 2016 - 1:38 am | Permalink

          800 years apart. Different targets but same, non-differentiated disregard for Magna Carta.

  23. December 15, 2016 - 6:34 am | Permalink

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265107/jewish-demography-bodes-well-israel-joseph-puder

    This is what Jews do for themselves. Sustain a 3.13 birthrate with US and German money, plundering us billions per year, all the while exterminating us. For us they propagandize idyllic couples without children. For themselves they propagandize large families.

    • December 15, 2016 - 10:54 am | Permalink

      They are doing everything to depress the demographics of Palestinians, this is very obvious. They encourage their emigration to Europe, thus picking two pigeons with one fave. They have urbanized Palestine with the intention of depressing their birth rates. The results show.

      • wolf's Gravatar wolf
        December 16, 2016 - 7:49 pm | Permalink

        Next Syria – oh look at all this abandoned land just like the Palestinians. How did this happen ? Must be the Lords Will… Thats what a Serial Killer would say, but when Jews say it, oh they are the chosen. We Gentiles are so dam naive, I think we should stop reading the bible and return to the laws of nature, Gods true laws.

  24. December 15, 2016 - 5:36 am | Permalink

    I don’t know how many Jews actually died during WW2, but the more, the better. Certainly the number was inflated to Jews’ advantage, like everything that Jews touch. Should they have lived, should Israel not have been created, there would have been at least 12 million more Jews in our evil White countries. They would have held a much tighter grip, and our genocide would have been far more advanced, we far more helpless.

    Hitler has too many faults, but he did do us this big favor. Even though he hated our Slavic nations, he would have been too old to do anything, even if he won. And the game would have become too complicated for him anyway.

    I was in sweet good terms with many Jews. My Jewish professor from Tel Aviv sent me a check of 640 euros, after I had left Israel. Pure love. Now put that in the perspective that many other Jews are actively working for my genocide, and have tilted all cards in that direction.

    My Jewish girlfriend from Tampa in 2011-2012 used to say “evil White people” all the time. She couldn’t wait to see us extinct. Obama worked very hard on that. I think Merkel unleashed the invaders in the moment when these globalists were at the maximum of their power. They just didn’t expect things to go the way they did, Brexit, Trump, Syrian war. They thought their grip was safe and they could afford what they did.

    Jews want to make the world one big favela. They think that’s better for them, it’s not. And I don’t see the world through the perspective of their interests anymore, I see it from the perspective of White interest. Let them call me all the names in the book, but I will not allow them to call me extinct.

    In 1812 US abolished its first Federal Reserve. Rothschilds unleashed British Empire into war to put US down again.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      December 15, 2016 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

      I don’t know how many Jews actually died during WW2, but the more, the better.

      I prefer to think that you mean us to take this sentiment not literally but instead as a lead-in to the counterfactual reflection of the remainder of your first paragraph. N’est-ce pas? I see nothing of enduring value to be gained by our becoming as bloodthirsty as our enemy is.

      Certainly the number was inflated to Jews’ advantage, like everything that Jews touch.

      Now this is genuinely solid ground! A perpetually skeptical old friend of mine, now dead alas, was fond of saying wryly that more Jews died in Hollywood’s World War II film fantasies than ever even served in real-life combat units.

      Finally, since you evidently spent so much time with her, I trust that your Tampa-dwelling Jewish girlfriend was really attractive. Most of us guys have done things they afterwards regret when a gorgeous gal is in the frame.

      • December 16, 2016 - 11:30 am | Permalink

        I could have married the Jewish girl if I wished. She was attractive, and with a PhD in SJW. Doesn’t matter that she looks forward to exterminate 1 billion Whites, and doesn’t matter that she was ready to settle, after having slept with half the male population of the world.

        I have noticed another thing that you better give it a thought. How come Jews only prosper among Whites? Arabs are more stupid than us, nonetheless, they don’t let Jews pul them around by the scrotum. I mean, it’s happening now, but only because Jews use Whites as the autistic tools that we are.

        Again, how come? Here is my take. White society is a very hospitable environment for Jewish parasite. The reason for that is actually all kinds of moralizations that you just inadvertently threw at me. I do actually mean that we must become more bastards, if we want to survive. We must forgive less, revenge more, elaborate less, react more, plan long term revenge. That teaches them to know their place. All that goodness of ours would be good, for in-group morality. Out-group we must be very different. Jews do the same. They are exterminating you, you still feed yourself tales of loving the enemy.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          December 16, 2016 - 1:15 pm | Permalink

          Alas, Ger, you don’t really know what or how much (or little) I feed myself. But I’m sad to see that you think that there is anything worthwhile to be gained by our “learning” from and then emulating Jews to such an extent that we become Jews in all but name.

          As for the Arabs, I respectfully suggest that you look at their societies, past and present, with a dark-adapted eye. You might start with Umayyad or Almoravid Spain, which were golden ages of Jewish prosperity and control of strings—and control of anything else you care to mention! And after Aquinas cherry-picked Avicenna and Averroes, the branches of Arab wisdom were stripped pretty darn bare of fruit. So you may or may not be on to something in referring to our fellow whites as autistic tools—I think you overstate the case by an order of magnitude—but if autism were a teachable skill, the Arabs would have cornered the market centuries ago.

    • December 15, 2016 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

      So, the final solution to the evil White people problem is what Obama meant by “fundamentally transforming the world”. He went close actually. And is diversifying our neighborhoods big time.

  25. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    December 15, 2016 - 4:30 am | Permalink

    There was a quote by Goebbels. Something like: “When the Jews outlaw criticism of Jews, it is the beginning of the end of the Jews.”

    I wish I had the exact quote. (Does anyone have it?)

  26. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    December 15, 2016 - 4:24 am | Permalink

    Does anyone know if there was an official sign at one of the Holocaust museums on location in Germany where they changed the actual sign from ‘4 million at this camp’ to ‘2 million at this camp’? ie all fully approved of by those in charge of the museum? In other words, have they already accepted some revision since the war? This would mean that it was done officially and not just a claim in a book. Or do they really claim the Allies would never lie or exaggerate when it came to this issue, even if such lies helped in the propaganda war to demonise the Germans?
    Re the way that Stalin was portrayed as ‘Uncle Sam’ – are we allowed to say this was an untruth and really he was not a friendly uncle at all? Is it okay to challenge this allied propaganda? So did the Allies lie about Uncle Sam being our friend, but not about anything related to Jewish persecution?

    —-

    (Mod. Note: If memory serves, the “all lies” referred to Joseph Stalin as “Uncle Joe”. Or at least FDR did.)

    • December 15, 2016 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

      Churchill let starve 4 Million people in India in 1943,
      Stalin let starve 5 Millionen Ukrainians in peace time in the mid 1930s,
      Mao let starve around 50 Million Chinese around the year 1960.
      These facts are not oftened mentioned in the history courses at schools and universities.

      To your question: That change is true for the concentration camp in Oświęcim in Poland. Up to 1990 the “official” number is 4 million, from then on it is “up to 1.5 millon”. In detail you can see that in h***ttps://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opferzahlen_der_Konzentrationslager_Auschwitz#Opferzahl_von_4_Millionen

      We Germans are forced by law to “believe” the official numbers. So I had to learn the larger number in my youth and my children had to learn the smaller number. This is crazy, but we are not allowed to doubt the “official number of the time”. If we would, we would go to jail.

      This november 2016 an 88year old German lady, Ursula Haverbeck, has been sentenced to 2 and a half year prison for “telling not offical numbers (=id est: “to small”) numbers for Auschwitz in the public”.
      Please klick and see a picture of that fine and strong German lady. She is a hero of all white folks.
      http://www.rp-online.de/panorama/deutschland/urteil-in-verden-holocaust-leugnerin-haverbeck-muss-zweieinhalb-jahre-in-haft-aid-1.6410634

    • Peter's Gravatar Peter
      December 15, 2016 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

      It was at Auschwitz, in Poland. The count was reduced from 4 million to 1.5 million (see the two signs in the article) in the early 1990’s and then the officials at Auschwitz reduced the figure to one million. This was after years of research by revisionists that poked many holes in their claims. Other historians believe the figure could be a couple hundred thousand, or even less. I wrote this article for this now defunct website. I use a pseudonym.

      http://www.deliberation.info/british-historian-david-irving/

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        December 17, 2016 - 2:42 am | Permalink

        Peter – I have read your article. I had no idea about those David Frost interviews.

        “British Psychological Warfare Executive, Chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, in charge of the PWE Victor Cavendish-Bentinck”

        We need to do a bit pf psychology on the PWE themselves and others on the Allied side who knew the truth about Germany to discover why they did not speak up after the War and support the search for the truth. Apart from anything else this would be strictly forbidden. But their silence was not simply that they had been instructed to be so. To say ‘we lied and the Germans were not as bad as we portrayed them’ would be the same in their minds as becoming a traitor themselves, as for the previous five years anyone who said that would have been undermining the War effort. After the War it would still be seen as undermining the War effort. You would feel that you were betraying your own side. The people on the Allied side wanted to believe after the War that they had fought for ‘freedom’ and to help persecuted Jews, and to tell them that their sacrifice was based on lies would bee seen as a betrayal of their own side.

        Does anyone seriously suggest that the approach of the PWE was, ‘we must stick to the truth’. Of course not. Their aim was not to tell the truth, it was to demonise the Germans.

        You cannot tell the people after the War “Even though you were not under attack, your leaders have led you into a War that has reduced your cities to rubble, and has caused the deaths of your brave and loyal soldiers, and has ruined your economy so that even after the war you are still all on food rations, and has given you a huge financial debt to the US, and has helped Stalin spread communism – and also, by the way, all those things we said to you over the past five years about the aim of the war to ‘free Poland’ and about Uncle Joe Stalin and about how evil the Germans are and about how many Jews were killed – they were all lies.’

        Having said that, one person did say ‘perhaps we killed the wrong pig’ – Winston Churchill.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      December 15, 2016 - 10:20 pm | Permalink

      P, all former concentration camps in Germany have memorials adorned with plaques. One was erected at Dachau, near Munich, which stated, that so and so many thousands were exterminated in the local gas chamber. The local US commander had it removed, because there were no gas chambers or any other such facilities that could have served that purpose. That famous photo of the GI opening the door has been widely misrepresented, even as the door to the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau, also referred to as Auschwitz II, as contrasted with the originally Polish cavalry compound at Auschwitz I, or the Stammlager, or Original Lager/camp.
      You are probably thinking of the large four granite plates in front of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum and its inevitable souvenir shop. When I visited twice, six weeks apart, in ’92, each of the plates was inscribed separately in Russian, English, Polish and French, stating, that four million Jews had been gassed there. Documentation by revisionists like Zundel, the Jewish David Cole [ who gave Zundel a personal tour of Auschwitz ] Faurisson and many others obliged the curator Piper, in time, to correct these numbers to 1 million, as did an Israeli rabbi recently and a handful of renowned Israeli historians, as contrasted with propagandists.
      Auschwitz I, as mentioned, was an old Polish cavalry compound. Its alleged gas chambers were a former munitions depot, where you can still see the traces of four walls in the floor, which divided this hall into five separate chambers to minimize an explosion. Its much-ridiculed light door opens inward, which would make the removal of the corpses almost impossible. Its adjacent crematory retorts are not connected to the famous chimney, which was built after the war by the Russians, who liberated the place on Jan. 27, 1945, with the inmates having been given the choice to remain or join an arduous march to Germany. As Anne Frank did, only to die of a lice-engendered frequent typhus epidemic in Belsen.
      The delousing gas Zyklon B comes in pellet form and takes 70 degrees Fahrenheit to gasify. There were no traces of heating, but the waste plumbing for a john. Its waste was connected directly to the system of the adjacent SS infirmary and the gas, if any, would have endangered those patients. Thousands of students from all over the world are forced through there yearly, in support of Israeli foreign and financial policy. A class of Germans came through and one of the girls fainted, which started a sharp but short exchange between me and the guide. The square holes in the ceiling were crudely made by using jack hammers, with re bar still sticking out, unnecessarily large and a temptation for desperate people to escape. This camp also has a museum in one of the original barracks. In one glass counter I saw a letter from Gestapo Auschwitz to Gestapo in so and so, near by, advising their colleagues to notify the Jew so and so to come to pick up the URN of his deceased relative, which is at odds with the Spielberg versions of the disposal of the bodies. The famous Wall of Tears, where Jews were simply stood up against the wall, showed no bullet holes, which I mentioned. Six weeks later this wall was covered by pre-fab wood-chip and concrete slabs, hiding the missing holes. A well-known Scandinavian Jehova Witness, who were persecuted by Hitler, an unlikely apologist for the NS, made seventeen trips to A and took thousands of photos, as far back as the sixties, and made friends there, who showed him a theatre for the inmates, attested to by one woman who produced plays for the children, included in Spielberg’s videoed witness collection, but never shown, though accessible, like many others, whose accounts are wide of the mark.
      Yes, the western press referred to Stalin as Uncle Joe, in their need to ameliorate communism and their documented attempt to import it into the US. Will Durant, that consummate liar, which qualified him as The New York Times chief Soviet correspondent, filed nothing but disinforming fuzzy reports.
      Consult the Leuchter Report, commissioned by Zundel. Leuchter, a US execution expert for many states, tested the concrete walls. When the gas comes into contact with concrete it leaves a Prussian-blue stain of considerable chemical lifetime. There were minimal traces in the Massachusetts chemical lab report for the alleged gas chambers, attributable to disinfection, and very high traces for the actual clothing delousing chambers, still there. A young Austrian professional engineer duplicated Leuchter’s methodology and found the same results. Finally a forensic department of a Polish Ministry repeated it a second time, and again was obliged to concur. The Jews attacked the messenger, in my opinion Jewish himself, having met him.
      I find it distasteful to argue about millions: people don’t die as millions but as single individuals, each having their families, homes, room and pets before their eyes during their last moments, and there were masses among them who were innocent, even of following their horrendous religion.
      That’s my short answer to your questions, for the longer version we had better both pack a lunch. Hope to have helped. Love the Moderator’s spelling of allies: yes, many volumes of documented lies.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        December 16, 2016 - 4:57 pm | Permalink

        Will Durant, that consummate liar, which qualified him as The New York Times chief Soviet correspondent, filed nothing but disinforming fuzzy reports.

        Your reminiscences are such a delight to read, Charles, that even the odd misstep, as here, only adds to the pleasure.

        You have conflated the American Will Durant (1885–1981), a curiously sentimental socialist and tireless secondary-source chronicler of civilization and philosophy—much of the work being done hand in hand with his wife (((Ariel)))—with the Englishman Walter Duranty, who certainly was a villain to the core. Duranty, who enthusiastically took up residence in the Soviet Union in the early twenties, seems truly to have believed that Lenin’s besetting vice was having too soft a heart.

        If memory serves, Will Durant wrote a book about the Soviet state in the aftermath of his own brief sojourn there in the thirties, but I know nothing of its contents or the accuracy (or otherwise) of its assessment of Stalin and his rule. If Duranty and Durant ever met, it would be news to me. At this point, the dial on my in-built Richter scale of surprise would barely stir were you to tell me that you used to dine with cousins of the Durants on a thrice yearly basis!

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          December 17, 2016 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

          The changes to the numbers at Auschwitz came after the collapse of the USSR, when the Soviet archives were opened to public access. Among the documents were the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp records. The numbers on the plaques were reduced, but the numbers are still inflated in comparison with the actual camp records. I believe David Irving was one those with access early on.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        December 17, 2016 - 2:46 am | Permalink

        Charles Frey – this would make an interesting documentary for mainstream TV, with all the details you provide. But it is about as likely as a documentary to investigate the truth about Global Warming on the BBC- ie it is not going to happen.

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          December 17, 2016 - 9:47 pm | Permalink

          Thanks. My details are merely a minute, personal brush-stroke on a huge, publicly available canvass painstakingly painted by others. Allow me a small addendum at this point. David Irving, who believes in “primary sources” as opposed to hearsay, dug into British Secret Service archives, only to find, that they had the Polish Underground tap into German cables between A and Berlin, and read the daily reported coded but broken personnel count of inmates, which did not support the current narrative. Birches love an abundance of water, hence Birkenau, or birch dale. The water level is only at three feet, an unwise place to throw corpses into the ditch, as claimed, poisoning your water supply. War time, allied aerial recognizance photos showed no evidence of the enormous mounds of coal, essential to cremate the claimed absurd number of bodies per day. A had a maternity ward for expecting inmates. There was a swimming pool for inmates in their special, fenced-off area, a no-go for guards. Inmates were valuable, underpaid labor, shipped out daily by train to work in the fields raising rice-paddy-like rubber plants for the extraction of latex to produce artificial rubber, from which Germany was cut off. The exhibited mounds of shoes and glasses were enlarged by placing boxes beneath them. A-II was really a collection of camps.
          After a very recent refresher conversation, I can say that the Jehovah’s Witness I referred to was Dietlieb Felderer. He came from Sweden, where he may have fled to after his parents were interned in A-I, where they died of one of the recurring typhus epidemics. On his first, early sixties visit he drove there by VW camper. Only organized, closed groups were given tours then. He feigned a mechanical breakdown, getting permission from local Immigration to remain in a local hotel, to ostensibly await the arrival of his parts from West Germany. He snuck out at dusk and into the alleged gas chambers in A-I and was the first to discover at that time, that the retorts were not connected to the chimney. On the following day, unchallenged, he photographed the said swimming pool for the first time, showing inmates bathing. He took ca. 5,000 photos during his repeated trips. In the late eighties he witnessed for Zundel at one of his trials in Toronto. A video, being interviewed by Zundel exists.
          The Jewish elite was interned in Theresienstadt, Czechoslovakia, where they enjoyed soccer matches against their guards, some SS men opting to play on their better team instead. Some inmates’ post-war statements suggest, that the films of the matches, still extant, were not made for propaganda purposes: recall the Spielberg-videoed Jewish female inmates, whose story was totally at odds. One recalled a “handsome” SS man who scrounged up some paint for her children’s production of Snow White. A Spielberg male interviewee spoke of camp money, paid for work, with which to purchase personal items and cigarettes at the “cantina”; his LA word. [Widely known and admitted fact]. By all accounts, ca. 5,000 Jews survived in liberal to red Berlin, having been hidden by “righteous gentiles”. Air Feldmarschall Milch was a half-Jew, as were many other enlisted men and commissioned officers, permitted under the Nuremberg race laws.
          But, I’m drifting into my long version I warned you of. I don’t wish to imply, that horrendous things did not happen, on all sides. Canadian James Bacque wrote “Other Losses” in which he depicts the terrible death of ca. 800,000 German POWs, taken from under the protection of the various Conventions, by Eisenhower’s magical reclassification as Deployed Enemy Forces, halving their rations. Starving to death, sleeping in water-filled holes for protection against an icy wind, freezing to death, falling exhausted into primitive latrines drowning in excrement and thirsting to death a few feet from the Rhine. Shot at by trigger-happy guards who also fired at women attempting to throw food over the crude fences. Described by a veteran on US TV years ago; with tears.The US Command pleaded shortage of medical equipment and supplies, which was already en route on the Atlantic and arrived at Bremerhaven daily, no longer needed: bought up by that Jew Cyrus Eaton for pennies on the dollar and sold by this shyster to wanting Stalin personally, no doubt at a huge profit, whom he visited in his private plane, exclusively allowed into Soviet air space..
          Jews incessantly preach to the Germans to come to grips with their [innate; Prof. Goldhagen] homicidal history. To do so objectively, requires unhindered but conveniently verboten examination. In all likelihood exonerating documents are among the yes, 30 million documents archived at Bad Arolson, Germany, closed until 2007 and still not entirely accessible. The International Red Cross had access everywhere and questioned inmates, as agreed, without the presence of German personnel.
          Start anywhere, then wander from source to source, but don’t forget in the meantime to expose your heart to sunshine.
          In my second-last paragraph of my previous comment I did not mean to say ” their horrendous religion” but rather “that horrendous part of their religion”, which has been amply demonstrated on this site and many others.
          Don’t look so grim, crack a smile! If you have very specific questions I would be happy to rummage through my memory.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          December 19, 2016 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

          Charles Frey wrote,

          Described by a veteran on US TV years ago; with tears.

          I truly wish I’d seen this, Charles. I’ve seen hundreds of my fellow vets over the years on various panels and at various fora brought into my living room by C-SPAN, but I’ve yet to hear a single one ever say anything suggesting his private regret for his own regrettable or at least questionable conduct. I’ve sadly heard far more of its contrary: stuff along the lines of “If I knew then what I know now, I’d have slit those German [or substitute Vietnamese or Afghani or Iraqi or anti-Semitic] bastards throats on the spot!” But no vet I’ve seen has ever been slow, of course, to lay ex post facto blame on comrades or subordinates or higher-ups.

          Ah, human nature! Aint it grand?!
          ______________
          P.S. It’s always good to see mention made of James Bacque. I doubt whether Ike ever felt anything approaching remorse for his genocidal conduct toward Germans during and especially after the war, but unlike the vets I refer to above, he at least had the decency to warn the blind and deaf of the dangers of the military-industrial complex many years later.
          P.S.S. A belated but big thank-you for your addition, which I saw just today, on the now-closed Giraldi thread to the chat Curmudgeon and I were having about Canada and NAFTA. Reading of your lady friend’s travails brought tears of both sympathy and anger to my eyes.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        December 19, 2016 - 1:42 am | Permalink

        Charles Frey – especially interesting was the point about no coal mounds, as these photos
        cannot be tampered with in order to ‘alter the evidence’, unlike other physical aspects of the camps which could be altered later.

        1) “30 million documents archived at Bad Arolson, Germany, closed until 2007 and still not entirely accessible”

        Do you think these documents will one day become scanned and accessible to historians, ie made public, or do you think custodians of the documents will end up destroying them. After all, David Irving’s property was robbed for this very same purpose to take away his documents. Surely a small group is now totally in charge of all the museums, and they will want control of all related documents. In the same way that in N.America I heard that the Native Indians have total control of any ancient burial mounds, and if they want to burn such bones they can – even if others dispute that they are Native American bones and are actually from Europeans who lived there hundreds of years ago. In other words, political correctness dictates that a special interest minority group is allowed total control over archives that they claim belong to their genetic type only, and some within the group might decide to destroy any evidence that contradicts their narrative, if they believe their narrative is more important than the truth.

        2) “He snuck out at dusk and into the alleged gas chambers in A-I and was the first to discover at that time, that the retorts were not connected to the chimney. On the following day, unchallenged, he photographed the said swimming pool for the first time, showing inmates bathing.”
        To clarify – was the camp still in use in the 60s in E Germany, and if it was then it could have had any number of refurbishments.

        3)”The exhibited mounds of shoes and glasses were enlarged by placing boxes beneath them”
        It is a bit strange to just pile glasses up in a giant heap. These would be expensive items and could have been reused and throwing them in a giant heap would damage them.

        I know a teenager who was sent on a trip to Auschwitz and given the full tour, sponsored by a charity. Then back in Britain the girl gave a talk to the school as part of the arrangement.

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          December 20, 2016 - 12:18 am | Permalink

          (Mod. Note: TOO is not a site for discussion of the details of various aspects of WW2 Revisionist History. Please take this stuff to sites dedicated to that discussion.)

    • Shlomo's Gravatar Shlomo
      December 15, 2016 - 11:52 pm | Permalink
      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        December 19, 2016 - 2:12 am | Permalink

        Shlomo – From the conclusion in the article. “The two official inscriptions on the memorial at Auschwitz-Birkenau, which followed each other–the first until 1990, the second since 1995–are of great instructive value, though certainly without intention: They remind us that there should not be an officially decreed truth, neither in history nor elsewhere.”

        Let us suppose there is finally decreed a certain official number, protected by law. Let us say it is 3 and a half million.

        We observe that there are penalties for saying it is less than this figure, on the basis that the motive for saying so is to make the Nazis less bad, and this is called ‘denial’, yet there are no penalties the other way – where the motive is to make the Nazis more bad – called ‘exaggeration’.

        So officially, denial exists but exaggeration does not and never has – even though in other aspects of the war the British Psychological Warfare people were found to have told tell lies in order to demonise the Germans.

  27. m's Gravatar m
    December 15, 2016 - 3:03 am | Permalink

    If I had to choose, I’d pick Chinese communism. I mean, if the government is going to control what you say in public, at least it’s better to have a government that is not concerned with dispossessing its majority with replacement aliens, but actually supporting its citizens as a people and culture.

    In the US one can still pretty much say in public what one thinks. It’s the private sector that does the censoring. This is why social media is on the war path against “fake news” and “hate.” Who needs government to suppress truth when it can be done socially through education and media (and workplace rules including affirmative action and other indoctrination sessions)?

    If any change is to come about in the US, it will require a “long march” through the institutions (primarily schools and universities which are in effect an arm of the government). That means reorienting the minds of white folks to recognize and not accept their dispossession. For Britain it is probably too late for anything to happen without violence. But that’s what happens when you outlaw peaceful means of change. The true English people fought in the last World War to make people like themselves impossible.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      December 15, 2016 - 5:55 am | Permalink

      Is China really “communist”? From what I see, the government of China is a strong supporter of free enterprise— this is inconsistent with communism.

      I’d argue that the present-day Chinese government is much closer to fascism than communism. (Anyone disagree?)

      @m
      I agree with you about the Chinese government. A variation of the Chinese system would be a good alternative to democracy.

      • m's Gravatar m
        December 15, 2016 - 12:31 pm | Permalink

        @ the Sgt Pepper: actually, since Mao died, the current faction stemming from Deng Xioping calls it “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.” The political party is nominally “communist,” but it has nothing to do with Marx. Economically the country runs on a horrible spoils system, but everyone gaining spoils are Chinese, and it is all run for the benefit of Chinese. No multicult nonsense at all. Everything…and I mean everything they do starts with the question: what is best for China and Chinese.

  28. Jeff's Gravatar Jeff
    December 15, 2016 - 2:09 am | Permalink

    The West is going the Russian way.
    In 2014 Putin passed a law proscribing ” Holocaust denial” and anti-Semitism while at the same time banning discussion on the Ukranian Holodomor, what he calls Nazi revisionist tactics.
    Sputnik news(formerly the Voice of Russia) have been publishing several articles arguing that the Holodomor famine-genocide never took place, that the whole thing is Nazi propaganda.

    Now there is a real possibility that a new Holocaust museum(beside the Jewish one) will be built in Moscow: The Moscow Museum of the American Indian Holocaust. Putin and the mayor of Moscow support the idea.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      December 15, 2016 - 8:23 am | Permalink

      “The West is going the Russian way.”
      Unless “the West” only refers to the U.S.A., your statement is backwards. Virtually all of the countries in the EU, as well as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have had “Holocaust denial” laws for decades.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        December 15, 2016 - 12:03 pm | Permalink

        Good reply, Curmudgeon! Fundamentally, Jeff’s game is inversion of truth (= lying). We need to stay on the alert for his subversion.

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          December 17, 2016 - 1:06 pm | Permalink

          Pierre, I was a Rolling Stones fan before it became popular. Their open turn to Satanic references ended that. The one thing that has stuck with me, as a warning, is Sympathy for the Devil:
          Just as every cop is a criminal
          And all the sinners saints
          As heads is tails
          Just call me Lucifer
          ‘Cause I’m in need of some restraint

          Curiously, it awakened me to the realities of what was happening in the world. Other parts of the lyrics were, to my mind, planting false narratives about our history. The above lyrics are a road map to “reality” of today: Whites are evil; BLM are peaceful; and while they have always been problem cops, all cops are criminals, and all the criminals are victims. Reality manufactured before your very eyes.
          IMO, Antifa needs restraint.

    • December 15, 2016 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

      Agreed, and that’s why I think we’re reaching an inflection point. The battle is being joined and force will increasingly become the enabler rather than the sleight-of-hand that has mainly applied to date. We can see the same thing in many other arenas such as the attack on so-called fake news.

  29. Fred Bostock's Gravatar Fred Bostock
    December 15, 2016 - 1:28 am | Permalink

    Look at the Public Order act – “Threatening or abusive” (“Insulting” has been dropped) comments are actionable by law – are the comments from Burns and Bonehill “abusive”? I think so; there must be a better way to get points over. On Radio 4’s “Great Lives” (13/12/16) Matthew Paris and actor Sir Ben Kingsley spoke about Elie Wiesel and how he worries that “deniers” will “….come out of the woodwork and swamp the Holocaust, try to kill it…” or word to that effect. The solemn, reverential mood of their conversation was as if they were talking about a higher form of religion (Holocaustianity?) yet their slightly hesitant pace and choice of words make me think they probably have a credibility gap on some parts or details of Wiesel’s account as set out in “Night”. That there is so much hysteria about Holocaust revisionism, about this new law and mass panic amongst liberal and media elites (not to mention Brexit and Trump) shows things are moving in the right direction – this “pesky internet” (as Dr Pierce once described it) is the key to exposing the historical inaccuracies of WW2 to the sheeple. We don’t need lurid and “abusive” rhetoric.

    • Maple Curtain's Gravatar Maple Curtain
      December 15, 2016 - 8:43 am | Permalink

      You’re tone-policing political dissent.

      You have indicated that you are quite happy to put the lower orders in gaol if they can’t win an Oxford debate.

      You are on the other side.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        December 15, 2016 - 12:31 pm | Permalink

        You’re tone-policing political dissent.

        @Maple Curtain:

        Unless one is a knee-jerk SJW (what a more plainspoken era called a yellow dog Democrat), from time to time virtually everyone disagrees with someone else. But white grown-ups as a rule find better, more honest ways to express disagreement than by resort to dime-store sloganeering smacking of license-free psychoanalysis (a Jewish grift, be it noted), as exemplified by the highlighted sentence above. Put otherwise, your disdainful reply reads as far more Oxford debatish than Fred Bostock’s comment, whatever the extent of one’s agreement or disagreement with the latter.

        I look forward to reading contributions from you that exhibit fresh or novel insights, preferably ones whose mode of expression has been rinsed of “rinse, repeat” and similar jargon and that don’t reflexively assume that the journalist’s device of formatting comments as single-sentence paragraphs adds ballast to lighter-than-air thought processes.

        • Maple Curtain's Gravatar Maple Curtain
          December 16, 2016 - 10:03 am | Permalink

          Thank you, Mr. Pomposity, for so eloquently making my point for me.

          This battle is existential for the white race. It is not about the egos of aged keyboard warriors like yourself and Mr. Bostock who posture on the internet whilst better men, like Joshua Bonehill, go to gaol for the crime of being ineloquent.

          After all, we can’t have the lower orders being so uppity as wanting control over their own societies when the likes of Pierre de Crayon are using big words on the internet, can we?

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          December 16, 2016 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

          Maple Curtain: I see that your native modesty has kept you from listing yourself among the “better men” you mention. I can’t help wondering, however, when you last hobnobbed with any of those from the “lower orders” whose champion you hint you are. Being one of their number by birth and upbringing, I hobnob with them every day—at least, every day that my ego and aged feebleness don’t keep me cooped up indoors. Yet I still retain enough of my wits to say with confidence that your schoolboy sarcasm and freeperish political posturing wouldn’t fool even the thickest among them.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      December 19, 2016 - 2:35 am | Permalink

      Pierre de Craon – I heard the same programme repeated on 16th and it is exactly as you describe. The words were carefully chosen to avoid saying that the holocaust was developed and turned into an industry by interested parties, and yet if you listen carefully to everything they said so reverentially and carefully, this is what comes across quite clearly between the lines they said – ie the way the holocaust industry was created and nurtured. The only other time you hear Radio 4 in such a fawning and reverential mode is when they are speaking of Saint Nelson Mandela, and trying to tiptoe carefully around his life story so as not to accidentally blaspheme.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        December 19, 2016 - 12:03 pm | Permalink

        Thanks for your addition to this block, pterodactyl. Credit for the comments you agree with and very helpfully supplement ought to go to Fred Bostock, however. Like you, I was impressed by the attentiveness and tone of his analysis.

        Our enemy has expended a great deal of thought, time, and energy in tailoring the message to the audience. Some parts of that audience are bludgeoned with a blunt instrument, whereas others are fed subtle, systemic, and slow-developing poison. One needn’t become a thug or a snake to learn its methods, but learning them is indeed essential to resisting and countering them. (Not coincidentally, the critical necessity of learning from one’s enemy without morphing into him was directly enjoined upon the Twelve in the parable of the Unjust Steward!)

  30. Maple Curtain's Gravatar Maple Curtain
    December 14, 2016 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Fascinating look into the minds of the UK elite, Jew and non-Jew alike.

    How is it that they can’t see where this leads?

    Willfully blind to human nature and the history of the world.

    What is the cause of anti-semitism, you ask, Melanie Phillips?

    Jews and their collaborators in the elites of occupied nations are the cause of anti-semitism, Ms. Phillips. You’re welcome.

    These people are going to create a world that will make AH look like an apologetic philo-semite.

    Ah well…sow, reap, rinse and repeat.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      December 19, 2016 - 2:47 am | Permalink

      This policy might work with tribes in the desert 2000 years ago, ie the view that all other tribes are the enemy – it might work with scattered desert tribes always at war with each other, but when the same mentality is transposed to modern life and tries to take down an enemy 100 times greater than itself, it can end badly.

  31. December 14, 2016 - 10:43 pm | Permalink

    Jews blame 1 billion Whites for Holocaust. Why shouldn’t we blame 15 million Jews for White genocide? Now I have come to think that Holocaust was karma in action. With all the genocides that Jews have done, time was ripe they tasted their own poison.

    • Scott Comin's Gravatar Scott Comin
      December 15, 2016 - 6:07 am | Permalink

      These people are so sick. They are constitutionally incapable of seeing their part in anything. It is pathological. Not all, but it seems true of most. This is so scary, so scary.

      • December 16, 2016 - 3:17 pm | Permalink

        They are sick, but they are slick more than sick. They see themselves for the bastards that they are, and pat themselves for that. In nature we have the best known example of the cuckoo. There are others. There is a wasp that parasitizes on bees. It emits a hormone that makes bees attend to every need of the wasp, even though the end line of this all is the extermination of the beehive. The equivalent for humans is morality. Yes, Jews gave morality to the world. We were far better with our pre-Jewish morality. If you look better into it, that morality that Jews gave to the world (only to evil White men in fact) actually worships Jews, never places guilt on them, preaches altruism for non-Jews. How about Jewish morality? You know too much about that by now. Jews gave morality to the world, and kept none for themselves.

        • December 16, 2016 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

          BTW, I have relatives that when they want me to attend to their needs, they become very traditional, moralist, real fathers of the family, virtuous. When they have the upper hand, they call me chupacabra and physically injure me all they can, without regards whatsoever. That’s the world we live in. Now I made it clear with them how they have been in the past. Guess what? They have no interest whatsoever to continue the game of morality, wisdom, sageness and tradition, as long as it is just a waste of time for them, without benefits. Should I fall for it, they don’t mind, as long as it benefits to them. First time that it doesn’t benefit to them, I’m off in my own devices, and resourceless, not having provided in time. Squeezed lemon. This is the same with Jews.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        December 19, 2016 - 2:57 am | Permalink

        Some justify any hostile act they get caught out doing to the West as fully justified in response to something that happened to their tribe 500 or 2000 years ago. On BB one of them was saying how he still felt the pain of some massacre or other from more than 2000 years ago. Another was saying ‘you cannot blame the Bolsheviks for what they did – they were only reacting to persecution and we must understand that this persecution provoked them’ etc and I said so you admit you are hostile, but that it is justified hostility? ‘Oh, no’ he said in denial mode.

Comments are closed.