The Real Obama Legacy, Part 3: Race Relations

Peter Baggins and Kevin MacDonald


Link to Part 1: Foreign Policy
Link to Part 2: The Economy

Obama was voted into office on the promise of “Hope and Change,” and chief among the many hopes for many voters was that there would be a dramatic improvement in race relations. This did not occur. In fact, Gallup polls showing historical trends found that racial attitudes for both Blacks and Whites were substantially worse after nearly 8 years of Obama than prior to that. Importantly, the dropoff really began in 2013, after Obama’s reelection.

Similarly, Washington Post-ABC News poll, taken in July, 2016 found 63% seeing race relations as “bad,” with a majority believing they are getting worse. Again, we see major changes in the last 2-3 years.

First, Obama’s being Black remained highly salient to Americans. The utopian dream of a post-racial America never materialized. His policies were “colored” by his name being attached to them. For example, a scholarly paper showed that racial polarization in support for health care reform was much greater in 2009–2010, when Obamacare was enacted, than under President Clinton in 1993–1994 (American Journal of Political Science 56.3 (Jul 2012): 690-704). This effect likely had ramifications for Obama’s other policies, such as immigration. “President Obama possesses a unique potential to polarize public opinion by race.” So even though perceptions of race relations did not deteriorate in Obama’s first four years, issues became racially polarized. People saw things through the lens of race.

Obama thus contributed to the racialization of politics in America —  TOO has 40 articles on the topic. By all accounts, the left promoted identity politics for non-Whites and sexual minorities. But these data show that White Americans also became, at least implicitly, more strongly identified as White — a phenomenon that may well have helped Trump and that bodes well for the Alt Right in the long run. And because Trump is seen as racially polarizing because of his statements on immigration, racial identities are not likely to diminish among all groups, including Whites, in the coming years.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Secondly, and far more importantly, specific events and Obama’s reactions to them, beginning with the Trayvon Martin affair in 2012 and continuing throughout his second term are likely to have influenced perceptions of race relations negatively. Particularly important was the rise of Black Lives Matter in the wake of the shooting of Michael Brown by Darren Wilson, a White policeman, in Ferguson, MO in 2013. Despite the facts of the case not supporting the BLM “hands up, don’t shoot” account, Obama and Eric Holder’s Justice Department were seen as squarely on the side of convicting Wilson.

The Baltimore riots in the wake of Freddie Gray’s death in a police van also received huge coverage, and again the facts didn’t fit with the liberal narrative. All of the officers, both Black and White, were acquitted despite a Black judge and Black-dominated power structure in Baltimore, including the mayor and the prosecuting attorney.

For anyone engaged with the media since the Ferguson riots, the entire narrative was about race throughout the entire media spectrum. Conservative media, which had typically focused on the usual conservative talking points about Obama (Obamacare, over-regulation, deficits, etc.), now focused day after day on race and on Obama’s image as far too sympathetic to the rioters. (Obama publicly associated himself with BLM activists by inviting them to the White House several times.) Conservatives generally sided with the police, while being careful to say that there are indeed bad cops and unjustified shootings.

The violence and property destruction prior to any established facts about the cases fed into stereotypes of inner-city Blacks. White America watching the TV coverage once again had its stereotypes of the Black underclass confirmed — irrational, violent, White-hating, police-hating (“Pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon”) and prone to criminality. Implicitly at least, there was an uptick in race realism. Hollywood’s continuing attempts to stereotype Blacks as intelligent computer experts with the wisdom of Gandhi suffered a major setback.

The fact is that, after enabling a Black middle class, after all the affirmative action, after electing a Black president and getting a race-obsessed Black attorney general, after the massive, incredibly expensive, futile efforts to improve the academic performance of Black children, after all the billions in welfare programs, after all the programs aimed at lowering Black criminality, there remains a very large Black underclass operating completely outside the institutional structures created by White society. For this group, nothing remains except anger at a system they cannot comprehend and blaming their failures on White racism.

Given the evidence that in fact race relations are now more polarized, it’s reasonable to suppose that images of rioting Blacks made Whites identify more with being White and as having interests that are radically divergent from Black America. It further polarized the racial landscape and may well have had repercussions during the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton generally sided with the BLM, meeting with BLM activists and emphasizing “systemic racism” and “implicit bias,” as well as the need for reform of the criminal justice system, while Donald Trump made repeated statements about the need for “law and order.”

The success of BLM in spreading a message that White police officers are wantonly killing Blacks then fed into assassinations of police officers, beginning shortly after Ferguson, with the December 2014 assassination of two police officers in New York. The killings of 5 police officers in Dallas received huge media coverage and, despite condemnations from all quarters, this event likely sharpened the racial battle lines even further. Obama’s response at the memorial service was to state that Black parents were right to fear that “something terrible may happen when their child walks out the door” — not the sort of thing the law enforcement community wanted to hear.

And, quite clearly, the message has gotten through to police officers: Abandon pro-active policing and avoid confrontations likely to lead to a career-ending media uproar. We know this because of the “Ferguson effect” — the dramatic increases in crime by Blacks in 25 of the largest 30 American cities. Here we defer to the indispensable Heather MacDonald (see also here), who projects an 11% rise in murders in 2015. Violent crime had been trending down since the early 1990s, and this continued into the first half of 2014. However, “the post-Ferguson violent-crime spike in the second half of 2014 wiped out that earlier crime success, leaving 2014 a wash. Since then, violent crime has continued rising.”

Baltimore’s per-capita homicide rate, for example, is now the highest in its history, according to the Baltimore Sun: 54 homicides per 100,000 residents, beating its 1993 rate of 48.8 per 100,000 residents. Shootings in Cincinnati, lethal and otherwise, were up 30 percent by mid-September 2015 compared with the same period in 2014. Homicides in St. Louis were up 60 percent by the end of August. In Los Angeles, the police department reports that violent crime has increased 20 percent as of December 5; there are 16 percent more shooting victims in the city, while arrests are down 9.5 percent. Shooting incidents in Chicago are up 17 percent through December 13.

Seen in broad perspective, the presence of a Black president openly sympathetic to BLM, as well as the blanket indictment of all of White society that is so common on the mainstream left, have disinhibited the activists, justified rioting and police assassinations and legitimized a general climate inviting the hatred of Whites. But the most obvious result of all this is an increase in Black-on-Black crime.

And yet, as Heather M notes in a recent article, liberals continue to push the meme that Obama promoted a “post-racial” America.

Tell that valedictory for “post-racial bridge-building” to police officers, who have been living through two years of racialized hatred directed at them in the streets, to the applause of many Democratic politicians. Black Lives Matter rhetoric consists of slogans like: “CPD [Chicago Police Department] KKK, how many children did you kill today?” “Fuck the police,” and “Racist, killer cops.”

Officers have been assassinated by Black Lives Matter-inspired killers who set out to kill whites in general and white police officers in particular. Gun murders of law enforcement officers are up 67 percent this year through November 23, following five ambushes and attacks over the November 18 weekend that left a San Antonio police officer and a U.S. marshal dead. A few days before those weekend shootings, anarchist wannabes in Austin led a counting chant based on the template: “What’s better than X dead cops?  X + 1 Dead Cops.”

Again, it can’t be emphasized enough: “Officers have been assassinated by Black Lives Matter-inspired killers who set out to kill whites in general and white police officers in particular.” Not exactly a harbinger of a post-racial America.

And finally, we should note that in fact Blacks are not more likely to be shot by police when the Black crime rate is factored in. For example, “according to the most recent study by the Dept. of Justice, although blacks were only about 15% of the population in the 75 largest counties in the U.S., they were charged with 62% of all robberies, 57% of murders, and 45% of assaults.” Several academic studies have found either no evidence of racial bias or have shown that Whites are more likely to be shot in similar threat scenarios than Blacks (summarized by Heather MacDonald here).

Growing Black Violence?

Obama recently used the Harvard Law Review to broadcast his claim that “there is no growing crime wave” despite the fact that the FBI’s 2015 crime report revealed a 10.8 percent increase in murders from 2014 to 2015—the largest increase in a single year since 1971.

The left-wing Brennan Center for Justice reported that violent crime surged in 2015 and in 2016: Nationally, the murder rate is projected to increase 31.5 percent from 2014 to 2016 — with half of additional murders attributable to Baltimore, Chicago, and Houston.

Obama’s claim of civic peace is also at odds with the televised evidence dramatic race riots, high-profile cop killings, rapes, murders, illegal alien crimes, and chaos that rippled across the country during the second term of his presidency.

Black militants murdered police in planned attacks, including five officers in a single night in Dallas during a Black Lives Matter demonstration. In 2016, there was a huge increased in the number of police killed on duty, according to the National Law Enforcement Officers Fund, which stated: Firearms-related incidents were the number one cause of death in 2016, with 64 officers shot and killed across the country. This represents a significant spike—56 percent—over the 41 officers killed by gunfire in 2015. ( From Breitbart)

Unsurprisingly, the outgoing president’s insistent dismissals have not set voters’ minds at ease. In April 2016, Gallup found public concerns about crime stood at a 15-year high: 53% of respondents, including 68% of nonwhite respondents, said they worried “a great deal” about crime.

While Obama lectured cops about the problem of their racism at a funeral for murdered cops, he has been more reticent to comment on the nation-wide epidemic of Black violent crime. Since the MSM is also reticent on the same subject, we conclude with seven statistics you may not know about this topic that the president and the MSM will not address.

  1. Data shows that 93 percent of black homicide victims are killed by other blacks.
  2. According to Riley, “Blacks commit violent crimes at 7 to 10 times the rate that whites do.”
  3. Black crime is even more prevalent in the country’s largest cities and counties.
  4. There were almost 6,000 blacks killed by other blacks in 2015.
  5. The percentage of blacks arrested for crimes is consistent with police reports.
  6. According to Riley, “Black crime rates were lower in the 1940s and 1950s, when black poverty was higher” and “racial discrimination was rampant and legal.”
  7. According to Heather Mac Donald, “A straight line can be drawn between family breakdown and youth violence.” Black crime rates were lower in the 1940s and 1950s despite greater poverty and racial segregation.

To amplify Heather M’s point, the counter-cultural revolution of the 1960s has proved devastating to Blacks and others in the lower part of the bell curve for IQ, resulting in a huge rise in births out of wedlock, now at 79% among Blacks and exploding rates of low-investment parenting. Yet, because liberals can’t countenance the possibility that there are genetic influences on behavior, their response is to continue to feed the beast — to make public assistance easy and not dependent on either work or responsible parenting. This is a recipe for dysgenics.

This series will conclude with a postscript on the situation in Chicago.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

17 Comments to "The Real Obama Legacy, Part 3: Race Relations"

  1. Stonewall Jackson's Gravatar Stonewall Jackson
    January 11, 2017 - 11:08 am | Permalink

    Obama was used to war against the white majority specifically WASP males thereby totally weaken resistance.

    As for BLM the flipside is a total media blackout of “Black Flash Mobs” a.k.a BFM.

    The offspring of Yankee carpertbaggers, doped out Californian hippes and Midwest commies owe us from the South an apology. We told you Negroes are criminally-bent and have to be contained.

  2. Punjab Bob Chapati's Gravatar Punjab Bob Chapati
    January 11, 2017 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    I agree. Obama at least gave us Donald Trump. I am sure if we had McCain in 2008 or Romney in 2012, we would have got Hillary last year and irreversible damage.

    Speaking of aggressive Indians taking over Corporate America and Sillicon Valley (the reason I came to TOO), Trump needs to close this colonization loophole.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-1B_visa

    https://stoph1bvisafraud.org

  3. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    January 11, 2017 - 7:19 am | Permalink

    The authors should have looked into who is funding BLM. It is the same folks who financed and groomed negroes during the Civil Rights era as well made blaxploitation anti-white movies like “Mandingo” and conditioning TV shows like “Different Strokes.”

    The other omission is demographics. After clowns like Ted Kennedy and Ronnie Reagan were used to flood us with browns and yellows, the “minorities”can read the writing on the wall and are becoming more aggressive. Gone are the days when even blacks were generally pleasant in the South or rural areas and respectful. You just have to look at the anti-white rap music videos on MTV owned by Sumner Redstone (Rothstein). Blacks are also pushing hard for “reparations” over slavery.

    The others are getting more demanding. Gone are the so-called model minority Asians. You also have aggressive Indians from India trying to takeover corporate America.

    It is nothing new folks. Over in England and France moslems have taken sections of Paris and London like Tower Hamlets where cops cannot even go freely with so-called Sharia Patrols. The demand for Sharia law is growing and a fool like Theresa May has endorsed this. The once humble moslems are now ever hostille to Limeys and raping their daughters wholesale.

  4. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    January 11, 2017 - 4:27 am | Permalink

    I have always wondered why any sane and racially healthy White man or woman would express dismay over the a decline in race relations between Whites and blacks, or for that matter, between Whites and any other non-white race.

    I welcome such division, because unlike the artificial fantasy world that the Hollywood jews and their self-hating, self-loathing, White guilt ridden White liberal allies try to depict in movies and on TV – I see racial division as a healthy dose of race realism.

    And, while allowing oneself to get brainwashed into believing the artificial Utopian fantasy world of Hollywood can easily get you killed or brutally assaulted – embracing race realism and understanding that racial conflict and racial division have always been the prevailing force in our world – helps one keep their guard up, helps you avoid being exploited and taken advantage of, and these character traits are essential for your survival.

    As horrible as it has been for the last 8 years for Whites to be subjugated to being ruled by this hate filled, anti-White Mulatto – I am now convinced that we all should be grateful that the jews made the mistake of putting him into the White House before Whites had been reduced to a minority. Had the loathsome Juan McAmnestyInsane or Mittens Romney and his oil drilling side kick, Paul Ryan managed to defeat him – we would have had amnesty for 40 million illegal aliens rammed down our throats and more wars for Israel and zero discussion of securing our border or drastic reductions in legal immigration.

    History keeps proving that the jews always make the mistake of reaching too far, pushing their agendas too aggressively – turning up the heat too high, and the frog they are trying to cook jumps out of the pot.

  5. Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
    January 10, 2017 - 11:54 pm | Permalink

    Having posted my brief comment on Obama below I came across a couple of very good pieces on racial crime in America in the Guardian Online.

    Being the Guardian the articles are, of course, hugely biased – blaming black crime on poverty, poor education, etc rather than on low black average intelligence, which leads to poverty, poor education and violent crime – but eye-opening nonetheless and worth reading for the stats and the stories.

    The first is: Grasping For Change on America’s Most Violent Streets – We Must Stop The Killing

    It focuses on the Natural Bridge Avenue area of St Louis, which has the worst per capita gun violence in the country. There are so many revealing and often tragicomic lines in this one. A few examples if you haven’t got time to read the whole thing:

    **‘Brandon Ellington was shot on 22 March . . . allegedly robbed by a friend . . . and left for dead in his car . . . Smith (the accused ‘friend’) wasn’t from St Louis, but . . . family said Brandon would look after him. “This is someone he fed. Brandon would cut his hair, and this is what he got for it.”

    **“Being out here is like being in Iraq,” said Anthony, a lifelong resident of the Greater Ville neighborhood who did not want his last name published. “Every night or every other night there’s a shootout.”

    **James Clark cuts an imposing figure in the St Louis cityscape . . . His deputies, mostly teens, filter in behind him armed only with clipboards and brochures, lawnmowers and trash bags, and their secret weapon: yard signs . . . “When I got involved with political organizing I fell in love with yard signs,” Clark said, “because they really send a message” . . . The message on the sign reads: “We must stop killing each other” . . . They’ve proven so popular, Clark can barely keep them in stock. “People actually steal signs now,” Clark said, with a chuckle.

    **“Nigga, it’s like that.” Once those words are said in St Louis, according to Clark, that means it’s “pistol play”. That means it’s on . . . It’s just a mentality that says ‘I’ll kill you’ . . . “It’s mostly just these interpersonal conflicts that occur on a daily basis.”

    **“This is what we’re up against,” Clark said, swiping on his phone to a picture of a 14-year-old teen posing with a submachine gun in one hand and a pistol in the other. “It’s real down here.”

    **Duncan was released from prison in 2015, and found himself shot within weeks of regaining his freedom. “I was in a wheelchair for six months. I got out the wheelchair, and four months later I’m shot again” . . . All over petty arguments, too. “One was over who moves out of the street. I said ‘you move’, he said ‘you move’. Next thing, guns are pulled out and I got shot.”

    **There’s no limit to the pettiness that can inspire this type of deadly violence. Duncan recalls a time he saw weapons drawn over a cigarillo, literally pennies worth of flavored tobacco. “No one wants to fight out here any more. It’s straight to pistols – that’s just what time it is.”

    **“I could be the first car at the light and there’s 10 cars behind me. Won’t nobody blow [their horn] when that light turn green if I don’t move,” Wrice said. “Because it’s like, you don’t know what he’s doing in that car and you don’t know his mindset. You blow your horn and he’ll get out and shoot every last one of them cars up” . . . “Honk your horn out here. See what happens.”

    The second is: Want To Fix Gun Violence in America? Go Local

    As well as a decent, though again very biased, commentary there are lots of interesting maps and graphs on violent crime in America’s major cities, specifically New York, Chicago, Baltimore, St Louis, Oakland and New Orleans, highlighting how the majority of gun crime is centred on black areas. For example:

    ‘In 2015, Chicago had the highest total number of gun homicides of any city in America . . . Just 13% of census tracts in Chicago saw multiple gun murders, and these tracts were responsible for 65% of the city’s gun homicides.’

    Also worth looking at is: Mapping the 2010 U.S Census

    This is a set of interactive New York Times graphics on the findings of the last nationwide census. For the most informative map, go to ‘View More Maps’ on the left of the page and select Racial/Ethnic Distribution 2010.

    It’s a colour-coded (haha) treasure trove of racial data for the United States, with percentage racial make-ups for each census tract. Zoom out for an overview of the nation’s towns and cities and how the races steer clear of each other, then zoom in for a close look at particular neighbourhoods. Marvellous stuff. Warning: it’s addictive – you’ll waste hours on here.

  6. L.L.'s Gravatar L.L.
    January 10, 2017 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

    I think Mr. Obama was great in some ways. A great speaker and listener. He seemed relatively authentic and caring.

    At the same time, it might be understandable for white people to want to have a white leader.

    Wishing good things for Mr. Obama and Mr. Trump.

  7. Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
    January 10, 2017 - 8:46 pm | Permalink

    There is no way that Obama, a one-term junior senator, could have risen to become President of the United States so quickly on his own merits.

    He is a Jewish creation – hence his ever-present handlers Rahm Israel Emanuel and David Axelrod during the 2008 campaign – selected as a telegenic, mixed race ‘unity’ candidate to appeal not only to minorities and liberals but to Whites as well.

    The fact that America is in a worse state after his eight years in charge comes as no surprise at all.

  8. Ray's Gravatar Ray
    January 10, 2017 - 8:24 pm | Permalink

    Hey Arch – Get your point but there are a few such places. Not too many but enough to not support a blanket statement/rhetorical question.

    They are:

    Barbados, Bermuda, Botswana, Namibia, The Bahamas more or less (stats vary by islands across the huge archipelago nation), Trinidad (45% black 45% East Indian), and Belize (settled by escaped Blacks from the Caribbean). The Dominican Republic, although not a paradise, is eminently more livable than, say, inner city Indianapolis!

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      January 11, 2017 - 9:43 am | Permalink

      The Dominican Republic is 73% Mulatto, 16% White and 11% Black. What that means for the protection of the environment as contrasted with Haiti (95% Black, 5% other, mainly Mulatto) can be seen from this picture :

      http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/international-borders-7-1.jpg

    • January 11, 2017 - 10:37 am | Permalink

      Always the white man’s “benefit of the doubt.” Why is it we are so prone to our disadvantage to believe lying Jew propaganda about our world?

      I used to fly cargo out of St. Thomas U.S.V.I to points all over the Caribbean. The largest building on that island is the Federal building and many of the cars there sport government license plates – there’s a clue as to how these Islands actually function.

      I have been to all of the Caribbean places mentioned above. At one time, I even lived in Cuba; Gitmo, but Cuba none the less. Nowhere do any of these countries appear or function anywhere near on par with even the lowest white society.

      None are technologically advanced and all are mired in the insane black bureaucracy that plagues African nations with large under classes of poor. For proof of this, just try going through island customs declarations with a load of commercial cargo, as I was required to do for my job. I spent as much time pushing paper work in a customs office as I did in the cockpit.

      Contrast any of these other Island locations with Jamaica, Dominica or Haiti and the similarities are readily apparent. Whatever their success, the Islands primarily owe their existence to the white money pumped in from former colonists nations. Most, (if not all) of the leadership is of the despotic variety that elevates a small group of elite blacks who, once empowered, leave their brethren masses poverty stricken.

      The Bahamas are a special case. These bleached sand spits serve as little more than Jew tax shelters and money laundering enclaves that allow them to function beyond their host nation’s tax structure. What’s more, these tiny – TINY – Caribbean countries are barely larger than extended villages and none support any advanced technology outside what they have been provided by white benefactors.

      The challenge still stands, don’t point to an island “village” and say “there you are.” Instead show me an example of a large, technically advanced “progressive” nation, like those in Africa, successfully run by Negroes. One should note even tiny, white European nations function far more efficiently than the largest African nations. At least this was the case before Jews moved in with their destructive immigration policies

      Probably the best evidence of how these island economies operate can be found in the example of a very liberal acquaintance of mine, a health care professional who found employment in St. Thomas. His wife found employment there as well, so all was good. I soon began regaling him with stories of paradise, as I had been quite enamored with island life.

      Not long after, he sold all his US possessions and bought a condo in St. Thomas and moved on with stars in his eyes. I heard nothing more from him for several years. One day I spotted him walking down a local dock in the Northwest and stopped to ask him how things were going in paradise. He did not spit, as that was beneath his class, but his affect was just as obvious as if he had done so.

      He went on to tell me about how god-awful life was in St. Thomas; how nothing functioned as it should. His revulsion stemmed from encountering the island’s standard “cool out mon” philosophy, a worldview that is the antithesis of those with a white cultural upbringing. While his liberal bent dared not allow open mention of the obvious racial aspect behind his grief, it was difficult to hide the fact.

      In the Islands, if one orders something scheduled for delivery on Tuesday, it may actually arrive on Tuesday, but don’t hold your breath as more likely it will arrive weeks later or never at all. In the islands it’s a crap shoot with anybody’s guess as to how quickly a task proceeds and efficiency is nowhere to be found in the mix. Another issue is how white people must often work two jobs just to afford the exorbitantly priced tourist economy. Many Negroes are supplemented by government largess and thus do not work at all.

      I found this backward aspect of island life charming. I liked walking down dirt main streets and the fact that a monkey wrench dropped into life’s pursuits on virtually every occasion. It was a marvel when something did go right. It all served to keep the Jew’s slave-driven concept of “progress” at a virtual standstill.

      Excerpt from my story Islands in Between

      “The Model 18 I would be flying that day was an all metal, twin engine, twin tail, low wing monoplane that drags its tail around. It greatly resembles the airplane seen at the end of the movie Casa Blanca and this particular example was about the same age. But the plane in the movie wasn’t a twin Beech and I certainly wasn’t Bogey – I boarded the plane.”

      This sums up my attitude about life in the islands. It was much closer to a 1940’s potboiler than “real life” in a “progressive,” Judeaized America. Backwards and broken – I loved it. As for my acquaintance, he sold everything and moved back to Ohio to the whitest part of Middle America he could find.

      During Vietnam, “short-timer” Marines serving overseas used to begin their lament over the status of their remaining time saying, “when I get back to the real world!” It never dawned on them that those “in country” were actually in the “real world.” What we awaited was our return to the rapidly darkening Jewish Disney Land called “America.”

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 11, 2017 - 11:02 am | Permalink

      It’s religion. Data from CIA Factbook:

      Bahamas- 70% Protestant
      Barbados- 66% Protestant
      Botswana- Christianity. Anglicanism. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Church of the Province of Central Africa. Dutch Reformed Church. Eloyi Christian Church. Evangelical Lutheran Church. Roman Catholicism- 79% Christian overall
      Namibia- Christian 85% [50% Lutheran]

      White man’s religion plus Protestant work ethic turned blacks into Whites, proving that it’s not genetic after all. . .

      >>>The notion of successful black countries is abomination. . .they have access to White tech and massive assistance. . .black minus White equals zero.

  9. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    January 10, 2017 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    ‘Dysgenics’, yes indeed. What we have in the U.S. is a Jewish orchestrated system of state sponsored dysgenics, and an incessant, low level race war being waged against White Americans. This disaster-in-the-making is finally starting to dawn on the Amerikinder, and is one of the primary reasons for the Trump insurgency. The race realism of the simian-like Negro tumult, and the (((media))) encouragement of the same, is a blessing in disguise for White nationalism. Like George Bush, the moronic ex-president said once, in one of his more profound moments, ‘bring it on!’.

  10. January 10, 2017 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    “In fact, Gallup polls showing historical trends found that racial attitudes for both Blacks and Whites were substantially worse after nearly 8 years of Obama than prior to that.”

    This should come as no surprise considering the extreme amount of hatred fear and divisiveness Jews have been constantly pumping in between the races since the sixties. The hatred ramped up considerably once a black leader was put in a position of power. The travesty of a Negro president like Obama served to make black racism an official political act with legal overtones.

    Just listen to the Negro rap booming forth from those shiny, new SUVs; those are stylized, electronic war drums and chants passing by.

    I present the same challenge to other whites that my father presented to me; one that served as a paradigm shift for my once liberal views of Negroes. “Show me one country, any country, successfully run (administrated) by Negroes.” I dare ya’!

    (Obama and the other Negro appointees don’t count, as these were merely blackheads for the Jew administrators running the government from behind the scenes.)

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      January 10, 2017 - 8:25 pm | Permalink

      If you google : “successful black nations”, you only find : “there are no successful black nations”. However Barbados, Bahamas and Botswana are said to do reasonably well (reason unknown).

    • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
      January 11, 2017 - 3:31 am | Permalink

      Just a little remark on this statement, for the readers not in the know.

      “This should come as no surprise considering the extreme amount of hatred fear and divisiveness Jews have been constantly pumping in between the races since the sixties.”

      That may well be a contributing factor, but from my South African experience I can mention that this animosity will exist even without the Jews, due to the cultural (thus inborn) gap between the world view of white and black. They think on a different level (different IQ, different hormonal menage, the are wired differently).

      South Africa power relationships between white and black during Apartheid was always like a powder keg, as long as one did not ignite the fuse, white and black could coexist.

      Look at South Africas history before Apartheid – there always was trouble between the white settlars and the black tribes, like the American settlars had with the Indian tribes. That was not the Jew that caused this divide, this already existed long ago. All that is happening today, is that this fuse is being ignited, that is, exploiting the racial problem.

  11. tom's Gravatar tom
    January 10, 2017 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

    The black middle class only exists through the existence of make work government jobs.

  12. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    January 10, 2017 - 9:50 am | Permalink

    Ironically, we could ask the question : if less “white racism” results in more black crime, then couldn’t less black crime be achieved with more “white racism” ? The same question could be asked about South African Apartheid.

    BTW, a “post-racial” society is as impossible as “post-biological” nature, but Marxists don’t recognize nature. Everything is a “social construct” and therefore can be “reconstructed”.

Comments are closed.