No Campus (Or Country) for White Men

Edmund Connelly, Ph. D.

Does anyone remember my column of nine years ago called “Letter of Termination to the White Race?” I don’t believe we know who really wrote this letter — or why, but the point is, it paints a chilling picture of what is in fact happening to the White race right before our eyes.

For instance, in the letter the author laid out what is in sad reality unfolding:

By carefully controlling and managing the schools, universities, media, and press, this “out group” has managed to convince the great bulk of your racial kinsmen that not only is resistance futile, but that it is immoral, barbaric, depraved, and unworthy of a “thinking” individual. By promoting the stereotype of a “racist redneck resistance,” they have made the idea of a struggle for White Identity a veritable sin in the minds of nearly every White person. In short: they have convinced European-derived peoples that a prolonged suicide is preferable to the unmitigated evil of “racism.”

Do I need to suggest who this “outgroup” might be?

TOO has emphatically emphasized the reality of this War on Whites, featuring the topic Anti-White Attitudes in fifty-three articles, and in particular the topic Jews as a Hostile Elite, fifty-five times. My article today belongs in either category [Ed.: actually both!].

Nine years ago, I was very taken with a literal belief that Whites were being systematically attacked in a coordinated strategy against us. I have no reason to doubt this now. Around the time I wrote “Letter of Termination to the White Race,” I also wrote kindred columns. For instance, I wrote about former Washington Post political columnist, Harold Meyerson, no friend of the White race.

Meyerson once wrote that “whiteness is a huge problem,” which of course means he believes Whites are a huge problem, just as his fellow Tribe members Noel Ignatiev, Susan Sontag, and a host of others have believed. Well, when Jews say these things, we flesh-and-blood Whites have good reason to worry, since these sentiments have often resulted in rivers of the blood of non-Jews. For example, it was not even a century ago that Bolshevik Jews became a hostile elite in Russia and, not coincidentally, millions upon millions of White Christians perished.

Our editor Kevin MacDonald has been in the fore in chronicling these massacres, nowhere better than in his review “Stalin’s Willing Executioners,” where he wrote, “If there is any lesson to be learned, it is that Jews not only became an elite in all these areas, they became a hostile elite — hostile to the traditional people and cultures of all three areas they came to dominate.” MacDonald made this case based on the bold theses presented in Yuri Slezkine’s book The Jewish Century. As we will see, Slezkine provides much fodder for the theme that non-Jews should indeed take Jewish hostility seriously.

MacDonald expanded on this theme in the foreword to Tom Sunic’s Homo Americanus, arguing that the current American regime is “maintained less by brute force than by an unrelenting, enormously sophisticated, and massively effective campaign to constrain political and cultural activity within very narrow boundaries.” Government death squads are not yet acting at the behest of our hostile elites, and dissenters “are not yet trundled off to jail or beaten with truncheons, but [they] are quietly ignored and marginalized. Or they are held up to public disgrace, and, wherever possible, removed from their livelihood.”

The key point, however, is that this could change — and quickly. We know any number of White activists who have suffered job loss without apology. We know the countless times law-abiding White Nationalist groups have been denied the right to free speech, physically attacked for their beliefs (with slap-on-the-wrist sentences, if they are prosecuted at all), and we know that others fighting for our cause have ended up in prison (often with long prison terms, even for non-violent offenses).

Looking at developments in Russia during and after the Revolution, it seems quite possible that America may experience the same trajectory. In Russia, Slezkine tells us that so many viewed the Jews as non-threatening outsiders, yet during the Red Terror, Christians expressed shock that seemingly pacifistic Jews changed almost overnight: “We were amazed by what we had least expected to encounter among the Jews: cruelty, sadism, and violence had seemed alien to a nation so far removed from physical, warlike activity; those who yesterday did not know how to use a gun are now found among the executioners and cutthroats.”

Slezkine also describes a “formerly oppressed lover of liberty [who] had turned into a tyrant of ‘unheard-of despotic arbitrariness.’” He had been “transformed outwardly into a leather-clad person with a revolver and, in fact, lost all human likeness.” He could now be pictured as “standing in a Cheka basement doing ‘bloody but honorable revolutionary work.’”

Quoting MacDonald in his Slezkine review once more, we can conclude that, “Indeed, hatred toward the peoples and cultures of non-Jews  … has been the Jewish norm throughout history . . . this sort of hostility to whites and to Christianity is a mainstream Jewish phenomenon.”

Which finally brings us to today’s topic: a new book by Scott Greer, deputy editor/columnist for The Daily Caller, called No Campus for White Men: The Transformation of Higher Education into Hateful Indoctrination. I ran into this book last month when F. Roger Devlin reviewed it at American Renaissance. It’s a fine review, but of course no experienced reader of AmRen expects to read about the root cause of the campus war on White men. Those in the know, however, can still savor Devlin’s nod to the “Marxist inspiration” that has created the current campus climate:

Political correctness is an ideology that grew up around preferential policies in order to protect and rationalize them. Of obviously Marxist inspiration, it substitutes white male heterosexual students for Marx’s bourgeoisie as the “oppressor” class, and non-whites, women and homosexual students for Marx’s proletariat or “oppressed” class. The ideology of political correctness constantly tries to stoke resentment among the “oppressed” and foster guilt among the “oppressors.”

Sounds like a familiar Tribe at work to me.

Then, upon finding another review of Greer’s book, this time at Counter-Currents, I had the familiar fear that Jewish machinations were going to go unexplored yet again — more than halfway through the review by Timothy Rohrer, as solid as it was, there was still no mention of the obvious cause of this campus war on White men. Then, thankfully — finally — Rohrer spelled it out: “The role of the Jews in this system is the critical element explaining why things have happened as they did.”

Really, does anything more need to be said? Rohrer is spot on when he points to activist Jews and the organized Jewish community, just as literally thousands of other real Whites have been over the last few hundred years. We KNOW this stuff already. After all, it has been more than a decade since MacDonald wrote about Slezkine’s admissions with respect to “Stalin’s Willing Executioners.”

Honestly, it is child’s play to show how Jews have essentially taken over higher education in America, transforming it into something akin to a “Jewish extended phenotype,” with Jews themselves doing much of the heavy lifting, but getting plenty of help from their recruited lackeys such as blacks and other non-whites, women, and disparate aggrieved groups that are now popping up like toadstools after a summer’s rain.

I remember back in the late ‘80s or perhaps it was the early ‘90s, when I found that five, six, or maybe even seven of the eight Ivy League presidents “happened” to be Jewish (oh, where was the echo meme then!). I shared this observation with just about anyone unfortunate enough to have been in my vicinity, but with depressing regularity, the response was a blasé, “So what?”

Well, for starters, the “So what?” is No Campus for White Men. And a mulatto president for eight years. And no White Protestants on the Supreme Court. And a media ruled by a hostile elite. And open borders. And the cultivation of “White pathology.” And the plunder of our economy (and Iceland’s, and Russia’s . . .).

Okay, let’s focus just on the campus. Author Greer doesn’t go near the Jewish Question, but we can easily see who rules academia, which group gets plum jobs out of proportion to their numbers or merit and so on. Take the obvious case of Elena Kagan, who lacked the serious qualifications it takes to become Dean of Harvard Law School. The evidence points strongly to the conclusion that she was appointed due to ethnic connections and in turn appointed Jewish professors based on the same ethnic connections.

Not only did she serve as Dean of Harvard Law, she was appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States, a development which MacDonald finds egregious [my emphasis added twice]:

Kagan is remarkably unqualified to be a Supreme Court Justice in terms of the usual standards: judicial experience, academic publications, or even courtroom experience. Rather, all the evidence is that Kagan owes her impending confirmation to her Jewish ethnic connections (see also here).

The same goes for Jewish over-representation in elite academic institutions – far higher than can be explained by higher Jewish IQ. Does anyone seriously think that Jewish domination of Hollywood and the so much of the other mainstream media is about merit rather than ethnic networking and solidarity? And then there’s the addiction of the new elite to affirmative action for non-Whites.

Whatever else one can say about the new elite, it certainly does not believe in merit. The only common denominator is that Whites of European extraction are being systematically excluded and displaced to the point that they are now underrepresented in all the important areas of the elite compared to their percentage of the population. The new elite distinguishes itself mainly by its hostility to the traditional people and culture of those they displaced. It is an elite that cannot say its name. Indeed the ADL was all over Pat Buchanan for merely mentioning that Kagan is Jewish and that, upon her confirmation, Jews would be one-third of the Supreme Court.

Folks, I gotta tell ya that this obsession with replacing Whites (particularly White males) with others is, well, obsessive. There can be no doubt that it’s a Jewish strategy. Take a look, for instance, at Andrew Joyce’s recent TOO essay “TEAM Westport: A Case Study in anti-White Activism”, which superbly documents feverish Jewish activism aimed at White displacement in a very White (92.6%) upscale town in Connecticut.

For our purposes, however, I’d like you to look through typical college job ads such as those found on this long list for Liberal Arts. Here’s what you’ll commonly find [again, emphasis added]:

Connecticut College is a private, highly selective institution with a demonstrated commitment to outstanding faculty teaching and research. Recognizing that intellectual vitality and diversity are inseparable, the College has embarked on a significantly successful initiative to diversify its faculty, student body and curriculum. The College seeks creative scholars excited about working in a liberal arts setting, with its strong focus on engaged teaching, participation in shared governance, and active involvement in an institution-wide advancement of diversity. We encourage applications from candidates who share this understanding of the faculty role and will contribute to the diversity of our college community, including members of historically underrepresented groups.

“Diversity” is so important that it’s mentioned four times in one paragraph. One could be forgiven for thinking that the entire purpose of the college is to promote diversity. And just to make people aware that they are on the side of the angels and committed to letting less talented people get jobs if they have the right skin color, there just had to be a mention of “historically underrepresented groups.”

Or take this. Am I the only one who detects contradiction in what they write? Do you think goy White males will be treated as “equally” as others?

Wells College is committed to a policy of nondiscrimination and equal opportunity for all persons. The College seeks to promote diversity in all of its hires; members of under-represented populations are strongly encouraged to apply.

Here’s another example. What, concretely, might they mean by this, anyway? How does one show a “proven commitment” in this instance? By skin color? Dress? Sexual orientation?:

We are keenly interested in candidates with a proven commitment to engaging in and promoting a diverse, multicultural community.

None of this will surprise most readers, as most of us have encountered such blunt statements of discrimination for decades. Part and parcel of “equality,” you see.

Again, I need to stress that in the campus setting, despite the attention aggrieved students who may be Black, Hispanic or Asian may get, when it comes to those relatively rare cases where Jewish interests conflict with those of their shabbos goy cannon fodder, Jews come out ahead, at least in most cases.

For instance, back in 2014, Native American professor Steven Salaita left a tenured position in Virginia to take up a post at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Foolishly, he thought that on his own time using Twitter, he could be mildly negative about what Israelis were then inflicting on the Palestinians (again). He wrote such things as “Let’s cut to the chase: If you’re defending #Israel right now, you’re an awful human being.”

Didn’t Salaita understand that you don’t reveal such thoughts, let alone tweet them, when you are preparing to teach at an American campus with 3,500 Jewish students? Sure enough, his tenure offer was rescinded, setting up a legal drama where he was given a significant settlement in exchange for never teaching at Urbana-Champaign.

Or take Tony Martin’s case, where the Wellesley professor of Africana Studies pointed out the disproportionate Jewish role in the slave trade. The abuse he endured prompted him to write a book called The Jewish Onslaught.

In modern feminism, Jewish feminists have had to confront the anti-Zionist platforms of non-Jewish women, as Joyce Antler discusses in The Journey Home: How Jewish Women Shaped Modern America. For example, at the United Nations International Women’s Decade Conference in Mexico City in 1975, when “Third World delegates began to attack Israeli representatives as ‘racists,’ all Jewish women attending the conference felt at risk; for Letty Cottin Pogrebin, this was the ‘click’ that initiated her life as a ‘Jewish-feminist.'”  Five years later, in Copenhagen, the next U.N. Women’s conference was even worse in this respect.  From these experiences emerged attempts to rid the feminist movement of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism; Pogrebin, for instance, wrote an eleven-page article in Ms. magazine that “described the prevalence of anti-Semitism on the political right as well as the radical left, within the black community, and among Christian feminists who blamed Jewish monotheism for the extinction of goddess cults and the death of Jesus.”

Hmm, some of the chickens coming home to roost?

In any case, I am pleased that Timothy Rohrer’s review of No Campus for White Men directed our attention to this issue. On one level, we can roll our eyes upon hearing of the latest nonsense going on at some university or other, but on too many other levels, this process of White dispossession is deadly serious.  Universities provide instruction that leads to important jobs and prepares the next generation for leadership of the culture and the country. The campus War on White Men, I am convinced, is but a prelude to the real war — the coming attempt at the extermination of the White race — a “hot” war, as opposed to the current “cool” gradual swamping of Whites via immigration, destruction of White families, etc.

This is deadly serious stuff, as I said, so we had best face the problem directly. Oddly, I’ve had this impression since Trump’s election that Alt Right sites that normally emphasize the Jewish Question have pulled back from discussing it, possibly in an attempt to gain “respectability” for the new administration and its Alt Right supporters. Now that the thrill of the Trump victory turns into the grueling reality of politics as usual, however, let’s hope that these sites return to writing about The Jewish Problem bluntly and honestly. Without a grim determination to face the issue, successful responses are not likely to appear on their own.

In closing, I’ll share an impression I had upon hearing the title No Campus for White Men. Some years ago I wrote about Cormac McCarthy’s bleak novel No Country for Old Men, and wove it into an account of the decline of America in step with the decline of Whites. I concluded that our situation could just as easily read No Country for White Men. A fortiori, this is true of the new book No Campus for White Men.  

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

39 Comments to "No Campus (Or Country) for White Men"

  1. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    March 10, 2017 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Not that it has anything to do with the above article except in an oblique way, I have constantly come across articles mentioning Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor under the Clinton administration, in which his foremost worry seems to be that white men, might get jobs over minorities. One such example of his fear of white employment, was when President Obama announced his intention of creating “shovel ready jobs”, during his first term in office. Mr. Reich stated that he just hoped that they wouldn’t go to “white contractors”. Lately he seems to be focused on whether or not President Trump deserves to be impeached.

    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      March 11, 2017 - 4:55 am | Permalink

      Was Reich the little scrounge that I saw in the (((group dumpster diving photo))) that is currently making the rounds ?

  2. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    March 10, 2017 - 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Equality is yet another manifestation of Jewish deception, chutzpa.

    I had a job interview for assistant professor of mathematics at Valencia College West Campus in Orlando, Florida. There were 0 Whites in the committee. I was certainly overqualified for the job, teaching experience and publications. Eventually the Black lady from the committee made me the disqualifying question: “What would you contribute to the diversity of our faculty?”

    Tesla hires on merit alone, hence Tesla is 100% non-Jewish White.

    As a professor I see that Jewish students are way overrated, by a factor.

    • March 11, 2017 - 6:38 am | Permalink

      You might have said that, with you, Ger Tzedek, they would be more diverse?
      The problem is that parasites simply can’t understand anything beyond parasitism. Just as tapeworms (presumably) don’t develop careful plans about doing things for themselves, parasitical people simply can’t understand causes and consequences. They (e.g.) can’t imagine times without electricity and cars, and don’t know where food and buildings come from. Probably the ‘committee’ members had no idea what mathematics has done in the past, and even less idea what it might do in future. They were there only because other parasites had put them there, at least while the system lasts. In my opinion, this is based on formalised and non-scientific religion, in which a lifetime’s ’employment’ was granted in exchange for a creed of some sort. In the modern world, productivity (in some parts of the world) is so high that huge scope exists for similar ‘parafraud’.

      • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
        March 11, 2017 - 3:25 pm | Permalink

        It is a matter of incidence of Borderline Personality Disorder, combined with IQ. Then I would come to fellow HOTEP, Thomas Sowell. Stupid people only do limit damage. You need a highly intelligent person for a really monumental disaster. Albanians have a high incidence of Borderline, low IQ, are a local nuisance. Jews have a high incidence of Borderline, high IQ, are the pest of the mankind.

        Just think Susan Sontag. She calls Whites the cancer of Mankind. All the pogroms, all the Holocaust, all the expulsions in thousands of years, were reactions against the parasite. She projects that state on us. Even if they win and manage to exterminate all White people, the new people won’t be friendly to Jews. That’s agains nature, and unrelated to IQ. Jews hope to produce a bland cattle-like humanity, that will fail like everything else, leaving behind a biblical disaster.

        The manifest destiny of borderlines is to become the laughing stock of the mankind. The question is, how much more damage will they do before then.

        • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
          March 11, 2017 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

          How many times have I overheard my White students say “nobody wants to hire a White guy anymore.” How did we get here? What Jews did to Hungary, Bavaria in 1919 and Russia in 1917 in a bloody manner, they’re doing it to America bloodlessly. The outcome is the same.

    • cecilhenry's Gravatar cecilhenry
      March 11, 2017 - 9:58 am | Permalink
    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      March 14, 2017 - 3:31 am | Permalink

      This situation would not have arisen and developed in the first place except that whites have a 15% enemy within who hate their own group, working in collusion with other tribes who hate them, whereas the other groups have less than .05% who hate their own group, and the rest will always favour their own group. In other words, the racist groups are given the jobs and the only non-racist group to exist is called racist all the time for not giving the others even more of what their ancestors made.

  3. March 10, 2017 - 10:14 pm | Permalink

    In regards to a possible final solution to the above-raised problem, Juergen Graf’s book should be of interest, as is also Alfred Schaefer’s video:

    Graf: White World awake: Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk –;

    Schaefer: 1984 + 33 =

  4. Dedalus's Gravatar Dedalus
    March 10, 2017 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

    All of this can happen because organizing Whites is like herding cats. The White middle class were emancipated about 200 years ago, and the White working-class about 100 years ago, after slavery. There’s nothing for us to feel guilty about. well, except that the only reason their ahistorical, pseudo-intellectual, anti-scientific point of view has taken root is because of the aforementioned lack of White organization, unity, and self-defense.

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      March 12, 2017 - 6:10 am | Permalink

      Whites who refuse to be herded in the only direction that will guarantee their survival and the survival of any offspring they might have – need to be pruned from the herd.

      These idiots are bad seeds. They are racially defective and if they are allowed to remain inside the herd, they will only serve as a destabilizing agent who will attempt sow seeds of division, confusion, and disunity from the inside.

      They have to be pruned out. Let them march over the cliff to their own individual genetic extinction. Time spent arguing with any White man or woman about whether survival is favorable to death and extinction is a waste of time and energy.

      • Gemjunior's Gravatar Gemjunior
        March 13, 2017 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

        Well, all I can say is that there won’t be too many whites left. I was so downhearted yesterday after reading responses to the tweet in support of Geert Wilders which one of our congressional reps, Steven King, had put out. The majority were white morons who were outraged at the nerve of him! Meanwhile, the fact that he even tweeted such an honest opinion is in itself wonderful and inspiring. True.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        March 14, 2017 - 3:39 am | Permalink

        This natural process applied in prehistoric times because groups were separated out from each other. The self-hate groups would have marched off the cliff and removed their genes from the gene pool. Today there is no natural selection in a large country as there are no distinct groups who get their comeuppance from their one bad genes. Their bad genes are protected and preserved by living in a country that looks after them even when they are causing harm. They never get to face the consequences of their bad genes as they just parasite off the country as a whole.

  5. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    March 11, 2017 - 12:25 am | Permalink

    Part of the problem is passivity. Why put up with nonsense?

    This is Ntokozo Qwabe, probably an Affirmative Action low IQ black South African who believes all his problems are due to “white supremacists.” Qwabe almost succeeded in bringing down a statue at Oxford but this was a hard sell even for the vile anti-white establishment. He must be a relative of Mandela.

  6. John C.'s Gravatar John C.
    March 11, 2017 - 3:45 am | Permalink

    Identity politics has been and is a blatant race war against Whites. When are we going to start playing identity politics as well? That’s when we stop losing. Race may not be the intellectual high ground but the war is being waged on race. Can we go there? Otherwise we will continue losing. Universal principles based on truth and objectivity not required. Identity politics means you are right and good by definition and everybody else is not. And you use all your power to subjugate your non-group(s). It’s offensive but that’s what we are confronted with. And they are winning because we refuse to play the same game. Our high mindedness is keeping our hands tied in a one-sided race war. Identity politics is simple and effective. It’s an “us vs them” world view. Once we adopt it we win. Otherwise we keep losing.

  7. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    March 11, 2017 - 4:31 am | Permalink

    Wow, yet another outstanding article by Ed Connelly to add to my collection of his greatest work.

    I have yet to notice the alt-right’s toning down discussion of the jewish threat – aside from AmRen, where Jared Taylor has even gone so far as to order his moderators to remove the ‘(((…)))’ identifier, whenever it appears in a comment that is the tiniest bit critical of a member of the Tribe.

    Also, I think a bigger worry that we all should be concerned about – is the tendency of Whites to think that, now Trump was elected, that they can go back to sleep or back to worshiping their sweaty, dread-locked, IQ of 75, inner city bred black sports stars and trust Trump to save the White race without any additional effort from White Americans.

    News Flash: Trump is NOT our ultimate savior. If he is anything, he is a stepping stone that can lead to a true, openly and unapologetic pro-White leader at some point in the near future. White race realists and the Alt-Right need to understand that now is the time for us to double-down, and work even harder to secure our racial survival.

    So, how would I personally define our final success? Simple answer. When Whites achieve their exclusively Whites only ethnostate – and when that ethnostate specifically excludes jews of any type or racial percentage.

  8. Erik S.'s Gravatar Erik S.
    March 11, 2017 - 7:35 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the article, but again, I have to reiterate and even remind our “movement” participants, that our most concerning contemporary enemies are not first and foremost the Jews; they rank just below a few others, to be shown here. It is important for us to be accurate ourselves. A better neologism to conceptualize our enemies is “CABIs” or “CABIJs” = Chinese, Aztecs/Arabs, Blacks, Indians, & Jews. Consider using CABIs or CABIJs in place of the sole use of “Jew”; it would be more accurate.

    On the “C” of CABIJs:

    Richard Lynn knew & expressed some time ago his thoughts on the “C”, and few here have remembered his arguments; yet, they are evermore salient.

    Strong Nations are ethnocentric, aggressive, and competitive Nations but with strategic foresight, big visions (e.g. expansionary & self-developmental), and the ability to beguile their competitors.

    Weak Nations have no borders, no discrimination, no aggressive sense of self and Other, etc., and willingness to act accordingly but strategically.

    Consider here, and don’t forget.

    White Supremacists, White Nationalists, etc., are the strongest of our kind. We must take pride in ourselves, even if we are ineffective in establishing any long-term, off-line, institutions and growth. At least we can know, we had the right mindset for the survival of the Occidental people, when most did not. Cheers.

    • Northerner's Gravatar Northerner
      March 11, 2017 - 2:33 pm | Permalink

      How powerful would Jews be were they not aided and abetted by White elites?

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        March 12, 2017 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

        How powerful would Jews be? Only about 98 percent as powerful as they now are.

        In terms of both self-interest and responsibility to the society whose welfare and survival they should have been working to uphold, what you call the white elites have been in full-scale retreat since white Christian America’s last real victory over the perfidious jews: the Immigration Act of 1924. Since shortly after that watershed date, members of the white elites have, figuratively speaking, been wearing a sign around the neck reading “For sale cheap—no reasonable offer refused” or words to that effect. Especially over the past fifty years and more, they have expended little effort to conceal their willingness—or rather their desire—to sell out to the (((nation’s enemies))).

        The comment of Erik S., which falsely and brazenly minimizes the Jews’ leadership role in the destruction of the West and calls upon TOO readers to do likewise, shows him to be either a fool or a knave. My money’s on the latter. Sad to say, as worded, your question implies support for his foolishness or knavery. I hope that such was not your intent.

        • Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
          March 12, 2017 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

          Pierre, once again, a direct hit!!! I always enjoy and learn from your deep insights. I remember when some wit, although I don’t remember who the wit was, stated that the Soviet Union always had a bargain when it came to American traitors–they betrayed their country at wholesale prices.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          March 12, 2017 - 10:30 pm | Permalink

          Thanks for your generous words, Bobby. I wish only that the scales had begun to fall from my eyes ten years sooner than they did!

          What I should have added to my earlier comment is that we have now arrived at a situation where a Gentile white-elite sellout no longer matters, what with the enemy having become so entrenched in every organ of narrative manufacture.

    • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
      March 11, 2017 - 4:20 pm | Permalink

      “…I have to reiterate and even remind our “movement” participants, that our most concerning contemporary enemies are not first and foremost the Jews…”

      Wrong. They are the root of the problem.

      “There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.” – Henry David Thoreau

      “…White Supremacists…”.

      White Supremacism is a ridiculous concept. I’m hoping the idea is some day seen as foolish. I’m White and like my people best but I don’t believe that we are necessarily the be all and end all of populations. I think it very likely that the die off of the American Indian from childhood diseases and the vast amounts of resources unleashed because of that caused a massive ship building surge that in turn pushed the Industrial Revolution forward further boosting our prowess. We were quick to take advantage of a good situation but a lot of it was just luck. Whites are an inventive people but look at us. Before the Industrial Revolution we were pressed into not the best of lands, Europe and now we can’t even keep that. Supreme, I think not. I think it’s likely that the Leftist Whites actually believe they are Supreme. The reason they are so likely to boost non-Whites. Myself…we’re a good bunch but that doesn’t mean we will prevail in keeping our communities.

    • Forever guilty's Gravatar Forever guilty
      March 11, 2017 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

      “Chinese, Aztecs/Arabs, Blacks, Indians, & Jews.”

      Actually I kind of disagree. I think there should be some rating which nationalities , races most and least dangerous, compatible with white population etc. My list would be something like that:

      Most dangerous:

      1 Jews (obvious)

      2 Indians: intelligent, ruthless, tribal , very fertile, and numerous , with little help from (((insiders))) could easily replace all white collar whites many times over.

      3 Arabs , Muslims, blacks, Mexican, etc, well, middle level risk without their (((masters))) not a big danger.

      4 Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Thai etc Most danger come from their powerful economics. On personal level I don’t feel threat from them. Chinese, Japanese etc for some unexplainable reason do not hate whites with all their guts. They have “sense of honor ” , usually keep their part of the deal and generally “mind their own business”. I could live in Chinese neighborhood, or country for example without risk for my life, dignity, or property ( car, etc )

    • m's Gravatar m
      March 12, 2017 - 4:32 am | Permalink

      …our most concerning contemporary enemies are not first and foremost the Jews…

      Most East Asians (Japanese, Koreans and Chinese) are pretty content to stay within their self imposed ghettos, and they mostly follow majority rules. With some exceptions (mainly out on the left coast where things have completely degenerated) they generally do not seek to infiltrate their host country’s political system in order to change it for the benefit of a foreign entity (think Jews and Israel). Also, there is enough animosity between the major Oriental groups to keep them from forming a coherent power center (Japanese v. Taiwanese v. Mainlanders etc).

      Since this site tends gravitate towards bio-deterministic explanations, an analogy of the East Asian presence in the West would be one of cultural endosymbiosis, commensalism or even (in some cases) mutualism. With Jews on the other hand we have a destructive cultural parasitism leading to what Francis Yockey termed advanced culture distortion.

  9. Peter Baggins's Gravatar Peter Baggins
    March 11, 2017 - 8:32 am | Permalink

    While I am intensely sympathetic to the cause, I found your article long on analysis, short on solutions.

  10. Ragnar Lothbrok's Gravatar Ragnar Lothbrok
    March 11, 2017 - 8:48 am | Permalink

    And everyone wonders what happened in Germany.People are screaming about Trump and whites standing up for themselves and the nation we built.Now we see exactly what happened in Germany.The problem wasn’t from the “white evil nazi “it was the jew. Hitler was not paranoid.What happened in Russia happened in Germany.Jews were killing and removing ethnic Germans before WW1 part of what led to these 2 great conflicts.,that is what began to set off people like Hitler and other pro white ethnic Germans. People that loved their country,the country they had built.Sounds familiar ,eh.Make no mistake ,their is NO difference in what happened in Russia or Germany.And all of it led to the same thing.The utter destruction of white christian peoples being torn apart and destroyed.Look at what they had all nations do to Dresden in Germany.Utterly disgusting.Absolute destruction to send a message.Also do not think Blacks are are friends.Blacks want Black supremacy.Look at all the BS movies coming showing how Blacks invented everything and taught whites everything and built this country.Absolute BS.

  11. cecilhenry's Gravatar cecilhenry
    March 11, 2017 - 9:33 am | Permalink
    • J-Garr's Gravatar J-Garr
      March 11, 2017 - 5:05 pm | Permalink

      Henry I recommend you to read about Plan Kalergi, it explains what is happening now in the world.

  12. March 11, 2017 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    It is ironic that, everyplace but Germany 1933-1945, Jews as a group have been admitted/welcomed into the “privileged” precincts of the White race, including in South Africa and the ante-bellum American South. Of course, we’ve seen what happened to Germany.

    From within, then, like the beautiful snake, parts at least of Jewry have turned on their benefactors, evidently to shed them from the privileged group, which would then leave only them in the catbird seat, above all others.

    Poison won’t hurt you if you don’t swallow it.

  13. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    March 11, 2017 - 12:11 pm | Permalink

    The attempt by the establishment to eradicate the discrete ethnic, cultural, and religious markers of European identity is classic cultMarx practice; I’m guessing. When a society accepts the intellectual liquidation of such markers, it allows for the eventual easy delegitimization of those who existentially bear the markers. And it doesn’t take a genius to realize that delegitimized groups or individuals can fall prey to those empowered by a legitimized unity of human form coupled with a discrete content. A group that is prevented, either by taboo or force, from expressing its discrete identity and interests is a group that soon has neither.

  14. March 11, 2017 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

    “It’s a fine review, but of course no experienced reader of AmRen expects to read about the root cause of the campus war on White men.”
    That is the absolute truth. No mention of the causation. And when I saw, several years ago, the 1984 style reworking of the original Stanley Hornbeck review of CoC on AR I realized that Mr Taylor is NOT on our side. Hornbeck’s work WOKE me back up. And reading Dr MacDonald’s writings and his talented crew here has kept me with EYES WIDE OPEN.

  15. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    March 11, 2017 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Never doubt that this article is the 100% truth. I’m experiencing it in person at my own University, HSU, here in Humboldt County. See for yourselves:


    The Hammer and Sickle is flown proudly over the entire student quad and no one bats an eye. Next to it is the anarchist flag, which is hilarious because these little pencil necked commies would be the first to go in the event of real civil breakdown. The leader of the “Greens” (aka, watermelons) is a jew named Chad Friefeld. What do you know about that…. A communist jew at a majority white University preaching anti white and anti system values. It’s as if everything espoused on the pages of TOO has magically come to life all in the same spot, at the same time. The stereotype is confirmed beyond any doubt. These white kids are literally being taught daily to hate themselves to the point of self destruction. Nothing written in the above article is an exaggeration.

    • Pushback's Gravatar Pushback
      March 11, 2017 - 11:24 pm | Permalink

      Next Stop the heroin shooting gallery to ride themselves of indoctrinated shame and self loathing OF COURSE their is always the Stockholm syndrome for those who can’t resist the hated White Privileged Label , in this second model they get to be Guards at the Gulag ready to Virtue Signal with a baton or gun .

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      March 14, 2017 - 3:55 am | Permalink

      This can only carry on while the self-haters stay rich, pampered, overfed in fact. Their only problem is whether to buy new trainers or a new phone. They will think differently when their country becomes third world and the economy no longer provides them with all the comforts they currently enjoy.

  16. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    March 11, 2017 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

    Last year in the UK Ernst and Young, a large accountancy firm, dropped the requirement for having a degree as there was no evidence that new recruits with degrees were any smarter.

  17. March 11, 2017 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Sheldon Silver
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In 1967, New York City leveled the 20-acre (80,000 m2) Seward Park Urban Renewal Area in Silver’s neighborhood, and removed more than 1,800 low-income largely Hispanic families, with a promise that they could return to new low-income apartments when they were built. However, the site was kept undeveloped for decades afterward, as Silver and key allies strove to maintain the area’s Jewish identity and opposed affordable housing, which would have brought more Hispanic and Chinese residents. Finally in 2012, the site was approved for the Essex Crossing mixed-use development project.[11] Construction is scheduled to be completed in 2024, some 57 years after the site was cleared.[12]

  18. Ron's Gravatar Ron
    March 12, 2017 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

    This conversation shows where the “Self Loathing” part of the now Iconic phrase ” Self Loathing Cultural Marxists” comes from

  19. SteveRogers42's Gravatar SteveRogers42
    March 16, 2017 - 10:00 pm | Permalink


  20. Sheila's Gravatar Sheila
    March 18, 2017 - 5:53 am | Permalink

    “The campus War on White Men, I am convinced, is but a prelude to the real war — the coming attempt at the extermination of the White race — a “hot” war, as opposed to the current “cool” gradual swamping of Whites via immigration, destruction of White families, etc.”

    (There is no doubt the machine, now operating as the Deep State, is intent upon this objective of complete white annihilation…The present administration is merely an interlude before the machete begins to swing.
    It is fortunate the white race has an inherent ability for establishing order within chaos. Cool article.)

Comments are closed.