Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi: Ideological Father of the EU

Beau Albrecht

This article describes a mixed-race political figure, basically a professional activist, who projected a benevolent exterior, yet brought destruction in his wake.  Count Richard Nikolaus Eijiro von Coudenhove-Kalergi is today an obscure political figure, though in his time he was kind of a minor celebrity, and began the concept leading to the European Union.

His father descended from Byzantine nobility, and also with ancestry from lineages all over Europe.  This citizen of the world was a diplomat and married a Japanese woman whose parents were quite displeased, throwing her out of the family.  Richard was born in 1894, the second of seven children.  In his infancy, they moved from Tokyo to a small town near the present-day Czech-German border.

When Richard was twenty years old, his father died, leaving him wealth of which the vast majority can only dream and freeing him to pursue his hobby full-time.  Much like Karl Marx, Richard wrote a lot but never had a real job in his life.  The major difference was that he was a scion of landed gentry, while Marx was basically a bum plotting worldwide revolution while swilling beer at London pubs.

Implementing meddlesome aspirations is all about having connections

Original flag of the International Paneuropean Union

Richard’s cause was globalism.  In 1923, he founded the International Pan-European Union, which he would head until his death.   Its flag was oddly similar to the Japanese imperial flag. This was the outfit that first got the ball rolling, beginning the ideological impetus eventually leading to the leviathan of the European Union.

His inherited wealth and privileged status allowed him to associate with many world leaders, enjoying access unknown to their own common citizens.  He even tried to hit up Mussolini for support, but Il Duce didn’t buy it.  Richard also associated with ultra-wealthy, anti-nationalist bankers who took quite an interest, such as Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild and Max Warburg.  The latter donated heavily to his early efforts and served as a liaison to Wall Street whiz kid Bernard Baruch.

On a side note, this must run in the family.  Max was the brother of Paul M. Warburg, considered the father of the Federal Reserve.  Paul’s son was James Warbug, who was FDR’s financial adviser, a Council on Foreign Relations member, and a proponent of the Morgenthau Plan.  He even had the supreme audacity to tell the Senate:

We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.

Richard had some interesting ideas for how the world should work, such as making English the global official language.  Further, he wanted to collapse all the world’s countries into just five:   the USSR, East Asia dominated by Japan and China, the British Empire, the United States of Europe (including the rest of Africa), and the Pan-American Union (all of North and South America, basically NAFTA on steroids).  At least it’s two more superstates than in Orwell’s 1984, though it’s not clear why he didn’t go full monte like John Lennon imagining no nations.

This great patriot of Europe had some even more interesting aspirations.  From his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism) came the concept now commonly called the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan.  There’s a good bit of snobby babble about nobility; just what you’d expect from an elitist like this.  The book is full of revealing quotes, but I’ll keep it brief, providing my translation:

Destroying diversity in the name of diversity

Der Mensch der fernen Zukunft wird Mischling sein. Die heutigen Rassen und Kasten werden der zunehmen-den Überwindung von Raum, Zeit und Vorurteil zum Opfer fallen. Die eurasisch-negroide Zukunftsrasse, äußerlich der altägyptischen ähnlich, wird die Vielfalt der Völker durch eine Vielfalt der Persönlichkeiten ersetzen.

The man of the far future will be mixed race. Today’s races and castes will fall victim to the increasing overcoming of space, time, and prejudice.  The Eurasian-Negroid future race, outwardly similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

After that, so the argument goes, races won’t exist but their spirit will live on, and everybody will be really, really diverse, which is a good thing because, as we all know, diversity is our greatest strength.  As for the world’s rich cultural tapestry, it would be reduced to least common denominator items, such as television, hamburgers, and shopping.

Destroying distinct cultures and genetic uniqueness, and replacing them with atomized, deracinated individuals — for some odd reason, that sounds rather like the agenda today’s social engineers have in mind.  Back in 1925, before the influence of Franz Boas, Ashley Montagu, and Trofim Lysenko had gotten very far with spreading the “race is only a social construct” meme, that was a pretty bold proposal.

In fact, Richard might have been tarred and feathered back then if his wealth, connections, and celebrity status didn’t make him untouchable.  That may have gone over with high society airheads, but it didn’t fly with real people.  Today, of course, only the very brave dare to speak against any of these ideas in public.

He went further yet to describe how wonderful the future would be after the multicultural pressure cooker turned everyone into monocultural mush.  Still, Richard was dead wrong about this being inevitable.  Countries that want to protect themselves from mass migration are quite able to do so. For just one example, China is still Chinese after thousands of years, and Israel is determined to remain a Jewish state.

Richard’s fevered dream is possible only if a country opens its borders to everyone, oblivious of how they’ll fit in (or not) with the native population, and with even less concern for the will of the people already living there — in other words, exactly the situation throughout the West.  Finally, if a pan-gaeic melting pot is supposedly inevitable and good, why is there so much propaganda trying to make people believe this?  Why rush it?  Now that’s an evocative question.

Finally, he was wrong about the ancient Egyptians.  They were not a mishmash but a distinct people, part of the Semitic family of nations, thus related to the Arabians, Babylonians, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so forth.  It’s a minor quibble, but distorting history to suit an agenda is rather disingenuous.

It doesn’t take a psychiatrist to see that this man without racial identity wanted to soothe his feelings of rootlessness by trying to remake the world in his image.  And in thinking about who should be in charge of the Brave New World Order, he naturally chose another group that did not identify with the peoples and cultures of Europe.

You Know Who

Der Kampf zwischen Kapitalismus und Kommunismus um das Erbe des besiegten Blutadels ist ein Bruderkrieg des siegreichen Hirnadels, ein Kampf zwischen individualistischem und sozialistischem, egoistischem und altruistischem, heidnischem und christlichem Geist. Der Generalstab beider Parteien rekrutiert sich aus der geistigen Führerrasse Europas: dem Judentum.

The struggle between capitalism and Communism about the inheritance of the defeated hereditary nobility is a brother’s war of the victorious intellectual nobility, a struggle between individualistic and socialistic, egoistic and altruistic, heathenry and Christian spirit.  The general staff of both parties recruits itself from the spiritual leader-race of Europe:  Jews.

Today, one must be careful about talking that way in German-speaking countries!  Basically, Richard said that capitalism versus Communism was a Jewish family quarrel.  (If so, it’s been quite a proxy war for the rest of us!)  In any event, describing capitalism versus Communism as a good cop/bad cop strategy might be taking it too far, but there were (and are) some pretty prominent figures on both sides.  As you may have guessed, he wasn’t too unhappy that the “spiritual leader-race of Europe” was manning the general staff.

Richard dishes out yet more lavish praise, including describing the murderous Leon Trotsky as the pinnacle of modern politics (!!).  Then it gets more interesting yet:

Nicht: das Judentum ist der neue Adel; sondern: das Judentum ist der Schoß, aus dem ein neuer, geistiger Adel Europas hervorgeht; der Kern, um den sich ein neuer, geistiger Adel gruppiert. Eine geistig-urbane Herrenrasse ist in Bildung: Idealisten, geistvoll und feinnervig, gerecht und überzeugungstreu, tapfer wie der Feudaladel in seinen besten Tagen, die Tod und Verfolgung, Haß und Verachtung freudig auf sich nehmen, um die Menschheit sittlicher, geistiger, glücklicher zu machen.

It’s not that Jews are the new nobility; rather, Jews are the womb from which emerges a new, spiritual nobility of Europe; the kernel from which a new spiritual nobility gathers.  A spiritual-urban master race is being educated:  idealistic, spirited, and sensitive; brave as the feudal nobility in their best days; joyfully taking death and persecution, hate and contempt in order to make humanity more ethical, spiritual, and happy.

That’s quite heart-warming.  But there’s more:

Als Volk erlebt das Judentum den ewigen Kampf der Quantität gegen die Qualität, minderwertiger Gruppen gegen höherrvertige Individuen, minderwertiger Majoritäten gegen höherwertige Minoritäten.

As a people, Jews experience the eternal struggle of quantity against quality; inferior groups against superior individuals; inferior majorities against superior minorities.

How’s that for laying it on thick?  As a non-Jewish Eurasian, he includes himself in the “inferior” category. In any case, this particular hobbyhorse of Richard’s might explain why the Eurocrat regime turned out the way it did.

What was he thinking?

What are we to make of that, along with the document’s frequent Führerrasse and Herrenrasse blather, as well as the rhetoric about wiping out distinct nations?  This means that Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, like Hitler, believed in a master race which, although labeled a “spiritual master race,” must be considered to be something more than that given the ethnic reality of Judaism. Actually, Hitler did have some pointed words about the Pan-European movement.  For example, his little-known Zweites Buch has a scorching criticism of the pacifism and warm, fuzzy internationalism, in which the former German chancellor calls Richard the “bastard of all the world.”

Like his father, this rootless cosmopolitan had a complicated thought process about the Jewish community:  first disliking them, then coming to embrace them.  In Richard’s case, two Jewish wives (the first and third) apparently made the difference.

It’s not about all Jews

Lest there be misunderstanding, most in the Jewish community don’t have the inclination or the power to promote this destruction.  The organized Jewish community and individual wealthy and powerful Jews have played a significant role in opposing European nationalism and in promoting displacement-level immigration into Western countries, but the common people among them are not at fault.  Some Jews, in fact, are horrified by the madness.  Much better relations between our respective communities would be very desirable.  Restoring good will can’t be just a one way street, though.  Handling these problems within their community would be an ideal solution, if that could come about.

Ultimately, this isn’t really about Jews versus non-Jewish people of European descent, but rather unaccountable globalist elites versus the public.  Those to blame (be they of any background) are would-be social engineers scheming to impose their will on the public, corrupt politicians selling out their countries, and overreaching plutocrats.  Those types would be well-advised that their hubris does not win hearts and minds.

In summary

A nation’s first duty is to protect its citizens.  If you’ve noticed all the riots and chaos, and wonder why the EU doesn’t stop the flow of “refugees” and immigrants incompatible with their native populations — and send the ones already there back to where they came from — it’s because the Eurocrats have other priorities.  The dysfunctional system is working as designed.  The politicians don’t serve the people, but rather their ultra-wealthy globalist cronies.  This is exactly what Richard, the grandfather of all this, wanted.  If Hell exists, he’s smirking about it even while enduring the tortures of the damned.

In 1950, for his efforts which eventually led to today’s Eurocrat regime, Richard himself was the first recipient of the Charlemagne Prize, sometimes called the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize.  He shares this dubious distinction with Bill Clinton in 2000, and Angela Merkel (bless her heart) in 2008.  It’s a strange world where there’s a medal for treachery.

Beau Albrecht blogs at Return of Kings.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

29 Comments to "Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi: Ideological Father of the EU"

  1. peter baggins's Gravatar peter baggins
    March 23, 2017 - 8:38 am | Permalink

    Fascinating history, thank you M. Albrecht.

  2. Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
    March 23, 2017 - 10:35 am | Permalink

    I hope you realize you are fomenting global antisemitism, of which this is merely a recent example:
    — [ ]

  3. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    March 23, 2017 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    “…Finally, he was wrong about the ancient Egyptians. They were not a mishmash but a distinct people, part of the Semitic family of nations, thus related to the Arabians, Babylonians, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so forth…”

    Linguistically the ancient Egyptians were Hamites. Hamitic languages are still spoken today by Berbers of North Africa, Hausas in Chad, several peoples in Ethiopia and Somalians. Together with the Semitic languages, the Hamitic languages form the language family that used to be called Hamito-Semitic, but nowadays is called Afro-Asiatic.

    Racially the Egyptians were Caucasians, though in ancient times already for 5% mixed with Negro blood, which has now increased to 20%. Egyptians without kinky hair hardly exist. So count Coudenhove-Kalergi was not entirely wrong about the mixed-race status of the Egyptians.

    • MGD's Gravatar MGD
      March 23, 2017 - 11:08 pm | Permalink

      “Racially the Egyptians were Caucasians, though in ancient times already for 5% mixed with Negro blood, which has now increased to 20%.”
      Which has worked out so well for the Egyptians!

    • Thorgrun's Gravatar Thorgrun
      March 24, 2017 - 9:21 am | Permalink

      A study of the DNA of King Tut done in 2010 has finally been released and he is from the R1a… Haplogroup, basically from the Black Sea Refugio in ancient times. Today, only 1% of Egyptians carry this haplogroup. 50% of Europeans today and 70% of the UK carry this haplogroup according to this recently revealed study from 2010.

  4. ariadnatheo's Gravatar ariadnatheo
    March 23, 2017 - 1:44 pm | Permalink

    This strange, twisted and troubled Eurasian demi-aristocrat brought to his “oeuvre” a philo-semitic sycophancy that combined an Asian submissiveness with the self-assurance of his paternal lineage on which he propelled himself, while reserving hateful rancor for white Europe. Fascinating in its monstrosity.
    The article contains the all-too-common disclaimer that seeks to immunize the author against suspicions of being given to “generalizations” with respect to any negative comments about Jews.

    Generalizations are bad: they enable logic, making judgments, and thought processes like synthesis. They are clearly a slippery slope that might lead to formulating such bigoted concepts as “group identity,” and — if unchecked– some day even to such dangerous new disciplines like evolutionary psychology, absurd as that may seem.
    Disclaimers must always be appended to any articles that mention Jews, indicating that any negative traits perceived in Jewish behaviors are only encountered in the elites (and even those are not 100% Jewish, are they?). Below that level, there is an ocean of all the rest us, Jews and non-jews, indistinguishable.
    This type of disclaimer is a special subcategory of “virtue signaling” that could be called “anti-anti-semitic signaling.”

    • Dante Ardenz's Gravatar Dante Ardenz
      March 23, 2017 - 11:04 pm | Permalink

      Indeed ! Kalgari was absolutely correct ,and take heed from him : Communism ,and Finance Capital are Allies. His words admission ,and revelation : The Dialectic manifest . The Left Right Matrix of the Jews march . This among other things is why Mussolini rejected him. On an epic scale how The Conservative Imperialist Churchill ,Liberal FDR ,and Communist Stalin could unite to pummel the Nationalist Axis powers who had defied ,and counter to the International Jews plan . Until OUR own ‘ movement ‘ breaks the Jews Left / Right Dialectic ….As NS Germany ,and Axis partners did ,can we counter the Cap- Com Judaic prison . I need no ‘ disclaimer ‘ either ! Unless the Jews heinous world conspiracy , weaved from ancient Sumeria ; that exclusive tribal hate diety that demands we worship them is hit head on all is for nought . So let’s quit the ‘ propriety ‘. As Patrick Henry said , ‘ if this be treason ,make the most of it ‘.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        March 24, 2017 - 10:05 am | Permalink

        Communism ,and Finance Capital are Allies

        Communism and Fake Money are jewish.

    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      March 24, 2017 - 8:46 am | Permalink

      The philo-Semitic (not all Jews) disclaimer/subdivision of virtue signaling is an escape hatch that simply doesn’t wash with most Jews, organized or otherwise. As a tactic, it can sometimes be useful, but it can only temporarily assuage some of the more gullible ‘Goyim’, and certainly not the highly perceptive Gegenraße itself.

  5. PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
    March 23, 2017 - 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Many years ago when I first read about Kalergi and his plan to transform Europe into an Afro-Islamic extension of the Mid-East a cold shiver ran down my spine. That we can observe this evil process happening throughout Europe is an indication of the strength and magnitude of the conspiracy.
    A question we need to ask is where does Kalergi fit within the wider elite circles of the 1920s and 30s? He has all the characteristics of a vain self-important social climber, and I suspect he was merely voicing the opinions and objectives he overheard at social gatherings of the stratospheric elite, people with whom he wished to ingratiate himself.
    His close friend during the early years of the Pan Europa movement was none other than Otto Habsburg, son of the last Emperor of Austria-Hungary. Otto, the purported champion of national traditions and conventional Christianity, was an enthusiastic supporter of Pan Europa and therefore everything that sought to degrade the traditions the public associated with the Habsburgs. Otto’s infatuation with the plan to destroy Europe and its people was no temporary aberration, it was a life-long commitment, indeed in 1972 he took on the presidency of the Pan Europa movement.
    It would appear these old-style aristos would rather rule and lord over a morass of dumbed-down brown serfs rather than share power with us ‘common’ White folk. To accomplish that heinous crime these old-money elites are in alliance with the new technocrats such as Bilderbergers.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      March 23, 2017 - 10:58 pm | Permalink

      It is not clear if Otto von Habsburg was an enthusiastic proponent of the racial destruction of European man and that that was his motivation for his support of the European Union. He comes across as an idealistic aristocrat, believer in traditional values and an enemy of totalitarianism. Keep in mind that the conspirators of the New Word Order always frame their plans in “idealistic” terms and that there always are naive people that fall for them. Otto von Habsburg was in all probability only a “useful idiot” for the NWO. Coudenhove-Kalergi’s remark about the racial mixing of European man is only a single passage in his little known book that Otto von Habsburg may never had read.

      To end on a humorous note, here is the full name of Otto von Habsburg that indicate his “traditional background” :

      Franz Josef Otto Robert Maria Anton Karl Max Heinrich Sixtus Xavier Felix René Ludwig Gaetano Pius Ignatius von Habsburg-Lotharingen.

      • David's Gravatar David
        March 25, 2017 - 10:21 am | Permalink

        With a name like Franz Josef Otto Robert Maria Anton Karl Max Heinrich Sixtus Xavier Felix René Ludwig Gaetano Pius Ignatius von Habsburg-Lotharingen, he would surely find filling out endless forms in this emerging, One-world bureaucracy very difficult.

    • Guest's Gravatar Guest
      March 24, 2017 - 8:45 am | Permalink

      To PaleoAtlantid: I doubt if Otto von Habsburg had any “infatuation with the plan to destroy Europe and its people” as you describe his association with the Pan Europa Movement. As with other concepts/ideologies, there is an outward show of benevolence and good intentions whilst the real goals are hidden from most people. True, one could read, if one could find it, Coudenhove-Kalergi’s first book setting this out, but its publication is no longer allowed and certainly not in Germany (references to “fuehrenrasse” alone would put it on a banned list). It is C-K’s later book, dealing with the concrete establishment of a Pan-Europa Movement which probably attracted Habsburg’s attention and support. Remember what all Europeans on all sides experienced from the Great War, and how nationalism was portrayed as the prime reason for this true holocaust. Every possible attempt to unite Europeans in peaceful organisations would have received interest and largely uncritical praise.

      A far more important aspect which seems not to receive attention is this article is that Coudenhove-Kalergi foresaw the Jews as the Master Race due to his presumption of their ‘superior moral stance’. This, and not only the goal of this project in eradicating the Caucasian Race and Western Civilisation, is the ‘Achilles Heel’ of this Project. One has only to expose what Judaic ‘morality’ actually teaches (only its own as fully human, usury and deceit as acceptable in relations with all others, the truth not to be spoken, heard or even thought if, in so doing, its threatens their interests, mandated hostility and destruction of Christian churches and bibles, and mandated sexual abuse of children, as only a few examples. How long would either the Coudenhove-Kalergi Project, or jewish standing and authority, last, once these were more widely known? Surely, that should be one of our strategies in defeating both the Kalergi Project and ‘Tikkun Olam’ (to ‘fix’ or ‘repair the world’ — for the supreme benefit and rule of the Jews).

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        March 24, 2017 - 9:55 am | Permalink

        Tikkun Olan- The Fix is In.

        the fix is in
        (idiomatic) A process (for example, a court case) has been rigged behind the scenes and its outcome will not reflect true justice.

  6. MGD's Gravatar MGD
    March 23, 2017 - 11:11 pm | Permalink

    “Ashley Montagu”
    Birth name Israel Ehrenberg.

  7. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    March 24, 2017 - 4:27 am | Permalink

    Where are this jews**

    Most of supposedly ”jews who are on our side” are unison to never criticize ”anti-semitism” in any instance. The heart of jewish hypocrisy is the ”anti-semitism”. If you show some examples of such a rare breed… still don’t mean ONLY jewish elites who are full in this retarded and evil plan.

    Indeed most of them [jews on ”our side”] seems are against:

    ”politically correct”,

    but NEVER honest about ”anti-semitism” AND the fundamental jewish role in all of this labels.

    If majority of jews were not fully related with this conspiracy why they are so quiet*

    But overwhelming of american jews are declared socialist, democrat, full-in ”multiculti” project. Overwhelm of jewish ”smart fraction”. And the american jews who are not socialist are overwhelming neocons. What’s up*

  8. Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
    March 24, 2017 - 6:03 am | Permalink

    “Lest there be misunderstanding, most in the Jewish community don’t have the inclination or the power to promote this destruction . . . the common people among them are not at fault.”

    Yes they are. They provide the wider tribal framework in which the genocidal anti-White, ant-West part of the “Jewish community” is able to flourish. If all Germans can be tarred as “Hitler’s Willing Executioners” there is no reason why we should not consider all Jews as “Yahweh’s Willing Executioners”. Because that’s what they are.

    It is a typically faired-minded White reaction to focus on the individual rather than the group but that fair-mindedness is used as a weapon against us and we fall for it again and again. We cannot afford to be fair-minded anymore. The Jews – all Jews – must be seen as The Enemy or we will continue to be defeated.

    The only “good” Jew is the Jew who not only understands what his fellow Jews are doing to us (and what they are doing in the middle-east) but openly protests that fact. How many of those do you know?

    “Ultimately, this isn’t really about Jews versus non-Jewish people of European descent”

    Nonsense, that is exactly what it is about and until enough of us wake up to that fact we will continue to suffer.

    “Much better relations between our respective communities would be very desirable. Restoring good will can’t be just a one way street, though. Handling these problems within their community would be an ideal solution, if that could come about.”

    Good luck with that. I’ll hold your wallet while you go ask them – I’m sure you’ll meet with a positive response!

    • March 24, 2017 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

      True. There are vast numbers of Jewish pressure groups – find an old copy of the Jewish year book and turn over the pages. (There used to be – I couldn’t relocate it – an online list, pages and pages of these pestilential organisations, dotted all around Britain, Jewish groups for this and that and the other). Now many must be online; I hope the ‘intelligence’ services keep an eye on them.

    • Thorgrun's Gravatar Thorgrun
      March 24, 2017 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

      Basically your point can and has been said about those that are Muslim, too. Seems to be a common problem with these two Abrahamic people, silence in my opinion = consent.

      • Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
        March 24, 2017 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

        There is simply no equivalence between Jews and Muslims and anyone who claims there is is either deluded or dishonest.

        We used to have generally good relations with most Islamic countries but that has been destroyed by the neo-Cohens who control our foreign policy and our media and use them to destroy and demonise the Muslim world.

        There are 1.5 billion Muslims and they have no power over us at all. There are 15 million Jews – just one per cent of the Muslim total – and Western nations grovel at their feet.

        The silence that matters comes from our own “leaders” who are well aware of the extent of Jewish power but don’t say a word about it for the sake of their careers.

        It makes me sick to hear politicians and pundits claim the recent flea-bite attack in London is an “attack on democracy” when in reality it’s another impotent cry of rage against what we are doing to the Muslim world on behalf of the Jews.

        • Thorgrun's Gravatar Thorgrun
          March 25, 2017 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

          I agree as to the power that Jews have in accordance to their numbers, it is obvious to anyone that has turned off the tee vee and opened their eyes that 17 years of conflict, bloodshed, and trillions spent that the West has been co-opted by another agenda.

          My opinion is that Islam when it is presented in large numbers of supporters, behaves much the same way as Jews behave, ie., in group good, others bad, simple. Both of these alien religions are dangers to Western nations.

    • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
      March 25, 2017 - 9:03 am | Permalink

      Nice Guy Eddie, just to say that I had reached into the same conclusions as you. It is bad and getting worse really fast. All Jews are complicit in our genocide because they ALWAYS follow the tribal line.

      The only good news is, Jews are assimilating fast. This implies that Jewish elites are losing their biosphere. This is a half-assed good news. The cruelest people in USSR and Germany were half Jews and atheist Jews. “My rabbi” told me that Judaism is a race, not a religion. Besides, there are willing goyim like Clintons, very happy to carry on with our genocide.

  9. March 24, 2017 - 7:38 am | Permalink

    Don’t forget that WW1 must have had a devastating effect on European aristocrats. (The Russian aristocracy being a perfect example – many had to flee, and they were the lucky ones). I think this piece under-estimates the Jewish money input, and under-estimates Japan’s resilience – they objected to a white fathering a child on them; very many other countries at the time could not fight back.
    But it’s a truly amazing story, a tribute to the power of censorship. As with many others: who’d have thought that e.g. Albert Pike was a significant 19th century figure?

  10. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    March 24, 2017 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    I fear that if TOO continues on this recently taken path they will become as irrelevant as Colin Liddel. History has proven again and again that embracing Jewry is a death sentence.

  11. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    March 25, 2017 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    Please simplify things to “Kalergi Plan”. If we say Richard Nikolaus Eijiro von Coudenhove Kalergi, we might sound schoolly, but nobody is going to show more interest on it. “Kalergi plan” is catchy.

    Once upon a time I was an EU patriot. Boy, have we been had. Can’t wait to see EU collapse. Cannot happen fast enough.

  12. Art's Gravatar Art
    March 25, 2017 - 2:35 pm | Permalink

    The spiritual founder of the EU did not care a rat’s ass about freedom and democracy, he admired Bolshevism with their GULAG-System, and that speaks volumes!

    If it will be necessary for the preserving of the “New and brave Global World Order”, the new Commissars (speak the self elected “master race” of “spiritual aristocrats”) will probably apply Bolshevik style violence against the future generations of post-European mongrelized population.

    An “EU-Gulag-System” will probably be called “The Bastion of Freedom and Democracy” in their Newspeak.

    Bolshevism is winning!

    The admirer of Bolshevism is openly honoured by the EU-Commissars!

    Do not be fooled with the “cold war” and the demise of the Soviet Block, these post-Bolshevik-states mutated into nationalistic states.

    They abandoned the globalist Comintern-Agenda, Communism was just a dead ideology there, a useful decoration for the Nomenklatura, like it is still the case in “Communist” China.

    The real original ardent Commies survived in the West and they are now pushing the original globalist Commie-Agenda!

  13. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    March 25, 2017 - 4:29 pm | Permalink
  14. E's Gravatar E
    March 25, 2017 - 10:17 pm | Permalink
  15. Lore Waldvogel's Gravatar Lore Waldvogel
    March 26, 2017 - 12:17 am | Permalink

    It is important to remember Coudenhove Kalergi and his plans for social engineering; it is also important to remember that Kalergi was greatly admired by Winston Churchill, who laid out his concrete vision of the “United States of Europe” under leadership of France and Germany, in his Europe speech in Zurich in 1946, just after reducing Germany to rubbles and acting like the Prince of peace, as they always do. Some think that Kalergi actually wrote the speech. Churchill is a recipient of the Charles prize, too, as is Tony Blair and the whole of the EU Mafia.

Comments are closed.