Fake Jews: Deceit and Double-Think in Britain’s Hostile Elite

Tobias Langdon

Here’s a quiz about Israeli politics. Are there any strongly identified Muslim or Christian Arabs high in Israel’s ruling conservative party? Do those Arabs write for Arab newspapers setting out the central principle of their lives: “Arabs must come first”? Finally, do those Arabs lavish praise on an opposition leader who opened Israel’s borders to the Third World and duped Israel into a hugely expensive and disastrous foreign war?

You have no guesses. You won’t need any. The answer to every question is the same. No, there are no Arabs like that in Israel. Not one. Furthermore, Israel has never opened its borders to the Third World or poured trillions of shekels into a disastrous foreign war. Israel is a Jewish nation where Jews are firmly in control and intend to remain so. That’s why they don’t allow Arabs to have genuine power or influence in politics, culture and academia. Arabs would have their own agenda and would not make Jewish interests their only concern, even if they weren’t hostile to Jews or determined to undermine Jewish power.

Tremendous respect for Tony Blair

In short, Israel is a sane country that keeps its large Arab minority where it belongs: out of power. Now compare the United Kingdom, a White and historically Christian nation. By comparison with Israel, the UK is insane, because it allows outsiders to exercise enormous power and influence. Worse still, those outsiders are both hostile to the White majority and determined to undermine it by promoting mass immigration and minority worship. Here is an article written for the Jewish Chronicle by Daniel Finkelstein, a strongly identified Jew high in the ruling Conservative party:

Corbyn must lose — for our sake  [i.e., for the readers of the Jewish Chronicle]

Tony Blair — a man for whom I have tremendous respect — has been arguing that, as Theresa May is going to win, what we really need is a strong opposition. … I have a lot of friends who vote Labour and I understand their dilemma. They have supported Labour all their lives and they don’t want to abandon their party to Jeremy Corbyn. Unfortunately, not abandoning the party to Mr Corbyn means supporting the party while he leads it. Despite the acuteness of the dilemma, this is unconscionable.

I realise that I am a Conservative peer and this point concerns party politics. But, still. Forgive me for this is a point I feel I must make as a Jew. If Jeremy Corbyn and his followers do not suffer a gigantic defeat in this election, it will be an utter, complete, ghastly disaster for Jews. It will mean that despite all that has happened in the past two years, all his supporters have said about Jews, people — even Jews, for goodness sake — can still support him. … Jeremy Corbyn mustn’t just lose. He must be crushed electorally. It must be impossible for his supporters to say that it wasn’t too bad and they should have another go. …

So it needs bravery now to secure the long term future of Jews on the centre left. Maybe I’m not the right person to give this advice. I can see that. But forget it’s me, I am right[,] aren’t I? (Corbyn must lose — for our sake, The Jewish Chronicle, 4th May 2017 / 10th Iyar 5777)

Daniel Finkelstein
Daniel Finkelstein: “Corbyn Delendus Est!

Beside being a Tory peer, Finkelstein is also an “associate editor” at the influential Times of London. He’s not a good writer, but he sets out his views and psychology with perfect clarity in that article. The British Labour party was founded to defend the interests of the White working-class. It abandoned that group decades ago and, at the behest of strongly identified Jews like Lord Levy, worked to harm their interests instead. Finkelstein doesn’t care. His only concern is that perennial question: “What’s best for Jews?”

Repent or be destroyed

If any political party in Britain doesn’t put Jewish interests first, Jews like Finkelstein see only two options. The first is that the party must be kept out of power until it repents and returns to the path of righteousness. That’s what Finkelstein wants for Labour. Alternatively, the party must be destroyed. That’s what Finkelstein and the rest of the Jewish elite wanted — and got — for the British National Party, which won millions of votes only a few years ago but has now collapsed, losing its two Members of the European Parliament and all but one of its local councillors.

You can see the same unblushing ethnocentrism and selfishness in “How the SDP failed the Jews,” another article in the Jewish Chronicle that puts Jewish interests first and Gentile interests nowhere. The SDP, or Social Democratic Party, was formed by rebels from the Labour party who thought their old party had become too left-wing to win elections. And look who was among those rebels:

Another youthful recruit [to the SDP], Danny Finkelstein — now a Conservative peer and JC columnist — joined Labour as a schoolboy. Delivering literature for the party during a local election campaign, he found some SDP leaflets stuck in a letter box. He fished them out, intending to throw them away but, having read them instead, promptly joined the new party. Two years after the SDP’s launch, Finkelstein became chair of the Young Social Democrats. He went on to become a political adviser to [David] Owen, a member of the party’s National Committee, and fought Ken Livingstone in Brent East in 1987. Indeed, fighting that year’s general election in alliance with the Liberal party, the SDP fielded more Jewish candidates than Labour. (How the SDP failed the Jews, The Jewish Chronicle, 13th March 2017 / 15th Adar 5777)

However, the SDP proved insufficiently pro-Israel, which is why the article concludes that it failed the crucial test for any British political party: are Jewish interests its first priority? The revelation about Daniel Finkelstein’s early political history is no surprise. Is it any wonder that he praises Tony Blair and is a good friend of the Jewish Labour supporter Jonathan Freedland? Finkelstein is a Conservative peer who isn’t actually a conservative — but of course, that’s true for a great many Tories.

That’s why the BBC are happy to allow him on the radio panel-show The News Quiz, where he sits happily with far-left folk like Jeremy Hardy and the Trotskyist Mark Steel (a Sephardic Jew). His appearances there prove that bad writing isn’t his only non-talent. He’s also bad at comedy.

Father and Son

Hugo Rifkind is another true Jew and fake conservative who airs his lack of comedic talent on the News Quiz. He’s the son of the former cabinet minister Sir Malcolm Rifkind, who, like Dianne Feinstein in the United States, has had a vital role overseeing the intelligence services. He became Chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee in 2010. Are you reassured to hear that Sir Malcolm thinks the surveillance state is doing an excellent job and keeping strictly within the law? You shouldn’t be:

On Tempora, it has been well known that the fibre optic cables that carry a significant proportion of the world’s communications pass close to the British coastline and could provide intelligence opportunities. The reality is that the British public are well aware that its intelligence agencies have neither the time nor the remotest interest in the emails or telephone conversations of well over 99% of the population who are neither potential terrorists nor serious criminals. Modern computer technologies do permit the separation of those that are of interest from the vast majority that are not. (What rubbish, Sir Simon! Our intelligence agencies are not outside the law, The Guardian, 20th September, 2013)

Deep-state defender Malcolm Rifkind

Malcolm Rifkind is yet another strongly identified Jew who has enormous power and influence in the White and historically Christian nation of Britain. The contrast with Israel is even starker when you consider that Jews, at about 1%, are a far smaller minority here than Arabs, at just over 20%, are in Israel. Britain is not a White democracy: it is much more accurately labelled a Jewish oligarchy. When the so-called Labour party was in power, it was firmly under Jewish control. Now the so-called Conservative party is in power and firmly under Jewish control.

Vibrancy and violence

That explains why mass immigration continues as freely under the Tories as it did under Labour. It also explains why the Tories introduced “gay marriage” and, with the fake conservative Theresa May as Home Secretary, told the police to stop persecuting down-trodden Black youths in London and other ethnically enriched cities. The result can be seen in vibrant news at Breitbart: “Knife Crime Soars to Five-Year High After Kerb on ‘Racist’ Police Stop and Search.”

Does this have any connection with vibrant news in the Guardian: “Reported rapes in England and Wales double in four years”? Yes, of course it does. Mass immigration from violent and corrupt Third-World nations inevitably increases crime in Western nations. Israel doesn’t suffer from this crime because it doesn’t allow mass immigration from the Third World.

“It is tough working for the Jews…”

Daniel Finkelstein, the Rifkinds and other members of the Jewish elite don’t care about the harmful effects of mass immigration. They think it’s “Good for Jews,” because it atomizes British society and provides ample excuse for authoritarian laws and mass surveillance. Most of them are wealthy enough to insulate themselves from non-White violence — not that this stops Jews demanding subsidies from the government for security against threats that they themselves created.

And although Jews claim to be deeply concerned about the welfare of minorities in Britain, the minorities in question often have different stories. Here are two extracts from a book called This Is London: Life and Death in the Big City (2016) by the Jewish author Ben Judah:

The Jews, they are a strange people. They like to talk to the Filipinas [who work for them as domestic servants]. “We are an immigrant family like you,” they say. And when the Filipina goes, “Oh, when did you move to Britain?”, the Jews say, “1880.” And the Filipina is stunned and confused. The Jews, they only ever talk about Israel — Israel, Israel, Israel, all day Israel — and it is as if they are living here in St John’s Wood [a wealthy suburb of London] but they are really there, in precious Israel. …

And it is tough working for the Jews. They make many Filipinas cry. They are more likely than anyone else to bring the Filipinas inside the family — but this is mostly a charade. They never, ever want to pay — as little as possible, as late as possible. And there are many, many Filipinas who burst into tears when they realize after seven years that the Jews have been cheating them on national insurance, their weekly salaries, or even more. (Op. cit., “Knightsbridge,” pp. 229 and 231)

If Ben Judah weren’t himself Jewish, he might have risked prosecution for spreading hate-stereotypes about Jewish venality, deceit and ethnocentrism. His book describes an atomized city full of crime, alienation and competing tribes. Twenty-first-century London is a Jewish creation, formed by policies dear to Jews and their liberal allies, but never supported by the White majority. In a supposed democracy, Jews have got their disastrous way on mass immigration.

No to Nassim

If you want to understand how a minority can control the majority like that, an excellent place to start is Nassim Taleb’s essay “The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dominance of the Stubborn Minority.” Taleb is an Arab Christian from Lebanon, a highly intelligent and insightful economist and statistician who predicted — and warned against — the financial crisis. Surely Taleb would make an excellent director at the Bank of Israel or a senior adviser in the Israeli government?

Nassim Taleb: No good for Israel

No, not at all. Taleb is precisely the kind of person Israel wants to exclude from power, not invite into it. He’s an Arab and a Christian. He wouldn’t make “What’s best for Jews?” the central principle of his life. In Jewish eyes, his intelligence and insight make him less suitable for high office in Israel, not more. And he’s even dared to suggest that the great Jewish intellectual Susan Sontag was obnoxious and uncouth.

Lascivious Priest

Politics in Britain inverts the Israeli rule: it doesn’t discriminate in favour of the majority, but against it. Any hint that a party seeks what’s best for the White majority will elicit loud accusations of racism, xenophobia and fascism. That’s what happened to Ukip and that’s why Ukip were delighted that their candidate in the mayoral election in Manchester was an Orthodox Jew called Shneur Odze. Alas, Mr Odze has let the party down. The Jewish Chronicle, which doesn’t like Ukip or Orthodox Judaism, was happy to report the following:

A strictly Orthodox man standing as Ukip’s candidate in the Manchester mayoral election has been accused of conducting an affair with a woman he met on a bondage sex website. Shneur Odze, who had declined to shake hands with a female political opponent on “religious grounds” earlier in the election campaign, allegedly posed as a Catholic priest on the site, which is described as a social network for the “fetish and kinky community”.

According to the Mail on Sunday, Mr Odze described himself on his profile as having been into bondage and sadomasochism “for a number of years” during which he said he had “tried a great deal and enjoyed even more”. The Mail reported that Mr Odze had met the woman for sex. She discovered his real identity when she put his mobile number into Google and found his Ukip Facebook page.

Mr Odze is married with four children. He has not responded to requests for comment. His local Ukip branch chairman resigned after the allegations were made, saying he could not support Mr Odze’s actions. A Ukip spokesman said: “This is a personal matter for Mr Odze. He has broken no law.” (Sex claims against Ukip candidate, The Jewish Chronicle, 5th May 2017 / 9th Iyar 5777)

Shneur Odze, fake Catholic

I was struck by the allegation that Shneur Odze “posed as a Catholic priest.” If true, it’s both funny and revealing. Odze was posing as a Catholic rather in the way that Daniel Finkelstein is posing as a conservative. He was both having his own cake and poisoning someone else’s — that is, helping to bring the Catholic church into disrepute. A devout Catholic exposed for posing as a rabbi on an S&M website would surely be denounced for anti-Semitism. Has the devout Jew Odze, posing as a Catholic priest, been denounced for Christophobia or goyophobia? No, not at all. Those concepts don’t exist in the mainstream, even though the phenomena are widespread among British Jews:

Jewish hostility to Christians: the prejudice no one ever writes about

The case of the Oxford lecturer in Jewish studies who says she was sacked after she converted to Christianity has thrown a spotlight on to an acutely sensitive subject. I have no idea whether Dr Tali Argov was treated unfairly — that’s for the employment tribunal to decide — but let’s not pretend that Jews who become Christians don’t face intense disapproval from their own community.

Christian anti-Semitism, Muslim anti-Semitism, Christian Islamophobia, Muslim persecution of Christians [note lack of a term for this] — all of these are acceptable topics of debate. But not Jewish hostility to Christianity [ditto].

You can understand why Jews might dislike the Christian religion: not only does it deify a man, the ultimate blasphemy for pious Jews just as it is for pious Muslims, but it’s also implicated in centuries of anti-Semitism. (I think its role in inspiring the Holocaust has been exaggerated, but that’s an argument for another day.)

Sometimes Jewish antipathy to Christianity spills over into hostility towards Christians. There was a piece in the Independent the other day by Christina Patterson that went way over the top in describing the rudeness of Stamford Hill’s ultra-Orthodox Jews towards non-Jews:

When I moved to Stamford Hill [in London], 12 years ago, I didn’t realise that goyim were about as welcome in the Hasidic Jewish shops as Martin Luther King at a Ku Klux Klan convention. I didn’t realise that a purchase by a goy was a crime to be punished with monosyllabic terseness, or that bus seats were a potential source of contamination, or that road signs, and parking restrictions, were for people who hadn’t been chosen by God. And while none of this is a source of anything much more than irritation, when I see an eight-year-old boy recoiling from a normal-looking woman (because, presumably, he has been taught that she is dirty or dangerous, or, heaven forbid, dripping with menstrual blood) it makes me sad.

Stephen Pollard, the brilliant editor of the Jewish Chronicle, described this as “pure, unrelenting unadulterated anti-Jewish bigotry,” on the part of Ms Patterson and indeed some of its undertones are disturbing. But monosyllabic terseness towards goyim? I’ve experienced it, and it’s maddening. Let me recommend a gripping book called Postville by the secular Jewish journalist Stephen Bloom, who records the extreme bad manners of Lubavitch Jews who moved en masse to a town in rural Iowa to run a huge kosher butchery. In the end, angry Christian townspeople, who had initially been welcoming, voted to annexe the land on which the factory was built, so they could tax and regulate it. Bloom, who felt the Lubavitchers had displayed “despicable” attitudes verging on racism, supported the move.

Jewish hostility towards Christians isn’t confined to the ultra-Orthodox. A woman friend of mine tutored the daughter of a Jewish couple in north London. When she said she wanted to take a break for Christmas, the wife went bananas. “We do not allow that word to be spoken in this house,” she said. An unrepresentative incident, no doubt; but my friend’s attitude towards Judaism changed after it took place. And I could tell other stories, of unbelievable haughtiness by the leaders of Anglo-Jewry, which would have led to diplomatic incidents if the Christians involved weren’t afraid of being accused of anti-Semitism.

[U]ntil now I’ve never written a word about Jewish prejudice against Christians, even though I’ve seen it at close hand, at a series of Jewish-run conferences I attended in America in the 1990s at which evangelical Christian believers were stereotyped as fanatics who needed only the right demagogue to turn them into murderous anti-Semites. If the conferences were being held now, I suspect most of the flak would be taken by Catholics.

It would be interesting read a book on anti-Christian sentiment among modern Jews, including Jewish historians who invest heavily in the notion of Christian or gentile collective guilt for crimes committed by others. But such a book would have to come from the perspective of someone without an axe to grind (ie, not one of the anti-Semitic nutcases who are such a depressing presence in the blogosphere). And something tells me it will never be written. (Jewish hostility to Christians: the prejudice no one ever writes about, The Daily Telegraph, 29th July 2010)

Christianity has been central to Western life and culture for many centuries. Is it wise to allow Jews, who are so hostile to Christianity, so much power and influence in the West? Anti-Semitic nutcases don’t think it is. They want Western nations to act like Israel and defend their majority race and historic religion rather than working to destroy them.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

51 Comments to "Fake Jews: Deceit and Double-Think in Britain’s Hostile Elite"

  1. AWB's Gravatar AWB
    May 16, 2017 - 8:47 am | Permalink

    It’s always good to see a new post on the blog roll, thanks for the insights!

  2. Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
    May 16, 2017 - 11:12 am | Permalink

    Thanks to Tobias Langdon for awakening us to the daily expression of hatred towards gentiles of which most are unaware. Here’s a quote from somewhere on TOO: “Looking at developments in Russia during and after the Revolution, it seems quite possible that America may experience the same trajectory. In Russia, Slezkine tells us that so many viewed the Jews as non-threatening outsiders, yet during the Red Terror, Christians expressed shock that seemingly pacifistic Jews changed almost overnight: “We were amazed by what we had least expected to encounter among the Jews: cruelty, sadism, and violence had seemed alien to a nation so far removed from physical, warlike activity; those who yesterday did not know how to use a gun are now found among the executioners and cutthroats.”

    I vaguely remember another story from TOO, describing the diary of a Jewish “Revolutionary”, who boasted about his revenge upon a beautiful Christian girl who refused his advances. He joined the Red Guard and used his newfound authority, and his new gun, to drag her off to a brothel to beat, rape and humiliate her, puffing himself up at his “manly” deed, imprisoning her in the brothel as a sex slave for him and his “comrades”. Snivelling little cowards, every one of them!

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      May 16, 2017 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

      @ Bramble: It’s part of Bagritsky’s poem, “February”
      (see p. 93), though slightly different to your description.

      • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
        May 17, 2017 - 3:15 am | Permalink

        @Trenchant: Thanks for finding that! Though the “poem” says he later “encountered” her in a brothel, she was Russian and therefore Christian in those days, forced into sex slavery in a brothel by the Bolsheviks, because a prostitute wouldn’t “refuse” him as she had done previously. And judging by the psychopathic level of Tribal “revenge for imagined slights”, we can guess who put her there.

    • May 19, 2017 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

      America’s corrupt, criminal Jewish “leadership.” These are the administrators, elected or not, that remain in power no matter what crime they commit.

      These are the people Americans allow to rule over what remains of their nation and its children. Know that this is the lightest of crimes committed against children by Jews.

      Of course, displaying their usual chutzpah, Jews are righteously indignant that they have actually been convicted of such crimes by non-Jewish courts. After all according to their most un-holy book these are not crimes, but the right of the Jews lording over goyim herds.

      Take a look at this slimy, sexual deviant and understand your child may well be the next victim of these criminal psychopaths.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        May 21, 2017 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

        @ Arch Stanton

        Accurate quotations from the Talmud authorising the murder of children to provide blood for Passover despite the Biblical prohibition would be interesting.

        Also, verification of the miracles associated with the medieval cases.

        Examples from recent Jewish history likewise.

        Readers may be interested in “Trent 1475” (Yale UP 1996) by Po-chia Hsia AND the customer reviews on Amazon.

        Note also that “witches” confessed, especially after torture, to most unlikely activities involving Satan, and that Arthur Butz and others have compared the trials to the post-WW2 tribunals obtaining “confessions” by Nazis.

  3. San Fernando Curt's Gravatar San Fernando Curt
    May 16, 2017 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

    We have in the West allowed, for at least 70 years, our chronicles and history to be written and viciously analyzed by people who hate us. Never feel guilty for your ethnic past if you’re a white gentile. It’s likely your suffering is based on lies of hateful Jews.

    • William's Gravatar William
      May 18, 2017 - 12:10 am | Permalink

      The downfall of the BNP apparently became one of encouragement of (((tribal))) members joining. They joined, killed it and left. I imagine the hope was that Jewish members presence would provide relief form accusations of the BNP planning a shoah and support for stopping the rapidly accelerating White genocide which is caused by unending Black, Asian and Muslim immigration and faux refugees. Jews have a lot to loose when Muslims finally dominate politics because the Muslims will no longer need to pretend to be liberal but will bring them to heal as per Koran and Hadith.

      John Tyndall of the U.K. National Front once wrote an excellent essay on His experiences of Jews in WN movements. “Do we need Jewish candidates”

      “But sobering experiences and enlightenment were not far away. I soon came to realise, in the course of being a keen activist in the patriotic movement, that though we may do everything possible to avoid conflict with Jewry, Jewry – or at least its politically organised elements – was determined on conflict with us. Protesting that one was not ‘anti-Semitic’ was of no avail; the moment one became involved and identified with the struggle for one’s own race and nation – in my case the British race and nation – one became tarred by the Jews with the mark of the Devil. And, as I later learned, one became a name on a file in the offices of various Jewish organisations and a figure on the Jewish ‘hit list’ – perhaps not literally in the sense of assassination but most definitely figuratively, as an enemy to be watched, monitored and, when thought necessary, publicly reviled.”

      The section on “attempted sabotage of meetings” is of great value.

  4. Floda's Gravatar Floda
    May 16, 2017 - 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Expulsion, find a way to rid the country of these parasites. It has been done before. It must happen again. I doubt if I will live to see it happen but I think a time will come when the Goys wake up and do what the Germans tried to do. What outrage might precipitate this I can’t say. I could be a 911 on a grand scale, say a nuclear device going off in a city traced back to the tribe.

    • H8R's Gravatar H8R
      May 17, 2017 - 10:18 am | Permalink

      ” I(t) could be a 911 on a grand scale, say a nuclear device going off in a city traced back to the tribe.”

      A rudimentary reading of the events of 9/11 points directly at the “Tribe’s” involvement in that horrible day. Yet they still go about the business of enslaving all of us with their various usury schemes without the least resistance or impediment from those they exploit. We’ve got to do better.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        May 17, 2017 - 4:55 pm | Permalink


        Just in case Israel does this anyway, this was posted on May 17 at 7 AM cst. I believe this leak is highly credible.

        Israel hatched another new 911 terror plot, and Trump shut it down. Here is how the story line was supposed to go:

        Terrorists were going to board a U.S. bound plane from Europe, with laptops. They were going to hack the plane with their laptops, and do a second 911. When Trump mentioned terrorists with laptops to Russia, and to get them off of planes, and then Trump banned laptops on flights to the U.S., he shut down the Israeli terror plot. [scroll down]

    • May 17, 2017 - 1:18 pm | Permalink

      If 911 wasn’t traced back to the tribe – despite in-your-face evidence – then it’s hard to see what will.

      • Scott the Strategerist's Gravatar Scott the Strategerist
        May 21, 2017 - 2:53 am | Permalink

        That’s not it. You have to get whites to think of ourselves as a real group which really exists; and to start thinking of most other racial/ethnic groups as hostile outsiders. Once a white person rejects the narrative that we’re all atomised individuals and “race is a social construct,” then they almost immediately wake up to Jewish involvement in 9-11 and other conspiracies because it’s OBVIOUS!

  5. timetowakeupamerica's Gravatar timetowakeupamerica
    May 16, 2017 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    “Anti-Semitic nutcase” is an oxymoron.

    Anyone that is truly “anti-semitic” is just someone that doesn’t buy all the “Jews” LIES, probably because they’ve actually educated themselves, and found out that the entirety of Western Civilization (including all of its institutions) has been completely HIJACKED by “Jews”.

  6. May 16, 2017 - 10:40 pm | Permalink

    This expose is confirming common knowledge about those who have been at it for decades. Just yesterday’s headline, “Israeli Minister Yoav Galant: “The time has come to assassinate Assad”, gave rise to Jonas E Alexis writing an article wherein he mentions Rebecca Gordon’s book: Mainstream Torture, OUP, which depicts how the CIA’s Phoenix Program in Vietnam committed horrendous acts against the Vietnamese. Jonas states: “The same people who orchestrated perpetual wars virtually all over the world and who torture men, women and children and sent them to the slaughter house for years are now telling us that Assad is the new Hitler who ought to be assassinated.” – • http://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/05/16/israeli-minister-yoav-galant-the-time-has-come-to-assassinate-assad/ … and what is our sense of common humanity doing about it?

  7. Rosemarie's Gravatar Rosemarie
    May 17, 2017 - 1:02 am | Permalink

    “Anti-Semitic nutcases don’t think it is. They want Western nations to act like Israel and defend their majority race and historic religion rather than working to destroy them.”
    Are we sure it is wise to emulate the Israelis / Jews? Are there only two choices, to be the hammer or the amboss? To be destroyed or to destroy?
    I really don’t think so. I believe white cultures are more intelligent and creative than that, and should be striving for a third option. Jewish ethnocentrism is primitive and barbaric, and is nothing to emulate.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      May 17, 2017 - 10:21 am | Permalink

      Amen and brava, Rosemarie! To emulate the Jews is to commit suicide.

      As for “anti-Semitic nutcases,” the experience of the last four centuries should have taught attentive white people, white Christians especially, that what the Jews and their servants and allies call an anti-Semite is simply someone who declines to accept organized Jewry’s demand that, alone among the peoples of the earth, they not be held responsible for the consequences of their actions (especially their crimes) nor be bound by any moral dimension of the principle of cause and effect nor be required to accept that any standard, any standard whatsoever, deemed binding on other human beings binds them, too.

      • May 17, 2017 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

        It’s not necessary to ’emulate’ Jews. But it is necessary to learn from them. For example, Jews have destroyed many books which they disliked. It would therefore seem sensible to destroy all copies of ‘Jewish’ books; after all, they did it first. Jews in the USSR destroyed much of the Russian Orthodox Church. It would seem reasonable to remove synagogues. Jews owning news sources tell lies – permanently, continuously, unashamedly. Some form of retribution and correction is necessary. I doubt if such deeds would be ‘to commit suicide’.

        • Rosemarie's Gravatar Rosemarie
          May 17, 2017 - 11:04 pm | Permalink

          I agree with you that measurements need to be taken, and that closely observing their methods of warfare might be a giveaway as to how they themselves could be defeated. As Paracelsus said: ubi malum ibi remedium.
          Generally speaking though, they have nothing to teach us. They need to learn from us!

          I think Hervé Ryssen’s stance is reasonable:
          “We must never lose sight of the fact that Judaism is not a religious faith or a race, or an ethnic people who eat bagels. It is primarily a commitment, a mindset, an ideology and a project of world Jewish domination over a slave planet. And so it is primarily through the mind that this evil mindset must be destroyed.

          When a Jew is sincerely converted to Traditional Catholicism, for example, his Judaism, his hate and his desire to dominate others and wreak vengeance is destroyed within his heart. Judaism can in fact be rendered harmless in a peaceful manner.

          For example, here a few common-sense measures for a future anti-Jewish program:

          We must begin by dissolving the major Jewish-Zionist organizations across the country. It will be established by law that any statement or written work, book, television program or film that glorifies immigration, miscegenation, adultery or homosexuality be punished by a prison sentence.

          Likewise, all writings calling for the establishment of a world government will be punished with imprisonment and a revocation of citizenship. Anyincitation of Westerners to engage in a Middle Eastern war against the Muslim world will be punished as well with a prison sentence. In this way, militant Judaism is sidelined.

          Further measures will be needed to put an end to the Jewish menace once and for all. It will obviously be necessary to forbid any rabbinical teaching, to close Jewish schools and synagogues because they teach hatred, and to separate children from their parents early enough to prevent the horrors of incest, which is all too frequent among the members of the sect, an atrocity which generates the characteristic pathology called hysteria in the Jews.

          Children from Jewish families must receive instead a quality education, inculcating all the basic Indo-European, Greco-Roman values. Jewish youth in the process of healing will be encouraged to engage in projects that show solidarity with others, and work with other American and European children who are out in contact with nature, fresh air, animals, woods and farms.
          And the most fragile young elements of the sect will receive the best care in specialized psychiatric hospitals.
          After three or four generations, Judaism will have completely disappeared. We will organize,in the meantime, an international trial for the crimes of Judaism against peace and humanity, and repudiate once and for all this disastrous, mankind-hating cult.”


          • sam's Gravatar sam
            May 18, 2017 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

            i have a better idea, there are two islands completely separate , all males on one island and all females on the other, the Arctic and the antarctic fifty years should see the lot gone

          • May 22, 2017 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

            “We must never lose sight of the fact that Judaism is not a religious faith or a race, or an ethnic people who eat bagels. It is primarily a commitment, a mindset, an ideology and a project of world Jewish domination over a slave planet. And so it is primarily through the mind that this evil mindset must be destroyed.”

            This is the best summation if the Jew I have ever read. It’s well past bagels race and religion. It’s an insect, hive like mind focused on our destruction. Think massive termite infestation in your home’s foundation.

            As for the solutions, I’ll call Donald on the red phone and get him on it right away.

          • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
            May 23, 2017 - 4:00 am | Permalink

            @ Rosemarie

            One problem is that attempts to convert Jews to any form of Christianity are regarded as ipso facto “antisemitism”. The notion of the NT fulfilling or superseding the OT is likewise seen as antisemitic. One interesting side-issue is that claim by Jews and liberal Christians that “The Holocaust” had its origins at last partly in the literal interpretation of the NT and the commitment of most Christian Zionists in the USA to – a literal interpretation of the same document.

            The fury and power of the main Jewish establishment against any fundamentalists who challenge Christian Zionism was shown in the disgraceful treatment of the Rev Stephen Sizer in England; a lesson more instructive than many read from the “Church” of “England” pulpits by sanctimonious “dear Vicars”.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            May 23, 2017 - 3:44 pm | Permalink

            @Arch Stanton:

            This is the best summation if the Jew I have ever read.

            Is it truly? Surely the point of Judaism-in-practice is that the “commitment, …mind-set, … ideology and … project of world Jewish domination over a slave planet” are inseparable from race and ethnicity in their workings. That the utterly primitive concept of “justification by matrilinealism alone” is the sine qua non of the Jews has been the experience of whites, a fortiori white Christians, in all places and at all times—except, that is, in our own time and place and in those few others where Jewish control of the public and even private narrative has been as claustrophobically circumscribed as it is here and now.

            It is odd, too, to see Ryssen’s analysis warmly greeted here at TOO, given that the intimate, inseparable connection of race, mind-set, and activity has been precisely observed by KM. In scientific, statistical, and historical terms and contexts, he documented this connection in PTSDA, SaID, and CoC.

            Surely, this body of evidence and observation doesn’t lead me alone in wondering what, if anything, Ryssen has been smoking. If the answer is “nothing at all,” one is compelled, I think, to wonder further whether Ryssen is anything more than yet another corrupted white guy whose true purpose is to deflect attention away from where we ought to be striving mightily to focus it.

        • Rosemarie's Gravatar Rosemarie
          May 18, 2017 - 12:08 am | Permalink

          I agree with you that we should closely observe their methods of warfare against us, as it might be a giveaway about how they themselves can be defeated… As Paracelsus said: ubi malum ibi remedium. Generally, though, I think they have nothing to teach us, as they are psychologically unhealthy people, mainly as a collective, but also as individuals. They need to learn from us! But I agree that we need to take measures for self-protection.
          I think Hervé Ryssen has made some really important observations.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          May 18, 2017 - 4:03 pm | Permalink

          @ Rerevisionist

          How would one go about destroying every single book, article or newspaper in the world ever written by a Jew, and every synagogue in the world? The entire Bible and Christianity obviously would have to go too, by your previously expressed criteria. Also, what about every movie ever made by a Jew or with a Jewish actor?

          And what about Jews themselves?

          Perhaps targeted nuclear incinerations might help – but these too are just another Jewish fraud, aren’t they? Maybe our UK Trident missiles really have bagels for warheads, and all those underground US, Soviet, French, Chinese and North Korean tests were just kosher chicken-soup cans exploding?

  8. RoHa's Gravatar RoHa
    May 17, 2017 - 2:00 am | Permalink

    There is no such newspapaer as “Times of London”. There is an old-established newspaper called “The Times”, which is published in London.
    All other newspapers with “Times” in their names are imitating “The Times”. They call themselves “The Irish Times”, “The Times of India”, “The Los Angeles Times”, and so forth. If you wish to make it clear that you are referring to “The Times” and not one of its imitators, you can write “The Times”(London).

    • Aitch.'s Gravatar Aitch.
      May 17, 2017 - 7:27 am | Permalink

      Jeez, what nit-picking.

  9. Forever Guilty's Gravatar Forever Guilty
    May 17, 2017 - 4:06 am | Permalink

    I very much doubt if there would be non white majority, life would be as usual.
    I doubt that Muslim non whites would contribute to old White people pensions or healthcare for example. I also doubt that Whites rights on homes and property would be respected by non white migrants, when they become majority. Perhaps it’s bigotry, but thought about Pakistani or Somali surgeons, dentists , police officers, judges, mayors, lawyers makes me nervous..

    Creatures promoting mass immigration, basically enemy’s of White population.

  10. Dan marotta's Gravatar Dan marotta
    May 17, 2017 - 5:25 am | Permalink

    An excellent article that I will share, very Interesting.

  11. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    May 17, 2017 - 9:11 am | Permalink

    Great article! I will make sure I share it.

  12. May 17, 2017 - 9:50 am | Permalink

    Tobias Langdon doesn’t seem to realise the long-term nature of Jewish influence in Britain (and other white countries). Cromwell in effect led a Jewish coup against England, for example. More recently, Churchill damaged Europe as much as he could for what Jews considered was ‘good’ for them. By these standards, Blair, and the Jew hacks quoted, are small fry.
    Although, clearly, what you write is true, personally I’m cautious about ascribing to Jews a sort of calculus of what is ‘good for Jews’. It’s equally, perhaps, explicable by simple instinctive aggressive parasitic behaviour, causing as much damage as possible from a vantage point straddling other cultures/ nations/ groups.

  13. Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
    May 17, 2017 - 11:34 am | Permalink

    SIR Rifkind’s article in the Guardian,cited by you, is a complete factual lie, by this PhD in Disinformation/Politician. His paragraph following your citation in your link would have been informative for us. After this fool peddles the infallibility of their law and their adherence to it, he states the following:”Our system is not perfect. There are occasions when the intelligence obtained may be of such little value as NOT to justify the diminution in privacy associated with obtaining it “. [Jewish logic].

    On May 29, 2001, Jane Perrone penned an article for the same Guardian, writing primarily of the then ECHELON satellite spy system, copiously summarized by Wikipedia under ECHELON; including photos. Her article is No. 11 of an astounding 70 professional sources listed by Wikipedia. Very worthwhile reading since it relates to Rifkind’s era, though of course superseded by Snowden’s revelations.

    Perrone, in part: ” The US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand created Echelon as part of an Anglo-Saxon club, set up by secret treaty in 1947. The five countries divided up the world to share the product of global eavesdropping. The Echelon operation is based at Fort Meade in Maryland, America, and at GCHQ in Cheltenham. Agencies from the five countries exchange intercepted transmissions, using supercomputers to flag up any message containing key words listed in the so-called Echelon ‘ dictionaries ‘. These transmissions are recorded and transcribed for future analysis “.

    Collectively, the five countries became known as ” the Five Eyes “.

    Perrone correctly stated, that ” …the five countries EXCHANGE intercepted transmissions…” , omitting, for whatever reason or protectionist editorial policy, to go into the word ” exchange ” itself.

    All five countries had so-called Privacy Legislation: like Lenin’s pie-crusts, ” made to be broken “. Spying on ONE’S OWN was illegal: but spying on the citizens of ANOTHER’S was not. Therefore the introduction of the essentially Talmud-based, LEGISLATION CIRCUMVENTING reason/necessity for the EXCHANGE. [ If you need to reread the foregoing—please do so—it’s a mouthful ! ]

    We must recall the Special Agreement between the US and Israel, which delivered up bulk meta-data intercepts to Israel, without even deleting the information on private citizens, as legally prescribed. Given the choice between completely controlling a country’s destiny, by controlling its credit, as attributed to Rothschild, or this bulk, unvetted data, I would prefer the data. Unquestionably this is responsible for almost all of our Luegenpresse’s news-cycles and a goodly proportion of our free and fair elections: purportedly interfered with solely by Russia; lusted-after for its momentarily unreachable riches.

    SIR Rifkind, fortuitously and graciously offered-up by a selfless British Jewry to assist a Christian British population, completely adrift in a stormy sea without their magnanimous and selfless support then writes a counterfactual article in the selfsame Guardian, addressed to the inferior goy Sir Simon, MERELY TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE PERONNE ARTICLE: Snowden’s intervening disclosures aside.

    In Rifkind’s full text to Sir Simon, he sarcastically credits Sir Simon with also belonging to the Elite, given his contributions to the magazine Country Life. Had Rifkind read said magazine closer, he might have realized, with the absence of advertising for gigantic, translucent spheres, that they did not exist to protect turnip crops from the inclement weather, as fourteen of them protectively enveloped secret spy satellite radar screens. At an RAF Base. Since, in his polemically questionable and logic-failingletter he stated that he had personally chaired the Parliamentary Committee responsible, he would surely have remembered these fourteen gigantic structures whose huge budget must have come through his important office.

    Good-bye Britain, unless you really start kickin’ !

  14. May 17, 2017 - 11:34 am | Permalink

    ‘Christianity has been central to Western life and culture for many centuries.’
    Perhaps. Or perhaps it has been peripheral and unimportant, except as a system for providing careers to idlers. The problem is: Christianity, however it started, was eventually smothered and embraced by Jews; it must count as a Jewish invention. The claims that the Church was hostile to Jews must be taken with a handful of salt. Unless it can be redefined (and updated) it’s simply another harness for Jews to partially control whites.
    http://www.big-lies.org/general/early-christianity-bible.html is an attempt to cast light on another long-running Jew fraud.

    • Rosemarie's Gravatar Rosemarie
      May 17, 2017 - 11:22 pm | Permalink

      I think you are raising a very important point! The Church hasn’t even been able to suppress heathen symbols, like the Christmas tree, the Easter eggs (though they did try). How much in our cultures is really Christian, and how much is much older, passed on orally, through folklore, legends, family traditions, innate values, and language? I have noticed how in historical scholarship, Europeans are always presented as not having a culture of their own, and that they had to import culture from abroad, such as Christianity from the Middle East and philosophy from Greece. Why do philosophers never discuss Germanic cosmology, with its rather sophisticated understanding of time, fate and natural processes? There is only one book I have come across that attempts a philosophical interpretation (German völkisch thinkers aside), which “offers new insights into the persistence of a residual paganism in the understanding of fate following the Christian conversion”: https://www.amazon.de/When-Norns-Spoken-Anthony-Winterbourne/dp/1611472962

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        May 18, 2017 - 9:40 am | Permalink

        Greece is Europe, as far as I know.

        • Rosemarie's Gravatar Rosemarie
          May 22, 2017 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

          Yes, but from the point of view of all the non-Greek European countries, Greece is still abroad.

    • May 18, 2017 - 4:06 am | Permalink

      CyndiLu Stone
      “Jews control Christianity; they invented it to destroy our European roots and blood ties. Paul, the Jew, wrote the new testament. Hollywood even makes big Religious Movies about Jesus. It’s how they prevent Europeans from uniting or turning against them as a force. Christianity is a rip off of pagan traditions. Dump the Semitic Mythology and embrace your true roots.”

      • CF's Gravatar CF
        May 18, 2017 - 8:43 am | Permalink

        Why would the Jews invent a religion whose holy book states that they are the common enemy of manking (1 Thessalonians 2:15) and the children of Satan (John 8:44)?

        The biggest religious movie about Jesus was Mel Gibson’s ‘The Passion of the Christ’, which they called anti-semitic hate propaganda.

        ‘It’s how they prevent Europeans form uniting or turning against them as a force’

        The Catholic Church provided more concerrted opposition to Jewish influence than the hundreds of disparate pagan sects ever did.

        ‘Christianity is a rip off of pagan traditions’

        Is it pagan or semitic? Make up your mind

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          May 18, 2017 - 11:22 am | Permalink

          “Christianity is a rip off of pagan traditions” [says Rerevisionist, either quoting or addressing someone called CyndiLu Stone]

          Is it pagan or semitic? Make up your mind.

          With respect, CF, the gentleman need not “make up his mind” because, as both his website and his comments here at TOO make abundantly clear, his mind is seldom if ever a formal participant in his axiom-forming process.

          The gentleman’s modus operandi plainly began with an animus toward the Cross and those who follow it, and he has evidently spent decades constructing the metaphoric equivalent of styrofoam packaging material to protect this animus from damage in the hurlyburly of life and thought that, at least in Socratic aspiration, constitutes human life.

          Of course, the selfsame process may be seen at work in the narrative dictation of our Jewish overlords and their brainwashed epigones. Is it any wonder, then, that the gentleman bridled at the statement that to emulate Jews is to commit suicide? He and they, alas, are in certain critical aspects brothers under the skin.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      May 18, 2017 - 4:23 pm | Permalink

      @ Rerevisionist

      To anyone who has made a serious scholarly study of the origins of the New Testament and the Quran, your referred article is full of demonstrable nonsense, but you think you know best and anyone with a contrary well-informed view of history must ipso facto be a Jew, a Jewish puppet or a Jewish dupe.

      Unfortunately, however, no serious discussion is even possible with a closed mind like yours. It is a handicap because it can be quoted by opponents to make websites like TOO look ridiculous.

      And if “the Jews” were really as omnipotent as your egotistic contributions suggest, what would be the use of trying to oppose them at all?

      • May 22, 2017 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

        I don’t usually waste time replying to [deleted]

        (Mod. Note: “ReRev”, could you please bone up on how to disagree politely? Thanks.)

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      May 21, 2017 - 3:52 pm | Permalink

      @ Rerevisionist

      “A handful of salt”? Am I correct in thinking that you believe that the Jews have been trying to dissuade others from using salt in order to make them ill?

    • Andy_Patton's Gravatar Andy_Patton
      May 26, 2017 - 3:24 am | Permalink

      Christianity is definitely not a Jewish invention. That’s blasphemous! You are confusing modern Judaized Churchianity with true (Aryan) Biblical-Christianity. Apart from the rogue Masoretic Jewish fantasy book of Esther, the remaining Bible and Apocrypha, inc Enoch, is OUR History and prophecy.

      The Govt-approved King James Version, although useful, has tragically misled ‘modern’ Christians and universalized the properly exclusive, racist, nationalist Anglo-Kelto-Saxon-Germanic-Nordic ancient religion and laws. See, read, study and be amazed at the academic explanations in Finck’s Christogenea and related sites. Discover your true IDENTITY and destiny and our ancient ENEMY.

  15. May 17, 2017 - 12:17 pm | Permalink

    And there are many, many Filipinas who burst into tears when they realize after seven years that the Jews have been cheating them on national insurance, their weekly salaries, or even more.

    Where have we seen this before?

    And Jacob said unto Laban, Give me my wife, for my days are fulfilled, that I may go in unto her. [ . . . ] And it came to pass, that in the morning, behold, it was Leah: and he said to Laban, What is this thou hast done unto me? did not I serve with thee for Rachel? wherefore then hast thou beguiled me? And Laban said, It must not be so done in our country, to give the younger before the firstborn. Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years. [ . . . ] And he went in also unto Rachel, and he loved also Rachel more than Leah, and served with him yet seven other years. – Genesis 29.

    Indentured servitude in the Old Testament. If Jews willingly to cheat their own relatives in their “holy” book, why not the gullible goyim?

    Filipina: “You’d do it to your own kind.”

    Tory Jew: “So what’s your problem? We sell our souls every day to be on the winning team and Jews are the winning team. – See ya’ chump.”

    Jews are obviously not very imaginative as they still cling to 3000 year old customs.

    “He’s not a good writer, but he sets out his views and psychology with perfect clarity in that article.

    And no wonder, the Jew’s god is absolutely the worst author that ever had a priest set words to papyrus. Yet he manages to convey his thoughts with perfect clarity, to wit:

    Thus saith the LORD of hosts … slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass. . . . Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.

  16. May 17, 2017 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

    On the evening of her election as Tory Leader Theresa May had dinner with Britain’s Chief Rabbi. ‘Nuff said.

    • Nancy Pelosy's Gravatar Nancy Pelosy
      May 19, 2017 - 10:18 am | Permalink

      Theresa May is CultMarxLite – vs Labs, Libs, Greens whi are full on CM. Typical fem-pol. Can never question (((MSM psyops))). Spouts Cathedralese bout end racism, sexism etc. Not an original thought in her female brain. Thinks police is too White.

    • Andy_Patton's Gravatar Andy_Patton
      May 26, 2017 - 3:27 am | Permalink

      Treasonous May!

  17. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    May 17, 2017 - 2:36 pm | Permalink

    @KM and Moderators:

    I just noticed that you’ve decided to revert to the older format for thread comments—that is, oldest first, newest last.


  18. Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
    May 17, 2017 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Fake Jews, that is “Perfidi Judaei”, as they were called in the Good Friday Catholic Prayer which, after the Second Vatican Council and the too oecumenical Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, was modified so that we do no more pray for the conversion and salvation of “perfidi Judaei”. Perhaps it’s for that that they seem every day more fake, deceitful, in a word worse.
    “Perfidus” means unfaithful, untrustworthy, traitor.
    And “perfida Albio” was a very well known dictum in political circles during the XIX and first paet of XX Century. I wonder how much of this “perfidia” was due to English people or Jewish elites.
    According to my personal experience they are “perfiid”, and as soosn as possible, when they realise you’re a certain Christian, especially a Catholic, even though not too practicing, they start to despise you and to keep you at distance. And if they can, they try to ruin you professionally.

  19. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    May 19, 2017 - 11:56 am | Permalink

    ‘fake conservative Theresa May’. Agree, women = poz. Can a female be a cuckservative?

  20. R. Smith's Gravatar R. Smith
    May 23, 2017 - 2:41 pm | Permalink

    End the Zionist occupation of Britain and Palestine!

Comments are closed.