‘Heaping Up Its Own Funeral Pyre’: Britain, Islamic Terror, and the Cult of Pacifism

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.


“Fail, and that history turns into rubbish,
All that great past to a trouble of fools.”
—­ W.B. Yeats, Three Marching Songs

In 1937 the great Anglo-Irish poet William Butler Yeats was visited by a professor from India who, after lengthy discussion over lunch, requested a message to his country. ‘Let ten thousand men of one side meet the other. That is my message to India,’ replied Yeats, who then seized a Japanese sword and shouted, ‘Conflict, more conflict!’ To twenty-first-century ears, the message might seem bizarre, and may even have jarred the constitution of Yeats’s visitor. It was rooted, however, in the context of the poet’s Romantic and nationalistic belief system — a belief system in which conflict was both natural and good, and essential to the prevention of tribal decay, pollution, and decadence.

We are now, of course, far removed from such an understanding. It has been exiled from artistic and political expression, and driven from instinct by a weak and perverted culture. In the present, to be angry is ‘to let your enemy win.’ To hate is to commit the most grievous of sins of personality. To assert yourself and your interests is to perpetrate a pathological level of selfishness. Yeats would be repulsed. He would have understood that whereas conflict offers at least the opportunity for victory, and thus assumes a heroic quality, the pacifism currently inculcated in the West offers only ignoble defeat and death.

The Yeats anecdote recurred to me in the early hours of the morning as I cast my eyes over emerging media commentary on the latest jihadist attack in London. With depressing regularity the mainstream media, politicians, and cultural personalities ascended into the airwaves like insects disturbed from a nest, all carrying the same poison. To be sure, no-one dared express surprise at the latest Muslim atrocity — we are, perhaps fortunately, getting to the point where that particular affront has exhausted its viability, although faux expressions of ‘shock’ continue to reverberate. Instead, the narrative advanced by these elites was based around the idea that terrorism “should not divide us.” Quite apart from the fact that a multicultural society means that there is no longer any ‘us,’ and the fact that terrorism aims to terrorise rather than ‘divide’ a population, the statement itself should be read as containing a subliminal message: “Do nothing.” It is an enjoinder to pacifism — to surrender.

There is nothing noble about refusing to be moved or motivated by terrorism. If a man broke into my home and assaulted my family I am not made heroic by standing in the corner and pretending that nothing has happened or pretending we’re brothers after all. In the last twenty-four hours social media has been awash with liberals appealing to images of British stoicism during the Blitz of the Second World War. Such allusions are flawed for two reasons, the first being that the stoical, ‘stiff upper lip’ Blitz narrative is nothing more than a myth and a cultural trope. The late British historian Angus Calder’s masterpiece, The Myth of the Blitz, clearly demonstrated that far from showing the British at their finest hour, the Blitz disrupted the lives and broke the will of the vast majority of Londoners, causing a quarter of the population to flee to the countryside.[1] And rather than encouraging national solidarity, both Winston Churchill and the Royal Family were booed while touring the aftermath of air-raids. If the aim of the German air raids was to instill genuine terror, weaken morale, and disrupt the life of the city, it largely succeeded in these goals. And if contemporary Britons believe that they can survive Islamic terror by appealing to a fictional ‘Blitz spirit,’ then they are horribly mistaken.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

The second reason why such allusions are wrong-headed is that stoicism is not a healthy attitude in conflict unless it is accompanied by aggression. Even though it has been exaggerated as part of national myth, there was an element of stoicism in British society during the Second World War — but this stoicism existed within the context of warfare. The public braved aggression in the knowledge that vengeance in some form would be visited up the aggressors. Bombs would be dropped on enemy cities. Enemy civilians would be forced to ensure the same hardships, and the same terror. No sane person would have advocated simply taking the bombings, much less taking great pride in the fact that they refused to retaliate or avenge their dead.

What masquerades as stoicism in Britain and much of Europe today is not actually stoicism at all. It is a particularly insidious form of pacifism, spread via cultural code. Its primary purpose is to facilitate the untroubled progression of the multicultural project. It should be made clear that this pacifism is not entirely autochthonous, by which I mean that this gutless passivity is not culturally native to Europeans. It has been taught and disseminated among our people via a system of language described by Jonathan Bowden as a “grammar of self-intolerance.” When you weaken a people’s sense of attachment to its own culture, you weaken the desire to defend that culture, and distort even the perception that that culture might be under threat. Liberals, Leftists, and the generally un-informed reach wildly for the things that they believe to be under threat from Islamic terrorism, but these never include the tangible interests of their own people. ‘Tolerance’ and ‘diversity’ are most often the abstractions of choice, but most recently one Guardian journalist even declared Islamic terrorism “a war on joy.” So while Whites are made a minority in London, are mangled under vehicles, and have their throats cut open in restaurants, they are uncomfortable perceiving themselves as targets or victims of Islamic invasion. They displace their own victimhood onto abstract concepts or values.

Aside from cultural indoctrination, which is intense throughout Europe, pacifism is also enforced and promoted via legal means. It shouldn’t escape the notice of the attentive that every Muslim atrocity is accompanied by the introduction of some form of government initiative purporting to make the nation safer. What these initiatives actually do is make the multicultural concept safer. Laws to monitor the internet, ‘hate preaching,’ and travel, which are sold to the public as a means of tackling radical Islam, are diverted with malice into coordinated efforts to stifle nationalism and any criticism of the diversity agenda. These laws are often pre-prepared by organizations like the Anti-Defamation League and their European equivalents. One can be certain that after every Muslim atrocity nationalist websites will be targeted for censorship, lone nationalists will be targeted for arrest for ‘hate speech’ against the troublesome minority, and travel bans (introduced with fanfare as a means of preventing the entry of radical Imams from Pakistan) will be imposed instead on people like Richard Spencer.

Right on cue, within twelve hours of the latest attacks, Theresa May announced that she would be seeking measures to tackle ‘extremism’ online, a measure that will undoubtedly target nationalists more than Islamists. The country, of course, isn’t made safer by the employment of any of these measures. Terrorist attacks continue, and the pattern is repeated. The jihadist threat and ethnic crime against native Brits intensify, while nationalism is muzzled, gagged, and weakened , drip by drip, step by step.

The combination of legal repression and cultural numbing produces a truly horrifying inertia. At first, there was some small, dark humor to be squeezed from the stereotypical aspects of responses to Muslim terror — the social media filters, the candles, the vigils, the clichés and non sequiturs. I’ve noticed recently among friends that we are laughing less at these responses, a sign perhaps that some of us are realizing that our situation may be more bleak than even we had previously thought.

Our own problems and pathologies aside, we are indeed at war, and at war on a number of fronts. At the best of times terrorism finds a poor foe in pacifism. Even moderately efficient terrorists, despite often possessing demographic and logistical weaknesses, often achieve a significant portion of their goals if they press long and hard enough at a particular weak spot. And all governments have their Achilles Heel. The most primitive goal of terrorists is often simply the violent expression of their anger against a population or government. The three dead Muslims lying on London Bridge achieved this goal with relative ease, their enmity against the West, whether religious, racial, cultural, social or economic (or a combination of all), quenched in one eight-minute frenzy of bloody and zealous fury.

Which brings us to a unique difficulty presented to the West by Islamic terror — the fact that its soldiers do not care if they go home and in fact welcome death. Liberals believe they stumbled on a piece of choice wisdom when they proclaim that ‘to give in to hate is to let your enemy win.’ The true, but demonic, genius lies with Islam, which proclaims that individual death itself (and thus the most personal form of defeat) can offer victory.

Aside from the narrow goal of personal vengeance, a particularly alarming aspect of Muslim terror is that it cannot be conceivably negotiated away. When the British government engaged in conflict with the Irish Republican Army it did so knowing the IRA’s war aims — the withdrawal of the British government, in all forms, from the entire island of Ireland. While the ‘hot war’ carried on for much of the twentieth century, there was a ‘cold war’ of negotiations and diplomacy behind the scenes, designed to ameliorate the violence via discussions and concessions that touched on aspects of the war aims of the terrorists — devolved government, gradual removal of British troops, and concessions to political prisoners. Crucially, the demands of the IRA were significant but not entirely inconceivable, and there were practical political means of dealing with them. A similar case is that of the Basque separatist group ETA, which employed terrorist methods against the Spanish government with clear geo-political objectives.

However, when one attempts to consider the war aims of militant Islam one is struck by their scale and inconceivability. Islamic terror is perpetrated with the intent of paving the way for a global Islamic Caliphate, to slaughter non-believers, and to ensure that the West enjoys no peace as long as there is suffering in the Middle East. In July 2016 Islamic State was unequivocal: “The fact is, even if you were to stop bombing us, imprisoning us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary reason for hating you will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam.”

None of these war aims can be negotiated, since none offer the prospect of a reasonable middle ground. The desire for a global Islamic Caliphate is intrinsic to Islam and encouraged by it. A Muslim possessing the blunt desire to slaughter non-believers can hardly be bargained with since his bargaining chips are counted in body bags. Meanwhile the Middle East has always been a hotbed of social, political, and economic dysfunction. Solving problems there is an impossibility, not to mention the fact that it is not Europe’s responsibility to fix the national failings of peoples in another continent.

Islamic terror cannot be negotiated with, and nor can it be fully extinguished from the Muslim population. It is now entrenched in Islam, some parts more than others, and it will therefore form an element wherever significant Muslim populations are to be found. The elites governing Britain and much of Europe have decided that vast Muslim populations are to stay in Europe, and are therefore complicit, in every possible sense, in the ongoing perpetration of terror on European soil. Their immigration policies, their refusal to act against Muslims generally, and their active suppression of dissenting elements of the native population form a veritable witches’ brew of treasonous activity. The nationalist therefore finds himself in conflict not only with the Muslim terrorists attacking his kinfolk, but also with those cultural and political elements which bolster, increase, and protect Europe’s Islamic colonization.

This war on many fronts may give rise to a feeling of pessimism. However, some small comfort can at least be derived from the knowledge that we, at least, know that we are engaged in conflict — and that conflict is natural and good. Marginalized, gagged and jailed, we know that we are in a fight, and what we are fighting for. We know that we are not witnessing attacks on ‘joy’ but on our people. We know that we are not fighting against people who want to damage ‘tolerance’ but who want to seize our territory and resources. Far-reaching though the war aims of Islam might be, we at least recognize them for what they are. And this knowledge will, in the right context, prove extremely useful. A great fight lies on the horizon; one greater than any of our fathers or grandfathers could have imagined. What fate lies beyond that fight is a great and dark unknown. But we will be better to approach it headlong rather than in the manner of the sheep around us, ignorant of their own rapidly deteriorating position. If nothing else, we will be better prepared.

If Yeats were here today, I’d ask him for a message to Britain. I’d like to think he’d reach for the sword as he did in 1937, hold it aloft, and repeat those immortal words: “Conflict, more conflict!”


[1] A. Calder, The Myth of the Blitz (Pimlico, London, 1992).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

65 Comments to "‘Heaping Up Its Own Funeral Pyre’: Britain, Islamic Terror, and the Cult of Pacifism"

  1. June 9, 2017 - 7:24 am | Permalink

    Andrew Joyce is indeed right that we are at war, yet he, in this article, only names one of its proxy forces, Islam and its adherents.

    I would have liked him to tie this proxy force to the real enemy, organized jewry, that is bringing in these people in the first place.

    ———-

    Andrew Hitchcock with Ole Dammegard – False Flag Attacks — TRANSCRIPT

    • Walter's Gravatar Walter
      June 10, 2017 - 3:17 am | Permalink

      Precisely my thought. It’s good but lacking that vital point. I consider us to be in a fight against the elitists. Islam is merely their army against us.

  2. Jason's Gravatar Jason
    June 9, 2017 - 8:17 am | Permalink

    MSM PSYCHOLOGICAL TACTICS AT WORK—DESENSITIZATION AND LEARNED HELPLESSNESS.

    Thanks for the interesting article, Sir. You are right, but I want to add a couple of points.

    The media, which is Jewish controlled, is using psychological tactics to brainwash the majority white public into submitting itself to the Jewish plan for white autogenocide—as retaliation for past wrongs, real or imagined, but mostly imagined.

    These psychological tactics are desensitization and learned helplessness.

    When medical students first see blood, or boils exuding foul smelling pus, they are horrifed and afraid, but then, slowly and slowly, they get used to it and accept it as a part of being in the profession. This is desensitization.

    The media shoves faces of 3rd world savages with long beards, screaming profanities, and black thugs throwing balls on TV and the people, normally disgusted at such images, on repeated exposure, become desensitized and do become TOLERANT and accept them.

    By telling people that terrorism is a part of living in a big city, and there is nothing we can do about immigration, since the aliens (who they imported) are already here, they are inducing LEARNED HELPLESSNESS into the general public—that there is nothing they can do about immigration but must learn to live with it.

    Solution: Do not give into either. They are psychological war tactics. Turn off the TV, cancel your subscription to the MSM, do not watch black sports, and keep fighting against immigration and alienism.

    Whites, once they wake up, and unite, have enough power to form a govt. and deport all 3rd world aliens in a day, from any white nation.

    • June 14, 2017 - 8:02 pm | Permalink

      Whites, once they wake up, and unite, have enough power to form a govt. and deport all 3rd world aliens in a day, from any white nation.

      I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but the white man’s alarm clock was irreparably broken long ago.

  3. Total Bro's Gravatar Total Bro
    June 9, 2017 - 8:53 am | Permalink

    “Pacifism will remain an ideal, war a fact, and if the White race decides to wage it no longer, the dark ones will, and will become the masters of the world.” — Oswald Spengler

  4. Biome's Gravatar Biome
    June 9, 2017 - 10:21 am | Permalink

    Does it not ever occur to look at the very real, substantiated possibility that these two latest ‘jihadist terror attacks’ are false-flag hoaxes? I am skeptical of such claims, but when the evidence is sought after, the official claims become weak with support and the assertion that perhaps they were manufactured non-events gains credulity. How this would play into the analysis of the greater geo-political situation requires a new level of mechanism for understanding.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      June 9, 2017 - 11:06 am | Permalink

      @ Biome

      We have to consider all the evidence available, and there is quite enough to work on so far in Manchester and London themselves. Conspiracies and false flags occur, of course, and views about them can change as new information becomes available (e.g. the assassination of JFK).

      We must however always begin with a rational evidence-driven basis for general meta-conspiracy frameworks. Otherwise we can develop an ever-complex Ptolemaic theory of geopolitics instead of a Copernican system, so to speak.

      A well-known booby-trap is for the real top-level agenda-workers (as UK anti-racist education subversives styled themselves) can divert, by careful disinformation, the credulous, the bigoted, the ignorant and/or the mentally disturbed into self-discrediting or energy-sapping fake conspiracy theories, such as Lemurian Lizards, the 9/11 hologram or a Jewish Hitler.

      • Biome's Gravatar Biome
        June 9, 2017 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

        @David Ashton

        I have yet to see the evidence to support the official story. I look and look and what scant evidence I find is vague and lends credence to other more likely explanations (akin to 9/11, 7/7, Brussels, San Bernardino, Umpqua, Sandy Hook etc.) Sometimes people are killed and the perpetrators are not who we are told. Sometimes it’s a complete non-event that is able to be effectively manufactured out of whole cloth. Hastily accepting their narrative on authority alone is a treacherous position for one to take, for the narrative writers are proven deceivers, and quite sophisticated in their abilities, with enormous resources, planning and technical capabilities at their disposal, not to mention a wholly owned mass media complex willing to go along without question.

        Blaming Islamic terrorists (Islamophobia), no matter how much we detest open immigration and refugee admittance into Western countries, works perfectly well into the Zionist-Globalist plan of manufactured Wars on (of)Terror. The psychological dissonance side of the operation is a major part of False-Flags/Terror Hoaxes. ISIS, al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra (Islamist Extremism) are clearly proven to be encouraged, funded and armed by western intelligence agencies
        The information (factual evidence) coming to light around Manchester Arena and London Bridge support an alternative explanation, no matter how uncomfortable that makes me feel.

        Let us indeed stay with the rational, evidence-driven framework for understanding this. Occam’s razor states that the simplest explanation given the available evidence tends to be the correct one.

        Let us use of discriminating mind to sift through the information, remove the mis- and dis-information, and stick with what remains to build our theory from. The fake conspiracy stuff (flat-earth revival, holographic planes, Jewish Hitler, lone gunman, etc) are put forth to intentionally discredit the truth movement. Once we see the booby trap, disabled it and show it to others, we can proceed to the next level of understanding with deliberateness and intensity.

        For instance, these two facts must be worked into the theory. In Manchester, the Fire Department, with trained and experienced staff, only ½ mile down the road from the arena was prevented for an hour and a half from accessing the scene. Why? Photographs of the injured and some eyewitness testimonies when critically analyzed for content are shown to be lacking of substance and credibility.

        In London, the video of the police changing clothes on the street beside their vehicles with one of the newly attired officers matching exactly the terrorist shot-dead in the photo released is uncanny?

        Where are the pictures of the bodies and the horrific scene? What few pictures are shown to us appears to be a very sterile and staged setting. I’m not into gore. I just want to see real proof. I suspect it’s lacking, not forthcoming.

        London and England in general is one of the most security camera rich places on the planet. Where are the CCTV angles that support the official story?
        The advanced drills, the crisis actors, the masonic affiliated special police force, the media contrivances…they spare no expense. It truly is stranger than fiction.

        As a thought experiment, can you offer an alternative explanation for what we are being told and shown is the evidence without doing the work of filling in the blanks with our own imagination. Forensic analysis and thorough proofs are in order. It’s tough work to question authority and the official stories. But we owe it to ourselves and each other to do the hard work. Only by threshing out the Truth from its hiding places can we truly be of service. We need to understand. It’s imperative!

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 10, 2017 - 8:36 am | Permalink

          Not much difference between us in principle, though you have more time and effort for this than I did when analyzing Soviet affairs professionally many years ago.

          We start with the evidence provided it is accessible and reliable, noting any anomalies or possible contamination, whether it is the ballistic data re JFK or the collapse of the third tower on 9/11. I am not persuaded that no-one was actually injured in the Manchester and London events attributed to Islamists – my brother-in-law’s daughter and family lived near the Ariana arena.

          I shall look into the Fire Engine hold-up. We had a case in Norwich when a meetings/restaurant center burned down only yards away from the local fire-station. Sometimes local human stupidity is more likely than Judeo-Masonic Master Machination.

          But when the facts change, so do my opinions.

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          June 10, 2017 - 11:42 am | Permalink

          @Biome
          “Blaming Islamic terrorists (Islamophobia), …”
          A phobia is an irrational fear. There is nothing irrational about being suspicious of a religion that has been attacking Europeans, and for that matter the rest of the world, for 1400 years. There are many adherents that openly state that they are out to conquer us.
          I, for one, am suspicious about most “terror” attacks for one simple reason: the response is a greater police state aimed at us – not the “terrorists” and more subservience to stopping Auntie Shem-itism. Judaism and Islam (reform Judaism) have the same goal world domination of the goyim/kaffir. Given the former owns our governments, using the latter as Judas goats would be no problem for either.

        • Bon's Gravatar Bon
          June 18, 2017 - 10:40 am | Permalink

          Biome
          The Manchester fire department may have been held back until the bomb squad checked to see there were no secondary bombs set up to kill emergency workers.

          That is standard procedure for emergency workers world wide: don’t rush in and get killed. Wait till the area is cleared by police.

          There was no fire in Manchester anyway, just one shrapnel bomb outside so there was no need for the fire department to put out a non existent fire.

          I don’t think anyone can find the truth about these kind of events from TV news and the MSM.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 9, 2017 - 12:28 pm | Permalink

      “Does it not ever occur … ?”

      Sure it does, Biome. Here at TOO, Trenchant, T.J., and several others planted doubt in me some years ago, and I know I’m not alone in being in their debt for doing so.

      Also, whether such doubts are substantiable in this instance or in any other one that could be cited, the fact remains, as you yourself indicate, that this is a wild card in the enemy’s hand that we all ought to be aware of. So welcome aboard the Dubiety Wagon!

  5. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    June 9, 2017 - 10:51 am | Permalink

    War is good department…except nukes.
    Re terrorism…deterrence thru hostage taking.

    Arabs especially seem to have strong family ties, perhaps more than Whites. This is due, if true, to their more collectivistic character, while Whites are more Individualistic and consequently less family oriented.

    The suicide-terrorists that we have in Europe and the US, that is, the Muslims, assuming they are not psychotic in the sense of not caring about anybody, are thus vulnerable to the taking of their families and friends hostage.

    Killing their families, etc. is less deterrence than jailing them, if for no other reason that when dead, families can join the terrorist in Heaven, if the young male terrorist can tear himself away from fucking virgins. Thus keeping the families in jail, means no Mom and Dad, etc. in Heaven.( Of course some of the gone-to- Heaven terrorists might prefer to be left alone in Heaven to experience unlimited orgasms forever, thus limiting the utility of my argument.) But, in general you can assume that the vast majority of suicide-terrorists still love their Moms and can be expected to think twice before they go on a joyride in a stolen truck running over White people/Christians. Mom in jail for 20 years, subject to rape, etc….?

    The terrorist , again, despite his impairments of the religious variety, still loves Mom and Dad and does not want them to be jailed for 20 years, along with all his siblings and maybe even close friends.

    So blow up, run over civilians for Allah, means there are consequences for the terrorists’ families as well as the terrorist, who it is assumed, is beyond retribution. Not so, or at least, not so when he thinks things over. Not so easy Getting Out when killing yourself.
    ——
    From a human rights point of view, the terrorist has lost all rights, and the question about jailing families means a step away from peacetime law and the entering into the rules , or laws of war.

    There are a number of laws of war. The internment of Japs in the US is well known during WW2. I suppose that a little research would discover plenty of precedent for the unique situation we are now in. Hostage taking has been around for thousands of years.

    For every situation, there is a solution, if you think about it, including doing nothing.

    Doing Nothing is what the liberals in Europe and the US are up to…while liberals even go so far as to be talking about sanctuary areas for muslims now, in the US.

    The fact that liberals are insane does not mean that we on the Right have to be silent.

    Jailing the families of suicide-terrorists would be received fairly well by most folks and the liberals’ jew jabber could be ignored.

    I don’t know how muzzies view dismembered bodies and burial, but if they don’t allow cremation due to Allah, merciful and beneficent, the burning of the body parts of the devout muslims might also be a deterrent.

    Muzzies probably have contempt for us also cuz of our lib stockholm/tolerance syndrome. Joe Webb

  6. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    June 9, 2017 - 10:57 am | Permalink

    The Anglo world has imbibed way too much of its own self-destructive, delusional ‘moral’ propaganda, for way too long. A very serious imbedded moral character flaw, to be sure.
    Then after herding the pugnacious, unthinking ship-of-fool’s into the Great Fratricide of 1939-45, in ambles Jewry to normalize the abnormal and further poison the intellectual waters. This subversive witch’s brew has resulted in a masochistic, third world invitational invasion of surreal proportions. A truly fatal racial embrace that will likely require a bloodbath to resolve, if the beguiled Whites still have the basic survival instinct, and the necessary grit.

    • Walter's Gravatar Walter
      June 10, 2017 - 3:34 am | Permalink

      I think of my siblings, they do not have this survival instinct. It is a very sad, frustrating, infuriating thing. Pathetic actually. They are slap-worthy, punch-worthy. A bucket-of-cold-water-worthy, but I’m still pretty sure they’d keep sleeping.

  7. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    June 9, 2017 - 12:24 pm | Permalink

    “If the aim of the German air raids was to instill genuine terror, weaken morale, and disrupt the life of the city, it largely succeeded in these goals.”

    — It is important to report that this German offensive was a response to prior British bombings, and Hitler was reluctant to answer in kind for the longest time. That fact should actually mean we see a correction in the OP.

    • June 14, 2017 - 8:26 pm | Permalink

      Absolutely! For years Jews sneered about the “Sitskreig” or “Phony War” as if it was some sort of cowardly act.

      Hitler refused to observe the British declaration of war, doing so for nine months until the British finally bombed a German port. So it was the British who not only declared war, but committed the first violent act of aggression of their declared war.

      By contrast, Hitler’s move into Poland had not been an act of aggression, but one of defense for German citizens being tortured and slaughtered by Poles in what had formerly been German territory.

      Hitler repeatedly warned the Poles to cease and desist their murderous depredations upon German citizens, but the Poles thumbed their nose, pugnaciously refusing to comply.

      Of course cowardly, Jew propagandists, sitting far from the carnage, completely inverted this history, making Germany the aggressor and England the righteous defender against evil.

      Leave it to the cowards to point fingers and scream “coward!” But not one of those cowards ever achieved an honor like the Iron Cross while serving under fire.

  8. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    June 9, 2017 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    I quoted Yeats myself today, in a comment at the realistreport blog concerning the USS Liberty, but that does not imply a whole-hearted endorsement.

    Yeats contributed to the compromising of Irish nationalism, by not being himself Irish obviously, by not thinking of Irishness as ethnic, and by helping establish a fake-nationalism based, literally, on fairy tales.

    I can’t judge his merits as a poet because I think all poetry except Spike Milligan’s is rubbish, but I can see that he conforms in extreme degree to a clearly established pattern of our nationalistic politically influential arts and entertainment ‘figures’ somehow all converging on a program of ‘archaic revival’.

    The Irish are literally away with the fairies as the Jewish bankers plunder their economy and Jewish social scientists flood their country with Africans and Asians.

    It isn’t a bug that Sinn Fein are more in favour of race-replacement of the Irish by Asians and Africans and other Europeans except the Brits, than the Brits ever were. It’s a design feature.

    We meet this inevitable defeat whenever we deviate from race and ethnicity as principle anchor and allow a debate about culture and ideas. These questions are endlessly debatable, so always permit some subversion. Subversion, once permitted as principle, means eventual inevitable submersion.

    Biology. Not ideas.

    • Lou's Gravatar Lou
      June 11, 2017 - 1:56 pm | Permalink

      Ambrose Kane Blog. last week.
      Clip of Blonde Irish gal weeping with her mulatto offspring and her own black eye.

  9. PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
    June 9, 2017 - 3:25 pm | Permalink

    These latest Islamic terrorists appear to have deviated from the script or have not fully understood their elite-given role in the remaking of Europe according to the Globalist’s grand plan.
    The role assigned to Afro-Islamic immigrants is to keep popping out Black and Brown babies, while the White population via taxation subsidizes and encourages such behavior. We are forced to finance our displacement and eventual destruction. Surely those Muslims with more than half a brain must realize this fact. So the question must be asked, as other commentators on this blog already have, why are these jihadists acting against the long term interests of their race? Stupidity or the impatient desire to call the faithful to prayer from a minaret comprised of severed Christian heads cannot be the full answer.
    If the false flag premise is accepted, then the jihadist attacks are an important and perhaps integral factor in the globalist’s strategy to humilitate, degrade and passivate the White population. Another possible explanation is a falling out within the establishment and pro-White activists within the security “community”, a distinctly unlikely possibility.

    • JM's Gravatar JM
      June 11, 2017 - 7:38 am | Permalink

      @PaleoAtlantid
      The Iranian media (PressTV News Videos), have for many years aired debates and criticism of ‘alleged’ terror events. This fact makes it interesting that the other side of Islam, the Sunnis, have not (so far as I know). After events ‘supposedly’ of the most horrific kind, there are no denials from the leaders of the Western European ‘communities’. Does this imply complicity in a conspiracy or ducking for cover? Don’t know, but it is possible that huge amounts of Saudi money passing into their ‘communities’ talks, the Saudi elites being just another arm of the NWO Global elites.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        June 12, 2017 - 4:56 am | Permalink

        @ JM

        There is a Saudi ruler – USA – Israel link, but aims and details need to be fleshed out.

  10. June 9, 2017 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    From the London Bridge Attacks, the world has now heard via the internet the battle cry of Britain.

    “Fuck you. I’m Millwall”
    http://www.independent.co.uk/News/uk/home-news/london-bridge-terror-attack-fk-fuck-you-im-millwall-hero-roy-larner-football-fan-lion-of-london-a7775246.html

    This at full throttle is the cry of one who did not obey the London police directive to hide or shelter in place like a good kaffir. This is the battle cry of Millwall fan Roy Larner who charged three jihadis armed with machetes at the Black and Blue [could not make this up] and fought them bare handed while hundreds of people fled to safety.

    Did anyone hear about that on the FakeNN?

    Roy received eight machete slashes and from his hospital bed continues to diss the Muslims, multi-culturalism, Saddiq Khan, the Political Traitor Class and the entire apparatus that Our Betters have marshalled for the rape and sack of England.

    Roy’s interviews are being livestreamed past the FakeNN to England around the world.

    And we are loving it – hearing Saddiq ‘no link between Muslims and terror’ Khan called a boofhead. And we are reliably informed by Roy’s mother (also being livestreamed) that our hero lowered himself to take on the Mozzies because Millwall usually rumbles with West Ham and Manchester. And there is more. Much more.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18SdVeLZF5g
    Millwall f**k em all at Leicester

    Mighty Millwall has heard their battle cry at London Bridge. Their old sparring partners have heard it too. Roy Lerner has covered his club in English glory and the rest of them are not going to be outdone.

    Now the Muslim jihadis, the rape gangs, hate preachers and all the rest, including their police protection are going to find out that the blood of England is strong and they have messed with the wrong nation.

    I am just an old woman on public transport but my cane is English oak and I have ordered the Millwall colours to be shipped out from England.

    • June 10, 2017 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

      Hopefully no blockhead will claim that Roy Larner and the St Thomas’ Hospital staff are part of a false flag operation!

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        June 10, 2017 - 9:35 pm | Permalink

        I’ll volunteer as blockhead and suggest that three guys with machetes or long knives are likely to have done a lot more damage that is apparent on the “Lion of London Bridge”. Sorry.

        Time will tell whether he won’t turn out to be the sort of non-racist, anti-Islam popular hero functional in its own way to the System. (I’m looking at you, Tommy Robinson!)
        http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/lion-london-bridge-roy-larner-10575658

  11. James's Gravatar James
    June 10, 2017 - 7:04 am | Permalink

    ” Islamic terror is perpetrated with the intent of paving the way for a global Islamic Caliphate…”

    Thus it can be concluded that our Western Oligarchs intend for the Islamic Caliphate to be the early version of their Global Government, ushered in by invasion and terrorism and abetted by political indifference and a police state whose aim is to aid the enemy and block any defensive effort.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      June 11, 2017 - 6:27 am | Permalink

      @ James, Walter, Curmudgeon, and others on various thread.

      Is Islamism a Zionist tool to establish a Jewish Global Slave State? Well, this notion of a GGSS is advertised and opposed explicitly by – guess who? – Islamists themselves, from Hamas to the Muslim Brotherhood, not to mention sects like
      al-Murabitun and websites like Radio Islam. More chains of evidence are needed on this one, folks.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        June 11, 2017 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

        Mr. Ashton:

        You wrote this on a now closed thread just before commenting was closed there:

        … take into account the anti-Jewish passages in the Quran and Hadith, revived by Islamists – and not only Arabs – because of Zionism in the USA, and the historical studies of Musliim “antisemitism” detailed notably by Andrew Bostom.

        Judaism and Islam share a hostility to the New Testament and the doctrine of the Trinity, but in our secularized age the conflicts and alliances become more basically ethno-political and socio-cultural. Europeans are faced with problems from different directions, and they are not all directed by “the Jews”.

        Despite what you say above, you seem prepared to turn your back on essentially innumerable chains of evidence that simply don’t accord with your document-based preconceptions. The evidence that Islam is a wholly owned Jewish subsidiary created to do the dirtiest of dirty jobs that Jews won’t do—fight and die to destroy the Jews’ enemies, with those who follow the Cross leading the pack—is overwhelming. What is more, deeming either Islam or rabbinic Judaism a religion, properly understood, and to contrast religious concerns with those of this “secularized age” is to credit the barefaced lies of Jewry and Islam in preference to what one’s eyes, ears, and powers of cognition tell one.

        In short, I think that you have trained yourself in what Newman call a “grammar of assent” to the self-serving puff pieces—the Talmud, the Koran, and the seemingly countless other “holy” books of Islam—of proved liars. Before you call for ever more chains of evidence, you need (1) to look at the tremendous mass of evidence amassed in the past 1,975 years (including the powerful evidence of pre-Reconquista Spain, which you brushed to one side with shocking ease) and (2) to recall that the documentary sources you keep referring to aren’t worth the paper they are written on.

        Please recall an elementary principle of formal debate: contra factum non valet argumentum.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 12, 2017 - 4:38 am | Permalink

          @ Pierre de Craon

          I am open to, and welcome, any “overwhelming” evidence that Islam is a “wholly owned” Jewish subsidiary.

          Much of our information about Islam and Judaism necessarily comes from the “texts” that both Muslims and Jews consider most important, such as the Quran and the Talmud; and these are subject quite rightly to critical analysis by Christians and anyone else. Most of our information about history comes from contemporary records. Please correct me if wrong, but I suspect you probably place an extraordinary trust in documents like the theological drama called the Gospel of (St) John.

          That the Quran used some Jewish sources, and also makes some bizarre or hostile statements about Jews, is fairly clear, as was Muslim practice of subjecting Christians and Jews to dhimmitude, with exceptions made to pick brains. That Jews at times used Muslims to attack Christian society is also “documented”. That current conflicts between Islamism and Zionism are a brutal reality also seem to fit the evidence, bearing in mind also the Israeli interest in e.g. exacerbating Sunni-Shia and other differences within the demographically greater Ummah.

          On Spain, I am aware of tributes to Moorish occupation by Muslims, notably the “antisemitic” al-Murabitun sect whose members I knew in Norwich, England. I am also aware of Muslim whitewashing of that era, exposed by e.g. Dario Morera’s “Myth of the Andalusian Paradise” (2016).

          You are welcome, space and moderator permitting, to outline your facts and reasons to refute, and therefore improve, my grasp of the real situation. I do not reject the “paper that sources are written” on until AFTER I have perused them.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            June 12, 2017 - 10:05 am | Permalink

            Dear Mr. Ashton: The incongruity of your reference to John’s Gospel is cause for despair. Call it a category error (as Britain’s linguistic philosophers did, following Gilbert Ryle), call it a comparison of apples and oranges, or call it what you wish. John’s Gospel has bugger all to do with secular world conquest, with self-aggrandizement for one’s tribe (i.e., Tribe), or with hatred of anything or anyone, save Satan—whom John, quoting his Master, calls “the prince of this world”—and his companions.

            Some time ago I tentatively concluded that you had a loosely Leo Straussian attitude toward Christians and the Cross. I now think, more in sadness than in anger, that I was quite wrong. Ever more of what you write weighs toward your possessing (1) no actual understanding of what religion truly is* and (2) something approaching hostility toward Christians and the Cross—how much I am ill equipped to say but certainly enough to stand many a man in good stead in the (((larger world))), not to mention among a not insignificant number of TOO commenters and authors.
            _______________
            *This would hardly be surprising given the extraordinary success of those who reconstructed the post-Enlightenment West during the past three hundred years. In today’s West, Christianity and Christians are openly mocked, even attacked, by Obama, the Clintons, and (unless I’m mistaken) many Tory and Labor leaders in your country—and this short list hardly begins to tell the tale. (Nor does the soi-disant conversion of the Blairs demonstrate anything save the Jews’ success in infiltrating and corrupting Neocatholicism, thus rendering it an effective nullity till in a time of God’s choosing the stables will be cleansed.) One may see, too, how Asian and African religions, whether actual religions or mere ethnic accidents or extravagances, have been rendered picturesque artifacts of peoples whom Jews (though not Jews alone, of course), far from truly respecting, consider too primitive to merit attention save as an exploitable resource or as a distraction (cf. the snail darter of happy memory—whatever became of that darling creature?).

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 13, 2017 - 3:12 am | Permalink

          @ Pierre de Craon

          I have summarized on another thread why I did not continue my youthful trajectory towards the Catholic Church – a disenchantment after Vatican II, followed by a serious study of the credibility of the Gospels as completely reliable factual accounts; I read all the chief Christian scholarly apologists, from Hilarin Felder to C.S. Lewis but also their critics. The problem with John’s Gospel is not its remarkable beauty but its accuracy in recording real events; nothing else.

          I am not happy about losing my prospective faith on top of my country, but I seek no fight with genuine Christians against common enemies, though I do protest against the guilt-ridden pathological altruism that too many modern clerics show towards Islam, Marxism and Decadence.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            June 13, 2017 - 12:12 pm | Permalink

            The problem with John’s Gospel is not its remarkable beauty but its accuracy in recording real events; nothing else.

            No one spoke of the Gospel’s “beauty,” nor can its beauty lay claim to being a proper and intrinsic matter of interest to any Christian—or to anyone else for that matter. Put otherwise, the Gospels are neither more nor less than accounts of the life, teaching, death, and resurrection of Jesus. Thus, men who can read words on a page may wonder why you change the subject?

            I presume the “inaccuracy” you loftily note refers to the Resurrection, which none of the Very Important People you’ve met in the course of your life has had personal experience of. N’est-ce pas?

          • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
            June 13, 2017 - 6:23 pm | Permalink

            I wish to add that the beauty of John lies in its outstanding literary achievement as a drama that presents a theological message about the deity of Jesus in a sequence of scenes and soliloquies comparable to those in some Greek plays, but is no more a completely realistic record of actual events than (say) Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” or Shaw’s “Saint Joan”; reference to modern NT scholarship will support this view, which is not refuted simply by mistaken presumptions about me personally.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            June 13, 2017 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

            My final word on this topic follows. I am grateful to the Moderator for his sufferance thus far.

            I’ll match my knowledge of “modern NT scholarship” against yours any day of the week, Mr. Ashton. How you can muster the shamelessness to write your silly first sentence is cause for wonder!

            Two facts that I don’t see you acknowledging are (1) that much of this soi-disant scholarship is written by Jews or their surrogates (in other words, in biblical studies as elsewhere, Professor MacDonald’s “culture of [Jewish] critique” has been the norm since the days of Jules Isaac some eighty years ago) and (2) that its overwhelming bulk isn’t scholarship in any recognizable sense at all. Rather, it’s largely an exercise in logrolling within a community of careerists, Christophobes, and sycophants.

            As for the “completely realistic record,” the implicit claim that you or effectively anyone else has insider knowledge of what really happened in the early first century of the Christian era is preposterous and shameful. An honest scholar—or honest man—would never write so presumptuously.

          • June 15, 2017 - 6:19 am | Permalink

            I am not happy about losing my prospective faith on top of my country, but I seek no fight with genuine Christians against common enemies, though I do protest against the guilt-ridden pathological altruism that too many modern clerics show towards Islam, Marxism and Decadence.

            Well stated. The real problem is not “God,” but whose “god?” For those caring to observe, there is ample evidence for creative intelligence behind the universe. However, from the beginning man has striven to twist and deform the truth behind this intelligence in a manner that serves his infantile design for personal gain.

            Judaism and its bloody sacrificial system is undoubtedly the very lowest pathological attempt to define that intelligence for personal gain, on par with what a psychotic child might develop in their attempt to steal all the marbles.

            Note Judaic communism’s attempt to replace Christianity’s man/god with the secular state while maintaining its own religious foundations. This was nothing more than replacing what had become an uncontrollable “heavenly” god with a down to earth statist version, one far more easily controlled by those writhing, crawling maggots who dare create “god” in their own twisted, debased image.

            As bastard stepchildren of Judaism, Islam and Christianity follow not far behind. Who dares dispute the fact these three religions have provided the basis for man’s most destructive efforts, that these three religions have been the motivating force behind the lion’s share of misery, suffering and death over the last two millennia?

            It is time to move beyond puerile Judaism and her two ugly daughters. It is time to move toward a more enlightened state of awareness about the design of this existence. Forget man’s nonsensical talk about personal god(s) and observe what creation clearly demonstrates.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 14, 2017 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

          Not much chance, most unfortunately, for “formal debates” here on (1) NT scholarship (which originally owed more to German Protestant polymaths than modern Jewish ax-grinders like Isaac, Maccoby or Flusser), or (2) on allegedly “overwhelming evidence” that the Jews are responsible for Islam, or according to another regular poster, also for Christianity itself. In the absence of a proper debate about Jesus or Muhammad, may I just request a little less personal anger from Pierre de Craon, and instead recommend his perusal of studies of John’s Gospel by e.g. Raymond Brown (Catholic) and Andreas Koestenberger (Protestant), before revisiting the credibility of gospel narratives about the “resurrection” of Jesus (and others, Matthew 27.52-53)?

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            June 16, 2017 - 12:24 pm | Permalink

            Raymond Brown is a curious choice for recommendation, Mr. Ashton, given that his pre- and post-Vatican II subversive deconstruction of biblical studies was being read by theology students fully forty years ago. In other words, citing Brown as an example of “modern NT scholarship” is comparable to speaking of Madison Grant as le dernier cri in racial consciousness.

            As for Koestenberger, it is not unfair to characterize him as, mutatis mutandis, having the credibility and intellectual credentials of Bob Woodward.

      • James's Gravatar James
        June 11, 2017 - 9:18 pm | Permalink

        “…notion of a GGSS is advertised and opposed explicitly by – guess who? – Islamists themselves,..”

        And their claims to the contrary are supposed to be taken as proof that world wide Jihad is not really intended to establish a Global Slave State? Bringing Islam to the world by force is a basic tenet of their religion/political system. Islamic expansionism exists wherever Muslims gather in sufficient numbers whether it be Dearborn Michigan or the Philippines. And by facilitating their arrival at our shores, our governments are promoting an eventual regime change, one which our elite welcome. This is because Islam is the perfect tool to control the masses. Islam demands SUBMISSION to its theocratic (nominally) government , and a completely submissive population is what will make a global government possible. But Islam will merely be the precursor to whatever final form this Global Government assumes. But you certainly are free to go on believing Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, as opposed to your own lying eyes.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 12, 2017 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

          My “lying eyes” have studied the writings of e.g. Sayyid Qutb whose “Muslim Brotherhood” views on the Jewish control and degradation of western society, and that of many other Muslim voices in the Arab, Persian and south Asian spheres, would go down quite well with some commentators here.

          I agree that the aim of Islam is ultimate world-wide “submission to Allah”, and have said so. (I meant J-GSS, another rushed typo we can no longer edit here.) For numbers involved see e.g. the Pew Research Center, “Muslims and Islam”, May 26 online. Whether this huge phenomenon has all been deliberately created and/or controlled by the omnipotent “Jew” is another matter, but I still think not.

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          June 13, 2017 - 6:12 am | Permalink

          There are two parts to a conspiracy. One is the end game, the other is the route to the end game. Of course Islam is a conquering philosophy, it is obvious to anyone able to think even half clearly, which includes our political leaders. Why then, do the political leaders insist on bringing massive numbers of these people into our midst, when 1400 years of history clearly demonstrates that these people are hostile aliens in every respect? As for Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, they provide a great excuse for Israel to continue on “protecting” themselves on their way to Eretz Israel. It is Christian Palestinians like Hanan Ashrawi who are the real threat to Israel.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            June 13, 2017 - 12:30 pm | Permalink

            Thank you, dear friend, for reminding me of Hanan Ashrawi, of whom I’d heard or read nothing for ten years at least. When, more than twenty years ago, I saw her talking with Brian Lamb of C-SPAN, she struck me as a remarkably brave but quixotic woman, in that opposing the interests of America’s Jews made a successful outcome to King Canute’s legendary undertaking something worth betting on.

            I gather from the online Pretend Encyclopedia that she’s been somewhat active in Canada in recent years. Has she gotten more of a hearing there in your homeland than here in the States? And speaking of (((Wikipedia))), can anything more revealing be said of its (((editors))) than that they view her having once (fifty years ago!) dated Peter Jennings as one of her life’s most notable episodes.

          • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
            June 13, 2017 - 3:09 pm | Permalink

            Alas Pierre, the media in this country is every bit as stifling about real newsworthy stories, as is the MSM in the US. Ms Ashrawi could set herself on fire in the Visitor’s Gallery of the House of Commons, during a debate, and it would likely be unreported.

          • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
            June 13, 2017 - 1:34 pm | Permalink

            @Curmudgeon

            Good question; I can only offer a very brief answer for Britain itself, and will then shut up.

            We were stuck postwar with immigration from our then “British” Commonwealth and, after much fuss, successive but ineffective “controls” were instituted. The first Pakistani wave had been quite pro-British, but the whole situation was drastically altered by chain migration, asylum claimants and illegals of various kinds, useful both to some business interests and to the leftist establishment which wanted easy votes and desired to “rub the noses of the ‘right’ in [permanent] ‘multiculturalism'” (a phrase from the Blair era).

            One story from my own experience. Forty years ago a lecturer on “multiculturalism” at London University explained that it was necessary to maximize immigration, on one hand, and to suppress resistance to it, on the other, by whatever means necessary. When asked how this would advance her goal of equality and global socialism, if we had a vast settlement of religious anti-communists from south Asia, she said that the first overwhelming priority was to destroy English “racism” i.e. national identity, but afterwards we would have to deal with Muslim “sexism”.

            You can trace the progress of such ideas in education and legislation to their current dominance in the top-down state ideology of “equality and diversity”, with mainstream “Conservative” politicians letting it happen or collaborating.

            The Marcuse-Gramsci New Left cultural subversion is shared on an international basis through numerous “academic” personnel, and sources such as “Patterns of Prejudice” or Routledge publishers, with “race-gender-class” agitation meeting little opposition because of its fake morality and incremental entrenchment in our institutions.

            During the Soviet era “liberals” even in the churches were likewise suckers for communist slogans about “peace and democracy”.

            The agitation, public and private, for “anti-racist legislation” from Jewish groups like the Board of Deputies was influenced, and assisted, by the fact that outspoken opponents of hostile alien immigration (not especially Islamist in the early years) were groups with a fascist past or (like Jordan and Tyndall) a (grossly) anti-Jewish present.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        June 12, 2017 - 6:26 am | Permalink

        @David
        While no one has provided photographs or original documents, there is enough information to piece together some logical conclusions. Among them are tha the Muslim Brotherhood was created in the 1920s by the British Intelligence services with the purpose of being a destabilizing force to prevent “Arab Nationalism”; the Israeli Government gave its blessing to the creation of Hamas; al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA using Osama bin Laden (Col Tim Osman) as a bogeyman; ISIS is a Mossad/CIA creation; and last but not least, Saudi Arabia was created to create a safe space for, and lost of money to, extremist (even in an Islamic context) ideologies.
        I openly admit to being a conspiracy theorist, because conspiracies exist. Who the conspirators are, identifying the conspiracy, and recognizing the end game are different matters. As an example, Alan Greenspan said no one could have predicted the 2008 financial collapse, yet Clinton appointee Brooksley Born, who opposed Greenspan’s deregulation mantra, testified before Congress accurately stating derivatives were illegal, and predicting the outcome – the financial collapse – of the deregulation. It’s pure co-incidence, of course that all of the banking/Wall Street casino cartel supported Greenspan, Born’s testimony was ignored by Congress (which is allowed insider trading) in order to pass legislation, and when the collapse happened, the MSM had never heard of Brooksley Born or her testimony. The greatest wealth transfer, or more accurately theft, in history occurred for a select few and the anti-socialist Congress goes on to allow more theft to occur while the suckers who pay taxes fund it. No conspiracy there, even though the (((usual suspects))) control all of the players.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 12, 2017 - 12:28 pm | Permalink

          @ Curmudgeon

          Conspiracy in its widest sense is the very stuff of politics, business, diplomacy and warfare. Yes, indeed, the question is sorting out and accurately identifying particular examples, their effects, connections and disconnections. There have been false leads galore.

          My chief personal experience in this respect is direct inside investigation of “anti-racist and multicultural education” in the UK, which has been spread outwards and upwards in our society by what is agents themselves called “agenda-networking”, in tandem with immigration, to become our state ideology known as “equality and diversity”. I am well aware of the part that Jews have played in this process, and their motives. My opinions are also supported by a considerable “documentation”.

          On the wider issues, I think the keynote was summarized, nearly a century ago, by the eccentric but earnest doyenne of “conspiracy theories” as the world-revolutionary plot(s) to undermine civilization by working for eventual abolition of nationhood, the family, private property inheritance, monarchies or constitutional governments, and Christianity.
          Various players can be seen in this process, by no means only Jews.

          • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
            June 13, 2017 - 5:51 am | Permalink

            @David
            I have never stated that Jews are exclusively responsible for anything, except their own religion and the ethics that arise from it. Every subversive movement needs useful idiots to deflect blame. However, the number of subversive movements in which they do not play a significant role in either leading or funding, are as scarce as rocking horse dung.

        • Bon's Gravatar Bon
          June 18, 2017 - 10:59 am | Permalink

          Curmudgeon

          I’ve read numerous books on Soviet subversion world wide. Front groups of various kinds were the most common method. Numerous sources claim that the Muslim Brotherhood, the ANC party of South Africa and The Congress Party of India were all founded and funded by the Soviet Comintern as front groups against the British Empire.

          I can’t cite the sources. But most histories of soviet subversion mention the Muslim Brotherhood as one of the numerous Soviet front groups established all over the world.

  12. Reverend Leo's Gravatar Reverend Leo
    June 10, 2017 - 9:27 am | Permalink

    Dr Joyce should preface his article with “If the mainstream UK media narrative is to be believed….. It’s a very big if. Otherwise it’s just angels dancing on the head of needles stuff. The two most recent “events” scream bogusness. Dr J is very familiar with the effort and intelligence that the IRA put into making explosives. Rebellious neighbourhoods produced surprisingly large numbers of inorganic chemistry and electronic engineering graduates. Yet the unlettered jihadists can whip up a 22 person killing IED from hair bleach and black pepper. This neutron style bomb doesnt even damage the floor or break the light bulbs whilst injuring 200. Smells like BS.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      June 13, 2017 - 5:58 am | Permalink

      Reverend,
      Not only smells like BS, but is BS.
      After the airplane lavatory bomb plotters were “discovered” and charged, which resulted in the current miniature amounts of liquid being allowed as carry-on, I read an article by an industrial chemist debunking the notion of making a bomb in a bouncing, shaking airplane.

  13. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    June 10, 2017 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Great article! Personally, I think that one of the main aims of our (((globalist))) governments in the west today is to make sure that the various native peoples never know or understand anything about demographic change, and the fact that this change will spell the death of a nation just as sure as a hot war will.

    In all things, there are tipping points, and demographics is the same. When you reach a tipping point where there are more of them than you, you do things their way, and that’s the end of your people and your nation. We’re steadily reaching that tipping point all over the west with mass migration of very fecund peoples who have multiple kids for every one we have.

    This won’t end well. Even trying to get the most staunch mainstream conservative to get off the terrorism train and onto the demographics train is a challenge. (((The agenda setters))) have done a great job in making sure that people in the west never think of themselves as racial or ethnic groups, and only as “people”.

    We have all been so far removed from the classic identifiers of culture that our people now form their identities simply around the products and entertainments they consume and nothing more. Through this removal of cultural identity, we have bought into the lie that no matter what ethnic or racial group makes up the west, it will still be “the west”. This will be the REAL death of us.

    • JM's Gravatar JM
      June 11, 2017 - 7:51 am | Permalink

      @Fenria
      It is demographics. All of these ‘Terror Events’, either real or synthetic (like a large amount of IRA activity), are nothing compared with the impact of mass Third World migration. The Zio-Controlled Oppositions are subliminally pushing the formula (Mass Third World “Migration” MINUS Muslim Terror Events = OK) among us, with the added bonus of vilifying Muslims in their own lands in their just resistance to Zio-Wars and occupation and in the process gaining identification of psy-oped Western peoples with the ‘similar plight’ of Israel. Some operation!

    • Reverend Leo's Gravatar Reverend Leo
      June 11, 2017 - 11:31 am | Permalink

      The tipping point is the time between “no, that will never happen” and “it’s too late, there’s nothing we can do”

  14. E.'s Gravatar E.
    June 10, 2017 - 6:08 pm | Permalink

    New Marvel Movie coming:

    “Black Panther”.

    https://youtu.be/dxWvtMOGAhw

    I will not be allocating my discretionary income to patronize this flick, but I have a dream of a day when a high-budget, pro-White, all-White, White Supremacist movie comes to the big mainstream screen; …but we have some considerable fighting to do to make the stories to tell/remember/show.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      June 10, 2017 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

      What? Are you telling me that Gal Gadot, heroine and slayer of Germans, isn’t white?

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        June 11, 2017 - 6:15 am | Permalink

        @ Trenchant

        A choice example of the sexy action-babe dominatrix that some men desire being presented as an anti-sexism icon. “There’s money in them thar shills”.

  15. Vestmann's Gravatar Vestmann
    June 11, 2017 - 1:18 am | Permalink

    I think people sense that most “terror attacks” are psy-ops and while they will not acknowledge the possibility that they are being manipulated, they simply cannot feel terror, sorrow, fear, horror, a wish for vengeance, or any other emotion that is easily evoked by real murder and mayhem. When flowers, teddy bear displays, and candlelight vigils become part of the operation rather than a spontaneous outpouring of compassion and concern from a terrorized public – the psy-op has outlived its usefulness. It wouldn’t work at all and we would be quick to identify the real perpetrators if our leaders would hold back from the temptation to use these attacks to further their own political agendas. We are being robbed of our ability to feel. The psy-op desensitizes us and we long to fight the real enemy.

  16. Art's Gravatar Art
    June 11, 2017 - 9:01 am | Permalink

    Is Multiculturalism and the “Death of the West” not the consequence of Churchill’s warmongering? Pat Buchanan believes that Churchill was a puppet.

  17. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    June 11, 2017 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

    So, why is Jeremy Corbyn getting a free ride when it comes to the rape of English children?

  18. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 13, 2017 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

    It occurs to me, as someone who has never been an unqualified admirer of Dr. Joyce’s views or writings, that the remarkably high quality of this article has received far too little notice in this thread. Indeed, I’d call it genuinely inspirational overall. What could prompt someone, for instance, to ignore its substance in favor of sneering at Yeats of all people?

    To take a single example, the paragraph beginning “There is nothing noble …” should gain this article wide distribution and acclaim and extended reference. Perhaps it’s my age (i.e., being born in the last year of World War II), but few things do my heart so much good as seeing the distortions of the soi-disant Greatest Generation dismantled, undermined, or exploded. The book by Angus Calder that Dr. Joyce referred to is going on my very short must-read list.

  19. Les's Gravatar Les
    June 13, 2017 - 2:05 pm | Permalink

    Thanks to article author for pointing out the book The Myth of the Blitz by Angus Calder. What a lot of people don’t know because of deliberate censorship is that in 1940 Hitler offered to stop the bombing of civilians and stick to military targets if the British would do the same. Churchill refused. He thought the sight of London and other cities being attacked would bring America into the war. It didn’t. This is confirmed in a book written during WW2 by UK air ministry official J M Spaight called Bombing Vindicated –
    http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/7/1/3358

  20. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    June 15, 2017 - 3:14 am | Permalink

    “When you weaken a people’s sense of attachment to its own culture, you weaken the desire to defend that culture, and distort even the perception that that culture might be under threat”
    On a positive note – the left know that this message is contrary to our inner natures. Or, to be more precise, the 15% true left know that this message is contrary to the inner nature of the other 85%. it is like taking a round balloon and squeezing it to make it a long balloon. You can do this all day long and certainly you do own a very long balloon, and everyone will agree. But you need to keep both hands on it all the time, as you are distorting the true nature. As soon as you let go, the balloon will go round again in an instant.

    As long as (1) the left own the MSM (2) we remain rich, overfed and pampered – as long as (1) and (2) apply the left can keep the balloon long. But as soon as either (1) or (2) ends the balloon will quickly revert to its natural state.

    The current state of self-flagellation and self-hate and worship of backward cultures who want to trample all over us in a racist way, this state of thinking is not natural and therefore can easily be discarded. This way of thinking is only genuinely held by a minority – say 15%. As soon as this 15% lose control of the MSM schools and government and all the authorities that they now control, as soon as this happens the bad things the left have done can be reversed. But we will have to wait for 1 or 2 to end.

    This is why the left fear free speech such as provided by the internet – Youtube and Twitter and farcebook (all controlled but not enough to stop the alternative narrative). The left know that THEIR message is contrary to human nature, and that the message of the right fully accords with human nature. The left know that it is THEY who must keep a tight control of the narrative and as soon as they can no longer do this and as soon as the people have access to other ideas the people will in an instant reject the message of self-hate.

  21. Dedalus's Gravatar Dedalus
    June 15, 2017 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

    The plan is to expand the Middle East into Europe to create Eurasia. The European Union will become The Semitic Union. And Latin America into the US to create The Americas. Russia is resisting, hence their demonization in the media.
    Regarding False Flags and Assassinations:
    The sinking of the Lusitania was probably the first. Readers here know the rest leading up to September 11th, and the ones after when they started to use movie extras and bags of fake blood and “real” cell phone videos, etc.
    With assassinations you also have an identifiable pattern that never before appeared in history. Though there are exceptions, from John Wilkes Booth to Lee Harvey Oswald, to James Hodgkinson, they’re always killed before we can get anything out of them.
    All of this fits with perfect exactness with the Jewish gift of hiding in plain sight.
    Some dismiss it as an Internet curiosity, or even deny it’s real, but JFK’s famous speech, the one they say got him killed, hits the Bullseye so well that it doesn’t matter it it’s real – what matters is – It’s True!

  22. Federal Reserve's Gravatar Federal Reserve
    June 15, 2017 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

    What Andrew Joyce is revealing to gullible whites is that the Jewish-Islamic axis of evil is displacing and dissolving European peoples.

    It is an evolutionary warfare brought upon by cultural & demographic assaults on European identity and heritage.

    White Europeans need a century of intense collectivism if they want to entertain any hope of survival.

  23. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    June 18, 2017 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

    May I respond briefly to Pierre de Craon’s description of me as “shameless” and “dishonest” regarding the historicity of the NT Gospels, [snip]
    ——-
    (Mod. Note: No, you may not respond, and neither may Pierre. The quibbling between you two is embarrassing. Get over it and comment on relevant topics, or none of your and Pierre’s comments will be approved.)

Comments are closed.