The Silent Sisterhood: How Feminists Collaborate with Rape and Murder

Tobias Langdon

In one of the most famous passages of his Summa Theologica, the great Catholic philosopher Thomas Aquinas (1225–74) considers this delicate question: “Whether the blessed rejoice in the punishment of the damned?” He concludes that, yes, they do: “the saints will rejoice in the punishment of the wicked, by considering therein the order of Divine justice and their own deliverance, which will fill them with joy.”

Xenophobes in charge

Aquinas reached that conclusion many centuries ago, but it has “contemporary resonance,” as the Guardian might say. What do nations like Hungary, Poland and Slovakia feel as they watch the vibrant enrichment of Western Europe? I think they must be rejoicing in “their own deliverance.” No suicide-bombers for Hungary. No rape-gangs for Poland. No FGM and drug-resistant TB for Slovakia. What’s more: Hungary, Poland and Slovakia don’t want to experience any of these things.

Beast in the East: Robert Fico

To the Guardian and other liberal outlets, this merely confirms the depravity and backwardness of politicians like Viktor Orbán, Beata Szydlo and Robert Fico, who are the xenophobic prime ministers of these nations. In a shameless rejection of all decent progressive principles, Orbán, Szydlo and Fico place the welfare of their own citizens above the welfare of the vibrant vulnerable. Indeed, Fico has crystallized his hate into a single shocking phrase: Islam na Slovensku nemá priestor — “Islam has no place in Slovakia.” Ach, if only he would consider what Slovakia is missing:

Indian Muslim woman ‘raped and murdered in honour killing’ after starting relationship with Arab man

An Indian Muslim teenager involved in a relationship with an Arab man was kidnapped, raped and murdered in a suspected “honour killing” in London, a court has heard. The body of Celine Dookhran, 19, was found stuffed in a fridge with her throat slit after a second woman who was also attacked raised the alarm from her hospital bed.

The two women were said to have been bound, gagged and kidnapped by masked men on Wednesday. They were taken to a house in Kingston-upon-Thames, south-west London, where they were both raped and Ms Dookhran was killed.

Mujahid Arshid, 33, of no fixed address, appeared before Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court on Monday charged with the murder, attempted murder, and two counts of rape and kidnap. He appeared alongside Vincent Tappu, 28, of Acton, west London, who stands charged with kidnapping both women. (Indian Muslim woman ‘raped and murdered in honour killing’ after starting relationship with Arab man, The Independent, 25th July 2017)


Teenage girl ‘raped in Birmingham train station attacked again by second man she begged for help’

A double manhunt is under way after a 15-year-old girl was raped by two different attackers, including a man she flagged down for help. Detectives said the teenager was first assaulted in a secluded part of Birmingham’s Witton railway station, near the Aston Villa football ground, some time between 7pm on Tuesday and 2am the following morning. The victim had walked to the station with her friend, but was led away by a man who approached her. Shortly after that attack, the girl walked out of the station and flagged down a passing vehicle to ask for help. However, after getting in the car she was then raped a second time by another man. …

The first attacker is described as Asian [i.e., Pakistani or similar] with light skin, brown eyes, of a skinny build and about 6ft tall. He was wearing a track suit top and bottoms, black trainers and was in his early 20s. The second attacker is also described as Asian, in his early 20s, 5ft 6/7ins tall, of large build with a tight-cropped beard and was wearing a blue jumper and black jeans. (Teenage girl ‘raped in Birmingham train station attacked again by second man she begged for help’, The Independent, 25th July 2017)

That’s just a little of what Hungary, Poland and Slovakia are missing out on by refusing to accept Muslim immigration. Britain, by contrast, definitely has a “place for Islam,” and Muslims have worked hard to re-pay British hospitality. When it comes to violence against women, melanin-enriched Muslims really put stale pale males in their place. Even so, a connoisseur of Muslim vibrancy might quibble about the “honour-killing” of Celine Dookhran (see above). It’s a little disappointing that she merely had her throat slit, rather than her whole head cut off.

But look at it from a practical point of view: a complete body can be “stuffed in a fridge” in a single, simple operation. A severed head complicates matters. One might drop it, then have to chase it as it rolls away into an awkward corner. The honour-killers obviously foresaw these difficulties and put criminal efficiency above Islamic aesthetics. Rape and throat-slitting were enough; rape and decapitation would have been over-egging the pudding. I for one am not going to criticize them for their decision.

Feminist priorities

But you might expect Britain’s feminists to be sending a lot of criticism their way. You might also expect feminists to have something to say about the double-rape in Birmingham. Curiously, this hasn’t happened. Appalling crimes against vulnerable women have been greeted with silence. Compare the feminist reaction to the “BBC pay scandal”: feminists were boiling with rage and indignation. Rich liberal women aren’t being as grossly over-paid as rich liberal men for their participation in the BBC’s incessant liberal propaganda. Feminists are horrified.

But feminists are tongued-tied when two teenage girls experience much, much worse from the Patriarchy. A 19-year-old was kidnapped, raped and murdered in London. A 15-year-old was raped in Birmingham, then raped again when she sought help. And all those crimes reflected an “entrenched culture” of misogyny and male supremacy. Why no detailed analysis and condemnation from the Sisterhood?

The answer is simple. Yes, the crimes were spectacularly brutal and misogynistic, but they were allegedly committed by non-Whites. If feminists drew attention to them, they would be undermining a central tenet of liberalism in general and feminism in particular: the Omnipotent Evil of the Stale Pale Male.

Malleus Maleficorum

Like the fallen angel Satan in traditional theology, Stale Pale Males are in liberal ideology the ultimate source of all the world’s ills. Stale pale males, or the cis-het ones at least, have to be overthrown and crushed by a Rainbow Alliance that includes both feminists and Muslims. On the one hand, mass immigration from the Third World means mass murder, rape-gangs, honour killings, female genital mutilation, grope-festivals, cousin-marriage and exotic diseases. Liberals are supposedly hostile to all those things. But mass immigration also means guaranteed votes for progressive parties like Labour in the UK and the Democrats in the United States.

In short, although Western women are badly harmed by mass immigration, the Rainbow Alliance benefits. So feminists have a choice. They could oppose mass immigration and defend Western women, or support mass immigration and strengthen the Rainbow Alliance. It’s not a tough choice: the Rainbow Alliance funds feminism. That’s why feminists prefer to ignore Muslim misogyny (with honourable exceptions like the lesbian Julie Bindel). Vibrant non-White Muslims are enemies of the Stale Pale Male; therefore feminists want as many Muslims as possible in the West, whatever the consequences for Western women. Indeed, the more badly non-White men behave, the better they appear in feminist eyes. The non-White men are emphasizing that they are not stale or pale and that they are hostile to Western civilization.

Hiding hate-facts

And do overweight, unattractive feminists secretly enjoy the thought of ordinary women being harmed by vibrant enrichers? I’m thinking of feminists like Barbara Roche, the Jewish immigration minister who opened the borders under New Labour, and Jenni Murray, the part-Jewish matriarch who oversees Woman’s Hour at the BBC. Feminism benefits from rape as a general phenomenon, because it provides support for feminist claims about male brutality and misogyny. But a dangerous hate-fact must be hidden: the much higher rape-rates among non-Whites and Muslims. That hate-fact isn’t good for the Rainbow Alliance.

Not a typical Syrian refugee: Rania’s Odyssey

Nor is another hate-fact: that the “vulnerable refugees” seeking “sanctuary” in Europe are overwhelmingly healthy young men who are migrating for economic reasons, not to save their lives. Liberal outlets like the Guardian and the BBC pretend otherwise, constantly using images of helpless women and children to accompany their pro-refugee propaganda. The Guardian is at it again with Escape from Syria: Rania’s Odyssey, a video about an affable, attractive, educated young woman that gives a false picture of the so-called “migrant crisis”:

Rania Mustafa Ali, 20, filmed her journey from the ruins of Kobane in Syria to Austria. Her footage shows what many refugees face on their perilous journey to Europe. Rania is cheated by smugglers, teargassed and beaten at the Macedonian border. She risks drowning in the Mediterranean, travelling in a boat meant to hold 15 people but stuffed with over 50. Those with disabilities are carried across raging rivers and muddy fields in their wheelchairs. (Escape from Syria: Rania’s Odyssey, The Guardian, 2nd August 2017)

The censorship solution

The Guardian doesn’t care about the true picture: liberals are interested in power and feeding their own narcissism, not in truth. Indeed, truth can be a handicap to those seeking power. When you have reality on your side, you want to persuade your opponents; when you don’t, you need to silence your opponents. Censorship can be much more effective than persuasion. And persuasion is, in a way, an admission of weakness. It depends on “a humble attitude towards facts and the rules of logic,” as Leszek Kołakowski put it in Main Currents of Marxism (vol. 3, 1978). In other words, by seeking to persuade, you are appealing to something higher than your own force of will and preferences.

The totalitarian tribe

Such intellectual humility is not palatable to totalitarians, as Britain’s vibrant Jewish community has just demonstrated. An Irish journalist called Kevin Myers said something completely unacceptable about the “BBC pay scandal.” It was unacceptable because it was true: Myers pointed out that the two highest-paid women at the BBC are Jews called Vanessa Feltz and Claudia Winkleman. He then said: “Jews are not generally noted for their insistence on selling their talent for the lowest possible price.” From the shrieks of outrage that greeted his words, you would have thought that he had called for yellow stars to be issued to all Jews in Britain, preparatory to their mass round-up and incarceration.

The Jewish thought-police didn’t lower themselves to debating the truth of what Myers had said. That would have been difficult and anyway, its truth was utterly irrelevant: what mattered was that Jews didn’t like it and that their will had to prevail.

And it certainly has: Myers has been dismissed from the Sunday Times and cast into the outer darkness, despite his loud protestations of admiration and respect for the “Jewish community.” As Mark Gardner, the “communications director” of the Community Security Trust, has simultaneously gloated and lamented: “Myers’s squalid example of blatant antisemitic language was swiftly dealt with but the premise of Jews and money and cunning remains rampant.” In other words, although Jews enjoy both enormous wealth and the political power that comes with it, the goyim are not allowed to raise these topics. Any goy who does so will, like Myers, be “swiftly dealt with.”

“Don’t debate: defenestrate!”

As I said above, censorship can be much more effective than persuasion. Myers wasn’t debated: he was “dealt with.” Jews do not have a “a humble attitude towards facts and the rules of logic.” Instead, they have a firm belief in two things. First, that Jews must be immune from scrutiny and criticism. Second, that Jews must be treated at all times as helpless victims at constant threat of persecution. To underline their helplessness, they crush all opposition without mercy. When Jewish power can’t be discussed, it can’t be challenged. And that’s the way Jews like it.

But so do lots of others in Brave New Britain. As Jonathan Sacks, Britain’s former chief rabbi, once pointed out, the Jewish love of censorship has infected many others on the left: “The process … began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays. … A culture of victimhood sets group against group, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression, humiliation is greater than that of others.”

Splits in the Rainbow

Rabbi Sacks forgot to mention Muslims, who have seen how effective accusations of “anti-Semitism” have been and created a victim-wail of their own: “Islamophobia!” All of these groups are interested in power, not in “facts and the rules of logic.” They’re wise in their preference, because facts and logic aren’t on their side. Nor, in fact, is history. The Rainbow Alliance is riddled with contradictions and held together only by a shared hatred for the cis-het gentile Stale Pale Male.

But ideologies that depend on inflating the ego do not make for successful alliances, because every victim-group wants to be King of the Castle. Big cracks are already apparent in the Rainbow: see the non-White progressives who demand submission from their White comrades and the conflict between the trans-friendly feminists and the “trans-phobic” feminists. These splits are only going to get bigger. As the Rainbow falls apart, the Alt-Right will continue to rise.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

40 Comments to "The Silent Sisterhood: How Feminists Collaborate with Rape and Murder"

  1. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 17, 2017 - 9:27 pm | Permalink

    Jewish controlled feminism*) was never intended to secure women’s rights, it was intended as a weapon against the white man, the major obstacle to Jewish supremacy. In order to be successful feminism had to appeal to feelings of jealousy and rancor of white women, based on the myth of the “oppressing white man”. In reality, of all women in the world white women are treated the best by their men. That white women, who score the highest in terms of wealth, freedom and respect, still consider themselves be “oppressed” must be considered as a success of Jewish subversive social engineering. White women who believe in the artificially created Jewish myth of their own “oppression” and then side with Muslim immigrants, who violate all women’s rights, are not to be taken seriously in any way. I don’t like the idea of “White Sharia”, but if that is what it comes to, such women deserve it.

    *) For the overwhelming Jewish dominance of feminism, see Wikipedia : List of Jewish feminists.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 18, 2017 - 12:15 pm | Permalink

      @ Franklin Ryckaert

      There are “feminisms” of all kinds, often contradictory (e.g. over porn, “sex work”, childcare), but then “that’s wimmin for yer”! The one thing that most have in common is a hostility to marriage+motherhood. Females are seen not as loving mates to protective husbands and fathers, but basically as industrialized competitors with males. The on-going transgender brainwash of children is a spin-off from this process.

      It is quite clear that, in the USA especially, Jewish women were a driving force, though also aggressive lesbians; “Sappho is a Right-on Woman”, Society for Cutting Up Men, &c. Though later back-tracking a bit, Betty Friedan talked about gender “equality rights” requiring a total revolution in society and human evolution itself.

      Jewish and non-Jewish leftist males, following notably Herbert Marcuse, aimed to enlist feminist “wyomin” with “blacks, immigrants, other minorities and ‘students'” as a collective “race-gender-class” army against white western national cultures and family values. This has gradually dominated so-called “academia”, not only the “social sciences”, and in Britain such legislation as the Equality Act 2010.

      It is like a sick totalitarian religion that requires a genuine New Enlightenment.

    • ilene's Gravatar ilene
      August 19, 2017 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

      I think women’s rights were already on the way to being secured before the Extremist feminists co-opted the movement. Steinem has admitted to her links with the CIA.
      When I entered college it was several years after the feminists had already co-opted the women’s movement. I remember at that time men seemed to be beneficiaries of the Feminists, as women had been talked into the “free-spirit sexual revolution”, which has damaged them so much. I remember distinctly how men were lauding the leftist feminists as it opened up more sex for them without the “baggage” involved, such as pregnancy (thats when men stopped marrying their pregnant girlfriends because they said they could get an abortion). I never fit into this culture, maybe because I saw right thru it. I saw how it damaged women who became great champions of the feminists, who I always equate with the sexual revolution (which has been nothing but a ploy to degrade females and get them to accept and participate in their own degeneracy).

      The “war” has always been against the White woman (and has had the consequences of affecting white men negatively in every way). My comment may not be published for this, but I also remember back in those earlier days, from college on, how I did not see white men come to the defense of women. A few did, but over all they indulged themselves in the “spoils” of this obvious Psychological warfare. It saddened me so much, as I did believe in the “white prince” fairy tales. So it came as an absolute shock when I entered college and saw how both men and women were conducting themselves.
      Harsh? Yes, but these are harsh times. I look forward to hiking for a year in Europe as I seek out my eventual retirement spot, I have 2 locations on top of the list. Even though Europe is going through and extreme Psychological War, directed at the white indigenous, I have more hope for them that Americans. Already there are a few places standing up to Jewish Supremacist power in Europe. I don’t see that ever happening here.

  2. Lucy's Gravatar Lucy
    August 18, 2017 - 5:39 am | Permalink

    Saddening that an author that is very much aware of Jewish dominance in White countries, has the naiveté to believe in the “holocaustian” myth that Poland’s Jews were exterminated and those who “miraculously” survived the Shoah fled the “famous” Polish anti-Semitism. The Shoah “gospel” naturally wouldn’t be able to keep its tight grip on the public if the independent media, also in Poland, had a fair chance to compete with MSM. Most Poles are poor and cannot afford Internet, which means that they easily buy into the lies about the governing party PiS (neocons that the tiny media on the right call PiSrael) setting the interests of the Polish nation first. Officially, only a handful Jews live in Poland. But if you dig a bit, you cannot ignore that many more than a handful in Poland’s elites were before having put on a pair of Polish patriot shoes equipped with Yiddish names. Mr Jaroslaw Kaczynski (aka Kalkstein) actually was the Solidarnosc leader’s (Lech Walesa aka Lejba Kone) adviser at the roundtable conference in Magdalenka Anno 1989, where the faithful communists (many of them enrichers who came to Poland in 1945 from the Soviet Union) agreed with ethnic Polish communists on “the benefit for the nation of keeping things as they are”. What confuses ordinary Poles and people abroad is the anti-Muslim rhetoric not only by the street parliaments but also by the government. As you, dear Author, obviously are an expert on the JQ, ask yourself why would a government in a country where no other migrants than Ukrainians are willing to stay (too low benefits) would want to drag on itself a severe criticism. Poland’s primary role in the globalist game obviously is to provoke Russia. Since many more than the 2,5 million Ukrainians that already arrived in Poland, are expected to come, a massive stand against Muslim immigration makes a perfect way to pull wool over the uber-Catholic boorish eyes. Looking on the surface Poland has at last “nationalists” in power, hurrah! The weird tings is that most of all those “patriotic” programs on TV in Poland have the hosts with Jewish background. Surprisingly to a western observer, those Jews are especially aggressive when it comes to muslim immigration. The difference to Sweden is huge, as Jews in Sweden are especially enthusiastic over the foreign “enrichment” of Sweden. (Ordinary Jews naturally might disapprove it, but they obviously do not voice their opinion.) I believe that Beata Szydlo is a useful idiot. She already was Poland’s PM when Knessed held its session in Krakow, and she had during her visit in Israel in autumn 2016 assured Israeli bigwigs that Poland will hasten the procedure of paying 65 billion dollars to Jewish survivers – or their descendants – as a restitution for real estates they lost during WWII. According to alternative media, Poland has regulated this “debt” in1960.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      August 18, 2017 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

      Thank you for that necessary clarification and contextualization of the Polish situation.

    • Artemis's Gravatar Artemis
      August 21, 2017 - 8:21 am | Permalink

      I might add that the Hungarian situation is unfortunately the same. First prime minister Antall, was a Jew, Horn was a communist who shot Hungarians in 1956, Gyurcsány’s wife Klára Dobrev is a Bulgarian Jew, her grandfather Antal Apró is a Jew from communist times, Medgyessy was code named D-209 working for the Soviets, Bajnai is a Jew, and last but not least, Orbán is a gypsy, and his wife is a Jew.
      As for Sweden, totally controlled by the Bonnier family in media: magazines and newspapers, publishers etc, and Wallenberg family in industry. Swedish Radio head called Cilla Benkő (Hungarian Jew) and SVT -Swedish TV head called Hanna Stjärne (Stern).
      “…. and I think to myself, what a wonderful world…..”

  3. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    August 18, 2017 - 6:45 am | Permalink

    For a balanced view of Sacks, see e.g. his interview with the “RC” Peter Stanford, Daily Telegraph, June 6, 2015. He has also drawn attention to the demographic collapse of western nations. The qualifier is that he remains a strong Zionist supporter of Israel, and regards Islamism as the third “antisemitism” after its medieval religious and the modern racial/economic predecessors.

    He is not in the same camp as e.g. Chief Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, but then as Jews often say and as once Hitler wrote, Jews do not readily agree with one another, except I would add, when they all feel equally threatened.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      August 18, 2017 - 2:08 pm | Permalink

      The balanced view of Sacks as regards race and nation issues – which we are here to discuss – is that I’m English, he’s Jewish; he has his country, I should have mine; I live in my country, he should live in his.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        August 19, 2017 - 4:56 am | Permalink

        @ Nick Dean
        I too am English and my fathers before me.
        Where is Sacks’ country? Occupied Palestine?
        However, one should not look every gift camel in the mouth.

        • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
          August 19, 2017 - 2:04 pm | Permalink

          We can assume historic responsibilities to the Palestinians only if we regain our own historic destiny. And then, the prevailing and Jewish authorized model for dealing with historic injustices will come back to bite them.

  4. RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
    August 18, 2017 - 8:43 am | Permalink

    Good piece…

    “…But ideologies that depend on inflating the ego do not make for successful alliances, because every victim-group wants to be King of the Castle. Big cracks are already apparent in the Rainbow: see the non-White progressives who demand submission from their White comrades and the conflict between the trans-friendly feminists and the “trans-phobic” feminists. These splits are only going to get bigger. As the Rainbow falls apart, the Alt-Right will continue to rise.”

    And this is Trump’s Ace up his sleeve.

    As Trump continues to whittle away at the coffers of the once flush and freely flowing cash taps aimed at the Coalition of Competitive Retards by, for example, cutting-off Federal Funding for Sanctuary Cities, the Top Predators in the Cunning Coalition are going to become vicious in (((their))) Addictive Quest for Material Gain.
    This viciousness will in turn produce even more glaring examples of Addicted Retard Syndrome that will prompt an even greater number of Jew-induced, Mass Stockholm Syndrome Victims to see the insanity of their own ways.

    Consequently, WhiteN/S/As’ ranks will swell.

    So the moral of the story is:
    “If you can spot a way of cutting the resource flow to the Coalition of the Retarded (i.e. cut funding to Sanctuary Cities), do try to spread this method around so word reaches the White House.

    Trump may not be a genius, but he is savvy enough to know a good idea when he sees one!

  5. Jason's Gravatar Jason
    August 18, 2017 - 10:38 am | Permalink


    This is a bit off-topic, but of critical importance, so I am posting here.

    What we need is a nation-wide restraining order, say from the US Supreme Court, restraining all states of the United States and all other local govts. from removing or altering or defacing any monument or statue, etc, for 5 years, until Congress has had a chance to study this issue and make a decision as to what is the proper thing to do for these monuments that some states do not agree with or prefer removal, of, such as whether they should be barred from removing it, or they can remove it, or they must turn it over to the federal govt. to be housed in a museum.

    Write to your congressman (fax) and ask them to introduce a bill to preserve these monuments and statues immediately.

    Trump must issue an emergency executive order (restraining order) or some conservative group can file a suit in federal court for this purpose in the meantime.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      August 18, 2017 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

      “. . .until (((Congress))) has had a chance to study this issue. . .”

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      August 18, 2017 - 2:21 pm | Permalink

      This is a Jewish effort to destroy a nation by destroying its past. In the Middle East “Islamist” ISIS (in reality a Mossad construct) has done the same by destroying ancient monuments in Syria. The Jews want a planetary population without biological or cultural identity. Hence their promotion of race-mixing and destroying historical monuments. The US government should adopt a law that forbids to destroy historical monuments, no matter how “offensive” they might be to certain groups.

  6. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    August 18, 2017 - 2:35 pm | Permalink

    “We Whites have done at least as much damage and harm to ourselves as the (((Hostile Elite))) -Professor Kevin McDonald (or words to that effect). When I read that, it was obvious that this did not need qualifiers or modifiers, that it was stone cold logic and fact. The Jew is the Jew; he will not change in his voracity or momentum. What we can change before it is too late, democratically, is ourselves through brutally honest evaluation and constructive criticism.

    “Our People” is a meaningless term. The only people that can make a difference are tuned in, turned on, turned up Whites and equal races-ethnics, i.e., Asians and HIndus. This constitutes the broadest and most effective resistance against the (((Virus-Parasite))).

    Remember the bandied about term “Cross Cultural”? We Caucasians are too preoccupied with our specific set of circumstances, tools of resistance-cultural, social, and economic. Extent in the World are other cultures that have definite resistances to the Jew’s siren songs. If we use the disease model of the virus at the mutation level of DNA and RNA, we would be interested in other peoples who show inherent resistance simply by being, congenitally speaking.

    Western Civilization may or may not have been the best the World has ever seen, but it will, at the present speed and direction hurtle toward and into the caldera of the volcano, to be obliterated for all time, if we don’t act smarter. Becoming a Buddhist and waving sayonara to Eastern Orthodoxy has provided me with new insights of the weaknesses and vulnerabilities of Christianity in toto. Buddhism is not amenable and mutable into Chewish servitude, washing away of uniqueness and collective zombie vacuity. The 1984 Apple Macintosh commercial is the exact metaphor for the state of Caucasians today.

    Any thoughts that somehow an “awakening” will occur, that pushed enough, Caucasians will act to effectively counter the blitzkrieg on all fronts, a total affront, is a fiction, wishful thinking, and escapism. Think of it in terms of thermodynamics and potential and synergistic energy. A survey of the necessity and and vital reveals simply “not enough” and not for a necessary time period. Sorry, all you “Aryan” Luftköpfe and Nordic Beauty Contestant enthusiasts. Do not deceive yourself any longer. You are on and within the Borg vessel and you are being assimilated and then will be dissimilated, dissolved UNLESS:

    We Separate and form our own ethno-state. Only then can the (((Virus-Parasite))) being excluded and our dwindling genetic stock and zeit-self respect be restored. Western society is a wrap around Borg vessel. The best genes in any group have a greater chance of expression into a phenotype human by having larger number of children. It simply is more rolls of the dice. A new society that will function as our own vessel to salvation and restoration would necessitate normal and exceptional women having 3 or more children per family. The answers to our dilemma and impending extinction are to be found in the practices and mores of the PAST. Do I have to enumerate them?

    Separate Or Die. There is no other choice or path.

    • Livonia's Gravatar Livonia
      August 18, 2017 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

      As Micheal Jones said, when a German goes to India looking for guru, it is a sign of total disillusionment, nihilism and degeneracy of the Spirit, the LOGOS.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        August 18, 2017 - 11:41 pm | Permalink

        Maybe. I view Buddhism as a trade up and improvement replacement over Christianity. East-West fusion produces a better outcome, combined with “living in the past”. Many modernisms, notions, and modifications are and have been disastrous and deleterious. The only societies that survive are traditional ones, with continuity and conservation of core values principles.

        • Livonia's Gravatar Livonia
          August 19, 2017 - 1:53 pm | Permalink

          How could some Eastern philosophy replace religion given to us by the Son of God, the LOGOS? Don’t you see what is happening while they are trying to replace us with the people of color and their religions? Christianity has built the Western civilization, with accomplishments never seen in history before, civilization with tradition and conservation, now being destroyed by Judaism, Buddhism, Islam.
          You contradict yourself, friend.

  7. Sally's Gravatar Sally
    August 18, 2017 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

    I never got ‘fat’ till I was sexually assaulted by a disgusting ugly loser who I wasn’t even on any kind of ‘date’ or ‘hookup’ with. Overeating/eating disorders are typical of sexual assault survivors. I don’t have an eating disorder as my childhood was pretty happy, and I’m not presently fat, nor have I been most of my adult life, but ‘fat is a feminist issue’ is a book worth reading, written by a british lesbian feminist. It assigns blame on the system and on men and women both for rape, and some of the eating issues it causes.

    If pseudo intellectuals actually looked at the complexity of ‘fat feminists’ you might actually accomplish something. Some women get fat because they’re pigs. Some women get fat because some men are.


  8. Sally's Gravatar Sally
    August 18, 2017 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    It doesn’t occur to men that getting fat is theoretically the best way to repel male sexual aggression, huh? That the drug aspects of some foods (dairy and sugar have opiate effects on the body) become a way to self medicate, and to defend oneself when an environment is too dangerous or rigged.

    So this ‘fat feminist’ BS presupposes that a lot of feminists are fat (a lot aren’t, at least in the older generations) because they’re just self indulgent, and/or incapable of attracting a man because…why? What do misogynists think? That these fat feminists are ugly women and then become fat out of self-medicating for rejection? The problem with that theory is that there are enough men for women during the mating years.

    One misconception about fat or overweight women is that they in fact repel assailants. An actual ‘fat’ woman might most times, but mere chubbiness tends not to, particularly when a woman is above average attractive to begin with, or particularly spirited/defiant/talented/independent etc. By the mid-90’s it was established that most targets of rape between acquaintances were overweight and that most of these rapes were planned. Insecure, neurotic predatory males clearly were targeting overweight but usually not fully fat women because they saw them as easier to project their delusions onto. Somehow a fat girl would either not fight back as hard due to low self esteem or simply give in more due to neediness or some combination thereof. No accounting takes place in the rapist losers’ mind that they are ugly and undesirable.

    I’m just going off here because this movement can’t self destruct enough, it seems. From every angle you shoot yourselves.

    Pretending that women become feminists to deal with rejection is as psychotic as all the colored hordes pretending whites are oppressing them while they stalk us and refuse to separate from us.

    • August 19, 2017 - 5:03 am | Permalink

      You obviously don’t know what Barbara Roche looks and behaves like.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      August 19, 2017 - 5:24 am | Permalink

      @ Lucy
      Years ago when I was a flaming “hottie”, I found that the best way to repel male sexual aggression was to 1) dress conservatively 2) behave like a lady when interacting with men or boys, and as a last resort 3) work out at the gym and take self-defence classes. I never needed, even once, to use my muscle or fighting technique on any man, so it seems that the first two options were a success.

      • Sally's Gravatar Sally
        August 19, 2017 - 10:19 am | Permalink

        For you, they were.

        I was ranked #1!!!!! in one of the MOST competitive states in a strength and agility-emphasizing sport. I descend from world record holders in a similar sport.

        Now, let’s all try for a little consistency, shall we?

        Can the best of female athletes in the same sport really take on the best males? Even the mid-level males?

        The notion that men don’t rape women precisely because they are ranked lower in terms of abilities, attractiveness, personality power, etc. is the problem.

        The feminists absolutely got ‘rape is a crime of power’ right.

        Hence the statistic of most female targets for rape being somewhat overweight. Most rape is planned well in advance. My experiences all involved larger very directly rigged political dynamics that made me a minority, usually of ethnicity/race (depending on who you include in ‘white’).

        Women who dress provocatively are usually seen as wanting attention from men. They really aren’t the main targets in that they don’t represent as much of a power kick.

        • HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
          August 20, 2017 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

          The feminists were wrong about rape: it is not about “power” but rather reproductive success. Power in itself has no value. It is true most rapists are low status males unable obtain voluntary sexual relationships with women due to physical unattractiveness and poor social skills, or some combination of the two. Rape represents a last ditch reproductive strategy for such desperate males. It is a possibility for propagating their genes, which after all is what evolution, if it is about anything, is about. This Darwinian understanding of the phenomenon in no way excuses it.

          • Sally's Gravatar Sally
            August 21, 2017 - 3:58 am | Permalink

            You’re dividing ‘success’ from ‘power.’ The two are intrinsically linked. I happen to agree somewhere, that rape (partially) represents a last ditch reproductive strategy for desperate males. Those last ditch males plot their strategies carefully, though, for the most part, so as to not engage the wrath of the alpha male.

            There are nuances I’d elucidate but the gist is similar; you’re just seeming to ignore or deny that rapists PLAN and therefore are not acting out of immediate circumstance lust. They plan when they can’t get what they want (success, power, status and the sex and gene perpetuation that theoretically goes with it). They rape because they’re angry and frustrated (sexually and otherwise). Indeed, the lack of social skills you cite (although I think literal physical ugliness, along with intellectual mediocrity) becomes part of the rapist’s frustration, and that is usually learned from parenting and society.

            It’s complex and simple but you miss some important aspect.

  9. Elizabeth's Gravatar Elizabeth
    August 19, 2017 - 12:51 am | Permalink

    The really insidious aspect of feminism that has so far been missed in the comments, is that women were told that the grass was greener in the outside world and that unless women had careers, they would lead unfulfilled lives. Women were also encouraged to be discontented with family life. A career can have some fulfilling aspects, but it’s nothing compared to raising a family. From the global perspective and in hindsight, feminism can be seen as a demographic attack in an ethnic war and women have been unwitting dupes.

  10. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    August 19, 2017 - 3:52 am | Permalink

    “No suicide-bombers for Hungary. No rape-gangs for Poland. No FGM “

    The important point is that unlike ALL conquered countries going back thousands of years, the currently conquered countries of the West are being conquered because THEY WANT TO BE. If one day, on the 3rd of a particular month they decided they no longer wanted to be conquered, then by the 25th or 26th of the same month, all the list above self-inflicted ailments could be completely ended.

    It is like someone who wears a camel-haired shirt, and one day deciding to simply take it off.

    Conquered people of the past did not have that option. The West are the first conquered people who do have this option, and who can take it whenever they choose to stop listening to their left-wing enemy within. Only (a) the West’s stupidity (believing the fake news MSM) and (b) selfishness (‘I do not care about mass immigration as I live in a white area and my house is worth £500,000 and that is all I think about) and (c) lack of principles for most (say nothing when the authorities ban free speech and go after Thought Crime instead of real crime) (d) wanting an easy life (‘the mass immigration will not affect me, it will affect the next generation so I don’t care enough to vote to stop it’) – only these things, plus the tendency to adopt the current narrative even when they know it is a bad one and against their own people – only these things are stopping them from ending the current mode of self-destruction.

    The reason the people stay in this strange state of self-destruction is because the culture of the West that the sheep subscribe to is provided by the 15% enemy within, who control the MSM and schools, and from which group our politicians are drawn. But when the sheep are no longer pampered and safe, and when their precious house is no longer worth £500,000 (economic collapse), they will reject this culture of self-hate provided by the Left, and they will turn to a culture of self-interest.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      August 19, 2017 - 6:33 pm | Permalink

      Gig’s not over till the fat lady sings.☺

  11. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    August 19, 2017 - 4:02 am | Permalink

    “They could oppose mass immigration and defend Western women, or support mass immigration and strengthen the Rainbow Alliance. It’s not a tough choice: the Rainbow Alliance funds feminism.”

    Money is one motive for some, eg the academic who says the right things to get a job in our far-left universities, and deep down has no political thoughts (those of us who have political awareness should remember that most people have little or none and just go with the flow). In this case he goes with the flow to get money/grants/a job, so money IS the motive. The same applies to jobs in the MSM.

    But money is insufficient as an explanation overall. Look at any comments section in the British DM for example (the most popular daily paper). Whether the story is about bashing Trump or about some feminist issue, you can observe the nature of the left with all their comments, either hating Trump or supporting feminism or Islam. Such comments are often the minority, but even if under a particular article they are 10%-20-30%, the point to notice is that these include many uneducated and illiterate people. They also are the types that support Antifa. The point is these are NOT rich and powerful. Their motive is NOT money as often Daddy provides their flat, or they live on welfare. They have obviously VERY STRONG political motivation, but they do not all work for the BBC or charities (sources of money for those with the correct views), and most do not see the Rainbow Alliance as advancing their career. They are NOT in line to get money from their views, and they know it – yet –and this is important – they are highly passionate people, and they know they (a) want more immigration (b) hate white people (c) hate the West (d) support feminism (e) support Islam. These views do not lead to them getting any money. These posts come from passion and not from wanting money. They do not think ‘if I write an anti-Trump comment it will lead to me furthering my career’. You can see the depth of feeling when there is NO prospect of it leading to employment or grants.

    Their passion and hatred cannot be explained by simply saying that they will get some government funded job as an equal opportunities person in local government. Such intense dedication (writing hate-filled posts, making their comments on Twitter) – their dedication gets them no money. Also, many are retired and still motivated to be feminists and lovers of Islam, and for retired people we cannot say the motive is money. Otherwise, when feminists leave the job market they would be less feminist, and this does not occur. And see all the volunteers in the aid industry rushing off to Calais. I saw a job advert for this role and the funding was – zero. All they got was accommodation. And the feminist women in their 50s going over to Calais to bring in more muslims are out of the job market anyway and living off their husbands’ income or their own pensions.

    Maybe the explanation is simply that they hate the West for genetic reasons, and this hatred is stronger than their other beliefs (such as equality of the sexes). They see Islam as backward and uncilvised, and they want to make their own country backward and uncivilised, so they embrace anything that will take us on the path to being third world and full of internal conflict. In other words, for the left, their hatred of the better/superior is stronger than money or self-interest. Of course they will at the same time as trying to bring us down, they will do everything they can to keep the flow of government money going into their projects and going to their type.

    If money was the motive for our current elite in the West then Hollywood would have observed that ‘American Sniper’ was the highest grossing film, and would make more films like this one that are not hostile to their own country and people. But they do not. They choose to make films that rubbish their own people and glorify other races. All current action films in the cinema at present have either blacks or women as the action heroes (and they have falling attendances). So this demonstrates that money is not the main motive, and their internal politics of hatred of the West is.

    Another example is the Daily Telegraph newspaper in Britain – when right wing it was hugely successful, now it has lurched to the left and has falling sales as it antagonises its right-wing readers with its new narrative. But they want to stay unsuccessful and left-leaning rather than be successful and right-wing again. So money is NOT the main motive.

    Another example is Teresa May (or Cameron) and the current Conservative Party in Britain – they know that if they got us out of the EU and closed down the BBC and ended foreign aid, and stopped mass immigration, they would be hugely popular. But they choose not to. This proves that as well as money: adoration and fame and success – these too are NOT strong enough motivators when compared with the internal politics of the individual. These politicians would rather lose a general election (and end their own careers) than reduce immigration. The motives of money or their own career or fame or adoration – all these come a long way behind their own internal politics. Decades ago the same types told Mrs Thatcher NOT to use the word ‘swamped’ when referring to immigration. She did anyway on TV the next day and won a landslide election victory. The point is that they (those who advised Mrs T) would rather LOSE the election than use the word ‘swamped’ (that might change the narrative by making such words acceptable and no longer Thought Crimes).

    So the enemy within will not change their views for money or career or fame or anything. They are wired to be as they are.

    • August 19, 2017 - 11:49 am | Permalink

      … If one day, on the 3rd of a particular month they (the white folks) decided they no longer wanted to be conquered, then by the 25th or 26th of the same month, all the list above self-inflicted ailments could be completely ended. …

      This a very good thought and I agree wholeheartely.

      … So the enemy within will not change their views for money or career or fame or anything. They are wired to be as they are. …
      This point has to be analysed in deeper detail. There are non-Germans (or non-whites) who live in Germany and maybe they work for their own advantage and not to the advantage of Germany. That should not be a surprise.
      Also there are Germans who work against the survival of the German folk. Those are folk-murderers, no matter how they call themselves.
      And from the first group come those who enable the German murderer-of-their-own-folk to do this extremely disgusting and evil work. There is an attack from all sides and all levels: daily propaganda, school history with a fake narrative, same in Newspapers and television, pseudo-morality, no free speech.
      Those parts of the German folk who are “internally prewired” in a way that they fit into this crazy system make deep bad effect against our folk. But they can do this only because the whole system is weird and crazy. Also the bystanders and dreamers and sleepers are part of our folk.
      But all of this can be blown away by a sharp wind. Our future as German folk /all white folks shall be bright! Per aspera ad astra! We must go through hard times in order to come to the stars!

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      August 19, 2017 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

      They are wired to be as they are. That is an assertion without proof.

      How many ways are there- to acquire views about anything?

      1) Being bought off
      2) Genetic determinism
      3) One’s own cognition
      4) Social interaction

      But wait, isn’t there another one? Oh dear it’s slipped my mind, I must walk around the block and refresh my memory. Oh yeah


      • Walteress's Gravatar Walteress
        August 19, 2017 - 5:54 pm | Permalink

        Agreed, and that thought control is twisted through a variety of turns with genetic markers being flipped and switched on through poisonous food-like products, promised to fill a belly temporarily while Mother is out earning cash for taxes to pay immigrants, more convenient junk food-like products for the children to warp (not grow) up on, and the flat she had to take when she left her husband for being not what the Jewywood shows and womens magazines said he should be.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        August 20, 2017 - 2:31 am | Permalink

        T.J. Perhaps 10-15% of the people are TRUE Left. For these people there is no way their views will be changed whatever happens.

        There are many examples of such types. Eg the father who still supported mass immigration even after his daughter was murdered by a gang of them in a refugee centre where she was working. At the funeral, he asked for donations to go to the refugee centre.

        And a few weeks ago in Occidental Observer we had photos of the white family that had adopted about six African boys. In my view, such people are permanently wired to be like this and nothing will shift their views.

        And then there was the girl working in a refugee centre who did not report a rape lest it caused the public to think badly of the refugees.

        As for the other 85% of the people – they can change their views as a result of your points 1,3,4,5 – ie the environment.

        My evidence that this is so is that humans are animals and therefore must be controlled in their behaviour by their wiring, and the only debate is: how much can the person be ‘trained’ away from the opinions provided by their wiring, and how strong is the effect of wiring on political opinion in the first place. And as I suggest, this inability to change on the left only applies to the 15% or so whose wiring includes strong innate thinking patterns for lefty politics – the rest who in the main have weak political wiring can fairly easily have their political behaviour changed (ie their political views changed by environment).

        The 85% of whites who are not true left (ie not the enemy within) – this group includes a significant number who these days despise their own white and non-racist-to-a-fault-race for being racist and wicked, yet these SAME genetic types born 100 years ago (our recent relatives, therefore the same as us genetically) were proud of their own race and viewed them as virtuous and a civilising influence in the world. The SAME types therefore have COMPLETELY different views, so, as you say, this is environment making them change their views over the last century, and the environment causing this is the MSM and schools and politicians.

        Once we understand the mechanism by the 15% true and committed left have been able to change the views of the majority of the rest (obviously not all of us – those who read this blog are part of perhaps a 5% group) , we can make better predictions of what will happen in the future to the West.

    • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
      August 19, 2017 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

      A large and growing number of White folks have already decided, many years ago, that they do not wish to be displaced, conquered, and eventually destroyed…BUT at present there is no effective path for these preservational instincts to be turned into concrete results.
      The best form of racially conscious action is for White couples to have a least 3 children and bring those kids up in the way they should go. The Amish did it, so can we.
      PS any religion that encourages miscegenation must be totally rejected.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 19, 2017 - 4:47 pm | Permalink

      Re Pterodactyl on British politics.

      The Conservative Party in England got votes at several successive elections by playing up immigration and defense; this was true even of John Major’s final (insincere) effort at his “soapbox” election. But they let the people down with regularity when in office. Of course, Labour and Liberal Democrats are worse. They all share the official commitment to “equality and diversity”, which at present is spreading like an epidemic on television and in the schools.

      The pipers call the tunes – the parties depend on huge donations from interest groups. The Murdoch press is still influential. The Mail has a few useful journalists like Peter Hitchens, and is robotically dismissed by left-liberals as a right-wing nostalgic rag, whereas its most notable characteristic has been for many years past to undermine the monarchy, especially by relentless continuous sniping at the Prince of Wales.

      The EU Referendum gave a chance for general public opposition to foreign immigration to be registered, when such opportunity is denied, for various reasons, in constituency polling at election time.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      August 19, 2017 - 6:45 pm | Permalink

      “All current action films in the cinema at present have either blacks or women as the action heroes (and they have falling attendances)”

      If Hollywood doesn’t meet the demand, someone else will. Perhaps not on the big screen, or through conventional channels. Entertainment for the red-pilled is likely a growth market.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        August 20, 2017 - 12:56 pm | Permalink

        I wouldn’t mind so much a western theater script being acted on stage by (say) an all-Negro cast, but the current practice of having a black Coriolanus or Tudor king, or a woman playing Hamlet or Lear, is too ridiculous. In Britain, we have had to endure a “Gay” Midsummer Night’s ‘Dream’, a black Friar Tuck, &c. History is being dishonestly rewritten along “Orwellian” lines, books suppressed or “diversely” rewritten, literacy dumbed-down, and screen entertainment dissolving even further into nihilist pyromania, sexual violence, freak-worship, miscegenation propaganda, &c. The assault on statues or portraits of past heroes – a recent example is the Oxford college replacing William Tyndale’s picture with that of TV presenter Laura Kuenssberg – is part of the attempt to obliterate Dead White Hetero Males from the western culture.

  12. Nandarani's Gravatar Nandarani
    August 19, 2017 - 8:25 am | Permalink

    Acknowledging the inclusion of St. Thomas Aquinas in the lead of your work with this little note; it seems appropriate because several times in history the only way the issue of Islam has been conquered for periods of hundreds of years, has been through countercurrents of a religious nature seriously pursued as the only solution. …

  13. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    August 20, 2017 - 3:00 am | Permalink

    PaleoAtlantid makes a point about some whites being racially conscious. Something I have noticed on places like Youtube is that white people in countries that used to be enemies (for no reason) are now forgetting their pointless grievances form history and are beginning to unite against the common enemies (the Left, Islam and those Jews who dedicate their efforts to helping the other groups). (The only exception being the silly childish Britain-USA rivalries in blogs over who won WWII and the War of Independence that are still going strong in blogs). In my view, the Jews are not the main instigators of our current path to suicide, but they gladly help us along the way. This should be a cheerful thought, as it means those Jews who wish us harm can be told to desist more easily than some imagine. So, I have noticed such whites in different countries uniting in their loyalties to each other and their cause. Perhaps in the future (perhaps after war and economic collapse) this block of the like-minded will migrate to certain areas of the globe and practice ‘apartheid’. (And this will arouse the intense hostility of the whites in the multi-culti part, who will dedicate their lives to our downfall, just as they dedicated themselves to the downfall of white S.Africa – even if we went to live on the moon they would still intensely hate us).
    This is the ‘natural way’ that happened in ancient times – ie for one group of those who were like each other to migrate to new lands. This process became more difficult when populations became larger, but it could still happen after civil unrest. (And there is already internal migration going on). Let the whites who love the third world – the Gates and the Zuckerburgs – let them move to one half and let the racially aware whites move to the other. On a depressing note, it is taking a long time for the whites anywhere to even notice what is happening to them as shown by the way they continue to vote for the likes of Merkel, and by the way no-one cares about the white genocide in S.Africa. For now the 85% are happy to be ordered by the 15% to lie on the floor and be trampled on by the third world for the ‘crime’ of being better.

    And another point – can you imagine in the white country a portion of the teenage children in their naivety – ‘Oh Daddy you are so racist, this country is so racist’. On the other hand, some children in the multi culti part will also want to swap. (‘Daddy, all this affirmative action against me for being white is so unfair’).

  14. Ashy Slashy's Gravatar Ashy Slashy
    August 24, 2017 - 4:42 am | Permalink

    Holy s**t! That article was quite a ride. There ARE still thinkers that can put two and two together in the West!

Comments are closed.