Ted Gold and the Jews of Weatherman, Part 2

Karl Nemmersdorf

Ted Kaptchuk and Ted Gold from the Columbia Spectator, Volume CXIV, Number 76, 10 March 1970

Go to Part 1

Weather Terror: the New York Cell

After the Flint War Council, the Weathermen organized quasi-underground cells or “collectives” in various major cities, and began planning a terror campaign. They renamed the group “Weather Underground.” The leadership assigned Gold to one of the several Weather groups based in New York. John Jacobs, always militant, led one group. Terry Robbins, a shrimpy New York Jew who was one of the strongest advocates of the terror policy, headed the main cell, which was tasked by the leadership with finding targets to bomb. At least two gentile females were members of Robbins’ cell: Cathy Wilkerson, Robbin’s girlfriend, and Diana Oughton, Bill Ayers’ girlfriend. Also present was Kathy Boudin, member of the prominent leftist Jewish Boudin legal family. Robbins, Gold, and the women based themselves in Wilkerson’s family townhouse on 11th Street in Manhattan while her parents were on vacation.15

Gold matched the others in adopting the idea of “bringing the war home,” the Weather motto for making America’s “White power structure” feel the violence that they were inflicting on the Vietnamese. Jonathan Lerner, fellow Weatherman, recalls that he and Gold had discussed planting a bomb on a Chicago railroad to kill workers returning home at night.16 Rudd remembers that Robbins and Jacobs “would rant, “White people are pigs. This whole society has to be brought down. We have got to defeat White-skin privilege.”17 In the last days before the fatal explosion, the once mild-mannered democrat Ted Gold issued a warning that anyone defecting from the group would be subject to death, with the strong implication that he himself would kill them.18

Robbins’ cell began building a nail-studded shrapnel bomb to plant at an Army dance at Fort Dix, New Jersey. There was just one snag in their planning. None of them knew how to make a bomb.

Just before noon on March 6, 1970, the day of the planned bombing, Terry Robbins was putting the finishing touches on the crude dynamite bomb in the basement of the townhouse. He mistakenly detonated what proved to be a tremendously powerful device. The bomb instantly ripped Robbins and Diana Oughton apart. Robbins was a bit more than ripped, actually. He was shredded. The collapsing townhouse crushed Ted Gold.

I have to confess that it brings me some pleasure to relate this exquisite misadventure. Three communist terrorists destroyed with their own infernal device. Cathy Wilkerson and Kathy Boudin, occupied upstairs, were stunned but unfortunately escaped. Boudin later descended into a front “revolutionary” organization (the May 19 Communist Organization) for a sordid group of coked-up Black faux revolutionaries and helped get three gentlemen killed in the Brink’s armored car robbery in 1981. (Gold’s old buddy, the Jew David Gilbert, another “mild-mannered idealist,” is still in prison for that one. So is Judy Clark. Can you guess her ethnic background? Gilbert, described as “luminously brilliant” by a former professor, and Clark resorted to the hilarious stratagem of denying the legitimacy of the court—because they were revolutionaries you know—and refused to mount a defense. The court consequently and logically sentenced them to forever in the slammer. Boudin, however, accepted good legal advice from her father and got out after twenty years. Last time I checked she was working as—what else!—a professor at Columbia University.)

Later History: The Weather Underground

After the shock of the townhouse the Weather Underground Organization imploded. The few who remained carried on propaganda bombings—usually restrooms in government buildings—but only sporadically after 1971. They lapsed into dormancy, with a few true believers clinging to Dohrn and occasionally issuing new missives reshaping their mushy ideology. Eventually most of them “surfaced” and faced their legal charges in the late 1970s and early 1980s. They remain important only in FBI records, and in the imagination of young radicals. They accomplished exactly nothing.

Leadership of Weatherman

We must sketch out the leadership of Weatherman. The charismatic, attractive Dohrn seems to be the key to understanding the power nexus in the group. She had burst upon the radical scene with the looks and verve well calculated to awe the often-homely Jews of the movement (her mother was Swedish, according to Wikipedia). She quickly became the lover of John Jacobs, the swaggering militant and Marxist theoretician who provided much of the thrust behind Rudd at Columbia. Together Dohrn and Jacobs planned and carried out the break with SDS that birthed Weatherman. They dominated Weatherman for its first year, until the townhouse.

Mark Rudd was briefly in the top leadership group. He rode his fame from the Columbia strike into a prominent role for Weatherman, but faded in importance, unwilling or unable to match the bent for violence of the others. Jim Mellen and Bill Ayers were two non-Jews in early leadership positions. Mellen was an older theoretician who worked with Ayers in Ann Arbor, but he quickly left the group when he realized how set on violence they were. Ayers, however, became one of the most important and enduring leaders of the group. Jeff Jones was another non-Jew with a lengthy tenure in the leadership. Jones and Ayers were, tellingly, both lovers of Dohrn after she moved on from Jacobs, and both derived significant authority from the liaison. Dohrn’s power is revealed also in the fact that she was the main mover in the expulsion of Jacobs from the organization after the townhouse; he was made a scapegoat for the “error.” Dohrn continued in the acknowledged top spot for years. She issued the communiques and drove the agenda.

Others among the top leadership were Terry Robbins (obviously short-lived), Howard Machtinger (cousin of Ted Gold), Robbie Roth, Eleanor Raskin (both later added to the “Central Committee”), and Ronald Fliegelman. All Jews. Fliegelman stands out in this group because he became the bomb-maker. After the townhouse, he volunteered to master the art of bomb-making and reportedly manufactured most or all of the bombs that Weather subsequently used. One of the Weathermen later said that without him, “there would be no Weather Underground.”19

John Jacobs (left) and Terry Robbins

The top theoreticians of Weatherman were Jacobs, Mellen, and Dohrn. The top militants were Robbins, Ayers, and Jacobs. The person in the brightest spotlight throughout was Dohrn.

The Jewish cohort seems to diminish slightly as one descends into the middling leadership group, and then again into the rank-and-file. However, this is hard to calculate exactly, as it is hard to gauge the membership.

Motivation of Weatherman

What was the motivation of Gold and the other Jews of Weatherman? What part did their Jewish background play? Motivations are complicated, but I am willing to grant the Weathermen a measure of idealism. Men virtually always strive toward some good they see in a course of action; vanishingly few are perverse and strive for something they know is evil. Gold and the Weathermen apparently felt very deeply for peoples of color and the struggles they faced. Gold’s father donated his time to serve the poor and Ted volunteered to tutor Blacks in Harlem. However, the idealism of the Jews of Weatherman was perverted; it was a canopy that also sheltered self-interest, murder and lust for power. Idealism also varied; it was the entire motivation for some, but very weak for others. We have seen that at least some of the radicals were utterly cynical in their use of issues. Probably the idealism was purer in the beginning, and faded in the fire.

Another aspect to consider in plumbing the depths of motivation is self-deception. Self-interest so easily and imperceptibly cloaks itself with morality. Kevin MacDonald discusses this matter perceptively in his discussion of the Left (p. 90ff) in Culture of Critique. Radical Jews, in common with many humans, often have little awareness of their own motivations, and not even the deeper ones.

There is plenty of evidence that the Jews of Weatherman were motivated by Jewish concerns.

The Jews of Weatherman were not benighted caftan-wearers stumbling out of the ghetto armed with rabbinic injunctions against the goyim; they were middle- or upper-class youth strutting onto top universities mindful of parental injunctions against the goyim. Not much of a difference. Mark Rudd provides choice testimony in this regard: “What outraged me and my comrades so much about Columbia, along with its hypocrisy, was the air of genteel civility. Or should I say gentile? Despite the presence of so many Jews in the faculty and among the students . . . the place was dripping with goyishness . . . Certainly I reveled in my role of head barbarian within the gates.”20

Then there is the emotional reaction to perceived injustice. Cathy Wilkerson remembers, “From the first, Teddy Gold had a deep sensitivity to injustice. This was encouraged and deepened by the stories his parents . . . told about the treatment of their families as Jews in Eastern Europe and Russia.”21 Wilkerson, a good friend of Gold, must have gotten this information straight from him. If so, it must have occupied his thoughts a good deal, and nurtured resentment.

National Socialist Germany and the holocaust figured prominently in the minds of the Weathermen, even before the holocaust became such an omnipresent phenomenon in American culture. A major Weatherman motif was the need to avoid standing by and allowing injustice to occur; they often reiterated the need to avoid being like the “good Germans” who did not resist but simply “went along.” Rudd says, “World War II and the holocaust were our fixed reference points. This was only twenty years after the end of the war. We often talked about the moral imperative to not be Good Germans.”22

David Gilbert’s parents taught him, “unambiguously,” that racism was wrong. “These values grew out of their experiences being Jewish following the Holocaust,” he wrote later. David’s first essay was about the “wonderfully accomplished” life of a man named Carl; the essay ended “But none of the above ever happened because Carl was killed, as a young boy, in a concentration camp.”23

Within a typically Jewish perspective, these Weathermen easily transferred their perceptions of National Socialist Germany to the US government. After all, both regimes were White, were they not? Not much difference in Jewish minds. It is a neurological fact that outsiders find it hard to discern variations within a different race. Rudd again: “We saw American racism as akin to German racism toward the Jews. As we learned more about the [Vietnam] war . . . we started describing the war as racist genocide, reflecting the genocide of the holocaust. American imperialist goals around the world were to us little different from the Nazi goal of global conquest.”24 [Emphasis added.]

Other sources insist radical Jews are motivated by “tikkun olam,” the purported holy imperative to “heal the world.” Rudd has a most hilarious rejoinder. “As a kid in Maplewood [attending synagogue] I never heard of tikkun olam, the now well-known commandment to repair the world. For all I know, Michael Lerner made the whole thing up.”25 (Lerner was a sixties radical turned progressive rabbi.) Rudd is hitting pretty close to the mark here; see this. “Tikkun olam” apparently does not represent a tradition of Jewish concern for justice in the outer world, but merely a concern for better implementation of laws within the Jewish world.

There are other, more minor, but still indicative Jewish aspects to the Weatherman phenomenon. David Horowitz and Peter Collier in their superb account describe the attraction that Jeff Jones, a blond California gentile, felt to the Weatherman leaders, “Like other WASPs, he was attracted to the Jewish drama of the new group and to ‘struggle sessions’ during which Rudd, Robbins, and J.J. [John Jacobs] histrionically argued their positions.”26 Here we see the intense verbal interplay and knowledge of texts that is a traditional element of Jewish life.

Another gentile, Bill Ayers, in his pretentious and often mendacious memoir, gives this odd reaction to his immersion in Marx coupled with the unjust expulsion of a Jewish friend from school:

I didn’t want to be a goy. I drew a Star of David and the word Jew on my forearm . . . recolored it for weeks and kept it hidden under my jacket. In Kerry’s honor, and for Marx as well, I invented another identity, part rootless, wandering scholar, part brilliant if ill-tempered Moor—I imagined myself a Jew.27

Bill Ayers mugshot


Weatherman was a movement led almost wholly by Jews, concerned deeply with Jewish themes, and straining fanatically towards a potentially genocidal communist dictatorship in which they could hold untrammeled power over the Whites of America. The movement evoked half a dozen earlier communist movements, each with their clique of Jewish leaders bent on revenge.

Thankfully, Weatherman was a tiny movement, virtually powerless against the vast and stable American society and government. Tragically, however, they and their leftist peers have carried out the Gramscian “long march” through American society and have shaped much of the country to their image. Dohrn, Boudin, and Ayers have all been employed by prestigious universities. Virtually all American institutions are presently committed to the attack on “White privilege.”

Have the Weathermen triumphed after all? Will the attack on Whites proceed from historical monuments and free speech, to flesh and blood? It seems likely. Patriots, brace yourselves.


  1. Information on Gold’s youth can be found in two short biographies: Kirkpatrick Sale, “Ted Gold: Education for Violence,” in Weatherman, edited by Harold Jacobs (Ramparts Press, 1970), 470-484, and Flying Close to the Sun: My Life and Times as a Weatherman by Cathy Wilkerson (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2007), 396-98.
  2. Sale, 474.
  3. Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, Roots of Radicalism: Jews, Christians, and the New Left. (New York: 1982), 80-83; Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements. (2002), 76-77. See also Mark Rudd, “Why Were There so Many Jews in SDS? (Or, the Ordeal of Civility).” Viewed July 11, 2017. http://www.markrudd.com/?about-mark-rudd/why-were-there-so-many-jews-in-sds-or-the-ordeal-of-civility.htm
  4. Mark Rudd, Underground: My Life with SDS and the Weathermen (New York: 2010), Ch. 3. See also Sale, 474-76.
  5. Here is a view of Ignatiev from the right. Here is another. See also “Theodore Allen” in Wikipedia.org. Robin Morgan, the Jewish feminist, was told by an unnamed Weatherwoman that she had no right to have the male “pig” baby [i.e., White] she was holding. Morgan, no shrinking Leftist violet, was shocked. “How can you say that? What should I do?” she asked. “Put it in the garbage,” the Weatherwoman told her. This story appears in Abe Peck, Uncovering the Sixties: The Life and Times of the Underground Press (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985), 217.
  6. For Weatherman ideology, see John Jacobs, et.al, “You Don’t Need a Weatherman to Tell Which Way the Wind Blows,” in Harold Jacobs, 51-90. See also Rudd, Underground, 147-48.
  7. Mark Rudd, Underground, 115.
  8. Rothman and Lichter, Roots of Radicalism, 35.
  9. Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Note 83.
  10. For an account of this “council,” see David Horowitz and Peter Collier, Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the ‘60s (New York: Summit Books, 1990), 95-7. See also “Stormy Weather” in Harold Jacobs, 341-50.
  11. “Stormy Weather” in H. Jacobs, 343.
  12. Mark Rudd, Underground, 194.
  13. Larry Grathwohl, Bringing Down America (New Rochelle: Arlington House, 1976), 183-84.
  14. Stephane Courtois, et. al., The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), 103-04. The passage can be viewed here.
  15. Good descriptions of the New York cell can be found in Bryan Burrough, Days of Rage: America’s Radical Underground, The FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence (New York: Penguin, 2015), 92 and 100-05; in Rudd, Underground, 192-94; and in Cathy Wilkerson, Flying Close to the Sun (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2007), 324-44.
  16. Bryan Burrough, Days of Rage, 93.
  17. Mark Rudd, Underground, 192.
  18. Mark Rudd, Underground, 197.
  19. Bryan Burrough, Days of Rage, 125
  20. Mark Rudd, “Why Were There so Many Jews in SDS?”
  21. Cathy Wilkerson, Flying, 396.
  22. Mark Rudd, “Why Were There so Many Jews in SDS?”
  23. David Gilbert, Love and Struggle: My Life in SDS, the Weather Underground, and Beyond (Oakland: PM Press, 2012), 15
  24. Mark Rudd (Why Were There so Many Jews in SDS?)
  25. Mark Rudd, “Why Were There so Many Jews in SDS?
  26. Horowitz and Collier, 80-81
  27. Bill Ayers, Fugitive Days: Memoirs of an Antiwar Activist (Boston: Beacon Press, 2009), 38.


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

42 Comments to "Ted Gold and the Jews of Weatherman, Part 2"

  1. joe six pack's Gravatar joe six pack
    September 15, 2017 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    Rothman and Lichter, Roots of Radicalism
    I would recommend this book heartily. I read it and was actually surprised at their honesty.
    They discuss, at length, the Jewish role in 70s radicalism.

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      September 19, 2017 - 2:01 pm | Permalink

      My 1960s high school classes were about 80% Jewish. Most of the Jewish students went from liberal to radical in the late 60s. Our valedictorian went to Harvard, joined the Rosa Luxemburg Chapter of SDS, then joined the Weathermen and dropped out. At one point his cell was learning karate in preparation for a beach fight with local blue collar youth. This was intended to earn the proles’ respect for the bespectacled intellectuals. I don’t know what came of this plan. Eventually, I heard, he finished his degree and joined a prominent radical law firm.

  2. Jim Smith's Gravatar Jim Smith
    September 15, 2017 - 2:02 pm | Permalink

    I don’t understand why Ted Gold occupies part of the title of this piece. He was a reasonably intelligent person, but clearly not one of the Weather Underground elite. Rather, he was a rank-and-file member who in the last months of his life would rant in unhinged, near-lunatic fashion trying to convert other radicals in the New York City area to Weather Underground. I happened to witness this while sitting at a lunch table in the CCNY cafeteria. When I read that he had died I thought of him as a sad figure.

    • Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
      September 15, 2017 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

      He was featured for two reasons: first, I used him to illustrate the progression–a template of the 1960s Movement–from compassionate “democrat” and “idealist,” to revolutionary, to violent communist willing to spill blood. This transformation is remarkable on its face. Secondly, he was the Weatherman who issued a public call for a Third World revolutionary committee to rule this country, a blatant summoning of the “victims” of “White Imperialism” to come and take their revenge upon the White man, in alliance with the Jews of Weatherman. Again, highly noteworthy.

      I am very interested in your knowledge of Ted Gold in his last months. Can you provide any details of his rantings or conversations? This would be quite valuable if you could remember details.

      • Jim Smith's Gravatar Jim Smith
        September 16, 2017 - 12:11 pm | Permalink

        Unfortunately my personal knowledge of Ted Gold consisted of those five minutes in which he came by our table and argued–“we” being a group of about four radicals at the time, members of the former Worker-Student Alliance faction of SDS. I don’t recall any details of his rantings, but we all agreed that even for a political opponent he seemed crazed.

        The template you mention was a common one: young people from middle-class, liberal, “progressive” and Communist families (the latter being the “red diaper babies.” I’m not sure just how much of a democrat Gold was, as at the age of 15 he was either a camper or counselor at Camp Woodland, dubbed “Commie camp” by historian Ronald Radosh, who wrote a lengthy article about it in David Horowitz’s Heterodoxy. I was a younger, apolitical camper there and found his name in the camp directory issued at the end of our stay. I will grant that it’s possible it’s not the same Ted Gold, as this one was listed as having lived in Flushing, Queens, not Manhattan.

    • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
      September 16, 2017 - 1:08 am | Permalink

      Jim Smith, very interesting take. I bet that Ted Gold had his eyes on the prize, like everybody else. Actually it is important to focus on figures like him who tried and failed to reach to the vertex of their failed movements. That would dissuade too many rank and file of all movements, telling them how it will end for them. I was in Albania during the movements of 1990-1991 against communism. All true believes are sitting ducks, ripe for exploitation. Whoever has potential and is not from the pre-selected ones, either is killed and made into a hero, or is otherwise chased away from the vertices.

  3. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 15, 2017 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, the true motive for most idealism is often utter banality – as in: “I feel totally alienated from virtually all the external markers of American society. The names of the people are all wrong and don’t reflect my ancestry. Their hair and eye colors are all wrong and their physiognomies don’t include mine. So, I feel left out and I cannot identify with the majority. Instead, I therefore choose to identify with the minority members of American society and to try and deliver them from the same alienation and sense of injustice we must surely possess in common.”

    Moral of the story: humans are still very much tribal in their perceptions and judgments of one another. And there’s nothing wrong with this tribalism. Rather than eliminate it, we should seek to encourage its growth, albeit in different territories.

    Revolutionaries seek refuge in idealism to mask their banal motives in the same way that fat ugly chicks often become feminist man-haters to cope with their lack of beauty and the men that would naturally go along with that beauty.

  4. Sursum corda's Gravatar Sursum corda
    September 15, 2017 - 7:11 pm | Permalink

    Rejecting Christ has completely warped these poor accursed people. They’ve rejected Logos, order and morality. Like the devil, their motto should be non serviam. Their insane belief in their own messiahhood always ends in an apocalyptic vision of chaos and lots and lots of bloodletting.

    • Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
      September 15, 2017 - 8:41 pm | Permalink

      It’s true. The damage they’ve caused–to themselves and to others–as a result of their rejection of Logos is tremendous. However, it is said that they will convert before the end. Divine Providence covers everything and brings forth good out of the most evil of things. I embrace the future, keeping in mind God’s Goodness. In the near future, however …

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        September 16, 2017 - 12:21 am | Permalink

        “However, it is said that they will convert before the end.”

        No they won’t; their behavior shows every indication of being genetically driven.

        • The Punisher's Gravatar The Punisher
          September 21, 2017 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

          Their behaviour stems from the fact they are demons in human form.

    • m's Gravatar m
      September 16, 2017 - 6:27 am | Permalink

      Rejecting Christ has completely warped these poor accursed people.

      This is, at least, Michael Jones’ argument. But back in the real world, we understand how these people were like this long before an historical Jesus was supposed to have arrived on the scene, only to then be murdered by them, as the story goes.

      Really, a thing cannot be but what it is. A few of anything might try to break free from their nature, and a few of those may even have some success doing it. But as a group? Not a chance. As Marx pointed out (and he had an inside scoop, of sorts):

      Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.

      Of course Marx figured that if society got rid of capitalism, then even Jews could be “emancipated” from themselves Did he really believe that? I laugh at that thought. Sure, it read well in print, and certainly fooled many goyim, who later became Marxists and other revolutionaries–like the Weather Underground. However, this line of thinking removed the blame from Jewish behavior away from the Jew qua Jew, and on to something abstract–i.e. money and the economic social order. Not understanding (or admitting openly) who manages money and the social order. Typical Talmudic deception.

      • JM's Gravatar JM
        September 16, 2017 - 11:56 am | Permalink

        How on Earth could you read that into this quote which merely says that the “secret of the Jew” isn’t as most would think, in his religion, but in his way of living. Maybe you think it’s in his genes? Possibly quite important, but if so, there is surely a lot of flexibility in their expression. Without economic parasitism and its associated power base, the Jew would surely be a lot better. In fact we all would.

        • m's Gravatar m
          September 16, 2017 - 2:16 pm | Permalink

          @ JM. I am not a materialist, but would argue that races act according to intrinsic spiritual properties. One could say that spirit is expressed materially, via genetics et al, and that would be correct as far as it goes.

          …there is surely a lot of flexibility in their expression.

          Actually, there is very little flexibility, and a lot of inflexibility, shown within distinct racial and/or ethnic groups. At least on core matters. It is why “stereotypes” are valid.

          To say that “without economic parasitism” Jews would be “a lot better” is kind of like saying that if your aunt was a man, she’d be your uncle. It would be abstractly (or imaginatively) true, but then she wouldn’t be your aunt to begin with.

          That is the problem I have with E. Michael Jones. The idea that if only Jews would only accept Christ and embrace Logos, they would no longer be revolutionaries and subversives.

          It’s the same argument with Marx–if only we didn’t have capitalism (the “precondition for Jewish hucksterism,” to use his words), Jews wouldn’t be Jews any longer. That may be so in places like John Lennon’s Imagine Nation, but in the real world one cannot so glibly imagine reality away.

          • JM's Gravatar JM
            September 17, 2017 - 12:47 am | Permalink

            I’m not suggesting some idealised end point to the Jewish Question. That will never happen. I’m saying that they would still subvert, but their scope for subversion would be far less. Religious restraints, though possibly of some merit, would have FAR less impact than non-exploitative, enforced economic settings, the absence of which provide tremendous leverage to minority networking and subversion. Of course once one avenue is closed, another is opened up. It would seem to be a continuous process of corrective iteration.

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      September 16, 2017 - 11:46 am | Permalink

      Rejecting schizophrenia and embracing sociopathy.

  5. Floda's Gravatar Floda
    September 15, 2017 - 9:44 pm | Permalink

    I would put nothing past these mad fanatics, nothing. Yesterday I watched Roger Stone (((?))) on YouTube, he was saying that WH insiders have reported President Trump has been slurring his speech in recent weeks. Stone appears to be a Trump supporter, he went on to say that Trump is a known Teetotaler and he does not do drugs. He is suggesting that his handlers have completely isolated him from Nationalist voices, to the point of even removing his most trusted Bodyguard because he was able to simply walk into Trump’s office anytime he wanted to. Stone made the point that it is possible Trump is being drugged which may explain the speech issue. I’d suggest anyone who is wise to the ways of our Jewish friends would never discount the possibility of using drugs to control a rogue President. These are the people who cruelly murdered the last Czar and his family, who nailed the corpses of Priest and Nuns to the doors of their churches long after they created the USSR. God help the people of the first White country to become a minority due to the influence of the Jews.

    • tadzio308's Gravatar tadzio308
      September 17, 2017 - 12:05 am | Permalink

      Roger Stone comes from a Catholic family of Hungarian and Italian descent. He has never struck me as being at all Jewish. Too puckish.

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      September 19, 2017 - 12:59 pm | Permalink

      I believe Stone is Jewish by ethnicity. Stone strikes me as deceptive. Just those ridiculous hats he wears are enough to shake confidence. When he predicted several months ago that Trump would be attacked as senile, someone commented, plausibly to my ears, that Stone was actually planting a suggestion. Stone’s analysis of Trump seems self-serving and shares with other Jewish pro-Trump commentators, such as Dick Morris, a lack of enthusiasm for détente with Russia or building the Wall. It is striking how much friendlier Jewish journalists felt toward Russia when it was the Soviet Union than now, when Christianity is reviving. Russia may be the world’s last Christian nuclear power.

  6. Anon 1's Gravatar Anon 1
    September 16, 2017 - 4:55 am | Permalink

    Thanks for posting. This article proves there is indeed nothing new under the sun. It also shines a light on how far the “hate the White” movement has come. As stated in Pt. 1: “after speeches by Dohrn and others, they raced out of the park smashing windows and attacking the police. They were shot, beaten, and arrested for their pains.”
    What we now see are police “stand downs” in the face of such violence, which proves Weatherman type radicles have infiltrated our government to the highest levels. We are now pretty much on our own, as the police state “order followers” will shoot their own in the face all in pursuit of a paycheck and a pension. It’s been a long march for these Satanic, Talmudic Bolshevik’s, but it seems they are just around the corner to success.

  7. Olaf's Gravatar Olaf
    September 16, 2017 - 8:23 am | Permalink

    Rudd is hitting pretty close to the mark here; see this. “Tikkun olam” apparently does not represent a tradition of Jewish concern for justice in the outer world, but merely a concern for better implementation of laws within the Jewish world.

    I’d rather say Rudd’s joking was part of his neurotic defence. As the obsession with “repairing the world” relates, by way of a neurotic complex inherent in Judaism, to the irreparable mutilation of socalled circumcision. A complex that more or less irreligious Jews to an even larger extent tend to project onto the “outer world”. “Tikkun Olam” of the daily prayer Aleinu constantly reminds the Jews as a “chosen people” of their condition –
    with the men themselves mutilated by their god, the women subject to the mutilation of their baby boys -and conditions them with a brainwashing “recipe for repairing the world” by destroying the “idols” of every other people – that is, in truth, genociding every other nation. The circumcision “covenant” of Genesis 17:14 and the daily prayer Aleinu in fact representing two complementary parts of a singular “infernal device”:

    “Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised in the flesh, will be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant.” Genesis 17:14.
    The phrase tikkun olam is included in the Aleinu, part of Jewish congregational prayer. The Aleinu beseeches God: Hebrew: “לראות מהרה בתפארת עוזך, להעביר גלולים מן הארץ והאלילים כרות יכרתוון לתקן עולם במלכות ש-די‎”
    Translation: “to speedily see Your mighty splendor, to remove detestable (idolatry) from the land, and the (false) gods will be utterly ‘cut off’, to tahken olam in God’s kingdom”

  8. September 16, 2017 - 2:02 pm | Permalink

    David Gilbert’s parents taught him, “unambiguously,” that racism was wrong.

    Really? I wonder how they explained the overtly vehement, racist policies of their beloved Israel, or did they even bother trying?

    A great article that helped put my past years of hippiedom in a more focused perspective. Most of my knowledge of these twisted Jewish minds came from the media and we all know where such knowledge leads.

    I too would like to hear more of the personal encounter with Ted Gold. Such encounters should be recorded for posterity.

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      September 19, 2017 - 1:24 pm | Permalink

      The whole counter-culture struck me as a national youth marketing of Greenwich Village bohemianism, which was a mixture of beatnik culture and radical politics. Sex, drugs, and rock n roll made the project profitable. Back in the day I was always struck by the juxtaposition of sunny pastel imagery and stinking, decrepit bathrooms in trendy Village night spots.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        September 19, 2017 - 6:46 pm | Permalink

        The so-called counterculture had little to do with the curious but quite different people and lifestyles of the crowd that for the first twenty postwar years gave Greenwich Village its reputation as the Montmartre of New York. Of course, both venues nowadays are little more than Jewish-run theme park versions of their former selves.

        In particular, rock and roll had no place in the old Greenwich Village. “Cool” jazz and the intellectual and artistic pessimism and pretension with which it tended to march in lockstep were the Village’s native woodnotes wild. The hippies and their baggage were far from welcome in the old Village.

        Odd that a self-described New Yorker would confuse these things.

  9. JRM's Gravatar JRM
    September 16, 2017 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Very interesting articles. Here’s a gem: “Gold and the Weathermen apparently felt very deeply for peoples of color and the struggles they faced”.

    It’s a key concept in understanding 20th c. Jewish politics (and with Jews, *everything* is politics).

    This great love for the “downtrodden black man” is just a ressentiment-packed container that facilitates and to the extent required, if any, sublimates their hatred of the Gentiles.

    Even the simple-minded black is seen to noticeably recoil from the Jew, however; they will accept the aid offered, of course, but the love seems to be unrequited.

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      September 19, 2017 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

      The NY Times recently published a list of the hundred most egregious slumlords in the city. A black or brown candidate for local office ran in the Democratic primary on the platform of defeating “the Jewish landlords.” Eventually he was persuaded to drop this slogan. I recall that when I was in high school a couple of Jewish friends berated one of their co-religionists over his father being a “slumlord.” One of the boys also defended the Nation of Islam as providing a model of masculinity that eschewed crime and drugs. He also seconded the black complaint that Jewish merchants overcharged the inner city residents. I suspect that the Jewish merchants have long ago been replaced by Koreans or Pakistanis or some other ethnic group, but I suspect the price gouging continues. You would think the blacks would learn to run their own stores. Malcolm X criticized the Jews for teaching blacks how to sit in but not how to run a business.

  10. Deep North's Gravatar Deep North
    September 16, 2017 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

    Many cucks point out Bill Ayers as the focal point for the Weathermen and fail to realize it’s Jewish members and their motivations.

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      September 19, 2017 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

      If you don’t grow up in a big city you probably don’t know a lot of Jews. I grew up in NYC and the political leanings were pretty obvious. In her book Romance of American Communism, Vivian Gornick describes her astonishment at discovering there were Communists who were not Jews.

  11. September 17, 2017 - 12:19 am | Permalink

    Re. Karl Nemmersdorf. Good piece.. but..:
    Conversion? Which conversion? Seems to me the other way around. Whites converted to Judaic-inspired Christian monotheism en masse in Europe by the 3rd ct. and 8th ct. Their secular conversion today is manifesting itself in the adoption of the cult of multiculturalism and its homilies of no borders, no races, and no nations—topped off by the civic religion of “metus judaeorum,” aka fear of the jews.

    • Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
      September 17, 2017 - 9:20 am | Permalink

      I was referring to Catholic prophecy about the conversion of the Jews before the end days. I know many here are not Christian believers, but I was replying to the one comment by “sursum corda.”

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        September 17, 2017 - 2:46 pm | Permalink

        As I’m sure you know, Karl, explaining what you mean when the questions you’re answering are loaded is an exercise in futility. Still, your courtesy stands as an exemplar of the value in declining to be divisive.

        • Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
          September 17, 2017 - 6:27 pm | Permalink

          Thanks. Being insulting or abrasive–which is so easy to do on the internet–has ended badly for me in the past, and I’ve learned to be diplomatic. This is a pretty inclusive site, and we must not fight over non-essentials.

  12. September 17, 2017 - 7:58 am | Permalink

    This 2-part piece seems a bit naive, to me.
    [1] The US ‘ZOG’ establishment wanted war to make profits and interest for Jews, plus of course deaths – contrary to the drumbeat here, not just whites: Jews targeted Chinese (at least twice), Indians (many times), Koreans, Japanese, Vietnamese, Cambodians etc.
    [2] After the 60s it was essential to prevent serious rethinking: Chomsky is a perfect example of a Jew heading off investigation of Jews.
    [3] The Sharon Tate etc thing was a fake for actors – see Miles Mathis’s terrific piece. I won’t give the URL – do some work. This of course was a discrediting move. But the Jews you mention (remember this was years after genocide in Vietnam had been established) presumably had the function of heading off military and paramilitary action. I can believe the ‘shiksa’ with Gold was blown up; but Gold being ‘shredded’ suggests a faked death.
    [4] I’m amused at the many comments on the views expressed by, rants from, supposed quotations of, these various actors. They are of course repeats of slogans etc. These people tell lies; it’s genetic. There is no credence whatever to be attached to their real or alleged remarks; the only exception is to in-group Jew confabulations, but even there external observer(s) are necessary.

  13. Ritual's Gravatar Ritual
    September 17, 2017 - 8:36 am | Permalink

    Great article, thanks.

    I keep thinking: Germany and Axis defeated, Vatican II. Colonial powers ebbing. In the US, all the post war affluence that Soviet communism could never match, i.e., Nixon’s refrigerator comments to Soviet leadership, Space Program pulls ahead after Sputnik, lots of upward mobility, Great Society, War on Poverty, Affirmative Action and
    Whites are still the bad guys.

  14. HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
    September 17, 2017 - 7:12 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article.

    I have been reading a book entitled “They Marched into Sunlight” by (David Maraniss). The narrative alternates between a U.S. Army battalion fighting in Vietnam and the anti-war radical protesters at the University of Wisconsin during the month of October 1967. The striking thing is the predominance of Jews among the ringleaders of the protestors and the academic figures that encouraged and assisted them; even the author feels compelled to recognize their over representation only to dismiss it as “nothing new”. The mayor of Madison Wisconsin, where the protests took place, said “if the outsiders didn’t come here and stir things up, we wouldn’t have these problems; the good kids of Wisconsin wouldn’t do these things”. Those outsiders were called “New York Indians” and the university Memorial Union where they hung out was called the “Jewish Emporium”

  15. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    September 17, 2017 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

    I really like this sort of history revision where they look at characters and see how what they did jives with what they say they were doing. Thanks you for the article.

    I found this link to a book “Ringolevio” written by Emmett Grogan who was head (bad term as there was no head but…) of the Diggers in Haight-Ashbury. The Diggers seemed to have a decent enough reputation as their philosophy was just to help people instead of trying to overthrow the government to make utopia. My impression was they were trying to make utopia from the ground up. Of course it all fell apart as all these schemes do. Not that I’m in any way making fun of or negating the idea or the sincerity of those involved. Anyways I read the “pdf” file “Ringolevio, Section Three” on the link below. He was very critical of the Jews. They would apparently steal all his ideas and take credit for them while fulfilling none of the actual work that was necessary to do what they intended. Instead of power to the people they wanted power to themselves while blathering on about the people constantly.

    I wonder did Kevin MacDonald run across Emmett Grogan, Peter Coyote or any of the Diggers during his wild hippy days? I would interested in his opinion of them. It could be very valuable to have this sort of insight.

    Link to parts of the ringolevio book.


    By the way I really dig the Diggers attitude. James Bowery post here, maybe he’ll see this comment. His great paper. “Exponential Remediation of Civilization’s Footprint”, on creating new territory, is very much in the Digger tradition. I wonder could we crowd fund an all White new country!


    There’s at least one billion Whites on Earth. If each one gave two dollars in return for a apartment could $2 billion dollars be enough to kick off a new White country? At $200 a piece you would only need 100 million. I think this could be done. In return you get an apartment in a building unfinished and citizenship on the collective vortex powered country. I do have reservations about depending on just the vortex. We should have lots of backup massive flywheels(cheapest solution) and maybe some nuclear power plants. Some Islands could be sold to non-Whites for revenue.

  16. Lou's Gravatar Lou
    September 17, 2017 - 9:12 pm | Permalink

    Also present was Kathy Boudin, member of the prominent leftist Jewish Boudin legal family.

    Where is KB now [working at Columbia].
    Who raised her son? [Ayers]
    Who is her son named after [cop killer]
    Where has son appeared in media? [NPR and Atlantic].


    • Lou's Gravatar Lou
      September 17, 2017 - 9:26 pm | Permalink

      Last time I checked she was working as—what else!—a professor at Columbia University.)—assistant Professor. check her Wiki page.
      Oh, here is a funny tale I read in LA Times, obituaries.
      Some jew who was a bomber did what Boudin does, works w AIDS patients or whatever..so LATs gave him a nice send off obituary.

  17. Lou's Gravatar Lou
    September 17, 2017 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

    In the 196os- 70s I knew a woman who bombed [or claimed to bomb] buildings.
    her dad [she claimed] was a senator.
    another 60s gal I knew lived in the slums w one of the Rockefellers [yes, for real] the Miss Rocky who is a feminist [she has a wiki page].
    Nelson R liked feminism [keep the kids in grade school to brainwash them and the moms will be tax slaves].

  18. Lou's Gravatar Lou
    September 17, 2017 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    I was reading KBs wiki page.
    Guess who one of the first people at the scene of the crime?
    Neighbor, (((Dustin Hoffman))).

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      September 19, 2017 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

      I carry no brief for Hoffman, but to be fair to the guy, the fact was that he lived in a nearby brownstone on the same block back then. In common with his neighbors, he was scared out of his skin by the explosion—who wouldn’t be? On the day after the explosion, there was a photo of him on the front page of either the Post or the Daily News because he was a celebrity, not because he had anything to do with the Weatherman mob.

  19. Lou's Gravatar Lou
    September 17, 2017 - 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Well well well, Jewess Goodman interviews,

Comments are closed.