The Origins of Swedish Multiculturalism

F. Roger Devlin

How Sweden became Multicultural
M. Eckehart
Helsingborg, Sweden: Logik Förlag, 2017

This brief (96 pages) study of the historical origins of Sweden’s multicultural policy was published ten years ago in Swedish, but has just now been made available to the English reading public. It is not a history of immigration to Sweden, which would require a much longer treatment, but of the spread and triumph of the multicultural idea. Massive extra-European immigration only happened afterwards, partly as a consequence of this shift in thinking.

In the early 1960s, when the story begins, the most significant minority ethnic groups in the country were of northern European stock: Finns were most numerous, followed by Estonians and the Sami, or Lapps, native to northern Sweden itself.

But following the end of World War II, others began arriving. In 1963–4, calls for restricting immigration began to be heard. This helped spark a series of debates in the press on the status of ethnic minorities in Sweden. It is generally agreed that the multicultural policy formally inaugurated in 1975 had its origin in these debates; but as the author of the present study points out, the background of the debaters and their motivations have seldom been inquired into.

Their initiator and most important contributor was David Schwarz (1928–2008), a Polish-born Jew who arrived in Sweden in 1950 for medical treatment related to typhus and tuberculosis he had contracted while a concentration camp inmate in Germany.

On October 21, 1964, Schwarz published “The Foreigner Problem in Sweden” in Dagens Nyheter, one of several Swedish dailies published by the Jewish-owned Bonnier Group, writing:

Before the Second World War Sweden was relatively restrictive with regards to allowing in refugees. The need for labor was not as great as it is today, and some professions feared foreign competition. But by the end of the war the government’s attitude changed, and over time 14,000 Jews and many others were transferred here from the German concentration camps. Simultaneously tens of thousands of Baltic refugees and several thousand stateless people fleeing the Russians came. Since then Sweden has continued to receive foreigners […] In other words Sweden got a large group of people, approximately 400,000, who were not born in the country.

Schwarz went on to argue that immigrant groups should face no pressure to assimilate; they should unconditionally be permitted to retain their cultural particularity. He recommended the appointment of a parliamentary inquiry with a view to formulating a culturally pluralist immigration and minority policy.

A week later, Schwarz’s fellow Jew Inga Goldfarb wrote in support of his position, asserting that Sweden had “a need for different cultural groups,” and that their presence would “give our life new content.” Such vague, unsupported statements would become typical of the debate.

The author of the present study counts seventeen distinct debates on immigration and minority policy in prominent Swedish newspapers and magazines between 1964 and 1968, consisting altogether of 118 articles. Schwarz personally wrote or co-wrote 37 of these, or 31% of the total. He also initiated no less than twelve of the debates; no one else initiated more than one.

Adding in other Jewish contributions, we find that this smallest of established minority groups in Sweden was responsible for 46 articles, or 39% of the total, despite constituting less than 1% of the country’s population. All Jewish contributors favored the multiculturalist position. The author has performed a valuable service in assembling this objective data, for discussion of the Jewish role in promoting multiculturalism in Sweden (as elsewhere) has often been dismissed as a “conspiracy theory.”

Ethnic Swedes contributed 19 articles to the debates, or 16% of the total, and were found on both sides. It may be significant, however, that the three Swedes who gave most support to the multiculturalist position co-wrote most of their articles with Jews.

Other groups contributed 38 articles (32%), and 15 articles are classed as “unknown” (e.g., unsigned editorials). Next to Jews, Estonians provided the strongest support for multiculturalism. Three Catholic immigrant contributors actually argued against the multicultural position.

If the passages quoted in Eckehard’s book are representative, the arguments deployed by the multiculturalists do not seem to have been very sophisticated. “Sterile homogeneity” was contrasted with “enrichment.” Increased immigration in the future was alleged to be “inevitable.” Schwartz claimed that Swedes’ abandonment of their ethnic interests domestically would somehow help them promote those same interests internationally. He portrayed cultural pluralism as a precondition for cooperation between groups and a key to avoiding conflict, although without explaining how assimilation could produce conflict and ignoring the social science data on the many costs of multiculturalism, including increased conflict, less willingness to contribute to public goods, etc.

Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised at the poverty of such reasoning. It was never the goal of minority activists to bring Swedes the (dubious) benefits of a pluralistic society, but only for Swedish ethnic interests to give way to their own.

Schwarz was very clear about placing responsibility for good intercommunal relations exclusively with the Swedish majority, writing, e.g., “It is the host population’s responsibility to insure that insidious slander of foreigners (‘They’re taking our houses’, ‘they’re taking our jobs’ etc.) ceases.” — essentially proposing that empirical data on the effects of immigration on the labor market, ecological pressures and housing were off limits.

The most important representative of the assimilationist position was the ethnic Swede Michaёl Wächter, who wrote, e.g.:

Assimilation is not only a possibility but also the solution which in the long-run is the most conflict-free and therefore happiest for most people and society. In Swedish society the conditions for assimilation are extraordinarily good. In fact, that’s precisely what concerns some individuals who are captive to their ethnocentric ideas, and so they call for help to protect their own localized interests.

Yet Wächter may have made some unnecessary compromises: e.g., accepting Schwarz’s contention that responsibility for intergroup relations lies with the Swedes: “There should not be demands for the minorities to assimilate. The demand should be for society to create more opportunities for assimilation.”

Eckehart notes that “the argument that foreign minorities would let themselves be assimilated, and that such an assimilation was practically possible, was brought up on repeated occasions by the assimilationists and was one of the primary reasons they lost the debate.” This may have been plausible in regard to the northern European minorities of that time, especially given their small numbers; today, over 30% of Sweden’s population is of foreign origin, and the largest groups include Syrians, Iraqis and Somalis.

Public discussion of immigration and minority issues was accompanied by increased political activity in the same area, with an average of thirty relevant bills being introduced into the Swedish legislature each year between 1965 and 1968. By comparison, the period 1945–60 had seen an average of three bills per year.

A review of the positions taken by the various political parties in the 1960s offers some surprises. The Right Wing Party [Högerpartiet] was the most active in proposing bills related to immigration. In August 1968, the party adopted the first political program that proposed extensive support for ethnic minorities in Sweden. This party subsequently changed its name to the “Moderate Party.”

The Social Democrats—with the crucial exception of rising star Olof Palme—were at first more skeptical of the new trend than one might expect. David Schwarz once related that, shortly before initiating the first newspaper debate, he had asked the Social Democratic Foreign Minister Torsten Nilsson at a public meeting how the government sought to solve the minority problem; Nilsson had said simply: “They’ll have to become Swedes or move somewhere else.”

Hans Hagness, a Social Democratic legislator, made the following statement in parliament on December 9, 1966:

It is of course in the interests of the employers to increase cheap labor and keep wages down and this has been the motivation that has been supported by the bourgeois newspapers. They’ve also organized sob stories about deportations and how bad we should feel for them. But one cannot build a policy on sob stories featured in liberal newspapers; instead we are obliged to pursue a conscious policy in the interests of the average worker.

In short, the Swedish left still thought in terms of social class.

In 1966, David Schwarz obtained a meeting with Social Democratic Prime Minister Tage Erlander through the latter’s speechwriter Olle Svenning. Svenning later recalled:

The old PM agreed to meet and brought his considerably younger assistant Olof Palme. [Schwarz] explained how important multiculturalism was, that Sweden already was a nation of immigrants and how the demands for linguistic and religious tolerance were growing strong. Palme, having been raised in a multicultural and multilingual environment, understood what David was talking about.

The following year Palme, now Minister of Education, announced his endorsement of multiculturalism in a speech at the Stockholm Jewish Center amid praise for Israel and the aspirations of Zionists. Yet this same man was so hostile to any display of Swedish patriotism that he expressed distaste for Sweden’s innocent Flag Day celebrations! Two years later, Palme succeeded Erlander as Sweden’s Prime Minister.

Another crucial landmark on the road to Swedish multiculturalism came in 1967 when the Swedish Trade Union Confederation reversed its opposition. Yet the reasons for this momentous change of heart remain obscure; historian Thomas Gür has written:

In literature dealing with Swedish immigration policy I have not found any accounts detailing the background and motives for [the Trade Union Confederation’s] stance on the matter. Nor is there any explanation in works dealing with [the Confederation’s] history.

As elsewhere in the West, the Swedish left was shifting its thinking from a class-based model of society to one centered on race and ethnicity. We have certainly seen the material interests of union members sacrificed to ethno-pluralist ideology elsewhere as well: notably America’s AFL-CIO.

The final result of the debates and political activity of the period 1964–68 was the appointment by the Swedish parliament of the Immigrant Investigation, with the task of studying the status of immigrants and minorities in Sweden. This body’s recommendations were released in 1974, and coincided almost perfectly with the arguments of David Schwarz and other multiculturalists.

The Immigration Investigation’s recommendations became the basis for government bill 1975:26 which formally declared that “Sweden was no longer a nation dominated by Swedish culture, but a culturally pluralist society where different minority cultures were going to be allowed to thrive.” The bill was unanimously passed by the Swedish parliament in 1975. It had only been eleven years since David Schwarz published his first essay.

As Eckehart points out, the dynamic which led to the rapid triumphal march of multiculturalism in Sweden is perfectly expressed in this observation by ethnologist Frank Salter:

Minorities have an advantage in ethnic competition in being more mobilized than majorities. Mobilization is the willingness to make sacrifices for a cause, for example, by donating money, time and work. Even a small group with limited resources can exercise disproportionate influence when its members are highly mobilized and its opponents, though superior in numbers, are indifferent.

The curse of Democratic states in our time has proven to be not the “tyranny of the majority” predicted by Alexis de Tocqueville, but a “tyranny of the minorities”—of highly motivated and politically activist minorities over naïve and complacent native majorities.

As the author observes, nearly all political changes produce winners and losers. In the shift from an assimilationist to a multicultural policy, non-Swedes living in Sweden gained a victory for themselves by persuading the native Swedish population to cede sovereignty over the only geographic area in the world solely dedicated to the Swedish people and Swedish culture.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

101 Comments to "The Origins of Swedish Multiculturalism"

  1. Clem's Gravatar Clem
    September 23, 2017 - 12:04 pm | Permalink

    I remember as a child in elementary school, I’m 64, asking my mother why she no longer went to the PTA (parent teacher association) meetings. I liked that she went to them because I hoped she’d meet some of my friends mothers. She responded that all they talked about was enrichment programs and it gave her an ill feeling. I never understood what she meant and I forgot all about it until reading this.
    Same story.

  2. September 23, 2017 - 1:35 pm | Permalink

    I haven’t read this booklet on Sweden, but I have to say it seems to retain much of the mythology promoted by Jews. —
    [1] ‘ … Swedish left was shifting its thinking from a class-based model of society to one centered on race and ethnicity.’ No. The ‘left’ is defined by Jews as Jewish: Jews always think it terms of ethnicity, or, more accurately, Jews and everyone else as animals.
    [2] … 1963–4, calls for restricting immigration began to be heard. This helped spark a series of debates in the press on the status of ethnic minorities in Sweden. .. No. The press was effectively all owned by Bonnier. Your extracts over look this point.
    [3] .. Schwarz … this and that… It’s a perpetual theme of Jew liars that individuals can be hugely effective. The truth is that Jews act as packs.
    [4] .. ethologist Frank Salter.. Even a small group with limited resources can exercise disproportionate influence when its members are highly mobilized .. Again, this is presumably deliberately wrong. It’s the ‘limited resources’ qualification that gives the game away. A tiny group with vast connections in other countries can of course have a lot of effect, particularly if ‘experts’ like Salter are on hand to lie.
    It’s sad to reflect that Eckehart’s 2007 book, which sounds as though it has limitations, still has no real counterpart here.

    • Winston Smythe's Gravatar Winston Smythe
      September 23, 2017 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

      Salter doesn’t address the role of organised Jewry to my knowledge. He is really referring to ethnic minorities generally. So if you’re implying that Salter is stating that Jews, per se, have limited resources you’d be incorrect.

    • JM's Gravatar JM
      September 24, 2017 - 1:13 am | Permalink

      “[4] .. ethologist Frank Salter.. Even a small group with limited resources can exercise disproportionate influence when its members are highly mobilized .. Again, this is presumably deliberately wrong. It’s the ‘limited resources’ qualification that gives the game away. A tiny group with vast connections in other countries can of course have a lot of effect, particularly if ‘experts’ like Salter are on hand to lie.”

      Salter isn’t “giving anything away”. What he is saying is that EVEN in cohesive groups with NO wealth or other pre-existing leverage, disproportionate social impacts can be and are made – and by implication – when the group is both highly cohesive AND wealthy and in possession of other pre-existing leverage, the effect is so much greater.

      • September 24, 2017 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

        There are countless examples of small groups being absorbed, swept away, dissolved, not to mention killed off. For that matter, groups definitely already within some society can make impacts, but not if they have limited resources. If you don’t agree, perhaps you could give me a few examples of this interesting process?
        What is it that makes ‘social science’ people so dim?

        • JM's Gravatar JM
          September 25, 2017 - 11:14 pm | Permalink

          Noone is saying that the impact of poorly resourced small groups (cliques) is necessarily a long lasting one, just that it’s often disproportionate. If you haven’t observed this reality by now, I cannot help you.

          • September 27, 2017 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

            You’ve given no examples of ‘disproportionate’ effects of small groups. Nor do I expect you ever will.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      September 24, 2017 - 11:06 am | Permalink

      In ON GENETIC INTERESTS at least, Salter isn’t evasive. He endorses MacDonald’s early works and draws attention to the fact that Judaism the culture acts as protector and incubator for Jewish genes. In his work on crime and groups he clearly lends support to the idea we should ourselves be group-conscious.

      I only know of one occasion he let us all down – that was when he lent some support a few years ago to the Anglo-Australia crowd, dividing Whites against ourselves. Otherwise he seems sound enough.

      • JM's Gravatar JM
        September 25, 2017 - 11:36 pm | Permalink

        @Nick Dean
        Australia is different to the US. The 1936 census revealed that Australia was 98% Anglo-Celtic in ancestry. This only changed – slowly – with the post WWII immigration, which, for the first decade was mainly British and N European. Reflecting this, Australian servicemen used to mock “typical Yank names” when they encountered American servicemen in WWII. Also a reflection of it is the fact that any use of “Whites” in Australia tends to be a -laudable flailing about for unity – US import, most founder Australians preferring simply “Australians” to describe themselves.

        • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
          September 27, 2017 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

          I’m English, and an English nationalist JM, so I wasn’t promoting a more diverse White Australia vs the Anglo model out of any personal preference or any self-serving assumption that the US’s more thoroughly mixed Whites are ideal. It just happens to be the case that White Australia was the policy and reality for generations and any move toward an Anglo-Australian policy must necessarily imply an aggression against the rights and property of other Whites who quite legitimately have made Australia their home, however few they are in number. It is wrong.

          • JM's Gravatar JM
            September 28, 2017 - 2:40 am | Permalink

            @Nick Dean
            “…any move toward an Anglo-Australian policy must necessarily imply an aggression against the rights and property of other Whites …”
            Pure fantasy!

          • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
            September 29, 2017 - 12:43 pm | Permalink

            Pure logic. It never even occurred to me that someone could disagree. It simply must be so, as Jim Saleam, pointed out:

            “Times have moved on, and Frank Salter rightly perceives an external threat to the survival of Australia. He says:

            “Anglo-Celtic Australians are being rapidly displaced by mass Third World immigration that they were never asked to approve, are excluded from multicultural forums, and are the prime targets of political correctness, including a growingly coercive legal apparatus.”

            I charge that this is a false position because it is white Australia, the formed nationality called “Australian” and I say too along with any other unassimilated “Anglo-Celts” and other “European ethnics” who are the targets of the system. It is white Australia in general that will be displaced by the Third World masses. Of course the system does attempt to hook unassimilated groups into its order to disrupt the formation of a clear racial demarcation line in immigration matters (i.e., it sets up an idea that we Australians are all “immigrants” and puts some white immigrants against the mainstream).


            “If the real challenge for Australians was one involving the need to displace the current globalizing state and building the unity of all ‘whites’ against the Third World intrusion, then a movement that opts to have its audience (the Anglo-Celts) exist inside a multicultural system as an “ethnic” group and which by its very nature must divide those whites against each other – would be a blessing. The first option is political to the core and the second an abstinence from the pursuit of power, a deconstruction of Australianity which the regime itself cannot but see as part of its own agenda howsoever it is dressed up.

            “If the political Anglos accept their cooption without resistance then the neo-conservatism of a state force intrudes onto our political territory as a Trojan Horse.


            I recommend reading the whole article.
            We cannot allow ourselves to be divided Whites against Whites where ‘White’ already is the prevailing identity. That’s just obvious.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      September 24, 2017 - 11:14 am | Permalink

      It isn’t often Devlin writes a pro-White or antisemitic article, so I appreciate this. Keep it up, Rog. Leave the White women-blaming alone for a while.

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        September 25, 2017 - 12:07 am | Permalink

        Good advice. It looks as if not too many see the obvious: that white women-blaming is no different from radical, or any kind of, feminism, where white men are supposedly responsible for everything that’s wrong in the entire world.

        • JM's Gravatar JM
          September 25, 2017 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

          It was the conscious application of class warfare tactics applied to a created gender war in which 50% were to be in a permanent state of warfare with the other 50%. The aim was a total disruption of the underpinnings of Western society. The claim that “…men are supposedly responsible for everything that’s wrong in the entire world” was simply a fabricated weapon in that war.

          • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
            September 27, 2017 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

            The nrx and mansphere attack on White women is also class warfare – against White Nationalism.

            It originates within the neoreaction, sponsored by Jew-supremacist Yarvin, and within the mansphere, sponsored by White-women rapist Roosh.

            It was ill-advisedly adopted by Devlin and others, and from there promoted by the Jewish-originating altright and newright.

            Anglin for example is just the end result of Spencer, Johnson, MacDonald and Devlin and their half-thoughtful, half-well-intentioned works, when he says White women are “worse than Jews.”

            These people destroy us by ideas. But Ideas do not matter in this context, genes alone do. Be loyal to White men and women. Be wary of mere ideas that divide us.

      • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
        September 25, 2017 - 8:48 am | Permalink

        Recognizing the evil that (((feminism))) has imposed on and been for White societies is a vital aspect of mass Awakening and any future return to social sanity. I’m usually a pure Race Man myself (separate from nonwhites, and we Whites can resolve all other issues ourselves, in our own good time), but despite being a native Southern Californian who has seen the multicultural devastation up close and over my lifetime, I must admit that feminism has been far more of a bane in my own life than racial integration.

        • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
          September 27, 2017 - 7:22 pm | Permalink

          Your personal shortcomings are your own affair. Post some stats, Leon if you want to say White people in California are not for the most part like White people everywhere else.

          I would guess they have children who look like themselves for the most part.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        September 26, 2017 - 7:12 am | Permalink

        IMO, this article is neither pro-White nor antisemitic. It is, for the most part, an overview of what happened in Sweden based on facts. Facts are facts. Those promoting multiculturalism wrote what they wrote and said what they said. It is a fact that the Swedish parliamentarians voted to accept multiculturalism based on what the promoters wrote and said. Exposing the who the promoters were, and distilling their motives, is not pro-White any more than it is Auntie Shemi-tic.

  3. Zaida's Gravatar Zaida
    September 23, 2017 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Hardcore criminals started coming to Sweden in the sixties with the Serbian guestworkers.
    The Juggemafian (Yugo mafia) is engaged, to this day, in all imaginable criminal activities.
    “Arkan” was the most famous of the Serbian gangsters in Sweden: a career criminal who later returned to Serbia to become a national hero in the Balkan wars of the 90’s.
    Recently the Danish authorities were accusing the Serbs, ahead of Albanians and Turks, of playing the leading role in smuggling heroin into Scandinavia.
    This was the good news; the bad news is that the EU will soon be granting EU membership to those Balkanic prehistoric tribal lands.

    • Lucy's Gravatar Lucy
      September 24, 2017 - 6:05 am | Permalink

      Dear Zaida! Not so few of those “Serbians” in Sweden are Muslims, at least by judging from their first names. The three “Serbs” that gang-raped my13-year old daughter actually were “Serbian” Muslims from Kosovo. This fact that “revealed itself” in the court of law.

      Easy to choose an ethnic identity in an age when the Zeitgeist of competitive altruism has replaced reason in our white societies. My son has a few weeks ago come into contact with five workers who claimed to be Polish. As my son doesn’t speak Polish, he bought into their lies, which wasn’t possible to uphold when I appeared at their meeting. In reality these people have spent about two years in Poland before leaving for Sweden. (Three of them seem to be Ukrainians, one a Chechen and one from Moldova. Even though, I cannot tell with certainty that these people are criminal, I advised my son not to hire them.)

      • gemjunior's Gravatar gemjunior
        September 24, 2017 - 10:30 am | Permalink

        How horrible for a child to have to endure such a thing. Such a terrible ordeal that your daughter and your family would most likely have been spared but for the presence of savage animals who don’t belong where they were in the first place. Your family will always be in my prayers.

        • Lucy's Gravatar Lucy
          September 25, 2017 - 6:18 am | Permalink

          Thank you for your sympathy, gemjunior. Alas, my beautiful and extraordinarily talented daughter has never recovered and she died 8 years after the disaster. She did not commit a suicide; the cause was an unexplained cardiac arrest.

          (Initially the authorities claimed that my daughter died from drug abuse, as her name remained in the data base despite more than 7 years passed since her last drug intake. The drug assumption was refuted by the results of autopsy. My daughter had symptoms of heart insufficiency but the doctors waved aside our concerns with reference to her “drug related mental shortcomings”.) With facit in hand, I will never forgive myself for not trying to fight harder the attitude that the Swedish “world best” health care bestowed on us.)

      • Sara's Gravatar Sara
        September 24, 2017 - 11:23 pm | Permalink

        Lucy: I can’t read this claim anymore: “Serbs aren’t criminal, they’re good people. Only Muslims (Albanians and Bosnians) are criminal. Come on people, who believes that!?

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          September 27, 2017 - 8:09 am | Permalink

          I can’t find the claim you attribute to Lucy. She has only expanded what was “Serbian” in Zaida’s claim that a Serbian criminal element had entered Scandinavia, by stating: “Not so few of those “Serbians” in Sweden are Muslims, at least by judging from their first names.”
          The Serbians and Croatians in Canada that I have met, acknowledge bad people on all sides, but point the finger at Bosnian Muslims and Kosovar Albanian Muslims as being far greater in number.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            September 29, 2017 - 10:42 am | Permalink

            Just so!

            Back in the mid-seventies, when Albanian and Kosovar Muslim thugs, criminals, and other bottom feeders first began to be red-carpeted into the States, Hollywood coincidentally began making Serbs the new, all-purpose villain class in its glossy films. A great many of Flickerdom’s “Serb” heavies were, then as now, played by Balkan Muslims.

            Thank heaven, no one is ever influenced by film fantasies!*

            As it happens, this is one of the areas where IMDB and Wikipedia (vade retro, Satanas!) come in handy—i.e., in that these outlets sometimes reveal the actual ethnicity and, shall we say, cultic loyalties of the film racket’s employees. These sources, however inadvertently, by and large confirm the accuracy of Curmudgeon’s points.
            *SARCASM ALERT!

      • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
        September 25, 2017 - 8:52 am | Permalink

        How awful! This type of story fills me with rage. I am so sorry for your particular tragedy, but hearing about it does bolster my own often flagging resolve (given how pathetically manipulable my fellow Whites seem to be) to keep on fighting for the White race, truly the worthiest cause of all.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      September 24, 2017 - 11:28 am | Permalink

      This is a local immigration issue without ultimate meaning for pro-White and nationalist politics. Naturally criminals migrate and exploit fresh territories. That is why all White Nationalism in Europe, as regards legacy sovereign states, is traditionally ethnonationalist: Sweden for Swedes, Bulgaria for Bulgarians, Germany for Germans, Scotland for the Scots.

      It’s what the people everywhere want, anyway, so for us it’s the easiest claim to support.

      Where you see anti-nationalists from the US altright or the Parisienne New Right talking about Eurasia or Aryanism or some such fantasy, they are not on our side. How clear must it be?

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        September 24, 2017 - 3:14 pm | Permalink

        Where then do I belong? I’m German/Russian/Ukrainian, and where do my children belong? My husband is English/German/Scots. We are all very White though, blondes and redheads.

        • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
          September 25, 2017 - 12:15 am | Permalink

          Karen, when the shit hits the fan, you and your family will know where you belong. Believe me, you will know, and it won’t be the result of any prolonged ruminating.

        • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
          September 25, 2017 - 3:32 am | Permalink

          Why ask me KT? I can only state the obvious: Obviously you’re not going to ‘belong’ quite anywhere as much as a simple Scot in Scotland or Russian in Russia. Unless your family is American and then such mixture would be typical and thoroughly American and you would ‘belong’ there.

          The fact that some people are of mixed ethnic background does not in any way undermine the general claim of a native majority to control its own country. And neither does this imply a need for ethnic cleansing. Never has, never will. No controversy or dilemma here.

          • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
            September 25, 2017 - 8:58 am | Permalink

            Nothing wrong with ethnonationalism, but it is a lower order of concern than racial nationalism. Pure races exist; hardly anyone is of a pure ethnic type. Over time, due to travel and economic mobility, Whites will inevitably become ever more “Americanized”. Mixed ethnicities will be predominant. What is NOT Inevitable is racial mongrelization.

          • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
            September 29, 2017 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

            Haller has it exactly backwards. The more specific is naturally the more valuable. If it were true that the more general – the ‘higher order’ in biogical terms, but which he calls the ‘lower order of concern’ because he isn’t focused on biology, then it would be sensible to pursue a politics like Hillary’s or Trump’s that insists on race blindness and includes all humans as equally our own.

            We all know this instinctively, our family members matter more than unknown co-ethnics, our co-ethnics matter more than co-racials, our co-racials matter than other more distant humans.

        • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
          September 25, 2017 - 8:08 am | Permalink

          Come to the USA.

        • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
          September 26, 2017 - 6:31 am | Permalink

          Karen T,

          I am not supportive of David Lane’s life path, but he did have something to say and I think he answers your question as to where you belong.

          Who is White

          Those of you who have over the years or decades either observed the murder of the White race know that provocateurs have attacked the racial purity of professed leaders to impugn their motives. In my opinion part of the reason this has successfully worked for the enemy is a mind set grown from an alien religion. A basic tenet of Judeo-Christianity and part of its fatal allure is that it allows inferior men to claim superior status without corresponding effort. A Judeo-Christian with an IQ of 90 and a dismal life history can get baptized, repeat a few ritualistic words and presto, suddenly proclaim divine status superior to that of a man a million times his superior in intellect and character.

          What I do know is this. I look White. I fight for White. I recognize the achievements of the White race. I want to preserve our kind. I am horrified that the beauty of the White Aryan woman may soon perish from the earth forever. I suffer for each White child tormented in America’s inter-racial nightmare.

          But we still do exist as a distinct and unique biological entity. The cultures and civilizations we create are beyond comparison. The beauty of our women, blondes, brunettes, redheads, green-eyed, blue-eyed, brown-eyed, is the desire of all men and the envy of all women. So, we do not want to be derailed by gossip or speculation on who may Italian, Spanish or Portuguese blood. We are not going to debate over whether the collective remaining White gene pool is 95% or 97% pure Aryan.

          Surely it would be a tragedy if the various divisions of our race lose their distinctive traits and beauty. And after we have secured the existence of our people and a future for ALL our children, hopefully we can take steps to preserve this diversity. But for now, we are going to accept the facts and circumstances as they exist. We are going to work together for the holy cause and we will not tolerate provocateurs, divisions or dissension. If someone looks White, acts White, fights White, then until their actions prove otherwise, they are our Folk. On the other hand, regardless of pedigree or appearance, those who oppose, criticize, hinder or fail to support our cause are no friends of ours.

          David Lane

  4. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 23, 2017 - 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Notice how Schwartz framed the debate not into the question whether Sweden should allow mass immigration or not, but into the question how to deal with the immigrants : assimilation or multiculturalism. By this tactic mass immigration is already taken for granted and beyond debate.

    It is remarkable that everywhere in the white world Jews were behind this disastrous development and it all started around 1965. This suggests a coordinated effort, in short a worldwide Jewish conspiracy.

    The reason why Sweden is especially targeted is that it is the country with the most blond people, a kind of people Jews have chosen for destruction.

    Control the press, control politicians and Labor Unions, start a “public debate”, and voilà you can destroy a whole country.

    • September 24, 2017 - 8:37 am | Permalink

      It’s called “Begging The Question” as in “When will you stop beating your wife?”

    • Thorgrun's Gravatar Thorgrun
      September 24, 2017 - 10:26 am | Permalink

      ” The reason why Sweden is especially targeted is that it is the country with the most blond people, a kind of people Jews have chosen for destruction.”
      Yes, and Hollywood has been at this hatred of blond people for decades. For an example of how early and with such animosity, the dangerous criminal or outlaw was not the swarthy, un-shaven, stooped shouldered, shuffling near-do-well, but switched over to the” blond man”, like Rutger Hauer in the movie, “Blade Runner” , 1982, directed by, Ridley Scott.

      • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
        September 26, 2017 - 6:50 am | Permalink


        And often do you see an African, Jew or Japanese (male or female) play a criminal on Television?

        • JM's Gravatar JM
          September 28, 2017 - 3:00 am | Permalink

          @Michael Adkins
          “And often do you see a… a criminal on Television?”

          Never mind; plenty do it off TV.

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        September 26, 2017 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

        Actually for most viewers. at least in Europe, Rutger Hauer and his character were the film best part.

    • AnotherAmalekite's Gravatar AnotherAmalekite
      September 24, 2017 - 3:28 pm | Permalink

      It is remarkable that everywhere in the white world Jews were behind this disastrous development and it all started around 1965.

      It was around that time that Israel is suspected of having first acquired an atomic bomb, and it is my belief that this emboldened worldwide organized jewry to become much more aggressive. One also didn’t hear much about the holohoax prior to this time. Once they had the bomb, everything went into overdrive.

      • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
        September 24, 2017 - 10:21 pm | Permalink

        That is an interesting observation, and probably right. If so, it only shows that the Jews consider themselves “at war” with the whole of humanity.

      • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
        September 25, 2017 - 8:09 am | Permalink

        That’s an interesting theory and plausible.

    • September 24, 2017 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

      Sweden was neutral in WW2, rather than doing their obvious duty to help the people supposedly chosen by God (or ‘G-d’).

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        September 25, 2017 - 7:12 am | Permalink

        Why pick on Sweden? Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, and the micro states were also neutral. All were neutral in WWI as well.

        • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
          September 25, 2017 - 8:11 am | Permalink

          Too bad the USA didn’t follow that plan. We might not be in the fix we’re in.

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          September 27, 2017 - 2:58 am | Permalink

          The neutral countries are being turned third world just as intensely as Germany is. This shows that the malice is applied to all white countries, and not just to those who ‘joined in with the H’. This shows that the hostility and the urges to make the West multicultural, this hostility is NOT due to any provocation, and exists just as intensely without any ‘provocation’ whether imagined or real. In other words, genetically programmed to be hostile to other tribes – even to those tribes who actively help you. But being two faced about it, and pretending all they want is harmony and fairness.

        • September 27, 2017 - 1:00 pm | Permalink

          Maybe because Spain and Portugal had had wars with Jews (‘Spanish Civil War’) and already been ruined (Portugal had been forced into miscegenation with Jews). Ireland, in case you haven’t noticed, has also been targetted – look up the career of the Jew Shatter. I think Switzerland, ever since Napoleon, had been assigned a special banker and settling-up role.

  5. JRM's Gravatar JRM
    September 23, 2017 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

    “The Immigration Investigation’s recommendations became the basis for government bill 1975:26 which formally declared that ‘Sweden was no longer a nation dominated by Swedish culture, but a culturally pluralist society where different minority cultures were going to be allowed to thrive.’”

    Well, you can’t say the Swedes weren’t warned…this is surprisingly honest language, considering the source.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      September 23, 2017 - 9:19 pm | Permalink

      In fairness, who, among the general public, ever studies these reports?

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        September 28, 2017 - 3:12 am | Permalink

        This is the problem with democracy – most people never vote for the party that has policies fully aligned with their own views, and instead vote for parties with the opposite views to their own, after being ‘sold’ to them in the same way adverts on TV sell them drinks or cars – all image and association and no logic or reason involved.

        So the people of Britain in the main want reduced immigration and an end to foreign aid spending, but vote for the opposite at every election. They shun parties that offer them these things.

        Most agree with Nigel Farage’s views on Europe and mass immigration, yet despite him standing many times as a candidate, the people have never put him in parliament, and have always voted for a pro-mass immigration candidate in place of him, as sold to them by the MSM.

        But the people are not actually unaware of Farage’s views – the media has not prevented his views reaching them, just given him negative coverage. So as the people ARE informed, although in a biased way, because they are informed they have no excuse for voting for their own demise.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      September 24, 2017 - 9:25 am | Permalink

      ALL political parties supported this radical import of the most different, incompatible, and unassimiable dregs of human misery and inferiority.

      This more than implies self-loathing and healthy attitudes of survival, prosperity, and fealty to one’s tribe or identity group.

      • September 24, 2017 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

        ‘All political parties’ were funded by Jews. Why does this prove self-loathing by whites? — Of course it doesn’t; or they’d form their own groups.

        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          September 25, 2017 - 5:41 am | Permalink

          Rere: You’re trying too hard to project outward the grotesque failings of Whites to protect, shield, and counteract CENTURIES of Chewish Mission Creep. “If you put up with it, you deserve it”, is a common expression of Real World engineers who don’t blame machinery or the Other, but take responsibility and ownership of Power Plant Operation.

          Please step up to Reality.

          • September 27, 2017 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

            Well … the problem is they haven’t been told, informed, hinted about the issue. You sound a bit like the alien in Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy complaining that earthlings had 25 years to consult the demolition plans for earth in proxima Centauri.

        • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
          September 25, 2017 - 9:03 am | Permalink

          You cannot let Whites off the hook. We are the world’s superior race, but, ironically for atheistic Darwinian White nationalists (one can also be a Christian, Darwinian, White nationalist), we are also the race least well adapted to our current environment. Cognitively and culturally superior, but evolutionarily inferior. Whites have had plenty of chances to save themselves, but they always cuck out.

          • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
            September 25, 2017 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

            It could be that compassion is a high evolutionary trait. Unfortunately, when the evolutionarily evolved commingle with the dross bad things happen to them…pearls before swine.

          • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
            September 27, 2017 - 4:18 am | Permalink

            Leon Haller – ‘they always cuck out’. Correct.
            The white’s possess a sub-group of lefties ie with genes to hate their own race for being better, and this is our downfall in terms of natural selection. The lefties think non-stop about politics and meanwhile the majority, who think little about politics, just follow meekly the culture that the left has defined, ie one of self-hatred in the West. The Jewish left are the same as our own left, with the added factor of not wanting to apply their hostility to their own race (in the manner that the whites do to their own), just to the host races that give them their vast wealth and security.

            I can understand that the majority of the people in the West, being very stupid in political terms, would vote for the left in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s as they were being persuaded by the left-controlled MSM and were being deceived. It was a case of ‘Can they not see the future of racial conflict that they vote for?’ No, they could not see the consequences, I assumed until recently, and I thought that never mind, at least when we leave the cliff edge, the people would finally wake up and see the path the left were taking them on, and would at last finally stop voting for it.

            But now that we have left the cliff edge, surprisingly, the people HAVE NOT STOPPED voting to head downwards! Incredible but true. We have starting the downward fall that is plain for all to see, even the most stupid voters can see it. Yet even now the vote in Germany shows that even now they have had their eyes opened to the consequences of voting left, THE VOTERS VOTE FOR MORE OF THE SAME! I really cannot comprehend why the people continue to vote for more self-destruction, now that the consequences are manifest. AFD only got 13% of the vote. It is beyond my comprehension why the other 87% voted for more self-destruction. How did the lefty subset and their allies manage to put the people into this state of self-hatred?

            The 87% in Germany might as well say ‘Cuck cuck cuck’ in loud voices as they vote. We cannot blame the Jews – the Jews who are hostile to us are just laughing as they facilitate us causing our own demise, but they could not do it without the 87% in Germany fully supporting them.

            I am sorry to say that those whites who hate themselves and who vote for their own demise actually deserve what is coming to them. Eg there is a constituency in Manchester called Gorton (Labour heartland) where only 1 in 20 people voted for UKIP/Tory and the rest voted for a range of pro-mass immigration candidates (I am being generous in counting Tory as not pro mass immigration even though most Tories are just as bad) . In the end the MP the voters chose (and half at least are white working class) was called Mohammed and was the Labour candidate. Meanwhile the Labour council is busy knocking down their historic buildings as fast as it can and they do not even notice, as all they think about is football. I feel no urge to help or protect such whites. These super-cucks deserve what is coming to them. It was not their sense of fairness or justice that led these whites to vote for Labour, or their love of Africans – it was that they accepted the terms that Labour offered them – Labour would (a) be hostile to “posh people who say ‘forty’ instead of ‘for-i'” and would (b) channel benefits their way, and in return they would let the Labour government make us multiracial. This was the deal offered, and they accepted. Then there are other whites – middle class ones in their constituencies, who vote left as they hate themselves for being better. These also do not deserve to be protected from themselves and they too deserve to have in full measure the anti-white hatred that they want against themselves. I have no urge to protect either of these white sub-groups and both are harmful to the other whites who actually made the West civilised and successful.

            When the West collapses due to voting to make itself third world, I wonder if a small subset of whites who are not self-hating-middle class or hostile-Labour-voting-working-class types, I wonder if in the end they will migrate to non-suicidal parts of the globe and defend themselves from the rest? It is a question of whether their own children would be genetically like themselves, or would a significant number be lefties who have self-hate and start undermining any successful white country that emerged?.

          • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
            September 27, 2017 - 8:11 am | Permalink

            @pterodactyl. AFD only got 13% of the vote. It is beyond my comprehension why the other 87% voted for more self-destruction.

            Give a listen to what Varg Vikernes thinks, then. New video, out today! (Sept. 27/17)


            You could start at 2 min 8 sec., but it’s quite watchable from the beginning, too.

          • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
            September 28, 2017 - 3:53 am | Permalink

            Barking Mad – interesting video. I actually do not think the voting is rigged (otherwise how could the Brexit vote have won? – they would have rigged that one too) , or at least the cheating is only about perhaps 10% of the votes (postal votes, fiddling with the boxes, faulty voting machines, ‘lost’ votes etc). In other words, if 65% voted for parties like UKIP, the cheating in the system could not stop them getting elected. And as for Varg saying AFD is controlled opposition – that does not matter even if it is – once in parliament and then on TV the viewers would hear a different narrative to the current one and that would shift the narrative to the right. Get the moderate AFD in power first, then attend to other causes of Western downfall later. It is like water coming in through a hole in the roof – put a piece of wood over the hole first of all to stop the rain coming in, then LATER on replace the wood with tiles.

            It is interesting to note how patriots from different countries agree with each other and support each other, whereas 200 years ago everyone’s loyalty was strictly to geographical country. In other words, loyalties are shifting to political ideas and away from territory. This applies to the left as well as the right, so a CNN reporter and a BBC reporter are in total unison in how they report USA news and British news, ie both see it from the perspective of the West is the villain in the world and needs to be brought down – there is zero loyalty to their respective countries. The CNN person hates his own country just as much as the BBC reporter hates his.

            I wonder if this will ever result in the long term in a migration so that humans start to sort themselves out by politics. I cannot see the self-hating subsection of the whites doing very well in the long term from the point of view of natural selection, and good riddance to them in natural selection terms once they live in their own countries and then self-destruct. Basically they have bad genes that in past centuries did not adversely affect them or their countries – they would actually confer advantage to the owners of lefty genes (as any parasite thrives under certain conditions), but now these bad genes are able to manifest themselves in modern wealthy societies and they might kill off the host as well as the parasite.

          • Kurt's Gravatar Kurt
            September 28, 2017 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

            Replying to pterodactyl September 27, 2017 – 4:18 am Re: poor showing (13%) of AfD I suspect that Stalin’s vote counters are responsible. Hillary was publicly confident that she would win the vote prior to Nov 8 last year – while her own Benenson polls showed that her firm support on 10/13/16 at 13% after falling 10% per week. By election day it was probably deep in the single digits. See salvage options pg 6-7 rense com/general96/hillaryagenda.pdf Then why were the official election results so close? It was the Fraction Magic vote counters: jonrappoport wordpress com/2016/10/31/biggest-election-fraud-in-history-discovered-in-the-united-states/ Hillary’s own poll suggests that the actual vote was 4 to 1 for Trump. The published US vote totals say that the DNC didn’t steal enough votes to make up for that landslide. Merkel probably stole a large fraction of her 87% “win” by the same method.

  6. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    September 23, 2017 - 4:39 pm | Permalink


    (Mod. Note: Since you are a “TOO regular”, I’ll allow this “naked” posting of a link, but hereafter please TELL US about the link, and why you think it’s relevant. “Naked” links will be relegated to the trash.)

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      September 24, 2017 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

      Is this double or triple drivel, “Santoculto”? And why does it matter and who cares?

      • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
        September 25, 2017 - 11:24 am | Permalink

        Again u?? Jeez

        Where is my other comment “moderator”??
        (Mod. Note: Not “again” for long.)

    • September 24, 2017 - 3:34 pm | Permalink

      There used to be quite a bit of hostility between what are now Swedes and Norwegians, hence the split of Sweden into two countries in 1900-ish. Thorstein Veblen, the ‘economist’, is an example.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        September 25, 2017 - 7:22 am | Permalink

        The 1814 Union was an aberration. The East Norse (Swedes) and the West Norse (Norwegians and Danes) have always been wary of each other.

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          September 27, 2017 - 4:27 am | Permalink

          And there are many in Western countries (Scotland. Wales and Ireland for example) who remember these animosities above all else. Eg about half of Scottish people have no problem being ruled by Brussels (or even becoming Islamic), but would never want to be friendly towards England. And this spills over into sport. The English always cheer on the Scots and Welsh and Irish in their international matches, totally oblivious to the way the fans from these countries in large numbers boo the English when they get through to the finals and hope they lose. Whoever is playing against England (Saudi Arabia for example), these types of Scots and Irish and Welsh cheer on.

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      September 24, 2017 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

      It’s just for curiosity the ethnic differences among Nordic groups. I don’t see photos with naked people in this link.

  7. September 23, 2017 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

    On March 1, 2017, Europe’s most conscientious Christian foreign minister Margot Wallström of Sweden threatened Donald Trump administration that in response to later’s visa ban on Muslims from seven Muslim-majority nations – Sweden might put a ban on Israeli Jews wishing to visit Sweden.

    “It is deeply regrettable that the United States will stop people from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the country, given the incendiary and aggressive nature of Trump’s new immigration ban, we want to ban Israelis from entering our country,” she said in a statement.

    In 2015, Benjamin Netanyahu had called FM Margot Wallstrom stupid for demanding an independent probe into Zionist regime’s extrajudicial executions of Palestinians.

    Sweden’s foreign minister also blamed the Zionist regime for over-reacting to the recognition of Palestine and that Israel’s rhetoric directed against those States who recognized Palestine had crossed all limits.

    Sweden became the first European nation to recognized Palestinian state in October 2014.

    Wallström stressed that Sweden was supportive of peace between Israel and Palestine but that it is sharply opposed to Israeli policies. She commented on Israeli’s aggressive policies and the negative impact of Israel’s posturing on the peace process.

    “Israel has been extremely aggressive. They have continued with their illegal Jewish settlement policies, they have continued demolition of Palestinian properties, they have continued their occupation policies which entail a humiliation of Palestinians, which makes the process difficult,” she said.

    Wallström has lead her ruling party to say no to joining NATO against the so-called “Russian threat”. For her stand, European Organized Jewry has called her a US-hater.

    In 2015, the Jewish media hailed Wallström as champion of women’s rights when she blasted Saudi ‘royals’ over mistreatment of Saudi women. It seems, Wallström is not aware of the fact that Saudi women are treated badly but not as bad as Jewish women in Israel.

    • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
      September 25, 2017 - 9:05 am | Permalink

      She is no Christian. Just another Socialist Gospel heretic.

  8. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 23, 2017 - 8:27 pm | Permalink

    It’s the same old story about tribal competition. No minority group is going to enter a country and demand that more of their own kind be allowed entry simply because they, the minorities, prefer living among their own kind rather than among the more numerous natives. Such a thing would be deemed “racist” and unacceptable. Instead, those wishing to invade a homeland turn the tables on their hosts and accuse them of being “racist” if they don’t allow unfettered immigration into the hosts’ nations.

    It’s a relativistic trick and it has worked wonders. For the life of me however, I haven’t the foggiest notion of why this trick has worked so effectively against Europeans. Perhaps we really are dumb? I don’t quite get it.

    • September 24, 2017 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

      It’s because Jewish money power and the entire media is united in trumpeting it, and all other voices are suppressed. Make a huge effort and perhaps you’ll understand.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        September 25, 2017 - 5:47 am | Permalink

        If traffic on the road is slow and the toilet doesn’t flush, may I blame it on the Chews? Or rather, did I take a road known to be frequently clogged with cars, and did I not try to flush my old tennis shoes down Mr. Thomas Crapper’s (1836-1910) invention?

        White Man has a permanent open wound that allow ingress of Cherish deleterious pathogens, and a pitiable immunes system. Throw in High Risk Behavior and Stupidity.

        • September 27, 2017 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

          I’m discussing the power of a mono-media in controlling all the information getting to Jews. Most people, unless they have some other insight, will believe what they’re told. nothing to do with road traffic. Nothing to do with being white, either. The accounts here of Jews inbreeding to an almost undetectable level remind me of Jew in China, who may well have had the same effect on the Chinese.

    • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
      September 25, 2017 - 9:05 am | Permalink

      Evolutionarily maladapted.

  9. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 23, 2017 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    I’m confused: Is the Jewish thread teased out explicitly in the work itself? Thanks for the review.

    • F. Roger Devlin's Gravatar F. Roger Devlin
      September 25, 2017 - 8:50 am | Permalink

      Yes, there is thematic discussion of the Jewish angle. Schwarz occasionally wrote for specifically Jewish publications, where he was explicit about the Jewish motivations of his political activism. The author quotes Dr. MacDonald as well.

  10. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    September 24, 2017 - 9:12 am | Permalink

    In more than 5,000 years civilization Europe has produced so many myths and legend. The favorite myth of (((our hostile elite))) is… The Rape of Europe. The myth that is coming true. I wonder why.

  11. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    September 24, 2017 - 9:21 am | Permalink

    This article, while wholly achieving its objective within its limit of words, does not tell the whole story of Sweden. Sweden was a poor country at the turn of the 20th Century. The Nobles and Moneyed Families were few, and peasants many. Sweden had little to export of any demand and domestic food production was inadequate, given the terrain and climate.

    However, Sweden did have iron ore and coal, which it swiftly developed into export for import, raising living standards and creating migrations to cities and industrial areas. This new found “proletariat” of first generation industrial workers AND farmers clamored and demanded socialism, a leveling of society, wealth distribution, and multiple benefits paid through the State.

    And so it has been. Socialism became the secular religion, which before long became taught and indoctrinated in kindergarten and up the education slope. Sweden was one of the first countries that embraced “social engineering”, which meant that “experts” in Behavioral Science were given power and authentication to shape the future, in essentially limitless ways.

    Growing up in the Sixties on several college campuses, Sweden and “Scandinavian Socialism” was all the rage, the panacea for all deficiencies, inequity, strife, etc, etc. But, as we all know, that power became expanded, evil, and quite objectively, Satanic. It ridiculed religion and any historically profound wisdom or teleologic connection to authority. Man became Divine and the fount of wisdom, decision, and direction.

    Thusly, Sweden’s Master Planners and Social Architect set about demeaning and diminishing the Traditional Nuclear Family. Sexual inhibition, delay, chastity, linkage of nudity and sexual praxis became a mere physical function, i.e., eating, crapping, walking, and put into service as natural (look at the animals), response to satiation of a stimulus, e.g., an itch. Thus, nudity, immodesty, worship of the body, sexual licentiousness, prostitution was anti-neurotic, progressive, Nature-al, without superstition and certainly absence of guilt or conscious. Sweden was known for the unique production of bestiality porno film clips in the Sixties and Seventies. Man is just an animal, after all. Sex in Sweden is little more than scratching an itch, even today.

    Faded from popular memory was the inversion of the family roles, as dictated from the Social Sciences/Government Complex. This gender reversal impressed into actuality mandated that the husband be the at-home nurturer and the woman the bread winner outside the home. This was progress! Gender neutral!. No bias! Equality! It was quite dropped from advocacy and Gummint support because the results were catastrophic-predictably.

    The deduction and takeaway from this narrative, is that Top Down Social Controls and Programs always result in negative and destructive outcomes. Just look at the lunatics, inadequate personalities, narcissists, and sociopathic, Luciferian misanthropes in charge-and their elected and appointed bureaucratic backers.

    As Orwell said, only an intelligent and educated person can see the good and benefit here. The real motivation is the objectification and depersonalization of the populace, making them uniform, Other-directed, and dependent upon the Central Authority for everything. Anything and everything. Prescribed and proscribed.

    Scandinavians are the most overrated people on the planet. Great things are expected from a suicidal and empty personas of a deluded and existentially frightened and cowardly peoples. Like the Greeks of today, they bear no resemblance of their ancient tribes of Vikings, or even strong willed pioneers.

    • September 24, 2017 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

      You’ve forgotten to mention that Jews controlled and control all their money, media, and education. C+.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        September 25, 2017 - 11:00 pm | Permalink

        Morgan Johansson, Sweden’s Justice Minister gets the Friedman treatment over immigration:

        • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
          September 26, 2017 - 7:01 am | Permalink

          As long as these hipsters, hennetasters and thralls can play authority figures our working class will suffer.

        • September 27, 2017 - 12:10 pm | Permalink

          Hello Trenchant,
          In Germany we have only a small number of Jews, many of them unknown, and very few prominent Jews. Michel Friedman is one them. The whole figure from the way he looks, the eyes, the way he speaks (the intonation), his multiple dirty scandals in Germany, his networking including Frau Merkel herself and Germanys state media, all this gives him an extremely negative aura. Formerly he was also high in the CDU (the government party in Germany). — But somehow it is good to see how foreign races live their life. Maybe it is according to their worldview allright. For us it is a negative example. — Thank you for the video. I did look it without sound. I know how Friedman speaks and I do not want to hear that kind of intonation. For those who have not heared it yet: Please listen.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      September 24, 2017 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

      The Church of Sweden seems to have been ineffectual. Or perhaps they abetted the drift leftwards.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        September 25, 2017 - 12:09 pm | Permalink

        Rather a lot of both, I think.

        There appears to be an almost incomprehensible quotient of intellectual indifference and moral blindness at work, too—though in my experience no Swedish clergyman of any denomination is as thick, complaisant, or monomaniacally self-concerned as Bergman’s films have made beau-monders (both with and without triple parentheses) believe. If a successful film director can be defined as a highly accomplished liar, Bergman goes straight to the top of the heap.

        I met the RC bishop of Stockholm once. As smart and articulate a gent as you’d ever hope to encounter, no doubt about it, but given that his entire flock couldn’t fill a Boston sports bar on a Patriots’ game day, you’d think that he’d have had lots of free time to dope out the enemy’s agenda and plan of action. Alas, no—or at least he wasn’t about to let on that he had if he had.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          September 25, 2017 - 5:43 pm | Permalink

          I fear that many, faced with the choice between race and civilization or pension and benefits, will opt for the latter. Tomorrow be damned!

          • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
            October 1, 2017 - 3:24 am | Permalink

            Trenchant re the comment about pension versus race – this sums up the reason why the West is being destroyed – the people KNOW what is happening (eg they know what they can and cannot say eg you can slag off whites but not blacks or Jews), and they know that it is wrong, but they do not object enough to vote for new parties, which does not even require any courage to do, merely an awareness that the current path is a bad one and needs changing. They cannot even get to this stage.

            Provided their money is intact (ie their house is worth a fortune) they do not really care about their country or history or the future of their race. They are perfectly happy to go along with the self-hate narrative. They accept it not because they deeply believe in the self hate of the left, but simply because it is the dominant cultural idea and they go along with it for that reason, and they are not wired to be able to formulate any higher thoughts of their own.

            Proof of this is that the local council can destroy their local heritage as freely as it likes and the people do not even notice or bother. They still vote for them.

            They assume things will carry on as they are for their lifetimes and do not care about future generations. This is a mistake – things are changing faster than they imagine eg a general level of incompetence is spreading (roads are no longer repaired competently, waiting ten days to see a doctor, cyclists riding on pavements and no-one bothers, buildings clad with inflammable materials) and the increased crime is likely to reach them too.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          September 25, 2017 - 8:59 pm | Permalink

          Someone better versed in this history could perhaps shed light on the “considerable political pressure” (((?))) alluded to here:
          “It was in 1958 that the Church of Sweden made the decision to allow the ordination of women. As some readers may be aware, this decision was not made without considerable political pressure from the Swedish government and parliament at the national level, and from the various political parties on the local level as a result of the present system regulating the life of congregations, which makes possible direct political control by the political parties. This political pressure was brought to bear on the Church Assembly in such a way as to cause it to reverse the negative decision it had taken on the ordination of women to the priesthood only in 1957. A not insignificant number of Swedish church leaders and theologians changed their position virtually overnight.”

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      September 28, 2017 - 9:02 am | Permalink

      @Poupon Marx. About Sweden being poor at the turn of the century. A 1987 Danish-Swedish film, Pelle the Conqueror, illustrates just how poor it was. Here’s the storyline (from IMDB):

      The end of the 19th century. A boat filled with Swedish emigrants comes to the Danish island of Bornholm. Among them are Lasse and his son Pelle who move to Denmark to find work. They find employment at a large farm, but are treated as the lowest form of life. Pelle starts to speak Danish but is still harassed as a foreigner. But none of them wants to give up their dream of finding a better life than the life they left in Sweden.

  12. RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
    September 24, 2017 - 9:37 am | Permalink

    This Swedish condition of the ’60’s and ’70’s is more or less the condition that Iceland is in now.

    The Jews here are a comparatively Microscopic Minority yet have a Inversely Proportional Amount of Material Wealth and Political Power.

    The Banks, the Media, the Aluminum Conglomerates and I suspect the Shipping and Fishing Industries not to mention the Industrial Farming and Retail Sectors as well as much of the Commercial (Hotel Chains) and Residential (High-Rise) Real Estate are probably owned or proxy controlled by Crypto-Jews.

    (((They))) successfully disguised themselves using firstly and fore-mostly the Icelandic Custom of Adopting one’s Fathers First Name as the Children’s Last Names.

    This practice allowed a comparatively VERY SMALL number of Jewish men,
    who no doubt through bribery and corruption,
    gained access into Iceland at the end of WW2,
    changed their first names to sound “…Über-Icelandic…” and proceeded to marry and breed Icelandic women
    (who were at that time very provincial and naïve) and…,
    had children whose last names…, and first names…, became even more Icelandic than the names of many True Icelanders themselves.

    Secondly, through the use of cosmetic, costume, and linguistic mimicry,
    not to mention the genetic appropriation of Female Genetic Material (i.e. Icelandic Female dominant blue eyed and blonde haired genes) these Mongrel Jewish Spawn have become all but indistinguishable to the common Icelandic people.

    So today, the “…Mongrel Race of Liars and Thieves…” is Psychologically, Implicitly Threatening Native Icelanders by Lying Through (((Their))) Teeth Overtime,
    using the usual tactics of Virtue Signaling and Demonization,
    in a Pied Piper Balancing Act that is luring Icelanders off the Cliffs of Lost Sovereignty and Genetic Extermination.

    What a Bloody Shame this is considering that the average Icelanders are probably the most Floppy-Eared, Doe Eyed, Lovable, and Altruistic People on the Planet!
    They have it so good today compared with how it was just 50 years ago that they fail to see what is coming down the Effluent Pipes thanks to the Jews and their Treasonous Free-Masonic Icelandic Helpers.

    There are rumblings however in the population at large about the Muslim Threat and the Corrupt Banks and All that emanates from them but,
    the illusion of peer pressure to “…fit in…”
    that emanates from the 1% of Liars and Thieves
    is so strong that it practically steam rolls any rational and open debate on the topic.

    Unless Icelanders Start to Face the Reality that indeed…, IT’S THE JEWS STUPID…,
    Icelanders will lose their country,
    their language and
    their open and altruistic culture and become a Mongrel Nation of Small Brained Humanoids who behave more like the Cannibalistic Jews of China and Africa than the Cultured Scandinavians they traditionally strived to imitate.

    God Help Iceland!

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      September 24, 2017 - 12:29 pm | Permalink

      It is too late, my friend. A lifetime of indoctrination, prohibition, forbidden and taboo subjects inculcated into Icelandic children cannot be washed out by fringe protests and exposition in high IQ journals and chronicles.

      Those hands, actually tentacles, on the levers of power and influence in Iceland are locked on with a death grip. Those fingers, even in death, would require a lever to unwind and unlock.

      Reference Ellen Wuornos, the serial killer of men: ” In a 2001 petition to the Florida Supreme Court, she stated her intention to dismiss her legal counsel and terminate all pending appeals. “I killed those men,” she wrote, “robbed them as cold as ice. And I’d do it again, too. There’s no chance in keeping me alive or anything, because I’d kill again. I have hate crawling through my system…I am so sick of hearing this ‘she’s crazy’ stuff. I’ve been evaluated so many times. I’m competent, sane, and I’m trying to tell the truth. I’m one who seriously hates human life and would kill again.”[30] While her attorneys argued that she was not mentally competent to make such a request, Wuornos insisted that she knew what she was doing, and a court-appointed panel of psychiatrists agreed.[31]
      IOW, she said stop me, kill me before I start to kill again. I hate all humans.

      Calling Chews sociopathic, genocidal, mass murderers, plunderers, is akin to calling a dog a four legged creature. I prefer the concrete analogy and parallel to abstract descriptions. The aliens attacking Earth in “Independence Day”, were stopping by in their Intergalactic cruise to kill all life on Earth and plunder all the resources for themselves, leaving it a lifeless planet devoid of resources or means to support life.

      “Hey, that sounds like the____________”.

      SEPARATE OR DIE, friends and neighbors.

      • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
        September 25, 2017 - 8:09 am | Permalink

        This is not quite true…, for Iceland at least. Iceland is still quite a paleo-conservative country even though the (((Media))) projects the image that it is some sort of “…Progressive Liberal Paradise…”.

        According to statistics published in one of the national news papers, 1% of the population controls 1/2 the wealth on the island and together with the other top 9% (total 10%) they control 75% of the wealth…, and it shows.

        So that’s 32,000 people who control 75% of the wealth. IMO, it is from this group that most of the “…shriekers and hollarers…” come that the (((Media))) displays for the purposes of public indoctrination and social engineering when it comes to public protests both in favour of the usual Jew-induced and self-abrogating cultural memes AND counter demonstrations against the usual minority of citizens that are intelligent and bold enough to demonstrate in favour of policies that are very much aligned with what the readers and writers at TOO advocate.

        And like most of the rest of the (once?) White world, where the tables are slowly turning in the populist direction, so too are the tables turning in Iceland.

        There have been a recent spurt of media lies regarding the Jew defined “…neo-Nazi Boogie-man…” threat ready to “…pounce upon and take over the nation…”.
        If taken into context with the recent spurt of White Advocacy Internet Domain Name thefts, shut-downs and other obstructive acts…, one may quite reasonably concur with those who have already suggested that this shows a certain amount of fear and desperation amongst the [redacted] Jews.

        Of course, whenever a Jew-owned Mass Media Organ sh!ts out one of these pieces, it is a cookie cutter verbatim repetition of the same stale sh!t they have been peddling for decades now.
        The difference these days is that there is a growing and significant minority of the, once called, White Lemming Cohort that We [people at White Advocacy Websites] have Red Pilled.
        Moreover, this Red Pilled Cohort is proportionally much larger in Iceland than in most (once?) White Nations.
        The Geostrategic position, the well above average education level and genetic capacities, and the famous personages who have freely been able to voice their opinions on the Jewish Malignancy all contribute to the reason why Icelanders know enough not to trust the (((Mass Media))).
        So in effect what the Jews do by repeating these scare tactics is to simply drive neutral people into researching the [redacted] Jew topic themselves on-line.
        The outcome of that research is that our ranks continue to swell and the Jews continue to lose support.

        Moreover, in my opinion, Russia, under Vladimir Putin, will become the beacon of White nationalism.
        The man is either a minor genius or he has some extremely clever advisors or both.
        Russia is the only White country that is capable of standing up to the Jewnited Snakes of Amerigoy and that deals with human excrement the way it should be disposed of.
        Russia gives it’s neighbours (i.e. Poland, Czech Rep., Magyar, et al) in Europe the courage to behave similarly. Furthermore, this hard line behaviour is rapidly spilling into Western Europe.
        So with any luck, Iceland will catch on before things become anywhere near as bad as they are in places like Paris, London or Germany.
        If indeed it does, Iceland will be the last country that will fall to the Jewish Engineered Third World Invasion.

    • September 24, 2017 - 9:05 pm | Permalink

      On March 9, 2011 – The BBC reported that property tycoons Robert and Vincent Tchenguiz were arrested as part of an investigation into the collapse of Icelandic bank Kaupthing. However, it was not mentioned that the two brothers were Israeli citizen and their father, Victor Tchenguiz, was an Iranian Jew and the royal jeweller of King Reza Shah (d. 1979). According to The Telegraph (March 6, 2010), Vincent Tchenguizs once dated Dorrit Moussaieff, the Israeli-born Jewish wife of Iceland’s President Dr. Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson.

      • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
        September 25, 2017 - 9:40 am | Permalink

        Thanks for this link!

        It may also be the reason for the sudden resignation of President Dr. Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson.

        Dorrit Moussaieff, the PM’s wife, was commonly introduced as stemming from a wealthy jewelers family in London.

        Moreover, the name, “Moussaieff” always struck me as sounding more Iranian/Persian/Islamic than it did Israeli/Jewish, but nobody cleared me up on the reason.

        When I first heard she was Jewish and that the President was supposedly well respected by the Icelandic population at large, I was lulled into ignoring my Jew-radar and willing to cut them both some slack… Now I see that I may have been stupid.

        • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
          September 25, 2017 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

          From the Wikipedia article on Dorrit Moussaieff :

          “Dorrit Moussaieff was born in Jerusalem. Her father, Shlomo Moussaieff, was from a wealthy Bukharian Jewish family from Bukhara, Uzbekistan, part of a long dynasty of jewellers. Dorrit is the great granddaughter of Rabbi Shlomo Moussaieff. Ancestors of hers are said to have woven the robe of Genghis Khan.[1] Her great grandmother, Esther Gaonoff, was a descendant of Yosef Maimon. Her mother, Aliza is an Austrian Jew of Ashkenazi heritage, but Dorrit identifies more with the Bukharian culture and was raised by her father’s large family.[citation needed] Moussaieff was born and raised in the Bukharan Quarter of Jerusalem. At thirteen, she moved with her family to London.”

          When I heard of her marriage to the president of Iceland I immediately thought about the “Esther tactic”, i.e. a Jewess marrying a man of influence to promote Jewish interests like the Jewess Esther marrying the Persian king from the Biblical book of Esther. Try to find out if she was engaged in any subversive activity during her husbands tenure.

    • Lucy's Gravatar Lucy
      September 25, 2017 - 5:45 am | Permalink

      Saddening to learn that Island is on its way to be like Sweden, dear RoyAlbert.
      The eternal sufferers who not only control but also own 98 % of Sweden’s media, are now shouting themselves coarse when smearing the NMR (Nordic Resistance Movement), the only voice in that dares to name the ethnic background of those who are the most fervent advocates for mass immigration. According to the omnipresent expressions against “hate”, NMR needs to be declared an terrorist organization and be asap prohibited. Most people seem to have bought into the chosenite propaganda, which isn’t surprising with regard to the fact that Sweden Democrats, the political party that poses as “Sweden-friendly” and therefore also the true “opposition to the traitor”, holds the secular religion of Shoah in a much higher esteem than the interests of the Swedish nation.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      September 27, 2017 - 8:45 am | Permalink

      All of the bad things happening in Iceland, can find their roots in Davið Oddson and his Milton Friedman loving Bolsheviks of the right, starting with his term as Mayor of Reykjavik in the 1980s. Prior to Oddson, Iceland had a highly regulated economy with significant local government and state presence in the economy. The Jews were well contained, and as one businessman with whom I am acquainted, put it – studied. It was Oddson who led the selloffs of municipal and state assets at salvage prices, deregulated, and privatized the Central Bank.
      The Jews didn’t “disguise(d) themselves using firstly and fore-mostly the Icelandic Custom of Adopting one’s Fathers First Name as the Children’s Last Names”, it was the law until Vladimir Ashkenazy moved to Iceland with his Icelandic wife and sought an exemption. He was already world famous, and sought the exemption by arguing that changing his name, his livelihood would suffer. When granted, he with help from his friend Daniel Barenboim, founded the summer music festival. There are real Icelanders who have used the exemption in law, because they want to be different.
      The old Eimskip head office (now the Radisson Blu) had a fylfot proudly displayed where the “1919” is now, as did all of the prows of the fleet. All of these reversals correspond to the rise of Davið Oddson.

  13. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    September 24, 2017 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Most usual example of White pathological altruism: becoming best friends with the Black killer of your brother.

  14. Andrew Towne's Gravatar Andrew Towne
    September 25, 2017 - 4:50 am | Permalink

    The world is more interested in Scandinavians than Scandinavians are in each other. They bore each other to death, and can only be fascinated by the dark races. We see the same thing with whites in America — really, with whites everywhere. Jewish money and influence have a lot to do with this, of course. Every white cultural achievement, tradition and custom is denigrated by the Jews and their minions.

  15. Elizabeth's Gravatar Elizabeth
    September 25, 2017 - 11:03 pm | Permalink

    I should think that since we all have the most intricate, imaginative and fascinating history of Western Civilization to draw upon, we should not find ourselves boring. Au contraire, it is the bleak and slender pickings of so-called third world culture that is truly boring.

Comments are closed.