Edmund Connelly: Black Rage Means White People Die

Edmund Connelly: In his recent blog, Steve Sailer tells us about last week’s shooting of eight White workers near Hartford, Connecticut. Sailer notes that  although the only evidence discovered thus far about actual racist behavior toward the black shooter “appears to have been in the stupid and resentful mind of a thieving mass murderer, he was a black stupid and resentful thieving mass murderer, so attention must be paid.”

And of course the media is paying attention, as Christopher Donovan related in his blog “Hate-Fueled Black Mass Murderer in Connecticut Spun as ‘Disgruntled Man’ by Media.”

Am I the only one that is weary beyond description of the way the media and  American society more generally handle these cases of mass murders of Whites? We get endless sympathetic stories about what might have driven a generally good but troubled non-White soul to have suddenly lashed out and taken the lives of so many Whites.

About those suddenly dead Whites, however, we hear so little. No movies, no comments from the President, no front page New York Times stories. It’s not like these Whites came from the perpetual victim classes like Vincent Chin or Leon Klinghoffer.

It’s all summed in the narrative about Chai Vang, the Hmong immigrant who nearly six years ago took the lives of six innocent White hunters. Well, possibly not so innocent because Vang — and the mass media acting as the chorus behind him — claimed the hunters had used racial slurs against him. Case closed: Whites said something racist, so death was a foregone conclusion. And besides, justice was served.

In the present case of Omar Thornton, this narrative is duly repeated. For instance, in a story used by Sailer, Beer warehouse shooter long complained of racism, we read that the mass murderer was a really nice guy:

But underneath, Thornton seethed with a sense of racial injustice for years that culminated in a shooting rampage Tuesday in which the Connecticut man killed eight and wounded two others at his job at Hartford Distributors in Manchester before killing himself.

“I know what pushed him over the edge was all the racial stuff that was happening at work,” said his girlfriend, Kristi Hannah. …

Thornton, who grew up in the Hartford area, complained about racial troubles on the job long before he worked at Hartford Distributors.

“He always felt like he was being discriminated (against) because he was black,” said Jessica Anne Brocuglio, his former girlfriend. “Basically they wouldn’t give him pay raises. He never felt like they accepted him as a hard working person.”

Well, I think we can call this murderous workplace explosion another instance of “going postal.”

It also points to something deeper: a common pattern where a black employee goes after White co-workers. In particular, it reminds me of a chilling case back in 1994. In that incident, three White FedEx pilots were attacked inflight by fellow black pilot Auburn Calloway. Calloway, too, was obsessed with the idea that his career had stalled due to White racism. In fact, he believed it had begun when he was a naval aviator.

Having reached his limit, Calloway concocted a plan to kill the three-man crew of a DC-10, then crash the heavily-loaded plane into FedEx’s headquarters building at the hub in Memphis, Tennessee. To effect this plan, he signed on to “deadhead” aboard the flight and brought with him hammers, a knife, and a spear gun secreted in his guitar case.

To their great credit, the Discovery Channel and National Geographic Channel showed in their series Mayday an accurate racial portrayal of attacker and victims. See this Video link from National Geographic Channel’s website. (You can also watch a re-enactment of the attack here in these YouTube segments.)

Here is an account of the attack where, thirty minutes into the flight, Calloway initiated his ambush of the White pilots:

None of the three men heard Calloway enter the cockpit. Sanders suddenly became aware of a struggle, and heard the awful sound of hammer blows raining down upon his crewmates. He turned to see both men slumped in their chairs, injured terribly, and a blood-soaked Auburn Calloway moving toward him.

Calloway swung wildly at Sanders. Some of the blows landed, some were deflected. The plane lurched as Sanders desperately tried to defend himself. Then something happened that Calloway had not counted upon. Tucker and Peterson recovered and began fighting back. Calloway was surrounded; he flailed about with the hammer, still inflicting gruesome injuries. The men would not give up, though . . .

The cockpit voice recorder transcript of the attack is worth reading to if only for the fact that it records with chilling clarity the risk Whites face due to the present multicultural arrangement that has been foisted upon us by a hostile elite:

DS = pilot Sanders

JT = co-pilot Tucker

P = flight engineer Peterson

AC = attacker Calloway

AW = autowarning

JT: Do you, uh, live over in Arkansas, Dave, or . . . ?

DS: Naw, I live in Fisherville.

JT: Aw, Fisherville, great spot.

(Sounds of hammer blows striking pilots.)

AP: Ow!

JT: God! Oh, ah, shit.

DS: God almighty!

AP: Ow!

JT: What the fuck are you doing?

DS: God, (groan), (groan), God almighty! God, God, God. . . .

JT: Get him, get him, get him

DS: He’s going to kill us.

JT: Get him!

DS: Get up, get him!

AP: I can’t, God!

UV: STOP! (unintelligible) Hold his goddamn . . .

AC: Sit down, sit down, get back in your seat, this is a real gun,

I’ll kill ya.

JT: Get him, get him, get him, get him, get him, get him!

AW: bank angle, bank angle…

JT: Get him, get him, get him!

AC: I’m gonna kill you! Hey, hey! I’ll kill ya!

AW: bank angle, bank angle

DS: Get him, get him, get him!

AW: bank angle, bank angle

DS: Yeah, get him!

AW: bank angle, bank angle

JT: Get him, get him, get him, Andy, I got the airplane!

AW: bank angle, bank angle

JT: Get him, Andy, get him!

AW: bank angle, bank angle

As Sanders and Peterson fought their attacker in the cabin, copilot Tucker “swung the aircraft into dangerous flight maneuvers in an attempt to literally knock the man off his feet.” At nearly 400 miles per hour, the copilot executed a barrel-roll, “as the three struggling men were tossed about the galley area, alternately weightless and pressed upon by three times their weight in G forces.

By now, the aircraft was inverted at 19,700 feet, and the alarmed air traffic controllers in Memphis were desperately calling for Flight 705.  Incredibly, after struggling with his attacker in the cabin, Sanders was able to return to his captain’s seat and land the plane, despite his near-fatal injuries and despite the fact that the DC-10 was grossly overweight for a landing.

You can read the whole account in the suspense-filled book Hijacked: The True Story of the Heroes of Flight 705.

I don’t mean to be voyeuristic with this use of the cockpit tapes. Rather, I want to wake people up. Despite the endless black carjacking murders of Whites, the rape-murder of White women, the murder of White police officers, and, like last week, the workplace executions of White men, people by and large still won’t wake up.

So I’m doing what I can to say, WAKE THE HELL UP!

Bookmark and Share

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

33 Comments to "Edmund Connelly: Black Rage Means White People Die"

  1. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    August 14, 2010 - 9:28 am | Permalink

    Edmund Connelly: “So I’m doing what I can to say, WAKE THE HELL UP!”

    For the little that it’s worth: you have woken me up to problems that our White brothers suffer that I had not been aware of, and when I get the chance I try to pass on that awareness to others.

  2. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    August 14, 2010 - 9:22 am | Permalink

    If I recall correctly, Severus has also said that Anglos are about as bad as Jews. (Germans would be much better of course.) There’s no research that supports this, it’s just a bizarre personal view.

    Severus has also identified himself as a National Socialist.

    Combining that with his equating of Anglos and Jews suggests…
    1. His attitudes to Anglos are not all that friendly, as National Socialist views on Jews were not all that friendly.
    2. But who cares, as the views of National Socialists are uninteresting unless they are exceptionally well thought through or based on empirical research, such that they stand up regardless of what you think of those who advocate them.

    If somebody had written a series as rigorous as A People That Shall Dwell Alone, Separation And Its Discontents and The Culture Of Critique supporting the view that Anglo and Jewish characteristics were the same, I’d worry.

  3. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    August 13, 2010 - 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Der weiße Engel,

    Race IS biological. I can’t even understand why anyone can say it’s cultural. That sounds like something a Jew would say – total illogical BS. A Black assimilated into American, British, Germanic culture still doesn’t share the same ancestry as we Europeans. That’s ridiculous. As for Severus, I think he’s just confused, go easy on him. :D

  4. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 13, 2010 - 12:29 pm | Permalink

    “Stop attributing your personal misunderstanding of what I said to me.”

    This is not exactly an answer to my two simple questions, is it?

    This would have been the perfect opportunity for you to explain just exactly how much you think the biology of race matters, or doesn’t matter. Instead you evade answering. I think that speaks for itself.

    Your reduction of race to skin color (i.e., Whites as “white-skins”) shows your complete confusion on this issue. This, and the fact that you think negros and “latinos” should be accepted by Whites on equal terms proves your devotion to egalitarianism. The following are excerpted from your own comments on this blog.

    Severus advocating a “rainbow alliance” of White and non-White:

    “… an exclusively “white” movement will fail no matter what. Moral high ground cannot include racial exclusivity given the present context of our nation and world.”

    Severus reducing race to skin color:

    “Again, I ask why so many white-skins here demand that they belong to an exclusively white-skin movement. How about looking at the mentality of your group’s members instead of their skin color? I personally would not want sub-par white-skins in my movement when there are outstanding nonwhite-skins out there who could really contribute something great to my movement.”

    Severus the anti-racist:

    “I feel that inclusion, along the lines of Freemasonic thought (which is what makes Freemasonry so attractive and powerful), is the best way to defeat the “chosen supreme race,” as well as the destruction of our peoples. Why would you want to emulate those you despise? Purebloods are as ‘racist’ as they come, but you want to emulate that? How has hating and resisting nonwhite-skinned peoples helped the white-skinned peoples up to this point, Wandrin? Can you answer this?”

    Severus the egalitarian Nazi:

    “Now, this is where the conversation starts to delineate into the topic of “superior” vs. “different”, which is what the equality argument is REALLY about. Are the human races equal on different planes of talent (the Nazi belief), or are some simply superior in every way to all others (the Pureblood belief)? I’ll let you decide the answer to that.”

    More egalitarianism from Severus:

    “For starters, why don’t you ask them? Have you ever even offered to form an alliance with a group of nonwhites? You might get rebuffed, but if you put feelers out, chances are they will come back when they see that you are not calling them “n***ers” and “b**ners.” You need to prove that you are genuine and show them that they are as competent as you in forming an alliance.”

    There’s more, but why bother? You are as racial-egalitarian as they come. What are you doing posting on this site, anyway? Besides collecting IP addresses, I mean.

  5. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 13, 2010 - 7:32 am | Permalink

    “Negro males mating with White women is all about rape…”

    Actually, I think that negroes (in africa) mating with women of any race is often all about rape. I saw a segment on The News Hour (yes, I watch The News Hour) reporting the spread of AIDS in africa. The piece described the rapist behavior of african men as “a unique sexual culture.” One negro man who was interviewed said, with great anger, that he was NOT going to let some social worker tell him how to have sex (w/condoms) and that getting sex from random women without their permission was an african tradition, one that he would not deviate from.

    Of course this is the root cause of the AIDS epidemic in africa. Yes, the rape of white South African women is rampant, but rape is rampant through ALL of africa, and black women really bear the brunt of it. Rape is part of who black men are. The worst outbreaks of AIDS in the new world have been where blacks live – Haiti, most of the Carribean, etc.

  6. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 12, 2010 - 5:21 pm | Permalink

    “Now on another topic, I think that cannibalism was a bit more widespread than Africa. The South Pacific and pre-Columbian Meso-America actually had the most heinous record of eating people. If you go back far enough, I mean WAY back, it happened in Europe, too. ”

    I disagree that cannibalism was more widespread in pre-Columbian America or in Polynesia than it was in sub-Saharan Africa. However, my point is that there is no historical record of cannibalism ever being institutionalized among White people; it has never been culturally accepted among us anywhere. In Africa it is part of the culture and exists to this day.

    Especially when taken together with all the other enormous differences between negro and White — in IQ, physical morphology, temperament, rates of psychopathy, rates of violent crime, the negro absolute inability to create or sustain by himself any kind of civilization, etc. — I would argue that this characteristic is important enough to be regarded as a species-level difference. But whether you accept that taxonomy or not, in any case, the behavior is evidently deeply encoded in negro genetics. This is a profound difference, akin to the wolf/dog difference in behavior, or the killer bee/european honeybee behavioral difference. White cultural influence can partially suppress it, but not eliminate it. In Africa, always present in the background, under the stress of war in countries such as Liberia and Congo it was easily made to recrudesce and was even used as a battle tactic.

    Here are my questions for those egalitarians who, like Helvena and Severus, believe that biology is meaningless and that culture is everything in shaping human behavior. First question, can you imagine a White army, under ANY conditions, behaving like this?

    http://www.news24.com/Africa/News/Pastor-We-ate-childrens-hearts-20080116

    The second question is optional, for extra credit. Can you even imagine humans behaving like that?

  7. Klassikality's Gravatar Klassikality
    August 12, 2010 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

    “The act of negroes pursuing white women is, in part, a psychologically hostile act, as this crime seems to imply. I believe that a white sex partner was, in his mind, just another aspect of his unsophisticated, crude
    assault on the white race. White women who can’t see this, well…I think their genes may be better suited to the negro race and we’re better off without them.”

    Negro males mating with White women is all about rape and revenge, there is no love involved, it is not possible. The White woman may love the negro, or think he loves her, but it is a lie. The negro lust for White women is two-fold. One, black women tend to be ugly, gross and unfeminine. Two, what better way (other than outright murder) to get back at de evil White man than by defiling his women, even better yet, producing disgusting mixed breed mongrels?

  8. Eman's Gravatar Eman
    August 11, 2010 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

    A large proportion of the ‘White’ women in the USA who sleep with and breed with Black men are themselves mongrels, usually part Indian, Hispanic, or even Black even if they appear fully White. After a few generations Black blood can get washed in to the White gene pool – same with Indian blood – and you can barely tell these people have non-White ancestry.

    These people are everywhere in the American South and in the urban areas of the USA – the gene pool there is irreversibly mongrelized, it’s why so many Americans are stupid and fat…because they aren’t fully White.

    The USA is just a delayed Brazil.

  9. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 11, 2010 - 9:33 am | Permalink

    “I though Indians didn’t make good slaves because you couldn’t get them to work at all.”

    Indians didn’t make good slaves because they were willing to fight whites, as evidenced by 200+ years of Anglo/indian conflict.

  10. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 11, 2010 - 9:30 am | Permalink

    “I thought Indians didn’t make good slaves because you couldn’t get them to work at all. If you want a good slave, get a white.”

    Indians didn’t make good slaves because of their willingness to fight whites, as evidenced by 200+ years of Anclo/Indian conflict.

  11. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 11, 2010 - 9:27 am | Permalink

    “I thought Indians didn’t make good slaves because you couldn’t get them to work at all. If you want a good slave, get a white.”

    Indians didn’t make good slaves because of their willingness to fight whites, as evidenced by 200+ years of Anglo/Indian conflict in North America.

    Now on another topic, I think that cannibalism was a bit more widespread than Africa. The South Pacific and pre-Columbian Meso-America actually had the most heinous record of eating people. If you go back far enough, I mean WAY back, it happened in Europe, too.

    To me, what sets the Sub-Saharan african apart from everyone else is that he is (GENERALLY speaking) detested by all other races of the world. It isn’t just a white thing. There’s almost a genetic intuition among Whites, Asians, Arabs, East Indians, light skinned, dark skinned people of world that finds negroes somehow repellent. It’s our inner Darwinian self telling us “stay away.”

    I’m not saying that to be mean, but if it is mean, so be it. It’s the truth. Many negroes in africa truly believe that they AREN’T negroes, but descendants of East Indian immigrants. They’re wrong…even they don’t want to admit to their negro-ness. Many black Americans who’ve gone over to africa in a fit of ethnic “pride” have been shocked to see how little “black pride” exists in africa. Pride is usually reserved for tribal or regional or local affiliations.

    ——————-

  12. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 11, 2010 - 6:06 am | Permalink

    Angel, I agree with some of what R. Oliver says but not all. I do not agree that Christianity is a strength for Western man or for any man. In my opinion it simply softened the beach for humanism which you would probably call liberalism. These words have changed meaning like the shape shifters. I still maintain that ragging on the Blacks is a sideshow.

  13. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 10, 2010 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

    Still getting the error message.

  14. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 10, 2010 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

    It’s an excerpt from “What We Owe Our Parasites”, by the palindromic Dr. Revilo Oliver. You can read the rest of the essay here:

    http://www.revilo-oliver.com/rpo/wwoop.htm

  15. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 10, 2010 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

    Angel maybe that’s what’s missing in us, a little of the savage. After all were have all the Berserkers gone?

    Dr. Oliver who??? I need a link.

  16. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    August 10, 2010 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

    “The murderer’s “girlfriend” was white though definitely not the choicest and most beautiful.” lol she was a dog.

    White people, regardless of impurities – and there must be a lot of this – must come together as the White race. Even those mongrels who consider themselves White must be allowed to join we Aryans. Once we win back our countries, we can enact a eugenics programme. Also, we can use genetic testing to weed out those contaminated elements that, if left to breed, will lower our standards. Purity of blood is everything, race-mixing is nothing. No good comes of this. Not that I’m saying we should kill off these Aryan pretenders who look White, but we must restrict their procreation. Aryans should use all our scientific knowledge to improve our race. This can be done. I don’t see a problem with this. This is the answer to our problems. Definately.

  17. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 10, 2010 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Here is Dr. Oliver on this same topic.

    “This capacity for imitation is possessed by savages, at least by the more intelligent ones, and it has deceived us time after time. The British are as gullible as we are. Hundreds and hundreds of times, at least, they gave scholarships to Blacks from Basutoland or Kenya or Nigeria or one of their other possessions, and the result was almost always the same. With the money given him, the savage bought himself a good wardrobe, attended an English school, learned to play soccer, attended Oxford, wrote a charming essay on Wordsworth or on ancient law, copulated with half-witted English women who thought him “romantic” and themselves “broad-minded,” and when he got tired of living on English generosity, went home to his tribe where he had a well-roasted baby served up to him as a delicacy of which he had been long deprived by the stupid prejudices of the stupid British.”

  18. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 10, 2010 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    “Angel, I hardly think that because I believe Blacks are human beings that makes me an egalitarian.”

    On the contrary, your continued assumption that they are human when, by any rational taxonomy, their penchant for cannibalism alone should accord them the rank of a separate species, means that you are afflicted with a particularly bad case of the egalitarian delusion Whites are noteworthy for.

  19. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 10, 2010 - 12:59 pm | Permalink

    “Angel, I hardly think that because I believe Blacks are human beings that makes me an egalitarian.”

    On the contrary, your continued assumption that they are human when, by any rational taxonomy, their penchant for cannibalism alone should accord them the rank of a separate species, means that you are afflicted with a particularly bad case of the egalitarian delusion Whites are noteworthy for.

    Here is Revilo Oliver commenting on this same topic.

    “Now, a perversion of all of these qualities in us operated during the centuries of our dominance to give us an utterly false conception of other peoples. We have imagined that by some magic we could convey to them not only our material possessions, but the qualities of our mind and soul.

    And we have always succumbed to the flattery of imitation. The capacity for imitating behavior is common not only to all human beings, but to all anthropoids, as we all know from the proverbial expression, “monkey see, monkey do.” An ape’s ability to imitate is, of course, limited. But, with the exception of the Australoids, other races have the capacity to imitate us convincingly in externals. If they dress in our clothes, observe our social conventions, and speak our language, using the phrases which as they can learn by observation please us, and using those phrases even if they don’t understand them or if they regard them as preposterous drivel and nonsense, the members of other races could imitate us so plausibly that we believe them converted to our mentality and to our conception of life. And any shortcomings that we may notice in the performance of the imitator, we generously overlook or regard as endearing naivete.

    This capacity for imitation is possessed by savages, at least by the more intelligent ones, and it has deceived us time after time. The British are as gullible as we are. Hundreds and hundreds of times, at least, they gave scholarships to Blacks from Basutoland or Kenya or Nigeria or one of their other possessions, and the result was almost always the same. With the money given him, the savage bought himself a good wardrobe, attended an English school, learned to play soccer, attended Oxford, wrote a charming essay on Wordsworth or on ancient law, copulated with half-witted English women who thought him “romantic” and themselves “broad-minded,” and when he got tired of living on English generosity, went home to his tribe where he had a well-roasted baby served up to him as a delicacy of which he had been long deprived by the stupid prejudices of the stupid British.

    With some of the highly intelligent Oriental peoples, the capacity for dissimulation goes much farther than that and approaches genius.

    That strange and unique international people, the Jews, who for all the time in which they are known to history have lived and flourished by planting their colonies in other people’s countries, have owed much of their success to the chameleon-like ability to take on, when they choose, the manners and attitudes of whatever country they choose to reside in. They are a highly intelligent people, quite possibly much more intelligent than we are. But all observers, notably Douglas Reed and Roderick Stohlheim, have commented on the Jews’ amazing ability to seem a German in Berlin, a Czech in Prague, an Italian in Rome, and an Englishman in London, shifting from one role to the other with the ease with which a man might change his suit of clothes. The Jews have, of course, the great advantage that their skins are white, and that many of them resemble, in features, members of our race, even to the point of being indistinguishable, at least to an untrained eye, and including persons with such non-Oriental characteristics as blond or red hair.”

  20. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 10, 2010 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

    @ Jim. I really don’t know. Certainly a person must look Caucasian to be accepted as one. But mannerisms, ideas, speech etc all matter. I was in Egypt once and hailed a cab because I was feeling uncomfortable and the driver looked European. When I got in he spoke to me like all the other Egyptian men and it really freaked me out. So in my head White is definitely more then phenotype. I thought Indians didn’t make good slaves because you couldn’t get them to work at all. If you want a good slave, get a white.

    Gates calls himself African and I assume he means Black. Diamond calls himself a Jew. If they can define themselves in these ways, we can define ourselves in ours. This is just more Jew mumbo jumbo science trying to deconstruct western societies. We may not be able to define ourselves clearly/perfectly but the task is up to us NOT them. Besides they can’t define black or jew either and probably less so then we can define ourselves.

    Angel, I hardly think that because I believe Blacks are human beings that makes me an egalitarian. Biology matters in that personality is affected, your dog and wolf example. But the mirror of that is also true. That although the wolf and dog look the same DNA (for the most part) they are not. A Slav and an European ??? Besides Angel, Blacks don’t have to be like us in order to ally. The Japanese weren’t like the Italians.

    Here is a perfect example of a Bacilli carrier who is a gentile and don’t we have many of these in our past: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ward_Beecher

  21. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 10, 2010 - 11:53 am | Permalink

    “What I have said in the past is that race is more than just biological …”

    In saying this, you are setting up a false opposition between the biological and the behavioral. Every biologist knows that taxonomic distinctions depend, in part, on animal behavior, but in non-hominid animals, it is universally accepted that their behavior, too, is regarded as determined by their biology. For example, wolves and dogs differ primarily in behavior, not in their DNA. DNA analysis has now shown that they are related more closely than negro and White, though unlike negro and White, they used to be considered separate species. Yet this taxonomic reassignment from a species-level difference to a racial difference doesn’t mean that their behavior is any less biological than it used to be. You still can’t make a wolf into a dog, even with an unlimited amount of training (i.e., “culture”); likewise, it is folly to think you can make negros into humans. Hundreds of billions of dollars and rivers of White blood have been shed trying to do so, with no result.

    Because the various kinds of hominids on earth can, to a certain extent, mimic each others’ behavior, this misleads egalitarian Whites such as yourself into thinking that the biology of race is meaningless, and that behavior is infinitely malleable by “culture”. It just ain’t so, McGee.

  22. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 10, 2010 - 11:08 am | Permalink

    Helvena,

    You say that race is more than just biology, and I believe that, but I’m curious, to what extent would you say that race IS a function of biology?
    I’m asking for your opinion, not presenting a challenge. Is there a critical mass of white blood that you think must be present in a person for them to be caucasian? 80%? 90%?

    I’ve met so many white people who claimed 1/4, 1/8, 1/16 Indian ancestory here in the U.S. that it would seem to challenge the notion of white “purity” – the vast majority looked and considered themselves white. Hitler did call us a “mongrel” nation.

    They didn’t have DNA tests in the old days, so obviously what existed through the centuries was some notion of relative purity- an oxymoron, I know, but a much more realistic, workable system of classification based largely on other people’s VISUAL perception of you, as well as your own personal desire to be associated with one group or another (which was usually white.) In this sense, race identification is more social, less biological.

    The problem is, the Henry Louis Gates and Jared Diamonds of the world seem to be applying modern scientific legalism to these old notions (with their DNA tests/data) in an effort to imply that the idea of “race” is all just a big sham, especially with whites who may not be as pure as they think they are. They want people to believe that if something isn’t true 100% it isn’t true at all.

    I’ll admit, the idea of American indian blood in whites is FAR, FAR less disturbing to me than even the smallest amount of negro blood, followed closely by Jewish blood. There was a good reason why Anglos in the new world went to the time and great expense to import slaves from africa rather than using the indians who were already here. Blacks were dumber and more easily lead, while Indians seemed to possess an inate resourcefulness and rebelliousness that made them less suited for the role. These were also qualities that Anglos often associated with intelligence, though they considered Indians beneath them. The number of black slave rebellions in North America in three centuries was astonishingly low.

    So I guess there is a chink in the armor of my concept of racial purity, but I also think that far too much can be made of it.

  23. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 10, 2010 - 8:06 am | Permalink

    Der weiße Engel says: We even see posters on this blog who are silly enough to believe that culture is everything, and that biological race determines nothing. (Yes, I am looking at you, Helena and Severus). – Apparently I haven’t made myself clear. There always has been and always will be some race mixing. First you have to define race. Some would say that Slavic people are a race separate from Europeans, the Nazis did. If a Russian and a Frenchman mix is that deluding the race? What I have said in the past is that race is more than just biological, so where you draw the line is important and different people will draw the line at different places.

    I am not in favor of race mixing but it has always happened. Many White men mix with Asian woman. White women are as irritated by this as much as white men are by seeing white woman with black men. Race mixing is race mixing. We shouldn’t forget that when the Mongols swept through Europe there was race mixing and when the Romans did and when the Moors did. Perhaps the threat is greater today because of Christian/humanism egalitarianism. So lets get to the root of the problem in our philosophy instead of going on about the bad Blacks and even to some extent the bad Jews. Though I see the Jews as the carrier/promoters of the bacilli.

  24. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 9, 2010 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    ” From the point of view of the woman’s genes, strong racism would be counter-productive, since it would disqualify her from breeding with males from an ascendant race that is not her own. ”

    That’s a great insight, and it occurs to me that what was always presumed to have been the rape of negroes by white American slave owners could in fact often have been consentual. Or at least consentual by the standards of the day. The half white offspring of a female slave was still a slave, but I believe he fared better than a dark skinned slave. That could’ve been enough motivation for some black females to seek encounters with their owners.

    The notion of mating with sub-saharans is unappealing to me, but I guess it’s the closest that a man in the Christian West could get to a legalized harem (if he leaned that way.)

  25. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 9, 2010 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

    “The truth is the vast majority of white women don’t couple with blacks …”

    While I would agree that most White women have not done so yet, I think this is changing very rapidly, at least in historical terms. In 1910, it would have been a very rare White woman who would have seriously considered voluntarily doing such a thing under ANY circumstances. Now, in 2010, it would be hard to find a White woman who would NOT at least consider the idea of copulating with a negro and even bearing his children. Perhaps not a negro street thug, but a handsome, well-spoken, high-prestige negro? You bet! The big change is that negroes are now routinely regarded by White women as not categorically off limits, and this is true especially among the youngest women. A woman would have to be a hard-core racist to do that, and there just aren’t that many White women who are hard core. Fashion and the opinion of their girlfriends is everything to women, and we are well past the tipping point when they would be inhibited from pairing up with a negro or Mexican by a perceived negative reaction of their friends. Nowadays it’s fashionable, and they’d even be cheered on! This change hasn’t been linear, either. It’s more like a geometrical progression, with most of the change in the last decade or two.

    You also have to keep in mind that for every negro you see paired with a White woman, there are certainly several other White women who have had sex with a negro, and are open to doing it again, but just don’t happen to be doing it right now. I just returned from an outdoor public event, and it was literally awash with race-mixing White sluts, many of them pushing their little nappy-headed Obamanations in a stroller or having slightly older ones tag along beside them. And this in a town with very few negroes, percentage-wise!

    For this change we have primarily to thank, once again, the egalitarian desire of Whites to see their own image reflected in other races. Sad though it may be, most of our fellow Whites really do imagine that negroes, Jews, and other mudmen are basically just White people with a different appearance, along with a few quaint ethnic customs, which they find completely charming. That’s the official story anyway, backed up by mass media and years of indoctrination in the “educational” system, and they swallow it, hook, line, and sinker. But it’s crucial to understand that it’s also what they want and need to believe, so it’s an easy sell. We even see posters on this blog who are silly enough to believe that culture is everything, and that biological race determines nothing. (Yes, I am looking at you, Helena and Severus).

    Because of the precedent set in the USSR, and the dark allusions that Dr. MacDonald constantly makes regarding the fate Whites can expect to face in a country controlled by Jews, it would be easy to think that history will repeat itself exactly; that Whites will some day soon be whisked off to gulags or worse. But I doubt it will be that simple. More likely, in my view, is a long, slow descent into darkness. Gulags won’t be needed. All that will be necessary to perpetrate a genocide against Whites this time is to encourage more and more White women to forego having White children. Especially as the race situation in America becomes more unstable, I can see the government offering substantial tax incentives for interracial marriage. Since the vast majority of Whites have already accepted that biological race is meaningless, there will be no reason for them to say no. Barring a complete collapse of the system, they will be thoroughly mixed away in only a few generations; perhaps a century or so.

  26. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 9, 2010 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    “Even in peace, White women willingly miscegenating with negroes, “latinos”, Jews, and other mudmen is an all too common sight.”

    I agree, although I think it’s just another modern racial myth to think that most white women secretly admire black men. True, the sight of white women walking with negroes in public is conspicuous to those of us old enough to remember when you didn’t see that sort of thing, but I think that conspicuousness tends to exagerate the phenomenom. Of course, it also gives simple minded negro men the absurd notion that they’re suddenly god’s gift to white women.

    The truth is the vast majority of white women don’t couple with blacks, and most whites are still usually won over by qualities like intelligence, wit, charm, and yes, income earning ability. Also, single white women almost NEVER choose to live in black neighborhoods. In fact, when a white (male or female) does choose to live with a black, they usually want little to do with the black community or culture. Of course, I can only speak to the region I live in. Might be different elsewhere.

    Let’s not forget that white marrying black was against the law for a long time in this country, and that situation may have given a false impression of racial solidarity among white women (or men.) I’m sure there have always been whites who were attracted to blacks, and I think it often may have had to do with low self-esteem (even 100 years ago.)

    I do, however, have an alternate theory (which I could never prove in a million years) about race mixing that has less to do with race than population. The population of our country and world has doubled in the last 60 years, and I can’t help but wonder if it hasn’t induced a sort of “lemming response” that makes people behave in self-destructive ways, both personally AND genetically. This would explain alot of recent bizarre tendencies: substance abuse, race mixing, divorce, abortion, gun violence, strange music…even body piercing and extreme sports!

  27. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    August 9, 2010 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

    It’s rather frightening all this violence against our people. If Blacks + the others can murder Whites with almost impunity today, now, what will it be like if, or when we are reduced to a minority ? We really can’t allow that to happen. However, even if we do become a minority; I believe we can still be victorious.

    It will be very interesting to see how Israel develops. Will they all be ripping each other off, or will they learn to put ethics and kindness before money ? With no Gentiles to exploit, how will they ever survive ?

  28. Finrod's Gravatar Finrod
    August 9, 2010 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

    While I too deplore the media’s attempt to exonerate the shooter with bogus claims of “racism”, I rather believe the phenomenon of “going postal” is statistically more of a white or asian sort of crime. Are their any statistics on this? This may be linked to the fact that black suicide rates are much lower than those of whites or asians, since suicide is implicit in this sort of choice.

    However, as blacks attempt to integrate into white work environments more and more, and inevitably meet with frustration and a deep sense of humiliation, these crimes may become more common.

  29. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 9, 2010 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    ““He always felt like he was being discriminated (against) because he was black,” said Jessica Anne Brocuglio, his former girlfriend. “Basically they wouldn’t give him pay raises. He never felt like they accepted him as a hard working person.””

    Note that the quoted Jessica is another white receptacle of this mass murdering negro’s genetic sewage. She was his ex-“ho”. The current one was named Kristi. It’s nauseating, isn’t it? Except for Charles Manson, I can’t recall ever seeing a story about a White murderer where his girlfriends defended him. Maybe that’s why Manson is still so demonized.

    It’s important to keep in mind that women, on the whole, are far less racist than men, and that this is a natural result both of evolution and the facts of sexual reproduction. To wit: A woman is always guaranteed that she is the mother of her baby and will pass on her genes, even if the father is a disgusting subhuman. Not so with men. They are guaranteed nothing. In order to pass on their genes, the men must always compete against other men for reproductive access to the women. This accounts for the racism that is built into so many cultures, and until recently was built into ours. Male racism helps ensure that the male’s racial group is selected for, as the prosperity and status of the male’s racial group affects his own individual reproductive chances.

    The sexes are affected differently in war as well as peace. In war, women always become the property of the victors. In such a situation, woman’s duty, from the point of view of her genes, is only to survive. Consequently, whether they like it or not, or whether morality approves or not, women of a defeated race will bed down with the butchers of their former husbands, brothers, and fathers. Even in peace, White women willingly miscegenating with negroes, “latinos”, Jews, and other mudmen is an all too common sight. As the mud’s status has been allowed to rise in the White world, this is an expected result, as women instinctively seek to enhance their reproductive chances by affiliating themselves with a high-status male of any race. Although many White women are weakly racist, strong racism is unusual in them. From the point of view of the woman’s genes, strong racism would be counter-productive, since it would disqualify her from breeding with males from an ascendant race that is not her own. When non-White males are allowed to circulate freely among them, engaging in courting behavior and propositioning them at will, White women intuitively sense weakness on the part of White men; they correctly sense that the non-Whites are ascendant, and that White males have lost status. It could be said that race-mixing White women are betting with their vaginas, wagering that the males of their own race will be defeated. They are trying to enhance their own individual reproductive fitness by genetically assimilating themselves to the victors.

    To sum up, women maximize their reproductive fitness by surviving and breeding with high-status men of any race, while men do so by winning the (sometimes racial) competition with other men.

  30. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 9, 2010 - 1:10 pm | Permalink

    Frank T said:

    “….offered up the choicest and most beautiful white women….”

    Now that brings up an interesting topic: The murderer’s “girlfriend” was white (though definitely not the choicest and most beautiful.) Anyway, the nature of sexual race mingling has motivations far outside the realm of “harmony among people”, as white liberals would wish. You’d think, if anything, this guy would have a greater understanding of white people being that his companion was white, but in fact it was obviously just the opposite.

    The act of negroes pursuing white women is, in part, a psychologically hostile act, as this crime seems to imply. I believe that a white sex partner was, in his mind, just another aspect of his unsophisticated, crude
    assault on the white race. White women who can’t see this, well…I think their genes may be better suited to the negro race and we’re better off without them.

    And then there’s biology: genetic upgrade

    I don’t think this applies so much with Asian or hispanic males who pursue white women, as there are Asian and hispanic women who would qualify as universally attractive to males of other races (though not to
    me.) There isn’t quite the “genetic upgade” appeal to an Asian that there would be to a negro. It may exist, but not to the same degree.

    Every era has had it’s racial myths. A racial myth of the 20th/21st century is that white women are the forbidden fruit to black men, fruit that they are now allowed to enjoy, but this isn’t an accurate picture…it doesn’t tell the whole story.

    Long before American slavery was african slavery, which often involved the enslavement of southern and western Europeans. Robert Davis of Ohio State estimates that 1.25 mil. Europeans were captured and enslaved in africa over the centuries, mostly by barbary pirates.

    Dr. John Azuma (who’s black) states that slavery in africa was mostly for sexual purposes, and a majority of the enslaved were, therefore, female. Davis says that the most highly desired female slaves were white. Now most of these african slaveholders were dark skinned arabs, not sub-saharan negroes, but they still felt biologically and knew intuitively what science would later prove empirically centuries later: white blood would enhance the intellectual quality and positive attributes
    of your offspring.

  31. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 9, 2010 - 11:49 am | Permalink

    I would suggest that the metaphor of waking people up is a trifle misleading. It presents the image of trying to wake some slumbering resident whose house is on fire, but this is doesn’t correspond at all to the present case, because in a situation like that, the sleeper wants to live and would appreciate your help. But I have come to believe that waking up White people is next to impossible because the vast majority of them don’t WANT to awaken. So deep runs this White need to believe in an egalitarian utopia, they would prefer to die rather than wake up from the dream. Try to tell them the truth, and you become Satan himself, the snake in their imaginary Garden of Eden.

    It can’t be doubted that in recent years – the last century or so – Jews have played upon these innate egalitarian sympathies of Whites for their own racial benefit. But other developments have been just as important, if not more so. The explosive growth of technology has, on balance, served to level the biological differences between races, and even the sexes. Men and women, negroes, Jews, and Whites, all have access to the same body of powerful techniques. Anyone can drive a car, use a computer, fly a plane, or fire an M-16. At the same time, the much-lamented death of God has left a spiritual void in White culture that many Whites have attempted to fill with an increasingly fanatic devotion to egalitarianism. Like a river shifting its bed, their spiritual energies have, with the state’s encouragement, all come together to flow into the idea of human equality. Egalitarianism has become a kind of secular church with its own pantheon of saints and martyrs. Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, and now even Barack Obama, have all attained mythic status among a large segment of Whites. Whites who don’t bow down and grovel before these minor deities of egalitarianism are depicted as racists and Nazis in thrall to Adolf Hitler, who rounds out the demonology of this ersatz religion. It also must be appreciated that, for various reasons, many of them systemic in nature, the full weight of “progress” has been focused behind advancing egalitarianism. Some of these are market-driven, since generally speaking, products that can be used by all, without any special abilities or training, have a better chance of making more money than those sold into a restricted market. This isn’t a plot, it’s just an economic fact of life. The prominence of negroes in professional sports and popular music, or of Jews in mass media, academia, and finance, which is probably ultimately based in biological differences, has also had the perverse result of making these alien races seem more equal to Whites than they actually are.

    But what is the solution? Though the implementation is difficult, in concept, it’s quite simple. Reshape the world in such a way as to destroy the pleasant fantasy of racial egalitarianism that so captivates the White psyche. Smash the glass, wake up the sleeper. Therefore, what is needed is not “progress”, but regress. The terrain of this struggle must be changed so that the biological differences between the races are once again made more important in societal interactions, not less. Even the biological differences between individuals of the same race must be made more important, just as they once were, since only in this way will a new leadership emerge. This likely will entail much blood and destruction, but it must be understood that only such a radical transformation will have a chance of succeeding. Yet once this is accomplished and made a permanent state of affairs, the problem will solve itself. It will disappear of its own accord.

  32. Frank T's Gravatar Frank T
    August 9, 2010 - 11:26 am | Permalink

    Unless a black man is lifted up on a pillow on gold, showered with money, and offered up the choicest and most beautiful white women to do with as he pleases while white men bow to him and blow their own brains out at his command, black men will always believe racism is holding them back. Well strike that, the white men have to rise from the dead and murder themselves again and again for the black man’s amusement, while the heavens open up and the black jesus smiles down upon the proud black man and then maybe the sin of racism is slightly paid back.

    I mean really what is worse than distancing yourself from an unpredictable, violent, aggressive and arrogant group of people who hates you for imagined reasons? Nothing that you should not die again and again for.

  33. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 9, 2010 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    I’ve noticed that both the AP and CBS no longer make reference to Thornton’s charges of racism in their most recent articles on the shooting. It’s now called “alleged mistreatment” (if mentioned at all), now that it’s been shown that his targets were executives or managers, not bullying dockworkers.

    They’ve also learned that he was selling the beer he was stealing (some of his customers have been arrested.) And the fact that the police found no evidence of graffitti has demonstrated to the MSM what most white people knew all along…the claims were bogus. The MSM’s basic approach with charges of racism, however, is always guilty until proven innocent.

    Now, the racism angle wasn’t played up as much when the story first broke as the Duke affair was, so you might think the MSM was learning it’s lesson. I suspect, however, that was because the Duke affair involved white (alleged non-lethal) violence towards (one) black, and that was deemed worse than black (undeniably lethal) violence towards (eight) white people.

    Somewhat related: Anyone else notice how the Charlie Rangel story disappeared for MONTHS until a few days ago, while the Ted Stevens debacle was shown 24/7 until he left the Senate? I believe all of Stevens’ convictions were overturned, as well, thogh I don’t remember hearing about it from the MSM.

    Oh, the MSM. I’m amazed I even bother anymore.

1 Trackback to "Edmund Connelly: Black Rage Means White People Die"

  1. on August 29, 2010 at 8:58 am

Comments are closed.