I have the feeling that Rick Sanchez will manage to return to a career in the national media. Jon Stewart concluded his bit on the affair by questioning whether Sanchez should have been fired for some “banal Jew baiting”; he also showed a clip where Sanchez condemned a guy with a swastika in the background who says he avoids the “Jew media.” So Sanchez’s heart is in the right place, at least when he “has time to think about it” and “isn’t worried about being fired anyway.”
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Hurty Sanchez | ||||
|
||||
Christopher Hitchens wrote some odd things.
In the manner in which Sanchez spoke … there was something like a buried resentment. He didn’t descend into saying that there was Jewish control of the media
But that’s exactly what he did say. Which is why he got in so much trouble. The amazing thing about all the mainstream discussion is a failure to discuss the extent which that is true. Hitchens continues:
But he did imply that liberalism was linked to a single ethnicity.
Sorry, I didn’t get that. Sanchez certainly accused Stewart of being a bigot and of having ”an establishment White liberal point of view.” Hitchens comes much closer to acknowledging Jewish power when he comments:
I ask myself if the world in which I have worked for so many decades—the intersecting and overlapping world of the news media, publishing, the academy, and the think-tank industry—is even imaginable without the presence of liberal American Jews. The answer is plainly no. Moreover, I can’t think of any other “minority” of which this is remotely true, unless it were to be the other minority from which I can claim descent: people of British or Anglophile provenance.
Hitchens’ claim that “British and Anglophile provenance” are even remotely on a par with Jewish involvement in these overlapping elites is far less than remotely true. And in any case, this high level of Jewish involvement means that Jews effectively hold veto power over things that can and cannot be said. That’s why Sanchez got fired in the first place.
Still, his statement is one of the remarkable comments on Jewish involvement in the information elites to appear from a mainstream media figure—a nice addition to Edmund Connelly’s collection. Coupled with his statements on the power of the Israel Lobby and his defense of Karel de Gucht, Hitchens is definitely being a bit edgy.
That reminds me of Philip Weiss‘s recent comments in his series “Note on my racism” (which bear a more extended discussion):
When you look at hives of Jewish writers, say the New Yorker Magazine, or the professors at Columbia University schools, I believe there is a strong kinship network at work. I’ve mentioned Lawrence Summers and Elena Kagan and Michael Walzer and Judith Shklar, their faculty networks at Harvard, as indicative of the same tendency.
Right. Elena Kaganas the poster child of Jewish ethnic networking. Jewish ethnic networking is the key to understanding contemporary information (and other) elites.
Hitchens wants Sanchez reinstated:
The best way to demonstrate the hidden influence of the chosen people would be for Jon Stewart and others to join me in calling for Rick Sanchez’s reinstatement. If it then didn’t happen, it would help us understand who really pulls the strings around here.
The idea seems to be that if Jews in the media like Hitchens (half-Jewish on his mother’s side) and Stewart call for Sanchez’s reinstatement but fail, then it would show that Jews really do pull the strings.
But the issue of how much influence Jews have on the media is not at all dependent on what happens in this case. There is already overwhelming evidence for Jewish power in the media and elsewhere based on a great many sources. Sanchez’s reinstatement, perhaps after a bit of groveling, certainly wouldn’t change that.
The good news is that statements of Jewish power are becoming more common all the time, both on the power of the Israel Lobby and the power of Jews the media. In the long run, frank discussion of Jewish power would also mean a frank discussion of how Jewish power compromises the interests of White Americans. That would really be the stuff of which revolutions are made. And even without an above-ground discussion, Whites with any degree of political sophistication are starting to “get it” and that in itself is a major step in the right direction.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Hitchens=Disingenuous. I wouldn’t be teased by his elocution. He’s smart enough to know, and deliberately chooses to play it safe and just fall back on hipster liberalism, rather than speak “truth to power.” Flaccid and unimpressive. A squirt gun to the face would make him scream “waterboarding,” if the stakes were for real. Mike
Christopher Hitchens said:
” Self-criticism among Jews, on matters of religion and statecraft, is actually rather noticeable.”
HUH? Christopher Hitchens once again proves that if you lie with confidence, there are always some fools out there who’ll believe you.
To me, the whole reason this debate exists, the reason blogs like this exist, the reason Sanchez’s “buried resentment” exists (in millions of people), the reason anti-semitism has existed for thousands of years is due precisely to this lack of self criticism among jews of influence. I don’t mean self-hatred, which jews have in great quantity, I mean self-criticism…MEANINGFUL, TRANSFORMATIVE self-criticism. The protestant reformation, whether you like it or not, is a great example of the self-criticism that exists within Christianity. This just doesn’t exist in judaism.
True, Mearsheimer and Walt state that jews in israel are more critical of their government and culture than jews in the US, but that’s not meaningful…that’s “all in the family.” The United States is a free and open society, we critique EVERYTHING here, from the president to the garbage collector; from sleeper cell mosques to pedophile Catholic priests to koran burning bumpkin pastors. Why then WOULDN’T we scrutinize jewish power? It would be discriminatory not ot. We not only have the right to critique jewish influence, but the obligation, given the impact it has on our lives.
Of course, when criticism doesn’t come from within, it’s only natural that it will come from the outside. And when that’s also squelched, it’s only natural to suspect that some agenda or plan is being covered up.
KMD:
“The idea seems to be that if Jews in the media like Hitchens (half-Jewish on his mother’s side) and Stewart call for Sanchez’s reinstatement but fail, then it would show that Jews really do pull the strings.”
I’m reading this as a sinister double-reversal verbal Jew-do move: If Hitchens, Stewart, and others call for his reinstatement and fail, then its a full exoneration. It PROVES Jews really don’t have any power, with the bonus implied conclusion that it must actually be White men who control the media. If put to the test, he’d probably be able to pull that off, too, since the Jews who made the decision won’t relent, and the Whites who were in on it will be too PC to do so. Brilliant!
“…half-Jewish on his mother’s side….”
according to peter hitchens, who has apparently done some genealogical research on their jewish ancestry, the brothers hitchens are 1/32nd jewish.
It is informative that John Stewart is also interviewing Sam Harris on this show, who like Christopher Hitchens or Richard Dawkins, is a professional atheist. Harris has written the books “Letter to a Christian Nation” and “The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason”. In the books Harris attacks the “appropriate” religions (Christianity and Islam) blaming them for anti-Semitism, but he somehow misses an in-depth critical evaluation of Judaism. Go figure Sam Harris has a Jewish mother.
http://lydiaswebpage.blogspot.com/2010/08/sam-harris-and-jews.html
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/the-grinch-delusion-an-atheist-can-believe-in-christmas/
I would like to correct my last post, Sam Harris does explore Judism in detail demonstrated in the following passage:
“The gravity of Jewish suffering over the ages, culminating in the Holocaust, makes it almost impossible to entertain any suggestion that Jews might have brought their troubles upon themselves. This is, however, in a rather narrow sense, the truth. Prior to the rise of the church, Jews became the objects of suspicion and occasional persecution for their refusal to assimilate, for the insularity and professed superiority of their religious culture-that is, for the content of their own unreasonable, sectarian beliefs. The dogma of a “chosen people,” while at least implicit in most faiths, achieved a stridence in Judaism that was unknown in the ancient world. Among cultures that worshiped a plurality of Gods, the later monotheism of the Jews proved indigestible. And while their explicit demonization as a people required the mad work of the Christian church, the ideology of Judaism remains a lightning rod for intolerance to this day. As a system of beliefs, it appears among the least suited to survive in a theological state of nature. Christianity and Islam both acknowledge the sanctity of the Old Testament and offer easy conversion to their faiths. Islam honors Abraham, Moses, and Jesus as forerunners of Muhammad. Hinduism embraces almost anything in sight with its manifold arms (many Hindus, for instance, consider Jesus an avatar of Vishnu). Judaism alone finds itself surrounded by unmitigated errors. It seems little wonder, therefore, that it has drawn so much sectarian fire. Jews, insofar as they are religious, believe that they are bearers of a unique covenant with God. As a consequence, they have spent the last two thousand years collaborating with those who see them as different by seeing themselves as irretrievably so. Judaism is as intrinsically divisive, as ridiculous in its literalism, and as at odds with the civilizing insights of modernity as any other religion.”
http://lydiaswebpage.blogspot.com/2010/08/sam-harris-and-jews.html
Hitchens has set the stage for Sanchez to return to CNN if Sanchez merely apologizes to Jews and agrees with Hitchens’ statement that Sanchez “didn’t descend into saying that there was Jewish control of the media.”
To return to the public’s and former AIPAC lobbyist and current CNN host Wolf Blitzer’s good graces, Sanchez need only confirm that any implication “that liberalism was linked to a single ethnicity [Jews]” is clearly wrong, as per Hitchens’ script.
In the end, Sanchez will be back on CNN delivering his convincing deceptions to viewers enthralled by his smile, Hitchens will have proven himself the beneficent intermediary, Jon Stewart will be seen as the all-forgiving (Christlike?) Jewish celebrity, and the message they will have sent to America is, “Of course Jews don’t control the media, and although they may sometimes seem to be prominent liberals, their influence is the same that of ‘people of British or Anglophile provenance.’”
Rick said:
“It is informative that John Stewart is also interviewing Sam Harris on this show…In the books Harris attacks the “appropriate” religions (Christianity and Islam) blaming them for anti-Semitism, but he somehow misses an in-depth critical evaluation of Judaism. Go figure Sam Harris has a Jewish mother.”
And, of course, the criticism they DO receive from Harris [in the quote from the above post] is imbedded in far greater quantities of sympathy (or self-pity in Harris’ case) for their victimhood. The problem is that Christianity lives for forgiveness; Christians are asking God for it all the time. They ask there fellow Christians for it all the time. Jews capitalize on this inner Christian need to assuage guilt with the ultimate guilt trip: the holocaust.
And here’s the thing, even if you were one of the millions of British or American soldiers of WW2 (or descendents of) who lost comrades or brothers and risked your own life putting Hitler down, you STILL need forgiveness from the jews for the holocaust. You’re Christian. And every jew of influence knows that Christian guilt is collective.
“Oops… if we reject the perforated condom too blatantly, the peasants might think they’re being SCREWED OVER”
Leftist comedy is rapidly becoming dadaist.
Love it.
Slate: Do Jews Really Control the Media
Someday’s post is hilariously disingenuous. Ask anyone who’s worked in the news media, including myself, and they can tell you that all materials must pass through a Jewish censor at some point. Besides, if Jews were not in control, then Sanchez would not have been tagged. The whole thing is so comical one has to wonder if it was staged, a roundabout way for Jews to fend off the mounting criticism, the higher and higher numbers of people noticing what’s going on. Don’t discount this. It’s exactly the type of thing Jews would do.
I would hope that Sanchez stands his ground and doesnt kiss the high preist of zionisms ring on bended knees nor protrate himself before the elite kabal to beg forgivness.
I think we need to continue to document and dialogue. The Rick Sanchez fiasco has given me the opportunity to discuss the tribes group stratergy with untold number of those I might not have otherwise. I have found the Latinos dont like jews either a bit more today than before this happens.
There jewish kabal has alot to risk from a potentole backlash from other ethnic groups who have a history of not taking the heat without reaction as they are a group and move react this way naturally..as whites we dont. I hope this bites them in the ars.
Hitchens (half-Jewish on his mother’s side)
Mitchondrial, therefore he is one.
That is the rule of theirs.
Interesting to see MTV owns Comedy Central.
Sumner Redstone, known to his parents as MURRAY ROTHSTEIN, owns CBS, MTV, Viacom, etc.
Sanchez is not one of us, a White, so he can always be brought back, look at Sharpton, Oliver Stone, et al. Sharpton was rallying the A-As in Harlem against a Jewish store owner. The gentleman died in an arson attack there.
Yet Al is still given airtime and nobody brings up his offer to, ALLEGEDLY, provide A-A marchers for a Mafia Captain.
So basically “free speech” means that one can only use the word “jew” in a positive sense. Using the word “jew” in a negative sense is ipso facto “antisemitism” and no one has the “right” to be antisemitic.
Now that’s really free speech Ollie!.
Slate: “Not one of the major television news operations—Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, ABC News, CBS News, or NBC News—is currently headed by a Jewish executive.”
This is a bit like saying “Of course Jews don’t control International Banking! Over 90% of bank employees worldwide are non-Jewish, and hardly any of them take orders directly from a Jew!”
But as almost everyone knows, international banking is owned and controlled by powerful financial interests whose principals peer out at the world through jaundiced eyes with little six-pointed stars for irises.
Network CEO’s and other high-ranking network executives do not produce the news or work as “news executives”. Why should they, when news bureaus are now mere propaganda outlets whose internal executives slavishly take their marching orders from above? The job of a modern “news executive” is simply to manage, coordinate, and implement rules of Zionist censorship from which no deviation is possible.
Slate has the educational value of used toilet paper, and it’s a good guess who owns it.
Re Slate:
Owned by the Washington Post Company(orignally owned by Katharine Meyer Graham)
-Jacob Weisberg is chairman and editor-in-chief of the Slate Group
-John Alderman is general manager of the Slate Group and publisher of Slate.
-David Plotz is editor of Slate.
well, what a surprise.
While I appreciate Slates Contributor, Gleen Greenwald, he is one of the few Jews who are allowed to go on the television networks and criticize Israel. If he didn’t have a Jewish background, he would be deemed a vicious anti-Semite. It’s a problem that the media networks can’t allow non-Jews to be critical of our foreign policy actions with respect to Israel. Jews are biased toward the safety of Israel. It’s their special project, that is a growing to be a disaster for themselves, The United States, the Middle East, the World and of course the Palestinians.
From a religious Jewish website they have this CATEGORY:
Jews In The American Media
Click on my name for the LINK to:
SimpleToRemember.com
From: Denver Media Service
To: 1TPU
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 07:03
Subject: The Problem With Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert
The Problem With Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert
by Ron Harold
I’ve watched Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert for years, and have enjoyed them and laughed many, many times at their antics. I’ve even been proud of Colbert and Stewart for championing certain issues; BUTT clearly these two clowns make millions of dollars joking about terrorism and the War On Terror……they like to give the (false) impression they are some kind of peace actiovist or anti-war personality….well, bullshit…these two highly-paid jokers avoid the most pivotal issue(s) regarding the War On Terror, which is: Do Islamic terrorists have a legitimate complaint or not? and, do you believe the solution is to hunt them down and kill them all over there before they kill us all over here?
I see right thru these two clowns…….they’re no different from most Americans, including the current President. I think I can best summarize and express my feelings about Colbert and Stewart in a faux transcript of me talking to them on their shows:
Ron: So Jon, do you support America’s War On Terror?
Jon: Well yes, but…….
Ron: But nothing…..do you support America’s War On Terror? Yes or no?
Jon: Well if I have to answer that question directly, yes I support America’s War On Terror.
Ron: Who do you want to win the War On Terror: al Qaeda or America?
Jon: Didn’t I just answer that question? Are you hard of hearing? Yes, I want America to win the War On Terror.
Ron: Question: Do Islamic terrorists have a legitimate complaint against the U.S. and Israeli government?
Jon: (feeling antsy, not sure what to say, eyes darting furtively)
Ron: Jon, can you please answer my simple question: Do Islamic terrorists have a legitimate complaint against the U.S. and Israeli governments?
Jon: (makes joke….not sure what to say or where I’m going…..tension begins to build)
Ron: Jon, why do you think we were attacked on 9/11? Because they hate freedom and democracy, hot dogs, apple pies and Chevrolets?
Jon: (makes joke about terrorists driving Chevys)
Ron: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Barack Obama all say that America was attacked on 9/11 because Islamic terrorists hate our freedom and democracy so much and were so jealous of America’s freedom and democracy and way of life that they decided to hijack airplanes and fly them into American buildings. Do you believe them Jon? Is that what you believe too? Is that why the 9/11 hijackers hijacked planes and killed themselves flying into American buildings at 500mph? Because they hate freedom and democracy? Because they’re jealous of our lifestyles?
Jon: Well, that’s what they say………
Ron: Well what do YOU think, Jon? Islamic terrorists couldn’t possibly be human beings who have very legitimate complaints against the U.S. and Israeli governments, huh? I want to hear you say why Jonathan Leibowitz thinks the 9/11 hijackers flew planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
Jon: (bewildered and befuddled, Stewart is trying to quickly figure out how to get out of what Stewart perceives to be a “trap.”)
Ron: ( I got Stewart on the ropes, now I’m going to knock him out) Jon, if we don’t hunt them down over there and kill them over there, we’ll have to fight them here in our own backyard, huh Jon? Do you support killing them over there or do you prefer killing them here in our own backyard?
Jon: (desperately seeking a humorous out to this nightmare interview)
Ron: Jon, do you believe like Bush, Cheney and Obama? Islamic terrorists have no legitimate complaint of the U.S. and Israel…they’re just mindless, faceless, souless sub-human creatures who America needs to exterminate until all the bad Muslims are gone, right Jon? Isn’t that what you believe too, Jon? You’re not a terrorist coddler, are you Jon?
Jon: (more bewilderment……he knows he’s on a nasty snipe hunt now….and he now realizes he’s my meal)
Ron: So you’re just like Bush, Cheney and Obama inasmuch as you too believe America can win the War On Terror by hunting them all down and killing them over there instead of here? Right?
Jon: (backpedaling wildly)
Ron: (interrupting Stewart’s incoherent rant) Guess what Jon? Here’s some breaking news for you and other brainwashed Americans everywhere: Islamic terrorists have very, very legitimate complaints against the U.S. and Israeli governments….they most certainly do!!!! They told us this repeatedly BEFORE AND AFTER 9/11!!!! But were we listening? Yes, our government heard the complaints and did nothing whatsoever to alleviate those complaints against us – OTHER THAN INVADING, ATTACKING AND DESTROYING SOVEREIGN ISLAMIC NATIONS AND THEIR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES!! So tell me Jon, you just said you support President Obama’s continued War On Terror, do you think there is a peaceful solution to the War On Terror? Or is that just foolish “happy talk” from naive peace activists?
Jon: (walking and talking on eggshells…wants to go to a commercial break)
Ron: Look Jon, you can’t have it both ways….you’re no John McCain (laughs) Can you please just this one time, please talk straight talk to me and the American people and tell us what you really think about the War On Terror: Do you think there is a peaceful solution to the War On Terror, or do you believe we must “hunt down and kill all the terrorists, and all the aspiring terrorists, and terrorists in waiting or whatever????……you can’t serve two masters Jon, you either believe there is a peaceful solution to the War On Terror and have opinions as to what that may or may not be…..or you believe as Presidents Obama and Bush do: It’s an ugly job, but we must hunt down and kill all the terrorists before they kill us all. Which one is it Jon?…………I tell you what Jon…if you don’t like those two obvious choices, then you give me your third choice for a solution to the War On Terror…..I’m listening…….
Jon: Let’s go to break now……
after break…..
Ron: So you’re a professional comedian…..do you think it’s funny to say that it’s possible to make peace with Islamic terrorists? True believers in the War On Terror will tell you that there’s no such thing as making peace with the terrorists; that’s French for we don’t give a crap about what their complaint is, we’re gonna kill anyone who disagrees with U.S. foreign policy.
ron sez…….
“Rick Sanchez was fired from CNN for saying “Jews run CNN and the media.” Well, it’s absolutely true. As a person who worked in the studios in Hollywood, California for years, I can categorically tell you that every single person in Hollywood KNOWS two things: how to spell their own name right and “Jews Run Hollywood.” If you went to a party in L.A., and said, “Boy howdy, I tell you what…at least the Jews don’t run Hollywood,” you’d be laughed at to no end……..to say that Jews don’t run Hollywood and the media is like saying Bayer doesn’t make aspirin and Pepsi don’t make soft drinks. It’s worth noting that Sanchez was fired by Big Media Jews, then criticized by Big Media Jews for saying Big Media Jews exist…isn’t it interesting and very telling that Big Media Jews don’t want the American people to know and realize that Big Media Jews have been feeding Americans Zionist crap their entire lives….from Day One. Big Media Jews don’t want you to know they run the show…they call the shots…they set the agenda..they set the criteria…they set the bar for what they deem, ‘anti-semitic.’ Don’t you know that outing Big Media Jews for being Big Media Jews is ‘anti-semitic?’ ………somebody pass me a bucket, please……….”
As Chairman of the Rick Sanchez for Congress campaign, we promise to go where no politician has gone before, but never has had the guts to do it yet: To call for an end to funding and arming Israel’s ongoing 45-year long illegal occupation of the Palestinian territories. Only Rick Sanchez has the guts to make peace with the terrorists. Only Rick Sanchez will talk about how America can make peace instead of war by defunding Israel and withdrawing from all Islamic land. Only Rick Sanchez can explain to his constituents how we can keep America safe without sending our sons and daughters into foreign, sovereign nations to kill and be killed….and for what? to spread freedom and democracy? Only Rick Sanchez will explain to America there is no such thing as constitutionally using our U.S. military to “spread freedom and democracy.” Only Rick Sanchez can explain to America the dire educational need for Americans to read and understand what our Founding Fathers themselves wrote about freedom, democracy, capitalism, religion, constitution, law and the roles of the branches of government. Our Founding Fathers wrote, ranted and raved about NOT showing favoritism to any one nation, much less COMPLETELY FUNDING AND ARMING A FOREIGN NATIONS’ ILLEGAL MILITARY OCCUPATION OF AN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES! FOR BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF U.S. TAX DOLLARS, YEAR AFTER YEAR, DECADE AFTER DECADE!!!
Isn’t it about time our American Congress STOP spending over four billion dollars annually, funding and arming Israel’s forty-five year long military occupation and abuse of the Palestinian peoples?
U.S. Tax Dollars Build, Fund and Arm Israeli Bombers That Go Bomb Palestinians (amongst other people)
Would Jesus bomb Palestinians? Who would Jesus bomb? Oh that’s right, Israelis don’t give a crap about what Jesus said……………..r o n
Isn’t it about time Americans realize it’s normal for army-less, navy-less and marine-less foreigners to strongly react to foreign armies such as the U.S. and Israeli militaries invading their land, killing their people, stealing their natural resources and forcing them to live under their military feet and foreign control?
Isn’t it about time America realizes that it’s possible to make peace with folks we pissed off with our incessant funding and arming of their own abuse, murder and demise for years and years?
Isn’t about time America votes YES for a Congressional representative who will just vote NO on the annual multi-billion dollar U.S. Congress giveaway to the Israeli government each and every year?
If Rick Sanchez is wrong, I don’t wanna be right.
Vote For Rick Sanchez For Congress!
.r o n
Slate Magazine itself is a Jewish publication:
http://www.slate.com/id/117517/
David Plotz(Jew) – Editor, Slate Magazine
John Alderman(Jew) – General Manager, Slate Group; Publisher, Slate
Magazine
Jacob Weisberg(Jew) – Chairman and Editor-in-Chief, Slate Group
Slate Magazine is owned by the Washington Post Company, which is a Jewish owned and Jewish run corporation.
Every editor of Slate Magazine has been a Jew:
Michael Kinsley(Jew) – Editor, 1996-2002
Jacob Weisberg(Jew) – Editor, 2002-2008
David Plotz(Jew) – Editor, 2008-present
The accusation that Jews control the media must have made David Plotz! ;-)
So it seems that the current editor of Slate owes it all to outspoken Goyim like Sanchez after all.
Five of some of the BIGGEST LIES ARE:
1. The check’s in the mail;
2. I love you;
3. I won’t come in your mouth;
4. Jews don’t run the media and entertainment business;
5. We were attacked on 9/11 because terrorists are jealous of us and hate our freedoms, democracy, hot dogs, apple pies and Chevrolets.
all one needs do is read the books that jews write for themselves or read anything jews write for themselves…say the new york times. they run things, they know it, they brag about it…from the banks to the film industry to all the other types of media. they claim that THEY are the new elite having pushed whites out. they love themselves those chosen few.
The great offense to most people is that if you are controlling something and have great power, don’t lie and disguise this power and claim you are a victim and minority status. That is really having it both ways. It’s ugly, corrupt, full of nepotism, and devalues a society.
So basically “free speech” means that one can only use the word “jew” in a positive sense. Using the word “jew” in a negative sense is ipso facto “antisemitism” and no one has the “right” to be antisemitic. – omop
Yet, we’re allowed to slam Muslims and Islam freely and with as broad a brush as possible. (Why in the hell is Marty Peretz still soon to be lauded at Harvard after his racist remark?)
It is currently impossible not to be intellectually honest and recognize the cynicism behind the double standard, and when people say this hypocrisy is only in response to millenia of cruel anti-semitism, I wonder what really came first? The chicken or the egg?
With its breezy willingness to disregard the ojectivity of truth it becomes clearer and clearer that Judaism is not and never will be of the Western tradition. It is an oriental import.
Oh, sure, there have been Jews living in the West for centuries, many of whom have made major contributions. But, that makes Judaism part of the Western tradition no more than intellectual contributions made be someone of Chinese or Japanese ancestry make Confucianism or Shintoism part of the Graeco-Roman heritage.
Ron, to your list of biggest lies, don’t forget:
“I’ll respect you in the morning.”
Kevin McDonald wrote:
“Hitchens wants Sanchez reinstated:
‘ The best way to demonstrate the hidden influence of the chosen people would be for Jon Stewart and others to join me in calling for Rick Sanchez’s reinstatement. If it then didn’t happen, it would help us understand who really pulls the strings around here.’
The idea seems to be that if Jews in the media like Hitchens (half-Jewish on his mother’s side) and Stewart call for Sanchez’s reinstatement but fail, then it would show that Jews really do pull the strings.”
I think something is eluding K-Mac.
Why are the Jews soiling themselves to be so conciliatory to Rick Sanchez? Oh, yeah, they still want (and will probably get) an apology from Mr. Sanchez. But why are the very same people whose motto seems to be “Never forgive, never forget, never learn” so willing to kiss and make up with Rick Sanchez?
Why is he being treated any different from Helen Thomas are the myriads of Whites who screwed up? Thomas apologized. Many Whites groveled and still found themselves being given the bum’s rush out the door.
I think it is a given that Rick Sanchez will be reinstated after he becomes more “conciliatory.” The process is already starting and even then it’s different as can be that the abject (and may I add utterly useless) groveling White offenders do on their media apology all over hell’s half acre before they are thrown into obscurity. Mrs. Rick Sanchez is apologizing FOR her husband who can’t be bothered. His wife is mending fences, like wives do when “good neighbors” have a falling out:
*On her Facebook profile, Suzanne Sanchez wrote, “Rick apologized to Jon Stewart today.” They had a good talk. Jon was gracious and called Rick ‘thin-skinned.’ He’s right,” she added.
Sanchez has made no public comment since the incident, and his Facebook profile is only visible to his approved friends. But on her publicly visible page, his wife Suzanne spoke of Sanchez’s regret.
“Rick feels horrible that in an effort to make a broader point about the media, his exhaustion from working 14 hour days for 2 months straight caused him to mangle his thought process inartfully [sic],” she wrote.
Suzanne Sanchez added, “He got… caught up in the banter and deeply apologizes to anyone who was offended by his unintended comments.”*
The point I am trying to make is that IF Rick Sanchez is reinstated (just because a handful of Jews said pretty please) it won’t have shit to shinola to do with the power of the Chosen People, but LA RAZA.
dan neil says:
“I think we need to continue to document and dialogue. The Rick Sanchez fiasco has given me the opportunity to discuss the tribe’s group strategy with untold number of those I might not have otherwise. I have found the Latinos do not like jews either a bit more today than before this happened.”
Jews and Latinos have clashed quite a bit for political seats in Los Angeles. Unlike the Negros (who are growing increasingly problematic themselves), those uppity Mestizos don’t want Jews representing THEIR interests once they achieve their own demographic advantage and are showing a distressing independence by voting out Jewish incumbents in favor of other Mestizos. This presents a ticklish problem for the Jews (who wanted to form their own Anti-White coalition with them, too). They may have to cede the basketcase that is California, but are loath to take them on in the rest of the country.
You see, even though they have been repeating the stagnant 12-15 million “undocumented immigrants” living in the shadows figure for years, they have no idea how many of them are here once amnesty goes through. My own conservative estimate would be to quadruple that number and I believe I would still come up short (since one peasant from Mexico alone – population approx. 200 million – said that half the people he knew were already living in the USA). That is not taking into account the rest of Latin America. I mean, come on, what other reason is there that the only thing the 2010 Census takers were asking was if the respondent was or was not Hispanic?
I think the Jewish controlled media is deliberating The Sanchez Situation, considering their options and laying the groundwork so that anyone paying attention can come to the “right” conclusion, whatever they decide it to be.
If they remain intransigent, they have set up their usual scapegoat to be blamed by angry Latinos. Hitchens has already done that by subtly seeding the ground:
“I ask myself if the world in which I have worked for so many decades—the intersecting and overlapping world of the news media, publishing, the academy, and the think-tank industry—is even imaginable without the presence of liberal American Jews. The answer is plainly no. Moreover, I can’t think of any other “minority” of which this is remotely true, unless it were to be the other minority from which I can claim descent: people of British or Anglophile provenance.”
What he is trying to imply is that the White liberal Anglo protestant is the one who pulls the strings at CNN. The reason why there are so many liberal American Jews there is because the WASPS are exploiting their creative abilities. White liberals have ALL started these fields before they were pushed out by Jews, but they retain enough of a nominal presence as “management” or “supervisors” so they can be the fall guy as the situation warrants.
If they feel “it is good for the Jews” that they relent, then it has to be done in a face-saving manner to hide the fact that Rick Sanchez with all the activists in La MecHa and Voz de Aztlan, and Latin Kings, and LA RAZA backing him up has them shitting in their pants. Because, this might give the largest racial demographic, the disorganized WHITES, some ideas about the benefits of presenting a cohesive, united an militant front to the Jews.
As James Williams said:
“Hitchens will have proven himself the beneficent intermediary, Jon Stewart will be seen as the all-forgiving (Christlike?) Jewish celebrity, and the message they will have sent to America is, ‘Of course Jews don’t control the media, and although they may sometimes seem to be prominent liberals, their influence is the same that of ‘people of British or Anglophile provenance.’”
This whole elaborate “just between us guys” drama being staged by Hitchens which stars the uncharacteristically easy-going Stewart is being done for the benefit of us White people. The truth is that the surging Mestizo demographics in this country are presenting a formidable challenge to Organized Jewry. Part of Mestizo blood is from the Iberian peninsula. It should never be forgotten that their Spanish ancestors expelled Muslims AND JEWS from their country during their last Reconquista. Something tells me their Amerind admixture would make THIS go round look like Reconquista on Steroids if the Jews piss them off.
I noticed Macdonald’s personal website does not have the links to some of the chapters from his book collection.
What happened?
Clytemnestra says:
October 6, 2010 at 4:24 PM
What he is trying to imply is that the White liberal Anglo protestant is the one who pulls the strings at CNN. The reason why there are so many liberal American Jews there is because the WASPS are exploiting their creative abilities. White liberals have ALL started these fields before they were pushed out by Jews, but they retain enough of a nominal presence as “management” or “supervisors” so they can be the fall guy as the situation warrants.
That’s right, guys; I’m Rick “the condom” Sanchez.
The White Liberal Anglo-Sausage Establishment pushed me to the limits and I went bananas, cause that’s what they do: they oppress and exploit minorities, like the Jews and me. Did I mention the Jews?
Move on.
The holocaust is the BIGGEST Jewish lie of them all. People uncritically accept that the Jews suffered inordinately during WWII, when in fact that is that the case. Many Jews did suffer and die, and were sacrificed by the (Jewish) powers that be in order to justify the ZIonist cause, but in far lesser numbers than Germans themselves did during and after the war. By the way, the notion of homocidal gas chambers, the core Holocaust belief is about as believable as Building 7 collapsing due to no plane hitting it and only small fires. See: Germar Rudolph, Lectures on the Holocaust and Dissecting the Holocaust.
I’m sorry, I meant to say, “that is NOT the case” of inordinate Jewish suffering in WWII (a Jewish caused war).
The fact is that Christopher Hitchens is a glib, opportunistic, lying literary whore. One would hope that since he sadly appears to be dying of cancer he could at least summon the courage to tell the truth in his last days.
Hitchens isn’t about the truth. The truth is about Hitchens.
@Clytemnestra says:
October 6, 2010 at 4:24 PM
The nightmare for the Jews is a La Raza middle class. The WASPS are also struggling with this possibility, it must be said.
Part of the problem is that a ‘disoriented’ Catholic Church (priests use to say Mass facing East as Kevin will tell you!) has lost touch with the poor and is unable to civilize enough of La Raza to speed up their ascent to the next social level. A process which used to occur with the Irish and Italians regularly for example before the Second Vatican Council of 1962. This Council incidentally, ushered in the era of the self-hating Catholic which papist Kevin has referred to in the past.
In any event, WASPs have a conundrum: they either get their wives off the pill or they put in with the spics. It’s their call because they can’t have it both ways.
If Jon Stewart could only read SEC filings he would know,or have known a decade ago, that Menachem Atzmon,convicted of money laundering in his own country of Israel,was behind the stock fraud called ICTS International that ‘guarded’ Logan Airport in Boston where the two planes that hit the WTC originated from according to U.S.government’s own official story.They were and ARE incorporated in Joe Biden’s state of Delaware as well as the Netherlands where the ‘accidentally’ allowed the Nigerian ‘crotch bomber’ to board flight 253 from Schiphol Airport for Detroit on Christmas 2009.Neither Obama or Stewart are as stupid as they pretend….
Because I stopped watching CNN long ago due to its right wing pro
Honduras coup and Zionist bias I really don’t know who Rick Sanchez
is.However I do know that Wolf Blitzer and CNN covered up and didn’t
report a $100,000,000 litigation against them in Florida by British
Israeli money launderer Michael Zwebner all because I was posting on a
penny stock message board called ragingbull.com about Zwebner’s
connections to then Israeli PM Ehud Olmert and Zwebner who used a
small part of his stock fraud against Americans to hire gay
prostitutes or indulge in harrassment litigation of his critics such
as myself.
He even tried to divert attention from his stock frauds by pretending
I was ‘anti-semitic’ and claimed I was accusing him of eating a
cheeseburger with a milk shake rather than the fact that I was
accusing him and Ehud Olmert quite properly of stock fraud and money
laundering against Americans.I emailed Blitzer with the fact that I
Tony Ryals was the one posting as wolfblitzzer0 on ragingbull UCSY
message board where Zwebner using his connections to Olmert and then
Israeli President Moshe Katsav,(later accused of rape), to promote his
non existent ‘air water machines’ in order to defraud investors,even
lieing about selling them to American Coalition forces in Iraq and
the Israeli army.Yes he was making money for himself and his
hypocritical Zionist pals by luring investors however naive into
buying worthless shares(incorporated in Nevada he used for money
laundering in Lichtenstein,the Caymans and Israeli bank accounts etc.
and Olmert even wrote aletter in SEC’s UCSY filings claiming to have
visited Zwebner’s ‘Air Water Machine’ factory in Israel ! So I know
nothing about this Mr.Sanchez until now but plenty and all need to
about CNN,FoxNews and Jon Stewart to know he is closer to the truth
than they are or will ever hope to be.Wolf Blitzer and CNN covered up
and did damage control for Olmert rather than doing an investigation
into who was suing them for $100 million in Florida.And Fox ‘News’ has
had myriad Middle East and war ‘experts’ who have been involved in
stock fraud and money laundering as well such as Ollie North, Mansoor
Ijaz,Marc Ginsberg,etc.,etc.
The L.A.Times is welcome to contact me if they wish to do a real
journalistic investigation because CNN certainly won’t.Oh by the way
Lanny Davis who defended the Honduras’ coup leaders also defended the
mortgatage and stock fraud called Novastar that lied about its
worthless dividend paying ponzi scheme being a victim of ‘naked short
selling’.What ever became of them ?
http://www.phillyimc.org/en/node/70918
CNN,Wolf Blitzer Cover Up of Michael Zwebner,Air Water Corp Fraud Helped Ehud Olmert To Israeli PM Office
by Tony Ryals | 07.04.2008
Long before Morris Talansky came on the radar screenin an Israel National Fraud Office investigation this past May,(do a google search ‘ehud olmert morris talansky global technologies ‘,CNN and Wolf Blitzer and their legal representative in Florida,Holland & Knight LLP,covered up Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s criminal ties to U.S. Air Water Corp stock fraud and to British Israeli con artist Michael Zwebner which enabled the corrupt Olmert to become Israeli PM in the first place !
WTC,9/11,ICTS International,NY Mosque:Netherlands Geert Wilders … – [ Traducir esta página ]I meant to only focus on two charcters in the 9/11 WTC mosque controversy ,Barack Obama and Dutch wingnut and Zionist with possible Jewish-Indonesian …
http://twincities.indymedia.org/2010/sep/wtc911icts-internationalny-mosquenetherlands-geert-wildersbarack-obama-declare-911-official
I didn’t think anyone still watched Jon “Stewart.” He quickly becomes tiresome.
“Hitchens isn’t about the truth. The truth is about Hitchens.”
Sorry, I meant to say: Hitchens isn’t about the truth. The truth ISN’T about Hitchens.
Sadie Vacantist says:
“The nightmare for the Jews is a La Raza middle class. The WASPS are also struggling with this possibility, it must be said.
Part of the problem is that a ‘disoriented’ Catholic Church (priests use to say Mass facing East as Kevin will tell you!) has lost touch with the poor and is unable to civilize enough of La Raza to speed up their ascent to the next social level. A process which used to occur with the Irish and Italians regularly for example before the Second Vatican Council of 1962. This Council incidentally, ushered in the era of the self-hating Catholic which papist Kevin has referred to in the past.”
I am a Catholic and I can say that the the problem with the Catholic Church is they worship Mammon more than they do Jesus Christ. A glaring case is their preferential treatment of the Kennedys. A cardinal literally came over and pressured the Kopechnes to refuse an autopsy on Mary Jo after she drowned in Kennedy’s car in Chappaquiddick. JKO married and Greek Orthodox Onassis and when she died she was a married Jew’s mistress. They have a painting of her in some church as an angel.
The early American church ministered the poor, because they wanted to build a sizable Catholic demographic. However, since the WASPS were vigilant back then, they bent over backwards to help European Catholic immigrants to outwardly assimilate to WASP culture. Moreover, they had to help poor immigrant children grow up to be more competitive with WASP children. To that end, they provided the extremely cheap but superior education to their child parishioners. The child parishioners were also taught impeccable English and the short-tempered Catholic nuns (who believed in corporate punishment) were notorious on punishing infractions. Catholic school graduates quickly became preferred by the business community, because they were a highly educated workforce that did not question authority figures.
The problem is, they did not limit its availability to parishioners. They could and did charge more money to non-parishioners and soon they preferred them to parish children. My brother sent my niece through Catholic school and the teachers are cold to parish children and their parents and fawn all over N/P children and their parents. It’s disgusting. The majority of these higher paying N/Ps (at least in Las Vegas) are Jews. In fact, I would say Catholic schools have more Jewish students attending than Catholics. There, the Jewish casino owner, Steven Wynn (like any other wealthy Jews there) bypassed sending his two daughters to Hebrew School and they graduated from Bishop Gorman. They were literally treated like royalty. Neither one was a raving beauty, but both got elected homecoming or prom queen.
As far as the RC church fostering up a La Raza middle class like they did with Italian, Irish and Polish immigrants, I don’t see it happening. Mexicans are notoriously bad about paying for stuff. That’s what Cinco de Mayo is all about. They stuck their French creditors with the bill and then they drove them out. No way can they be bothered when the public school system will not only do it for free, but educate them in Spanish and feed them free breakfast and lunch, too.
White Catholics are not happy and are leaving the RC in droves, but the mainstream Protestant churches, instead of putting up their own cheap schools to lure them over are now pandering to Latinos, too.
Sadie Vacantist says:
“In any event, WASPs have a conundrum: they either get their wives off the pill or they put in with the spics. It’s their call because they can’t have it both ways.”
Actually, they need to do both. I have already discussed this with several young Whites, especially those in my family. I told them to get fluent in Spanish and Hispanicize their surnames. Hispanic is not a race, it’s a tongue and Hispanics, like Jews bridge many races.
For whatever reason the Republicans in the Nixon administration decided to give Spanish speaking people a separate racial category, they are getting the best of both worlds. For crime-reporting statistics, they are White. For job preference and welfare benefit purposes, they are not. They have the freedom to form and join overtly racio-ethnic organizations that can exclude Negros and they have no compunctions whatsoever at driving Negros out of their neighborhoods.
White people who get proficient in Spanish and Hispanicize their surnames would be in like Flynn in getting jobs, because they will fill their employer’s minority program. Likewise, they will get into key Ivy League universities. If I were in my late teens, early twenties, I’d have no compunction whatsoever about changing my last name.
White people are, to all effects, culturally homeless. They have no cohesive, militant force to defend them. That is why they are being mowed down like sheep with a pack of wolves set on them.
Yes, I think the Whites should throw in their lot with Hispanics. I have hung out with them and they are intensely loyal once you earn their friendship and vindictive as hell to anyone who crosses you. Anglo culture has stabbed us in the back at every given opportunity.
Moreover, Hispanics are mostly White anyway. If Kennewick Man tells the correct story, many Amerinds were actually already Eurasians when the conquistadores landed. They got another infusion of European DNA and then they have acquired more with additional mixing.
@Clytemnestra
I understood your second post but your first one seems a collection of anecdotes.
The number of people reading Kevin MacDonald’s material is tiny and the notion that these refugees can launch a revolution is fanciful. Their parochialism is typical of those who have never owned a passport. As Kevin points out it is medieval Europe which offers the definitive model for resistance. Without that model as the template, whitey might as well stay on the reservation eating his burger ‘n fries and swilling Cola. These “consumers” can whisper the above mentioned anecdotes to one and other in between burps but even then last night’s edition of X-Factor might prove irresistible as the preferred topic of conversation.
@Sadie Vacantist
“The number of people reading Kevin MacDonald’s material is tiny and the notion that these refugees can launch a revolution is fanciful.”
Certainly, there is no prospect of any meaningful change arising from any conceivable political process undertaken in the US. The opposing forces are far too powerful. But I am predicting the emergence of an adaptive response from White Advocates which will take an altogether different turn.
As was the case with Al-Queda, I expect this will take the form of a violent asymmetric adaptive response for which the authorities simply will have no viable answer. Imagine, for example, if a White Advocate, recently diagnosed with a terminal illness, were to simply decide to go out and take out a prominent member of the Jewish establishment. What would he/she stand to lose? Imagine if such an action were to “inspire” others to similar actions.
There are c.500,000 Americans diagnosed with terminal cancer every year. Lets’ say 1% of these (5k) are White Advocates – which is not unreasonable since such individuals tend to be older as do White Advocates – and that 10% of these (500) decide on such a course of action with a 50% success rate.
Imagine the panic, intimidation and fear that would spread among the elite, knowing that, if they continued on their course of action, c.250 of their leading lights would be wiped out every year, or one for every working day of the week.
I suspect it would have a powerful intimidatory effect. If Muslims evolved such an adaptation, is it fanciful to expect something similar from Whites.
And now [drum roll] the apology:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101008/ap_on_en_tv/us_tv_sanchez
What this Hitchens creep is saying is that it is perfectly fine for the Sanchez creep to hate English-speaking whites, but if he makes any tepid remark about Jews, the usual public grovelling apology is in order.
“this Hitchens creep”
Well said!
@BMadoff says:
October 8, 2010 at 3:36 AM
Thanks for you response.
I have had similar irrational exchanges with eurodele. And on this very subject irrationality we need to go back to Regensburg and the Pope’s lecture on the issue of ‘faith and reason’. (Frankly, and eurodele of course can’t see this of course serving up the usual WASP canards, Benedict XVI is the best show in town at the moment). Consider the response of the NYT and the BBC to Regensberg when they started whipping up hysteria in the Middle-East. These news agencies are from countries whose troops are committing atrocities on a daily basis in the Islamic World and yet they point the finger at the Holy Father, accusing him of intolerance towards Islam. All this in response to a lecture on reason.
No less curious is it when WASPs complain about the MSM but believe everything it says when it comes to the Catholic Church. Imagine how Catholics feel when they observe this? Little wonder why they turn to Don Corleone “for justice” because a judge won’t imprison a brother WASP for an attrocity. Yes, WASPs put on the white shoes as and when it suits.
On this very issue of the unreasonable, what you and many on here are proposing is violence. Like those young lads who berated Rhett Butler at the beginning of Gone with the Wind, but I think you are, like them, deluded as well as unreasonable.
As a footnote Jefferson Davis, who was educated by the Dominicans, always spoke movingly of how the Vatican recognised the sovereignty of the Confederacy during the darkest days. but his project still failed though. As will this one if violence is involved.
Lest Sadie continue to take my name in vain, let me briefly refresh her memory.
My disagreement with the Catholic Church has to do with its benighted policies on minority contraception and immigration, and their disastrous effects on White people and societies.
If Pope Ratzinger wants to stop siding with Big Jew, take back the Vatican portfolio, and come to Jesus regarding the fact that White countries cannot absorb an infinite number of White-hating non-Whites who won’t even do us the favor of speaking our languages, then this may change my view of him and the bureaucracy he figureheads.
Until then, any White person who embraces Catholic policies on these matters is about as irrational, or at least as suicidal, as they come.
I wish this judgment were unnecessary, but it’s written in stone.
@eurodele says:
October 8, 2010 at 12:06 PM
Would I take thy holy name in vain Eurodele?
If whites follow Church teaching on contraception and abortion, they are committing suicide? How? They are doing the opposite!
The Jewish media have been running a campaign against the “Nazi Pope” ever since his election and you seem to have fallen for it. That business with Milwaukee (rehashed again by CNN a week ago) is the result of the ex-Archbishop and homosexual Rembert Weakland (dismissed by Cardinal Ratzinger in 2002) feeding lies to Laurie Goldstein of the NYT.
“It’s written in stone” – who are you Moses or just pontificating ex-cathedra?
That’s the problem with protestantism, Catholicism has but one Pope but the protestants insist on having millions of them. Henceforth I shall call you Pope Eurodele!
That’s the problem with protestantism, Catholicism has but one Pope but the protestants insist on having millions of them. Henceforth I shall call you Pope Eurodele!
Lol, that’s a feature, not a bug. Jews know this too. Just try bribing “the head of the Jewish faith” to do your bidding; that’s a loooooot of rabbis to bribe.
The Pope goes nuts, and millions are screwed.
Sadie Vacantist says:
October 8, 2010 at 3:17 AM
The number of people reading Kevin MacDonald’s material is tiny and the notion that these refugees can launch a revolution is fanciful.
Quantity =/= Quality
Even the commies knew that.
Plant the right seed in the right soil at the right time.
You’d be surprised.
Svigor says:
October 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM
The Pope goes nuts, and millions are screwed.
The Pope made me do it, I know it wasn’t right!
Disgusting swarthy low-IQ Spanniard Catholics with their siestas and their fiestas …
Steve Sailer was right!
Sadie Vacantist: “If whites follow Church teaching on contraception and abortion, they are committing suicide? How?”
Sadie, you’re the vacantest.
Whites are being crowded off the planet in two ways.
(1) Their territories are being flooded by cohesive groups of fast-reproducing nonwhites. It’s far too late for Whites to win or even draw the breeding game against these groups.
(2) Whites are under increasing pressure to breed with nonwhites, and thus to sacrifice their genetic integrity as a race. This pressure is being exerted through a combination of media suggestion, PC indoctrination, and unnatural physical proximity which has been thoughtfully engineered by Big Jew with enthusiastic nods and winks from Il Papa.
Whites are finished unless they can stop the further infestation of their territories by fast-breeding “minorities” (actually worldwide majorities), and dial down the high-r reproductive behavior of these nonwhites in their own countries before they build up to unstoppable human waves at the borders. Unfortunately, smack in the way of both of these dire necessities stands Ratzinger, as obsessed as any other pope with the dream of breeding vast brown (black, yellow, chartreuse) armies of militant Catholics in Whitey’s pad, on Whitey’s tab.
If you and the Pope want a vast brown army of Catholics, then move to the Arctic and find a horde of obedient lemmings to baptize. But do us all a favor, and don’t tell Carlos and Juanita and Jamal and Latisha to be fruitful and multiply like cockroaches in our front yard so that we end up supporting their low-IQ crime-prone kids at the direct expense of White ones.
Thanks.
Guys
I am begining to think that Kevin must be a lapsed Catholic because the same thing is happening here as happened in Nazi Germany. A lapsed Catholic leader is surrounded by adoring protestants except only in ‘microcosm’. As the results of 1932 election in Germany reveal however, none of the Catholics voted for him. Mr and Mrs Ratzinger sensed danger for their 3 young children. What gives a WASP the biggest kick then? The image of 16 yo Josef in a field, surrounded by GIs or 65 years later, the same guy being hounded by Goldstein and his pals at the NYT?
What is being proposed here is exactly what the elites want and in particular the White Shoe Boys. You are handing them a massive war on a plate. This suits the WSBs for the last thing they want is accountability as all the accountants will be up at the front along with Leroy, Pablo, Slugger et al.
This is lose-lose strategy. Even if the USA wins (when was the last time the USA actually won a war? The Soviets were the only winners in WWII), do you really think that Leroy, Pablo and Slugger will come home and be in the mood to work the fields for you? And the fields WILL need working because things will be that bad … Or is your strategy, like that of the elites, to simply wipe out these guys along with all the troublesome accountants, no questions asked?
Maybe you didn’t get the memo, Sadie.
Slugger O’Toole is on our side now. Leroy doesn’t work anyway…he prefers violent crime and producing that most precious of all things, little black chillun born with curses in their mouths, guns in their hands, and hard-ons for Whitey. And all Pablo does is produce anchor babies, play with his shiv and his gat, and salivate at the Reconquista billboards all over LA.
Even if Leroy and Pablo could be lured into the armed forces, who could they possibly fight against for the survival of the White race? They, and no one else, are the worst enemies of the White race by far (aside from kindly Abe Finkelstein, who tends to stay safely out of reach in skyscrapers, gated communities, European villas, and synagogues).
Personally, I work my own fields (literally). It’s not worth the trouble to avoid it. Sure I’d like to have it done for me, but I don’t trust Pablo and company, and Leroy’s lazy as hell and has a real bad attitude. Does that mean that they should all be “wiped out along with all the troublesome accountants”? Certainly not, provided they leave us the @#$% alone. After all, they have their own countries and continents to keep defecating all over.
In my opinion, the current crop of White big shots and their Jewish enablers need to loosen their ties and pick some lettuce (not the kind they print for a change, but the kind that grows up out of the dirt). So do the Pope and his cardinals. No matter what they tell themselves, they’re not even remotely morally or intellectually qualified to sit around on their fat overdressed asses rearranging the world to their liking at our particular expense. They’re way too stupid and self-interested for that.
No kidding.
“On this very issue of the unreasonable, what you and many on here are proposing is violence.”
@Sadie Vacantist
You misrepresent me, probably deliberately. As a professional scientist, I am not advocating violence, I am predicting it, as a logical and rational adaptive response, and the particular form I predict is one for which the hostile elite will have no effective answer, but it may emerge in any one of a host of different and less or more optimal manifestations. This is the expected evolutionary pathway for an asymmetric defensive response and is perfectly understandable within the framework of Social Darwinism. The Al-Queda response, by contrast, is only explicable once you parse the mindset of the Muslim fundamentalist. And while for those pursuing this strategy it has been remarkably successful from their perspective it is, of course, irrational, but that is only to be expected since, like your own devotion to the papacy, it stems from the inherently irrational foundation of religious belief.
However, the belief that the white race needs to be protected from a wide array of forces arraigned against it is anything but irrational. The empirical evidence is there for all to see and extensively documented. And the classification difficulties which used to accompany the definition of race are rapidly disappearing thanks to advances in genetics. So a violent strategy arising from this belief would be quite rational and reasonable. After all, time is short, the natural world is extremely violent, history shows that violence does work, and when directed against a tiny but powerful elite on behalf of the majority, is likely to be very effective given that the base beliefs which give rise to it are so well-founded in empirical observation.
So what interests me is the question: what would be the most effective and difficult to combat response that could be mounted by White Advocates to stem the current onslaught against the white race?
I have outlined one strategy which I think meets all the criteria, but, like any scientist I would like to see it tested by subjecting it to rigorous challenge. And I would be interested in other formulations. I do consider, however, that increased devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary is unlikely to make the grade.
“The idea seems to be that if Jews in the media like Hitchens (half-Jewish on his mother’s side) and Stewart call for Sanchez’s reinstatement but fail, then it would show that Jews really do pull the strings.”
Hitchens’ view here is bizarre. In reality, the thing that shows that Jews really do pull the strings is the fact that Jews in the media like Hitchens and Stewart are NOT calling for Sanchez’s reinstatement. They are sticking together for no reinstatement.
Hitchens’ view here is bizarre. In reality, the thing that shows that Jews really do pull the strings is the fact that Jews in the media like Hitchens and Stewart are NOT calling for Sanchez’s reinstatement. They are sticking together for no reinstatement.
No, Hitchens’ view is not bizarre. It’s part of the game. Sanchez out forever? Then the media will simply trumpet his supposed insulting of John Stewart as the main cause. After all, Sanchez is latino and he was front and center at CNN. Sanchez is let back in? Then the jews will say it shows the jews aren’t in charge of “everything”. Most everything involving the jews is set up to be used at least two ways.
The problem for the jews is that they are so deceptive they can’t see that their arrogance and control is becoming more and more obvious. Comments made to me this past week during a convention surprised me. I was stunned and very pleased at the number of people who were (albeit carefully) remarking on jewish control, jews believing they’re “… some type of special people,” and jews screwing up the country with immigration. This is a good sign. As things get worse, the timidity will fade. I can only hope the philosophizing and religious ranting here will fade faster than that timidity. Nothing turns off newcomers or fence sitters like petty arguments and pseudo-intellectual fluff that has little bearing on the here and now. Anyone who believes that whites are going to get out of this mess without having to crack a few skulls may as well jump off a cliff. People who see this reality aren’t advocating violence. They’re just acknowledging that it is inevitable.
“Nothing turns off newcomers or fence sitters like petty arguments and pseudo-intellectual fluff that has little bearing on the here and now.” M.HD
Amen.
“I can only hope the philosophizing and religious ranting here will fade faster than that timidity.”
Based on my own personal experience and readings of history, that’s not likely. Good sentiment, though.