The project of translating Alexandr Solzhenitisyn’s 200 Years Together into English continues apace. The 18,000-word Chapter 19, “In the 1930s” is now available (see here). The decade of the 1930s was tragic almost beyond description. The main idea advanced by Solzhenitsyn is that all segments of Soviet society suffered, including Jews who had been members of the elite. However, the suffering of Jews pales in comparison to the suffering of the Ukrainian and Russian farmers undergoing forced collectivization. Moreover, Jews were never targeted as Jews, and in general Jews remained vastly overrepresented in elite positions throughout the period, even after the purges.
Solzhenitsyn emphasizes the culpability of the West. The brutal process of industrialization was carried out with the cooperation of Western merchants and bankers eager to do business with the Soviet Union. Such commercial cooperation had been prohibited under the Czars because Jewish activist organizations had pressured governments not to do business with Russia because of its treatment of Jews — much as there are now sanctions against trading with Iran because of the concerns of the Israel Lobby. As we also see today, financial and commercial interests were not concerned with ideological commitment to capitalism or with human rights but simply sought to expand their profits. Trade was allowed because there was the perception in the West that “Soviet power would not oppress the Jews, but on the contrary, that many of them would remain at the levers of power.”
And indeed, many Jews did remain in positions of power. As usual, Solzhenitsyn is at his trenchant best when he skewers the historical blind spots of Jewish apologists. This one is particularly outrageous: “In the 1980s we see assertions like this: in the Soviet times, the Jews in the USSR were ‘practically destroyed as a people; they had been turned into a social group, which was settled in the large cities as a social stratum to serve the ruling class.’”
The outrageous claim that Jews were mere pawns being manipulated by a nefarious ruling class is ridiculous because, as Solzhenitsyn notes, in fact “Jews were to the large extent members of the ‘ruling class.’” While the rest of the country suffered from mass murder, starvation, and political oppression, the government’s efforts were directed at “improved provisioning, furnishing and maintenance” of the urban areas where Jews predominated.
This reminds me of an example from my chapter on self-deception in Separation and Its Discontents. The problem for the apologist is how to depict Jews as oppressed when they are obviously vastly overrepresented in terms of wealth and other positions of influence:
This self-deception of Jews as oppressed can be seen in a recent work by Tikkun editor Michael Lerner (Lerner & West 1995) in which he argues that for Jews in contemporary America “there is a level of spiritual and psychological oppression that is as real and as fundamental as any other form of oppression. . . . It’s the oppression and pain that comes from denying our human capacity” (p. 237). Jews are outsiders in American society because American white society as a whole does not conform to a specifically Jewish ethical ideal despite the fact that Jews are highly overrepresented among all the indices of economic and cultural success in American society, including ownership of large corporations. In Lerner’s perspective, this high-income economic profile of the Jews occurs because Jews are passive victims of the non-Jewish “ruling elite” that uses them as helpless servants to further its own interests just as it did in traditional societies: “Jews have been put into an intermediate position, in between the ruling elite who own the major economic institutions and the American majority, which has little real economic power. Jews become the middlemen—the lawyers, doctors, government bureaucrats, social workers, school teachers, and college professors. They appear to the vast majority of the population as the public face of the ruling elite” (p. 232)
No matter how obvious this sort of self-deception is to any impartial observer, it resonates with other Jews. Quite simply, such examples appeal to the Jewish self-image that their behavior cannot be other than exemplary. Any putative exceptions are interpreted as due to the machinations of the “non-Jewish ruling elite.” It’s the same problem now with images of Israeli brutality, oppression, ethnocentrism, and ethnic cleansing. Activist Jews easily dismiss such images as anti-Semitism or self-hate. Dialog is impossible.
Solzhenitsyn shows that there were fewer Jews in the party elite after the purge of Trotsky and his predominantly Jewish followers. However, the purge was “absolutely not anti-Jewish.” There remained very powerful Jews, notably Lazar Kaganovich who played such an important role in the mass murders of the period. While comprising less than 1% of the population, Jews were around one-sixth of the Communist Party membership and around 33%–40% of top party positions. Stalin assigned a Jew, Yakovlev-Epshtein, to the top administrative position in charge of collectivization (labeled by Solzhenitsyn “the destruction of the way of life of the people”), and notes several other Jews who worked under him. After listing dozens of Jews with high-level positions throughout the economy, Solzhenitsyn concludes that “Soviet Jews obtained a weighty share of state, industrial, and economic power at all levels of government in the USSR.” Similarly, in diplomacy, “Just as in the 1920s diplomacy attracted a cadre of Jews, so it did through the early and mid-1930s.” Indeed, even after the purges, when Molotov took over the People’s Commissariat of Foreign Affairs in1939, he publicly announced during a meeting with diplomatic personnel that he “will deal with the synagogue here,” and that he began firing Jews on the very same day.
Jews had a substantial representation in the secret police. Solzhenitsyn refers to the increasing presence of Jews in the state security apparatus in the mid-30s. “On the eve of the most massive repressions” Jews comprised nearly 14% of the senior positions and were well-represented at the highest levels, including Genrikh Yagoda who headed the NKVD from 1934–1936. In December of 1936, 7 of the 10 heads of the sections of the NKVD were Jews. Similarly in the GUlag. Solzhenitsyn recalls the outrage that greeted his simply including a photo with the (predominantly Jewish) names of the heads of the camps in his Gulag Archipelago.
However, presumably because of their elite status, Jews suffered disproportionately in the purges of 1937–1938. Solzhenitsyn cites figures indicating that Jews comprised “50% of the main structural units of the central apparatus of the [NKVD], but by 1 January 1939 they headed only 6%.” Although Solzhenitsyn rejects the idea that the purge was specifically anti-Jewish, the displaced Jews were not replaced by other Jews, indicating a decline in Jewish power.
Solzhenitsyn provides long lists of Jewish victims of the purges and again rejects apologetic interpretations by Jewish writers. For example: A Jewish apologist argued that Jews “were used by [the Soviet government] and then mercilessly discarded when their services became redundant.” Solzhenitsyn responds: “What a great argument! So for twenty years these powerful Jews were really used? Yet weren’t they themselves the zealous cogs in the mechanism of that very dictatorship right up to the very time when their ‘services became redundant’? Did not they make the great contribution to the destruction of religion and culture, the intelligentsia, and millions among the peasantry?”
What’s amazing is that the Jewish author is only able to see Jewish suffering. Never mind that the purged Jews had been pillars of the most murderous regime in history. The only injustices that matter were directed against Jews.
Another apologetic account by an author who was well aware of the horrors of collectivization wrote that “awkward attempts to establish ‘socialism’ in Russia took the heaviest toll from the Jews”; “the scorpions of Bolshevism did not attack any other people with such brutal force as they attacked Jews.” Solzhenitsyn’s reply is the emotional centerpiece of the chapter:
Yet during the Great Plague of de-kulakization, it was not thousands but millions of peasants who lost both their ‘right of living’ and the ‘right to live’. And yet all the Soviet pens (with so many Jews among them) kept complete silence about this cold-blooded destruction of the Russian peasantry. In unison with them, the entire West was silent. Could it be really out of the lack of knowledge? Or was it for the sake of protecting the Soviet regime? Or was it simply because of indifference? Why, this is almost inconceivable: 15 million peasants were not simply deprived of entering the institutes of higher learning or of the right to submit a dissertation, or to occupy nice posts — no! They were dispossessed and driven like cattle out of their homes and sent to certain death in the taiga and tundra. And the Jews, among other passionate urban activists, enthusiastically took the reins of collectivization into their hands, leaving behind them an enduring memory of evil. Who had raised their voices in defense of the peasants then? And now, in 1932–33, in Russia and Ukraine —on the very outskirts of Europe, five to six million people died from hunger! And the free press of the free world maintained utter silence… And even if we take into account the extreme Leftist bias of the contemporary Western press and its devotion to the socialist “experiment” in the USSR, it is still impossible not to be amazed at the degree to which they could go to be blind and insensitive to the sufferings of even tens of millions of fellow humans.
If you don’t see it, your heart doesn’t cry.
-
Holodomor Victim
For Jewish apologists, the victimization of a few thousand Jews (not even targeted because they were Jews) merits deep concern while millions of non-Jews were being murdered. Jewish involvement with Bolshevism is perhaps the most egregious example of Jewish moral particularism in history. The horrific consequences of Bolshevism for millions of non-Jewish Soviet citizens were not an issue for Jewish leftists not only in the USSR but also in the US. In America during the 1930s, the CPUSA was promoting specific Jewish interests including opposing anti-Semitism, supporting Zionism, and advocating the importance of maintaining Jewish cultural traditions (see here, p. 36 ff). American radicals glorified the development of Jewish life in the Soviet Union as “good for Jews.” American radical Jews —a substantial percentage of the entire Jewish community at that time — saw the world through Jewish lenses.
An important aspect of the suppression of this information in the West was the “utter silence” of the media. As discussed here (p. 38), the New York Times was owned by a Jewish family and was much on the mind of American patriots like Charles Lindbergh concerned about Jewish media influence. During the 1930s, while it was highlighting German persecution of Jews and pushing for intervention into World War II against Germany, the Times whitewashed the horrors of Soviet rule, including the Ukrainian famine, even though the story was covered extensively by the Hearst newspapers and even though the leadership of the Times had been informed on numerous occasions that its correspondent was painting a false picture of Stalin’s actions. The Times has never renounced the Pulitzer Prize given to it reporter, Walter Duranty, for his coverage of Stalin’s Five-Year Plan.
Solzhenitsyn notes that foreign Jewish groups continued to see the USSR as good for Jews and that Soviet Jews saw the government as a bulwark against popular anti-Jewish attitudes. A Jewish author claimed that “If the Bolshevik dictatorship falls, no doubt there will be wild anti-Semitic ravages and violence. …The fall of the Soviet regime would be a catastrophe for the Jews, and any friend of the Jewish people should reject such a prospect with horror.” Feelings were particularly deep in the Ukraine where Jews were seen as implementing the starvation of the farmers as revenge for centuries of anti-Jewish attitudes.
Jews were concerned about any possible revival of Russian patriotism: Alarm about Russian patriotism “did not leave the minds of Jewish publicists for the next half century” despite the fact that the war “saved Soviet Jewry.” Solzhenitsyn is struck by the lack of gratitude: “Looking back at that war of 1941–1945, let’s admit that this is a highly ungrateful judgment.”
As indicated by these comments, anti-Semitism continued to be an issue. Jews were often the public face of hated government policy. Solzhenitsyn scoffs at a Jewish author who wrote that Jews had no choice but to work for the government: “This is so shameful to read. What oppression and despair! See, they had almost no other sources of livelihood, only privileged ones. And the rest of population was absolutely free to toil on [the collective farms], to dig pits, and to roll barrows at the great construction projects of the 5-year plans.”
Finally, Solzhenitsyn is concerned to show that even after the purges Jews were overrepresented among the elites, taking issue with a Jewish author who claimed that “without exaggeration, after Ezhov’s purges, not a single prominent Jewish figure remained at liberty in Soviet Jewish society, journalism, culture, or even in the sciences.” Solzhenitsyn shows the abundance of Jewish names in all areas of culture: performing arts, propaganda, the movie industry, science and technology. For example, Jews were a majority of filmmakers, while the real victims were the audience: “So, who was really the victim – deceived viewers, whose souls were steamrolled with lies and rude didactics, or the filmmakers, who ‘forged documentaries, biographies and produced pseudo-historical and essentially unimportant propaganda films,’ characterized by ‘phony monumentality and inner emptiness’?”
Solzhenitsyn concludes, “No, the official Soviet atmosphere of 1930s was absolutely free of ill will toward Jews. And until the war, the overwhelming majority of Soviet Jewry sympathized with the Soviet ideology and sided with the Soviet regime.” Indeed, he cites a Jewish source noting that “At the end of 1930s, the role of the Jews in the various spheres of the Soviet life reached its apogee for the entire history of the Soviet regime.”
The bottom line is that although Jewish power declined in some areas, such as in the NKVD, in general Jews retained their elite status on the eve of WWII. (Later chapters chart the decline of Jews in the post-World War II era.) The reputation of the USSR as good for the Jews meant that “Polish Jews, and the Jewish youth in particular, met the advancing Red Army with exulting enthusiasm” (as they had during the Soviet invasion of 1919) — a phenomenon that certainly angered Polish patriots and became a major aspect of Polish anti-Jewish attitudes in later years.
Finally, a fascinating tidbit: The method of gassing victims by piping exhaust fumes into passenger areas of trucks was invented not by the Germans but by a Soviet Jew, Isai Davidovich Berg, in 1937 while working for the NKVD.
Facing the Future as a Minority
The Jewish Bolshevik symbiosis is such an important yet neglected part of twentieth century history. The brutal reengineering of Russian and Ukrainian society to make it more amenable to Jewry was a dramatic foretaste of what was to occur in the latter part of the century (though less violently) in the West.
One thing is pretty certain – without the enthusiatic genocidal brutality of Bolshevik Jews in the 1930s, the Nazi persecution of the Jews (with the willing collaboration of many occupied populations) would never have taken on the nature that it did. The failure to embed the historical phenomenon of National Socialism in this wider context makes understanding the true nature of WWII impossible. It was the Judeo-Bolsheviks who ushered in the ‘Age of Extremes’.
By the way, do any museums and memorials to the victims of the Judeo-Bolshevik genicide exist in any Western nation? I’ve never come across one. If there are I would like to take my students there.
Perhaps they banned on the grounds that they are anti-Semitic? Only Jewish victims count apparently, and to highlight the deeds of Jewish criminals is itself victimisation of Jews. They seemingly have arrogated to themselves the exclusive right to consign the Tribe’s historical blemishes down the memory hole – while ensuring those of goyim (that affected Jews) live in infamy for all eternity. Pharisees! Hypocrites!
“By the way, do any museums and memorials to the victims of the Judeo-Bolshevik genicide exist in any Western nation? I’ve never come across one. If there are I would like to take my students there”.
The Lithuanian Genocide Museum based in the former KGB prison in Vilnius, and the Museum of the Occupation of Latvia in Riga may fit the bill.
The passage from SAID, detailing the almost pathological level of self-deception on the part of Jews is most interesting. I have noticed that otherwise seemingly honest Jews will twist themselves into pretzels to deny undue Jewish influence or the possibility of Jewish abuse of power. All the physical and emotional manifestations of a creature deep in the agony of denial are present – on some level they truly are fooling themselves.
Have there been any examples of Jews actually confronting the actions of their fellow Jews and finally accepting the truth of it? I don’t mean that Jews need to take on some metaphysical level of guilt beyond all others, just accept that their people have been guilty of crimes like any other group. I wonder if their bizarre denial of the obvious feeds a more aggressive attempt by critics to point out Jewish misbehavior, which in turn breeds more defensiveness, and so forth.
It would be wonderful if Jews could simply accept the all too human failings of their people and stop demanding a privileged place at the table, and thus put an end to the endless cycles of recrimination and injustice. But I’ve got the sinking feeling that this behavior is virtually hardwired.
Norman Finkelstein comes to mind. Do an internet search and you can find videos of him discussing his book “The Holocaust Industry.” But he is a rare example and has been ostracized by Organized Jewry as a “self-hating Jew” – in other words, a Jew who doesn’t follow the narrative set by the authoritarians at the top of Jewish society.
KMD: “While comprising less than 1% of the population, Jews were around one-sixth of the Communist Party membership and around 33%–40% of top party positions.”
Of course, that also means that non-Jews were five sixths of CP membership and around 60-67% of top party positions. Surely we must also assign them some blame too, even if only a smidgeon. So if we try to do this, how do we explain the complicity of Whites in the genocide of their own people? We are told that nowadays in America and Europe the main driving force is supposed to be “White guilt”. Is that also to be the excuse in the USSR? If so, what were they guilty about? Or was it, from a racial point of view, a kind of inwardly-directed psychopathy and sadism, masquerading as “altruistic punishment”? Or shall we suppose that these non-Jewish party members and bigwigs just didn’t know what was going on (seems unlikely)? Or (and this seems to me more reasonable), can we actual lay a lot of the blame on the technical structure of the modern state for the scale of the genocide: its fragmentation of responsibility into a hundred bureaucratic departments, its necessarily hierarchical organization and magnificent killing efficiency enabled by improved technology, and the greater consequences of errors made with these more highly developed techniques?
We can and do discuss whites killing other Whites. Indeed we are told always in the MSM and in our school’s curriculum how intrinsically evil we Whites are daily.
What we cannot do, what we are punished for doing, is discussing the disproportionate involvement of Jews in our undoing. If you want to discuss whites hurting Whites Der weiße Engel then start a blog and detail your evidence and create your theory. You may shed some light on the matter.
In the meantime, Kevin Mac and all the other bloggers here can get on with detailing what is not allowed in the MSM and wider community.
The fact that you can only learn such things here, on the perimeter’s of White Western civilisation should be instruction enough for you.
Another large percentage of the party bosses were made up of other ethnic minorities who were hostile to the Great Russians (Stalin, Beria, Dzerzhinsky, et al.). Others who collaborated with the Bolsheviks earned the enmity of the people and owed their power and privilege to it–there are always opportunists.
Also, I don’t think that Soviet atrocities were the result of mere bureaucratic indifference. There was clearly a plan to break and remake the Russians.
re the above remarks about the gentiles that were the largest part of the CPUSSR, I understand that about half of the CPUSA were gentiles. That would include my parents probably. I was an anti-communist leftie…Whites make the best “innocent” lefties, while Jews have always waged Race War. They know what they are doing although they are overplaying their hand.
The Great Depression drove many folks into the CP, like my parents, who were more or less English, Swedish, and German by blood. Working class by the way.
Clearly Whites do not need Jews to be daffy. The whole history of LIberalism goes back to the Reformation, but most clearly stands out after 1789 and 1776, in England with its 19th C. history of liberalism opposing imperialism, abolishing slavery, and even Tory socialism which defended the poor, along with other liberal-type groups. Then there was in the U.S. the Transcendentalists, and Abolition folks who carried on the tradition from England. Whites have this odd thing of Thinking Big about Humanity, without any evidence. Take the American Civil War…more crusading John Brown Liberals. That is because Whites are projecting their inherent genetic disposition to Trust, etc. onto Strangers, Others. We are such simple souls…Fool’s Paradise, etc.
E. MIchael Jones would say that the Jews’ Revolutionary Spirit fired minds of Protestants and led to 1789. Well, the Catholic Church welcomes all races into the arms of Mother Church. Can’t get much more revolutionary than that. Equality by race, by birth, by biology, etc. it is all the same Abstract Universalism
No Other race thinks about Universals, racial equality, Equality generally, and so on. We are natural-born suckers. And are thus the prey-of-choice for Jews. Asians would and will dispose of Jews lickity-split. Joe
J
Joe: “Asians would and will dispose of Jews lickity-split.”
Whites certainly seem to have lost all common sense and civilizational consciousness. I believe this happened when they compromised their Christianity and sold their souls in exchange for modern “secular” statism and materialism (with some adapting their “Christianity“ around what actually amounted to a selfish and greedy materialism-first belief system) — all of which was the perfect means through which to be infiltrated, subverted, co-opted and eventually destroyed by hostile organized Jewry.
Supremaicst Jews hate Christianity and Western civilization because both are historically “anti-Semitic.” Thus, it only follows that “progressive” secular and atheist materialist ideologies would be implemented and utilized by Jewry over time to provide them the opening they needed destroy their most hated enemies.
Thus, a return to the traditional Christian order is a return to the common-sensical grounding that Whites have lost, but Asians and some others still possess, but without simultaneously adopting orientalism’s unrefined and often brutal political and social methods.
This project of educating Western audiences about the suppressed history of Communism is perhaps the most important historical and cultural work going on right now. Westerners and especially Americans are extremely fortunate to have witnesses like Solzhenitsyn and those translating and otherwise presenting his work.
I suppose someday Jewish apologists will attempt maintain that the (at least) 139 of the Forbes 400 who are Jewish were simply “used” by the “real” elites to take the fall if capitalism ever went into major disrepute.
The whole victim shtick, no matter how much power, wealth or privilege they attain, is part of Jewry’s swindle. MacDonald apparently believes it’s at least partially self deception, but I believe it’s nearly wholly premeditated strategy.
Because in modern times the Internet exposes any thinking people to all manner of viewpoints and perspectives and realities, the excuse that the bulk of Jewry might not be responsible for its group actions, or is being manipulated or put under some sort of coercion or thought control, simply won’t fly much longer; indeed, Jewry’s ongoing embrace of Zionism, despite the troves of available evidence as to its viciousness, institutional racism and supremacism, belies any claims that their behavior isn’t fully self-serving and volitional.
In typical Jewish-Left swindler fashion, Chomsky tries to get around this by claiming America is pulling Israel’s strings, and always has. Next, he’ll probably say that the racist rabbis who recently actually came out bragging about how ‘racism originated in the Torah’ and is justified when institutionalized by Jewry are actually anti-Semitic CIA plants.
It’s obvious that the Jewish Right, which shapes Jewry’s arrogant, entitled and gangster view of the world, and the “intellectual” Jewish Left, which goes about manufacturing complex smokescreens and “proving” that Jews are really the victims of nefarious Gentile masterminds who are the “real power,” are actually working as a cohesive team, despite how we are constantly assured otherwise.
the jew channels all streams,
supplies the bookends and the books in between…
NOTHING engenders group cohesion as well as shared suffering. Commandants of military academies know this, which is why for so long they allowed hazing. Soldiers who’ve suffered through battle together do as well. In addition, if you can’t have real shared suffering, why not, then, vicariously share the suffering of your ancestors suppposedly victimized for generations?
Additionally, persons or a people who view themselves as victims find it easier to rationalize their own cruel and unjust behaviour toward others. “We’ve suffered (real or just imagined), why shouldn’t they?”
Filx: “In addition, if you can’t have real shared suffering, why not, then, vicariously share the suffering of your ancestors suppposedly victimized for generations?”
No wonder they’ve made a comprehensive Holocaust education (indoctrination) a core requirement of Zionism 101. And for those who can’t actually visit Auschwitz, they’ve got the various Steven Spielberg productions and other Hollywood fare.
But I believe criminal Jewish swindler Jack Abramoff said his seminal Jewish identity construction came from watching Fiddler on the Roof, so obviously, it doesn’t take too much prompting for these people to wholeheartedly embrace a Zionist identity. I guess the Jewish network dangling all of that cash in front of their noses doesn’t hurt, either. In fact, I would hazard that the money has as much to do with it as the indoctrination, if not more. The word “Jew” is also a verb for a reason.
I’ve heard Alex Jones, and the deplorable Glenn Beck, decry the Anglo/Aryan “bankers”.
“Of course, that also means that non-Jews were five sixths of CP membership and around 60-67% of top party positions. Surely we must also assign them some blame too, even if only a smidgeon.”
Currently the blame as assigned 100% white and 0% jewish. So i’ll focus on the jewish angle until the balance is reasonable if that’s ok.
“the complicity of Whites in the genocide of their own people”
Because “whites” aren’t their own people – Lithuanians, Russians and Georgians are all separate peoples. The jews in Russia did the same as they always do. They create a coalition of minority groups against the dominant majority group and use that coalition to destroy their main competitor. The same way they’ve created a coalition of blacks, hispanics, homosexual groups, feminist groups etc in America. It’s the same process of divide and rule they always use.
Usually they get found out early and expelled. In the Soviet Union the process reached its logical conclusion. The other logical extension was reached also. The coalition of minorities see what jews are like when they have power, fear for their own future, and start to work against them.
‘The jews in Russia did the same as they always do. They create a coalition of minority groups against the dominant majority group and use that coalition to destroy their main competitor.’
100% correct. Well put.
Wandrin: “Currently the blame as assigned 100% white and 0% jewish.”
For people who think that Jews are White, which most Whites do because of Christianity and other reasons, I suppose that makes a weird kind of sense.
Wandrin: “So i’ll focus on the jewish angle until the balance is reasonable if that’s ok.”
You are free to focus on whatever you want, but standards of science and scholarship, I think, require that the question I posed be answered. It’s also important to know because the answer might help explain the current conduct of Whites in America and Europe, and that question interests many people on this forum, even if not you. At the least, it seems clear that “White guilt” doesn’t work very well to elucidate the genocides of communism in the USSR. There can be other causes.
Wandrin: “Because “whites” aren’t their own people – Lithuanians, Russians and Georgians are all separate peoples. The jews in Russia did the same as they always do. They create a coalition of minority groups against the dominant majority group and use that coalition to destroy their main competitor.”
I’m using the term White to denote members of the White race. Are you saying that those ethnic groups aren’t White? If so, what is your basis for saying that? Also, what if we apply that standard to Europe? Are there any Whites in Europe, or only Germans, French, Greeks, Spaniards, etc.? Ultimately, it seems that if you go that route you are going to be forced to admit that the White race doesn’t really exist as more than a social construct. I reject that view.
On the other hand, if you admit that Lithuanians, Russians, and Georgians are White, then the question stands. Why did Whites take such an active hand in committing genocide against their own people? So far, the only explanation proposed seems to be that White intra-racial ethnic differences were exploited by the Jews. But is that the whole story?
“in the Soviet times, the Jews in the USSR were ‘practically destroyed as a people; they had been turned into a social group, which was settled in the large cities as a social stratum to serve the ruling class.’”
It’s so sick. Earlier chapters show their move to the cities was due to standard jewish nepotism after the Bolsheviks took power.
“Of course, that also means that non-Jews were five sixths of CP membership…”
Another take.
What proportion of the entire Hollywood work force are jews?
What proption of the total workforce at the New York Times are jews?
I’d be surprised if it was more than 1/6.
However what proportion of the *critical* positions are held by jews – 80%, 90%, 99%?
Which positions are critical is a matter of opinion. KMD stated that 60-67% of the top jobs were held by non-Jews, and I’m assuming top == critical. If you are saying “top” and “critical” aren’t the same, I’d be interested in hearing why.
“The reputation of the USSR as good for the Jews meant that “Polish Jews, and the Jewish youth in particular, met the advancing Red Army with exulting enthusiasm” (as they had during the Soviet invasion of 1919) — a phenomenon that certainly angered Polish patriots and became a major aspect of Polish anti-Jewish attitudes in later years.”
The Jewish youth in Poland not only greeted the invading Soviet Army, but also participated in mass murder of ethnic Poles 1939-1941.
See here:
http://www.citinet.net/ak/polska.php?Page=66&Lang=EN
http://info-poland.buffalo.edu/classroom/koniuchy.html
…of course, Jews deny that:
http://www.ukemonde.com/e-poshta/jewishrole.html
Engel
“At the least, it seems clear that “White guilt” doesn’t work very well to elucidate the genocides of communism in the USSR. There can be other causes.”
Well obviously. In the USSR they gained control through force and the non-Russian minorities were already there and already had a grudge through being part of the Russian Empire.
In the USA they gained influence through stealth but to gain actual control they needed to import minorities. That process required somehow preventing white Americans from defending their living space. They achieved this with the social conditioning of the multicult – which could be labelled “white guilt” among other things.
Engel
“I’m using the term White to denote members of the White race. Are you saying that those ethnic groups aren’t White?”
No, i’m using race in the earlier sense of people of common descent i.e Germans, French, Russian, Polish etc. To me they are the white races rather than the White Race. Personally i’m a WN on the basis that all the white races are under attack and need to team up on that basis. I know other people see it differently.
Wandrin: “i’m using race in the earlier sense of people of common descent i.e Germans, French, Russian, Polish etc….”
Following Salter, KMD’s idea is that all the white races are of common descent. See here, for example.
Clearly, either the White race exists as a biological entity or it does not. If common descent is your criterion, then while we can agree there are ethnic differences between the “white races”, all of those races are also members of the White race. Unless there really is a White race, KMD’s analysis of the Jewish/White dynamic in terms of evolutionary psychology becomes unintelligible.
So we still need to understand how, in the absence of the White guilt mechanism which, according to KMD’s theories, plays so large a role now in the psychology of US and European Whites, Jews were able to force the five-sixths of CP members who were not Jewish, and the roughly 2/3 of those occupying top jobs in the Soviet hierarchy, to genocide their own race. Intra-racial White ethnic differences exploited by the Jews for their own purposes no doubt played a part in that, but I don’t think it’s the whole story, not by a long shot.
Der weiße Engel,
You make some excellent points.
I tend to think what happened is that non-Russian Whites joined the Left because of anti-colonialist grievances they had against the Czar.
This created a situation where after the Left won, the non-Russian Whites found themselves bottled up in positions of power with the Jews.
Then what happened may have been a lot like that Arthur Miller play The Crucible.
It was exactly because Abigail Williams was especially vulnerable to being called a witch that she started calling other members of her community witches.
She had a justified fear of being punished by the witch hating town elders, and so she instinctively tried to direct that witch hatred away from herself.
In a similar way, I think the non-Russian Whites involved in revolution could instinctively tell that the extreme Jewish animus expressed toward Russians was fundamentally driven by a more general hatred of Whites.
This made them feel vulnerable, and made them want to concentrate on maintaining their place in the Soviet hierarchy to the exclusion of helping the Russians.
A basic issue here is that the Russians were, as a group, almost completely disempowered after the revolution.
This meant the non-Russian Whites couldn’t form an effective alliance with them in the context of a situation where the doctrines of Communism were used to justify the creation of total state power over the masses.
Der weiße Engel’ s only intent is to undermine White unity. It’s the same thing he/it always does. It never changes. One of his recurring themes is to undermine White culture by portraying all White leaders as psychopathic sadists — his words and not in satire, he meant it. So you see, he wants to get attention off the real criminal behavior of Jews in the Soviet Union.
He uses a pseudonym that was the nickname for Josef Mengele and this is done to try and connect White advocacy with some bizarre cult of sadism. Of course he fails in that attempt. He tries various tactics to smear White culture by first pretending to agree with White advocacy and then conflating it with various crackpot theories.
Engel
“Which positions are critical is a matter of opinion…If you are saying “top” and “critical” aren’t the same, I’d be interested in hearing why.”
Well simply put if say you have ten gulags and each gulag has a CEO and say five other executive level posts below them and above that there is an overall gulag CEO who also has five executive level posts working for them then in total you could have sixty-six “top” jobs but the eleven CEOs would be “critical.”
More generally, in a repressive state the critical posts are those related to the army, police, secret police and state propaganda. Being in charge of the railways or agriculture is a top job but not critical in terms of control.
However that isn’t really neccessary. The key point i think, which relates back to the “white guilt” argument is that jews create ideologies that lead white people to work for jewish interests. jews created marxism and some white people fell for it enough to help jews create their monster state.
In the same way jews created the multicult and now large numbers of white people are helping them destroy white countries.
Wandrin: “Well simply put if say you have ten gulags and each gulag has a CEO and say five other executive level posts below them and above that there is an overall gulag CEO who also has five executive level posts working for them then in total you could have sixty-six “top” jobs but the eleven CEOs would be “critical.””
In such a hierarchical structure, it would be just as logical to say that the top CEO had the ONLY critical post. In fact, the Jews use exactly the same reasoning you are using here when they excuse themselves from responsibility for the Soviet genocides by saying that since Stalin wasn’t a Jew, nothing that happened was really their fault. And of course, when it comes from Jews, we don’t accept that reasoning, and we are right not to do so. I think it makes more sense to say that the entire bureaucratic structure, along with all of its component individuals, must share in the responsibility.
As it turns out, “I was only following orders” isn’t just a Nuremberg excuse. It’s characteristic of all bureaucracies, and probably part of the point of having such a structure; it’s a side effect and dubious benefit of the technique. Bureaucracies inherently allow for blame shifting and diffusion of responsibility if something goes wrong, but strictly speaking, this is not a legitimate excuse. Nevertheless, one can hardly imagine the modern technological state without bureaucracies. They provide an environment tailor made for lemmings, which is perhaps why there are so many lemmings nowadays. Modern bureaucratic societies like ours are a perfect breeding ground for them. Like many on this very forum, the lemming has a child-like faith in this technique, too, even as it abuses him. Solzhenitsyn says in The Gulag Archipelago that people arrested by the secret police typically thought they’d be cleared; they were dragged off to prison thinking that it was all just a mistake and they’d be let go if only they could explain. This optimism proved unfounded, of course. The modern technological state grinds on, and once set in motion, doesn’t necessarily need anyone present at the controls.
Wandrin: “Being in charge of the railways or agriculture is a top job but not critical in terms of control.”
Agriculture was Lazar Kaganovich’s assignment. Surprisingly, it turns out eating is pretty critical and does give you a good way to control people, especially if they haven’t had any food for a few weeks. So the millions who died in the Ukraine in 1932-33 would probably dispute you when you say that agriculture isn’t critical. At least they would if they were still alive.
Wandrin: “However that isn’t really neccessary. The key point i think, which relates back to the “white guilt” argument is that jews create ideologies that lead white people to work for jewish interests. jews created marxism and some white people fell for it enough to help jews create their monster state.”
There was certainly an element of idealism and universalism in the Bolshevik revolution that appealed to a certain class of upper crust Whites in Russia – their SWPLs, if you will. You only have to read the anarchist writings of Prince Peter Kropotkin or Bakunin to see that. But I don’t think that their involvement with anarchism had much to do with KMD’s White guilt idea. Interestingly, however, the anarchists were among the first groups neutralized once the Bolsheviks took power.
But the problem with these sorts of explanations is that they can really explain anything, and so explain nothing. For example, we could ask the question, did Jews create the Christian religious ideology to advance Jewish interests? It can be answered either way, as we’ve often seen in debates here. No matter what happens or what has happened, you can always make a case for yes or no. But to use an example from evolutionary psychology, this is quite different than asking, does the cuckoo lead the cowbird on to work for its interests by laying its own egg in the cowbirds’ nest? For there, it’s clear that the cowbird can have no possible evolutionary payoff of its own for hatching and raising a cuckoo, and so the answer must be yes.
By contrast, there were plenty of reasons for Whites to try to bring Russia into the modern era that had nothing to do with ethnic or racial conflict; a lot of self-interested reasons that had nothing to do with Jews. Ideas aren’t cuckoo’s eggs, and clearly, people can have their own motives for thinking what they think and are responsible for their own choices. Marxism came to be seen as providing a rough political blueprint for how to make this technological “progress” that was thought so desirable, and collectivizing agriculture was a logical part of that. Remember that at that time in history there actually was reason to think that collectivizing agriculture might result in gains in efficiency and productivity. I don’t believe that collectivization was itself a plot. We saw the same technical incompetence repeated again in Soviet agriculture with Lysenkoism and the persistent failure of “vernalization” to deliver. As Solzhenitsyn informs us, the Soviet socialist “experiment” frequently suffered from plain old technical incompetence in a LOT of areas. Modernization meant trying to take what was essentially still a medieval nation and make it leap into the 20th century in a single bound. Even without Jews such radical changes probably still would have killed a lot of people.
If you want to be a German separatist, be a German separatist, you bloody moron.
Don’t be a German supremacist who wants to keep non-Germans Whites around to be your servants.
Why should non-Germans want to be a part of something where they’d be second class citizens discriminated against for being non-German?
There’s a German-American society in Tulsa, perhaps you’d get the kind of preferential treatment you crave there.
http://0000rs2.previewcoxhosting.com/
The English are per their genetic baseline more individualistic and more bourgeois moralistic than are Krauts.
That’s fair enough.
I’m sure anyone who has visited the Fatherland from the “Anglosphere” can attest that Krauts are more plugged into networks of extended kinship.
Genetically that makes some sense. I remember that I was surprised to see the Germans much closer to Iranians than the English are in terms of genetic distance.
Not really sure if it was an artifact of which genes Salter looked at, but still interesting regardless.
And of course in Kraut-country we see the likes of Thilo Sarrazin. Despite the utmost effort at crushing Kraut nationalism for all time, it is they who are beginning to stir once again. What of the English and their Amerikwan extended-phenotypes? Nothing but the crickets chirping.
There is the BNP, though to be honest they seem to be run by a pack of retards, but whatever.
Hopefully this time around *the English* will have the good sense to mind their own fucking business if the Krauts decide to make a move.
If you want to try to shame them into that, fine with me.
Just try to lay off the damaging idea that the Germans are so much the Master Race that they should be discriminated in favor of.
In an American context, the idea is even more toxic than most of your other ideas.
The White Angel’s right – the culpability should be spread around more. As usual Dr. MacDonald, an evolutionary psychologist, weirdly attempts to ascribe “blame” to the actions of humans where he wouldn’t with other animals. The Jews do and have done what’s good for Jews – that’s what groups should do. Isn’t that what everyone on here craves for their own particular group? The problem is that those others without whom the Jews couldn’t function don’t advance their group, but undermine it. It is we who are the problem, and until that’s adequately addressed and evolutionarily corrected, we just resemble a bunch of babies eternally crying about what’s been done to us.
If you’re going to attempt to march forward under so broad and meaningless a term as “white”, be prepared to realize that there are literally tens of millions of those who have that particular skin color who will undermine you in every way. The Jews, it so happens, compared to us, have a lower proportion of their people who are traitors to their folk and a higher proportion of those who realize that the group is the way to go, and that everything to the contrary is meaningless.
Waaah. It’s always the Jew. Point the finger, whitey, and four point back at yourself.
Wow, how many fake logon IDs are you going to create. Another false flag troll.
Thought it was interesting that Stalin praised Karl Marx as a Jew. :)
Let’s not forget that Stalin was the leader of the non-Russian, Eurasian national & ethnic minorities in the Communist Party. A position that Lenin had picked out for him.
I found this quote from Dr. MacDonald’s work out of Separation and Its Discontents very interesting – From Chapt. 2:
The great majority of those stigmatized by the Un-American Activities Com-mittee of the House of Representatives (HUAC) were Jews, many of them in the entertainment industry (e.g., Sachar 1992, 623ff; Navasky 1980, 109ff). A belief that “Jewish Hollywood” was promoting subversive ideas, including leftist political beliefs, was a common component of anti-Semitism in the post-World War II period, and indeed the push for the HUAC investigation was led by such well-known anti-Semites as Gerald L. K. Smith and Congressman Rankin (Platt 1978).37 For example, Smith stated that “there is a general belief that Russian Jews control too much of Hollywood propaganda and they are trying to popular-ize Russian Communism in America through that instrumentality. Personally I believe that is the case” (in Gabler 1988, 360).
In addition to the great work of translating Solzhenitsyn, we need to keep alive the traitorous actions of Jewish Communists during the 20s, 30s, 40s and 50s. Jews were not the only traitors, but they were, once again, very “disproportionately represented. I don’t understand how a people could prosper so much in the US and then turn around and stab it in the back.
Not HUAC.
HCUA.
A picture speaks a thousand words.
That picture of the boy is shocking.
One little victim of Bolshevik terror.
Jews suck!
Or an individual encounter. Brit journalist Malcolm Muggeridge was in Moscow during the winter of 1931-32. In a hotel lobby he had a brief conversation with a Red Jewess: “Supposing two or three million peasants do die this winter,” the Jewess said mechanically, getting up. “What of it?” Then she was off to a lecture on Film and the Class Struggle….
Judeofascists will never take any responsibility or accountability for their past mass murder or ongoing crimes against humanity, because doing so would jeopordize future epic ponzi schemes and plans for even more totalitarian mass murder to cover their tracks.
If they are ever to be held accountable, it will have to be imposed from above by non-Jews — and don’t ever expect any help from “bleeding heart” Jewish apologists of any stripe in attaining historical justice. They are a crucial component of Zionist Jewry’s ongoing murderous swindle.
“Judeofascists will never take any responsibility or accountability for their past mass murder or ongoing crimes against humanity, because doing so would jeopordize future epic ponzi schemes and plans for even more totalitarian mass murder to cover their tracks.”
I am forced to conclude that the asinine idea of “Tikkun Olam” is one of the most dangerous and pernicious ideas around. Like valedictorians, young and still wet behind the ears, they urge their fellows to go forth and create a better world, one which they know little about and which with their belief in their own superiority, they will be automatically hostile too. Anyone who believes in his own automatic choseness is fundamentally unprepared to look objectively at any problem or the people he’s “helping” without making a complete cock-up things. It happened with colonialists who believed destiny had chosen them to enlighten the natives. It happened with city planners who believed if they just threw enough money at a problem, they could solve things. The free marketeers, with their belief in their own superiority, have made a cock-up of Wall Street, and the largely Jewish neocons with their smug belief in their own righteousness have brought our own country close to the point of bankruptcy and left a swath of death and destruction wherever their meaty-handed policies have been applied.
Be very afraid of anyone who, other than personal self-renewal, says he can renew the world, i.e. Tikkun Olam.
Where I work, Jews have displaced non-Jews overwhelmingly. The pay is good. They waltz in and get prestigious offices and positions. There is no merit required, as is painfully obvious in meetings. They also have a lot of accents. Russian?
I’ve been told they “know” their own on sight. Indeed, they stare at me searchingly, then dismissively or fearfully, when first encountered. Amazing.
I have a family member who’s bipolar. It’s a disorder, mental and more. I see the craziness in his eyes and the trembling in his hands, when he goes off his meds. What manner of environmental and other “abuse” triggered his latent tendency?
I maintain that just as physical and emotional trauma/abuse causes problems, there is a type of spiritual abuse.
In any event, certain thought-systems traumatize the adherents and result in deranged viewpoints and practices. They are visceral in effect. Multiple layers exist to reinforce and punish.
For one to break free, they first experience emotional upheaval as when mind-control victims struggle to wake up. And then there’s the tremendous peer/community pressure.
There are “hot” viruses like Ebola that are so virulent that victims die while attempting to flee.
We cannot assume that some thought-systems should be protected. The adherents will destroy (financially, culturally, etc.), ultimately, all who are not part of the “borg” mind.
Jewish identity, backed by Talmudic craziness (even for the secular), is arguably one such deadly thought-system. Regardless of original intent and purpose, it has “evolved” over time to be destructive to host countries (and neighbors) and populations. The separation is eternal, apparently, for all who continue to so self-identify.
I maintain that just as physical and emotional trauma/abuse causes problems, there is a type of spiritual abuse.
In any event, certain thought-systems traumatize the adherents and result in deranged viewpoints and practices. They are visceral in effect. Multiple layers exist to reinforce and punish.
Liam,
Your very perceptive, and I always felt what you say is true.
I like to interpret it as an ongoing demonic oppression that has attacked, and more apropos, beguiled Western man for the Ages.
Fine work Kevin. A nice historical journey that is utterly worthless unless we are all bright enough to see the same transformation
happening here in the USA. Torture, anyone? Straight from the USSR! Someday soon, Americans will be praying for deliverance. We really are a bunch of Talmudic beasts, aren’t we?
I’m glad this book is being translated.
Why do you call Germans “Krauts”? I thought it meant “cabbage”. Years ago I read a novel by Sol Stein where he continually refers to one character as The Kraut and it rubbed me the wrong way.
An Orthodox shrine rises on a Russian killing field – The New York Times
“ALL OF RUSSIA WAS GOLGOTHA IN THE 20TH CENTURY”
Thank God they are finally beginning to talk about this. Whites MUST stop “sucking it up”.
And, once again, Caiphas was calling for Jesus death.
While reading Chapter 19, I noted the section on Jewish composers in the Soviet Union and their works and was rather astounded to find that many songs listed by Solzhenitsyn by way of example were performed at the Soviet naval base in Vladivostok in the summer of 1937, on the occasion of the visit of the American Asiatic Fleet. My grandfather was an officer on board the USS Augusta, the flagship, and he gave me a copy of the program for a big banquet the Soviets put on for the American sailors. In addition to the food menu, the musical selections were listed, including the Budenny March, excerpts from Soviet movie soundtracks, and the communist “folk” music. The whole affair, he said, was kosher to the core.
Don’t know where to post this, but “Christmas Food Court Flash Mob” (youtube video upper right hand corner) was priceless. Thanks muchly. I see that there’s 18,000,000 views since November 17th.
p27.
“By the mid-1930s [Stalin] saw in the example of Hitler all the disadvantages of being a self-declared enemy of the Jews. Yet he likely harbored hostility towards them”
Too True.
What hasn’t been mentioned is the reason why the Germans might have been particularly appalled by the the news of genocide in the Ukraine that started appearing, despite the best efforts of the Jewish controlled media in Germany to contain it, in the 1920′s and 1930′s.
The most prosperous of the Kulak farmers were in fact ethnic Germans who had emigrated to to the Ukraine in the eighteen century or earlier. These so called “Russian Germans” were not only disproportionately murdered during the Holmodor, they were also murdered in far greater percentages than probably any other group during the purges of the later 1930′s.
See here: http://www.artukraine.com/famineart/openwound.htm
With their belief in their superority over the rest of humanity, especially among their more pious members, Jewish indifference to the genocide of anyone else is only logical and should be of little surprise. Beliefs really do have consequences.
“With their belief in their superority…” http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/st_PISA1206_20101207.html
The latest three year PISA [Program for International Student Assessment] study. Israel – below average in all three catagories.
Not so much ‘superiority’ as “chosen-ness.” There is one God, and that God has a relationship with them (chose them to have a relationship) and NO OTHERS. They are the only ones who have any god at all. No other god is real. And the only real god chose only them to talk to. More people should take two weeks, and every single day, read the Torah. (Lots of people go on about the Talmud, but just read the Torah.) Read it long enough to begin to get a feel for it—and consider that Christianity does not exist. Read this book as if IT NEVER EVER EXISTED. (nor islam) Like learning another language. Christianity does not exist for them. Never existed. And there is only this account of your own racial people, the one the only god chose, and the others have no god. There has never been any incarnate god who dies and gets back up, ever.
The Talmud is more like damage control, imo. After the destruction of the temple, it’s about how to survive in exile. how to make rules that will disallow others to break them up as a group, and so on. It’s a survival manuel, in a way. Vilification and social in-group cohesion. But the Torah is less defensive, per se, more an expression of an internal way of being. The god gives the ‘land,’ and they are to take it, smash all the others’ gods, ways of life of people, leave no remnant of the living people and so on.
The ethical perspective was transcended by many thought movements since, but it’s an older system that survived. In a way, Judeo-Christianity should be like saying Loki-Christianity. or Sun-Christianity or Saturn-Christianity, or whatever. –a conflation of incompatible ethics.
Amen. No worries though – there almost no English left….The Pakistani Muzzies won’t go to war “for” England. They are too busy taking over…
One of the chief architects of the gulag archipelago was one Naftaly Aronovich Frenkel, a Jew born in Constantinople. This subject of the Ottoman sultan went on to become a millionaire timber magnate known as the “timber king of the Black Sea.” That this person could rise to such a position of prominence in Russia speaks volumes about the Soviet terror. He died peacefully in the 1950s.
“I have the feeling that he (Frenkel) really hated this country!” Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago Vol. 2.
Felix
“NOTHING engenders group cohesion as well as shared suffering… Additionally, persons or a people who view themselves as victims find it easier to rationalize their own cruel and unjust behaviour toward others. “We’ve suffered (real or just imagined), why shouldn’t they?”
Yes. The holocaust films aren’t just about making white people feel guilty it’s about re-inforcing jewish cohesion. The other thing they’ve done is transfer this jewish pathology to other groups as part of their coalition building: black, hispanic, feminist, homosexual etc. If you’ve ever had dealings with black criminals for example then they have the same attitude that they’re entitled to harm white people out of revenge.
Ciaran
“I’ve heard Alex Jones, and the deplorable Glenn Beck, decry the Anglo/Aryan “bankers”.”
As things crumble that’s how they’ll try and sidestep it.
Tom
“Let’s not forget that Stalin was the leader of the non-Russian, Eurasian national & ethnic minorities in the Communist Party. A position that Lenin had picked out for him.”
Interesting. I didn’t know that.
Actually, Beck has had quite a bit to say recently about a Jew-globalist financier named Schwartz, alias Soros.
Oh, yeah. Stalin wrote on the subject of national minorities at Lenin’s suggestion, and also made his only trip out of Russia to confer with Lenin about the subject. Stalin was marginally White, or a Eurasian, as a Georgian.
My son currently attends an ivy league school.He has become friendly with a Jewish student who shared with him that in the synagogue a man he barely knows approached him and told him to contact a Jewess at the admiss office who would help him and to tell her who sent him.He was admitted but my son thinks he is a little uncomfortable.
…in the synagogue a man he barely knows approached him and told him to contact a Jewess at the admiss office who would help him and to tell her who sent him.
–
That’s absolutely disgusting.
No wonder White Americans are being dispossessed not only from their former neighborhoods due to ethnic cleansing, but from each and every educational and career opportunity possible.
Harvard Hates Whites—Does America, Too?
Unz, himself Jewish, noted that at his alma mater, “Asians comprise between 2% and 3% of the U.S. population, but nearly 20% of Harvard undergraduates. Then too, between a quarter and a third of Harvard students identify themselves as Jewish, while Jews also represent just 2% to 3% of the overall population.” Not only was he so blunt about this, he took the step — rare in the mainstream media — of drawing the logical conclusion: “Thus, it appears that Jews and Asians constitute approximately half of Harvard’s student body, leaving the other half for the remaining 95% of America.”
…
Of course “our” government is not interested in quantifying the relative decline non-Jewish whites are experiencing, but a few have done this independently. One researcher has used government statistics to graphically demonstrate how whites are penalized at all levels of intelligence when earnings are compared to others in the same IQ cohort. As he concluded, “A bright mind is indeed a terrible thing to waste, and it is the bright White gentile minds that are being denied educational opportunities at significant costs to our country.”
Unz understood this, too, demonstrating how education levels play out over one’s career. What he found at Harvard about white Christian underrepresentation “is present to a greater or lesser degree at most of our other elite educational institutions: Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Berkeley and so on. And partly because these universities act as a natural springboard to elite careers in law, medicine, finance and technology, many of these commanding heights of American society seem to exhibit a similar skew in demographic composition.”
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-Harvard.html
Sorry, but considering that, as the article points out, that there are just so many more Whites in the country (Britain and America) who are just as (if often not more) qualified, intelligent and ambitious, the ethnic disparities which exist then in certain minorities favor simply cannot be written-off as being based primarily on merit and ‘hard work’ alone.
hmmm..the more things change….
of course today’s weapons of mass murder are :
1)the drug culture
2)pornography
3)entertainment
you no longer have to do the physical killing yourself, you can now program your victims to destroy themselves…can someone do an estimate of how many millions of whites have been destroyed by these methods in the past 50 years?
Excellent article! I look forward to every new section of the English translation of this great work.
And I think it’s time to take the gloves off and state under no uncertain terms that Jews represent a Culture of Psychopathology.
They can not internalize ethical codes as they relate to others and have no shame about it.
and it’s the lack of conscience and an inability to internalize moral codes that help define a Psychopath.
I was raised the scapegoat of a very large and abusive family and it took me most of my life to crawl from the wreckage and keep my focus while studying about bullies and the whole offender/victim dynamic. I stumbled many times during what has been an interesting and not infrequently exhausting, but ultimately rewarding emotional, psycholoigcal and intellectual journey. But I have no doubt that, for all of the stumbling, it was the right road.
Meaning, I was there to learn. Not using the fact that I was victimized as an opportunity to place myself above criticism. The desire of all psychopaths.
I have come to the conclusion that the psychopaths number one problem is not so much with people, but with Reality. And that is why so many of them are Utopianists, wtether of Theology or Ideology, Religion or Politics (which in many ways is just secular religion).
And such people simply need a scapegoat to absorb what they can not face in themselves.
This leads to another important aspect, or, to be more precise, behavioral pattern, of the Psychopath.
The pattern of
Victimizing.
Blaming the Victim.
Playing the Victim.
Obviously the last one is an attempt to cover their tracks.
They simply have no choice but to place themselves above criticism. No choice, meaning, since they can’t and won’t face reality, that they are as imperfect and as flawed as the rest of us, they simply have to find others to take the heat and pressure off of the inevitable consequences that come with living in a perfectionists fantasy world.
Children don’t know what normal is.
They only know what they are being taught.
Psychopaths know this and know that they must break their will from the very beginning.
And this is known, from the childs perspective as, bonding with your abuser.
The behavioral and attitudinal pattern of the Abusive Primary Caretaker with that of the Hostile Elite today in all of the major institutions that drive civilization (or, that are driving civilization into the ground) fit with perfect exactness. As the patterns found in a seed obtain through the entire body of a tree, from the roots to the leaves.
This is culture of psychopathology.
It is not limited to Jewish culture. But as they are the only ones with inflexibly ethnocentric, extremely well-organized, and deeply committed, and totally shameless, as a collective they present the greatest threat to the humanty since it is obvious that they are prepared to turn on the entire world unless it does their bidding.
For this reason we should take the gloves off and begin to provide the world with serious, scholarly articles on Psychopathology and Jewish Culture. Not saying that they are the only ones. But that as a group they are number one and so pose the greatest threat to world peace and stability.
Also, in addition to scholarly articles we could haverelated pieces, individual stories by everyday people, based on fact and personal experience – to counter their sentimental sob stories on everything from Immigration to Jewish Victimization, largely if not entirely based on fantasy that itself comes from their persecution mania.
I humbly recommend that this idea be given serious consideration and that all the while we practice what we preach and apply what we learn on ourselves. That way we can serve as powers of example and not hypocrites. Because lets face it, we wouldn’t be in the position we’re in today if we didn’t share in some with with a soul sickness that is both endemic and epidemic. Either way, we need to act, and fast.
I recall back in the 1980′s, at Children’s Hospital in Philadelphia, a group of Jewish doctors formed a business “association” within the hospital, forcing a Muslim surgeon out. He had been at the hospital for decades and saved countless lives. Needless to say, he had a hard time finding a law firm that would represent him.
…in the synagogue a man he barely knows approached him and told him to contact a Jewess at the admiss office who would help him and to tell her who sent him.
“That’s absolutely disgusting,” says some guy who hasn’t adapted.
What’s disgusting is Aryans not doing the same.
Learn how to play the group evolutionary strategy game, dude.
Once upon a time I wouldn’t, but now I agree with you. To continue to ignore what’s now so plain would be foolish; the time for fighting back is come.
Reality Check
“ALL OF RUSSIA WAS GOLGOTHA IN THE 20TH CENTURY
“Operation Golgotha” is the name given to the plan described by Anatoliy Golitsyn in his books “New Lies for Old” and “The Perestroika Deception.”
The plan was also referred to as “the 2nd October Revolution.”
Golitsyn was part of the Soviet planning committee in the early 60s to create a long-term plan for takeover of the United States. He defected and was (is?) living undercover somewhere in the west and had contact with Christopher Story through intermediaries. Christopher Story (now deceased) published Golitsyn’s manuscripts into the 2 books which are available on his website http://www.worldreports.org
Solzhenitsyn is important history but Golitsyn is the future planned for us by Jewish Soviet planning committee. What they did to White Russians they plan to do to white EuroAmericans. For them there is no difference between White Russians, Germans, Kulaks, White Europeans and Americans.
I heard that the whole Illuminati conspiracy is just a front for an even deeper conspiracy, run by shapeshifting reptiles from another dimension. And word on the street is, the real deal is run by lepricons.
Always the expert in painting yourself into a corner.
Lepricon, fairy jew
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepricon
Scroll down on the right side is a picture of an old engraving titled Lepricon counts his gold. Note the big hook nose. A characature that wouldn’t be out of place in der sturmer.
…in the synagogue a man he barely knows approached him and told him to contact a Jewess at the admiss office who would help him and to tell her who sent him.
“That’s absolutely disgusting,” says some guy who hasn’t adapted.
What’s disgusting is Aryans not doing the same.
Learn how to play the group evolutionary strategy game, dude.
It is pretty horrid because Jews present an image for all of us – like we’re all equal, we’re all one race, but behind our backs they show favouritism, nepotism to their own tribe. That’s part of why they’re so successful. They are great deceivers.
One rule for us and another for them.
Aryans would be doing the same if the Jews hadn’t programmed us to see non-whites as equal to our own blood.
The multicult is the big thing, and the Jew who promotes it will still be a Jew when we are all racially polluted.
Merry Christmas
“…in the synagogue a man he barely knows approached him and told him to contact a Jewess at the admiss office who would help him and to tell her who sent him.”
Yes, the power of ethnic networking is quite real. And yes, Whites should learn to do the same. But also remember, there are Whites that already do. At first, I was put off by that story, but then I remembered that all the Italian guys from my high school had an “in” with the fire department … and a bunch of them work there now.
And where I work, someone told me he got a job promotion, partially because he sings in the same church choir that someone way up in the organization does. So, Jews are not the only ones that help each other out.
Oddly, enough, it is probably the more Nordic Whites that help each other the least.
In relation to your interesting tidbit, kevin.
Zundel trial, 1988, Leuchter testimony:
“At Majdanek concentration camp, Leuchter examined a combination crematory and gas chamber facility, and a building known as Bath and Disinfection no. 1 which was alleged to have contained two experimental gas chambers and one conventional gas chamber.”
“Information supplied by the Majdanek Museum indicated that at the end of or just shortly before the end of the war, this entire facility was levelled, with the exception of the cremation ovens. It was not explained how. After the war, the facility was rebuilt from plans that the museum officials said existed but which they no longer had and no longer knew the location of.”
“At this point, Judge Thomas directed defence counsel to stop further questioning about this building since it was a *reconstruction* and he would not have evidence in the court about “tourist attractions.”
Okay, still with me ?
The official view of the Auswitch Gas Chamber is: The Soviets and Poles *created* a in an air-raid shelter that had been a ”
The Revisionist view is: The Soviets and Poles *created* a in an air-raid shelter that had been an air-raid shelter.
So, both are agreed that the has been created, recreated, *reconstructed*.
So, according to Judge Thomas, the Auswitch must also be inadmissible as evidence.
oops,
The official view of the Auswitch Gas Chamber is: The Soviets and Poles *created* a Gas Chamber in an air-raid shelter that had been a Gas Chamber.
The Revisionist view is: The Soviets and Poles *created* a Gas Chamber in an air-raid shelter that had been an air-raid shelter.
So, both are agreed that the Gas Chamber has been created, recreated, *reconstructed*.
So, according to Judge Thomas, the Auswitch Gas Chamber must also be inadmissible as evidence.
Ciaran, yeah Alex Jones is a huckster. I turned in today and he had this guy Lindsey Williams, who is another huckster, selling his supposed “inside knowledge” of the conspiracy …. for a cheap low price!
It was so lame. And yes, Jones and Beck and a lot of the other “conspiracy theorists” have a fetish about the royal family of England. They like to put them at the center of the “power elite”. It’s stupid.
Reality Check: ” …http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-Harvard.html
Sorry, but considering that, as the article points out, that there are just so many more Whites in the country (Britain and America) who are just as (if often not more) qualified, intelligent and ambitious, the ethnic disparities which exist then in certain minorities favor simply cannot be written-off as being based primarily on merit and ‘hard work’ alone.”
This is absolutely true RC. What people don’t realize is that despite very large percentages of the Jewish and E. Asian populations putting in far more study time than the average white youngster in the US (one study showed less than 45 min a day for most whites and 3.5 to 5 hrs a day for the former two groups) the admissions system is rigged. You can see this by looking at the raw numbers of youngsters scoring over 700 in the verbal and mathematics portions of the tests. The raw number of whites scoring over 700 in either category up through the 1990′s was generally 10 times that of either Jews or E. Asians. I remember one year in which 30,000 whites scored over 700 on the math portion of the test for example, vs. just about 3000 apiece for the chosen and their selected protected minority. But which groups ended up getting the Lion’s Share of admissions to the Ivy League, MIT, the “Big UC Schools” (Berkeley and UCLA) and so on? It wasn’t the white kids.
On a more personal level, I personally know two Jews from High School, one went to Princeton, one ended up getting in to Harvard, and they were certainly not intellectual giants. Good enough to get A’s in most subjects if not by smarts all the time, then by ingratiating themselves with teachers along with their parents doing the same as part of the teamwork tactic. (The Asian families at the school did the same I should add) I had a very high SAT score and straight A’s. Neither of the two jewish kids were within 200 points of my score on the SAT (it was math and verbal only back then). I couldn’t get a look from an Ivy League college lol, and I doubt that being from what was not the best of financial situations was a major factor. Being a white kid over 6 feet tall with blonde hair and blue eyes was the main problem. I could feel it even then. No legacy connections either I should mention. In addition, this experience left me feeling as if most of these colleges lie about the average SAT scores of many who are admitted, especially Jews and Asians. The two Jewish guys I mentioned were always inflating their scores in later years when telling people how they made it to the Ivy. This belief was also buttressed by an article about an Asian doctor whom I had gone to high school with. Part of the article mentioned his “near perfect” SAT score. In reality he didn’t even score 1400 (1600 was the highest you could go in those days, I was over 1500, great for a stupid white kid). The Asian fellow did outscore the two Jews by a bit, but to hear them all talk now, they were within 10 points of 1600 back in the day.
Here’s another item to take note of regarding Jews and their manipulation of certain gateways to derail white success; the ‘essay’ added to the SAT is a tool used to try and give certain groups a leg up on the test. After all, the test reviewers are operating blind. Sure. The essay is not a test of writing ability. If one can work into the essay you are a Jew, black, Asian, homosexual, anything but a straight white kid, you will receive bonus points, you will get a break. This isn’t publicly acknowledged yet test prep materials for ‘aggrieved groups’ encourage these parasites to follow this line of action when putting together their essays. Surprisingly, even some leftist teachers have complained about the essay portion of the test when seeing youngsters they knew to have less than stellar English speaking and writing ability receive astronomical scores. Amren allows comments on this. But they always remove “Jews” from the list of groups benefitting from this new twist on weeding out whites. Go ahead. Bring it up over there, provide a list of the beneficiaries. They will remove the self chosen. Solzhenitsyn would have had some choice words about that bunch of purported White Nationalists.
I hear you, brother! I scored a 1540 on the old SAT, and got perfect scores on two subject tests and I couldn’t get into any of the top 15 schools. For law school, I couldn’t break into the top 20.
Jeff,
Alex Jones is valuable in one sense – He leads people in the right direction. Or, at least, those of us who can see that the people he talks about but never mentions are from the Jewish tribe. Sure he cons his followers into believing it’s the Anglo/European establishment but eventually his sheep will look elsewhere for the truth.
It was thanks to AJ that led me to PKM. I quickly seen past the con and started looking around for info on Jews which led me to TOO. David Icke has the same value. Tho I think they both are con men who don’t have any racial loyalty. As well as none of them are even qualified to speak on these issues. lcke’s even trying to blame it on the Khazars… lol They blame everybody from Reptilian aliens to child sacrificing Royal families… but never mention the Jew.
Jones & Icke are making a lot of money from their sheep.
Yeah PKM is the man.
Tic Tac,
That’s a good point. If Alex Jones leads people to the next stage in their thinking that is good. Actually a lot us start off in the flakier areas of conspiracy theories before doing more research, I know I did. I just don’t want this site to be giving him credibility – or I should say, I don’t want this site losing credibility by any equivalence between us and him.
Mr. Maylor, Who assigned you the role of Arbiter of Good Taste and Provider of Absolutes?
Please… Give it a rest already! Permit the rest of us the freedom to make up our own minds without your constant barrage of sputtering, virginal indignation.
I don’t like you doing my thinking for me. Not now, not ever.
The proposed communities in ‘What Will Work, Part Three’ seem like a modern version of Ukrainian peasantry. But the lesson of the 1930s is that even implicit ethnic communities will not be left alone. They’ll be perceived as a backward and ignorant, a reservoir of prejudice.
There was no Holodomor. The Holodomor – the deliberate terror famine that murdered 5-10 million Ukrainians – simply never occurred. What occurred was a famine harvest followed by a famine in all of the USSR. Yes, 5 million died, not usually of hunger but of disease epidemics due to weakened immunity, but it was not deliberate. The harvest simply collapsed that year.
Further, there were no 15 million murdered peasants in the 1930′s. A lot of people died, but those figures are excessive.
Executions: 800,000
Dekulakization in Ukraine: 390,000
Gulags: ~500,000
Totals: ~1.7 million
With the famine:
Famine: 5.3 million
Executions: 800,000
Dekulakization in Ukraine: 390,000
Gulags: ~500,000
Totals: ~7 million
As this was occurring, life expectancy rose wildly and the death rate collapsed, compared to Czarist Russia. So the deaths and killings were occurring in tandem with the greatest humanitarian life-saving project that the world had ever seen.
There was no Holodomor.
I was utterly touched by this article, as immigrant to the US from Russia, as an attorney and just as simple down-to-earth human being.
The moral flexibility/relativism with which Jewish “element” (I can’t find better nomer for what we’re facing here) exhibits itself in many forms, se of them historically documented, some plainly happening in front of us. We only need to look and think. Think.
Holodomor? Soviet concentration camps? NKVD torture that goes beyond simple use of cheap labor force? Yes, this has happened, and Jews took enormous part in that. But we don’t have to look any further but our own quarters. Take example of Alan Dershowitz. I looked up to Prof. Dershowitz and adored his writings when I was in law school, he served as an example of integrity, moral wholesomeness, an example what legal mind should be.
Things changed in 2003. Prof. Dershowitz account of how our nations psyche should be adjusted to realities of new times, recommendations on how we should conduct ourselves when faced with possibility of torture, the whole idea of undermining basic fundamental principles upon this nation was built opened my eyes. When I realized what that Dershowitz’s driven by simple premise that “Israelies have been doing this for decades, what stops us”, I looked closer and realized one very important thing: it is all words, what he says, and what stands behind is very scary thing. Shame on you, Prof. Dershowitz, you don’t deserve the seat you hold right now!