A major theme of the European right, exemplified by Geert Wilders, is that Islam does not mesh with European values—that it promotes political despotism based on fear, the subjugation of women, and a fatalistic world view that is inimical to economic progress. (Wilders’ essay on Islam is well worth reading. I was particularly struck by his description of the arrival of the Egyptian President Mubarak at Sharm-el-Sheikh in 1982: “I remember the fear which suddenly engulfed the town when it was announced that Mubarak was coming on an unexpected visit; I can still see the cavalcade of black cars on the day of his visit and feel the almost physical awareness of fear, like a cold chill on that very hot day in Summer.” Political despotism indeed.)
I thought of that when reading Victor Davis Hansen’s National Review article “Two Californias.” He describes a rural California that exists in a parallel universe to the coastal cities—indeed to all of White America. Decades of immigration and White dispossession have resulted in a Mexican sub-culture that has simply transplanted itself from Mexico to California. Spanish is the first language, and the schools (among the worst in the state) are almost completely Mexican. The small White farmers have been displaced by mechanized agriculture and the White working class has seen their manufacturing jobs shipped overseas.
Aided by generous welfare benefits, these immigrants have many of the gadgets of the middle class. But there the similarity ends. It’s a culture that is completely unregulated–garbage strewn everywhere, animals roaming around without fencing, and no construction or business codes, and no tax collection. White California is ruled by an elitist culture of the well-heeled left in political alliance with non-Whites; it loves regulating business in the name of moral virtue (like the recent deluge of anti-global warming laws). Meanwhile, the areas inhabited by their Mexican clients are completely unregulated.
In short, the Third World has simply transferred itself to California. (Coming soon, if not already arrived, to a state near you.)
Hansen bends over backwards to avoid any racial implications. No talk of their low IQ or why the schools are so bad; nor is there a mention of their high fertility. (Heather MacDonald notes their fertility is twice the White fertility, and their teenage fertility is by far the highest of any ethnic or racial group; rates of births out of wedlock are second only to African-Americans). But it’s pretty clear he has a low opinion of his new neighbors:
I don’t editorialize here on the logic or morality of any of this, but I note only that there are vast numbers of people who apparently are not working, are on public food assistance, and enjoy the technological veneer of the middle class. … The federal and state governments are either the main employers or at least the chief sources of income — whether through emergency rooms, rural health clinics, public schools, or social-service offices.
These are the people that the LA Times and the rest of the liberal media say would vote Republican if only the Republicans would support the DREAM act and comprehensive immigration reform. With Republicans like these ….
This parasitic lifestyle is mainly courtesy of the state of California (which now has a $26 billion [that's $26,000,000,000!] budget hole). So the productive White people are leaving and the heavily subsidized Mexicans continue to come in droves. The result is a “social, cultural, economic, and political time-bomb, whose ticks are getting louder.”
In both America and Europe parallel societies have been created–completely outside the White mainstream and indifferent (Mexifornians) or hostile (European Muslims) to the White culture that so generously subsidizes their Third World lifestyle. The time bomb is ticking.
It remains to be seen whether Whites will wake up and begin the Reconquista. But in any case, Hansen is pointing to an ecologically unsustainable situation: The Third World economy being created simply cannot sustain a First World culture. California with its $26 billion budget deficit will find that out soon enough.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
I’m sure I’ll be attacked for this one, but like Kevin MacDonald, I’m going to stand up for what I think is right despite being a minority voice in this arena.
Regulating anthropomorphic global warming emissions is important for our children and our grandchildren.
According to Naomi Oreskes, author of Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming denial of Global warming has been partly fueled by a few scientists, such as Seitz, Singer, Nierenberg and Robert Jastrow, who are driven by an ideological belief that governmental regulation will lead to socialism and communism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchants_of_Doubt
In a report from Greenpeace entitled “Kock Industries Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine” corporate manipulation is documented. Just like Jews have the own interests, so do industries who profit off the use of fossil fuels. I am not a member of Greenpeace which a view as far to the left, but I agree with the findings in the article.
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2010/3/koch-industries-secretly-fund.pdf
Many people dismiss Kevin MacDonald’s books outright because they do not like the message. We can ignore anthropomorphic global warming because we don’t like regulations, but can we deny it because we don’t like the message?
Give ‘em an inch they will take a mile department:
It was 30 or fewer years ago most places, you put your garbage cans & trash on the side of the house, and once or twice a week it was picked up and carried to the street by the garbage man or men and thrown into a truck by them.
Then about 20 years ago you had to put your own cans on the curb, some places you had to bag your trash in plastic bags, and use plastic cans.
Now you have garbage carts, that you have to push out by a certain time in the morning, the truck is automated with a mechanical arm to pick up the cart, and God forbid you get the wrong kind of trash in the recycle cart.
You pay for this “service” too.
Professor MacDonald rightfully points out the unsustainability of allowing hordes of immigrants into the country to partake in a subsidized gluttonous lifestyle. It the Californian elite are so concerned about global warming why are they allowing an unsustainable artificial increase in the Californian population which is driving up consumption and global warming emissions?
“If the California elite are so concerned about global warming why are they allowing an unsustainable artificial increase in the Californian population which is driving up consumption and global warming emissions?”
The 2005 Sierra Series. Sierra Club Puppeteer—Long-Suspected Scandal Revealed,
by Brenda Walker, VDare, Februar 2, 2005
“Just what is the cost to buy off the Sierra Club—once the most respected environmental organization in America? A low nine figure sum does the job according to the Los Angeles Times in its story last fall about David Gelbaum, one of the key funders of the 112-year-old environmental organization. ["The Man Behind the Land" by Kenneth R. Weiss, Oct. 17, 2004] A nice round $100 million was enough for Executive Director Carl Pope to toss the principles of honesty, democracy and conservation out the window. Many of us involved in the grassroots effort to restore population sanity to the Sierra Club were suspicious that the mysterious $100 million in donations might have immigration strings attached. After all, the 1996 switch from common sense to political correctness was an abrupt change from the earlier position that the Club should work to “bring about the stabilization of the population first of the United States and then of the world.” Our suspicions were correct. The LA Times article revealed that shadowy funder Gelbaum donated generously on condition that the Sierra Club not address immigration as an environmental issue. Said Gelbaum, “I did tell [Sierra Club Executive Director] Carl Pope in 1994 or 1995 that if they ever came out anti-immigration, they would never get a dollar from me.”
God’s Chosen Parasites have eviscerated environmental groups when it comes to overpopulation and immigration simply because waging the jewish war on White Gentiles by utilizing non-White population replacement trumps any concern for environmental sustainability. Sorry Mother Nature, jewish interests come before yours.
Re Gelbaum, see:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2009/12/jews-are-the-financial-engine-of-the-left/
Kevin M
Roy Beck Of NumbersUSA has tried to show the connection between the envionment, and, immigration.
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/issues/environment.html
Wasn’t it Plato who said that the middle class needs to be the bulk of the population, because the rich want to be richer and the poor want to steal your money? (Please excuse my poor paraphrasing.)
When Governor-elect Jerry Brown calls for a referendum (he *did* promise not to raise taxes without voter approval) on raising *my* taxes, he’ll probably get a majority for the idea.
The gullible poor (including the Browns who are eligible to vote – or can slip through the cracks at the pools) will be joined by the rich (who can afford a tax-hike) and the politically retarded portions of the middle class who think they can afford it.
Reconquista? How, at this point, can it be done? It seems politically impossible even to deport the illegals. Soon, it wont’ even be electorally possible to force the government to reduce legal immigration.
I want to know what California and the other southwestern states are going to do when they run out of water.
You have millions of armed militia all over this country, mainly ex millitary…trust me, a blood bath is coming and these parasites are going to feel the full force of it because people are tired of them and the criminal U.S. government that has engineered the whole thing. I cant wait to see the cowardly looks on the faces of the big bad ms13 gangs and all mexican gangs faces when the real war starts…they wont be able to get to their ces pit mexicao fast enough!
Sean,
There are not millions of “militia” out in the country. Loose talk like that has been around for at least three generations – and it never means anything. The real conflict is not physical but in the realm of ideas. We have to convince Whites they have a right to exist and preserve their own culture. Once that happens, then everything else fall into place. Without it, some guy posing with his collection of weapons won’t save us.
“A major theme of the European right, exemplified by Geert Wilders, is that Islam does not mesh with European values—that it promotes political despotism based on fear, the subjugation of women”
Wilders is stupid.
What does he know about European values?
What does he know about the status of women and children throughout European history?
Nothing!
In Ancient Rome, the pater familias (“father of the family”) had almost absolute power over his wife and children.
The pater familias had the power to sell his children into slavery, to approve or reject marriages of his sons and daughters, etc.
Even adult children remained under the authority of their father and could not themselves acquire the rights of a pater familias while he lived. Legally, any property acquired by individual family members was acquired for the family estate: the pater familias held sole rights to its disposal.
Even women who were “sui iuris” (i.e. neither under the power of her father, nor under that of her husband) were put under the guardianship of a “tutor” (“tutela mulierum”).
The status of Greek women was even lower than that of Roman women.
The status of women among Germanic and Slavic peoples was no better.
The Salic law (the most important source for old Germanic law) established that an individual person is legally unprotected by law if he or she does not belong to a family. Concerning the inheritance of land, the Salic Law said “no portion of the inheritance shall come to a woman: but the whole inheritance of the land shall come to the male”.
According to some sources, in early Slavic societies women were expected to commit suicide if their husband was killed in battle.
So, when Wilders talks about “European values” what he means are the liberal values of the Enlightenment + the “values” of the Jewish Culture of Critique.
Wilders is a liberal. I have a feeling that Muslim immigrants would be acceptable to him and his kind, if they just adopt feminism and all the other stupidities of the Culture of Critique.
ethnonationalism says:
“…The pater familias had the power to sell his children into slavery …”
Wow, this argument sounds just like one Der Wienerschnitzel made a few days ago when trying to denigrate Whites in ancient history. How odd. Plus you add the anti-Enlightment stuff that Der Wienerschnitzel always mentions. How very interesting.
Anyway, the position of women in Western culture has been light years beyond that of women in any other culture. White culture has been very good to women and they have a lot to lose if it passes from the earth.
‘Wilders is stupid.’
Misguided as he undoubtedly is on some points (particularly Israel and the true nature of Judaism) I think you still have to respect a man who has basically given up his personal freedom to stand up against a malevolent force like Islam.
How many of the contributors here would be willing to live permanently in virtual imprisonment to defend Western culture and values (at he incorrectly conceives them).
One thing’s for sure, as formidable an opponent as organised Jewry undoubtedly is, an individual runs a far greater risk to his personal safety in criticising Muslims than criticising Jews. If KMD had written a trilogy critiquing Islam instead of Judaism – I’m pretty sure the death threat quotient would be WAY higher.
While Wilders has a flawed conception of Western values he is undoubtedly brave.
I remember at a previous residence of mine when my Mexican neighbors became indignant and angry with me for calling the zoning authorities about the roosters those neighbors were keeping in their backyard. The roosters, I guessed, were used for illegal cockfighting. I considered cockfighting cruel and did not appreciate the crowing early in the morning.
The mistreatment of animals (dogs and chickens for example) by Blacks and Mexicans may be something that reaches the SWPL types and makes them realize White culture really is different … and better.
I don’t think this issue alone is going to transform their thinking, but it reminds me a statement made by Greg Johnson a few days ago, to the effect that SWPLs believe only Whites are moral agents (Blacks and Mexicans are excluded due to their presumed powerlessness). But as Whites begin to witness how Blacks and Mexicans treat animals in their care – animals that are at their mercy – they may begin to realize that Blacks and Mexicans are moral agents as well, and quite capable of abusing power.
Richard Walker discusses the two Californias, but from the opposite end of the political spectrum. Click on http://www.newleftreview.org/?page=article&view=2868
Mike Davis, although a leftoid, and married to a Mexican, has written some very readable California “noir” without getting into the Mexican causes of many of the problems California faces.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Davis_(scholar)
Mr. Jeff,
If you don’t believe me, you got here an English translation of the Law of the Twelve Tables (the oldest Roman law) so check it out yourself…
http://www.constitution.org/sps/sps01_1.htm
…and here you have other sources of Roman law
http://web.upmf-grenoble.fr/Haiti/Cours/Ak/
…and here is the Salic (Germanic-Frankish) law:
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/salic-law.html
The status of women cannot be an argument against Muslim and other immigrants.
What if Muslims decide to improve the status of women in their societies?
Will they become acceptable in European countries?
If you want an argument against immigration and multiculturalism, just point to Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, and the murder of millions of people in and by these multicultural experiments.
Ethnonationalism, I don’t doubt that 2,500 years ago in Greece the status of women was lower than we in the West would be comfortable with now. But would you care to investigate how women were treated 2,500 years ago in Africa, Asia and South America? Those women would have killed to live as well as a Roman woman.
And the whole pater familias thing was true in the early days of Rome, but it was continually weakened and as a practical matter came to an end long before Rome fell. The power over life and death was abolished and the ability to sell children was restricted to extreme cases of necessity – where the child might die due to poverty of the family. Many of these practices still exist today in Africa and parts of the Muslim world.
I don’t know why you are using Rome, in say 300 BC, as the standard for how the West treats women. No one seriously doubts women have been treated much better in the West compared to other regions. Why are you disputing that? Pick almost any period in history and a woman born in a Western country is infinitely better off than her counterpart in China, Persia, Africa or the ancient culture of the Americas.
KMD
“nor is there a mention of their high fertility. (Heather MacDonald notes their fertility is twice the White fertility, and their teenage fertility is by far the highest of any ethnic or racial group;”
This is more dangerous than many of you guys think.
Demographic changes were one of the main reasons for the war in Bosnia.
In 1961, Muslims were 24% of the Bosnian population (according to the 1961 Census).
In 1991, Muslims were 43% of the population.
Their percentage almost doubled in some 30 years. Muslims had vary high birth rates.
This created fear among non-Muslims (especially Serbs), and that is why it was so easy for nationalists to recruit people for war.
The war completely reversed the entire situation. Today, Muslims once again live on only 23% of Bosnia’s territory.
Even their birth rates are far lower than before the war.
Of course, the Muslims I am talking about are White (Slavic), not the Arabic-Turkish sort you have on the West.
P.S.
Why am I on moderation?
Re Ethnonationalism: It’s a quirky system set to automatically allow anyone who has had a post approved. But it doesn’t always work that way. Kevin M
I think it also triggers when one posts links in the body of a comment; presumably an anti-spam measure.
@kmcd – “Islam does not mesh with European values.”
no, no it doesn’t:
“islam + politics = muslims like”
http://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/islam-politics-muslims-like/
White California is ruled by an elitist culture of the well-heeled left in political alliance with non-Whites; it loves regulating business in the name of moral virtue (like the recent deluge of anti-global warming laws).
They excel at packaging their limitless selfish material greed as “moral virtue”. This is what “principled WASPS” in the USA have always done. The Hearst family was just one of many examples of this. Both elites in the Civil War provide further examples, too.
A primary goal of “global warming legislation” is succinctly explained here;
http://brucekrasting.blogspot.com/2010/12/cap-train-wreck.html
Yes. A carbon dioxide cap ‘n trade commodities market that is six times the size of the wheat market. No prizes for guessing (a) who will pay through the whazoo to operate this “market” or (b) who will skim all the profits using a variety of insider trading schemes.
This is the real reason the Anthropogenic Global Warming cultists want to go ahead even though it’s clear neither China or India will get on board. And even when the data fails to support their case and when real critical review tears giant holes in the entire thesis. And it’s why such measures are promoted even in very restricted venues like California.
My only question for Victor Davis Hanson would be whether he or his family ever employed mestizo labor on their California family farm. If they did then the old boy should just shut up.
He was clearly mediocre in his other profession as professor of classics, too. The end stage of the Roman Empire also witnessed the emergence of parallel legal systems in core areas of Italy; one for imperial subjects and a separate one for “barbarians” (i.e. illegal immigrants)
Either Hanson never learned that much about Roman history or he’s sunk too far into senile decrepitude to recall it.
Ex-Pro White Activist writes:
“My only question for Victor Davis Hanson would be whether he or his family ever employed mestizo labor on their California family farm.”
Hanson has never denied that they have hired legal temporary Mexican workers on their farm for the harvest. All this illegal immigration he discusses is entirely another matter however.
So if you are no longer a Pro-White Activist, what are you now?
3500 new ship scheduled to be built over the next three years will create more pollution then an addition 25 BILLION new cars…so are the elite really concerned about the environment or are they just working up ways to milk us some more? I suppose you could argue they care about our ability to consume overseas trinkets (and their profits from it).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cjjThHvmRg
“Heather MacDonald notes their fertility is twice the White fertility”
From Amren.com’s Hispanics: A Statistical Portrait
“Between 2000 and 2005, the Hispanic population increased at a rate of 3.7 percent a year, no less than 14 times the growth rate for whites and more than three times the black rate.”
For those unfamiliar with California history, the wealthy east coast lawyers used the legal process to seize the property of illiterate Spanish and Mexican land grant holders outright or they taxed them off their unproductive lands when they were unable to adapt to the new situation. The new owners of the land were able to round up Indians and mestizos and put them to work if they claimed they were feeding them. Corrupt Indian agents discovered that reservation lands were still open for homesteading and claimed it for themselves. Then they rented the same land back to the US government for reservations! The rich lawyers also managed to foreclose on any homesteads held by poor White farmers and vast acreages in California were sold to land and cattle companies by the banks. Agribusiness bought up a lot of land and they employed immigrant labor while avoiding hiring White farm laborers. During the Great Depression, the US government and the Mexican consulate agreed to repatriate approximately 500,000 Mexicans to open open jobs for White farm laborers. This was documented in John Steinbeck’s “Grapes of Wrath, ” and in his lesser known “In Dubious Combat.” The rich farmers were spoiled by decades of
almost free mestizo farm labor, so they resisted the flood of “okies” from the Dust Bowl. Fast forward to the 1980′s and California saw an explosion of immigrant and minority crime, which resulted in the building of so many prisons that California became called “The Golden Gulag.” Some of the best jobs in the Golden Gulag are prison jobs, psychiatric technican jobs and teaching jobs. The rich middle class of Central California does not want a mass deportation of illegal aliens, because the Mexican work force has become their “bread and butter.”
Hmmm that sounds like an awfully Leftist, class based history of California. Have you been collaborating with Der Wienerschnitzel?
Jeff,
“Wienerschnitzel” is actually an Austrian meat dish. Of course, here in the U.S. (I found out when I emmigrated here many moons ago) it’s a fast food chain that serves delightful French Fries. I think it’s an affront to both to use that illustrious name to describe Der weiße Arschloch. :)
In both America and Europe parallel societies have been created–completely outside the White mainstream and indifferent (Mexifornians) or hostile (European Muslims) to the White culture
I have to question whether these Latinos are merely indifferent to White culture. One has only to see the eyes of HATE in people like Congressman Luis Gutierrez, (D-IL) whenever they speak of our people and the civilization created. It is very much out in the open, how one could possibly miss it is beyond my ken.
Why does the writer not call these Latinos: American Christians?
Because that is what they are, whilst the religion of the non-White invaders is paramount.
Mario Obledo (former California secretary of health and welfare and co-founder of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund: “We’re going to take over all the political institutions of California. California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn’t like it should leave. If they [Anglos] don’t like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe.” [interviewed on radio station KIEV, Los Angeles, June 17, 1998.]
George P. Bush (son of Florida Governor Jeb Bush and his Mexican-born wife Columba, and nephew of the President speaking to a gathering of Hispanics) — “… we have to fight for our race, we have to find the leaders who represent us.” [Reuters, Aug. 2, 2000.]
Rodolfo Acuna (professor of Chicano studies at Cal State Northridge) “There’s a growing feeling ‘Why should we pay for all these senior citizens’ if the majority of them are white and all they were willing to pay for was prisons?” [Jonathan Tilove, Generation Gap Becoming Racial Gap, San Francisco Examiner, Nov. 23, 1997, p. A17.]
Augustin Cebada (Head of the Brown Berets, a Hispanic activist organization at a July 4, 1996 rally) — “We’re here today to show L.A., show the minority people here, the Anglo-Saxons, that we are here, the majority, we’re here to stay. We do the work in this city, we take care of the spoiled brat children … we are the majority here and we are not going to be pushed around.”
Augustin Cebada “Go back to Simi Valley, you skunks! Go back to Woodland Hills! Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people, it is your duty to die …” [Quoted in Barbara Coe, Reconquista, The Takeover of America, California Coalition for Immigration Reform, 1998, p. 20.]
Prof. Jose Angel Gutierrez (University of Texas, Arlington) “We have an aging white America. They are dying. They are shitting in their pants with fear! … I love it!” — [Speech of Jan. 1995, quoted in Coe, Reconquista, p. 16.]
Mario Obledo — (1998 Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient and former head of Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund — MALDEF) “California is going to be a Mexican state, we are going to control all the institutions. If people don’t like it they should leave.” [Tom Leykis Radio Show, June 7, 1998.]
Art Torres (former chairman, California Democratic Party) — “Remember, [Proposition] 187 [the measure to cut public benefits to illegal aliens] is the last gasp of white America.” [The Social Contact, Summer 1998, p. 290.]
Good Christians all, so obviously indifferent…
~~David Duke 03-02-2007
Correction
Because that is what they are, whilst the religion of the non-White invaders of Europe is paramount.
I question whether this antipathy toward white culture is inherent. After all, Mexican culture still traces itself back to Catholic Spain–there should be plenty of (cultural) common ground. But what I see are leftists (and evangelical zionists to a lesser extent) agitating among the Hispanics to instill in them racial, as opposed to cultural consciousness. Conservative, traditionalist Mexicans need not be so great of a threat. Mexicans indoctrinated with Jewish atheism and the ideology of ‘la Raza’ certainly are.
I was raised in Central California and lived there for 40 years. In that time I saw small towns like Reedley, Sanger and Dinuba go from nice small communities with high values and little crime to gang invested garbage dumps. One of the biggest heart breakers came when I went to the Sierra Kings Hospital in Reedley not to long before we moved to Montana. I was born in this hospital and it was founded and built by my doctor and relative Menno Gaede. The once pristine little community hospital had become something that looked like it belonged in a Third World country. The receptionist could barely speak English and was visibly upset to have to stop babbling in Spanish on the phone (on an obviously personal call) to check people into the hospital. The floors were filthy, the chairs had stains and holes in them and the waiting room was full of unruly Mexican kids climbing on the furniture like it was a jungle gym. I had the same experience when I went to see my mom in the Fresno Hospital a few years later, the woman who came to “clean” the room threw down a wet rag onto the floor and ran it around with a stick. Seriously, this was their method of cleaning. Most of the night janitors looked more like gang members than hospital employees and shouted and carried on at all hours of the night so that my mom could not sleep. There was dirt crusted into the floor and once again my mother’s nurse could barely speak English. One of my fathers elderly friends died in the parking lot of the Clovis hospital when he was sent out to lay down in the back of his truck since the waiting room was overcrowded. My brother took his 5 month old baby to the Children’s hospital ER and he and another white couple were purposely bypassed by the Mexican receptionist until they left and went to another hospital, where they were seen and sent back to the Children’s hospital in an ambulance and immediately seen. The first time they waited over 5 hours, and in California it is not unusual to wait anywhere from 12 -24 hours to see a doctor at the ER. Because of the long wait, the Mexican families usually bring in their extended family, food and bedding and camp out in the ER taking up space. If you think I am exaggerating you are wrong. I am downplaying how bad it is. And due to this I moved from my home to Kalispell Montana one of the Last Best Places. If any of you want to find out about the conscious white community I am building here, email me april_gaede@yahoo.com BTW, the waiting time at the ER , usually about 5 minutes if at all
It’s too bad California is all but lost. It’s a beautiful state, the richest and most beautiful of all of them in my opinion. Whites are packing up and leaving though, not fighting for it. The problem with relocating to Montana is, if they wouldn’t fight for California, what makes you think they’ll fight for Montana? It’s easy to see they’ll just fold again, and for all the same reasons.
Well that’s a thoughtful response from Der Wienerschnitzel. Of course, he hopes to encourage behavior on this board that would discredit White Advocacy. Everything he agitates for violates the basic tenets of public persuasion. Not even Hitler, of who I am not a fan, went around spitting out ethnic slurs.
Der Wienerschnitzel hopes to make White Advocacy something scary and frightening to the masses, so that people will not stop to consider it’s content. And of course, reaching White people and changing their beliefs is what this is all about. Der Wienerschnitzel knows that and is trying to subvert it.
This is a good example of the kind of person I’m talking about. The last time the self-admitted Jew Jeff “I’m using my real Jewish name” Maylor was in a fight was in yeshiva shul, when he got punched in the face by a 12 year old girl who stole his lunch money. Expecting any real resistance from pantywaists like that is hopeless. That’s why he so desperately wants all Whites to adopt his non-violent philosophy and kosher speech codes.
It’s truly amazing how impotent the anti-White Leftists are in terms of ideas. Note that they tremble at the prospect of Whites taking control of the moral high ground. They are only capable of defeating what has been called the “Hollywood Nazi”, the skinhead, the illiterate street fighter. In other words, they can only win when they get to pick their opponent. When they are truly forced to respond in the realm of ideas, they collapse, they are a paper tiger.
What they fear is a self-respecting White Advocacy, courageous, moral and loyal, the same force that has propelled Whites forward since our ancestors first brought civilization to this earth.
Yeshiva boy has got plenty of ideas for Whites alright. Ideas like running away, non-violent surrender, and kosher speech codes. The same ideas that lost California; the same ideas that haven’t worked for the last sixty years and are guaranteed to continue to not work in the next sixty. That’s the moral high ground, according to him. Do you really think Whites are that stupid?
And now we see the SPLC operative Der Wienerschnitzel come unglued. Note the obvious contradictions:
Why should someone like Der Wienerschnitzel, who hates science and technology, care to save a state like California in the first place? Why would he want to save Silicon Valley? Why would he want to save Cal Tech or Stanford? If he honestly believed his anti-technology rants, he would be celebrating it’s demise (which, for other reasons, he is).
Of course, Der Wienerschnitzel hopes to promote some caricature of White culture that his Leftist Jewish friends can easily defeat. That is how sad and pathetic their “intellectual” powers truly are.
Needless to say the purpose of this forum is, among other things, to discuss how White Advocacy can be advanced. It is quite reasonable when a
A childish smear artist like Jewy Jeff isn’t capable of leading anyone to anywhere, at least, anyplace good. Non-violence, shitting your pants and hysterically denying it if you’re called a racist or a Nazi, running away from racial conflict, and imposing kosher speech codes on White people. No, I’m not kidding! Those are his brilliant ideas for White advocacy. That’s what he thinks is going to attract worthwhile followers. Incredible, isn’t it? Let’s hope nobody is stupid enough to be deceived by this hokey Jewish con artist.
Again, note Der Wienerschnitzel claims to be so appalled by the idea of non-violence, yet it was he that spent several furious days blasting American servicemen as murderous cowards who had brought so much mayhem in his view. He has detailed every slanderous accusation of violence he could find against our Founding Fathers, in order to paint them as violent psychopaths. His presentation was like the opening remarks for a war crimes tribunal.
And now he claims to be offended by a “non-violent” approach to White Advocacy (I wasn’t aware of another type) that seeks to unite Whites. He may very well be an agent provocateur, so be very careful in any dealings with him.
Why can’t we have both soft words AND a big stick?
Athanasius writes: “I question whether this antipathy toward white culture is inherent. After all, Mexican culture still traces itself back to Catholic Spain–there should be plenty of (cultural) common ground.”
Two things, first, the illegal immigrant mestizos from south of the border are overwhelmingly of Indian descent. Secondly, their “Christianity” is of a heavily pagan form of Catholicism replete with lurid visions of bloody martyrdom and elements of Aztec idolatry.
American culture is still overwhelmingly white and Protestant. Not much common ground at all.
@ Rudel
Yep. That’s the real fault line.
Certainly more common ground than the Indians and Pakistanis who are taking over the medical profession, or the Somalis in Minnesota, etc. I’m not saying it’s not problematic, but it might not be an all or nothing proposition. Catholics and Protestants can live together. You are right about their interpretation of Catholicism, but even that has antecedents in Spain and among the Franks. (look at Renaissance crucifixions).
Of course racially, they are certainly distinct, but if they were to be de-radicalized, and their numbers controlled, they need not be an existential threat.
Glen:
“Misguided as he undoubtedly is on some points (particularly Israel and the true nature of Judaism) I think you still have to respect a man who has basically given up his personal freedom to stand up against a malevolent force like Islam.”
Wilders often criticizes Islam for all the wrong reasons.
I remember that in one of his interviews, he criticized Muslims because they are against homosexuality.
Wilders is a liberal. His critique of Islam doesn’t differ much from the liberal-left and neocon critique of Islam (and Christianity).
His positions are almost identical to those of Jewish neocons.
Wilders is the European version of Norman Podhoretz, Daniel Pipes and Martin Peretz (all in one body).
His vision of “conservatism” is exporting homosexuality, feminism, and Zionism to Iran and Saudi Arabia.
He is living proof of how neocons and their puppets destroyed traditional conservatism.
Wilders is either stupid, or a Crypto Jew with an agenda.
I think I basically agree with you. I question, however, your apparent assumption that the neocon critique of Islam is altogether without substance. Many of the claims made by neocons about Islam are true:
Islam is a social and political system first, and a personal religion second.
Islam is violently hostile to non-Muslims.
Muslims do want to establish a global Islamic caliphate where Sharia law is imposed everywhere.
Islam does regard women as inferior beings.
Islam does reject the notion of a separation between the sacred and the secular.
Islamic values are incompatible with those of the West.
I hate the neocons as much as anyone. That does not lead me to assume that ALL of their arguments are invalid. The neocons may enlist these truths in the pursuit of specifically Jewish interests – but that does not make them untrue.
I agree with you both. But I don’t have a problem with exporting homosexuality and feminism to Muslim countries, because I think they are cultural time bombs.
All the Muslim professionals in this country that vote Democratic, they love the notion of greater tolerance for homosexuality and the breakdown of the family b/c they know this. How many of them also want gays in the Pakistani or Saudi military?
Rudel,
Hanson has never denied that they have hired legal temporary Mexican workers on their farm for the harvest. All this illegal immigration he discusses is entirely another matter however.
Thanks for answering.
The people Hanson labels “illegals” are called “family” by the others Hanson viewed as “legals”. These paper definitions are just arbitrary differences that existed under the now defunct gringo law.
It reduces my empathy level for VDH – and his entire extended family benefitting from this – right down to 0.00. They brought it on themselves.
XPWA
I’m not a big Hanson fan either, especially because of his cheeleading for war in the Middle East. Nevertheless he is performing valuable work for the cause of whites by arguing against the wave of mestizos pouring into California.
Hansen is one of those “reformed liberal” neocons. He joined Hitchens in a Hoover Institution trashing of Pat Buchanan’s WW2 book, but if HE’S complaining about the Mexican problem, then it must be bad, and a voice like his will carry more weight with the cowardly lions of proper society.
That’s just reality.
Well, well, well, I guess it seems like Europeans made a deal with the devil (Zionist Jewry) and he’s coming back to collect- with a full 110% APR. Bashing Islam is not going to change anything or improve upon your situation, in fact the more nonsense and smears about Islam goes on the more hysterical Jews and their minions will become, hence, more slippery slopes to disaster.
Islam Doesn’t consider women (or anyone else for that matter) “inferior”. Islamic world is a very huge place, it’s not only in Arabia, just take a look at Iran, Turkey and even Bangladesh- a Muslim majority nation with an elected women as a prime minister, and please, forget about the corrupt pro-American Gulf Arabs because they never even count in the Islamic world.
Islam is not sentimental; just doesn’t pin too much expectations more than one’s capacity; a person is suppose to be the way he/she are created. It’s realistic and takes biological differences into consideration, that’s all.
Europeans are trying to equate practically everything to each other in the last 100 years, be it pets and all the way to gender, with the only successes being population decline (more women want wealth but no babies) and rise in open homosexuality among other things like gays and women in the military, clergy and judiciary.
Even your own science is vindicating Islam, men were proven to be More Intelligent than women by a factor of 10-20%, and that’s coming from a supposedly ‘liberal’ scientist. Do you really want to be judged by a jury made up entirely of women? Or your daughter just “fell in love” with a drug addict bum or a criminal, there is nothing you can do about it because she is over 18 and plus it’s “cool” because “she’s in love”.
One thing is considered one of the biggest sin in Islam (apart from the Jewish widespread usury) is hypocrisy and affectation to be something which is not.
‘Islam Doesn’t consider women (or anyone else for that matter) “inferior”.’
You have to joking. If not, please explain the following:
The Qur’an:
Qur’an (4:11) – (Inheritance) “The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females” (see also verse 4:176).
Qur’an (2:282) – (Court testimony) “And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women.” Muslim apologists have sometimes creatively tried to explain why a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s under Islamic law (based on this verse) while still attempting to maintain the semblance of equality. Unfortunately for them, studies consistently show that women are less likely to tell lies than men, meaning that they would make more reliable witnesses in any court – were it not for Islam’s obvious sexism.
Qur’an (2:228) – “and the men are a degree above them [women]”
Qur’an (5:6) – “And if ye are unclean, purify yourselves. And if ye are sick or on a journey, or one of you cometh from the closet, or ye have had contact with women, and ye find not water, then go to clean, high ground and rub your faces and your hands with some of it” Men are to rub dirt on their hands if there is no water to purify them following casual contact with a woman (such as shaking hands).
Qur’an (24:31) – Women are to lower their gaze around men, so they do not look them in the eye. (To be fair, men are told to do the same thing in the prior verse).
Qur’an (2:223) – “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will…” A man has dominion over his wives’ bodies as he does his land. This verse is overtly sexual. There is some dispute as to whether it is referring to the practice of anal intercourse, which it has been used historically to justify. If this is what Muhammad meant, however, then it would appear to contradict what he said in Muslim (8:3365).
Qur’an (4:3) – (Wife-to-husband ratio) “Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four”
Qur’an (53:27) – “Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female names.” Angels are sublime beings, and would therefore be male.
Qur’an (4:24) and Qur’an (33:50) – A man is permitted to take women as sex slaves outside of marriage. Note that the verse distinguishes wives from captives (those whom they right hand possesses).
From the Hadith:
Bukhari (6:301) – “[Muhammad] said, ‘Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?’ They replied in the affirmative. He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her intelligence.’”
Bukhari (6:301) – continued – “[Muhammad said] ‘Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?’ The women replied in the affirmative. He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her religion.’” Allah has made women deficient in the practice of their religion as well, by giving them menstrual cycles.
Bukhari (2:28) – Women comprise the majority of Hell’s occupants. This is important because the only women in heaven ever mentioned by Muhammad are the virgins who serve the sexual desires of men. (A weak Hadith, Kanz al-`ummal, 22:10, even suggests that 99% of women go to Hell).
Bukhari (62:81) – “The Prophet said: “‘The stipulations most entitled to be abided by are those with which you are given the right to enjoy the (women’s) private parts (i.e. the stipulations of the marriage contract).’” In other words, the most important thing that a woman brings to a marriage is between her legs.
Bukhari (62:58) – A woman presents herself in marriage to Muhammad, but he does not find her attractive, so he “donates” her on the spot to another man.
Muslim (4:1039) – “A’isha said [to Muhammad]: ‘You have made us equal to the dogs and the asses’”
Abu Dawud (2:704) – “…the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: When one of you prays without a sutrah, a dog, an ass, a pig, a Jew, a Magian, and a woman cut off his prayer, but it will suffice if they pass in front of him at a distance of over a stone’s throw.”
Abu Dawud (2155) – Women are compared to slaves and camels with regard to the “evil” in them.
Ishaq 593 – “As for Ali, he said, ‘Women are plentiful, and you can easily change one for another.’” Ali was raised as a son by Muhammad. He was also the 4th caliph. This comment was made in Muhammad’s presence without a word of rebuke from him.
Ishaq 593 – “From the captives of Hunayn, Allah’s Messenger gave [his son-in-law] Ali a slave girl called Baytab and he gave [future Caliph] Uthman a slave girl called Zaynab and [future Caliph] Umar another.” – Even in this world, Muhammad treated women like party favors, handing out slave girls to his cronies for sex.
Tabari VIII:117 – The fate of more captured farm wives, whom the Muslims distributed amongst themselves as sex slaves: “Dihyah had asked the Messenger for Safiyah when the Prophet chose her for himself… the Apostle traded for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins. The women of Khaybar were distributed among the Muslims.”
Tabari IX:137 – “Allah granted Rayhana of the Qurayza to Muhammad as booty.”
Ishaq 969 – “Men were to lay injunctions on women lightly, for they were prisoners of men and had no control over their persons.” – This same text also justifies beating women for flirting.
Tabari Vol 9, Number 1754 – “Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals with you and do not possess anything for themselves.” From Muhammad’s ‘Farewell Sermon’.
The Qur’an:
Qur’an (4:34) – “Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them.”
Qur’an (2:228) – “and the men are a degree above them”
Qur’an (33:59) – “Tell thy wives and thy daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them…” Men determine how women dress.
Qur’an (33:33) – “And abide quietly in your homes…” Women are confined to their homes except when they have permission to go out.
Qur’an (2:223) – “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will.” Wives are to be sexually available to their husbands in all ways at all times. They serve their husbands at his command. This verse is believed to refer to anal sex (see Bukhari 60:51), and was “revealed” when women complained to Muhammad about the practice. The phrase “when and how you will” means that they lost their case.
Qur’an (66:5) – “Maybe, his Lord, if he divorce you, will give him in your place wives better than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, penitent, adorers, fasters, widows and virgins” A disobedient wife can be replaced.
From the Hadith:
Bukhari (88:219) – “Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler.”
Bukhari (2:28) – Ingratitude toward her husband (ie. disobedience) can land a woman in Hell. Muhammad explains why women comprise the bulk of Hell’s occupants.
Bukhari (72:715) – A charming little tale in which a woman seeks Muhammad’s help in leaving an abusive marriage, but is ordered by the prophet to return to her husband and submit to his commands.
Bukhari (4:149) – Muhammad’s wives are even trained to defecate on his command.
Bukhari (48:826) – Women have a deficiency of intelligence, meaning that their decisions will not be comparable to a man’s.
Bukhari (58:125) – Women are tradable commodities. A Muslim with two wives offers a fellow Muslim his pick between the two. Muhammad then arranges a wedding banquet.
Bukhari (62:81) – According to Muhammad, the most important part of a marriage contract is the unrestricted access that a man has to his wife’s vagina.
Abu Dawud (567) – “…even though their houses are better for them.”
Observer, you’ve been pwnd! :lol:
I’d say the point about Hansen is a canary in the coalmine point. Someone of his generation will have seen the consequences of maintaining segregation and later white majority status as being unfair without understanding the consequences of not maintaining it. jews used people like him as allies in their war against white America.
One of the things you should see more of as the reality of what a white minority actually means becomes more obvious is people like him waking up. They won’t ever be WNs but they’ll switch to neutral.
What this means in turn is jews will find it harder and harder to find suitable white people who they can use as camouflage.
Glen,
What is the point in criticizing Islam?
Who are we to interfere in their traditions and way of life?
Frankly, who cares about how Muslims treat their wives?
It’s not our problem.
I know that the neocons don’t care either, they just want an excuse to criticize Muslims (because they are enemies of Israel).
If Muslims were to someday become Zionists, the neocon critique of Islam would immediately stop.
Europe has problems with immigrants from all over the world. We got hundreds of thousands of Chinese immigrants entering Europe every year.
These people are so adaptable that they can live everywhere: from Dublin to Sarajevo (even in the parts of the city that were completely destroyed during the war).
While you can see criticism of Islam in the European press, there has never been one word about the Chinese problem.
And I don’t like Muslims.
Arabs, Pakistanis, and Turks should be thrown out of Europe. Not on the grounds that they are Muslims, but on the grounds that they are alien ethnic groups whose presence in Europe is a source of ethnic competition and conflicts.
Yes, and letting White women know what they have to lose should Islam become more influential can only help. I know for a fact many White women are beginning to realize their future freedoms could be threatened.
‘What is the point in criticizing Islam?
Who are we to interfere in their traditions and way of life?
Frankly, who cares about how Muslims treat their wives?
It’s not our problem.’
I’d agree with you if Muslims stayed in their Turd World hellholes. Unfortunately, thanks to their Semitic cousins, they are aggressively invading our homelands and looking to impose their nasty degenerate ways on OUR people. Muslims belive that Sharia Law applies to everyone, where Muslim or non-Muslim, and whether we like it or not. This is the reality we now have to deal with. Look how they behave in the UK and France.
“What is the point in criticizing Islam?”
The multicult uses liberal values, sexism and homophobia to attack white people (and only white people). You can use the multicult’s double standards over islam to attack the multicult.
Correct.
I am an ‘anti-Semite’ in the broadest sense. The Jews and the Arabs, and their pernicious belief systems, have been the bane of Western civilisation for centuries.
Some here apparently think that if you oppose Jewry you must accept that Muslims (because they hate Jews) must be okay after all.
I disagree. In this case the enemy of my enemy is definitely NOT my friend – he’s another enemy, and a nasty degenerate one at that.
The neocons are actually correct about the threat of Islam. Sure they manipulate the threat for the purposes of furthering Jewish interests (most notably with regard to Israel). Notwithstanding this, the threat is real.
Read the Islamic texts and study Islamic history and you’ll soon realise that Islam is POISON, and that the neocon critiques of Islam are largely factual.
I agree that Jewry is the far more formidable and dangerous enemy of our people. However, the Muslims come next in line after Jewry in the danger they present for our people and civilisation.
The bottom line is Jews AND Muslims both suck. The Semitic peoples and their diseased belief systems are the world’s misfortune.
In my neck of the woods Hmongs are allowed to hunt and fish out of season for food. The DNR realizes to enforce such laws on people that don’t understand them will appear if not demonstrate a form of persecution-apologist believe that one day the Hmongs will become “assimilated”. In the end laws are products of culture, not the other way around. Sadly, the state doesn’t recognize its limitations even as they practice them.
Very interesting … this seems to be the ultimate outcome of a multicultural society – balkanization. I don’t think things will turn out the way the elites hope, instead the US may someday become an ungovernable mass that breaks apart. People will look back in amazement that there was once a time when a White man could drive from sea to sea and feel at home everywhere he went.
I see no point in opening up a two front war. Christianity is cut from the same cloth as Islam so if we are going to talk about diseased belief system we might start with our guilt loving one. Muslims wouldn’t even have wanted to come to Europe or the States if their own countries hadn’t been corrupted and in some cases ruined by our Debt Dollar and military. So in a very real sense we are reaping what we sowed. Control the elite by taking away their source of power – speculative finance and the power to print money. Let all nations control their own means of exchange and stop believing in the White man’s burden, and things will rectify themselves.
I agree that Christianity was initially a Semitic creation – but it was an extremely atypical Semitic creation, stripped as it was of the tribal moral particularism that strongly characterised Judaism and Islam.
In the hands of Europeans Christianity evolved into the antithesis of Judaism. Undoubtedly the universalistic anti-tribal ethos of Christianity has had some very negative effects in undermining white ethnocentrism and leaving us as fodder for the multiculturalist social engineers.
Oh I agree their is no reason to spend time going to war against Islam in the global sense. In other words, we don’t need to worry about the culture in Egypt, Iran or Saudi Arabia. But it is legitimate to point out the very real changes that are coming to America and Europe due to Arab/Muslim immigration. So it’s a bit of a subtle distinction I suppose. I don’t want us to go off on some war against Islam, but I do want us to note the alien influences that will change Western Civilization, which includes Latino culture, Asian culture and Islam.
So as long as Islam stays out of the West, we’re cool.
Wandrin said:
“The multicult uses liberal values, sexism and homophobia to attack white people (and only white people). You can use the multicult’s double standards over islam to attack the multicult.”
There was a TV news piece a few weeks ago when Obama visited Indonesia, where he had spent part of his “diverse” childhood.
DIVERSE?? yeah, right. The story went on to explain that Indonesia is an extremely homogeneous country ethnically. It claimed that Obama was teased all the time about his ethnicity when he was a kid in Jakarta, NOT because he was black, but because he had a white mother and a black father. Indonesians thought it was the crazy for a white woman to marry a black man (or Indonesian, for that matter.) They thought, and still think, that race mixing was degenerate and made no sense, even among people who weren’t of their race.
THAT’S diversity in the third world.
I meant to say that Indonesians are racially homogeneous rather than ethnically homogeneous, as they have many languages. About 90% Moslem though.
A race against time.
I have just listened to Professor Mac.Donald’s interview on the ‘Political Cesspool.’ It was both galvanizing and refreshingly enlightening. The irony, is that I am still a passionate Old Labour British Socialist and that my mother was once a fully paid up Communist Party member, however, I put the preservation of my race before any political ideology, unity is strength not diversity. The sinister Frankfurt School and its Jewish intellectualism is far more deadly to our civilization than Marxism ever was! Their colozionation of academia since the war, and their relentless trickle down promotion of: multi-culturalism, miscegenation, homosexuality, feminism, single parenthood, debauchery, pornography, irresponsibility etc. is being ruthlessly propagated via. a media friendly Hollywood and co. workforce; this toxic anti-white virus, will inevitably, lead to our extinction. The extended racist jewish family network ensures their survival. hate to say it, I think we could learn a lesson or two from the clannish Asiatic tribe. Merry Christmas.
Hanson is an insidious neocon, a huge cheerleader for the Iraq war. Like Wilders, his only concern is that these dark immigrants don’t fit as nicely into jewish liberal multiculturalism as he does.
HA,
Don’t know if you meant to imply it, but Victor Hanson isn’t Jewish.
He is pretty liberal though, so maybe that’s what makes him like Jewish liberal multiculturalism.
“A major theme of the European right, exemplified by Geert Wilders, is that Islam does not mesh with European values—that it promotes political despotism based on fear, the subjugation of women, and a fatalistic world view that is inimical to economic progress.”
Correct me if I’m mistaken, but didn’t white racialists make the same or similar claims regarding another Middle Eastern group (the Jews) in the 19th and early 20th centuries?
I have to laugh at the “right-wingers” today who have no problem frothing at the mouth at the spread and threat of Islam in the West (and rightfully so), yet they blatantly ignore the influence of Jewry on our society’s values and traditions.
I don’t think you’ll find that opinion here.
@ ethnonationalism
“The status of women among Germanic and Slavic peoples was no better.”
The Salic Law you quote was from medieval times. By that time the ‘Judeo-Christian’ Church had usurped the original folkish religion of the Northern Europeans. That change resulted in the devaluation of women from their traditional honored role.
The primal religion of Europe, spec. Northern Europe respected women highly. This is illustrated by their inclusion of equal number of goddesses in their pantheon. Both gods and goddesses served as behavioral role models for their Folk.
Charlemagne was the principal author of the destruction of the original folk religion of his people. He had over 4,000 Saxon nobles captured under a false pretext and then had them beheaded in order to break the resistance to his imposition of Christianity. The anti-folk and anti-female spirit of the desert religion then established itself throughout Europe, although it was deeply ‘germanicized’ in order to be accepted.
Islam, Judaism and Christianity are all products of the Middle-East. Islam and Judaism strike me as mirror images of each other, except that one is extremely particularist – the ‘chosen’ – while the other is universalist – all may be muslim if they ‘submit’. Both Yaweh and Allah have blood-thirsty psychopathic tendencies. Christianity at least has moved beyond that.
The only problem with Muslims is that they are immigrating in large numbers to Europe (and in lesser numbers to the US). That’s not really a problem with Islam, though – it’s a problem with the elites of our own societies who are letting them in. That seems like it should be obvious.
All the stuff about “the Islamic threat” and how the Muslims are out to get us is being cooked up by Jews to provide support for wars against Israel’s enemies. People like Geert Wilders, who hate Muslims but rarely if ever criticize the immigration policies that are allowing them to immigrate to Europe in the first place, are enemies of White people and ought to be viewed that way.
My mother and grandparents are from a small Central Valley town not far from and not unlike the one Mr. Hansen writes about.
It is totally destroyed.
I took my 87-year old mother through her hometown not long ago and the transformation brought her to tears — the graffiti covered buildings, the trash strewn streets, the idle men hanging around the streets leering at 12 year old girls, the entire lack of English, the broken down businesses, homes that resembled shacks and lean-tos.
My mother said that even though she and her family grew up in the depths of the depression, people had pride in their towns and schools.
But why should the Mexicans care? They don’t feel (yet) that the US is theirs; they’re here to collect Free White Money.
But even when California is ‘theirs’ it will resemble a vile, loathsome border town marked by violence, gang warfare, drug use, failure and joblessness, just as does my mother’s hometown.
And, as Professor MacDonald writes, it is coming your way; we Whites here in California are in the vanguard of the country’s unfortunate transformation.
I am doing something I never thought I’d do in my life: Leaving the Golden State before I am either taxed to death or ethnically cleansed.
Bon
Bon, are other White people in California admitting this to themselves? I suspect not. It is truly sad, we will see the collapse of White America in our lifetimes with everything that implies.
Rick, please take the “climate change” propaganda somewhere else. It’s as silly as telling people that oil is a “fossil fuel” which has been known to be a falsehood for over 50 years – go ahead, look it up. Or simply speak with your average Russian for instance. The fossil fuel myth is kept going to keep Joe Blow believing that we could run out of oil at any time.
California isn’t being ruined by indios and mestizos from Mexico creating more emissions, lol. It’s being ruined by their primitive behaviors.
Jeff:
Whites here in California are being driven out due to satanic taxes, wretched, non-Whites schools, a White-hostile political climate, Third World dregs forced into our neighborhoods and schools via Section 8 housing.
As Mr. Hansen writes, 2,000-3,000 productive Californians are fleeing this state each week, businesses that haven’t fled are fleeing, our roads look like Mad Max with illegal drunken Mexican drivers causing fatal accidents.
Whites here know we are outnumbered and that resistance is futile — the election results weren’t even close, the marxists swept back into power portending more taxes, business regulations and onerous laws that only Whites are compelled to follow (making our lives miserable).
We have no voice here, as do race-based organizations such as la raza, Maldef, ‘immigrant rights’ groups and other race-based advocacy associations specifically for mexicans and central americans who continue to pour over the border demanding rights–such as to welfare and housing benefits and free educations for their children.
California has a growing non-White non-tax base demanding that a shrinking productive White base support them fully and in perpetuity.
My own neighborhood is being de-Whited home by home — in the past two years I’ve lost my White next door neighbor (replaced by “upscale” mexicans), my White neighbor across the street (home is now a rental, filled with mexicans), and last week another White family told me they are on their way out this coming summer.
Homes on my street start at approximately $550,000.
California is facing a 26-29 billion dollar gap and unlike a lot of others, I do not believe that mexicans will skitter back across the border because of E-Verify or if their welfare benefits dry up. They believe this is their land, stolen from them by Whites, that Whites owe them and that any wealth and property Whites own belongs to them. They are hostile and will attack at the first opportunity afforded them.
And the government will not help us, but rather will encourage our destruction.
This is my take on the situation, I’m calling it as I see it.
And yes, we do speak of these things; there is no way Whites do not know the pressure we’re under.
But we only speak of the coming terror behind closed doors.
Bon
For Bon-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU56IHIvysQ&feature=player_embedded
Tabla La Raza:
Thanks, sweetie.
Great video. Be ever alert and prepared! (it’s only going to get worse, as in this recent article out of Florida):
Florida: White Couple Attacked By Dozens of Black Youths,Media Silent
http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=9670
Bon
“A major theme of the European right, exemplified by Geert Wilders, is that Islam does not mesh with European values—that it promotes political despotism based on fear, the subjugation of women, and a fatalistic world view that is inimical to economic progress.”
As Islam proscribes interest based loans (and usury) it’s inimical to the Libertarian financial service sector and its debt driven consumerism.
Hispanics are Catholics and the original Chitiamnity (Paul’s Catholicism) was, in terms of consequences, a dysgenic export (high differential fertility resulting from its clerical elite being celibate, and its underclass being encouraged to breed. The higher, lower ability TFR (from pro-natalist, anti-abortion dogma) slowly dumbed down the outgroup. It was, by stealth, an effective consumer farming strategy. Christianity was created by The Chosen Ones for export only, and the Reformation was a failure in all but reforming this aspect of Christianity across Protestant Europe (see Luther). California, surely, is just an illustration of an old strategy at work. Look at the PIGS (and onetime ‘Catholic’ nations like Poland) in Europe today for vestgial effects.
Perhaps best seen as an insidious, pernicious, process which accounts for the observed actuarial disproportionalities and many colonizing predatory migrations throughout history?
Bon:
That sounds pretty bad. Hopefully the white liberal assholes who are partially running things will read some of this and feel some of that famous white guilt before they get kicked out of office by their own ungrateful immigrant constituants they encouraged to come here. When a white liberal gets defeated by a minority candidate it serves them right. Hopefully, the concept of hari kari will then come to them.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_hari_kari
It is vital to understand what Weert Gilders is all about. Yes, he may, in his less venal moments, make some interesting comments about the madness of encouraging the influx of huge numbers of unproductive (except for fecundity) immigrants from ‘alien’ cultures. The indigenous and (more or less) culturally homogenous population naturally feels threatened as increased competion for the social resources provided by the advanced ‘western’ societies makes their life more difficult and unpredictable.
However, Wilders is primarily concerned with the fate of the pariah state of Israel. He was a kibbutzim in his youth. It was in the heady atmosphere of the kibbutz that the young
Wilders acquired his hatred of Muslims. Most of the evicted Palestinians upon whose stolen land the kibbutz movement flourished were, of course, Muslims. To spread the idea – easy enough – that Muslims are a danger to western ‘values’ fits in nicely with Israeli aims to portray Arabs in general – and Palestinians in particular – as impossible to live with, or amongst. Remember, too, the the most vociferous proponents of mass immigration into European countries – and the US – were always Jews. Weakening of the indigenous culture and racial homogeneity was thereby most easily accomplished – paving the way for Jewish dominance. Now that the ingredients are in the mixing bowl, what’s needed is a big stir. That’s what he’s doing. More chaos = more power to those he (secretly? – it’s hardly a secret) serves. Wake up and realise who your real enemies are!