The threshold for anti-Semitism reaches a new low

Jennifer Rubin

Jennifer Rubin, the Washington Post’s neocon blogger, is very upset. According to Rubin, an article by the notoriously anti-Semitic Time Magazine claimed that “Jews only care about money.”

Wow! To think a very mainstream liberal publication would publish such a thing. Surely concentration camps for Jews cannot be far behind.

So I thought I would check the Time article just to actually comprehend the evil myself.

Advertisement

Here’s the offending passage, from “Why Israel Doesn’t Care About Peace,” by Karl Vick:

As three Presidents, a King and their own Prime Minister gather at the White House to begin a fresh round of talks on peace between Israel and the Palestinians, the truth is, Israelis are no longer preoccupied with the matter. They’re otherwise engaged; they’re making money; they’re enjoying the rays of late summer. A watching world may still see their country as being defined by the blood feud with the Arabs whose families used to live on this land and whether that conflict can be negotiated away, but Israelis say they have moved on.

In other words, Vick is saying that life is good for most Israelis. Like most people, they are preoccupied with making a living. One might say that they are enablers of the Palestinian dispossession rather than actively beating the drums of ethnic cleansing.

Now I strongly suspect that if true at all, this applies only to a certain segment of Israeli society–surely not the ethnocentric, hyper-religious fanatics that Netanyahu’s government represents.

In any case, one expects such over-the-top fanaticism from neocon publicists like Rubin even as one is horrified that she has a pulpit in the mainstream media. What’s interesting is that Rubin’s diagnosis of anti-Semitism has been accepted by the U.S. State Department. Rubin interviewed Hannah Rosenthal, the State Department’s special envoy to combat anti-Semitism, asking her if the Time article was “over the line.” Rosenthal “said without hesitation, ‘That is absolutely over the line.’ Those types of assertions, she said, ‘are made by people who do not know history or misread history.’”

Now one could perhaps forgive Rosenthal for agreeing with Rubin’s nonsense. After all, she was presumably taking Rubin’s word for what the Time article said. But one would think that an official State Department representative would look up the wording and quickly tell Rubin not to publicize her comment. Obviously that didn’t happen.

Even J Street, the relatively less pro-ethnic cleansing wing of the Israel Lobby, is under suspicion for anti-Semitism. Rubin asks: “Will she advise administration figures not to attend (as former National Security Advisor James Jones did in 2009), this year’s J Street conference if it features groups or individuals who go over the line into anti-Semitism?”

It’s simply bizarre to suggest that J Street might be considered anti-Semitic. It’s a Jewish organization, funded by George Soros. Although J Street does criticize settlement expansion, it states, “Our opposition to settlement expansion does not contradict our belief that ultimately some Jewish settlements and a clear majority of settlers on the West Bank close to the Green Line, and the Jewish neighborhoods in East Jerusalem, will be incorporated within the borders of Israel in return for swaps of equivalent land with the state-to-be of Palestine.”

If that’s the sort of thing that passes for anti-Semitism these days, it’s going to be pretty hard to find  people who aren’t anti-Semitic. But that’s just the sort of bunker mentality that has always characterized the ethnocentric core of Judaism–the same people who are driving the settlement expansion in Israel, dominating the current Israeli government, and supporting them to the hilt in AIPAC.

And Rubin manages to spout all this from a perch in a prestigious outpost of the mainstream media. The real problem for America as a client state of Israel is that people like Rubin can present these ideas with nary a peep from anyone in the political, media, or academic establishment. And that is a really awesome display of Jewish power.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

78 Comments to "The threshold for anti-Semitism reaches a new low"

  1. Barry's Gravatar Barry
    July 24, 2011 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    I had no idea George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Condalezza Rice converted to Judism. I new those Jews would get us into a war with Iraq.

    I find amazing how people talk about Jews. To read some of the comments you would think that Jews in a position of power had been handed everything. Did it ever occur to you how hard these people have worked. How much school they’ve attended. It didn’t come easy.

    Let me tell you how most Jewish parents raise their children: go to school. Do your best. Lead an exemplary life and give back to the community. It doesnt always work that way, but that’s what most of us are taught.
    Jews represent 2 percent of the American population,and 1/4 of 1 percent of the world’s population. Take a piece of paper. Pretend it’s the globe. Tear off a small piece from the corner. That’s the Jewish population. The rest is everyone else. What is it about that tiny tiny piece that so many hate. I’ll never figure it out.

  2. May 18, 2011 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

    The Jews are going to pull us into a war protecting this trash race, they claim to be Americas friend while they spy and steal our secrets I hope Israel is scraped off the face of the earth

  3. dan neil's Gravatar dan neil
    January 25, 2011 - 1:41 pm | Permalink

    Why are jewish woman so ugly? Serioulsy!

  4. Gary Jones's Gravatar Gary Jones
    January 25, 2011 - 10:51 am | Permalink

    I believe Not Sailer’s figure of 97.5% of whites marrying

    whites is too high for “highly diverse” areas such as Los

    Angeles County where I live. Most of my professional

    co-workers over my 28-year career went “native”, adopting

    other culture(s) and marrying non-whites.

    Many of them would have been unmarriagable,

    anti-social, misanthropes otherwise due to

    unpleasant characteristics, such as alcoholism,

    propensity for punching out loved ones,

    philandering with underage girls, etc. Usually

    these misanthropes took great peverse pride

    in their “mulicultural activities” seeing themselves

    as exemplary heroic pioneers. Often the results

    of their “mulicultural activities” were painfully

    disasterous for their partners and offspring.

  5. anonymous's Gravatar anonymous
    January 25, 2011 - 7:06 am | Permalink

    Writers who are accused of anti-semitism for criticizing Israel should sue for defamation and writers like this through the courts. That would temper their rhetoric in the future, I believe.

  6. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    January 24, 2011 - 10:01 pm | Permalink

    “Anti-Semitism is nothing but the antagonistic attitude produced in the non-Jew by the Jewish group. The Jewish group has thrived on oppression and on the antagonism it has forever met in the world… the root cause is their use of enemies they create in order to keep solidarity,” Albert Einstein, quoted in Collier’s Magazine, November 26, 1938.

    Theodor Herzl and many leaders of World Zionist movement, though Khazarian Turks, wanted the so-called ‘anti-Semitism’ kept alive among the western Christians for their evil design to occupy Muslim-majority Palestine.

    http://rehmat2.wordpress.com/2011/01/15/anti-semitism-old-vs-new/

  7. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    January 24, 2011 - 9:52 pm | Permalink

    And speaking of ugliness, could the following be the real reason Rubin doesn’t care much for Keynes? [This from Damian Thompson of the Telegraph, an article titled JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES ON ‘REPULSIVE’, ‘IMPURE’, ‘UGLY’ JEWS] :

    “Did you know that John Maynard Keynes was a venomous anti-Semite who could have given Richard Wagner a run for his money? Me neither. Yet the evidence has been out there for decades. Here are a couple of extracts from his writings, courtesy of Chris Dillow via Clive Davis’s Spectator blog:

    ‘[Jews] have in them deep-rooted instincts that are antagonistic and therefore repulsive to the European, and their presence among us is a living example of the insurmountable difficulties that exist in merging race characteristics, in making cats love dogs …
    It is not agreeable to see civilization so under the ugly thumbs of its impure Jews who have all the money and the power and brains.’

    If Keynes was an intellectual hero of the Right, rather than the Left, do you think those quotes would be so little known?”

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/8163741/John_Maynard_Keynes_on_repulsive_impure_ugly__Jews/

    (I absolutely love Thompson’s observation following the quote from Keynes.)

  8. WDG's Gravatar WDG
    January 24, 2011 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    It is probably a strategy to limit discussion of Jewish interests and influence by labeling people as “anti-semitic” but, if I can speak for myself, it is not working. Quite frankly, it really has very little impact on what I say about Jews or anyone else for that matter. In fact, if anything it has the opposite effect because I am more determined than ever before to speak my mind and exercise my right to freedom of speech. And if this upsets Jews, than too bad because quite frankly I really don’t give a dam.

  9. Gary Jones's Gravatar Gary Jones
    January 24, 2011 - 12:12 pm | Permalink

    Jewish hypersensitivity to perceived anti-Semitism
    results from their guilt about all their skulldudgery
    (they know moral value of what they are doing) and
    fear of discovery and retaliation by the goyim.

    We are in the late stages of a Jewish supremacist cancer
    that has metasized to virtually every corner of
    Europe, USA, and Canada. I commend Professor
    MacDonald for his optimism but I believe the
    patient is terminal.

  10. January 24, 2011 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Israel Sucks!

  11. Blake Kohl's Gravatar Blake Kohl
    January 24, 2011 - 11:24 am | Permalink

    All white Americans should declare them selves as “Independents” .

    Let us say to each party ” What about me, What about mine” then we will choose for whom to vote.

    The Democrats and the Republicans treat white America like a whore.

    Let us demand equal value for equal value. Give us something of value for our vote.

  12. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    January 24, 2011 - 10:58 am | Permalink

    Is Jewnnifer Rubin a Tranny? What the “H” “E” double-hockey sticks IS that?
    Ewww.

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      January 24, 2011 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

      If she is a tranny, she needs to sue her doctor. Clearly, he botched the job.

  13. Blake Kohl's Gravatar Blake Kohl
    January 24, 2011 - 10:51 am | Permalink

    The term “anti Semitism” is a political used against anyone who discusses the Jews and their doings period.

    I think everyone should be anti Semitic. We should talk freely about everything the Jews do and hold them accountable. The Jews have acquired the power they have in this country and the world because they have controlled all speech by saying it is anti Semitic. Even the truth, we can not even speak the truth.

    In the 60′s there was a Political Coup in this country, a tranfer of power from the white majority to the Communist and Zionist Jews.

    This was done through the Johnson Amendment of 1954, The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and Ultimately through the Civil Rights Laws that are unconstitutional.

    It is time for us to stop being cowards and have true conversations about Jews, blacks, illegals, and whether Muslims compliment our culture.

    But , We can only do this if the Jews allow us to.

    I have said it and I will continue to say this, the social communist Jews control the Democrats and the Zionist Jews control the Republican Party.

    There is not one politician who cares a rats ass about the rights of white Americans, We have no rights, no one represents us.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      January 24, 2011 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

      You are insightful and right, Blake. Our best bet for change would be the Tea Party but it, too, is heavily influenced by the Neocons.

  14. me's Gravatar me
    January 24, 2011 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    i know people are joking about jewish looks, but if you look at the archetypal witch and troll from fairy tales…umm who do they look like? I live in New York City and when I see a certain ‘look’ in a Jew I can almost predict how they will behave.

    • Jim's Gravatar Jim
      January 24, 2011 - 12:57 pm | Permalink

      “I know people are joking about jewish looks, but if you look at the archetypal witch and troll from fairy tales…”

      Sadistic Nazis, too. I saw RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARC last night, and it struck me how jewish Ron Lacey looked and acted. He often played jews and homosexuals in other roles.

      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_V6K4fnZSzxE/SxUM2ZZ3NxI/AAAAAAAAAao/ypmcH_Rzfh0/s1600/ronald-lacey-raiders.jpg

      Also, the characters of Col. Klink, Gen. Burkhalter, and Sgt. Schulz (Hogan’s Heroes) were all played by jews.

    • Blake Kohl's Gravatar Blake Kohl
      January 24, 2011 - 1:17 pm | Permalink

      I would like to see a survey done as to how many of the stars on TV and the movies, any media are Jewish. This is another area where whites have been pushed out. Most of the white faces we see on TV and the movies are Jewish. NPR who receives heavy funding from the government are Jewish, black, hispanic and perhaps Muslim. It would be difficult to find a white on NPR.

    • January 24, 2011 - 3:13 pm | Permalink

      “Also, the characters of Col. Klink, Gen. Burkhalter, and Sgt. Schulz (Hogan’s Heroes) were all played by jews.”

      All of the post-war Hollywood denazification shown and broadcast across the Liberal-Democracies served to promote Libertarianism, i.e. free-market anarchism, thus helping to keep Soviet statism at bay. Like so much Libertarian propaganda it makes authority (regulation) appear evil or else comical (cf. satire, parody, alternative comedy etc). This worked well because German National Socialism, and Soviet Socialism in One Country‘ were essentially the same political system, just run in two different nations. Von Mises and George Reisman of the ‘Austrian School’ of economics wrote about the identity. It was also done recently with respect to N Korea by the South Park team when they did ‘Team America’. In earlier times it was done via The Road To Serfdom (a critique of socialism) by Hayek, much lauded by Margaret Thatcher, the Private Sector, big corporations etc. Horror stories broadcast about Western German concentrations after the war were the classics, but in recent decades, denigrating humour has been used much more often, and far more effectively to get the message across to those in the Liberal-Democracies that statism is undesirable. It’s proven far better to get people to laugh at the idea of their being regulated, organised/authoritative etc at home to sustain economic anarchism, consumerism and debt.

  15. January 24, 2011 - 9:40 am | Permalink

    Jan. 24, 2011

    Prof. Kevin MacDonald is noted by the New York Times…

    The Economics of Big Love
    New York Times
    The psychologist Kevin MacDonald mobilizes considerable evidence suggesting that the social imposition of monogamy in Europe in the early Middle Ages …

    LINK:

    http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/24/the-economics-of-big-love/

    Thank you and remember:
    Peace is patriotic!
    Michael Santomauro

    • Matthias's Gravatar Matthias
      January 24, 2011 - 11:46 pm | Permalink

      Thanks a lot for that, Mr. Santomauro. Way to go, Prof KMac! Huge news! Major, major exposure! First on The Daily Show where you were about to become a household name? Now you’re a cited authority at the NYTimes? Am I dreaming? And this is only the beginning! Please, let’s help our hero in his Herculean efforts by making a monthly donation to this excellent website. Three cheers for our ProfKM! And let’s WIN this.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      January 25, 2011 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

      I think monogamy was the original mating system for Europeans. Europeans weren’t polygynous before the Middle Ages. The social imposition of monogamy was really getting a few wealthy men to restrict themselves to monogamy and was really aimed at lords with several women not the masses.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      January 25, 2011 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

      Matthias: Have you read the dreadfully silly Times piece that the other poster links to? I have, and I have also read about half of the article by Professor MacDonald that Nancy Folbre (the largely incoherent blogger in question) cites in support of her ramblings. The fact that the Times blithely assumes that its readers will accept this rubbishy, jargon-ridden exercise in roundabout politically correct praise of the ongoing homosexual- and Jewish-led drive for the further desacralization of marriage as having anything to do with economics, its putative subject, is occasion either for despair or for contempt. (Had Folbre thrown in a few references to Skinner and used intertextuality and similar hip academic terms, I would have been quick to nail her as a clone of or a cover for our own David Longley!) Nor, may I add, is her capsule characterization of Professor M’s article particularly accurate—unless, that is, he completely reverses course in the article’s last 25 pages.

      To sum up, unless one considers MSM mention of any sort and at any price inherently valuable (as Mr. Santomauro seems to), I think that one and a half cheers, uttered sotto voce, are the absolute maximum admirers of KM’s work should assign to this citation.

    • Matthias's Gravatar Matthias
      January 27, 2011 - 1:51 am | Permalink

      Monsieur de Craon: That has to be the most magnificent and beautifully written disagreements one has ever had the pleasure to read. Thank you. Reminds one of another gifted commentator I’ve praised among these pages elsewhere. Your points are noted. To this layman, though, the farther our great Professor KMac’s brilliance shines, the more light bulbs go on in the minds of our sleepwalking brethren, and the closer we collectively come, however painfully slowly, to advance our goals.
      BTW, if ever the praise I give our good Prof is uttered sotto voce it would be for dramatic emphasis purposes only!
      Thanks again, and more commentary please.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      January 27, 2011 - 3:04 am | Permalink

      Your comments are so generous, Matthias, that you tempt me to seek further occasion to disagree with you!

      As to your points, they may well be correct, and my grumpiness over Folbre’s agenda-driven drivel may be misplaced (I’m very pleased that it was clear to you that you yourself were not its object). Any favorable mention at all, even one founded upon a misreading, may indeed do the cause good—certainly more good than harm. So let’s see whether there are any ripples and where they head. I shall be delighted to be found in error on this matter.

      However this plays out, hats off to the professor!

  16. January 24, 2011 - 9:20 am | Permalink

    ‘Anti-Semitism’ in the USA may work for Zionists by facilitating Jewish migration to, and support for, Israel, just as the USA’s (largely non Jewish) presence in Iraq is good for Israel. The main problem for most American citzens today is probably not Zionists, but Libertarians.

    Incidentally, these people talking about what other people say (in Time), clearly don’t report what oher people say, they make it up (see other comments on the blight of intensionalism). They feel free to be creative.

    • January 24, 2011 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

      Longley: “The main problem for most American citzens today is probably not Zionists, but Libertarians.”

      Oh, yes, it was Libertarians who lied America into the Iraq war for domestic Zionism, Israel and to grow the totalitarian statist leviathan via the “national security“ card. (Truth: actually Libertarians were chief among the few who tenaciously opposed the Iraq war.)

      Yes, it was Libertarians who used the Fed, political Zionist “regulators” within corrupt Big Government, and government-connected Wall Street Banksters to transfer billions from Main Street to Washington, its cronies, and Wall Street. (Truth: ONLY Libertarians have been tenaciously opposed to the Fed and the swindling, corrupt, increasingly powerful Zionist central government and its thieving Keynesian economics.)

      Yes, it’s Libertarians who are self-serving racists and ethnic-networkers who have infiltrated American society in order to promote their own, plunder non-Libertarians, and put America in a political stranglehold. (Truth: that would actually be the Judeofascists and Zionists.)
      —–
      David “freedom and Libertarians are the main problem, not Zionists” Longley: you are emblematic of Zionist shill and/or useful idiot, and (nearly) everyone on this board knows it.

    • January 24, 2011 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

      “it was Libertarians who lied America into the Iraq war”….Yes, it was Libertarians who used the Fed… and government-connected Wall Street Banksters to transfer billions from Main Street to Washington, its cronies, and Wall Street….”

      Those bits above are probably accurate, as it is the case that Libertarians are deregulators (anarchists), i.e anti-statists.

      The rest of what you write appears to be just more muddled name-calling (as usual). Like many, you clearly don’t like what you are being told, but you should take it on board and see how it fits, as all this deregulation has been Libertarian/Neocon policy for the last few decades, one infamous more recent example being Brown’s speech to the CBI in 2005.

      You should ask yourself if you frequently abuse people who disagree with you, or who try to teach you anything. It’s never a good strategy as it tends to merely reinforce prejudice. On the other hand, your emotional behaviour could indicate that you have been rattled or rumbled. If that is the case, it’s probably a cue for you to learn.

    • January 24, 2011 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

      Longley: “all this deregulation has been Libertarian/Neocon policy for the last few decades”

      The shrink doth protest too much.

      The “deregulation” you speak of is mythological. It was actually a RE-REGULATION that facilitated the funneling of billion$ in resources and value from average Americans and Main Street straight into the pockets of statist-connected elites on Wall Street like Goldman Sachs and their political patrons in Big Government. It was remote, unaccountable, imperious Big Government that engineered and enabled all of this, not small government, efficient government-demanding libertarians. Is Barney Frank, who facilitated the mortgage bubble wealth transfer to Wall Street a small government libertarian, or a Big Government, neo-Tortksyite Jew? It’s the Left that’s opposed to cleaning up the Fed and its swindling Keynesian economics, and libertarian Ron Paul that’s pushing to “End The Fed.”

      Read these:
      Fed both “regulated” and covered up for banks engaged in massive fraud by spending trillions in taxpayer dollars to buy their toxic loans
      http://www.libertariantoday.com/2010/10/fed-both-regulated-and-covered-up-for.html

      How Big Government caused the housing crash
      http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/leef12.1.html

      Longley, even you would have to admit that Bolshevism/Leninism/Trotskyism/Stalinism turned out to be a massive wealth transfer from the Christian elites, average Russian Christians, and even dirt-poor peasants to the (largely Jewish) inner Party and its functionaries.

      Well, Americans may be too “sophisticated” to fall for Communism, but they weren’t too sophisticated to fall for the equally Jewish neoconservatism/neoliberalism, which is accomplishing the same ends via its influence upon Big Government, only in a less obvious and domestically murderous manner — so far.

      Longley, you’ve been talking down with psycho-babble to captive audience prisoners unable to honestly reply to your b.s. for so long now, you actually believe your own b.s.

      False consciousness, Longley — that’s where you exist. A false consciousness engineered by Big Brother and the fact that you yourself are vested in the Big Brother system.

  17. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    January 24, 2011 - 2:06 am | Permalink

    So how long will this continue and what does it say about Wasp Elites in America. Is it Jewish power or Wasp cowardice?

  18. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    January 24, 2011 - 1:17 am | Permalink

    Thanks William W. It’s not so easy conquering the world – is it!!!

  19. January 23, 2011 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

    alexander.

    That’s odd. Oh well.

    • January 23, 2011 - 10:34 pm | Permalink

      Everything is coming out italics and I am not doing anything. Ce’est la vie – or however that is said in French.

  20. January 23, 2011 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

    Alexander

    hello world yes indeed

    Something happened with the italics stuff, but the instructions should still work.

  21. January 23, 2011 - 10:30 pm | Permalink

    Alexander writes/asks
    “European. Sorry. I just can’t get the hang of using italics.”

    A tiny bit of background, and then an example. First of all, the less-than-character is got by holding down “shift” and hitting the comma-key on your keyboard. The greater-than-character by holding down the “shift” key and hitting the period-key. You probably can see this if you look at your keyboard.

    To write
    hello world yes indeed
    type the following (the following looks sort of long, but it just looks that way) – anyway, start by typing
    hello
    and follow that by the less-than-character
    and follow that by the letter i
    and follow that by the greater-than-character
    then type
    hello yes
    then type the less-than-character
    then type
    /
    then type the letter i
    then type the greater-than-character
    then type
    indeed

  22. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    January 23, 2011 - 8:58 pm | Permalink

    European. Sorry. I just can’t get the hang of using italics.
    Also, I should add a comment from an unhyphanated American friend of mine:
    Also when I was a child about 10 years old they had the coronation of QE2 broadcast to America via the under water cable that was just built and installed (1950 or so). I watched the coronation on a neighbors television since we didn’t have our own TV. While watching the coronation ceremonies I distinctly that the Archbishop crowned her “Queen of Israel”. I asked the neighbor Lady who was the mother of my friend Why she crowned her “Queen of Israel” and she said “How the hell should I know”. She cussed a lot She’s gone now but I miss her.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      January 24, 2011 - 4:38 am | Permalink

      To get the hang of Italics, Alexander, you simply double-check you have inserted a close tag for every open tag you have used, BEFORE clicking the “Post Comment” button. Is that difficult?

    • admin's Gravatar admin
      March 4, 2011 - 5:05 pm | Permalink

      Incorrect: <i>Text<i/>
      Correct: <i>Text</i>

  23. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    January 23, 2011 - 8:55 pm | Permalink

    European wrote We ought to ask for apologies and accountabilities from them for their demeaning and offensive attitude and teachings of/toward Gentiles, for which they show no conscience, remorse, guilt or anything else. You might be unaware that Christians often refer to Jesus as the Galilean as Nazareth is in Galilee. Mathew 4:15 has the clause Galilee of the Gentiles. So now you know why most Jews hate Jesus (Not that others don’t too).

  24. Abe Fauxman's Gravatar Abe Fauxman
    January 23, 2011 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

    Thank You Gregor and Shalom!

    …and in totally unrelated news, the new/jew meaning of “self-defense”, to be exclusively used by my persecuted coreligionists.

  25. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    January 23, 2011 - 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, we’ll they’re correcting that too. They instinctively know to go to for the hot Nordic girls (though Jewish men have a fixation with East Asian women too).

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      January 24, 2011 - 9:44 pm | Permalink

      Alas, too many “White” males are buying into the Asian women are more feminine canard, as well as Jews.

    • Not Sailer's Gravatar Not Sailer
      January 24, 2011 - 11:01 pm | Permalink

      97.5% of whites in the US marry other whites. Stop falling for the propaganda.

  26. January 23, 2011 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

    A few rhetorical questions on this:

    –Why is yet another hard-core Zionist writing for the Washington post?

    –After all we’ve been through in the last two or three decades (e.g. lied into the Iraq war for Israel, Jewish grifter-engineered Wall St. meltdowns, general organized Jewish desecration and plunder of Americans and their culture and society) why do we continue to fall in line every time the “anti-Semite” cudgel is wielded?

    –Why is there a special envoy on anti-Semitism in the State Department and not a special envoy on, say, anti-Christianism or anti-Islamicism?

    Let me posit a quick answer to all three: we are today living in a Jewish supremacist (Zionist) caste-system, organized swindling Jewry and complicit gentile collaborators and cowards have their greasy fingers on nearly every lever of power, and our system is today nearly entirely one massive ponzi scheme with Zionist rats holding the linchpin.

  27. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    January 23, 2011 - 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Kevin McDonald said: “Jennifer Rubin, the Washington Post’s neocon blogger, is very upset. According to Rubin, an article by the notoriously anti-Semitic Time Magazine claimed that ‘Jews only care about money.’”

    Actually, she’s right. Jews don’t only care about money. They care about money AND israel, as per her own mission statement from the Washington Post:

    “What do I believe in? For starters: American exceptionalism, limited government, free markets, a secure and thriving Jewish state, defense of freedom and human rights around the world, enforced borders with a generous legal immigration policy, calling things by their proper names (e.g. Islamic fundamentalism), and recapturing vocabulary (a “feminist” is not the same as a pro-choice activist). Nearly all wisdom is found in the Godfather movies (no, not Part 3!) and the Torah…I’m a harsh critic of racial preferences, the Middle East “peace process” (which is short on peace-production), Keynesian economics, judicial imperialism and liberal statism….I’ll try to inform and amuse, expand your Yiddish vocabulary…”

    Tic Tac, HA and Glen, you’re right about her looks, but it isn’t so much that she looks like a man. It’s that she looks absolutely nothing like a conservative, neo or otherwise. “…generous immigration policy?” “Pro-choice?” How does that fit in with even NEO-conservatism? She’s just another Israel Firster who sees neo-conservatism as the best vehicle to achieve jewish group goals.

  28. anne's Gravatar anne
    January 23, 2011 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

    lol, Ms. Anti-pants with her anti-panties in a knot!

  29. anne's Gravatar anne
    January 23, 2011 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

    I’m personally glad the Jews have obviously never read the story of “The Boy Who Cried Wolf.”

    The existence of the story, which is ours, is what tells us we have been in this boat before.

    About this woman, lol: Don’t your Anti-Panties in a knot.

  30. Tom Brown's Gravatar Tom Brown
    January 23, 2011 - 10:18 am | Permalink

    Brother Nathanael says that today’s anti-Semites are tomorrow’s heroes. When anti-Semites become the majority, what then? Goyim in the professions may be anti-Semitic, but won’t let on. It would be a career decision to do so, but what will happen when fewer and fewer Goyim are reluctant to express their feelings about a minority which has clearly acted with great animus against their own self-interests? Hopefully this will begin a reversal in the setbacks they’ve suffered at the hands of these impassive elitists.

  31. JJ's Gravatar JJ
    January 23, 2011 - 9:11 am | Permalink

    The most ethnocentric people in the world become the arbiters of what constitutes racism. Outsiders are of no concern any longer, the mask is off. We have arrived. Only the Jew exists. Stay out, this is a private conversation.

  32. Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
    January 23, 2011 - 8:22 am | Permalink

    Anty-Semite! Anty-Semite!

    “Its a trick. We always use it.”

  33. Abe Fauxman's Gravatar Abe Fauxman
    January 23, 2011 - 6:20 am | Permalink

    The *new* Anti-Semitism rears its ugly head not only in the U.S.A, but in Europe as well, particularly in France; on Thursday the Government included writer Louis-Ferdinand Celine on its list of notable personalities whose anniversaries are to be celebrated this year.
    Although considered a genius of literature, Celine has written awful slurs about people who happen to be of the Jewish Faith.
    Yes, that was 70 years ago, and the printing of these pamphlets is severely prohibited, but still . . .
    My devoted friend Serge Klarsfeld vehemently protested, his appeal duly reported in every newspaper, website, radio and TV channel, none of which we control unfortunately.
    Mr Klarsfeld was sent packing and asked to mind his own business !
    Well, almost; he had to wait 24 hours, yes 24, before the French Government acceded to his demands and removed Celine from the list.
    When facing such hateful behavior, isn’t it time for my powerless and frightened community to seriously think about making aliyah?

    • Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
      January 23, 2011 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

      For someone named “Fauxman” you have a unique and pleasant sense of humor! Celine would love it.

  34. monte's Gravatar monte
    January 23, 2011 - 5:01 am | Permalink

    It’s OK! As harder they yell, as less credible they get.

  35. Philip's Gravatar Philip
    January 23, 2011 - 4:32 am | Permalink

    Karl Vick in Time magazine writes, “A watching world may still see their country as being defined by the blood feud with the Arabs whose families used to live on this land and whether that conflict can be negotiated away, but Israelis say they have moved on.”

    The irony of Jennifer Rubin’s attack on Vick’s article is he was actually carrying water for Israel. The real reason Israel does not care about peace is because peace is trumped by the desire for Zionist expansionism.

    And I wonder what land in Israel the moderate ethnic cleansers at J Street have in mind swapping with the Palestinians.

  36. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 23, 2011 - 2:58 am | Permalink

    @ HA …
    I was about to post something similar myself. I actually recoiled in disgust when I first set eyes on Rubin’s photograph above. Does it not look to you more like a wimpy male wearing a woman’s wig?

    As others have already repeatedly said, Judaism is really mental illness put to paper and myth. Those who believe in all this sick junk just have to be suffering from dysfunctional synapses and/or serious emotional disorders. This presumably is how they end up actually expecting the rest of us to tolerate (if not venerate) such a corrupting malady in our midst.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      January 24, 2011 - 9:43 pm | Permalink

      Well, Anglo – I essentailly wrote the same thing re: Rubin’s looks – and I got a negative rating, so I’m cheesed about your 15 pluses.

      Who is rating these posts negatively?

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      January 25, 2011 - 2:52 am | Permalink

      @ Ciaran …
      Who? I suspect its the same 4 people who neg rate most other commenters. Ha-ha-ha.
      Never mind. I’ve given you several plus rates in the past!

  37. Robert Browning's Gravatar Robert Browning
    January 23, 2011 - 1:30 am | Permalink

    The Jewish “J Street” is now the “anti-semitic” organization, so anything to the right of “J Street” is “radical leftist anti-semitism” or something – or is it “right wing anti-semitism” – who can keep it straight?

    Who takes the ADL, $PLC, and the like seriously anymore?

    Other than the heavily Jewish media – like CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNBS, etc. – who really takes what the ADL and $SPLC says as anything more than the hysterical posturing of some rich New York and/or Atlanta Jews?

    Who cares? Not me.

    Why isn’t George Soros arrested on an international arrest warrant yet? I’m sure we could get two decades worth of trade agreements with Indonesian if we turned him over.

    No sweat off of my back – Soros is a crook, turn him over. He’s not even an American.

    • Cary's Gravatar Cary
      January 23, 2011 - 7:26 pm | Permalink

      We don’t have to take them seriously, but we should take their efforts to protect their brand seriously…and that’s what Rubin was all about. We need to learn to protect our brand, too.

  38. Glen's Gravatar Glen
    January 23, 2011 - 1:29 am | Permalink

    It takes many millenia of intensive inbreeding to produce such stunning human specimens! It’s nature’s revenge. The Jews may have more money, assets, power, prestige, and status than any other group in the world. Unfortunately for them, none of this alters the fact that they are, in general, an atrociously ugly bunch.

  39. January 22, 2011 - 11:07 pm | Permalink

    It’s simply bizarre to suggest that J Street might be considered anti-Semitic. It’s a Jewish organization, funded by George Soros.

    When I go to the J Street website, and look in the “about”, I can see that one would very likely classify J Street as a Jewish organization. And wikipedia’s section on Soros has pretty obvious information 1 or 2 pages from the start that would pretty likely categorize him as Jewish. (I’m not saying that MacDonald’s post classified Soros as Jewish.)
    Part of the problem is what constitutes a valid categorization of a person as Jewish.

    More to the point. What I am looking for is easy ways for me to find (preferably online) sources, which, when the larger public looks at some section in the source, they say, yes, sure, ok, the person is Jewish (in practice, searching with google doesn’t work so well for this purpose). As a pretty strong example of such a source, with one Congress woman, I came across an online source that listed her as one of the people speaking and being honored at an event called “Jewish women in [whatever]” or an event of a name close to that. This is an example of a good source.

    More, I am looking for how I can tell which members of Congress (House or Senate) are Jewish, and also how I can come up with sources like the above for these members.

  40. John's Gravatar John
    January 22, 2011 - 10:03 pm | Permalink

    I would just like to point to a slightly unrelated bit of information, but one that I think can be tied into the conversation of ethnicity. There is a documentary on Nova called Dogs Decoded. Basically, grey wolves and domesticated dogs are the same species and shared virtually identical DNA, up to 99.8%. They can easily interbreed with one another as well.

    There is an interesting portion about halfway through in which researchers in Hungary perform tests on wolves and dogs to determine whether a dog is “born” or is created through human interaction. They used a control group of domesticated dog puppies and raised them for 8 weeks from birth with a special amount of affection. They then took five wolf cubs and raised them in the same manner, allowing the wolf cubs to sleep in their beds and provided other measures of affection, essentially treating both groups the same.

    Eventually, the wolves start to demonstrate behavior that is completely different from the puppies: aggression, a lack of inquisitiveness, and a failure to obey commands. In conclusion, the documentary states it is nature, not nature that controls the behavioral differences between dogs and wolves.

    Humans and wolves/canines are obviously different, but this experiment should demonstrate that there is very real differences between ethnic groups even when DNA is very closely aligned. I believe those differences can be even more exaggerated amongst humans compared to wolves vs. dogs since humans have a vastly more complex mind which allows for more variables in behavior.

    People just want to refuse this reality.

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 22, 2011 - 10:05 pm | Permalink

      Sorry, I meant to say “nature not nurture” that controls the behavioral differences between dogs and wolves.

  41. European's Gravatar European
    January 22, 2011 - 8:01 pm | Permalink

    I am at loss with the usage of “Anti-Semitism” today. The word has almost the same effect as the “Gestapo” word. We fear to disagree with a system, and are forced into silence. Anything you might say will be used against you in the court of jewish law. They come after you (in Europe they already do) like the Gestapo came after everyone that opposed the Regime. ( 6 mil none-jews too) Are the Jews taken on the roll of the Gestapo, where Free Will, Free Speech, and Free Thinkers and Doubters are a threat to them? The overuse and the accusations of ANT-SEMITISM is like a Hammer. They say it enough times to us, verbal abuse, and after a while we beliefe it. They are in fact taking our natural sense and ability to judge right and wrong, and whatever is in between, away from us.
    We ought to ask for apologies and accountabilities from them for their demeaning and offensive attitude and teachings of/toward Gentiles, for which they show no conscience, remorse, guilt or anything else. (Why is the whole world playing their GOD game or bought into it) All are created in the image of God according to the Torah.
    That might be a start to reduce anti-semitism, as they then would perhaps become a better and more friendly people, who would treat Gentiles with the same respect and value as they would treat their own. Jews should not be “without accountability” for the language they use against Gentiles, or overuse, and the effects it has on an entire Nation. (all their abuses) Someone needs to establish some lines, as it infringes upon my sense of freedom. I do not carry my ancestors baggage with me from a thousand years ago, nor was I taught all the evils done to them, nor layed upon my heart to avenge them, or look down on another people, what ever differences were apparent, and neither should say. I am not responsible for their blood-libles, what Christians did to them in the middle ages, or the Holocaust, or that they were disspelled from numerous countries. If anyone behaves like a jerk or an a.., then that is what they are, Black, green, braun or yellow. That does not make me an anti-semite. If I don’t agree with their politic, that does not make me an anti-semite etc. etc. either.” Pretty soon ANTI-SEMITE is equivalent to being a CRIMINAL”?. America give me a break, wake up!!!!
    Confusion is the Author of evil. As a wasp, am I asking for toooooo much from the jewish people? Help me to understand what I absolutly do not understand. Either they have lost their mind, (eloquent abusers) or I am loosing mine.

    • Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
      January 23, 2011 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

      European, interesting thoughts.

      May I point out to you that the word “Gentile” is a judeo-centric term which is actually a claim of supremacy?

      By dissolving the diverse White European peoples, wherever they may exist, into a uniform “other” from the perspective of a judeo-centric consciousness, the true DIVERSITY that exists among White European people/s is smothered.

      The claim to name us is also a claim to DEFAME us.

      May I suggest to you and other readers that one cure for judeo-centric naming and defaming of our people is to no longer accept their namings? In particular the words “gentile” and the more yiddishkeit version, “goyim”.

      In our own discourse among and about ourselves, we should use something like “diverse White European Americans; if one dwells in America. Change the term according to your dwelling place.

      Carl Schmitt wrote that “A nation is first conquered when it acquiesces to a foreign vocabulary …”

      Our acceptance of a “naming” by a hostile “other” is not acceptable. They can name themselves as they wish, but they should not be allowed to universalize their own centricity and interests by claiming the right to name (and defame) us.

    • Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
      January 23, 2011 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

      One more thing European …

      Why do you defame yourself and the diverse White European peoples by using the term “wasp”? We are not insects!

    • January 23, 2011 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

      European: “I am not responsible for their blood-libles, what Christians did to them in the middle ages, or the Holocaust, or that they were disspelled from numerous countries.”

      According to them, in fact, you are — because you’re a Gentile, and Gentiles did all those things to them. They believe in collective guilt and punishment, and in eternal guilt and punishment.

      One more point: so called “anti-Semitism” ebbed and flowed throughout the Middle Ages in rough proportion to Jewry’s own behavior, meaning they were generally only “persecuted” or expelled to the equal extent that they and their partners (often “nobility”) cheated, swindled, and abused the Christian masses.

      And The Holocaust (TM)? Even that was largely a consequence of Jewish Bolsheviks and the epically murderous precedents they set and atrocities they perpetrated, with death tolls also in the millions well before the Nazis ever rose.

      Jewry’s primary enemy is, and always has been, its own bad will and bad karma.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      January 23, 2011 - 5:41 pm | Permalink

      Chris, the narrative of the oppressed medieval Jew is just another example of the effects of their control of every major university.

      How many people have heard of the massacres of Christians by the Jewish Dhu Nawass in Sanaa the late 6th century? Everyone has heard of the massacres by the Crusaders, but how many people know that during the Persian sack of Jerusalem in 614, the city was given over to the Jews who massacred 40,000 Christians? (see the Chronicle of Theophanes)

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      January 24, 2011 - 9:06 am | Permalink

      “Are the Jews taken on the roll of the Gestapo, where Free Will, Free Speech, and Free Thinkers and Doubters are a threat to them? The overuse and the accusations of ANT-SEMITISM is like a Hammer.”

      Look on the “bright” side, when the blowback comes (and it will come as it always does), it’ll be that much more powerful. More and more it’s clear that “anti-Jewish” pogroms were no more than the native population reasserting their rightful control.

    • Palestinian's Gravatar Palestinian
      January 24, 2011 - 3:19 pm | Permalink

      Well, my friend, they see you as inferior to them. They are the superior race and thus can not tolerate to see scum-bags like us, gentiles, criticizing them.

  42. Ares's Gravatar Ares
    January 22, 2011 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    This is quite a testament to the excessive paranoia of the Jews, always seeing the anti-semitic boogeyman behind every corner. I’m personally glad the Jews have obviously never read the story of “The Boy Who Cried Wolf.”

  43. Glen's Gravatar Glen
    January 22, 2011 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps we need to adopt a similar strategy – where we immediately nail any statement that could be even vaguely conceived to be anti-white or anti-Christian. Of course it’s hard to police this when the commanding heights of the media are in the hands of the enemy.

    As for the whole hyper-sensitiveness many whites feel to being labelled an anti-Semite. The label doesn’t frighten me one bit. I AM an anti-Semite, and will tell anyone who is interested the reasons why. I don’t care what Jews think of me – they hate me and my kind regardless.

    TicTac – I myself think Jennifer Rubin is a ravishing Judaic beauty. She and Elena Kagan surely exemplify the aesthestic excellence of the Tribe!

  44. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    January 22, 2011 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t that part of their tactical defense, their “Game Theory” ?? If people are condemned as anti-Semiticals for the slightest criticism of Jews, no matter how tedious and insignificant the critique, then how much more impossible must it be to voice concerns on the really critical issues?

    There’s logic behind their madness. If it’s frowned upon to scratch the tree, then it’s impossible to cut that tree down (:

    Guys, I was going to comment on – does Jennifer Rubin look like a man, or what? – but didn’t want to be nasty …lol

    TT

  45. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    January 22, 2011 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    The allegation of anti-Semitism is not a carefully husbanded ‘hole card’, the more they use it to attack simple reportage the stronger it gets. Mainstream liberal publications are the most dangerous to Israel, that is why they are held to be anti-Semitic for the most innocuous statements. Jewish activists lead with their strength – always. Contrary to all predictions the allegation of anti-Semitism has lost none of it’s force with overuse, in fact it is becoming even more effective.

    Vick makes some startling statements :-

    The concrete wall Israel erected on its eastern side during the second intifadeh sealed out not only suicide bombers but almost all Palestinians. An Israeli Jew can easily pass an entire lifetime without meeting one.

    • Cary's Gravatar Cary
      January 25, 2011 - 12:25 am | Permalink

      “Anti-Semitism” is simply a boundary word, designed to herd the insiders and to shut up the outsiders. We need to make “anti-white racist” a similar boundary word for the same purposes and aim it at haters at every opportunity.

      These words do not wear out by over-use in the same way that all stop signs don’t lose their validity by seeing them everywhere.

      From this point of view, what Rubin was doing was just following the rules about laying down boundaries.

      By the way, the reason her hair looks like a wig is for the same reason that many Jewesses look like they are wearing a wig — they are! For orthodox Jewesses like this check and for Christiane Amanpour, it is a requirement.

3 Trackbacks to "The threshold for anti-Semitism reaches a new low"

  1. on July 24, 2011 at 5:17 pm
  2. on January 24, 2011 at 3:41 pm
  3. on January 22, 2011 at 7:18 pm

Comments are closed.