Charlie, Say It Ain’t So

Edmund Connelly


Alas, the news is that fabulously popular actor Charlie Sheen has been canned or at least suspended from his show Two and a Half Men. Though the show has been CBS and Warner Bros. Television’s top-rated sitcom for the season, Charlie crossed the line: He said something construed as anti-Semitic.

It happened in a radio interview with Alex Jones:

In his interview with Jones, Sheen repeatedly evoked violent images and ideas. He also derided [Two and a Half Men producer Chuck] Lorre in an attack that reeked of anti-Semitism.

“There’s something this side of deplorable that a certain Chaim Levine — yeah, that’s Chuck’s real name — mistook this rock star for his own selfish exit strategy, bro. Check it, Alex: I embarrassed him in front of his children and the world by healing at a pace that his unevolved mind cannot process,” Sheen said.

“Last I checked, Chaim, I spent close to the last decade effortlessly and magically converting your tin cans into pure gold. [In a radio interview Sheen claims that Lorre has pocketed a $500,000,000 from the show.] And the gratitude I get is this charlatan chose not to do his job, which is to write,” he said. (See here for the story.)

Advertisement

This is a different kettle of fish from comments by  Rick Sanchez and Marlon Brando on Jewish predominance in the media.  Sheen doesn’t like his producer, and by pointedly calling him by his Jewish name, the implication is that the allegedly evil traits of Chuck Lorre-Chaim Levine stem from his Jewishness. It’s like Mel Gibson’s statement, “Fucking Jews…the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.”

Sheen denies any anti-Semitism:  “So you’re telling me, anytime someone calls me Carlos Estevez” — Sheen’s birth name — “I can claim they are anti-Latino?” Predictably, the ADL didn’t buy it:  “We don’t know what he really meant by it. But we’re concerned that, in the midst of a negative tirade, he’s making an irrelevant reference to the guy’s Jewishness. If someone was calling [Sheen] a ‘maggot’ and saying his real name was Carlos Estevez, then yes, that would be conceived as anti-Latino. It’s all about the context.”

It’s okay to say Jews are smart. That will get you major media coverage. But implying something negative about Jews in general is definitely going to bring out the heavy artillery at the ADL.

Sheen obviously has problems of his own.  Wiki tells us, “Sheen’s personal life has … made headlines numerous times, due to marital problems and his various bouts with drug addiction. His role on Two and a Half Men fit well with this image.”

Indeed, the confluence of Sheen’s private life and his TV persona makes him a very effective contemporary icon for dissolute sexual behavior and lack of interest in family and children by young males—the decades-long Hollywood campaign for cultural dissolution. It’s a good example of the general point that the cultural values of the people who script what actors like Sheen portray are dramatically out of sync with the values of most Americans and even more so with traditional American culture.

“The elite was [since the 1960s] and remains disproportionately anti-Establishment in its social and political views and . . . remains so even as a large segment of the American public continues to be ambivalent, or opposed to the new social paradigms” (Powers et al. 1996, 48). Moreover, the social and political messages emanating from Hollywood have been impervious to election returns, and “if anything, the ascendance of conservative politics in Washington may have accelerated television’s leftward tendencies by alarming and mobilizing the predominantly liberal Hollywood community” (Lichter et al. 1994, 418).

The difference between the Hollywood elite and both the traditional elites and the general public is clearest on what Powers et al. term “expressive individualism”—a dimension tapping ideas of sexual liberation (including approval of homosexuality), moral relativism, and a disdain for religious institutions. …

Michael Medved (Is Hollywood too Jewish? Moment 21(4), 1996, 42), who acknowledges that the majority of influential production executives are Jewish, describes the messages emanating from Hollywood as stressing “instant gratification rather than deferred gratification; superficial glamour rather than moral substance; and emotion, instinct, and violence rather than self-discipline and self-control.” He also notes that public opinion polls indicate that “the overwhelming majority of Americans believe that movies and television encourage criminal violence, promiscuous sex, and other forms of destructive behavior.” Medved also expresses his concern that the silence of Jewish self-defense. (See here, p. 87)

Lorre-Levine’s Two and a Half Men certainly fits this pattern.

While Sheen’s behavior is well known, Lorre-Levine is said to have an “acerbic personality” and a long history of not getting along with the people he works with—reminiscent of the portrayal of aggressive, acerbic, and massively egotistical Jewish Hollywood executives in Barton Fink.

Lorre’s acerbic personality has fired at other targets too. He is famous in the industry for “vanity cards” that contain long messages and flash at the end of his shows’ episodes. On one card, Lorre once wrote that critics are so jealous of him, they would probably “eat a hole through their loved ones and crawl through it if it meant they could get my job.’”

In a Fox Sports Radio interview Friday with Pat O’Brien, Sheen said of Lorre and co-creator Lee Arohnson: “These guys are a couple of AA Nazis and just blatant hypocrites…. They just do not practice what they preach; it’s so transparent and so sad.”

One would love to hear exactly what Sheen had in mind by calling them Nazis and hypocrites. Perhaps that the Hollywood addiction to left-liberal cultural values coincides with displays of Jewish ethnocentrism, Zionism, and superiority to non-Jews—a certainly not uncommon pattern. Haim Saban, pillar of the Democratic Party and fanatic Zionist, comes to mind.

[Editorial note: Comments on this article (e.g., Pat Hannagan)  noted that Lorre-Levine posted the following "vanity card" indicating that he is indeed quite ethnocentric--and the product of one of a Jewish family environments that doubtless augured his future as an acerbic Hollywood producer:

I’m writing this vanity card in Israel. I like it here. Not for the geography, or architecture, or even the history. No, I like it because for the first time in my life I’m surrounded with DNA much like my own. Until I got here, until I wandered around Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, I didn’t realize how much my double helix yearned to be around similar strands. Now that’s not to say that I don’t occasionally have that very same genetic experience in Beverly Hills (particularly in Chinese restaurants on Sunday night). But the sheer homogeneity of Israel overwhelms any over-priced kung pao gathering at Mr. Chow’s. The cop, the cab driver, the hotel concierge, the pilot, the waiter, the shoe salesman, the beautiful girl looking right through me as if I didn’t exist — all Jewish! If I had to sum it up, I’d say the sensation is like being at a B’nai B’rith summer camp that is surrounded by millions of crazy bastards who hate the sound of kids playing tetherball, and all the poor little camp has going for it is pluckiness and nukes. Anyway, I have to believe my visceral and very pleasant reaction is some sort of evolutionary, tribal thing. Some sort of survival gene that makes human beings want to stay with their birth group. Which raises the question, why have I spent a lifetime moving away from that group? How did Chaim become Chuck? How did Levine become Lorre? The only answer I come up with is this: When I was a little boy in Hebrew school the rabbis regularly told us that we were the chosen people. That we were God’s favorites. Which is all well and good except that I went home, observed my family and, despite my tender age, thought to myself, “bull$#*!.”]

In any case, Sheen must have been under the influence of something because it’s inconceivable that anyone in Hollywood now could be unaware of the rules when talking about Jews.  Think Marlon Brando, Mel Gibson, Rick Sanchez.

Perhaps as the star of a very lucrative show, he thinks that he is untouchable, but that may not be the case: “Surely Lorre and his writers are clever enough figure out an “Operation: Off the Rails” story line in which a vibrant and distracting new character is introduced mere moments after Sheen’s Charlie Harper has gone on “an unexpected and indefinite trip to Morocco.” Lorre would probably script a painful and humiliating screen death for his nemesis.

Joseph Sobran famously wrote that Jewish power is unique “in being off-limits to normal criticism,” and that “Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you” (see here, p. 55).

Same old, same old, I guess.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

142 Comments to "Charlie, Say It Ain’t So"

  1. Chaim Paddaman's Gravatar Chaim Paddaman
    April 11, 2011 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Charlie Sheen has made the painful discovery that”Chaim doesn’t pay”.

  2. Chonodomarius's Gravatar Chonodomarius
    March 14, 2011 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

    Why do we celebrate Arminius’ victory over the Romans in the Teutoburg forest? Because if he had lost our Germanic forefathers would have been latinized. There would be no English language, no Anglo-Saxon Common Law and our gene pool mongrelized with Asiatics and Africans, all vastly more valuble than Roman infrastructure. As Toynbee pointed out, mimicking dead civilizations like Rome retards the developement of native civilization. Give me a Norse stave church to a basilica any day. Italians, Sicilians and Levantines that poured into America can’t understand our Germanic freedom ways because they are not part of our historical experience. They claim the ruins of Rome as their inheritence, just as absurdly as the fellaheens do the ruins of Egypt.

  3. Bobo's Gravatar Bobo
    March 10, 2011 - 6:04 am | Permalink

    Any chance this could’ve been a psyop to strengthen the public image of them as the persecuted ones ? Just seems a bit surreal.

    Galliano gets a jewish lawyer

    http://www.eurojewcong.org/ejc/news.php?id_article=6327

  4. Mister White's Gravatar Mister White
    March 5, 2011 - 3:01 am | Permalink

    I didn’t like the way my last post showed up,so I’m reposting.
    Rev. Ted Pike on Charlie Sheen vs.The Tribe:
    Will ADL Foxman Apologize to Charlie Sheen?
    By Rev. Ted Pike
    In 1918 Vladimir Lenin recorded and sent throughout Russia a phonograph record threatening death to any Russian who revealed the Jewish name of a Bolshevik leader. [1] A photo of the first People’s Commissariat at that time reveals the nearly total dominion of Jews over Bolshevism: All five were Jewish. (See Jewish Activists Created Communism)
    On February 24, actor Charlie Sheen committed an offense that would have sentenced him to death in Jewish-controlled Bolshevik Russia. In an internet radio interview he used the Jewish name (Chaim Levine) of Chuck Lorre, producer of his sitcom. Instantly, “Amerika’s” thought crime commissar, ADL head Abe Foxman, sprang into action (read more…)

  5. Mister White's Gravatar Mister White
    March 4, 2011 - 10:05 pm | Permalink

    Rev.Ted Pike opines about Charlie Sheen vs. The tribe.

    Will ADL Foxman Apologize to Charlie Sheen?
    By Rev.Ted Pike

    In 1918 Vladimir Lenin recorded and sent throughout Russia a phonograph record threatening death to any Russian who revealed the Jewish name of a Bolshevik leader. [1] A photo of the first People’s Commissariat at that time reveals the nearly total dominion of Jews over Bolshevism: All five were Jewish.(more…)

  6. Si's Gravatar Si
    March 2, 2011 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

    Headlines
    John Galliano apologizes, will face trial over alleged anti-Semitic remarks
    Charlie Sheen Anti-Semitic Text Message To Brooke Mueller?
    Rabbi Jason MillerRabbi Without Borders
    Posted: March 2, 2011 03:00 PM
    Are Charlie Sheen, Glenn Beck, John Galliano and Julian Assange Anti-Semites?

  7. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    March 2, 2011 - 5:01 am | Permalink

    @Miriam K February 28, 2011 – 8:28 am

    Touché! LOL – a spelling gag never works!! I salute you!!!

  8. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    March 2, 2011 - 2:13 am | Permalink

    “I find it a struggle to dismiss Roman civilization and the Renaissance as “accidents”. This is a classic example of the paradigm in which “Anglos” indulge. Even up until the 19th Century the itinerary of the grand tour took in Rome, Florence and Venice.”

    Anglos, and north europeans generally, always looked back to classical Greece and Rome and the Renaissance. Perhaps even a little too much. You just have to look at the architecture and the names of American institutions like the Senate.

    Individuals on web forums only speak for themselves.

  9. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    March 1, 2011 - 1:06 pm | Permalink

    @David

    Given the Catholic Church’s long established opposition to contraception you are late to the party with your dysgenic argument. Pius XI in Casti Connubii (31/12/1930) opposed unnatural methods of contraception but theological opposition can be dated back to Augustine in the 5th century. The teaching was famously upheld by Paul VI in 1968 who had revisited the issue because of the emergence of the oral contraceptive. I don’t recall many white liberals or conservatives supporting him. In fact he was mocked by the cognoscenti.

    In respect of Irish monastic education, only the eldest was sent. The decision was as arbitrary as that. In addition, if “rubbish” was being taught in these institutions, as you posit, then what possible use would a scholastic education afford? Aquinas, who was taught ‘rubbish’ by the Irish in Paris, was considered a genius by Dante. The latter’s obsession, incidentally, with a nice white girl called “Beatrice” brought a whole new meaning to the Western understanding of dysgenics.

  10. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    March 1, 2011 - 3:44 am | Permalink

    @David Longley February 28, 2011 – 2:20 pm

    Athanasius is correct. The monasteries educated the laity (including women) and not all entered the religious life.

    The dysgenic argument is reminiscent of Stalin’s observation that “only old people go to Church in Russia”. What he failed to exlain was from where, 25 years later after he passed the comment, the old people kept coming?

    • March 1, 2011 - 8:39 am | Permalink

      buckle March 1, 2011 – 3:44 am

      “Athanasius is correct. The monasteries educated the laity (including women) and not all entered the religious life.”

      You (both) miss the substantive point.

      The issue is not de facto but de jure. Rules are always broken, which would account for some genes finding their way into other classes of course, but the rule means one would likely find differences from say Judaism, where this rule does not exist (although the Jewish Ashkenazi have their own infertility issues which I have raised before but has gone unremarked upon).

      The points I am making are demographic and epidemiological, i.e are about population trends, i.e relative frequencies. They warrant some careful analysis. It is a fact that under Roman Catholicism in particular see Eastern Orthodox for minor variation), the clergy were drawn from the brighter part of the population, wherever they appeared (more literate, could learn Latin etc), and they basically administrated the entire state from parish (a few hundred) upwards. That is how the church and state pre Reformation were one. These administrators or ministers were effectively state eunuchs (as in Egypt…). It wasn’t just preaching that they did. They taught, much of it rubbish of course. The same is true today alas.

      There seems to be a woeful inability of many readers and posters here to concentrate on what matters. It doesn’t bode well. More people here need to try to think a lot further outside their immediate self-centred, impulsive, little bubbles, in order to see what I am describing as determining intelligence, hegemony, and behaviour..

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      March 1, 2011 - 9:58 am | Permalink

      But how can you incontrovertibly assert that the only benefit that the intelligentsia convey to a society is to reproduce?

      In the medieval world, the smartest society didn’t always ‘win.’ Look at the successes of Mongol and Turkic peoples who neither then nor now display traits that demonstrate high intelligence.

      In the West, there were actually warrior monks.`

    • March 1, 2011 - 10:33 am | Permalink

      Athanasius March 1, 2011 – 9:58 am

      “But how can you incontrovertibly assert that the only benefit that the intelligentsia convey to a society is to reproduce? “

      Imagine a farmer who has a prize winning herd of cattle which he proudly shows off. Next he says that they are sterile.

      I am not interested in arguing with you.

      You have to look ahead in terms of many generations. You must do the same backwards. That is how Behaviour Geneticists analyse.

      The problem with lower IQ people is that they do not think beyond the here and now. That is hard work, it requires behaviour inhibition, aka self-control. They can not/do not plan ahead – they are easily conned etc. They can not see beyond the end of their own noses. This is why Mao told his people they were working for future generations.

      Do you see American youth, especially modern American female youth, working for their next generations? That is really how welfare states are built. They are like savings systems for the future. Libertarians just asset-strip these rather like criminals plunder. Not very smart people think money is being made, but it’s not, it’s just being stripped from previous investors in the state. When it all goes (as it is) it seems that smarter people don’t breed (see Russia and ex Eastern Bloc) . They can see trouble ahead. Smart people plan and build, not wreck :-(

      “In the medieval world, the smartest society didn’t always ‘win.’ Look at the successes of Mongol and Turkic peoples who neither then nor now display traits that demonstrate high intelligence.”

      Go and look into the East Asian IQs and PISA scores. Some Muslim practices are dysgenic just like some Catholic practices are. What was their common origin? Look into feminised brains and height.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      March 1, 2011 - 11:20 am | Permalink

      If the PISA scores can’t account for the fact that the West, NOT East Asia, has developed computers, the internet, the internal combustion engine, antibiotics, calculus, nuclear weapons, and nearly every important idea for the past 1000 years, then who cares?

      You’re shoving the complexities of human societies into a very narrow hole that seems more ideological than scientific. Surely you’re aware of the evolutionary benefit of altruism among kinship groups (starting with studies on bats and working up from there). Furthermore, anyone who is familiar with medieval history knows that it was rare that an entire family entered the clergy. People had 10 children, and maybe one of them became a priest (that dynamic persisted in Catholic families until very recently). That person could then help his kinsmen. I’m not saying for sure it was a positive trait, but I’m not prepared to accept that it was maladaptive just because you say so.

    • March 1, 2011 - 11:46 am | Permalink

      Athanasius March 1, 2011 – 11:20 am

      “If the PISA scores can’t account for the fact that the West, NOT East Asia, has developed computers, the internet, the internal combustion engine, antibiotics, calculus, nuclear weapons, and nearly every important idea for the past 1000 years, then who cares? “

      People like you should care.

      Populations change. China is growing economically, the USA/EU is not. You should look to where most of the development work is now being done. It is not in the USA, and when it is, you can bet it will be sone disproportionately by East Asian Americans.

      The Libertarian-Democracies are now dysgenic, as I keep trying to get you to grasp. Why is this not sinking in?

  11. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    February 28, 2011 - 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Well people like Charlie Sheen doesn’t read the writings on the WALL. Last week, British designer John Galliano made a ‘political wrong statement’ too – by saying: “I love Hitler”. As result, Sidney Toledano, the Jewish Chief Executive at Christian Dior, suspended Johan and the French Jewish Lobby has dragged him into police station.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/john-galliano-irks-jewish-groups/

    • March 1, 2011 - 8:17 am | Permalink

      Note these are feminine brained/behaviours businesses too? So is Hollywood. It’s all show, lure and fabrication. So is Madison Avenue.

  12. ihatejews's Gravatar ihatejews
    February 28, 2011 - 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Jews aren’t as clever as they’d like us to believe. They may appear like this awe-inspiring super conspiracy. But really they’re just a glorified bunch of rag peddlars who can’t help but steal, destroy and defile anything we allow them to get their hands on. It’s what they do.

    The Jews hide behind a facade of their own creation. But everyone knows what they’re about. The facade just needs to be torn down.

    That’s why Geraldo and Levine and other Jews have to make such a big deal about this, and act like Charlie Sheen’s world is falling apart because he outed one of the chosen ones. So they can awe us with their power. But Charlie Sheen can open his mouth all he likes. The Jews can’t take away his coke, his whores, his millions of dollars, or his right to say what’s on his mind.

    How Charlie Sheen’s image emerges from this scenario, will determine how we see the Jews. If we let the Jews drag Sheen through the mud, and make him look pitiful, then the Jews win. They will show to the world what happens to anyone who defies them. But make Sheen a hero, for speaking up about 9-11, and outing the Jew, then the Jews lose.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 28, 2011 - 8:46 pm | Permalink

      Do we have to hang our hopes on Charlie Sheen? I wonder if we can’t find someone a wee bit more balanced than a meth-head and a whoremonger?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 3, 2011 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

      OK, so my comment saying that Charlie Sheen should not be our poster boy gets knocked down as “abusive”. I hope the hotheads realize now that Charlie, while interesting, is not the symbol of White Advocacy that we need – LOL. Because, among other things, he is not a White advocate. And he apologized for any offense to Jews.

      Some of the thumbs down come from trolls, but I sense there are a few hotheads that need to stop and think before reacting.

  13. Scathach's Gravatar Scathach
    February 28, 2011 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

    The latest one is John Galliano…..

  14. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 28, 2011 - 11:34 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon
    February 28, 2011 – 7:53 am

    I obviously touched a nerve!

    I live in one of the 3 English cities cited and from my office window can see a perfect replica of Giotto’s campanile. There are industrial motifs dotted around these cities which were inspired by Italian architects. The USA’s own impressive tradition of country house derives it’s inspiration from Palladio. You are correct to assert that much civic architecture is inspired by Greco-Roman models which affirms the cultural importance of Southern Europe rather than contradicts it. Greece and Italy are indeed the cradles of our civilization.

    Between 100AD and 1000AD – mainland Europe regressed and was saved by the Irish monks who established the first universities. It was the Irish who civilized the Northern tribes by Christian truth via the Hiberno-Scottish mission from the 6th century onwards. It was the Irish (and also the Muslims to the East) who had documented the cultural breakthroughs of the Greco-roman world (including scientific and technological) and diffused these ideas via the monastic orders and missionary activity. Thomas Aquinas himself was taught by the “Peter the Hibernian” and whole new scholastic tradition was born. The renaissance soon followed which began in Italy as you rightly say.

    Here is just an example of what the Irish mission achieved during the dark period:

    Columbanus (563-615) was active in the Frankish Empire from 590, establishing monasteries until his death at Bobbio in 615. He arrived on the continent with twelve companions and founded Annegray, Luxeuil, and Fontaines in France and Bobbio in Italy. During the 7th century the disciples of Columbanus and other Scottish and Irish missionaries founded several monasteries in what are now France, Germany, Belgium, and Switzerland. The best known are: St. Gall in Switzerland, Disibodenberg in the Rhine Palatinate, St. Paul’s at Besançon, Lure and Cusance in the Diocese of Besançon, Beze in the Diocese of Langres, Remiremont Abbey and Moyenmoutier Abbey in the Diocese of Toul, Fosses-la-Ville in the Diocese of Liège, Mont-St-Michel at Peronne[disambiguation needed], Ebersmunster in Lower Alsace, St. Martin’s at Cologne, the Scots Monastery, Regensburg, Vienna, Erfurt and Würzburg. In Italy, Fiesole produced Saint Donatus of Fiesole and Andrew the Scot of Fiesole. Another early Schottenkloster was Säckingen in Baden, founded by the Irish missionary Fridolin of Säckingen who is said to have founded another at Konstanz. Other Hiberno-Scottish missionaries active at the time, predominantly in Swabia, were Wendelin of Trier, Kilian, Arbogast, Landelin, Trudpert, Pirmin (founded Reichenau abbey), Saint Gall (Abbey of St. Gall), Corbinian, Emmeram and Rupert of Salzburg.
    In conclusion then, the Greeks, Italians and Irish are the real stars my friend which is something to consider the next time you listen to a Mozart CD who (unlike Willie Nelson) was awarded a Anglo-Saxon

    This was all in the period of one man’s life time! The Irish (like the Italians and the Greeks) are incredible!

    Curiously, I had the exactly this same debate a few weeks ago on this blog with someone who was called “Caleb” and was later exposed as an agitator. Anyway plenty to consider the next time you listen to a Mozart CD who (unlike Willie Nelson) was awarded the Order of the Golden Spur in 1770 as a 14-year old from Pope Clement XIV . The present Pope is also an admirer – plus ça change …

    • February 28, 2011 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

      “This was all in the period of one man’s life time! The Irish (like the Italians and the Greeks) are incredible!”

      Look more long-term.

      What you are describing is not a system for civilization but precisely the opposite – dysgenesis.

      The monastic system lured the bright and able into what was effectively the life of a eunuch whilst the genetically less able bred unhindered.

      If one looks ahead to subsequent generations it could only have served to dumb down the overall population. A church in every parish too, one for every 50 families. This was a means of conquest.

      It’s all very well being ‘very clever’ in a university/monastery, but if that served to lure more into the same fate, that was a formula for serfdom, not eugenic growth of a people.

      Note how the mechanism was mentalism, which distracts from behaviour and its consequences. Note how Behaviour Analysis is vilified today too. By whom especially? Why? Because it soon exposes what’s been going on as soon as one learns to eschew mentalism.

      The civilizations which you refer to all ended in ruin through dysgenic decay.

      We are doing much the same today, but this time, by sending bright females into the workplace. The lure:- money and consumerism.

      Plus ca change…

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 28, 2011 - 2:52 pm | Permalink

      I still think this argument is too simplified. Sure, the medieval intelligentsia didn’t produce offspring (well, some of them did). But they DID produce intellectual works. These works benefited ALL society.

      Essentially, the monks were professors who were financially supported by the peasants. Had they had families, they would have had to so some directly economically tangible work to support them!

    • February 28, 2011 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

      Athanasius February 28, 2011 – 2:52 pm

      “I still think this argument is too simplified. ”

      It’s not an argument.

      Where did everyone in the USA etc falsely learn to describe what they and others have to say as ‘argument’?

      It’s nonsense. One should have learned that was the case from work done in the 1950s. Only misguided humanities and social ‘science’ types argue.

      Argument is just a mechanical (computational), logical, process of connecting premises (truth functional statements) with conclusions. It is about validity, that’s all. Today we call it programming.

      What matters are empirical facts, their frequencies by classes, and how these functionally relate in lawful ways, and which can be managed.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      March 1, 2011 - 3:13 am | Permalink

      Curiously, I had the exactly this same debate a few weeks ago on this blog with someone who was called “Caleb” and was later exposed as an agitator.

      @ buckle … If you care to look back in the archives you will see ‘Caleb’ and I exchanging the occasional comment. So, whatever you are alluding to isn’t correct. It exists in your imagination.

      I have a question. Should you not wait a while longer before jumping to conclusions about who is who, and which commenters amongst the many posting here at TOO are the most genuine and reliable?

      For the moment, I forget what ‘Caleb’ was guilty of, if indeed he was ever ‘guilty’ of anything. For the time being, what I would recommend you do is learn to ignore the 1 or 2 or 3 hysterics who regularly frequent this blog-site and who also have a tendency to post accusations and trumped-up charges against various other commenters. They seem to be in love with the word “troll”.

      I would be very disappointed to see someone with your intelligence led astray by this small group of “agitators”.

  15. Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
    February 28, 2011 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    As soon as things start to get too hot for The Tribe some interlocuters appear setting up a divide and conquer strategem to try and take the heat off: Anglo vs. Italic, etc., etc.,

  16. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    February 28, 2011 - 10:57 am | Permalink

    I saw Geraldo Rivera (Jewish Jerry Rivers) say on the Fox’s O’Reilly Factor that Charlie Sheen could do almost anything, however horrible, and survive in Hollywood. But one thing he could not do if he is to survive. He cannot make antisemitic statements. If he does that, he is through on TV and in the movies. Geraldo was super-emphatic about this.

    • C. Demall's Gravatar C. Demall
      March 7, 2011 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

      Geraldo’s real last name is Rivera. His mother is Jewish, not his father (his father’s name is Cruz Rivera). Yes, Geraldo is considered a Jew and being a Jew greased the skids for his career. But we must keep our facts straight. Geraldo’s father is Puerto Rican. His mother is Jewish.

  17. Tom Brown's Gravatar Tom Brown
    February 28, 2011 - 9:57 am | Permalink

    Charlie, the slave is never greater than the master. Maybe you should change your name too. How about Sheeny?

  18. brahms's Gravatar brahms
    February 28, 2011 - 7:08 am | Permalink

    Do people still watch sit-coms?

    I think all here would benefit from reading the comments of one Michael Mills -his comments start on page 9. Its quite a treat seeing these PC historians get demolished. Some of the best stuff I’ve read concerning real Jew history.

    http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=144462&start=120

    Anybody here know him? He needs a blog.

    • February 28, 2011 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

      Hat tip to brahms. I’ve culled Micael Mills’ comments and created the following post:

      History of Judeofascism: Ancient Jewish sages recognized that Judeophobia originates primarily from Jewish racial hostility toward non-Jews
      http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/02/history-of-judeofascism-ancient-jewish.html
      —–
      What MIlls’ documentation demonstrates is that the Judeofascists have been in nearly constant conflict with Western Civilization, and prior to that, the Ancient Near East, since they formed their ethno-religous ideology.

      Yet these racist, warmongering, perpetually subversive and troublesome people, who have declared war on Christendom and Western Civilization time and again, are who the corrupt American Establishment has unilaterally decided the country should cast its lot with?

      Sorry, but that’s a perfect storm for failure and utter ruin.

      And even if this America alliance with the Judeofascists could attain some sort of Pyrrhic vicotry in the Middle East, they would stab us in the back at first convenience anyway as their bigoted, self-serving history demonstrates; indeed, as this article suggests, their ethno-religous ideology demands such action in order to sustain itself.

      The U.S. is increasingly reaching the tilting point wherein those who compel alliances with the Judeofascists must be declared the treasonous mortal enemy of America, Western Civilization, and Christianity, and treated as such.

    • Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
      February 28, 2011 - 7:01 pm | Permalink

      @ brahms, this was an excellent discussion. Thank you very much for posting it. I would really like to hear more from Mills.

  19. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    February 28, 2011 - 3:52 am | Permalink

    @ Terek Odine:..”Marlon Brando,Mel Gibson and Charlie Sheen can not all be wrong!…”.(add half-Jew Oliver Stone to this list). No they are not all wrong but they are all cowards.They all apologized profusely to the Jews.Charlie Sheen will do that too,mark my words.They should NOT have apologized in the first place,but stood their ground.Then they should UNITE and form their own GENTILE film industry,producing wholesome and uplifting entertainment.They should even start a magazine criticizing Jewish Hollywood, exposing all its faults: its promotion of moral degeneracy,violence,attacks on Christianity, anti-White racism,hatred for Germans and Arabs,Holocaust lies etc. etc.Thus they would have BROKEN Jewish power in the film industry. Similar tactic could be used in all other fields.This is what I mean with GROUP-COURAGE. Use it and see that it works.

    • Matthias's Gravatar Matthias
      March 8, 2011 - 2:46 am | Permalink

      Mr. Ryckaert said, “They all apologized profusely to the Jews. Charlie Sheen will do that too, mark my words.”

      In the 20/20 interview, Charlie Sheen, when asked if he would consider apologizing for the sake of reconciliation, looked into the camera, and said not once but twice, “I’m sorry for offending you, MR. LORRE.”
      Great call, Mr. Ryckaert.

      And all along I thought Charlie Sheen was just another revolting shabboz goy wretch when along comes ZOG and claims Sheen’s a Sheenie.

      Lo and behold, “Charlie Sheen says he’s Jewish and proud
      March 6, 2011

      LOS ANGELES (JTA) — Actor Charlie Sheen, who has been accused of anti-Semitism, claims that he is Jewish and proud of it.”

      http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/03/06/3086292/actor-sheen-says-he-is-jewish

      ZOG scores a bullseye. Damn these TOO commentators are sharp. Although perhaps Mr. Buckle should check out this incredible new video from David Duke about that other racial crime syndicate: Judaism.

  20. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 28, 2011 - 3:31 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon February 28, 2011 – 1:55 am

    So, a lack of archeological evidence is no proof of “zero culture”.

    This sounds like the neo-con argument for invading Iraq. No evidence of WMD is proof that he hasn’t got any. It just prooves his WMD are more sinister than we thought …

    Nobody is saying that Northern tribes lacked culture. What I said exactly is that of the peasants who came to the USA, the Italians would have been exposed to an unprecedented cultural legacy in their own country. Thus even a thug like Capone attended the opera …

    I find it a struggle to dismiss Roman civilization and the Renaissance as “accidents”. This is a classic example of the paradigm in which “Anglos” indulge. Even up until the 19th Century the itinerary of the grand tour took in Rome, Florence and Venice. I don’t recall anyone visiting Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds. Curiously the civic architecture (and even industral) of these latter cities were copied from Italy.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 28, 2011 - 7:53 am | Permalink

      @ buckle …
      Many TOO readers will question why you elected to respond to my earlier post all the way down here, instead of staying inside the original thread, above. The more perceptive amongst us will know why.

      I put you under a little pressure, and you immediately reach into your bag of dirty tricks …

      This sounds like the neo-con argument for invading Iraq. No evidence of WMD is proof that he hasn’t got any. It just prooves [sic] his WMD are more sinister than we thought …

      What has the criminal lies of Bush, Blair, and Tel Aviv got to do with our discussion? Why are you inserting NeoCon Agenda arguments into a discussion about comparative cultures in northern Italy versus the Germanic Tribes during and immediately following the decline of Rome?

      I find it a struggle to dismiss Roman civilization and the Renaissance as “accidents”.

      It appears you enjoy inserting new Strawman arguments into your responses to skeptical comments directed at you. I made no reference to “accidents”. It rather reads like you are debating with your own shadow. Furthermore, I was not aware we were discussing the Renaissance, which (according to some) began in the 14th century.

      I was under the impression you and I had started out discussing the centuries between 100 AD and 1000 AD; the period when the noble and manly Germanics eliminated the filthy poison that was pederastic Rome before properly inheriting their land, and properties, and titles!

      This is a classic example of the paradigm in which “Anglos” indulge.

      Wrong again buckle. Your apparent disdain for the “Anglos” is possibly the result of you believing Jewish propaganda. You have conflated “Anglo” ethics with the tenets of British-Israelism. Typically, all well-informed Anglo’s despise what is so often attributed to them by malicious gossips.

      Even up until the 19th Century the itinerary of the grand tour took in Rome, Florence and Venice. I don’t recall anyone visiting Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds.

      Here, and with some snobbery, you are mixing apples and oranges. I don’t know if your constitution can take this, but the rest of the world should know that England’s financial strength was actually built by the cities of Leeds, Manchester, and Liverpool. In their heyday, the combined GDP of these great English cities probably exceeded that of Rome (excluding the Vatican), Florence, and Venice combined.

      Curiously the civic architecture (and even industral [sic]) of these latter cities were [sic] copied from Italy.

      Wrong again buckle. They woz copeed from … GREECE … after Rome had in turn copied theirs from the Greeks! Me thinks you are in luv with all things Roman: slavery, brutality, live “snuff movies”, grand larceny, extortion rackets, widespread prostitution (of both genders), murder, incest, insanity, and disease. Yeah, Rome … the home of “civilization” … of a very sick kind!

      I suspect you’re just the kind of person who would jump at the chance to visit Manhattan in order to wallow in some truly rich “kulture”. Borf!

      What I said exactly is that of the peasants who came to the USA, the Italians would have been exposed to an unprecedented cultural legacy in their own country.

      Unprecedented? Mmmm? Ever heard of China’s Qing Dynasty? Or the Silk Road? Or of the glittering and highly artistic Moghuls of India? And what about Persia … provider of one of the world’s richest cultural legacies?

      And what had the allegedly culture-starved German immigrants to America been exposed to in their home country? Well let us take a sample:
      Johann Sebastian Bach (1685–1750), Baroque composer;
      Ludwig van Beethoven (1770–1827);
      Johannes Brahms (1833–1897);
      George Frideric Handel (1685–1759);
      Johann Carl Gottfried Löwe (1796–1869);
      Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791);
      Richard Strauss (1864–1949);
      Richard Wagner (1813–1883); and the celebrated artist …
      Albrecht Dürer (1471 – 1528) … etc., etc.

  21. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 28, 2011 - 3:00 am | Permalink

    @Tenrek Odine February 27, 2011 – 11:16 pm

    What is your point? There were Jewish mobsters also? My key point is that the mob have a clear GES which rendered it very difficult to destroy and could thus resist out group penetration and takeovers. The same could not be said of the financial services industry or Hollywood to name but a couple of examples.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 28, 2011 - 11:09 am | Permalink

      ‘What is your point? There were Jewish mobsters also?’

      Not that there were, but that they were/ are prevalent in the dirty underworld.

    • February 28, 2011 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

      Might it just be that successful (often Jewish, but not exclusively so, see NYC geography, immigration and demographic) banksters were genetically verbally dextrous relative to Italian gangsters (dumbed down via generations of Catholicism), to arrange for their venal behaviours to be declared legal, i.e legislated for, rather than against?

  22. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    February 27, 2011 - 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Charlie Sheen is a half-Jew. His mother is an Ashkenazi Jewess: Janet Templeton. There are numerous references on the internet to her being Jewish. And she looks Jewish too:

    http://photos.benefitoffice.org/Events/Speak-Truth-to-Power-New-York/STTP-NYC-240/103950618_XTuRe-L.jpg

  23. Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
    February 27, 2011 - 11:19 pm | Permalink

    Marlon Brando, Mel Gibson, and Charlie Sheen can not all be wrong!

  24. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    February 27, 2011 - 10:14 pm | Permalink
    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      February 28, 2011 - 5:00 am | Permalink

      Z.O.G.

      Great link on Jones. We used to have a local jew-owned radio station which made heavy pretenses of being conservative. He slipped in so much of that crackpot Illuminati ghost type stuff it was obvious anyone believing his garbage would only discredit themselves. But of course it makes it easy then for other jews to label us as crackpots. But as Mickey Meadows put it so well in an earlier thread that’s one of the subtle tactics we need to learn.

  25. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 27, 2011 - 9:54 pm | Permalink

    @David Longley February 27, 2011 – 3:03 pm

    This is a fair point. The Icelanders were ripped off by their own working in tandem with Dutch and British interests. Swedish carpetbaggers whacked the Baltic states whose peeople concluded that they received better treatment under the Soviets. The Austrians went for the Central European states. The ‘banksterism’ of recent years is not an exclusively Jewish phenomenon. Don’t misundertsand me. I know full well that Goldman Sachs when long and short on Greece in what was the ultimate play.

    Yet people will watch Irvin Winkler’s “Goodfellas” over and over – it was on TCM yet again this weekend. Fascinating to see people fall for Hollywood propaganda.

  26. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 27, 2011 - 9:18 pm | Permalink

    Jason:

    I wish Nancy Pelosi would move into a 90% black neighborhood – lets see what her behaviour would be like!

    Speaking of behavior – what would be the news media’s reaction to a picketing of an NBA game – for lack of diversity on the playing court. Anyone have the guts to do that?

  27. Mr. Z's Gravatar Mr. Z
    February 27, 2011 - 8:52 pm | Permalink

    @ flavia’s earlier comment about ‘Romulans’ being an enemy in Star Trek.

    Yes, Stark Trek. Isn’t it lovely. Could there have been a bigger piece of Jewish communist propaganda than that monstrosity by the Jew Gene Roddenberry?

    Just about all of the original series cast was Jews or non-white, except for maybe Scotty.

    And that continues to ‘The Next Generation’. Speaking of which, here is some lovely comedy for you:

    http://i51.tinypic.com/jg1h60.jpg

    • andre's Gravatar andre
      February 27, 2011 - 11:33 pm | Permalink

      @ flavia’s earlier comment about ‘Romulans’ being an enemy in Star Trek.

      Yes, Stark Trek. Isn’t it lovely. Could there have been a bigger piece of Jewish communist propaganda than that monstrosity by the Jew Gene Roddenberry?

      Just about all of the original series cast was Jews or non-white, except for maybe Scotty.
      Mr. Z

      Gene Roddenberry wasn’t a Jew, he had Norwegian ancestry. His left wing racial views were motivated by his race mixing. The more explicit Jewish elements in Star Trek mostly came from Nimoy and various Jewish writers. Shatner, the other famous Jewish cast member, isn’t particularly into Jewish culture.

      James Doohan (Scotty) and Deforest Kelley (Dr. McCoy) were White.

    • Mr. Z's Gravatar Mr. Z
      February 28, 2011 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

      @ andre

      My mistake on Roddenberry, thanks for the correction. I did notice now after a google of terms like Roddenberry Jew, that some Jewish star trek site claims he was raised southern baptist christian, and then abandoned it for secular humanism.

      Though, as you said, just about everyone else associated with the franchise was non-white or Jewish, and it seems the influence and heads were purely Jewish.

      From the following Jewish site: http://www.myjewishlearning.com/hot_topics/ht/Star_Trek.shtml

      “The creator of Star Trek, Gene Roddenberry, was not Jewish–though his two initial co-writers, Bob Justman and Herb Solow, were. Several episodes were influenced by the specter of the Holocaust, which, in the mid-1960s, was still relatively recent: In “The City on the Edge of Forever,” Kirk, Spock, and Dr. McCoy travel back in time to the first days of World War II. “The Conscience of the King” can easily be read as an allegory for Nazi hunting: on a distant planet, a former tyrant who personally planned the execution of thousands of innocents seems to have run away and reinvented himself as a Shakespearean actor.”

  28. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 27, 2011 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

    @Helvena

    Terry Jones is as former Monty Python. Are you kidding me?

    Have you been to Italy? They are still using bridges built 2000 years ago by the Romans! It is still not known how these guys placed a roof on the Coliseum! The contribution of the Italian peninsula is without parallel in human history. In the fields of science, art and technology, they have no equals. As recently as 1930’s, Mussolini could still look down his nose Hitler and did! Despite being fluent in German he was only ever rude behind Hitler’s back … Italian engineers have built the logistics module for the latest shuttle launch. The module, which is used as a packing box for supplies in the orbiter’s payload bay, would normally return to Earth with every shuttle mission, but for Discovery’s flight it will be left on station to provide extra storage space. The module is called “Leonardo …”

    You guys neeed to get out more. You also need to start making friends or this project is doomed. WASPs possess no GES so it’s pointless complaining about other peoples’ superior versions. Kevin Mack is urging the development of a GES for the majority in the USA and watching Monty Python will not get you one.

  29. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    February 27, 2011 - 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Buckle, take a look at this Terry Jones series about the ‘Barbarians’ and you might change your mind or at least have a greater appreciation for the indigenous Northern European. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Jones'_Barbarians?wasRedirected=true. This isn’t to say great things didn’t come out of the Italian peninsula.

  30. Alex's Gravatar Alex
    February 27, 2011 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

    So, in ALL these cases below – Jews were innocent victims? Always falsely accused, right?

    Expulsions of Jews from Host Nations: 1). A.D. 250, Carthage; 2). 415, Alexandria; 3). 554, Diocese of Clement (France); 4). 561, Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612, Visigoth Spain; 6). 642, Visigoth Empire; 7). 855, Italy; 8). 876, Sens; 9). 1012, Mayence; 10). 1181, France; 11). 1290, England; 12). 1306, France; 13). 1348, Switzerland; 14). 1349, Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349, Hungary; 16). 1388, Strasbourg; 17). 1394, Germany; 18). 1394, France; 19). 1422, Austria; 20). 1424, Fribourg & Zurich; 21). 1426, Cologne; 22). 1432, Savory; 23). 1438, Mainz; 24). 1439, Augsburg; 25). 1446, Bavaria; 26). 1453, Franconis; 27). 1453, Breslau; 28). 1454, Wurzburg; 29). 1485, Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492, Spain; 31). 1495, Lithuania; 32). 1497, Portugal; 33). 1499, Germany; 34). 1514, Strasbourg; 35). 1519, Regensburg; 36). 1540, Naples; 37). 1542, Bohemia; 38). 1550, Genoa; 39). 1551, Bavaria; 40). 1555, Pesaro; 41). 1559, Austria; 42). 1561, Prague; 43). 1567, Wurzburg, Genoese Republic; 44). 1569, Papal States; 45). 1571, Brandenburg; 46). 1582, Netherlands; 47). 1593, Brandenburg, Austria; 48). 1597, Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614, Frankfort; 50). 1615, Worms; 51). 1619, Kiev; 52). 1649, Ukraine; 53). 1654, LittleRussia; 54). 1656, Lithuania; 55). 1669, Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670, Vienna; 57). 1712, Sandomir; 58). 1727, Russia; 59). 1738, Wurtemburg; 60). 1740, LittleRussia; 61). 1744, Bohemia; 62). 1744, Livonia; 63). 1745, Moravia; 64). 1753, Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761, Bordeaux; 66). 1772, Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775, Warsaw; 68). 1789, Alace; 69). 1804, Villages in Russia; 70). 1808, Villages & Countrysides (Russia); 71). 1815, Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815, Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria; 73). 1820, Bremes; 74). 1843, Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75). 1862, Area in the U.S. under Grant’s Jurisdiction; 76). 1866, Galatz, Romania; 77). 1919, Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45, Nazi Controlled Areas; 79). 1948, Arab Countries.

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      February 28, 2011 - 5:13 am | Permalink

      Alex

      That is a truly awesome list. I’ve long known their pattern has been repeated over and over since Egypt, but had no idea it was so extensive. If that same pattern shows up in all these cases that in it’s self is powerful ammunition and should be distributed as widely as possible.

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      February 28, 2011 - 8:40 am | Permalink

      @ whiteawake

      “That is a truly awesome list…”

      Here is an even more awesome list: 109 countries from which we Jews have been expelled since AD 250. Needless to say, each and every time we Jews were spotlessly innocent. We done nuthin wrong, ok? History is full of similar instances of blatant anti-Semitism.

      http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm

    • James Woroble Jr's Gravatar James Woroble Jr
      March 8, 2011 - 3:53 pm | Permalink

      There is an old European proverb:

      If one man calls you a jackass, ignore him.

      If two men call you a jackass, consider the possibility.

      But, if three men call you a jackass, BUY A SADDLE!

      —-

  31. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    February 27, 2011 - 4:07 pm | Permalink

    The Jews understand very well that as a small impopulair minority,in spite of their enormous wealth, influence and power,their situation is pretty precarious.If a sufficient amount of goyim rebel against their parasitic rule they will be toast.It happened many times in their history and they want to prevent it at any cost.Criticism of any kind might lead to persecution or worse.Therefore even the slightest criticism must be nipt in the bud.Should an uppity goy still venture to break this sacred rule,he will be immediately called to order and forced to publicly apologize in a most humiliating manner.Thus the Jews create a “taboo” around themselves and in this way they “rule”.No isolated goy can break this power,only a group can.What is needed is group-courage.

    • Alex's Gravatar Alex
      February 27, 2011 - 4:22 pm | Permalink

      Franklin – hope I can post links – I’ll give it a try:
      Moldovans tear down menorah & put up cross

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 27, 2011 - 6:25 pm | Permalink

      Yes, in the end, Jewish leaders take advantage of the good will and altruism of Whites, and use it against Whites. They are very aware of our sense of fair play and basically game the system to their advantage. In some Whites, the level of trust and good will has become a pathological gullibility and suicidal sense of self-sacrifice.

    • February 27, 2011 - 7:31 pm | Permalink

      Jason Speaks February 27, 2011 – 6:25 pm

      “Yes, in the end, Jewish leaders take advantage of the good will and altruism of Whites, and use it against Whites.”

      It isn’t just Jews who do that. So why single them out?

      Plenty of Whites (and other groups) do exactly the same (our prisons are full of them, and elsewhere, they’re handsomely rewarded with large bonuses for doing just that).

      How do you explain their behaviour?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 27, 2011 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

      There are chihuahua’s that outrun greyhounds on occasion as well. But we can still ascertain the typical behaviour of greyhounds and assert that on average, they run faster than most dogs. It’s called population genetics. It’s not a category that all greyhounds must outrun all other dogs, but as a population they typically do.

      It’s not always true that every African has a lower IQ than Whites or Asians, but that is typically true. It is true enough to be statistically important and to affect their behaviour when compared to other groups.

      Jews have a typical behaviour when considered as a population with regard to how they interact with other groups. In studying the behaviour of different human populations it is useful to study history. By studying history we are able to grasp various patterns of behaviour that have emerged from groups and also how different groups respond to conflict.

      Not every crime is committed by a black person, but if we were to drop 500,000 African-Americans into Oregon, we can be fairly confident their crime rate would soar, based on their behaviour. A White person would generally be rational to say he doesn’t want to live in a 90% black neighborhood, for fear of violence and crime, even though blacks are not the only criminals on earth. A White person’s avoidance is rational given our knowledge of black behaviour.

      Having a large population of Jews in a nation has typically led to certain conflicts and problems that stem from Jewish behaviour. This behaviour has been documented over centuries, across continents and cultures.

      Have we used the word behaviour enough already?

    • February 27, 2011 - 10:25 pm | Permalink

      Longley: “It isn’t just Jews who [take advantage of White good will]. So why single them out?”

      True, Longley. Communists like you do as well. No wonder you Commies are soft on Judeofascism: you’re like-minded mooches, parasites, and enemies of Christian civilization.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 28, 2011 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

      But it’s not gonna work much longer. Things are getting too bad. People start looking for real answers to “why”.

      Looking only makes people “see”. The vision will lead to one point.

      We know what happens next…

  32. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 27, 2011 - 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Buckle:

    Have you ever been to the German part of Switzerland? It is a paradise on earth, so clean, orderly, beautiful – the town lake and surroundings of Zurich is a masterpiece. Just because a fat idiot like Orsen Wells says the Swiss have contributed only cuckoo clocks doesn’t make it true. Your reprinting it shows you must be one of those 2 standard deviations below 100 IQ types. Hopefully, they can keep out the destroyers of civilization.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      February 27, 2011 - 6:15 pm | Permalink

      @Scooter

      I have been to Switzerland and speak French, Italian and German although I don’t doubt I fall below the “100″ mark as you rightly say.

      The Swiss get their money mainly through a criminal banking system. Events of 2008 suggest that the USA is attempting to emulate them. It’s a matter of conjecture as to which country is proving the most successful in the field.

      Switzerland’s national hero William Tell is best known to us courtesy of Italy’s Gioachino Antonio Rossini although some might say that Jean-Jacques Rousseau is worthy of this soubriquet. I understand the latter is popular in your part of the World where freedom is highly valued. There are other famous Swiss citizens of course and I must confess Roger Federer’s forehand has always impressed.

      Orson Well(e)s (we both misspelt his name so does that make us both examples of those 2 standard deviations below 100 IQ types?) always struck me as a man with an IQ in excess of a 100 and sadly an ego to match. It’s a mute point as to whether he or Greene is responsible for the “line”. Perhaps I should be more patriotic or indeed sectarian and claim my fellow English Catholic Graham Greene as its author.

      NB – you also misspelt “Orson”

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 27, 2011 - 6:22 pm | Permalink

      I’ve always heard very good things about Switzerland, especially the German parts. I don’t think it’s fair to say they have only made money through “criminal banking”. I doubt they have a higher percentage of criminal money in their banks than, say, the Caymans, or many banks in Mexico or South America.

    • brahms's Gravatar brahms
      February 28, 2011 - 6:45 am | Permalink

      Having visited quite a bit of Europe, I’d place Italy on the low end of the organization scale. I’ve driven in France, Germany, Netherlands, and the UK and driving in Italy is almost like driving in the Caribbean – chaos. But this is expected if believe in stereotypes. Just look at what they let their president get away with.

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      February 28, 2011 - 8:28 am | Permalink

      @ buckle

      NB – you also misspelt “Orson”

      You misspelt “moot”:

      (It’s a mute point as to whether he or Greene is responsible for the “line”.)

  33. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 27, 2011 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon February 27, 2011 – 12:16 pm

    I have been thumbed down so I shall try to back out gracefully! As Athanasius says, nobody is saying that the Northern tribes (especially their elites) did not possess culture. There is no comparison however between the Germanic tribes and the achievements of the Italian penisula. As Orson Wells said: “In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love; they had five hundred years of democracy and peace and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.”

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 28, 2011 - 1:55 am | Permalink

      @ buckle …

      I am sorry for your “thumbed downs”, but there is nothing I can do except re-open your hidden comment. I am sure you have noticed that these voting buttons are being used mostly as emoticons, and not as they were originally intended. As David Longley has commented elsewhere on these TOO pages, we are certainly very strange creatures. And of course we do have a few regular TOO visitors (and Commenters) whose mental ages are struggling to get past age 16.

      I don’t wish to disagree with you, but I think you should avoid using language such as: “There is no comparison however between the Germanic tribes and the achievements of the Italian penisula [sic].” I believe this is too extreme and exaggerates the valid dichotomy you are promoting.

      The early achievements of the Italian Peninsula were largely due to an accident of geography! Orson Wells was of course referring to the competition between the various city states in and around Northern Italy, following the Germanic takeover of Italy (and Rome) that was concomitant with the Carolingian Dynasty. And as we all know (or should know) the wealth of Rome had long acted as a magnet for those kinds of people who excel in designing and making beautiful buildings, paintings, sculptures, frescos, etc.

      The natural home of the Germanic Tribes was and still is a great deal colder, with harsh winters and thick snow. Prior to the 14th century, it was densely forested, and also home to wild boar and wolves. Nearly all their most prestigious early architecture was constructed from timber. It has since rotted away or was eaten by insects. So, a lack of archeological evidence is no proof of “zero culture”.

      Recently, reasonably intact graves of ancient Germanics have been found. They date back 2,600 years. Burial rituals and methods that show great sensitivity to the dead, speak volumes about how culturally advanced a people are. These graves confirm that the Germanics were culturally advanced long before Julius Caesar conquered Gaul.

      Regards,
      Angelsachse

  34. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    February 27, 2011 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

    “instant gratification rather than deferred gratification; superficial glamour rather than moral substance; and emotion, instinct, and violence rather than self-discipline and self-control.”

    Working class people are most vulnerable to that kind of indoctrination, (unless they are religious fundamentalists). Lurid Hollywood ‘entertainment’ has more to do with the maladaptive course being followed by ordinary whites than anybody knows.

    • February 27, 2011 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

      Someday February 27, 2011 – 3:02 pm

      “instant gratification rather than deferred gratification; superficial glamour rather than moral substance; and emotion, instinct, and violence rather than self-discipline and self-control.”

      Working class people are most vulnerable to that kind of indoctrination, (unless they are religious fundamentalists). Lurid Hollywood ‘entertainment’ has more to do with the maladaptive course being followed by ordinary whites than anybody knows.

      Consumers.

      Libertarian economies thrive by breeding/importing and selling to, such consumers.

      This is the USA’s dysgenic, populist, market.

  35. NadePaulKuciGravMcKi's Gravatar NadePaulKuciGravMcKi
    February 27, 2011 - 9:47 am | Permalink

    Charlie Sheen questions Obama about 9/11
    despite AIPAC controlled media censorship

  36. Mister White's Gravatar Mister White
    February 27, 2011 - 2:05 am | Permalink

    The tribe operates like the mafia.They’ll do anything and everything in their power to protect one of their own.
    Sheen was mouthing off,blew this tribe member Chuck Lorre’s Chaim Levine’s cover.Charlie named the jew,perhaps implicitly,but in the eye’s of the Kosher Nostra (a fitting name for them), Charlie had crossed that forbidden line.For a lowly goy to name the jew,it’s like a low ranked hood mouthing off about his mafia boss;and we all know how that story goes.How many times have we seen similar cases like Charlie Sheen’s?
    Meanwhile a really vile,and evil creature is extolled and positively promoted by jewish controlled Hollywood.Because he’s one of them.

    • Curt's Gravatar Curt
      February 27, 2011 - 6:07 am | Permalink

      Mister White;
      “Meanwhile, a really vile and evil creature is extolled…”
      – Yes indeed, Polanski is vile and evil and one of the most perverse and disgusting films that I have ever seen was made by this “man”. The movie was called “The Tenant”, and it had the distinction of being the only film that I had ever seen (in a theater) where the audience actually booed the film after it was over. That film is a reflection of Roman Polanski’s mind.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      February 27, 2011 - 9:20 am | Permalink

      “The tribe operates like the mafia”

      It’s interesting to see how WASPs buy into the mafia paradigm for purposes of comparison: “like the mafia” but let us ponder the mindset of an Italian male when confronted by Americans, descended from the European northern tribes, as they looked down upon him on his arrival at Ellis island. Both ‘group’s had left poverty behind but the wealth of civilization on the Italian peninsula is without parallel in human history. Even Al Capone cried during “Pagliacci” and frankly Scottish reels don’t possess the same cultural impact. Indeed, the peasants of the Slav, Scandinavian and Northern tribes brought zero culture and their food, for example, remains discusting even to this day. Moreover, the WASP’s greatest cultural achievement – the plantation mansion – was inspired by Palladio.

      Organised crime however is where the Jews were outfought because they were confronted by a stronger and smarter (“wiser”?) GES. In “legitimate” areas of business they could outfight their rivals and in 2008 pulled off the biggest heist in history and through the Federal Reserve the heist continues. In so doing their profits dwarfed those of the criminal empires of the traditional crime bosses.

      Yes, something to ponder the next time you’re listening to a Willie Nelson CD.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 27, 2011 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

      @ buckle …
      Some good points, particularly about the Mafia dealing effectively with the ‘Jooze’.

      But I shall have to disagree with your opinion of “Northern Foods”. I personally consider Scandinavian cuisine to be very refined, although I would concede that pickled Herrings or Eels do not suite everyone’s palate. Have you never sampled an authentic smorgasbord?

      http://www.allscandinavia.com/scandinaviancuisine.htm

      Also, if you enjoy Pork, then you really must seek out a quality German restaurant to experience the magical ways they serve it up!

      When you celebrate: “… the wealth of civilization on the Italian peninsula is without parallel in human history” … I fear you are forgetting something very important. The largest part of the civilization that you so admire was actually established by Germanics who had taken control of Italy’s northern territories during the final 100 years of the Western Roman Empire. In fact all the great, culturally rich cities of northern Italy — such as Ravenna and Milan — were actually established and embellished by the Germanic tribes. It was they who created the success story that is Northern Italy.

      And as for culture elsewhere in early Northern Europe, here are some examples of jewelry by allegedly “zero culture” Anglo-Saxons, dating from the period between the 7th and 9th centuries AD:
      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Alfred_Jewel.jpg
      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9b/Pentney_hoard.jpg
      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Brit_Mus_Fuller_Brooch.jpg

      I think you will agree that these fine examples, fashioned in gold, are equal, or superior, to anything that has come out of that toilet of a region known as the “Middle East” … source of de Juden hoax books.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 27, 2011 - 2:04 pm | Permalink

      Anglo-Saxon,

      I for one, have great respect for the accomplishments of Germanic peoples. I’d go so far as to say that in the American paradigm, peoples whose ancestors emigrated from other parts of Europe owe some (not total) deference to extant Anglo-Saxon culture–and regardless, they’d be wise to take into account those aspects of Germanic culture that are particularly successful.

      That said, to claim that all European accomplishment is Germanic is ridiculous. You mentioned Ravenna–Compare San Vitale (a Byzantine structure) to Theodoric’s tomb or San Apollinare (which has Byzantine mosaics, despite being an Ostrogothic structure). Once again, I’m not saying that Germanics had not culture, or event that they had a low quality culture, but rather that they weren’t superior at all times in all places.

      Furthermore, clearly the Germanics built upon Mediterranean culture. The fact that those exquisite gold pieces you posted use Latin letters articulates this fact. Does that mean Mediterranean peoples’ can claim all Germanic accomplishment? Of course not.

      Still, the fact that the Germanics, for the most part, lived behind a buffer of Slavs, Greeks, Armenians, and Latins, who had to constantly fight the Arab and Turkic hordes, must have been a great boon.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 27, 2011 - 11:16 pm | Permalink

      Buckle you sound real un-educated about the mob.

      1.) ‘Lucky’ Luciano teamed up with the Jew Meyer Lansky!

      2.) The quintessential mob paradise, Las Vegas, go its main start from the Jew Bugsy Segal!!!

    • History is Bunk's Gravatar History is Bunk
      February 28, 2011 - 2:24 am | Permalink

      Also, I have read that 6 of the 7 mobsters murdered in the St Valentine’s Day Massacre, 1929, were jews.

      The Dead – Frank Gusenberg, Pete Gusenberg, John May, Albert Weinshank, James Clark, Adam Heyer, and Dr. Reinhart Schwimmer.

      I believe the murders were pinned on Al Capone. Al must have been an auntysemite as well as a tax evader. Tut tut.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 28, 2011 - 2:26 am | Permalink

      @ Athanasius [February 27, 2011] …

      Look Brother. Why attribute an opinion to me that I did not express? Please indicate exactly where I stated anything that resembles this:

      That said, to claim that all European accomplishment is Germanic is ridiculous.

      My basic position is that I refuse to be cajoled into painting the ‘Germanics’ (of which there are several tribal manifestations) as ‘uncultured’ and ‘barbaric’. This kind of anti-German slander is a legacy of 2,000 year old Roman propaganda, which is still enthusiastically promoted by the bum-sniffing faggots and Rothschild maggots who control London. It is high time you recognized it as such.

      Yes, I was aware of Theodoric’s tomb. As regards Byzantium, this was founded by the Ancient Greeks in 667 BC. This city was also once under the control of the Sassanid-Persians. Therefore, one would expect the Byzantines to have had a rather more developed capability vis-a-vis structural engineering and artwork. Should we condemn the Germanics simply for living to the north of the Alps and the Danube?

      The Romans introduced the tribal Germans to the art of making and drinking wine during their short occupation, following Augustus Caesar. Thereafter, grape cultivation has flourished in the Rhineland (for 2,000 years) and the allegedly “uncultured” Germans have been proud of their high quality wines ever since.

      Did you know that a housewife from Dresden, Germany named Melitta Bentz invented the first coffee filter? If not, then next time you sit down to enjoy a brewed cuppa, perhaps you could find a few moments to pay homage to the amazing inventiveness of the German Volk?

  37. February 27, 2011 - 12:03 am | Permalink

    I got this information via Auster’s blog, where a reader links to Chaim Levine’s vanity card flashed up at the end of Two and a Half Men:

    CHUCK LORRE PRODUCTIONS, #327

    I’m writing this vanity card in Israel. I like it here. Not for the geography, or architecture, or even the history. No, I like it because for the first time in my life I’m surrounded with DNA much like my own. Until I got here, until I wandered around Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, I didn’t realize how much my double helix yearned to be around similar strands. Now that’s not to say that I don’t occasionally have that very same genetic experience in Beverly Hills (particularly in Chinese restaurants on Sunday night). But the sheer homogeneity of Israel overwhelms any over-priced kung pao gathering at Mr. Chow’s. The cop, the cab driver, the hotel concierge, the pilot, the waiter, the shoe salesman, the beautiful girl looking right through me as if I didn’t exist — all Jewish! If I had to sum it up, I’d say the sensation is like being at a B’nai B’rith summer camp that is surrounded by millions of crazy bastards who hate the sound of kids playing tetherball, and all the poor little camp has going for it is pluckiness and nukes. Anyway, I have to believe my visceral and very pleasant reaction is some sort of evolutionary, tribal thing. Some sort of survival gene that makes human beings want to stay with their birth group. Which raises the question, why have I spent a lifetime moving away from that group? How did Chaim become Chuck? How did Levine become Lorre? The only answer I come up with is this: When I was a little boy in Hebrew school the rabbis regularly told us that we were the chosen people. That we were God’s favorites. Which is all well and good except that I went home, observed my family and, despite my tender age, thought to myself, “bull$#*!.”

    (Source)

    Maybe Charlie Sheen would like to be “surrounded with DNA much like [his] own.” Nothing wrong with that now, is there?

    I suppose Auster would find it “anti-Semitic” to note Chaim Levine’s race based love of his own people as opposed to his obvious hate of White people.

    • February 27, 2011 - 3:03 pm | Permalink

      Mister White February 27, 2011 – 2:05 am

      “The tribe operates like the mafia.They’ll do anything and everything in their power to protect one of their own.”

      That could be revealing….

      Is hostility towards Jewish people akin to the one-time hostility towards some Catholic Italian-American people? The 1924 Immigration Act brought about a selective and dramatic reduction in both Italian and jewish people.

      To many, the image of he ‘American gangster’ was successfully crafted by largely Jewish Hollywood as almost exclusively an Italian vice. We know this is not true, it was Jewish and Italian) but here’s a question – given that many can easily see how American Libertarianism (anarchism) was a magnet to potential blue-collar criminal immigration, why did many not see that the same would be true with respect to White collar banksters/retailers who were a bit brighter (see remarks Catholic dysgenic populations and the clergy vs Jewish eugenics/genetic endogamy)? Clever Hollywood/Madison Avenue misdirection?

      Once again I suggest interested, inquiring, open-minded people here look back to January and the link to NYC demographics. Which are the minority groups? What else really matters?

  38. February 26, 2011 - 11:35 pm | Permalink

    Charlie’s mother’s maiden name was Templeton.
    I would think Charlie might count as a White of Spanish background. Just like Antonio Banderas.

    Can you imagine having to swallow all that Jewish Chutzpah, day in and day out, who will be the NEXT biggie to have the tape stop and the truth come out?

  39. Cry Wolf's Gravatar Cry Wolf
    February 26, 2011 - 11:00 pm | Permalink

    We the people should be very wary of two things . 1 Are these Arab revolts really as spontaneous as we are being lead to believe . 2 The Overlords may play the last card in a game which is to crash the world currencies , create chaos and erect a new world order that is able to totally control what the individual sees and watches–No more questions about Jewish control.

    I have a deep suspicion that satellite technology is being used to stir up populations in Arab cities using brain wave technology (believe it or not). The Big game is to get the Middle East integrated into Europe (thus the Millions of Muslim migrants in Europe now [to acclimatize the Indigenous populations of Europe] allowing the borders of Israel to be opened and the Palestinians can leave. To integrate these countries into Europe there needs to be similar democratic structures , one of the problems with Iran is that Iran has a religious democratic structure which makes it very difficult for the Overlords to manipulate –their Gov wants to be independent–Preposterous ! Israel has been bating for a war with Iran for years but it seems they decided the world wouldn’t swallow this rat.
    Don’t crow to soon , you can be sure that international Jewry already saw this time coming and either created it or has an escape plane.

  40. Edgardus de la Vega's Gravatar Edgardus de la Vega
    February 26, 2011 - 10:31 pm | Permalink

    Well… Charlie Sheen is indeed using the ‘Latino’ context properly. That is to say: actual, real Latinos are Caucasians from Spain, Italy, Romania et cetera. The Jews are generally anti-Caucasian (therefore, anti-Spanish given their exit from Spain in 1492 via Queen Isabella). Remember: Mr. Sheen’s father is a Galician (i.e. a Spanish Celt) from Northwestern Spain. Cheers.

  41. john thames's Gravatar john thames
    February 26, 2011 - 9:09 pm | Permalink

    The comments by Flavia about people getting fed up with Jews are well taken – I cannot think of any other reason why so many Hollywood types whose livelihoods depend on Jewish approval would finally be speaking out.

    JEWISH COMMISSARS OF “FREE SPEECH”

    When Oliver Stone made the comment that Hitler and Stalin needed to be put in “historical context” the Israeli billionaire and Hollywood film producer, Haim Saban, went ballistic. He was further outraged by the additional comments of Mr. Stone that Hitler did more damage to the Russians than the Jews and that Israel’s media lobby distorts the facts on the Middle East. Saban opined that henceforth Oliver Stone should be allowed to practice his Fifth Amendment rights in retirement. What Haim Saban was really saying was that Jews should be allowed to define the limits of free speech and intellectual inquiry – upon pain of career destruction.

    Mr. Saban would undoubtedly argue that the First Amendment only protects citizens from government retaliation, not private retaliation. That is technically correct. However, Haim Saban must surely realize that, historically, Jews have provoked pogroms and expulsions through their anti-social behavior. Among the abuses which the Jews have committed are attempting to stifle criticism of their behavior and to suppress historical interpretations which they deem detrimental to their group interests. A good example of this process was the enormous pressure that was put on former President Jimmy Carter over the publication of his book “Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid”. Another example was the forced resignation of Marge Schott as the owner of the Cincinnati Reds for her qualified praise of Adolf Hitler. Now Oliver Stone, himself half-Jewish, is getting the “Mel Gibson” treatment.

    Haim Saban is unwittingly laying the groundwork for a rising tide of anti-Semitism. People do not care to be told what they can think and how they may express themselves. They particularly do not like to be dictated to as the price of a paycheck. Perhaps these minor considerations do not occur to the arrogant Mr. Saban. But to the man-in-the-street, certain considerations will flow through his mind. He will conclude that if one cannot criticize Jews, then Jews must be the real rulers of these United States. He will conclude that Jews are throwing their weight around and that maybe that evil man, Adolf Hitler, was on to something. He may even consider that the state of Israel is harming U.S. interests in the Middle East – and that super rich Jews like Haim Saban and their campaign contributions – are one of the reasons for U.S. support of Israel. He may even conclude that enforced silence is one of the big reasons for these abuses – and that perhaps those who enforce silence should themselves be silenced.

    These are dangerous thoughts indeed – and they lead to reactions well documented in history. Oliver Stone is quite correct that Hitler and Stalin need to be discussed in context. But to raise that context would perturb Haim Saban immensely. It would raise all the forgotten historical facts that he does not want examined. To put Hitler in context would mean recalling the injustices of the Treaty of Versailles and the immense Jewish involvement in same. It would mean remembering the names of the Communist revolutionaries in Germany and Hungary after the Great War – almost all of them Jewish. It would mean remembering all the Jewish commissars who served Joseph Stalin in the 1930’s and 1940’s – before he got around to purging them. It would mean examining Joseph Stalin’s attack plans in 1941 – before Hitler beat him to the punch. No doubt the context of all these matters would even disturb Mr. Stone and some of his mistaken notions. But that is what freedom of speech and intellectual controversy is all about – rocking the boat.

    It is blindingly obvious that there is a de facto Jewish approved religion of thought in these United States. This approved religion becomes ever more blatant in its efforts to crush freedom of thought and dissent. The issue is not one of bigotry and intolerance, for what is bigotry to one man is truth to another. Jewish Commissars of “free speech” like Haim Saban should no more be tolerated in these United States than the Jewish gulag commissars of 1930’s Russia should be allowed to die quietly of natural causes in their Moscow apartments.

    Haim Saban must learn that “freedom of speech” does not mean the freedom to fellate Haim Saban as the price of Hollywood fame and fortune. The House Un-American Activities Committee once rooted Jewish Communists out of the movie industry. It is time to root ethnic bully boys out of Hollywood, so that both Oliver Stone and Mel Gibson, men of surely diverse viewpoints, can have their say without fear of retaliation.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      February 27, 2011 - 10:29 pm | Permalink

      john thames, I salute you.

  42. ihatejews's Gravatar ihatejews
    February 26, 2011 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Charlie Sheen went on the Alex Jones with that 9.11 was an inside job stuff. And he’s been in Hollywood long enough to know how much clout the Jews have. Add the two together, throw in a little drug induced paranoia and it won’t take him long to come to the conclusion that Jews are incredibly dangerous. Not the kind of danger you ignore, and hope the bully will pick on somebody else, but the kind of danger you have to confront.

    • History is Bunk's Gravatar History is Bunk
      February 27, 2011 - 5:44 am | Permalink

      Mr Sheen speaking publicly against the Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory is strange. He has a very high profile and yet, he is still above ground and breathing.

      All I can come up with is that they don’t believe he poses a threat to them, otherwise he would have met with a fatal accident by now; accidentally, of course.

  43. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 26, 2011 - 7:54 pm | Permalink

    how about Goys from Brazil. Or, Kike-Strike Force. Brando Brigade. Hollywood LIberation Front. A new sit-com like the comic Shapiros a couple years ago which
    featured the various Jewish gangsters…satirizes The Sopranos. Consult with the Cohen Brothers, make a billion dollars for the counter-revolution. j

  44. Klassikality's Gravatar Klassikality
    February 26, 2011 - 7:49 pm | Permalink

    Wow, Alex Jones must really have been sweating when Charlie metioned Lorre’s real name. After all, Jones is the leading light in the jew-controlled “9-11 Truth Kosher Conspiracy Theory movement” that blames everyone except the jews. Check out:
    alexjonesexposed.wordpress.com

  45. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    February 26, 2011 - 7:30 pm | Permalink

    I don’t get it either, Alexander. Why does the ADL have to get in the into the middle of a disagreement between two grown men? Is Sheen’s adversary incapable of speaking for himself?

    Jeez, the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church doesn’t get itself involved in MY affairs.

  46. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    February 26, 2011 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    I was in my car when I heard of this story and they played a recording of Sheen refering to all the show’s top executives as talentless men who go home to sleep with their ugly wives and tell heir ugly kids that they’re big men. He really let them have it. My gut feeling is that this was sheer fatigue, not just the money. I still feel that way and think many ordinary people are feeling this way. For Sheen, these producers are like a rotten gas station hotdog that he couldn’t keep down after drinking too much. At least his tv character. I say good for him. At this point I don’t need to analyze it further. No moral outrage here.

  47. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    February 26, 2011 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    I’m lost. One guy calls another guy a little maggot and it becomes an international incident. I also don’t see how calling some guy a little maggot can be construed as being anti-Jewish. If Jews are that sensitive we should be more caring and put them all in a sanitarium to protect them from nasty name calling. Being a bit slow I’ll have to go down to the pub and have a couple of beers while I try and work it all out!

  48. jrackell's Gravatar jrackell
    February 26, 2011 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

    You mentioned the vanity cards flashed at the end of each episode. From Auster’s blog, a commenter posted a reference to this vanity card frome Lorre. Wow!

    “I’m writing this vanity card in Israel. I like it here. Not for the geography, or architecture, or even the history. No, I like it because for the first time in my life I’m surrounded with DNA much like my own. Until I got here, until I wandered around Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, I didn’t realize how much my double helix yearned to be around similar strands. Now that’s not to say that I don’t occasionally have that very same genetic experience in Beverly Hills (particularly in Chinese restaurants on Sunday night). ”

    http://www.chucklorre.com/index-2hm.php?p=327

    It goes on in the same vein. Tailor-made quotes. The commenter at Auster’s blog thought this was what Sheen was reacting to and against.

    Auster’s discussion here: http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/018761.html

  49. Earlaiman's Gravatar Earlaiman
    February 26, 2011 - 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Charlie Sheen I do not know…. I have never seen his program, never expect to, and I am not one of his fans, so I couldn’t care less that he is canned from his job, except for the reasons he was canned, which are a crime against humanity.

    He is just another honest man who has been victimized by Zionist Jewish racism!

    Earlaiman

  50. Philip's Gravatar Philip
    February 26, 2011 - 5:24 pm | Permalink

    In Hollywood there does seem to be resentment by non-Jews of the old Jews network.

  51. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 26, 2011 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Also from our friends in Hollywood, here is more confirmation of Kevin MacDonald’s theories with regard to Jewish psychotherapy and it’s attack on WASP culture. This is a short clip from Bloggingheads that features David Edelstein talking about the movie “The King’s Speech” and how it plays on these themes. Very interesting.

    http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/34471?in=25:38&out=30:01

  52. thm's Gravatar thm
    February 26, 2011 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

    I’ve watched two and a half men maybe six or eight times — the show itself struck me a an icon for “the decades-long Hollywood campaign for cultural dissolution.” Charlie Sheen was raised a Catholic and I got a sense that Sheen was playing a character that was out of synch with his own values and conditionings and sense of dignity. The show is just one more expression of the Jewish supremacist hatred of White culture and values — very out of touch with Charlie Sheen’s own inner feelings perhaps.

    He might have been stuffings his anger and frustration over the part because of the show’s sheer success, acclaim and the financial reward to him. That might have been part of the cause of his recent self-destructive behavior.

    The cognitive dissonance might just have gotten to be too much for Charlie Sheen and, even if was getting over a million dollars a show, he finally just had to say, screw it. And this was his way of doing it.

    That’s my take, anyway.

    • Masculinity's Gravatar Masculinity
      February 27, 2011 - 2:57 am | Permalink

      Exactly THM. Exactly.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 27, 2011 - 4:04 am | Permalink

      Trivia Question: What was the first flick that Sheen had a major role in?

      Red Dawn

      He has gone from making one of the best Pro-Western entertainment movies ever (which ironically was directed by a Jew, John Milius, perhaps one of the few ‘good Jews’, along with Otto Weininger) to making utterly irrelevant garbage television created by the lowest of the low Jew bottom-feeders.

      Imagine what it must be like to have come crashing down from so high!

    • thm's Gravatar thm
      February 27, 2011 - 11:58 am | Permalink

      @ Tenrek Odine: Chaim Levine/Chuck Lorre certainly IS a bottom feeder. He created a part for Charlie Sheen where Sheen played a dissolute hedonistic/sex junkie going from affair to meaningless affair. Watching Sheen play the part, I always had the feeling he was being forced into a role that he didn’t feel good about. Shows like that that glamorize low values and promiscuity have a strong (negative) effect on peoples’ behavior and values.

      Chaim Levine/Chuck Lorre is one of any number of Jews who have had a toxic effect on European ethnic societies: Freud, Edward Bernays, the Frankfort School crowd, Aaron Lopez, Betty Friedan, Emmanuel Celler, Karl Marx Haim Saban etc. The list is endless.

  53. February 26, 2011 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    The fact that these dust-ups between the Judaics and well known figures and celebrities are becoming increasingly common is great news for America-firsters. I mean, just in the last few months it’s been Sanchez, Beck, Sheen…even dumbed-down Americans will eventually figure out where there’s smoke, there’s fire.

    The fact that the Judaics go apeshit at the drop of a hat now is also great news, because of the “though doth protest too much” phenomenon. But at this point, they have to, because the wheels are starting to come off their rackets, so they’re forced to milk the “anti-Semitism” card to the last of its value.

    History tells as that the Judaic rackets have always been discovered and flogged from respectable society in the end, and of course Jewry is aware of that more than anyone.

    This era may be the beginning of the end of Judeofascist financial, social and economic hegemony over America, and consequently much of the world, and thanks to the Internet, they will have a difficult time picking up their rackets elsewhere.

    They are clearly increasingly cornered, and desperate. Now would be a good time to invest in futures on one-way tickets to Israel.

    • February 26, 2011 - 11:01 pm | Permalink

      Nice…but you’ve got it backwards. Jews rule Palestine only because they rule America. And the number of Jews who have reverse-aliyah’d from “Israel” to America exceeds the number who have done the Zionist thing by by a factor of hundreds to one; only the (last) transfusion of Jews from the collapsed Red Empire has kept “Israel” afloat demographically, and that was a one-timer. As the Jews’ power position in the Middle East declines – what with US-supported, soft-on-Israel dictators now dropping like flies – more and more Jews will be doing the reverse-aliyah to the “true Zion” (as Sharon admitted a few years back), America. And this is all to the good: historically, there is a 1-to-1 correspondance between the percentage of visible Jews in a population and that population’s awareness of the Jewish problem, aka “anti-semitism”. Bring ‘em on.

    • February 27, 2011 - 1:05 am | Permalink

      As I see it, the Judeofacist’s natural environment truly is in the Middle East. There, they’re dealing with cut-throat Islamic totalitarians who understand and respect cut-throat Judeofascists just enough to tolerate them…barely.

      Here, in the morally-refined Christian West, we’ll respectfully and compassionately hold our tempers and tongues until things get so bad that we have to…well, we all know the history of what Western Civilization has been driven to time and again. And it wasn’t pretty, for anyone. But it will continue to be necessary for our own survival.

      If Zionist Jewry knows what’s good for it, it will make a separate peace with it’s Semitic, Arab and Islamic cousins, who like the Judeofascists themselves, don’t bother to distinguish between politics and religion.

    • Curt's Gravatar Curt
      February 27, 2011 - 5:43 am | Permalink

      “This era may be the beginning of the end of Judeofascist financial, social and economic hegemony over America, and consequently much of the world, and thanks to the Internet, they will have a difficult time picking up their rackets elsewhere. ”
      Chris, you may be right but, in the meantime they have robbed the US to the point of making it a 3rd world economy as well as sending all our industry and technological expertise to the Chinese (who do NOT bear us good will). In the end, many Jews will “escape to Israel”, or so they believe. They have done this very same thing repeatedly in the past- to other great civilizations and countries from ancient Greece and Rome to Portugal. Even if, in the end, we are rid of the Jewish parasites, they will have left us pauperized as a nation.

  54. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    February 26, 2011 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Some comments:

    “The scales are quickly falling from people’s eyes as they recognize . . .”

    I’m sure race-conscious whites have been saying this for decades. Unfortunately the collective awakening never happens, and that’s because we assume that just because we’re aware that others are as well. Things aren’t getting better for us, they’re getting worse.

    “The word cannot retain its power if it is used this frivolously.”

    As long as they control things, it can. There are no signs that the term is less powerful today than it was 50 years; in fact its power only seems to increase as the years go by, as whites accept their fate as a dying people.

    • Hans's Gravatar Hans
      February 26, 2011 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

      “Things aren’t getting better for us, they’re getting worse.”

      Totally disagree. The Internet has changed the game significantly, even in the past few years. Ten years ago there was Stormfront and VNN. Now there is VOR, this site, and even Vdare taking a more erudite approach to the problem. Who would have thought we’d see the day when a site such as Facebook would play a decisive role in toppling Eretz Israel’s puppets in the Middle East? And there’s no going back. Governments over there who do the U.S./Israel’s bidding will no longer be tolerated for so long. The mullahs will insure that. We need a Christian counterpart to balance that.

    • Scott Mollett's Gravatar Scott Mollett
      February 26, 2011 - 7:09 pm | Permalink

      The LA Tmes is allowing non filtered comments. Go look at the comments for any story about jews or Israel then come back here and try to defend your statement that people are not snapping out of it.

      The jews always fall when their fiat money crashes. Any belief that it will be different this time is sheer foolishness.

      The winds of change are howling.

    • Boudicca's Gravatar Boudicca
      February 27, 2011 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

      The LA Tmes is allowing non filtered comments. Go look at the comments for any story about jews or Israel then come back here and try to defend your statement that people are not snapping out of it.

      Interesting that the LA Times is allowing non-filtered comments. This yellow- propaganda bird cage liner has for decades been the false arbiter of “news” for white Angelenos, promoting and advocating for illegal aliens, covering up and/or excusing black-on-white crime, pushing diversity and multi-culturalism down our throats as desirable and generally cheering for white demise. This wretched anti-white biased rag should be considered a mortal enemy to all whites everywhere.

      For decades and without rebuttal the LA Times has insulted and demeaned its white reader base and is finally paying the price as the advent of the Internet has wised us up to and exposed the media’s repeated lies and cover-ups.

      The LA Times was beset in the first decade of the 21st century by a change in ownership, a bankruptcy, a rapid succession of editors, reductions in staff, decreases in paid circulation.

      As far as I’m concerned, the LA Times is getting exactly what it deserves and I will cheer its closure as the English-speaking population of LA is driven out of S. California, aided and abetted by the likes of the LA Times.

      It’s far too late for them to unfilter their comments sections; this is a last dying, desperate gasp of a medium that is no longer the only source of information for white Americans and, in fact, should be shunned and boycotted and sneered at by whites.

      Good Riddance.

      And this, from Mr. Duke, on the spread of his videos throughout the Internet and blogsphere:

      The total viewership of all these videos has now exceeded 50 million views and grows by over one million views each week! Even more astounding is is the fantastic positive reaction to the videos from the general public. My video “The Real Rogue Nuclear State” had 1,221 “thumbs up” and 30 “thumbs down.” That’s less than a 3 percent negative rating.

      See here: http://tinyurl.com/2f5my8q

      re-post the videos everywhere you are able.

    • lanceman's Gravatar lanceman
      February 27, 2011 - 10:12 pm | Permalink

      The LA Times is considering requiring that comments be posted under real names. The justification is to provide a more civil forum. I suspect that the real reason is the increasingly racial awareness of the comments including a definite anti-zionism. Ironically, the example given relating to comments about the female reporter that was assaulted in Egypt. Ironic because it was Jewess Debbie Schlussel who most notably stated that she “deserved it.”

      http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-onthemedia-20110226,0,7518393.column

  55. Burrhus's Gravatar Burrhus
    February 26, 2011 - 2:42 pm | Permalink

    I am an anti-semite in accord with the creed posted below.

    The Anti-semites Creed

    The jews are a problem–not our ONLY or SOLE problem, not responsible for EVERY problem faced by gentiles, not some ALL-POWERFUL race that we shouldn’t bother trying to resist, not an EXCUSE for avoiding responsibility for problems of our own making –but nonetheless, A REAL, SERIOUS PROBLEM.

    White gentile responsibility includes recognizing, openly admitting, learning about and DOING SOMETHING about this problem. Anti-semitism does not imply hatred of or a desire to exterminate the jews.

    I will stop being anti-semitic when the semites stop being anti-gentilic. Not a day sooner.–Burrhus

    • Scott Mollett's Gravatar Scott Mollett
      February 26, 2011 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

      I am not a gentile. Why do you let jews name you? As long as we call ourselves the names they made up for us we are playing into their hands.

      There is no such thing as a gentile. It is jew propaganda.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 27, 2011 - 6:49 am | Permalink

      @ Scott Mollet …
      Exactly right brother. Once you accept, use, and identify with the language of your enemy, then you are already defeated.

      This is why Christianity is our Achilles Heel.

      The Ethnic-European man’s original and authentic belief system is older than Hinduism (usually touted as world’s oldest). To rediscover the meaning of your native roots, read this info:

      http://www.asatru.org/aboutasatru.php

    • Scott Mollett's Gravatar Scott Mollett
      February 27, 2011 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

      @ Anglo Saxon

      I agree muslims and christians are demi-jews.
      I also agree about the old ways.

    • Joseph's Gravatar Joseph
      March 1, 2011 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

      Anglo Saxon: You see no connection between the dechristianization of the West, completed in the 1960′s and our current situation?

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      March 2, 2011 - 4:08 am | Permalink

      @ Joseph …

      I do see a connection, but it is a false (misleading) one.

      If I am reading your short comment correctly, then I would suggest you are content to only see the mask; you have not yet bothered to look behind it, to see who the wearer actually is.

      By default, we made ourselves vulnerable to perpetual outside interference just as soon as we rejected our native (non violent) belief systems in favour of a set of Jewish superstitions and alien myths centered around a revengeful ‘God’.

      As I wrote earlier … just as soon as you identify with the language of your enemy, then you are already defeated.

      Perhaps the onus is on you to demonstrate exactly how Christianity is going to “save us”? Because so far, it has only succeeded in destroying us. Individuals may delude themselves into thinking they can find salvation through ‘Jesus’ but the irony is that these kinds of childish beliefs are destroying us collectively.

      The evidence is all around if you’d care to look.

  56. Joseph's Gravatar Joseph
    February 26, 2011 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t this a bit over the top? We have just seen Horowitz calling Ron Paul “a vicious anti-Semite” and now this, along with many others. If a critic like Ron Paul is a “vicious anti-Semite” or if someone with a personal grudge against someone who happened to be Jew is an anti-Semite, then what is someone like David Duke?

    The word cannot retain its power if it is used this frivolously.

    This is of course good news for everyone who doesn’t like the superstitions we are forced to live under today, where certain words works like magic spells. But it is quite bad for the spell casters, but they seem unable to comprehend that.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      February 26, 2011 - 11:42 pm | Permalink

      Insightful post, Joseph. Thank you.

    • Scott Mollett's Gravatar Scott Mollett
      February 27, 2011 - 10:52 pm | Permalink

      I am not recomending the LA Times they are liar jews to nth degree. The will take down some comments and they have a dirty trick of killing your nic without letting you know. It looks like your post posted but if you refresh it is gone. It takes around 2 weeks for them to kill one of my nicks but I hit them hard.

      They may be letting a lot of posts through because as you say they are losing their shirt and know people will stop going to the sight if they censor them. I hope they go under.

  57. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    February 26, 2011 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

    “Joseph Sobran famously wrote that Jewish power is unique “in being off-limits to normal criticism,” and that “Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. ”

    Not for long.

    To quote Robert Allen Zimmerman: “The times they are a-changin’.”

    The scales are quickly falling from people’s eyes as they recognize what the majority of the financial geniuses who caused the global financial meltdown and the primary architects and cheerleaders for America’s self-destructive misadventures in the mid-East share in common.

    • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
      February 26, 2011 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

      today’s WSJ piece on the affair has nary a mention of the jew angle.

      By the way, apropos of nothing in particular, I came across a formulation from someone who left a note on my windshield complimenting me on my bumper sticker (American First, Not Israel). She, sounds like a she, used the term: “Anti-philo-semitic. ” Now that is pretty good. Makes people think.

      Then there is the NYT story today on Robert Gates who is now saying anyone who proposes another war I(for Israel, me) in the middle east, ‘should have his head examined’ . Actually it is a veiled warning to the jew and anybody who listens to them. Joe

    • Protocols of Albion's Gravatar Protocols of Albion
      February 26, 2011 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

      @Joe – “Anti-philo-semite” … I LIKE that! Just added it to my ammo bag.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      February 26, 2011 - 7:26 pm | Permalink

      I sincerely hope that you’re right, Felix, but I discovered years ago that betting against Joe Sobran’s being correct is a quick way to lose your money.

  58. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    February 26, 2011 - 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Why do Jews always feel the need to change their names? If they’re so proud of who they are, why didn’t Bernie Schwarz stay Bernie Schwarz and why didn’t Chaim Levine just stay Chaim Levine?

    • February 26, 2011 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

      I think that question was part of Sheen’s point. The answer, of course, is that they change their names because average Americans will lower their guard when doing business dealings (and personal dealings) with someone with a more traditional-sounding name.

      In other words, it’s part of their “cover,” and it abets their rackets.

    • Peter's Gravatar Peter
      February 26, 2011 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

      And then they think to themselves and kvetch to their fellow Jews “Can you believe the rank antisemitism? I had to change my name to become successful!” Their deception facilitates their discrimination against us, enriching them financially, while we get the blame.

    • Past Hurt's Gravatar Past Hurt
      February 28, 2011 - 2:53 pm | Permalink

      Architect Frank Gehry is really named Frank Goldberg. It has been suggested that his wife Anita told him to change his name because of Antisemitism during his childhood in Canada and in school in the states. But this sounds suspect, given he attended LA City College and eventually USC. That was in the 1950′s, so it may be the case, but why today will certain people change their surname?
      Antisemitism is listed as the reason, although it’s likely a preventative measure to blend into the surroundings. This notion of crypsis (blending in to the environment) has been discussed here in the past. Changing the surname is one component of this camouflage.
      Imagine changing your last name to blend into society? It’s hard to fathom. This is probably what gives them the capacity to act without morals, as they are not representing their family good name, but the history of a fabricated surname. Think about it…

  59. Bobo's Gravatar Bobo
    February 26, 2011 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Charlie seems to be a 9 11 truther too.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 27, 2011 - 3:54 am | Permalink

      Am personally glad that Sheen came out in favor of 9/11 Truth.

      Just glad that some celebs are still willing to be themselves, like Tom Cruise railing against psycho-trophic drugs and Psychiatry (note that Psychiatry and Evolutionary Psychology are two very different fields so I am not bagging on Dr. Kevin Macdonald).

      It is nice to see that not every single celeb is willing to be another kosher cog in the machine.

      P.S. I personally am not a 9/11 Truther.

    • History is Bunk's Gravatar History is Bunk
      February 27, 2011 - 5:19 am | Permalink

      Tenrek,

      Which chapters of the Official Conspiracy Theory provided by the Israeli Government of America are your favorites?

      Personally, I am most impressed by the Miracle of the Pentagon . . . “Massive jet airliner evaporates into sub-atomic particles; leaving no trace, other than a missile-sized hole in the Pentagon wall – one of the most heavily protected buildings on the planet – and NO video footage at all from any of the myriad cameras filming around it 24/7, showing the airliner in question just before it dematerialized down the rabbit … oooops, sorry, missile hole.” – ROFL.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 27, 2011 - 8:37 am | Permalink

      ‘Which chapters of the Official Conspiracy Theory provided by the Israeli Government of America are your favorites?’

      As a White Advocate I do not believe there is a need to go into ‘Conspiracy Theory’ territory at all to advance the Cause.

      There is already enough written by Prof. Macdonald using Evolutionary Psychology to provide one with all the reasons to be suspicious of Organized Jewry.

      Also there are a multi-tude of incidents ‘within the mainstream’ so to speak that one can utilize to make their point about the harmful effects of Organized Jewry

      1.) The bombing of the USS Liberty

      2.) Jonathan Pollard spying scandal

      3.) The murder of Rachel Corrie (as someone who lives in the Pacific Northwest and has visited Olympia WA this one is a real sore point with myself)

      If some wish to pursue Conspiracy Theories within the broader context of White Nationalism, hey go for it, ‘Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom’ but at the same time I submit that not every single White Individual needs to submit and believe someone elses pet Conspiracy Theory.

  60. Venona's Gravatar Venona
    February 26, 2011 - 12:03 pm | Permalink

    I anticipate an avalanche of stories on Sheen’s many vices with be forthcoming in the weeks and months ahead.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 27, 2011 - 11:43 pm | Permalink

      They are focusing on painting his as insane.

  61. flavia's Gravatar flavia
    February 26, 2011 - 11:39 am | Permalink

    Such a GOOD LOOKING people.

    As a female, I follow pop culture quite closely….for the life of me I do not remember so many instances of speaking out against our Khazar Overlords. I think people are just getting fed up. Two years ago I was listening to Emily Bazelon bitch on Slate- now I listen to Dr. Duke. I am not unique. They overplayed their hand. Things are changing.

    • February 26, 2011 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

      Welcome, Flavia. So you’re a nice Roman girl! Please avoid bulimic tendencies, and let’s fight decline together!

      Isn’t Emily Bazelon the Yale legacy girl who protested against legacy white firefighters?

      Check out my blog mindweaponsinragnarok.wordpress.com

    • flavia's Gravatar flavia
      February 26, 2011 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

      Yes, I was young and impressionable. BTW-I don’t think the Romans even had vomitoriums….everything negative I hear about my people is suspect. The Jews have an agenda and they never forget.

      To wit: The Romulans were created by Paul Schneider, who said “it was a matter of developing a good Romanesque set of admirable antagonists … an extension of the Roman civilization to the point of space travel”.

      Grudge obsessed little Khazars….

      The funny thing is by their own hand they created an enemy. I was an ignorant girl just going through life. Now a picture of the Arch of Titus hangs on my wall. And I’m not unique. We’re waking up. It’s exhilarating!

    • flavia's Gravatar flavia
      February 26, 2011 - 8:15 pm | Permalink

      BTW Romulans are Star Trek characters who are “the enemy”- I forget we’re not all nerds.

    • Past Hurt's Gravatar Past Hurt
      February 28, 2011 - 2:36 pm | Permalink

      It’s a fascinating study when you understand and awaken to the plot. The problem for them is that their agenda, while not publicized openly by the press, is right there beneath the surface. It’s like looking through a glass bottom bucket into the ocean.
      Many are afraid to look through it, because its a dark endless gaze.

  62. Curt's Gravatar Curt
    February 26, 2011 - 11:05 am | Permalink

    Well, his career is probably toast now, and possibly his father’s as well knowing how vindictive the Jewish power block is. As to Jews being “smarter”, I would prefer to say that they seem to have an inherited “talent” for things financial- making money. This coupled with their unexcelled ethnocentrism and intergroup cooperation in the areas of finance and acquiring power have put them at the top of the human pyramid- for now.

Comments are closed.