Truth, Heresy, and Heroes

Christian Miller


White identity politics is a form of heresy, and heresy has grave consequences.  Advocating White nationalism or merely defending White interests often results in a loss of social standing.  Moral cowards, amoral sycophants, and racial traitors are rewarded while heroes and righteous guardians are demonized.  Pretending that Whites are social constructs or have no legitimate interests to defend is accepted, even celebrated, in a society infested with anti-White multiculturalism.  White racialists realize that the cornucopia of cultures is designed to exclude any White culture, and the future rainbow of races is actually a muddled mess of miscegenation.  It is therefore a tremendous challenge to steadfastly support of the White extended genotype.  The anti-White opposition is well-funded, well-organized, malicious, and persistent.

White advocacy is beset on all sides.  Campaigning against White genocide attracts derision and scorn from anti-Whites.  Lamenting the decline of the White population into minority status is attacked as intolerance.  Merely calling attention to, let alone denouncing, the maliciously disproportionate amounts of violent interracial crime committed against White people is paradoxically described as hate.  Protecting the continuity of family lineage by expecting exclusively White marriages and White procreation is seen as backwards, provincial, or outdated.  Suggesting that many trends or ideas that harm White interests have been disproportionately created, organized, disseminated, or financed by Jewish interests can lead to accusations of insanity or mental instability.

Advertisement

This derision, scorn, and accusations of intolerance, hate, and insanity are reactions that require White nationalists to have a thick skin in order to maintain their viewpoints.  It is hard to be a heretic.  But the requisite resilience to carry forward is about more than insensitivity to insults or threats.  It is inspired by the love of truth.  White racialists know that race is real and that it has important consequences for civilization and ethnic genetic interests. White nationalists realize they are being systematically dispossessed and ethnically cleansed from their homelands.  Defenders of White identity understand that there is nothing hateful or unhealthy about wanting to continue their heritage by having White babies in White societies.

The steely resolution that guides a White nationalist is a personality trait or perhaps a spiritual constitution that values eternal truth more than ephemeral social standing.  A patriotic White man understands that truth can be directly opposed to popular opinion, and that such a situation is not without historical precedent.  An exemplary White man is willing to act in accordance with that wisdom.  A heroic White man can marshal these convictions into effective action and change the dynamics of society.  The White race is in desperate need of more heroes.

White people are known to be more individualistic than other races.  In a White-dominant society, free from ethnic or racial competition from non-White groups, this individualism helped propel White people beyond the established limits of science, technology, philosophy, and religion.  The individualist refusal to conform to the “popular consensus”—which always opposes scientific breakthroughs or heretical ideas—is precisely why so many White historical figures persist within the collective memory as titans of Western civilization.  Nobody remembers a conformist, but everybody remembers a successful catalyst of righteous revolution.  The reward for success in such a struggle is immortal fame.  How could it be any other way?

Why would anyone remember Galileo if he were not individualistic and self-assured enough to confront the ruling dogma of a geocentric universe?  Whose bookshelf would carry the works of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn if he decided to bow his head to Soviet oppression because speaking out was not worth going to the gulag?  Who could call themselves Protestant if Martin Luther lacked the courage and conviction to stand before the Catholic Church and criticize it without fear?  All of these White men had radical ideas that stood directly against the ruling orthodoxies of their societies.  These men would be scattered to the winds of time had they not found everlasting fame by tenaciously promoting important ideas despite intense societal opposition.  These were all rebels with a cause, and that cause was truth.  Truth is heresy before it is accepted as truth, so all of these men were once called heretics.

White nationalists face similar pressures because being pro-White is heresy in modern America.  Professors will express hostility to ideas about White interests, and this may translate to lowered grades in school or a denial of tenure in the academic world.  Employers often terminate workers who openly defend the civil rights of Whites in their private lives.  Former friends may cut ties when they sense the imminent risks to social standing that follow from associating with a racially-conscious White person.  Sometimes even immediate family members will choose material security and peer-group acceptance rather than support a relative who is protecting the entire extended family.  Heresy has social consequences, as Galileo, Solzhenitsyn, and Luther knew all too well.

“Racist!” is the modern equivalent of “heretic!”  Words like ‘intolerance’ and ‘hate’ are used as shibboleths to shout down dissension and preclude debate.  The words have changed, but the methods of social ostracism remain the same.  Cry ‘heretic!’ or its equivalent, and let the crowd take care of the rest.

History is replete with examples of entrenched orthodoxy stultifying new ways of thinking in an oppressive manner.  In more primitive times, the mystical shamans or oracles consulted with the gods in order to divine wisdom for tribal consumption.  To deny the oracle’s wisdom, or to suggest the shaman was merely influenced by psychotropic drugs, was grounds for ostracism from the tribe.  Only a heretic would oppose the dominant spiritual class because it was social suicide.

Skip forward thousands of years.  Oracles and shamans became priests.  The mystical priests consulted with God and the Bible in order to divine wisdom for public consumption.  To deny the priests’ monopoly on the word of God, or to suggest they were power-hungry sycophants, was grounds for excommunication from the Church and society—a lesson Martin Luther learned the hard way.  The charge of heresy was used to preclude reasonable debate, just as charges of racism or anti-Semitism are used today.

The modern ruling orthodoxy follows political correctness—the anti-White bastard child of Cultural Marxism.  Nietzsche declared the death of God, but nature abhors a vacuum.  In His place, the elite cabals in academia, finance, media, and politics erected a new totem pole to worship and venerate.  Whether it is called liberalism, egalitarianism, Cultural Marxism, multiculturalism, or diversity, the dynamics of enforcing this untenable, genocidal, and anti-White worldview remain the same: ridicule, isolation, defamation, prosecution, ostracism, or humiliation— but never open debate.  Heresy is not to be debated.

While most of humanity has evolved beyond burning heretics at the stake or performing ritual human sacrifice, the same procedural thought control remains, consistently corrupting and subverting impressionable White minds.  Anyone who denies the existence of ritual sacrifice is not looking closely enough.  If an influential figure violates the dogma of multiculturalism, the gatekeepers will quickly close ranks.  Instead of ominous tribal drumbeats, the background music will be cries of “racist!” or “hater!” or “anti-Semite!” as the eager executioners prepare the sacrificial altar.  Instead of carving out the heretic’s heart, the mainstream media and its supporters will try to ruin the heretic’s reputation as he is defamed as an intolerant, hateful, and bigoted person.

Public persecution of heretics persists in the modern age.  Remember that the public sacrifice is also a warning.  It is a powerful message to the rest of the group: heresy has serious consequences.

Unfortunately, the heretical path of White nationalism, White identity, and White interests is a narrow one.  The trailblazers of the movement must deal with the prickly thorns, rough terrain, and back-breaking labor needed to clear the brush so others may be enticed to follow.  At this stage, it is inevitable that some people will sever social connections with a pro-White person once the nationalist motivations are made clear.  It seems strange that these same people would gladly continue the friendship or express glowing admiration, if the cause at issue concerned the rights of any other racial group except for White people.  This promiscuous out-group altruism is the height of absurdity when an ostensibly White person rejects the company of another White person who advances both of their shared interests.  But this is the reality of anti-White multiculturalism.  The perverted ideas that have poisoned American discourse are designed to marginalize, ostracize, and demonize any remaining White person who dares to stand against the rolling tide of White dispossession.

What keeps a White nationalist from throwing in the towel?  Why trudge on, when the road ahead is uphill and laden with obstacles at every turn?  Beyond an undying love for one’s people, it is the same determination that drove Henry Ford to publicize Jewish subversion in the Dearborn Independent despite the imminent threat it posed to his financial interests.  It is the same zeal for truth and liberty that compelled Thomas Jefferson to pen the Declaration of Independence.

The same love for truth burns in the heart of every White nationalist, and no amount of social pressure, slander, or temporary isolation is enough to extinguish the flame.  The fuel source is the righteous indignation that arises when one man recognizes a cosmic injustice and is willing to fight through Hell to rectify it.  The temptation of capitulation is great, the course of retreat is enticing, and the punishment for having the gall to continue is severe, but the footprints of so many great men of the past are enough to inspire forward progress.  Spiritual man values virtue infinitely more than material comfort or fleeting adoration from those not worthy to provide it.  Patrick Henry confirmed his status as a spiritual man when he thundered his revolutionary call-to-arms to the Virginia House of Burgesses: “Give me Liberty or give me Death!”

The movement for White identity and White interests needs more spiritual men.  This is not intended to be a criticism of capitalism, profits, or material success.  White nationalism needs donors, financiers, talented businessmen, and creative capitalists.  But it is an inescapable conclusion that defending White people is not a get-rich-quick scheme, and it is not guaranteed to win more friends than enemies in the short term.  Arthur Schopenhauer said “All truth passes through three stages.  First, it is ridiculed.  Second, it is violently opposed.  Finally, it is accepted as being self-evident.”  White identity politics is somewhere between ridicule and violent opposition.  The goal is to move towards Schopenhauer’s third stage.  It will not be easy.

White nationalism is not for the weak, the timid, the gullible, or the emotionally dependent—instead, these attributes describe the demoralized and deracinated White person.  The strong have always helped the weak; right now, the White race is in a position of weakness.  Those who have not fallen under the spell of White guilt must reawaken their White brothers and sisters.  Those who have looked beyond the horizon and gazed upon the possibility of White extinction must warn the unenlightened about the reality of White genocide.  Those who value truth and who retain a healthy sense of White pride and White identity must shoulder the burden for the rest of the group who have been robbed of their heritage.

Leadership, integrity, persuasive ability, organizational skills, and inspirational ideas are sorely needed in the White nationalist movement.  The genetic capacity to express these skills and traits has not been lost—yet.  The potential remains within the White genotype, whether expressed or dormant, waiting to be expressed in the next familial iteration.  Preserve that potential as an irreplaceable treasure.  Remember that the spirit of conquest, scientific discovery, opposition to tyranny, bravery in the face of adversity, and most importantly, unshakeable determination in the pursuit of truth are all fundamental aspects of White genetic and historical heritage.  The same individualism that has been cruelly exploited to disenfranchise Whites in the midst of hostile minorities can be redirected to fight against the injustice of White dispossession.

The inherently White characteristic of Western individualism can be rescued from its current subversion and redirected towards the improvement of White society.  There was a time, not so long ago, when protecting the White race, the White nation, the White village, or the White family was a heroic and virtuous act to be celebrated, rather than a reason to be called a “racist.”  This spirit of brotherhood, kin, and race has not been completely extinguished from the White population.

The task ahead is to awaken the yearning for truth, focused determination, sense of justice, ethnic identity, and iron will that resides within the White race.  Part of the struggle is to destroy taboos and transform heresy to accepted truth.  When that day comes, the titans will stand up, yawn, and throw off the shackles of anti-White multiculturalism with an effortless shrug of the shoulders.  Charges of heresy will be ignored and fade away.  Unencumbered and emancipated, the White race will continue its eternal march throughout history, breaking philosophical barriers, reaching higher plateaus of health and virility, discovering profound scientific truths, inventing exciting new technologies, and achieving greater zeniths of civilization.  Who will lead the charge?

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

80 Comments to "Truth, Heresy, and Heroes"

  1. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    April 4, 2011 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Fifty years ago in the area where I grew up pro race-mixers were considered such unspeakable scum no local white would have dared say anything to the contrary; even expressing such an opinion would have at the very least brought instant shunning.

    So now we see the situation exactly reversed, except that the mixers have the benefit of all the jew-owned media and the apparent support of the rest of the world. “Apparent” is the proper word here because so many people still do privately consider mixers scum of the earth; they just consider it impolitic to say so.

    We can’t do much about the media; for that we have a viable excuse. But one of the main reasons we’ve come to this, and which is entirely under our control, is that in the face of fire we’ve displayed a disgusting lack of courage. Yes, there will be punishments for speaking out. You may find yourself forced out of a job, or out of a career as I’ve been. You may find yourself and your family under threat. You may find your property stolen or destroyed. You may find state-of-the-art psychological tactics being used against you and your family. So there are a lot of good reasons to keep your opinions to yourself, and only one to do otherwise: That knowing your race and your family are being exterminated, and still “going along to get along”, you have to get up every morning and look in the mirror. If you can do that then your demise will be a loss to no one.

    • John's Gravatar John
      April 5, 2011 - 9:11 pm | Permalink

      Hey Whiteawake, I’ll just say that I respect your courage. I take heart that people like you belong to our cause. Perhaps when the time comes, people will look to the sacrifices you made and you will be rewarded in some manner. I certainly hope I can help on that end. We must always reward our friends and punish our enemies.

    • ProActive's Gravatar ProActive
      April 6, 2011 - 3:31 am | Permalink

      You say we can’t do anything about the media .Defeatist Talk. The MSM must be pilloried at every turn -A hostile elite. When you stop for petrol.When you talk to someone in a supermarket .We must be proactive .Bend the conversation to it.Be not embarrassed , ashamed , stand your ground.Defend your principles .When you here ‘What can I do about it there all the same..’ refuse such notions . We are many , they are few , we are the market , vote with your feet.Be consistent, be stubborn ,persist .Advertisers go down on their knees for our attention ,Refuse the meal if they poison the water.But speak out to strangers , no matter how lowly his condition (don’t get mugged though) brace his spirit ..He is not alone but one of many who are being dispossesed .Refuse Refuse Refuse!

  2. Non-African American's Gravatar Non-African American
    April 4, 2011 - 6:44 pm | Permalink

    Machiavelli said that a man’s success depends upon the temperature of his mind being in conformity with the times in which he lives.

    Obviously, for us, that means embracing the enriching and vibrant diversity that truly reflects the global community, and taking all occasions to proclaim the most extreme hatred and intolerance of White racism.

    But what of those Whites who are successful under these term? Don’t you know that they have a very real fear that diversity will never give them the same kindness and concessions that they give it?

    They live in terror, and are trying to scam the system for as much loot as they can before the collapse. They know what’s coming, they just make a calculation that it won’t hit them before it hits the rest of us. We are racists, after all, so we deserve the Diversity Curse, whereas they are open, welcoming, tolerant, and inclusive, so they just hope to be left alone a little while longer and maybe somebody will ride in to the rescue at the last moment, like the God of Good Sense, but it won’t happen….

    The Day of Racial Reckoning fast approaches- let’s make sure the “tolerant” Whites get reckoned with first…

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      April 6, 2011 - 8:55 am | Permalink

      Non-African – “..The Day of Racial Reckoning fast approaches- let’s make sure the “tolerant” Whites get reckoned with first…”

      Most likely the Diverse will take care of this justice, for us…

  3. Lively Whitey's Gravatar Lively Whitey
    April 4, 2011 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

    Patrick Henry’ didn’t think through his rhetoric before he shouted it. What he said doesn’t make sense, but we really don’t need to examine it to closely and lose admiration for that great White American patriot and warrior.

    We’d never say “Give us liberty or give us death,” because our audience of today has never heard of Joseph Addison’s “Cato”. Cato had rather to die that live under Caesar. So he killed himself and prevented Caesar the moral victory.

    We’d be more calculating. We agree to get along to go along, and then dispatch with Caesar instead of ourselves.

    Better dead than Red? Nope. Better alive and Red to plan for the day of alive and not-Red. Deception is a legitimate war tactic, not suicide. The Jews teach us that. Jews will change their names to sound like English Lords and Ladies and then receive the Christian baptism. But they stay Jews, and as Jews, the plot the demise of the Anglo-Christian culture and society.

    We need to out-Jew the nasty Jews.

    A WN Patrick Henry would say, “Touch my White Privilege Liberty, and I’ll give YOU death.”

    Remember Patton? “I’m not asking you to die for your country. I’m telling you to make some other SOB die for HIS country!”

    White Rising… can’t you feel it?

    And who is Christian Miller? Where can we get bio. and see photo? A hottie? Or some WN dude writing under another pseudo?

  4. NBG's Gravatar NBG
    April 4, 2011 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

    We need places – really even whole communities – where Pro-Whites dominate. Not a state – just a small town or city. We need a base on which to start.

  5. phil white's Gravatar phil white
    April 4, 2011 - 8:57 pm | Permalink

    BINGO! Put that man at the head of the class!
    If a town elected a mayor who stood on the town square and said “This town realizes the truth of white genocide. We must have our own living space.
    I can’t order the police to evict non-white intruders, but you can shun them. We can all refuse to do business with them, and if they send in the 101st Airborne again to arrest all of us, then white America will know what their future holds.”
    The 101st commanding general wouldn’t dare. Many of the smarter non-Jewish elites are beginning to feel the breeze of change. They don’t want to be on trial after a revolution.
    See “known unknowns” by Nathan Freier of the U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute, pages 30-32.

    http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB890.pdf

  6. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 4, 2011 - 9:04 pm | Permalink

    Nationalism, White or non-White, is a sort of racism.

    Church’s monoply over religion was never based on the true teachings of Moses or Jesus. Church was also a sort of ‘chosenness’ or racism against the non-followers of the Church.

    As the saying goes: “What’s in the name?”. Racism comes in different shapes and colors.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/nationalism-another-name-for-racism/

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      April 4, 2011 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat, I’m not at all sure just what you’re trying to say, but your use of that most offensive to whites term “racism” makes me wonder if your comments wouldn’t be more appropriate at an NAACP site rather than here. You’re also using the term the way blacks do: to label any and everything they don’t like whether it has anything to do with race or not.

    • Christian M's Gravatar Christian M
      April 4, 2011 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

      re: White Nationalism is racism

      ‘Racism’ is a word like ‘democracy.’ It lost any concrete definition and it is only used to put people in a trance and lead them to a predetermined conclusion.

      I’m sure you don’t like how ‘democracy’ is used to justify military aggression in the Middle East. Similarly, White Nationalists do not like how ‘racism’ is used to justify White genocide and the dispossession of White interests and culture.

      James Edwards has said that a racist is a White person, and he is largely correct.

      Whites affect non-White culture abroad: racism.
      Non-Whites affect White culture: diversity.

      Whites colonize abroad: racism.
      Non-Whites colonize White nations: multiculturism.

      Scholarships for Whites only: racism.
      Scholarships for non-Whites only: social justice.

      Anti-racism is a CODE WORD for anti-WHITE. This is clear in any mainstream application of the word ‘racism.’

      Nobody says a Muslim country is too Muslim and needs diversity, do they? Nobody says a Black neighborhood isn’t diverse enough. They’re already 100% ‘diverse.’ Diversity is just a code word for “less White people.”

      Robert Whitaker has expounded at length upon these very obvious points. ‘Racism’ and ‘multiculturalism’ are supposed to be universal moral systems but they are NOT universal. They exist and operate solely to harm White interests.

      Besides these finer points above, the readers of this blog are not going to be cowed into submission by being called “racist!” We’ve all figured out that’s just a way to shut up White people while their entire existence is yanked away from under their feet.

    • Scathach's Gravatar Scathach
      April 4, 2011 - 10:44 pm | Permalink

      “Nationalism, White or non-White, is a sort of racism.”
      Actually the correct word is “racialist”. And yes, it is. What is your point? I think it is pretty well established that most people here are racialists and quite proud of it.

    • April 5, 2011 - 12:28 am | Permalink

      @Rehmat

      As an anti-racist, you should support nationalism, but then again Arabs are too dim-witted to have a sophisticated political stance.

      I don’t sit around worrying about who is “White” and who is not. My tribe is fair-skinned by chance of evolution. I never really obsessed over group anatomy, aside from my own sexual preferences for a mate.

      A race is a population group of common heritage who share a set of variable characteristics that are collectively rare in everybody else. Moreover, a race is a historical community of persons who share customs, traditions, mores, religion, and language that are propagated and maintained by linear natality (linear birth).

      Race as “skin color” is a simpleton’s definition. Conversely, I don’t expect you to have any informed ideas on race. You’re just a reverse Stormfronter who lacks cultural intelligence. Anyone who “ain’t White” is one of your own. Political elites are wise to this so they play most non-Whites like you for fools.

      Rehmat is one of those dumb non-Whites that believe President Obama is somehow “on their team” because they have approximately the same skin color. Just like the dysgenic, Jeboo Holy Babble-thumping, NASCAR fans in desolate zip codes who are victims of globalization believe that George W. Bush is “on their team.”

    • checkitb4uwreckit's Gravatar checkitb4uwreckit
      April 5, 2011 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat, your egalitarian, race-mixing religion of Islam is nothing more than a tool of the Jews to destroy Europe. That’s why they’re bringing your ilk there in hordes and brainwashing them to hate Whites. Same thing happened back in 711 A.D. when the Muslim hordes invaded Spain with the full support of the Iberian Jews.

  7. mr wittenberg's Gravatar mr wittenberg
    April 4, 2011 - 11:21 pm | Permalink

    We must never underestimate the power of a homogenous white nation.

  8. tma_sierrahills's Gravatar tma_sierrahills
    April 5, 2011 - 1:36 am | Permalink

    I don’t care if this writer looks like a golden Greek goddess or Broderick Crawford on a bad hair day–I want more!

    “Merely calling attention to, let alone denouncing, the maliciously disproportionate amounts of violent interracial crime committed against White people is paradoxically described as hate.”

    A mundane but apt example: After merely pointing out this sad violent crime statistic, yours truly was recently banned for life from Atlantic online by that Senior Editor Coates person, who first emailed me, calling me a name and then pronouncing me “Banned,” as if he were presiding over a sweltering flyspecked kangaroo courtroom in some Third World hellhole. Which reminds me, awhile back I read about one former colonial African nation where the judges and lawyers still intone importantly into the former colonial courtroom microphones, but with Whites long gone, the sound system is completely inert. In any case, at the once respected Atlantic, the compassionate Tolerance Police importantly speak into their morally and intellectually dead microphones, with ever fewer serious people able or willing to hear.

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      April 5, 2011 - 8:37 pm | Permalink

      Reminds me of the Reconstruction era blacks in the Mississippi legislature getting their daily newspaper like the whites_and pretending to read it while it was upside down.

    • John's Gravatar John
      April 5, 2011 - 9:52 pm | Permalink

      I have been banned from a few “respected” websites as well for speaking my mind. You can see where free speech ends for these publications.

  9. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    April 5, 2011 - 7:01 am | Permalink

    If I could interrupt the half-baked conspiracy theories and Rambo fantasies on some of the other threads, this is actually something intelligent. This is a remarkable article from Foreign Policy magazine that discusses the rise of tribes and race in the modern world, starting with the Han in China but also dealing with Europe. Basically, it says tribes are back. Here is an except:

    Europe today can best be seen as divided between three cultural tribes: Nordic-Germanic, Latin, and Slavonic. In the north, there is a vast region of prosperity, a zone of Nordic dynamism. Characterized by economies based on specialized exports, a still powerful Protestant ethic, and a culture that embraces authority, these countries — including Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Germany, and, arguably, the Baltic states — are becoming ever more aware of the cultural, fiscal, and attitudinal gulf between them and the southern countries.

    It is remarkable that something like this would show up in a major establishment magazine. Of course, it plays down the role of genetics, but anyone can read between the lines. It also highlights the reality that although Whites as a whole have similar interests and need to stick together, there are also differences among the various “tribes” of Whites that will have to be respected. Here is the link to the article. After reading, you can go back to playing Rambo.

    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/17/rise_of_the_hans?page=full

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      April 5, 2011 - 11:52 am | Permalink

      Jason,

      are you referring to HAC’s work?

      I really wouldn’t want to war, but we are men after all. And if we don’t stand then who will? Somethings are worth fighting for.

      TT

  10. April 5, 2011 - 7:07 am | Permalink

    I think the author is repeating what I have said before and still again. What we have is a ‘Whigger Problem.’

    In fact, I decided to put it into song. For those of strong ears, here below is a three-minute song about the matter — a parody of a Dave Ball’s ‘Thinking Problem.’

    http://www.spacemirror.net/lindstedt/useful/audio/TMT/LP/Whigger_Problem.mp3

    Right now I’m sort of between web pages and forums because of a mamzer and jew incursion into Christian Identity which has resulted in around 9 or ten of my web pages becoming censored thanks to jew and whigger run Internet Service Providers.

    So what to do?

    I think that what needs to be done is what will end up happening by default. What my kind calls the racial, religious and class civil war is The Great Tribulation. What is necessary is for this Great Tribulation to not only exterminate 160 million muds, but 130 million whigger herd animals and all of the spawn of Satan jew parasites as well.

    So the true natural leadership, I think, will become one of Ten Thousand Warlords who will hold sway over the remaining ten million Whites. Now while I truly believe that Jesus Christ will return, it will be this struggle in the midst of a Great Collapse which will define the lives of these White leaders.

    Hoping for a ‘Great Awakening’ is a fantasy. Whiggers, like zombies, want to die and feast on living White flesh. We as Whites should give Whiggers the first half of what they want — death — while living and living well is our best and lasting revenge.

    Every problem can be eventually solved if enough problem-makers are eliminated with extreme prejudice.

    Hail Victory!!!

    Pastor Martin Luther Dzerzhinsky Lindstedt
    Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri
    http://spacemirror.net/lindstedt/lindstedt

  11. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 5, 2011 - 7:55 am | Permalink

    Whiteawake – I am surprised you did not ask me to post at ADL website instead of NAACP. That is one of the old trick Israeli Hasbara idiots use on Christian discussion sites to discredit the anti-Israel Muslim posters.

    I am against all kind of “Chosen People” – based on religion, color of skin or a land they live at – and once the people start looking down others who do not share with them either of those ‘special identity’ – it make them a RACE and their practice of superiority over others – RACISM.

    Judaism is the living example of a religious doctrine based on racism. One is a Jew, only if one is born to a Jewish mother – Father doesn’t count.

    When the West awards the so-called “freedom of speech” rights only to the hate-mongers or Zionist Jews – it’s a RACISM.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/its-very-dangerous-to-speak-truth-in-the-west/

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      April 5, 2011 - 8:12 am | Permalink

      Rehmat

      Thank you for the clarification. In the future I’ll just consider you as another ignorant black trying to disrupt a white forum.

      You might try looking into the genetic effects of race-mixing. You might also consider the disaster which is and always has been nearly every mongrel country.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 5, 2011 - 10:01 am | Permalink

      Rehmat, which language do angels speak?

    • Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
      April 11, 2011 - 2:37 am | Permalink

      Rehmat, you act like there is a crime in recognizing that racial, ethnic, cultural and national differences exist. You have bought into this egalitarian mindset imposed by Marxist Jews that everything and everyone is equal in every way when God has given us all different abilities. In doing so, you are letting multiculturalism wipe away any and all true diversity. Who should dictate WHAT we will all be WHEN we are all the same? Think on that for a minute. Don’t you value your culture? Don’t you want the common courtesy of having it respected and protected? Haven’t you been angry to the point of being homicidal when it has been dismissed and disrespected (i.e. those stupid Mohammed cartoons?) Well everyone feels the same way.

      We are not supremacists, we’re separatists. We appreciate the kind of diversity where each diverse group shines like a jewel from its own setting. I can appreciate your sentiment that Baptist churches don’t belong in Mecca. Well, please appreciate mine that mosques don’t belong in Rome.

      These global merchants with no soul or heart just want to turn the entire world into one big Walmart and sell everybody nothing but an amalgamated junk culture to replace their own.

      The best global utopia is one where you have the freedom to travel and sample the best of what another culture has to offer and than go HOME back to your own culture and exhale and recharge. That is what Americans used to do before the Forces of Diversity decided to use multiculturalism to destroy diversity. The Italians had their own neighborhood, the Irish, theirs, etc. The Irish and everyone else would go to Little Italy and drop some money at Italian restaurants and celebrate Columbus Day and the Italians and everyone else would go to the Irish neighborhoods to celebrate St. Patrick’s Day and then they would all go home and enjoy their lives.

      May I ask what is so goddamned supremacist about that?

  12. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    April 5, 2011 - 10:18 am | Permalink

    Athanasius,I can’t speak for Rehmat,but I think he’ll first have to calculate how many angels can dance on the point of a needle…

  13. iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
    April 5, 2011 - 11:33 am | Permalink

    Let’s just say that politics won’t work, so then what do we do? die? How far are you willing to go to win our freedom?
    I say we stakeout a bit of land, and if anyone comes calling, we fight. Isn’t that the way it’s always been?

    TT

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 5, 2011 - 12:09 pm | Permalink

      I’m not sure that would work either. Most people who advocate it are thinking of an agrarian communal state. But white people have already built up the technological infrastructure in the USA and Europe. The communications and energy needs of any prospective state would still be in the hands of hostile foreign elements.

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      April 5, 2011 - 1:12 pm | Permalink

      Mr MacDonald thinks it could work, staking out a homeland.

      Shouldn’t we atleast try? At the end of the day, when we become a minority, and on the road to oblivion, our enemies may atleast say: well, the Aryans were all too cowardly to make a stand, but that TT guy, he fought. Good on him. That’s how I want to be remembered. We can do it, guys.

      Freedom

      TT

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 5, 2011 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

      Right now, the power over us is mostly constructed. We can still choose what kind of arts and culture we want to consume. We can choose to enter the professions, and to promote the right kind of people. We can choose to have children.

      True they have us trapped when it comes to finance and banking, but why can’t we rebuild a society within society? Do we lack discipline?

    • mark's Gravatar mark
      April 5, 2011 - 7:53 pm | Permalink

      iboTTs said on April 5, 2011 – 1:12 pm
      Mr MacDonald thinks it could work, staking out a homeland.
      Shouldn’t we atleast try? At the end of the day, when we become a minority, and on the road to oblivion, our enemies may atleast say: well, the Aryans were all too cowardly to make a stand, but that TT guy, he fought. Good on him. That’s how I want to be remembered. We can do it, guys.

      You can stake out a homeland but how are you going to defend it?

      If the homeland is anything like Farnham O’Reilly’s idea it will be too small to be defended. And in any case, who are going to be the ones to defend it. The inhabitants that reside there aren’t going to do it because they’ll most likely be the libertarian-types and they could actually get hurt and wouldn’t be able to spend all of that money they love so much.

      No, any solution that does not include ridding North America and a good chunk of South America of non-white human life is just going to put off into the future our demise. We need to put both physical and chemical barriers between the White population and any remaining non-white population that somehow manages to survive the coming lengthy guerrilla war. Their numbers will also have to be controlled by us to make sure we are never threatened by them.

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      April 6, 2011 - 8:30 am | Permalink

      Mark

      Who will defend it? A hundred motivated Aryans, and their passion for their people will carry them further than a thousand lamers fighting for ZoG gold. And anyway, we don’t have to beat them, just fight them. (Fight them as in defending ourselves, our families and people.)

      If you want your homeland, want your secure society, then you ain’t going to get it by dreaming about it.

      HAC’s Pacific NW

      TT

    • mark's Gravatar mark
      April 6, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

      iboTTs said on: April 6, 2011 – 8:30 am

      “Who will defend it? A hundred motivated Aryans, and their passion….”

      That’s putting the cart before the horse. The first order of business is to weaken the US Government to the point that it is non-functional, its state and federal law enforcement infrastructure impotent, and then to depopulate the non-white areas of the Western Hemisphere.

      What it sounds like you’re advocating is running and hiding from the larger battlefield and allowing the non-white population to continue to exist—and therefore to always remain a threat to Whites in North America.

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      April 6, 2011 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

      Mark

      I’m not saying you should hide. I’m saying the NW homeland that HAC advocates is the best thing I’ve ever heard. You need a place where White people can congregate in strength, then you can begin the task of removing the non-Whites. I think America is lost, bro, you need to leave if you want to survive. Start again in the NW. Once you secure your new homeland, then you may even have a chance of recovering all of America. Whatever you do, I hope you do it soon.

      TT

    • April 6, 2011 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

      That’s putting the cart before the horse. The first order of business is to weaken the US Government to the point that it is non-functional…

      The Alaskan Pipeline is very vulnerable, and if it was attacked properly it would have the kind of major economic effect which would probably push the US Government a lot closer to being non-functional than it is now.

      and then to depopulate the non-white areas of the Western Hemisphere.

      You better get to work attacking that pipeline, because your sense of what kind of rhetoric is productive and not may leave something to be desired.

    • April 6, 2011 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

      What it sounds like you’re advocating is running and hiding from the larger battlefield and allowing the non-white population to continue to exist—and therefore to always remain a threat to Whites in North America.

      Every race has threats to it. At least since the invention of modern means of transportation this has been the case.

      It might make more sense to attack the World Technological System, as the late Der Weisse Engel advocated.

      Although thinking about it, not many Whites would support that either.

    • April 6, 2011 - 3:13 pm | Permalink

      Note mark is probably right that the US Government must be made essentially non-functional before what Al Qaeda calls the Disunited States of America can actually become an arena for White Separatists.

      At the same time he’s making a blunder in combining this important message with the idea of killing millions upon millions of people.

      There could be some potential terrorists who will be turned off by this, and thus reject even the valid part of mark’s message.

    • mark's Gravatar mark
      April 6, 2011 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

      @TT

      Well, White people can congregate wherever they want—nobody needs Harold Covington to do that.

      Our main efforts now should be on degrading the US Government, its economy and law enforcement apparatus. We need to be stirring up as much interracial animosity as possible and that is what paves the way for any White enclave.

      The kind of White homeland we need is one that the non-whites can’t use law enforcement or the court system to destroy. In any case, such a move should only be seen as a temporary measure with the eventual goal being the complete occupation by Whites of all of what is now the USA, Canada, and northern Mexico. From the southern part of Mexico to a point south of the equator would be a depopulated area. There will no longer be any such thing as a Mexican.

      Quit shilling for Covington.
      ****************
      @Reginald

      If anybody but Whites remains near or inside of White living space they would always be able to come back at our descendents 100 years or 500 years hence and kill them. Are you willing to provide the non-whites with that option? I’m not.

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      April 6, 2011 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

      Mark

      I really don’t appreciate you calling I a shill. And if you read the Professor’s notice at the bottom of the page, then you’ll see that he doesn’t appreciate name calling either. I like HAC and his ideas. And the fact that TOO allowed his work to be highlighted tells me that they don’t hate him either.

      And when I say “fight, make a stand”, it’s in the context of defending our homeland – if and when we create one. I want to make that clear. Self defence. And when I said to you – “Whatever you do, I hope you do it soon.” I didn’t mean anything illegal.

      Christian, I forgot to say, I enjoyed reading your article.

      TT

    • mark's Gravatar mark
      April 6, 2011 - 10:37 pm | Permalink

      iboTTs said on April 6, 2011 – 9:03 pm

      I really don’t appreciate you calling I a shill. And if you read the Professor’s notice at the bottom of the page, then you’ll see that he doesn’t appreciate name calling either. I like HAC and his ideas. And the fact that TOO allowed his work to be highlighted tells me that they don’t hate him either.

      And when I say “fight, make a stand”, it’s in the context of defending our homeland – if and when we create one. I want to make that clear. Self defence. And when I said to you – “Whatever you do, I hope you do it soon.” I didn’t mean anything illegal.

      Well, if you recall from the thread “Harold Covington’s Northwest Quartet”, he had very little support and his negative personal character received a great deal of exposure. Since you had been putting a link to his site at the bottom of your posts you had to be either shilling for him or you are Covington. Again, nobody needs Covington in order to move to the Pacific Northwest and hang out with other Whites.

      ‘Making a stand’ is not going to be good enough. We’re going to have to take a great deal of offensive action to create any kind of long-term homeland and security for that homeland. Since you’re against doing anything that would be illegal, I guess that means that you are willing to permit non-whites to live in close proximity to that homeland, and if they choose at some point to overrun us, you would continue to use a defensive strategy—while they are using an offensive strategy. That’s kind of dumb, isn’t it?

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      April 6, 2011 - 11:37 pm | Permalink

      Until our people start using the words anti-white and white genocide, against our enemies, there will be no popular support and no white homeland. The power is already in our hands. All we have to do is start using it.

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      April 7, 2011 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

      Mark

      If you think I’m HAC, then I’ll take that as a compliment. Seriously, I never even heard of the guy until his work was displayed here. And I probably got carried away a bit after reading The Brigade. Also, I deliberately invalidated the HyperLinks; I was just using it to show that I think the homeland concept is a good idea.

      If we create the homeland, and ZoG makes war against us, then going on the offensive is ligit. But to retain the moral highground, we should wait until they strike first. Going on the offensive right now, outside the context of the homeland, would give ZoG the moral highground. I agree with you, I just think, if we are smart, we can justify our actions, not least to ourselves.

      Moral justification is a prerequisite for any actions I undertake. And the “homeland” gives me that. After all, a man has the right to protect his castle, and his family. And yes, I don’t advocate illegal activities. I’m a potential freedon-fighter not a criminal.

      TT

  14. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 5, 2011 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

    “But white people have already built up the technological infrastructure in the USA and Europe”

    Nyeth – Most of those people are Asiatic Khazarian Jews, dude!

    David Brooks in his January 12, 2010, Op-Ed column ”The Tel Aviv Cluster’ in the New York Times boasted many Jewish achievements considering they make-up only 0.2% of world’s population. He claimed that 54% of world chess champions, 27% of the Nobel physics laureates and 31% of the medicine laureates are Jewish. David Brooks also adds that though Jews make only 2% of United States population – 21% of Ivy League student bodies, 26% of the Kennedy Center honorees, 37% of Academy Award winning directors, 38% of those on a recent Business Week list of leading philanthropists and 51% of Pulitzer Prize winners for non-fiction are Jewish……

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/01/21/jewish-or-israeli-achievements/

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 5, 2011 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

      And who conferred all those honors upon them? Modern academia/government/law/art is nothing more than a mutual masturbation society.

      Who invented the light bulb? The computer? The transistor? The microchip? Whose skilled labor put all that into action? Who developed the most productive agriculture in the world?

  15. April 5, 2011 - 1:12 pm | Permalink

    “When men’s hearts are breaking and their souls are plunged into the depths of despair, their great forebears turn their eyes towards them from the dim shadows of the past – those forebears who knew how to triumph over anxiety and affliction, mental servitude and physical bondage – and extend their eternal hands in a gesture of encouragement to despairing souls. Woe to the nation that is ashamed to clasp those hands.”
    – Chapter 12, Book I, Mein Kampf

  16. Barbara's Gravatar Barbara
    April 5, 2011 - 2:38 pm | Permalink

    What an inspirational and wonderful article. I’m so glad I found Christian Miller’s website.

    I have been banned from the local newspaper forum, wrote the editor and asked why people are allowed to champion more illegal immigration in his paper where a Muslim and a Hispanic have columns but I’m not allowed to oppose it. He has never responded to my emails.

    Perhaps we should all email editors when this sort of thing happens. We might have an impact if we stuck together – seems like it might be a good project. I’ll email the editors of your newspapers if you’ll email mine. My dream would be if someone like Kevin MacDonald or Christian Miller sent an email. Wonder if they would get any response.

    This is happening across our nation not only at major city newspapers but on local tv news channels too. If any of you have attempted to speak out locally you know what I’m talking about.

    • April 5, 2011 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

      Good comment Barb

    • April 5, 2011 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

      Also Barb, how did you find his site? I’m not a computer whiz.

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      April 6, 2011 - 11:29 pm | Permalink

      Barb,
      They say they are anti-racist, but what they really are is anti-white.

      Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  17. omop's Gravatar omop
    April 5, 2011 - 2:44 pm | Permalink

    At an after dinner meet in the old, really old very old days, a bunch of elders shooed the women away brought a premium box of Havanas and began debating who is the king of the jungle.

    A pro lion spokesperson opened up by claiming that the lion was king of jungle and when asked how did the lion come to that conclusion. Said whenever the lion came upon “other different animals” he would posit the challenge along these lines….”who is king of the jungl?” Every response was to the effect that he was king of the Jungle.

    That worked until the lion came upon an elephant and challeneged the elephant as to whom is really the king of the jungle. The elephant busy with washing itself down responded, “go away do not bother me as I am busy”.

    The lion’s response was to further challenge the elephant for a response. after an interlude of ten or so minutes. The elephant had had enough and proceeded to grab the lion with his trunk and bounced him against an oak tree.

    Whereupon the lion got up and cried, “hey you dont have to get made if you dont know who the king of the jungle is.

    Western civilization has been snookered since accepting the premise of a Garden of Eden and following the premise that a God has created a “chosen people” not white, brown, black, green, red or rainbow colored but just “CHOSEN” thus by passing any color by the simple adage of havi ng been created superior to all colors.

    Thereby creating both a curse and a blessing. enjoy.

  18. April 5, 2011 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article. Especially,”Truth is heresy before it is accepted as truth”.

  19. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 5, 2011 - 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Barbara – did you ever thought – you were trying to spam the website by post usual Israeli Hasbara lies – like Alan Dershowitz? Personally, I am banned on every Jewish website; Forward, Tablet, Wall Street Journal, Foreign Policy, Meadoweiss, etc. – plus the Jewish run ‘Muslim websites’ such as Ummah, Shia Chat, Pakistan Tribune, Islamic City, etc.

    If you ask Rev. Ted Pike – he will be glad to tell you that Jews are behind all the pro-immigration groups. They want to use the immigrants’ shoulders to cry ‘anti-Semitism’.

    Here is one example which could educate people like you: “Anti-Immigration law, holocaust, racism and Israel Lobby”.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/05/24/anti-immigration-law-holocaust-racism-and-israel-lobby/

    • Christian M's Gravatar Christian M
      April 5, 2011 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

      Excerpt from Rehmat’s article above: “Personally, I believe that people from the third world, whose natural resources are still being looted by the Western colonial powers, should be given the right to immigrate to the rich countries as cheap labor…”

  20. Denys Picard's Gravatar Denys Picard
    April 5, 2011 - 9:01 pm | Permalink

    Christian,

    A bit of ranting is always good. I have found out that ranting about potential dangers that create stress has brought me relaxation. So I know where you are coming from Christian.
    This being said, while I was reading your article, I was reminded of the Brooksley Born story. Born was Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairwoman in the late 1990s. PBS Frontline did a show on her and her battle to prevent the Clinton administration from not regulating futures. Naturally she lost. What was incredible is that the 4 men who where fighting her were Alan Greenspan, Bob Rubin, Lawrence Summers and Arthur Levitt. In the show, this quartet of garbage was presented as 4 White Men, representing typical White culture when they were in fact 4 Big Fat Jews, which is not the same. So I understand what you mean when you talk about the White getting the crap all the time. You see, when the Jews do badly, they are white persons, when they do well, suddenly their heritage becomes very important and they are Jews again. And that is the way it goes.

    So the problem we face is what kind of strategy can White culture embody, or at least white activists, in order to succeed in modifying this trend of white bashing. The problem is that in the minoritism culture Jews have imposed, the majority must be continuously harassed in order not to gain momentum. At the same time the majority is made vulnerable because it is filled with potential defectors. Jews for first like to blend with white culture until its reward time. Also in time of Jew crisis, Jews identity becomes important, that is why it is very difficult in attempting to gain white respect, to have as partners the Jews because they will defect in the most inopportune time. Jews have studied the patterns of defection in groups quite extensively because it was of critical importance in implementing and sustaining their minoritism approach to democracy. In this process, they found out that women will easily defect from ethnic group identity towards woman group identity if you push the right buttons. That is why Jews have made women their allies in their political strategy. If under the pressure of certain button you can disjoint white identity momentum by splitting males and females, then you weaken the potential for majoritism. That is the main driver in the continual negative white male bashing we witness in the news. Show enough of it and women will start to look at their own husband as someone representing a permanent danger, a menace instead of a partner.

    This serves the Jews in weakening white solidarity by increasing female identity. And I could go on. The whole Jewish approach is to subdivide the white community in subgroups. White leaders often betray their own group by pretending to represent them while plotting with the Jews for their own benefit. We see this in Washington dc everyday.

    So the problem I am observing is, while there is a strong sentiment for white unity and solidarity, a majority is always difficult to manage in terms of solidarity. And what lacks in discussions like this one is often what strategic actions we may commit to in order to change the current status, to destabilize the actual establishment so we can have a change of system, because this is what is needed.

    Obviously, there is brute force, but I am not very good at that. Currently I am in the work of trying to establish strategic vulnerabilities to the minoritism system that could be attacked intelligently within the system. I would challenge you to identify10 of them, and ask your colleagues to do the same.

    Frankly,

    Denys Picard

    • April 6, 2011 - 12:31 am | Permalink

      An excellent article, Christian Miller. Western civilization has often focused on individual heroes such as Martin Luther, Joan of Arc, Leonardo Da Vinci, and so on. This is concomitant to our genetic proclivity towards individualism, moral universalism, altruism, etcetera.

      Here is my long and thoughtful post, maybe I should start writing columns for Occidental Observer, lol.

      @Denys Picard

      “Jews have studied the patterns of defection in groups quite extensively because it was of critical importance in implementing and sustaining their minoritism approach to democracy. In this process, they found out that women will easily defect from ethnic group identity towards woman group identity if you push the right buttons. That is why Jews have made women their allies in their political strategy.”

      Basically, whatever doctrine used to bind us as entities distinct from Jews, including Christianity (even though it’s just a crazy Jewish sect), constitutes a danger to Jewry, and therefore had to be dismantled. Furthermore, Jews are hostile to any form of bond that ties us even as individuals:

      - family bonds: destroyed through “sexual revolution”
      - ethnic bonds: destroyed through “multiculturalism”
      - religious bonds: destroyed through “modernization”
      - racial bonds: destroyed through “multiracialism”

      for the reason that each can function as a platform for “dangerous” individuals to emerge and recruit.

      In its days of autonomy, Christianity was very hostile to Jews, thus on this regard alone it doesn’t matter that it used to be an anti-Jew Jewish sect. The poison it really brought was slave-morality: mindless obedience, humility, cult for superstition and ignorance, “love thy enemy,” “turn the other cheek,” hostility to Aryan things such as purity, honor and glory. It was an INADVERTENT time bomb that eroded through our people’s pride century by century, which CULMINATED in the so-called “secular” Humanism (Renaissance), which is Christianity without a god.

      This ideology of world communion based on an intrinsic equality between “every human soul” (white, negro, man woman) is so ingrained into our minds and we have been culturally conditioned to regard it as a desirable pinnacle of justice. Here you have the Aryan love for justice sidetracked into an act of perpetual compromise (so that the world, which is based on INEQUALITY, be squeezed to fit their crazy ideals).

      Denys Picard: “And what lacks in discussions like this one is often what strategic actions we may commit to in order to change the current status, to destabilize the actual establishment so we can have a change of system, because this is what is needed.”

      My strategy since 2007 has been to support a libertarian-conservative politician such as Dr. Ron Paul. He’s not perfect, but nearly all his positions are good for us: against illegal immigration, against birthright citizenship, anti-big government, wants to end all foreign aid including to Israel, pro-freedom of association, wants to abolish the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and “End the Fed [eral Reserve]. He is not openly racialist or nationalist, but that is of no significance for now. Let me elucidate why this would be ideal for us, currently the powers that be are holding us back from organizing and associating with ourselves. The 1964 Civil Rights Act prevents us from discriminating based “race, color, religion, sex or national origin” in private matters ON PRIVATE PROPERTY! This is unconstitutional because it violates our freedom of association enshrined in the 1st Amendment. It’s obvious Jewish power is largely based on the Federal government and central banking, when a state or city has a “hate crime” and doesn’t “prosecute” the culprits, the Feds send in the FBI and Justice department and inundates the state/city with a large lawsuit. Public education is another area that Ron Paul/Rand Paul wants to abolish and this works in our favor because it eliminates one of the two sources (media and academia) of Jew brainwashing.

      Some people may ask, “Why swap oppressive statism for oppressive, managerial-transnational corporations?” What they fail to realize is that Jews only make up ~25% of all CEOS, ~75% of CEOS are White Protestants or White Catholics. Jewish power is centralized; envision the impracticality of controlling 50 independent states in the USA. Jews are shareholders of multinational corporations, but Whites make up the bulk of management. It would be impossible, even with all of their money. If the government collapses or is dramatically reduced, Whites will step in and fill the shoes. Corporations can provide security, community, organization for our people. I want to point out an example of how a future White ethnostate might operate: the Hanseatic League (13th-17th centuries), an economic alliance of trading cities and their guilds that dominated trade along the coast of Northern Europe in the later Middle Ages.
      http://depts.washington.edu/baltic/papers/hansa.html
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanseatic_League

      In summary: destroy or weaken the federal government by any means possible and we will win. This goes for all Western nations. Destroy the EU, WTO, NAFTA, World Bank, IMF, etc. Smash any supranational organization.

    • I's Gravatar I
      April 6, 2011 - 3:01 am | Permalink

      You see, when the Jews do badly, they are white persons, when they do well, suddenly their heritage becomes very important and they are Jews again. And that is the way it goes.

      Or as they say about all the big Jewish mass murderers in the Soviet Union: they “abandoned their Jewishness”.

      Jews have studied the patterns of defection in groups quite extensively because it was of critical importance in implementing and sustaining their minoritism approach to democracy. In this process, they found out that women will easily defect from ethnic group identity towards woman group identity if you push the right buttons.

      This is interesting. Who did this research? Do you have any more information about it?

      Currently I am in the work of trying to establish strategic vulnerabilities to the minoritism system that could be attacked intelligently within the system.

      Be sure to let us know what you come up with.

  21. Scott Mollett's Gravatar Scott Mollett
    April 5, 2011 - 11:28 pm | Permalink

    I run into people trying to ridicule me all the time. I simply start laughing at them and never stop pointing out that calling me names does not make you right. I tell them that I understand low IQ people have trouble shrugging of brainwashing. I then pick apart everything they say pointing out how stupid they are. Having the truth on your side makes it almost too easy.

    I used to try to explain things nicely to these morons but on a few occasions that I lost my patience and joined in the name calling I found an audience. Not all people are dumb and when you continually point out stupid things stupid people say others catch on.

    The other day on XBOX live I mentioned how native North Americans were close to 3000 years behind Europeans living in the stone age when we were long into the age of steel. After pointing out people who fall so far behind probably don’t deserve to keep a whole continent the name calling began. One white guy claimed that the natives had a culture 1000 times richer than whites and we are evil. I just started laughing and asked him why he believed people who lived in tents made out of tree branches and animal skins had a culture more advanced than the one that built the Canterbury Cathederal or the Sistine chappel? Soon several people in the lobby were laughing at the guy as he got more and more frustrated. Later I mentioned all the minority on white violence and crime and some Mexican guy started calling me a white mother fu….r telling me he is gonna trace my ISP and find me to kick my ass. It was awesome the stupid guy did not realise he was proving my point but at least half of the 16 people listening did.

    It seems the youth of today want to be on the winners side in these insult contests. I say good. Arguing is one of my favorite things to do and my friends and I used to try to “burn” each other verbally as a sport. It is not hard to point out fluff when someone is trying to use it as an argument. It goes against all conventional wisdom but starting an argument with “Only a total moron thinks…” is actually a pretty good tactic with the population of the USA. After all no one wants to be a moron and I am tired of being the one back on my heels. Lets face it if a person is so stupid they believe calling people names is fomenting an argument how much good are they going to do any cause? I sacrifice the stupid trying to reach the smart and my XBOX friends list is full of people who asked to join after hearing me speak.

    The author hit the nail on the head as to why I do this. I don’t hate anyone I just love logic, critical thinking, and the TRUTH.

    • Christian M's Gravatar Christian M
      April 6, 2011 - 12:11 am | Permalink

      Hear, hear! Make sure to say “anti-racism is just a code word for anti-White” and to point out that Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, and White nations for everybody means White genocide (and that nobody’s flooding Mexico with non-Mexicans and telling them to create a blended humanity).

      Not all truths are equal– some truths can never be forgotten, even if one tries. Try hitting your audience with The Mantra– the Hammer of Thor for White advocacy.

      http://www.whitakeronline.org/bobsmantra.htm

    • Scott Mollett's Gravatar Scott Mollett
      April 6, 2011 - 4:27 pm | Permalink

      Christian M, I point out all of the wrote about plus that all nations developed along thenic/language lines for a reason. The reason being that in times of famine and political strife people band together with their own in group ethnicity and fight the closest out group for resources. History has shown this over and over most recently in Sarajevo where the Croats fought the Serbs over limited resources and political division. I also point out that the US founding fathers knew this and that whites are a minority on the planet earth. The founders clearly meant for the USA to be a white nation and our immigration laws reflected that to the point of using the word white in the language of the law.

      Unfortunatly too many of our youth do not see a problem with whites disapearing over the long term but the above facts will effect them personally. We have to frame our arguments around what will concern the people we are trying to reach on a personal level. We live in an individualistic culture and personally I am glad,

  22. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    April 6, 2011 - 8:58 am | Permalink

    I just barrel though. Say what I want to say – and barrel through. Do use humour and sarcasm to attack your detractors – set them up to say stupid things – and then make fun of ‘em. To their faces, and in front of others…

    • Scott Mollett's Gravatar Scott Mollett
      April 6, 2011 - 4:32 pm | Permalink

      I also speak out loud in public. I use the XBOX to try to reach the kids. Its hard for an old guy to get near 20 year olds in a setting to inform them in person. The web is 24 hour a day access to the youth of the USA. It might be a cliche but the children really are the future.

  23. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    April 6, 2011 - 9:05 am | Permalink

    Scott Mollett, good post.

  24. phil white's Gravatar phil white
    April 6, 2011 - 10:07 am | Permalink

    What is to be done?

    (1) Progpagandize on the net and on the street.
    The most cost effecitve and time efficient method is to wear a T-shirt with a short pro-white slogan and a link to a pro-white web site.
    You can also use magnetic signs on you car to catch peoples attention. A pickup truck I passed a coule of day ago caught up to me for a few seconds, then dropped back again. Obviously he had noticed my “Asia For Asian, Africa for Africans, white childrens countrie for everyone” sign.
    With a magnetic sign you can remove it when you park at work, or even when you are in your home town, but put it one your side panel whey you are OUT of town.

    (2) Meet up with a local pro-white off the web. Stormfront has 200,000 members now. Form a local group for mutual moral support and effectiveness.

    (3) “In case of emergency break glass.” I.e. if it should come to a civil war, make sure your 18 year old did a stint in the Army infantry, or at the very least, buy him a U.S. Army infantry tactics manual at your local gun show.

  25. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    April 6, 2011 - 11:35 pm | Permalink

    I think Mr. Miller is right when he tells us to be dedicated to the truth. He is 100% on target. A body cannot live without a beating heart and neither can the White Race live without the beating heart of truth. Truth is on our side. It is certainly not on the side of the Jews. Do you realize how powerful that is? Truth is our savior. It is our armor. Truth, and our dedication to truth, is the weapon that will destroy our Enemy.

    It seems trite these days to sound religious, but Christ did say truth shall set us free./b> Jews hated Him for it. Those words uttered by the Lord (obviously not meant for the Jews) and His very existence as the Son of God stripped them of their god. That had to be a devastating blow. Jews felt they had lost enormous ground! How can the Jews exist without a God approving their lies, degeneracy, butchery, wars, swindle and genocide. Or ordering them to commit such acts? Life is a minefield without a God to serve Jewish interests.

    As we can see Jews work every angle trying convince Christians to go back in history and respect their old murderous Hebrew God. Millions of weak, muddle minded Christian-Zionists do. Even Rome made the shocking decision to excuse the Jews for the murder of Jesus Christ. Not in our wildest imagination would we have expected a Christian institution to sink so low. Thankfully, truth is not confined to the Church. Truth lives in the hearts of men. Truth and honesty is the fiber of the White Man’s being.

    It is imperative for us to be true to ourselves.

    If truth and honesty is part of us then we will be unable to settle for anything less. Not even the hordes of needy, greedy, hostile barbarians the Jews are bringing into our homelands can offset the righteousness of the White Man. America belongs to us. Canada, Australia and Europe are white homelands and these uprooted barbarians know it. Taking charge and getting rid of them is a course of action that is right and they know it. A thief may hope not to get caught, but he expects it.

    • Christian M's Gravatar Christian M
      April 7, 2011 - 12:22 am | Permalink

      Heather Blue,

      Whites are unique in that they ask, “What is true?” That tendency is suppressed by current anti-White dogma. We must revive it.

      For those readers who call themselves Christian, let me humbly suggest a return to following Christ, rather than Christianity (which has been perverted and subverted):

      Matthew 23

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      April 10, 2011 - 12:25 am | Permalink

      Heather:

      The Pope said it was the jewish leaders of the temple, not the jewish people who are responsible. It is a reasonable statement when you think about it. The parallel with today is that the jewish leaders are the problem, not the average big nosed jew, who probably doesn’t follow the law of the Old Testament or the torah anymore than you do, and has to struggle to survive with the rest of us powerless folk. Very few jews have the power ascribed to them by many people here. They are just as much puppets of the rich and powerful as we are, but they have a genetic predisposition to justify their petty crookedness and racial bias towards their own. Plus they feel picked upon and hated, which they of course bring upon themselves. Hopefully, my fellow white men and their loyal wives will have a higher standard of life than the sell your soul to the devil accumulation of filty lucre at any price.

  26. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    April 7, 2011 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

    I believe that all people of all races are basically fair minded .
    I also think there is a powerful supremacist religion/group that is behind anti-white multi-cutlturalism and much of the world’s strife .
    I think there will come a day when all people look to the puppeteers and just say no to being manipulated . Then all people can rebuild their respective nations with their racial kin and live as good neighbors.

  27. mark's Gravatar mark
    April 9, 2011 - 3:12 am | Permalink
  28. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 9, 2011 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Christian M – I am affraid if one really want to follow Christ’s true Ministry – one got to be either NAZARINE (believer in St. Barnabas’ Gospel) or a Muslim. The modern Christianity was created by St. Paul, a Christ hunter during Christ’s life.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/12/28/hideseek-exhibition-insults-jesus/

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 9, 2011 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

      The “Gospel of Barnabas” is a 16th century Ottoman forgery probably written by Sephardic Jews. Why don’t you go peddle your nonsense on beliefnet or something.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      April 9, 2011 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

      In fact, both NT and Talmud were written by Sephardic Jews. I am peddling behind you all the way to the 280 Jewish brothels in Tel Aviv.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 9, 2011 - 10:04 pm | Permalink

      There was no such thing as Sephardic Jews in the 1st c. A.D.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      April 9, 2011 - 10:14 pm | Permalink

      Well – there was no Christian or Jews in the 1st c. A.D.

      Christianity was established in 325 CE and Jews were INVENTED in the 19th.c AD.

      Hey, I far more I have to follow you to Tel Aviv’s Jewish brothels?

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 10, 2011 - 2:48 am | Permalink

      There most certainly were Christians in the 1st c. A.D.

      There is no need to rehash all the medieval and modern propaganda of the Moslems here. I think that anyone can view any Moslem country in the world and come to the correct conclusion that we’ve no need of that rubbish.

      What is particularly disgusting is your sanctimonious self-righteousness and denial of all the evil you’ve wrought throughout history.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      April 14, 2011 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

      I am sure there is no use talking sense to a 10 ft. thick Wailing Wall – but the word ‘Christianity’ began after the Holy Conference in 325 CE.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 14, 2011 - 4:27 pm | Permalink

      I don’t know that the “Holy Conference” or “CE” mean. The word “Christianity” is English, so I suppose the word didn’t originate until the Saxons converted to Christianity in the 9th c. A.D. However, in the relevant languages of early Christianity (Greek, Latin, and Syriac), it is clear from the New Testament itself that people were first called “Christians” at Antioch in the 1st c. A.D. ( Acts 11:26)

      You really should stop peddling lies and ignorance.

  29. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 14, 2011 - 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Jews know how to make heroes out Christian elites. Did not they put a Crypto-Jew as a Pope (John Paul II mother was Polish Jew)?

    Now, Vatican has a Zionist double agent Pope Benedict XVI, sitting on St. Peter’s throne.

    Israel, even have found two nails the Jews used to nail Jesus on the Cross to prove that he was an ‘imposter’ (a punishment described in OT for imposters).

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/04/14/israel-finds-nails-used-to-crucify-jesus/

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      April 14, 2011 - 4:04 pm | Permalink

      Is this post satire?

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 14, 2011 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

      No, Rehmat, here, you can see how Islam is actually a Roman Catholic trick to conquer the world! http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0029/0029_01.asp

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      April 14, 2011 - 6:07 pm | Permalink

      Jason:

      He cites his own blog as the “authority” so it must be a true fact..lol

3 Trackbacks to "Truth, Heresy, and Heroes"

  1. on April 10, 2011 at 5:31 am
  2. on April 26, 2011 at 12:54 pm
  3. on May 25, 2011 at 12:08 am

Comments are closed.