White Dispossession and the Racialization of American Politics Accelerate

Ron Brownstein’s aptly named “The Next America” is a tale of increasingly rapid White dispossession. Key quotes:

From every angle, the results showed that the nation’s transformation into a “majority-minority” nation is proceeding even faster than expected. Nationally, the overall share of the non-Hispanic white population dropped from 69.1 percent in 2000 to 63.7 in 2010, a greater decline than most analysts anticipated. In a mirror image, the minority population grew from 30.9 percent in 2000 to 36.3 percent in 2010.

Given that the White percentage includes Jews and Middle Eastern people who do not identify as White (or vote like most Whites), the White population of European descent is likely below 60%.

The change over the past decade was especially dramatic among young people. In the new census, 46.5 percent of people under 18 were minority, a dramatic jump from 39.1 percent in 2000. As recently as last summer, demographers projected that minorities would make up a majority of the under-18 population sometime after 2020. At the current rate of growth, however, nonwhites will comprise a majority of children in the United States by 2015. And because of the explosive minority growth in the youth population—the people who will form families and become parents in the coming years—the nonwhite share of the overall population is likely to grow even faster over the next decade, says Brookings Institution demographer William Frey.

Advertisement

If the minority share of the vote increases in 2012 by the same rate it has grown in presidential elections since 1992, it will rise to about 28 percent nationally. By itself, that could substantially alter the political playing field from 2010, when the minority vote share sagged to just 22 percent. It means that if Obama can maintain, or even come close to, the four-fifths share of minority votes that he won in 2008, he could win a majority of the national popular vote with even less than the 43 percent of whites he attracted last time.

This would mean that  Republicans would have to come to the realization that only a super-landslide of White votes can win them the presidency. And they have to realize that their future as a competitive party in national elections is dim indeed–unless they do something to stop these trends while they have a bit of power. But they won’t. Texas is typical:

“Anglos still dominate the [Texas] electorate and will for a while longer, but every election for the rest of your lifetime will have a higher percentage of Latinos and a lower percentage of Anglos than the previous one,” says sociologist Stephen Klineberg of Rice University.

The only solution for the  Republicans offered in the article (stop me if you’ve heard this before)  is to court Latino support.

Republicans cannot win if they allow Obama to keep two-thirds of the Latino vote he attracted in 2008. The first step toward turning some of that support, he contends, is aggressively pursuing those voters with Spanish-language advertising.

But what do Latino voters want? More Latinos (aka “Comprehensive Immigration Reform”) and lots of government benefits. (Brownstein calls the Republican opposition to illegal immigration “a sharp right turn” [!!]) The result would a dystopia where the two major parties compete to cater to an increasingly large, poorly educated, low-IQ population of non-Whites. One would think that at some point Whites would wake up to the realization that this just isn’t working for them.

And to illustrate the gap between the priorities of the traditional White majority and what this new non-White soon-to-be majority wants, consider Texas, the topic of another Brownstein article (“Texas Hold ‘Em“). Brownstein makes it very clear where his political sympathies lie, and it’s not with White folks:

The census starkly frames the challenge of equipping minority children with the education and skills they’ll need to ascend into the middle class. Once, that might have been viewed as a question of social justice; it is clearly now an issue of economic necessity. The census found that nonwhites comprise nearly 47 percent of Americans under 18, with Hispanics and African-Americans representing almost four-fifths of that total. Those two groups lag whites in virtually all measures of educational attainment (such as high school graduation) and well-being (such as access to health care). Unless the nation closes those gaps, it will struggle to produce a labor force capable of attracting decent-paying jobs, competing internationally, and generating enough tax revenue to tame the federal debt.

As usual, the only thing needed to get Blacks and Latinos up to White levels of educational attainment is more money. IQ never enters the  picture.  But the evil Republican governor, Rick Perry, who got 84% of his votes from Whites, refuses to raise taxes to accomplish this. Whites probably also account a vastly disproportionate share of the total tax revenue for the state, and not surprisingly, they don’t want to provide yet more public services for people unlike themselves. This, of course, is a basic principle of evolutionary psychology, as scientists like Frank Salter have found: People are unwilling to contribute to public goods to people unlike themselves. This is a huge cost of diversity never mentioned by those who paint a picture of the harmonious multicultural future of America.

So we are headed to an Atlas Shrugged situation: An increasingly low-IQ population in need of massive levels of government services  supported by increasingly reluctant racially different tax payers. Not a good recipe for a peaceful future.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

96 Comments to "White Dispossession and the Racialization of American Politics Accelerate"

  1. Stephen Palmer's Gravatar Stephen Palmer
    April 1, 2011 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

    I moved from Connecticut to northern Georgia a few months back to escape the cold and enjoy cheaper housing, but one can’t escape the increasing hostily of minorities towards Whites it seems. It’s as some of them go into a predator mode and can sense a weakness in the air.

    Last August I had major surgery at a hospital near Atlanta. Most of the nurses were kind, but two on the night shift, one Black female and one male Malaysian, displayed open hostility towards my requests for assistance of which I made a formal complaint. Of course I can’t prove that their anger towards me was due to the fact that I’m a White male, but to me it was obvious by their temperament, words spoken, facial expressions, and body language.

    Secondly, my new Black neighbors have a 158 pound Rottweiler that never breaks eye contact and charges the fence towards me each and every time. I practically had a heart attack twice. The owners hardly pay attention though I voiced my concerns to them to no avail. It’s as if they enjoy it when they let the dog out while my back is to the fence.

    There’s another Black family that lives across the street. Last Sunday a group of 14 Black young adults moved their basketball game from that house to the middle of our cul-de-sac circle for a lengthy and loud game. I dared not venture out to ask them to stop knowing since, from my perspective, there was a good chance of a verbal or physical confrontation. And of course some will say they my fear was unfounded, but at my age I know better.

    There is also a large Hispanic population down here due to the never ceasing need for cheap labor. Most of the local politicians want to take action to stop the influx of illegal aliens but are blocked by the ACLU and the hostile media, or some excuse that always seems to trump their attempts.

    Lastly, Black on White crimes in this state seems to garner the news broadcasts on a regular basis. Just last week another White police officer in Athens Georgia was gunned down in cold blood by a Black male with no hesitation.

    The future doesn’t look too rosy as the number of minorities increase.

    • Pete's Gravatar Pete
      April 2, 2011 - 5:06 am | Permalink

      Stephen,

      I fully sympathize and share your consternation. In 2007, I was temporarily living in Augusta. Following oral surgery, I was prescribed a drug that gave me hiccups for over 24 hours straight. The force of constantly doing so began to become painful, fatiguing, and I could not sleep.
      On my birthday then, I decided to go to emergency room, at about 11 pm on a weekday night. To my relief, there was nobody there. But everybody that worked there that night was black. I had to distract attention from the Black receptionist away from the Black custodian, who were engaged in deep conversation. When she learned what I was there for, she was cynical and rude as to my motivation for being there, in spite of my explaining the circumstances, that I wasn’t trying to pull anybody’s leg, and that it was my birthday to boot and I had other things I would like to be doing.
      After she began the initial processing, she told me to have a seat in the waiting area. I waited for 15 minutes despite being the only visible patient in the emergency room. Nobody came or went in the time I waited. The reason everything was so desolate is that this was a military hospital with which the general public did not have access.
      After 15 minutes, I was screened by a Black nurse. She was also disrespectful and presumed to know more about my situation than I did. After taking my vitals, she again made me wait in the waiting area. After another 15 minutes, the receptionist told me that the doctor was “busy,” would not see me, and that I would have to make an appointment and come back another time.
      The situation was too much for me, and I began to protest my treatment. At no time did I raise my voice to the point of yelling nor did I curse or make threatening body language. The other Blacks in the hospital came over to view the spectacle. After the receptionist could not offer suitable rejoinder to my argument that in the course of an hour I had not seen one patient come or go besides me, she played her trump card and insisted that I was beginning to threaten her and that I would have to leave or she would call security.
      Still refusing, that’s exactly what she did, and I was escorted to the entrance by two Black security guards, while the other Black workers made little effort to hide their amusement.
      Looking back at the incident, it was clear that there was ethnic solidarity at play by all involved. I never followed up on the incident and regret having handled it so badly. At a minimum, I should have used what clout I have with the government at the time to prevent my removal. For the good it could have done, I could have also followed up with an Equal Opportunity complaint, although I suspect that everybody in here would agree that because of the demographics of the aggrieved, that nothing would have become of it.
      In a way, the incident was beneficial as I was still not racially aware at the time, despite the accumulation of a lifetime of incidents and observations. I later read “Death of the West” at the insistence of my dad and followed it up with “The Bell Curve.” From there, my education progressed first to American Renaissance and VDare and then finally to David Duke and Professor MacDonald. I now have a clear understanding of all aspects of the cycle that have engendered the problems I and every other ignorant (but not dumb) American I know have experienced.

    • April 2, 2011 - 11:26 am | Permalink

      I tried to post these 2 links that are examples of JUST what
      Stephen Palmer April 1, 2011 – 5:08 pm
      is talking about the OPEN hostility, which, for many of us, is a DAILY thing.
      I submit them again:
      http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/03/31/irish-eyescan-see/

      http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2011/03/31/miami-tennis-treason-unleashed/

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      April 2, 2011 - 8:26 pm | Permalink

      I’m sorry but I can’t sympathize with you at all. You came to the South with your Northern attitude toward living in mixed-race housing and now you’re finding out the hard way what the white South has always known. Move man, move.

  2. Tom Barnes's Gravatar Tom Barnes
    April 1, 2011 - 7:43 pm | Permalink

    I lived in Northeast D.C. for 22 years. It is a heavily black section of the city. If you were a white man you did not say anything about anybody butting in line at a corner Mom and Pop grocery store. My nom de plume, Tom Barnes, was murdered merely because he was white. It happened in 1991 on Acker St, N.E.
    He was popped in the back of the head with a 32 I think, when he went out to get some Seven Eleven coffee on a winter night just because he was white.
    It was never national news, even though it was 7 blocks from the U.S. Capitol. A race motivated murder of a white man disappeared down the memory hole never to re-emerge.

    Talk about a double standard, if he had been black and the murderer white they would have named a street after him. It would have been national news for months.
    There is a double standard operating in the media when it comes to minorities. My question now is, now that whites are a minority in many parts of the country, or now that our kids our minorities…do they get double standard rights? Will they be allowed to discuss ethnic matters with impunity because they have double standard minority rights?

  3. S Fowler's Gravatar S Fowler
    April 1, 2011 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    Liberal Whites presently are tolerant of minorities but will not tolerate being a minority.

    • Joseph's Gravatar Joseph
      April 1, 2011 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

      Yes, of course. Liberalism in itself requires a totalitarian mother/nanny-state together with unceasing flood of propaganda.

      The “problem” is that it requires a population able to read and absorb the propaganda and internalize its contradictory “values” and put them above genetics. That is, it needs White people to feed.

      Whites have an ability to put truth above race, tribe and clan which is a beautiful property. A necessary property in order to be able to build a civilization I’d say. With nepotism, tribal-thinking and all sorts of corruption you won’t get far in the establishing of order.

      However, this strength is also a weakness because it has been corrupted by the mass media.

      Now, the rest of the people think tribally and are incapable of the struggle towards objectivity. If they discover something which is true and which might at first glance seem bad for their tribe, they’ll just reject it.

      This is what Whites has to learn. They are to only ones able to transcend race and seek truth, the others cannot. They put subjectivity as the primary value.

      Hence, we cannot live with them. They are not interested in truth, only promiscuous reproduction and to dominate other populations.

      We cannot become like them, and behave so outrageously subjectively. It is not within our nature. But we can realize that we are not the standard human issue, we are not the universal man. We are unusual, and must therefore separate ourselves.

    • ben tillman's Gravatar ben tillman
      April 4, 2011 - 1:03 am | Permalink

      “Minorities”? You mean “NON-WHITES”!!!!!!

      Whites are a minority. Please stop parroting the mass media’s prortrayal of us as a dominant majority.

    • ben tillman's Gravatar ben tillman
      April 4, 2011 - 1:27 am | Permalink

      What is wrong with you? “Minorities”? You mean “NON-WHITES”!!!!!!

      Whites are a minority. Stop re-inforcing the mass media’s prortrayal of us as a dominant majority.

    • John's Gravatar John
      April 4, 2011 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

      Oh, they will, trust me. I’d say about 80% of Whites are perfectly happy with being a minority, even as they’re driven from their homes. The media has brainwashed these individuals so thoroughly that they are beyond hope. As for most women, they’re perfectly happy watching their fellow White men fade away as they are not interested in having children or have no problem courting some low IQ minority as their new partner just to score PC points.

  4. Dirk de Wit's Gravatar Dirk de Wit
    April 1, 2011 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    The white underclass will have to decide whether it sides with the minorities against the white elite, as in the Bolshevik revolution, or side with the white elite against the minorities, as in Germany’s NS counter revolution.

    For the white elite, if it doesn’t want to be taxed out of existence for the benefit of minorities, there is no choice.

    • ben tillman's Gravatar ben tillman
      April 4, 2011 - 1:04 am | Permalink

      You, too? They’re not minorities — they’re NON-WHITES!

  5. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 1, 2011 - 9:49 pm | Permalink

    Republicans and its new boby Tea Part are more racists and narrow-minded than the Democrats. But the facts on Ground Zero are – it’s not the White voters voter which would put Republicans back in the White House – but it’s the Jewish Lobby which plays the “King Maker’s” role in the US&A.

    A political aware person will tell you that American voters have not much choice. They have to slect between the two evils (Republican and Democrat). However, for the evangelists and the Christian extreme – Republican is the choice – and the color of skin doesn’t play much part in this chess game.

    Latinos, Asians, Middle Eastern and Afro-American have not much of a choice either – as a very few members from those communities get tickets from the either political party. Just look at the Nov. 2010 election – Pro-Israel Christian Right and Jews ran-over both the Congress and Senate. The number of Rep. and Sen. belonging to those minorities can be counted on fingers.

    As I said before – the non-White are not a major threat to the future of the White race – but the traitors amongst them are the real threat.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/richard-falk-911-ahmadinejad-and-the-lobby/

    • Frank Edwin Stone's Gravatar Frank Edwin Stone
      April 2, 2011 - 11:51 am | Permalink

      Rehmat,

      the readership of your blog must be very low.
      Nobody seems to be interested in what you have to say.
      You must feel lonely and therefore you constantly visit this white nationalist website, which stands against everything you stand for.
      You represent the Third World and therefore its promoters, the Jews.
      We have nothing against being friends with your people, even form a common front against the Jews.
      Even Hitler was friendly towards Islam and the Arabs.

      But, first you must respect us and go home.
      You have no place in Europe, not now, not EVER.
      In America, all non-European immigration must stop.
      There are many Arabs here, such as Steve Jobs, who successfully integrated into the white community.
      If you do not want to follow his example, you should go back to your respective countries.

      Rehmat, if it gets real lonely on your blog, try to go for a walk in the park, ooops, bazaar.

    • Pax Europa Forever's Gravatar Pax Europa Forever
      April 2, 2011 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

      Frank Edwin Stone,

      There should be zero tolerance for any personal attacks on individuals on this TOO website. If you were to make a comment on an article, direct it towards groups.

      Instead of saying, “Rehmat,” you can say, “Blacks or Arabs.” It is a COINTELPRO tactic to sow dissent and hatred amongst like-minded White Nationalists or people who support White Nationalism.

      Everyone: remember to discuss the content of the article or comment, not the person behind it. If you object to Harold A. Covington’s past or history, discuss it and do not attack him as a person. There’s a place to do ad hominems and character assassinations and it’s not here.

    • Frank Edwin Stone's Gravatar Frank Edwin Stone
      April 2, 2011 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

      Pax Europa writes:
      “It is a COINTELPRO tactic to sow dissent and hatred amongst like-minded White Nationalists or people who support White Nationalism.”

      Rehmat is for sure neither a white nationalist nor does he support white nationalism. The only thing he has in common with us is his awareness of and opposition to the Jews.
      If you are talking about personal, ad hominem attacks, Rehmat is the only one on this forum who attacks white racialists as bigots. That is typical of the $PLC and ADL vocabulary, but has little to do with the real meaning of the term in the English language.
      He might as well describe the entire website as “bigoted”.
      So what is he doing here? If he is here using that kind of language he opens himself up to fair and yes, personal, criticism within the bounds of good taste.
      Rehmat even goes as far as denying major criminality among the Middle Eastern immigrants in Europe.
      The man is at war with Reality itself, therefore he is carrying water for the Jews.
      For those who understand German, here is a peak at the shocking ReaIity that Rehmat denies:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGeMCCc9w04&feature=player_embedded#at=96

    • Hans's Gravatar Hans
      April 2, 2011 - 6:42 pm | Permalink

      Well said, Frank. When will we ever wake up?

    • April 3, 2011 - 8:00 am | Permalink

      You’re right, Frank Edwin Stone. God, I can’t stand Arabs and Africans. The Jew is just a higher evolutionary form of a parasite. The lower evolutionary form parasite is the African or Arab.

      Give a hammer to a White man and he will build civilizations. Give the hammer to the yellows and they will build more hammers. Give the hammer to the browns (Arabs/Latinos) and they will beat their wives with it. Give the hammer the blacks and they will kill white people with it. Give the hammer to the Jews and they will give the hammer to the blacks.

  6. PeteR's Gravatar PeteR
    April 1, 2011 - 10:01 pm | Permalink

    Check out this story about the Dodger’s opening game yesterday.

    White man in induced coma after unprovoked attack by Hispanics

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      April 2, 2011 - 2:58 pm | Permalink

      Don’t expect Roman Catholic John Boehner to do anything in the way of restricting immigration when 99% of the illegal aliens are Roman Catholics, and a large percentage of the legal aliens are also Roman Catholics.

      These Roman Cathoic politicians of both political parties are as bad or worse than Jews.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      April 5, 2011 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

      What Tom’s nasty anti-Catholic subcomment has to do with PeterR’s original comment is, aside from its predictability, anyone’s guess. Though laying out the plain facts for the umpteenth time won’t do any more good than it did on the previous umpteen-minus-one occasions, let it nonetheless be stated for the record that Catholicism is not a matrilineally tribal genetic structure of some sort, nor is it a lapel bin or a bumper sticker (cf. Mt 7:21–23, wherein a high authority on Christianity spells things out in plain terms). John Boehner can call himself whatever he likes, but no Catholic alive prior to 1960 would call him a Catholic. That assessment goes double for the unwashed, invading masses whom I dislike quite as much as Christophobic Tom does.

      If the post-conciliar neocatholic church—the product of several centuries’ worth of Judeo-Masonic subversion and infiltration—may be said to have an upside, it consists in one thing only: in transforming the once tired old rhetorical question “Is the pope Catholic” into a live one.

  7. Baltasar Nordstrom's Gravatar Baltasar Nordstrom
    April 2, 2011 - 12:16 am | Permalink

    I am also seriously concerned about these demographic developments and fear it will come to no good, or even worse than we have already. But we have to remember that the anti-illegal-immigrant movement in this country is very powerful and effective, and has repulsed dozens of complete and partial forms of amnesty for illegals in Congress. This is because most Americans are furious about our open borders, and 60-70 percent of Americans in polls reject any further coddling of illegals and want a return to normalcy. The majority of blacks are also opposed. With the recent elections, there is more chance now than ever in the past 20 years of putting through some pro-white legislation, and a Supreme Court case related to Arizona’s right to enforce immigration control may be pending. NumbersUSA is the organization at the forefront of these efforts though they are others, and I suggest full involvement with such organizations. TOO has a much more comprehensive view on things and is not single-issue, but at this point I do not think we can afford to sit back on the immigration issue, as the current demographics clearly show. We are at a historical crossroads of profound significance. The political party AP3 is also working for us, but does not yet have enough clout on the national level.

    That said, among other things I think we should
    (1) support each other economically by doing business with white-owned and staffed concerns whenever possible, and
    (2) immerse ourselves in the better parts of white culture and historical knowledge and not just mass entertainment.
    Both economic and cultural strength may help political strength. I would add certain religious or spiritual ideas to that since all great civilizations have had a strong spiritual component, but that gets into too many issues.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      April 2, 2011 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

      Agreed. The Jews support each other over everyone else. We MUST do the same.

  8. Henry's Gravatar Henry
    April 2, 2011 - 2:07 am | Permalink

    “Not a good recipe for a peaceful future.”

    It won’t be peaceful for us, that’s for sure. Unfortunately I don’t see whites ever revolting, not even in the face of mass-murder.
    It’s pretty clear our destruction is all but inevitable, and I’m torn between weeping for the loss and wanting it to come as soon as possible just so I can enjoy the malicious glee of seeing the look on so-called “conservatives” faces when everything they hold dear goes down the drain. All those Free Republic idiots who think the answer to an extermination policy is a tax-cut for billionaires, and who mindlessly cheer the bombing of non-enemies abroad because they’re too gutless to confront the real enemy that is extirpating them at home.

    To the fellow who said Liberals won’t tolerate being a minority, you’re dreaming. They’ll support the anti-white holocaust right up to the bitter end, then they’ll move out and support the mass-murder of any whites unfortunate to be left behind. See South Africa.

    To Dirk De Wit, the Nazis weren’t the elite of their time, far from it, and they made a large effort to eliminate class distinction. I’ve just finished reading the book “Frontsoldaten” by Stephen Fritz which made the point that this effort to destroy classism was one of the things that made the German army most effective. In any case, if the choice comes down to the choices you name I hope they side with the minorities and slaughter the elite. What has the white working and middle class ever got from the elite except spit and genocide? In modern times the elite never has and never will side with the white lower classes against minorities. And they always have the choice of grabbing the cash and heading for Switzerland or whatever other sanctuary they can bribe their worthless hides into.

    • April 2, 2011 - 9:45 am | Permalink

      “All those Free Republic idiots who think the answer to an extermination policy is a tax-cut for billionaires, and who mindlessly cheer the bombing of non-enemies abroad because they’re too gutless to confront the real enemy that is extirpating them at home.”

      Succinct and sadly all too true. That could well be the secret high-level agenda memo of every ‘conservative’ ‘news’ outlet from CNBC to Faux News.

  9. Philip's Gravatar Philip
    April 2, 2011 - 5:35 am | Permalink

    No matter how many articles Ron Brownstein writes over how many years on this subject, he still cannot reach obvious conclusions. Can’t he see by now that whites are not buying the argument that spending ever more money on social services for poor non-whites is the road to prosperity for whites? In fact, more social services will serve as a magnet for still more illegal immigration and more poverty. And whites have mechanisms for political control other than their votes, that is, they have campaign contributions. I will not call Brownstein a dolt, but he is unable to see what is happening right in front of him.

  10. rechill's Gravatar rechill
    April 2, 2011 - 9:42 am | Permalink

    Fighting illegal immigration is a half-measure. There needs to be a 40 moratorium on ALL IMMIGRATION.

    • GDJ's Gravatar GDJ
      April 2, 2011 - 11:50 am | Permalink

      Right on! Most Americans babble opinions

      like “I am OK with legal immigration but

      opposed to illegal…” In midst of a depression

      we have imported several million more foreign

      workers LEGALLY to depress wages per

      Greenspan’s open policy of “elimnating

      inequality” between American and

      Chinese wages (86 cents an hour, no pension,

      no medical, etc.) I have been China and

      viewed their “model housing”, which was

      an appalling trash heap. God help us!

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      April 2, 2011 - 2:39 pm | Permalink

      NumbersUSA is “the” organization pushing for an immigration timeout. Everyone should register and use their website—they also deserve a few dollars too. Put your money where your mouth is with Numbers, and with TOO.

      http://www.numbersusa.com/content/

    • Baltasar Nordstrom's Gravatar Baltasar Nordstrom
      April 2, 2011 - 3:34 pm | Permalink

      Since you put it that way, I think we have already reached our population limit. Even if all illegals were to leave, which should be one of our primary goals, the country would still have a large population, and it might still be too crowded. I think the only thing we should allow after that is natural population growth with a very low level of legal immigration, perhaps in the 50-100k level annually. The only exception to this might be if we want to give a home to Caucasians who would want to emigrate here in case we ourselves are unable to restore most of the demographic makeup that existed before the Kennedy/Jewish immigration reform bill of 1965.

    • Baltasar Nordstrom's Gravatar Baltasar Nordstrom
      April 2, 2011 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

      Let me rephrase that to a 0-25k annual immigration limit with preferences for Caucasians.

    • mark's Gravatar mark
      April 3, 2011 - 3:46 am | Permalink

      How about unlimited, 100% White immigration only – very conservatively defined – especially from areas that have seen a great deal of non-white aggression toward Whites—like South Africa.

    • S Fowler's Gravatar S Fowler
      April 3, 2011 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

      People are willing to oppose illegal immigration with some fervor because they can avoid the charge of “racism”.

    • Philip's Gravatar Philip
      April 4, 2011 - 1:40 am | Permalink

      “People are willing to oppose illegal immigration with some fervor because they can avoid the charge of ‘racism’.”

      Actually, they can’t.

  11. Brian's Gravatar Brian
    April 2, 2011 - 10:02 am | Permalink

    We need to introduce into the political debate the term “interracial taxes” and start demanding to know why our tax dollars are handed to other racial groups

    • Joseph's Gravatar Joseph
      April 2, 2011 - 11:27 am | Permalink

      Do you think it will help? Materialism and capitalism is the primary reason we are here. I don’t think more of the same will help.

    • Joseph's Gravatar Joseph
      April 2, 2011 - 11:30 am | Permalink

      To be more precise, I don’t think more “anger against something” will help. We have to have something positive to reach for. Not something negative to be against.

      O’Mearas idea of a White Republic is something along these lines.

    • Baltasar Nordstrom's Gravatar Baltasar Nordstrom
      April 2, 2011 - 3:51 pm | Permalink

      Good point. We should also, as I have mentioned before, restore IRS reporting to its previous, more transparent state when Jewish income and wealth were specified in its statistics. Nowadays they are hidden within white economic statistics as far as I know.

    • phil white's Gravatar phil white
      April 3, 2011 - 11:56 pm | Permalink

      “We need to introduce into the political debate the term “interracial taxes”

      Good idea.

  12. April 2, 2011 - 11:20 am | Permalink

    I would say we were at 65% in 2000 based on what I read in various news releases on demographics at the time.
    The recent census reports stated that the overwhelming majority of Hispanics ID’d as WHITE, yes, the same MFs wearing “BROWN PRIDE” shirts will ID as WHITE because in their little minds that is the higher race and they want to BE that race.

    These races, the brown, black, yellow are SYMPTOMS of a DISEASE, which is identified in The Culture of Critique.

    The universities are programming Whites to HATE themselves.
    Commencement Address at Portland State University in Portland, Oregon
    June 13, 1998 William J. Clinton
    “Today, largely because of immigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New York City. Within 5 years, there will be no majority race in our largest State, California. In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States.”

    When Clinton made the last remark, “In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States.” the students, WHITE students, climbed upon their chairs and CHEERED him.

    I would think that if the Enemy of Humanity threatens in this manner that the last vestiges of the White race should carefully assess that and ponder it:

    “What would serve the Jew-hating world better as repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a nuclear winter? Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens? For the first time in history a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?”
    –Professor David Perlmutter, writing in the Los Angeles Times, April 7, 2002

    “We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…We have the capability to take the world down with us, and I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”
    –Martin Van Creveld, Israeli Historian

    • Baltasar Nordstrom's Gravatar Baltasar Nordstrom
      April 2, 2011 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

      Unfortunately for Van Creveld, the Western power of nuclear retalation against places like Tel Aviv, Haifa, and Jerusalem as well as various forms of retalation against other Jewish centers would be much more powerful. This man is full of big talk but his not-so-unsual Jewish apocalyptic threat would mean severe suffering for the majority of Jews as well.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      April 4, 2011 - 12:46 am | Permalink

      Is there a video of Clinton making that speech?

  13. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    April 2, 2011 - 11:35 am | Permalink

    Brownstein has been writing on this theme for almost year. He wrote an article in the National Journal over the summer called The Gray/Brown Mismatch where he discusses voting trends in Arizona and makes the same argument. Brownstein mentions that Arizona’s large community of White retirees generally favor directing their tax money to essential infrastructure like roads and bridges, and also to public retirement entitlements.

    Meanwhile, Brownstein cites demographic data that shows the rising youth generation in Arizona is overwhelmingly low-performing non-Whites that favor, of course, directing tax money to “education” and other services for Arizona’s (non-White) youth.

    Brownstein includes an interesting discussion of the various clashes in the Arizona state legislature over the allocation of tax money, citing a serious split between legislators who want to prioritize the needs of Arizona’s older White population versus those who do not. Brownstein suggests the debate in Arizona is usually misleadingly characterized as “generational” — a dispute over the needs of Arizona’s young versus the needs of the old — when in fact the dispute is racial.

    Of course, I don’t need to tell anyone here which side Brownstein himself takes.

    http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/the-gray-and-the-brown-the-generational-mismatch-20100724

  14. Sebastian Ernst Ronin's Gravatar Sebastian Ernst Ronin
    April 2, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Geography + demography = destiny. The fat lady waits in the wings. The trade-off is simple: defense and continuation of the Europid White race on the North American continent in exchange for the sacrifice of the industrial nation-state towards new, secessionist polities. That’s the deal. Take it or leave it. (Post-Peak Oil collapse and devolution are friends.) Do what the globalists are so accomplished at: co-opt their agenda. NAmerikan White Nationalists who steadfastly, belligerently and obediently bow to the colossus of the industrial nation-state are traitors to White Europid blood. They sign the death warrant of White Europids upon the NAmerikan continent as surely as do the enemies of our race.

    The situation is similar north of the 49th. A Kanadian neo-lib “think thank” has called for a population increase of 70 million (from the current 34 million) to 100 million by the end of the century. Needless to say, none of these immigrants are likely to come from Eastern Europe.

    The racial battle cannot be won via the institution and political confines of the two existing nation-states on the continent. It is a bitter pill to have to swallow.

  15. Arkan's Gravatar Arkan
    April 2, 2011 - 12:51 pm | Permalink

    I think accelerating economic problems brought on by globalization and peak oil will cause things to come to a head before whites are a minority. I will guess that the southeast will be increasingly black, southwest Hispanic and the north white.

  16. Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
    April 2, 2011 - 1:27 pm | Permalink

    If Latinos and blacks couldn’t build modern functioning societies in Latin America or Africa, why would anyone believe they’d do anything but tear down our own society here in America and recreate the the same sort of dysfunctional hellholes they left?

  17. Ares's Gravatar Ares
    April 2, 2011 - 2:07 pm | Permalink

    White people are still far more afraid of being called “racist” than they are losing their own country to the Third World. That may be about to change.

  18. Pax Europa Forever's Gravatar Pax Europa Forever
    April 2, 2011 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

    The timeline is simple:

    18th/19th centuries: The Jew uses the bourgeoisie to depose the clergy and the aristocracy.

    19th/20th centuries: The Jew uses the proletariat to depose the bourgeoisie.

    20th/21st centuries: The Jew uses non-Whites to depose the proletariat.

    Who’s to blame: Jews for being so cunning and treacherous, or Whites for being so naive and gullible?

    Jews have owned Europe since the 1688 Glorious Revolution, and they fomented the 1789 French Revolution, US Civil Wars, WWI, WWII. In fact, every major war from 1688 onwards was financed by Jewish bankers.

    A Short History of Jewish domination from 1600-Present
    http://paxeuropaforever.wordpress.com/2011/04/02/a-short-history-of-jewish-domination-from-1600-present/

  19. Rod Mckenzie's Gravatar Rod Mckenzie
    April 2, 2011 - 6:07 pm | Permalink

    The first writer wrote:

    I moved from Connecticut to northern Georgia a few months back to escape the cold and enjoy cheaper housing, but one can’t escape the increasing hostily of minorities towards Whites it seems. It’s as some of them go into a predator mode and can sense a weakness in the air.

    Did not the writer do some investigation as to the demographics of the place in Georgia that he was moving to! He could of gotten the same ethnic hostility and cheaper housing by moving to the Black area of Hartford.

    Negroes generally do not like small towns, but Latinos seem to love them and the smaller the better. If you want to get away from Latinos, don’t move into any places with a large agricultural industry. It is so easy in this day and age with all the ethnic statistics available, to find a place with the demographics that suit you.

  20. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    April 2, 2011 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

    White Americans should all move back to Europe. Not only would it bring us to a much nicer continent but it help them with their labor shortage, and thus stop the need for third world immigration.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      April 11, 2011 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

      That sounds like a good idea. Do you get free medical care?

  21. Jupiter7's Gravatar Jupiter7
    April 2, 2011 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

    First about numbersusa.com. Numbersusa.com bases immigration reform completely on the interests of blacks and post-1965 nonwhites. Native Born White Americans do not exist over at numbersusa.com. So what are the consequenes of this political tactic as the racial compostion of America changes and the hostility towards White Americans increases. The numbersusa.com strategy will not stop the racial transformation of “America”. In fact, the racial transformation of America can not be halted throuh the political system. It is just question of when amnesty will pass..so maybe it would be better if amnesty were passed now. For sure, their would be massive backlash against amnesty because of what amnesty would set into motion the day after it was passed. The numbersusa.com strategy may be a fools strategy-with very high probablity.

    There should be a complete shutdown of all nonwhite legal immigration permanently. A moratorium is so obviously a half-backed approach that would open the door to massive nonwhite legal immiration in the future. I don’t understand Kevin McDonald’s fascination with a moratorium. The immigration moratorium idea was conjured up in the head of the repellant Dan Stien…. that’s a fact. Another reason-Peter Brimelow-not to support a moratorium..shut the whole thing down to 0.

    Let them pass the amnesty this week. All the trophy wives-and every thing in between-and their offspring I saw this morning will have to deal with the vicious taunting of White Americans that will commence the day after amnesty passes. Let amnesty pass…let it wreck the economy beyond repair..let it wreck ecosytems…wreck the country for all the idiots who are currently a revenue stream for Dereck Jeter.

    Another point Kevin..what difference would it make if the racial transformation in Texas was driven completely by Asian immgration….it would make 0 difference…so why waste time on the IQ and race issue?

  22. Jesus Laughed's Gravatar Jesus Laughed
    April 3, 2011 - 12:24 am | Permalink

    Is the USA heading towards a quasi military government? The next election is going to be very interesting indeed. Indeed if their is another election and not a state of emergency declared due to a currency crash . I have been reading some books on the Jewish influences in WW1&2 , so I think this might be quite possible. What is the European Americans plans if a Junta imposes travel and migration restrictions on those without forward financial arrangements ? If I was a white guy living in a Minority area I would seriously think of moving soon.
    Is this alarmist?

  23. fabricius's Gravatar fabricius
    April 3, 2011 - 2:07 am | Permalink

    The truth of the matter is that jews are salivating at how close they are to achieving their lifelong dream:
    to exterminate the white race. What an colossal event, and we seem to be going with hardly a whimper!

  24. Sebastian Ernst Ronin's Gravatar Sebastian Ernst Ronin
    April 3, 2011 - 6:24 am | Permalink

    That the nation-state of Amerika (and Kanada, for that matter) can be “saved” for Whites is a false political premise. Ergo, all positions/opinions/commentary that relate back to said false premise miss the mark. It is a priori wishful thinking. It is nonsense.

  25. April 3, 2011 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Obviously, this ethno-tribal, multicultural future being engineered by leftists, liberals, Zionists and greedy White Republicans doesn’t bode well for average Whites.

    Had Whites maintained the assimilationist, melting-pot ethic of traditional Christianity, this wouldn’t have been a problem, because the ethno-tribal voting blocks being assembled by the Left, politically patterned on diaspora Jewish Zionism (ever since the early days of Marxism/Jewish Bolshevism), would never have been allowed to form in the first place.

    Unfortunately, factions of money-worshipping and power mad Whites on both the Right and Left (looking to enrich themselves through their own Zionist-style swindles and money and power grabs) broke ranks, adopted the tribal Judaic ethic, and stabbed Whites, Christianity, Western Civilization, and the entire process of Christen enlightenment in the back out of greed, opportunism, careerism and sheer ornery low character.

    These were compounded by factions of ethnic tribalists minorities who wanted to dwell in the relative peace and prosperity of Western Civilization without assimilating into the Western ethic, and worse, exploiting and abusing the good will of the Christian ethic at every opportunity.

    So White greed, as manifested in Judeo-Christian Zionism, open borders globalism and corporatism, shysterism, liberal statism, and the quest for international monetary Keyenesianism, are as responsible for the perilous condition of Whites as anyone or anything.

    Consequently, these corrupt White “elites” must be dealt with as readily as the others, otherwise the pattern simply repeats in perpetuity until the final genocide (patterned on Communist genocide).

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      April 4, 2011 - 7:14 am | Permalink

      One of the bigger questions we must soon resolve Chris Moore is surely this. Who do we go after and take down first? The Traitorous White Elites (a consequence) or the Masonic-Jewish-Zionists (the perpetrators)? Which strategy choice would be more efficient?

    • April 4, 2011 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

      IMO, Identifying Zionists or those with a record of supporting Zionism politically or a record of Zionist sympathies is key to flushing out the snakes.

      The most evil people on the planet seem to be coalescing around Zionism; fortunately, this has now been going on long enough that the records have been established and the battle lines are increasingly clear.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      April 5, 2011 - 3:44 am | Permalink

      @ Chris Moore [April 4, 2011 - 9:15 pm]
      Yes, that sounds like a realistic and workable identification strategy. And as for your 2nd para, this certainly seems to be the case; I would say its clarity has become blatant since 2008 (following the TARP heist).

  26. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    April 3, 2011 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

    There does not seem to be much discussion of the absolute increase in population that is coming, what are all these people going to do – service jobs ?

    The idea that, with more education, non whites will enable the US to out compete China or India in manufacturing or knowledge based industries is a joke.

    Living standards will be forced way down ( for everybody but the elite of course).

  27. barb's Gravatar barb
    April 3, 2011 - 5:54 pm | Permalink

    “Not only would it bring us to a much nicer continent but it help them with their labor shortage, and thus stop the need for third world immigration.”
    I’ve looked at that. Can’t see as where they’d LET me, a White American, in.

    • Gloria's Gravatar Gloria
      April 3, 2011 - 9:10 pm | Permalink

      Hungary will accept you if you have Hungarian ancestry and speak the language. It would be nice if Britain would do the same if they feel they need immigrants so badly. Include a rigorous test on British history and culture. If you can pass, it’s likely you’d happily assimilate.

  28. Wideawake's Gravatar Wideawake
    April 3, 2011 - 11:17 pm | Permalink

    JOSEPH above (Apr 1 & 2a, 2b) actually hit three TRUTHS, but failed to name the deeper Truth. First he said we seek Truth more that others driven to push their group more than Truth. He says WE ARE SPECIAL. Yes! [So who are we?]

    Second he said materialism & capitalism destroy us. Yes!
    (Especially global capitalism seeking both monopoly AND driving us to live like Chinese by shipping manufacturing.
    I argued this point with Ayn Rand befare it was so clear.
    Note top bankers funded Trotsky to push “red” revolution! So clealry it’s also a tool of top manipulators against us.
    And materialism foisted on us makes us short-sighted.)

    Third, he seeks something like a White Republic. Separate and not under global “capitalism” nor global democracy in which we are a hated minority (that’s sure to destroy us!)

    We actually are quite different! We were made after other original human groups (excluding mixes like mestizos) and given dominion over…. (whom?) We were given fixed laws. By God. In the actual Christian Scriptures, once you grasp identities. On this I cannot write more here, but seek information: study original words in early Genesis. And make it conform with geo-science and chronology. (A Day of creation was a time span, not 24 hours!) Know Pre-Adamites vs Adamites. Adam was revealed to be son of God, ending lineages Luke 3:23-28. What did Adam look like? Study! (Those into the place of Jews or Arabs ought to look up what Bible actual says! Try a word study on “arab” & their origin. Also see Josephus on Edomites who were made into Jews, etc. Know that Satan also has offpsring. Genesis 3:15. Who? Some call this “two seeds” but actually there are three: Adamites, pre-Adamites and Satan’s bood. Who is who??? Never taught in “chuches!”)

    Note that Jesus identified Jews rejecting him as NOT his folks. That’s in John 10 etc)

    Don’t buy the myth “all men were created equal.” (Really??)
    Don’t buy sacrosanct US Constitution that empowers men to make any laws. (?Versus what? God’s fixed laws. What do thay say? Anything about groups? Yes, plenty! Where did lost Israelites go? Ans: among MEDES. 2 Kings 17 & 18.
    Then they migrated. Jesus only to them! Mat 10:6 15:24)

    Know the GOSPEL OF THE KINDGOM (named often!) as it is to return with our warrior king! Rev 19:11-21 Ambassador of that regime (change) is our role! (2 Corinthians 5:20) So we don’t need a new republic, but a kingdom of his law.

  29. phil white's Gravatar phil white
    April 4, 2011 - 12:47 am | Permalink

    Some White liberals are waking up. See that guy Bodeker who was a trendy film maker from Wisconsin (or was it Minnesota?).
    http://www.aconversationaboutrace.com
    Even if some people in the elites, like Pat Buchanan, understand the problem and write about it, and have been trying for years to stop it, it’s looking like Tom Chittums scenario in “Civil War II” is coming in on schedule, the year 2020.
    The demographics are whites are NOW 58%. Jews are about 4% of the population. A recent survey said 4% of homes had menorahs during the Christmas season. Jews, even on a census form, rarely admit their ethnicity.
    Worse still is the demographics of what will be military age youth in five years.

    “The census found that nonwhites comprise nearly 47 percent of Americans under 18″

    Maybe white nationalist could start a “scholarship” fund for young white males just out of high school to join the U.S. infantry. Say a $200 a month additional stipend for every month they are in military service in a combat arm.
    Even more or less “progressive” white youth will understand when the time comes, that in Tom Chittums phrase “their skin will be their uniform.”
    It’s a bleak picture, but I don’t see any likely peaceful solution.
    Revolutionary changes in public attitude are like that. It happens almost over night. The pressure in white minds is just building up under the surface.
    The inflection point in the emotional loyalties of average whites is going to come fairly suddenly.
    This is the scenario former Lt. Col. Nathan Freier was thinking about when he wrote in Nov 2008, pre-t party protest, that multi state insurrection and purposeful resistance was an unlikely but needed to be planned for “Black Swan” game changing event.
    Now post t party protest I wonder what he and other military planners are thinking?
    Freiers “known unknowns” paper for the U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute (pgs 30-32) concluded the Army could not and would not want to handle such an event.
    I try what I can to wake up ordinary whites, rather than spend all my time posting here with the choir, but I’m not optimistic.
    I just got two magnetic signs for my car, so I don’t have to waste time talking or posting to main stream web sites.
    A sign is much more cost efficient.
    They read: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”
    and” Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, white children’s countries for everyone.”
    I also leave business cards with similar quotes and web site addresses for waitresses and people I do business with.
    I’m hoping the explosion of white racial consciousness is coming within five years.
    Maybe by then we can put white politicians in who will vote to end all immigration and send back all illegal’s and stop the citizenship process for those legal immigrants in the pipeline for voting rights. But short of that, I think the large white block will find they have no choice but all out war.
    Even if that level of race consciousness doesn’t come till we are 45% of the population and 40% of military age males, we will win in an all out conflict.
    But it didn’t have to be but for the massive corruption of our white elites.
    H-ll, just made up my mind I’m gonna start handing out cheap Army Infantry field manuals to white young people now. You can buy them at gun shows.
    :(

  30. phil white's Gravatar phil white
    April 4, 2011 - 1:08 am | Permalink

    Ronin: I read a little of an article of yours.

    This quote interest me.

    “It is important to win first, and fight later.”

    My stance in terms of waking up average whites is:
    “The more you sweat in politics, the less you bleed in war.”
    In other words, the more whites we can wake up to their coming subjugation and have them partially prepared, the easier it will be on us in a possible civil war.
    Tonight I’m feeling civil war in ten years or so is a 50-50 bet.

    :(

  31. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    April 4, 2011 - 2:20 am | Permalink

    Like I said, its getting dangerous. But I am not sure what IQ is going to do. If these Blacks and Hispanics were high economic acheivers it will only makes things worse as they will dominate culture, jobs and resources as the Jews now do.

    • Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
      April 22, 2011 - 9:23 am | Permalink

      We are fighting a war with our hands tied behind our backs. Other ethnic groups can form self-interest organizations, but if whites do, we are racist. Foreign companies can discriminate against whites, but we aren’t allowed. Every dollar we earn is taxed again and again. No working under the table for us. Nevermind, that open violence is perpetrated against us in our schools and communities.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      April 24, 2011 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

      Don’t you worry, sir. Any Black or Muslim who comes to power in the West – has to obey the western Jewish masters (Israel Lobby), – whether it’s President of the US or world’s most populated Muslim country, Indonesia.

      http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/obama-bronzed-in-indonesia/

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 19, 2011 - 8:10 am | Permalink

      Blacks and Hispanics high economic acheivers can be counted on ones’ fingers. They’re not even represented in Congress based on population. While Jews with less than 2% of population have 30 Congressmen and Senators – Muslims (3%) have only two Congressmen and even they’re Black converts – one represents Muslim community while the other, like Obama, represents Israeli interests.

      According some estimates, there are 1500 billionaires and 230,000 millionaires in the US. You will find only a few Blacks, Hispanic and Muslims among Them. Take the example of Rupert Murdoch, the multibillioaire to learn who “dominate White culture”.

      http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/murdoch-israel-and-jews-under-attack/

  32. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    April 4, 2011 - 7:10 am | Permalink

    Frank Edwin Stone,

    Rehmat strike me as your typical Muslim. He does share with many here an opposition with Jewish activism. To be fair to him the only ones who even say anything about Jewish activism are White Nationalist in America. Its no surpise therefore. In fact David Duke is probably one of the most supported US activist in the Arab world and has appeared in Al Jazeera Arabic. So did Loius Farakhan. The only reason why is because these two attack Jewish influence in US foreighn policy. Thats it. But I really doubt whether it really matters for nationalist in the end anyways what Muslim in the West think of them. You can’t expect a Muslim Pakistani in England or a Turkish Muslim in Germany is going to be happy about being told he needs to take a hike. Muslims around the world would be more than glad to support Nationalist in US and maybe even Europe and end immigration of Muslims to Europe in return for Nationlaist support in FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES. After all compare to 1.6 billion Muslims around the world what is 20 to 40 million Muslims in Europe anyways? There are twice as many Muslims in Egypt alone. Only a small percentage of Muslims are in Europe and even smaller in US. They are easily expendable for Muslims around the world. Palestine is much more important for them and a change in US policy even more. And the way it seems, other than US nationalist ain’t nobody in the West is doing anything about Jewish activism.

    Yeah, I think Muslim support for Nationlist is a case closed. They have no choice. I believe many Nationalist can easily make big money when these revolutions bring about new leadership in the Arab world. A new leadership that won’t bow to the US government and would want real change. A change only Nationalist and maybe Libertarians can bring. Rehmat is a Muslim all right but he is an immigrant. Therefore he ain’t relevant in the end.

    Thats how the deal goes.
    You give us your money and we will end Jewish influence in the West and in return you help us deport all the Muslims in Europe and US and help them settle in your lands. At least most of them. Sounds like a sweet deal to me. They don’t belong in Europe anyways.

    Do you all remember the Mufti of Palestine and his support for Hitler? I wonder why.

    • phil white's Gravatar phil white
      April 4, 2011 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

      Yes, Arab money would be usefull. Then every retiree like me could have pro-white magnetic signs on their cars. Wouldn’t recommend it be on your car while in your home town if you have a job.
      Maybe have the too web address on the sign too, and a note such as “tell them Bigmo sent you.” We could have this as a sort of competitoin to see which of us brought in the most new members in six months. :)

  33. Jupiter7's Gravatar Jupiter7
    April 4, 2011 - 8:07 am | Permalink

    Bigmo

    The race and IQ is most defintely irrelevant to the revolt against race-replacement at the hands at high fertility post-1965 nonwhites. I fact, anybody who raises the issue in a debate will sidetrack the debate-discussion away from the race-replacement issue. It is a very effective way to let the Asians in America off the hook.

    And if the race and IQ enthusiasts actually go up against someone who understands the statistical evidence and underlying conceptual issues involved, they are going to be in big trouble. One shouldn’t conclude from this that environmental determinism is a fact. The main point is that it is a poorly understand issue and the revolt against race-replacement shouldn’t hinge on it. Raise the race and IQ issue in a debate and expect an endless debate about it..complete waste of time.

    I read James Fulford’s recent justification for vdare.com’s preoccupation with the issue. And I read Mangan’s-any time you want to debate me on the issue Dennis, just give holler- justification for his preoocupation with the issue.

    Blacks and Hispanics won’t accept that they are less intelligent than Whites and Asians. Asians will you use the race and IQ issue to justify their vicious war of race-replacement against White Americans. If White Americans don’t want to be forced to subsidize Blacks and Hispanics..stop doing it. No doubt this will provoke a racial uprising of Blacks and Hispanics against Whites. Whites will retaliate back. This is where we have been heading for a long time. Having scientific proof that Blacks and Hispanics are less intelligent than Whites won’t prevent this.

    I also state with full confidence:the vasy majority of White Americans have 0 interest in a mind numbing eyes-glaze-over discussion about the psychometrics of race and IQ.

    I challenge vdare.com’s James Fulford to debate me on this topic right here on Kevin’s website. Of course, he knows full well that neither he and Brimelow will take up the offer because they know what the obvious outcome of the debate will be.

    And yes, I am very upset the Kevin raised the IQ and race issue with regard to the race-replacement of White Americans in Texas, for all he has done is played right into the hands of the Asian supremacists who drove that young White Woman off the USC campus.

  34. Elizabeth Carter's Gravatar Elizabeth Carter
    April 5, 2011 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Watch her videos. This is what standing up looks like.
    http://www.barnhardt.biz/
    Until we stand up, it is all just idle chit chat.
    You don’t have to like her or agree with her but you do need to see what standing up looks like.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      April 5, 2011 - 7:49 pm | Permalink

      Ms. Carter says that these video comments from a certain Ann Barnhardt represent “what standing up looks like.” Had she instead written, “This is what standing up as a half-witted member of Israel’s fifth column looks like,” she would, I am sad to say, have been much closer to the truth. What good is done, please, by reading aloud predictably foul passages of the trashy Koran and burning each page after it’s been read, when all the while the woman doing the reading and burning is standing in front of an American flag that represents not itself but the flags of Israel and international Jewry, the powerful, power-mad forces of which the American flag is a mere vassal’s insignia?

      Both here and in her trashy video attack on Lindsey Graham, a preternaturally easy target, Ms. Barnhardt never once seeks to identify the force or forces that have long used Islam and Muslims as their own instrumentality. Need it really be said yet again and this late in the day that, as rotten and evil as that religion and many of its adherents certainly are, they would present no threat to this country or its few genuine legitimate interests had the Tribe not long used them to advance its own far more evil and perilous designs?

      Like the millions of other adherents of the full-bore mindless-Freeper view of the U.S. government—that it should stick to murdering foreigners instead of turning domestic society over to darkies, spics, and faggots—Ms. Barnhardt thinks that Graham’s attitude to Koran burning is despicable because it undercuts the position of our (ahem) heroic troops in Afghanistan, or whichever raghead nation or locale is the official “democratization” Target of the Week.

      Equally depressing is Ms. Barnhardt’s predictable huzzahs for World War II and, presumably, the part played in it by the USA and the other self-styled Allies. I am second to none in the extent to which I despise Hitler, but I am also aware that as a murderous swine he was not even in the same league as America’s heroic ally Stalin. Nor is it any longer possible, I would think, to deny that Churchill and FDR were at least Hitler’s equals in aspiration, if not quite in accomplishment. Indeed, when one considers the just barely thwarted plan to carpet-bomb Rome developed by Winnie and his evil twin Bomber Harris and the, alas, all-too-unthwarted Operation Keelhaul, saying that the Yank and Brit monsters joined Hitler in a dead heat for place position in the Damnability Sweepstakes becomes a statement not to be argued with.

      Nor am I impressed by Ms. Barnhardt’s self-comparison with Wyatt Earp, especially the Wyatt Earp of Tribal Hollywood’s imagining. What her clip shows us is a government thug with a big gun smacking around a petty thug with a small gun. Why in the Lord’s name should we be applauding either of these forms of bacterial life?

      Ms. Barnhardt seems clearly to lack the wits to be a true hasbara type, but her very naïveté will serve her masters’ purposes just as well within a certain slice of the American demographic. (Could Ms. Carter be an equally unwitting fragment within that slice? Better that than the alternative explanation.)

      There is no doubt that those who wish to expose and overturn the Judaic subversion of the West generally and this country specifically need to view LRC-style libertarianism cautiously—not least because Mises, Rothbard, and many other libertarian movers and shakers are or were Jewish. But it is worse than foolish to discard those thinkers’ fundamental insights into the functioning and raisons d’être of modern Jewish-controlled managerial-democratic states. War and social reconstitution always and everywhere go hand in hand. That is, in Rothbard’s formulation, we live in a welfare-warfare state. (In a sense, Peter Brimelow’s version is better still: the ZOG-U.S. motto might usefully be stated as Invade the World, Invite the World, In Hock to the World.) If Ms. Barnhardt isn’t hip to this elementary fact, she is of no use to anyone sympathetic to TOO’s aims. If she is hip but still goes on as she has, she is not merely useless but an enemy.

      Perhaps Ms. Carter has brought Ms. Barnhardt to our attention to give a prima facie demonstration of the sorry accuracy of what Joe Webb implicitly and explicitly complains of anent present-day white women in his “What Ails Us?” article. I can’t imagine Ms. Barnhardt blushing about anything, least of all her entrance into womanly maturity, a state of life that she appears to have consigned to permanent back-burner status. She would do her fellow Oklahomans and all white Christian Americans a big favor by helping her clients invest their money in pro-Christian, pro-white stocks (if are there any) and spending less of her limited and precious time doing the enemy’s work for him.

    • meh's Gravatar meh
      April 6, 2011 - 8:15 pm | Permalink

      If this is what “standing up” looks like, we all should just stay seated and keep quiet. Stunts like this does not help our cause, it simply sends us down another blind alley – as intended (not by this lady necessarily, but by those who created the mental programming she is responding to).

      Of all the real problems we are facing, Sharia Law simply isn’t on the agenda in our life times in the USA, arguably not even in Europe either. Islam is militarily powerless and would not even be an issue now if Jews had not opened up our borders to let Muslims in, in the first place, or sent us off on fool’s errands pursuing wars for Israel in the middle east.

      But she doesn’t have a clue about any of this. These “red, white and blue” patriotic “support our troops” White Americans are the worst possible types we could have right now, representing White interests. As useless as the militia types from the 1990s, and potentially as dangerous. They obviously have not noticed that Whites are rapidly being displaced in their own countries, or thought seriously about what this implies for our future. No, she “courageously” fights against Islam, which is at best a secondary, not the primary, problem.

      Look at this, please, at what this Ann Barnhardt wrote on her blog:

      “Finally, if you read down the comment thread, these folks begin to remark that while I appear to be intelligent and sincere, my problem is that I have been tricked and manipulated by the REAL enemy . . . ‘da JOOOOS. I have had a couple of people email me similar thoughts. Everything is the fault of ‘da JOOOOS. ‘Da JOOOOS did 9/11. ‘Da JOOOOS are behind everything. Blah, blah, blah. What a bunch of crap. There are good Jewish people and bad Jewish people just like every other ethnic group. There are Jews who love Israel and Jews who HATE Israel. Most Jews today are in no way religiously observant, and do not care about Israel, because they don’t believe in God. Jewishness today is mostly an ethnicity, not a practiced, observed religion.”

      “Here’s my take on the Jews. They are genetically predisposed to carry about 20 extra IQ points on the average, and thus excel in many endeavors, including business, finance, engineering, physics, mathematics and biomedical disciplines. If you don’t believe me, just look at the roster of Nobel Prize winners and Fields Medal recipients in the hard sciences and mathematics. No matter where they go, because they are intellectually gifted, they tend to outperform the average. And for this, they are universally resented. People tend to resent the success of other people. Are there dumb Jews? Of course. Two words: Barbra Streisand. ‘Nuff said. Are there dishonest Jews? Yep. Sure are. JUST LIKE IN EVERY OTHER ETHNIC GROUP OR NATIONALITY ON EARTH. So, please, people. Spare me the Judenhass. I’m not interested and never, ever will be. ”

      She’s not very bright or well informed, to put it mildly. Her entire knowledge of “da jooos” is that they are smart, not religious, but otherwise just like you and me, some good, some bad, but smart (as though “anti-semites” are against Jews because they think Jews are low IQ types! Seriously, WTF?). The only reason she can think about why people might object to Jews is jealousy! Her excuses for Jews could just as well be applied to Muslims. Muslims aren’t unified or a monolithic group, either.

      She doesn’t seem to be aware of any of the really significant facts about anything related to the Jewish Question. She certainly hasn’t read Kevin MacDonald, and I’d wager her real world interaction with Jews is pretty limited, nothing beyond the usual cliche “some of my best friends are Jews”. She has no conception of evolutionary group psychology and can only think in terms of ideology: yesterday the “existential threat” was communism, today it is “islamo-fascism”.

      She’s the perfect example of the brainwashed American Christian Zionist that almost a century of intense mass media propaganda has produced. People like this are why we are in the mess we are in today. You could lead her to the truth, but she won’t look. It is going to take something radical to break the mind conditioning on these sorts of Whites.

  35. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    April 5, 2011 - 8:02 pm | Permalink

    In my comment “awaiting moderation” (why?), I mistakenly refer to Ann Barnhardt as an Oklahoman. She is a Coloradan. The remainder of my comment is, I believe, accurate.

  36. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    April 6, 2011 - 7:04 am | Permalink

    Tom
    April 2, 2011 – 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Don’t expect Roman Catholic John Boehner to do anything in the way of restricting immigration when 99% of the illegal aliens are Roman Catholics, and a large percentage of the legal aliens are also Roman Catholics.

    These Roman Catholic politicians of both political parties are as bad or worse than Jews.

    It’s Christianity that is the underlying problem, not its two silly sects of “Catholicism” and “Protestantism”.

  37. Elizabeth Carter's Gravatar Elizabeth Carter
    April 6, 2011 - 10:42 am | Permalink

    To Pierre,
    I did not say that I agree with Ann Barnhardt.
    I said that I respect the fact that she stood up and spoke up.
    She has already received a notification from the IRS that her taxes are being audited. She may end up being sued, put in jail or killed for doing it and she says she knows that. These are real possibilities so I hope she really does understand that.
    A lot of the people who have stood up can tell plenty of horror stories about it if they are still here to tell them.
    She used her own name. She put herself on the line.
    I don’t always agree with Kevin McDonald or David Duke, but I respect the fact that they stand up for what they believe in, use their own names and put themselves on the line.
    I am glad you said what you believe. I don’t know if you are using your own name or if you are a troll. I hope you really are standing up.
    If we don’t stand up and speak up, we can’t have a conversation about anything. We are just being controlled by the slavemasters.
    Standing up and saying what you believe is a starting point. It does not mean that you know the entire truth, it means that, “I have had enough and I am going to say something even if it is wrong.”
    We have all been systematically lied to from every source of information for so long that actually finding the truth is very difficult.
    I believe that we have to get to the point where we say, “This is what I have found out.” and see what others have found. No one will have all the answers.
    Standing alone in silence is not going to help us find out where we need to be going. Hiding from them is not going to help because they have our computer IP addresses.
    Divide and conquer is the method they use because it works.
    Together we stand a chance. Standing together means finding points of agreement. Finding points of agreement means saying who we are and what we believe and then trying to find out if what we believe is valid or needs to change.
    They have actually been using people they call “Change Agents” for a long time. They call together a “Blue Ribbon” panel, get you to say what you believe in and then all attack you in order to get you to “change” your mind into the construct they have already determined.
    If we can’t talk to each other in this kind of environment then we really are doomed.
    People on these comment sections rant against other peoples viewpoints, but the moderators are pretty much letting the discussions happen without a predetermined outcome.
    I may not agree with you, but I do read all of the comments when I get involved in one of these and I often learn as much or more from the comments section than I do from the articles.
    I actually agree with you more than I agree with Ann about a lot of things but that is not the point I wanted to make. All I wanted to say is, “Speak up while we still have a semblance of free speech left.”

    • meh's Gravatar meh
      April 6, 2011 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

      It really does matter if, when you “stand up”, you actually know what you are talking about, and not spouting nonsense.

      Most people shouldn’t stand up and make themselves targets needlessly: if you are going to risk yourself, it should be for good reason. A Kevin MacDonald standing up is very dangerous to the enemy; an Ann Barnhardt “standing up” is worse than useless to us.

      Maybe she’ll learn the truth eventually but she’s more likely to lead more Whites down another useless blind alley. Controlled opposition, as the late Revilo P. Oliver learned about the John Birch Society – safely wasting our time “standing up” in ways that don’t threaten the enemy in the slightest.

  38. C. R. Burr's Gravatar C. R. Burr
    April 6, 2011 - 11:19 am | Permalink

    This is good in what will turn out to be the not-so-long run. Whites need to be pushed into a corner, slapped in the face to fight. This is going to eventually do it. If anyone thinks that the “all powerful” jews can lead a hodge-podge of squabbling “minorities” to form some sort of jew fantasy coalition to take out whites they are as mistaken and unrealistic as the zionists and their allies. And stop worrying about fantasies of the jews dropping the big one on us etc.

    Picture the US at say 40% white, and those whites finally having to fight and take things back. Roughly half the whites will be what I have to call cowards, sissies. Those who have been brainwashed by the one-eyed bolshevik in the living room to be cowardly, to back off against non-whites, jews, others. The media has been very specific in inculcating this cowardly, freeze instead of act behavior in whites. The other whites who will not fight, not act, are those who intellectualize “violence”, say we shouldn’t ever fight because we’re dropping to the level of our enemies, because it will put us in jail, because we could get hurt, on and on. All the while we’re being murdered or run off. These people are simply base cowards.

    In the end, while not advocating violence (but supporting self-defense) one has to step back and coldly analyze fighting. Violence is a tool as some very wise men have pointed out. And it will be one of the tools whites will have to utilize, merely to survive while things are settled. Others have noted that it will be best to keep the cowards, at least those who try to intellectualize their fears by stating they are merely being intelligent, thinking things out, not being impulsive, it will be best to keep these types away from any positions of influence, whether in media, academia, politics, whatever, as these individuals are basically worried about themselves instead of the race as a whole. I’m not specifically referring to personal safety, I’m stating that’s their overall world-view, although most will toss rocks as they continue their petty self-deception that rivals that of the jews.

    Those who are worried about “the jews” have to understand that the tribe is going to cut and run once things look bad, at least the leaders. Much like Netanyahu telling Jonathan Pollard that after the Israelis are finished with the US they will toss it aside, the jews will merely run for it and say good riddance. Of course they’ll be giggling in Haifa over yet another country destroyed or at least derailed. But that’s a score to settle later, once the bulk of North America is cleaned up.

    So we have 20% of the population fighting the bulk of the other 60%. A group comprised mostly of blacks and latinos, with Asians and jews. Yes, they’ll get together and form one hell of an army. Please. It’s over for their side. They are already fighting with each other and the ringleaders are watching the leashes slip out of their hands.

  39. F. Aialen's Gravatar F. Aialen
    April 6, 2011 - 11:50 am | Permalink

    People should stop parroting the race and IQ materials, especially the claims of E. Asians being more intelligent. The ONLY reason they have a higher “average” IQ (although not all psychometrists claim this) is because years ago the weight of certain types of questions was changed, and this plays to their strengths.

    In another thread weeks back on this site one person pointed out the fact that for all the Asians who major in mathematics, less than 2% end up working outside Applied Mathematics. Very few can think outside the box. I can side with this based on personal experience working with Asians. Memorization and being able to understand something does not equate with having any insight or the ability to create. To very un-PC, the overwhelming majority of Asians lack high lateral thinking ability, they seem to be unable to link unrelated items when trying to come up with ideas. That’s why they’ll work to death something that someone else created. The Jews like these people because they are so obedient and for the most part toe the line. And they tend not be politically savvy despite claims otherwise. However the plain fact is that without contact with whites, Asians would be living a medieval existence.

    The US is not too far off from complete collapse and chaos. Whites will take it back, whether it’s by a real Civil War or some sort of battle of attrition remains to be seen. The Asians and Jews will try to run for it.

  40. Elizabeth Carter's Gravatar Elizabeth Carter
    April 7, 2011 - 7:51 am | Permalink

    To Meh.

    If the only people who are allowed to stand up are the ones who fully realize how thoroughly we have been deceived by the Jooos, the silence will be deafening and the Jooos will be the only ones allowed to speak. They know what they have done to us, we are still trying to figure out how deep it goes.

    Actually that is pretty much where we are right now. They talk and we maintain silence.

    I believe a person has to start standing up where ever they are and learn as they go.

    People who can’t express themselves and take the heat as they go will never learn or grow.

    Ignorance is not bliss, it is very dangerous.

    Learning and growing by definition means a person is not fully knowledgeable or grown yet.

    Ann wouldn’t be the first person who had to change her mind about them and she wouldn’t be the last.

    The fact that she doesn’t want to discuss it at this point is just Cognitive Dissonance. It is hard for anytone to realize how deeply they have been deceived and they tend to avoid that knowledge. She is pretty normal from that standpoint.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      April 7, 2011 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

      Ms. Carter: You could do much worse than heed the counsel “meh” has given you. Otherwise—and these are my last words on this matter—two things you wrote to me are of particular note.

      (1) “All I wanted to say is, ‘Speak up while we still have a semblance of free speech left.’” Since freedom of speech is largely an illusion and, anyway, since speech is pointless unless something of worth is said; since the weight of Western wisdom, going back to its Greek roots and earlier, is chary of speech, even useful speech (narratio argentea, silentium vero aureum est [speech is silver, silence is true gold] had been proverbial for centuries before it took its familiar form first in Latin then in every Western language still spoken and read); and since, if anything, we are drowning in the noise of empty speech, Ms. Barnhardt would have done far better to hold her tongue. Further to this matter is something one of my heroes, Samuel Johnson, said: “I never desire to converse with a man who has written more than he has read.” Update “written” to “blogged” or “YouTube’d,” and the applicability of Johnson’s remark is again as fresh as a daisy.

      (2) “I don’t know if you are using your own name or if you are a troll.” Neither do you know whether I have stopped beating my wife, nor for that matter do I know whether you have stopped being a receiver of stolen goods—the point being that this vile game is one that two or more can play at. And how, precisely, does this sort of rhetorical abuse differ from the Establishment’s ploy of calling anyone who hints at the true state of the world an anti-Semite or a racist? Is this tactic one that you wish to associate yourself with? I sincerely hope not.

      Ms. Carter, if you think as well of Ms. Barnhardt as you seem to, the truly friendly and charitable thing would be to give her some sisterly correction. Bravery and bravado may look alike to a fool or a child, but they aren’t the same thing.

  41. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    April 7, 2011 - 1:16 pm | Permalink

    I believe that all people of all races are basically fair minded .
    I also think there is a powerful supremacist religion/group that is behind anti-white multi-culturalism and much of the world’s strife .
    I think there will come a day when all people look to the puppeteers and just say no to being manipulated . Then all people can rebuild their respective nations with their racial kin and live as good neighbors.
    I do not think we pro-whites need to fight other races we just have to expose the man behind the curtain and then to make alliances as to what is mutually beneficial for all races .

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      April 7, 2011 - 6:10 pm | Permalink

      Mr. Hearns says that he “believe[s] that all people of all races are basically fair minded.” I on the other hand believe that it’s Pollyannaism such as Mr. Hearns’s that has contributed mightily to getting us into the pickle we find ourselves in. I urgently call upon the gentlemen to cease posting on this or any other site till he has read and digested Professor M.’s three best-known books on the Jewish question.

      Roughly 160 years ago all white Western Christian nations began accepting as an ideal the self-destructive notion that the just society should be founded upon man’s aspirations rather than his nature. The people and groups advancing this grave, delusional falsehood were deliberately deceiving our ancestors then, and they continue to do the same to us now.

      Mr. Hearns and like-minded others need to clear their minds of cant. Our enemies are real and are in earnest. There is neither virtue nor truth in attributing the guilelessness of the dove to the destructive cunning of the serpent.

  42. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 7, 2011 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

    Here is another case – how the Whites are destroying their own societies for Jewish money.

    In June 2003, Kansas City Star had reported that asking the question: “Is any of this stuff made in Israel” – would drag the customer to court for discrimination (anti-Semitism). According to the article, by that time US$26 million had been fined to the American violators.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/us-%e2%80%98boycott-israeli-goods-and-pay-fine/

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      April 21, 2011 - 11:45 am | Permalink

      Good citation Rehmat. I thought you were wrong because I’ve never seen any israeli made stuff in the US, since everything in the stores is made in China, but this refers to exports.
      Maybe a brave politician will try to get people to sign a sarcastic loyalty pledge to israel to satirize the situation.

  43. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    April 8, 2011 - 10:22 pm | Permalink

    @ Pierre de Craon

    My solution to the problem of anti-white multi-culturalism is simple and effective .
    People prefer to live amongst their own and always will so we only need to offer such a world .
    The supremacist self chosen are going to be exposed . After the revelations then the majority of people will “get it ” and probably want to live in their own racial nations as neighbours on earth .

    The pen is mightier than the sword .

  44. April 8, 2011 - 10:58 pm | Permalink

    America has degenerated far too much to be saved. It must first be destroyed by the causes of this degeneration before it can be rebuilt. Can you say Ragnarok?

  45. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 9, 2011 - 2:06 pm | Permalink

    How much America has dispossessed?

    Mikis Theodorakis (born 1925), is considered a hero in Greece. He wrote the music for the film “Zorba the Greek”. He claimed in the interview that “everything (bad) that happens today in the world has to do with the Zionists.” He added that “American Jews are behind the world economic crisis that has hit Greece also.”

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/04/09/theodorakis-i-am-anti-zionist/

  46. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    April 21, 2011 - 10:48 am | Permalink

    On April 13, 2011 – Dr. Robert Satloff, executive director Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) gave his testimony to the Congressional Subcommittee in which he called for Obama administration to block the Islamist and semi-Islamist groups (Muslim Brotherhood, Gamaa Islamiya, Al-Jihad, Wasat Party and US-Saudi funded sectarian Salafist movement).

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/lobby-asks-obama-to-block-islamists-ruling-egypt/

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      April 21, 2011 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat, forgive me, I asked you a question before but I forgot what thread it was in, so you may have already have already answered.

      Are you Muslim? Are you White or Arab? Just curious if you are hear not so much as a pro-White person, but as an anti-Zionist person.

  47. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    April 22, 2011 - 6:31 pm | Permalink

    Here is another example of what Whites can expect if dispossession continues. This was posted on Drudge. A White girl is brutally beaten at a McDonald’s.

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ec0_1303444048

  48. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    July 25, 2011 - 11:13 pm | Permalink

    The real enemy is the ruling class. They don’t care what you look like, so long as you aren’t among them. What they want is America to be one giant plantation with them in the owner’s mansion. When you’re not part of the ruling class, I guess I get to quote Michael Jackson: It really makes no difference… if you’re black or white.

    By having bickering ethnic groups, we all are distracted from the real problem, the rich hoarding the whole economic pizza. By engaging in any racial strife, you are playing into the ruling class’s hands. It does us all no good to be duking it out while the rich drive their Lear Jets 40,000 feet over our heads, laughing to each other as one holds the flight yoke.

  49. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    February 4, 2012 - 12:55 am | Permalink

    KMD………..

    this is food for thought more than something to post
    thye didnt run the comment but blogged on it:

    49 pm

    increase text size decrease text size
    0
    0

    Lilyburk Did the horrifying murder last month of Los Feliz teen Lily Burk get so much media attention because the 17-year-old victim was Jewish? At least one reader thinks so. A more puzzling question for us at the Opinion Manufacturing Division, though, is whether we should provide a forum for such ugly allegations.

    If you’ve ever wondered why your comments take so long to appear, both on this blog and on the graffiti boards on latimes.com’s editorials and Op-Eds, it’s because each comment has to be screened by somebody here at the OMD. If a comment doesn’t meet The Times’ standards — if it contains profanity, or is blatantly offensive or inflammatory — it doesn’t get posted. Most of the time, deciding whether or not to post something is a snap, and the vast majority of reader responses make their way onto the site — latimes.com readers are a pretty well-educated, civil bunch. But sometimes, making a call on a reader comment is harder than, say, making a call on President Obama’s health care plans. A comment in response to one of today’s editorials is a case in point.

    The editorial concerned Burk’s murder, and the effect it might have on California prison policy. One reader submitted the following:

    On the day Lily Burke was killed a man killed his daughter and then himself and several others were shot and killed in the LA area. Lily Burke was a jew so her death is still in the media. It is an insult that the media considerers a jewish girls death so much more important than anyone else’s. I had a friend murdered. She was a Mexican American around Lily Burke’s age and also killed by a stranger with a criminal record. Her death was not on TV. She got a little spot in a local newspaper. Is a jewish girls death really that much more important than anyone else’s?

    Should The Times post this comment, or others like it? This one posed so many problems that I ran that question past my fellow editorial writers. It is, on its face, anti-Semitic, playing into a vicious stereotype that Jews control the American media. On the other hand, it raises an important point that should be of great concern to journalists and readers: Do newspapers and other media value the lives of some kinds of crime victims more than others? If this reader had criticized the media for playing up the Burk story because she was white, we would have posted it without hesitation. So why would we be reluctant to post it because the criticis……

3 Trackbacks to "White Dispossession and the Racialization of American Politics Accelerate"

  1. on April 2, 2011 at 1:08 pm
  2. on April 6, 2011 at 3:33 pm
  3. on September 16, 2011 at 6:23 am

Comments are closed.