Greg Johnson and Alex Kurtagic have been discussing a familiar witticism: worse is better. Axiomatically, reducing a concept down to three simple words necessarily strips it of nuance. Worse isn’t always better, but is it necessarily always worse? As Alex points out, we have to be capable of providing an alternative to the system for that system’s failure to be in our interest. Greg accurately notes that the system’s failures are opportunities for awakening…
“The ultimate premise of “worse is better” is the old ‘pathema, mathema’ (suffer and learn) principle: Most people do not learn from intellectual warnings, which are abstract and universal, but through experience, which is concrete and individual.”
But what if we as a people are congenitally incapable of learning from our mistakes? What if we as a society are so deeply invested in our toxic abstractions and fatuous distractions that we’ll keep parroting them louder and louder as it all falls apart? What if our reaction to the anti-White genocide is pretty much independent from economic and political events? What if we’re so hopelessly lost that we’ll dutifully carry on about us all being “children of God” until the very last one of his White children is bludgeoned senseless by a vicious brown mob hellbent on total control?
I know I’m being morbid, but it’s not because I’m off my meds. It’s because I just watched Mugabe and the White African.
This documentary sympathetically records the trials of one of Zimbabwe’s last White African farming families. To my surprise, I found myself growing impatient with the White Africans the more and more I learned, to the point where I was sneering derisively at their expense until the point at which their punishment for willful ignorance exceeded the crime. A revelation presented itself: White liberalism is White Supremacism with a smile. This liberal documentary couldn’t help but side with the plantation owners because they’re ideological brethren: two sides of the same imperialist coin.
Throughout the film, the White Africans repeatedly tripped over themselves to emphasize that they were helping their Black laborers, even boasting that their laborers can afford to have themselves several children. They cloyingly attempted to relate to their minions, assembling a veritable comedy reel of awkward attempts to bond while their charges grinned nervously and laughed along unconvincingly. As these White Africans see it, they’re doing God’s work, providing economic opportunities that wouldn’t exist without them. After all, isn’t it wasteful to let all that fertile farmland go to waste under that racist Mugabe’s cronies?
Accusing White liberals of being the real White Supremacists seems cheap at first pass, on par with “I know you are, but what am I?” But the only difference between the Campbell family and White America’s elites is that the ones over here can still afford a few degrees of abstraction from their exploitation and control of their non-White minions. They can even appoint an affable Black spokesman to run the plantation for them. Their Democratic party’s White and Jewish elite hand out jobs and bribes to the brown masses in exchange for continued dominance—a macrocosm of the Mount Carmel farm.
Unfortunately for Mike Campbell and his family, it’s an unsustainable situation. Human beings don’t strive for money and food. They strive for power. Africa was far wealthier under European imperial control than it is now, but Africans don’t want wealth as much as they want sovereignty. Detroit would be far more prosperous with some White technocrat instead of Kwame Kilpatrick, but Detroit’s urban Blacks are smarter than White Americans. They realize something we don’t: It’s better to starve with freedom than feast in submission. Mugabe’s assuredly a miserable thug, but he’s their miserable thug.
Throughout the movie, the family desperately appeals to their White cultural traditions, insisting on their universality. According to decades-old government records, they have a lawful right to keep their farm, but what are “rights”, “laws”, and “justice” when those in power have no use for them? And why should they? Western values enable White supremacy. Zimbabweans—being less intelligent and educated—will never win if they play by the White man’s rules. They’ll win by playing to their strengths: brutality, terror, and superior numbers.
I Want You Out!
About a third of the way through the documentary, the idealistic son-in-law Ben Freeth gets into a debate with one of Mugabe’s henchmen (Mr. Peter Chamada). The White African prattles on about the international tribunals and how he bought the land from a willing seller, but the Black African sees through his smokescreen of imperialist bullshit: “My friend, you take all the land from us. You starve us. You bring sanctions. And you want to cripple us so you can take over. It will never be a colony again, this country. It will never be a colony. I will sleep here until you are out, and I mean it. I want you out!”
These White African farmers are kinfolk. They deserve our support, but only in the form of assisting their emigration. If we support their continued efforts to promote multiculturalism in Africa, we’re only enabling their tragic refusal to let go of something they’ve already lost. Arthur Kemp, himself a Rhodesian refugee, defines a White South African as “someone who would rather be murdered in his bed than make it.” It’s hard to deny that harsh reality after watching this, though my heart was still broken by its shocking—if predictable—conclusion.
Ben Freeth - A Martyr for Multiculturalism
These folks have noble instincts. They’re intelligent, well-bred, and heroically abide by their anti-White principles through their dispossession, dislocation, and demise. To their credit, they stood by their rhetoric in a way that countless liberal White African expatriates have not. Most of them are still spouting this garbage from their comfortable White refuges in the Commonwealth and America. Meanwhile, the women, children, and elderly who can’t escape are left to bear the horrific consequences of following White liberalism to its logical conclusion.
The lesson I learned from this is that worse is not better. It’s always just worse. We as a people are too abstract, idealistic, and removed from our instincts to act in our tribal interests in the same way other populations do. If anything, the more trials we experience, the more resolved we become in our folly. This doesn’t mean we’re doomed. It’s actually liberating. We don’t need to sit around and wait for things to get bad enough for our people to rise up. What we need to do is adopt a new set of principles and our people will pursue them with the crusading zeal we Whites manifest when stirred by an abstract ideal.
PBS will be airing Mugabe and the White African on July 26th. Check your local listing for the broadcast time and be sure to weigh in on the public discussion.
Facing the Future as a Minority
The only enemy of the White man is his naivety, the only friend of the White man is his realism. You cannot survive in a jungle with the “principles” you learned as a child at Sunday school, tigers don’t believe in the Sunday school.
It is useless for a White man to stay in a Black country. It is also useless to send help to such countries. Let them fend for themselves, they will relapse to their own evolutionary level. We are not responsible for that level.
Abstract idealism is the curse of the White man. There is an immense irony in the fact that evolution has produced the White man, creator of civilization on this planet, and then that White man causes his own extinction by not abiding by those same evolutionary rules that have created him in the first place. One wonders: are we perhaps approaching an evolutionary bottleneck through which only those with realism will survive, while those with idealism will go extinct? Let us hope so.
For clarity what is that idealism we will have to shed and what is that realism we will have to adopt?
Briefly:
Idealism:
1) All men are equal.
2) All men are brothers.
3) When we act on these principles, Utopia will be reached on earth.
Realism:
1) All men are unequal.
2) All men fight for resources and dominance.
3) When we act on these principles, those with the best qualities will acquire the best facilities thus creating a higher civilization, while those with lesser qualities will create lesser civilizations.
Elucidation to point 1): All men are unequal. This is true both inside races and between races. Inside a race this creates the class system, with unskilled labourers at the bottom and intellectuals at the top. Between the races this creates the hierarchy of civilizations, with that of the Black man at the bottom and that of the White man at the top. Point 2): All men fight for resources and dominance. Look at history, isn’t it a continuous story of battles between peoples and empires? And at present, do we have world peace? We can make this battle more humane, but a battle it will remain.
Point 3) Peoples who create a higher civilization should be the sole inhabitants of their own country. Others will only act as parasites on them. Thus the hierarchy of civilizations will have a territorial realization.
The key-word is: realism.
No. Whiteness is abstract idealism. Our greatest strength, the characteristic that makes us unique, has been turned against us. The trick isn’t to stop being crusading idealists–It’s to envision new crusading ideals.
I can name a Caucasian population which is eugenically selected for greater intelligence and realism instead of idealism and aesthetic beauty.
Idealism doesn’t have to be of the “weez all be eekwahl” stripe. I can name a Caucasian people who opted for greater intelligence, realism, idealism, and aesthetic beauty. I think they were pretty popular in the 1930s and had imitators across Europe.
Having to choose between realism and idealism is a false dichotomy. Our ancestors have been balancing them successfully until XXth century. The problem is cultural (and by extension) racial distortion. We lost touch with our roots and let in hateful sophists. What would have been a passing malady for the White race become solidified by culture distorting aliens.
The irony of “helping” Africa now means a greater African population will starve later, and we won’t be able to send enough money to help everyone, assuming their “leaders” don’t steal it all as usual. The only real help we can give them is to tell them what to do, how to do it. For their own good, they need to stop having children they cannot feed and raise themselves – we will not be able to “help” much longer.
“I can name a Caucasian population which is eugenically selected for greater intelligence and realism instead of idealism and aesthetic beauty.”
You are in error here. Jews are not Caucasians by their own definition, and do not consider themselves to be so. They think of themselves as a race apart from all others, and many of their attributes attest to this (one of the most startling being their insect-like willingness to allow a segment of their populace to die for the “good of the race”). Also there are physical traits that identify them apart from Caucasians as well, if you know what to look for (the classic “nose” is just one). Their white skin is just camoflage.
From the mouths of Jews themselves:
“You cannot be English Jews. We are a race, and only as a race can we perpetuate. Our mentality is of a Hebraic character, and differs from that of an Englishman. Enough subterfuges! Let us assert openly that we are International Jews.” – Gerald Soman, Chairman of the World Jewry Fellowship, in its official manifesto, January 1,
1935.
“You are not Whites–either symbolically or literally–as anyone knows who goes to Israel.” – Professor Leonard Fein at speech at 27th biennial congress of the Jewish Board of Deputies in Johannesburg, May 15, 1972.
“A Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A Free thinker and Atheist always remains a Jew.” –
Jewish World, London December 14, 1922
Curt,
Caucasian is a broad anthropological category which includes a good portion of people who are quite clearly not “White”. What one Jew or another fancies about how he defines his group doesn’t make the least difference in this discussion. Genetically, Jews are very closely related to Europeans, belonging to a set of “Caucasians” like the Turks, Berbers, Arabs, and Saami who are not-quite-white.
Are they a distinct race? That question lies at a precarious intersection of ideology and science which guarantees to waste time and accomplish nothing. On one hand, their group evolutionary strategy transcends race, with all but a small fringe of racialist Jews considering Black Jews, Asian Jews, and blonde Jews as true and equally Jewish Jews.
We do indeed belong to an umbrella category of “Caucasians”, but it’s irrelevant and wholly tangential to the point I was making. The point is that you can’t strip us of our idealistic inclinations without stripping us of our Shakespeares, da Vincis, Newtons, and Franklins. Our ability to transcend parochial instincts and selfish interests is what makes us unique, writes our epics, paints our masterpieces, sketches our inventions, fills our expeditionary sails, and stirs our warriors to victory on the battlefield.
Sure, it’s also what’s cutting our own throats at the moment.
Frosty is correct in noting that idealism and realism need not be dichotomized. Granted, our abstractions and ideals are currently set against reality. This is; however, a recent problem. It can be remedied without stripping us of the very thing that makes us truly unique among the races of man. If we must become our enemies to defeat them, then I don’t care to win.
Scooter: You asked me a question earlier today on a thread from last month. I just posted an answer. (Now, as usual, I need a massage to alleviate writer’s cramp.)
It is not as simple as everyone changing their thinking. Changing one’s ideology is not an easy thing. And white people are more willing than any other group to destroy themselves out of pure high-mindedness. How, then, do we get our people to adopt a non-suicidal worldview? Only a vanishingly small percentage will learn from reason. The rest learn from experience, bitter experience–or they do not learn at all. The ones who cannot learn, cannot be saved. And when they are in positions to lead the rest of us to ruin, we have to displace them from such positions. How might they lose their grip on power? The most likely path is by leading our people into such suffering that people will stop listening to them and start listening to us. But it has to be more than listening. They have to obey, and that means that White Nationalists have to think in terms of taking command. We have to position ourselves as the natural leaders of our communities when the current leadership discredits itself. History can be our guide here, as there are many examples of old orders collapsing under the stress of catastrophe — such as war or economic collapse — and new orders taking their place. It is much easier to change people’s thinking from a position of power.
People are already with us in large measure.
It is true that many will not learn, that some will learn from experience, that a very few will learn from reason. But learning is not always necessary: there is a subset who will seize on our narrative and adopt it as their own, simply because it resonates with them at an instinctive level—because it goes with the grain of their personality / psychological make up. Which is why the process of building for the post-collapse world needs to follow a narrative, infused with myth, capable of inspiring at a pre-rational level those who are naturally receptive to its core, underlying values and ideals. We have both iterated this point on various occasions.
@ Alex Kurtagic
{“…a narrative,infused with myth…”}
If you want to start a movement you need an ideology.But for that ideology to inspire the masses you need “myth”.With “myth” here I mean ideas clothed in forms that stir the emotions,such as music,songs,marches,objects of art etc.When you look at old recordings of the Nazi era with their marches, songs,mass meetings etc. you see that they had “myth”, which was surely part of the reason for their success.( a good example would be Lenie Riefenstahl’s “Triumph of the Will”,which can be viewed on Youtube).Ideology alone will only attract intellectuals,”myth” will attract masses.
Alex, as I see it, there will be a minority of people who accept our views rationally. Using art, literature, religion — myth — we must assemble an even larger group who believe the right thing on essentially irrational grounds. But even that enlarged group will still be a minority.
That means we are still going to need more than potent arguments and myths to save our people. What else do we need? In a word, power.
The next group to win over are the people who can be bought by delivering security, prosperity, and peace, for which they will exchange their conformity to the order we envision. (There will be a fourth group of people whom we can never win over, but if we can get the masses on our side, the holdouts simply won’t matter politically.)
But to deliver prosperity, security, and peace, we need power. And we are not likely to gain it until the current regime enters a sharp legitimacy crisis brought on by their own stupidity, incompetence, and dishonesty. The worse for their system, the better for us.
Of course in the meantime, we cannot just wait around for the system to self-destruct. We need to win converts, build community, and make ourselves into a microcosm of the new order we wish to create, so that we have the credibility to lead our people when we have the chance to take power. Looking at it that way, my only fear is that the system will self-destruct too soon.
Franklin Ryckaert, the Nazis are no guide to what will work as much of their success was due to favorable circumstances which they did nothing to bring about, in order of importance :-
1. There was a youth bulge (read Gunnar Heinsohn.)
2. The political class had been completely demoralized by the aftermath of WW1.
The Nazi movement is the worst possible model.
Greg Johnson said “Looking at it that way, my only fear is that the system will self-destruct too soon.”
Nationalists have been thinking that way since before your father was born, as Adam Smith said there is a “great deal of ruin in a nation.”
For the political mainstream to move towards a racial nationalist perspective in our lifetime, something truly catastrophic (from a liberal viewpoint) will have to befall the society at large.
Your 100% right about power, but as a formula that is a circular argument: nothing succeeds like success.
I have this tape as well.
There’s a definite sense of doom. The main character is way too happy go lucky being in that situation, a minority white in a majority black country.
I think what decline does is make people more racially aware. The election of Obama was the best thing to every happen to WN. When things were good almost no one cared about immigration or interracial violence.
Since the mention of genocide of White people in Russia (60 million) and Ukraine (7 million) by communist Jewish elites has long been declared as ‘anti-Semitism’ – there are plenty of Crypto-Jews hidding behind the White-race cover to demonize Africans and Middle Eastern for relatively less ethnic-cleansing of the White minorities than the what the later did to the former during the western colonial period.
Robert Mugabe, a former close friend of US-Israel, did a very un-kosher thing last year. He invited Iranian President Ahmadinejad to his country. During his visit Iranian official signed mutual agreements in the fields of science, mining, industry, agriculyure and tourism.
The Zionist-controlled western media gave the visit headline: “Iran strikes a secret deal nuclear deal”.
Interestingly, it was US President Jimmy Carter who refused to recognized the first Black government of prime minister Bishop Abel Muzorewa (a Methodist) in Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), which replaced the White-ruled government of Ian Smith in 1979. Jimmy Carter kept US sanctions against Bishop Muzorewa. In 1980, Robert Mugabe came to power with the help of Swiss-based World Council of Churches (WCC) and National Council of Churches (NCC). In 1973, the NCC had hailed Mugabe’s guerrillas as “co-workers with God”. He imprisoned Bishop Muzorewa in 1983 for allegedly consipring with Israel and South Africa for the ‘regime-change’ and recognize the Zionist entity.
Both Israel and South Africa supported the Rhodesian White government with arms and military training during the African resistance against the White rule. Though Mugabe established relations with PLO in 1983 – he maintained trade relations with the Zionist entity. According to the Online Journal (December 18, 2008): “Zimbabwean Opposition blames Israel more than China for propping up Mugabe with security assistance and military equipment”. In return for support for Mugabe, Israel had access to Zimbabwe’s gold and diamond resources, as well as those in Congo over which Zimbabwe has control. Zimbabwe broke diplomatic relations with Israel after later’s Dec-Jan 2009 Gaza genocide.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/mugabes-journey-from-tel-aviv-to-tehran/
This Englishmen in Zimbabwe are immigrants. I mean, to compare these people to Europeans in Europe (in their ancestral homelands) is an insult.
What would you prefer them to be called – Holocaust survivor like Europeans in occupied Palestine?
Did not what Helen Thomas that Zionazi Rabbi? You’re invaders and must go back to your ancestral homelands in Europe. Same goes for European invaders in Zimbabwe unless you believe that England is located in South America and not in Europe.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/playboy-israel-and-helen-thomas/
I would be curious, in this light, to have commentators and participants to this website give their view on the events in Oslo.
This whole thing looks once again like a pretext to start a final war on White Western Christians, and this is why listening to the Mugabe video may prove futile if Whites have lost their reflexes to react to media sponsored propaganda.
Already, the insistance that the Oslo perpetrator is a white fundametalist christian with anti-multiculturist views, describes as a single White Christian should sound alarms among all Western Christian Whites.
This event happens 24 hours after the release of a promotional video by Dep of Homeland Security that encourages americans to report “suspicious activity” by what appear mostly white american males acting alone.
This coincides well will the coming election year, any white christian involved in politics will appear suspicious unless he pledges his alliegeance to israel and multiculturism.
This appears like the NWO order sponsored totaliarianism lead by Jews, Gays and Lesbians and minorities.
It appears to me that the guy did what it looks like he did for the reasons they’re saying he did them. There’s no reason to suspect a false flag.
We certainly have cause for concern that our enemies will use this against us.
@ Denys Picard
[re: Oslo Bombing]
Most probably a “false flag” operation by the NWO-crowd with Jews (Mossad) at its centre,yes.(for more ideas about this ,see: Northern Truthseeker,july 22,2011:”Norway Bombing has stench of Mossad all over it”).Though the official reaction will be all too predictable,the CABAL that keeps on perpetrating this kind of acts doesn’t get that an increasing public is beginning to see through their tricks – on the Internet.All the major (Jewish owned) conglomerates of news media are in crisis now (see for example Rupert Murdoch’s problems) and their empire of lies is falling apart.In the end they will fail.
The mass muders in Oslo are very disturbing the ‘left’ must be relieved it is not a muslim (as usual when these things happen). It is likely that the ethno-marxists will try to exploit this agressively against White Activism.
Here are some photos of Anders Behring Breivik
http://politicons.net/breaking-name-of-utoya-shooter-released%E2%80%A6-anders-behring-breivik%E2%80%A6-photos/
Here is an anti-multiculturalism article he wrote:
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/btd4la
His actions are bizzare, what were his motivations, what was he hoping to achieve in attacking a bunch of White left wing Labour party youth? He must have no sane conception of the reaction of most humans will be to this act so he must be detached from reality in some way.
The most interesting thing about the Oslo attack is how closely it follows on the heels of Alan Dershowitz’s claims that Norway had become both anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist almost exactly four months ago.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704474804576222561887244764.html
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/alan-dershowitz-norway-to-jews-youre-not-welcome-here-2011-03-28
Or just go to http://www.BING.com and type in “Alan Dershowitz & Norway.” No false flag anyone?
Well – Norwegians are considered ‘anti-Semite’ by the Jewish Lobby groups, so figure out who benefits from Oslo bombing killing 92 people?
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/07/23/israeli-venegeance-strikes-oslo/
@Matt
you said “It appears to me that the guy did what it looks like he did for the reasons they’re saying he did them.”
Since when do we take media accounts at face value?lol I didn’t know WN’s controlled the media now!! Nobody told me!!
Systemic,
It doesn’t do WNs a lick of good to construct an alternate reality in which everything that we wish hadn’t happened was actually an elaborate false flag.
Yes. I know false flags do happen. I know conspiracies do occur. I don’t trust the controlled media, either. But the evidence pouring in comes from a variety of institutions and directions and is consistent with the media’s basic narrative.
The challenge is to keep them from inappropriately framing what happened, not to pretend it didn’t happen.
Yes, Matt, these Whites in Rhodesia are typical two faced Anglo hypocrites, who are fooling no one but themselves. Certainly not the race savvy Negroes. Like most western Whites, living in a state of intellectual make believe and race denial, they are their own worst enemies. Their fate is certain, yet they continue to linger in that racial danger zone, pretending their imminent demise aint’t so. You locked onto some of the reasons for this delusional mindset when you mentioned our people’s infatuation with toxic abstractions, fatuous distractions and willful ignorance. As Franklin alludes, Whites will probably have to pass through an evolutionary bottle neck, if the White gene pool is to survive. Greg’s comments are also quite apropo. The gravitas of real White power would improve the intellectual dynamics immeasurably.
Quite a few of the Rhodesia whites were ex Royal Air Force who felt like they owned the world after 1945. Some of the hard feelings are because they fought a war against ZANU and lost. If Rushton is right, the blacks will need an administrative class, but they have East Asia to look to, which needs their mineral wealth and agricultural surpluses.
Yes, some of it is hypocrisy, but many of them are true believers. Reading the blog of Cathy Buckle is educational. She’s a liberal who couldn’t wait for the liberation of Zimbabwe from the evil colonialists. Now she chronicles the state of the collapse and bewails the bad government that’s causing it all. That’s all Zimbabwe needs – a change of government.
Bear in mind that this nightmare is over 30 years old now. A generation has grown up knowing nothing else. They’re suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. I’ve seen this even in South Africa. They have nowhere else to go, and they’re just trying to survive.
Lancs Lad – agricultural surpluses? That’s a joke, right? If the Chinese want Zimbabwean agricultural produce, they’ll have to grow their own – and I have no doubt they will. I fervently hope they won’t share it with their hosts.
“White liberalism is White Supremacism with a smile.”
Finally! Of course, white liberalism is a remnant of white supremacy although much displaced onto other white people. When Irish-Americans call British descendants WASP, and when British descendants refer to the Irish, Scots, and Welsh with sneering terms (not to mention the French, Germans, Italians, and Russians), that’s all a remnant of white supremacy, distorted and twisted, but still supremacist, and it is not limited to so-called NW Europeans, either.
So is the unwillingness to embrace all our white cousins.
So is the unwillingness to get down into the muck of the anti-white narrative (slurs, stereotypes, hate caricatures, and anti-white texts & media) and raise hell about the hate slogans of our adversaries, preferring the children’s sing-song about “sticks & stones,” the default anthem of white supremacists.
Yes, refusing to resist the anti-white narrative is just more evidence of white supremacy mildly cloaked in a superior posture — “you can’t hurt me.”
As it appears, it looks to me like the narrative for the Oslo tragedy is purposefully convoluted. If there’s nothing concrete to grab on to, the story can be used for whatever purpose it needs to be used for by those who tell us how the stories are to be heard. Like Emanuel Goldstein. Who cares where he came from or what he did or whoever he was, the point is to bring him out as a symbol for whatever is supposed to be hated at the time. If there is no factual evidence to the contrary, it is infinitely malleable. The bigger the confusion and lack of cohesive narrative on the ground, the better.
False flag, all the way.
Hmm, I wonder why that could be?
But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
- Rabbi Jesus, Matthew 5:39
And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.
- Rabbi Jesus, Matthew 5:40
If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.
- Rabbi Jesus, Matthew 5:41
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you
- Rabbi Jesus, Matthew 5:44
But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you
- Rabbi Jesus, Luke 6:27
Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse.
- Rabbi Saul, Romans 12:14
Hey ZOG just one question:
Why does the tribe invests so much time, money and energy destroying Christianity in society if its so conducive to their anti-white cause? Following your reason to conclusion, Hollywood would be supporting Christianity at all costs because, according to you, it brainwashes whites to accept a multi-cult environment.
-But then why in the world is the tribe trying to destroy Christianity at all costs? The premise becomes paradoxical in nature when viewed through your respective lens.
Jews are trying to “destroy Christianity at all costs”? That’s the stupidest thing I’ve heard in my entire life. The Jews have never tried to “destroy” Christianity, nor will they ever.
The most that Jews do is mock and ridicule Christianity in their controlled media. But the Jews also mock and ridicule the Republican party in their controlled media. Does that then mean that the Republican party is good for Western Civilization? According to your stupid logic, it does.
The Jews have never tried to “destroy” Christianity, nor will they ever.
Wow, did you just post that?LOL No need for follow up on that
one. And “according to my stupid logic” Ohhh ZOGgy baby-
your so emotional, just like my girlfriend! Whew-took me to
school right there.
- Zoggy the real question is: Why are you more interested in
Jesus than the pro-white arguments on this site? It seems you
only weigh in when someone expresses a belief in Jesus. And
usually when someone does this they are articulate posters
adding great comments to this site, unlike Rehmat who posts
anti-white statements. So why the witchunt against
Christians? Your showing more piety in your attempts to
destroy a “fictional character” than the piety shown by an actual
believer. Don’t you find this a little pathetic as well as ironic,
you caring more about Jesus than the believer? Paradoxical in
nature if you ask me.LOL
All these intellectual discussions are fine for passing the time. But I seriously doubt one inch of actual or figurative ground ever has or ever will be won with them. Until we learn to think in terms of stimulus and response, like our opponents, I doubt we ever will gain anything. At present the blacks are furnishing far more effective stimuli for our cause than we ever have. Their crimes are the best thing we have so far. But we need much more. While the jews are running the ball down the field we’re discussing the philosophy of the game.
You have a winning strategy? Don’t leave us hanging.
We don’t know Whiteawake but the winning strategy will be to develop ways to speak with our white voice (“As a white American, I insist that…..”) and in a white centric way (“The damage this does to little diverse white American children must stop.”)
This is what newbies need, models for speaking out in ways that don’t bring the world crashing down on their heads. When we have 5% of the diverse white Americans armed with techniques for speaking out directly (instead of hiding behind Conservatism, Libertarianism, Constitutionalism, etc.) in their white voices in a white centric way, we will have succeeded in setting the stage for massive reforms.
Each aware person needs to decide for themselves whether they will be objectively pro-white or objectively anti-white, and consider ways of talking and writing in very public ways that will attract newbies, and teach then how to talk and write. This is not tough to understand….leave the Gothic horror stories home for the insiders, and present attractive material to the outsiders about the harm done to our children by this or that event. There’s no shortage. Thin edge of the wedge, not the thick edge!
There’s a big difference between the blunt horrendous truth, on the one hand, and digestible bits of the truth, on the other hand, as ways to attract newbies even if the bits of truth do not scream and wail about the worst excesses of the Other. I know it is tough to understand, and probably tough to keep a readership when the exotic thrill of violent rhetoric keeps grandma away and titillates the regular readers.
Interestingly, on the West Coast this year attempts were made to inject our white interests into the redistricting formulas calling for the protection of communities of interest for which we are completely qualified in California, at any rate. What happened? The white activists were too busy chanting about this or that aspect of misbehavior by Others in our multi-racial (not multi-cultural) society, to actually build a case around a full propaganda effort to claim the status of a community of interest. What a lost opportunity in certain states to talk and to speak about ourselves, not the Other.
That is, the spectacle of a lot of diverse white Americans demanding recognition of white communities in the re-districting process, win or lose on the issue, would have been an obvious vehicle to introduce ourselves to our newbies.
The Catholic church refused to join the world council of churches and forbade its clergy and members from joining it on the grounds that the WCC was nothing more than a Communist front funded and run by Moscow.
The Catholics did a lot of investigation before they came to this conclusion. Just about everything the WCC ever did is proof that the Catholics were right. It was and is a communist front.
I don’t buy this at all. There isn’t any kind of supremacism to be found here; these whites are simply delusional. That’s all there is to it.
One of the things which has seemed to be effective in the past for various groups is very carefully selected instances of confrontation. If the predictable response of the opponent is such that sympathy is created for the people doing the confronting, then they’ve won. I can’t think of a better example than Birmingham when Bull Connor brought out the dogs and firehose. Basically this type of situation sums up the whole civil-wrongs movement. But the confronting party must be willing to suffer the consequences, because that’s where the power is.
If my understanding is correct there are literally thousands of people being forced into communist propaganda sessions called “sensitivity training” or some such garbage; it strikes me as an overripe field for refusal to take part, hopefully well publicized.
I sometimes hear of pro-white meetings prevented or broken up. I refer the reader to that sort of problem when Hitler was trying to build a following in Germany; his response was NOT non-violent and it gained him more converts.
I don’t want to write a bad book here but the idea is to actually DO things_the _Stimuli_study the Response for it’s positive or negative effects, and the go on accordingly.
In a general way every act against whites is an opportunity if it’s made so. The media will naturally ignore, lie, or connive however they can. But properly used even that can be turned against them. What, for instance, would a lying newspaper or tv station, do if a mob showed up on their doorstep with signs proclaiming the facts? And how would that impact their willingness to lie in the future?
There’s a line between idealism, cowardice, and stupidity.
True idealism requires enough psychic strength and discriminative power to recognize empirical facts and their pragmatic relevance to the application of ideals … for example, the statistical (if occasionally excepted) fact that blacks are intellectually and morally inferior to Whites. Anything less is cowardice or stupidity.
Obviously, it is impossible to uphold any ideal except in harmony with reality as it actually exists. True respect for “White” ideals like universal tolerance, compassion, and cooperation entails realistic recognition of the fact that they are socially sustainable only when reciprocated by their beneficiaries, something that we now empirically know to be beyond the capabilities and inclinations of the vast majority of Blacks. Those in denial of this fact are not “idealists” in any true sense of the word, but mere deluded weaklings afraid to leave the womb. Sadly, this describes the majority of modern Whites, who have too long been spared any meaningful form of genetic selection and have grown sickly as a result.
The solution? The problem may solve itself. Our fake idealists and DWL’s, being pathetically unfit to survive the trials they have already precipitated, will probably be removed from the gene pool. Though their White genes bestowed on them the puerile stirrings of an immature idealism, they remained stunted by weakness and degeneracy, and they and the world will be better off without each other. Indeed, given the hysterical reaction of the average DWL to any mention of eugenics, it is hard to believe that such people are not on some level aware of their eligibility for extinction (which, unfortunately, they project onto fitter specimens of their kind).
After all, fake idealists can be easily replaced with stronger, more intelligent, and more genuinely idealistic people … people capable of understanding and coping with two simple facts: that perfect ideals are forever at odds with an imperfect world, and that their sustained application requires the honest recognition and exclusion of defectors, be they Black, Jewish, or White.
Whether we like it or not, the culling process will soon begin with an old-fashioned round of Darwinian selection as the parasitic “elite” and their equally parasitic underclass stooges moronically finish the job of sucking us dry and bringing the world built by our ancestors down around our ears (and their own as well).
Under present circumstances, it is meaningless to talk about White “idealism” without taking all of this into account.
“The lesson I learned from this is that worse is not better. It’s always just worse.”
Not necessarily. As usual the “worse is better maxim” in the context that most WN’s use it is grossly misunderstood, twisted and distorted. Worse is definitely not better where whites are completely outnumbered and disenfranchised as in Zimbabwe and S. Africa. But a general worsening of conditions can galvanize whites to collective action when they are still the majority (albeit a shrinking one) with some measure of political influence and power.
We are seeing some evidence of this in Europe, England and America. The actions of the non-white hordes, more than anything, has served to discredit and impugn racial equality and madcap multiculturalism.
I, for one, do not desire conditions for white people to deteriorate any further but cold hard facts about racial disparities in violent crime and intelligence and pro-white polemics only go so far.
The lesson I learned from this is that worse is not better. It’s always just worse. We as a people are too abstract, idealistic, and removed from our instincts to act in our tribal interests in the same way other populations do. If anything, the more trials we experience, the more resolved we become in our folly.
I’m afraid there is a lot of truth in this. We assume that if Whites become miserable enough, they will fight back as Whites and walk away from their mistaken “ideals”. But as the author states, often misery just reinforces the determination of White liberals to struggle forward, as if the pain they are feeling is proof of their nobility!
So it is absolutely essential that the truth of race realism be transmitted to Whites. We need to reach as many as possible and inform them that the idealistic MultiCultural Utopia they are pursuing is a unicorn that simply cannot exist.
Sounds like perfect Zionazi ideology practiced by Israel against 1.5 million non-Jew natives living inside Gaza ghetto – Make them so miserable that they will dump their Islamist ruling party Hamas and Jews will have another Germany under Angela Markel right in Gaza.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/bonn-%e2%80%98how-thee-define-anti-semitism%e2%80%99/
Sounds like a Zio-Pio-Hotty-Body-Roxy-Nazi games are afoot!
I apperciate this discussion as I happened to catch this movie last night on pbs. I felt compassion for this family for the violence they had endured but also annoyance at there sense of entitlement. This movie is a reminder of the complicated layers of oppression, power, and prejudice. I truly believe there is no such thing as reverse racism but still the use of violence is always destructive.
No matter if we agree or disagree on these subjects, these discussions are essential in creating change in our world.
@REHMAT:
“Both Israel and South Africa supported the Rhodesian White government with arms and military training during the African resistance against the White rule.”
From many ex-Rhodesian military forums I gather that the military chaps were well-informed about many aspects of why Rhodesia was lost, but I yet have to meet military people on these forums who are political wise. They did not operate at a political level while in the bush. That privilege was reserved for a very few. Thus in general there are some things they do not know, and perhaps still do not know to date. That is a silence that has to be broken, out of fairness for these people.
Here is the answer:
http://www.amazon.com/Zionist-Factor-Ivor-Benson/dp/0949667994
A downloadable version exists here (German):
http://nsl-server.com/Buecher/Nach-1945/Benson,%20Ivor%20-%20Der%20zionistische%20Faktor%20-%20Der%20juedische%20Einfluss%20auf%20die%20Geschichte%20des%2020.%20Jahrhunderts%20%282000,%20272%20S.,%20Text%29.pdf
Ivor Benson was not just anybody. He was a man of some standing.
Background:
http://www.historiography-project.org/jhrchives/v13/v13n3p21_benson.html
“The new Prime Minister, Ian Smith, appointed him Deputy Minister for Information.[14] At this time, van der Byl’s chief adviser was a South African called Ivor Benson, who strongly believed in an international communist conspiracy which was plotting to overthrow white rule in Rhodesia”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._K._van_der_Byl
Extracts from the Zionist Factor (Google translation)
“An in-depth analysis of the betrayal, the leadership of the Rhodesian committed to their own country, Ivor Benson in later writings made. Mentioned here by name are four chapters Truth of his book Out of Africa (revised edition 1995)”.
Chapter 16 The Zionist Role in Rhodesia
(Benson quotes from a book by one Kosmin)
“Kosmin leaves no doubt arise that the recovery
the Rhodesian Zionist rested entirely on Prime Minister Smith…”
“One can pay to Kosmin no doubt that the overthrow of the
white rule in Rhodesia and its replacement by a
black puppet regime lined up perfectly in the long-term
Zionist strategy”.
Several high-ranking Jews in the Rhodesian government and politics are named and their incredible role in subverting white Rhodesia, and the connection with the internationalists and terror groups. The chapter describes why it was both beneficiary for the Zionist Jews to fight the terrorists (good for business & according Kosmin in the thirties the per capita donations of the Rhodesian Jews favor of the Zionist cause were the world highest) but at the same time undermine white Rhodesia (wanted to initially follow the line of a racial aware ideology and the last Christian bulwark against the internationalist who were controlled from of New York).
Also interesting – his book The Opinion Makers:
http://www.bidorbuy.co.za/item/27729996/For_the_political_history_boffin_THE_OPINION_MAKERS_by_Ivor_Benson_first_ed_1967.html
Chapter 14, Rhodesia’s TV lesson for South Africa.
There you can read who dabbled in Rhodesia’s media industry. He claims it never was in Rhodesian government hands but in the hands of leftists and liberals. He names the corporations. He mentions that he will not uncover all intricacies.
He does not mention Zionist control, but with today’s hindsight and knowing who controls Americas main stream media it leaves open many questions.
I DVR’d this but haven’t had a chance to watch yet. PBS also has an interesting documentary called “The Story of India”. The first episode last Friday dealt with the Aryans that originally invaded India 3,500 years ago. Fascinating stuff.
I can understand anyone who isn’t ‘rhodesian’ to be confused and try to explain the fraud called ‘Mugabe And The White African’ through the lense of their own racist understanding of the world.
MATWA could better have been titled “The Campbell-Freeth Gambit”, because it is all an attempt to cling onto their *12,000 hectare* estate called Mount Carmel. The ‘farm’ part may only be 3,000 hectares (under 1500 hectares), but that is typical for the non-use of land before land reform.
One of the frauds: Campbell bought ‘Mount Carmel’ from the government after independence. He didn’t, in fact he goes to some length to show that they bought this giant estate in the European Areas (whites only) from the illegal rebel government of Ian Smith, in 1974. Somehow, they don’t mention the price they paid for it after 1980, or why the new government would be interested in selling land to whites, when they (1% of the population) had already accumulated 43% of the country under colonialism and UDI.
In fact, unlike what Freeth asserts (they have been ‘told by Mugabe’ that they want the land back), the return of the land has been on the table since it was stolen, in 1891. In 1896, there was the first rebellion under spirit medium Mbuya Nhanda, to get the land back.
MATWA is a fraud, because the viewer is knowingly kept in the dark, and only hears the view of Campbell, Freeth, and (for chrissakes) their lawyers, who are legally bound to sing their praises. A bit like their servants, who get to say “Yes boss”, and “Everything will be alright boss”.
I have an extensive debunking of MATWA on my blog:
http://maravi.blogspot.com/2011/02/sticky-mrk-mugabe-and-white-african.html
Don’t be deceived by MATWA’s crass attempt to appeal to racial solidarity over the actual facts.
If we want to save our fellow whites from their fate in SA and Zimbabwe, why don’t the unmarried WN’s marry these people and bring them to the US and make them citizens? You see white men marrying Asians all the time and getting them citizenship, why not do it for a fellow white and their family? The filipinos have made a whole lifestyle by doing this, and they’re dumb, so why can’t we do something? Maybe someone needs to look into making a “dating service” for this, along the lines of the mail order bride wesbites? Just a thought….but think about it. This country needs more white immigration, those white Africans need to get out, how could it not be a great idea??