Muslims decide the French election

A theme at TOO has been that the Democrat Party has become the party of the non-White (and often anti-White) coalition, able to win elections with less than 40% of the White vote. The Democrats aggressively pursue the importation of a new people, realizing that 60-95% of non-Whites will vote for them. And, as Pat Buchanan notes in his recent article “Has the Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?,” Mexicans are not going to vote Republican, since they are part of the non-taxpaying class and benefit from the entitlement/affirmative action culture that is another pillar of the Democratic party (see also here). (Buchanan comes close to race realism on IQ in noting that educating the Mexicans is not going to work. The US  has poured trillions down the drain attempting to change the educational profile of Blacks, without success.)

While non-Whites, especially Mexicans, are the key to the looming dominance of the Democrats in the US, Muslims are becoming a critical factor in fueling the left in Europe. A report by Soeren Kern (“Muslim Voters change Europe“) shows that Muslim votes were the deciding factor propelling François Hollande into the presidency of France. The Muslim vote split 93-7 for Hollande, and their numbers were the deciding factor, since Hollande won by only 1.1. votes, and 1.7 million Muslims voted for him.

The French vote marks the first time that Muslims have determined the outcome of a presidential election in a major western European country; it is a preview of things to come.

As the politically active Muslim population in France continues to swell, and as most Muslims vote for Socialist and leftwing parties, conservative parties will find it increasingly difficult to win future elections in France.

Advertisement

In the US, the Democrats have been the party of amnesty for illegals. Hollande promised amnesty for illegals and legislation allowing Muslims to vote in local elections without being citizens. And as with Mexicans in the US, an important reason why Muslims vote for the parties of the  left is that they benefit from entitlements:

Most Muslims in Europe live in lower-income households and experience higher levels of unemployment. As a result, Socialists and Muslims are locked into a politically advantageous power-dependence relationship, between the givers of social welfare benefits and the givers of votes. Not surprisingly, Socialists favor increased Muslim immigration, which in turn produces more voters for Socialist parties.

In the US, the culture of Mexican activism is decidedly anti-White, with organizations like La Raza promoting ethnic studies programs that reflect hostility toward the traditional people and culture of America. In France,

In the ideological sphere, Socialists and Muslims generally share a mutual antipathy for traditional Judeo-Christian values. Although many Muslims oppose the secular agenda of the Socialists, most Muslims wholeheartedly support Socialist multicultural dogma, which they are leveraging to promote the Islamization of Europe.

A major difference, however, is that whereas in America, over 80% of Jews vote Democrat, Jews in France voted overwhelmingly for Sarkozy, at least partly because he was quite friendly to Israel.

Socialists and Muslims share a mutual disdain for the United States and Israel. Leftwing parties across Europe have turned anti-Zionism into a politically correct form of anti-Semitism. The increasingly hysterical anti-Israel rhetoric emanating from Socialist circles has contributed to a spike in anti-Semitic hate crimes across the continent; many of these crimes against Jews are being perpetrated by Muslims.

Indeed, Jews responded to the victory of Hollande by increasing interest in moving to Israel. However, this certainly does not indicate that Jews in France will support anti-Muslim parties of the right, such as Marine LePen’s National Front (see here). In general, Jews want a house-broken Islam in Europe that will not threaten European support for Israel and is not stridently anti-Jewish.

Kern points out that similar trends can be seen elsewhere in Europe whereby Muslims are becoming a decisive force in elections. In Denmark, the socialist Prime Minister owes his election to overwhelming support from Muslims, and in Spain, the Socialist Party has attempted to allow Muslim non-citizens from Morocco to vote.

France does not yet show the pattern of racialization so apparent in the US where the White working class is voting Republican. However,  LePen’s voters are primarily working class, so, although Hollande won the working class vote,  a similar phenomenon may be beginning to occur in France. Clearly the French socialists are not acting in the best interests of the White working class when they favor Muslim immigration.

The main point is that the left throughout the Western world has adopted a strategy of importing low-IQ immigrants who want more immigration and more public services. These parties are at the forefront of White displacement, with mainstream conservatives doing little to stem the long term trends. By not opposing immigration, they are dooming themselves to extinction.

The glimmer of hope is that the National Front and similar parties will attract enough voters to eventually begin the process of reconquista.  This process is quite a bit more difficult in the US with its strong two-party tradition, but that’s what the American Third Position is all about.

 

 

 

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

119 Comments to "Muslims decide the French election"

  1. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    June 1, 2012 - 2:47 am | Permalink

    “…Jews want a house-broken Islam in Europe that will not threaten European support for Israel and is not stridently anti-Jewish.”

    And you know this…how?

  2. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    May 27, 2012 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

    jibe, not jive

  3. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 23, 2012 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    The resettlement of Algerian Jews in France was mainly the result of Algerian independence in 1962. Algerian Jews had the French citizenship and moved to France whereas Moroccan Jews had not acquired it and therefore moved to Israel.

    That doesn’t quite jive with what I’d been relayed to by various French born offspring of Moroccan Jews sharing their respective family tales.
    According to whom once the Arab government order to hit the road came down, local Jews had to evacuate in a hurry; oftentimes carrying basic belongings only.
    Thus France simply happened to be the closest civilized destination which oughta ‘explain’ way the ‘fleeing’ North-African Jews sailed across the Med rather than eastward to the Rothschild-Outpost-in-Palestine a.k.a. Israel.
    Incidentally, 2 of those offspring later wound up in Montreal. Unlike 3rd one who moved to Manhattan, NY where he took local Chinawoman as a wife.
    (I reckon a good half of these stories are probably standard-issue Judaic fairy tales anyway.)

  4. icr's Gravatar icr
    May 22, 2012 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

    The direct approach:

  5. Sanjay's Gravatar Sanjay
    May 22, 2012 - 7:04 pm | Permalink

    @mari:

    It speaks volumes about how gullible whites are. jewish side knows what they are up to. whites dont.

  6. mari's Gravatar mari
    May 22, 2012 - 6:09 pm | Permalink

    “There are already rumblings about the two senators from California being non-Hispanic.”

    good!!!!!! I hope every White californian votes those 2 anti White women out of office. I’ll vote for any thing other than those 2 millionaire marxist genocideal Jews.

    Correction, Feinstein and her White collar criminal husband are billionaries. Richard Blum has committed more SEC etc violations than Bernie Maddoff could even imagine.

  7. Steelback's Gravatar Steelback
    May 22, 2012 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

    Hollande a Rothschild Jew replaced Sarkozy another Rothschild Jew.

    Some choice. Some election.

  8. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    May 22, 2012 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

    @ogg: If indeed you are a Muslim and conservative, considering how anti Jewish we are, we can probably accomodate you. I believe if we politically worked together but maintained our separate cultures and societies, we would scare the jews to death. There is no good reason the US must fight for Israel in the Middle East, and there is no reason that white Americans must be taught to hate Muslims, and Muslims hate us. We should make peace with the Muslims in the Middle East, and jettison the zionists.
    In return, we only ask that America stay white, and the middle East can be peaceful and Muslim.

  9. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    May 22, 2012 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: Jason, i have to say I laugh at the liberal whites running for their Democratic congressional seats against the ungrateful Mexicans they imported who know longer see the white liberals as any different from any other white – just a usurper of minority representation. There will come a time no white person can win a democrat seat anywhere – then maybe they will see what a bunch of shmucks they have been, and that we were seeing farther down the raod than they were.

  10. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    May 22, 2012 - 1:14 pm | Permalink

    @icr: I would gladly join any kind of succession movement that had a chance – I think the idea will grow in popularity among productive whites.

  11. Anty ep's Gravatar Anty ep
    May 22, 2012 - 8:47 am | Permalink

    Marxism and anarchism are rhetorically and historically close. Read m. Bakunin and it will become clear to you.

    Marxism won the support of proles because it sensibly called for worker organization. Anarchism foolishly advocates disorganization onthe mistaken belief the powerful will magically lose one day. Marx knew better. Do we? I see Cheech is again promoting one of these collapse ideas like that.

    Cheech, the rich of today understand thR possibilty of hyperinflation just as much as we do. They however are able to and do now trade their fiat riches to squire land and ownership of capital and other tangibles that will outlive any government default. So they just wont quit and die when the FRN finally goes under.

    There is no substitute for organization. Marx knew this. And it’s how Stalin whipped Trotsky. Organization is where WN fails today.

  12. Anty ep's Gravatar Anty ep
    May 22, 2012 - 8:37 am | Permalink

    Republicans do not represent working whites either. They have been gutting union privileges that have been totally beneficial to whites. They fo this to benefit their Judaeo-capitalist investment banker paymasters.

    Unfortunately the immigration rhetoric is mostly an illusion. Republicans love cheap labor even more than dems.

    Europe s parliamentary elections allowing proportional representation allow more authentic party action than the American winner take all system which is totally manipulated by our plutocracy.

  13. Anty ep's Gravatar Anty ep
    May 22, 2012 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    Chryssi Avgi is not a “zionist front.”. That is ridiculous.

  14. May 21, 2012 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

    @Rehmat:

    Can rehmet be banned? He is spreading pro-Islam, pro-Israel disinfo on this site.

    Rehmet can post on CNN or jerusalem post.

  15. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    May 21, 2012 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

    @Mark White:

    I checked out this hideous creature Cohn-Bendit on Wikipedia He is a sick parody of the certain hypocrites that Dr McDonald has written about.

    Cohn-Bendit is involved in Marxist politics, then sexual freedom politics, anarchism (how did Marxism ever subsume anarchism which is quite different) and now green-Marxist politics, the new opportunity for exploiting human anxiety.

    In 2010, he was involved in founding JCall a left wing group dedicated to supporting Israel. In Wikipedia/Jewpedia it is watered down description says it is merely a group concerned with middle eastern affairs.

    The next step in the sexual ‘deconstruction’ of Western morality was promotion of acceptance of pedophilia. It was a step to far due to the revulsion it causes but Cohn-Bendit tried nevertheless.

    “While Fischer was more concerned with demonstrations, Cohn-Bendit worked in the Karl-Marx-Buchhandlung bookshop and ran a kindergarten. In his 1975 book Le Grand Bazar, he described himself as engaging in sexual activities with very young children at the kindergarten. In 2001 Cohn-Bendit said that the account was invented for purposes of “verbal provocation”, and that “I admit that what I wrote is unacceptable nowadays” “

  16. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    May 21, 2012 - 5:01 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:@Curmudgeon: Perhaps I didn’t make myself clear about socialism. I have nothing against socialism, except that, the way it is practiced in the United States, completely screws European-Americans. I also agree with universal health care, otherwise whats the point of depending on citizens to do anything if they aren’t healthy citizens,etc. That’s where it all starts. As for the rest, I think you were misreading my message.

  17. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 21, 2012 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

    @Luke:

    Yup, it’s great, isn’t it? Thousands upon thousands of these deformed, dysfunctional, half-insane middle easterners being bred and trained to destroy us. I can’t wait to see how this century turns out.

  18. May 21, 2012 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

    US top Islamophobe and Israel-Firster David Horowitz’s website FrontPage Magazine has claimed that Francois Hollande could be “the first Muslim-elected president of France“. Why? Because while majority of 500,000 French Jews voted for Hollande’s opponent Sarkozy – a majority of seven million French Muslims voted for Hollande. Furthermore, Hollande’s Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault has appointed three Muslim members (one minister and two junior ministers) in his 34-member (17 male + 17 female) cabinet in addition to three Zionist Jew ministers.

    Elliott Abrams, a Zionist Jew and former National Security Council Advisor, who was convicted for lying to Congress – wrote in the CFR’s magazine (May 14, 2012) that Hollande will not follow “France’s tough position on the Iranian nuclear program“.

    However, the Zionist propaganda thugs were affraid to tell their paranoid Zionist Jews that in fact all major decision-making cabinet posts including the Presidency, are held by rabid Zionist Jews.

    The newly-appointed Prime Minister Jean-Marc’s inclusion of radical Zionist Jews in his cabinet indicates that former president Nicolas Sarkozy’s tough pro-Israel stand against Syria, Lebanon, Iran and Gaza will continue – at least for the time being.

    Hollande’s Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici and Interior Minister Manuel Carlos Valls – are all Israel-Firster Zionist Jews. Just before the run-up election Fabius met Netanyahu in Israel and assured him that when it comes to Israel – Hollande’s foreign policy will not be different than Sarkozy’s.

    However, Richard Prasquier (nicknamed as French Abe Foxman), President of CRIF, the representative body of Jewish organisations in France, is not excited about the new government with Muslim ministers. None of the three Muslim ministers is known to be friend of Hamas, Hizbullah, Muslim Brotherhood or Iran. Furthermore, French foreign policy is controlled by the French President and not by the cabinet ministers. The new prime minister Jean-Marc is a close ally of Hollande. However, Socialist Party leader, Martine Aubry is considered to be sympathetic towards French Muslim minority and thus “hostile to Israel” which is not the case with Hollande.

    Morocco-born, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, 34, is the youngest member of Hollande’s cabinet. She is the Minister for Women’s Affairs and will be the official spokeswoman for the Government. She claims, she don’t practice Islam and doen’t wear Hijab. However, Israel Lobby has blamed her for not supporting Sarkozy’s ban on Muslim Hijab. Hollande himself is agaist Hijab in France.

    Hollande’s Junior Veteran Affairs Minister at the Ministry of Defense, is Algiers-born Kader Arif. He is also member of EU parliament. The Israel Hasbara Committee is blaming him for being anti-Israel and pro-Hamas.

    Hollande’s Junior Minister for French Nationals Abroad at Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Yamina Benguigui, is daughter of Algerian Muslim parents. She is a French film director and married to a French-Algerian Jew. The Zionist Lobby’s problem with her is – that unlike Jewish Sarkozy, she is not against Turkey’s membership in the EU. And we all know AKP government has turned Turkey into an Islamic state, whose leader Erdogan, like Ahmadinejad, has planned to ‘wipe Israel off map’ and throw 130,000 Jewish Turks into the Sea.

  19. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    May 21, 2012 - 11:26 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    gotcha. I don’t know who will win. I hope it’s Obama though. Although I will think of what Luke said.

  20. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    May 21, 2012 - 11:24 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    A war on Iran could hurt the US terribly

  21. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    May 21, 2012 - 11:22 am | Permalink

    @Luke:

    FWIW hunting/killing animals is cultural…very prominent in the US because of its history and the big country. The psychopath early signs is about torturing animals, which is very different.

  22. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 21, 2012 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    @Luke:

    I killed things with a bb gun as a kid too, but I think what Boosh did was a bit different. I believe he put firecrackers in their mouths, and threw them in the air to watch them explode. That just seems different. Maybe it’s not really, but it just has more a feel of cruelty for it’s own sake, not as part of a sport.

    There was a kid down the street that tortured lizards. He grew up to be a druggie and died at the age of 17 of an overdose. Without his family connections, that might have closer to Boosh’s fate.

  23. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    May 21, 2012 - 10:59 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: You are right. As a kid, I remember spending hours in the summer with my BB gun, looking for birds to shoot. I didn’t really give it much thought, until I got a little older – maybe about 10 or 12. Then, one day it occurred to me how senseless it was to kill those birds for no reason other than to practice my marksmanship skills. So, I stopped doing it.

    I then started looking for wasp’s nests and shooting them with my BB gun – and I never did feel guilty about that, because there was the element of danger involved. I figured those wasps had weapons themselves, and they could fight back and sting me if I made them mad. Birds didn’t, so that wasn’t a fair fight.

    Wasps taught me to learn how to run fast, since they usually didn’t like having their nest hit with BB’s and would get after me in a hurry. I seldom got stung, but the adrenaline rush that came from the fear of being stung was very stimulating.

    At any rate, most kids who mature normally will grow out of some of the cruel stuff they might do before they learn to know better. Boosch never grew out of his cruel streak. He traded flies for killing and maiming and torturing humans, as soon as he managed to get the power to do it with impunity.

    We’re talking about a really, truly sick and mentally twisted and demonically evil individual here.

  24. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 21, 2012 - 10:53 am | Permalink

    @Luke: @Mickey Meadows:

    Yes, that is why it’s impossible to choose in a way between the two. Mickey is right about Israel having more sway, but Luke is right about Supreme Court. We still have a 2nd amendment in this country, and it is mostly due to GOP. Also, I would rather switch up the power structure as much as possible.

    I am more concerned with helping the US than hurting Israel anyway.

  25. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 21, 2012 - 10:48 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    It’s not that I want Romney to win, I just think he will. There could be real advantages to Obama winning for us (as well as problems). I’m not sure which is best. So, I’m not pro-Romney, in fact I kind of detest the guy.

  26. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    May 21, 2012 - 10:46 am | Permalink

    What makes anyone think Jewry should be scared of Muslims in ‘democratic’ countries down the track? Besides being as pointless as wondering who will attend your funeral, i imagine ‘voting rights’ won’t even be kept for illusion if ethno-Europeans are gone… and then people-power will be as useful as cockroach-power.

    Anyway, ethno-states will return naturally but only once the unnatural force is dealt with, and never before.

  27. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    May 21, 2012 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: A near certain consequence of another term of Obama is the appointment of one or two, maybe as many as three more jews to the US Supreme Court. Or, at least one more racist, virulently anti-White, Communist non-white.

    That means: Goodbye First Amendment, hello ADL Hate Speech laws. Goodbye Second Amendment, hello Civil War 2 when they try to confiscate them and wind up being resisted with deadly force.

  28. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 21, 2012 - 10:42 am | Permalink

    @Luke:

    I believe Bush blew up frogs for fun as a kid. Animal abusers are suspect (although I know kids do crazy things). I suspect tons of our politicians are borderline psychopaths. Some of this is true in any age, which is why I don’t favor too much centralized government.

  29. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    May 21, 2012 - 10:41 am | Permalink

    @fender: The American taxpayers are paying for their viagra, Brother Fender.

  30. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    May 21, 2012 - 10:40 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    If you want romney you want what israel wants.

    I want Obama to win, which happens to be what Israel does not want.

  31. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 21, 2012 - 9:59 am | Permalink

    @Marcus:

    If a Russian moves to israel I consider him or her Jewish, not Russian. I don’t care how White he or she is, biologically speaking. If you make the conscious decision to become a part of the jewish nation, you’re a jew. Also, Orthodox Jewish birthrates are skyrocketing right now.

  32. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    May 21, 2012 - 9:40 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: You are right in your analysis that Romney is considerably smarter than Jorge Wmd Boosch. However, both men exhibit clear indicators that point towards the conclusion that they are psychopaths. Romney is a bit more polished, more refined – whereas Boosch was crude and behaved like an arrogant, smirking and obnoxious oaf who seemed to have a serious case of narcissism, to go along with his psychopathy.

    Incidentally, I’m convinced that had that Iraqi fellow taken the time to smear a few inches of dog poop on that shoe that he threw at Boosh, I am certain that the extra weight would have improved his aim and he would have scored a hit to the forehead.

  33. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    May 21, 2012 - 9:28 am | Permalink

    @candida: It occurs to me, every time I see one of these white whale females pushing a shopping cart or stroller with a kinky haired mulatto mongrel inside it – that not only are black males producing thousands and thousands of illegitimate black babies that the Government forces the White man to subsidize and feed via his taxes, but thanks to these stupid White race mixing females who bed down with blacks, now the black males are producing mulatto mongrels that he refuses to take responsibility for either, and these mulatto bastards wind up being subsidized by the White man’s paycheck, as well.

    Meanwhile, healthy, stable, hard working White men and women who do want to have more children – cannot afford it, because their resources are being stolen from them and used to subsidize the irresponsible breeding habits of their parasitic racial enemies.

    Answer: A White Ethnostate. Exclusively White. Whites cannot survive if we do not get these parasites pried loose from our necks and our wallets.

  34. Gallic (with poor English skills)'s Gravatar Gallic (with poor English skills)
    May 21, 2012 - 6:04 am | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:
    “After the Arab states of North Africa and MidEast reciprocated for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine by ordering local Jews out, hordes of them (read: Tunisian; Algerian; Moroccan) had relocated not to the newly established ‘Jewish state’ of Israel but France.”

    The resettlement of Algerian Jews in France was mainly the result of Algerian independence in 1962. Algerian Jews had the French citizenship and moved to France whereas Moroccan Jews had not acquired it and therefore moved to Israel.

    “I’d like to know who was behind that lobbying campaign in Paris.”

    Algerian Jews (but not Muslims) were granted the French citizenship through the lobbying of Adolphe (Isaac-Jacob) Crémieux in 1870. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolphe_Crémieux

  35. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    May 21, 2012 - 6:03 am | Permalink

    @Gallic (with poor English skills): I disagree about the tribe hostility towards France.

    The student/social revolution of 1968 that wrecked De Gaulle government was instigated by the jewish pedophile Daniel Cohn-Bendit, still a powerful figure in the far-left.

    A holocaust survivor, Simone Veil was responsible for abortion legalization in the 1970s.

    Robert Badinter, a jewish lawyer and later politician ended the Death Penalty in 1980.

    Jews in France are about open borders and anti-racism, even if the blacks and arabs will come for their children.

  36. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 21, 2012 - 4:54 am | Permalink

    After the Arab states of North Africa and MidEast reciprocated for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine by ordering local Jews out, hordes of them (read: Tunisian; Algerian; Moroccan) had relocated not to the newly established ‘Jewish state’ of Israel but France.
    I’d like to know who was behind that lobbying campaign in Paris.
    France also bears dubious distinction for fining and/or jailing individuals who may cause the kosher ones ‘emotional anguish’ (think: John Galliano) or pose unauthorized queries regarding The Holocaust ®.

  37. May 21, 2012 - 12:29 am | Permalink

    @Dr. Faust:

    i am 1/2 white 1/2 indian. my kids 3/4 white. let us aim for a whiter world. a more peaceful, prosperous, whiter civilization.

  38. Dr. Faust's Gravatar Dr. Faust
    May 20, 2012 - 11:54 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay: As an aside, given your focus on White culture, why choose an East Indian pseudonym?

  39. Dr. Faust's Gravatar Dr. Faust
    May 20, 2012 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

    @Bear: Well said. I would only add that the pro-White left-right alliance must be made aware of the long history of organized Jewish hostility towards all outgroups, especially Whites.

  40. May 20, 2012 - 11:35 pm | Permalink

    @Marcus:

    False. Jewish fertility has risen from 1.8 to 3 children/woman.

    Arab fertility dropped from 7 to 3.5 children/woman.

    convergence. Jews are rapidly multiplying. Arabs not so fast anymore.

  41. May 20, 2012 - 11:33 pm | Permalink

    @Fenria:

    Not true. Jews at top and bottom are like a cohesive pyramid.
    The few at the bottom speaking against immigration are deceitful.

    That is the Jewish cunning. Play both sides. Talk a good game.

    But look at their actions carefully. Actions speak louder than words.

    Jews at top and bottom are all committed to destruction of whites and western peoples.

    You should stop spreading this disinfo about concerned or pious jews at the bottom.

    I have heard this canard many times before. “only jews at top are hostile”. Well how did they get to top? Were they always on top?

    No. Most Jews at top were in the bottom at some point in history. So I dont agree with this top-bottom fracture you are talking about.

    You don’t sound convincing.

    I wish Whites were the cohesive, organic peoples we desperately need.

    No left or right, conservative or liberal, Just White.

    What is good for the Whites? that is the only guiding principle we ever need.

  42. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    May 20, 2012 - 11:32 pm | Permalink

    Actually, i think there’s plenty of room for them in Israel, which has been so desperate to offset the stagnate Jewish growth rate vis-a-vis their Arab population that it has allowed many thousands of Russians who qualify as Jewish due to maybe having a Jewish great uncle.

  43. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    May 20, 2012 - 11:02 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay: No, I did not miss ANY point. I already understand jewish venom, but what you don’t understand is that there are two classes of jews; the jews at the top making decisions, and the jews at the bottom mindlessly meting out the agenda.

    The jews here at the bottom are the same ones moving out of places like Queens, Brooklyn, the Netherlands, and France in droves because of how anti semetic the top jews’ new pets are. believe me, the jews at the bottom are acutely aware of the mounting danger coming their way, and they also know that there is not nearly enough room in Israel for them all. I’ve heard them personally complain about it when they thought no one was listening. They also know that “greater Israel” is a total pipe dream, and this is why you’re starting to see the appearance of groups of jews advocating immigration control here in the US and Europe.

    Naturally, the jew hitches his wagon to our engine, and this immigration control makes absolutely no mention of the fact that jews and Israel are the exact reason why white nations are in the state they’re in today. The jew is merely covering his butt. That’s the interesting part, though. The fact that even the jews at the bottom, long the purveyors of anti white jewish agenda, are throwing up a red flag and starting to voice concerns that maybe their agenda has gone a little too far, a little too fast. When jews start complaining about non white immigration, you know you’ve got a canary in a coal mine.

  44. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    May 20, 2012 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

    The first Socialist Prime-minister of France was the Jew Leon Blum, this in 1936. There is others, Pierre Mendes-France, Rene Mayer, Michel Debre and Laurent Fabius who is now Foreign Minister of the Hollande government.

    The very jewish Dominique Strauss-Kahn could have been President by now if he had not played with his wiener in NYC.

    The tikkum olam backfired on jews faster in France because most of the third-world immigrants are uneducable blacks and arabs, thats why they switched to the “conservative” crypto-jew Sarkozy.

  45. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    May 20, 2012 - 10:07 pm | Permalink

    I’m with the ideas of Francis Parker Yockey on this. We need a left right alleigence that is pro-white so that the White vote doesn’t split because this wedge politics is the idea of the gender-ethno-marxists and acquiesed to by cheap labour crony captitalist. What does it matter if someone is pro-welfare, anti-welfare, christian, atheist, feminist, gay, libertarian so long as they are pro-White. One might even include in that pro-White non Whites who are mourning our passing.

    The traditional working class left is more damaged by immigration than anyone. Is Patrick Buchanon “left wing” because he wants tarrifs?

    We need to purge outselves of this useless left/right language. If someone wants paid maternity leave, give it to them so long as they also want immigration restriction and an end to affirmitive action.

  46. Gallic (with poor English skills)'s Gravatar Gallic (with poor English skills)
    May 20, 2012 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay: I wonder how gullible the French people really are, they don’t see through Hollande’s ethnic fraud. A DNA exam can easily prove.

    Georges Hollande, the father, was actually a supporter of Tixier-Vigancourt, a French nationalist who was widely considered “far-right”. The family of Ségolène Royal, his former “partner”, shows a similar background.

    The tribe does not manifest itself in the same way as in the USA. It is less powerful and less hostile as a whole, although it certainly does not go without problems. It also has more diverse political views. There are proportionally less Jews. They are less backward with fewer ethnically-oriented orthodox fanatics. And they are really physically threatened by Muslims, much more than the French.

    One other important reason is that the French tend to be more awaken to the peculiarity of Jews than White Americans, so they expose their tribalism more often, but calmly and without too much bitterness. As a result, a Jewish opinion is expected to be self-interested and therefore has less clout. For example, if I tell to a group of my compatriots that “Jews always seek their interest first and you must understand them that way”, this can pass almost universally if I don’t speak of the Middle East and the Holocaust, even among left-wingers. And the Jews of France know that, naturally. Actually, in a polite dialogue, you can tell it to a Jew.

    The tribe is still eerily ubiquitous in the media, though.

  47. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 20, 2012 - 8:02 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Yes, I would agree with that. The elites would very much prefer Obama to win. They feel that a rejection of Obama would mean a rejection of Multiculturalism. Of course, the elites will in fact do just fine with Romney, as I am sure you know. But their strong preference is for Obama.

    I agree, they enjoy the psychological impact on Whites, especially young Whites, of being ruled over by a black man. This is a black man that we are all commanded to respect (never has a President been so exempted from mockery by comedians). The image of a swaggering black man lording it over quiet Whites who must always speak in respectful terms to him, has the undertone of black/white prison relationship. But maybe this is what some Whites need in order to wake up.

    But they can’t get their boy Obama anywhere near 50% in the polls, and that does not bode well for them in November. If Romney wins, it will be a clear sign that race does indeed matter, since neither the conservatives nor Evangelicals really liked the guy. We can surmise that it is race that is driving them, even if they can’t admit it yet.

  48. Sanjay's Gravatar Sanjay
    May 20, 2012 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    “Jews cant destroy islam by importing Muslims into Europe”

    You are putting words in my mouth. I never said this.

    I said, Jews want to destroy Islam so they can minimize the differences between europeans and 3rd world, and push for assimilation (intermarriage) genocide.

    We must sharpen differences between europeans and 3rd world by immersing ourselves in our own Western culture, language, dance, music, customs, history, diet, habits.

  49. Multiracialism Killed Multiculturalism's Gravatar Multiracialism Killed Multiculturalism
    May 20, 2012 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    @Roger Sutherland:

    To add just a little to Sutherland’s analysis, it is important to understand that this all began with “pluralism,” a social theme introduced in the 1880s, advanced with great maliciousness, and finally successful everywhere that mattered by the mid-1950s.

    Pluralism morphed into “multiculturalism” in the 1970s and that theme in turn dominated the thinking of educators, politicians, and law-makers for the next two decades.

    In the mid-1990s, “multiracialism” arose out of multiculturalism as a political partisan notion that Sutherland discusses and may loosely be described as “my race, my political party.”

    [One good thing about all this is that we can declare with confidence that multiculturalism is dead, killed by multiracialism which is a true statement.]

    It’s important to understand who worked for disunity in America and bent all the rules that united us. However, what is done is done, and the sooner the diverse white Americans start to see themselves as a political party the better.

    The tea leaves tell us, too, that by the mid-2020s multiracialism will have morphed into an open claim for “multinationalism.” That’s going to be automatic, not something to scheme or plan for, and should make plenty of readers here very happy.

  50. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 20, 2012 - 6:32 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    A Romney win (highly unlikely, btw) wouldn’t be good for Whites, but it would be bad for non-Whites. It would symbolize the failure of Obama, who in turn symbolizes the triumph of the mulatto/dark man over the White man.

    This is precisely why Obama will win: the elites NEED him to win. The illusion must be maintained. They even said it on one of the mainstream news stations: if Romney wins, it nullifies Obama’s first term. The system will not allow this to happen.

  51. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 20, 2012 - 6:28 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay:

    The Jews can’t destroy Islam by importing Muslims into Europe, they can only destroy Europeans by doing that. Jews hate Whites more than they hate Muslims because they know that European civilization is superior to Arab civilization. That’s why they want it wrecked: every Greek temple, every German cathedral is a testament to their inferiority. That’s why they wreck nations: ressentiment.

  52. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 20, 2012 - 6:08 pm | Permalink

    @Luke:

    Yes, I wouldn’t say a Romney win is a good thing. I honestly don’t know if it is better in the long run for Whites than Obama or not. I just think it is very likely. I used to think Obama would win, but not enough Whites seem willing to support him. And in the long run, I think Whites becoming more of a block is a good thing.

    And most likely, whatever happens with Iran, the fears are overstated. The world isn’t going to erupt in WWIII. I have no idea what Romney will do in any area, because he is a politically unprincipled man from all the evidence. I don’t think he believes in anything. Well, except winning.

    And that may be an advantage of him over Jorge Boosh. I think Romney is a little smarter and more street wise. He may be less likely to get embroiled in another pointless war. But that may be wishful thinking on my part. Anyway, I’m about 90% sure he will win in November.

  53. Hedgerow's Gravatar Hedgerow
    May 20, 2012 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    The American political system, as a two-party system (due to being winner-take-all, loser-get-nothing), is different, of course, from European parliamentary systems (where small parties can potentially exercise more power). It will be interesting to watch what happens if Muslims, as their numbers grow, start forming their own political parties and can possibly play the role of kingmaker in coalition governments. Seeing what Muslims demand for their support could prove engrossing. Indigenous European women, among others, could be in for a rude shock. Another interesting potential development would be if rival Muslim sects (Sunni, Shiite, etc.) in Europe begin the practice of killing and bombing each other, as in the Middle East and elsewhere.

    In the United States, there is now the phenomenon of black-racist flash mobs, which attack and rob non-blacks. Further, Americans await the time when the Mexican drug gangs have sufficient members in the United States and feel bold enough to begin assassinating American police officers, judges, journalists, etc., as is done in Mexico. Nothing changes elite opinion in the U.S. quite like when the elite must personally experience the consequences of its own actions. These are interesting multicultural times.

  54. candida's Gravatar candida
    May 20, 2012 - 5:16 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Expelling these women will only improve your gene pool. Make sure that they don’t pop out mongrel children and force them to live outside Europe.

    I can’t imagine they are my relatives. That would be the case in that I am strongly pro- Muslim style treatment of women.

  55. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 20, 2012 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

    Black homosexual Jewess in a wheelchair sharing a political party ticket with Pakistani Wahhabi.
    Ah, the colors of British rainbow.

  56. Hedgerow's Gravatar Hedgerow
    May 20, 2012 - 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Business backers of conservative parties find cheap, immigrant labor attractive. The left sees huge numbers of poor people as a ticket to political power. The more poverty the better is the left’s calculation.

  57. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    May 20, 2012 - 3:44 pm | Permalink

    @Roger Sutherland:
    ‘The problem facing the Labour Party, which is also true of the Democrats in America, is that their promotion of identity politics is certain to backfire on them sooner or later.’
    Call it schadenfreude if you like, but if i am around when this happens i am really going to enjoy watching it. Amy Biehl on a continental scale i guess.

  58. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 20, 2012 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

    @omop:

    Fat old White women are looking for jigaboos to screw because White men don’t want to have anything to do with them, and black men will screw anything that moves (unless they can eat it).

  59. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    May 20, 2012 - 12:24 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    Does that sound like another ethnocentric group that punches above their political weight, and has corrupted the political process in those same countries and the US?

    Precisely so.

  60. May 20, 2012 - 11:47 am | Permalink

    A similar phenomenon can be observed in parts of Britain; I am thinking in particular of the recent by-election in Bradford West, a historical safe consitutency for the Labour Party. The Labour policy between 1997 and 2010 was to bring in more immigrants to establish safe voting blocs for future elections, as has been admitted by party insiders. Readers of TOO will be interested to note that the two main architects of this immigration policy – Jack Straw and Barbara Roche – are Jewish.

    Bradford West has a large Muslim population, and in every election between 1997-2010, the Labour and Conservative candidates have both been of Middle Eastern origins; between them, the vote share has always been at least 85%, with the majority going to the Labour Party. It is, in some ways, a microcosm of the Labour Party’s experiment with electoral identity politics.

    It is interesting to note, then, that in the 2012 by-election, the percentage of the Conservative vote share collapsed to single figures (their candidate was a White woman rather than an Asian man). The Labour Party fell into second place, and the victory went to Respect Party, a group of far-left international socialists at the forefront of the anti-war movement. The victorious is George Galloway, a White Muslim, and a long-time employee of Press TV, the official broadcast network of the Iranian state (which had its broadcasting licence revoked in Britain not long before this election, to my annoyance of many – myself included). He won 55% of the vote. The old centre-left vs. centre-right dichotomy has been broken, and replaced with far-left vs. centre-left!

    I should stress that this result is not representative of the nation as a whole, in part because Galloway benefited from a number of geo-temporal factors. He is a high profile household name in Britain, and he is known as a supporter of the anti-Western states in the Middle East, which undoubtedly drew a substantial number of Muslim voters to him. His party also lacks the financial means to compete with the three main parties on a national scale. Nonetheless, it is significant insofar as it symbolises a threat to the long-term electoral sustainability of the Labour Party, if the current demographic trends allow Muslim voters to become a decisive factor in general elections.

    If they want to win back the voters who’ve defected to the Respect Party, they will have no option but to take a more radical pro-Muslim line, to match the unambiguous anti-Israeli, pro-Iranian positions of the Respect Party. If they do that, they will lose their Jewish financial benefactors, and they will alienate a large number of White voters for giving too much weight to the Muslims (these voters will defect to the BNP, UKIP and the Conservatives). The fact that the Labour Party is led by Jew Ed Miliband is not likely to enamour that party to the most radical sections of the Muslim population, either.

    The problem facing the Labour Party, which is also true of the Democrats in America, is that their promotion of identity politics is certain to backfire on them sooner or later. Right now, most of the special interest groups they represent are still minorities without enough demographic power for self-determination. They have to work as part of a coalition with other minority groups and White liberals in order to attain their goals, but as their numbers increase, they will become less reliant on establishment parties. It is what Anders Breivik referred to as “demographic warfare”.

    British Muslims, for instance, will reach a point at which they can defect from the Labour Party in large numbers, and create a less compromised Muslim identity group. The pragmatic allegiance of “moderate Muslims” with Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Blacks, atheists and homosexuals is not likely to persist when one thinks of the comparative radicalism between older Muslims and the young generation. The general trend is that younger Muslims are far more sympathetic to Islamism than their elders. This tendency will continue to grow for as long as the government serves the interests of the Jewish lobby. The burgeoning conflict with Iran, which the Labour Party supports, will lead more Muslims to look elsewhere for political representation. It is just another example of the inevitable conflict that must emerge within a multicultural society.

    The White liberals promoting multiculturalism and “inter-faith dialogue” are keen to disempower their own ethnic group, but their beloved Muslims are not. If Muslims become the majority, they will work to advance their own group interests at the expense of all others.

    Do multiculturalists really believe in the long-term sustainability of a country in which Jewish transgender lesbian feminists can live next door to radical Islamists? They must know, deep down, that it can never work without major brainwashing and political repression (both of which are functions of a system which doesn’t work!).

  61. May 20, 2012 - 11:41 am | Permalink

    @Haris: The immigrant vote in Europe, Canada, and Australia works differently than in the US. Because multi-culturalism has been encouraged, the immigrant groups are under no pressure to assimilate. Within the immigrant groups, they become active within all political parties, unless that party would be of direct harm to them. In short, they play all sides against the middle to advocate for their immigrant group. Does that sound like another ethnocentric group that punches above their political weight, and has corrupted the political process in those same countries and the US?

  62. May 20, 2012 - 11:32 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: In your world, I am undoubtedly a “Leftist”, because I believe the State has a strong role to play in people’s lives. That role should be a positive non-intrusive role.
    I am opposed all of the things in your list, except socialism. I am a nationalist, first and foremost. By virtue of being a nationalist, by necessity, there are elements of socialism in my political viewpoint, for example, universal healthcare, and strong public educational systems. What is magical about an insurance company paying the physician of your choice as opposed to your government? How is the care you receive any better? If you want a successful economy, educating your young is a necessity.
    Being a nationalist requires refutation of all other things in your list, as the focus is shifted from what is good for corporations to what is good for the citizens, and by extension, corporations.
    The US Supreme Court has stated that corporations are citizens. The statement is factually and conceptually untrue. If they were citizens, they would appear on voters lists, and they don’t. If they did appear on voters lists, they someone would be casting two ballots. Is that equality before the law? What about vote fraud for voting twice?
    Get with the programme Bobby, corporatism is winning. The moneyed interests own our governments and courts. Even Mussolini would be shocked at the extent to which fascism has been corrupted.

  63. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    May 20, 2012 - 11:15 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: Brother Jason is optimistic, regarding Romney’s likelihood of beating Obama.

    The reason Is say this is because – despite the 3 and a half years we’ve had of open and in-our-faces anti-White racist venom being spewed at the White majority by Obama, Holder, Sharpton, and jews like Tim Wise and Jon Stewart, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, et al., I attended a backyard cookout just yesterday and there were two self-hating, de-racinated, programmed-for-genocide Whites there who were still gushing their praise for the non-White creature in the White House.

    Cavanagh really nailed it when he said “Gullibility is the achilles’ heal of the White Race. Any creature that cannot recognize its’ enemies for whatever reason, will not last long, regardless of average IQ score.”

    Also, consider this aspect to a Romney win. World War 3. A war against Iran in order to appease his jewish masters. Has anyone looked at the website that lists the Romney campaign team? Nearly all of the vile and despicably evil, war mongering, lying neo-cons who were attached, like disease carrying ticks to Jorge Wmd Boosch, are now attached to Mittens. That ought to tell us all something about a Romney White House.

    And, remember – WW3 will be getting thousands of Rambo-movie brainwashed, gullible and easily duped White soldiers killed, wounded, maimed for life. Which serves the jewish agenda of genociding the White European race.

    Leaving our white females as booty to hand out to blacks and other non-whites. Result: No white babies are born.

  64. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    May 20, 2012 - 10:49 am | Permalink

    @omop: White European women visiting a land of negroes for sex. AIDS abounds among the natives but these race traitors are too ignorant and shameless to care. MSNBC is as usual gloating over this disgusting display of racial depravity:

    http://now.msn.com/entertainment/0519-cannes-sex-tourism.aspx

    As for the French elections, the socialists may have won – for now. Greece is likely headed for default within weeks, if not days. A similar scenario is on the near horizon for Spain, Portugal and Italy. Restless German workers and voters will not continue to allow themselves to be robbed through taxation to support these failed Mediterranean welfare states. Beyond these, more EU welfare states will likely default. The US will not be immune. I just don’t see the sustainability of taxpayers propping up millions of parasites, native or imported, in their own countries let alone in other countries. That which cannot be propped up will collapse.

  65. omop's Gravatar omop
    May 20, 2012 - 8:28 am | Permalink

    To ALL.

    Muslims, muslims everywhere. English women, and their European cousins looking for love[!] with Muslim boys.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2146793/Graphic-film-European-women-sex-tourists-African-gigolos-cheered-Cannes.html

  66. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    May 20, 2012 - 6:53 am | Permalink

    A 2007 Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report argued that some Muslim population projections are overestimated.[30] Philip Jenkins of Penn State University estimates that by 2100, Muslims will compose about 25% of Europe’s population. Jenkins states this figure does not take account divergent birthrates amongst Europe’s immigrant Christians.[31] Other analysts are skeptical about the accuracy of the claimed Muslim population growth, stating that because many European countries do not ask a person’s religion on official forms or in censuses, it has been difficult to obtain accurate estimates, and arguing that there has been a decrease in Muslim fertility rates in Morroco, the Netherlands and Turkey.[32] A Pew Forum study, published in January 2011, forecast an increase of Muslims in European population from 6% in 2010 to 8% in 2030.[33] PEW also found that Muslim fertility rate in Europe would drop from 2.2 in 2010 to 2.0 in 2030. On the other hand, the non-Muslim fertility rate in Europe would increase from 1.5 in 2010 to 1.6 in 2030.[34]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Europe#Projections

    I don’t think there is a comparison between America and Europe. The Muslim population there is still not critical. Europe is sill very homogeneous. Critical is 20% or above.

  67. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    May 20, 2012 - 6:47 am | Permalink

    wattylersrevolt

    May 19, 2012 – 10:02 am | Permalink

    Everytime Pat Buchannan raises the IQ and race issue he opens the door wide open for a massive sidetracking away from the race-replacement issue. The IQ and race issue is irrelevant. Suppose that a massive investment of tax $$$$ did result in many more muslim ad hispanic rocket scientists..would the case against muslim and hispanic immgration be made weaker even in th slightest? No it wouldn’t.

    Pat Buchannan continues to push the immigration moratorium. The immigration moratorium concedes the labor scarcity issue to the race-replacement ethusiasts. This makes the “debate” ultimately an economic debate..when labor becomes scarce..and the real wage rises..crank up not white legal immigration again…asian variety..in the end Native Born White Americans are race-replaced.

    END QUOTE

    Good point made.

  68. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 20, 2012 - 6:13 am | Permalink

    @Gladwyn Hulderic:

    Yes, I don’t mean to suggest that “we” are going to win because the GOP wins everything, indeed far from it. Bush did everything he could to legalize 20-30 million illegal brown invaders. No, I just mean that things are not going to go as many pundits, including White Nationalists seem to think.

    Whites are likely to start voting as a block, implicitly, sooner than we thought. It will take some time for the interests of Whites to be explicitly discussed.

  69. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    May 20, 2012 - 6:12 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Maybe Zuckerberg’s wife is a chinese Esther? When the time comes, all the enemies and rivals of chinese will be executed?

  70. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    May 20, 2012 - 6:03 am | Permalink

    I guess it has to be counted as “good for us” that facebook boss Zuckerberg marries an Oriental lady.

  71. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    May 20, 2012 - 5:59 am | Permalink

    There’s an interesting article about local elections in Oslo, Norway, last december.

    Labour Party looks to slash Oslo immigrant dominance

    Excerpt:

    Leading Labour Party politicians in Oslo believe voters have too much influence in the city and are calling for changes to the country’s election laws after immigrant candidates snagged eleven of the party’s 20 seats on the City Council.

    Reminder:
    Labour Party is the party, who was blamed for immigrant policy by Breivik and whose activists he shot at Utøya.
    Ironic.

  72. Hedgerow's Gravatar Hedgerow
    May 20, 2012 - 4:59 am | Permalink

    The left hopes it can bribe Muslims, with government handouts, to stay out of social policy. The deal is for the left to deliver the handouts but for Muslims not to try to make their Muslim values into government policy. It is a high-risk strategy. When Muslims eventually become a majority, indigenous European women in particular could be in for a rude shock. Their status could drop precipitously.

  73. May 20, 2012 - 4:28 am | Permalink

    @Marcus:

    Islam is a good thing for Europeans because it sharpens differences between europeans and Asian/African muslims.

    Jew wants to destroy Whites with intermarriage so he wants to destroy Islam. It is subtle. think carefully.

  74. Gladwyn Hulderic's Gravatar Gladwyn Hulderic
    May 20, 2012 - 4:15 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    ‘We may have the Senate, House and Whitehouse under GOP control for much of the next decade.’

    The last time this happened was during the tenure of W. Bush (for four years)… illegal immigrants still came streaming across the border and Jewish Neo-cons actually INCREASED in power as a result ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Presidents_and_control_of_Congress )

    This is not something to get excited about given past history. ‘Meet the new boss, same as the old boss…’

  75. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    May 20, 2012 - 3:14 am | Permalink

    I probably move in the wrong social circles – it’s my job – but all these foreigners that you talk about mostly seem to have well paying jobs in the support services: government, nannies and health care workers. While it is all very well to pay someone $20/hr to change adult diapers unless they can invent something on their own or produce real wealth I’d be inclined to stop worrying as the future is going to be a tad different than we thought. In the meantime you might want to learn how to grow food or perhaps invest in precious metals. And while you are waiting for your crop to come in you might want to vote for A3P.

  76. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    May 20, 2012 - 1:25 am | Permalink

    @Sanjay:
    I think you are mostly right, but already some of the more farsighted among the multicult elite have started to express concerns about the latent antisemitism and ethnocentrism among both majority Catholic Hispanic and Muslim immigrants. “Red Danny” Cohn Bendit articulated this well when he said “yes to Muslim immigrants, no to Islam.” Fortunately most are too focused on destroying their host to consider the long-term consequences of a post-European world; or they just plan on moving to Israel as mentioned previously. However even the Israel option looks less attractive without a strong US to back them up against demographically stronger neighbors. Russia and China have shown little empathy for Israel to say the least, so I don’t expect them to step in to the role of host.

  77. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    May 20, 2012 - 1:01 am | Permalink

    @Sanjay: It makes one wonder where the greater Jewish community was, when Susan Sontag, could make statements like “the white race is the cancer of human history”,etc. She would have been a candidate, one would think, of a hate crime, were hate crimes invented around the time she wrote this sick comment.

  78. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    May 20, 2012 - 12:56 am | Permalink

    @wattylersrevolt: Excellent points. As much as Pat Buchanan is right on most of the time, he does get into issues that, well, are totally irrlevant to the main issue.

  79. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    May 20, 2012 - 12:41 am | Permalink

    “Leftwing parties across Europe have turned anti-Zionism into a politically correct form of anti-Semitism.” / … / “Indeed, Jews responded to the victory of Hollande by increasing interest in moving to Israel.”

    The new Hollande government has several Jewish ministers (out of 34 ministers) : Fabius (foreign affairs), Moscovici (Economy & Finances), Peillon (Education).

    Manuel Valls (interior) isn’t Jewish but I watched a video on the internet where he says: “My family is deeply connected to Vladimir Yankélévitch… Through my wife, I am connected in an eternal way to the Jewish community and to Israel”.

    Ayrault, the new prime minister is a member of the honor committee of the Léon Blum Circle.

    Presentation of the Blum Circle (abridged) :

    ** The Leon Blum Circle was formed in May 2003 by the gathering of hundreds of activists from political parties in the parliamentary left but also many organizational leaders … / We came together to fight the resurgence of the new anti-Semitism which in the past few years has been coming from part of the French left / We decided to continue the struggle we have been fighting for many years against right-wing racism and antisemitism and to extend it to those who, despite their progressive proclamations, make perverse associations and try to make the Jew into the new scapegoat of the beginning century. **

    The honor committee of the Blum Circle has 35 members, a third of them Jewish, a number of them former ministers. Besides Ayrault, five of them have become ministers of the new Hollande governement: Nicole Bricq (minister for the environment), Aurélie Filipetti (minister for culture), Bernard Cazeneuve (European affairs), as well as Moscovici and Peillon, already mentioned.

    Three ministers are former activists of largely Jewish “anti-racist” organizations: Delphine Batho and Benoît Hamon (former members of SOS Racisme), as well as George Pau-Langevin, former president of the MRAP.

    So, it isn’t exactly an anti-Jewish government. Hollande himself isn’t supposed to be Jewish, but I am suspicious of that.

    The new government also has non-Jewish non-White ministers: Kader Arif, Yamina Benguigui, Victorin Lurel, George Pau-Langevin, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, Fleur Pellerin, Christiane Taubira. (Taubira, a former French Guiana separatist and anti-White activist, is the new minister for justice.)

  80. May 20, 2012 - 12:15 am | Permalink

    @Fenria:

    You missed the whole point. Jews want to create a total mess in America and Europe with 3rd world invasion.

    They do not care if mexicans, blacks and muslims are anti-semitic. Jews want to inflict maximum damage on whites.

    jews murdered 120 million europeans and lied about 6m jews with holohaux stories. But jews are not satisfied. they want to exterminate all whites with intermarriage and cultural marxism induced childlessness.

    If things go too bad between Jews versus mexicans, blacks, muslims, they can always move to Isreal or to a safer less populated area in europe or America.

    Jews are so full of venom that unless western peoples become mongoose, there is no future for whites.

  81. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    May 19, 2012 - 11:55 pm | Permalink

    “In general, Jews want a house-broken Islam in Europe that will not threaten European support for Israel and is not stridently anti-Jewish.”

    Exactly, and this just shows the extent of jewish over reaching in that jews actually think they can maintain that delicate balancing act of importing millions of non whites into white nations in order to break the white power structure, but still have said non whites emulate all the things they love about the white power structure such as order, non violence, willingness to consume popular culture, sympathy for jewish causes, and predictability.

    The fact that jews even think they can take millions of muslims, blacks, and Mexicans and turn them all into jew friendly cosmopolitan consumers who leave their own cultures at the door and adopt the prevailing jewish popular culture is totally absurd.

    Jews: Yeah, you guys will destroy white civilization, but when we whites are stuck standing outside our own civilizations, guess who will be stuck standing there right next to us as well? Hahahaha. As you guys screw us, you doubly screw yourselves! You think these new crops of muslims and Mexicans you’re using to break Europe and the US want to hear any of your holocaust stories? Hahahaha, yeah, right. As a person who went to school with all of these various non white groups, I can assure you that the interest they place in sympathizing with jewish eternal victimhood is slim to none.

  82. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    May 19, 2012 - 11:26 pm | Permalink

    @Dr. Faust: That may be true, but there are definetly leftists, or so they identify themselves, that push or at least AGREE, with toxic policies like OPEN BORDERS, INTERNATIONALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, SOCIALISM, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, QUOTAS, AND SET ASIDES FOR ANYONE IN THE U.S. WHO ISN’T OF EUROPEAN DESCENT. So the effect of this treachury commited by some European-Americans on the so-called left, is to make it easy on those that are pulling the strings behind the scenes and who want these policies in any case.

  83. Dr. Faust's Gravatar Dr. Faust
    May 19, 2012 - 11:00 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Exactly. Organized Jewry vs humanity is the heart of the matter. Left vs Right, and even White vs non-White, is a game the Jews have designed for you. Don’t play.

  84. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 19, 2012 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus:

    It has antecedents all over Europe probably, but it was developed and nurtured in France more than anywhere else.

    @Chechar:

    I doubt there will be the kind of economic collapse WN’s need. Things may get ugly and people may become poor, but it’s clear to me that our system is based on parasitism and incompetence, and if there’s two things that the majority of humanity has in abundance….

  85. fatbelly's Gravatar fatbelly
    May 19, 2012 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

    See here…

    The Socialist Party candidate, Francois Hollande, who finished first Sunday with 28.6 percent of the vote to Sarkozy’s 27.2 percent, is expected to get a “sizeable portion of French Jewish votes” because many still vote for the Socialist candidate and they “expect him to have the same positions as Sarkozy in the foreign policy area,” Prasquier said.

    http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/international/french_jews_fears_rising

    I believe that these news reports are unreliable.

    We have no reliable information as to how the Jews voted in the French election.

  86. fatbelly's Gravatar fatbelly
    May 19, 2012 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

    Kevin,

    I truly believe that Jewish vote did not go to Sarkozy. I think some double checking is in order. On Steve Sailor’s site the article was “French Jews IN Israel” I want to know who the Jews who live in France voted for. Holland is himself a Jew (despite the fact that it is impossible to find proof of this fact), as well as all his leading party officials (not impossible.)

    I’m sorry there is no way that the French Jewish (jews who live in France, not Israel) vote went to Sarkozy.

  87. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    May 19, 2012 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

    Does this surprise you about the French? Afterall, this is a nation that has a street named after American cop killer, Mumia Abuu Jamal. Europes leftists are ensuring its future, for the leftist paradise to come.

  88. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 19, 2012 - 7:22 pm | Permalink

    I’m reminded of one particular episode from our own dreadful pantomime referred to as ‘presidential contest’, when John ‘Skull & Bones’ Kerry was “challenging” George ‘Skull & Bones’ Bush.

  89. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    May 19, 2012 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:
    Real time proof of your position: government complicity with illegal immigrants via taxes – all while both sides claim to be fighting it.

    http://conservative-daily.com/2012/05/14/tax-day-is-pay-day-for-illegal-aliens/

  90. May 19, 2012 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

    Forty years ago, George Wallace said there wasn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats. Today, there isn’t a cent’s worth of difference.
    Abandon the Left vs Right paradigm. All political parties these days will look for the message that will get them elected. After the election, they follow the dictates of those who have bought them like a cheap whore.

    In Canada, the governing Conservative Party – which uses US Republican advisors, has increased 3rd word immigration over the already ridiculous levels of the Liberals. I agree with Lombard. A bright light has to be shone on the ones who control and corrupt the political process. I would add, however, that it will also shine a light on the corrupt economic model. Capitalism and Communism are controlled by the same people. There is a difference between true free enterprise and capitalism, just as there is a difference between true socialism and communism.
    Ignore the labels and focus on the substance.

  91. May 19, 2012 - 5:23 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    One thing we need to realize is that the capitalist-socialist system we have is designed to never fail. It’s not going to decay on its own…

    Nope. The system will fall in this very decade. See the forthcoming End of the Road documentary.

  92. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 19, 2012 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Among recent candidates running for the highest office in France was a card-carrying Trotskyite. LOL
    Marine Le Pen and her camp must be perfectly aware that this new Khazar (read: Hollande) isn’t going to fix anything.
    Moreover, any deterioration in the already bad economy would only benefit Front National by expanding the pool of sympathizers be they ethnic French or immigrants from Portugal, Greece, Poland who, in fact, work for a living and are fed up with having to sustain African savages and inbreeding Mohammedans via increased taxation.

  93. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    May 19, 2012 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Existentialist philosophy has roots in German thought. It never was exclusively French. It was two French writers, Camus and Sartre, to be sure, who had the most success with it and popularized it. But, if I remember correctly, its origin was German — possibly Jewish-German?

  94. ArturoPendriago's Gravatar ArturoPendriago
    May 19, 2012 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

    If there is ever a time that we, as race realists or WNs, control the government, whether through secession or co-opting the Republican party, then we should encourage immigration from Europeans who do not want to live in a European caliphate.

  95. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 19, 2012 - 2:25 pm | Permalink

    @Marcus:

    The shit won’t hit the fan unless Europeans make it hit the fan. One thing we need to realize is that the capitalist-socialist system we have is designed to never fail. It’s not going to decay on its own, not as long as it has new waves of incoming worthless third world parasites keeping it alive.

  96. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    May 19, 2012 - 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Where are Charles Martel and Jean de la Valette when you need them? I think one positive is that immigrants are usually concentrated in large cities (not so much in the US) and therefore when SHTF they are probably going to be busy fighting each other and due to their parasitic nature they won’t be able to sustain themselves. Gradually the natives could move back in if they find the willpower somehow.

  97. ogg's Gravatar ogg
    May 19, 2012 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Muslim here. Sorry about this guys, there are some right wingers among us (not that it helps).

  98. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 19, 2012 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    The revolution will start in either central (Hungary, Romania, Austria) or southern (Greece, Italy) Europe. In my opinion, anyway.

  99. May 19, 2012 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    @Haris:

    Immigration leads to wage suppression and cultural destruction. Labor could get away with it because the people have become docile like a cattle.

    If people had short fuse and rioted at labor’s headquarters and liquidated a few MPs and Bankers, no one would have dared to bring all the 3rd world inside Britain.

  100. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    May 19, 2012 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    “This is why I wonder if MacDonald could be wrong. He thinks the revolution will start in Europe”

    I don’t know where the revolution will start, but I do feel sure that it will have to be won in America. Fights have to won where the enemy is strongest.
    Personally I don’t think it matters that much that America will go White minority in the next few years. Whites are a very powerful group when they are organized. So much so, that whenever this comes about they will be formidable and capable for restoring their rights (to their space/culture/continuity)

  101. May 19, 2012 - 12:57 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    “What’s happening here is completely natural: the weak and sickly races are being conquered by the healthy, virile races.”

    It took Will Durant more than three decades to write the monumental The Story of Civilization. After finishing the ten volumes of the Story, it followed the essay The Lessons of History, which reflects both Durant’s erudition and his accumulated wisdom. Durant wrote:

    So the first biological lesson of history is that life is competition. The second biological lesson of history is that life is selection. We are all born unfree and unequal. Nature loves difference. Inequality is not only natural and inborn, it grows with the complexity of civilization.

    The third biological lesson of history is that life must breed. Nature has no use of organisms, variations, or groups that cannot reproduce abundantly. She has a passion for quantity as prerequisite to selection of quality. She does not care that a high rate has usually accompanied a culturally low civilization, and a low birth rate a civilization culturally high; and she sees that a nation with low birth rate shall be periodically chastened by some more virile and fertile group.

    It is amusing to find Julius Caesar offering (59 B.C.) rewards to Romans who had many children, and forbidding childless women to ride litters or wear jewelry. In the United States the lower birth rate of the Anglo-Saxon has lessened their economic and political power. So the birth rate, like war, may determine the fate of theologies; just as the defeat of the Moslems at Tours (732) kept France and Spain from replacing the Bible with the Koran.

    There is no humorist like history.

    Indeed!

  102. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    May 19, 2012 - 11:57 am | Permalink

    UK, 2009.

    “The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

    He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”.

    As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.”

    Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser

  103. omop's Gravatar omop
    May 19, 2012 - 11:04 am | Permalink

    Ghandi said it best….”first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you WIN.”

    At one time the French wanted to make Islamic Algeria part of France.

    In the 21st. Century the Jews have began making the U.S. of A part of Israel…..

    http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000749587

  104. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    May 19, 2012 - 10:59 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Yes, yes the buffaloes at long last are now stampeding as a herd only still in the direction of the abyss. Small detail…

  105. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 19, 2012 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Oh yes, I didn’t mean to imply that “we” (as Whites) would have control of all three branches, in the sense they would be acting on behalf of White interests. That was inexactly stated on my part. But, this is nonetheless a major shift. Forget who Whites are voting for at the moment, what’s huge is that they are starting to vote as a block. Not as dramatically as blacks or Jews right now, but getting 70% of Whites voting for one party is no longer out of the question. And when you consider the category White includes Jews and other questionables, this makes the unity all the more striking, because the percentage among true White Gentiles is even higher.

    If this sticks, this will be a huge deal politically. It won’t happen overnight; we won’t have a national party or leader emerging that talks pro-White just yet, but as the competition heats up to when this big White block of voters over, it is bound to veer that way.

    This is why I wonder if MacDonald could be wrong. He thinks the revolution will start in Europe, but maybe it requires Whites to truly feel pushed up against a wall and on the verge of minority status, like we are headed in the US, in order to take real action. Who knows? But going forward, everyone will know, that browns, blacks and Jews vote one way, and White Gentiles vote another. I think it will have a dynamic all it’s own.

  106. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    May 19, 2012 - 10:24 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    We may have the Senate, House and White House under GOP control for much of the next decade.

    Unless race-conscious Whites stage a coup within the Republican Party, just like the Jewish neo-cons have done, and change the direction of the party, even an all-White Republican Party will not care for the demographic interests of Whites. They will care for more wars for Israel abroad and at home for open borders, amnesty for illegals, non-stop legal immigration of non-Whites and they will pander even more to the non-White vote (especially Hispanics) to “prove” that they are not racists.

    And how do you get rid of the Eric Cantors and keep the Sheldon Adelsons at bay? Nowadays “White” doesn’t mean automatically “pro-White” anymore.

  107. fender's Gravatar fender
    May 19, 2012 - 10:18 am | Permalink

    The French gave us modern liberalism, existentialism, and nihilism. To me, it’s a good thing that the most insane Whites are being bred out of existence.

    What’s happening here is completely natural: the weak and sickly races are being conquered by the healthy, virile races. If some pockets of Whites survive the third world takeover it will be the strongest, fiercest, and healthiest who do so, and it will be better for us.

    I don’t want Whites to be the most populous race, I want them to be the best race. Quality, not quantity. If it takes a few negrified European nations for us to wake up to reality, then so be it. That’s what it takes. If Whites don’t wake up and die in their leftist sleep, then it simply means we weren’t strong enough to survive in this world of perpetual conflict.

  108. wattylersrevolt's Gravatar wattylersrevolt
    May 19, 2012 - 10:02 am | Permalink

    Everytime Pat Buchannan raises the IQ and race issue he opens the door wide open for a massive sidetracking away from the race-replacement issue. The IQ and race issue is irrelevant. Suppose that a massive investment of tax $$$$ did result in many more muslim ad hispanic rocket scientists..would the case against muslim and hispanic immgration be made weaker even in th slightest? No it wouldn’t.

    Pat Buchannan continues to push the immigration moratorium. The immigration moratorium concedes the labor scarcity issue to the race-replacement ethusiasts. This makes the “debate” ultimately an economic debate..when labor becomes scarce..and the real wage rises..crank up not white legal immigration again…asian variety..in the end Native Born White Americans are race-replaced.

  109. May 19, 2012 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    “In general, Jews want a house-broken Islam in Europe that will not threaten European support for Israel and is not stridently anti-Jewish.”

    And why not, as it worked like a charm with the Christians of the USA, who are now fervently Zionist, both Catholic and Protestant.

    Shouldn’t be too hard to pull off with Islam too. All the Semitic religions are the same, just a bunch of Semitic double-talk, words that SEEM to mean one thing but can mean something else, even the opposite. Very hard for the upright but naive Nordic to grapple with. “Thou shalt not kill” for example, sounds very definite, doesn’t it?

    So, does Judaism preach world-domination by the Master Race, or universal brotherhood? Who can say? It’s whatever they need to emphasize at the moment. What is Christianity, Borgia or Savonarola?

    Now, Islam presents itself as the “completion” or “correction” of the teaching “distorted” by the previous two. Now, does that mean “we are all brothers of The Book” or “Exterminate the infidels”? Who, or at least, who of Nordic blood, can tell?

    I can’t wait to start seeing the euro-neo-cons lauding “our Judeo-Islamic heritage” and the proclamations of Islamic Zionism.

  110. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    May 19, 2012 - 9:50 am | Permalink

    @Peter:

    This is worth noting:

    “A big question is whether the Jews will be able to pacify a future Muslim elite and work closely with them as they did in medieval Spain and in the Ottoman empire. There are already signs they can do it. The Qatari royal family recently bought up London’s Olympic Village for future development in partnership with a company owned by the Ritblat family. There are plenty of other such partnerships forming across the religious divide.”

  111. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 19, 2012 - 9:48 am | Permalink

    Take heart. Yes, the long term trend, if not corrected, will be very bad for Whites. However, we have increasing evidence that politics is becoming more racial, not less. This is good – racial polarization is a good thing.

    Romney will almost certainly win in 2012, which is why Obama is panicking. The Democrats will not get nearly 40% of White vote. I’ve seen polls down around 36-37%, and that won’t be sufficient for Obama to win. Look for the White vote to veer toward 70% GOP in the coming years. We may have the Senate, House and Whitehouse under GOP control for much of the next decade.

    Of course, the other side will go ballistic (maybe literally at times). Interesting times. Just remember, as the Dems become THE brown/black party, no matter what Whites say, the Dems will lose social prestige (nobody really wants a black doctor). You see, it will be harder for Whites, including Jews (if we call them White) to be elected as Dems – blacks want black congressman, Latinos want a Latino, etc. There are already rumblings about the two senators from California being non-Hispanic.

    So, one party having tons of browns and blacks in leadership positions will turn even more Whites off, because deep down, Rev. Al Sharpton is their image of black leadership. And it’s not cool, not even to SWPLs.

  112. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    May 19, 2012 - 9:32 am | Permalink

    @Lancashire lad:
    The money for votes/communities also happened with Italians, Greeks and i suppose other groups through the 20th century (at least in Australia). Difference being that they have European heritage and quickly enough adapt.

    The other real problem with the immigration method is that it creates a crisis of conscience/hypocritical situation. Most Europeans are good hearted so why would they join a movement that has the local Paki/Hindu family fearing for their lives? They didn’t invade by force did they. So any anti-muslim/immigrant movement that isn’t naming the root-cause explicitly, is just another Breivik/Golden Dawn zio-front which hurts our interests. Why?
    Because the narrative should be J’s/Zios vs the world, not Whites vs Non-Whites… which only sends anyone that feels marginalized into the left camp.

  113. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    May 19, 2012 - 9:26 am | Permalink

    A big question is whether the Jews will be able to pacify a future Muslim elite and work closely with them as they did in medieval Spain and in the Ottoman empire. There are already signs they can do it. The Qatari royal family recently bought up London’s Olympic Village for future development in partnership with a company owned by the Ritblat family. There are plenty of other such partnerships forming across the religious divide.

  114. Gladwyn Hulderic's Gravatar Gladwyn Hulderic
    May 19, 2012 - 9:04 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    ‘And yes, Hollande is a crypto-Jew. ‘

    At first I rolled my eyes at this, but if you just type in ‘Francois Hollande’ in google the autocomplete-style search suggestions pops up ‘Francois Hollande Jewish’!!

    First Sarko… now this! Haven’t the French suffered enough?

  115. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    May 19, 2012 - 6:39 am | Permalink

    Another point that should be made on European politics is the tendency of muslim communities to influence politics by offering funding, for example providing community funding for apparently white parties in exchange for toleration of immigration, support for building mosques, etc. I don’t know of any data on this, but it’s spoken of within parties. Money and favours are the way politics works in their own societies.

  116. icr's Gravatar icr
    May 19, 2012 - 5:36 am | Permalink

    This process is quite a bit more difficult in the US with its strong two-party tradition, but that’s what the American Third Position is all about.

    I think it’s clear that nothing good will happen until the American Empire is crippled and the USA is broken up. People have plenty of gripes against the DC-Hollywood regime (which includes Wall Street) that can used to stir up sentiment in the direction of secession. Someone like Chuck Baldwin as Head of State for a new nation composed of the former states of N. Dakota, Montana and Wyoming would be a major step forward.

  117. Conor Cavanagh's Gravatar Conor Cavanagh
    May 19, 2012 - 5:30 am | Permalink

    I believe many French people have been brought up to believe in all the nonsensical dogma that has been infused into the consiousness of France since before the French Revolution. Remember that the Jews have been promoting “Liberte Fraternite agalite” as a tool to decieve the French to their peril and to the benefit of the Jews. It is the French People who were sold this line of thinking, and they bought it hook, line and sinker. For the French People to have any chance at long term survival, they would need to throw out their toxic notions of equality of all two legged, featherless bi-peds, and come back to reality. Their whole Weltanschauung is based on false premises. The situation for them looks grim indeed, especially since it is Illegal to even say that the non-White immigrants are intellectually inferior, or that they are the enemies of the French People. In Europe, they have made it a crime to tell the truth. I find it ironic that the very institutions of democratic government that were created by the White Race, are now being used as tools for their destruction. I hate to be so pessimistic, but I’ve spoken with French People and even used to have a french roommate, and they are totally clueless to the very basics of the realities of their situation. If the French people are so gullible as to welcome their own destruction, there is no way to help them. Have they learned nothing from what happened to their countrymen once they became a minority in San Domingo in modern day Haiti? If the French ever do see the light, it had better be soon. It won’t do any good to realize what’s happening after they’ve become too small a minority. I think it is wishful thinking to think that the same democratic institutions that have been used to destroy the White Countries of the world can be counted on to also save them. The global White Race has gotten itself into such a pickle that it could now only be remedied with tremendous hardship and sacrifice. I am worried about my people, but I think they are way too easy to fool and manipulate. Gullibility is the achilles’ heal of the White Race. Any creature that cannot recognize its’ enemies for whatever reason, will not last long, regardless of average IQ score. In any case, I doubt the White French will be so confounded about what’s happening to them when things really get untenable for them in fifty to one-hundred years or so from now. In the end, it is the responsibility of the French People fight for their own survival at any and all costs. I can say confidently that the White Race is now at the precipice of extinction, and it will either realize that fact and act accordingly, or else can expect to suffer the same fate as did the colonists of Rhodesia and San Domingo.

  118. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    May 19, 2012 - 4:39 am | Permalink

    The endeavour of socialists to import more non-white “proletariat” into white countries merely to win elections is perhaps the worst kind of ethnic treason ever conceivable.
    If Dante were alive today he would have reserved the lowest hell for them.
    And yes, Hollande is a crypto-Jew. There is a Jewish agenda behind this all.

    There seems to be a Hegelian dialectic in present day Jewish strategy, with as thesis the mass importation of non-Whites of whatever background (including Muslim) into all white countries, as anti-thesis the co-optation of all white countries in a global war against Islam for the sake of Israel, which threatens to contradict the importation and acceptance of Muslim immigrants in white countries and as synthesis the endeavour to steer the Islam of the immigrants into a non-anti-Jewish direction so that the white dispossession project is not jeopardized while at the same time Israel’s hegemony in the Middle East is secured.
    No, Jews are not our “allies” and a “Judeo-Christian” civilization doesn’t exist.

  119. May 19, 2012 - 3:22 am | Permalink

    Hollande is a Crypto-Jew leading the Anti-White coalition, just as Sarkozy the Jew was leading the gullible White coalition.

    I wonder how gullible the French people really are, they don’t see through Hollande’s ethnic fraud. A DNA exam can easily prove.

    Anyhow, Fiat money has made Jew lot more powerful in forcing his diktat.

    If France and America follows the Ron Paul formula of sound money (Gold standard), non-intervention, low taxes for middle class (freedom from Jew farmer), free enterprise, it will dramatically reduce Jewish power.

    And stop all Asian-Latino/African immigration (where Paul is weak) for next 100 years.

    Hopefully Marine Le Pen will be more popular in coming years.

1 Trackback to "Muslims decide the French election"

  1. on May 19, 2012 at 5:31 pm

Comments are closed.