Having grounded ourselves in the history of Russia’s Jewish Question, it is now time for us to turn our attention to the anti-Jewish riots of the 1880s. The following essay will first provide the reader with the standard narrative of these events advanced by Jewish contemporaries and the majority of Jewish historians — a narrative which has overwhelmingly prevailed in the public consciousness. The latter half of the essay will be devoted to dissecting one aspect of the Jewish narrative, and explaining how events really transpired. Other aspects of the Jewish narrative will be examined in later entries in this series. While a work like this can come in for heavy criticism from certain sections of the population who may denounce it as ‘revisionist,’ I can only say that ‘revisionism’ should be at the heart of every historical work. If we blindly accept the stories that are passed down to us, we are liable to fall victim to what amounts to little more than a glorified game of Chinese whispers. And, if we taboo the right of the historian to reinterpret history in light of new research and new discoveries, then we have become far removed from anything resembling true scholarship.
The Jewish Narrative.
In 1881 the ‘Russo-Jewish Committee,’ (RJC) an arm of Britain’s Jewish elite, mass-produced a pamphlet entitled “The Persecution of the Jews in Russia,” and began disseminating it through the press, the churches, and numerous other channels. By 1899, it was embellished and published as a short book, and today digitized copies are freely available online.[1] By the early 20th century, the pamphlet had even spawned a four-page journal called Darkest Russia – A Weekly Record of the Struggle for Freedom, ensuring that the average British citizen did not go long without being reminded of the ‘horrors’ facing Russian Jews.[2] The fact that these publications were mass produced should provide an indication as to their purpose: It is clear that these publications represented one of the most ambitious propaganda campaign in Jewish history, and combined with similar efforts in the United States, they were aimed at gaining the attention of, and ‘educating,’ the Western nations and ensuring the primacy of the ‘Jewish side of the story.’ Implicit in this was not only a desire to provoke anti-Russian attitudes, but also copious amounts of sympathy for the victimized Jews — sympathy necessary to ensure that mass Jewish chain migration to the West went on untroubled and unhindered by nativists. After all, wasn’t the bigoted nativist just a step removed from the rampaging Cossack?
The first element of the narrative advanced by the RJC is essentially a manipulation of the history of Russian-Jewish relations. It holds that the Jews of Eastern Europe have been oppressed for centuries, their whole lives “hampered, from cradle to grave, by restrictive laws.”[3] It was claimed that the Russians had an unwritten law: “That no Russian Jew shall earn a living.”[4] Russian Jews, according to the Russo-Jewish Committee, have wanted nothing more than to participate in Russian society, but have been rebuffed time and again as “heretics and aliens.” The Pale is an impenetrable fortress, where every Jew “must live and die.” Implicit in this interpretation of the history of Russian-Jewish relations in the belief that “the fount and origin of all the ills that assail Russian Jewry” has nothing to do with the Jews themselves, but everything to do with the Church, the State, and the Pale. In essence, the plight of the Jews was the result of nothing more than irrational hatred. Jews adopt a meek and passive role in this narrative, having committed no wrong-doing other than being Jews. They are also presented as the only victims of Russian violence. There is no acknowledgement of failed Russian efforts to break down the Jewish walls of exclusivity and claim the Jews as brothers. In fact, there is no reference at all to the walls of exclusivity. The pogroms themselves, according to the Jewish narrative, broke out following the assassination of Alexander II, when shock, anger and a desire for revenge brought this irrational, rootless hatred to the surface.
The second element of the Jewish narrative is that the government and petty officialdom had some role to play in organizing and directing the pogroms. Much disdain is heaped on the government, and petty officialdom, which was said to have been afflicted with “a chronic anti-Semitic outlook.” It was claimed that when the riots began, the government was “not altogether sorry to let the excitement of the people vent itself on the Jews.”[5] In reference to the restrictive May Laws, the authors were forced to concede they had never really been enforced, but maintained that “whether moderately or rigorously applied, the May Laws still remained on the Russian Statute Book.”[6]
The third element of the Jewish narrative is that the pogroms were genocidal, and that they had been organized and perpetrated by groups seeking the extermination of the Jews. The 1899 edition of “The Persecution of the Jews in Russia” included a copy of a lengthy letter written to the London Times by Nathan Joseph, Secretary of the RJC, dated November 5th, 1890. In the letter, Joseph claimed that in the present circumstances “hundreds of thousands could be exterminated,”[7] and that Russian legislation in relation to Jews represented “an instrument of torture and persecution.” In sum, the Jews of Russia were claimed to be living under “a sentence of death,” and it was further claimed that “the executions are proceeding.” The letter ends with an appeal to “Civilized Europe” to intervene, chastise Russia, and aid the victimized Jews.[8]
The fourth key element of the Jewish narrative is that the pogroms were extremely violent in nature. Contemporary media reports especially were the source of most of the atrocity stories, reportedly gleaned from newly-arrived ‘refugees’ who had given statements to the Russo-Jewish Committee about the pogroms they had fled. In these reports, which were carried very regularly by both the New York Times and the London Times, Russians were charged with having committed the most fiendish atrocities on the most enormous scale. Every Jew in the Russian Empire was under threat. Men had been ruthlessly murdered, tender infants had been dashed on the stones or roasted alive in their own homes. During a British parliamentary consultation on the pogroms in 1905, a Rabbi Michelson claimed that “the atrocities had been so fiendish that they could find no parallel even in the most barbarous annals of the most barbarous peoples.”[9] The New York Times reported that during the 1903 Kishinev pogrom “babes were literally torn to pieces by the frenzied and bloodthirsty mob.”[10]
A common theme in most contemporary atrocity stories was the brutal rape of Jewish women, with most reports including mention of breasts being hacked off. There are literally thousands of carbon-copy reports in which it is claimed that mothers were raped alongside their daughters. There is simply not enough space to cite extensively from these articles, but they number in their thousands and are available to anyone with access to the digitized archives of any major newspaper, or the microfilm facilities at major libraries. In addition, these articles claim that whole streets inhabited by Jews had been razed, and the Jewish quarters of towns had been systematically fired.
The ‘atrocity’ aspect of the narrative has continued to be advanced by Jewish historians. For example Anita Shapira, in her Stanford-published, Land and Power: The Zionist Resort to Force, 1881-1948, claims that “each series of new riots was worse than the one preceding, as if every bloodbath provided a permit for an even worse massacre.”[11] Shapira further hints that the murder of Jewish babies was common during the pogroms, stating that a common worry of Russian Jews was “Will they take pity on the small babies, who do not even know yet that they are Jews?”[12] She concludes one particular section on pogrom violence by stating, without referencing any evidence, that there were “numerous acts of rape,” and that “many were massacred — men, women, and children. The cruelty that marked these killings added a special dimension to the feeling of terror and shock that spread in their wake.”[13] Joseph Brandes, in his 2009 Immigrants to Freedom alleges, without citing evidence, that mobs “threw women and children out of the windows” of their homes, and that “heads were battered with hammers, nails were driven into bodies, eyes were gouged out … and petroleum was poured over the sick found hiding in cellars and they were burned to death.”[14]
Another crucial element to the Jewish narrative is that Russia is barbaric, ignorant, and uncivilized compared to the Jewish citizens of the country. Russia is said to be lingering in the “medieval stage of development,”[15] and in comparison to the “ignorant and superstitious peasantry,”[16] Russia’s Jews are presented as an outpost of Western civilization — they are urban, and “intellectual.” The RJC publication argued that university quotas allowing 5% of the student body to be made up of Jews were insufficient for “an intellectual race.” Astonishingly, it is claimed that “the root of the whole matter is racial arrogance,”[17] though this arrogance of course is said to emanate from the Russians.
The RJC charged the government with criminal sympathy, the local authorities generally with criminal inaction, and some of the troops with active participation. The situation, they argued, was simply so hopeless and the possibility of extermination was so great, that the only way out was for the civilized nations of the West to throw open their doors and let in these poor ‘Hebrews’.
And to a great extent this is exactly what the churches, the politicians, and the media agreed to. This capitulation to manipulated conscience ushered in the greatest migration in Jewish history, with profound consequences for us all. But there was just one small problem — the vast majority of this narrative was a calculated, designed, and expertly promoted fraud, furthered by the willing participation of Russian-Jewish emigrants who wished to ease their own access to the West and obtain “relief money from Western Europe and America.”[18]
The ‘Atrocities’
Let us first turn our attention to the atrocity stories. Prior to any major reports of violence, the British public was already being primed to hate the Russian government and accept the Jewish narrative. John Doyle Klier points out that the Daily Telegraph was at that time Jewish-owned, and was particularly “severe” in its reports on Russian treatment of Jews prior to 1881.[19] In the pages of this publication, it was stated that “these Russian atrocities are only the beginning. … [T]he Russian officials themselves countenance these barbarities.”[20] Around this time in Continental Europe, Prussian Rabbi Yizhak Rülf established himself as an “intermediary” between Eastern Jewry and the West, and, according to Klier, one of his specialities was the spreading of “sensationalized accounts of mass rape.”[21]
Other major sources of pogrom atrocity stories were the New York Times, the London Times, and the Jewish World. It would be the Jewish World which furnished the majority of these tales, having sent a reporter “to visit areas that had suffered pogroms.”[22] Most of the other papers simply reprinted what the Jewish World reporter sent them. The atrocity stories carried by these newspapers provoked global outrage. There were large-scale public protests against Russia in Paris, Brussels, London, Vienna, and even in Melbourne, Australia. However, “it was in the United States that public indignation reached its height.” Historian Edward Judge states that the American public was spurred on by reports of “brutal beatings, multiple rapes, dismemberment of corpses, senseless slaughter, painful suffering and unbearable grief.”[23]
However, as John Klier states, the reports of the Jewish World’s “Special Correspondent,” “raise intriguing problems for the historian.”[24] While his itinerary of travel is described as “plausible,” most of his accounts are “flatly contradicted by the archival record.”[25] His claim that twenty rioters were killed during a pogrom in Kishinev in 1881 has been proven to be a fabrication by records which show that in that city, at that time, “there were no significant pogroms and no fatalities.”[26] Other claims that he witnessed shootings of peasants on his travels have been entirely discredited due to the vast number of minor inaccuracies in those accounts.
Furthermore, Klier states that the atrocity stories compiled by the Jewish World correspondent, which went on to be so influential in manipulating Western perceptions of the events, must be treated with “extreme caution.”[27] The reporter “portrayed the pogroms dramatically, as great in scale and inhuman in their brutality. He reported numerous accounts where Jews were burned alive in their homes while the authorities looked on.”[28] There are hundreds of instances where he references the murder of children, the mutilation of women, and the biting off of fingers.
Klier states that “the author’s most influential accounts, given their effect on world opinion, were his accounts of the rape and torture of girls as young as ten or twelve.”[29] In 1881 he reported 25 rapes in Kiev, of which five were said to have resulted in fatalities, in Odessa he claimed 11, and in Elizavetgrad he claimed 30.[30] Rape featured prominently in the reports, not because rapes were common, but because rape “even more than murder and looting” was known to “generate particular outrage abroad.” Klier states that “Jewish intermediaries who were channelling pogrom reports abroad were well aware of the impact of reports of rape, and it featured prominently in their accounts.”[31] The two most dramatic and gruesome accounts came from Berezovka and Borispol. In fact, as the year neared its end, the reports became more and more gruesome and brutal in the details they conveyed.
There is, of course, a reason for this. As the non-Jewish public began to tire of the reports and switched their minds to the coming Christmas festivities, Klier states that records show the RJC made a conscious and calculated decision to “keep Russian Jewry before the eyes of the public.”[32] A key component of this strategy was to take the accounts of the Special Correspondent and publish them in a more widely circulated and respected newspaper. They settled on the London Times, which was already predisposed to “critical editorial faulting of the Russian government.” Klier further states that these evidently false reports “garnished with the prestige of The Times and devoid of any attribution, subsequently published as a separate pamphlet, and translated into a variety of European languages … became the definitive Western version of the pogroms.”[33]
As increasingly lurid atrocity tales again captured the attention of the Gentile public, the British Government found itself under pressure to intervene. The British Government, however, adopted a more cautious approach and undertook its own independent investigations into events in the Russian Empire. Its findings, published as a “Blue Book,” “presented an account of events at great variance with that offered by The Times.”[34] The most notable aspect of the independent inquiry is the outright denial of mass rape. In January 1882, Consul-General Stanley objected to all of the details contained within reports published by The Times, mentioning in particular the unfounded “accounts of the violation of women.”[35] He further stated that his own investigations revealed that there had been no incidences of rape during the Berezovka pogrom, that violence was rare, and that much of the disturbance was restricted to property damage. In relation to property damage in Odessa, Stanley estimated it to be around 20,000 rubles, and rejected outright the Jewish claim that damage amounted to over one million rubles.
Vice-Consul Law, another independent investigator, reported that he had visited Kiev and Odessa, and could only conclude that “I should be disinclined to believe in any stories of women having been outraged in those towns.”[36] Another investigator, Colonel Francis Maude, visited Warsaw and said that he could “not attach any importance” to atrocity reports emanating from that city.[37] At Elizavetgrad, instead of whole streets being razed to the ground, it was discovered that a small hut had lost its roof. It was further discovered that very few Jews, if any, had been intentionally killed, though some died of injuries received in the riots. These were mainly the result of conflicts between groups of Jews who defended their taverns and rioters seeking alcohol. The small number of Jews who had been intentionally killed had fallen victim to unstable individuals who had been drunk on Jewish liquor — accusations of murderous intent among the masses were simply unfounded and unsubstantiated by the evidence.
When these reports were made public, states Klier, they represented “a serious setback for the protest and aid activities of the RJC.”[38] The Times was forced to backtrack, but responded spitefully (and bizarrely) by stating that the indignation of the country was still justified even if the atrocities were “the creations of popular fancy.”[39] (Reminiscent of the JewishGen response to Ukrainian discoveries mentioned in Part 1 of this series?!)
The revelations came at a bad time for the RJC, which was at that time attempting to move the British Government to “act in some way on behalf of persecuted Russian Jewry.”[40] It resorted to republishing (in the Times) its pamphlet on persecution in Russia twice in one month, presumably in the belief that blunt repetition would suffice to overcome tangible evidence. Klier states that the pieces were examples of “masterful” propaganda, as they attempted to undermine the credibility of the Government consuls, while sycophantically appealing to “the wise and noble people of England,” who “will know what weight should be attached to such denials and refutations.”[41] The RJC offered its own “corroborative evidence of the most undeniable kind,” though of course the exact source of this evidence was not specified beyond “persons occupying high official positions in the Jewish community” and “Jewish refugees.”
In essence, the people of western nations were being asked to trust an anonymous Rabbi on the other side of the world rather than identifiable representatives of their own government. The pieces, states Klier, “painted the familiar picture of murder and rape,” and despite the debunking statements of the consuls, “a number of mother/daughter rapes, which had already done so much to outrage British public opinion, were again repeated.”[42] Although the move for British government intervention failed, in the battle for public opinion “the RJC clearly won the day,” and the Times and the RJC remained good bedfellows.
The Consuls were outraged. Stanley reiterated the fact that his intensive investigations, which he carried out at great personal cost with a serious leg injury, illustrated that “The Times’ accounts of what took place at each of those places contains the greatest exaggerations, and that the account of what took place at some of those places is absolutely untrue.”[43] He related the fact that a Rabbi in Odessa had “not heard of any outrages on women there,” and that the object of almost every pogrom he had investigated was simple “plunder.”[44] Enraged by the lies circulating in Britain and America, Stanley “went right to the top,” interviewing state rabbis and asking for evidence and touring pogrom sites. In Odessa, where a wealth of atrocity stories had originated, he was able to confirm “one death, but no looting of synagogues or victims set alight.” There was no evidence that a single rape had taken place. One state Rabbi admitted that he had not heard of any outrages of women in Berezovka and further assured Stanley that he “could with a clear conscience positively deny that any deaths or any violations had occurred there during the disturbances of last year.”[45] He again sent this report to his superior in London, with a note saying “This is in accordance with all the information I have received and forwarded to your Lordship, and which I think more credible than anonymous letters in The Times.”[46]
Despite Stanley’s best efforts the Jewish narrative advanced by the RJC, imbued with atrocity tales, has remained unalterably attached in Western perceptions of the pogroms. The Blue Book was smothered by the more visible, and oft-repeated, tales of the RJC and organisations like it around the globe. Only with the decade-long research of John Klier has some revision of this narrative, grounded in scholarship and archival evidence, been possible. In light of this evidence, one can only conclude that stories of rape, murder and mutilation were “more legendary than factual.”[47] However, the task remains to further dismantle and analyse other aspects of the Jewish narrative, and to seek the true motives behind its creation.
[1] http://archive.org/stream/persecutionofjew00russ
[2] Max Beloff, The Intellectual in Politics: And other essays, (London: Taylor and Francis, 1970) p.135
[3] The Persecution of the Jews in Russia, (London: Russo-Jewish Committee, 1899), p.3.
[4] Ibid, p.4
[5] The Persecution of the Jews in Russia, (London: Russo-Jewish Committee, 1899), p.5
[6] Ibid, p.8
[7] Ibid, p.36
[8] Ibid, p.38.
[9] Anthony Heywood, The Russian Revolution of 1905: Centenary Perspectives (New York: Routledge, 2005) p.266.
[10] “Jewish Massacre Denounced,” New York Times, April 28, 1903, p.6
[11] Anita Shapira, Land and Power: The Zionist Resort to Force, 1881-1948 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999), p.35
[12] Ibid, p.34.
[13] Ibid.
[14] Joseph Brandes, Immigrants to Freedom, (New York: Xlibris, 2009) p.171
[15] The Persecution of the Jews in Russia, (London: Russo-Jewish Committee, 1899), p.4
[16] The Persecution of the Jews in Russia, (London: Russo-Jewish Committee, 1899), p.30
[17] Ibid.
[18] Albert Lindemann, Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997) p.291.
[19] John Doyle Klier, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82, p.399
[20] Ibid.
[21] Ibid.
[22] Ibid, p.400
[23] Edward Judge, Easter in Kishinev: Anatomy of a Pogrom (New York: New York University Press, 1993) p.89.
[24] John Doyle Klier, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82, p.400
[25] Ibid, p.401
[26] Ibid
[27] Ibid.
[28] Ibid.
[29] Ibid.
[30] Ibid.
[31] Ibid, p.12
[32] Ibid, p.404
[33] Ibid.
[34] Ibid, p.405. (Correspondence Respecting the Treatment of Jews in Russia, Nos. 1 and 2, 1882, 1883)
[35] John Doyle Klier, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82, p.405
[36] Ibid.
[37] Ibid.
[38] Ibid, p.405.
[39] Ibid.
[40] Ibid.
[41] Ibid, p.406.
[42] Ibid.
[43] John Doyle Klier, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82, p.407.
[44] John Doyle Klier, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82, p.408.
[45] Ibid.
[46] Ibid.
[47] Ibid, p.13.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
This is interesting. LINK below from Wikipedia:
Excerpt:
Forced conversions in Jewish history: are reported to have happened under the Hasmonean Empire. The Gentile Galileans, Samaritans and Idumaens were forced to convert to Judaism, (either by threats of exile, or threats of death, depending on the source.) For the forced conversion of the Idumaeans under John Hyrcanus, see Flavius Josephus Antiquities 13.257-258. For the forced conversion of the Ituraeans under Aristobulus, see Flavius Josephus Antiquities 13.319. In Eusebíus, Christianity, and Judaism Harold W. Attridge says that “there is reason to think that Josephus’ account of their conversion is substantially accurate.” He also writes, “That these were not isolated instances but that forced conversion was a national policy is clear from the fact that Alexander Jannaeus (ca 80 BCE) demolished the city of Pella in Moab, “because the inhabitants would not agree to adopt the national custom of the Jews.” Josephus, Antiquities. 13.15.4, 397[11]
Maurice Sartre has written of the “policy of forced Judaization adopted by Hyrcanos, Aristobulus I and Jannaeus”, who offered “the conquered peoples a choice between expulsion or conversion,”[12]
And in ‘The early Roman period, Volume 2′, William David Davies has written that. “The evidence is best explained by postulating that an existing small Jewish population in Lower Galilee was massively expanded by the forced conversion in c.104 BCE of their Gentile neighbours in the north.”[13]
More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
ReporterNotebook@gmail.com
This is one of the critical facilities of this sight . : The following essay will first provide the reader with the standard narrative of these events advanced by Jewish contemporaries and the majority of Jewish historians — a narrative which has overwhelmingly prevailed in the PUBLIC CONSCIOUSNESS.
It would seem that our ‘leaders’ don’t care whether there children have to look at the ground in shame whenever Jews wheel out the Holyhoax and then make another demand .Whipping themselves into a righteous ,aggressive, vindictive lather over so many phoney claims of victimhood .Not only do we know on TOO that their claims are mostly phoney but that on closer examination we find that they are infact the inverse of the truth ! Brainwashing Duplicity .
Thanks again for this article , may the gods protect you!
@Free Thinker:
Jews are masters of total inversion of the truth. After reading this Part-2 there are real doubts whether 6 million really died.
The Jews murdered 120 million White European Christians from 1914 to 1945. The greatest mass murder in Human history.
Denying the genocide of 120 million and manufacturing the stories of 6 million sounds like the real inversion of the truth.
This article struck a resonant chord with me – gilding the lily seems irresistible for Jewish historians, not to mention the overt propagandists.
Those unfamiliar with the signature hyperbole could do worse than reading Heddesheimer’s The First Holocaust>
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/tfh/
As the commenter “Bear” noted, much Jewish power is drawn from the pool of sympathy for their putative suffering at the hands of Gentiles; nothing could be more explosive than the erstwhile sympathizer realizing his emotional manipulation.
To be an honest historian is one of the riskiest professions imaginable, Dariusz Ratajczak a case in point. I thank Andrew Joyce for his contribution.
“The New York Times reported that during the 1903 Kishinev pogrom “babes were literally torn to pieces by the frenzied and bloodthirsty mob.”
Probably it is about “babies”.
Kishinev was virtually flooded with jews by the Tsarist Empire, using the jews against the local Romanian population. At 1900 it was 43% jewish. During some revolts of the Romanian peasants (1903 and 1905) against the shameless exploitation of the jews, the tsarist police opened fire. The British envoys considered that some more Romanian blood not that important to be mentioned. So much of a pogrom as a state sponsored rebellion.
In my opinion, after 1800 the Tars used the jewish population against the original populations of its newly acquired western territories. No matter the historical period or the part of the world the jews formed alliances with the elites national (the Polish case – no pun intended) or imperial (the Tsarist case but also the Polish case against the Ukrainian peasants) against some occupied peoples. The alliance is broken when considered fit, usually by the jews (when somebody starts talking about backstabbing). The real victims are depicted as criminals and the real criminals as saints (jews or gentiles).
Interesting is that the same account – killed babies – is given the other way around after 17 July 1941 (the day when the Romanian and Germans troops liberated Kishinev from the soviet occupation).
A German-Romanian commission described the killings of a number of babies, smashed by the walls or thrown through the windows of the Children’s Hospital of Kishinev by the local jews and NKVD officers during the soviet occupation of Besserabia between June 26, 1940 and July 26, 1941. This kind of imagines “smash the head of the children against the stone” are coming from OT. Really old but permeates the jewish imagination.
In fact the number of anti-Romanian atrocities committed by soviets (jews or not is almost unbearable to count).
Katyn but also Finatana Alba, Tiganca, Kishinev etc.
In fact the jews were conditioning themselves against the autochtonous populations inventing horror stories only to make them real at the opportune moment. After more than 100 years we are still debating how real those “pogroms” were. Not what the heck were the jews doing at Kishinev or how many Romanian peasants died under the Russian bullets during the Kishinev pogroms).
As a matter of fact I have nothing with the Russians for that – frankly the same has happened in Romania in 1907 during another peasant revolt directed to the same jewish exploiters.
How much it had to do with British Empire diplomatic pressure is another good subject.
A fascinating and revealing article Mr Joyce. What you have provided have here is the missing first chapter in conventional accounts of the Bolshevik Revolution. The Jewish supremacist attitudes you have identified as being mainstream among the leading Jews of the time (including an utter contempt for the Russian people) was ultimately THE prime motivation for the Judeo-Bolshevik mass-murder of millions of Russians and other eastern Europeans after 1917. I very much look forward to Part 3.
@Brenton Sanderson: As someone who greatly enjoys and respects your work, I take particular pleasure in your positive comments on this piece.
Thankyou.
Mr Joyce:
Thank you for your reply to my comment under Part 1 in which I cautioned against employing the term “pogrom” without qualification because the term already signifies certain “facts” and a certain narrative that you are apparently arguing is to an extent false. Employing the term without qualification to some degree implicitly affirms that narrative.
I suggest, or had suggested in that comment, instead using terms such as “rebellion” or “uprising,” or setting the term “pogrom” off in quotes, or with the phrase “so-called.” I believe it may be worth reposting these thoughts again here so that other readers may consider the issue. I plan to read your Part 3 as you suggest.
I also have concerns with your description of these events as “anti-Jewish riots.” The term “riots” tends to connote an animalistic violence, an irrationality, a people given over to excess, a vulgarity. Such an image is part of the Judaic caricature of the European-derived peoples. The reasons you gave me to defend your use of “pogrom” would not seem to apply to “riots.” Again, compare the difference in images created by the terms riots versus rebellion or uprisings or protests or demonstrations.
One should also be careful with the phrase “anti-Jewish” as it can imply a racist irrational hatred of Jews rather than a reaction against Jewish exploitation or aggression.
@Anonymous: Thankyou again for your comment. I am in total agreement with you – I think you will find part three to address your concerns in their entirety.
When Jews control our communications system, mass media, they are our Masters. If we could get back the control our own communications system, particularly the television networks, we are our own Masters.
The purpose of a communications system is to provide information, knowledge and guidance. Being our own masters is the ultimate in power and freedom. With media under the guidance of intelligent white men every individual would be his own master and free to become all that he was meant to be. The world would be a very different place.
Stories of oppression against Jews in Eastern Europe in the interwar period (1910s, 20s) were met with great skepticism by the U.S. State Department and were seen as propaganda. It amazes to read the following history relating that issue, which history includes accounts of behind-the-scenes machinations by two Jewish U.S. Supreme Court Justices to lobby for Zionism:
“Probably no tactic employed by the Zionists caused greater resentment than their efforts directly to intimidate the State Department and its staff. One such effort serves to demonstrate the Zionist technique. It was a highly effective tactic, and continues to be, and it goes far in explaining why the professionals at the State Department and successive secretaries of state harbored various degrees of animosity towards the Zionists.
“The case involved an urbane and highly successful diplomat, Hugh Gibson. At the age of 36 in 1919 he was the newly installed ambassador to Poland, or to use the grandiose title of the day, the envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary. Post-war Poland was home to one of the largest and least assimilated Jewish communities in Europe and their troubles were trumpeted by the Zionists as an example of ruthless anti-Semitism. In fact, anti-Semitic incidents were common, but not as common in Gibson’s view as claimed by American Zionists. To his mother he wrote: “These yarns are exclusively of foreign manufacture for anti-Polish purposes.”
“Gibson’s skeptical reports to the State Department about the troubles of Polish Jews came to the attention of Brandeis. On 24 June 1919, Gibson was called by Colonel House to a meeting with the fabled justice and his protégé, Felix Frankfurter. Gibson not only was at a disadvantage because of Brandeis exalted status but also because his appointment as ambassador to Poland had yet to be confirmed by the Senate.
“In Gibson’s words, the two Zionists opened what the young diplomat later called the “prosecution” by saying that
“I had done more mischief to the Jewish race than anyone who had lived in the last century. They said…that my reports on the Jewish question had gone around the world and had undone their work….They finally said that I had stated that the stories of excesses against the Jews were exaggerated, to which I replied that they certainly were and I should think any Jew would be glad to know it.
“Frankfurter claimed that Gibson “had no right to make reports to the department in regard to Jewish matters and should have ‘refused’ on the ground that I could not possibly learn enough about them to make even general observations.” Frankfurter then hinted that if Gibson continued his reports that Zionists would block his confirmation as ambassador to Poland by the Senate.
“Gibson was so furious by the confrontation that he wrote a twenty-one page letter about it to his friends in the State Department, including Frankfurter’s claim that Gibson should not report on Jews. Nothing is more disconcerting or insulting to a diplomat than to have his reporting questioned, much less to be advised that he had no “right” to report on certain matters. Reporting is the secret heart of the diplomat’s art, a talent especially valued in Washington where officials in those pre-television days depended on it as their window to the world beyond.
Frankfurter could hardly have raised a more sensitive question or one more certain to raise the hackles of diplomats. Gibson went further in his letter than just describe his encounter. He also shared his suspicions of what the Zionists were trying to accomplish-a conscienceless and cold-blooded plan to make the condition of the Jews in Poland so bad that they must turn to Zionism for relief.” The State Department in those days was a far more closed and clubby establishment of upper class scions than after 1945. This attack on one of its own was highly resented. A rising star of the foreign service had been humiliated and threatened by a justice of the Supreme Court acting as a spokesperson for a narrow Jewish group not even accepted by most Jews. Rancor was particularly strong in the Warsaw embassy, where it lingered for years. In 1923, Vice Consul Monroe H. Kline reported: “It is common knowledge that this race of people [Jews] are continually and constantly spreading propaganda, through their agencies over the entire world, of political and religious persecution.” He added: “The Jew in business oppresses the Pole to a far greater extent than does the Pole oppress the Jew in a political way.” ”
Source:
Fallen Pillars: U.S. Policy towards Palestine and Israel since 1945
By Donald Neff
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/fallenpillars.htm
Thank you for this article. Even after all the reading I have done, I still have trouble taking the scope of the deceptions in. How will we ever persuade the larger public?
@Michael Santomauro:
That was certainly an interesting first comment. I’m glad to read that the Hasmonean Empire was included, when it comes to forced conversions. There’s a switch.
But wiki goes on to say: ‘The Gentile Galileans, Samaritans and Idumaens were forced to convert to Judaism.’ Wouldn’t that be incorrect? There were no ‘Gentiles’ back in the BCE, if ‘Gentiles’ means ‘followers of Jesus’.
I always thought the names John Hyrcanos, Aristobulus I and Jannaeus were Greeks, but it turns out they were the Hasmonean kings of that dynasty. I wonder if the origins of the two-face Janus is derived in any way from the name Alexander Jannaeus?
Going on to Andrew Joyce’s article, it was very insightful into the machinations of the use of newspapers in drumming up public opinion, and keeping it going. I don’t know why the British Government’s Blue Book wasn’t more publicized. Where it forced the Times to backtrack, that seemed like a good start. Too bad the pressure wasn’t kept up. The Jews wouldn’t have had a leg to stand on.
@blue rose:
Blue Rose blundering again! (sigh) :
1) The word “Gentiles” ( Hebrew : Goyim) simply means non-Jews. Even after the foundation of Christianity the term never was exclusively used for Christians. Christians are called Notzrim (“Nazarenes”) in Hebrew.
2) The Hasmonean dynasty was originally established to fight hellenization of the Jews. Ironically all the Hasmonean kings adopted Greek names.
3) The two-faced Janus was a Roman god of doorways, beginnings and transitions. He was also the god of the new year, hence his two faces, one directed at the old, and one at the new year. The name of the month January (ianuarius) is derived from him, as is the word “janitor”(ianitor) since he was also the god of doorways.
It goes without saying that the name of this ancient Roman god is not derived from the name of a little Jewish king at the other side of the Mediterranean!
Well, so much for this time. Up to the next blunder.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
*sigh* Yes, I know. Well sorry Franklin. I’m not a Ph.D. in ancient history. So things get jumbled up.
As it was I had about 15 web windows opened up today, following all the leads from the three Hasmoneans, which led through the Idumaeans, the Itureans, and Samaritans, who were all groups forced to convert to Judaism via the Hasmonean kings, which led me to an interesting tidbit about the Hellenized Jews elsewhere, which might be of interest (or not):
“The Hellenization of the Jews began inconspicuously. First it infected their language, manners and customs and eventually encroached on their morals, ethics and religion. Greek games were popular and nude wrestling commonplace among Jewish youths. I Maccabees tells us, “They built a sports-stadium in the gentile style in Jerusalem.” It was during this period, that the Torah was translated into Greek.”
With a quick gander at one of those academic on-line books I happened upon, which might actually be of interest to the academics here:
The Jews of the Ottoman Empire in the Late Fifteenth and the
Sixteenth Centuries by By Aryeh Shmuelevitz (of course he might be a Jew from the sound of his name, but scanning it, the book looked thorough and objective).
ALL THE WHILE wracking my brain for ONE WORD that a poster used on an article comment board, which I couldn’t remember which article, the link to which I lost yesterday when my web page browser crashed. The word I found today and it was the “Phanariotes” — a link in the chain regarding the use of Jewish tax collectors.
I’ll do my best to pay attention, teach!
This essay vindicates an observation made by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: “… the Jews are the great masters in lying….”
@ Franklin
Sorry. I forgot to mention. The reason why I asked if there was a connection to Alexander Jannaeus and the Janus figure is because in the wiki page on him it says:
“Under the name “King Yannai” he appears as a wicked tyrant in the Talmud, reflecting his conflict with the Pharisee party. ”
So I thought of the Janus figure.
But you explained it, so it’s o.k. There’s no connection.
Thank you everyone for the information about Jewish propaganda. I knew some of it, but you have increased my knowledge about Jewish propaganda.
@John H: What a remarkably helpful excerpt and link! Thank you, sir. Remarkable, too, is the fact that access to this bit of treasure comes via the revolting Washington Post. Wonders, evidently, will never cease.
@Uncle Sam: Re: Your comment by Schopenhauer. “Is it true?” is the most fundamental question the followers of most creeds and philosophies first ask. “Is it good for us?” is the acid test for rightness or wrongness in Judaism. No one should wonder at their ease for prevarication.
@Heather Blue: Getting back the media is easier said than done. Clearly, the Jews targeted this critical area decades ago.
Did you know there used to be a fourth television network, one run by a Gentile? See http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/05/the-dumont-television-network/ by the excellent writer Andrew Hamilton.
These lying, sociopathic fanatics are the ancestors of the people the current crop of dupes regard as truth-tellers of THE HOLOCAUST. Only a few generations removed.
Blood will tell. They were a tribe of lying racist fanatics in the 19th century, they were a tribe of lying racist fanatics in the 20th century, and they’re a tribe of lying racist fanatics in the 21st century.
Why anyone would trust a Jew to give him the time of day is a mystery to me.
This article elucidates a great many things generally left unsaid.
@Edmund Connelly: I’m sure you’re not ancient enough to recall much, if any, of the stuff that Andrew Hamilton writes about (lucky you!), but I can attest, from the perspective of a then young viewer, that nothing in his article struck a false chord.
In particular, he is absolutely right about the sky-high reputation of DuMont televisions. My folks got their first TV—it was a Pilot—in 1950. As I frequently heard them say, they would have bought a DuMont had they been able to afford one. When one of our neighbors did buy a DuMont, you could have cut the envy in my digs with a knife!
The one interesting albeit trivial sidebar that Hamilton omits is that DuMont made rather a big marketing deal of the fact that it produced the TV with the largest screen then available for sale to the home viewer: 30 inches. I don’t know how many were sold, but I recall getting a bit weak at the knees when I first saw one sometime around 1960.
As a postscript, allow me to mention that back in those days a great many people in the Northeast thought that the town of Dumont, New Jersey, was named after A.B.D. or at least his family. The fact that his headquarters were in northern New Jersey certainly fueled such speculation, even though, as it happens, it was groundless. Still, se non è vero, è ben trovato.
This really hits the nail on the head.
@Alice Teller:
Yes, for normal European people, it’s very hard to conceive of the impudence and audacity required to peddle such lies and deception. Among ourselves, we have almost no examples of it.
It literally takes one’s breath away once one actually “sees” the depth of the deception underway against us.
@Gregor:
Worse than that – I find myself thinking ‘no…it couldn’t be that bad..’
even though I know better. Astonishing.
Pogroms where essentially revolts against an international backed Marxist terrorism campaign who were using the Pale of Settlement as a base to launch high profile terrorist attacks including the murder of Tsar Alexander the 2nd and leading Russian officials to overthrow the government and install a Marxist regime and Jewish Usury and organised crime like prostitution rackets and white slave industry. It was the Grozny of its day but without the kidnapping gangs and open slave markets.
“Vyacheslav Plehve was appointed Minister of the Interior in 1902. His main concern was to suppress those advocating reform. At a speech given in Odessa in 1903 he claimed that in: “Western Russia some 90 per cent of the revolutionaries are Jews, and in Russia generally – some 40 per cent. I shall not conceal from you that the revolutionary movement in Russia worries us but you should know that if you do not deter your youth from the revolutionary movement, we shall make your position untenable to such an extent that you will have to leave Russia, to the very last man!”
Vyacheslav Plehve was blamed for encouraging pogroms against the Jews and in 1904 Evno Azef, the Jewish head of the Terrorist Brigade of the Socialist Revolutionary Party, ordered his assassination and he was killed on 28th July, 1904.”
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RUSpogroms.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20101124055118/http://jewishtribalreview.org/10whsla.htm
@Edmund Connelly:
Yes, you are right. Jews targeted the media decades ago. And I agree it won’t be easy getting our communications system back. I don’t think anything is going to be easy for us, anymore. But this is a revolution, isn’t it? A Jewish revolution? The people just don’t know it, yet. The Russian people did not know, either.
This charade of gay marriage was pulled on us this week….starting with Vice President Joe Biden advocating gay marriage on the NBC program “Meet the Press.” Supposedly, the White House did not know about it and were so influenced by Biden (a person they usually ignore) they rushed the President out to declare his warm feelings for gay marriage. I suppose NBC was gullible, too.
This whole business reeks of mendacity.
Young people are going to be so confused they won’t know what to think. Many of them already are in that state. Now, they have the spectacle of the President and Vice President of the United States making gag marriage top priority!
Forget the economy, forget unemployment, forget trying to meet the bills, forget families losing their homes, forget parents trying to feed, clothe and educate their children, forget the country going down the drain. How could any of that possibly be more important than a man marrying a man or a woman marrying a woman?
It is imperative for white culture to have integrity and trust. A moral foundation is essential to our well being. It keeps our heads straight. But more and more of our standards are smashed. Television entertainment is heavily involved in immorality, race mixing and the promotion of perversion.
It all has to do with carrying out White genocide.
@Gregor: @Alice Teller:
It is very difficult to process the depth of hatred that is directed at Whites. But, if you think back, the other side has been pretty open about it for decades. You can go back to the 60s and find Leftists drooling over the prospects of “people of color” rising up and killing White people. In 1967, Susan Sontag, leading Jewish feminist Leftist said “The white race is the cancer of human history”.
She later retracted that statement because she said it it slandered cancer patients. That is pure, unadulterated hate. The problem is, most of us Whites thought these Leftists were kooks that could be ignored – some sort of weird generational aberration that would pass. We didn’t realize that people like Sontag were actually the voice of this new elite taking power. I suspect our tardiness to recognize this rather blatant declaration of war is because we never faced an enemy this smart, this powerful and this committed. And we’ve never really faced (in the US) an opponent with genocidal intentions. I use the term genocidal because describing a people as a “cancer” makes your goal pretty clear: You kill cancer.
Their policy since seizing power has been to do everything possible to destroy any institution or social norm that made for healthy White families. They have purposely flooded this country with a mass of Third World immigrants and used every opportunity to promote miscegenation (almost exclusively directed at Whites).
I think people 100 years from now (maybe much less) will look back with some shock at how naïve we were.
Jews are a disease. When in 1943 the German Army reached Vinitzia in Western Ukraine, locals urged them to dig up the prison courtyard. There they found and counted about 9 to 10 THOUSAND corpses with at least as many uncounted. The NKVD would gun diesel truck engines to drown out the gunshots. The IHR has an account of this event by a young Ukrainian who was in Berlin and under surveillance by the Gestapo. He was taken to Vinnitzia by mild coercion as an interpreter for the old Gestapo hacks. He describes how the ‘meticulous’ Germans identified each corpse and how every few moments a woman would commence wailing as she recognized her husband, father-brother. he also notes young females were naked while older Women were clothed. All were dispatched by a .22 Bullet to the back of the head. Two twelve year old boys were also killed because they climbed a tree and saw what was going on.
The Germans observed that without exception these people met their deaths in 1938 long BEFORE war with Germany. The relatives all claimed that their departed husband-brother etc had been arrested by the NKVD and sent to Siberia ‘without postal rights’ so as to account for the non appearance of any mail.
The murderous scheming Jews of course ran the NKVD and what the lying bastards did was liquidate potential future enemies. That what these misbegotten murderous shysters do when they get control. Its what they do to children in Israel. I have no doubt whatsoever if they can they will do exactly the same in the US and other countries which they infest.
@Jason Speaks:
Well said. The sad news is I lived through many of the process and I am shocked by how easy it was. One of the great benefits of articles like this is to demonstrate that millions of Jews accept all atrocity stories as absolute truth, and they have heard them all. Looked at from their prospective the hostility makes simple good sense.
@Alice Teller:
Another funny thing about Jews is how they exempt themselves from the rules they impose on the rest of us. A bit off topic, but I just saw this “behind the scenes” little video on the hateful Bill Maher Show – basically short clip on how it is put together.
Every single write was White or Jewish! All of them. Most of them probably Jewish. This means that Maher demeans America weekly for “bigotry”, while employing no women, blacks, browns or Asians as writers. And yet no one brings this up! I think we should try and impose on Jewish Hollywood what they impose on us.
@Floda:
The idea of “preventive genocide” isn’t strange to Jewish culture at all.
Think of the festival of Purim in which the preventive slaughter of 75,000 Persians is “celebrated”. The remembering of this massacre is a source of the greatest pleasure for Jewish children taking part in pageants, dressed up in all kinds of funny costumes etc.
Some time ago an Israeli rabbi of a settlement on the West Bank published a book called The King’s Torah in which he wrote :
If fantasies of “preventive genocide” are such an integral part of Jewish culture, it comes as no surprise that the Jews will practise them in real life when they have the power to do so, as the Russians experienced and as we will have to avoid happening to us.
@Edmund Connelly: Don’t mean to play Cassandra yet again but I don’t think our people realise that the evil ones could manufacture a world crisis to censor the internet and close sites such as this .
The money can only control the structure IF the money can buy up all the media/information outlets or impose their will on the proprietors that do own them (and take that ownership away if displeased) .Controlling history by propaganda is critical to guiding the masses were they want us to go i.e. the NWO . The carrot (money & medals) and stick (public disgrace and fines) is a the simple universal tool , and both medals and disgrace are set by precedent (historical truth ) as indoctrination for correct behaviour .Hate Crimes anyone ?
So the Overlords in my opinion need to manufacture a world-wide catastrophe as an excuse for placing strict political censorship over the internet and producing a new electronic currency thats easy to monitor. I am firmly convince the coming attack on Iran will produce the required CRISIS results , false flagged or real [ see a times.com for the latest scam : civilian deaths in Afghanistan http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/NE11Df01.html ,to show Iran that the Overlords don't need to deal in reality or truth when they want to get something ] , a state of emergency I think could be used to to reorganise the world and put the Overlords firmly back in control of political history ( ie the MSM exclusive propaganda machine ) and a whole lot more like the merging of the MiddleEast and Europe . And this date is coming very soon I believe , because their power has reached the high-water mark : China’s rise and the loss of Russia mean future power history is slipping out of their control .
If 9/11 (just the latest barbarity ) doesn’t tell us about the ruthless nature of these people nothing will . And surely this fantastic article directs to the same conclusion .
This is too depressing for most people but some might respond intelligently to this comment . But the genie of free speech might already be too far out to the bottle to put back in , but I think a huge economic crisis could produce the desired results.
@jack: Interesting . Imagine if Gentiles has tried to stop the introduction of Multiculturalism and massive none-European immigration . We could expect that our leaders (i.e. us) would have been subjected to the same violence and assassination .
@Franklin Ryckaert: Brother Ryckaert: I must say that it warms my heart every time I read about the skyrocketing sales of guns and ammunition, which I am convinced is overwhelmingly being driven by the white demographic group in America.
Granted, less than 10 percent of those Whites are probably racially awake and are able to recognize the identity of our #1 enemy and are aware of their murderous, diabolically evil history – but, I think these millions of firearms being purchased by millions of White Americans really is the only thing that has prevented the jews from starting to slaughter whites openly – like their ancestors did when they controlled the USSR.
I also think that, since jews are the biggest cowards to ever walk the face of the Earth – they’d much rather sit back and use their control of our news and entertainment media to incite racial hatred for Whites among the minority populations and then let these predators rape, rob, assault, murder and generally terrorize the White population with their endless violence and racial hatred. And, while I believe that the jews see this method as being far too slow to suit their tastes – it does provide them with greater personal safety, since far too many Whites are too stupid to realize who’s inciting these minorities and will therefore never connect the dots back to the jews themselves.
Dot connecting. Isn’t it amazing how so few White humans possess this ability? I’ve had this ability all of my life and, for many years, assumed that everyone else did too.
@Heather Blue: Heather , on the Man-on-Man issue , I think Biden is just a part of the political scam . Ofcourse the white house knew it . What ‘they’ are doing is dividing the responsibility and so halving the blame . The ‘controversy’ also sucks the oxygen out of Romney and forces him to appear as a biggot and so forces the Black and Jewish and Latin vote back into the Democrat camp: activation the ‘Hope’ campaign . These shysters in the WHouse are using every political scam in the book and show to trick the gullible and ignorant populace . So we have the TMartin affair and show trial (like Bin Laden it will be milked for a while yet) now Man-on-Man celebrations ; me thinks these cynical f..kers will go for a hat-trick .
And there is Romney , mincing away and does’t know what the hells going on .
@Luke:
Luke – I can see you developing into a sort of WN answer to Caroline Glick. You’ve got that sort of intensity and drivenness.
@Jason Speaks:
Good point, I also think it is interesting that the folks working for Obama are mostly white, and never darker than a brown paper bag.
Perhaps this accounts for some of their success, hiring for competence rather than diversity. I have long suspected that the decline in accomplishment at NASA is related to this. When they accomplished miracles it was all white men. As NASA came to resemble a Bennington ad it had less and less success. Sadly, this has been mirrored all over the country.
@John H:
Thank you for this fact filled link. I urge all to read it.
The folks working for Obama are mostly white? They’re mostly JEWISH!!!!!!! And they were all well trained as Wall St. thieves.
@Brett Combs:
I stand corrected.
It’s okay with me if Romney is a “bigot” because I’m a bigot too. Those labels become more and more meaningless as people discover who is manipulating the message and the fact that they are out to destroy us.
@Brett Combs:
Romney is the wrong kind of “bigot” in the sense you mean it. He has become rich in a very Jewish way, has Jewish (even some Israeli) advisors all around him and will, if elected implement a Jewish agenda both in foreign and domestic policy (and that includes immigration!). Whether it will be Romney or Obama, roughly the same Jewish agenda will be followed. Some “democracy”!
Present World population is about 6,852,500,000 of which Judeo-Christians make up approximately 33% & Muslims about 26% .
The total world Jewish population is 14,000,000 or about 0.2%.
http://www.chacha.com/question/what-is-the-population-of-the-world-right-now
Christians have been “led” to admire the contribution of Judaism to Christianity, world civilization & to “sorta” believe their mutual “God” has an enduring covenant with the Jewish people.
Today just as previously happened in Germany & Russia Jewish “over representation” in the USA & the UK has led to a current “war on Islam”, devastation & the death of millions of human beings.
A clever neocon/Zionist narrative advanced using the Holohaux industry & other tales of pogrom atrocities led to the creation of Israel & its subsequent belligerent use of its military as the world’s super nuclear power in the Middle East.
History seems to be repeating itself with disastrous results.
This is an outstanding series, Mr. Joyce. Your scholarship on this subject matter is certainly refreshing and illuminating.
I look forward to the remainder of the series.
The persecution of the Jews by the Russian government was largely due to their seditious and treacherous activities, it’s no coincidence that one of Lenin’s first moves after seizing power was to strike down antisemitic laws.
I struggle to grasp what is accomplished by replacing teleprompter reading Barry Soetoro with teleprompter reading Mr. Evil Spell Deflecting Underwear whose bizarre cult proscribes consumption of not just coffee, but even tea.
When both are Jew-financed, Jew-handled and Jew-subservient empty suits.
@Alice Teller: Yours is a typo with real point. The company you’re thinking of is Benetton, but the town of Bennington, Vermont, and its famous institution, Bennington College, are, like NASA, also prime examples of the utter ruin that Jewish domination, when combined with an influx of criminal and criminally unqualified blacks, can do to a beautiful New England community and a once-great school.
“The persecution of the Jews by the Russian government”
Never happened. The Jews were not any more “persecuted” than the Russian peasantry was.
When Jews are not in absolute control of something, they scream persecution. The jews don’t want equality, they want control.
@Neville:
“The total world Jewish population is 14,000,000 or about 0.2%.”
There is no way of knowing how many Jews there are in the world because a lot of them- possibly even most of them- do not identify themselves as jews out in the open. There could be ten times as many in the world as we think.
@Jarvis Dingle-Daden: In practical terms I agreed with you 100 percent until a few days ago. With our black Indonesian president’s having taken an outspoken stance in favor of the pretence that a horse can be changed into a chicken simply by calling it so—i.e., homosexual “marriage”—I now think that the decent but oppressed white citizenry of the United States needs to be offered hope that not all is lost, that we are not mere days away from renaming this country the Talmudic Republic of Gomorran Faggotry.
Of course, on the underlying principle my view is unchanged. I quite agree that little if anything describable as positive can come from the election of a man whom you have well and fairly described, a man with whiteness but, alas, nothing else to commend him to us. But not being one of those that believe that things must get worse before they can get better, I don’t want hardworking, albeit blindered, Christian Americans—for their children’s sake if not their own—to feel that yielding to despair is their sole option.
The mainstreaming of sexual degeneracy is the Tribe’s current tactical priority. I want that goal and those associated with it to take a hit, preferably a devastating hit, in terms that even their media won’t be able to sugarcoat. You and I know may know that the corruption that underlies everything degenerate in the West will be unaffected, but with the ground already sodden, I see no point in praying for yet more rain, especially since it shows every sign of coming unbidden.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Romney is a mini-jew. Romney will be even worse than Obama.
Obama stabs from the front. Romney will stab in the back, when you least expect.
@fender:
There are a lot of crypto-Jews, probably in millions, but not 10X. Cryptos are the most lethal among Jews.
Nixon was a crypto, Gingrich is a crypto. One sure way of identifying cryptos is that they surround themselves with strongly identified Jews and other cryptos.
@Pierre de Craon:
How kind of you to attribute my error to my poor typing skills rather than my poor memory. Thanks. The bad news is I fear that the problem has spread far beyond any of the three.
@fender:
I know very little of this region, but wasn’t the Pale a very large area? Has anyone ever challenged the notion that there was certainly little harm done by limiting the Jews to this region?
@Alice Teller: Heaven forbid that I’d ever suggest otherwise!
Incidentally, I have had a longish comment stuck in moderation for about an hour. In the comment I use the rude but not obscene commonplace for the state that once was called homosexuality before the three-letter adjective meaning “merry” and related noun forms of that word were substituted for it by the decree of government and the media. I flat refuse to resort to an asterisk or a string of hyphens for a perfectly decent word when the usual foulmouthed know-it-alls get to post comment after unmoderated comment filled with loathsome thoughts and words even worse.
@Alice Teller:
Pale was essentially Belarus + Ukraine. equal to Texas and Idaho combined. very large indeed.
@Pierre de Craon:
Shall we take it as a compliment that we are still considered dangerous?
@Sanjay:
In our sad ignorance, I fear many Americans have the notion that the Pale was slightly larger than a ghetto. Has anyone ever addressed the question of why the most brilliant, imaginative people in the world were suffering in poverty in a region this large?
@Alice Teller:
Jews were winning the reproductive war by breeding furiously, and the income per capita did not keep pace with Jewish population explosion.
But total Jewish wealth was still expanding.
Another reason why Jews flourish in diaspora but not so much in Isreal is due to parasitic ethnic nepotism.
As the ratio of jewish to non-Jewish population rose in the Pale, opportunities for Jewish parasitism reduced and consequently Jewish per capita wealth declined.
This behavior is somewhat similar to cancer growth. At some point cancer becomes so large that the body can no longer provide enough resources. The body dies, but so does the cancer.
We have seen in this article how terrible the “suffering” of the Jews was during the socalled pogroms. Jews equally complain about the fact that they were confined to the Pale of Settlement. This area however to which they were “confined” was about 28 times as big as modern day Israel! Under these horrible restricted conditions the Jewish population grew from 1,6 million in 1820 to 5,6 million in 1910. You can imagine that for Yahweh’s Chosen People who by divine decree are entitled to the whole world and all its wealth such “confinement” must have been an unbearable suffering! Fortunately the Jewish led revolution of 1917 led to their liberation and a well earned revenge on the Russians by the killing of 66 million! Divine justice indeed from revenge-god Yahweh!
My God, you’re nuts. Nixon hated and feared the Hebes. Have you not heard the famous tape with Nixon and Billy Graham? You can’t be that far out of the loop. Whew.
Yes, it’s true that MR will be just like BO, since both are owned body and soul by Wall St.
I don’t think we’ve had a POTUS not owned by the Jews since Jack Kennedy, and they killed him off.
The Jew cries out in pain even as he strikes you.
@Brett Combs:
Right, with the exception of Jimmy Carter, but he is – as everybody knows – an incorrigible anti-Semite! (major crimes : 1) forcing Israel to give up the Sinai for peace with Egypt, 2) writing a book about Israeli “apartheid”). All other American presidents since Kennedy have been obedient servants of the Jewish bandit state.
@ Pierre de Craon
You can’t possibly believe that O’Bummer-the-politician actually gives a flying sombrero whether or not Chad and Thom may go on to exchange bodily fluids with full confidence that theirs is a unit which the State would now recognize as ‘marriage’ with all the underlying legal ramifications.
Recall that we are in the midst of an election year when virtually each and every bait can and will be tossed out there.
Judaic role in promoting acceptance of butt piracy is especially prominent due to the Tel-Aviv-on-the-Pacific (formerly known as Hollywood) and the showbiz at large being dominated – pardon the pun – by a certain subset within Team Yitzhak which never locked itself in the john with the lingerie section of their mom’s Sears catalog.
Sidebar: a synthetic estrogen called Bisphenol A has been used in food containers for decades. Some Americans whom the Anal-Defecation League a.k.a. ADL describes as ‘conspiracy theorists’ (read: closet anti-semites™) wonder aloud if it could be another vehicle to retard population growth; particularly since the Feds don’t seem to have an issue with it despite the outcry from the genuine greenies (as opposed to the foundation controlled fraudsters).
@Edmund Connelly:
First, copyright must be exposed as an illegitimate state franchise, dating back to The Statute of Anne 1710, designed to control discourse and secure monopoly rents.
http://subsol.c3.hu/subsol_2/contributors0/nimustext.html
Only when the institutional props are removed will Jewish cultural domination be challenged. The internet shows how rapidly ideas can spread when the paradigm changes.
@John H: Without tracing the history of their political ascendency it’s difficult to appreciate the extent of Jews’ dominance today, so comprehensive is it. Thanks for interrupting The Truman Show.
There was a lot of anti-Russian feeling in Britain at the end of the 19th century (see e.g. Kipling writing about the ‘great game’, and material ont he Crimean War). The Tsar was regarded as rather horrifically dictatorial. It occurs to me this may have been the effect of Jewish liars, rather than something endogenous and/or rational.
It also occurred to me that other events might have been Jewish-influenced. For example, Ireland
*Had a so-called ‘Limerick pogrom’
*Had prolonged atrocity propaganda against Cromwell
*Had a ‘rebellion’ at a similar time to the Balfour Agreement
*Had oddities with de Valera (not Irish, I think)
*Had odd events when there was violence in Northern Ireland – secret orders, presumably, preventing terrorists being found
*Now has a Jewish minister forcing coloured immigration with houses and passports
@Sanjay:I believe Eisenhower was of Jewish extraction, notwithstanding the controversy of that contention. On what do you base your assertion that Nixon and Gingrich should be classified as crypto-Jews, aside from the complexion of their management-team?
@Jarvis Dingle-Daden: I am completely uninterested in what politicians may actually believe, assuming for the moment the by no means absolutely demonstrable proposition that they are capable of belief in any form or in any meaningful sense of the term.
What I wrote above is what I mean; nothing more nor less. And by it I stand. White Americans—certainly those I know, love, respect, or any combination of the foregoing—deserve to be served and/or ruled by people better than the scum now occupying Washington, the imperial president and his Judaic handlers first and foremost.
@Trenchant: It was Rehmat who first brought the matter of Eisenhower’s probable Jewishness to my attention. Talk about the broken clock etc. …
@Trenchant: The problem is that, like Humpty Dumpty, Sanjay is misusing a word, perhaps without meaning to, that has an accepted signification; he thereby muddies waters that were none too clear to begin with. He means that the people named are stooges of the Jews or hirelings or something of that sort.
@Brett Combs:
My reply to you is held up in moderation. I did not write anything illegal. But if edits are required the Webmaster can do so. Thx
@Pierre de Craon:
My tentative conclusion about Eisenhower comes more from revisionist history, and an interest in his particular malice towards Germans. The use of “Disarmed Enemy Forces” to escape Geneva Convention dictates after the cessation of hostilities shows a premeditation that invites scrutiny.
Rehmat made a very interesting comment a long while back about Ayn Rand father’s closeness with Yagoda, and how this facilitated her departure, as opposed to flight, from the USSR. There was no substantive proof offered, tenable though it seem. Much about Rand’s personal life is guarded jealously by her sentinels, and it would take more than a dilettante to come up with the goods on her father’s circle of acquaintances and friends.
You know they already have back-up plan in case the concept of a ‘crypto-jew’ were to become more well known. I heard a (paid-for) Consp. Theorist the other day spend 3 hours trying to push the idea that ‘Crypto’ actually means Satanists pretending to be Jewish! As always, 2+2=6million.
@Trenchant: Apropos Eisenhower, just so. His intense animosity towards Germans, entirely out of proportion to anything a professional soldier might be expected to feel, was never one of his appealing characteristics. (His part in Operation Keelhaul is equally repellent.) But the lightbulb of a possible Jewish connection had never gone on till eighteen months or so ago.
@Alice Teller: Why not? Let’s live the dream. As Dave Barry wrote some years back, you’re only young once, but you can be immature forever.
@Sanjay: If one people is dependent for its survival upon exploiting other peoples, then limiting them to the Pale would cause THEM harm. However, for a relatively small people who were independent, industrious and honest, an area the size of Texas and Idaho combined would be more than sufficient for them to prosper. The simple fact remains Jews cannot survive without being able to exploit others. As in any other cult Judaism’s members despise or, at best, simply look down upon outsiders, but they know they need them for their existence.