Stephen Jay Gould is definitely high on the list of ethnically motivated pseudoscientists that populate The Culture of Critique. In reading over the section on Gould from Chapter 2 (see pp. 30-37), I was struck by how many evolutionary biologists viewed Gould as a charlatan and were willing to say so in public. John Maynard Smith’s comment gets it exactly right: Gould “has come to be seen by non-biologists as the pre-eminent evolutionary theorist. In contrast, the evolutionary biologists with whom I have discussed his work tend to see him as a man whose ideas are so confused as to be hardly worth bothering with. . . . All this would not matter were it not that he is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary theory.”
Gould’s importance comes from his position at Harvard as well as his access to the media. (Gould’s Chair for Politically Correct Popularization of Evolutionary Biology at Harvard is now held by Steven Pinker.) My treatment in Culture of Critique emphasized his obvious political motivation and his defamations of various 19th- and early 20th-century scientists, such as Samuel George Morton.
The point is that Gould’s political motivation, his lack of academic credibility, and his fraudulent use of sources were well-known before the 2011 study showing that in all likelihood Gould committed scientific fraud in his analysis of Morton’s data on race differences in skull size (“Stephen Jay Gould: Next to Judas Iscariot, Brutus, and Cassius in the Devil’s Mouth at the Center of Hell“).
But Gould is a Jewish intellectual hero, so it’s not surprising to see attempts to rehabilitate him. An article by Benjamin Ivry in the Forward attempts to do just that—badly, beginning with the implication that Gould’s only intellectual sin was his defamation of Morton. But in the process he provides some good material showing Gould’s strong Jewish identity. Indeed, the title, ”Evolutionary Biology after Auschwitz,” only makes sense if there is indeed a deep connection between Gould’s work as an evolutionary biologist and his Jewish identity.
In the 1998 chapter I had managed to find evidence for Gould’s Jewish identification—that he was raised in the Jewish radical subculture of New York where radicalism was a very mainstream Jewish identity, that he had a strong commitment to Jewish culture, and that he had the typical lachrymose view of Jewish history, including the (false) view that hereditarian ideas on IQ led to immigration restriction which resulted in the murder of Jews in the Holocaust. Ivry expands on Gould’s Jewish identification, noting that
the Holocaust was not a remote historical tragedy [for Gould]. In “I Have Landed,” he observes: “I need hardly mention the searing events of my parents’ generation to remind everyone that current acceptance [of Jews in society] should breed no complacency.” Although he was a music lover and a fan of Johann Sebastian Bach, Gould notes, “I recoil from Bach’s anti-Semitic Passion texts because they express the worst aspects of our common nature, and because these words have wreaked actual death and havoc.” In another recently reprinted book, “Leonardo’s Mountain of Clams and the Diet of Worms,” Gould asks how it is possible that throughout European history, cultivated Germans could “promote such iniquity [of anti-Semitism] of their own free will (and with apparent moral calm and intensity of supposed purpose)?”
Ivry discusses an essay in which “Gould addresses the nonscientific but essential question of how to ensure that the Holocaust does not recur.” Indeed, Gould’s work on race and IQ would seem to be motivated by exactly that.
Ivry notes that Gould
became the quintessential biologist-after-Auschwitz, marked by the creative anxiety to understand and explain a scary world where either dinosaurs ruled the earth or the more recent horror of the Holocaust could occur. In the same chapter, Gould addressed how in the notorious 1942 Wannsee Protocol, in which plans for the Holocaust were drawn up and rationalized, Adolf Eichmann misused the Darwinian term “natural selection” to describe how Jews should be, and indeed would be, massacred. Gould’s life was based on the beauties of science and on the particular appeal of how Charles Darwin’s discoveries correspond to realities in the natural world. He reacted violently to finding Darwin cited in this context, addressing the reader:
Perhaps you do not see the special horror of this line (embedded, as it is, in such maximal evil). But what can be more wrenching than the violation of one’s own child, or the perversion for vicious purpose of the most noble item in a person’s world?… What could be more unnatural, more irrelevant, to Darwin’s process, than the intricately planned murder and starvation of several million people by human technology?
The problem is that for humans, gene changes routinely occur because of the artifacts and technology made possible by the human big brain, whether or not one wants to use the phrase ‘natural selection’ to describe it. For humans, evolution (changes in gene frequency) cannot be understood without considering the effects of human culture. An obvious example is the selective effect that superior military technology has had throughout human history, enabling, for example, the conquest of North America by Europeans. The assault by the Bolsheviks against the Russian people was similarly enabled by 20th-century technology, as well as an ideology of class warfare that legitimated hatred, revenge and destruction of class enemies.
The whole point of The Culture of Critique is that human evolution is now being fought out in the realm of ideas and that the Jewish intellectual movements of the left—particularly the promotion of the ideals of cultural pluralism (now called “multiculturalism”), the decline of evolutionary thinking in the social sciences, and the general loss of cultural confidence by the West—have been major components of the huge unfolding evolutionary disaster for Europeans. See, e. g., here, p. 248 ff, on how these ideas facilitated the sea change in immigration policy beginning with the disastrous 1965 immigration law which has dramatically altered the demographic profile of the U.S. This change in policy has resulted a huge decline in the relative frequency of European genes. Whether or not one wants to call this natural selection, it certainly has the same effect as natural selection in the natural world. Ideas matter.
Gould was a major voice of the Jewish intellectual left—especially influential in the decline of Darwinism in the social sciences. To that extent, his life work can be seen as an evolutionary battle on behalf of his own group against his perceived enemies—people of European descent whom he blamed for historical anti-Jewish attitudes and ultimately for the Holocaust. I have little doubt that he was quite happy about the biological decline of the West apparent before he died and perhaps more than a little proud of his role in the process. As a biologist, he surely would have been aware of the long term implications for Europeans and their culture. Extinction, after all, has been the fate of the vast majority of species that have ever existed.
Facing the Future as a Minority
With a few changes to the opening paragraph I could write that as one of them “Non biologists” I’m not surprised that Gould is described as a pseudoscientist. My bishop (Anglican) also attended Harvard and he could just as easily be described as a pseudobishop and equally be viewed as a charlatan giving a false picture of the state of Christendom. Must be something about Harvard
Main reason why Jew succeeds in his lies, deceit and fraud is he entangles the gentiles in trivialities with TV, video, internet.
Just look at google hot trends any day of the week.
http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?date=2012-5-21
Are people reading KMac’s revealing books? Are they researching federal reserve and Jewish carpetbaggers?
No. Trivialities is what destroying white people.
Trivialities is what is wasting so much time, energy and money of Whites. It screws up the mind, and then whites wonder why they need anti-depression medications and all the rest.
BUT LOOK AT THE DAMAGE GOULD CAUSED.
Every time I hear about all these Jewish “geniuses” who turn out to be little more than charlatans I’m reminded of this incredible quote from Nietzsche in The Gay Science.
“As for the Jews, the people who possess the art of adaptability par excellence, [my line of argument] suggests immediately that one might see them virtually as a world-historical arrangement for the production of actors, a veritable breeding ground for actors. And it really is time to ask: What good actor today is not — a Jew? The Jew as a born Litterat [‘man of letters’], as the true master of the European press, also exercises his power by virtue of his theatrical gifts; for the man of letters is essentially an actor: he plays the ‘expert,’ the ‘specialist.’”
Brilliant insight into people like Freud, Gould, Boas, etc.
This reminds me of the Jewish journalist and author Thomas Friedman. I saw him on television years ago telling us the “world is flat” and to prepare for globalization. He also pushed the global warming message. In addition, he wanted Serbia bombed into the Stone Age during the Kosovo war. Finally, he still cries “terrorism” and asked the State Dept to “shine a light on hate speech wherever it appears”.
It seems as if he knew the globalist agenda and has been softening up the unwary public to prepare for their own demise, and I believe he had an inside track to this because he’s one of many CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) propagandists.
One thing I’ve never understood is why Kevin MacDonald never addresses the evolutionary weakness of europeans. How is it possible a few million eastern europeamn yiddish speakers can come into america, grab all the good university posts, transform the economy into usury capitalism, eradicate the wasp culture, laught all the way to the bank, and then get the euros to die fighting their cousisn in the middle east.?
I think their main ally in this conquest were the papists from southern europe, the Hannity fox irish and italian degenerate sabbath goy who also hated wasp culture. without this ally, none of this would have happened.? And how much of this was consciously criminal as in the hyman roth mafia fiction, or non fiction of italian irish jewish organized crime ?
But more importantly, why do europeans hate themselves so much to allow it to happen? Not one iota of sellf preservation left in them? why?
“Michael we’re bigger than us steel”
I have written quite a bit about the weaknesses of EUropeans–especially individualism and moral universalism.
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/06/guilt-tripping-the-europeans/
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Duchesne-Review.pdf
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/WhiteEthnocentrism.pdf
Serious scientific types have long complained about the media’s tendency to exagerrate and misinterpret scientific findings in “popular science” stories. Nicknaming the theoretical Higgs boson as “The God Particle” is one of the worst recent examples that comes to mind, not to mention the pseudo-science surrounding racial differences.
The cult of the Brilliant Jewish Scientist promoted by the media, from real scientists like Fenyman to frauds like Gould and Freud, has been discussed here.
Scientists, being humans, are just as tempted by the lure of money and fame as laymen, and there is plenty of funding/financial motivation to falsify results to support politically correct conclusions. So again it comes down the control of money and media.
Worse, it seems the major political attacks on Darwin now come from the Christian conservatives, due entirely to their literal belief in Hebrew biblical mythology. The idea that “Darwin led to the Holocaust” is embraced by Jews like Gould and Christians like Michelle Bachmann. Charlatans like Ben Stein are eagerly promoted by the lumpen-fundies.
@fender:
The best actors are Italians (most of the post-war neo-realist films used amateurs and they were still good). Curious perhaps, that K-Mack notes how difficult it was for them to integrate when they first arrived. They also have a strong ethnocentric identity. They remain America’s hidden ethnic jewel.
@Steve:
“Thomas” Feidman, that’s almost as bad as “Christopher” Wallace. Maybe, “Jesus” Jaffe or “St. John” Shapira is next?
LOL.
@Steve, you will probably enjoy Matt Taibbi’s hilarious take on Thomas Friedman called “Flathead.”
http://rolocroz.com/junk/friedman.html
Stephen Jay Gould (9/10/41 – 5/20/02) is quoted above in part asking how it is possible that German and German Christians could have come to lack appreciation for Jewish Germans.
Aside from fears generated by Bolshevik Jewish participation in the starvation campaign in Ukraine in the 1930s, Resisting Defamation offers another reason that Christian Germans may have come to seriously dislike some Jewish Germans. It comes under the heading, “Graetz Legacy,” and it discusses how the Heinrich Graetz campaign of “scourging” and “flogging” Germans by propaganda commenced in 1868 and carried forward, thus allowing uncounted instances of verbal targeting Christian Germans for the period 1868 – 1939 [70 years] which may answer Gould’s saucy question. Smears and hate speech have consequences.
http://www.resistingdefamation.org/sub/g29.htm
This of course refers to the difference in the quality of tools and weapons (and perhaps also of social organization) that enables certain human groups to expand their territory and increase their number, thus effecting changes in gene frequencies.
Since this type of selection is caused by culture and not by nature it is recommendable to speak of cultural selection instead of natural selection.
On a still higher level there is the selective power of ideas that can influence collective behaviour with an effect on gene frequencies. We think here of ideas about immigration, miscegenation, abortion, birth control, feminism and trans-racial adoption. Such selection-by-ideas could be called ideal selection.
Ideal selection, when ignored can annul gains attained by cultural or even natural selection. Thus a higher race with a higher culture can be defeated by the adoption of destructive ideas.
It may be clear that Jews such as Stephen Jay Gould and others mentioned in the Culture of Critique are engaged in an evolutionary battle with Europeans on this level of ideal selectiion, a fact most Europeans are totally unaware of, still stuck as they are on the second level of cultural selection, inventing better and better tools and weapons while the cunning Jews are manipulating their minds to their detriment.
It is the task of publications such as TOO to fight the evolutionary battle of Europeans against the destructive ideas of the Stephen Jay Goulds of this world on this third level of ideal selection.
@Richard Pierce:
Thanks Rich. That was comical. Like Gould, Friedman is being exposed as what he truly is for those of us in the know; a propagandist for the Jewish new world order.
@Richard Pierce: And while we fiddle, Rome burns: http://www.politics.ie/forum/current-affairs/188190-thousands-nigerians-have-had-their-applications-irish-passports-returned.html
Michelle Bachman is COMPLETELY irrelevant.
@Steve: @Steve: Steve, for what it’s worth, I was recently watching the tv show Jeopardy, in which Friedman, Anderson Cooper, and a woman reporter for the New York Times where the constestants. I could not believe the utter ignorance of traditional American history these brilliant “reporters” demonstrated. The final question was something like, who invented the cotton gin in the South? NONE OF THEM KNEW THIS……..It simply blew me away. The were all about my age and every kid in school knew it was Eli Whitney, when I attended grammar school. Remember, these are the people that are supposedly keeping the American public INFORMED…..HAHAHAHAAH………………………………………..
@Richard Pierce: Opposition to Darwinian theory of evolution comes from two sources.One is indeed from “creationists” of literal adherence to the biblical stories and more importantly from a growing group of very exacting scientists,like Behe,Dembski and Mayers who are Christians by background but do not apply any religious believes in their inquiry.Now, these are very arcane matters of microbiology and of cosmology and it would be leading too far away from the subject [Gould the self-promoting clown of science] but let us simply state that in the light of ever more precision in understanding unfathomable complexity of life it becomes impossible to hold on to ideas of random mutations and explanations of spieciation.Like with everything else opportunistic Jew tried to jump on their wagon and “lead”.The movie Stein made is pretty awful and should go to the waste bin where all the eloquent stupidity of Gould or Sagan went.
. . .he plays the ‘expert,’ the ‘specialist.’”. . .the kibitzer
Ah, the joo kibitzer. The guy who offers unsolicited advice at a card game.
The quintessence of joo mentality. The outsider telling others what to do, and think.
kib·itz (kbts)
intr.v. kib·itzed, kib·itz·ing, kib·itz·es Informal
1. To look on and offer unwanted, usually meddlesome advice to others.
2. To chat; converse.
The offering up of HIS HOLY OPINION- that is the jew.
@Sanjay:
It’s a mistake to focus on the sheep, or their trivialities. The shepherds are our audience.
The sheep will simply have different trivialities provided to them.
This article and the Benzion Netanyahu article are so good I can’t believe it. Just essential for understanding the whole thing. MacDonald has this huge brilliance in tying other huge aspects into the article without really going on a tangent at all, because it’s so related.
But the holocaust is a myth. Would being open about that cut the TOO interest by 80 percent? Maybe. But at the same time knowing that the holocaust is a myth is essential to understanding the big picture.
@protorenaissance
Yes, intelligent design. That intelligence being Odin, of course. Oh, you meant the Hebrew Bible god, YHWH? I don’t know, I’m a big fan of malevolent design, myself.
@Steve:
ha ha ha. Jew World Order sounds better than “jewish new world order”. :)
Wish all of us climb the human energy pyramid quickly and be in positions of power and influence.
@Franklin Ryckaert
I thought the idea of an “extended phenotype” describes phenomenon like tool/weapon making and how they can influence selection. As for “ideals” perhaps language can be seen in a similar way. The popular notion of “memetics” works something along those lines.
@Richard Pierce
“Malevolent design”! I like that! That’s good! Mind if I use that?
@Franklin Ryckaert
I propose the term “social selection” for the workings of the human mind and culture on human evolution, as distinct from “natural selection,” the result of selection pressure from the environment. That covers both ideation/behavior and culture/artifacts.
The fiction of the holocaust concerns the inflated numbers and the instrumentalities. The nonfiction is that a great Gentile nation rose up against the seemingly assimilated social parasites embedded and shook them off and out. That was definitely a systematic effort and necessarily a forceful one. The strength of the effort horrified the Jews, the losses whatever they were horrified them, the defiance of Jewish power horrified them. Those things are real psychological motivations for them and the numbers of casualties don’t affect the core narrative as it exists in their collective tribal memory.
@HP wish I could claim creation (no pun intended!) of “malevolent design” but I first heard it in a Noam Chomsky interview. He said there’s no evidence of intelligent design, but perhaps malevolent design. I assumed that referred to something like how populations evolve defenses against predation and parasitism, etc. A quick internet search shows the phrase has been around a while.
Noam Chomsky himself is a pseudo-scientist in the mold of Gould, of course. Not sure if his linguistics work has been relevant for decades, but his social science/political activism is clearly in the Jewish radical anti-White/European tradition of the Culture of Critique.
Related to the general topic of evolutionary theory and its political enemies, David Sloan Wilson has an excellent series of articles about the political suppression of the theory of “group selection.”
Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection Part I:
http://scienceblogs.com/evolution/2009/10/truth_and_reconciliation_for_g.php
Part five actually references Stephen Jay Gould, and one cannot help but notice the irony; here Gould defends his fellow Jew against the same sorts of political attacks he himself engages in against the “goyim:”
I’m almost certain I discovered Sloan through his defense of MacDonald and his acknowledgement that while the idea of “Jews as parasites” has a long history in “anti-semitic” discourse, parasitism is nevertheless a morally neutral description of the relationship between certain species.
The whole 15 part series is well worth reading.
“Did you see the news that White babies are now a racial minority in the land of their ancestral inheritance? Have you contemplated what horrors await them in the future? If Whites are exterminated, which begins with our minoritization, why would Jesus bother to come back? Satan wins at our extinction, so Jesus must come back soon if he wants his birth, suffering, death, and resurrection to count for something.”
-Rev. Jed DeValleyism, “Why Jesus should watch the news,” 2012
Whites, as a subspecies, could go away. And, if not completely vanish, their numbers, especially as a percentage of mankind, could become perilously small in a shorter time than most imagine.
Look at Europe on a globe sometime. It’s not a big land mass. Compare that to vast expanse of Africa, in which all the countries are overwhelmingly African. And will remain so in perpetuity. Same with Asia and Latin America.
Activist Jews play a major role in this, but this anti-White attitude is widespread. I just heard White Southern Baptist Bill Moyers (very leftwing) gloat about the “displacement” of Whites in America. Robert Wright, a White Gentile who writes books on evolution, also had a smirk on his face when discussing how “old Whites” are dying off from the American scene.
This is what hate looks like people. And it isn’t just Jews who feel that way (although the activist Jews have been instrumental). Significant numbers of Whites take a gloating joy in being traitors.
@fender:
” And it really is time to ask: What good actor today is not — a Jew?”
Jews run all major film studios & the unwritten law is that they OBVIOUSLY serve and forward the interests of their own kind.
Jewish actors are mostly favored & the others have to be extra talented & believe in Jewish myths .
http://tinyurl.com/8zglr6
@Richard Pierce:
Chomsky is a total rascal. Mark! how he lectures whites on socialism, diversity, interracial marriage and empathy.
But does he practice what he preaches? No.
He lives in 95% white housing, married to a Jewess, and sent kids to white schools.
No interracial Black majority housing, schools, marriage for Chomsky, all the while he lectures whites.
What a venomous jewish hypocrite.
@Jason Speaks:
There are many traitorous Whites but unless we do a DNA, we do not know if Moyers and all these other “Whites” are crypto-Jew or plain whites.
We desperately need DNA tests. crypto-jews are very smart at infiltrating.
@Jason Speaks:
My favorite is the commercial for Bill Moyers in which Jon Stewart says “This is how weeee fight back” Who is we? Is Jon Stewart some poor silenced Jew hiding in the ghetto? When I think that this is what the enormous promise of public television has come down to I don’t know whether to laugh or weep!
@Franklin Ryckaert:
When you’re good you are very. very good.
@Anty ep:
You have made the absolutely essential point. We often forget that this is a new religion and that the vast majority of Jews believe every single word. Their history of Western Civilization is of a tiny minority of morally, intellectually, and spiritually superior people who have been relentlessly, brutally, and sadistically persecuted by Christian Europeans. Looked at from their perspective everything they do is only is in the interests of survival and forced upon them by our wickedness.
@Alice Teller:
@Sanjay:
I don’t know what to make of Moyers, except he has the air of a conman to me. He comes off with that sanctimonious, self-righteous air, and puts a moral sheen on the destruction of his own people. He is able to use tones and verbiage calculated to sucker basically good people who aren’t paying close attention. He treats the destruction of White culture as some kind of sacrifice we should all be proud of.
I suspect he’s an empty vessel. I have known people similar to him, who I know were White, who had the same weird animosity toward their own people.
@Jason Speaks
A Southern Baptist (follower of the Hebrew/Jew god Yhwh) who gets to appear in the Jewish media, and Robert Wright, also appearing in the Jew media. I’d say that has more to do with the selection of Whites than anything else. We know that any White who is against the destruction of our people is not going to be allowed to appear in the Jew media in anything but an adversarial role.
@Sanjay
Yes, Chomsky is a particularly virulent and odious anti-White jew bigot. Remember, to a jew it’s not “hypocrisy” it’s “chutzpah” – a good thing.
DNA testing can play a key role in determining who is White and who isn’t going forward. I appreciate your contributions and often agree with you, but you are an Indian breeding with a White woman, right? Therefore, not us, and in fact, an ethnic/racial competitor, literally “stealing our women/genes.” Hopefully your children will marry back into the Dharmic tribe.
A living example of the tragedy of European imperialism.
Mark Twain about Jews:
http://isteve.blogspot.com.br/2010/08/mark-twain-concerning-jews.html
@Bobby:
It was indeed a real pleasure to watch the self-styled global savant, Tom Friedman, finish in third place, with a paltry $1000, after missing the Final Jeopardy question! (They were playing for respective charities, of course, and his and NBC News’ Kelly O’Donnell’s charities both received $10,000.00, while Anderson Cooper’s– for gay victims of bullying, of course!– received $50,000.00.)
For the record, the Final Jeopardy Answer (rather than Question) was not quite that straight forward. It was phrased something like “So-and-So credited him with the South’s prosperity, but within five years, he was out of business.” I think Kelly was the one who answered “Who was [George Washington] Carver?” I think that the global savant failed to come up with anything at all…!?! Cooper obviously knew who they were talking about, but simply could not remember Eli Whitney’s name; he was in the middle of writing something like “Who invented the cotton gin?” when time ran out on him. (I am sure that they would have denied him the credit, regardless, without his at least coming up with “Who was Whitney?”) Even if he had gotten it right, he would have been nowhere near the $50,000.00 that he automatically received for his charity for finishing first on Friday’s show.
All in all, there were only a few reasonably impressive “power players” all last week. People like Tom Friedman and Chris Matthews pretty much just made fools of themselves on national television– unable to control the content, as they are used to doing, and without having underlings to do most of their researching for them! The 16-year-old high-school girl, with braces, who won $79,600.00 in a two-day Teen Tournament final, just the week before, put all fifteen adult “power players” to shame– as did most of the teenagers during that annual two-week competition! As they say, “It’s not what you know….”
@Mark White: Just goes to show, he wasn’t all that smart.
Sadly Goulds successfull haughty populism means most of his false statements are still believed by the general populace.
Whites will need to develop our own publishing houses, electronic publishing format, versions of YouTube, movie making and distribution etc as well as insurrection current media.
Ofcourse this searing analysis of Goulds mendacity is to an extent crying over spilt milk. We need to go on the offensive instead of just waiting around till they come for us again. I am delighted by the effectiveness of the “anti racist is code for anti white” meme. Its so lucid and has that nagging grain of truth to it. I love the idea of calling ourselves pro white to get away from the “racialist / racist” term.
We also need to be able to smear and tar our opponents, not mendaciously but truly for their malevolence and duplicity.
It’s no good being passive and reactive, we need efficient forms of mememattic offence.
@Jason Speaks:
I am afraid the answer is as simple as the fact that greed, fame and influence are very seductive. Remember that Moyers got his start in Lyndon Johnson’s White House selling the Civil Rights Act to the South. He was the face of the enlightened Christian that we were all to emulate. This holier than thou, sanctimonious, professional Southerner was the front man for Johnson’s crimes in Vietnam.
Vert clear thinking — very illuminating! Thank you.
@Athanasius:
That is the story after his daughter married a Jew. Here is his former sentiments.
http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/Twain.html
@D. K.:
That does sound like fun! I hope I can find it on you tube?
I am reminded by this article of nothing so much as Ben Bernanke, and the leader of his cheering section, Paul Krugman. Economics is quite as perverted as was/is (the non-biologist’s view of) evolutionary theory.
And it’s arguably more important.
Congrats Kevin, another excellent article!
Jewish effrontery, as exemplified by Gould [Jared Diamond is another dissimulator of the same stripe], simply knows no bounds. These deceitful subversives have to be the most racially motivated and perversely driven people on earth. In this regard, I would also have to say that ‘Anty Ep’ whacked a rhetorical grand slam with her incisive comments on the stunning rejection of Jewry by a certain ‘Gentile nation’ in modern times. That’s exactly why Jewry, the quintessential hate nation is today, so aggressively and vengefully making war against the entire White world. Their malevolent nature, as well as their tenacious Old Testament spite, and wicked desire for revenge….is what impels this particular Anti-race.
I recently listened the Richard Nixon tapes and… Wow!!! This one really shocked me:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzF80OPxXrE
So in the 1970s we had a conservative President talking with a well know Evangelical about Jewish domination? This is UNTHINKABLE today.
Sadly, the quality of Gould’s work is still taken for granted due simply to his undeserved prestige like Freud, Einstein, Boas, etc. “The Mismeasure of Man” is probably still part of many college curricula.
@Mark White
Surely Billy Graham was the last gasp of American Protestantism. His (in)famous posing “in prayer” on the White House lawn after a meeting with Nixon was dutifully picked up by the Jew media and successfully embarassed Nixon.
Billy Graham went on to backpeddle and deny any “anti-semitism” and spent the rest of his life kow-towing to his jew masters, heaping praise on jews and the foreign nation of Israel, all to keep in the good graces of the jew media, in order to keep his fame and the money rolling in.
Surely the most odious and disgusting example of American Evangelical Judeo-Christianity of the post-war era. He later went on to promote anti-White, anti-”racism” and even publically denied his own religion (that he clearly never actually believed in) and embraced some sort of Universalism. Billy Graham was instrumental in de-segregating American Protestantism and was originally famous for his mixed-race “revivals” in true Pentacostal tradition.
Is he dead yet? What a boon it will be for Whites and America when that whore is no longer suckering little old ladies out of their hard earned cash.
@Marcus:
It is indeed! My sister’s step-daughter had it as a mandatory text in a class at a well-regarded, high-priced, private, liberal-arts college in Upstate New York, two years ago.
@Richard Pierce:
I am not Indian. I am anglo-indian. my kids look whiter than most whites. They like to listen to wagner and beethoven. They read Aesop fables. So? whats your point?
You failed to save whites. I am doing what i can to save whites. get over it.
@Sanjay
I doubt that.
More culturalism, just like jews converting to catholicism, claiming to uphold our culture more than we can. How … jewish. Hilarious, an Indian “anti-semite” basically adopting the strategy of semitic jews.
I’ll wait for the DNA test.
How embarassing for your grandfather, that you and your father/mother abandoned a perfectly respectable Dharmic tradition/race to breed with us Whites. Now you want to lead us, by excluding the semitic/Arab Jews.
By breeding with White women and fathering half-breed mulattoes? Come on, how seriously are we supposed to take you?
No thanks, Sanjay. Try that one on the Catholic priests, they will probably buy it.
@sanjay
I alluded to this fact in another threat. Many (most) WN’s want to slam your head through a wall if you have a tan, but David De Rothchild and Natalie Portman would be welcomed like heroes into the club.
A perfect display of how Jews play arrogant (in denial) aryans like fools can be seen in a ‘A dangerous Method’.
@Athanasius:
@Alice Teller:
As a comparison of the copy in the two links will show, Sailer merely cherry-picked his quotes and shuffled them around a bit, whether to deceive readers and thereby fend off the usual obloquy or merely to sugarcoat the words’ impact is not for me to say. What I can and will say, however, is that somewhere on my shelves is a Twain essay and speech collection which includes the whole of this article. My clear recollection is that in its entirety, it is slightly longer than Alice’s linked excerpt.
There are clear indications that Twain, whose death came six months after his beloved Clara’s marriage to the very renowned pianist and (less renowned) conductor Ossip Gabrilowitsch, was of at least two minds about the marriage. But as she was his favorite child (his youngest daughter, Jean, who was virtually crippled from severe epilepsy, died in December 1909, two months after Clara’s marriage and four months before grief combined with physical woes killed Twain himself) and he greatly feared division with her, he kept any fuss to a minimum. His will, however, puts an electrified fence around his estate so that no husband of hers could ever wrest the money Twain left Clara from her.
@D. K.: D.K. Thank you. You brought the correct form of the answer back to me. I knew what I wrote wasn’t quite accurate, but since I immediately knew they were talking about Eli Whitney, it just blew me away, that people like Friedman, who go on shows like Charlie Rose,etc. and are referred by Rose as the final authority to the “truth” about what goes on in places like the middle east and others, are so clueless when it comes to simple American history. It said a lot to me about them..
@sanjay:
sanjay – don’t listen to the nasty comments. Whites can use every friend they have right now.
@Sanjay:
DNA testing is a simple obvious solution to membership, but I would suggest that it be something done behind the scenes as part of a bigger process of ‘conversion’.
In other words…a bad dna test can be one of the events causing a conversion to be rejected. But the cause doesn’t have to be given out as a reason.
Some of the hebrew solutions are bad for us, but others are fine.
The reality is the vast majority of Jews do believe in promoting Darwin’s evolutionary theory since it helps destroy Christianity.
Look at how the ACLU fought the Intelligent Design movement on behalf of the Darwinist and the whole media supports Darwinian theory. Those who question darwinian theory are labeled fools and Christians nuts. Anyone scientist who questions Darwinian theory loses funding and even can get terminated. It has happened many times.
I must point out the comic aspect of this. Even if for the sake of argument you concede all of KM’s criticisms of Gould, Gould was still a hugely accomplished scientist and historian of science who made many and diverse scholarly contributions. Go read Wikipedia or any other article surveying his career. From Wikipedia: “Gould is one of the most frequently cited scientists in the field of evolutionary theory. His 1979 “spandrels” paper has been cited more than 4,000 times.[41] In Palaeobiology—the flagship journal of his own speciality—only Charles Darwin and G.G. Simpson have been cited more often.[42] Gould was also a considerably respected historian of science. Historian Ronald Numbers has been quoted as saying: “I can’t say much about Gould’s strengths as a scientist, but for a long time I’ve regarded him as the second most influential historian of science (next to Thomas Kuhn).”
KM’s career, for the last several decades, has been devoted to a single proposition — that Jews are engaged in genetically programmed intergroup competition with Whites, and are winning and consequently destroying the White race, by tricking Whites into being liberals. (No explanation, ever, of how Jews’ alleged genetic interests square with the fact that about half of them now marry non-Jews.) In the decades since its publication, there have been almost no scholarly citations to KM’s trilogy on Jews (I recall reading that the total number is 3, but am happy to be corrected if wrong. It’s tiny in any event.)
So which of them, Gould or KM, is likely to be remembered as an “ethnically motivated pseudoscientist”? This strikes me, to use a Freudian concept, as a classic case of projection. ;-)
Gould’s 1979 spandrels paper is exactly the problem. People cite it because it’s so bad and so obviously political. That paper is a standard stalking horse for evolutionary psychologists. In fact, reading that paper is what made me highly skeptical of Gould in the first place, way before I had any interest in the Jewish angle. Same for his co-author Lewontin, also a major figure in Chapter 2 of Culture of Critique.
@Hmmm:
Since Gould is disparaged by actual scientists in his field already, so I suspect his reputation will suffer greatly and quite soon. I’m reminded of the great fall Freud’s reputation has had in the last few decades – except the recognition of Gould’s pseudoscience occurred much sooner after his death. Even in terms of the general public, while people today know the name of Dawkins, very few know the name Gould anymore. Go to a bookstore, the shelves have 5 or 6 times as many Dawkins’ books as Gould.
Gould will be remembered – to the extent he is – more in the mold of a Lysenko.
Jason, you’re kidding yourself. Go read the Wiki.
@Hmmm:
Indeed, go read it. This section stands out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould#Controversy
For someone who has pushed so hard to be subjected to this much criticism this early, is pretty amazing. Gould is a MUCH SMALLER figure than EO Wilson, who’s stature continues to grow (and since he is still alive, he gets to write more books). Note that Gould opposed EO Wilson, which is a loser for Gould. Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Steven Pinker supported the position of EO Wilson, over Gould.
That’s called game over.
@Hmmm:
Well,Hmmm you almost seem to prove prof. MacDonald’s theory of the Jewish group evolutionary strategy by always trying to defend Jewish group interests. That seems to be the only reason for your coming here.
Talking about the pursuit of group interests leads one to the idea of ethnic nepotism, a Jewish speciality. It is here that we have to look for the reason of much of Jewish “success” in whatever field. Jews not only control key positions in all spheres of life, they also use those positions to shamelessly promote each other. In the field of science that means citing each other. On the other hand scientists who are perceived as a threat to Jewish interests are at least systematically ignored, if not persecuted. That is the reason why Gould is cited so much and prof. MacDonald so little.
Jewish group evolutionary strategy at work to suppress the knowledge of that same strategy!
@Alice Teller: Who is the current version of Moyers?
@Hmmm:
“(No explanation, ever, of how Jews’ alleged genetic interests square with the fact that about half of them now marry non-Jews.)”
When Jews marry Whites they always make sure the kids are raised Jewish, and then those kids go on to marry other Jews, and the gap is closed again. The Jews are always injecting fresh blood into their tribe. KM has, in fact, talked about this.
“In the decades since its publication, there have been almost no scholarly citations to KM’s trilogy on Jews”
Most scientists and historians don’t want to be labelled antisemitic and have their livelihoods threatened by admitting they’ve read KM’s work.
@Church of Jed:
Sadly there are too many candidates. I give up. Who is the modern Bill Moyers?
Another bit of irony, Ivry quotes Gould decrying “anti-semitism” in a pre-scientific medical text:
Yet in Israel, prominent American-born rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh says as much: if a Jew requires a liver transplant to survive, it would be permissible to seize a Gentile and take their liver forcefully.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzchak_Ginsburgh
So Ivry and Gould decry the “anti-semitism” of the “goyim” when non-Jews accurately describe the Jewish religion/culture.
Could one even imagine a White scientist being lauded as a “biologist after Ukraine” or an “evolutionist after Nakba?” They complain of science being used in the ethnics interests of Whites while shamelessly committing fraud to use pseudo-science in the ethnic interests of Jews.
Surely, Whites are susceptible to this sort of thing because they simply cannot comprehend “chutzpah” this blatant.
Kevin MacDonald wrote: “I have written quite a bit about the weaknesses of EUropeans–especially individualism and moral universalism.”
I am German, quite left leaned and very interested in human evolution and ethnic identity, which can be called a rare trait combination. I think K. MacDonald’s theory is partly convincing and thought provocing, but it has its weaknesses too. Is there really a relative lack of ethnocentrism among Europeans, especially Northern Europeans? Northerners were the greatest theoreticians of race and racism, the USA were way more racist than the Portuguese in Brazil; there was fervid animosity against Jews, gypsies and Muslims across medieval Europe, not to forget theories about Anglo-Saxon apartheid in the Dark Ages. Maybe the current anti-nationalism is not in the genes, but a cultural, political and – of course – an economical thing.
All the theories of Western culture stress individualism. For example, Ricardo Duchesne:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Duchesne-Review.pdf
Individualists are less likely to develop group identities, but are more likely to do so in times of stress, etc. This is a paper on the psychology of White ethnocentrism:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/WhiteEthnocentrism.pdf
I always cringe when Euro-Americans tremble around Jews. They’re so fearful it’s embarrassing. Grow a spine, for Christ’s sake. Jews are, by and large, leftist/liberals. They draw their support from the vastly larger number of leftist/liberal Euro-Americans who – by their very nature – opened up all the doors to this country and allowed them in. Had it been negroes with superior IQs they would have done it for them, as well. And they’ll do it for the Chinese, when and if their numbers grow great enough.
Destroy the power of leftist/liberals of all races and you will destroy the power of the Jew. They cannot survive otherwise. To wallow in fear of them is not only demeaning, but unnecessary. Jews sans leftist/liberalism are no more a threat than negroes or Chinese. Those who understand this do not fear them, but instead look towards eradicating the environment they thrive in.
When the author uses the term “Holocaust” in this essay, what is the term’s specific meaning?
@sanjay:
I for one welcome your participation. And it’s not even because you have English ancestry or your kids look white.
Fraud in science, especially by American Jews, is a field likely to increase (cneosrhsip permitting). The nuclear weapons fraud was Jewish (Oppenheimer, Teller – a Hungarian Jew, and many more). The uranium industry, and nuclear power industry where Jews have a monopoly of ‘maintenance’ is, I’d take a huge bet, a fraud. Much of modern physics is a fraud – it’s a sort of theology. NASA and space exploration is fraud, again with Jews at the top. AIDS is a fraud. About a half of biology research is a fraud. Such things as forced drug imports (analogous to forced immigration) and drugs generally, as with the opium wars against China, are Jewish. The disposal of fluorides is another Jewish fraud. One of the reasons for dumbing down of white education is to increase the odds that populations are uninformed – the global warming racket and things like ‘wind power’ could not survive an educated population. MacDonald is only beginning to scratch the surface with his comments on Gould.
@John Rennick:
“Destroy the power of leftist/liberals of all races and you will destroy the power of the Jew. They cannot survive otherwise.”
It’s not about leftism, it’s about treason. What Jews do is basically bribe members of a competing tribe to turn against their own people and support policies that are against their own people’s interests. Think of rich White philosemites like Romney and Bush. Getting rid of leftism won’t change anything, you need to get rid of either greed or radical individualism, or both. This would immunize us against jewish parasitism.
@Hmmm:
This topic is vast and earth-shatteringly significant, yet it is cravenly ignored by the rest of academia. There is more than enough material here for a specialist or a school of specialists, possessing the requisite courage.
Rennick,
I have to disagree that Jewish power stems from left/liberals, even discounting the fact the left has largely been led by Jews for the past century.
Instead, it’s ethnocentrist Jewish leadership in media and finance that is the key to Jewish power. Mass media is so powerful at influencing society at large it’s hard to overestimate. Finance is the lifeblood of the economy and touches every single aspect of society. Our democratic system relies largely on money and mass media, so organized Jewry is able to control politics through those mechanisms.
If it was just left/liberal politics, you wouldn’t have spectacles such as the entire Republican party establishment on bended knee to the foreign nation of Israel and their AIPAC lobby, nor right-wing Christian conservatives using “Hitler/Nazis” as the ultimate example of evil, second only to the devil himself. These attitudes are the result of Jewish control of media (the Hitler channel) and money (AIPAC).
It’s so frustrating to see the consistent focus on ideologies, religions, and culture instead of the mechanics of power and the technocratic mechanisms of control. One is reminded of a Trilateralist from the 1970s describing how control of the functional institutions makes direct political control of member democracies unneccessary.
Political ideologies, religion, and even cultural beliefs are the result, not the cause, of Jewish power.
@Spartacus:
Jesus, yes, and that is why they are not THIRD WORLD. Good, or bad? Really, do we all have to look like eachother? White Liberals FLEE from Hispanics when the Hispanics take over the schools. Blood is thicker than water, or multi-cult nonsense.
Look at Israel, full of Jews. Without Western Civilization, it will collapse, -Jew elites are killing the Golden Goose. Not sure if they will make it into Chinese Government. Doubt it. Scorpion and the Frog, perfect analogy. They will do what they do. Can’t change em.
Dinosaur in a haystack was an interesting read. But wrong premise. Life is most likely elemental, and universal. Starting in Water, life will eventually evolve into fish, and from there. Just like (higher) life supporting planets have a thin line with little variation. Not saying you can’t have bactiria here or there, but you need an earth size planet with the same chemistery to get higher life forms, and a ‘Class M’ planet will evolve higher life forms, starting with fish types. That is the foundation for reptiles, and then mamals in a nutshell.
@sanjay:
Coincidentally: http://www.vdare.com/posts/comedian-russell-peters-the-anti-sacha-baron-cohen
@Hmmm:
Interesting that you should finish with that particular flourish. When I was a graduate student in Personality and Social Psychology at a major American university, three decades ago, my Statistics professor was a very unassuming old bachelor, whom I had befriended while working in the department, prior to graduate school. He was also then the third most-cited psychologist in the world– despite the fact that no one outside of the social sciences ever had heard of the man! Ahead of him, then, in second place, was the famous Swiss developmental psychologist, Jean Piaget. Who held down the top spot? None other than Sigmund Freud, of course– one of the greatest intellectual and scientific charlatans of all times! More than forty years after his death, and decades after anyone who was anyone should have known better, Freud was still being widely cited in the professional literature, not just in the popular press and Hollywood screenplays. The Freudian fraud, in one form or another, remains one of the basic tenets of belief of the new cultural orthodoxy.
For ’tis the sport to have the enginer
Hoist with his own petar; and ‘t shall go hard
Schumer and the Church.
http://www.businessinsider.com/chuck-schumer-wrote-a-law-that-may-vindicate-the-catholic-church-in-its-fight-with-obama-2012-5?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=politics
@D. K.
Well said!
:
@Wiggy:
“Not sure if they will make it into Chinese Government. Doubt it.”
They’re already in the Chinese government, and have been for decades. The Chinese love Jews.
@Anty ep:
this is the reason why nazism invites so much coverage, but communism and Japanese militarism almost nil.
Jew fears white revival. Jew fears that whites will sooner or later discover that diversity, multi-culti message is designed to exterminate whites.
so jew pushes holocaust propaganda like never before. once you stop believing in holocaust, the entire power structure of Jew comes tumbling down.
My wife, a university professor, found Gould “dismissive” and “arrogant” when she met him 20 years ago. Actually, I think “yech” was the first word she used to describe him.
Stephen Jay Gould, Cornell West, Cass Sunstein, Elizabeth Warren – I wish Harvard would hire more of these people. As their reputations erode, can Harvard’s be far behind?
“NASA and space exploration is fraud, again with Jews at the top”
Horsecrap. Where do you guys dig of some of this nonsense?
NASA was legitimate and space exploration is a 100% White venture. Jews do not come into the picture except to find ways to adapt space exploration to tools of murder and control.
We could be established on the moon now, and likely on Mars, but the demons who run our society would rather little D’Loauntavious receive all tha cibbil rytes that hims be owed by da wyte debbil.
I HABS A DERAM
@Mark White:
Sometimes crypto-jews masquerade as explicit anti-semites to attract, infiltrate and trap white patriots.
Nixon was a crypto-Jew. He was using these tactics. After 70s, Billy Graham’s influence declined. Same thing happened to Pat Robertson after 80s.
Mao used similar tactics to attract those revolutionaries he thought were not loyal to him. once they revealed their intent, he arrested, tortured and killed them.
Question for Prof. Kevin Macdonald:
Your trilogy were published during 90s early 00s. Since then, there must have been a lot more material related to Jews which must have been published.
KGB archives, de-classified documents, autobiographies, biographies of prominent jews etc etc.
Have you considered updating your trilogy in light of these new materials? Perhaps a second edition…
I have much more respect for Lewontin than for Gould, because he introduced electrophoresis to population genetics. But I wonder why “The Spandrels of St. Marco” didn’t sink their academic career. It was a monument of arrogance and contempt and very bad science at the same time. Social and rational intelligence below threshold. Above all the spandrel metaphor is the most ridiculous highbrow posing I have ever met. Maybe even inaccurately applied.
@Richard Pierce: I agree with you entirely Richard. In fact, the Germans have a saying, ” Geld regiert die Welt”. My loose translation would be,(though there are others) “Money governs the world”, or “Money is the boss”, or maybe, “Money governs everything”, would be most accurate.
@Jed: Jed, I agree with you that NASA, “was” legitimate, as was space exploration. At some point, I would say after the Apollo-Soyuz mission, in 1975, something went terribly wrong. It’s always been my belief, that the space shuttle missions were mainly about SPYING. Afterall, this stuff kept going until we were using 30 year old technology, really weird if it was all about “space exploration”.
@Richard Pierce: Classy
So the response to the point that Gould’s article is the most cited article in its field is to say that that’s because everyone’s attacking it? I’ll grant that it would take a lot of spade work to settle this (which I’m not going to do for the sake of an argument on the Internet) but it seems extraordinarily unlikely the article is the most cited article in the field because everyone thinks it’s wrong. That doesn’t make sense. If it was generally thought to be wrong, you’d expect the citations to have drastically tailed off. After all, the piece is 33 years old. I am not an expert, but from what I can glean, the spandrels concept has been criticized, modified (some critics might argue modified in ways that refute the original point) and incorporated into the conceptual toolbox of evolutionary biology in myriad ways. I don’t see what basis there is for saying that Gould is wrong or “smaller” than Wilson because Gould was attacked soon after his death. In fact, he was attacked during his lifetime, and so has Wilson been. What’s clear is that sociobiology is somewhere between science and social science, and the relationship between genes and social structure is poorly understood (despite the dogmatism on all sides). Notably, Wilson abandoned his long-held belief in kin selection just 2 years ago: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/05/eo_wilson_disavows_his_own_kin046341.html
Nor does being Jewish seem to mean one has a “genetic interest” in being a Gouldian rather than a Wilsonian. Steven Pinker, a prominent Wilson supporter in these debates, is quite evidently Jewish. If I had to bet, I’d put money on Wilson having had numerous Jewish grad students over the years, while many of those supporting Gould seem to be non-Jews.
A final word, on Freud: Talking therapy, which he and other (mostly Jewish) founders of psychoanalysis pioneered, is still in wide use throughout the world, and longitudinal studies show it’s pretty effective in relieving anxiety, depression and other symptoms (different types of therapy are effective for different types of disorders, though some disorders are resistant to therapy altogether). So while Freud had a lot wrong, he still contributed at least a very important innovation in treatment that has helped countless people. (This is at minimum… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-psychoanalysis) Also, as with Gould, some of Freud’s harshest critics/debunkers have been Jews (Karl Popper, Adolf Grünbaum) while many of his most prominent pupils were not Jews (Jung, Ernest Jones).
By the way, the idea, purveyed by the National Socialists, that the intellectual contributions of Jews can be reduced to and explained by their Jewishness led directly to, inter alia, relativity being labeled “Jewish physics” and the Allies developing nuclear weapons first.
Pinker says homicide rates in Western Europe have been falling for 800 years. Gregory Clark, who was first to point this out, more or less says the decline in violence was by natural selection. So according to Clark the West Europeans are a highly selected population.
Pinker gives a completely different explaination of the decline in violence; he credits “Enlightenment humanism”. He is supposed to be an evolutionist! Pinker is hostile to any explaination of human behavior through natural selection. Pinker is firmly in the tradition of Gould .
Clark says it was by natural selection of west europeans are
The spandrel paper was called “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme”
Wikipedia article on Adaptationism: ” Critics (most notably Richard Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould) contend that the adaptationists (John Maynard Smith, W.D. Hamilton, Richard Dawkins, Steven Pinker and Daniel Dennett being frequent examples) have over-emphasized the power of natural selection to shape individual traits to an evolutionary optimum, and ignored the role of developmental constraints, and other factors to explain extant morphological and behavioural traits.”
When the money is on the table, Pinker is firmly in the Gould camp. He takes Clark’s work and recasts it as evidence for the unimportance of civilization in selecting for non violent personality types. Instead of arguing that violence was maladaptive (because congenitally violent men tended to kill each other off and not to leave as many offspring as congenitally peaceful men) Pinker argues that Enlightenment humanism convinced people to be less violent.
Pinker is saying there is nothing unique about populations like the English who have been under selection for peaceful cooperation for several hundred years. Once humanism is explained to them, the population of central Africa would be just as non-violent as the English. So according to Pinker, don’t worry about any precious genetic adaptations being lost when Africans replace the English.
Richard Pierce
May 22, 2012 – 12:54 am | Permalink
@Sanjay
my kids look whiter than most whites.
I doubt that.
They like to listen to wagner and beethoven. They read Aesop fables.
More culturalism, just like jews converting to catholicism, claiming to uphold our culture more than we can. How … jewish. Hilarious, an Indian “anti-semite” basically adopting the strategy of semitic jews.
I’ll wait for the DNA test.
How embarassing for your grandfather, that you and your father/mother abandoned a perfectly respectable Dharmic tradition/race to breed with us Whites. Now you want to lead us, by excluding the semitic/Arab Jews.
I am doing what i can to save whites.
By breeding with White women and fathering half-breed mulattoes? Come on, how seriously are we supposed to take you?
get over it.
No thanks, Sanjay. Try that one on the Catholic priests, they will probably buy it.
——————————
Richard Pierce, can you explain more your attack on Sanjay?
As far as I can see Sanjay is helping Whites with his views.
The fact that he is half White and half Indian, to me is a good sign, that is, he yet recognizes that White interests should be promoted.
“NASA and space exploration is fraud, again with Jews at the top”
… NASA was legitimate and space exploration is a 100% White venture. Jews do not come into the picture except to find ways to adapt space exploration to tools of murder and control.
———————–
Thus Jed. Unlike Jed, I think the whole idea may well have been a non-starter, though I agree there was some optimistic idealism. The difficulty is simply moving the vast amount of material needed. There’s some discussion here on the limits of rockets.
http://raetowest.org/NUKE-LIES/www.nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic2f94.html
The point being there’s a limit to the extent rockets can be scaled up. This is on top of problems of radiation, micrometeors, hot/low temperatures, and the vacuum of space. And the problems of biology – food, air, water, etc. Note that most critics of NASA and the moon don’t look at these issues; only at the pictures. ANyway – rockets look impressive, but in terms of the task, the whole venture is like getting into a small rowboat in jeans and t-shirt with a packet of sandwiches and trying to cross the Atlantic.
—————————
As I say, the whole question of scientific fraud is in its infancy. But there’s a hell of a lot of it. As regards the Jewish angle, the odd thing is how long it takes us goyim to catch up. It’s true they have media control, but people don’t have to read it, and academics could circulate devastating replies.
——————————
Can I suggest a bit more on ‘parasitism’. A balanced human society needs different types – slow-witted unexcitable types are good for long-drawn out labouring work, presumably. Big strong types are useful for some things; but presumably take more resources than more smaller ones. I’ve seen it suggested a small proportion of colour-blind people is a benefit, on the few occasions they see things that others don’t. A few thugs may work to the benefit of all. A few pacifist calm types ditto.
Possibly we have an unconsciously over-democratic view of species – despite the facts of extreme specialisation in ants, bees, etc. I’m trying to suggest Jews are specialised parasites — they concentrate as a group just on the mental behavior of their hosts, specialising in lies, deceit, and trickery, which needs what shows as a higher IQ. The non-thinking part of the ‘balanced society’ simply don’t begin to understand.
@Spartacus: Lewontin and Gould having their careers sunk? That’s a good one!
@Bobby:
” Geld regiert die Welt”. It means, literally, money rules the world.
@Hmmm:
Did anyone claim this? Sounds like a straw refutation. The thread article is about Forward magazine’s support of MacDonald’s argument that Gould’s conclusions are motivated by ethnic interest. Furthermore, MacDonald shows that scientific fraud and subterfuge were involved.
You counterattack that MacDonald promotes his own ethnic interests but have demonstrated neither fraud nor subterfuge.
@Someday: I said it’s a miracle that it didn’t
Ants and bees – all I meant was that members of the same species have very different roles – workers, drones, queens, soldiers, what have you. With mammals I don’t see why reshuffling genes within a pool shouldn’t generate a stable-ish mixure of energetic individuals, plodding individuals, creative individuals etc even if it’s not immediately noticeable. Any parasite which aims at one subset will have a disporportionate effect on that population. It’s a bit like a disease organism concentrating on one point, which then becomes a point of weakness.
@Rerevisionist: I think I got it. In other words millions of Americans have their heads up their b……….s.”
@Rerevisionist:
“Thus Jed. Unlike Jed, I think the whole idea may well have been a non-starter, though I agree there was some optimistic idealism. The difficulty is simply moving the vast amount of material needed. There’s some discussion here on the limits of rockets.”
The limits of rockets are utterly irrelevant, as all bodies within the inner solar system are well within the capabilities of conventional rocket technology. Further, manmade points can be an arbitrary distance away from the point of origin (MIR vs earth).
Technology improves. Intercontinental travel was hard in the horse-and-buggy age. Now you can go from NY to Paris in a few hours. God knows how propulsion technology would develop if researched.
How can we invest in nuclear pulse propulsion when we pour trillions of dollars into teaching apes how to not rape people and spell their own names?
“The point being there’s a limit to the extent rockets can be scaled up. This is on top of problems of radiation, micrometeors, hot/low temperatures, and the vacuum of space. ”
Most of the problems you mention have already been solved. I don’t know if you have read any news of the last 30 years, but we have people living in space for months at a time. And all technology is capable of improving. Or didn’t you know?
The idea that space exploration is a dead end because liquid combustion rockets have an upper limit in size (just like everything else in the universe) is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard in my life.
BTW the computer you are typing on was a direct result of the space race between two White nations.
“Note that most critics of NASA and the moon don’t look at these issues; only at the pictures. ”
The benefits to not having the entire human population on earth should be, and are, obvious to many people. The only real downside, of course, is the spread of the disease called “diversity” off earth and into space.
“ANyway – rockets look impressive, but in terms of the task, the whole venture is like getting into a small rowboat in jeans and t-shirt with a packet of sandwiches and trying to cross the Atlantic.”
No, it’s like going 100 feet into the Atlantic and building a resort/hotel/restaurant/harbor. By your logic jet skis are a sham because you can’t circumnavigate the globe on one in a few hours.
Well … not just Americans. There’s a comparison somewhere on the net (I think by the ‘Heretical Two’) with parasites which affect the brains – or at least behavior – of their ‘hosts’, in an adverse way – for example a snail parasite which makes the snail climb high up and advertise itself, so it gets eaten. Skilful propaganda seems to have a similar effect on people. The traditional antidote is free speech. Let’s hope it works.
@Rerevisionist: You are a man after my own heart! A very large portion of modern medicine is fraudulent – vaccines, cancer research, treatment for hypertension, cholesterol phobia, medical treatment for depression, cancer screening, and ninety-percent of prescribed medicines.
In the realm of “science” the development of the neutron bomb by one Sam Cohen is the perfect example of Jewish fraud and bamboozling.
@Mark White: I saw Twain’s comments on Jews some years ago. They are not accurate, they are a retelling of the Jewish version.
How do I know? More than 25 years ago, I met an old Englishman, who was a shoemaker. His father was a cabinet maker, and one of his uncles was a French polisher, which was a method of finishing furniture.
A century ago, all of the tradesmen used to meet annually to discuss the cost of making a product. They agreed on a price, which was based on their costs, the complexity of the work, and a small profit for themselves. Once agreed, the price held until they met again. These tradesmen were from all parts of the town or city. They tried not to infringe on each others “territory”. Where there were 2 close together, since the price was the same, people buying would look at the quality.
How do the Jews fit in? The cabinet maker Jews in the Golder’s Green area of London, as an example, always undersold the agreed price. The quality was good, but not exceptional. One by one, all of the other cabinet makers were put out of business. As the few Jewish cabinet makers needed to expand, they hired the now out of business cabinet makers at apprentice wages. Slowly
they continued their expansion with the same tactics to drive more and more out of business.
They should have lowered their prices to match! Couldn’t be done. The Jews were the middlemen providing the wood to make the furniture. Guess who got a better deal?
The same model translates into all aspects of our modern life. Jews are instant experts on any topic – according to other Jews. Whether Gould, Chomsky, or Greenspan, the aim is to mis-direct us (put us out of business so to speak) and promote themselves.
Bottom line: Gould is biased in his puported science by his Jewish ethnocentrism.
Science posits an Aristotelian universe where Nature is governed by laws. By Logos. Whether or not this is a non–theistic metaphysical view or a more Aquinas-like one, it differs fundamentally from the Jewish metaphysic of perpetual discourse, endless relativistic kvetching, Talmudic- Pharasiacal sophistry, which rejects Logos at the root. They do not really believe in Truth. That is their path. This is why Fred N. So admired them- they rejected “dualism.” in favor of tribal will. But dualism means: discerning Truth, and not truth. We all have to pick one way or another.
Science clearly seeks truth and IMO Jews are not the best at it, in spite of their skill at getting published in journals and such.
Harvard is a club. It stopped being a university a while ago. A rich club though, but, still just a whitened sepulchre. Truth is not in it, just power.
Yet we grudgingly admire it, befuddled by the days of lost Wasp glory.
Today, quality comes from funny unexpected places like CSULB.
It’s funny that a
Steve, Friedman [ a piece of crap] was published alot in LA times.
I dont look at LAT much so I dont know if his lies are still in vogue there.
I wonder, how many adults are gullible enough to fall for such nonsense? they ‘get it’ 24/7..school, media, ads etc…..
@Mickey Meadows: @Lombard: @Anonymous: @D. K.: @katana:
Thanks for support. I will continue to do what I can to save Whites. They are part of our humanity and they are worth saving.
@fender: “The Chinese love Jews. ”
Nonsense. Certainly none of the Chinese I talk to “love Jews”. In fact, the Chinese I talk to are extremely suspicious of Jewish businessmen and their motives.
“They do not really believe in Truth. That is their path. ”
Yes you still see constant posts where people are shocked by their ‘chutspah’ or ‘shamelessness’ etc. OTOH Euros have always believed in some form of universal observer/arbiter, whether JC, Ancestors, Archetypal Gods, Santa, Universal Laws, etc essentially an accounting for every thought and action. Thankfully they did as it allows to move from jungle law to healthy civ/society.
Unfortunately today, it’s not only the direct ‘power’ of J’s… it’s the ‘ideology’ which has effected so much of the host cells and the natural immune system (morality, reason, logic) is too weak to protect the body.
[1] @Jed. This is off-topic – unless there’s a Jewish link, which is very likely. I’m not sure what you mean, or could possibly mean, when you say the limitations of rockets are irrelevant. If men want to live on the moon, they need shelter, food, water, protection from the vacuum of space, and therefore large amounts of air, and so on, all of which presumably have to get there by rockets, however many intermediate stages there may be. Unless there’s some way to manufacture necessities on the moon etc, everything else would need to be shipped out. You seem to be relying on the unthinking view that progress must always – well – progress. Maybe you could indicate a website which provides conclusive plans for a moon base, and a Mars base, including sufficient defensive stuff to fend off meteors? And incidentally give the colonisers something to do. And I don’t mean NASA crap aimed at people as suckers.
[2] Very convincing posts on the Jewish mentality as endless drivel, like salesmen’s patter, or lectures which always subtly miss the point. Trotsky and ‘permanent revolution’ seems similar to “Jewish metaphysic of perpetual discourse, endless relativistic kvetching, Talmudic- Pharasiacal sophistry..” and “Euros have always believed in some form of universal observer/arbiter, whether JC, Ancestors, Archetypal Gods, Santa, Universal Laws, etc essentially an accounting for every thought and action.” The Egyptian judgment day shows the same sort of thing. If I’m not mistaken, the chapter on John Dewey (a Jew) in Russell’s ‘History fo Western Philosophy’ is a perfect example of this clash. Russell assumes, correctly I’d say – not being a Jew – that there is such a thing as truth, but it’s not easy to discover etc etc, and Russell is amused but puzzled by Dewey’s convoluted insistence on pragmatic ‘truth’ – if your examiner wants some nonsense, or a politician, then it’s ‘true’. I can imagine a time in the future where there’s perhaps a legal trial, or investigation, and some Jew will start on his bamboozling, and there’ll be a final snapping – people will simply lose all patience with their deceit.
@ S Fowler – thanks for your comments. I tried to find you by Googling but am unsure who you are. My approach – this is off-topic from Darwinism, but on-topic for bad science – is the work of Harold Hillman, who I knew well personally, and his work on misinterpretations in cell structures (endoplasmic reticulum, double cell wall, chemical receptors etc etc are all mistakes, so anything erected on them is likely to be wrong). In understanding bogus science, it’s important to understand how basic flaws enter these subjects. Ironically, perhaps, Hillman is, or thinks he is, Jewish. I’ve written quite a lot about Hillman on big-lies.org and there are now some youtubes made from his own films, which he showed decades ago, to try to get his views across to young biologists. (NB there’s also material on the doubtless phony neutron bomb).
@Spartacus: It took 30 years for a scientist to publish a critique of Lewontin’s Fallacy. And it is significant that A. W. F. Edwards said his paper could have been written 30 years previously; he was 68 years old when he took Lewontin to task. Given that no one published scientifically obvious criticism of Lewontin’s highly influential ideas about race, it would be a miracle if anything he (or Gould) wrote could have sunk their careers.
Better to look for degrees of inventiveness. That seems to precede the tools and culture that follow.
@Rerevisionist: “John Dewey (a Jew)”!
Can you offer some documentation—indeed, any at all—for this claim? It is just possible that his second wife was Jewish, but that is still a horse of a different color.
@Pierre de Craon:
It is a bit off topic but I would love to read your take on the Church vs Obama.
Madison Grant, hereditarian anthropologist.
Stephen Jay Gould described The Passing of the Great Race as “The most influential tract of American scientific racism.”
“One of his long-time opponents was the anthropologist Franz Boas” No surprise here.
And Wikipedia is defaming Grant with guilt through association by linking him with the judeophilist Breivik. ‘Grant was mentioned prominently in Anders Behring Breivik’s 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, in whiclh Breivik argued for the preservation of the Nordic race whilst criticizing miscegenation.”
All of which tells me Grant must have been onto something.
@pierre de craon – My source is a review by Mencken of Thorstein Veblen; I got onto this via a review I put on Amazon, expressing great disappointment in Veblen. See e.g.
http://tmh.floonet.net/articles/hlm_veblen.html
WHich incidentally gives an overview of the period when e.g. Willaim James was widely quoted. The actual passage from Mencken (there are several more on Dewey) is: “… On the one hand, I was sorry to see so learned and interesting a man as Dr. Dewey sent back to the insufferable dungeons of Columbia, there to lecture in imperfect Yiddish to classes of Grand Street Platos. …” from which I assumed Dewey was a Jew. I’m not particularly interested in Dewey; it may be I’ve misinterpreted that passage, and that Dewey was expected to lecture to ‘Jews’ in Yiddish – but surely that’s unlikely?
@Anty ep: The only thing neccesary to graduate from Harvard is to gain admittance. Virtually everyone gets to graduate, presumably because they are so superior. To me, it is just another self congratulatory institution that hates white people.
@Sanjay: Well said – keep it up!
@Rerevisionist: Thank you for the link, sir. My own impression, arrived at after an hour’s Internet search both confirmed and greatly augmented what I already knew about Dewey, is that your view of Mencken’s meaning may be correct, though it is also quite possible that he is simply mocking Dewey for his unusually large number of Jewish personal and professional connections, not the least of the latter being his involvement in the founding of the New School here in New York City, an institution that has been a Jewish racket from day one.
I think it is notable that in a Google search on the expression “john dewey jewish,” it was only when I reached page 6 (@ 20 items a page) that I finally found a page without a tribute to or an estimation of Dewey, published in either a small-circulation magazine or a learned journal and written by one or another soi-disant Jewish scholar (frequently self-identified with the Frankfurt School’s outlook), for his (i.e., Dewey’s) influence on Jewish education and schooling in this country, whether one means to refer to their schools for their fellow Jews or to those in which they school the goyim—us, the cattle.
In short, I think, not that your view of the situation is wrong, but simply that it is somewhat less likely that, ethnically, Dewey was anything but the scion of Vermont Yankee stock that he appeared to be, as well as a thoroughgoing traitor to those very same folks and the rest of white America.
@PinkHarrier:
Yes, the talent to invent must be present in the first place. There is however also the secondary phenomenon of imitation (aka “cultural borrowing”). Certain groups can imitate the technology of others and then that borrowed technology can give them too an evolutionary advantage, even to the point that they may become serious competitors of those from whom they have so borrowed. Think of the Chinese, Koreans and Japanese, how they have become serious competitors of Whites from whom they borrowed their technology. But, still here too a previous talent must have been present, reason why we savely may assume that for example Africans will never become such competitors.
@arthurdecco:
Then how do you explain the heavy Jewish presence in Chinese government and finance, and why the Chinese use the Talmud as a business guide? The Chinese are the Jews of Asia, the Japanese the Aryans.
@Someday: I had the impression that there was always some sort of criticism around toward Gould. But maybe this is my German bias. In Germany Gould never was very popular. Dawkins was (or still is).
I never understood why anybody in the field of biology could buy this spandrel nonsense. The mathematical theory of evolution is absolutely clear about it. A genetically transmitted feature, which is harmful to its carrier, inevitably vanishes from the gene pool. A neutral feature has a certain low possibility to spread or to persist. And that is what you can call a spandrel. A feature with advantageous properties of its own right can’t be a spandrel. It’s an adaptation. And of course a beneficial feature has a much, much higher chance to spread. So the best guess for any possible feature you meet is that it has an adaptive past. And that is exactly what was found in tons of observations and experiments.
@Pierre de Craon:
***
Dewey is considered the epitome of liberalism by many historians,[36][37] and sometimes was portrayed as “dangerously radical.”[38] Meanwhile, Dewey was critiqued strongly by American communists because he argued against Stalinism and had philosophical differences with Marx, despite identifying himself as a democratic socialist.[39]
Historians have examined his religious beliefs. Biographer Steven C. Rockefeller, traced Dewey’s democratic convictions to his childhood attendance at the Congregational Church, with its strong proclamation of social ideals and the Social Gospel.[40] However, historian Edward A. White suggested in Science and Religion in American Thought (1952) that Dewey’s work had led to the 20th century rift between religion and science.
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dewey#Criticism]
***
@Rerevisionist:
I was very pleased to see your article about Edward de Vere. I strongly feel it would be tremendously good for us should he finally be credited with the works of Shake-Speare.
It would rehabilitate the traditional aristocracy to an extent. Theirs was an incredibly eugenic process.
But also, just how, when you look at him, ludicrous it is to think the Stratford man did the work. Yet academia won’t budge. And then the wonderful de Vere and how his life and events fit like a glove. I suppose it reminds me of the vicelike grip we are in of cultural marxism, with black claimed white and up down. I want my Western Civilizatioin back, and I want de Vere to be properly credited and thanked for his lovely work.
@pierre de craon – Maybe I jumped in too soon; but [1] there were large numbers of Jews who hid their identity in 1900-ish; [2] The name ‘Dewey’ suggests Jews, at least to me; [3] Mencken seems to have known Dewey personally, or at least listened to lectures, but I admit I don’t know enough about him to know whether he had a Yiddish accent; [4] Dewey’s whole mind-set seems Jewish, at least so far as I’ve bothered with him – he’s an American ‘icon’ rather than British. I’m tempted to say I’m surprised there’s any doubt about the issue, but on second thoughts there are many, many examples of prominent people at the time (Col House, Trotsky, Freemasons, news and cinema people…. ) who kept their ancestry concealed as much as possible…
@Mickey Meadows – Yes, it’s quite terrifying how they won’t consider the issue. The leading American academic on ‘Shakespeare’ is a Jew. It’s an interesting test case, since all the protagonists have been dead for 500 years or so; therefore the vested interest must be entirely an academic clique. I don’t know if you’re interested in Anatoly Fomenko and his group of radical history re-daters. I’m agnostic about them, but I’d guess it’s possible de Vere met Scaliger, so the plays may contain references to constructing dates for long-past events. The whole period of post-Reformation Europe, plus the expanding horizons of sea exploration and land exploration – China, for example, and the rise of science and Renaissance art and letters, made that period arguably the most important ever. I sometimes wonder if removal of Jews is analogous to removal of the Catholic Church, and if so, if it happens, whether there’ll be something similar in future.
“I want my Western Civilizatioin back”
I don’t. I want it consigned to the pages of history. I want a new European civilization: no Christianity, no liberalism, no democracy, no capitalism, no communism. Just blood and soil.
@D. K.: You’re bringing coals to Newcastle, sir. I have been familiar with Dewey’s name since my boyhood. Sometime in the very early fifties, my dad had to explain to me that J.D. was not the same man as the then governor of New York, who was something of a revered figure chez moi and chez lots of other folks. (I recall vividly my mother’s follow-up joke, too: “But he is related to Donald Duck!” Remember Donald’s three nephews?)
My point is that Dewey’s name was very much alive outside the academy, in the sense that he was subject to lively attack as a controversial exponent of a false and vicious concept of human nature and a warped, anti-Christian theory of education. That is, among us mere goyim he was a familiar name but not a heroic figure, and the schools which I attended took pride in their frank rejection of him, his educational theories, and everything else he stood for. Alas, by this time no one in high authority in the American Catholic Church would publicly point to the Jews as the primary source of his fame and support, but very, very frequent mention was made—from the pulpit, in the home, even in the grammar school classroom—of his success as emblematic of the ongoing war on the Faith in the deceptively friendly confines of the United States.
Unfortunately, the very people who succeeded shortly after in making Vatican II a revolutionary event were also hard at work making sure that Dewey’s theories and Jewish supremacy generally were neither fought nor even questioned.
@Rerevisionist:
This is off-topic – unless there’s a Jewish link, which is very likely. ”
It isn’t off topic. Space exploration is one of the White race’s greatest feats. I am always suspicious of anyone who tries to downplay the significance of human beings walking literally on another world.
“I’m not sure what you mean, or could possibly mean, when you say the limitations of rockets are irrelevant. ”
Solid-fuel rockets are sufficient to allow us to reach Mars within 6 months. Waypoints or other structures, like the ISS, can be built anywhere in between. These rockets are not the end, but your idea, that they are bad because there is a limit to what they can do, is a terrible argument and I doubt it is one you would apply roundly.
“If men want to live on the moon, they need shelter, food, water, protection from the vacuum of space, and therefore large amounts of air, and so on, all of which presumably have to get there by rockets,”
Again, we have people living in space for months at a time. They have air, protection from the vacuum of space, food, water, etc. What is so hard to understand?
“Unless there’s some way to manufacture necessities on the moon etc, everything else would need to be shipped out.”
Nothing is impossible for Whites. In 1900, we were stuck on the ground and there were no commercially viable automoblies. 70 years later we were walking on another world. I doubt the cost of leaving earth, or the necessity of food on other astronomical bodies, could hold us back.
“You seem to be relying on the unthinking view that progress must always – well – progress.”
The technological progress of Whites has been inevitable to the present day. Or are you seriously arguing that technology in the 1800s was more advanced than it is now?
“Maybe you could indicate a website which provides conclusive plans for a moon base, and a Mars base, ”
Maybe you could indicate a website which provides conclusive plans for a nuclear power plant or MRI or an F22 Raptor? If you can’t, then I deny that those things are feasible.
“including sufficient defensive stuff to fend off meteors?”
Uh, people in the ISS already have fair protection against meteors. And the near side of the moon is even better, since huge swaths of it are almost untouched by meteor impacts thanks to earth’s gravity well. So meteor impacts are way down on the list of problems.
@Pierre de Craon:
In replying to you with that selection, Pierre, I was merely intending to amplify upon your own response. It was someone else’s eye that I was actually intending to catch….
@D. K.: Ah! I hope you catch your fish.
I certainly agree with everything in your comment. Just goes to show that if we cherry-pick data from Wikipedia as Wikipedians cherry-pick data to exalt the Eternal Victims, something useful might be salvaged from the site’s distortions.
@Alice Teller: Franklin’s good is he, Alice?
I’m not as good as I once was, but I’m as good once as I always was. If you get my drift.
Jed on spaceflight being whites’ greatest achievement! You’ve been suckered; or else you’re yet another hired liar. You don’t have any idea that ‘progress’ has some limits. Some things may well turn out to be impossible; I suspect cell biology is dealing with things so small there may be no way ever to investigate them scientifically, for example, though obviously the current practitioners keep up their pretences. I note you provide no website with solid info on getting to the moon or Mars. I won’t reply to any other posts of yours, out of respect for the other readers here.
@Pierre de craon – Do you have an explanation of the Catholic Church’s cowardice? I know they dislike the Russian Orthodox Church, but surely while it was being fleeced and wrecked by Jews, they might have made a comment? And what about Poland and the anti-German atrocity stories – surely they could have commented on the Holocaust fraud 50 years ago? How is the trick done? (The same thing is true of the Church of England, or course, and the BBC. Is it all done by the power of paper money?)
@Rerevisionist:
Questions are being begged. Facts not in evidence are being assumed.
Please rephrase as a frank charge and provide specifications, with appropriate times and places. Then I shall answer to the best of my ability.
@Rerevisionist:
In order to address the anti-German atrocities, please read href=”http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/deathinpoland/dp00.html”>Death in Poland.
Be advised to carefully enlarge the photographs, and read the captions.
It’s a German publication of 1940.
Having that done, return, and I will expose the filthy wartime atrocity propaganda as it is.
@fender: The Blood and Soil Bar – what will be the house specialty?
@Pieer de craon – It’s hard to say how disppointing I find your answer. Millions of Russians and other died at the hands of Jews. Catholics have a mixed history – Belgian Congo, Italy, Vietnam, and here you are, playing word games. Maybe everyone has a mixed history. But for more than 50 years Jews have defrauded the world with the ‘Holocaust’ fantasy. And Roman Catholics have done absolutely nothing. I think it’s fair to call them cowards, if not something a lot worse.
@GREZCM – thanks for the link. I hope the truth about Germany emerges. What I read on that site didn’t entirely please me – it was too small-scale and Anne Frank-y, and too concerned to sell books, for my taste. But good luck.
@Rerevisionist:
How disappointing, that we’ll have no petty discussion on the German propaganda booklet authored by a quite prominent German author – Edwin Erich Dwinger.
The publication is worth reading, analytically, with inevitable conclusion that anti-German filth atrocity propaganda was precluded by German anti-Polish filth atrocity propaganda. And there is more it, if someone wants to know.
There is a storyline, that German forces fought the war in the most honorable way, and German policies in conquered lands were just, though tough, but, understandably so, due to circumstances.
In my evolution towards revisionism, I was disillusioned in many ways. This includes Germany’s alleged “tough, but just” policies of WW2.
There was a Polish writer, by the name of Alfred Szklarski, who achieved prominence since 1960s in Poland for his adventurous novels addressed to early teenage boys. He portrayed a Tomek (Tom) – a teenage Pole, who traveled all corners of the world, experiencing many picturesque adventures. His stories are reminiscent to Carl May’s. Szklarski’s novels were huge success, with millions copies sold. I have read all of them, red-cheeked.
However, during WW2, Szklarski had a job of writing pornographic stories, published under German supervision. Moreover, the stories were illustrated with natural pictures of women in full nudity.
Here is the youtube publication of Polish TV, a very credible series “Errara do biografii”. From 2nd to 3 rd minute, the publications are leafed through: href=”German pornography in Poland”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=455BpKUP5GM where one can see pornography peddling in occupied Poland. At those times, it was unthinkable to publish such filth addressed to Germans.
Dignity of German women was “hollly”, as German propaganda stated, but it was not to be shared by others.
@Rerevisionist: Well, this is a tiresome charge, but a frank one at least. The short answer to it is that you either don’t know what you are talking about or else you are lying through your teeth. Apropos the Bolshevik Jews, for one matter, look up Pope Benedict XV (reigned 1914–22), read his statements and encyclicals, and then—if you are prepared to drop the ranting village atheist pose—we’ll have a basis for talk.
Before the subversion of the Second Vatican Council (and the two hundred years of Jewish subversion and infiltration that preceded and prepared for it), the Catholic Church was the most formidable foe of Jewish deceit and treachery and had been since the time of the Apostles. It will be again. (Had you half the investigative bent or instinct that you, on your vanity website, flatter yourself with having, you wouldn’t need to be told this.) I have provided supporting chapter and verse time and again over the past two years, but you irritably, indeed contemptuously demand that I return to page 1 and do it all over again for you, and why? Because of childish irritation that I burst the bubble of your John Dewey fantasy? Please!
Furthermore, am I to be expected to bandy words with a man who seriously contends that the Holocaust is merely a fifty-year-old fraud? The number of articles, links, and comments of a non-crank nature on this site’s archives alone—never mind books and journal articles—in support of the view that the roots of the fraud go back to the thirties must by now be in the hundreds. Have you lifted a single complaining finger to find and examine them? I distinctly remember when the actual, near-copyrighted term Holocaust, so spelt, first began appearing in the controlled mainstream press. It was the late sixties, perhaps 1970. (In other words, that’s not a fifty-year-old phenomenon either.) At the time, literally the only figures who made any fuss at all about this blasphemous preemptive usage—albeit a highly unpublicized fuss, Tribal dominance already being what it was—were a core group of Baptist and other Protestant fundies and a handful of post–Vatican II Catholic bishops and the entirety of Traditionalist Catholics (of whose number, I regret to say, I was not one in those long ago days). These unsung, unadmired, un-self-flattering Christians were the only people who had the guts to insist that history’s one true capital-T Holocaust took place on Calvary, never to be repeated and never to be manipulated for the profit of self-worshiping Judaic monsters. Were you shooting your mouth off then?
Finally, get one thing straight: Christ did not institute His church to jump through secular hoops of your choosing or anybody else’s. Do the words “my kingdom is not of this world” sound remotely familiar? The church’s divinely ordained mission is to preach the Truth of eternal life—life in heaven or hell, that is—and assist, with all its might, everyone who has ever lived or ever will live on this earth to do what is required to end up in the former permanent residence. The fact that your conception of what the church or churchmen ought to be doing fails to comport with this reality isn’t worth the proverbial bucket of warm spit. Similarly, the fact that a great many ordained and consecrated ministers have failed in their duty to the Faith also doesn’t detract from the mission itself. As Saint John Chrysostom—he whose eloquence was so great that he was given the sobriquet “anointed mouth” and whose hundreds of pages of denunciations of the Jews and their practices have made him an object of their unconcealed hatred for sixteen hundred years—wrote, “the floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops.” So please spare me this uninformed, adolescent crap about the church this or the church that. Get off your rear end and learn a thing or two.
Postscriptively, I note that you seem to be an Oxfordian. I suppose that means that there is some hope for you yet. Your discussion of Looney is sound, but you barely make mention of Ogburn’s extraordinary The Mysterious William Shakespeare or Ogburn’s own downsized version of it, The Man Who Was Shakespeare. Could it be that you haven’t read one or the other? Could this thus be yet another area where you know less than you pretend to?
Incidentally, I’ll be glad to submit all the appropriate copyright and publication information for Mysterious Will should you demand it of me. After all, my twenty-five-year-old copy of it is on a shelf a mere five feet away from where I sit now!
@Pierre de Craon:
(1) “the roots of the fraud go back to the thirties” should read “the roots of the fraud go back at least to the thirties.”
(2) “history’s one true capital-T Holocaust” should read “history’s one true capital-H Holocaust.”
Sorry, one and all, for both oversights.
@Pierre de Craon:
Bravo! Muscular Christianity at its best. Once again you prove Ipsa scientia potestas est
@Someday:
On Selectivity of Western Europeans, the Black Plague supposedly wiped out higher testosterone individuals also, leading to a huge jump in evolution if true.
@Rerevisionist:
Did Shakespear put alot of pornography in his works now? Or are those to be discovered later.
@GREZCM: Permit me a small sidetrack, sir, inspired by your mention of Karl May, whose name is completely unknown to most Americans. Here is a brief summary of him and his work from a reference book about the Old West written for high school and junior college students:
One of my closest friends, now deceased, was a Dutchman who had read a dozen or more of Karl May’s books, both in German and in Dutch translation, and frequently said that they were immeasurably better than the western novels of Zane Grey or Louis L’Amour (they could hardly be worse, of course). He spoke of Old Shatterhand and Winnetou as if they were dear friends of his whom I had never been lucky enough to meet, as indeed I wasn’t.
@Pierre de Craon:
I have not diminished Carl May’s fame, I suppose. I only wanted to say, that in Poland, there was an author (Alfred Szklarski), who wrote novels for early teen-age boys, likewise successful as Karl May’s, plus a peculiar stint during WW2. By the way, Szklarski was born in the USA but, MOST! probably was not a Jew. He returned to Poland, with his parents upon regaining independence.
@GREZCM: I understand what you were doing, and I meant no criticism of it in any way. Reading Karl May’s name just awakened good memories, and I wanted to share them.
@Pierre de Craon:
In fact, Szklarski’s novels were more inspired by the Polish novelist Henryk Sienkiewicz (Nobel Prize winner), than of May’s, but it’s a long story.
fyi. the rather attractive Hey Ruka has a new video up explaining why Diversity is bad for society (in 5 minutes). Some discussion of Lynn’s research and crime rates. Recommended viewing.
@Pierre de Craon: Heddesheimer would put it “at least ” to the Great War. No news to you, it may be to some. The First Holocaust:
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/tfh/
@Pierre de Craon: Men in habits and frocks aren’t all gormless or effete. Bishop Richard Williamson wins my admiration for his fearless words piercing the great myth of our times. Devastating work on the Holocaust, too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15xyzd45uRA
@Trenchant: I have been on this good man’s newsletter mailing list for years. About eight or nine years ago, long before he was branded a hater by the guardians of virtue, I was chatting with some friends and acquaintances after mass one Sunday (this was the very time when I permanently cut the conciliarist cord and went unreconstructed retro), and I mentioned something His Excellency had written in his (online) published letters and sermons. One woman said to me, “What do you think of his peculiar ideas about Jews, Masons, and 9/11?” I replied, “When it comes to those topics, I may be more peculiar than he is.” She looked around and then whispered, “That’s exactly what my husband says, too.”
@Pierre de Craon: Peculiar speaks ill of the times, not of you.
*Pierre de craon – I’m a bit surprised at your vehement outburst. You appear to be claiming that the Catholic Church was infiltrated, and that was the reason for their not doing anything about the ‘Holocaust’. A perfectly reasonable, and very likely true, answer, which appears to be supported by the fact they did nothing to expose the ‘Holocaust’, despites its being in a sense is non-denominational – it’s just another fraud which, like any big fraud, should be stamped on by everyone. Williamson of course is doing his best; but what about all the other non-speakers-out? I’m interested in this question because it also applies to the BBC and I’m puzzled exactly how it was done.
As the regards the ‘Great War’, of course it was a huge disaster and my feeling is it was probably supported and maybe caused by Jews, too. I see the revisonist processes as going back through time, and reexamining everything. Including the Civil War and slavery in the USA.
It seemed to be implied I had no idea the ‘Holocaust’ had precedents in Jewish lies. In fact my site has (for example) the complete text of Frank Britton on ‘Communism’, and other e.g. 1930s material, much of it going back to the middle ages.
As regards de Vere, this is all off-topic so I kept it short. My site isn’t intended to be exhaustive – that of course would take many volumes. It’s what I regard as an overview, looking at all the aspects of the issue, the idea being to arouse curiosity and with luck induce people to make some effort. There’s a truly bizarre idea, which has been out there maybe for centuries, that ‘Shakespeare’ is easily understood and was put on at popular theatres – if you watch the extras on the ‘Anonymous’ DVD you’ll see the hack scriptwriter thinks de Vere was the same sort of person as him. Incredible. If some people’s scepticism is aroused, that’s about as much as I can ask.
Finally, and this of course is problematical, the idea of an etheral God fathering a son who after being killed can save everyone, if they do the right things, is so ridiculous that no rational person can accept it.
@Rerevisionist: Ethereal as opposed to…?
@Athanasius:
Not that smart ???
Yet very rich & successful —
@Trenchant: … Republican, surely. Odd you didn’t figure that one out without assistance.
“One thing I’ve never understood is why Kevin MacDonald never addresses the evolutionary weakness of europeans.”
It’s not a weakness in the context in which it evolved. An open, individualistic but still homogenous society maximizes synergy and technical innovation which leads to immense strength and prosperity as long as everyone within the nation is of that type.
It’s weakness is to internal competition from invasive alien populations who don’t share those open individualistic traits.
All White people need is to understand their nature requires that everyone within their borders has to be of that type. All clannish minorities – not just Jews – will automatically become parasites.
.
“Northerners were the greatest theoreticians of race and racism…Maybe the current anti-nationalism is not in the genes, but a cultural…”
That’s the point. Most peoples on the planet are instinctively and naturally racial. Northern euros lost that (only to a degree of course, these things are along a spectrum) and started to replace it with an ideal-based racialism. Having an ideal based racialism rather than an instinctive one like Jews is what allowed it to be overturned.