Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon


Alfred Kinsey, Time Magazine cover, 1953
“The only unnatural act is that which you cannot perform.”

It comes as a big shock to learn that two of the fathers of the Sexual Revolution were both sexual perverts with an evangelical mission in life: to infect society with their wacky ideas and turn the world into a vast masturbatorium.

I refer to the 2oth century’s premier sex researcher Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956) and his notorious contemporary, cult psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957).

Steeped in the dangerous claptrap of the fraudulent Freud—see here and here—both Kinsey and Reich enthusiastically embraced the laissez-faire Freudian philosophy: “I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life”. Like their Viennese mentor, they would have been only too pleased to add, “If only Americans knew—we are bringing them the plague!”

According to Freud and his followers, anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots in sexual repression. Its cure lay in “sexual liberation”. The theory, in its crudest and simplest form, amounted to this: instead of picking on the Jews, why not just chill out and have sex?

Advertisement

The underlying assumption here is that sex is the great liberator and that all political and economic frustrations can be alleviated by sexual activity—particularly by obsessive and addictive sex. People who spend all their waking hours in search of sexual stimulation are obviously unfit to organize pogroms, mount bloody revolutions, or become a threat to the rich and powerful.

This, in a nutshell, was the philosophy of Wilhelm Reich, high priest of the “masturbation industry”, to borrow a phrase from E. Michael Jones’s magisterial work Libido Dominandi, where Kinsey and Reich are both discussed in great detail.

Sex, according to the philosophers of the Sexual Revolution inspired by Reich, is to be the panacea for all society’s problems: the new opium of the people. If people cannot have bread, let them eat cake. If they cannot have jobs, security, fulfillment, and a valid purpose in life, let them have sex as a substitute. If nothing else, recreational sex will provide a useful distraction and give people something to do.

The Case Against Reich

Willhelm Reich

A compulsive masturbator himself, Reich believed that masturbation was a useful tool in producing “well-balanced” individuals without religious hang-ups or anti-Semitic attitudes. His major finding (here and here) was that masturbation and the religious life were incompatible, which is why he advocated masturbation as the most effective means of eradicating the religious instinct—which he regarded as the ultimate evil. “What Reich discovered was a fundamental truth of sexual politics, one discovered by the Catholic Church long ago, “Dr E. Michael Jones comments. “Either masturbation destroys your prayer life, or prayer destroys your ability to enjoy masturbation. The two forms of activity are psychically mutually exclusive.” (See here, p. 259)  Like many other psychoanalysts, Reich is known to have masturbated his female patients in therapeutic sessions. “The pleasure of living and the pleasure of orgasm are identical,” he pontificated, thereby equating infinite happiness with the provision of an infinite number of orgasms. 

Reich was, by his own account, not only a compulsive masturbator from early childhood but a self-confessed pervert with wide-ranging sexual interests. Beginning sexual activity at the early age of four with a maidservant whose pubic hair he was allowed to play with, he went on to seduce the family cook at eleven-and-a-half. While still a small boy, he had begun to take an unhealthy interest in farm animals and could be seen prowling around the stables where he “stimulated mares by inserting whip handles in their vaginas.” At 15 he began visiting brothels where his insatiable appetites made him the talk of the town. Here he is in his Autobiography describing his uncontrollable libido:

Was it the atmosphere, the clothing, the red lights, the provocative nakedness, the smell of whores—I don’t know! I was pure sensual lust. I ceased to be. I was all penis! I bit, scratched, thrust, and the girl had quite a time with me! I thought I would have to crawl inside her…

Nursing an incestuous passion for his mother, he would snoop on her having sex with the family tutor. “I need a woman,” he wrote in his journal, “who is both mother and whore.” Once he was tempted to break into his mother’s room, while she was engaged in sex with his tutor, and demand to be part of a threesome:

I heard them kissing, whispering, and the horrible creaking of the bed in which my mother lay. Ten feet away stood her own child, a witness to her disgrace…. All I remember of that catastrophic night is that I wanted to rush into the room, but was held back by the thought: they might kill you!… I crept back to bed, without hope of consolation, my youthful spirit broken! For the first time, a deep feeling of misfortune and of having been abandoned overcame me…. [I even thought of] breaking in on them and demanding that she have intercourse with me too (shame!), threatening that otherwise I would tell Father.

As it turns out, he did inform his father about his mother’s infidelities, conveniently omitting to mention his own incestuous desires for his mother. His disloyalty to her in becoming an informer, combined with the brutal ill-treatment she was to receive from her tyrannical husband Leon, finally drove his mother to suicide. She swallowed a pint of Lysol, a common domestic cleaning fluid, and died in agony. Another account fills in the bizarre background details to this family saga: “She swallowed one poison after another, while Leon continued to beat her as she died” (emphasis added).

Wilhelm Reich, her son, the famous psychoanalyst-to-be, was only 13 at the time.

This is the man who went on to become, like his equally perverted contemporary Alfred Kinsey, one of the godfathers of the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s.

From the likes of Kinsey and Reich, the easily duped Americans were to receive instructions on how to conduct themselves sexually.

(For corroborative details, see Wilhelm Reich [pdf download])

As part of the neo-Freudian school of psychoanlysts, Reich received the enthusiastic support of a number of psychiatrists and writers, many of them part of the Jewish psychoanalytic sub-culture that was so important to erecting a powerful critique of Western culture, reaching its peak influence in the post-WWII era: Herbert Marcuse, Erich Fromm, Adorno, Horkheimer, Alexander Lowen, Stanley Keleman, Moshe Feldenkreis, Ida Rolf, Paul Goodman, Norman Mailer, Allen Ginsberg, Saul Bellow, Fritz Perls and Arthur Janov (see here and here).

Jewish Porn star Richard Pacheco, who had wanted to become a rabbi at one stage and had even applied for admission to a seminary, was an ardent admirer of Reich whose books he read from cover to cover. Reich apparently influenced his final decision to become a porn star rather than a rabbi. Like his mentor, Pacheco was also an unabashed masturbator. When asked if he still watched pornographic movies now that he had retired from acting and become a senior citizen, he replied with disarming candor, “Occasionally I’ll toss one on for masturbation if my wife ain’t around.”

In 1954, at the height of the McCarthy era, Reich was imprisoned on a charge of medical fraud for trying to promote and sell “orgone boxes”. Slightly smaller than telephone boxes, these were little compartments that patients were told to sit in for short periods to soak up “cosmic rays”. These would reportedly reinvigorate them sexually, cure impotence and cancer, and act as an antidote to radiation poisoning from UFOs which (according to Reich) had secretly invaded the earth. (See here)

While interviewing Einstein, Reich told the great man in confidence that most people considered him (Reich) mad. Einstein replied dryly, “I can believe that.”

The Case against Kinsey

It comes as no surprise to learn that Kinsey, like Reich, was also an avid consumer of pornography, even going so far as to photograph his own penis on several occasions and getting his wife to act in home-made porn movies. His favorite boast was that his Institute’s collection of pornography was the second largest in the world, the largest being housed at the Vatican. A malicious lie, it turned out, since it was easy enough to prove that the Vatican was entirely porn free. (See “The Case Against Kinsey”, here)

It has to be emphasized that Alfred Kinsey, though born and brought up as a Christian, was not only an atheist with a lifelong hatred of Christianity in general and the Catholic church in particular, but was also a Zionist and Shabbat goy who owed his spectacular success entirely to organized Jewry. His fraudulent research, designed to make deviancy appear to be the norm, was generously funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and other Jewish-dominated organizations. (pp. 340–341). “By the time it cut him off in 1954,” E. Michael Jones tells us, “the Rockefeller Foundation had poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into the coffers of the Kinsey Institute.”

The only reason they decided to stop the funding is that by this time the Institute, anxious to retain its squeaky clean image, could no longer take the risk of being associated with Kinsey. His shady criminal activities with a predatory homosexual pedophile, a pervert who had molested and tortured 800 children, suddenly made Kinsey persona non grata (see E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi, pp. 327–337).

A sexual pervert of the kinkiest kind, Kinsey once inserted a toothbrush into his urethra and had himself filmed, subsequently adding this gem to his porn collection. Himself a homosexual with an avid interest in little boys, he would make a point of measuring the penis, both recumbent and erect, of every male he interviewed while conducting his “research”. Why? One can only guess.

A year before he died, Kinsey sliced off the foreskin of his penis with a pocket knife—a crude attempt at self-circumcision. No one has been able to figure out why he did this. Kinsey’s death, however, has been ascribed to his sexual proclivities.

Dr. Judith Reisman writes:

An early adherent and advocate of masturbation, Kinsey suffered an untimely death due, at least in part, to ‘orchitis,’ a lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of orgiastic self-abuse.

The New York Times, owned by the Sulzberger family and known to be America’s foremost  organ of left/liberal propaganda, did its best (like the Rockefeller Foundation) to promote Kinsey and turn his name into a household word. Indeed, it comes as no surprise to learn that Arthur Hays Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times, was actually on the board of trustees for the Rockefeller Foundation all during the time it was approving money for Kinsey’s dubious experiments (see here, p. 340).

Kinsey’s most vocal critic and nemesis, Dr. Judith Reisman, has this to say about the Kinsey-Rockefeller connection:

The Rockefeller Foundation was the major funding source for Kinsey, even though it had ample, repeated warning from noted statisticians and social scientists that Kinsey’s pseudo-science was a hoax….

Kinsey is second only to Darwin in the secular pantheon, and a lot of people recognize that exposing Kinsey’s lies is a major assault on the Sexual Revolution and a threat to the sexual license they enjoy….

Kinsey claimed to have proven, based upon the deviant samples used in his research, that 95 percent of American men engaged in deviant sex and thus were sex offenders….

Kinsey believed that all sex was legitimate—pedophilia, bestiality, incest, adultery, prostitution, group sex, transvestitism, sadomasochism—and he worked to overthrow all laws prohibiting any of these perversions. (See here)

Kinsey went out of his way to interview the dregs of society, frequenting slums, gay bars, brothels and prisons. From these interviews he formed sweeping generalizations about the sexual habits of society in general. His methodology, you could say, was outrageous. In Gary, Indiana, for example, he collected 71 case histories, all of them based on interviews with Black female prostitutes. Taking note of what these women told him, Kinsey was apparently happy to conclude that the average White American housewife was a cat in heat—sexually adventurous in the extreme! American psychologist Abraham Maslow put it mildly when he said, “The whole basis for Kinsey’s statistics was proven to be shaky.” (See here, p. 322 and p. 324)

Dr E. Michael Jones is as convinced as Dr Judith Reisman that Kinsey was far more than just an impudent fraud, he was in fact a criminal: a blackmailer (p. 330 ff), a perverted pornographer, and a pedophile who masturbated little children as part of his so-called “research”.

One four-year-old was “specifically manipulated” for twenty-four hours around the clock. This child achieved twenty-six orgasms in this time period. Another eleven-month-old infant had fourteen “orgasms”, according to the Kinseyan definition, in a period of thirty-eight minutes, or one orgasm every 2.7 minutes. (E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns, p. 106)

It cannot be stressed too strongly that all this criminal activity was supported by generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation to the Kinsey Institute, still flourishing at Indiana University. Waxing eloquent with indignation, Jones’s devastating conclusion is that Americans have to all intents and purposes been led over the cliff like Gadarene swine by Kinsey and his corrupt supporters:

The Rockefeller family was not above supporting illegal activities to attain their ends. … They were willing to use psychological warfare against their fellow Americans. … Sex was part of the arsenal of psychological warfare, and the Rockefellers’ interest in supporting Professor Kinsey of Indiana University gave every indication that they were planning to use that weapon in dealing with new enemies. (p. 313) …

The Kinsey Institute was now in the pornography business and the Rockefeller Foundation was footing the bill . … the Rockefellers were [now] funding the filming of the molestation of children. (p. 336) …

The Rockefellers were interested in social engineering through the manipulation of sexuality, and the Kinsey Report was the vehicle which would make that possible in the near future, with the collaboration of a supine mass media culture. (p. 341)

If Kinsey is still a national hero today, the ultimate authority on all things sexual, we have to thank the Rockefeller Foundation for this remarkable public relations stunt.

The bizarre private lives of sex researchers who dupe millions of people into buying their books—and enthusiastically adopting their mad, bad, and dangerous ideas—simply beggars belief.

Sexual Perversion is good for you: The case of The Independent 

Here is another representative of the elite intelligentsia, British prize-winning author Howard Jacobson, who happens coincidentally to be Jewish. He, too, would be proud to wear a T-shirt sporting the slogan: SEXUAL PERVERSION IS  GOOD  FOR  YOU!

Prizewinning author Howard Jacobson puts in a good word for sexual perversion:

It is only when we explore the outer boundaries of our sexual desires that we become most fully human.  We are all sick in our way….When he wasn’t looking at pornography or writing The Trial, Kafka visited brothels. I am glad for his sake and for literature’s that he did. I feel about prostitution as I do about pornography—that a man ought to avail himself of whatever is on offer…

We grow a little freer when we read De Sade’s One Thousand Days of Sodom, though we know we cannot live up to its lawlessness….We must find the space to think, and where possible to act, rebelliously, refusing all attempts to confine us to the hell of the normative…

We are strange creatures, part angels of reflection, part beasts that claw the earth. It is too cruel that an accidental species as peculiar as we are should ever have been made to think there is a right way and a wrong way of conducting ourselves sexually, as though there were some divine pattern we were framed to follow. I don’t say that giving ourselves over to the demoniacal, or just the deviant, will necessarily make us happy … but the straight and narrow has never yet made anyone anything but miserable. — Howard Jacobson, In Praise of Perversion. (Emphasis added)

According to this unabashed advocate of sexual perversion, being sexually normal is “hell”. Add spice to your life by making use of prostitutes and pornography. A man, after all, “ought to avail himself of whatever is on offer.”

Howard Jacobson is a Jewish writer who has written novels in which sexual perversion always plays a predominant part. For example, in his novel Peeping Tom he gives us voyeurism; in The Act of Love he dishes up generous dollops of fetishism. All Jacobson’s heroes, like Philip Roth’s Portnoy, are devout masturbators. Jerking off, you could say, is their substitute for religion.

Jacobson’s article advocating perversion was published in a newspaper in which he has appeared as a regular columnist for many years. The same British newspaper, the Independent, has also published for many years the articles of another Jewish writer known as Johann Hari who shows an equal aptitude for sexual perversion. In 2002 Hari wrote an infamous article for the Guardian, Forbidden Love, in which he had put in a good word for incest.

A self-confessed plagiarist, Hari received the Orwell Prize fraudulently in 2008 with the full backing of his newspaper editor who vouched for his veracity. He was forced to return the prize in 2011 when the full extent of his plagiarisms and other duplicities became apparent. For example, he had made up many stories for the Independent, including African atrocities, passing off fiction as fact. Later on, to make matters worse, this gay rights activist and mincing homosexual was to be outed as a writer of gay incest porn.

Now consider this bizarre coincidence: two Jewish writers, both vocal advocates of sexual perversion, receive major literary awards in quick succession (in 2008 and 2010), thereby giving an air of legitimacy and glamor to sexual perversion.

Orwell prizewinner Johann Hari, incest apologist and writer of gay incest porn

If you’re repelled by the idea of having gay sex with your brother, don’t upset yourself needlessly by reading Hari’s How my little brother learned to be a whore, written under the secret pen name of “David Rose”.

*            *            *

Now try and connect the dots here: during the many years that these two Jewish writers, Howard Jacobson and Johann Hari, both of them enthusiasts for deviant sexuality, had been regular columnists for the Independent, the editor of that newspaper was also a Jew: one Simon Kelner.

And now for the Big Surprise: the Independent is also Jewish-owned!

Here, then, is the pattern: Jewish columnists pushing sexual perversion, Jewish editor encouraging sexual perversion by publishing their articles, and Jewish newspaper tycoon presiding over the same edifice of sexual perversion by making it all possible by his ownership of the newspaper.

Who owns the Independent?

Step forward Alexander Yevgenievich Lebedev, listed in Forbes magazine in May 2008 as the 358th richest person in the world. Estimated fortune: $3.1 billion. Mr Lebedev, a Russian oligarch, ran away from Russia with billions of rubles under his belt when Vladimir Putin came to power and decided to claw back some of the ill-gotten wealth that a small number of mega rich Jews had filched from the Russian treasury.

On 25 March 2010, Lebedev bought the Independent for a nominal fee of £1, with the derisory token sum of £9.25m to be paid a few months later.

This reminds me of that other Russian oligarch, convicted crook Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who in 1995 rigged an auction in which he managed to steal Russia’s largest oil company, Yukos, reportedly worth $40 billion, for the laughably small sum of $300 million—a mere fraction of its value. (See here)

How do they do it?

The Case of Frank Kameny

Founding father of the gay rights movement in America, Jewish pornographer and perversion promoter Frank Kameny was the main force behind pressuring the American Psychiatric Association (in 1973)  into reclassifying homosexual activities as “normal sex”. Hitherto regarded as a socially destructive mental disease that was curable, homosexuality was now given the green light and reclassified as a normal and healthy “alternative lifestyle”.

Here is Kameny saying nice things about sexual perversion:

If something which someone arbitrarily defines as a ‘sexual perversion’ provides happiness for consenting adult participants, then its enjoyment is enshrined in basic Americanism. So let us have more and better enjoyment of more and better sexual perversions, by whatever definition, by more and more consenting adults. We will all be the better off thereby. And that will be Americanism in action…

Having given his imprimatur to sexual perversion in general, Kameny then gives bestiality his blessings. He himself is not particularly keen on having sex with dogs, he tells us, but he sees no reason why other people shouldn’t have sex with the family pet if that’s what turns them on:

Bestiality is not my thing. But it seems to be a harmless foible or idiosyncrasy of some people. As long as the animal doesn’t mind (and the animal rarely does), I don’t mind, and I don’t see why anyone else should. (See here).

How can Kameny be so sure animals “don’t mind”? Has he asked them? No, he casually assumes they will be delighted. Had he studied the Babylonian Talmud, he might have been astonished to learn that bestiality was forbidden to a woman at all times, though it was permissible for men under certain circumstances—a clear case of double standards. “If a woman allows herself to be made the subject thereof, whether naturally or not, she is guilty. But if a man commits bestiality, he is liable only for a connection in a natural manner, but not otherwise.” (Scroll down to picture of Talmud, page 55a, here).

To clarify: For a woman, sex with an animal is wrong at all times, whether the sex is natural or unnatural. For a man, on the other hand, sex with an animal is wrong only when the sex is “natural”. It’s NOT wrong when the sex is unnatural! Figure that out for yourself. I confess I am stumped.

We’ve all heard of Jewish chutzpah, but it comes as a surprise to learn that this famous gay rights icon Kameny has the cheek to condemn God Almighty for his prudish homophobia. Wagging his finger at the God of the Bible, Kameny describes him as “a sinful homophobic bigot who needs to repent.”

Sigh. That’s the trouble with God. If he’d been less bigoted, he would have allowed Adam and Steve to have sex—and make babies.

It comes as even a greater surprise to learn that President Obama recently conferred the supreme honor on this bestiality-supporting Jewish paragon of sexual perversion by rolling out the red carpet for him at the White House, actually shaking his hand and congratulating him on the remarkable benefits he had bestowed on mankind.

“We are proud of you, Frank!”

At a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) reception held at the Oval Office in June, 2009, President Obama congratulated Frank Kameny, gay rights pioneer and promoter of sexual perversion, for his outstanding contributions to society.  “We are proud of you, Frank,” he said, “and we are grateful to you for your leadership.” (See here)

 

Jews Dominate the American Porn Industry: The Case of Reuben Sturman

Let’s approach this subject from another angle now by asking a simple question: What group dominates the systematic promotion and dissemination of pornography in society? What group can therefore be held responsible for the mass contamination of minds that takes place on a daily basis in Hollywood movies, television shows, magazines, newspapers, and advertising?

We shall now consider this question as objectively as possible, relying only on established facts from the most reputable sources. No source could be more reputable than academic historian Dr Nathan Abrams, world authority on Jewish pornography. I have therefore relied heavily on Dr Abrams. His classic article on Jewish dominance in the porn industry, Triple-exthnics, was published in the winter edition, 2004, of the prestigious Jewish Quarterly.

From 1890 onwards, the main peddlers of inflammatory erotica in America were immigrant Jews of German and East European origin. In the postwar era, America’s most notorious pornographer was a Jew: Reuben Sturman, known as the ‘Walt Disney of Porn’.

By the end of the 1960s, Sturman ranked at the top end of adult magazine distributors and by the mid-70s he owned over 200 adult bookstores, including updated versions of the traditional peepshow booth.

This involved a hole in the partition wall of the booth, through which a pervert would thrust his erect penis, allowing an anonymous individual on the other side of the partition to fellate him discreetly without being seen. The hole in the wall, for some reason, is called a “glory hole”. And its inventor was almost certainly a degenerate Jew associated with Sturman and his sleaze factory.

Convicted of tax evasion and other crimes, Sturman was to die in prison in 1997, surrounded by a stack of his own pornographic magazines. His son David continued the family tradition of constructing “glory holes” across America for the delectation of millions.

If I focus here on the sordid aspects of the peephole, it is not out of prurience but because I wish to draw attention to the fact that Jewish-dominated Hollywood during the next few years has thought it perfectly legitimate to introduce the glory hole into the average American home, which includes children, as a normal and healthy ingredient of family entertainment.

The same people who try so hard to squeeze tears out of the eyes of the public with Holocaust movies such as Schindler’s List, are also, it seems, doing their best to contaminate the minds of the public with movies like Sex Drive, Serial Mom, Jackass Number Two, and other such excursions into the sleazy world of lavatorial lust.

Family entertainment has now been reduced to nasty and scurrilous scenarios such as this: lurkers hanging around urinals hunting for sex, heavy breathers in cubicles with their pants round their ankles, lesbians thrusting their breasts through portholes cut in female washroom walls, female voyeurs invading male washrooms and looking through a peephole only to have their eyes injured by a rampant penis rearing up at the other side, deadly snakes sinking their fangs into tumescent organs thrust though same peephole—and other such abominations too depressing to mention. (See list here.)

It’s worth noting that all this gross indecency continued unchecked without the American government lifting a finger to intervene. There was no attempt to rein in the smut merchants or restrain them from defecating on the cherished values of Christian America. It’s almost as if the ruling classes wanted to see their “huddled masses” turn into salivating perverts.

The reason for this laissez-faire attitude to the systematic demoralization of Christian America is not hard to identify. It clearly lay in the fact that America’s former elite, the WASPs, had already capitulated to the rising Jewish elite. They had been debased and corrupted themselves by the polluted mental atmosphere in which they lived, a psychosphere created by the philosemitic media and Hollywood. One could hardly expect these victims of moral decay to clean out the Augean stables of America, given that they were themselves accustomed to wallow in the same filth and feculence. When the Good Shepherds are up the creek without a paddle, what hope for the good sheeple?

Parable of the Blind Leading the Blind, James Tissot
“If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” (MATT. XV. 14)

The link between pornography and sex crime

According to Rabbi Samuel Dresner, an orthodox Jew (born 1923 in Chicago), the rootless Jews who ran Hollywood and were behind the lucrative porn industry were all “despoilers of morality and corrupters of culture.” Indeed, Jewish history for Rabbi Dresner was “one long battle against sexual deviancy.” (See here and here)

Ted Bundy, Serial Killer

In an interview with his prison psychologist, James C. Dobson, Bundy confessed to the murder of over a hundred young women. Agonizing over his life-long addiction to pornography, he revealed how it had fueled his compulsive behavior. “I’ve lived in prison for a long time now,” the serial killer confided, “and I’ve met a lot of men who were motivated to commit violence. Without exception, every one of them was deeply involved in pornography—deeply consumed by his addiction.”  (See here). Homosexual serial killer Gary Bishop was equally candid in revealing that porn had turned him into a sex killer. “Pornography was a determining factor in my downfall,” he admitted.

Perhaps the most chilling and persuasive porn-made-me-into-a-sex-killer story is that of Thomas Schiro of Evansville, Indiana, whose obsession with pornography from the age of six onward—accompanied by compulsive masturbation 10-12 times a day—led him into a spree of sex crimes in the 1970s and early 80s. “The one thing that remained constant in Schiro’s slide toward the ultimate violation was his constant use of pornography,” Dr E. Michael Jones reports. “It was the gas that fueled his obsession.” (Libido Dominandi, p. 569).

THE AXMAN COMETH, Joshua Hoffine 

“Exposure to erotica has no impact on moral character….. The increased availability of explicit sexual materials has been accompanied by a decrease in the incidence of sexual crime…. There is no evidence to date that exposure to explicit sexual materials plays a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior.” (The Lockhart Commission Report on Pornography. Quoted here, p. 558) 

In an ideal world, there would be no need or place for pornography. Porn is a toxic product of dystopia. Any government that permits it is under the dominion of evil.

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Her articles can be read here, her poetry here

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

364 Comments to "Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance"

  1. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 26, 2012 - 6:18 pm | Permalink

    @Winterlight:

    Your comment is a pleasant surprise. Thanks for letting me know.

    I agree that what has happened to the word “gay” is unfortunate. And the same is true for the beautiful colors of the rainbow.

    Sometimes I feel unworthy to receive some of the comments that I do. And this is one of those times. Of course, your comment wasn’t just for me; it’s for anyone who reads it.

  2. Winterlight's Gravatar Winterlight
    June 26, 2012 - 6:39 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    You used the term “homophobic” (or “homophobe”) several times in your comment.

    I think it is worth mentioning that that word was invented by a Jew.

    Also, that word (“homophobe”) is commonly used by homosexual activists to intimidate people into accepting (or at least being quiet about) the homosexual agenda.

    It’s been a very effective tactic.

    I agree with your comment entirely. I myself used the word “homophobe” in its commonly accepted dictionary meaning as someone who disapproves of homosexuality. According to this definition, I am myself a “homophobe”, since I find it hard to enthuse over sodomy and the alleged delights of anal intercourse.

    The way this word is used nowadays is to suggest that there is something nasty about being a “homophobe”. The word, like the word “Nazi”, has taken on deeply pejorative connotations.

    These queers are cultural saboteurs: they have destroyed the beautiful English word “gay” and made it impossible for us to use it in its original meaning. Sad. Because there is no equivalent word in the English language.

    “Queer” is another word they have ruined. It’s no longer possible for the novelist to say: “The gay corsair, with a merry twinkle in his eye, gave me a distinctly queer look.”

  3. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 26, 2012 - 6:06 am | Permalink

    @The Khazar Hunter:
    Your work of Khazar hunting is much appreciated, but when it comes to criticizing certain terms, you’ll have to know their proper etymologies. For that some elementary knowledge of Latin and Greek is required.

    Homophobia doesn’t mean “fear of men”, nor does homosexual mean “sexual man”. To be sure homo in Latin means “man” ( in the sense of “human being” ; “man” as opposed to “woman” is vir in Latin), but in this case it is not from Latin but from the Greek word homos meaning “common” or “equal”. Thus “homosexual” means a person who is sexually attracted to someone of his own sex, while homophobia means fear for the homo, the contracted form of the word homosexual.

    It is true that instead of “fear” ( phobia ) a better term could have been used ( such as “aversion”) but that’s the way it is.

    Whether homosexuals really are “gay” people is a moot point. My impression is that their life is rather problematic and that they are far less “gay” than normal people.

    As long as homosexuals live their own life and don’t bother us they can be tolerated. After all they are a minority that will always exist. It is only when homosexuality is deliberately used to undermine society that it becomes problematic. I’m thinking here of gay-prides, gay-marriage, adoption of chidren by homo-couples, stress on homosexuality in “sex-education” to children etc.

    • FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
      June 26, 2012 - 8:43 am | Permalink

      To take + a masculine cover = apo+calypse in ancient Greek.
      Hetero bullying is what causes gay pride, because if we submit to hetero pressure that means allowing ourselves to be stoned to death or commiting suicide.
      Women who have reproductive sex exclusively end up with total hysterectomies by their fifties. Men who do not releive the pressure often enough end up with prostrate dysfunctions. Societies that practice hetero reproductive sex exclucively end up overpopulated, leading to extinction of species for consumption, leading to ecological dysfunctions/breakdowns/disasters leading to plagues, famines, pestulance. Teaching your children to hate causes hate crimes, so you loose your children. So human reproduction is problematic no matter how you look at it. It’s better to educate your children on how to enjoy sex without causing dammage.

  4. The Khazar Hunter's Gravatar The Khazar Hunter
    June 25, 2012 - 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Thanks to the moderators for allowing my previous comment. In the heat of the battle against these psychopathic Zionist criminals, kind of go out of my way and call things the way I see them. Glad you altered the original word I wrote then, about that Chicago puppet selected by the masters. My apologies for that. Still in keeping with the topic of the article wanted to bring attention on how the practitioners of this sick behavior, have an agenda and a tendency to change word definitions and use them to sustain their unnatural purposes. First for example the term GAY. The true meaning is CAREFREE and nothing more. Homophobia: means fear of men. Homo is the ancient Latin language of the Lazio in Rome that means MAN. Phobia is a term of Greek etymology origin that means just that: FEAR. Clearly no to be confused with the word Hate. Fear and hate have nothing in common. HOMOSEXUAL refers to: a sexual man. Can forget the ladies: FEMOSEXUAL= a sexual woman. That’s just a part of the consistent word meaning tampering and many other things that they are experts with.

  5. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 25, 2012 - 8:00 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    I want to add to my comment above, that I want all people to have peace and joy.

    I don’t know if that is possible. I hope so.

  6. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 25, 2012 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

    @Winterlight:

    “There are others here who believe the opposite, however, and seem violently homophobic.”

    Hi Winterlight

    You used the term “homophobic” (or “homophobe”) several times in your comment.

    I think it is worth mentioning that that word was invented by a Jew.

    Also, that word (“homophobe”) is commonly used by homosexual activists to intimidate people into accepting (or at least being quiet about) the homosexual agenda.

    It’s been a very effective tactic.

    (And it is very clear that there really is a homosexual agenda, even though so many people scoff at the term.)

    I don’t make fun of people who consider themselves homosexual or “gay.” But I think it is good to be honest about the fact that homosexual attraction/behavior is disordered, some kind of sexual perversion.

    At the same time, I don’t support a lot of the things that heterosexual couples do. So I’m not trying to scapegoat those who consider themselves homosexual.

  7. 49er's Gravatar 49er
    June 25, 2012 - 12:00 pm | Permalink

    This was a stellar article! Kudos to the author for highliting this most scandalous chain of events! I look forward subsequent

  8. Orion_Blue's Gravatar Orion_Blue
    June 21, 2012 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    @Bear:

    I quite agree about the way in which a (somewhat belated) war on pornography’ is really no such war. People can avoid that dreck if they so wish. The real war is against Heresy and that is something we should all be mindful of.

    I look at websites such as ours and see both articles that are thoughtful and considered, often times with thoughtful and considered comments and responses. I see mainstream sites with reproduced snippets from mainstream media with far more intemperate responses that never get removed.

    If In see this, then I am sure our ideological and political adversaries can do likewise. This is what scares them. It really scares them. This is why we now have an increased call for internet censorship all of a sudden..

    If we have to register for adult access to view heretical web sites, this puts us on a par with those who would be required to register for smut and sleaze.

  9. Winterlight's Gravatar Winterlight
    June 19, 2012 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Fender,

    You obviously believe that homosexuals will fit into any future White Nationalist state and must be encouraged to join. There are others here who believe the opposite, however, and seem violently homophobic. So here are a few questions for you:

    (1) How is this question to be decided about who gains entry to the future White Nationalist state? Is the homophile to get his way or the homophobe? Either way, one party is not going to want to join the future WN state. If you get your way, for example, and homosexuals are welcome, then you will be alienating maybe millions of WN homophobes who won’t want to join in that case. This is obviously a problem.

    (2) I am assuming from your previous comment that you are, if not pro-homosexual, at any rate that you are tolerant to the presence of homosexuals. So as a matter of interest, if homosexual are to gain entry and be welcome in your future WN state, would you allow same-sex marriage?

    I ask these questions in a neutral way. I am neither pro-homosexual nor anti-homosexual. There are so many other questions I’d like to ask.

    For example, would Jewish converts to Christianity be allowed to join the WN state? What about the fair children of a White female and a Muslim or Asian female?

    I’ve never quite figured out the criteria of who gains admission to the hypothetical WN state and who doesn’t gain admission. The homosexual is obviously a case in point, with some opposed to his entry and others, like yourself, in favor of his entry.

  10. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 19, 2012 - 12:52 pm | Permalink

    @fender:
    I agree entirely – and the people who came into the streets to protest integrated schools looked like vicious, hate-filled idiots. It saddens my how many young people cannot see the parallels.

  11. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 19, 2012 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

    I just thought I’d post this, since we were discussing homosexuality in this thread:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7GhBKuVxZE&feature=player_embedded

    This kind of crap just embarasses me. This guy, who looks and sounds like a Chris Farley character from an SNL sketch, does more harm to our cause than good. He’s doing exactly what our enemies want: standing in the streets and screaming at people about things that don’t even matter. How does protesting against homosexuality at all help increase the number of White babies being born? Those people aren’t going to be reproducing anyway!

    And this dork calls himself NaturesFinest. LOL! The guy’s an untermensch if I ever saw one. If he’s nature’s finest, then we’re really screwed. For the women here, who among you would actually breed with this guy? If someone believe that homosexuality in any way endangers Whites then let’s see the data on it. Do some research, don’t just make a sign and shout in the streets like some retard. It wouldn’t surprise me if this guy was actually an antifa just trying to make us look bad.

    Oh, also: Savewhitepeople.com. Is that a question or a command? If it’s a command, then who is it aimed at? No one’s going to save us, not our leaders, not god, not even our fellow Whites. This guy is a helpless slave, screaming for someone to save him and his people. A truly proud White man would never let himself go physically like that, and he wouldn’t start a site asking people to save anything. If a people need “saving” then it simply means they are too weak to survive on their own, and deserve to go the way of the dodo.

  12. The Khazar Hunter's Gravatar The Khazar Hunter
    June 17, 2012 - 9:49 pm | Permalink

    John Kaminski has in his website an excellent article concerning this sickness. Something about the F.ilm A.ctors G.uild plague. In the article he mentions the hook nose who’s shaking the half-negro hand on the picture showed above here. Also in that article there is a link to the aforementioned in his Chicago anti-physiological ways days. The web is:
    http://www.johnkaminski.info Scroll down and you’ll find it alright.

  13. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 16, 2012 - 8:32 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    Excuse my shamefully crude characterizations.

  14. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 16, 2012 - 8:15 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    One of the horrible effects 60s Revolution, feminism, and the Playboy Lifestyle, has been the complete breakdown of the common wisdom that was once passed from generation to generation, from mother to daughter. Mothers once gave guidance to their daughters in choosing a man. They didn’t just throw them out there in the “game” and wish them well.

    I must say, those societies, like India, in which parents play such a big role in who their child marries have their advantages. Not that I am recommending that, but at least in the old days, things like family background and the young man and woman’s reputation used to matter. I suppose everything comes full circle, and eventually those values will return, but it may not be for many generations, who will have to suffer needlessly.

  15. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 16, 2012 - 7:41 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Now it should only be around noon or so over there when you gave those answers Lord Meadows, yet I swear it sounds like you had a pint or two :)

  16. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 16, 2012 - 7:23 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    I read someone say that men like sexy women who enjoy cooking and mothering and women like kind men who know how to fight, f**k, and make a lot of money.

  17. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 16, 2012 - 7:18 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    Richard – please do this for others but elevate me to Lord Meadows

  18. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 15, 2012 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Hi Fender

    It’s because women like jerks.

    I don’t think that’s the case for all women.

    …being a strong leader so often involves being an arrogant jerk. How can one lead without supreme confidence in his own abilities?

    I think a man can be confident without being arrogant, but I haven’t given it a lot of thought. I know some good, strong men who don’t seem arrogant to me; definitely not jerks.

    Girls settle down with “nice guys” when they get older and their looks start to fade, since they can’t attract the bad boys they used to.

    That’s not the case for some (beautiful) girls I know. They have settled down (in their 20’s) with good men. Maybe it has something to do with upbringing, especially a girl’s relationship with her father.

    The ones I’m thinking about had good, healthy families/fathers/upbringings.

    I’m wondering if the fact that you live in the NYC area has something to do with your take on this issue. (I think you mentioned that’s where you live.) I remember hearing that the NYC dating scene is different from other parts of the country.

    @Jason Speaks:

    You and Alice bring up a good point about there being at least two different kinds of women in the dating scene; those who are interested in short-term relationships, and others who are interested in long-term (marriage.)

    I’m definitely not an expert on these issues, and I appreciate y’all’s comments. Hopefully future generations will learn from whatever mistakes are being made; individual mistakes and group/cultural mistakes, too.

  19. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 14, 2012 - 10:36 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Yes, I agree with all of that. I didn’t mean to an imply that a man should adopt a beta status in any situation. However, I do think the term alpha male tends to be used as an overly broad category. It seems to include everything from a billionaire, to a rock star, all the way down to some low IQ jerk hanging out at a bar. There is a difference between Julius Caesar and Rocco the barfly. Although, there are many women who don’t seem to know the difference.

  20. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 14, 2012 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    The rules of being an alpha male also apply to men who want to marry, or want to be in a serious long-term relationship. Girls settle down with “nice guys” when they get older and their looks start to fade, since they can’t attract the bad boys they used to. Part of the female tragedy is that their looks tend to fade earlier than men, which is why you see 40 year-old guys running around with girls half their age. Back on point, if a man wants to keep a woman, he must be the leader in the relationship at all times. If, in marriage, a woman loses sexual interest in her man, she’ll look for satisfaction elsewhere (provided she can still attract men, of course).

  21. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 14, 2012 - 8:18 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:
    Richard, I would be please to have you call me Alice. Of course, we all need forgiveness, but that does not mean we should not be grateful for our gifts. You have the great gift of bringing out the best in many of us and of keeping us all honest. Thank you.

    I think both fender and Jason have made good points. Excluding people who are very seriously damaged, fender describes women who are looking for someone to play with. Jason, quite wisely points out that the criteria for a husband is very different from that for a play-date. Sadly, our entire culture encourages people to be self-indulgent children rather than adults who take themselves and each other seriously.

  22. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 14, 2012 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    Isn’t an arrogant jerk a kind of cheap imitation of a strong leader?

    That sounds right to me. However, many women confuse the two. Sadly, they have not been taught to distinguish between a genuinely strong, secure male, and a flashy, chain wearing dufus in a bar.

    Also, women who are in short term mode when it comes to relationships are much more likely to go for Guido with the gold chains and steroids. Women who are looking for a long term partner are likely to pay attention to more serious character traits.

    One problem I have with many White guys is their often eager willingness to overlook a woman’s sordid past. There is something very tragic about a woman giving her youth and beauty to a string of jackasses for the first 20 years of her active dating life, then deciding (as her looks fade and baggage accumulates) to find a “nice” guy to settle down with. She presents herself to this poor sucker with a disturbing sexual history and perhaps an illegitimate child or two.

    Sadly, too many White guys are willing to settle for that. If women knew men would scorn them for their long string of one night stands and associated baggage, it might make a few of the irresponsible women reign in their self-destructive behavior.

    The good news is, there are still sane White men and women out there. But we need more. There seems to be a section of White people that are still acting responsible, but there is a smaller subset of Whites that mimicking ghetto behavior when it comes to sex.

  23. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 14, 2012 - 7:09 pm | Permalink

    In the past I have used the honorifics “Mr.” and “Mrs.” before the names of some of the other T.O.O. commenters.

    I did this out of respect and acknowledgement of my elders.

    But after some consideration, thinking about it briefly here and there for a few days, I’ve decided that from now on I will refer to all commenters by their first (or only) name as it appears in their screen name. I figure it is fairer to all.

    (I haven’t lost respect for the people that I used to refer to with a “Mr.” or “Mrs.” in front of their name.)

    I’m not assuming that anyone really cares much either way. But I just wanted to let others know in case they do care.

    If any practical forgiveness is necessary for this or any other comment, please forgive me.

    I hope anyone reading this has a good evening.

  24. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 14, 2012 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase, “Cute girls only like jerks,” or complaints from feminized White men that fall along the lines of, “Why does [insert desired female's name here] always date guys who are such jerks?” It’s because women like jerks.

    It’s like how in school girls develop crushes on guys who pull their hair and make fun of them. The same things lasts throughout our entire lives, but somewhere along the way some hideous beta male White man (or Jew) starts educating us about feminism and equality, and all of the sudden everything that turns women on and attracts them to men becomes politically and socially incorrect.

    You’re right about females wanting strong male leaders…but being a strong leader so often involves being an arrogant jerk. How can one lead without supreme confidence in his own abilities? For a pop culture example of what women want: Sean Connery in the old Bond movies, when he was thin and had hair. That’s the kind of guy women want, not today’s beta males who treat their women like goddesses.

  25. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 14, 2012 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Fender, if you are reading this, one of the things that does not sit well with me is that you say women want “arrogant jerks” — you’ve used that phrase several times in previous comments.

    I can understand why you write that.

    But maybe what women really want is a strong leader. (I’m not sure.)

    (I’m not saying that I consider myself a strong leader; I’m not sure what I am.)

    Isn’t an arrogant jerk a kind of cheap imitation of a strong leader? Isn’t an arrogant jerk someone who might temporarily fool a woman into having sex with him? And isn’t that (sex, one-night stands) the purpose of the advice from the guy who calls himself Roissey, the guy who writes the blog that you mention — chateau heartiste?

    If I’ve mischaracterized him or his blog, please correct me and I’ll apologize.

    You say he is racially aware, but does he actually care about White people or White families or the long-term health of society?

    (I’m not sure I spelled his name right, or that I fully understand the point of his writings.)

    You wrote:

    But generally speaking, women like to feel like they’re being led by their men. They like knowing that when their man gets home, everything will be all right…

    The man you describe does not sound like an arrogant jerk, but a strong leader.

    One of the reasons that I write comments to you, Fender, is that you seem approachable.

  26. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 14, 2012 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    I don’t think I’ve ever approved of treating women like “punching bags.” That’s something I’d be against. I’d say that would be indicative of a low, primitive culture, just as treating women like Goddesses is the product of a culture at the opposite end: overly socialized and restrained.

    But generally speaking, women like to feel like they’re being led by their men. They like knowing that when their man gets home, everything will be all right because he’s in command. This is why feminist, masculinized womyn are so dysfuctional and neurotic, because they don’t have the reassurance that comes with the presence of a man in their lives.

    So many of our societal problems would be solved if White men grew a pair, spent a few hours a week at the gym, threw away the video games, and just banged the hell out of their girlfriends every night.

  27. June 14, 2012 - 5:49 pm | Permalink

    On homosexuality:

    It seems to me that the IE mannerbund was sexually ambiguous, rather than ‘homosexual’, and that attitudes to homosexuality should surely be ambiguous as well, considering all the different causes, situations and contexts of people’s sexual behaviours. But the gay movement has been well toxic from its creation, and all homosexuals sympathetic to such agendas as redefining the family, are natural enemies.

    I think there’s a need to avoid unhelpful extremes, here, and especially to avoid ‘church vs state’ thinking.

  28. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 14, 2012 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Fender, you’ve nailed it. But with lots of hyperbole and exaggeration. Women as a whole are submissive and they want a masterful man, but no woman I know wants to be ruled over by a beastly tyrant and treated like a punching bag.

    Harlequin Romances are full of abduction fantasies. A woman is whisked away by an Arab sheikh on his foaming black steed and becomes her abductor’s “Prisoner of Love” in some crusader castle. She trembles at his approach and goes weak at the knees whenever he approaches, inscrutable and sardonic, but he never actually beats her up.

    Though he is masterful, he is always a man of honor and treats her with punctilious courtesy. What a woman cannot abide is a wimp. I once knew a man who said to me after dinner and drinks at his house, “Do you mind if I kiss you?” It was downhill all the way after that! ☺

    A man should be masterful but not bossy. A tyrant won’t do. Women do have maochistic fantasies, but the last thing they want in real life is for a guy who beats them up regularly. You only have to look at the huge number of women who run away every year from physically abusive husbands and take refuge in shelters.

    What I’m aying is this, Fender: masochism in fantasy, fine; violent brutality in real life, no — absolutely not!

    Remember Neitzsche’s Zarathustra: “Thou goest to Woman? — Remember thy whip!”

    I used to quote that a lot once. It seemed like a fun thing to say. I’m not so sure any longer.

    To get a woman and keep her, a man needs to be tender as well as forceful. He has to be someone the woman can respect and trust and look up to as a superior person. He should have a sense of humor. A little mystery would help.

    Above all, as I say, he mustn’t be a wimp, falling over to please her.

    You’re quite right: there are a lot of feminized men around nowadays. And I wish there weren’t. But there are lots of masculinized women around too, and I think they’re even worse.

    Maybe they suit each other and would make good mates: the domineering, masculinized female and the submissive, feminized male! ☺

  29. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 14, 2012 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    No normal White woman we know frequents interracial sites, but there are lots of abnormal White women around who do. We know such women personally. They are a small but not insignificant minority.

    Sorry, that was sloppily expressed! What I meant to say was that no White woman known to Lasha and me personally (friends, acquaintance, family, colleagues etc.) are addicted to interracial porn sites or indeed to ANY porn site.

    The people I referred to here: “There are lots of abnormal White women around who do ‘frequent interracial porn sites]. We know such women personally.”…… I ought to have used the word IMpersonally. That would have been more accurate. These are women we have never met who have written to Lasha with their problems, seeking advice after reading Lasha’s two articles on sex (“Sex and the Jews” and “Sex Plague”). We have learned quite a lot about these matters from strangers who have written to Lasha, both men and women, pouring out their problems and generally seeking help and guidance.

  30. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 14, 2012 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    “In every single case they have very strong masochistic tendencies and enjoy being brutally ill-treated by black men. The more violent and abusive the black man is, the more these women crave sex with them. They want to be badly treated. Their pleasure comes from extreme debasement.”

    But this is true of women in general. I read somewhere (chateau heartiste I think, a blog run by a racially-aware White guy) that something like 60% of women admit to having rape fantasies. Females are naturally submissive. They secretly demand that men dominate them, while at the same time public proclaim that they want equality (they don’t).

    The thing is, we live in a culture that specifically molds White men into manboobed, submissive little weaklings and non-White men into wise, aggressive, alpha male he-men. This is why White women go after black guys– not because of their race, but because they’ve been trained to see them as their masters, and all women want male masters.

    This is why the book 50 Shades of Grey is such a huge hit: it’s about a young (White) woman basically becomes a sex slave to a handsome older (White) man– who apparently is modeled after Robert Pattinson, the guy from the Twilight movies.

    You can be sure that if White men were’t so feminine and cowardly today, and if they actually did what was necessary and dominate their women, NO White women would be looking for black guys to screw. None.

  31. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 14, 2012 - 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Here is a comment about porn I’ve just read on the Counter-currents blog. (Edited here for brevity)

    Slippery Pete
    Posted January 20, 2012 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    . . . Women are NOT directly affected by porn. They don’t watch it, they don’t like it, and even if they reference it in passing, it’s almost always to turn the heads of the males present.

    I have to add, interracial porn is the same: women do NOT watch this stuff. It’s male fantasy that drives it!!

    Every statement here is false. All the research Lasha recently done indicates that this commenter is living in cloud cuckoo land.

    (1) In the past, before the internet, women were relatively unaffected by porn. Most porn in those days consisted of magazines featuring nude women. (Or nude men for the gay crowd, much harder to obtain, and certainly not sold in most shops.) This sort of porn did not interest women in the slightest.

    Internet porn has hit women hard. Roughly one in three visitors to porn sites are now women, with almost one in five women admitting to a serious porn addiction. According to sex researchers Carnes, Delmonico and Griffin (2001), of the population that has developed severe problems with sex on the internet, 40 percent are women.

    (2) As for the comment that [White] women don’t watch interracial porn, this poster is again totally up the creek. Having researched this subject thoroughly, I can say this categorically: the main customers for interracial porn sites are (a) black men who lust after white women inordinately, their lust fired by an atavistic hatred of the White race; and (b) White women who have masochistic fantasies about being raped by black men.

    Sites such as this, I may add, are almost never frequented by White men. White men are absolutely repelled by what they see here. It’s this sort of interracial sex that fuels the White man’s misogyny towards the women of his own race.

    No normal White woman we know frequents interracial sites, but there are lots of abnormal White women around who do. We know such women personally. They are a small but not insignificant minority.

    In every single case they have very strong masochistic tendencies and enjoy being brutally ill-treated by black men. The more violent and abusive the black man is, the more these women crave sex with them. They want to be badly treated. Their pleasure comes from extreme debasement.

    One woman actually told Lasha: “The more disgusted I am, the more excited I get and the more easily I come.”

    Believe me: interracial sex is something many White woman are addicted to in a big way. If this were not the case, you would hardly get so many female sex tourists taking sex holidays in places like Jamaica.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-who-travel-for-sex-sun-sea-and-gigolos-407202.html

  32. George's Gravatar George
    June 14, 2012 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Interesting arithmetic – the incredible numbers

    Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number of survivors: Olga Lengyel’s Five Chimneys: a woman survivor’s true story of Auschwitz (Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).

    According to Lengyel, ‘After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews and Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was all the time it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency, functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits, which could destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well for German industry.’ (Paperback edition, pp80-81). [No trace of any remains of or in ‘death pits’ has been found.]

    This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million in 40 days, or six million in 240 days (eight months). Notice the bald precision of the figures without any explanation, the utter confidence in the reader’s credulity.

    The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune: “Passionate, tormenting”. Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US construction of the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering “You have done a real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten speak.”

    Could this claim be a misprint?

    Kitty Hart, in spite of her name a Jewish survivor born in Poland, fully confirms these figures:

    ‘Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of about 18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a further 8,000 in the same period.’ (p 118; Return to Auschwitz – paperback edition by Granada (1981, 1983).

    According to the cover blurb, ‘The subject of the award-winning Yorkshire television documentary of the same name.’ ‘Both engaging and harrowing…an important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of which conveys so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive’ – Martin Gilbert, The Times.

    ‘Sir’ Martin Gilbert, indefatigable Jewish campaigner on behalf of the ‘Holocaust’ and biographer of Winston Churchill, adds to the rich flavour and makes his own numerical claims, certainly not without chutzpah:

    In his book Auschwitz and the Allies (1981) he states

    ‘The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe’s Jews was unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period during which it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka.’ (p.26). [This statement, first noticed by Professor Robert Faurisson, was then deleted (not corrected) from the next edition - no simple typo, no simple error with omission or spelling or grammar, just a case of being caught red-handed in blatant chutzpah deluxe.]

    If we assume a minimum figure of 200,000 per day, this amounts to say a million a five-day working week, or 6 million in six weeks, and this does not include the truly awe-inspiring claims for Auschwitz put forward by Hart and Lengyel with Gilbert’s blessing.

  33. George's Gravatar George
    June 14, 2012 - 3:21 pm | Permalink

    And take a look at the article from The American Hebrew, October 31 1919

    (see attached reproduction below), prophesying a ‘holocaust’ of ‘six million':

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_H._Glynn

    http://www.jrbooksonline.com/images/091031crucifixion.gif

    The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!
    By Martin H. Glynn
    (Former Governor of the State of N.Y.)

    From across the sea six million men and women call to us for help, and eight hundred thousand little children cry for bread.

    These children, these men and women are our fellow-members of the human family, with the same claim on life as we, the same susceptibility to the winter’s cold, the same propensity to death before the fangs of hunger. Within them reside the illimitable possibilities for the advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings. We may not be their keepers but we ought to be their helpers.

    In the face of death, in the throes of starvation there is no place for mental distinctions of creed, no place for physical differentiations of race. In this catastrophe, when six million human beings are being whirled toward the grave by a cruel and relentless fate, only the most idealistic promptings of human nature should sway the heart and move the hand.

    Six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life; eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. And this fate is upon them through no fault of their own, through no transgression of the laws of God or man; but through the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.

    In this threatened holocaust of human life, forgotten are the niceties of philosophical distinction, forgotten are the differences of historical interpretation.. etc etc etc

  34. George's Gravatar George
    June 14, 2012 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

    The political art of large-number repetitionistic reiterationism:
    Zionist trial runs of “6 Million” Holocaust propaganda in 1911, and also in 1919

    Max Nordau (1849-1923) was the co-founder of the World Zionist Organization together with Theodor Herzl.

    Have a look at this Max Nordau quote from Ben Hecht’s book ‘Perfidy’ – which is available for free in PDF format at
    http://www.hirhome.com/israel/perfidy.pdf (on page 232 of 261):

    Quote:
    In the Zionist Congress of 1911, 22 years before Hitler came to power, and three years before World War I, Nordau said, “How dare the smooth talkers, the clever official blabbers, open their mouths and boast of progress. . . . Here they hold jubilant peace conferences in which they talk against war. . . . But the same righteous Governments, who are so nobly, industriously active to establish the eternal peace, are preparing, by their own confession, complete annihilation for six million people, and there is nobody, except the doomed themselves, to raise his voice in protest although this is a worse crime than any war . . .” unquote.

  35. George's Gravatar George
    June 14, 2012 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    It’s now official – there’s been no actual shortage of Holocaust Survivors :

    Quote from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso in the year 2000:
    ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million.’ (page 83)

    I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

    Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.

    In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

    CODOH – Committee for Open Debate of the Holocaust – breaking the power of taboo

    http://www.codoh.com/

  36. Hyacinth's Gravatar Hyacinth
    June 14, 2012 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

    Well, it’s quite obvious that the ‘Pagan vs. Christian’ routine is just another divide and conquer game.
    No doubt healthy and free Whites, regardless of religion, always valued honor in all facets of life including the sexual.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pudicitia
    And any honest evaluation of Christianity must note that sexual relations between married men and women are joys and blessings from God, not to be despised, and certainly not used to generate income!
    Just as we must move past the old left/right paradigm, so must we also recognize that the war between Christian and Pagan Whites must end.

  37. omop's Gravatar omop
    June 14, 2012 - 1:28 pm | Permalink
  38. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 14, 2012 - 10:54 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Bravo, what a difference the ‘rest’ makes!

  39. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 14, 2012 - 10:50 am | Permalink

    @tom penn:
    Excellent point, tom, and I would be content to let them live with the consequences if that were the only price. However, in our society, it is precisely those women who are most active in support of Obama and the welfare state. Look at any group of women in their forties and fifties and there are many who have pursued the self-indulgent life. They have not pursued high powered careers nor devoted themselves to family. They have countless men and a couple of divorces behind them, no children or very angry children, and in this economy are often broke and frightened of the future. These bitter women are the most active in preaching, indeed demanding, that the government, meaning me, my husband, my children and all other tax payers insure that they be protected from the consequences of their own choices. They do this, of course, in the name of compassion for the poor, black underclass and the noble immigrants who did not have our privileges. We are the evil, selfish, judgmental, hypocritical Christians who dare to quibble about the speck in their eye.

    They are also very prominent in the sad, sick business of elevating and celebrating pets as the equivalent of children. I love animals and have always been a pet owner but I am not a pet parent, and have never had difficulty in distinguishing my children from my pets. Interestingly, these women never seem to suggest that the outrageous amounts of money allocated to pets, pet health and grooming might be better spend elsewhere. This is reflected in ordinary language. There was a time when one reared children and raised animals. No such distinction exists today. What a sad state we have reached.

  40. omop's Gravatar omop
    June 14, 2012 - 10:47 am | Permalink

    The following aught to be of interest to Dr. Darkmoon and others….

    Selected Teachings of the Talmud

    Gittin 69a . To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix with honey and eat it.

    Shabbath 41a. The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way is given.

    Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden.

    Yebamoth 63a. Declares that agriculture is the lowest of occupations.

    Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years “and a day” old).

    Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.

    Kethuboth 11b. “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.”

    Yebamoth 59b. A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest.

    Abodah Zarah 17a. States that there is not a whore in the world that the Talmudic sage Rabbi Eleazar has not had sex with. On one of his whorehouse romps, Rabbi Eleazar leanred that there was one particular prostitute residing in a whorehouse near the sea, who would receive a bag of money for her services. He took a bag of money and went to her, crossing seven rivers to do so. During their intercourse the prostitute farted. After this the whore told Rabbi Eleazar: “Just as this gas will never return to my anus, Rabbi Eleazar will never get to heaven.”

  41. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 14, 2012 - 9:50 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Whether because he was a Negro homosexual, or in spite of it, the late, great jazz pianist and composer Billy Strayhorn had things figured out, to the proverbial tee:

    Romance is mush, stifling those who strive.
    I’ll live a lush life, in some small dive.
    And there I’ll be, while I rot with the rest
    Of those whose lives are lonely too.

    Most remarkably, Strayhorn first composed “Lush Life” while just a 16-year-old high-schooler, in Pittsburgh!

  42. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    June 14, 2012 - 9:44 am | Permalink

    “Kinsey believed that all sex was legitimate—pedophilia, bestiality, incest, adultery, prostitution, group sex, transvestitism, sadomasochism—and he worked to overthrow all laws prohibiting any of these perversions.” If Lovely Tim ever gets bored, Only Boys Aloud have themselves a new choirmaster.

    “Reich apparently influenced his final decision to become a porn star rather than a rabbi.” Choices. Choices.

  43. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 14, 2012 - 8:25 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: As a certain Thai king played by Yul Brynner is reported to have said (by Rodgers and Hammerstein anyway), “Is a puzzlement!”

  44. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 14, 2012 - 5:39 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    It’s the duty of the average mother to tell her average daughter to settle down with an average man…. I find that average women really resents being reminded of how average she is. Someone needs to tell her before it’s too late, women are perishable after all.

    Well Richard, I can’t disagree with any of that. You state the obvious. Organized Jewry have been spectacularly successful in driving a wedge between man and woman. They have been the main promoters of feminism, a dangerous philosophy that has had disastrous consequences for women. Anyone who clains women are now far better off than they were before feminism reared its ugly head, are sadly mistaken. If women have won “the battle of the sexes”, it’s a Pyrrhic victory.

    Since the advents of feminism there has been a hige increase not only in misogyny but in misandry too. Never before in the history of the world have men and women hated each other so cordially — not on an individual basis but as a sex.

    And yet, this remains very much a love-hate relationship. Men need women badly. They simply cannot exist without women, whose beauty they find irresistible when the women are young and beautiful.

    Nor ought Woman to be despised, for every woman is in a sense a handmaiden of the Goddess, a fragment of Magna Mater or the Eternal Feminine.

    The Great She, the Great Mother, is the Primal Archetype. Never forget this.

    While it is undeniably true that the”Average Woman” is a thing that can be despised by a “Superior Man” such as yourself, it is equally undeniable that the “Average Man” is a pathetic speciment to the Superior Woman — the type of woman, I mean, who is an understudy of Magna Mater or the Eternal Feminine, i.e., the Ideal Woman.

    In the City of God, in the New Jersualem, all women will be young and beautiful and chaste and noble and possess all the qualities that the Superior Man would fine desirable.

    Woman is indispensable. You will never build Utopia without her. If the Average Woman today is a flawed specimen, it’s because we live in a dystopia in which the Average Man is equally flawed.

  45. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 14, 2012 - 1:24 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    a)Men want money to get women.
    b) Women want men to get money.

    Basically right, but I would like to add :
    Therefore :
    a) Men fall for attractiveness in women, which often means younger women.
    b) Women fall for status in men, which often means older men.
    Thus nature secures the survival of the species : men chose beautiful (read : young and healthy) women to beget their children with, while women chose successful men to take care of themselves and their children. This explains indeed 95% of human behaviour. The rest is “romance”, but who would like to miss that “rest”?

  46. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 14, 2012 - 1:15 am | Permalink

    By the way, there is a benefit to responses’ appearing at the bottom of the stack, rather than immediately below the comments to which they are replying; to wit, replies are not thereby overlooked when one seeks to pick up where one left off reading, earlier, at the end of the stack!

  47. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 14, 2012 - 1:05 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    I tried to respond to the email itself (after I subscribed to one thread) but wasn’t able to figure out how. I didn’t see any option to respond by email. It would be nice occasionally to insert a comment where it is relevant!

  48. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 14, 2012 - 1:01 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    I too salute dc, though with a heavy heart at the news he conveys. I pray that I may emulate his dignity and grace under fire, just as I pray for him.

  49. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 14, 2012 - 12:44 am | Permalink

    @D. K.: Well stated.

    Actually, I’ll go you one better. I’m not sure that much of the 95 percent even matters. By which I mean that believing that both men and women haven’t been expertly deceiving themselves for most of recorded history about their wants and those wants’ underlying motivations—especially as their wants concern wanting each other, for ends either long or short term—can best be described as kidding oneself. Things may be different, indeed much worse, in degree nowadays, but I am pretty certain that they are hardly different in kind.

    The wild card not present in the past is that the Tribal masters of society are working overtime to reinforce the lies, the liars, and the self-deceivers and to silence anyone and anything trying to state or restate the obvious truths about sexual attraction and its relation to a healthy individual and family life and a healthy society. Alas, the obviousness of these truths seldom appears to the uncounseled until age or bitter experience drives their truth and obviousness home.

    Yet again, of course, forty-six years of mass Third World immigration and a directly proportional increase in worldwide Jewish power, far from improving the situation, have either caused this grave problem or contributed immeasurably to its gravity.

  50. Family Man's Gravatar Family Man
    June 14, 2012 - 12:39 am | Permalink

    Good article. One thing that surprised me was the mention of Moshe Feldenkreis and Ida Rolf, as accolades of Kinsey. That’s really weird because they were/are well known names in the health and fitness industry. Can someone explain me the connection here?

  51. June 14, 2012 - 12:26 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    Is there not a useful, if limited, mere actuarial approach to all this? There appears to be a high correlation between full-throttle sexual hedonism and career damage, social networking damage, marriage damage and physical health damage. Just call it “Mysterious Factor X”—we are better off driving in low gear, and practicing “erotic dieting”.
    . My own sense over several decades is that not more than
    01 out of 20 full throttle sexual hedonism devotees escapes very significant penalties in these domains.

  52. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 13, 2012 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    And so, my twelve or so years of college were not wholly wasted, after all! :-)

    Here is what I (think that I) have figured out, to date– and, more so despite my higher education, rather than as a result of it:

    (a) Men want money to get women.

    (b) Women want men to get money.

    (c) That (a + b) explains about 95% of adult human behavior.

    (d) The other 5% really does not matter even that much.

    This is not to cast aspersions on either sex; it is merely the way that male and female each have evolved, in parallel, in order to best propagate the species, more successfully than its competition. Likewise, the distribution curves for the two sexes, along various attributes, vary significantly from one breeding population to another, racially and ethnically.

  53. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 13, 2012 - 11:33 pm | Permalink

    @dc:

    BRAVO!

  54. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    June 13, 2012 - 10:58 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Women do, indeed want to marry up

    i think that they marry up by lying down …

    also this: since the numers are roughly equal, if women insist on marrying up, eventually the top will get crowded, giving rise to polygamy, while the bottom will be populated by embittered, disenfranchised rogue males, looking for and provoking trouble.

  55. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 13, 2012 - 10:46 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Your comment was not addressed to me, and I’m not assuming that you had me in mind when you wrote it, but I want to respond to it anyway.

    You wrote:

    I’m used to having my posts misrepresented, the constant personal insults, accusations of being a “troll” and posters reminding me of how popular their views are compared to mine.

    Sometimes you misrepresent other people’s posts/beliefs. (I’m not saying that others don’t do the same to you.)

    You insult others, calling them “eunichs” and “homosexual men (pretending they aren’t homosexual)” and “you religious fanatic nutjobs” and refer to Pierre de Craon as a “cat-lady”.

    All of those personal insults are contained in this thread alone.

    (I don’t know if your comment about “homosexual men” was directed at any T.O.O. commenters. It might have been for/about Catholic priests. But the other insults seem to be directed at other commenters.)

    I have a feeling that there are lots of male posters who get really giddy when “chatting” with female posters, and enjoy the emotional bonding they subjectively experience, so do a lot of “white knighting” and are reluctant to disagree with females and quick to give a “you go girl!” etc.

    I think it is possible that that is mostly in your mind.

    I don’t know if I speak for others, but “white knighting” is not why I’m here. I enjoy interacting with both men and women. I, along with other commenters, happen to agree with some of the women sometimes.

    Some people treat the women with basic respect, but does not mean they are trying to “white knight” anyone.

    Of course men and women are different, and I figure some of the ideas in the so-called men’s rights movement are good and valid; but I’m concerned that maybe it encourages a kind of undeserved, empty bravado.

    That’s ok, I don’t know any of you people, this is a blog not a “movement” and I’m here to read interesting articles, comments and speak my mind.

    This website by itself might not be an official movement, but it is definitely a very important part of a larger pro-White movement.

    I doubt my comment here is anywhere near perfect. I’m trying to be fair to you, myself, and others.

  56. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Richard – I didn’t suggest you had said anything equivalent to ‘women are lying whores’ and I’m really sorry if I said things in such way to make that a likely implication that people would draw.

    The point for you was that, you speak within contexts that make what you say quite questionable.

    You’ve already said before you don’t agree with some of the things I suggest. But what I think is that this is again a matter of context. I would ask you to imagine what it would be like if the number of people tentatively coming to the WN world, increased by…say….ten or twenty fold.
    That still wouldn’t be much in absolute terms because WN is not growing at all or growing slowly. But even so…a twenty fold increase would drastically expand the range of personal views, personal experiences, personal beliefs, personal styles, behaviours, intellectual level, educational background, social preferences, lifestyle choices, lifestyle commitments….life mistakes (requiring rationalizations and defensiveness and so on).
    I would just ask you to consider what ways this could be managed, taken advantage of, built on, and so on? Not forgeting all the infiltration attempts, and/or suspicion of such, that go along with it.
    Just think about it, and try suggesting some answers that don’t duck the issues (or walk away from them)

  57. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 13, 2012 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows

    Well I certainly never said “women are a bunch of lying whores” but I’m used to having my posts misrepresented, the constant personal insults, accusations of being a “troll” and posters reminding me of how popular their views are compared to mine.

    That’s ok, I don’t know any of you people, this is a blog not a “movement” and I’m here to read interesting articles, comments and speak my mind.

    I have a feeling that there are lots of male posters who get really giddy when “chatting” with female posters, and enjoy the emotional bonding they subjectively experience, so do a lot of “white knighting” and are reluctant to disagree with females and quick to give a “you go girl!” etc. Not for me. I’m not here to get a date, and don’t particularly care if people agree with me.

    I also disagree with your idea there is some “core WN movement” that has some specific set of rules, or that we should avoid certain topics to not “drive away the new posters” etc. I’m thinking that’s a Catholic thing, perhaps the poster dixiegirl might agree somewhat. There is no “pope” of the “WN movement” and there isn’t some monolithic “WN” movement anyway. If you want a political party, there is A3P. This is a blog.

  58. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    damn…ok so you can reply….drat…wrong attribute

  59. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

    @Robert Paul Mune

    Hi Robert – thank you for explaining why no one can reply to you. I hope new intrigue shall become, how did I then turn the table by replying to you such that you could not reply to me :O)

  60. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Hi Richard – first of all note the smiley…I find your views interesting.

    I’d have to see the contextual framework set up by Devlin to be able to say whether I thought he was also talking a load of crap. Crapness is determined by context. Almost every angle and view point is reasonable and meaningful within some or other context.

    For example, if the discussion was in terms of evolutionary psychology, there are many things that could be said about the differences between men and women. One classic example might the hypothesis that women are inherently unfaithful and sexually duplicitous in certain scenarios, say where the bonding-mate is good for rearing the family but genetically less desirable than the rugged warrier who wants to screw around and then be gone. Agree or disagree, the context establishes the possibility is reasonable.

    But take it out of that theoretical context and into, say, a discussion about the morality of women vs men in traditional society….and say suggest women are a bunch of lying whores. This would qualify for ‘talking a lot of crap’.

    That’s what I think you are doing a lot of the time. The ideas are possibly valid but the context, style and social judgement involved is questionable.

    IMHO.

  61. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 13, 2012 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows

    What specifically are you objecting to? I’m mostly paraphrasing Devlin, who is published in The Occidental Quarterly.

  62. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    He’s got a hardnosed aryan kind of gig going.

    That’s a great line!

  63. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Richard – you really talk such a lot of crap :O)

  64. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 13, 2012 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping

    Exceptional woman are the exception, by definition. But most women are average, yet the average woman believes she is owed an above-average husband. Consequently, they put off marriage and child bearing, chasing after above-average men, who are often quite willing to enjoy the benefits of our sexually loose culture, then cast the women off when they start losing their looks and fertility.

    It’s the duty of the average mother to tell her average daughter to settle down with an average man. Hypergamy and monogamy were compatible when men had a superior social status compared to women. Equality means you have to choose 2 out of 3.

    I find that average women really resents being reminded of how average she is. Someone needs to tell her before it’s too late, women are perishable after all.

  65. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 6:52 pm | Permalink

    Case in point. Take fender on this list. I think most people would agree that apart from being a very smart and wired-up individual, fender is also at the far end of the spectrum in terms of how he sees the world. He’s got a hardnosed aryan kind of gig going.
    Yet fender can see that, for example, the gay issue could be used intelligently by us to enormous gain. For example, just imagine an outspoken gay component of the WN movement. Gays for equality for whites. Something like that would totally change the public perception of what it meant to be a WN. Suddenly it would be trendy…soft…non-extreme. Natural.

    Yes…perhaps the reasons are because of how twisted society is, but so what? It would be of huge advantage to us.

    Now….in terms of the core WN movement, I would intersect the judgement shared by Franklin either on this thread or the other one. He says that it would be fine for quietely gay people to contribute on a don’t ask don’t tell basis. But that any gays also on a mission about gay rights, would be bad for us.

    He’s bang on the money. There could be a ‘gay and white rights’ movement within the gay community itself, but within the core WN movement it would be a case of, don’t bring the gay issue with you.

    This would have to be done in such way that the gays were not offended, and it would be possible to do this via a more general principle that WN’s bring only their desire for continuity of their people. All other political and ideological views would be left at the door.

    Would this mean that views here couldn’t be expressed? Of course not….but it would become a specialised component..not the core WN which would be more like a safehaven for any and all whites. The traditional values component would probably be the most influential and powerful in time because people would naturally migrate across to it as and when they were ready. The traditional component would probably also be the the support base of actual political parties like the Third Way.

    fender – I believe from what he has said – would support things like this if they could work. And fender is one of hte most hardline (but intelligent and well judged) individuals commenting here.

  66. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 6:38 pm | Permalink

    @Someday:

    Hi Someday – right gotcha. Thanks for clarifying.

  67. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 6:20 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Hi Alice – first just to mention how much you’ve bloomed in terms of what you give to this place.

    I’m not an intellectual heavyweight…and don’t want to be pseudo…so I guess the way I choose to add value is helping to keep the focus on the issues that (a) matter (b) relevant to KM’s own focus (c) are likely to make that newcomer keep coming back to read the place from time to time.

    That said, the issues being talked about under Lasha and KM’s articles, in my view, touch on matters of great importance which I don’t think the WN has properly nailed.

    I won’t reiterate all of it here, save to say, we surely must all agree that the enduring frusration of the WN movement is not being able to breakthrough into the mainstream.

    The insight that I will keep trying to help people to have, is that there needs to be a more widespread, and more commonly shared, vision that everything that we want to happen, would happen as a process. It wouldn’t happen in one big go. Now…I know that’s obvious….but what I think is happeneing is that despite people understanding that is so, perhaps on the intellectual level, typically they still talk and think as if things happen ‘switch’ like.

    The example of what sort of social/ideological/lifestyle/philosophical demands should be made of newcomers is a case in point. The fundamental misconception here is that all of those values and understandings will be clear to newcomers at their point of arrival.

    Nothting could be further from the truth. And in fact, they will be scared off by too heavy a requirement. No one likes anything rammed down their throats. People need to be given space to have the insights in their own time. The role that WN needs to play is to be a non-judgemental, welcoming, homebase for all and any Whites who are in the process of realizing they are actually part of a people that could go extinct by changes happening around them…and that this is something they feel like they don’t want to happen, but have nowhere to take their fears in the mainstream. We are home for them. We are not browbeaters who tell them who or how to be.

    We need to be more confident in our core beliefs that they are not whimsical, arbitrary, random things that people need to be bullied and indoctrinated into. We need to realize that the other cultural and societial and ideological values are in fact *consequences* of caring about your people and realizing what has been done to your people.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 13, 2012 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

      @ Mickey Meadows: beautifully put and that was what I was trying to express.

      I often forward links to these articles to friends who sense that ‘something is very wrong’ yet are not finding useful insights from the regular (mainstream) sources, (and I have on more than one occasion written directly to TOO writers to thank them for their excellent work).

      However as I followed the responses to Lasha Darkmoon’s essay I found the writing becoming more and more cranky and thus ultimately alienating.

      This alternated with amusement as commentators started to speculate as to why I might have ‘privileged’ access to make comments inside an indented box…finally some bright spark worked out that it is indeed because I use a mail program (and not because I am a Zionist plant and/or agent provocateur).

      Realizing that most regular commentators are familiar with each others’ online presence, and intending to continue making my contribution I felt I should reveal a little about myself, which only seemed to raise the paranoia level a notch further.

      I will continue to chip in my thoughts whenever I feel they might be of service to the greater whole.

      Ideologies evolve or perish.

      Does anyone find fault with this idea?

  68. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 13, 2012 - 6:15 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    Thanks, D. K., for this very plausible analysis. Never having availed myself of the subscription option—why further clutter up your inbox if you look at this or another site as part of a daily routine?—I had no idea that one might respond to a comment via e-mail. Clearly, few of the regular or even irregular commenters ever do so!

    If your explanation turns out to be wrong, I for one will be very surprised.

  69. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 13, 2012 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    @fender

    Notice this:

    Women do, indeed want to marry up

    So, women want equality as a group, they want to marry up individually, and they want monogamy.

    Will someone kindly tell the females they are going to have to choose two out of three? I for one am quite confident they can analyze and interpret the data, but remain unconvinced that they can accept the conclusions.

    http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/devlin_shalit.htm

  70. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    June 13, 2012 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: Ernest Jones became pesona non grata after his trial for indecency. His medical career was ruined, so he went on to become a shill for a Jewish attack on the culture of White gentiles.

    Jones is a paradigm case of an intelligent but seriously flawed White promoting a Jewish intellectual movement.

  71. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 13, 2012 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    @Someday:

    I’ll try again….I dare say TOO readers would not be at all surprised if Hari has Jewish ancestry. If anything, I would be mildly surprised if Lebedev does not have any Jewish ancestry. But I would not, and you ought not, state things as facts just because they are plausible on the face of it. Especially not in an a TOO article. Implying or raising the possibility is the appropriate way to mention rumors. Once you state things as facts a miss is as good as a mile, that’s why you should do so only when you know it’s true. When you have got it wrong, as we all do at times, apologise for your error.

    Very well put, Someday. And on the whole, a very fair statement. In our defense, I need to make three points.

    (1) At the time of writing, we were 100 percent certain that Lebedev and Hari were Jews. That’s why Lasha had no qualms about stating this as a fact. If there had been the slightest doubt in her mind that the the ethnicity of these two individuals was problematic, she would have thought twice about stating categorically that they were Jews. She would have qualified her statements with some such phrase as this: “I am not altogether certain that Lebedev and Hari are Jews, but on balance I think they are. There is a 50/50 chance that they are Jews, particularly in view of Lebedev’s Rothschild connections and the fact that he was a Russian oligarch (most of whom where Jews), and also, un the case of Hari, because others have actually stated in print that he is “reportedly Jewish”.

    (2) Now that doubts have been cast on the certainty of these two individuals’ Jewish ethnicity, Lasha can hardly go back and revise the text and expect KMD to re-edit the whole article. It’s too late. Which is why Lasha has offfered the same article to another website and agreed to incorporate all these doubts and uncertainties about Lebedev’s and Hari’s Jewish origin into an extended endnote running to 1 A-4 page. This is, in our opinion, customary academic procedure. Even Wikipedia does this sort of thing.

    (3) As to Lasha apologizing for an error, she has already apologized through me, her spokesperson, for a possible error. She can hardly apologize for getting Lebedev’s and Hari’s Jewishness “wrong” when you yourself state above that you wouldn’t be surprised to learn these guys actually ARE Jewish!

    This is what I have already said:

    The essay itself will remain unchanged. The reason for this is that Lasha Darkmoon honestly believes (as I do) that a certain doubt hangs over the ethnicity of both Lebedev and Hari. Their non-Jewishness is not a proven fact.

    It’s for these reasons that Lasha is willing to relegate all these doubts about the ethnicity of Lebedev and Hari to a footnote. However, she sees no reason why she should be coerced into rewriting her essay to accommodate the doubts and uncertainties of a few posters here who could very well turn out to be wrong.

    As things stand, Someday, if Lasha should find herself in an academic court of some kind and the question was: “Is Lasha Darkmoon guilty of academic dishonesty?”, the answer would be a resounding “NO.”

    Inaccuracy? No, she is not guilty of inaccuracy either, since the possibility of these guys being Jewish cannot be ruled out, as you yourself admit.

    What Lasha is guilty of and for which she now apologies through me, her spokesperson, is this: she is guilty of incertitude.

    I hope you can accept this.

  72. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 4:46 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    meant only non-Jew

  73. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 4:46 pm | Permalink

    @Someday:

    What would be the angle on why a WN columnist would want to focus on the only jew..this Jones fella?

  74. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Women aren’t meant to be pro or anti anything, as they lack the mental faculties required to analyze and interpret data.

    The problem is, as that is written, it is overly broad. Of course, there are women who can analyze and interpret data. I have seen women use spreadsheets! And I mean on pretty dry data, and large amounts of it. Not just inputting data, but figuring out how the data should be linked, etc.

    Now, the real stars in spreadsheet building, programming or any kind of IT work are overwhelmingly male. The same is true of the upper ranks of scientists or engineers. But in my experience with average levels of professional level work, many women are as capable as the men.

    So, I think they can analyze data – they would be virtually retarded if they couldn’t analyze any data! But even today, if you look at the upper echelons of every field that requires thinking, men are at the top.

    I am sympathetic to the idea that young women have been encouraged to follow their whims and urges and hook up with whatever male they find desirable, which is leading to dysgenics (bad breeding). There was wisdom in letting the parents play a big role in mate selection!

  75. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

    @Catiline:

    At this point in time, White men are not very pro-White either. Neither sex is. What I mean to state is, White Advocacy or WN is in the interest of White men and White women both. There is no reason to present it with some angry face toward one gender or the other.

  76. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    June 13, 2012 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: I’ll try again. Being 100% certain that Lebevev is not a Jew is not a requirement to hold off from baldly stating that he is. Jurors need to be sure beyond reasonable doubt before finding someone guilty, it follows that those found not guilty are often not innocent. I dare say TOO readers would not be at all surprised if Hari has Jewish ancestry. If anything, I would be mildly surprised if Lebedev does not have any Jewish ancestry. But I would not, and you ought not, state things as facts just because they are plausible on the face of it. Especially not in an a TOO article. Implying or raising the possibility is the appropriate way to mention rumors. Once you state things as facts a miss is as good as a mile, that’s why you should do so only when you know it’s true. When you have got it wrong, as we all do at times, apologise for your error.

    Jews certainly run the porn industry, but it’s a long time since they made up the majority of performers. The article does indeed fall off at the end because you are talking about Hari, he is a nobody. A far better person to discuss in the article would be Ernest Jones, a sexual pervert who preyed on patients, including children. Jones was virtually the only important psychoanalist without Jewish ancestry, the first English-speaking practitioner of psychoanalysis and Sigmund Freud’s official biographer. and .

  77. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 13, 2012 - 2:53 pm | Permalink

    @AliceTeller@hotmail.com perhaps we can arrange something which would be advantageous to both of us.

  78. dc's Gravatar dc
    June 13, 2012 - 2:13 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Dear Alice

    The 1911 Britannica sits decaying on my shelves. I am not likely to live very much longer. If you can find some way of communicating a postal address, I should be delighted to leave instructions that the volumes be sent to you.

  79. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    June 13, 2012 - 1:09 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: Lucy, give my regards to your sister. She is a brilliant writer. At the same time, everything Lasha writes, albeit somewhat negative, is a shot at the enemy.

    Just as the Frankfurt school got together and worked out their game plan to defeat the White Race, we, too, are trying to work out a game plan to fight back.

    The point I was trying to make (I can’t write as well as Dr. Darkmoon or for that matter, Alice Teller) is that we must start thinking of the Jews as an enemy Race – just as our government forced us to see Germany as an enemy nation. Just as the Jewish psychological team is once again trying to make us see Russia as an enemy nation…and the Arab nations as enemy nations. (All except Israel. The American people are pressured to view Israel as our only friend in the Middle East.)

    Throughout Europe America is being seen now as a bad nation. Our image as a friend has been severely tarnished.
    Inside America it’s about race. (Except the Jewish Race) The White Race is condemned as an evil Race without exceptions. Non-whites are not permitted to see us as individuals, some good and some bad, but as a Race. If an white individual is charged with a hate crime the entire White Race is condemned.

    The Jewish Race as a race is not condemned at all. Only their acts – like the porn industry, forced integration, legalized abortion, the anti white movies, non white crimes, illegal immigration, laws like the Civil Rights Act and Affirmative Action. The ACLU is hated. But not one finger is pointed at the Jewish Race as the perpetrators.

    We cannot win any battle by fighting individual Jews. Or pieces of their game plan. That is why they are winning. To overcome these problems we must see the Jewish Race in their entirety as an enemy race.

  80. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    I actually doubt Obama will let Pollard go. The intelligence community really hate the guy and it’s been mainly them that have stood their ground on this matter. Pollard got a lot of people killed. Not just any people either, but patriots who were risking their lives for their country.

  81. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Things cannot be changed by democratic means, because you don’t exist in a democracy any more. Things cannot be changed by military/violent means either, because it is not inherently that sort of problem.
    It’s a problem defined by the actual objects on the landscape. Political corruption, public opinion corruption, multiculturalsm, white guilt, self hatred and and disarray, controlled instintutions involving law and interpretation of constitution, MSM, etc, etc, etc.
    It’s good…there are ways through this matter. Not that many…but there are some.

  82. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 13, 2012 - 11:56 am | Permalink

    @http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinder,_K%C3%BCche,_Kirche

    Maybe women collectively ought to observe the 4 K’s. But I think there has to be a role in public life for exceptional women.

    If we made all women housewives, it would certainly solve a lot of problems. It would solve the unemployment problem at a stroke. It would mean that woman, instead of pursuing a career, could stay at home and keep house for her husband and be a force for good in the nurturing of her children.

    Easy to say, hard to do. The average woman would be frittering away her time at home reading trashy women’s magazines and Harlequin romances, watching soap operas on TV, and generally making herself unfit for motherhood.

    She’d be gadding about spending her husband’s hard-earned money on clothes, cosmetics and perfumes.

    And if she’s anything like some of the Slut Culture females I know, she will deceive her husband behind his back by taking a lover, possibly a Negro stud, and by pleasuring herself at other times with her vibrator.

    How sad. Are there grounds for misogyny? Sigh. I’m afraid there are. “Man is evil, but woman is base,” Nietzsche said in Thus Spake Zarathustra. Maybe he had a point.

    It needn’t have been like this. Women have been corrupted by organized Jewy, seduced by feminism and turned into featherheaded sluts. And now they are turning to lesbianism in large numbers just to show how trendy and liberated they are.

    I can stand back and see all this.

    And yet this is a distorted picture of women. It seems men are destined to get the women they deserve. Men who masturbate to pornography in front of monitor screens cannot expect chaste Griseldas as their brides. Pervs and degenerates will inevitably create a society in which their female counterparts are sluts.

    If you want a society of noble women, chaste and modest and exquisitely feminine, then you must give women a society of men to match them in virtue: pure and strong and virile, masterful, confident, just, noble and brave.

    Men must change themselves first if they want women to change.

  83. Donar van Holland's Gravatar Donar van Holland
    June 13, 2012 - 11:37 am | Permalink

    @artashes2: May I remind you that there is a whole world outside the US? In that world Christians are normally NOT circumcised. This practice is typically American. Now if you are looking for a hurtful Jewish influence on American sexuality, THIS is a real example, not pornography.

  84. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 13, 2012 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    @fender:
    For a bright guy you are sadly mistaken. Are you honestly suggesting that I am incapable of interpreting data? Women do, indeed want to marry up, not so that we can have men knock us or order us around, but in order to provide our children with superior options in life. If one chooses wisely, deference to a husband is good sense, not a burden.

    Yes, we do want a man we can respect, and foolish women who have not been brought up wisely may test men in very nasty ways, that is a product of feminism, not something inherent to women. Give us a chance, you might like us.

  85. Donar van Holland's Gravatar Donar van Holland
    June 13, 2012 - 10:55 am | Permalink

    When Christians simply state that their God objects to pornography and masturbation, I can respect that. But to claim that societal decline is caused by these factors is ridiculous. Not to put to fine a point on it, masturbation (and therefore pornography) is one of the great constants in history, whatever the phase of the civilization.

    Furthermore, it seems that Christians have their own definition of decadence, namely a period when sexual activity does not conform to their views. A pagan definition would focus on military and cultural power.

    If I were malicious I could point out that the decline of the Roman Empire did not happen in pagan times, but in its Christian phase. And the great flowering of Greece and Rome happened in times when sexual mores would have made Mrs Darkmoon shudder.

  86. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 13, 2012 - 10:48 am | Permalink

    @Brock Ludlow:

    Your post has cheered me up. I sincerely hope you are right and that more and more people wake up. Things cannot be changed by democratic means, however, since there’s only one party that calls the shots and always gets in: AIPAC. They even control the voting machines.

    I pray for the unexpected to occur: a military coup and the rise of a charismatic leader who decides to clean out “the Augean stables of America”, to quote the article.

    Drastic remedies are needed for drastic diseases. The pains of America cannot be allievated by aspirin. I fear blood must flow, whether we like it or not. It will be surgery without anaesthetics.

  87. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 13, 2012 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    @Catiline:

    “Are women very pro-White in exchange? Be honest. ”

    Women aren’t meant to be pro or anti anything, as they lack the mental faculties required to analyze and interpret data. Women are meant to be guided and led by men. This goes back to what I was saying earlier: the problem with the White race is that its men are cowards.

  88. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 13, 2012 - 10:40 am | Permalink

    @Catiline:
    I entirely agree that most women are not pro-white. There are many reasons for this -all regrettable. Feminism has done terrible damage. However, no matter what your feelings toward women are, the one inescapable truth is that the future of white people depends on white women. If those women who are inclined to be on our side or merely seeking truth visit here and are greeted not with legitimate criticism of feminism but deep-seated hatred and contempt for women we are unlikely to win many over.

    I can assure you that I have been assaulted with very ugly accusations that have no relation whatever to any position I have held or endorsed. If we really want to win, we are going to have to find people willing and able to work on behalf of the people and culture we love, not only those who enjoy venting their anger against all they hate – which all too often includes our own people.

  89. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    June 13, 2012 - 10:21 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    “White Advocacy is very pro-woman…”

    Are women very pro-White in exchange? Be honest.

  90. Brock Ludlow's Gravatar Brock Ludlow
    June 13, 2012 - 9:47 am | Permalink

    To those who claim that our cause is “hopeless” let me repeat a bit of wisdom from a post above. Obama sucks up to the Jews but he refuses to invade Iran. Why the change? Why is Israel no longer TOTALLY in control of our military? My answer is “The Israel Lobby” by Mearsheimer and Walt.
    You see, as the truth is revealed, bit by bit, anti-semitism will indeed rise (as it always has) and our masters will either stupidly keep pushing a cornered dog and feel his bite, or back off and give the dog some room.

  91. Brock Ludlow's Gravatar Brock Ludlow
    June 13, 2012 - 9:20 am | Permalink

    I don’t believe that it’s hopeless, and I’ll tell you why. More and more people are waking up. As this happens, a critical mass forms. We are still a majority at 68% and that is a big number of people. Millions of angry resentful whites are bound to do SOMETHING. I have a feeling that there will be Anders Breiviks going on rampages all over the country, and they will no doubt target Jews and liberals. Much like the Arab terrorists, when people have nothing to lose they go into radical mode. I’m not saying that I would engage in terror myself, but I can see it coming. You can’t steal a country away from a people and expect those people to just lay down and die. Whether it’s Palestinians or white Americans, the outcome will be the same. A marginalized and mistreated group is bound to fight back.
    On the other hand…..my sincere hope is that the powers that be will wise up before the SHTF, stop the flow of third world losers, and also stop the blatant anti-white policies that are killing this nation. If the parasite kills the host, the parasite dies too.

  92. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 9:12 am | Permalink

    @http://www.jewishjournal.com/nation/article/in_first_bipartisan_house_letter_seeks_pollards_release_20120612/

    At least he’s been imprisoned for over 25 years, which is something. I would suggest polite calls and emails to your congressman might dissuade a few from going along with commuting his sentence. Let them know people don’t approve. Of course, if Obama loses, it might be one of many pardons he doles out in exchange for consideration.

  93. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 8:43 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Personally I think it’s much better if Pollard is allowed to go free.

    It helps more to know the reality. It could be there are lots of people like Lucy who have pinned a lot of significance on Pollard. In which case, it helps more to release him and let those people understand the situation more fully.

    While it is true we are in the process of being defeated at the current time. It is not good to attach too much significance to that. The fight hasn’t actually begun yet. All of this…this is…to keep the thread topic…..foreplay.

  94. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 8:34 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Good question. We all used to be able to respond to posts through the website and have them indent on the particular post we were responding to, but that was taken away. Since that time (well over 6 months ago, if not a year ago) I have never seen it done one time, except of course when moderators respond.

  95. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 13, 2012 - 8:20 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Reading through this string, I would theorize that a response is indented below that to which it is responding when the response is made through e-mail, by those who receive these comments through their e-mail programs, as RSS messages, while those of us who are simply replying directly through this site, instead, have our comments added at the bottom of the stack. Does that sound like a plausible explanation, or are others of you also replying to comments via e-mail, without the aforementioned indented treatment?

  96. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 13, 2012 - 5:25 am | Permalink

    @Sean: I meant to thank you for this comment several days ago, but my health being an on-again, off-again affair, I simply forgot to. I thank you now.

    I once heard a tale of a retiring history professor. Evidently a suck-up former student asked the prof whether he had a preference for one period or another or one school of historiography or another. The professor is said to have replied, “If I could do it all over, I’d never teach anything but Thucydides and Tacitus. They observe, they record, they reflect. Everyone agrees that that’s what historians should do, but very few of them actually do it.” Whether the tale is true or not, the embedded observation is pure gold.

  97. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 13, 2012 - 5:21 am | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    I can’t say I disagree with anything you say here. Both Lasha and I have always found your posts most illuminating. The sad fact is — and there is not a poster here who would disagree with this assessment — we are engaged in an internecine war with an implacable Enemy who appears to be winning.

    I had always thought that the Jonathan Pollard case was a litmus test. As long as Pollard, who did immense damage to America, was kept behind bars where he belongs, it was possible to argue that America was in control and did not take orders from Israel. It now seems that Zionist puppet Obama is about to pardon Pollard at the insistence of his Jewish handlers. This tells us that the Jews have got the upper hand. They are now our masters and we are their slaves.

    When was there last an American President who stood up to the Jews? There have been some. And their careers have either been cut short disastrously or they have been assassinated.

    Neither I nor my sister Lasha know of any way out of this tunnel of darkness. We have been accused of defeatism. Gosh, it’s hard to keep smiling while your house is on fire!

    Lasha and I have great respect for the commentariat here, even for those who have shown themselves consistently hostile to us and treat us with discourtesy, but what are we all doing here but whistling in the wind?

    How do Lasha’s articles in any way help to curtail the powers of the Jews? In no way at all. A pebble tosssed into the ocean would create a greater ripple than anything Lasha says here. And the same thing applies to all the articles on this site, even the best ones, and this applies just as much to all the contributions of this erudite and exceptionally intelligent commentariat.

    What we have here on this site is mere spit in the wind. Words! Words! Words! Nothing we say here is helping to win the “war of the races”. I see no dent in the Enemy’s armor. We are in retreat. We are beleaguered. We are at our wit’s end. Our world is in a shambles. We are doomed.

    And here we are, fiddling while Rome burns.

    We look for a rescuer. America needs a revolution. I do not advocate violence, but I doubt that anything can be done to rectify this parlous situation without blood flowing in the streets.

    Blood will flow in the streets, I feel sure…but most of the blood, alas, will be ours. Kevin MacDonald was right. We can look forwatd to a future of “unimaginable cruelty”.

    God help us all…

  98. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 13, 2012 - 4:41 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: I laughed out loud at your linking of string theory and queer theory. The sooner they join Lysenkoism, the phlogiston theory, etc., in the dumpster, the better off we’ll be. The point of both seems to have been to provide deliberately bad explanations for things that aren’t really subject to explanation at all.

  99. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    June 13, 2012 - 4:15 am | Permalink

    Thanks for your article, Dr. Darkmoon. You did a lot of research and gave valuable information. It should make people aware how destructive the pornography industry is.

    The way I see it….the pornography industry is just a part of the warfare the Jewish Race is carrying out on the White Race. The same is true with their promotion of perversion…gay rights and same sex marriage. Also, so-called reproductive rights. And forced integration. And massive immigration. If the Jewish Race is not launching an attack in one way they are launching it in another. All of the strategy, psychology and propaganda they use is calculated to bring us to destruction.

    We did not declare war on any race and do not see ourselves as being at war with any race. Race wars are repugnant to white people. But what we failed to perceive is that a race of people has declared war on us. Hundreds of years ago, the Jewish Race declared war on the White Race. Some of the great thinkers had an awareness of it and wrote about it.

    We feel other races are involved in the war against white people, too, and they are, but only at the behest of the Jews. They are merely mercenary warriors who fight for material gain. They have been promised utopia.

    Ths is a race war between two races.

    In the past sixty years the Jewish Race has gathered a lot of steam. They are on a roll. Part of their success is due to the fact Whites think of them as “Jews” instead of the Jewish Race. There are millions of Jews scattered around the world and especially in white nations, but only one Jewish Race. Saying that all Jews are not bad is beside the point. The Jewish Race is bad. It is the Jewish Race that has us embattled.
    When we went to war against Germany in World War II we were not at war with some of the Germans. Nor did we feel obligated to say all Germans are not bad. We saw ourselves at war with a nation.

    This time we are at war with a race. We must start looking at the Jews as a race. Like we look at a nation. The Jews are a race at war with our race.

  100. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 13, 2012 - 3:37 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Excellent advice, Jason. Sad, isn’t it?

  101. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 13, 2012 - 3:33 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    There does seem to be an odd stylistic familiarity to them doesn’t there? Where have we seen this before?

  102. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 3:28 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Richard Pierce’s comments are 0bviously intended to disrupt normal conversation. They are also very similar in style and tone to various pseudonyms we have seen go out of their way to insult other posters, and try and present White Advocacy as somehow anti-woman. White Advocacy is very pro-woman, and perhaps the best recent example is the gentleman in Texas who took care of his daughter’s attacker. Now, that was a White man.

    I would suggest we all refrain from feeding this particular troll, under whatever name he appears in the future.

  103. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 13, 2012 - 3:22 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:
    At least you are consistent. Your judgement of me and traditional women are as misinformed as your judgement of Christianity. Suffice it to state that there is nothing at all in the rulebook which requires a lady to accept insult and assault on cherished values with deference.

    I am sorry you find it so painful that I have cordial relationships with many here. It is really not a conspiracy against you, it is a phenomena which often arises among men and women of intelligence and shared values and goals, respect.

  104. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    June 13, 2012 - 2:25 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:
    According to the excellent [and anti feminist] ‘ THE DARK SIDE OF MAN’ ..Rape is not about power or hate of women [sorry feminazis] rapists are poor young males.
    The author ‘takes on’ the fantasy world spun in the famous
    ‘AGAINST OUR WILL, MEN, WIMMEN AND RAPE’.

  105. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    June 13, 2012 - 2:20 am | Permalink

    @Ciaran:
    You forgot the joos:
    ginsburg [some of his writings I like]
    J rubin [no talent]
    abby hoffman, his buddy [no talent]
    and the list goes on and on…oh the 60s.

  106. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 13, 2012 - 2:03 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller

    I sincerely hope that this is a conversation that we can have, it would be lovely if the one trick ponies and vulgarians, and naughty little boys would permit us to have it without their input.

    Alice, if you are truly concerned with the breakdown of the traditional monogamous family and high investment parenting, I suggest you are looking in the wrong place – your, and the author’s, rather hysterical attempts to blame men, and men’s sexuality, or homosexuals, is misplaced. I noticed this revealing comment:

    women have actually been the great losers in feminism. It was Christian Europe, virtually alone in history that granted women high status

    Which makes sense – as a typical woman, you are upset that your social power has been diminished by feminism, so you long to return to what you presume to be a more powerful position under Christianity. Your utterly self-interested motivations are clear; likewise, Darkmoon’s objection to mastrubation – aside from superstitious aspects as (constantly) outlined by Richard – is that it is something a “husband” would do (note her objection; how could a husband look her in the eye, etc.) All the sexual perverts Darkmoon catalogs are men; all the sexual perversities she points out are stereotypically male; women are presumed to be hapless victims.

    A few years ago I read the excellent series of articles by F. Roger Devlin on monogamy and female hypergamy. The Jewish media loves to gloat that women are now more likely to have college degrees than men, that women are now economically independent of their husbands, and often outearn them. The culture – both the liberal left Jewish culture – as well as the “conservative” right wing Christian culture – are both in 100% agreement that the breakdown in the family and monogamy are the fault of men, and that this problem must be solved by men, by spending more time catering to women, appealing to women, paying more attention to women, and loving women more, “manning up” and “doing the right thing” etc.

    I’m just curious – do you think that women have contributed to the breakdown of the family? Have you considered the possibility that women have lost the ability to be lady-like? That modern women – conservative Christian or liberal feminist – do not submit to men’s authority, do not show proper deference to men, and are often arrogant and rude?

    These internet conversations can be rough, and posters are often rude and dismissive to each other, but I also notice that while you – as a typical woman – can “dish it out” so to speak – going so far as to question not only my intellectual honesty, but even my race and masculinity, generally speaking male posters will rush to your defense. It seems to me you want to have it both ways; you expect to be treated like a lady, but not necessarily act like one.

    As Devlin points out, it’s most often the “conservative” Christian men who enable this kind of unladylike behavior from women in general; lots of focus on “husbands loving your wives” but kind of soft-peddaling the “wives obey your husbands.” Even ostensibly conservative men complain of “sexism.”

    It’s always seemed obvious to me that one of the major problems with traditional marriage these days is that it’s put off too long; traditionally, men and women were married by early adulthood or late adolecence. But the idea that women should attend college (unmarried) has tended to add five years, at least, to the average age a woman is married.

    Just curious – would you suggest your daughter forgo university, and instead get married, get pregnant, and start raising children at age 18? Would you counsel your daughter to accept a lower living standard, less consumerism, and perhaps a bit of poverty, in order to avoid work outside of the home and accept living on her husband’s salary alone? Would you tell your daughter to marry a man that’s perhaps not quite handsome, or not very “sexy,” or one that doesn’t necessarily “make the earth move” but instead, would be a devoted husband and father? What sort of advice would you give your daughter on how to submit to her husband, how to keep him sexually satisfied, cook for him, clean the house, keep him interested, etc? If by economic need she has to work outside the home, surely her paycheck would go directly to the head of the household – her husband – so he can do his job and make the economic decisions?

    I can only assume that due to your strong objection to pornography, you would forbid your daugther romance novels, TV shows like “Sex and the City” “Girls” or “Twilight” not to mention magazines like Cosmo and Glamor and salacious novels like 50 Shades of Grey.

    I have to say, I rarely, if ever, read any presumably conservative, traditionalist women giving this sort of advice to the younger women. It’s pretty much “what can this new traditionalism do for me?” and “how can we get men to do such-and such for us?” and “look at those nasty perverted men!” Not only is it selfish, and not very traditional, it’s also not very ladylike (but it’s very stereotypically female.)

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/07/sexual-utopia-in-power-part-1/

    …..

    As an aside, you and Craon love personal insults, and have both accused me of “vulgarity” in your various colorful ways – and as usual with you Catholic superstitious types, I was left scratching my head: all I could come up with was using the term “homo” which I assumed was a non-pejorative abbreviation of “homosexual” that sounded a bit less clinical. Sometimes I try to avoid “gay” and “lesbian” because they seem fraught with political baggage. So, no vulgarity meant.

  107. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 1:50 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Thank you very much for the very informative post on EB. I have noticed in the past that when I find a science book from the 1950s or earlier, it is generally far easier to comprehend than the material I see these days. I am not an expert on writing, but there is a directness and flow that often makes reading a the older material a pleasure.

    And of course, the lack of PC-dogma in earlier works makes for much better prose. It’s funny, you mentioned the lack of entries on things like String Theory, yet my understanding is that ST may be the biggest lark of the last 30 years. It is not even testable in theory! I’m afraid String Theory is on the same epistemological plane as Queer Theory.

  108. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 1:39 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Yes, and both seem to have rather the same focus in their posts. A very detailed focus on explaining intimate details of their lives with strangers. I hope the moderators are aware. The ability to indent suggests some higher level of access to the site.

  109. TJ's Gravatar TJ
    June 13, 2012 - 12:40 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    Well said. It is a vomitorium. I feel the urge to get a gun whenever I see our daughters exploited this way.

  110. June 12, 2012 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    A stark actuarial study packs lots of punch about this topic.
    The likelihood is great that those having full throttle sex lives and devotion to porn (and sex toys, aphrodiasiacs, etc. ) have correlative damage in their careers, their social status, their physical health, their marriage security and so on. The great scholar E. O. Wilson makes this point. I’ve found perhaps about 01 in 15 of these full throttle hedonists that do not upon scrutiny give evidence of a lot of correlative “price paid” for their repeated few seconds of spinal ecstasy. An actuarial fact not sufficiently emphasized.

  111. Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
    June 12, 2012 - 10:23 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    I wonder if this refers to me, if so please allow me to explain: I left for work at about 8 a.m. I returned at about 6 p.m. and checked my mail. Three of the twenty or so additional posts encouraged me to respond, the other seventeen(-ish) didn’t.

    The only pot stirring coming from this direction will be when I leave here in a few moments to begin making dinner.

    No conspiracy here!

    Robert Paul Mune is my real name. I use no pseudonyms. I have been reading here for about 3 or 4 years. My wife was raised Catholic and explained to me this morning why my point of view might disturb those who adhere closely to the Church of Rome, but I feel my energies are well spent in a debate which I think is crucial if our collective hopes are to become viable.

    The Catholic Church itself is a broad Church, and I’m sure that Professor MacDonald himself knows that numbers count in conflict. I would gently suggest that we find that which we can all agree on and not be in such a hurry to launch witch hunts to whittle our numbers down still further.

    A house divided…well, I’m sure you know the rest.

  112. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 10:08 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Indeed, and the writers often seem to stir the pot if the argument slows down.

  113. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 9:56 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Have you noticed? There’s now someone else getting the special locked-box treatment, a person who calls himself FrederickRhodes. I would be oh so glad if KM or Matt Parrott would do a moderator-ex-machina bit and explain to us what gives.

  114. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Since I own neither a Kindle nor a cellphone, you can guess my response, Alice.

  115. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 8:35 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns:
    I entirely agree, sex is a wonderful gift and deserves respect. Sadly, however, all good things can be degraded. It is precisely because I hold sex and procreation in high esteem that I object to pornography which is quite distinct from art.

    I do not wish to demonize any innocent person. I do indeed have sympathy for any one who is afflicted with unhealthy urges, whether for sex, food, or anything else which harms rather than nurtures. However, I also have a duty to protect the innocent and ignorant in my field of influence from being taught lies. The GLBT movement is based on lies. I can stick a banana in my ear, but it will not be normal, natural nor nourishing. We live in the sexual equivalent of the vomitorium. Not surprisingly, we are dying out as a result. That is the worst kind of ingratitude for God’s gifts.

  116. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 8:17 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    As always, good advice. After reading both your remarks and Franklin Ryckaert’s, I have the oddest urge to obtain, at any price, a hard copy of the 1911 edition. Is this an early sign of senile dementia or is it entirely reasonable to want to hold the book in your hand and know that no one will alter it overnight? Oh dear……

  117. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 7:54 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Yes, I do have a few. Again, I quite agree with Franklin Ryckaert. Yet insofar as many noncurrent and apolitical topics are concerned, there are still few sites that provide as much useful information in a cogently and often elegantly and expertly composed form as EB. On European, African, and Asian historical and prehistorical matters especially, the EB is remarkably good. The only American academic site I have ever seen with local articles of comparable quality is that of the Texas State Historical Association.

    Before you spend the money on a subscription, however, let me ask you a question: do you have a relative or a good friend with academic connections? If you do, it is quite possible that you might be able to use his or her good offices to acquire access to the EB at the much-reduced university rate. Many universities and colleges subscribe, and their faculty members get free access, usually via a simple password. Even when such is not the case, an academic can self-subscribe at a reduced rate. If neither of these avenues is open to you, then by all means consider subscribing—though not before you avail yourself of the fourteen-day free trial. Never underestimate the power or importance of buyer’s remorse!

  118. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 7:23 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: I am grateful for your correction to my rendering of this fine old aphorism, whose missing si, I am glad to say, is down to haste and carelessness rather than ignorance.

  119. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    June 12, 2012 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    I like church buildings (very beautiful/inspiring and comforting) and believe there is a lot of potential for great things when people gather together in a beautiful place.

    Bingo. I agree entirely.
    Christianity should be made to be an aid and not a detriment to WN.
    God wants it that way since nationalism is very natural and God made nature.

  120. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 12, 2012 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Great comment.

    I hope you won’t mind if I piece together some of my favorite parts of it.

    You should consider it a big deal. No man is an island. Everything your neighbor does affects your personally. By masturbating in front of his monitor screen, this man is altering the universe in which you live. He is part of your environment and he is polluting it.

    Just as passive smoking impairs the health of non-smokers, men who copulate with dogs in the privacy of their bedrooms are adding ugliness and dissonance to the world we all share.

    We are not separate units. We are part of one organic whole.

    What the hand does, what the foot does, affects the whole body. We are all cells in a universal body known as Humankind. Every good thing you do helps to make the world a better place for me. Every evil thing you do adds to the bad vibes in the universe and it affects me deeply — because I have to share this universe with you.

    Thanks so much for this.

    You articulated something that I believe is very important: we are all a part of each other; we are all interconnected.

    I’ve meditated on this for a while, for at least a couple years.

    Hopefully, one day all people will understand (and care) that their actions, even their thoughts behind closed doors, affect others/the world.

    Your comment, although addressed to Mrs. Teller, was in response to something that Robert Paul Mune wrote; and I want to clarify that I thought his comments were helpful in a way — he seems likeable and respectful, and probably better than me in a lot of ways.

    Here is something that I liked in one of his comments:

    I would sum up my moral value system as a grab bag of Christianity (long on Jesus, short on Church), and the more pragmatic (Hitlerian) end of National Socialism with a great big proud sprinkling of my countryman Oswald Mosley; whatever works.

    I don’t know who Mosley is, but I’m interested in the Jesus + Hitler combination. And even though I don’t really go to church or belong to a denomination, I like church buildings (very beautiful/inspiring and comforting) and believe there is a lot of potential for great things when people gather together in a beautiful place.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 12, 2012 - 9:51 pm | Permalink

      Thank you Richard for your kind estimate of my personality.

      My formative years were very much shaped by the Church of England which is a very gentle Church, not much Old Testament but lots of Jesus, compassion, and charity. The Christlike echoes in Adolf Hitler have always seemed pretty obvious to me.

      Oswald Mosley was an English politician whose career stretched between the 1920s and the 1950s, he continued afterward as a writer and theorist but no longer held out hope of political power. Sometimes described as the ‘English Adolf Hitler’ by the usual type he was of course no such thing; less gifted as a leader, but perhaps more cohesive as a theoretician, he argued that Fascism would naturally take a different form inside each national community and he attempted to develop the English form.

      I recommend this site to any who might wish to learn about Mosley:

      http://www.oswaldmosley.com/

  121. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: I’m prepared to endorse Mr. Ryckaert’s assessment of EB 11. I also agree that its current ownership, along with the well-nigh irresistible pressures to assign articles to mainstream (i.e., Tribe-coopted) scholars, makes reliance on newer editions very, very dicey indeed—except, of course, regarding the history of the Hittites or the excavations of Troy or similar matters.

    I do think, however, that it’s worth stressing something that Mr. Ryckaert doesn’t stress; namely, that 99 percent of the things one ought to go to an encyclopedia for will be reliably found in the 11th edition. Even when it comes to the hard sciences—and clean contrary to what people addicted to television and the press would have you believe—the number of areas where the answer to a physics-, chemistry-, or biology-related question might be different in 2012 than it was in, say, 1950 is vanishingly small. Even pushing the date back to 1900 would still give you reliability in excess of 90 percent. And needless to say, only a complete innocent would look to EB 11 for information about string theory, charmed quarks, or the difference between aerodynamic and ballistic explanations of characteristics of hypersonic flight.

    As for Wikipedia, as I have several times earlier written, I abide strictly by what I call the Bradley Smith Rule (I counsel others to do likewise): “Wikipedia is the first place to go if you want it quick, do not want much, and there are no ethical or moral issues involved” (Bradley Smith’s Blog, 11/19/2009). One must assume, however, that any other information therein is tainted. I consider your own experience with Boas entirely representative of what anyone interested in mere evidence and facts will encounter at that cesspool of Judaic deception. Permit me to provide a trifling example from my own very limited experience. Once, while reading an article about a certain British TV program that I had seen on a videotape, I noticed that the writer had described the theme music as being taken from a recording by the German countertenor Andreas Scholl. Knowing for certain that the recording used was one made by the late Alfred Deller, I entered the correction and thought no more of the matter. Some months later, looking again at the entry, I found that my correction had been “reverted.” Again entering the correction, I this time noted that I owned the recording and thus knew what I was talking about. I also referred to an online link to the recording of the same piece done by Scholl and commented that anyone with ears could hear that that recording and the theme music had nothing in common. This time the reversion was accompanied by a comment referring me to Wikipedia’s ban on “original research”!

    Seeing how Wikipedians have made the “anti-Semitism” article collection the largest on the site and how they have distorted the facts of the USS Liberty’s sinking virtually beyond recognition, heaven alone knows how they might respond to the query “Is it raining out now?” How’s this for an answer: “To suggest looking out the window is to encourage original research, which violates Wikipedia’s canon 467.22b/§42β.”

  122. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Some people here say that Johann Hari (they think) is not a Jew, and I am willing to accept that they may be right.

    What I am trying to convey to stern critics like Someday, however, is that it is not at all CERTAIN that Hari and Lebedev are non-Jews. Rumors swirl about both these individuals that they are “probable Jews” or “crypto-Jews”.

    There are Lebedev’s known links with the Rothschild family, and the fact that “Lebedev” is a Jewish name, and again the fact that Lebedev was a Russian oligarch — and we know that most of these men were Jews.

    I quote again what I said earlier:

    If Lasha Darkmoon asserted that Johann Hari was a Jew, it’s because she had formed this impression from her reading. She had read this somewhere, either in a newspaper or on the internet.

    Here is an article called “Kinsey and the Jews”. It contains this sentence: Johann Hari and Melanie Phillips are reportedly Jewish.

    http://aangirfan.blogspot.ca/2009/08/kinsey-and-jews.html

    “Reportedly Jewish” surely means that the writer of that article had seen it reported elsewhere that Hari was Jewish.

    It’s for these reasons that Lasha is willing to relegate all these doubts about the ethnicity of Lebedev and Hari to a footnote in any future reissue of this article. However, she sees no reason why she should be coerced into rewriting her essay to accommodate the doubts and uncertainties of a few posters here who could very well turn out to be wrong.

  123. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    June 12, 2012 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

    We are all cells in a universal body known as Humankind.

    L. S.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 12, 2012 - 9:38 pm | Permalink

      100% in accord. Who are these arrogant ‘Christians’ judging ‘God’s work’?

      “He who is without sin…”

  124. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    @Someday:

    Good point, Someday. I take it on board. However, even if it were true that Lasha Darkmoon had misidentified two non-Jews in this essay as Jews — which is not at all certain — these shocking errors would hardly justify your earlier comment that TOO “loses all credibility” by publishing such an article.

    This is a bit like saying that Edward Gibbon “lose all credibility” as a historian just because he got a few dates wrong and confused Nero’s uncle with his nephew.

    I repeat what I said earlier:

    Most people on this site would be willing to assert, with 100 percent certainty, that Kevin MacDonald is not a Jew. But I doubt if they could state with 100 percent certainty that Lebedev and Hari are non-Jews. I bet they wouldn’t wager $1000 on this, let alone their lives.

    This essay is not about Lebedev. He is a minor character and plays a very minor role here. If Lasha has misindentified him as a Jew, this is a culpable error, but it would hardly invalidate the general thrust of her argument that pornography is an instrument of subverson and moral anarchy, and that the Jews are the main force behind it.

  125. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    June 12, 2012 - 6:05 pm | Permalink

    IMO;
    Homosexuality is counter to procreation. Homosexuality should be seen as something that needs to be researched and understood and not “demonized” but for sympathy should be shown to those who have homosexual tendency, while not allowing the importance of positive procreation to be diminished in any way.

    • FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
      June 14, 2012 - 8:38 am | Permalink

      That’s a great point. Then if you stop teaching your sons to hate their naturally bi sexual human nature, you may be lucky enough that he and his gay partner/lover will be willing to help his straight brothers and sisters to raise their families, with interior home designs and tuition, increasing your WN agenda, And there is a chance that your gay sons may meet some lesbian couple that wants children so you can still have grandchildren, so your bloodline/name doesn’t die out.

    • FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
      June 14, 2012 - 9:43 am | Permalink

      @Pierre de Craon: Allow me. They have been cencoring many of my comments, just not the ones that are psychologically important for the WN’ists to understand how to increase White people success rates at reproduction. From my point of view I can see just how your extreme hatred for non breeders causes you to actually decrease your procreation success rates. What you are ignoring is the fact that just because a person is born a man does not make him good father material. Not all men are meany to become fathers, that’s why Mother Nature evolved us to be concieved at the rate of one woman to every four men, to give Her daughters a better selection, and the extra men help out with the chores of raising a family much better than a bunch of mothers married to one man dependant on society to support their children, like in Romney’s religion.

    • FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
      June 14, 2012 - 10:12 am | Permalink

      @Heather Blue: The finish line at the race for ethnic domination is total extinction. Just immagine an ocean with only one culture of white coral, or only white dogs of one breed.

    • FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
      June 14, 2012 - 10:21 am | Permalink

      @Alice Teller: I agree with your analogy, Bananas are ment to be stuck in the mouth, no where else.

  126. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    June 12, 2012 - 5:57 pm | Permalink


    The Eleventh Edition (1910-1911) of the EB is of course outdated in many respects but still contains useful information, especially because it stems from a pre-PC age. For example under the entry “negro” you find the following remark :
    “Mentally the negro is inferior to the white…the arrest or even deterioration of mental development (after adolescence) is no doubt very largely due to the fact that after puberty sexual matters take the first place in the negro’s life and thoughts”.

    IMO ;
    A graphic depiction of a very handsome white man having sex with a beautiful white woman is not dirty or perverse or anything bad. While, even the most “innocent” reference to a black man having sex with a white woman is absolute filth.

    Sex is about procreation. Procreation is very important. Sex is not something to be ashamed of if positive and healthy procreation is kept most important.

  127. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    I missed the link to the Duke piece, can you re list it? The real question is who are the 80%. To whom and what do we owe our loyalty. For many religious folk the line must be drawn at the line of faith, not to the faddish sin of the moment that the churches, like all institutions in the west indulge in, but to something that is very difficult to explain to a non-believer, especially in a forum like this.

    You have tried very, very hard to bring us all together, but I have reluctantly reached the conclusion that lines really must be drawn. I sincerely hope that this is a conversation that we can have, it would be lovely if the one trick ponies and vulgarians, and naughty little boys would permit us to have it without their input.

    The sad truth is that we have been so conditioned to the notion that tolerance is the evil that landed us here. In fact, tolerance is the amount of variance from the norm acceptable before the entire system mal-functions.

  128. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    June 12, 2012 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    This idea that a TOO author prevents TOO readers from betting their lives (that Hari ect is not Jewish) by stating that he is in fact Jewish, is completely wrongheaded. You need to have a serious re-think about this wretchedly counterproductive ‘close enough’ fact checking policy.

  129. kapoore's Gravatar kapoore
    June 12, 2012 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

    I loathe Kinsey but he was a true believer. The sexual revolution was suppose to be a liberation, although it ended up being an exploitation of women and children. But since I lived through it I can attest to the idealism, misguided though it was. Ironically it could be porn that is saving the First Amendment that folks like those in the Weisenthal Museum would love to get rid of or at least amend to be more like Europes; but they can’t because then the Jewish porn industry would die with it. It’s like the scale with porn on one side and the freedom of speech on the other. I suppose they’ll manage somehow (they) being the undefined neo-liberals that care so much about gays and minorities but not sexual exploitation children. The porn industry, after all, are big donators to the Democratic party.

  130. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    June 12, 2012 - 4:27 pm | Permalink

    @ELIMINATION of the Assad regime in Syria was not an idea conceived by either the neocons or the broader Israel Lobby; instead, it can be traced back to the Israeli Likudniks, having been articulated by Oded Yinon in his 1982 piece, “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties.” In that article, Yinon called for Israel to use military means to bring about the dissolution of Israel’s neighboring states and their fragmentation into a mosaic of ethnic and sectarian groupings. Yinon believed that this would not be a difficult undertaking because nearly all the Arab states were afflicted with internal ethnic and religious divisions.
    In essence, the end result would be a Middle East of powerless statelets that could in no way confront Israeli power. Lebanon, then facing divisive chaos, was Yinon’s model for the entire Middle East. Yinon wrote:

    ‘Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian peninsula, and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short-term target’. (Quoted in my book, The Transparent Cabal, p. 51.)

  131. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 12, 2012 - 4:22 pm | Permalink

    Fantastic piece by David Duke.
    But it’s going to take some new thinking also within WN.
    We have to start recognizing that to want to secure your people is not something that necessarily comes with any particular political or social outlook.
    What may be true, is that when you start caring about your people, you are inexorably led toward certain other realizations that are, broadly speaking, very much like the values expressed by people here, also by the NS and so on.

    But the key point I’m making is that, those values come later on, and that means Whites as they wake up, are going to be coming with a very wide spectrum of viewpoints.

    It is the duty of people awake now to prepare for that tidal wave of people.

    The question I would ask is, can it really be part of our duty to be turning 80% of those people away, or putting them off, because we are prematurally demanding political/ideological/social/lifestyle criteria?

    This is a bad gig…and this really matters. Because that tidal wave might only come once. And the enemy will use every opportunity to shut the whole thing down. So this is somethign we need to be thinking about. We don’t have the *right* to screw this up over differences that simply do not matter compared to securing the people.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 12, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

      @ Mickey Meadows. Exactly! Common sense at last.

  132. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    June 12, 2012 - 1:16 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Hari is a profoundly disturbed homosexual and plagiarist but to my knowledge he is not a jew. He is, if anything, aggressively pro-palestinian in the way that the untouchable homsexual left are allowed to be in modern Western democracies. 80 years ago, in Germany, AH welcomed this sort of socialist into the party but was forced to dump them when they became an embarassment.

    Thus the choice remains a stark one for the angry wasp brigade on here. They either get into bed with Rome or with Johann Hari …

  133. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    June 12, 2012 - 12:23 pm | Permalink

    Ted Bundy was lying about his addiction to porn. He told Ann Rule, who knew him well before he was discovered to be a serial killer, that he had no sexual desire at all. Serial killers are never interested in normal sex. Many of them are necrophiles and cannibals. That’s not caused by any pornography.

  134. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    June 12, 2012 - 11:47 am | Permalink

    howard jacobson’s face presents a graphical synthesis of jewish essence, what binds them together despite genetic disparity.

    what do sephardis, falashas, orcs, khazars, marranos, ashkenazis, ghouls, cryptos, donmeh, conversos and busted flush have in common.
    a poetic soul that shortcuts them to man booker, as evident in jacobsen’s beatific expression.

  135. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 11:29 am | Permalink

    Perhaps there is hope for our children after all. It seems that in Texas men still know how to deal with child predators.

    http://blog.chron.com/newswatch/2012/06/dad-beats-daughters-alleged-molester-to-death/

  136. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 11:05 am | Permalink

    @Catiline:
    It is about time the woman-hating he-men chimed in! You poor guys cannot even stretch your minds far enough to see that women have actually been the great losers in feminism. It was Christian Europe, virtually alone in history that granted women high status, and they did not demand that we become cheap, imitation men to do so.

  137. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 10:57 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Alas, I lack both your extraordinary gift for languages and technological savvy. The tribe is always there to cater to all of our shortcomings whether the sexual or intellectual. Really an amazing people.

  138. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    June 12, 2012 - 10:56 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    “Typical woman, her sexuality is fluid, she has “crushes” on other women, therefore she sides with “celibate” homosexual men (pretending they aren’t homosexual) and goes into sexual panics over various things.”

    Female hypocrisy in matters relating to sex is quite well known and borders on the psychopathic. Otto Weininger correctly posited a deep connection and similarity between Jewishness and femininity. If Lasha and Lucy are so morally qualified, why don’t they write about female sex-tourism (by White women) in Africa and the Caribbean, for example? (And that’s only the tip of the iceberg.)

    “Homos aren’t the problem – loud mouthed, uppity females are the problem.”

    Bulls-eye.

    “She should be tending to her children, grandchildren, and making her husband a sandwich, and stop “white knighting” the (ostensibly male, Catholic, eunuch) cat-ladies like Craon.”

    Lasha and Lucy like discussing porn. It turns them on. Craon is wrong on this issue but he’s still a good chap nonetheless.

  139. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 12, 2012 - 10:24 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:
    The essay you linked invokes “archaeological gaydar,” which the author admits is fraught with “pitfalls,” to defend a “hunch” that the Catholic Church is historically gay. The strongest evidence put forth is the established practice of monks sleeping in separate cells and having rules against particular friendships. These practices may guard against homosexual temptation, but there are far greater precautions taken against heterosexual temptation. Usually nuns and monks reside in geographically separate locations.

    In the essay, historically and geographically isolated Incidents of decadence, such as during the late Northern Italian Renaissance, are used to tarnish the 2000-year-old, worldwide Church. Reform campaigns against homosexual infestation one thousand years ago are used, not to not too illustrate the Church’s eternal vigilance, but to argue that the Church was always homosexual. Even the author’s questionable “hunch” that many priests were gay does not mean what it seems. By “gay,” the author means born gay (a questionable proposition in itself) and not necessarily acting out. The idea that somebody could be homosexual without participating in gay sex is a thoroughly modernist and has nothing to do with the guilt of sodomy, which is the Church’s only concern.

    You now say that you had actually meant to complement the Church for finding a useful niche for the homosexually-inclined. However, your original posts involved the language of ridicule. It is quite common that self-styled gay defenders will ridicule others for imagined gay tendencies and thereby, in a backhanded way, admit the shamefulness of what they purport to defend.

  140. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 12, 2012 - 10:20 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    The Encyclopaedia Britannica (32 vols.) is no doubt the best in the world. (there seems to be one still better, it is the Enciclopedia Universal Illustrada Europeo-Americana in 118 volumes, but that one is in Spanish).

    I have had the EB for a couple of years then resold it, a thing I later regretted.
    But that was before I had access to the Internet. Now I find that you can find anything on the web if you search well. You don’t need encyclopedias or even dictionaries in book form anymore. And since the EB is now Jewish owned that will have consequences in terms of PC and SC (semitic correctness).

    The Eleventh Edition (1910-1911) of the EB is of course outdated in many respects but still contains useful information, especially because it stems from a pre-PC age. For example under the entry “negro” you find the following remark :
    “Mentally the negro is inferior to the white…the arrest or even deterioration of mental development (after adolescence) is no doubt very largely due to the fact that after puberty sexual matters take the first place in the negro’s life and thoughts”.

    Needless to say you won’t find such “race-realist” remarks in any modern encyclopedia and certainly not in a Jewish owned one.

    For further information, see Wikipedia : Encyclopaedia Britannica Eleventh Edition.

    If you search well on the web you don’t need to spend $70,00 a year for access to the EB.

  141. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    June 12, 2012 - 10:01 am | Permalink

    It is amazing to see Roman Catholic Congressmen, and Senators 100% in support of the Homosexual & Lesbian political agenda. We are talking big Catholic names, from big Catholic states.

    Maybe the Catholic politicians see themselves as protecting their own Roman Catholic clergy?

    Naturally, as someone pointed out, the Roman Catholics & the Jews in Congress are voting as a unified group on immigration issues too.

  142. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Are you serious? I didn’t know that. Lasha has never had access to an indented box. Nor have I, since I am not a writer for this site. But honestly, I don’t see any advantage in having this indented box or why one is not allowed to reply directly to “Robert Paul Mune”. I may add that both Lasha and I know very little about computers, which is why the obscure website we have is managed for us by someone else.

  143. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 9:06 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    How odd, all other authors seem to have such access.

  144. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 9:03 am | Permalink
  145. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 8:56 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    I’d be curious about your view of Wikipedia versus Britannica as well. In the past, I assumed Britannica would be much higher quality, and perhaps it is, but recently I’ve heard that even famous encyclopedias can be full of mistakes. The idea has been put forward that with proper care, Wikipedia may be useful in many instances, due to the large number of people who contribute to it (and especially those that endlessly correct entries).

    Of course, we know it has an ideological bias, and we know it won’t tolerate much critique of any Jewish behavior (I was told to stop mentioning that Boas was Jewish. They blocked me from editing – that was a little project I tried a couple of years ago but soon quit). So, when read with proper qualifications, I’ve found it useful as a quick guide to many topics.

    But, if Britannica is of superior value, it might be worth a gift to myself someday.

  146. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 8:53 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Ah, I see, you are hinting that I may be the poster known as “Robert Paul Mune” because he has an indented box. I’m afraid not, Alice. Neither Lasha nor I have access to an indented box. Apart from which, Robert Paul Mune says things I would never agree with. Such as this:

    . . . the village idiots will always be with us. If they now choose to masturbate in front of the monitor screen rather than puke up in front of the alehouse I consider it no big deal.

    I happen to believe the reverse. This is what I would say to Robert:

    You should consider it a big deal. No man is an island. Everything your neighbor does affects your personally. By masturbating in front of his monitor screen, this man is altering the universe in which you live. He is part of your environment and he is polluting it.

    Just as passive smoking impairs the health of non-smokers, men who copulate with dogs in the privacy of their bedrooms are adding ugliness and dissonance to the world we all share.

    Try and understand this, Robert. We are not separate units. We are part of one organic whole. The penis cannot masturbate and say to the brain, “Why do you object to what I do? I am the penis and I decide what I do with mysellf! You are the brain, and you should mind your own business — we are separate organs!”

    What the hand does, what the foot does, affects the whole body. We are all cells in a universal body known as Humankind. Every good thing you do helps to make the world a better place for me. Every evil thing you do adds to the bad vibes in the universe and it affects me deeply — because I have to share this universe with you.

  147. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 12, 2012 - 8:47 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    If you allow me to chime in : I suppose you want to avoid Wikipedia because it is Jewish controlled. Not to discourage you but I found this on the Internet :

    In January 1996 Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc. was purchased by billionaire Swiss financier Jacqui Safra for $135 million. Safra also owns Merriam-Webster.

    But who is Jacqui Safra? Wikipedia :

    Jacqui (Jacob) Eli Safra is a Swiss investor, descendant of the Lebanese-Swiss Jewish Safra banking family.

    We seem not be able to escape them!

    And for more information on the Jewish control of Wikipedia, go to : Radio Islam > The Jewish Hand Behind Internet > Wikipedia.
    Radio Islam is a website with a mine of information on international Jewry.

  148. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 8:35 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Thanks Alice…but who on earth is “Robert”?…I assure you I have no connection with any Robert!

  149. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 8:20 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    Lucy/Robert/Lasha, I would take your compliment more seriously if you had taken my advice and learned to discipline your ego. You considerable writing gifts still tend to be dimmed by your gift for self-promotion.

  150. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 12, 2012 - 8:07 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Scusi, ma quello dovrebbe essere : si non è vero è ben trovato.

  151. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 12, 2012 - 8:05 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Scusi, ma quello dovrebbe essere : si non

  152. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 8:00 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    On an entirely different topic, I have taken your scolding re Wikipedia to heart and I am considering a subscription to the on-line Britannica. It runs about $70.00 per year. Any thoughts?

  153. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 7:50 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:
    Once again, your comment is full of donkey dust. I am many things, typical is not among them. I am never loud-mouthed. I am not uppity, I even condescend to address fools like you. I assure you that I have no problem at all fulfilling all of my duties to family and finding the time to appreciate all of the intelligent men who speak up on behalf of their people and not simply come here to vent a little hatred.

    Since you felt free to offer me advice may I suggest that you take your claptrap with you when you leave?

  154. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 7:41 am | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:

    I think you would do well to consider writing this argument off as a lost cause, Jarvis. I just spent fifteen minutes reading the OED’s discussion of the etymology of church—it occupies fully two-thirds of a page in an entry that covers three full pages and quite a bit of a fourth—and there is nothing else to be said than that the OED’s editors say precisely what Mr. Ryckaert and Athanasius say, and vice versa. I’m willing to bet that if I still had a copy of Skeat’s etymological dictionary, it would say the very same thing, too.

    Still, it’s certainly true that the old Italian proverb applies to your case for Circe: non è vero, è ben trovato.

  155. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 7:03 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: It’s good to see you’ve gotten over your sulk. I was truly concerned lest I’d broken your village atheist heart. Besides, gutter language is just so much more you, darling, as your poofter acquaintances would say.

  156. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 6:55 am | Permalink

    This does not mean to say I am hostile to Alice’s detractors. I have nothing against them. Though I am a practising Roman Catholic myself, like Lasha, I feel no hostility whatsoever to the Christ bashers on this site. I was myself a Christ hater once, and I now regret it. I love Christ now…because he let me. That’s all I can say.

  157. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 6:54 am | Permalink

    @ Alice Teller

    Alice has surpassed herself for eloquence. Her prose is impeccable. I agree with almost everything she says. She is Alice in Wonderland!

  158. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 6:25 am | Permalink

    Alexander Lebedev and Johann Hari: Jews or non-Jews?

    @Lucy Skipping:

    As for Johann Hari, most people here seem to claim he is not a Jew. They may well be right. But would they stake $1000 on it? Would they bet their lives on it?

    I don’t think so.

    If Lasha Darkmoon asserted that Johann Hari was a Jew, it’s because she had formed this impression from her reading. She had read this somewhere, either in a newspaper or on the internet. Please believe me when I say that there are rumors in circulation that Johann Hari is Jewish.

    Here is an article called “Kinsey and the Jews” which Rehmat posted yesterday on the darkmoon.me site. It contains this sentence:

    Johann Hari and Melanie Phillips are reportedly Jewish.

    http://aangirfan.blogspot.ca/2009/08/kinsey-and-jews.html

    Well, no one doubts that Melanie Phillips is Jewish. We all know that. So why doubt the possibility that Johann Hari is Jewish too, given that there are so many rumors in circulation about his Jewish roots?

    Reportedly Jewish” surely means that the writer of that article had seen it reported elsewhere that Hari was Jewish.

    As both Lasha and I have too.

    It’s for these reasons that Lasha is willing to relegate all these doubts about the ethnicity of Lebedev and Hari to a footnote. However, she sees no reason why she should be coerced into rewriting her essay to accommodate the doubts and uncertainties of a few posters here who could very well turn out to be wrong.

  159. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 12, 2012 - 6:00 am | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:
    I know that in modern Greek the èta is pronounced as an “i”, so Kirkè is pronounced as Kirki, but that doesn’t make the idea that the word for “church” in the Germanic languages is derived from the name of a Greek pagan mythological figure any more likely.

    A derivative of the word for “Lord” is also used for another thing besides for “church”. In Greek the word for Sunday is Kyriakè, which is short for kyriakè hèmera, which means “day of the Lord”, but I’m afraid you will think that too is derived from Kirkè.

  160. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 5:26 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Your comments are habitually nothing but personal attacks. Virtually all you do is try to bait other posters. It seems rather odd to me that a poster shows up suddenly whose only interest is disturbing conversation.

  161. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 12, 2012 - 5:09 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    OBAMA TO FREE JONATHAN POLLARD.

    If this is true there’s no hope for America.

    Perhaps. But this move has to be seen in the present context. The Jewish Lobby wants Obama to attack Iran. But the US cannot afford a war with Iran. That would be absolutely a disaster both militarily and economically (rise of oil price due to closure of the Strait of Ormuz).
    But on the other hand Obama needs the support of the Jewish Lobby to be reelected. So what he does is anything he can do to please that Lobby except going to war with Iran. Freeing Jonathan Pollard is simply part of that.
    So, actually it is good news : there will be no war with Iran.
    It means that the power of the Jewish Lobby is great but not absolute.
    Still some hope for America!

  162. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 12, 2012 - 4:47 am | Permalink

    @ Franklin Ryckaert

    Thanks for checking in.
    I rely on the expertise of individuals who invested decades in researching this and similar subjects. Not insignificantly, they’ve got no rackets (religious or otherwise) to protect which, in my estimation, only fortifies their credibility. Consequently, I tend to find their interpretation more plausible.
    You, on the other hand, merely rehashed what’s been floated on the interwebs by various electronic strangers whose authority under the best of conditions is foggy. BTW, feel free to get hold of a native Greek speaker for help on how to pronounce Κίρκη.
    In terms of my ‘intellectual background’, permit me just say that I’m involved with the Office of Strategic Influence under the umbrella of the Project for the Glory of Zion.
    Ask Jason Hasbarovitz, he’ll tell you.

  163. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 12, 2012 - 4:46 am | Permalink

    OBAMA TO FREE JONATHAN POLLARD
    http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=16194

    If this is true, there’s no hope for America. The capital of America has shifted from Washington to Tel Aviv. Goodbye, America!

  164. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 12, 2012 - 4:07 am | Permalink

    I suspect, but none of us know, that sexuality is malleable to some extent. If this were not the case, how do you explain bisexuality? There are multiple factors at play here. Young people are often simply confused about their entire identity. I went to a girls school, in such an innocent age that our drama club was called the Gay Pretenders, and it was very common for younger girls to have a “crush” on an older student, which generally resulted in imitation of style and dress.

    Typical woman, her sexuality is fluid, she has “crushes” on other women, therefore she sides with “celibate” homosexual men (pretending they aren’t homosexual) and goes into sexual panics over various things.

    Homos aren’t the problem – loud mouthed, uppity females are the problem. She should be tending to her children, grandchildren, and making her husband a sandwich, and stop “white knighting” the (ostensibly male, Catholic, eunuch) cat-ladies like Craon.

    Now we know.

  165. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 1:25 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: You have nothing to apologize for. A great comment and a true one, albeit painfully so.

  166. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 1:18 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: There was a little gas in the tank. I figured, why not use it in a good cause?

  167. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 1:15 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    That is a tragic story and I hope Joan is doing better now. I hope she also realizes she was purely a victim and has no reason to feel ashamed. I am afraid a great many parents are completely unaware the pressures their children face.

    Ever since around 1990, it seems there has been an extreme promotion of lesbianism in our culture. The form I am talking about is not the feminist variety, but instead what is often called “girl on girl” activity or “action” for the entertainment of heterosexual males. I’m sure such things have always existed, but there seems to have been a sudden onslaught of such imagery starting around 20 years ago. Soon, college girls and even high school girls were being pressured to “put on a show” for the their drunken peers. It also became at least somewhat common in regular dance clubs. It was often females seeking attention. And of course, for a while you couldn’t turn on the television without seeing women embracing in some form – Britney and Madonna being an example from about a decade ago. I still remember AOL having their kiss as its main news story for several days, for adults and children to see.

    Let’s face it, we have become very careless with our children’s lives. While I understand, as a male, the desire for titillation, I simply cannot forgive putting a cheap thrill above your own children’s development. There is something unforgivably pathetic (well at least unforgivable for a non-divine person such as myself) about a man with children, talking publicly about how “hot” he finds some illicit female activity, without any regard to how he is promoting a dangerous culture for his own daughters.

    Sorry, didn’t mean to be so explicit, but these are the times in which we live.

  168. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 1:00 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I am delighted to see that you are feeling well enough to respond in your old form. On behalf of all civilized folk I thank you gentlemen for saving this thread from the mad and the blind.

  169. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 12:57 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Indeed, confusion and chaos seem to be their preference.

  170. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 12:51 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    You also brought to mind a point I hadn’t thought of before, namely, that the promotion of homosexuality could to some extent be done out of pure maliciousness. That is, while they may hope to convert a few, they simply enjoy the pain and suffering they can inflict on a young person who succumbs to their manipulation in a moment of weakness, especially a young middle-class White person. it’s a horrible thought, but I have noted an extreme viciousness among some homosexuals. And the visceral hatred among anti-Whites who promote gay culture, whether they are straight or homosexual, is very evident.

  171. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 12:44 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Your point on affiliation is an excellent one. I have a Jewish friend of many years, who had great difficulty accepting her daughter’s turn to Lesbianism. The daughter had been married and had children, but when her marriage faltered she took up with the Au Pair. My friend only came around when her thirteen year old grandson stood up in school and defended his mother and all lesbians. It never occurred to her that no adolescent should have to acknowledge, must less defend, his mother’s sexuality in a public forum. Isn’t adolescence painful enough without this burden?

    Homosexuals have always existed, and had two options in decent society, keep their private life private, with grace and decorum, or move to a gay neighborhood. Everyone born prior to the sixties knew maiden ladies who shared a home and confirmed bachelors who bunked together, we need not know more.

  172. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    @Tusk: What a remarkably informative comment! I thank you, sir, for contributing it.

  173. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 12, 2012 - 12:36 am | Permalink

    http://justifiedtype.wordpress.com/2010/04/15/israeli-propaganda-on-youtube-is-seeing-believing/

    The IDF broadcasting porn to besieged Ramallah should give pause for reflection.

  174. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 12:32 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    I meant to say in the last paragraph, that the knowledge of homosexuality among children, will interfere with normal patterns of affiliation and trust that should exist at that stage of development. As soon as boys learn about homosexuality, no matter what the official judgement they are taught, they immediately wish to avoid being associated with it.

    • FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
      June 12, 2012 - 9:00 am | Permalink

      Great point, I denied my lust for the masucline, that is until I found out I was erectile dysfunctional with women. I was born with a choise to become bi, straight or gay, and decided gay because I was lonely, my ED, and I had bad teeth and didn’t want to share my genes, even thow I thought how great it would be to have a wife, children raise a happy family like my Catholic family. It turned out that my ED was caused, I was cut severely as an infant, removing not only all my foreskin, but the frenulum nerves and some of my shaft skin. Later I found out that the Catholic doctors who cut my brothers and I were trained by Jewish mohels how to do the most distructive form of routine infant circumcision, periah, knowing well from their own history how it causes a lot of the men to die out which lead to the Jewess Diaspora. They believe they were chosen to practice eugenics on they rest of humans. My teeth went bad at a young age because my stupid young aunt taught me how to eat oxalis clover which dissolve tooth enamal. Please don’t take my porn away, too.

  175. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 12, 2012 - 12:31 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    May I interrupt with an anecdote? I have an old friend, a man who had earlier been one of my philosophy professors. He married around age fifty, and he and his wife had a daughter (let’s call her Joan), whom I came to know quite well. They saw to it that Joan received excellent schooling, and when it was time for her to go to college, of the places that accepted her, my friend urged her to go to Oberlin.

    Joan dropped out of Oberlin after a year and proceeded to have something akin to a nervous breakdown. Neither my friend nor his wife, both of whom I continued to see frequently, had any idea what had gone wrong, and Joan was reluctant to speak to them in detail. I had a hunch—rather than more than a hunch—what the problem was, but I said nothing to them.

    Several months later, we were all at a social gathering. I hadn’t seen Joan in almost two years, and we got to talk alone at some length. Rather than ask her questions, I just came out and said, “Your dad told me that you had a bad time at Oberlin. I wasn’t surprised to hear it. I know how rough those gay and lesbian groups can be when they decide they want to recruit someone.” The wave of relief that swept across Joan’s face could have been spotted fifty yards away. She proceeded to pour the whole sordid story out to me, including, of course, the bit about how she was ashamed and terrified to say anything to her parents, who, for all their worldliness and sophistication and familiarity with academe, had no idea what was happening on less “inhibited” campuses than his.

    This world—a world where degenerates recruit their replacements through, first, feigned camaraderie, then social intimidation, then psychological warfare; a world where such easily bruised and tender-hearted people as Richard Pierce feel right at home—is the world that your children and grandchildren, Alice, and my grandnephews, grandnieces, and goddaughters will be living in, barring a social and societal revolution of almost unimaginable proportions. If that revolution comes, as I pray it will, I hope that the miraculousness of its advent will include bloodlessness. But I am not counting on it.

    • FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
      June 12, 2012 - 2:05 pm | Permalink

      “If that revolution comes, as I pray it will, I hope that the miraculousness of its advent will include bloodlessness. But I am not counting on it.”

      Are you refering to Armegeddon, where it’s Christian killing Christian, Jew killing Jew, Muslim killing Muslim, & Children killing their parents?
      I can see it coming soon, too, even without the scriptures. I told you so. Teaching your children to hate their sexuality is the cause.

  176. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 12:22 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller

    Those are good points. I suspect, but can’t prove, that female sexuality may be slightly more malleable than male.   Male sexuality is so visual and concrete (that’s not all there is to it, we aren’t total animals, but you get my meaning).  Males are quite capable of being sexually attracted to women they don’t even like.  So, as strange as it may sound, we don’t really have to have any admiration for a person to be sexually attracted to them.  Otherwise, how would such horrible things as rape be possible?

    So yes, young boys and even adult males can have deep feelings for each other as brothers, even something like love, as in male bonding of various forms (I always hated the term male bonding but I suppose it’s a technically correct). 

    Actually, as we talk about it, what disturbs me the most about the promotion of gay culture is that it might tend to disrupt normal patterns of affiliation between young males and young females that are probably necessary for healthy development.  As soon as very young children learn about homosexuality, I’m afraid it will create an artificial distance that would normally grow up between children of the same sex in a more innocent environment.

  177. Tusk's Gravatar Tusk
    June 12, 2012 - 12:19 am | Permalink

    @ James O’Meara

    I am really getting tired of your half-baked, californialized “Männerbund”-blabla. You obviously have no real knowledge about Hans Bluher’s theory (which is the most extreme among many others of his time) of the Männerbund but from hearsay. How should you? Nearly none of his writings were ever translated into English, at least not published. He never claimed family values to be “semitic” let alone “parasitic”. He rarely spoke of “Aryans” either. His theory of society was that a twofold Eros exists in Man (often within the same individual) that if “inverted” turns towards the Male, creating the Männerbund and the State (a concept in concentric circles, with the highest degree of “erotic” radiation in the center) and if directed at the Female of the species creates the Family. Both have a distinct function in a healthy society.

    Bluher’s “Eros” however is not identical to homosexuality per se, it is an energy, a male “erotic” association principle rather overlapping with actual sexuality. So it is a more subtle concept. One of his core theses was, that there was no such thing as (mere) “sexuality” in the human species, as it is always bound to “Eros”, even in its most primitive forms. Certainly he famously thought that “fully inverted” men played a crucial role in the Männerbund; but note that he also distinguished “natural” inversion from neurotic and decadent forms. Now, his descriptions of social erotic hierachies within the Wandervogel groups or Student corps (notably areas where adolescent forms of sexuality prevailed) were certainly accurate, well-analysed and experienced first hand, but any serious sociological inquiry will easily show that actual states and institutions (that applies for ancient Athens as well) aren’t really built up the way he thought, not even if one applies an undue expansion of the notion of “Eros”. The “Männerbund” seen as group of men united in “homosexual” Eros is a rather romantic (pseudo-greco) myth Bluher (among others) created, and you are about the fifth-thousandth vulgarizer of this to show up. In his later writings he regarded the male-to-female Eros as “deeper” and superior than male-to-male (much like Evola, who saw no metaphysical significance in it at all). The pillars and creators of culture in Bluher’s complex philosophy are certainly not the “homosexuals”, but the inspired “Geniuses” (utterly regardless of sexual orientation), and those he called the “primary race”, which is not an ethnologically defined “race”, but a sort of “vertical”/elitist/”aristocratic” layer within any ethnic race (“superior” races are simply those that have a highly developed “primary” element among them).

    Bluher also became an antisemitic, (although rather unorthodox) Lutheran Christian in the 1920s without renouncing his views on “inversion”. Though he always was proud of his Germanic race, and a fierce monarchist-nationalist he sharply ridiculed any notions of “Aryaness” and had nothing but contempt for the “Volkish” crowd. He also had nothing but contempt and ridicule for the silly “Jew plague” theory either, which already was around back then like a virus of stupidity and cultural and metaphysical ignorance. But enough for now. It is again up to you Americans to vulgarize and simplify everything you pick up from Old Europe…

  178. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 12, 2012 - 12:01 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    I suspect, but none of us know, that sexuality is malleable to some extent. If this were not the case, how do you explain bisexuality? There are multiple factors at play here. Young people are often simply confused about their entire identity. I went to a girls school, in such an innocent age that our drama club was called the Gay Pretenders, and it was very common for younger girls to have a “crush” on an older student, which generally resulted in imitation of style and dress. I have no doubt that the same girls would be shepherded directly into the Lesbian subset today. Many young people go through a period when they take great delight in shocking the world. To what lengths must they go to do so today? Given the shockingly high rates of STDs in the homosexual community a little experimentation can have dire effects.

  179. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 11, 2012 - 11:57 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    I can’t respond directly to the posts of Robert Paul Mune either, and I notice his replies are in a nice indented box … please tell us how you do that Robert!

    Bravo, JS! You beat me to the punch by four minutes. Let’s see if we get an answer.

    May I add how shocked, shocked, I was to learn from an unimpeachable source on another thread that you and Hadding Scott are one and the same commenter. Of course, I had long since figured out that you, Trenchant, and Franklin Ryckaert were the same guy, but I thought it impolite to spill the beans to the hoi polloi.

    Besides, my control in Tel Aviv, acting on orders from Antarctica and the Vatican, told me that all this deception and subversion were in a good cause; so I should just follow orders and keep mum.

  180. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 11, 2012 - 11:47 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Damn right. I’ll gladly split the drive time with you.

  181. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 11, 2012 - 11:40 pm | Permalink

    This is not the time or the place for trivial pursuits, we have real work to do. We have an intellectual landscape to recolonize, and nations to regain.

    Is there a reason that the preceding sounds like an outtake from the script for James Cruze’s 1923 silent film The Covered Wagon or John Ford’s Wagon Master (1950)? To answer my own question, I think there is. Your words, Mr. Mune, give off the familiar, unmistakable scent of near desperation, of a consuming fear that someone reading this might mistake you for a person who is, like me and certain other commenters, so totally uncool as to think that there is a down side to the hypersexualization of society and everyone within it. Don’t worry, sir. Your words have fully succeeded in setting you apart. Enjoy the coolness … while it lasts.

    Having spent the years from 1967 to 2008 working, first, at one of the world’s most renowned institutions of “high culture” and then in the publishing racket—in both of which Jews and homosexuals were something between overwhelmingly influential and totally dominant—I went through the phase of thinking that “they” were just like “us,” that “OK, maybe their primary moral choices are misguided but, c’mon, it’s not like they’re our enemies, or anything so primitive as that”—until I realized that, whatever their entertainment value, “they” are deeply primitive in their animosity towards “straights,” as they privately call us with undisguised contempt.

    One of the things many people find very hard to do is rid themselves of the adolescent-carryover need to have the approval of their peers, especially those who can give them a leg up in the world. Until you yourself do, you will be useless to the colonizing movement you call upon others to sell their souls to join. May you wake up to this fact before you find yourself too morally compromised to break free of their clutches.

    A point of commenting privilege: Mr. Mune, be so good as to tell me and the other commenters here how your comments, alone on this thread, get to be embedded within those of others and remain immune from direct reply? Are you a moderator on this site, or do you have a connection with one of the moderators? If you are one or the other, what has qualified you for this task?

  182. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 11:36 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    I can’t respond directly to the posts of Robert Paul Mune either, and I notice his replies are in a nice indented box … please tell us how you do that Robert!

    By the way, while I do not approve of the promotion of gay culture at all, I will say that fears of inducing homosexuality are probably overdone. For most boys, certainly by age 12, it is irrevocably set as to which sex you wish to see nude. Indeed, all kinds of methods have been devised to throttle male heterosexual desire over the centuries, and none of them seem to work.

    So, I don’t think it is possible to really change a young male’s sexual orientation with culture. But, I do think the promotion of gay culture undermines masculine ideals and weakens our youth from the standpoint of normal, healthy assertiveness.

  183. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 11, 2012 - 11:29 pm | Permalink

    Robert, It is not your personal choices I challenge it is the quality of your intellectual arguments. I know that all Californians are prone to believe that the rest of us should continue to follow you blindly, but you do seem to be headed for a cliff.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 12, 2012 - 2:30 am | Permalink

      ..and after a short delay away from the keyboard.

      Dear Alice,

      I am not really a Californian but a Londoner living in California as my previous words should have made clear, and I am unclear if it is me personally you believe is heading for a cliff or the State of California.

      Evidence suggests I’m bucking the dismal national trends, so giving us both the benefit of the doubt I will hazard a guess that you refer to this Golden State?

      I do not believe that California is ‘heading for the cliff’, but naturally it is undergoing changes, because everything does, and I am perhaps more ‘of the right’ than a ‘conservative’ (which always brings images of King Canute to my mind). I have no anxiety over changes. Change is natural.

      I am a foreigner, of course, but it seems to me that California has been America’s laboratory for many years. This is both a physical landscape, and a cultural environment of great fertility and great instability. Perhaps you misunderstand California, perhaps you should see it through European eyes?

      I love California, I have found the freedom that America promises here. I found the IHR here, Dr. MacDonald lives here. It’s not all gay marriage, gangs and tortillas you know!

      I haven’t posited any ‘intellectual arguments’ here today, and truthfully neither have I read any. In fact my complaint concerned the embarrassingly naive and prurient sex chatter I found here which slightly ashamed me. Our people can do so much better. Shouldn’t we just get our noses out of other people’s dirty laundry?

      I am not a consumer of porn, but I cannot see it as markedly different from the rest of the toxic swirl of misinformation served up by our (?) media. Pornography is just one more lie amongst many. It lies to us about what human sexuality is, it reduces something varied and rich, something that can be vulgar, trivial, spiritual, loving, priceless or even comical to a set of violent and biologically inaccurate cliches.

      It is a pity after Dr. MacDonald has shared such good stimulating writing with us the comments frequently drag everything down to such a level of small minded banality.

      I really believe that we should be more positive in our outlook, and welcoming to ALL who feel proud of our European heritage, and ANY determined to fight for its rebirth.

      Good night from this beautiful little slice California!

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 12, 2012 - 2:35 am | Permalink

      I don’t have any idea why my almost worthless words are getting special treatment. Perhaps it’s because I occasionally slip in the Oxford English spelling?

      Or maybe it’s because I use my real name?

  184. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 11, 2012 - 11:21 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Indeed not, but the time has come to fight this one on our own if need be. The truly terrifying phenomena of good, loving mothers thinking it is cute to dress their daughters as tarts makes me doubt the intelligence of our folk.

  185. Hyperborean's Gravatar Hyperborean
    June 11, 2012 - 11:21 pm | Permalink

    Robert Paul Mune

    Your last comment was hilarious, couldn’t agree more!

  186. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 11, 2012 - 11:12 pm | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:
    I don’t know what your intellectual background is, but what you call a “nice try” with “word play” (sic) is what intellectuals with some relevant education call etymology, the science of the origin of words. Is it really so difficult to understand that the words for “church” in the Germanic languages (church, kirk, Kirche, kerk, kyrka) are derived from the first part of the Greek term kyriakè ekklesia ( “congregation of the Lord”), while the words for same in the Romance languages (église, iglesia, igreja, chiesa) are derived from the second part?

    Besides, some common sense on your part could have convinced you that a religious movement around a person whom they venerated as their “Lord” would be more likely to call their organization the “congregation of the Lord” (kyriakè ekklesia) than after Kirkè, a figure from the mythology of a pagan religion that they despised and that had absolutely nothing to do with their movement. Kirkè BTW is not pronounced as Keer-kee, the è is the Greek letter èta.

    But I am afraid this solid scientific information is lost to someone who – unhindered by knowledge and understanding – is engaged in pseudo-science as a hobby.

  187. Hyperborean's Gravatar Hyperborean
    June 11, 2012 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    While I hardly consider myself pro-Christian, attempting to discredit/slander Roman Catholicism and Christianity in general by claiming it is pro-homosexual isn’t going to win you any converts. I have a Catholic upbringing and can assure you that most of the priests I know are quite sincere regarding their motivations and beliefs (whether I agree with them is another matter). The teaching of an inverted slave-morality, combined with the marxist takeover of the churches lie at the root of the Christian problem. Homosexuality is peripheral issue, attempting to label the church as such only detracts from your argument

  188. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 11, 2012 - 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Robert Paul Mune, For reasons which elude me I seem to be unable to reply to your posts in the conventional method. It seems that despite our common presence on this site we do not share many fundamental values. Your diet does not affect me either, but I nonetheless hope that you have access to a healthy one. Sadly, many of our people are vulnerable to the forces which surround them, just look around you.

    I care not at all about your private preferences, I care very much about the health and fertility of white people. Only a people whose minds have been poisoned, perhaps beyond hope, could continue to pretend that we may all eat all the sugar we want and never gain weight nor have any tooth decay.

    Thank you for the kind words. I do not mean to sound unfriendly either, merely challenging you to up your game.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 11, 2012 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

      Hello once more Alice,

      I am excited to accept a challenge but unfortunately in this context I really do not know how to ‘up my game’.

      My (mainly organic) diet is as excellent as California can provide I think, at any rate my wife and I do our level best.

      I would sum up my moral value system as a grab bag of Christianity (long on Jesus, short on Church), and the more pragmatic (Hitlerian) end of National Socialism with a great big proud sprinkling of my countryman Oswald Mosley; whatever works.

      (Numbing ideology is for the left in my opinion),

      I’m for action.

      I care passionately about the progress of our race, but I am not as pessimistic as many on this site. our ancestors rose to the challenge many times in the past and won, so shall we.

      It seems that white people have a wide spread of EQ, the village idiots will always be with us. If they now choose to masturbate in front of the monitor screen rather than puke up in front of the alehouse I consider it no big deal.

      Neither do I fear they are about to be ‘turned gay’.

      It seems that I am unaffected by this moral panic!

  189. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 11, 2012 - 11:05 pm | Permalink

    @Edward

    You go from claiming that every Protestant sect complained of rampant homosexuality in the Church to admitting only on example from a pre-Protestant heresy. You try to compensate by showing that other pre-Protestant and Protestant sects complained about the celibate priesthood but make to no connection with homosexuality.

    It’s not surprising you didn’t read the article I linked; facts don’t matter to religious people. The article quotes Luther, Calvin, proto-Protestant movements, and plenty of Catholics even earlier. If it wasn’t clear, I was not making a pro-Protestant argument, you’re all just as bad as far as I can tell.

    I guess since I already called out the “post Vatican II” excuse, you are now moving it back a few years and claiming the communists did it. But of course, at any time in the history of Catholic celibacy, you will see homosexual scandals among the celibates, and protection from the highest levels of the church.

    Clearly in these decadent times there sodomites among the priesthood that have no intention of repentance.

    Yes, these decadent times, and previous decadent times, and all the way back to the beginnings of Catholic celibacy.

    There are credible reports of modern seminaries that screen out all normal seminarians to allow only homosexuals making it through to graduation.

    Yes, and it looks the same in the past as well, all the way back to the beginning.

    @Alice Teller

    You certainly can’t expect any intellectual honesty from religous people, that’s for sure. After all, you already know the truth, because YHWH told you. It’s not a surprise you’re accusing me of “intellectual dishonesty” while not even making honest counter-arguments, nor reading any of my references, and simply ignoring any proof I give.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity

    Just like your “elder brothers in the faith,” the Jews, the YHWH lovers can’t take the slightest bit of criticism, have zero respect for the facts or truth, and resort to nasty personal insults like “regular pond scum” “illiterate one trick pony” “smug” “idiotically Christophobic” – and then have the NERVE to complain that people are unfairly criticizing them?

    For the holier-than-thou Christians, just remember – I’m not being sued for decades of sexual abuse, I’m not engaged in harboring criminal pedophiles, I’m not routinely being caught in gay bars, and I’m not preaching one thing while practicing another. That is the province of lying Catholics, their Protestant lackeys, and their fellow YHWH-worshippers, the Jews.

    “Chutzpah” doesn’t even begin to describe it.

    Thank Zeus he didn’t make me a Jew or a Catholic, and unlike Alice here (1 Tim. 2:11) I took Paul’s advice – when I became a man, I put away childish things.

    ….

    The other maddening thing about you religious fanatic nutjobs, I wasn’t even insulting gays, or Catholic celibates, but rather, pointing out that the Catholics provided some protection for gays against the even more fanatic Jews wanting to go around killing gay people. I think of it as a rather clever hack, giving them some place in society, a nice “closet” where they could serve the community and contribute to society without scandalizing people. A nice example of human culture evolving, from the ignorant superstition of the Jews, to a slightly less abhorrent Catholicism, to a slightly better Protestantism, to finally a scientific understanding of the world that allows us to *actually* heal the sick, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, etc., as opposed to just mouthing superstitious miracle stories from thousands of years ago.

    Just imagine where we could be if we had evolved naturally from our pagan, Greek and Roman roots, without the long wandering in the desert due to Judaic infiltration, YHWH worship, and ignorant bible-thumping.

    James O’Meara above was absolutely right – you people just LOVE to HATE. Talk about Judaic inversion of values.

  190. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    June 11, 2012 - 10:59 pm | Permalink

    I’d like to add 3 points.
    1 authors sometimes make mistakes, the comments section functions as a kind of peer review. Why not add a possibility of updating a revised version of the article. A kind of wiki.

    2 I recall that at one time nationalists were mocked as gay n@zi fetishists. The dark ones will use any means to attack.

    3 might I suggest that there might be something akin to good or healthy pornography versus that designed to pervert us from a healthy family and racial life. After all northern Europeans and japanese are famously indifferent to nudity in bath houses and nudist beaches over centuries while Jews and Muslims were hysterical over the issue. It’s only the unrestricted malevolent commercialisation that has made it a agent of perversion.

    Porn like media hasbeen expropriated as a way of destroying or expanding healthy balanced social and sexual boundaries.

    Consider the plethora of inter racial black on white female gang bang porn “Mandingo massacre” which involves extreme defilement. Who watches that crock?

  191. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 11, 2012 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Of course, Alice, I agree with you; I agree completely. I wished only to say that it is shocking to see that the only censorious approach to the patent degeneracy of the program and its creators that the columnist and her employer thought fit to take is one that in its eighteenth word declares Matthew Weiner a genius. With friends like these …

    On the present occasion and in furtherance of the limited but important goal (i.e., protection of the innocent from those [Weiner et al.] that would corrupt them) that the occasion embodies, I would be happy to call Linda Stasi an ally, at least for the nonce. I know, however, that, far from accepting my support, she wouldn’t spit on the best part of me. Nor would she, I believe, treat you any the better.

  192. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 11, 2012 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    Robert Paul Mune Sir, What possible basis, other than the tainted sources listed above, do you have for your assertions? Human sexuality exists on a continuum. I have no doubt that there are many folks who have appetites that are neither healthy nor attractive. I, myself, confess to an inordinate fondness for chocolate. That does not make it a healthy diet nor does is it make me impervious to advertising. The absurd assumption that sexuality, unlike all other human behavior is not influenced by the culture, especially a culture as intrusive, pervasive and hell bent on destruction of the host people as ours, is unworthy of intelligent people.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 11, 2012 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

      Hello Alice,

      My assertions are based on the only road map that any of us might really trust: my own life.

      I understand and confess the limited nature of this source of insight, I only wish that some of the rest of you would also recognize the limitations of your own experiences. Perhaps you should travel a little?

      It’s fine if you want to eat chocolate Alice, because it doesn’t affect me.

      I believe that sexuality is indeed affected by culture, but not to the extent of making another man’s arse a thing of beauty to me. It also appears that despite a constant diet of Holocaust crap I have found myself to be a National Socialist.

      Are others really so much weaker than me?

      And if so, do we really need that kind of intellectual and emotional weakness amongst us when the times demand fighters?

      (Actually Alice, I thought your comments some of the better ones and I do not mean to sound unfriendly)

  193. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    June 11, 2012 - 9:09 pm | Permalink

    @Jerzy Ulicki-Rek.:

    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek.
    June 11, 2012 – 12:17 am

    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek ,
    Whatever made you introduce human copulation with animals into the discussion — could it be possibly be a Freudian slip on your part ?

    Your insult is noted as is your personal fear of ” socio-manipulation “.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 11, 2012 - 9:57 pm | Permalink

      I have been following the torrent of responses to Lasha Darkmoon’s piece, initially with good humor, then with frustration, and finally with depression.

      How did this debate end up in such a deeply silly place?

      I would be thoroughly ashamed to forward this article to any of the friends and acquaintances I try to convert to our cause for fear that they would be exposed to the entirely inadequate level of this debate.

      Some of you seem to fear homosexuality is ‘catching’, (it is not). Please accept this testimonial from a confidently heterosexual man who survived growing up in London in the 1980s, and attending an all boys school without once feeling the need to kiss a bloke.

      Secondly, gay friends have told me (yes, I have gay friends), that many gay men do not practice anal intercourse, however I have met plenty of straight men and women who brag that they do…and you know what? I don’t care and I hardly think this is some kind of litmus test as to who we should accept as allies. Personally I’m more despairing of human behavior when I see bad driving on the freeway. I really don’t care to know what sexual activities other consenting adults get up to, it is not my business, it does not threaten me, and I cannot see how it is relevant to the defense and promotion of ethnic European interests.

      I would fully expect Jewish involvement in any industry that avoids hard work, has very low start up costs, a huge potential for profit, (with plenty of sleazy fringe benefits), was primarily exploitative of the out-group, and was in conclusion entirely beneath contempt. That’s frequently how they are.

      We have an historical opportunity right now to intellectually rebuild the right, and this is the spade work that urgently needs to take place for us to end our string of 20th Century defeats and progress toward victory. Lasha Darkmoon’s essay seems to have horribly excited some barely repressed anxieties out there and served as a real distraction.

      This is not the time or the place for trivial pursuits, we have real work to do. We have an intellectual landscape to recolonize, and nations to regain.

      Adults welcome.

  194. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 11, 2012 - 8:06 pm | Permalink

    @Edward:
    Hear, hear! Surely it is not too much to ask for a little intellectual honesty from those who claim to be white men?

  195. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 11, 2012 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I understand all too well. As much as it grieves me to add to your burdens these days, I know that you prefer to combat the beast or die trying. We must all stand up to this ongoing evil which is happening before our eyes.

    Tempting as it is too blame all who have preceded us for every evil and ill that has befallen us, may I request the we occasionally look evil square in the eye – ourselves, here and now and if we cannot reverse the assault, at least demand a halt? One need not be a grand conspiracy fan to name child predators as evil. Is there any hope for a group, who claim to be the enlightened, awake, aware elite yet respond with a endless accusation that Christians have failed to be perfect? Do they truly not understand the difference between failure to obliterate a vice and the celebration of it?

  196. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 11, 2012 - 7:13 pm | Permalink

    @ Franklin Ryckaert

    Nice try, but no sale. Incidentally, going down the path of wordplay only reinforces what I said in that ‘keer-kee’ seals the deal right there and then.
    Are you aware that Χριστος doesn’t mean what ‘everybody knows’ it means ?
    I won’t even get into the issue of how the whole ‘anointment’ business got rolling since we are on a family-friendly resource. LOL

    @ Athanasius

    The point was being made concerning tribesmen on this (read: non-Continental) side of the Channel. Who must’ve gotten the Convert Now memo earlier.

  197. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 11, 2012 - 6:23 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: You will, I know, understand my meaning when I say that I wish I had never been invited to read the article you linked to and its even more appalling comment thread. The mere presentation of the scenes the columnist describes would once have been ipso facto grounds for their suppression (and yes, I do mean to use the intolerant, anti-intellectual, hate-filled word suppression) or, better still, the suppression of the entire program or (best of all) the series of which they were meant to be a part. That the only permissible attack on the scenes—yet another product of a truly sick homosexual Jew—is one arising from the equally subversive grounds of a Talmudic feminism that deeply hates both woman’s actual nature and all physically existing white and Christian women and men demonstrates yet again the unanimity of the media attack on us and the remnants of our societies and nations.

    Whether the vehicle is the polysyllabic prose of the Frankfurt School, the august and reasoned reflections of the New York Times and NPR, or the slobberings of the owners, hirelings, and readers of the New York Post, the message is univocal, the motivation is the same, and the venom is unrelieved. All that differs is the amount of spittle on the source’s lips.

  198. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 11, 2012 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: You go from claiming that every Protestant sect complained of rampant homosexuality in the Church to admitting only on example from a pre-Protestant heresy. You try to compensate by showing that other pre-Protestant and Protestant sects complained about the celibate priesthood but make to no connection with homosexuality. In fact, these examples have more to do with heterosexual priests like Luther wanting to marry. There has always been sexual scandal in the Church but the vast majority of it has been heterosexual. The quote from Leo IX shows a wise policy of requiring those guilty of sodomy to repent and atone for their sin. Were you expecting dismissal upon the first offense? Catholic repentance requires having a firm purpose of amendment and sticking to it.

    Clearly in these decadent times there sodomites among the priesthood that have no intention of repentance. The Communist party infiltrated Catholic seminaries by the thousands in the 30s and 40s with sleepers who pretended orthodoxy, but waited to rise in the ranks before controlling and corrupting Church institutions. There are credible reports of modern seminaries that screen out all normal seminarians to allow only homosexuals making it through to graduation.

    The unfortunate experience of the modern Church should demonstrate to everyone how corrosive and destructive is the sin of sodomy. Nevertheless, a remnant still remains to serve as the strongest and most consistent bulwark against the collapse of our society into Sodom and Gomorrah.

    • FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
      June 12, 2012 - 11:59 am | Permalink

      Sodomy means anal sex. I’m gay and don’t like anal. Do you also condemn the acts of oral sex and docking sex? If we don’t spill our seed upon the ground, but plant it or eat it, is that OK? I was told that we are supposed to eat the fruit from the tree of life but not the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

  199. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 11, 2012 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes:

    I think Lasha Darkmoon has a traveling circus of haters following her around the internet.

    Kevin MacDonald can confirm that. Only last week he received a poison pen letter from a source that claimed Lasha Darkmoon was a femme fatale who had tried to get under the skin of one of the biggest and most influential figures in the anti-Zionist movement by targeting him in a sexual “psyop”. How? By allegedly sending him sexy emails that included 12 “sadistic and pornographic pictures.”

    Fortunately, Lasha was able to prove in a few minutes that the entire letter was a tissue of fabrications.

    Similar poison pen letters about Lasha — in which she has been accused of perpetrating something mysteriously known as “the Darkmoon frauds” — have now, we are told, been circulated to many other editors of anti-Zionist sites, attempting to get her blacklisted forever as a writer.

    Lasha is still reeling from shock at these vicious attacks on her — attacks in which she is portrayed as the Whore of Babylon.

  200. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    June 11, 2012 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

    The Independent newspaper always reported on sexual abuse of children with a suspicious amount of unnecessary detail, so the article was basically correct about it. However, mistakes like the ones about Lebedev and Hari are fatal to TOO’s credibility, especially in an article, and could so easily be avoided; don’t say things like that unless you know they are true. Plausible reasoning doesn’t count as knowing.

    untreated sewage was being pumped from illegal Israeli settlements on to Palestinian land, contaminating their reservoirs.

  201. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 11, 2012 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows

    hostility to Christianity which seems to take precedence over WN.

    An amazing display of projection – it is the Christians that promote their majority non-White religion over the interests of White people. It is the Catholic church that is one of the major promoters of non-White immigration into the US (all those Catholic mestizos). It is the Christians that promote their universalist morality.

    “White identity, interests, and culture” not “Christian identity, interests, and culture.”

  202. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 11, 2012 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    @Edward:

    Richard exagerated and misrepresented in line with his hostility to Christianity which seems to take precedence over WN. What probably is true is that church …and the military…would have been where many homosexuals choose to live their lives. But by and large it would have involved a life choice of celebacy. No one accuses the military of being pro-homosexual or somehow reduced for likely having tradionally had a lot of homosexuals in career military positions.
    Christianity doesn’t condemn celebate homosexual people so there’s no intrinsic problem if a priest has a homosexual nature. What you’ll note is the church is consistently against homosexuality in practice and so if there are or were homosexuals in the ranks they clearly put the faith way above their instincfts. Probably this is something WN should take note of in this particular discussion.

  203. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 11, 2012 - 2:44 pm | Permalink

    @Edward

    The celibate lifestyle is tailor made to appeal to men with no sexual interest in women, and that is going to include a lot of homosexuals obviously. Catholics laity are simply in abject denial of the reality of homosexuality and try to paper over the differences between “celibacy” (not getting married) and “chastity” (not having sex).

    Here’s a good essay on the topic, heavily footnoted:

    http://michelangelocode.com/2007/08/28/footnotes-what-this-is-a-blog-and-youre-asking-for-footnotes/

    This is what the Lollards said:

    The Third Conclusion, sorrowful to hear, is: That the law of continence [that is celibacy] annexed to priesthood, that in prejudice of women was first ordained, induces sodomy in Holy Church.

    You will find similar quotes from Calvin, Luther, and all the rest of the Protestant and proto-Protestant movements.

    all the major heresies from 11th Century on, attack in some way on the privilege of the celibate/homosexual priest class. The Cathars, the Albigensians, the Lollards, the Hussites, the Waldensians, and finally the Reformation itself. In each case the heresy posits the idea that there be no formal priest class, but rather married heterosexual preachers coming from the laity.

    Typical is Leo IX response to accusations of rampant homosexuality in the celibate orders:

    In light of divine mercy, the Holy Father commands, without contradiction, that those who, of their own free will, have practiced solitary or mutual masturbation or defiled themselves by interfemoral coitus, but who have not done so for any length of time, nor with many others, shall retain their status, after having “curbed their desires” and “atoned for their infamous deeds with proper repentance.

    Hail Marys and penance, but no explusions.

    Often the reason I am finding my best information from conservative traditionalist webpages is because, like Mrs. Engel, they frantically trying to expose homosexuality among the clergy, and are frustrated because little is done to punish the sinners. For example Roman Catholic Faithful posted full screenshots from the St. Sebastian’s Angels webpage, a chat room for gay priests. And then they were appalled that the priests they had caught red-handed continued to hold their positions

    Same as it ever was.

    Lying Catholics keep telling people this is a new phenomenon and it’s all because of Vatican II, but mostly they are lying to themselves. You’re the one that has a problem with gays, not me, and it’s your Catholic priests that are constantly getting outed as unchaste homosexuals and worse. You actually thought that straight men were going to give up marriage and sex to become celibate priests?

    Now I’ve provided you with plenty of references, but let’s be honest, facts don’t matter to religious people.

  204. June 11, 2012 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who opposes the ritual sexual mutilation of babies, done by mohels, doctors, or whomever, is absolved of all other sins in my book.

  205. artashes2's Gravatar artashes2
    June 11, 2012 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    a book that is more heavily censored than the books of my friend Eustace Mullins is Vladimir Istarkov’s book
    Source: book “A Impact/Blow of Russian Gods” by Vladimir Istarkhov, ISBN: 5-7058-0312-5; ISBN 5-9243-0044-7 (4-th updated and revised edition)
    Chapter 10 “The mystery of jews circumscision”, pages 104-105.
    The three lowest “Survival Chakras” are still intact in every circumcision, but the more important upper 4 chakras, Heart, Throat, Mental and Spiritual Chakras COMPLETELY cut off hence making circumcised men into Sexual Cripples.
    THIS BOOK HAS BEEN BANNED EVERYWHERE AND I’M LOOKING FOR IT EVERYWHERE. I hope to prove Istarkov wrong but I tend to strongly agree with him until someone can prove to me that this is way off mark.

  206. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 11, 2012 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:
    You accuse Catholics of “bizarre sexual obsessions” yet you write many paragraphs of unbacked assertions on the topic. You promote acceptance of homosexuality while falsely accusing the traditional Church of backhandedly promoting homosexuality. This resembles the subtle tactic of inferring that all critics of homosexuality are themselves latent homosexuals.

    You state that the homosexually was always common in the Church and that “Pretty much every single Protestant movement … loudly condemned the rampant sodomy in the same-sex celibate relgious orders.” I was not aware of such historical condemnations. Can you point to the sources?

  207. J.J. WHALEN's Gravatar J.J. WHALEN
    June 11, 2012 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

    LASHA’S ARTICLE IS GOOD BUT DOESN’T IT SUDDENLY FALL OFFF AT THE END.

  208. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 11, 2012 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes:
    Thank you, Gentlemen. I am not generally given to despair, but if we cannot or will not exert some small measure of discernment regarding posters here what hope have we of influencing the larger culture?

    It seems to me that we have lost the ability to think and judge for ourselves. Rather than intelligent men and woman who have an awful lot at stake here, far, far too many behave like small children who delight is repeating naughty words or those unable to entertain any thought other that a reflexive reverse of what they have been taught. It is Jimmy’s fault, no Billy did it first!

    Many are here, not to protect and defend the people and culture that is their heritage, but to indulge in the forbidden game of touting their own pet peeve. The absurdity of pretending that our embrace of homosexuality is a vital question makes me want to weep. The vast majority of homosexuals are deeply entwined with the rainbow coalition, the tiny remnant that may be on our side are far more likely to do us harm that any miniscule benefit they may bring.

    All around us we see the ongoing effort to normalize pedophilia and we spend our time hating each other! I have never seen the TV show Mad Men, but I have no doubt this is a valid judgement of it.

    http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/hands_off_sally_7BVSqUqC1kRBCufb7TrjSI

    It seems that we are now reduced to those who like hating Jews but demand that everything they have brought us is so wonderful that we must not be asked to give any of it up.

  209. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 11, 2012 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

    @Peter Winskill:

    To dismiss an intellectual giant of Wilhelm Reich’s stature in a cavalier manner…
    In “The Mass Psychology of Fascism,” Reich argues that traditional Christian family structure consisting of an “authoritarian” father, dutiful mother, and obedient children will result in a “fascist” citizenry. Reich proposed a “sexual revolution” that would destroy the traditional Christian family to achieve a more progressive citizenry. Admittedly, the plans of this “intellectual giant” have succeeded.

  210. FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
    June 11, 2012 - 12:05 pm | Permalink
  211. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 11, 2012 - 11:56 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Within the Lodge, all religions are held to be equal. That puts Judaism and Islam on an undeserved equal footing with Christianity. The name of Jesus is banished from all masonic prayers. Jews of the B’nai B’rith are allowed to join Scottish Rite lodges, but Scottish Rite gentiles cannot join B’nai B’rith lodges. Thus the Scottish rite is infiltrated while the B’nai B’rith is able to pursue ethnic interest. All freemasons swear blood oaths of obedience to their higher-degree masters who are ultimately unknown.

    Anti-masonry is not the result of squabbling between Catholics and Protestants. Most serious Protestants are also anti-masonic. The Nineteenth Century American Antimasonic political party was largely Protestant. Treasonous, liberal Catholic leaders are often pro-masonic. The liberal Vatican II mass was created by a secret freemasonic infiltrator of the Vatican, Cardinal Anabale Bugnini.

    Pre-Christian paganism resembled Christianity to the extent that both systems shared a deep commitment to those family values essential to racial survival. Post-Christian pagan systems, such as freemasonry, wicca, and new age, do not foster family values.

  212. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    June 11, 2012 - 11:51 am | Permalink

    @fender: I somehow doubt that “Nazi fetishism” shown by gays makes very many people think they are WN’s. However, if it were true, it would be quite the liberal cunundrum! To be a liberal is to support gays and hate WN’s – there is no gray area.

  213. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    June 11, 2012 - 11:42 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Well said, Alice. As always your contribution to this site is quite valuable.

  214. artashes2's Gravatar artashes2
    June 11, 2012 - 11:39 am | Permalink

    @http://www.SexAsNatureIntendedIt.com will give you an idea what happens to a females sexuality when having intercourse with a circumcised male.
    This LASHA reminds of those missionaries that went into the micro-polynesian islands trying to shove the bible down these naturally sexual people. Study Margaret Mead, Havelock Ellis and other Anthropologists. This is SEX guilt BS, sex positivity is soooo natural. LASHA call off your tired ethics.
    PLUS self-pleasuring releases sperm which is a huge factor in male prostrate cancer…
    I don’t call it PORNOGRAPHY as this is a pejorative meaning, I call it delicious eroticism.

    • June 11, 2012 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

      This is why I posted the blog article on the research on sex. These comments reflect the basic psychoanalytic view on sexuality. THey are divorced from the research on the effects of pornography and the sexualization of culture, which is unanimous in showing that there are very negative effects.

  215. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    June 11, 2012 - 11:32 am | Permalink

    @Peter Winskill: If the guy was such a genius with weather control 80 years ago and his techniques are used today, where exactly are we controlling the weather?
    I think Lasha Darkmoon has a traveling circus of haters following her around the internet.

  216. Peter Winskill's Gravatar Peter Winskill
    June 11, 2012 - 10:32 am | Permalink

    To dismiss an intellectual giant of Wilhelm Reich’s stature in a cavalier manner suggests to me that Dr Lasha Darkmoon is just not up to the task of doing real research or reliably checking her souces. Reich’s genius ranged over a huge area and a nultiutude of subjects. His focus on the life force energy (aka prana, chi, tachyon or zero point energy) is now cutting edge in the searches for alternative energy. Reich put his finger on body work and (later gestalt psychology techniques) long before others. Also he understood and used weather control technology now in use. He was a visionary far ahead of his time. Dr Moonbeam seems to have taken quotes out of context from the multitude of Reich’s writings and applied them for her own agenda. Reich studied people’s sex lives not in the prurient way as Dr Lighweight suggests but to further his research. This was new territory in the 1930’s.

    • June 11, 2012 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

      I allowed this comment to appear, but I certainly don’t agree with it. Reich was a classic pseudoscientific charlatan whose work is commented on in Chapter 4 of Culture of Critique (link in my current blog article). Darkmoon is quite right to note his orgone boxes–an excellent example of his nuttiness. His views on sexuality are even more egregious than Freud’s in reducing everything to sex (including love as sublimation) and seeing nothing but positive effects form ending all sexual repression. See my accompanying blog article on the real effects of the sexualization of culture.

  217. john's Gravatar john
    June 11, 2012 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    Lasha’s article expands neatly on her previous research.

    I concur with Lucy Skipping’s explanation about Lebedev as [of the 'synagogue'] of the plunderers of Russia’w wealth in 1990’s. Deripaska basking in Monte-Negro sun also whisked off with Nat Rothschild and Peter Mandelson by private jet to do a little aluminiuming in siberia.

    Regarding the Bible —- no wonder the chosen hate it. Don’t forget the public burning to help cleanse the infection in the world of the ‘notorious, vile, idolatrou book the New Testament [and especially the four Gospels which dared to record Jrsus' love and mercy and justice] —- conflagration organised by town deputy mayor in good ole ashkeNAZI style in N Israel.

    Thanks to sterling efforts by not only Lasha, we have had our eyes opened.

    John UK

  218. Bon, From the Land of Babble's Gravatar Bon, From the Land of Babble
    June 11, 2012 - 9:23 am | Permalink

    @JB:

    Thanks for posting the list of the qualities of a sociopath. I copied it into a file for further reference. Yes, they are masters of deception and fraud.

    As I read that list, I was reminded of the student radicals of the 60s — charismatic, had a “glow” about them, a way with words, able to lead and persuade and hypnotize others to their utopian causes to the point of violence, able to convince others persuasively that THEY were right and their parents and society, i.e., White Culture were wrong and, importantly, they are self-serving and self-serving only.

    We are dealing with the fall out to this day of these dangerous individuals and their ideology.

    Everyone needs to take note of and heed these warning signs — we could save ourselves a lot of grief from these social deviants and their destructive, sick doctrines.

  219. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 11, 2012 - 9:11 am | Permalink

    In 2007, the Israeli embassy got former Miss Israel Gal Gadot to pose salaciously in the mens’ sex mag Maxim as part of Tel Aviv’s quasi-porn propaganda to improve Israel’s image among American youth.

    http://rehmat1.com/2011/09/01/gary-wexler-on-israeli-porn-campaign/

    It was felt that impressionable young American males, fired with lust for an attractive young Jewess from Israel, would automatically be fired with lust for Israel and no longer criticize it quite so harshly.

    This is how the Jews uses sex: as a psyop against Western civilization.

    My sister Lasha emailed me yesterday:

    I can understand very well why so many misguided posters on the Occidental Observer should be such ardent defenders of pornography and stick up for the Jews (like Kameny) who push sexual perversion and the philosophy of the Cheap Orgasm, i.e., masturbation.

    Just as children love those who offer them candy, ruining their teeth, these pleasure-loving simpletons love the pornographers who offer them cheap orgasms.

  220. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 11, 2012 - 6:32 am | Permalink

    @Ward Kendall:

    Ward – in terms of what would serve the Jewish agenda, arguing either way for or against homosexual WN’s, could work if it is done badly, or with a definite intention to do harm.
    So the question is how to do this well, from a mindset of commitment to our cause and a principle of “do no harm”. One thing thing that comes to mind is to take out the emotive and misleading elements by asking what actually is the debate on reasonable, pro-white, pro-cause terms?

    I think the problem for all of us, is that we and our parents have grown up in an environment in which controversial/problematic societal issues, especially regarding tradition vs change, have been ubiquitously dominated and articulated and manipulated by a totally hostile intellectual contingent. I just think we have to get away from the idea these issues cannot be thought through in a reasonable and respectful way that respecfts the value and importance of traditinal/family values.
    So for one thing…a gay person that is woken up to the genocide of his people, is by definition – by definition or it just ain’t real – putting his people way higher than his sexuality and personal preferences. He’s not going to be some mincing pinko burning everyone up with intense focus on homosexual priorites. He wouldn’t be a woken up man or woman if that was the case. No one can be woken up to this reality and not become totally stripped away of all priorities and preferencs and prior intra-cultural differences, and instead just be a white staring at what could be the end of his whole race.
    I mean look…that should be the guiding principle and the standard for all comers. And that can be an incredible simplifying force…very powerful.

  221. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 11, 2012 - 6:14 am | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes:

    Vlad – the counter-argument would be that such matters of whether homosexuality should be tolerated or criminalized (I don’t anyone is suggesting it has to be endorsed, loved or accepted), pornography, civil liberties and all the rest are in the ‘what is good for society and people’ category. But our current status is that we are dispossessed from what was our society…we have no power over the culture and that culture is hostile to our future existence. Given this is an existential crisis for us, the question would be whether white homosexuals, who also have a genetic stake with us through their nephews, nieces and wider family, should be regarded as having the same right to a wish for the continuity of their race and culture.
    That’s the situation right now. It isn’t about whether homosexuality or any of the other outsider/offbeat/deviant lifestyles are desirable in a vision of some better tomorrow when we’ve managed to restore self-determination and power. It’s just the point that none of this is going to matter in a future where we’ve been dispossessed and then go extinct. So the only relevance of things like this to us now, should be strictly to the extent the issue helps, hinders or is neutral to our prospects of winning back power.

  222. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 3:55 am | Permalink

    @Edward:

    1. I realize Christianity gets put down a lot around here, so I understand the desire to respond. I would also agree that some posters seem more anti-Christian than pro-White. It is seldom, if ever, the pro-Christian posters that start the insults.

    2. The Freemason thing doesn’t seem beyond debate to me. Unfortunately, the whole topic is so filled internet trash and urban legend, that it is almost impossible to separate the wheat from the chaff. Yes, I am sure at some point in history, a guy calling himself Lord HaHa of the Flying Ducks, wearing a mermaid outfit, declared he and his minions would overthrow the Crown and make the world tremble before their swords, or whatever people say after a few scotches. And I am sure there have been more serious approaches taken by Freemasons for good or ill, but I don’t think it is “beyond debate” that they are tools of the Jews, or even that relevant to history. I’ve just never seen anything that seemed that convincing.

    And unfortunately, a lot of the anti-Mason stuff seems like tribal squabbling between Catholics and Protestants. Of course, the Masons wanted to undercut Catholic Church power at various times in history, and of course, this made them “Satan” in the eyes of the Vatican. But I can’t see it was much more than a turf war from the Vatican’s viewpoint. I can’t find anything that really supports the idea of an effective Masonic grand conspiracy, except material from deeply partisan anti-Masons, who claim to be in possession of occult material. Apparently, there is nothing like MacDonald’s work on the Jews, in regard to Masons. And given that Masons are not blood relatives with ethnic ties, I am deeply skeptical of such a group to exercise the kind of power assigned to it, over many centuries.

    3. Restoration of Christianity may indeed be a good thing for Whites (especially if it was properly tweaked). But can you say it is the only guide that has ever worked for Whites? What about the Romans for several hundred years? Or the Greeks? Indeed, many say Egypt was originally a White nation, and they were very pre-Christian. Many other examples exist. I’m not sure the Roman ancestor worship wasn’t a bit more biologically correct than what came later!

  223. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 11, 2012 - 3:24 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Correction : The word for “church” in the Germanic languages is derived from the Greek (female) adjective kyriakè ( not the neutral form kyriakon as I wrongly wrote above), which is part of the expression kyriakè ekklesia, meaning “congregation of the Lord”. This also explains the origin of the word for “church” in the Romance languages.

  224. June 11, 2012 - 3:21 am | Permalink

    From the-not so distant -times when people were talking and singing about love and other silly human feelings…
    Enjoy.
    Domenico Modugno – La Lontananza
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZOxUpX-zMo

    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

  225. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 11, 2012 - 3:17 am | Permalink

    @Edward: It’s a privilege to second your comment, too.

  226. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 11, 2012 - 3:13 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    1. James O’Meara trollishly attacked Christianity in the first comment. This naturally called forth a response.

    2. Freemasons are most certainly tools of the Jews. That point is really not debatable.

    3. Restoration of Whites necessarily involves restoration of Christianity among Whites (at the very least among the women and children) since that provides the only well-known reference point for a healthy White culture.

    Even Whites who are not themselves believers should be able to recognize the essential role Christianity has always played in keeping White society healthy and fecund. Perhaps there are self-styled WN’s more anti-Christian than pro-White.

  227. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 11, 2012 - 3:09 am | Permalink

    @Athanasius:
    To end this bickering about the origin of the English word “church” :

    The English word church is derived from Old English cyrice.
    The Scottish word kirk is derived from Old Icelandic kirkja.
    Other Germanic languages have similar words : German Kirche, Dutch kerk, Swedish kyrka.
    These all are derived from the Greek kyriakon (“of the Lord”) an adjective formed after kyrios meaning “Lord”.

    It has nothing to do with Circe (Greek : Kirkè), the sorceress in Homer’s Odyssey, whose name probably means “falcon”.

    In Greek itself the word ekklesia (“congregation”) is used and this word is reflected in the word for church in the Romance languages :
    French église, Spanish iglesia, Portuguese igreja, Italian chiesa.

  228. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 11, 2012 - 3:02 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: It’s a privilege to second your comment.

    Dr. Darkmoon’s articles appear to have a kismet factor, in that they seem fated not simply to bring the worst out of the regular pond scum hereabouts—I am thinking, of course, of Richard Pierce and the other predictably smug and idiotically Christophobic products of the all-self-esteem-all-the-time post-1954 American “educational” system, creatures whose entire raison d’écrire subsists in demonstrating their command of the vocabulary and mind-set of black and Jewish discourse—but also to wake from hibernation such a semiliterate one-trick pony as O’Meara, who here as elsewhere indulges his taste for a hit-and-run gutter sneer or two, occasionally accompanied by a link that Z.O.G. et alii might have missed. Perhaps least appetizing of all is the way that this fine lady’s articles bring the deplorable worst out of some, such as fender, who are capable of rational thought when the general commenting tone is high enough to embarrass them into it.

    Generally speaking, calling a spade a spade is seldom either as sharp-witted or as useful a course of action as it is frequently bruited to be. Yet at such a time as the present, taking any other course leaves one feeling as morally soiled as the sleepwalking Lady Macbeth.

  229. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    June 11, 2012 - 2:28 am | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden: Are you saying that the English weren’t/aren’t a Germanic tribe?

  230. Bon, From the Land of Babble's Gravatar Bon, From the Land of Babble
    June 11, 2012 - 1:36 am | Permalink

    Excellent article.

    Thank you for writing this, it’s the best thing I’ve read all week.

    Amazing, isn’t it, that these two perverted losers had such power and influence over our culture — yes, with a LOT of help from the media and academia, the ones that disseminated this sick, perverse ideology as “normal” for everyone — an ideology that left a lot of victims in its wake.

    This article exposes the sheer hatred against Whites and the attempts by the alien-controlled media, academia and government to destroy Whites down to a family level.

  231. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    June 11, 2012 - 12:49 am | Permalink
  232. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    June 11, 2012 - 12:32 am | Permalink

    @Ward Kendall: I agree, I see no benefit from accepting homosexuals into the WN movement. Back when this country was great (it sucks these days) it wasn’t even questioned that homosexuality was deviant – there wasn’t any need to explain something so obvious.
    Who can defend one man sticking his ding dong up another man’s arse?
    This country has really sunk down low. It is a pathetic shell of its former greatness. We need to rebuild it. At this point, I only see a dismal future for my white children and it makes me angry such a great country destroyed itself.

  233. June 11, 2012 - 12:17 am | Permalink

    @Neville:

    I do agree with you: if you decide to copulate with your dog or cat in none of my business.
    But I will not agree if you try to promote such behavior in public or advertise it as a norm to follow because on the next level of socio-manipulation every person who refuse to fuck a cat will be presented as deviant :)

    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

  234. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 12:14 am | Permalink

    I might kindly suggest that many comments on this blog show what happens when you put some religious belief first with regard to white survival.  Notice that we have two sides, ostensibly pro White, accusing each other of being dupes under the command of Jewish overlords.  The Catholics say that the Freemasons are dupes! The other side says, no the Catholics are blind to their servitude to the Jew!  Then the pagans join in and say, all of you Christians are dupes!  Lastly, the militant atheists chime in and say, we must first destroy all religion, because all  of you are all dupes!

    Accepting religious differences would probably be a better approach than trying to rehash the last 2,000 years of theological debate, before we can get on with the business of saving White people.

  235. Wiggy's Gravatar Wiggy
    June 11, 2012 - 12:07 am | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:

    Actually, “homosexuality” is rampant in Muslim lands, in the form of ‘low down’ behavior, ie: ‘heterosexual males having it off with other males. Anti-homosexual behavior probably comes from N. European and Anglo culture.

  236. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    June 10, 2012 - 11:54 pm | Permalink

    @http://www.nysun.com/opinion/smart-but-not-always-wise/15022

    Still believing in all the scripture mumbo jumbo they will believe just about anything while allowing their fellow Christians to be all but totally ethnically cleansed from Palestine — their Holy Land..

  237. June 10, 2012 - 11:48 pm | Permalink

    “Any government that permits it is under the dominion of evil.” : this is so true, quite a number of governments fall into this category, as having no moral compass whatsoever, and makes the rape of innocents, in areas of conquest, easier..

  238. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 10, 2012 - 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Team Yitzhak has always hated anything and everything Catholic with intensity of a thousand suns.
    Freemasonry, anybody ???

  239. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    June 10, 2012 - 11:21 pm | Permalink

    The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance ?

    Look — its quite simple — sexual appetites & preferences for humans are varied & individual & with consenting adults just whatever they get up to in private is nobody’s business whatsoever & should be legal.

    Some of the comments here are sadly puritanical , perhaps based on the ridiculous belief that sex should only be between man & a woman (husband & wife) & should only be engaged in to “make a baby”.

    http://www.nysun.com/opinion/smart-but-not-always-wise/15022

  240. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 10, 2012 - 11:15 pm | Permalink

    @ Athanasius

    Word ‘church’ is modified from Scottish ‘kirk’. Unsurprisingly, in Greek the name ‘Circe’ is pronounced as ‘keer-kee’.

    Sidebar: Besides, your timeline is off. Germanic tribes have gone completely Christian some 100-plus years after the English. How could they be in a position to lend that word ?

    http://www.covenofthegoddess.com/goddesscirce.htm

  241. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 10, 2012 - 11:07 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    I don’t know if I’m in a position to offer advice, or that you are in a position of needing it.

    But I want to write something anyway, and maybe it will help you or others. This comment is for anyone reading it.

    For several years now I’ve been practicing self-awareness or awareness of my own thoughts/mind. Some might refer to it as “watching the thinker” or something like that, and it might be related to Eastern spirituality.

    Anyway, I started being aware of my thoughts and how I felt (physically and mentally) while I was masturbating — and I realized that I did not actually enjoy it.

    I think a lot of people are addicted to orgasms, addicted to whatever happens in the brain during an orgasm. It’s like a drug.

    (And similar to traditional drugs, people who look at porn or seek out recreational sex often need a stronger “dose” to get the original effect.)

    When I brought awareness to the times when I was masturbating, I realized that there was no part of me that felt genuinely good in those moments. And so I started to see through the illusion.

    Now I no longer desire pornography or masturbation. At all. I’ve mentioned before that I believe semen is sacred, and I don’t consider that a religious belief.

    I don’t have lustful thoughts or cravings, and I don’t consider my lack of those things as “repression” or “suppression” or anything unhealthy.

    Being aware of my inner world/mind also helped me quit drinking. (I had a relatively short alcohol phase…) And when I brought awareness to the times when I was not-sober, I realized that I did not actually enjoy it — alcohol was not bringing me any kind of happiness. Again, it was like I saw through an illusion.

    I want to address something else.

    There is an idea that men who masturbate do not see women as anything more than physical objects, and that might be true in some cases, but that was not the case for me.

    Even when I used to masturbate, I still loved women in a non-sexual way. I loved them on a soul level then, and love them even more now.

    Have a good week.

  242. June 10, 2012 - 10:22 pm | Permalink

    As a antidote to jewish poison let me dedicate YOU this:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq3qW3BmRNg&feature=list_related&playnext=1&list=AL94UKMTqg-9DgQBU9Tapu3b1vU_fILtU3

    Il Divo – Amazing Grace
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYMLMj-SibU

    Old heretic and atheist.
    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

  243. June 10, 2012 - 9:57 pm | Permalink

    PS.”Especially in the phone sex business many customers are drunk, lonely and horny. ”
    Tadzio.
    This is a dream puppet masters are trying (and winning ) to archive. A.Huxley predicted this very well many years ago in “Brave New World”.
    Animal like copulation without any feeling attached.
    Atomized society of trained monkeys .
    “Don’t be a slave labor for McDonald.Be a star!!!Sex industry is waiting for you.
    On every corner”
    “Negative selection” was,is and ever will be jew’s favorite weapon in destroying the society.
    To win they must annihilate the traditional family values.
    Porn is a fantastic tool helping them to reach their goal.

    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

  244. June 10, 2012 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    @Tadzio:
    Simple and working solutions.
    But-considering the fact that EVERY politician is a whore of the worst sort(with a standard whore customers buys her body,with a politician customer buys his body and soul) without HUGE grass root pressure nothing will be done.
    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

  245. June 10, 2012 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    @Tadzio:
    Simple and working solutions.
    But-considering the fact that EVERY politician is a whore of the worst sort(with a standard whore customers buy her body,with a politician customer buys his body and soul) without HUGE grass root pressure nothing will be done.
    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

  246. It is I only's Gravatar It is I only
    June 10, 2012 - 9:16 pm | Permalink

    I always found it funny, when morality is preached by homosexual pedophiles!
    So keep your eyes open for legalization of homo-pedophilia (very close see,NAMBLA) then bestiality.
    What’s next you could ask?

  247. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    June 10, 2012 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

    @Leif Oldhart:

    “And wasn’t it not so very long ago that the infamous “Bishop of Rome” made it a capital crime to read or possess a certain disreputable and dangerous book called “The Holy Bible?”

    Yes! And we would all be better off today if that abomination (The Bible) had been universally banned rather than read by the likes of snake lovin’ Pentecostalists and Evangelicals awaiting their Rapture.

    “…I.e. the readin’ of das book caused social problems and would likely endanger your immortal soul (not to mention the voluminosity of his serene excellency’s pocketbook?”

    How much would you say the 700 Club rakes in annually? Also, see comment above.

    Peace be with you.

  248. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    June 10, 2012 - 9:00 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    “Catholics ban some vice, thus giving the Jews a monopoly on selling it, just like they did with usury.”

    Usury isn’t a vice, it’s a crime.

    “Catholics and Jews have been working together since the beginning, in some cases, directly and openly (as with promoting immigration to the US).”

    Was Oliver Cromwell a Catholic?

    “The Catholic Al Capone and the Jew Meyer Lansky, the perfect symbol of Judeo-Christianity.”

    What is this a symbol of, champ?

  249. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 10, 2012 - 8:18 pm | Permalink

    @me:

    There has never been a healthy culture that at the same time has been a decadent one.

    Of course! That is logically the same as saying : “There has never been a healthy person who at the same time has been a sick one”.
    BTW, the health and degeneracy of cultures is cyclical. All originally “healthy” cutures end in degeneracy. There is no such a thing as an “eternally healthy” culture, just as there are no “eternally young” persons. The law of nature is adamant.

  250. June 10, 2012 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

    @TabuLa Raza: You’re darn tootin’! And wasn’t it not so very long ago that the infamous “Bishop of Rome” made it a capital crime to read or possess a certain disreputable and dangerous book called “The Holy Bible?” For the very same reason? I.e. the readin’ of das book caused social problems and would likely endanger your immortal soul (not to mention the voluminosity of his serene excellency’s pocketbook?

  251. me's Gravatar me
    June 10, 2012 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    @Donar van Holland:

    As a pagan I do not accept the arguments by Darkmoon. While I think that sex without love is unwise and will not lead to happiness, I will not have the love for my race and opposition to the Jews be funneled into a resurrection of the Christian view of sexuality.

    There has never been a healthy culture that at the same time has been a decadent one. The Entruscans were decadent, the Moors were decadent, early Romans were not, Christian Spain was not.. .who won?

  252. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    June 10, 2012 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden: Church comes from German Kirche, which in turn comes from Greek Kyriakon (house of the Lord).

  253. Arbiter's Gravatar Arbiter
    June 10, 2012 - 7:35 pm | Permalink

    Lasha’s articles are a genre of porn, too.

  254. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 10, 2012 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    And America is still Christaian enough for it to work at the ballot box.

    Things which happen when you choose to partake in the masturbatory exercise that is elections in America.

  255. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    June 10, 2012 - 6:20 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: NYC is a example of this, the Jewish and Italian mafia started there in the early 20th century, they pretty much own the city today.

  256. burgermeister's Gravatar burgermeister
    June 10, 2012 - 5:56 pm | Permalink

    @Ward Kendall:

    You are absolutely correct and anyone who desires to be a leader in the WN movement needs to articulate this. Unabashed and overt homosexuality is poison to any male dominated group association.

  257. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    June 10, 2012 - 5:53 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: This is also my view.

  258. Raymond's Gravatar Raymond
    June 10, 2012 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Stories were told for hundreds of years in ancient times that the Jews made a pact with the Devil. How can there be any doubt?

  259. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 10, 2012 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

    @ Richard Pierce

    You’re asking people to notice that which is hidden in plain view.
    I find it to be slightly anti-semitic™ , LOL
    Talking of things in plain view, wait till they discover who was the Greek goddess Circe which is where the word ‘church’ derives from.

  260. Tadzio's Gravatar Tadzio
    June 10, 2012 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    The American government actively promotes pornography. Over 10 years ago credit card companies started reject porn providers as vendors. It was for a simple business reason. Especially in the phone sex business many customers are drunk, lonely and horny. When they wake up in the morning they reject the billing. This was and is a major headache to the card industry.

    Some members of Congress intervened, [yes, mostly jews and shabbos goy acting at the behest of jewish campaign contributors] and obtained a ruling that credit card companies were common carriers and could not reject customers. There has been some cleaning up of the porn sellers’ act, but the US government “has their back.”

    As a practical matter the government should deny access to the financial billing system to filth purveyors. Personally I think it would be a viable campaign issue. Of course, one would be called an anti-Semite but it is past time when that canard should be a badge of honor.

    Porn is an industry. Industry requires cash flow. Cut the cash flow and the industry withers to a back alley black market. It is doable.

    An alternative could be two credit cards available to the public. One would be a normal one that is for general use. The other would be available to those peddling perversion. It could be embossed with a large red A, standing for Adult or Asshole, take your choice.

    The problem of television degeneracy could be imaginatively handled too by means of voluntary censorship through membership in groups that act as gatekeepers. The technology is there. If Hollywood found that 50% of homes could not receive a program, due to the public’s own free will in subscribing to a gatekeeper provider, they would have a strong incentive to clean up their programming. After all, were I a billionare I would hire someone to survey entertainment and pick out what I wanted to my own standard. Shouldn’t Everyman have a the Right to his own, personal amusement valet?

    To jews porn is shekels. Strangle the shekels. There are viable ways to do it. And America is still Christaian enough for it to work at the ballot box.

  261. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 10, 2012 - 4:40 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    They can only be a slippery slope if the race morally devotes itself to those ideologies as our does. However, if a race first devotes itself to its own advancement and strength, then it can easily tolerate things like abortion, porn, and homosexuality with little or no problem. Homosexuality and porn are big in Israel but that doesn’t hinder its ability to function, does it?

    We need to face an unpleasant fact here: our race is weak. It was weakened primarily by two world wars that destroyed the bearers of its most aggressive, manly, and virile genes. The ones who stayed away from the fighting- the feminine and the cowardly- are the ones who reproduced, and now their offpsring run our nations alongside the jews and other non-Whites. This is why our catchphrases are no longer “Fortune favors the bold” or “Deutschland uber alles,” but “be tolerant,” and “diversity is our strength.”

    I don’t trust WN’s who get hung up on homosexuality, abortion, porn, and sex because they don’t have their eye on the ball. They’re moralists in a world that favors only the strong and aggressive. If we were smart we’d find a way to use homosexuality, porn, and abortion to our benefit, and we easily can.

  262. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 10, 2012 - 4:27 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Pornography, homosexuality, equality for women and broader civil liberties, are not intrinsically particularly hostile or harmul. What they do have in common is a sort of ‘slippery slope’ potential that could conceivably become harmful. However, the extent of that risk can be minimized/managed or maximized/incited. The issues have been used over the past few decades in such way as to maximize. But most of the harm has come from that malign purpose to bring harm about. Not much the underlying issues.
    The way I feel about this, would be another instance of, I can see the hurt we inflict on ourselves (by unnecessarily alienating sections of society that could contain individuals who could oneday become incedible assets to our cause (think Turing). But what i don’t see is the payoff, or not much so.
    I would probably put porn in a different category than homosexuality, womens rights and civil liberties. I don’t know what to say about porn. I think it’s become a harmful phenomena, and I’m guilty of looking at it from time to time.

  263. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 10, 2012 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Good post. I was going to get into how Christianity screwed up our sexuality but I was just tired of arguing with all the Christians on this site.

  264. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 10, 2012 - 4:16 pm | Permalink

    I have rarely seen better examples of the corruption, not only of our culture, of our very ability to think clearly than the comments here. Evidently, few have either read the pagan philosophers or the Christian Fathers, or even bothered to listen to Ramzpaul.

    We have an animal nature and appetites. Superior people recognize this, grasp the concept that if left unchecked they occupy a disproportionate share our lives, contribute to unhealthy families, both physically and emotionally, and in extreme cases enslave us. Therefore, the only route to a better life is to exercise some self-control. Healthy societies help individuals to do this by encouraging healthy behavior and discouraging harmful behavior. This need not be heavy-handed government. Indeed, it is precisely the government which prevents us from doing so.

    This is not a question of Christian or pagan, prudery or licentiousness, it is a question of value judgements. Just as we must make judgements and draw lines among groups of people, so we must among choices in life. Some choices are better than others. For both for the individual and the community. Some behaviors must be outlawed and fought every inch of the way, such as pedophilia. Others, such as homosexuality between consenting adults ,should be tolerated but not celebrated nor promoted. A subsection of a big city allocated to this lifestyle may be tolerated, promotion of disordered appetites should not take place in grammar schools, no matter whose feelings get hurt.

    The point here, is that it is not the Jews who introduced sex, it is their unique ability to saturate us in it. It is everywhere we turn, bill boards, school rooms, newspapers, entertainment and so called scholarly works – so only an idiot or sexually repressed religious fanatic could or would resist. To compare the Kama Sutra to the fifth that is shown on the commercials in the evening news is preposterous. It is not surprising that a man with a harem might become jaded, to do so to children is repulsive. The result for us is obvious, we are so jaded we are not even reproducing ourselves.

    Have we so lost the ability to think and speak for ourselves that we do not even know how to have this conversation? Have we killed the desire in decent men and women to protect the innocence of their children? Do we really not know how to stand up and at least demand that they do want they want – but not do it here? Pitiful people, really pitiful.

    • Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
      June 10, 2012 - 6:48 pm | Permalink

      Eloquently expressed, I agree completely.

  265. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 10, 2012 - 4:06 pm | Permalink

    It’s really amazing to see many of the (presumably) Catholic commenters still in abject denial about the actual nature of their Catholic church, especially, how *gay* it is. I often explain to my liberal friends that we already have “gay marriage” and we’ve had it for a thousand years – it’s called the Celibate Catholic Priesthood.

    The irony of the Catholic laypeople talking about the evils of homosexuality during the week, then taking their sons to church on Sundays to participate in ritualized pederasty with adult celibate not-actually-chase never-married men and having their daughters taught Sunday school by never-married women who live with other women – I mean, you really don’t get it?

    The Catholic church is homosexual to its core – that’s what it has always been, since the very beginning.

    There are some real, legitimate scientifically-describable problems with pornography (see yourbrainonporn dot com), and homosexuality is likely some sort of hormonal development disorder, but Catholic sexual morality is chutzpah on a level that even the Jews must envy.

    I can understand it must be difficult for homosexual priests and nuns trying to supress their every sexual urge, but many of us are quite sexually normal, thank you very much.

    The pro-White movement doesn’t need anymore superstitious Judeo-Christianity, and being lectured to about sex from pederast priests who have never touched a woman is hardly the way forward for White people.

    The faster we develop a pro-White movement that is not hung up about gays, abortion, and other irrelevant distractions, the better. The Republican party is going to save us from “gay marriage” while inviting the entire third world into our borders, and close down Planned Parenthood so non-Whites have even more babies? This is madness.

  266. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 10, 2012 - 3:53 pm | Permalink

    The Rothschilds aren’t exactly notorious for holding press conferences ahead of putting in motion yet another one of their diabolical schemes.
    Even after almost 100 years, how many Americans know who was actually pulling the strings behind the plot to establish a non-federal ‘Federal Reserve’ ?
    The only Russian-based oligarch who is on record as having dealings with the Rothschild spawn is Oleg Deripaska. Who, incidentally, happened to be the wealthiest man in Russia prior to the latest crisis.

  267. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 10, 2012 - 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Those of us who didn’t grow up Catholic sometimes have to scratch our heads over their seemingly bizarre sexual obsessions with mastrubation, celibacy, and abortion. While most of Reich is pseudo-scientific and unreadable nonsense, he and his compatriots were sort of “on to” something regarding “anti-semitism” and sexual repression – the Catholic church itself and it’s troubled relationship to homosexuality. If they saw the Catholic church as the source of “anti-semitism” they may have assumed it could be undermined by “sexual liberation” of its closeted homosexual “celibate” priest class.

    Famously, Judaism introduced “homophobia” to Western culture. Philo of Alexandria, a Jew with a huge influence on Christianity, was one of the first to demand immediate execution of “sodomites” saying they shouldn’t be allowed to live for “even a minute.” The Sibylline Oracles, a Jewish-Christian work, accuses pagan Rome of pederasty and calls it the “ultimate” crime.

    As Christianity took root in Western culture, homosexuality was suppressed, and a new institution – Catholic celibacy – was developed. Early Christian figures like Origen actually castrated themselves, literally heeding the words of Christ to “cut off” parts of the body that led them into sin. Normal marriage – to a woman – seemingly wouldn’t do the trick, and one can guess why.

    So the very center of the new Catholic church were single-sex institutions of priests, monks, and nuns, who remained “celibate” and never married, while living in close quarters with each other. While modern Catholics like to pretend that homosexual scandals in the Catholic church are a post-Vatican II phenomenon, they reoccur since the very beginning, over and over again, with regularity. In all cases, breaking the vow of celibacy – a priest marrying a women (or a nun marrying a man) – resulted in expulsion from the same-sex institution. But breaking the vow of chastity, even including having homosexual relations with their “brother priests” and “sister nuns” required only some Hail Marys and penances, and all was forgiven.

    Pretty much every single Protestant movement attacked the celibate priesthood, and they all loudly condemned the rampant sodomy in the same-sex celibate relgious orders. The first thing priests like Luther and Calvin did when they became Protestants was to get married (to women!) and virtually every Protestant church demanded their religious leaders be conventionally married men.

    So the Jews, perhaps rightly, thought that “sexually liberating” all those closeted homosexuals in “celibate” Catholic orders would destroy the church, thus ending “anti-semitism.” E. Michael Jones has mentioned the famous nunnery in California that hosted some sort of New-agey Freudian group therapy to “liberate” the nuns, and it evidently did, most of them became radical lesbians.

    The Protestants wrongly thought that the unnatural state of celibacy/chastity *caused* homosexuality in the Catholic church. What seems much more likely to modern eyes is that the whole *point* of celibacy was basically a big closet for homosexually inclined men and women to hide out in – right at the center of the community – and in fact, lead the social religion, just like they did in pagan times.

    Jews like Reich were wrong about “anti-semitism” though, it’s not the Catholic church that is the cause of “anti-semitism” – it’s the behavior of Jews. When the Catholic church finishes dying off, there will still be “anti-semitism” because there will still be “semitism” – Judaism.

    Increasingly secular Protestants in America were just fine with our birth control, 2.5 children and our married, heterosexual pastors, until the Jew-Catholic alliance opened the borders in the 1960s.

    As for pornography, one might think Jews have peddled it for the same reason they traditionally peddle other addictive vices, like alcohol, gambling, and drugs. It’s a great way to make money. Considering the actual nature of the celibate Catholic leadership, and their clear and open involvement in pederasty and giving international asylum to criminal pedophiles, one might see their promotion of sexual morality – for us, not them – as simply the “good cop” to the Jew’s “bad cop.” Catholics ban some vice, thus giving the Jews a monopoly on selling it, just like they did with usury. Catholics and Jews have been working together since the beginning, in some cases, directly and openly (as with promoting immigration to the US).

    The Catholic Al Capone and the Jew Meyer Lansky, the perfect symbol of Judeo-Christianity.

  268. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    June 10, 2012 - 2:46 pm | Permalink

    >>>@Jett Rucker: Governments that would criminalize the production of “pornographic” material will proceed from that province to the criminalization of any and all other material for which they can produce an argument that it is anti-social.

    Opposing pornography is one thing. Criminalizing it is something else.<<<

    That is why free speech is absolute, and why the first amendment says NO LAW. The first exception shreds free speech. From that point on the line will be moved more and more toward State control of ideas.

  269. June 10, 2012 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Greetings Lasha Darkmoon. You touch on a major issue here — not especially porn and perversion, but the place of sex itself, including sex in a WN/pro-ethnic movement. Some probably will not care for what I have to say, but for those with open minds, it will be worth thinking about.

    One comment above mentions the apparent mutually exclusiveness of a prayer life (also perhaps any life of dedication) and masturbation. The practice of one tends to preclude the practice of another; and no doubt it does. Many folks make the same claim about the pursuit or focus of attention, or even looking forward to any type of sex. It’s also easy to understand what they are getting at and to know they are onto something.

    But consider the old Aryan Law of Three. Are we limited to only TWO mutually exclusive choices? Can their be a THIRD WAY?

    Actually, there is. Use the energy engendered by the sexual arousal as a form of “prayer” or directed dedication.

    There’s only one caveat, quibble, or roadblock in this: it’s probably necessary to arouse the energy and learn to avoid the release or so-called orgasm.

    After all, it’s not the act of sexual arousal that drains one and ruins dedication and planning. It’s the abrupt release of the accumulated energy. And why, after working on building up and filling oneself with such powerful bio-energy (collected from the surrounding Multiverse), would one wish to just dump it down the rathole (so to speak). There exist people oriented to the darker side who claim that the release of energy may be focused and used to cause positive things to happen, but there are allegedly grave dangers in that, as well as scientific evidence that it is not the best way.

    However, the accumulation of the energy without release is quite harmless and may be very useful.

    That’s all I’ll say about it here. Those wanting more information may visit a website named reuniting dot info.
    Even more info may be garnered from the writings of a South American man named Samael Aun Weor, specifically a book titled “The Perfect Matrimony,” which may be had as a free PDF online if you search.

    I do not mean to offend staunch Christians who are anti-body to whatever degree. I don’t intend to peeve White Nationalists who are convinced that sexual energy is wholly negative and has no place in saving our ethnic roots and future. But don’t you think that there’s a reason and use for it? Other than as a test thrown up by the alleged “His Holiness, the Middle-Eastern Pillar of Smoke” (YHVH)? The Reuniting dot info website probably offers your best bet for lucid understanding. Please check it out.

  270. June 10, 2012 - 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Very timely and informative article Dr. Darkmoon especially since there is some what of a debate about the role of homosexuals in the WN movement (thanks to the courageous Carolyn Yeager). Not surprised at all to see James jump in with both feet first and fists pumping. The Romans as well as the Samurai did engage in homosexual acts during a limited time of their total existence however at NO time did they believe a homosexual life style wasn’t a perversion. They understood their reproductive and nurturing duty to society. Please keep the debate going because the tooth needs to be drilled out.

  271. Pete's Gravatar Pete
    June 10, 2012 - 11:48 am | Permalink

    Howard Jacobson’s truly repugnant face never ceases to amaze me! Sexual selection clearly played a far lesser role among Ashkenazi Jews than others. Otherwise, how could the genes behind such a hideous visage ever be perpetuated? He makes the Jewish caricatures of the Third Reich look like sympathetic understatements.

  272. Birder's Gravatar Birder
    June 10, 2012 - 11:39 am | Permalink

    @ Lucy Skipping

    Being a promoter of pornography is one thing, being a producer of it is another. I happen to agree with all of the statements attributed to Dr. Kameny in the piece, but that does not make me a pornographer.

  273. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 10, 2012 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    “I prefer to view it from the perspective that everything the Jews touch turns into shit for everyone else. Pick any topic: literature, theatre, art, sport, or politics. All have been debased. Yes, the Jews gain wealth from the debasement. Bigger fools are we.”

    Agreed. Jews represent degeneration and decay. It’s just who they are: freed slaves who like to destroy.

  274. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 10, 2012 - 11:13 am | Permalink

    @http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18155404

    With tens of thousands keen to take part, the community needed a big venue. On Sunday 40,000 men filled Citi Field, home to the New York Mets baseball team, to chart a way forward.

    Amid concern over the dangers the internet poses to traditional morality, organisers said the discussion focused on how to protect children from pornography and violent sites. The proliferation of social media was also a key concern.

    I believe that pornography and masturbation are harmful (and simply not enjoyable), but I’m probably not educated enough to have a strong opinion on whether pornography should be legal or illegal.

  275. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 10, 2012 - 10:45 am | Permalink
  276. June 10, 2012 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    @Jett Rucker: Governments that would criminalize the production of “pornographic” material will proceed from that province to the criminalization of any and all other material for which they can produce an argument that it is anti-social.

    Opposing pornography is one thing. Criminalizing it is something else.
    ====
    Governments have criminalized telling the truth by passing “hate” laws, while at the same time passing laws promoting homosexuality and pornography.
    A government will do what it is told to do by those who own the government.

  277. June 10, 2012 - 10:14 am | Permalink

    @fender:
    “Also, yes, porn is filth; it’s much better…”
    I prefer to view it from the perspective that everything the Jews touch turns into shit for everyone else. Pick any topic: literature, theatre, art, sport, or politics. All have been debased. Yes, the Jews gain wealth from the debasement. Bigger fools are we.

  278. June 10, 2012 - 10:07 am | Permalink

    @http://www.cwporter.com/crumb.htm and
    http://www.cwporter.com/INPRAISEOFMULTICULTURALISM.htm
    3) I didn’t state “oversexed”, I stated when “decadence and sexual perversion set in”. It’s not the same. White countries today are in the decadence and sexual perversion phase. Jews played their part in the decadence and sexual perversion of Rome.

  279. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 10, 2012 - 9:56 am | Permalink

    @fender:

    I found this on another site — it is a list of Jews involved in the homosexual agenda/movement. It’s relatively long, but seems relevant to both the article above and your comment.

    (I do not claim to know how accurate the information in this list is.)

    ========================================

    Larry Kramer — co-founder of “Act Up,” a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men’s Health Crisis

    Alan Klein — co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA. COM

    Arnie Kantrowitz — co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

    Jonathan D. Katz — founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San Francisco branch].

    Harvey Fierstein — film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay activist.

    Moisés Kaufman — playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].

    Israel Fishman — founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of the American Library Association] , the world’s first gay professional organization.

    Bella Abzug and Edward Koch — both Jewish — the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].

    Winnie Stachelberg — political director, Human Rights Campaign [HRC]

    Michael S. Aronowitz, The New York Log Cabin Republicans.

    Tony Kushner — gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright [for Angels in America, 1992].

    Len Hirsch — president of the GLBT federal government employees group, GLOBE.

    Meg Moritz, Ph.D. — a Director and member of the Executive Committee of GLAAD.

    Barbara Raab — an NBC-TV producer; a “Jewish lesbian feminist journalist, writer.”

    Charles Kaiser [?] — author & founding member of National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA].

    David Goodstein — owner/publisher of the gay magazine The Advocate [1975-1985]; co-founder of the National Gay Rights Lobby.

    Judy Wieder — Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.

    Alison Bechdel [?] — cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly comic strip “Dykes to Watch Out For.”

    Kevin Koffler — Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.

    Garrett Glaser — National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA] national board member.

    Ronald Gold — reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn the American Psychiatric Association’ s policy that homosexuality is an illness.

    Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany; founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific Humanitarian Committee; coined the term “transvestism” ; fled Nazi Germany.

    Fred Hochberg — deputy administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC].

    Michael Berman — member, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors. Mitchell Gold — HRC Board Marty Lieberman — HRC BoardAndy Linsky — HRC BoardDana Perlman — HRC BoardAbby Rubenfeld — HRC Board Andrew Tobias — HRC Board Lara Schwartz — Senior Counsel, HRC Heather Wellman — HRC Field Coordinator Dan Furmansky — HRC Senior Field Organizer, West Sally Green — HRC Associate Field Director

    Rick Rosendall [?] — President, Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC.

    Barney Frank — member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies

    Kerry Lobel — executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

    Robin Margolis, American coordinator of the Bi Women’s Cultural Alliance and author [Bisexuality: A Practical Guide].

    Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund — and — the executive director of Freedom to Marry.

    Jennifer Einhorn — Communications Director, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD] Nancy Alpert [?] — Treasurer, GLAAD Judy Gluckstern — Board of Directors, GLAAD.Stephen M. Jacoby — Board of Directors, GLAAD.Matt Riklin — Board, GLAADCarol Rosenfeld — Board, GLAAD.William Weinberger — Board, GLAAD Tanya Wexler — Board, GLAAD. David Huebner — GLAAD Counsel.

    Richard Goldstein — Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics

    Ron Schlittler — Director of Field & Policy, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays [PFLAG].

    Craig Ziskin — Deputy Director of Development, PFLAG.

    Debra Weill — Senior Field & Policy Coordinator, PFLAG.

    Dody Goldstein — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

    David Horowitz — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

    Shawn Frank — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

    Leon Weinstein — Chair, Nominating Committee, PFLAG.

    Kate Kendell [?], National Center for Lesbian Rights.

    Gayle Rubin — lesbian author/activist.

    Hilary Rosen — a founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund; former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.

    Roz Richter, American attorney and activist.

    Bob Kunst — long-time activist in gay and Jewish causes.

    “Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network” [GLSEN]. Board co-chairs: Marty Seldman, president

    “National Gay & Lesbian Task Force” [NGLTF]. Board co-chairs: ….. Rachel Rosen in Santa Fe, N.M Dave Fleischer — Director of Training [political training], NGLTF. Craig Hoffman — Board of Directors, NGLTF. Beth Zemsky — Board, NGLTF. Marsha C. Botzer — Treasurer, NGLTF. Jeff Levi — first, Levi was NGTF’s lobbyist, early 1980s [NGTF became NGLTF in 1985]. Later, he was NGLTF executive director.

    Bill Rubenstein, J.D. ’86, developed the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights Project

    Martin Duberman — author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.

    Ben Schatz ’81, J.D. ’85, is executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Foundation.

    Kevin Schaub, American; Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk Institute in San Francisco, the world’s largest center for queer studies.

    Sarah Schulman [1958- ], American playwright, novelist, and activist [one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian rights organization] .

    Susan Spielman — principal/head of Common Ground, an education/consultin g firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation education; her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations, helping them to implement domestic partner benefits plans; co-author of the book Straight Talk About Gays in the Workplace.

    Gertrude Stein — wrote the first openly lesbian novel, “Q.E.D.,” in 1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.

    Rikki Streicher (1925-1994), American activist and businesswoman.

    Michael Goff — founded Out magazine in 1992.

    Paulette Goodman — founder of local chapter [Washington D.C.] of PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization from 1988-1992.

    Jeffrey Newman, American, president and COO of the Gay Financial Network; president and CEO of out.com.

    Jim Levin — New York gay historian.

    Barrett Brick — GLAA [Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance] Treasurer.

    Robin Tyler — American comedian [born Arlene Chernick] who was the first openly gay comic in North America; Tyler is also an activist who was the stage producer for the first three gay marches on Washington and the national protest coordinator for the “Stop Dr. Laura” campaign; she produces women’s comedy and music festivals, and operates a lesbian travel-tour company.

    Dr. Bruce Voeller [1935?-1994] [?] American gay rights activist, molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher (pioneer in the use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide); cofounder and first executive director of the National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa Foundation [an AIDS prevention research organization] .

    Mark Elderkin [?] — co-founded Gay.com.

    Leroy Aarons — American professor, journalist, and founder of the National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association (1990).

    Dr. Donald I. Abrams — American physician, HIV expert, medical marijuana researcher, and past president of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.

    Johnny Abush (1952-2000) — [Canadian]; archivist of the International Jewish GBLT Archives.

    Roberta Achtenberg [1950- ]; civil rights lawyer and federal official; appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.

    Miriam Ben-Shalom [1948- ], American Army Reserves drill sergeant and gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with the Reserves when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Veterans Association [GLBVA] in 1990, serving as its first president.

    Larry Brinkin, American gay activist who brought the first domestic partnership lawsuit [against Southern Pacific Railroad, 1982].

    Rob Eichberg, American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out Day [October 11th].

    Scott Evertz, American; in April 2001, President Bush appointed him to serve as the Director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy [ONAP].

    Gene Falk [?, Jewish name], American business executive; Senior Vice President of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk; Chair of the Board of Directors of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

    Surina Kahn — American lesbian activist.

    Larry Kessler — founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in New England.

    Kathy Levinson — American investor and philanthropist; serves on the board of PlanetOut; also on NGLTF Board of Directors.

    Judith Light — actress, activist for gay causes.

    David Mixner — gay activist, political consultant; co-founder of the Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of wealthy gays and lesbians who became influential in local politics; president Bill Clinton’s Special Liaison to the Gay-Lesbian Community.

    Dan Savage — American author of gay-themed books [The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant; Skipping Towards Gomorrah: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Pursuit of Happiness in America] and gay-themed- sex-advice columnist [Savage Love].

    Susan Schuman, American executive vice-president and general manager of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.

    Scott Seomin, American entertainment media coordinator for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

    Jason Serinus [Jay Guy Nassberg] — founder and coordinator of the Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the New York chapter of the Gay Liberation Front.

    David Sine [?] — American CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian cable TV network.

    Rex Wockner — longtime gay, American journalist who has reported news for the gay press since 1985.

    Jack Fritscher — became Editor in Chief of Drummer gay magazine [1977].

    Leslie Feinberg [1949- ], American trade unionist, transgender activist and author [Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to RuPaul].

    Allan Ginsburg – late Jewish garbage poet and leading member of North American Man Boy Love Association.

    ======================================

    I hope everyone has a good Sunday.

  280. Birder's Gravatar Birder
    June 10, 2012 - 9:50 am | Permalink

    Where did Deluded Darkmoon get her information that Dr. Frank Kamney was a pornographer? On a cereal box ?

  281. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 10, 2012 - 9:14 am | Permalink

    In an ideal world, there would be no need or place for pornography. Porn is a toxic product of dystopia. Any government that permits it is under the dominion of evil. (Lasha Darkmoon (above).

    This is not a factual statement. It is a value judgment and a worldview. Just as paganism is.

    These are just attitudes to life, no more.

    Since pornography and masturbation are inseparable, I suggest that those who disapprove of pornography also disapprove of masturbation and regard it as a shameful habit. I know my sister Lasha does.

    “Masturbation is incompatible with self-respect,” she tells me. “It entails a loss of honor. How can a man who masturbates over pornography look his wife in the eye?”

  282. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 10, 2012 - 9:06 am | Permalink

    Knowing who is a Jew and who is not a Jew is a tricky game we keep playing. We can never be sure how many Jews among us are masquerading as Gentiles. We know for a fact that it is common practice for Jews to hide their ethnicity.

    Lasha once referred to Rupert Murdoch as a Jew on some internet forum and she was roundly abused for this. “You’re wrong,” she was scolded. “This proves you’re an anti-Semite! Rupert Murdoch is a Christian!”

    On the other hand, Lasha has been denounced by an entirely different set of people on her own site (darkmoon.me) for refusing to go along with the myth (promoted on the internet sometimes) that Stalin an Beria were Jews. Stalin may have had some Jewish blood, she believes, because he was a Georgian. And Georgia has always had a lot of Jews in it, real Jews and cryptos and Jews who didn’t even know they were Jews. (Note that Georgia is roughly situated in the same region as the ancient kingdom of Khazaria, the seedbed of the Ashkenazi Jews).

  283. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    June 10, 2012 - 8:54 am | Permalink

    @http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/oct2008/forbes-list-oligarchs.gif
    (Definite Jews are marked in RED, probable Jews in pink).

    (4) The name Lebedev occurs on this list in pink, i.e., as a probable Jew. But the Christian name given here is “Platon”. So the question is: are Platon Lebedev and Alexander Yevgenievich Lebedev the same Lebedev, or are we talking about two different Lebedevs?

    (5) If we are talking about two separate Lebedevs, then why isn’t the name of Alexander Yevgenievich Lebedev listed here also? Because he too, in his Wikipedia article, is described as “one of the Russian oligarchs” and he was included in the May 2008 Forbes List as the 358th richest man in the world.

    (6) I am willing to accept that Platon Lebedev and Alexander Lebedev are two separate individuals, but why then (I repeat) is the second Lebedev NOT mentioned on the list? He, too, after all, is an exceptionally rich Russian oligarch.

    (7) I am inclined to hypothesize (not state) that Platon and Alexander Lebedev are the same individual and that there is only ONE Russian oligarch called “Lebedev”.

    (8) If this hypothesis turns out to be correct, then the Lebedev we are talking about (pink star on list) is a “probable Jew”.

    * * * * *

    Please understand that I am not trying to justify my sloppiness in persuading Lasha to include her Lebedev reference in this essay. Maybe you are correct in stating he is not a Jew. But what if it turns out that the “probable Jew” we are talking about is actually a crypto-Jew?

    Given Lebedev’s proven connections with the Rothschild family, which another poster here has been astute enough to provide, I don’t think we can rule out the possibility that Lebedev is a crypto-Jew.

    One final point.

    This essay is not about Lebedev. He is a minor character and plays a very minor role here. If Lasha has misindentified him as a Jew, this is a culpable error, but it would hardly invalidate the general thrust of her argument that pornography is an instrument of subverson and moral anarchy, and that the Jews are the main force behind it.

  284. Michael S.'s Gravatar Michael S.
    June 10, 2012 - 8:50 am | Permalink

    @Kevin W. Cornell:

    The hedonism of the latter day Roman and Greek empires can certainly not serve as an argument in defense of a “little sexual liberation”. Quite the contrary, their hedonism was, at best, a minor factor in their ultimate downfall.

  285. June 10, 2012 - 8:34 am | Permalink

    Dear Madame

    I would like to congratulate You.
    I admire Your courage and integrity.
    Please ignore jewish scowls.
    This is what they call”dialog”.
    My sincere respect.
    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

  286. FrederickRhodes's Gravatar FrederickRhodes
    June 10, 2012 - 8:08 am | Permalink

    I’m a 55 y.o. GWM who was accidently exposed to every type of pornography in a paper recycling plant, when I was only 12 starting puberty. I did not become psychotic or obsessed. My only regrets is that I discovered at a young age that I was sexuallly mutilated as an infant because the society I grew up in was unaware of how to educate their children on the proper functions, hygiene, and safe use of their prepuce. Being sexually traumatised as infants and children is the real cause behind all these grusome sexual brain dysfunctions, whether it be by rape, circumcision/surgery, or religious fanatism…

  287. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 3:42 am | Permalink

    @Haris:

    Yes, very very few White women choose to be with a black guy. In fact, I believe the rate of marrying outside of the race is lowest among White women of any race. In other words, blacks, mestizos, Asians and Jews are more likely to marry outside their group.

  288. sybille's Gravatar sybille
    June 10, 2012 - 3:25 am | Permalink

    Platon Leonidovich Lebedev is a former CEO of Group Menatep, currently imprisoned in Russia, and is best known as a close associate of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, he was also an associate of Alexander Lebedev. Platon is jewish so is Khadorovsky.. so I am very sure Alexander Lebedev is also jewish.

  289. Donar van Holland's Gravatar Donar van Holland
    June 10, 2012 - 3:22 am | Permalink

    It is all a question whether one looks to the pagan or to the Christian past for Health and Truth.

    As a pagan I do not accept the arguments by Darkmoon. While I think that sex without love is unwise and will not lead to happiness, I will not have the love for my race and opposition to the Jews be funneled into a resurrection of the Christian view of sexuality.

    Any study of pornography shows that non-Jewish societies are perfectly capable of producing their own mountain of pornography without any Judaic help, thank you. It also shows that the prevalence of pornography is perfectly compatible with vibrant peoples and healthy, traditional societies.

    What about the innumerable Greek vases with pornographic images? Or the many pornographic frescoes and statues in Pompei? These also show that many of the sexual practices that Darkmoon abhors were praised and practiced among Greeks and Romans at the height of their civilizations. Japan was mentioned. Would Darkmoon care to investigate the innumerable woodblock pornography prints that have been circulating in Japanese society for the last four hundred years? A propos Japan: this country may seem westernized at the surface, but is in fact still a very traditional society, based on a hierarchy of virtue, not of money.

    The “sexual revolution” may have been welcomed and stimulated by the Jews in their short-sighted hate of Christianity, but the change in sexual mores was already noticeable a hundred years before. The real cause is atheism and/or the return of paganism. And as a pagan, I don’t complain. But the Jews may, when the gods again take possession of white men and they find a horde of Berserkers coming their way…

    I am sure, by the way, that the Berserkers would not object to a regiment of Templar Knights charging with them!

  290. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 10, 2012 - 3:05 am | Permalink

    @Is (2010, Middle-Class, White, Female) Love Colorblind?

    I tend to agree with the author of this article – it’s only 1,5% and 35 respectively.

  291. Tim Webb's Gravatar Tim Webb
    June 10, 2012 - 2:23 am | Permalink

    One is intrigued as to why these bound, fettered, and helpless Servants of Pornography should be described as its masters.
    Their case is entirely analogous with that of Lazarus, and their only salvation is to be found where his also was found. As with him, their persons stinketh, and as with him, their only remedy is in hearing the voice of the Son of God, and coming forth. It is perhaps entirely appropriate that a nation which stated collectively ( although there were many exceptions ) that they would not have this man to rule over them should have become so entirely degraded in their habits and sensibilities by the person whom they chose to rule over them instead.
    Here are the inevitable results.

  292. Mikhail Evan's Gravatar Mikhail Evan
    June 10, 2012 - 2:10 am | Permalink

    Best article I have ever read here. Congratulations.

  293. June 10, 2012 - 2:06 am | Permalink

    Forty years ago I did Reichian therapy for a short period and then Janov’s therapy (Primal therapy) for a longer period, and although the combination of them left me with some very disabling after effects that have partly remained to this day, the two therapies also restored in spades my ability to feel, which I had lost. I count the latter as outweighing the disabilities I incurred.

    Some other clients I knew or knew of in Janov’s therapy had worse experiences than my own, and at the other end of the spectrum, some clients of both therapies had excellent results. The great mass of clients had results somewhere in between.

    Reich’s therapy aimed not so much at producing seismic orgasms per se, but at producing changes in clients’ bodies that would allow them seismic orgasms as well as the pleasures of uninhibited flow of internal energies in their everyday life that he viewed as natural. He attempted to accomplish this by gouging at what he called the muscular armoring of the body.

    I had one experience in that therapy which I can think of no other way of describing than Reich’s way: I felt for the first time what felt like a stiff suit of leather armor just below the surface of my skin, beneath which energies that felt incredibly sweet were struggling to flow.

    Looking back on that moment later, during my lefty days, I realized it was a moment when I parted company with Western civilization…any culture that put it’s members in a state where they moved through their daily lives without feeling those energies, I wanted no part of.

    Still later, I realized matters were a bit more complicated! But even now, despite my love for many creations of my race, I can’t join in what to me seems a mystification of whiteness by many in the white movement. I’m in this movement because I’m white and what is being done to me and my race infuriates me.

    I feel a bit embarrassed and exposed by the personal nature of what I’ve added to the discussion, but I don’t like to see what seem to me important parts of a story left untold.

    The other interests of Reich, his orgone box and cloudbuster, etc., I never had any interest in, and Janov I think is very much of a hustler, but both men for all their faults, and their being part of a movement that’s been destructive to us, have also touched on levels of how we experience being alive or could experience being alive that IMO should be methodically investigated and utilized.

    As to the general question of sex, a phrase of Reich stuck in my mind, “the sexual agony of adolescents.” Having been an adolescent male in the 1950s, I and millions of other American adolescent boys of that period can identify with that phrase. There has to be some better solution than chastity before marriage for males (I won’t try to speak for women) in a society where marriage typically doesn’t occur until a decade or so after puberty, merciful God!

    A very pleasant little book that’s very readable for learning what Reich’s therapy is about, and seeing it working at its best, is Orson Bean’s “Me and the Orgone.”

  294. June 10, 2012 - 1:27 am | Permalink

    “Jewish Porn star Richard Pacheco, who had wanted to become a rabbi at one stage…”

    That says it all. So does this…

    “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks.” – Al Goldstein, publisher of Screw magazine

  295. jack's Gravatar jack
    June 10, 2012 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    According to psychoanalysts the underline cause behind Anders Breiviks action in Norway is that he couldn’t get laid.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VNOuWt5vUc

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNzqAnWmqxA

    @Russian Correspondent

    Whether he is Jewish or not is irrelevant what is a fact is that he is part of the British establishment alongside that other toad Gorbachev who is his partner that was a KGB agent in London prior to the collapse of the USSR and like the other Oligarchs has direct Rothschild connections.

    “Lebedev’s bank was raided in 2010 by armed police in masks and he has complained in interviews with Reuters of being under attack by corrupt officials in the law enforcement agencies.

    Lebedev, who served in Russian foreign intelligence under diplomatic cover in London, made billions trading stocks and bonds after the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union.”

    http://www.thestaronline.com/news/story.asp?file=/2012/2/18/worldupdates/2012-02-17T133609Z_1_TRE81G0TW_RTROPTT_0_UK-RUSSIA-BANK-LEBEDEV&sec=Worldupdates

    “Besides Novaya Gazeta, Lebedev owns two British dailies, The Independent and the Evening Standard. He and his son run the Raisa Gorbachov Foundation, named after the wife of Mikhail Gorbachov who died of leukemia in 1999. According to Russian sources, Lebedev’s British ties date from his work in London as a young KGB officer in the 1980s, his friendship with members of the Rothschild family having subsequently facilitated the amassment of seed money for his acquisition of the NRB in 1995.”

    http://larouchepac.com/node/16591

  296. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    June 10, 2012 - 12:07 am | Permalink

    The infrastructure and mechanisms being setup to control pornography on the Internet coul easily be turned into mechanism for political contro with pro Whie activists likely to be a target. The canard of “fighting child pornography” is a particularly potent one. Pedophile pornographers in fact use file sharing arrangements. Nevertheless in Austrialia a fight along these lines is proceeding and should the current labor government rewin the next election it may succed.

  297. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    June 9, 2012 - 11:41 pm | Permalink

    Lasha, if a picture is worth a thousand words, then you hit the mega-millions with that photo of Jacobson. He looks like a caricature straight out of the pages of der Stürmer!

  298. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    June 9, 2012 - 11:36 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    I would argue that homosexuals, males in particular, have formidable organisational and social skills and often spare time If harnessed in a pro-White manner it would be potent and we have seen such in Holland under Pym Furtuyn. Cultural Marxism Works at attacking the paradoxes and ambiguities of a society and coopting homosexuals has been one of their triumphs. It need not have been this way I feel.

  299. Sean's Gravatar Sean
    June 9, 2012 - 11:18 pm | Permalink

    The Romans were hardly all about sexual permissiveness.

    Tacitus, for example, admired the sexual restraint of the Germanic tribes, implicitly comparing it to the elite of his own society.

    http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/tacitus1.html

    Marriage Laws. Their marriage code, however, is strict, and indeed no part of their manners is more praiseworthy. Almost alone among barbarians they are content with one wife, except a very few among them, and these not from sensuality, but because their noble birth procures for them many offers of alliance. The wife does not bring a dower to the husband, but the husband to the wife. The parents and relatives are present, and pass judgment on the marriage-gifts, gifts not meant to suit a woman’s taste, nor such as a bride would deck herself with, but oxen, a caparisoned steed, a shield, a lance, and a sword. With these presents the wife is espoused, and she herself in her turn brings her husband a gift of arms. This they count their strongest bond of union, these their sacred mysteries, these their gods of marriage. Lest the woman should think herself to stand apart from aspirations after noble deeds and from the perils of war, she is reminded by the ceremony which inaugurates marriage that she is her husband’s partner in toil and danger, destined to suffer and to dare with him alike both in in war. The yoked oxen, the harnessed steed, the gift of arms proclaim this fact. She must live and die with the feeling that she is receiving what she must hand down to her children neither tarnished nor depreciated, what future daughters-in-law may receive, and may be so passed on to her grandchildren.

    Thus with their virtue protected they live uncorrupted by the allurements of public shows or the stimulant of feastings. Clandestine correspondence is equally unknown to men and women. Very rare for so numerous a population is adultery, the punishment for which is prompt, and in the husband’s power. Having cut off the hair of the adulteress and stripped her naked, he expels her from the house in the presence of her kinsfolk, and then flogs her through the whole village. The loss of chastity meets with no indulgence; neither beauty, youth, nor wealth will procure the culprit a husband. No one in Germany laughs at vice, nor do they call it the fashion to corrupt and to be corrupted. Still better is the condition of those states in which only maidens are given in marriage, and where the hopes and expectations of a bride are then finally terminated. They receive one husband, as having one body and one life, that they may have no thoughts beyond, no further-reaching desires, that they may love not so much the husband as the married state. To limit the number of children or to destroy any of their subsequent offspring is accounted infamous, and good habits are here more effectual than good laws elsewhere.

  300. JB's Gravatar JB
    June 9, 2012 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

    Could the global and reoccurring phenomena of anti-Semitism be the result of Jews having an unusually large number of high functioning sociopaths in their ranks? Here are the top 10 signs for spotting a Jew sociopath. ;)

    ———————————

    10 signs for spotting a sociopath

    #1) Sociopaths are charming. Sociopaths have high charisma and tend to attract a following just because people want to be around them. They have a “glow” about them that attracts people who typically seek guidance or direction. They often appear to be sexy or have a strong sexual attraction. Not all sexy people are sociopaths, obviously, but watch out for over-the-top sexual appetites and weird fetishes.

    #2) Sociopaths are more spontaneous and intense than other people. They tend to do bizarre, sometimes erratic things that most regular people wouldn’t do. They are unbound by normal social contracts. Their behavior often seems irrational or extremely risky.

    #3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse. Their brains simply lack the circuitry to process such emotions. This allows them to betray people, threaten people or harm people without giving it a second thought. They pursue any action that serves their own self interest even if it seriously harms others.

    #4) Sociopaths invent outrageous lies about their experiences. They wildly exaggerate things to the point of absurdity, but when they describe it to you in a storytelling format, for some reason it sounds believable at the time.

    #5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and “win” at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

    #6) Sociopaths tend to be highly intelligent, but they use their brainpower to deceive others rather than empower them. Their high IQs often makes them dangerous. This is why many of the best-known serial killers who successfully evaded law enforcement were sociopaths.

    #7) Sociopaths are incapable of love and are entirely self-serving. They may feign love or compassion in order to get what they want, but they don’t actually FEEL love in the way that you or I do.

    #8) Sociopaths speak poetically. They are master wordsmiths, able to deliver a running “stream of consciousness” monologue that is both intriguing and hypnotic. They are expert storytellers and even poets. As a great example of this in action, watch this interview of Charles Manson:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIfGj_55FHI

    #9) Sociopaths never apologize. They are never wrong. They never feel guilt. They can never apologize. Even if shown proof that they were wrong, they will refuse to apologize and instead go on the attack.

    #10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it! Charles Manson, the sociopathic murderer, is famous for saying, “I’ve never killed anyone! I don’t need to kill anyone! I THINK it! I have it HERE! (Pointing to his temple.) I don’t need to live in this physical realm…”

    http://www.naturalnews.com/036112_sociopaths_cults_influence.html#ixzz1xGb76sD1

    Wikipedia lists parasitic lifestyle as one of the characteristics of psychopathy. Interesting.

    Also from Wikipedia:

    Studies have suggested a connection between a variant of the Monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) gene (dubbed the ‘warrior gene’) and psychopathy.[64][65] In the variant, the allele associated with behavioural traits consists of 30 bases, and produces comparatively less MAO-A enzyme.[66] Low MAO-A activity was found to result in a significantly increased risk of aggression and antisocial behaviour.[67][68][65] The variant was found to vary widely in demographic prevalence among different ethnic groups, with around 80% of Chinese, 60% of Maori, and 60% of Africans carrying the MOA-A genetic variant, compared to 30% of Caucasians, suggesting that the former ethnic groups were more genetically predisposed by the MAO-A gene towards aggression or antisocial tendencies compared to other ethnic groups studied. [69][70][71] However, that does not necessarily imply actual higher overall aggression or antisocial behaviour among such ethnic groups.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#Non-western_cultures

    The Chinese have an even higher frequency of the warrior/psychopath gene than Africans? God help us!

  301. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 9, 2012 - 10:59 pm | Permalink

    During the days of the Warsaw ghetto (read: WWII) internal Judaic-comprised polizei force turned the business of meeting the deportation quota into, well, business.
    Cash, precious metals and/or stones, attractive (by Khazarian standards) Jewesses were all accepted as a form of payment to allow – if only for a short while – those families who could afford it avoid getting a one way ticket to Auschwitz.
    Is it any wonder, then, that a tribe capable of producing members of such “high” moral fiber and value scale would come to be prominent in white slavery; sexual ‘entertainment'; pornography production and/or distribution for the past 200 years ?

  302. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 9, 2012 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

    @Jett Rucker: And now I’m writing to myself. Apologies folks, graveyard shift 3 nights a week sometimes doesn’t do much for mental acuity.

  303. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 9, 2012 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: I’m sorry, I noticed your first name presented as Jett, instead of Jeff.

  304. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 9, 2012 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

    @Jett Rucker: I think you nailed it on that aspect Jeff. It’s one of those thorny problems, democratic systems are constantly challenged with.

  305. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 9, 2012 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    My personal opinion as to what constitutes “porn” in its’ totality, is the same as that person who said, “I can’t say what it is but I know it when I see it”. However, I admit this is just a cop out. In my opinion, the human psyche, is so complex, that what two people, or a man and a woman do in private with each other, and where both are in complete agreement with each other, cannot be defined or even morally judged by an outsider. Does that make sense?

  306. June 9, 2012 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Governments that would criminalize the production of “pornographic” material will proceed from that province to the criminalization of any and all other material for which they can produce an argument that it is anti-social.

    Opposing pornography is one thing. Criminalizing it is something else.

  307. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    June 9, 2012 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

    “The only unnatural act is that which you cannot perform.”

    OK, so Ted Bundy wasn’t so bad, after all.

    Good to know.

  308. Robert Paul Mune's Gravatar Robert Paul Mune
    June 9, 2012 - 9:41 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:

    Well that’s a treat; to see the MC5 get a mention here!

    (didn’t spot the relevance but it made me smile anyway)

  309. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 9, 2012 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    @Ward Kendall:

    “f Jews wanted to undermine the WN movement, why not infiltrate it with the meme that homosexuals and homosexuality are “good” for its adherents. ”

    The only way Jews (or anyone) can undermine a WN movement is if they do what they do with nationalist groups in Europe and try to get them to put in kind words for Israel and right-wing Jews.

    “There is only one solution, and that comes from the departed spirit of Dr. Pierce as well: destroy all pro-homosexuals in the WN movement. Root them out. Eradicate them. Identify who they are and ostracize them. Do not permit them to speak at pro-white functions. Do not patronize their websites. Extinguish them by black-listing them.”

    This is an absolutely horrible idea. For one, homosexuals are shown to have higher-than-average IQs, so by discriminating against gay WNs we’d be sacrificing a lot of brainpower. Secondly, what on earth could a gay WN do to damage the WN cause? I just don’t see what the problem is. Thirdly, you can bet that there are a lot of gay WN’s out there; Nazi fetishism is big in the gay community, and by hating gays all we’re doing is dividing and weakening ourselves. Fourth, showing that we openly “accept” gays would make the mass media’s head spin, which is a good thing.

    Oh, and I hope you’re not a Tchaikovsky fan.

  310. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    June 9, 2012 - 9:22 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Jack Kerouacv renounced his depraved period, shortly before he died. The others? Thompson blew his head off, with family, including small children, in house. Burroughs wa a drug addict. The rest? We need to stop celebrating depravity, no matter how well written the filth is.

    That Howard Jacobson’s actual face is far more grotesque, depraved, and degenerate and EVIL than any Anti-Jewish cartoons, on any NS propoganda. YIKES!!!!

  311. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 9, 2012 - 8:10 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    On second thought, I’m not sure that I found the comment by “Der weiße Engel” (in my comment above) here on T.O.O.

    I just wanted to make that small correction.

  312. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 9, 2012 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

    @Scotsman:

    Hi Scotsman

    You wrote:

    The divorcing of sexuality and procreation has probably been the biggest negative for the European race over the last century. To support pornography and sexual promiscuity is to celebrate our own destruction, and thats before we get into the very Jewish nature of the pornography industry.

    A while back, I found a comment on T.O.O. that (I think) expands on what you are saying. It was written by a commenter named “Der weiße Engel”. I don’t know if I completely agree with what he writes, but hopefully it is worth sharing.

    Here it is:

    ================================

    It is important to notice that the great increase in homosexuality that we see nowadays, and also the increase in prestige for that form of behavior, is due in no small measure to the existence of scientific means of birth control. This development was a watershed event in evolutionary terms, decoupling sex from the natural, reproductive function it had served ever since life began on earth and making it into something that is now widely viewed as only a lifestyle statement. By their nature, scientific birth control technologies create a large pool of people of both sexes who don’t have children and who won’t have them, either by choice or simply because they are not able to conform to cultural norms. Such people have no stake in the future, and live only for themselves. The existence of this element acts like a corrosive acid on the structure of a society, eating away cultural bonds and decomposing it into individual atoms.

    Once the pleasures of sex have been in this way decoupled from reproduction, the inevitable result is equality – between the sexes, because now women can have sex with the same abandon that was previously only the birthright of men, and between heterosexual and homosexual, because heterosexual sex need not necessarily lead to reproductive consequences either. It all becomes just undifferentiated pleasure, a lifestyle choice. This has the effect of raising the prestige of homosexuality, which had heretofore been held in contempt since ancient times, to put it on a par with heterosexuality.

    Before the advent of such technologies, women had very little say in whether they were going to have children or not. The biological attractions of the reproductive act are such that virtually all fertile women ended up having them. But now, in what must certainly be a supremely dysgenic move, the genetic fate of the White race has been placed into the hands of the empty-headed, weak-willed, easily-brainwashed sex. As a result, the most intelligent White women often defer having children until it is too late. Even the White women who do have White children often end up choosing to have the children of the more feminine, brainwashed, politically-correct males available to them, because such males fit in better with our politically-correct culture and are therefore more likely to have stable social networks and employment. Some of them — too many of them, no doubt — have even aborted White children and chosen to have trendy [black babies] instead.

    All in all, it’s hard to overstate what a disaster scientific birth control techniques have been to the White race.

    ====================================

    That’s the end of his comment.

    I inserted the words “black babies” in brackets because the author used a derivative of the n-word.

  313. FIREBELLINTHENIGHT's Gravatar FIREBELLINTHENIGHT
    June 9, 2012 - 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Back again with a another blockbuster Lasha? Wow, this is a long one which is going to take a long time to read through. Nice to see you shaking the very foundations of Jewish power again. :)

  314. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 9, 2012 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

    @ Franklin Ryckaert

    Cough

    meant in jest

    Cough

  315. Gessler's Gravatar Gessler
    June 9, 2012 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Actually, Johann Hari isn’t Jewish either. A gay sleazy fraud, and Zionist puppet, but actually a Gentile.

    That Jacobson fella is as disgusting as he looks though

  316. Brock Ludlow's Gravatar Brock Ludlow
    June 9, 2012 - 6:22 pm | Permalink

    “True believer in a cause?” You need to read up about the guy. He was scum. The lowest of the low.

  317. turtle's Gravatar turtle
    June 9, 2012 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

    “The Five(?) Dancing(?) Israelis”… don’t doubt it won’t be obvious to many.

  318. kapoore's Gravatar kapoore
    June 9, 2012 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Great article! Fortunately the relationship between sexual revolution, perversion, and sexual exploitation is now being exposed–the more porn the more pedophiles, the more porn the more sexual criminals. When I was growing up children were safe. Parents could shoo the kids out the door and say, go play, and the children wouldn’t come home until dinner. Parents didn’t worry because there was no need to worry. Now society is filled with predatory creeps due to porn. I live in the capital of porn (San Fernando Valley) and so I definitely know who makes the porn, and porn producers are super rich , particularly those involved in internet porn. Every part of the business is loaded with money and criminal activity. But unlike with Kinsey who was a true believer in a cause, the porn producers (in my opinion) aren’t interested in porn. It’s just a business to them like any business. They could be producing pencils or writing tablets or whatever, but they produce porn because it’s more lucrative. Porn brings a lot of money into our little valley and you could say it kept our economy booming when other places were hard hit. But…. what kind of a society has America become when we rely on illegal drugs, porn, and the military industrial complex (wars) to survive economically?

  319. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 9, 2012 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:

    When translated from original Greek the word ‘pornography’ literally means ‘spent balls’.

    I don’t know which “original Greek” you are referring to, but according to my dictionary of ancient Greek pornos means “lewd, lascivious”, while “grafia” of course comes from grafein “to write”. So pornografia means so much as “lewd writing”.

  320. Scotsman's Gravatar Scotsman
    June 9, 2012 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Very good article, one minor mistake (the Jewishness of Lebedev fellow) notwithstanding. Darkmoon and MacDonald are the two biggest reasons I still follow this website.

    It also reminds me the confusing nature of the ‘AltRight’s sexual permissiveness. The divorcing of sexuality and procreation has probably been the biggest negative for the European race over the last century. To support pornography and sexual promiscuity is to celebrate our own destruction, and thats before we get into the very Jewish nature of the pornography industry.

  321. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 9, 2012 - 4:04 pm | Permalink

    When translated from original Greek the word ‘pornography’ literally means ‘spent balls’. Not to be confused with the so-called ‘blue balls’ whose pandemic has bedeviled Mohammedan lands since time beyond recall.
    Consequently sexual violence and every manner of perversion in such paradigms of family conducive environment as Saudi Arabia (alongside her various Wahhabi offshoots), have been off the charts.

    Sidebar: Lebedev is a retired SVR (Foreign Intelligence) colonel who’s never being accused of being a Joo, nor has he ever ‘fled’ Russia.
    Lebedev is, in fact, periodically called upon by the bureaucrats running Russian Central Bank on account of his vast experience in that sector.

  322. Russian Correspondent's Gravatar Russian Correspondent
    June 9, 2012 - 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Damn, a good beginning but after that BS I’ve stopped reading.

    “Mr Lebedev, a Russian oligarch, ran away from Russia with billions of rubles under his belt when Vladimir Putin came to power and decided to claw back some of the ill-gotten wealth that a small number of mega rich Jews had filched from the Russian treasury…”

    You see, this is all lies in this sentence. The guy never ran from Russia. And he is not Jewish as far as I know. Sorry about that but please do your homework and check FACTS.

  323. June 9, 2012 - 3:49 pm | Permalink

    I generally do not like discussing the issue of homosexuality (even though I reference this subject in my novel Hold Back This Day ) but find it necessary here to post an observation: lately, there’s been a concerted effort by certain websites to legitimize homosexuals and homosexuality as a newly-discovered “strength” for the WN movement. More jarring still, these same websites now proclaim that anti-homosexuality is “Jewish”(!).

    In other words, if you dare to condemn homosexuality or homosexuals, YOU are suddenly – my God! – pro-Jewish. Talk about Machiavellian tactics! Take a moment to think about it: if Jews wanted to undermine the WN movement, why not infiltrate it with the meme that homosexuals and homosexuality are “good” for its adherents. Furthermore, why not disarm all opposition to homosexuals and homosexuality by labeling those who oppose these twin perversities as “Jews” or “Jew lovers”?

    Then again, could the truth actually be the opposite – that those who continue to insert this meme into white nationalism actually be pro-Jewish themselves? A few years ago, the answer would have been an emphatic ‘yes’. Imagine these same people trying to convince Dr. William Pierce to accept this idea. What would he have said to them? I need not answer that, for all of you know – and it wouldn’t have been pretty.

    What’s to be done, then?

    There is only one solution, and that comes from the departed spirit of Dr. Pierce as well: destroy all pro-homosexuals in the WN movement. Root them out. Eradicate them. Identify who they are and ostracize them. Do not permit them to speak at pro-white functions. Do not patronize their websites. Extinguish them by black-listing them.

    If this sounds cruel, remember that the acceptance of homosexuality or homosexuals into the WN movement will give our enemies – Jew or otherwise – a strong foothold inside our camp. In addition, we should demand of our leaders to take a stance on this issue: is Kevin MacDonald against accepting pro-homosexual ideas into our movement? Is Tom Sunic? Is Alex Kurtagic?

    I certainly oppose the infiltration of homosexuality and homosexuals into the WN movement. Having them amongst us will only serve to undermine our morale and weaken our resolve. In the end, there simply is no positive justification for “homosexualizing” the WN movement.

    Hold Back This Day

    The Towers of Eden

  324. turtle's Gravatar turtle
    June 9, 2012 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

    This is a trick question. We should be more concerned about the “Five Dancing Israeli’s” Video about September 11 2001. The rest is mere distraction. Maybe that’s the point.

  325. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 9, 2012 - 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Also, yes, porn is filth; it’s much better to go out and actually have sex. A better term for porn, however, would be pig feed. That’s all the Jews make: pig feed. Their movies, their literature, their art, all of it is meant for pigs. The low-class, unthinking masses. That’s how they make money. That’s how they always to the top: low standards in everything.

  326. June 9, 2012 - 3:32 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:
    Re: “Aryan sexology”
    I suggest that if you want to look at and “sexology” in Europe after the mid-19th century, you would need to look at isolated rural areas, or to places like the Faroe and Orkney Islands, or Iceland. German “anti-Semitic” writers had, by 1850, already identified the corrupt influence of the Jews to the moral fibre
    and culture.

  327. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 9, 2012 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    1. It doesn’ matter who promoted them, what matters is that these writers were White, and every bit as degenerate as Jews are. Jack Kerouac is still widely read in schools today; can we say the same of Reich and Kinsey?

    2. It’s because blacks are low-IQ, high-testosterone people, and women are attracted to arrogant, dominant men. The media does their best to make sure that White males are feminized and non-White males are masculinized. White parents don’t do their jobs by informing their daughters that non-White males (Jews included) like to prey on White women.

    3. Your argument is that the Greeks and Romans disintegrated because they were over-sexed? There were a million more practical reasons why Rome decayed (poor emperors, political corruption, Christianity, increasing strength of the northern Europeans, etc.). As for the Greeks, I haven’t done much reading up on their disintegration, so I won’t comment on that.

    4. Agreed.

  328. June 9, 2012 - 3:21 pm | Permalink

    @fender:
    1. I suggest you look behind the people you named to see who promoted them, and why. The “few obscure scientists” are every bit as toxic.

    2. Is the completely disproportionate incidence of extremely violent black on white rape because blacks are “over-sexed”, or, has the behaviour been introduced through “obscure” social scientists promoting white guilt?

    3. Our Greek ancestors, particularly the Trojans practised a form of eugenics. Both the Greek and Roman societies began to disintegrate when decadence and sexual perversion set in.

    4. Japan has become infinitely more sexually screwed-up since the “Allies” – meaning the Jewish owned governments of the US, UK, Canada, Australia, etc – decided to “Westernize” post WWII Japan.

  329. Bohemianh's Gravatar Bohemianh
    June 9, 2012 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

    The jewish filth travels where ever they room. The reach once once battled by the Roman Catholic Church but in recent years has had it’s own issues. It is the failure of all that support this industry. Supply and Demand, the sexual practices of many are abhorrent to me personally.

  330. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 9, 2012 - 2:44 pm | Permalink

    I just finished reading this article and probably have many thoughts.

    If others want to skip my comments, I won’t be offended.

    Thanks to Dr. Lash Darkmoon for writing about this very important issue. I don’t think its importance can be overstated.

    I don’t know if I totally agree with every thing she writes, or the apparent tone of certain parts, but I’m very (very) grateful for what she has done here. It looks like she put a lot of time, energy, and love into this article. Thanks again.

    I was a teenager in the late 90’s and early 00’s, growing up in a middle class environment during the age of internet pornography.

    I can confirm that a large percentage of my classmates and friends looked at porngraphy and masturbated. There was little if any shame in admitting this.

    I remember watching re-run episodes of the tv show Seinfeld, and there was one particular episode that was about masturbation. The four main cast members had a contest to see who could go the longest without masturbating. The basic message was that everyone masturbates, and that it is virtually impossible to not masturbate.

    Also, it suggested that people who don’t masturbate are unable to sleep and extremely irritable and yell at at their friends.

    Pornography and masturbation weaken individuals and society in different ways, on different levels. I think the effects are all around us, woven into everything.

    I’m so much better with a chaste mind. I have more mental energy and passion and creativity and love inside me now.
    So there is hope for anyone reading this.

    I believe semen and sex are sacred, for procreation. I know that some probably disagree with me on that point.

    I believe it is good for a man (or male of any age) to keep his life force and creative energy inside. It can be good to see females as mothers and sisters and daughters.

    @rhondda:

    Rhondda, you wrote:

    However, conflating masturbation with serial killers is an out right lie. Part of the Christian fear of the body.

    I agree that most people who masturbate do not become serial killers. But I don’t think Dr. Lasha Darkmoon suggested that.

    Regarding how Christians see and relate to their body, I think the words “respect” and “honor” are more appropriate than the word “fear”.

    Have a good weekend, everyone.

  331. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 9, 2012 - 2:30 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:
    Fortunately I recently listened to a program by Carolyn Yeager on her new website the White Network, called “The Homosexual Menace”, which deals especially with your ideas, so I understand where you are coming from with this comment of yours.

    With due respect for homosexuals and knowing very well that a certain percentage of humanity always will be homosexual and that some great men of history have been homosexuals, I still believe that your idea that homosexuals should form a kind of cultural vanguard in the new to be created White nationalist culture, is not healthy. Normal people are heterosexual and fortunately they are the majority. Creative homosexuals can contribute to society but their deviant sexuality should never be upheld as an example to the majority.

    Nor do I share your belief that a homosexual Männerbund has always been at the core of Aryan culture and that a Jewish sexual morale (“Jew vomit”) has oppressed this source of creativity. There is no other proof that such a Männerbund was a kind of “homoclub”, besides your own wishful projection.

    I would advise to people like you : be creative but don’t show off your homosexuality. That can never be a model for us, who are – with or without Jewish morals – the normal majority.

  332. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    June 9, 2012 - 1:33 pm | Permalink

    That was fascinating. By the time I left school in the 60’s the world I was promised had gone and I could never really understand what had happened. Everything today is a lie. On Yahoo this morning Cher was introducing her daughter as her son and “Dr” Kinsey claimed that The only unnatural act is that which you cannot perform when any farm labourer or anyone with eyes knows what is natural and what is not. Dr Lasha’s article certainly shed some light on how my world changed (If only I was born five years earlier or even five years later).
    As for some earlier comment on the American former elite, the WASPs, didn’t Yockey state that the American High Culture developing along the Hudson River collapsed during your war between the states and that America never recovered?

  333. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 9, 2012 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

    A self-confessed plagiarist, Hari received the Orwell Prize fraudulently in 2008 with the full backing of his newspaper editor who vouched for his veracity.

    and

    On 25 March 2010, Lebedev bought the Independent for a nominal fee of £1.

    Therefore, Lebedev had nothing to do with “The Independent” promoting Johann Hari, isn’t it?

    And, yes, seems that Lebedev is not jewish.

  334. rhondda's Gravatar rhondda
    June 9, 2012 - 12:52 pm | Permalink

    @me: Licentiousness is not liberty is true. However, conflating masturbation with serial killers is an out right lie. Part of the Christian fear of the body.

  335. C. C. J.'s Gravatar C. C. J.
    June 9, 2012 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Alexander Lebedev, owner of the independent, isn’t a Jew. And he hasn’t fled Russia either.

  336. me's Gravatar me
    June 9, 2012 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Licentiousness is not liberty. Great article. So glad to see Miss Darkmoon writing again!

  337. rhondda's Gravatar rhondda
    June 9, 2012 - 12:23 pm | Permalink

    I had a distinct feeling of deja vu reading this. Oh I remember. The radical feminist Sheila Jeffreys in her 1990 book ‘Anticlimax,’
    She pretty much says the same thing, only her solution was that women should become lesbians and all men were perverts.
    I didn’t buy her propaganda and not buying this either.
    Relationships are not just sexual.

  338. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 9, 2012 - 11:35 am | Permalink

    @Ted Riordan:

    I didn’t realize LA was the only city in America. My mistake.

  339. Kevin W. Cornell's Gravatar Kevin W. Cornell
    June 9, 2012 - 11:08 am | Permalink

    Very interesting article. I’m personally leaning towards the view that “sexual deviancy,” as it’s called, is in general poisonous to a strong, vital and free society. However I think the other extreme – puritanical dogmatism – is perhaps equally unhealthy (or almost so) and that it represents an overreaction that we would be wise to caution against after condemning sexual hedonism. Let’s remember that the ancient Greeks and Romans that we admire so much were no prudes. I think that in an ideal society sexual behavior would promote stability, harmony, fecundity and joy, and that these things are what we should always have our eye out for when discussing these matters.

  340. Sanjay's Gravatar Sanjay
    June 9, 2012 - 10:50 am | Permalink

    One of the rare Jews who is not anti-White, Judith Reisman, fought tirelessly against porn and cultural marxism.

    Very rare indeed. But one thing is sure.

    Porn did more than anything else to pacify and weaken the American society, and to take away its edge.

    Edge, energy, vitality only comes from abstinence and fruitful marriage.

  341. Ted Riordan's Gravatar Ted Riordan
    June 9, 2012 - 10:42 am | Permalink

    Uh, the jocks don’t get the women here in Los Angeles; the Jews do. The Jews have the money and run the show. What planet are you from?

  342. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 9, 2012 - 10:34 am | Permalink

    I find some of this hard to swallow (heh, sorry).

    1. You’re ignoring certain hugely popular White writers like Jack Kerouac, Hunter S. Thompson, Chuck Palahniuk, Brett Easton Ellis, and William Boroughs that had/have a bigger effect on culture at large than a few obscure scientists, most of whom were probably never read nor followed by anyone (Freud excepted).

    2. Ted Bundy was a highly manipulative sociopath. His blaming his behavior on pornography was most likely another ruse by him. Bundy liked to screw with people’s heads and he loved the spotlight. In his interviews he spoke of an “entity” that would consume him and drive him to commit those horrible acts. That sounds much more plausible (and honest) to me than the idea that “the porn made me do it,” which seems a bit far-fetched. I don’t doubt that the porn influenced his sexual behavior, but there’s a pretty big line between being over-sexed and murdering someone.

    3. Sorry to say it, but people are sexual creatures. Not that I condone the outright weird stuff that Kinsey and Reich did, but I do think that suppressing sexuality is unhealthy and unnatural. You can be sure our Roman and Greek ancestors had little or no sexual stigmas. Read Plato’s symposium, or do a search on Roman orgies; that’s how the upper class amused itself back then (and probably today as well– you just never read about it).

    3. White sexuality vs. Jewish sexuality. I honestly don’t think there’s much of a difference. In school it was always the White jocks who got the most girls, not the Jewish nerds and outcasts. Many of the Jews I knew, and was friends with, couldn’t get laid to save their lives. That some Jewish pseudo-scientists and writers have exploited sexuality to further their careers is really no different from the tribe exploiting (and abusing) science, economics, philosophy, etc. They have a massive inferiority complex, and they over-compensate by coming up with grandiose theories of human behavior. Sexuality is only a small part of that.

    4. If you think the Jews are screwed-up sexually, I’ve got one word for you: Japan.

  343. June 9, 2012 - 10:33 am | Permalink
  344. June 9, 2012 - 10:31 am | Permalink

    Some good ideas here, but ironic that the author, and her probable enthusiastic audience, don’t realize that the real Jewish takeover, so nicely described as the:

    “fact that America’s former elite, the WASPs, had already capitulated to the rising Jewish elite. They had been debased and corrupted themselves by the polluted mental atmosphere in which they lived”

    first occurred some 18 centuries ago in Rome, and periodically since, until even Iceland and Rus’ succumbed to the Jew Plague. Criticizing Jew-sexology by means of Jew-morality [anti-sex, anti-homo, etc.] may give you a warm feeling [like the Jew, you love to Hate, don't you?] but does nothing for the White race. It literally get us nowhere, returning us ever again to the same Jew vomit.

    Try reading some real Aryan sexology, such as Hans Bluher [who distinguished the Aryan Mannerbund State from the Semitic "family values" society of parasites] or Alain Danielou [the man Rene Guenon humbly submitted his manuscripts to for correction, but who thought the Kama Sutra was more orthodox].

    As Andrew Hamilton wrote in a much more useful piece [indeed, other than the general similarity of topic, the two are incommensurable, as Hamilton’s is useful and Darkmoon’s just part of the problem:

    “It is by no means obvious that whites are capable of directing their collective destiny anymore. They have been dependent on Jews for guidance, direction, and “moral” instruction for so long that they seem addicted to it. They have forgotten what it means to rule. This is as true of conservatives and most white nationalists as it is of other whites.”

    Away with these truly sexually perverse “lover’s quarrels” between the Jones and the Kinseys, the Darkmoons and the Reichs, over who is most subservient to the Jew God.

    FOR Athens!
    AGAINST Kansas City!

    “You must choose, brothers and sisters, you must choose!”
    — Rev. J. C. Crawford, opening proclamation, “Kick out the Jams, Motherfuckers” by the MC5

9 Trackbacks to "Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance"

  1. on June 15, 2012 at 12:28 pm
  2. on June 12, 2012 at 1:43 am
  3. on June 11, 2012 at 4:59 am
  4. on June 10, 2012 at 2:52 pm
  5. on June 10, 2012 at 1:39 pm
  6. on June 9, 2012 at 10:19 pm
  7. on June 9, 2012 at 9:57 pm
  8. on June 9, 2012 at 6:44 pm
  9. on June 9, 2012 at 3:13 pm

Comments are closed.