Liberal Bias in Academia: The role of Jewish academics in the creation and maintenance of academic liberalism

Kevin MacDonald


A study to be published in September in Current Directions in Psychological Science, prominent peer-reviewed academic journal, goes beyond the well-known fact that the vast majority of social psychologists are on the left (“Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement“).

Psychologists Yoel Inbar and Joris Lammers, based at Tilburg University in the Netherlands, surveyed a roughly representative sample of academics and scholars in social psychology and found that “In decisions ranging from paper reviews to hiring, many social and personality psychologists admit that they would discriminate against openly conservative colleagues.” …

More than a third of the respondents said they would discriminate against the conservative candidate. One respondent wrote in that if department members “could figure out who was a conservative, they would be sure not to hire them.” …

Generally speaking, the more liberal the respondent, the more willingness to discriminate and, paradoxically, the higher the assumption that conservatives do not face a hostile climate in the academy. …

A 2007 report by sociologists Neil Gross and Solon Simmons found that 80 percent of psychology professors at elite and non-elite universities are Democrats. Other studies reveal that 5 percent to 7 percent of faculty openly identify as Republicans. By contrast, about 20 percent of the general population are liberal and 40 percent are conservative. …

[While much larger percentages of faculty are economic conservatives,] the widest divide occurs on social issues, the contested terrain in the culture wars shaking the academy. On these contentious issues, 90 percent identified as liberal and only 4 percent as conservative.

Of course, social psychologists by definition perform research on social issues—precisely the areas where they are overwhelmingly liberal. Don’t expect any race realist research on criminality or ethnic differences in aggressiveness to come out of mainstream social psychology.

Advertisement

The authors originally questioned Jonathan Haidt’s finding that such a large percentage of social psychologists were liberal, but in the end they extended Haidt’s findings (see here and here). Haidt emphasizes that social psychology has become a tribal moral community in which those who publicly eschew liberal attitudes are seen as morally defective and therefore appropriate targets of shunning. As a result and as noted by Inbar and Lammers, because they are necessarily a silent minority, the very small numbers of conservative social psychologists cannot possibly act as a check on the liberal attitudes of their colleagues.

I have an article arguing that the liberal bent of the social sciences is the result of displacement of previously dominant WASP elite by Jews with a decidedly left of center perspective (Why are Professors Liberals? — A Corroboration of The Culture of Critique. The Occidental Quarterly, 10(2), Summer 2010). The article is essentially a commentary on a paper by two academic sociologists, Neil Gross and Ethan Fosse. It emphasizes Jewish issues and my own experience as a heretic from the liberal attitudes that are mainstream among academics. The main points are:

  • Because of the prestige of science in general, the social sciences are a critical force in shaping how we view ourselves. Social psychology, which deals with issues like discrimination and attitudes between races, is right at the center of forming elite opinion on critical issues related to race, ethnicity, immigration, etc.
  • Because leftist world views are entrenched in academia, liberals self-select to become professors, while conservatives come to realize that they will have to hide their opinions to remain a viable academic. IQ is not important.
  • Universities were relatively liberal even before the 1930s, but there was a pronounced shift to the left with the ascendancy of Jewish academics. This was particularly pronounced in the 1960s, although, e.g., Boasian anthropology, prepared the way by dominating anthropology by the 1920s.
  • The academic world is hierarchical, with top-down influence. Elite institutions are able to dominate the image of ideal professors (political liberalism is a criterion of being ideal), and they are able to police the academic world to ensure that non-liberal attitudes are excluded or at least marginalized. The work of Inbar and Lammers on discrimination by liberals clearly supports the latter proposition. As a result, elite academics are of particular concern to the liberal establishment. Hence the outrage over figures like E. O. Wilson, John Mearsheimer and Stephan Walt, and John Watson).
  • Jews are strongly overrepresented among academics, especially in the social sciences and especially at elite institutions. As a result they have wielded disproportionate power in creating the image of ideal academic attitudes and behavior.
  • The attitudes of Jewish academics are well to the left of Americans in general but are entirely in line with the mainstream Jewish community. As Inbar and Lammers note, around 40% of Americans label themselves conservative compared to well under 10% of academics. In the 2008 election, 80% of Jews voted for Obama, compared to around 40% of European-Americans. The Jewish identification with the left originated in the early 19th century and has remained consistent in the Western diaspora. At least through the formative decade of the 1960s, political radicalism was entirely mainstream within the Jewish community and had a strong effect on the intellectual climate of elite college campuses at that time (see here). The Jewish community, including professors, continues to be well left of White Americans on social issues.
  • The role of Jews in changing academic culture is consistent with other scholars. For example, intellectual historian David Hollinger

    calls attention to “a secular, increasingly Jewish, decidedly left-of-center intelligentsia based largely but not exclusively in the disciplinary communities of philosophy and the social sciences.” He notes “the transformation of the ethnoreligious demography of American academic life by Jews” (p. 4) in the period from the 1930s to the 1960s, as well as the Jewish influence on trends toward the secularization of American society and in advancing an ideal of cosmopolitanism.

  • Gross and Fosse subscribe to a conflict theory of cultural change (as do I; see Evolution, Psychology, and a Conflict Theory of Culture. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(2). 208–233 (2009)); They provide three characteristics of successful intellectual movements: (1) Those involved in the movement have a complaint. (2) They are able to form cohesive, effective networks; (3) They have access to the most prestigious academic institutions.
  • The body of the paper then shows that all of these themes are prominent in The Culture of Critique . Jews indeed had complaints (the long history of anti-Jewish attitudes and a sense of exclusion in homogeneously White, Christian America). They were able to form cohesive, effective networks, typically by citing and promoting each other. Reflecting the importance of elite institutions for successful intellectual movements, Jews had access to the most prestigious academic institutions.
  • Finally, the paper points to a parallel development in the academic world and beyond where Jews have made alliances with non-Whites and with Whites who also have complaints against the system (homosexuals, radical feminists). In the wider world, the Jewish alliance with non-Whites has meant that Jewish organizations were the predominant force in creating a White minority America and their involvement in promoting Blacks and other minorities. In the  academic world, the rise of the new Jewish elite was quickly followed by the establishment of departments and scholarly disciplines focused on minority and sexual grievance (e.g.., Black Studies; queer studies). Collectively, these departments now wield a great deal of power within universities; they are reliable proponents of the leftist, multicultural world view. 
  • The ability of the left to discriminate in hiring and promotion means that there is a very great inertia in the system.

A further point that is not in my paper is that the academic world is international. Because of the vastly greater numbers of researchers and resources committed to research, American social science has had a leadership role throughout the world. Open any textbook in the social sciences, whether in America or elsewhere in the West, and you will find that the great majority of the research cited is by American professors, with British professors a distant second.

Attitudes at elite academic institutions in the U.S. therefore become the ideal for the social sciences throughout the West. Liberal academics from other countries are welcomed in academic societies. But if, for example, a Norwegian academic society began to promote research and teaching with strong overtones of ethnonationalism, it would be expelled from international academic societies and excluded from having a presence at academic societies in the U.S. The hierarchical structure and international scope of academic societies make them particularly valuable resources in  ethnic competition. Jews understood this and have made the most of it.

The result is that the university as a very prestigious, elite institution has become a central manifestation of the hostile elite that is now dominant in the U.S. and throughout the West. 

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

149 Comments to "Liberal Bias in Academia: The role of Jewish academics in the creation and maintenance of academic liberalism"

  1. Elie's Gravatar Elie
    September 5, 2012 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    @StuckInBetween:

    It’s really difficult. You might even meet people who are aware of some of the same things as you, but talking about it is difficult.

    I never even bring up such subjects even with my close friends, many of whom are apolitical anyway.

  2. StuckInBetween's Gravatar StuckInBetween
    September 5, 2012 - 8:40 am | Permalink

    @Elie:

    Yes, Elie, I’m in a similar position with my beliefs too. The couple friends that I do have are accusing me of being racist and fringe, as you have said. I like this place because the people who post here for the most part sound intelligent and articulate. I have a friend that claims he is Jewish but is from a Dutch background. He used to always harp about the Jews this and the Jews that, and now that I have not been around he has gone into complete Stockholm Syndrome mode and is a Jew boot licker and calls me ignorant when I talk about Jewish control of the media, banks, and court systems. He says that usury is required for an economy to work (he’s an expert in economics I guess). I know I have to connect with Whites, but with me being “fringe” and non-mainstream it’s hard to find White people who “get it”. I wish I could find more people like you.

  3. Elie's Gravatar Elie
    August 30, 2012 - 5:01 pm | Permalink

    @StuckInBetween:

    Yes. Your feelings of weakness and uprootedness are EXACTLY why cultural pluralism is an evil philosophy.

    The only way you can fight it is by picking your identity.

    You are ethnically “white.”

    “white” is an ethnicity that was formed by European settlers in America, Canada, Australia, and the various other settlements.

    “White” means that you have European ancestors, but you are no longer rooted within a particular European ethnic group.

    You should not feel bad about who you are because HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of people have the same identity: Mixed European ancestry, maybe with even a hint of something else.

    “Whites” have been explorers, inventors, pioneers, and many other things.

    Just about every single “white” person in America has mixed ancestry.

    The battle is to preserve “whiteness” as an ethnic group, as the cultural Marxists have declared their intent to destroy it.

    The greatest threat to us, however, is when we started to consider Jews ethnically “white.” They began to sabotage our identity.

    But, as I’ve said, there are hundreds of millions of diaspora whites, many with mixed ancestry, who are under assault for trying to be their own ethnic group.

    And you are part of the ethnic group “white.” You should feel at home. And you should have no problem identifying with all the whites from America, Canada, Australia, etc, who are under assault.

    Don’t worry. There is no way “whiteness” is just going to disappear.

    These events are only recent. There is likely to emerge some kind of ethnic allegiance among whites.

    But it is extremely hard in this phase.

    I am in the same position as you: The older generation of whites are utterly clueless, and the younger generation of whites are faced with the choices of either kissing up to the multicultural cult that runs the colleges and universities or being a racist, fringe, lunatic.

    Don’t worry. I’m a 20 year old college student. When I went away to my school, non-Jewish whites were about 30 percent of the population, and I made NO non-minority friends.

    But I am still one of those lunatics that the multiculturalists would cringe at.

    And people like Kevin MacDonald, Richard Spencer, and the other “lunatics” on the explicitly-white conservative side have me confident that an explicitly white diaspora identity is going to emerge.

    I’m from New Jersey where the major colleges are run by the same Berkeley cult in California. And I know why Dr. MacDonald felt the same way I felt being around them.

    Don’t worry. If blacks can survive as an ethnic group, I think we whites will too.

  4. StuckInBetween's Gravatar StuckInBetween
    August 29, 2012 - 4:13 pm | Permalink

    @Elie: @Richard:

    Both your comments have been acknowledged. You see sometimes I get really sad and I reflect on my life and then I wonder with all the debauchery I’ve seen that I wonder if its worth to go on. Mind you I haven’t lived that long and I’m in my mid twenties.

    Lately I am feeling a bit better and as you say Richard, I wonder if all this can be fixed. I try to talk to my friend about these issues and getting him to even acknowledge the issues is even hard for him. He says that mass immigration of third world immigrants is good for Canada’s competitiveness. I don’t have to tell you guys that’s bologna. What do we do? Send all these non-white folk back in a boat? It’s not just the immigrants that are a part of the problem.

    And I also wonder if I am technically your brethren, even though I do support the White Nationalist cause. I am of European descent and Asia-Minor (Turkey). Just the differences in culture has screwed family with the fragmented alliances and the struggle for personal identity. My mother’s Germanic side has abandoned our family because of our differences. I can’t call them racists because I understand we are different. We have the right to difference. There is no tribal allegiance in pluralist Canada.

  5. Elie's Gravatar Elie
    August 23, 2012 - 4:56 am | Permalink

    @StuckInBetween:

    “… if in two years I haven’t really achieved anything, or the world doesn’t change I think I will take an early exit off this planet. What to do guys, what to do?”

    Are you serious?

    Talking like that is basically surrendering to the enemy. Your enemy is a psychological enemy that has evolved to become so powerful by being in worse situations than you are.

    This tribe of Abraham was oppressed by practically every single European nation since the time of the Romans.

    And here you are, because you can’t put up with the psychological pressure, you’re going to talk like that?

    You clearly don’t have an appreciation for who you are, what your people have done, and what you are capable of.

    Why don’t you discover some pride, find out who you are, and get spiritual support from some of your brethren, rather than just lying down on the battle field and saying “I can’t take it anymore.”

    Strong, worthy, esteemed people are driven by the will to live: the will to power.

    If you truly wanted to feel better about yourself, you would search your soul for that will to power. Then the psychological pressure from the ancient tribe of Israel would only give you more fuel for the fire in your soul that is your will to be.

  6. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 19, 2012 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    “I’m a big believer in getting plenty of sunshine. I think it is good for the body and the mind…”

    I want to correct something.

    I really do believe that getting plenty of direct sunlight on the body / face is not only good, it’s great. Truly great.

    And I think it is essential for good physical and mental health.

    Whenever I’m in the direct sunlight, with my eyes closed… I’m not sure how to describe it. I feel better instantly. My thoughts are clearer.

  7. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 19, 2012 - 10:44 pm | Permalink

    @StuckInBetween:

    Great comment.

    I think I understand a lot of what you’re saying.

    Regarding the very last part of what you wrote:

    “Don’t have good job prospects, and if in two years I haven’t really achieved anything, or the world doesn’t change I think I will take an early exit off this planet. What to do guys, what to do?”

    I don’t think killing yourself is the answer. But I can understand that sense of hopelessness. Sometimes it feels like the flow / current / gravity of whatever is happening in the world is too strong to ever be corrected.

    On different levels and in different ways, it can seem inhumane and brutal and unbearable.

    I sometimes wonder if some of the damage is irreversible.

    And maybe it is.

    But there is so much we don’t know. Maybe we have access to just a relatively tiny amount of reality or truth.

    (Back to the bad stuff.)

    The cultural stuff you mentioned is bad enough.

    But on top of that I have concerns such as:

    Environmental issues; Genetically modified food; Possible overpopulation;

    Like you said, there does seem to be some Satanic or evil force in this world, and it appears to be winning.

    What’s my point?

    I’m probably not in a position to preach. But I’ll offer advice in case you or anyone else is interested.

    Try not to focus on the results. It’s good to have an aim for yourself and even for the culture, but if you or I get too obsessed with a obtaining a certain outcome in life… that’s probably not going to help.

    Put another way, do your best and let God do the rest.

    There is so much good you can do. Really.

    In this internet age you can be a great force for good. You could become the next pro-White internet celebrity on YouTube, drawing hundreds of thousands of views per video. Maybe take a couple of video editing classes at your college?

    And there are many other ways to make a huge difference. I often think about the ripple / domino effect that we have.

    On a somewhat related note: something that has helped me is getting plenty of sunlight. I try to get direct sunlight on my body and face every day. Of course I’m careful to avoid getting burned — I rotate frequently, and don’t sit out for long periods. It also helps to get sun in the morning or late afternoon, instead of the middle of the day. I’m a big believer in getting plenty of sunshine. I think it is good for the body and the mind, and many White people probably had ancestors that spent hours per day in the sun, so it’s natural and a part of who we are.

    Anyway, I thought I’d offer some thoughts. No need to response. If you want to, that’s fine too.

  8. StuckInBetween's Gravatar StuckInBetween
    August 19, 2012 - 6:29 pm | Permalink

    @Mother Trucker:

    Nice article Mother Trucker, I remember reading an Ayn Rand piece on ethical egoism in an intro philosophy class and I remember thinking “how does this type of thinking help the greater good”. I think you know the answer to the question. I am a deep thinker, and I believe that life could be a wonderful joyous thing for pretty much all human beings, except in our current paradigm Global Jewry has ruined that for all except the ruling elite, who lead parasitic lives on truly hard working people.

    This type of “me me me” attitude is what is taught in our Jew run liberalized schools. It is anti-human, it is satanic. They want to make us genderless with feminism, they want to destroy our sense of self through Cultural Marxism and mass third world immigration to the Western world and destabilize society. Once they’ve destroyed our individual cultures and sense of self, we become Westernized to Global Jewry and indoctrinated by pop-culture though music and media. This brings about the nihilism, drug cultures, the hook-up culture which results in arrested development, and thus we never fully mature and connect with the opposite gender. I’ve seen it first hand and I know that people share my view that heterogeneous societies simply DO NOT work.

    I am so mad that I had to be born into this cesspit called Western society. I lived in a bubble of confusion for a long time before I finally put a lot of the pieces of the puzzle together. I am halfway through a Sociology degree, and I dropped out of my 6th semester before I couldn’t take the feminism, and race propaganda anymore. What should I do guys? Should I just get a two year diploma since I’m half way to a degree anyways and finish it later? Don’t have good job prospects, and if in two years I haven’t really achieved anything, or the world doesn’t change I think I will take an early exit off this planet. What to do guys, what to do?

  9. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 18, 2012 - 9:18 pm | Permalink

    @DEL:

    You wrote:

    “This article which focuses on Jewish academics appropriating power in America’s highest universities, curiously attracts plenty of white identity advocates.”

    I’m not sure I understand what the point of your comment is.

    If you look at the green banner at the top of this page, you will see that it says:

    Occidental Observer — White Identity, Interests, and Culture

  10. Stan's Gravatar Stan
    August 18, 2012 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

    The very groups supporting the talentless Pussy Riot in Russia would demand a hate crimes prosecution if it happened in a synagogue in the US

  11. DEL's Gravatar DEL
    August 18, 2012 - 9:05 am | Permalink

    I found your site by following a link from Dr. David Duke’s website. He is intent on exposing Zionism as it helps him in his subtle quest to promote white majority power. Your article is informative and still easily exploited by those you wouldn’t necessarily want to associate with.

  12. DEL's Gravatar DEL
    August 18, 2012 - 8:50 am | Permalink

    This article which focuses on Jewish academics appropriating power in America’s highest universities, curiously attracts plenty of white identity advocates.

  13. Mother Trucker's Gravatar Mother Trucker
    August 17, 2012 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Sociology of the Ayn Rand Cult (Rothbard, highly recommended)

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard23.html

  14. Mother Trucker's Gravatar Mother Trucker
    August 17, 2012 - 3:58 pm | Permalink

    The Walker book is pure filth. Find some other source of Rand crit.

    I know a lot about this matter. I met “Nathaniel Branden” (Natan Blumenthal)
    at the Soroptimist House at Cal State Long Beach in Dec. 1968. He gave a talk to explain what happened with the famous split (with Rand) of a few months earlier. We started to make Seminar records- monthly recordings- Q&A with Branden. This went on till 1971.

    (My take): Rand had a very peculiar view about looks and moral virtue. She almost thought they were the same! That’s why she picked Cooper for The Fountainhead. That’s why she married Frank O’Connor. That’s why she had an affair with good-looking (young) Branden. The affair with Rand (I think) started around 1955. She knew Branden from 1950. So she was diddling with two good lookers until the split of ’68.

    During this 18 year period Atlas was being written, and NBI (Nathaniel Branden Institute) was being formed (1958). She was taking Dexedrine (dextroamphetamine) for weight control. She didn’t know of cognitive effects.
    Her mental health was probably impaired while writing The Novel.

    Names: Feel free to look up AYN SOF to see what AYN means in Hebrew.
    I have it on good authority from a former clerk at The Objectivist (magazine) that “Branden” comes from Ben-Rand- meaning SON OF RAND. Branden says he picked it out of a phone book! Does Son of Rand mean Son of G-d? I dunno.

    I believe this whole business of the Rand cult is miscast. It all started with the “NBI” in 1958. There was no “Objectivism” until NBI was formed. The real hard-core cult was at NBI in New York City. The real cult was Nathaniel Branden Institute. (It was his idea, not Rand’s, AFAIK).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivist_movement

    Imagine if NBI had never existed. Would there have been a cult?

  15. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    August 16, 2012 - 11:52 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: “I like Ryan for his past pro-Ayn Rand remarks…”

    Ayn Rand was a racist and ultimately, a simplistic propagandist. Full Stop. If you don’t believe me, Marcy, read Jeff Walker’s book, “The Ayn Rand Cult”.

    He’ll fill you in.

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Rand-Cult-Jeff-Walker/dp/0812693906

    Go read some reviews of the book on Amazon, both positive and negative, before you make up your mind…

  16. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 16, 2012 - 12:01 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    @49er:

    As usual, Franklin yet again renders the creation account of genesis completely out of context. See folks, this is the only thing he can do. Create his own strawman arguments, attribute them to his enemy and then shoot his own arguments down.

    2 Peter 3:1 This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance:

    2 That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:

    3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,

    4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.

    5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:

    6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

    7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

    8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

    9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

    So, the 7 days of creation in on God’s calendar equates to about 7000 years in human years and not 7 days in human years like Franklin likes to claim.

    After the creation how long did Adam and Eve live before their fall? One would have to find this answer and add it to the biblical calander of how long it was from the fall to the Flood and from the Flood to the present day.

    One thing is absolutely sure, the earth is not “billions and billions” of years old. Whenever you hear Macro Evolutionists stating this, know they are full of it and so is their fairytale religion where man came from a soup of water and rocks and the big ball of mass before the big bang came from nowhere.

    Radio Carbon dating is extremely unreliable. One can find one claim after another that completely contradicts the age of of things we already know.

    My theory is taken from ancient texts, the OT accounts etc, and would date the earth to be around 12 to 15,000 years old. This is ONLY a theory but I do think it is pretty accurate.

    In the Old Testament, Job 26:7 explains that the earth is suspended in space, the obvious comparison being with the spherical sun and moon.

    A literal translation of Job 26:10 is “He described a circle upon the face of the waters, until the day and night come to an end.” A spherical earth is also described in Isaiah 40:21-22—“the circle of the earth.”

    Note, the Biblical Hebrew word for “circle” (חוג—chuwg) can also mean “round” or “sphere.”

    As to Adams rib, the rib is the best place to obtain DNA on the human body. Also, if one removes the rib carefully from the periosteum, it will grow back.

    Humans are made from carbon molecules. The field of Organic Chemistry is the study mainly of the Carbon atom as well as other atoms that bind to Carbon [such as Hydrogen, Nitrogen, and Oxygen].

    What makes a man a man is testerone. What makes a woman a woman is the family of hormones known as estrogens. The estrogens have one less carbon rib than testerone has. The chemical formula of testerone is C19H28O2. The chemical formula of the estrogens is C18H24O2. Thus estrogens has one less carbon rib than testerone.

  17. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 15, 2012 - 9:54 pm | Permalink

    @49er:
    There is a difference between Creationism and creationism, though I may not have made that clear enough. Creationism (with a capital C ) is the creation story of Genesis, which I say is definitely false ( creation of “the world”, which is thought of as a flat disc with the sky as a dome above it, some 6000 years ago, in six days, creation of “light” before the creation of the sun on the fourth day, creation of Eve from the rib of Adam etc etc ). Any other form of the formation of the universe and the forms of life where some spiritual power(s) were involved could be called “creationism” ( with a small c). I say that if the (materialistic) evolution theory is not sufficient to explain the development of the various forms of life then it is a “false dilemma” to conclude that THEREFORE only the silly Genesis story is the alternative. Theorethically it could be any other story though I personally believe none of the creation stories of other religions is more plausible than the Genesis story.
    So if we conclude that the materialistic evolution theory is an insufficient explanation then some sort of “creationism” should be assumed but that would anyway exclude “Creationism” ( the Genesis story). No contradiction here, but I admit I had not made myself clear enough.

  18. 49er's Gravatar 49er
    August 15, 2012 - 7:41 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Here’s your third contradiction: In regard to Creationism you state that it is a silly false-teaching yet contradict yourself by adding “Any other theory might be correct.” Yet you maintain as FACT that creationism is false. CONTRADICTION ALERT So lets get this straight. According to you, all creation accounts might be true but Creationism is definitely false. Thus, you claim objectivity for your point of view and subjectivity for those you don’t agree with. UNBELIEVABLE!
    Remember the old adage: “If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.”

  19. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 15, 2012 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    The Christian account of creation is a little bit more detailed;

    In the beginning, an all powerful being brought the universe into existence. With the help of others he created (angels/aliens), he created mankind on earth in his own image.

    The leader of the helpers named Lucifer became jealous knowing that this new creation would be greater than him so he formed a rebellion, lost and was cast into the earth.

    Because the all powerful entity acts upon the principal of free will, he allowed one section of the new creations dwelling to be occupied by his enemy. This all powerful being warned his new creation that they can do whatever they like but under no circumstances should they entertain the one section in their dwelling occupied by his enemy. If they do, they would no longer be immoral but would eventually become mortal. This new creation is tricked by the enemy and becomes a mortal being.

    In order to put everything back on track, in accordance with his original plan, the supreme creator (who is a compound oneness) sends the physical portion of himself to the earth to show his new creation how to act correctly in face of the enemy. He shows his creation the way out of the bondage they found themselves in proclaiming that if they believe him and followed his example, they can beat the enemy and regain their previous immortal status. He promises his new creation that his enemy will be completely defeated when he comes back to totally occupy his new creation (earth) and at this time a trial will ensue where all who are on/in the earth will be held accountable for their actions.

  20. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 15, 2012 - 1:16 am | Permalink

    @49er:
    In the first case we are talking about a false dilemma ,in all subsequent cases there is a realdilemma. So there is no contradiction.

  21. 49er's Gravatar 49er
    August 14, 2012 - 10:57 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    So you admit, you contradicted yourself. Well, actually, you contradicted yourself a second time with your response to me. If you are correct in your analysis, then the sum of both of our posts is pointless. So you’ve just admitted, by your own logic, that your argument is pointless. End of story!
    Your starting to come off as a real “Internet Academic.” As such, you should probably check out the Law of Non-Contradiction as well as the Relatavist Fallacy.

  22. August 14, 2012 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Here is the real dilemma as I see it.
    If I am to believe the evolution theory, life in earth began sometime after a “big bang” of some unknown object, of some unknown origin, had an atmosphere created in some unknown way, that shot a lightning bolt into a puddle of ooze, of another unknown origin. The ooze created a single celled life form that followed the neverending cycle of eat; reproduce; evolve; to a plethora of life forms. Some of these life forms continued to evolve, and some died off.
    If I am to believe the creationalist narrative, an omnipotent being, chose to create life on this planet, and created it in an orderly fashion, leaving humans to the end. Periodically, this greater being has wiped out species by causing natural events – like floods, or comets smashing into the earth. This omnipotent being has never been seen, but does speak to certain individuals calling on them to do his bidding inorder to save humanity.

    While I find both versions less than plausible, the latter has a lot fewer unknowns.

    • Robert Lloyd's Gravatar Robert Lloyd
      August 14, 2012 - 8:24 pm | Permalink

      Curmudgeon… you got me laughing on this one!!!

  23. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 14, 2012 - 5:21 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    First off Franklin, YOU ARE SUPPORTING EXACTLY WHAT I ALREADY STATED while claiming I made the Creationist vs. Macro Evolutionists scenario an exclusive either-or. I did NO such thing! How very typical of you! You seem to be the main protector of the Jewish narrative on this site. Congrats!

    Here is what I said to MotherTrucker:

    “Evolutionists only have slanders and demonizations to support their theory they teach as fact in Academia. This THEORY is promoted and sustained by the “Jews” in Academia with a viciousness rarely seen anywhere. Why? Let me explain to you why. What is left if macro evolution is pure nonsense? Creation is the ONLY thing left, so now one must subscribe to one of the alien creation theories promoted these days on the history and sci fi channels on JEW TV, or they must come up with their own- or support one of the 3 monolithic religious accounts.”

    Hence, the fact still stands that Macro Evolution is an easily disproven theory and anyone worth their salt in science knows this to be true. If however they openly state they do not believe in the fairytale, they KNOW they will end up losing their job in the Jewish Controlled Academia. You know, sort of like saying the Holocaust is almost all a hoax. Same thing- so is evolution, Macro Evolution that is.
    Secondly Franklin, Wikipedia is NOT considered a reputable citation or source/reference in Academia. The ONLY reason I have ever quoted from it here is because YOU quote from it as if it is some infallible source of information. I should know, I am a year away from my legal degree and am presently attending a Military University.

    FYI here is some folks at Storm Front had to say about Wikipedia and Jewish control of information. Very interesting! lol

    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t588488/

  24. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 14, 2012 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    @49er:
    I can play that game with your proposal too, and then you can do it with mine, then I again with yours etc. This is called regressus ad infinitum.

  25. 49er's Gravatar 49er
    August 14, 2012 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    So Franklin, you’re saying that EITHER I believe your stance that one must accept multiple theory’s of creation OR be wrong to believe the traditional creation narrative?
    OOPS AND WOW!!…. You’ve just committed the same supposed error you criticized tyron for. You’ve stepped into quicksand without even realizing it! Do you also believe that there is no truth?haha (Please say yes!!!)

  26. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 14, 2012 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:

    “…true SCIENCE does not dispute the bible. It PROVES it correct.”

    This idea is based on is the typical logical fallacy of the false dilemma : either the evolution theory is correct or the Bible is correct. In reality, if the evolution theory is proven to be incorrect or to have some weak elements in it, then that doesn ‘t automatically mean that the silly naive creation story of the Bible is correct. Any other theory might be correct. The different species could have been created by many “spirits” or by one. If by one, that wouldn’t necessarily be the evil spirit called “Yahweh” that was venerated by that Middle Eastern bandit tribe that we have come to know as the Israelites, it could equally well be the Hindu creator god Brahma or any other creator god of any other people on earth. Sorry, but even in the case of creation poor “jealous” Yahweh would have competitors!

    BTW the creation story in Genesis is a combination of two originally different creation stories, weaved into one by a clumsy biblical redactor, hence the contradictions. For further information see Genesis creation narrative Wikipedia.

    ( Warning : Wikipedia is controlled by a sinister Jewish cabal, intend to undermine the Christian Identity Gospel according to St. Tyron! ).

  27. teutonic1's Gravatar teutonic1
    August 14, 2012 - 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Unless you’re taking a pure science like physics or math, education now is about telling you how to think.
    And, if you don’t spew out your professors’ ideologies and views in other classes, you can fail.
    Schools have become propaganda mills. Teachers are so liberalized. The same with all of America. There are “Conservatives” who really are liberalized. They THINK they are conservative, but they tow the line for destroying what this country once stood for. They aren’t really Conservative at all.

    • Robert Lloyd's Gravatar Robert Lloyd
      August 14, 2012 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

      Definition: NEO-CON: Moderate liberal, calling himself a conservative, and willing to kill anyone that disagrees with him.

  28. 49er's Gravatar 49er
    August 14, 2012 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    The result is that the university as a very prestigious, elite institution has become a central manifestation of the hostile elite that is now dominant in the U.S. and throughout the West.
    Great informative article, Professor. My only complaint would be the over-focus on the symptoms of white plight rather than the cure. As we all know(or should know) the cure is REPRESENTATION. And why you ask?

    Because:
    REPRESENTATION forces a wedge between subjects and those acting to exploit them. It shifts the terrain onto negotiation, agreement and consensus.

    The longer we wait for representation, the more articles, such as the one above, we have to weepily read through thus continuing the circular cycle of powerlessness and inevitable frustration.

  29. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 14, 2012 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    You said

    1.We can’t personally witness evolution because it takes millions of years to occur, and none of us has that much time on our hands.

    Answer:

    Exactly so Macro Evolution is simply THEORY and an easily disproved religious theory at that.

    You said

    2.Scientists don’t use the term “missing links,” they use the term “transitional fossils,” and there are plenty of them to prove gradual changes in species over time.

    Answer:

    The ONLY evidence Evolutionists have is micro Evolution which does not support Macro Evolution. Creationists are not disputing micro evolution in any way because no one is suggesting there are not tiny changes, adaptings, quirks or genetic mutations that are classified as disfigurements. This is easily observable but these tiny changes do not add new DNA. They subtract from what is already coded. In other words; there is absolutely NO evidence anywhere were new species or kinds have EVER been produced- only changes within the species or kinds that already exist.

    You said

    3.No one here is interested in your religious views, so I suggest either leaving or keeping them to yourself and actually discuss the topics at hand.

    Answer:

    Take your own advise! I am addressing the issues of SCIENCE and true SCIENCE does not dispute the bible. It PROVES it correct. It is your Macro Evolutionary religion that is a fairytale.

    This link explains what I am saying in great detail.
    http://www.exchangedlife.com/Creation/macro-evol.shtml

  30. Russell D's Gravatar Russell D
    August 14, 2012 - 6:54 am | Permalink

    This organisation, by the way, has received written support from influential leaders of the Reform, the Conservative and the Orthodox branches. Check out the wiki pages on Yaakov Weinberg and Alexander Schindler in particular. Introducing evangelical Christians to this site may be helpful.

    http://jewsforjudaism.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=187%3Acpr-for-the-jewish-soul&catid=21%3Aspeakers-bureau&Itemid=468

  31. Russell D's Gravatar Russell D
    August 14, 2012 - 6:44 am | Permalink

    For those that are interested, here is another self-professed instance of Jewish hostility towards Christianity (and, one might surmise, the population that historically adhered to it):

    http://jewsforjudaism.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=94:should-all-christianity-be-condemned-because-a-few-did-horrific-acts&catid=56:new-testament-anti-judaism&Itemid=495

  32. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    August 14, 2012 - 1:13 am | Permalink

    @mari: Personally, I love it when Mexicans and blacks fight each other in the ghettos and in jail. However, the reason America is so screwed up is how people view it. I view it as proof diversity is unworkable. Liberals view it as proof that blacks don’t receive enough free stuff.

  33. Dr. Doom's Gravatar Dr. Doom
    August 14, 2012 - 12:40 am | Permalink

    Don’t worry this won’t last very long. It never does.

    White Christians were the only people on Earth that DIDN’T hate Jews, but they fixed that up quick! In less than a hundred years in America, and already the knives are being sharpened for Kristalnacht!

    2012 America reminds me greatly of 1920s Germany and the Weimar Republic. The Jews were everywhere there also, ruining everything as usual.

    Hitler returns in 10, 9, 8, 7, 6 …

  34. August 13, 2012 - 11:52 pm | Permalink

    It used to be ‘gays in military’ was a controversial issue. Now, there are open gays in the military and even a lesbian promoted to general.

    Today, opposing ‘gay marriage’ is controversial.

    We live in a country where some mulatto as president says he’s for gay marriage but suffers no repercussions and is slated to win re-election.
    We have a GOP candidate who remains silent on the gay issue out of fear of rich Jewish donors to the GOP and the powerful liberal Jewish controlled media. And socially liberal Wall Street.

    There are so many racial, cultural, and social issues to attack Obama on, but Romney can only yammer about big government and taxes. Doesn’t he understand that the globalist free trade and finance capitalism that he supported shrunk the middle class and hurt the working class? Since the American middle can no longer depend on reliable jobs, they look to government for protection. That’s why so many Americans prefer Democrats and big government. With a slumped economy, the government is their last remaining safety net.

    This is a sick nation not even worth saving.

    PS. Obama is channeling Reagan in a way. Though times are bad, he’s never apologetic and standing firm and strong.
    Romney is all wishy washy. He must be channeling Carter.
    Style wins in politics. Obama may be in the Carter position but he’s stylistically playing Reagan whereas Romney, though in the Reagan position, is as willy nilly and wussy goosey as Carter.
    And he chose Grover as VP.

  35. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 13, 2012 - 11:01 pm | Permalink

    @fender:
    He says : “The first rule of science is to be able to witness something happening over and over in a controlled environment”. As if scientists not only have millions and millions of years time but also laboratories big enough to contain dinosaurs, whole continents or even galaxies! Under such an impossible condition no science like biology, geology or astronomy would ever be possible.
    He talks about the three monolithic religions instead of the three monotheisticreligions, showing once again how ignorant he is.
    He is ignorant, stupid and obsessive sectarian worse than a Jehova witness.

  36. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 13, 2012 - 7:03 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    I want to expand on something I wrote yesterday.

    “Ram Z Paul is an example. I don’t watch his videos, but I know he’s really popular. And as far as I know, he’s just a guy with a webcam. Yet each of his videos gets thousands of views.

    Think of the potential — someone with Dr. MacDonald’s knowledge combined with the humor of a comedian, and a little basic video editing skills — sounds very possible.”

    What I want to add is…

    I’ve noticed that the YouTube video-bloggers who get tens of thousands of views per video have something in common — their videos are well-produced and high-quality.

    I’m not saying they are expensive to make or time-consuming. I’m just saying that they are high quality.

    I’m not an expert, but I’m pretty sure that it costs them very little to make their videos. It just takes some passion and creativity and a basic understanding of video editing.

    I’ve noticed that their sound quality is good too. I don’t hear that static or “air” sound.

    Anyway, here are some examples you can search for on YouTube:

    Vsauce

    RayWilliamJohnson

    Sxephil

    Nigahiga

    You can copy and paste their names into the YouTube search feature.

    I don’t really watch their videos… ever. But I’m familiar with the style of editing and the quality of the audio / video.

    And I notice that a lot of them do some kind of cut and paste. Their videos are sort of tailored to the Attention Deficit Disorder crowd.

    Anyway, that was my point. That if a new pro-White YouTube “celebrity” will emerge, someone who can attract many thousands of views per video, he or she should probably study the YouTube video bloggers who attract tens of thousands of views.

    (Some of those video bloggers get hundreds of thousands of views per video. Think of the possibilities.)

    I’m just brainstorming.

    Richard Pierce popped into my mind because he is unapologetic, has a sharp mind, somewhat offensive, no holds barred, etc.

    It’s not that I agree with every thing he says. But his style of presenting his ideas might work in video format.

    Maybe it could be a duo. There are some really popular video bloggers that come in pairs.

    Alex Linder is another person that comes to mind. Again, it’s not that I agree with everything he says. I don’t know if his approach is the right one. But I think it’s possible that someone like him, his attitude and fighting spirit, might really appeal to the average White person who stumbles upon his (hypothetical) videos. Maybe not. I don’t know.

    If my comment is too off-topic or needing forgiveness in some other way, then please forgive me. (Or let me know.)

    Thanks for reading.

  37. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 13, 2012 - 6:21 pm | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:

    “Has ANYONE here EVER seen any kind or species morph through macro evolution into a new kind or species? The answer is NO and there is not one single “missing link” in ALL of archeology concerning the MILLIONS OF different species/kinds-and that includes mankind. And Mari wonders why “I can’t keep my theories to myself”? LOL”

    1. We can’t personally witness evolution because it takes millions of years to occur, and none of us has that much time on our hands.

    2. Scientists don’t use the term “missing links,” they use the term “transitional fossils,” and there are plenty of them to prove gradual changes in species over time.

    3. No one here is interested in your religious views, so I suggest either leaving or keeping them to yourself and actually discuss the topics at hand.

  38. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 13, 2012 - 6:02 pm | Permalink

    @Mother Trucker:

    The absence of a missing link in ALL cases concerning the MILLIONS of different species/kinds shows that there is ABSOLUTELY NO physical evidence and besides, the first rule of science is to be able to witness something happening over and over in a controlled environment. Macro Evolutionists only have slanders and demonizations to support their theory they teach as fact in Academia. This THEORY is promoted and sustained by the “Jews” in Academia with a viciousness rarely seen anywhere. Why? Let me explain to you why. What is left if macro evolution is pure nonsense? Creation is the ONLY thing left, so now one must subscribe to one of the alien creation theories promoted these days on the history and sci fi channels on JEW TV, or they must come up with their own- or support one of the 3 monolithic religious accounts.
    I am presenting on these boards pro white creation evidence backed up by the OT and NT. What you believe is ultimately up to you.

  39. Mother Trucker's Gravatar Mother Trucker
    August 13, 2012 - 5:49 pm | Permalink

    The absence of missing links proves that Christianity is true?

  40. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 13, 2012 - 5:41 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby:

    Thank you Bobby. My post above answers those questions you asked. Either one believes or they don’t. Some are inbetween and have other beliefs and theories. I have never once called to have anyone here censored- such is evidence of Jew corruption/protection, or of one being a Jew themselves.

  41. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 13, 2012 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    @mari:

    I suggest that anyone who does not want to meander to Tyson’s ideas about what was going on in 5,000BC just skip over the page when his name appears. That is what I do.

    Answer:

    Yea, thats why your writing about me now-LIAR

    You said

    But today I was reading comments from the end instead of the
    beginning to get the latest and read Tyson’s theory that we are all physical Israelites proof of which is Tyson’s reading of that collection of myths, frauds and falsehoods known as the bible, torah, talmud etc.

    Answer

    Lie again. i do not use Talmud. I use as reference OT and NT accounts that are supported by archeological evidence, ancient records from diverse peoples attesting to what we claim, Anglo and Saxon outright admissions about their ancestors, dress codes, military equipment, tools and ship building evidence, religions WE european-whites adopted when we left the land, linguistics and all of this and more back up by GIANTS in Academia like Dr E Raymond Capt.

    What really angers you protectors of the “Jews” in academia is that it PROVES the bible correct and you CANNOT have that so you do like you are now, slander and demonize for lack of intelligent retort- just like a “good Jew” always does when confronted with the truth.

    You said

    So why can’t Tyson keep his ideas to himself? There are numerous bible babbling protestant websites where Tyson can have a good old time exchanging ideas with people like himself.

    Answer:

    Because what I have presented you can’t refute and when you do, you use JEW Frankfort School-Marxist/Macro-evolutionist theories designed to MURDER white Christiandom.

    Has ANYONE here EVER seen any kind or species morph through macro evolution into a new kind or species? The answer is NO and there is not one single “missing link” in ALL of archeology concerning the MILLIONS OF different species/kinds-and that includes mankind. And Mari wonders why “I can’t keep my theories to myself”? LOL

    You said

    Tyson makes us look either like idiots or hasids who spend their time on kabalah and other studies counting the words in the bible or whatever until they lose their minds and their health.

    Answer;

    Correction- I make YOU and your JEW PROTECTING ilk look like idiots.

    You said

    So why is he here?

    Answer

    As Paul says in Corinthians

    5 We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.

    I will speak to you no more on this thread. MIND you OWN buisness, I was NEVER speaking to you in the first place.

  42. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 13, 2012 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby:
    While I cannot speak for Mari, I can offer my own reason. We have become so nonjudgmental that we can no longer order our own society. I was brought up to be kind to, but avoid. people who behave in strange ways. There comes a time when, just like the vets who do not grasp that it is inappropriate to impose their attentions on people who are clearly not interested, it becomes clear that a poster is not interested in a discussion, merely imposing his view on others. I am a Christian, but I accept the reality that non-believers are not going to be persuaded by Biblical quotations. I do ask that they not go out of their ways to slur them, but I must concede that people like Mr. Parsons give all of us a bad name.

  43. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 13, 2012 - 5:07 pm | Permalink

    @mari: @Bobby:
    I cannot tell you how important it is to tell the tale. These stories never seem to get into the press. At least not as an ongoing problem as opposed to an isolated incident. Please keep up the good work – better still, write a book!

  44. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 13, 2012 - 4:53 pm | Permalink

    @mari: Mari, on this issue of Vietnam Vets, I totally agree with you. If there’s one thing I’ve noticed, it’s the number of people that constantly try to ride on the coattails of the unfortunate guys and girls that got sucked into that bogus conflict, obviously thinking it gives them some kind of class or makes them get benefits they don’t deserve. Lord knows, nothing is seriously checked by the bogus state of California as to who is really disabled and who isn’t.

  45. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 13, 2012 - 4:50 pm | Permalink

    @mari: Mari, I think you are a brilliant poster. But why call for someone to be conpletely censored? That’s acting like the treacherous govennement with its affirmative action policies,etc. I agree tysons posts get too long winded, but I just jump to the main points he tries to make, and often leave the religious stuff alone.

  46. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 13, 2012 - 3:53 pm | Permalink

    I can assure you Alice, that the alcholic, retarded, drug addicted insane vets living off the taxpayers at the LA Vets center are not Vietnam vets. Their ages range from about 35 to 55, far too young to be Vietnam vets. I am pretty good at estimating low IQs because I was a special Ed teacher for a while.

    Their is a grade school nearby. They harass the little girls as well as the women. As per usual in LA schools, the kids are almost hispanic indians. Hispanics live in crowded households so there is usually an adult around to escort the girls home to protect them from the disabled black bets.

    So the Mothers and Grandmothers pick them up after school.
    So the black bets harass the Mothers and Grandmothers. Some of the hispanic men (unlike White men) are very upset about the problem. Imagine. Your 30 year old wife or 55 year old Mother has to pick up your 9 year old daughter after school and then the Mother or Grandmother gets harassed.

    I have told some of the Persians and hispanics about the old organization that must never be spoken, 3K. After a 70 year old 5ft tall Persian woman who is a friend of mine got beaten up at the neighborhood swimming pool by a 35 year old 6ft black disabled vet the Persians and hispanic men are talking about taking some action.

    I have given some advice about how to avoid getting caught if they do take action. Of course all the White, persian and hispanic men are at work during the day while the black vets are free to roam about harassing everyone.

    They even go into stores and harass the women clerks.

  47. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 13, 2012 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

    I suggest that anyone who does not want to meander to Tyson’s ideas about what was going on in 5,000BC just skip over the page when his name appears. That is what I do.

    But today I was reading comments from the end instead of the
    beginning to get the latest and read Tyson’s theory that we are all physical Israelites proof of which is Tyson’s reading of that collection of myths, frauds and falsehoods known as the bible, torah, talmud etc.

    I am an extreme White nationalist, or perhaps revanchist might be the better word. I have a lot of ideas on how to take back our country but they are all illegal, so I don’t post them on this or any other White interests site.

    So why can’t Tyson keep his ideas to himself? There are numerous bible babbling protestant websites where Tyson can have a good old time exchanging ideas with people like himself.

    Tyson makes us look either like idiots or hasids who spend their time on kabalah and other studies counting the words in the bible or whatever until they lose their minds and their health.

    Other White websites ban the idiots, lunatics and extremists.
    Why is Tyson’s insane ideas allowed to use up space in this website. His 5000 BC imagines have nothing to do with the issues of anti White racism, affirmative action, black on White crime and the Jewish causation of these anti White measures.

    So why is he here?

  48. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 13, 2012 - 1:48 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    I hear what you are saying but the link I provided was speaking about the linguistic and dress factors concerning the links between the European peoples and the Israelites of old.

    As to Stonehenge and Skara Brae, both were radio carbon dated which is highly unreliable. In the case of Skara Brae it was believed up until about 1970 that it was built around 500 BC.

    Also, according to the biblical narrative, before the flood and after the flood, the people on the earth were practicing paganism-fallen angel worship.

    Take the Pyramids in Central America for example. Simply because the South American Indians were using them by the time Cortez arrived, people automatically assume that they had built them when according to their own account as well as archeological evidence, the white man built them. Hence, just because we have a population living among some ruins does not mean that their ancestors are the ones who constructed it. Furthermore, not all white people are physical Israelites; it just happens that most, the majority are. Food for thought.

  49. Robert Lloyd's Gravatar Robert Lloyd
    August 13, 2012 - 12:26 pm | Permalink

    Of course they discriminate… I would too, only I would discriminate against liberals if I was hiring. This is war and war for keeps.

  50. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 13, 2012 - 2:07 am | Permalink

    @Tadzio: Money, or what it can do for people, will corrupt practically anyone that grows up in a system totally controled by it. It’s not just a matter of physical survival; money is taken as a matter of self-worth, status, etc. Only a very few people can genuinely say they’ve freed themselves from these meanings. Today, young people seem more than ever before, totally taken in by the “system”. I hear them all the time, utterly exaggerating the significance of material things. Those who imagine that todays youth will be the agents of change where the prevailing system goes, are kidding themselves. I don’t see it in them.

  51. Tadzio's Gravatar Tadzio
    August 13, 2012 - 1:40 am | Permalink

    Re: Briton. Would that Boston talk show host be Howie Carr? He used avoid the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. Now he is super zionist. The change came when he wrote a gangster book and found $$$ with a New York publisher. He wrote another book and now has a contract to write novels for which he has no track record.
    Howie Anythting-for-a-shekel Carr, bought and paid for. He is a typical sell-out and a template for how the jewish media corrupts.

  52. rapparees's Gravatar rapparees
    August 13, 2012 - 12:54 am | Permalink

    @fnn:
    The fact that these cultural Marxist Jews hate a somewhat renegade, opinionated southern white man,
    who writes excellent critiques, despite the prevailing politically correct jew/leftist liberal discourse and diatribe,
    makes Vidal,s writings definately more appealing.

  53. Random's Gravatar Random
    August 13, 2012 - 12:49 am | Permalink

    @Hmmm:

    Haidt, Gross and Inbar are all Jewish. How do you account for their decisions to conduct and publish research that undermines what you see as Jewish interests?

    They’re not undermining jewish interests at all. Jews now have a much stronger grip on the right than they do on the left. Lots of people on the left, possibly even a majority among the more intellectual left, realize that jews are behind the Middle East wars and the financial crisis. Hence the jews are now pushing for a greater representation of philo-semitic right-wing types in academia.

  54. August 12, 2012 - 11:06 pm | Permalink

    @fender:
    It is elitists like you who are the problem. The labourer, the bricklayer, and the truck driver are the ones who are prepared to take on the powerful. That is why strikes occur. They know they are getting diddled and are prepared to do something about it. Slavery is an economic tool. It creates a surplus of labour and drives down wages and living standards.

    Most white tradesmen I have met know 3rd world immigration threatens their standard of livingas well as their children’s future, and are opposed to it. Why you continue to promote the idea of exclusion is beyond me.

  55. August 12, 2012 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons: Given that Skara Brae and Stonehenge both predate the pyramids, I suggest that the opposite may be true.

  56. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 12, 2012 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    @fnn:
    Thanks, that was a good piece. It seems he was inconsistent on many things, did not take himself very seriously, and could not resist a good line. He did have courage.

  57. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    August 12, 2012 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

    @Fender, I agree with your idea of playing the system of higher education even if lying is necessary. College is filled with real cheats anyhow. And I especially like the part about networking with other Whites. I’ve done that for years. All I was saying is that some degrees are totally worthless and aren’t worth taking out loans for and sacrificing income producing years for. For people choosing courses on “The Fab Five” or “Filmography of the Three Stooges,” almost anything would be better. You’d think that was obvious, but people keep paying for this stuff. But yes, lie to the faculty about diversity if it means getting into med or business school.

  58. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 12, 2012 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    You said

    Manual labor is what blacks were brought to America for. Do you want to lower yourselves to their level? Where is your aristocratic mentality? We need writers, scientists, economists, and political leaders, not construction workers.

    Answer:

    I respectfully disagree. Farmers are the bedrock of any healthy and independant nation. A healthy society needs a healthy money system and free market. Where there is one the playing field is level because honest labor (meaning manual labor) is need just as much if not more than those who use their intellect. Think of a nation like a body. Each organ, even the rectum, is indispensible to the whole. Therefore should the “Brain” be paid more than the “rectum”? I say no, but then again, maybe so. In reality the free market with an honest/sound money should drive these concerns and settle these disputes based upon the present needs of that nation/society. We use to have a nation where the sh-t shoveler could meet with the doctor and be mutually respected by the other, if for no other reason than because they both made a darn good living, enough to own property, houses, raise a family, all with one income. It use to be much this way you know…

    This is where the banking and financial “Jews” screwed us the most. They know this but they are elitists who took over and lopsided the system in favor of their desired pursuits pushing and manipulating all the prestige into the areas they now dominate . The nature of the class system we must endure today is heavily “Jewish”- no doubt about that.

  59. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    August 12, 2012 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Vidal was inconsistent on immigration:
    http://guardianlv.com/2012/08/gore-vidal-the-most-important-american-communicator-of-twentieth-century-dead-at-86/

    …A frequent champion of progressive ideas, Vidal nevertheless claimed that he thought of himself as a conservative. This was evident during a 1999 lecture in Dublin where Vidal said: “A characteristic of our present chaos in the dramatic migration of tribes. They are on the move from east to west, from south to north. Liberal tradition requires that borders must always be open to those in search of safety or even the pursuit of happiness. But now with so many millions of people on the move, even the great-hearted have become edgy. Norway is large enough and empty enough to take in 40 to 50 million homeless Bengalis. If the Norwegians say that, all in all, they would rather not take them in, is this to be considered racism? I think not. It is simply self-preservation, the first law of species.”

    My guess is that he considered the US a hopeless case given the nature of its current ruling elites. One of his essay collections includes a very admiring portrait of Charles Lindbergh.

  60. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 12, 2012 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I see. Thanks Alice, for replying.

  61. August 12, 2012 - 8:27 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    great post. thx. Whites should rapidly climb human energy pyramid and anyone who advises otherwise is a traitor.

    @Richard: @Aquilax:

    ya, thats true. Canada is hopeless, but we must not give up. We are still 200 million. Even if a million make a good effort, and 1% succeed, we will still have 10,000 tenured professors.

    There is no other way than to jump like gladiator and fight.
    Jews are determined to exterminate us, take away our land, dispossess us.

    There is no choice. The only choice is to win or be extinct.

  62. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    August 12, 2012 - 8:25 pm | Permalink

    Jonthan Haidt better watch his step. His work is a little too subversive.

  63. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 12, 2012 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby:
    Sorry Bobby. I know that Hanson is in league with the neocons, never the less, his background in the classics and honest accounts of the ruin immigration has brought to California has me often agreeing with him. I was surprised by the angry piece he wrote on Gore Vidal. Perhaps your account of Gore’s causal disregard for the decline of the most beautiful state in the union accounts for his anger.

  64. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 12, 2012 - 6:59 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Alice, I’m familiar with Hanson, but I apologize for not getting the point of your post. Could you clear it up for me please.

  65. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    August 12, 2012 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

    The academies are so polluted I fight the impulse to want to destroy them, including my own alma mater. Starving them of cash is the only practical alternative.
    As for their usefulness, I think nothing short of a PhD or MD of JD is worthwhile anymore. A mere BS in anything is a waste of money. A barely competent mechanic can make more than virtually any bachelor’s level college graduate these days, so why go into debt and forgo the 4 years of making money while you learn?
    Why support the system that relentlessly spews hatred toward white folks?
    The only person I can detect who was impressed by my own degree is my dear mother and my beloved wife!

  66. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 12, 2012 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby:
    Perhaps this accounts for Victor David Hanson’s nasty obit. I have come to expect them from the usual suspects but it is always jarring when a white man does it.

  67. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 12, 2012 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Some of the advice posters give on this site is asinine. “Don’t go to college,” “become farmers and truck drivers,” “do honest manual labor,” etc.

    Manual labor is what blacks were brought to America for. Do you want to lower yourselves to their level? Where is your aristocratic mentality? We need writers, scientists, economists, and political leaders, not construction workers.

    Enough with this “honest labor” bullsh*t. There’s nothing honorable about shovelling cow dung or laying bricks and mortar.

    Yeah, while you toil away at your “honorable” job in the good ‘ol south or midwest, some high-powered Jew or Indian or Chinese guy is sitting in a corner office in Wall Street deciding the economic future of the entire nation. Yeah, those “honorable jobs” of slave labor offer you real independence, don’t they?

    The only reason why any of you resent the professors, economists, politicians, etc. is because they have power and you don’t, and your idea of fighting them is to reject their professions. Well guess what, they still run the country. If you want to run the country, you need to get to where they are.

    So what you do? Here’s a strategy: have kids and instill a racial conscience in them, but make sure they NEVER make their views public. Put them through the school system and make sure they do whatever their crazy liberal teachers tell them to do while at the same ensuring that they know the truth.

    Make sure they get into good colleges and then get high-paying jobs. Once they’ve got the high-paying jobs then they’ll be set. They can raise larger families and bring more race-conscious Whites into the world.

    If you want to change things you need influence, and if you’re driving trucks for a living you really don’t influence anything but the traffic. Self-determination belongs only to those with power and money, so stop resenting the jews who have the power and money and start doing what’s necessary for you to gain power and money.

    Network with people. Hire White lawyers. Go to White doctors. Pool resources. The internet is your friend. Post lists online of White-owned businesses and services in your area. Use those businesses only. Ask questions online like, “Is so and so White?” This is exactly what Jews do.

    This isn’t rocket science. All it takes is money and a MINIMAL amount of organizational ability.

  68. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 12, 2012 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby:
    As I remember it, it was often the guests who were not able to keep up with Cavett. The powers that be do not like white men who are quick witted.

  69. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 12, 2012 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: That’s good to learn, Alice. Cavett is now in the enviable position of no longer having so much celebrity that he would be crushed to have it all taken away overnight.

  70. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 12, 2012 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: Just so. As I say, he could be one hell of an irritating queen when he wanted to be—which, alas, was much of the time.

  71. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 12, 2012 - 5:07 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Alice, I always felt kind of sorry for Dick Cavett, a man who was obviously so misplaced as he was in life. He was far too intelligent to be a talk show host, where most of the American public was concerned. It was easy to see, that most of the time, he was talking right over the heads of most Americans, and this was the reason he wasn’t the super talk show celebrity host, that Carson, Letterman and Leno,etc. became.

  72. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 12, 2012 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Pierre, I agree with your views on Gore Vidal and his political insights. He was a sharp observer, and noted that the so called Cold War, between the Soviet Union and the U.S. was essentially a scam. What I didn’t like about Vidal, were some of his easy going leftist inspired statements that he often uttered in such a blase and in my opinion ignorant way. For example, I heard him a few years back, say that illegal aliens from Mexico pouring into California were no problem because they did low paying restuarant jobs and “the territory of California used to belong to Mexico anyway. He uttered this while feeding his fat face in an expensive restuarant in California, while on vacation from his residence in Italy. This struck me as quite hypocritical.

  73. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 12, 2012 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    As far as I can ascertain, only Dick Cavett had the decency to write a piece without the ritual condemnation of his sins – a refusal to promote gay marriage and his temerity in calling out Podhoretz and Co.

  74. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 12, 2012 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

    @Mother Trucker: Well, I suppose to Dr. Gailbraths credit, he at least was honest about being a “paycheck whore”.

  75. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 12, 2012 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I subscribe to every syllable of this statement on and assessment of Gore Vidal. He could be one hell of an irritating queen when he wanted to be, but Vidal knew who the enemy was and fought him with a will.

    That Vidal also had virtually nothing good to say, at least publicly, about his cousin, the inventor of the Internet, made him, latterly at least, a hard man to dislike.

  76. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 12, 2012 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

    @Howard: Howard, in mentioning these “taxi” businesses, are you sure your’e talking about New Jersey? It sounds like your’e talking about California. LOL. (tongue in cheek)

  77. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 12, 2012 - 3:29 pm | Permalink
  78. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 12, 2012 - 3:28 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    You said:

    Today, I do not attend church, and haven’t for decades. I recognize that the old Christian teachings are not significantly different from the old pagan ones. Honesty is honour. Do unto others is honour. Aiding others brings honour. Honour is central to the old European pagan religions. These are nothing other than a guide to living in peaceful co-existance honourably.

    Answer:

    I think you might find this link interesting- in the very least;

    http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emoiz.com%2Fthe-hebrew-israelite-canaanite-origins-of-druidism-norse-teutonic-and-celtic-paganism&h=XAQG9Oz0WAQEU_G-lZUaHef8qS5932NswxPc-xvvsL4OX4A&enc=AZNfO6YOM9Qcmps4K6fW393-5cbYLuEB2i-LYG84AD3hcY5JeaREsCmd75ZhmxPaAimc-kq2QOpMdpGnftPAnESa&s=1

  79. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    August 12, 2012 - 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Lancastershire Lad. There are some very intelligent people here and I don’t consider it my job to carry coals to Newcastle on anyone’s forum.
    My remark on Page was entirely tongue-in-cheek and I never even looked back to see if it was printed because I just assumed it wouldn’t be.

  80. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 12, 2012 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay:

    “The problem is, WN need to develop fighting will and guts.”

    Shortly before reading your comment (in quotes above) I had a similar thought.

    The pro-White movement does not really have a shortage of resources.

    The problem seems to be a spiritual one. I’m not really talking about religion. I mean “spiritual” in the sense of passion and energy and devotion to the cause.

    There are probably dozens of great pro-White websites and organizations, but compared to what we could be doing — we’re not doing very much. Again, that is relatively speaking. It’s an optimistic statement about how much potential there is.

    I’m not writing this as if I’m doing more or better than others. I’m just thinking about how much potential there is. All the possibilities. All the great minds available to us. All the technological resources. All the spare time. A little creativity, passion, and organization can go a very long way.

    But for different reasons, the pro-White movement does not have its act together. Maybe those reasons are good ones. I don’t know. But it seems like we’re making use of only about 1% of our potential.

    I know that many people devote such an admirable amount of time, effort, and money to the pro-White movement. And I don’t want to sound ungrateful for all the years of hard work others have done. A part of me realizes that I’m not worthy to even write about such things.

    My comment is optimistic. There is so much potential.

    Anyway, I agree with your comment — we need more spirit and energy and creativity.

    Thanks to anyone who does good things for White people. Sorry for if my comment has a preachy tone.

  81. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    August 12, 2012 - 2:25 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay:
    Sorry ignore the first paragraph that I’ve written in the last post (about waiting 12 years, that was for a specific department in a school I used to go).

  82. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    August 12, 2012 - 2:22 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay:
    Here in Canada you cannot finish your Ph.D. before the age of 28-29 (depending on the month you’re born). To get tenure, you usually have to wait 12 years.@Sanjay:

    You’re right, it can be done in that amount of years, but here in Canada you might never reach the level of “professor” (I’m not even talking about getting a tenure). To cut the expenses, you get hired as a “lecturer” sometimes for at least 5-10 years.

    But you are totally right about fighting will and guts, so many whites have some sort of mental block. I once presented a project about the cosmopolitisation of conservatism, and it involved jewish influence. So many people were so surprised when they encountered the work “jewish” on my text, they were freaking out : “but but but! Hold on a second, you can’t generalize like that?!” They were totally destabilized but at the same time, they didn’t feel like laughing neither.

    Anyways, all this to say that once we get rid of the little thing inside of us that makes us weak, that stops up, that blocks us, nothing can get in our way.

  83. August 12, 2012 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    Great catch. I guess this guy called “marcy flemming” just wants to implicate TOO by association and get this site shut down.

    Violence, especially at a place of worship is not helpful to WN cause. its harmful and dangerous.

  84. August 12, 2012 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

    @Aquilax:

    40 years old. thats when one crawls at snail’s pace. You can finish BS at 21, Masters at 22, PhD at 26-27, and get tenure by 30-33, and then you can be conservative for next 35 years.

    The problem is, WN need to develop fighting will and guts.

  85. August 12, 2012 - 1:21 pm | Permalink

    @Blake Watts:
    “They’ve been programmed to believe that the Jews are spiritually superior (which turns out to be comical in its’ wrongheadedness).”

    This is a recent phenomenon. When I was confirmed in the Lutheran Church 50 years ago, the message was clear: the Jews broke their covenant with God. The new covenant was with those who accepted the teachings of Jesus.

    I emphasize for the RCs here, that while there were references made to other Christian denominations, and how they differed – sometimes rather bluntly, often with gentle humour, at no time were others presented as “not really Christian” as the now Zionist controlled Robertsons and Hagees of the “born again” psychopaths would have it.

    Today, I do not attend church, and haven’t for decades. I recognize that the old Christian teachings are not significantly different from the old pagan ones. Honesty is honour. Do unto others is honour. Aiding others brings honour. Honour is central to the old European pagan religions. These are nothing other than a guide to living in peaceful co-existance honourably.

    The irony in Dr. MacDonald’s piece is that a large number of Universities in the US were founded by Christian religious sects that would have sought to have their professors come from their followers. That in itself, would be considered to be discriminatory by the likes of the ACLU and ADL. As these universities have become Judified through being “progressive”, the raison d’être of these universities has been perverted. The followers of the sect are now the ones facing discrimination in the teaching ranks.

  86. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 12, 2012 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

    @fnn:
    I, too, have been struck by the demand by the neocons to spit on Gore Vidal’s grave. I was not much of a fan, but he did have the courage to speak his mind.

  87. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 12, 2012 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

    @Blake Watts:

    Great comment.

    I can really relate to what you are going through.

    Hopefully each person who feels the way you do can find their niche, some way to channel their energy to help White people.

    On first glance, it might seem that we are relatively powerless. But there are so many tools available to us in the digital age.

    Ram Z Paul is an example. I don’t watch his videos, but I know he’s really popular. And as far as I know, he’s just a guy with a webcam. Yet each of his videos gets thousands of views.

    Think of the potential — someone with Dr. MacDonald’s knowledge combined with the humor of a comedian, and a little basic video editing skills — sounds very possible.

    That’s just one example.

    There are so many ways to help White people, an ocean of possibilities.

  88. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 12, 2012 - 11:40 am | Permalink

    @Lancashire lad:

    Hi Lancashire Lad

    You gave Marcy Flemming the following compliment / encouragement:

    “Your example of moderation makes an impression on those of us who are trying to be fair-minded here, so please do not be discouraged by the negative comments.”

    I want to share one of Marcy Flemming’s comments from the “Death To Modernity” article / thread here on T.O.O.

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/08/death-to-modernity/

    Here is what she wrote at 6:16 PM on August 6, 2012

    “We have lost one of our most valued contributors. Michael Page.
    He posted under several names here.
    Gentlemen, please adjust your flies to half mast to honor this great patriot who so bravely shot disarmed Sikhs because he thought that they were Muslims and the cause of in his immortal words, ‘our sick society.’

    It does not sound like she is being honest, much less “fair-minded”.

    How would she know that the Wisconsin shooter posted comments on T.O.O. under several names? I doubt she would have access to that kind of information.

    I refer to Marcy as “she” but the internet is relatively anonymous, so Marcy could be either male or female.

  89. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    August 12, 2012 - 9:09 am | Permalink

    @90404:

    A friend who studies Islamic Fundamentalism says this is in keeping with their long term strategy to take over US and Canada.
    And they spend 50x? as much lobbying as does Israel.
    Any comments?

    Qatar sends millions each year to islamic organizations in France.

  90. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    August 12, 2012 - 6:25 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    Your example of moderation makes an impression on those of us who are trying to be fair-minded here, so please do not be discouraged by the negative comments.

  91. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    August 12, 2012 - 1:42 am | Permalink

    @mari:
    Indeed, it was a sad day when ‘Mr Infanticide’ Obongo was invited as a hero to NOTRE DAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  92. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    August 12, 2012 - 1:39 am | Permalink

    @mari:
    Mari, if you look carefully at the last BIG L.A. riot, Van Jones or his group were behind it!!!!
    Do a web search.

  93. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    August 12, 2012 - 1:35 am | Permalink

    @mari:
    The 1/2 joo , half Puerto Rican, and a real creep.
    His lastest [?] book is ‘His Panic’ a ‘what me worry about the Mexicans taking over the USA’ tome.
    He is very anti-White.

  94. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    August 12, 2012 - 1:27 am | Permalink

    Off Topic: I was listening to NPR [yuk] and they cheerily reported [take a deep breath] That over 1000 MOSQUES
    have been built in the USA since 9-11.

    A friend who studies Islamic Fundamentalism says this is in keeping with their long term strategy to take over US and Canada.
    And they spend 50x? as much lobbying as does Israel.
    Any comments?

  95. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    August 12, 2012 - 1:22 am | Permalink

    @Pessimist:
    UCLA or U C LOTSA ASIANS.
    I doubt all those Non American Asians or 1st generation citizens will be as gullible as the White Christians.
    Or perhaps they will bond with the joos against the goys.

    KMD, what do you think, or see at Cal State?

  96. Barbara's Gravatar Barbara
    August 12, 2012 - 1:02 am | Permalink

    @fender: The name of that university?

  97. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 12, 2012 - 12:10 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    Anyone who tries to tar us all because some madmen starts shooting Sikhs is enemy enough for me.

  98. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 11, 2012 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

    @celt:
    Your history lesson is well worth knowing for all of us, thanks. An even simpler answer is that there is a separation of Church and State, not house of worship, temple, or mosque and State.

    On another note, the implicit whiteness portrayed by the Romney/Ryan announcement is rich. I am not supporting them, I am looking at the open appeal to a restoration of the competence of white men. Both men are openly religious, have blond wives who are full time mothers, larger than usual families and have a traditional elder/mentor relationship. Travon could be Obama’s son and Ryan could be Mitt’s son. Both are known for their effectiveness. Obama has done his best and been found wanting. The only reason he has Joe Biden around is so he can play the fool to make Obama look good. This is clearly the narrative, Obama is the embodiment of affirmative action, and it is not working for anyone. At a townhall meeting, put out by Ryan’s office, he is shown at a town hall meeting in which a man complains about the catch and release program for illegal immigrants. A woman interupts and demands that Ryan stop him from saying racist and sexist things. Ryan poloitely stands up for the guy’s right to speak. It may be an interesting campaign.

    I understand that the big money is in control. I merely find it heartening to see the story they want conveyed. Looks like white folks are not quite gone yet. While I do not subscribe to the theory, someday we will see Obama as the fall guy for the banks. It is not their fault the economy is shot, It is Obama’s fault! Tricky devils.

  99. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    August 11, 2012 - 10:52 pm | Permalink

    This is an important topic for everyone to learn about. People are willing to take out loans just to sit in a class with an arrogant Jewish “professor” leading a discussion? And even if they’re not present in the class the curriculum and reading list will be as twisted as they are. I guess people will learn the hard way that all of these worthless degrees are a money pit and dead end to employment. It always amazes me what uniformity of opinion Jews seem to have. Small school or large university, it’s all anti-White all the time. They don’t even need to discuss it. It just happens organically. Is their an anti-White gene in the tribe? I’m going with yes. And before you jump up and down with your teen when he or she gets accepted to a college (like in tv commercials), look it over carefully and just refuse to pay for any of the soft degrees. Tell your child straight out that it’s just a waste of money and won’t help in their job search. They’re better off driving a truck then attending some colleges.

  100. celt's Gravatar celt
    August 11, 2012 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    @Blake Watts: Speaking as someone who has published in US history, here’s the quickest non-conspiracy answer to the claim America was “not a Christian nation to begin with.”
    1) At the time of independence, the white population of the United States was 98% Protestant. That’s pretty fricking Christian.
    2) Several states maintained state churches two generations after the ratification of the Constitution — the last state to have a state church was, incredibly enough, Massachusetts. It ceased to be a state church sometime in the 1820s or 1830s.
    3) No serious scholar of American history — as opposed to left-wing talking head — claims that the First Amendment meant that Congress was denying that the United States was a Christian nation. It simply means Congress cannot declare that the United States has an established church at the federal level. As noted above, states were free to have them.
    4) After making these points, ask which of the Founding Fathers denied that America was a Christian nation. None did. More to the point virtually all of them made statements demonstrating they believed in a divine power — and they weren’t referring to Allah.
    For the record, I’m not particularly religious and I think the Founding Fathers were right not to have an established church at the federal level (which would have been difficult anyway given the plethora of Protestant churches at the time).
    You’re right about the Frankfurt School, but you don’t even need to mention them in this instance.

  101. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    August 11, 2012 - 8:56 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for all of your thoughtful contributions to the ongoing debate here.
    Alice, funny thing is that when I post on pro-Jewish forums I get accused of being a self-hating Jew.
    Sometimes you can’t win for losing !
    I like Ryan for his past pro-Ayn Rand remarks but I hope that he doesn’t compromise.
    I oppose Romney for his extreme pro-Israel remarks.
    I fundamentally agree with the commentators here on the black menace and to anyone who supports the blacks, be they Jews or Gentiles.
    There is no need to create enemies where they don’t exist and I am not an enemy on this crucial of the Black threat to western civilization.

  102. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 11, 2012 - 7:11 pm | Permalink

    @mari:

    “There are no longer any White majority private colleges. ”

    Completely untrue. The private northeastern university I graduated from had maybe two blacks in it. Everyone else was White, minus the Jews and Italians.

  103. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 11, 2012 - 6:49 pm | Permalink

    @mari:
    What you have described is the inevitable result of the fundamental misunderstanding of equality. The American people entered into the polite fiction that all blacks were capable of controlling themselves sufficiently to be trusted to govern themselves. Always remember that the real message that people understood at the time is never the one which is officially reported.
    The original talk after the March on Washington was not about MLK’s speech, few listened to it. The real story was the undeniable fact that very large numbers of blacks gathered together without violence. Coupled with MLK’s request to be judged by the content of their character, we gave it a chance. I don’t know the age of the vets you see are, but in Vietnam, blacks were used as disposable cannon fodder. The exemption for college saw to that.

    Foolish enough to actually believe our own press, we fell into acceptance of the notion that if one black could do something without embarrassing himself then all blacks must be presumed to be capable of so doing. The result was New Orleans in Hurricane Katrina. Only the military was capable of dealing with the lawlessness. The vast majority recognize that we may face this again and delude themselves that it will only be used for their protection. That is how freedom is lost.

  104. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 11, 2012 - 6:32 pm | Permalink

    There are no longer any White majority private colleges. The private colleges are as bad or worse than the state colleges.

    Even the Catholic universities pride themselves on admitting unqualified black protestants and asian and arab buddists, hindus, muslims and atheists instead of well qualified Catholics.

    Anyone who thinks one can escape anti White racism by transferring to a private college should check out the webstites of private universities . Actually, there are no longer any private universities except for a very few. All universities are controlled by the EEOC and Judicial orders to discriminate against Whites . That is because
    of federal student loans and massive federal grants.

    Most medical research is carried on at university medical schools with teaching hospitals. The money comes from the goverment. That research money supports the entire system.
    Then there is the goverment employee insurance, medicare and medi-caid paid to the university hospital fior medical care.

    Whether is is a major medical center like the private university Georgetown or some small college, all colleges operate with federal money and all colleges must discriminate against Whites or the federal, state, and student loan money stops.

    “Take the King’s shilling and do the King’s bidding” “Whoever pays the piper picks the tune”

    There are virtually no colleges that do not discriminate against Whites except for maybe the tiny St. John’s in Ojai Ca and one called something like Hinsdale in Indianna.

    Loyola University in Los Angeles is a private Catholic university. It is as anti White racist as is the public state university of California systen.

    Harvard is a private school. Google professor Noel Ignatiev of Harvard if you wish to read all about Harvard’s opinion of Whites. Ignatiev advocates the extermination of Whites.

  105. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 11, 2012 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    There are no longer any White majority private colleges. The private colleges are as bad or worse than the state colleges.

    Even the Catholic universities pride themselves on admitting unqualified black protestants and asian and arab buddists, hindus, muslims and atheists instead of well qualified Catholics.

    Check out the webstites of private universities Fender. Actually, there are no longer any private universities except for a very few. All universities are controlled by the EEOC and Judicial orders to discriminate against Whites . That is because
    of federal student loans and massive federal grants.

    Most medical research is carried on at university medical schools with teaching hospitals. The money comes from the goverment. That research money supports the entire system.
    Then there is the goverment employee insurance, medicare and medi-caid paid to the university hospital fior medical care.

    Whether is is a major medical center like the private university Georgetown or some small college, all colleges operate with federal money and all colleges must discriminate against Whites or the federal, state, and student loan money stops.

    “Take the King’s shilling and do the King’s bidding” “Whoever pays the piper picks the tune”

    There are virtually no colleges that do not discriminate against Whites except for maybe the tiny St. John’s in Ojai Ca and one called something like Hinsdale in Indianna.

    Loyola University in Los Angeles is a private Catholic university. It is as anti White racist as is the public state university of California systen.

    Harvard is a private school. Google professor Noel Ignatiev of Harvard if you wish to read all about Harvard’s opinion of Whites. Ignatiev advocates the extermination of Whites.

  106. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 11, 2012 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Let’s go over the role of Jews in the destruction of S. Africa. They began arriving in the late 19th century, the same time they invaded Palestine and America en masse from Russia.

    There was Dr. Selma Browde, leader of the ANC and leader of the S. African communist party. There was Kitson, who supported the party through his crooked businesses. Who can forget Joe Slovo, Albie Sachs, Dennis Goldberg, Harry Schwarz and Helen Suzman and others?

    They are doing to White Americans what they did to White S. Africans. Anyone seen the Anaheim Ca anti police riots in the news lately? It is all led by Jewish occupy movement activists.

    There are not enough blacks in the Los Angeles area anymore for a riot so they racist anti White Jews have to make do with
    hispanic illegal aliens and their felonious children

  107. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 11, 2012 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Plans for the White genocide are in the making. Interesting that the Tea party activists consist mainly of senior citizens.
    The military and National guards have in the past few years done the same planning against White supremacist neo nazis taking over small towns.

    Anyone notice that Holder made a speech at the funeral service for the Sikhs? Speech consisted of we will make more laws cracking down on and punishing Whites.

    Geraldo Rivera, nee Gerald Rivers is having a special tonight 8/11 Saturday about us evil White supremacists and especially those in the military. He claims that Whites in the Whites in the military have all sorts of secret neo nazi White supremacist cells. I can well understand why any
    White, Asian or Hispanic person in the military would become anti black after observing the behavior of black military and their rowdy dependents. Amazing how many teen age spawn of black majors and colonels end up in the juvenile detention centers of military base towns.

    For White hetrosexual men there is also the issue of affirmative action discrimination which is as bad in the military as it is in the Post Office. For the White women the issue is not just affirmative action but fending off the advances of the black lechers and rapists.

    I myself live near a huge VA hospital. It must be about 5 sq miles. They have housing for “disabled” vets. Those vets are virtually all black ghetto trash. They are not combat vets. They did not get injured while working at some job like mechanics or storekeepers. What use they were to the military I cannot imagine.

    They are all alcholic drug addicted borderline retarded and mentally ill. I know they are mentally ill because they wander the neighborhood carrying their medical records around.

    They love to harass women in the neighborhood, any age from 10 to 80. They show me their medical records. I notice scitzophrenia, bipolar, hallucinations, alcholol and drug addiction.

    How they got into the army I don’t know. White taxpayers in addition to supporting millions of black civilians on welfare and bogus disability are supporting this army of semi retarded, alcholic insane drug addicts living and eating free in VA housing.

    Here is the article

    Tuesday, August 7, 2012 Washington Times

    Imagine Tea Party extremists seizing control of a South Carolina town and the Army being sent in to crush the rebellion. This farcical vision is now part of the discussion in professional military circles.

    At issue is an article in the respected Small Wars Journal titled “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future.” It was written by retired Army Col. Kevin Benson of the Army’s University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., and Jennifer Weber, a Civil War expert at the University of Kansas. It posits an “extremist militia motivated by the goals of the ‘tea party’ movement” seizing control of Darlington, S.C., in 2016, “occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council and placing the mayor under house arrest.” The rebels set up checkpoints on Interstate 95 and Interstate 20 looking for illegal aliens. It’s a cartoonish and needlessly provocative scenario.

    The article is a choppy patchwork of doctrinal jargon and liberal nightmare. The authors make a quasi-legal case for military action and then apply the Army’s Operating Concept 2016-2028 to the situation. They write bloodlessly that “once it is put into play, Americans will expect the military to execute without pause and as professionally as if it were acting overseas.” They claim that “the Army cannot disappoint the American people, especially in such a moment,” not pausing to consider that using such efficient, deadly force against U.S. citizens would create a monumental political backlash and severely erode government legitimacy.

    The vision is hard to take seriously. As retired ArmyBrig. Gen. Russell D. Howard, a former professor at West Point, observed earlier in his career, “I am a colonel, colonels write a lot of crazy stuff, but no one listens to colonels, so I don’t see the problem.” Twenty years ago, then-Air Force Lt. Col. Charles J. Dunlap Jr. created a stir with an article in Parameters titled “The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.” It carried a disclaimer that the coup scenario was “purely a literary device intended to dramatize my concern over certain contemporary developments affecting the armed forces, and is emphatically not a prediction.”

    The scenario presented in Small Wars Journal isn’t a literary device but an operational lay-down intended to present the rationale and mechanisms for Americans to fight Americans. Col. Benson and Ms. Weber contend, “Army officers are professionally obligated to consider the conduct of operations on U.S. soil.” This is a dark, pessimistic and wrongheaded view of what military leaders should spend their time studying.

    A professor at the Joint Forces Staff College was relieved of duty in June for uttering the heresy that the United States is at war with Islam. The Obama administration contended the professor had to be relieved because what he was teaching was not U.S. policy. Because there is no disclaimer attached to the Small Wars piece, it is fair to ask, at least in Col. Benson’s case, whether his views reflect official policy regarding the use of U.S. military force against American citizens.

    The Washington Times

    UPDATE: The standard Defense Department disclaimer was added to the article after The Washington Times drew attention to the omission.

  108. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 11, 2012 - 5:11 pm | Permalink

    @Mark White: Put plainly, Connelly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Several commenters on this thread, including yours truly, went to some pains to indicate that the problems with Vatican II were far deeper and far longer in the making than a bunch of crypto-Jewish converts among the periti.

  109. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    August 11, 2012 - 4:23 pm | Permalink

    OT:

    The fanatically Zionist The New Republic denounces the Late Gore Vidal as a Ku Klux Klansman:
    http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/105747/where-have-all-our-racist-aristocrats-gone-requiem-gore-vidal

  110. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    August 11, 2012 - 3:55 pm | Permalink

    @Howard: What Howard said bears repeating ….

    “So-called “liberal bias” in academia, in reality, is an anti-White bias.”

    It’s so, so, so important for pro-Whites to “rewire” their brains and not be confused by the “liberal-conservative” and “left-right” dichotomies, which are actually disordered categories of discourse.

    It’s not an accident that such disordered categories are produced and highlighted in every media: it’s intentional, and for purposes of distracting from the anti-White nature of what’s going on.

    Thanks for your insight, Howard.

  111. Mother Trucker's Gravatar Mother Trucker
    August 11, 2012 - 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Liberalism/statism is where the money is. I was in a tire store during the eighties and picked up a ladies’ magazine. Here was an interview with Professor Galbraith (John Kenneth)-: “as soon as I started advocating interventionism (into the economy) I was never at a loss for any material want.”

    A Paycheck Whore! Ah, I knew it all along! Dr. Galbraith ended up owning a chalet in Switzerland. It is nearly impossible for foreigners to own more than 49%. Arms must have twisted at the highest levels. . .

    Surely, there are no Paycheck Whores in our movement!!

  112. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 11, 2012 - 3:48 pm | Permalink

    @Huntelaar:

    Sounds like you need to transfer. No it won’t get you away from cultural marxism but judging by your quote about on-campus crime, it sounds like your school is just a bit too “culturally enriched.” Try transferring to an all-White or majority-White private college. It’ll still be a bastion of liberal lies and fantasies, but it’ll be much more tolerable.

  113. Huntelaar's Gravatar Huntelaar
    August 11, 2012 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

    As a current college student I can say that cultural marxism dominates EVERYTHING about academia. EVERYTHING. It is beyond bad. It is just unthinkable at this point.

    Let me give you a glimpse of how bad it is:

    -There are multiple clubs/associations for various ethnic groups/nationalities (chinese association, latino club, blah blah blah) but every single club/association that is white/european oriented has been unconditionally banned, and they keep a list of all those banned clubs on the club policy website to scare off people who want to start new ones in that vein.

    -These ethnic clubs hold various propaganda campaigns during the year such as “carribean week” which includes posters about the slave trade. There is also the lovely islamic society which openly attempts to proselytize people and has held prayer in pain sight of everybody in the quad. The christians have clubs but they seem to mind their own business.

    -They have a campaign to “END RACISM” which involves indoctrinating freshmen during orientation with a bunch of pro-black, pro-minority, white guilt propaganda.

    -There are “embrace diversity” posters everywhere, some of which include pictures of mixed race couples.

    -There is an academic policy on “tolerance” which forbids any racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia etc. in all areas of academics, including research. This doesn’t just mean you can’t say ‘race x is inferior to race y because xyz’, it also means you can’t say things along the lines of “European cultures are objectively more desirable to African cultures because xyz.” In other words, if you don’t accept the cultural marxist line, you better keep your mouth shut.

    -The student newspaper is constantly spewing out anti-white BS. After the Trayvon martin incident a (black) columnist wrote an article saying that it was proof that there was endemic widespread white oppression and racism towards blacks.

    -when a crime happens on campus (which happens pretty often) they put out warnings on the email system giving some characteristics of the perp, but they never include race.

    -Cultural Marxism is everywhere in the curriculum in all areas except hard sciences. It is in economics. It is in international relations. It is in geography. It is in all the soft sciences. It is EVERYWHERE.

    I could go on but my blood pressure is getting too high.

  114. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    August 11, 2012 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

    @briton: Bernard Lazare, one of the greatest Jewish writers in all history in his book “Anti-Semitism” on page 350 wrote: “The Jew is not satisfied with de-Christianizing, he destroys Catholic or Protestant faiths, he provokes indifference but he imposes his idea of the world, of morals and of life upon those whose faith he ruins. He works at his age old task, the annihilation of the religion of Christ!”

    50 Years Ago: Vatican II changed the Vatican’s positions on key issues including the church’s teachings on Jews. Many of the intellectual forces behind the reforms were converts from Judaism.

    Read more: http://forward.com/articles/159955/converts-who-changed-the-church/?p=all#ixzz23GXpUEqf

  115. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    August 11, 2012 - 2:41 pm | Permalink

    “The curious thing that I see (or sense; perhaps incorrectly) is how right-wing Jews are now starting to dominate traditional conservative and extreme conservative web sites, news outlets, talk shows, etc. Many Jewish intellectual pundits are now embracing traditional American values – but with a Jewish slant. ”
    It’s easy to uncover them : they are obsessed with Muslims and never by the dispossession of whites. They never talk about the propaganda of racial-mixing, they don’t care about non-white fertility rates AS LONG AS the newborn population is not “judeo-incompatible”. Take France for example (or Geert Wilders in the Netherlands), the only way you could hear people talk against immigration on television is only if they talk about Muslims creating tension towards the Jewish community. In the 80’s and 90’s these people were the first one to call nationalists “n4zis”.

    So this comes back to what I said in my other post, as soon as things become judeo-incompatible, you are allowed to speak and be part of the system.

    There was a website that I encountered by accident, it was some sort of conservative think-tank, it took a few seconds to know who was behind it, and it wasn’t white anglo-saxon protestants.

    [ok after a couple of minutes I found the website]

    http://theunitedwest.org/about/our-mission/

    As you can see, you always have the same elements that express a jewish interest :

    -obsessed with the Muslim world as being the number 1 problem in the world (and not the dispossession of white nations)
    -trying to prove that Israel is a member of the Western civilization and that it should lead the way for a war against Islam.
    -never talk about immigration, unless this immigration contains judeo-incompatible element (muslim immigration).
    -never talk about things that matter for white ethnic solidarity (always pointing out the Muslim problem without pointing out those who promoted “tolerance, anti-racism, multiculturalism” and ridiculed nationalism in our nations).

  116. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 11, 2012 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

    @Blake Watts:

    You said

    “America was not a Christian nation to begin with!” I stifled the urge to talk about the Frankfurt School, because a short time explanation only results in my being labeled a “conspiracy theorist.”

    Comment

    Yes, you are right. Christians have been brainwashed (most and they are mainstream). America’s law is Common-Christian-Constitutional-natural law. What is being practiced by the Corporation UNITED STATES is Admiralty-UCC-Judaic legal fictions. This is completely different from actual law and one can easily verify this through any legal vs. law dictionary.

    America’s primary religion is still Christianity but it has been watered down through a myriad of schemes, including but not limited to divorcing the people from Christian law into Judaic legal fictions coupled with a massive dose of cultural Marxism.

    America was INDEED a Christian nation and country but the National Government was not. It took on a Christian Character due to the people who served in the National Government.

  117. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 11, 2012 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

    @briton:

    You said

    The curious thing that I see (or sense; perhaps incorrectly) is how right-wing Jews are now starting to dominate traditional conservative and extreme conservative web sites, news outlets, talk shows, etc. Many Jewish intellectual pundits are now embracing traditional American values – but with a Jewish slant.

    Answer

    You are describing two sides of the Star of David matrix. Others are Communism and Corporatism- Fascism and Zionism-National Socialism and Militarism. All of these points have global dominion and a combining of the world monolithic religions into one as an end goal.

    In America, we need to break this matrix and the way it is done is by way of protection of the military (which we do have) inside a lawful Republic style (bottom-up Authority structure) Government with Christianity (true) as the majority belief system with European/whites as the majority (90% plus) stock.

    I refer you all again to the re-inhabited Republic Governments (Nation States Articles of Confederation and Republic for the united States)

  118. Blake Watts's Gravatar Blake Watts
    August 11, 2012 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

    First of all Dr. MacDonald, I want to thank you yet again for your tireless and brilliant work. I know that the pressure must be intense and that confrontations are draining, but the fact that you have unmasked the truth must give you great energy and fortitude. You really are a pioneer leading your people out of a dark wilderness.
    And such a dark wilderness it is! An ignorant Christian friend lectured me recently that, “America was not a Christian nation to begin with!” I stifled the urge to talk about the Frankfurt School, because a short time explanation only results in my being labeled a “conspiracy theorist.” To fully understand the magnitude of the damage the left has done takes many hours of study and research. That’s the saddest part to me, that decent and fair minded people have been taken advantage of, and know down deep that something is TERRIBLY wrong, that our heritage is being confiscated…but they’re so utterly brainwashed that the truth simply bounces off their brains. Figure that the subversives have had a 70 year head start working the hearts and minds of an innocent populace that could never have imagined the kind of malice that their intellectual “superiors” have for them. It makes me so angry I could explode. It’s hard to figure out what to do with this information, how to channel the very real and normal righteous anger that you must feel when you start to figure out what has been going on right under our noses for decades. I hope that we are able to come up with some solutions.
    Christians are a tough nut for so many reasons. They’ve been told to turn the other cheek. They’ve been told to love others unconditionally. They’ve been programmed to believe that the Jews are spiritually superior (which turns out to be comical in its’ wrongheadedness).
    And of course, academia pounds us with PC, as does Hollywood.
    Thankfully, there are a few brave conservatives in the university system who are willing to stand up and FIGHT.

  119. August 11, 2012 - 1:34 pm | Permalink

    A society has agendas and taboos. In the end, taboos may be more effective than agendas.

    People may support or oppose an agenda, but agendas provoke open debate. Pro or con, it’s a matter of rational discussion and argument.

    A person might disagree with an agenda but may not find the agenda offensive or beyond the pale of discussion.
    Taboos are different. Taboos are considered ‘hateful’ and ‘foul’ and ‘noxious’ and ‘odious’. It’s treated more like a nasty fart than an idea. It cannot even be debated. The reaction is visceral; it overpowers a person’s emotions even before he or she gave it any thought. Certain words are loaded with ‘taboos’ via associations pushed by the media. So, the word ‘racism’ immediately conjures up Auschwitz, lynchings, KKK cross burning, bombed churches. But ‘communism’ isn’t taboo because the media haven’t associated that word with visceral images of murdered victims, razed villages, and etc.
    So, communism is still considered an agenda than a taboo. Even as one rejects communism, it is not thought beyond the pale to propose communism as an agenda.

    But taboos end debate. Indeed, taboos determine what can and can’t be agenda. Since ‘white racism’ is taboo, there can be no pro-white agenda.

    So, taboos control agendas more than vice versa.
    Who controls the taboos of our country? And what are our taboos?

    ———————————–

    At a time when the middle classes face economic troubles and anxieties, what does the GOP give us? Romney and Ryan whose main convictions revolve around tax cuts for the super-rich.

    Why doesn’t the GOP appeal to the (white) middle classes(at least working outside government)? Partly, it’s because much of the donations come from the superrich. But even more superrich money go to Democratics, so that alone can’t be the reason.

    The crucial difference is that Democrats not only appeal to the superrich(especially Jews) but also appeals to blacks, Hispanics, women, and gays because those brands of identity politics are permissible in our society. So, Democrats get money from the superrich but maintains the moralistic cachet of being for the ‘little people’.

    The ‘little people’ that the GOP should appeal to is the white middle class and working class, but such isn’t allowed because white identity politics is taboo in American society. So, GOP has nothing left but ‘free trade’ and ‘tax cuts for the rich’, which the American middle class and working class have tired of. Tax cuts for the superrich is especially stupid for the GOP since 2/3 of the superrich are Democrats, and nearly 40% of the Forbes 400 are Jews, and most of them are Democrats.

    Also, if Democratic Jews(the most powerful group within the Democratic party) eagerly push the party to appeal to identity politics among blacks, Hispanics, Asians, single women, and gays, it just happens that Republican Jews or neocons(the most powerful group within the Republican party) ardently push the party AGAINST playing to white middle class/working class identity. So, Democrats not only cater to the superrich but wrap themselves with the mantle of being for the underdogs. In contrast, the GOP caters to the superrich but cannot connect with underdog middle class and working class whites who are conservative for social and cultural reasons.

    GOP has become spiritually separated from its mass base that increasingly feels unappreciated, ignored, taken for granted. The only identity politics left in the GOP is pro-Zionism. Romney visits Israel and supports its apartheid policies against Palestinians but doesn’t even support Boys Scouts’ Christian policy on gay scout leaders.

    Neocon Jews see the white middle class and working class as potential pitchforkers–angry antisemitic mobs–, and so the GOP has become the party of abstract principles that serve the globalist rich. Its only identity politics is trying to appeal to the Hispanic vote and willing to start more wars for Israel.

    Yes, Jews do control this country, and Neocon influence has been deadly to the GOP.

  120. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    August 11, 2012 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

    @thm:
    THM, an image of Padre Pio? Where are you from (or your parents)?

  121. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    August 11, 2012 - 12:20 pm | Permalink

    Well, the Jewish worldview has captured both the center-left and the rightist elements of American politics. Let’s just say that the American ideological divide is now nothing more than the Jewish ideological divide.
    ———
    What makes the difference between the “system” that englobes the left-right political spectrum on one hand, and nationalists on the other hand is one single element : ethnocentrism. As long as you don’t promote ethnic solidarity of the founding and majority population, you are part of the system from the far-left to the far-right (neo-conservatives are conservative on everything EXCEPT, and this is the important element which makes all the difference, they do not accept an ethnocentric America, unlike paleoconservatives).

    So basically you have the system which is “judeo-compatible”, and when things become “judeo-incompatible” (like promoting ethnic solidarity for whites in our own countries, becoming more independent of the Middle-East and Israel, etc.) you get kicked out of the system.

  122. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    August 11, 2012 - 12:10 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay: Where there is a will, there is a way.

    Conservatives, WN, can breach the academic gates by pretending as liberals until they get tenure.

    Once they get tenure, make a sharp U-turn. Once a critical mass is reached, agitate, write, publicize, relentlessly and uproot and throw out this Jewish cultural marxism.
    —————
    But who is willing to spend so much money to get a Ph.D., wait another what, 10 years to get tenure (if you got the job in the first place), and I’m not even mentioning “social cost” with the risk of losing friends, hanging out with the wrong people (because they think you are a liberal when in fact you’re not), lying, pretending, keeping a façade, etc…until you reach the age of around 40 years old.

    Who is willing to accomplish this?

    The simple solution is to find a teacher who’s conservative, keep him as a good friend who will supervise your M.A., give you recommendations for bursaries, and then you will have a good springboard to keep on going in academia.

    Or, you can get some kind of diploma, and open up your own business and promote your own ideas (a nationalist library, a not-for profit organization that mostly helps whites, etc.).

    The goal and the mission should always be : how can I increase the ethnic solidarity of my people?

  123. thm's Gravatar thm
    August 11, 2012 - 11:43 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:

    Your readers might be interested to know that many South African Jews have fled the horror that majority rule in South Africa has brought courtesy of Mandela and his Communist friends.

    One thing that I noticed is that when the Israel press has articles about Jewish life in South Africa today, they are very blunt and candid about the catastrophic, violent situation that Jews (and all Whites) face there, saying such things as every South African Jew knows someone who was murdered or the object of brutal violence. Yet when the (largely Jewish controlled) Western mainstream media, such as the New York Times, the BBC etc, have articles about South Africa, they universally stick to the narrative that the problems in South Africa are caused by the residue of Apartheid (which ended 18 years ago) and never look at the terrible violence Whites there are experiencing because they are White.

    Of course those South African “Communists” you mentioned were by far predominantly Jewish. As am I, by the way, at least ethnically if not religiously.

  124. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 11, 2012 - 10:22 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    You neglected to mention your favorite tactic, slandering good people with guilt by association. Must make you proud to be Jewish!

  125. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 11, 2012 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    While I have no real hope for either political party, I am heartened that Romney did not pick an affirmative action VP. It seems that I am not the only one who recognizes that the only hope for this country is to restore white men to power.

  126. briton's Gravatar briton
    August 11, 2012 - 9:56 am | Permalink

    Well, the Jewish worldview has captured both the center-left and the rightist elements of American politics. Let’s just say that the American ideological divide is now nothing more than the Jewish ideological divide.

    The curious thing that I see (or sense; perhaps incorrectly) is how right-wing Jews are now starting to dominate traditional conservative and extreme conservative web sites, news outlets, talk shows, etc. Many Jewish intellectual pundits are now embracing traditional American values – but with a Jewish slant. That’s because they conceive of the old American-ness as being increasingly Jewishness. It’s a comfortable position to be in when you can define both yourself and your opposition.

    One prominent conservative Boston talk show host has recently started to use the on-air term “anti-semite” as a slur against those on the Left who might be critical of any neoconservative position – and he’s not even Jewish. Basically, this host is using the term as a silencing technique against the Liberal-Left in the same way that the terms racist and bigot are used as silencing techniques by those on the Left.

    The truly Christian worldview is now dead and buried in America. It only shows itself as a convenient and friendly mask of the new reality.

  127. August 11, 2012 - 7:57 am | Permalink

    @Howard:

    Never too late. cleverness, Strong will and deep faith. thats all we need.

  128. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 11, 2012 - 6:34 am | Permalink

    @Hmmm:
    Especially, if those “questions you don’t like” have an obvious Jewish agenda!
    Your only contribution here is exactly asking such questions. I remember you very well.

    Take a course in Advanced Jewish Trolling in Tel Aviv and then come back. ( but we have already taken a course in Detecting Advanced Jewish Trolling, so I can’t really help you ).

  129. Hmmm's Gravatar Hmmm
    August 11, 2012 - 6:04 am | Permalink

    It’s always an impressive style of argumentation to accuse those who ask questions you don’t like of being Jews.

  130. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 11, 2012 - 5:42 am | Permalink

    @Hmmm:
    Possibilities :
    1) Controlled opposition.
    ( they don’t mention “Jews”)
    2) Right wing “neo-con” Jews.
    3) Totally assimilated Jews.
    4) Exceptional “good Jews”.
    ( these are so few, they can’t stop the destructive behaviour of the Jewish majority).

    I suspect that behind the pseudonym “Hmmm” hides a name that is as Jewish as for example Inbar.

  131. Hmmm's Gravatar Hmmm
    August 11, 2012 - 3:42 am | Permalink

    Haidt, Gross and Inbar are all Jewish. How do you account for their decisions to conduct and publish research that undermines what you see as Jewish interests?

  132. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    August 11, 2012 - 2:19 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    Yeah TR , that may well have been the source.

  133. Hedgerow's Gravatar Hedgerow
    August 11, 2012 - 2:18 am | Permalink

    Something I noticed in many social science textbooks was that issues about which there was ambiguity were presented nevertheless in the book as if they were settled — and settled in accordance with the views of the authors. What was being dispensed often amounted to doctrine.

  134. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    August 11, 2012 - 1:58 am | Permalink

    @John hearns: Sums up nicely Hayek’s The Intellectuals and Socialism
    http://is.gd/uwIzuy

  135. Howard's Gravatar Howard
    August 11, 2012 - 12:47 am | Permalink

    @Eli Moore: “My girlfriend and my parents think that I am crazy for my obsession over cultural Marxism, but they, like most whites, have never been taken from an all white town and placed in the crazy world of a diverse college. ”

    Your ‘obsession’ is justified. Our country and culture is being torn asunder and Whites marginalized, demonized and disenfranchised by cancerous Jewish cultural Marxism, as was its purpose.

    Btw, I unfortunately, still reside in New Brunswick, NJ, home of your Alma Mater. I don’t know what years you attended this ‘esteemed’ institution that required incoming students to right an essay about the (non) ‘merits’ of diversity (excuse me while I puke…) but as it stands now, the demographics are about 5-10% white, 10-15% black and the rest of the city is Hispanic with illegal alien Mexicans comprising the majority of those interlopers.

    Need a ride to the college? No problem, Acapulco Taxi, Amigos Taxi or Latinos Taxi will get you there in a jiffy.

    What an outrage….

    Howard

  136. Howard's Gravatar Howard
    August 11, 2012 - 12:26 am | Permalink

    @Sanjay: IMHO it is too late in the game for that tactic. Should’be been implemented forty years ago.

    Howard

  137. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    August 11, 2012 - 12:24 am | Permalink

    I recall reading one opinion of why so many intellectuals tend to be liberal and it went something like this …

    Some smart people tend to be arrogant and they like to puff themselves up and to show off their intellect by creating long winded and high sounding words to try to support the most ridiculous ideas.

    There is nothing in it for these liberals to admit that a regular Joes common sense is superior to their so called intellect. But, it is.

  138. Howard's Gravatar Howard
    August 11, 2012 - 12:23 am | Permalink

    So-called “liberal bias” in academia, in reality, is an anti-White bias. Same as the so-called “mainstream” media. White people have to realize that there is not a “liberal” bias to the media but an anti-White bias and the reason for it. It doesn’t just come from nowhere; it comes from the Jewish ownership and the very strong editorial control they have over that media. They get to make sure there is nothing anti-Jewish that goes out in the mainstream media and they certainly do allow and put in anti-White things. Ditto in ‘our’ government.

    Howard

  139. Eli Moore's Gravatar Eli Moore
    August 10, 2012 - 10:22 pm | Permalink

    Dr. MacDonald,

    Don’t lose hope on college-aged whites. The picture of Jewish-intellectual rule that you have painted in your books is exactly the confusing world I found myself in at Rutgers University (ranked high by Hillel for Jewish population).

    I wasn’t even around Jewish professors much because I was studying hard sciences, but just the atmosphere drove me crazy.

    It took me about a year to unravel the insane world of a 68% white state having a university that was only 40% or so white (including Jews and probably Arabs).

    I remember having to write an essay on the merits of diversity just to get into the school.

    We need more academics like you to stand up for white Americans. You need to network and start an academic alliance! Please!

    My girlfriend and my parents think that I am crazy for my obsession over cultural Marxism, but they, like most whites, have never been taken from an all white town and placed in the crazy world of a diverse college.

    I think that other sane-minded whites will certainly stop their passiveness when they find themselves under assault.

    I was never political, religious, or ethnically conscious at all before college.

    Just the social pressures, crazy liberal doctrines, and ethnic cliques made me question my identity.

  140. Pessimist's Gravatar Pessimist
    August 10, 2012 - 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Starve the beast, don’t send your kids to the Ivy Leagues or any high priced college. All you do is reinforce the current psychopathology that infects higher education and mess with your kids.

    Face it they are also doing a lousy job educating by any measure.
    Read this study of the California system by NAS.
    http://www.nas.org/articles/politics_undermining_learning_scholars_warn_university_of_california

    The state of affairs is dreadful. There is no reforming it outside of starving it to death and doing a reboot.

    If a student wants social studies, buy him/her a beer truck, all the classic books(which are quite cheap) along with some DVD’s and they are set and cost a lot less than listening to some degenerate Leftist freak spout agit prop instead of lecturing and short changing the kid.

    Also support any change in student loans that make them harder to get. Academia has gotten addicted to the easy money like a heroin addict is to heroin. Support politicians who want to allow students to declare bankruptcy to get out from the loans.

  141. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    August 10, 2012 - 7:09 pm | Permalink

    Alice, for once I totally agree with you. We would all be better if Academe was either shut down en toto or sharply curtailed. American Academe is the last stronghold of Marxism in the world. All feminist, People of Color, so-called ‘Holocaust’
    and Latino studies need to be abolished now. They practice guerilla warfare against the country.
    Your readers might be interested to know that many South African Jews have fled the horror that majority rule in South Africa has brought courtesy of Mandela and his Communist friends.

  142. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 10, 2012 - 6:36 pm | Permalink

    I hope to live to see the day when Dr. MacDonald is seen as the man who led the way out of the wilderness. One of the pleasant by-products of the current mess is that all intelligent people will be forced to take a look at what went wrong. Sooner or later, the natural consequences of willful blindness become too difficult to avoid. The social sciences will be one big area of investigation. How many billions have been “invested” in ending the cycle of poverty, the cycle of abuse etc. All to no avail. I think the gig is up, people all over have been saying that they long suspected that the Emperor had no clothes. My guess is that college, to some extent even the elite colleges, will be a buyers market. That may result in serious change.

  143. August 10, 2012 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

    Where there is a will, there is a way.

    Conservatives, WN, can breach the academic gates by pretending as liberals until they get tenure.

    Once they get tenure, make a sharp U-turn. Once a critical mass is reached, agitate, write, publicize, relentlessly and uproot and throw out this Jewish cultural marxism.

  144. Leo Hirschocker's Gravatar Leo Hirschocker
    August 10, 2012 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    This is a replay of Weimar. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction (until it is at a state of equilibrium)?

  145. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 10, 2012 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

    K MacDonald:

    Have absolutely no arguements with this. These truths need to be spread far and wide.

  146. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    August 10, 2012 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Intellectual historian David Hollinger is quoted here (“page 4″), but page 4 of what book? His “Post-ethnic America: Beyond Multiculturalism” is described as a civic rather than ethnic-oriented book on Amazon, but he sounds interesting.

Comments are closed.