The Future of the European peoples (Part 1)

September 9, 2012 — 44 Comments

Tom Sunic

The following is a translation of my speech delivered in the German language ( Die Zukunft der Völker Europa) at the NPD Summer Academy in Saarbrucken, Germany (August 23–26, 2012). The meeting and the lectures were also attended by several representatives of the Front National from the nearby Alsace, France. My original speech in the German language can be downloaded here.

* * *

First off, thanks to the NPD for the invitation. I would also like to extend my greetings from my colleagues from our American Third Position Party. The ethnic and demographic situation in Europe today looks completely different from 40 years ago. Therefore, it is appropriate to reevaluate differently terms such as ‘nation’, ‘state’ and ‘national consciousness’. My main thesis is that the future of the European peoples, or rather their chances of survival, lie in the rejection of petty nationalism, in the rejection of all forms of interethnic resentments, as well as in the revival of the idea of the Reich.

I must point out that some unpredictable historical deviations occurred during the period of the last decade of the previous century. In the early nineties of the last century communism collapsed in Eastern Europe because its ideas had already been better put into practice in the West — albeit under a different name. Many paleo-communist ideas, such as egalitarianism, the intellectual Gleichschaltung, as well as the belief in permanent economic progress in a putative multicultural system — all those ideas the early Bolsheviks and latter-day Marxist intellectuals had dreamed about — were better realized in the capitalist West. For that reason alone, it was to be expected that former Marxist intellectuals and politicians in Germany or the EU could easily convert to liberalism and the ideology of the free market.

Advertisement

A second historical deviation allows us now in hindsight to welcome some parts of the communist legacy. In Eastern Europe there are almost no non-European immigrants. Thanks to modest living conditions under communism, Eastern Europe had never exerted attraction on Third World immigrants, although the communist system had always longed for and also worked toward a multi-cultural system, and in addition, rejected any form of nationalism. However, Third Worldimmigrants were not naïve, as they knew that they could have a better life in former colonial countries and former so-called fascist countries of the West. Life in Frankfurt on the Main was more enjoyable than life in Frankfurt on the Oder.

A third historical paradox needs to be mentioned here. Those of you, those of us who lived for a period of time in Third World countries know well what racial discrimination and social and cultural exclusions against the Other means. A mestizo inMexico, or a Turk from eastern Turkey residing in Istanbul, knows very well which racial and cultural circle he belongs to in his homeland. A destitute Turk with Asian features has no place in the higher echelons of White upper-class Turkey, whose denizens are, as a rule, very proud of their European, i.e. White Albanian and Bosnian origins. A Mexican illegal immigrant, in his now newly discovered America, knows his rights by heart — rights he can only dream about in his native Mexico. Otherwise he would not have come to the so-called racist Americain the first place. Now, residing in America, he can bet on legal support from left-wing intellectual circles. Germany and America offer immigrants from all parts of the Third World social opportunities that are usually foreclosed to them in their native countries.

Let’s make a first quick summary: The course of history is always open. We should be careful with predictions about apocalyptic endtimes awaiting the European peoples. History is not pre-programmed and there are no last stops on the horizon. The lapse of historical time knows no boundaries and can easily destroy all walls of time — if I can use the title of a book by the German writer Ernst Jünger. Our present liberal wall of time may collapse any minute. Therefore, it is wrong to invoke horror scenarios and complain about the imminent extinction of the European peoples.

East and West Europe: What moves their peoples?

We have to make a clear distinction between the self-perceptions among Eastern European and Western European peoples respectively. What moves Western European and Eastern European peoples today? Which are their dominant myths? Thirty or forty years ago, the main topic among West European nationalists was not non-European immigration, but rather the subject of communism and how to defend themselves against the communist threat. The national question of various European nations, apart from low key riots in South Tyrol, Northern Ireland, or the Basque country, was not on the agenda. The perceived enemy of all West European nationalists, including their political establishments, was not the issue of non-European immigrants, but the issue of the communist commissar. Today the communist commissar is no longer an issue for Western European nationalists because the overriding issues is that all West European peoples, without exception, are exposed to a massive inflow of non-European immigrants. In retrospect, and in light of today’s endless waves of non-European immigration, the question arises as to whether communism, after all, was really such a life threatening danger for the European peoples? Maybe under communism all Western European peoples would have secured their identity far better than under capitalism?

After all this was the case inEastern Europe. National consciousness in Eastern Europe is today much more pronounced than in West European countries. This may be partly due to the erstwhile violent repression of their nationalist sentiments by the communist system which, as a rule, the ruling communist party always dubbed “the fascist danger.”

Fear of the endless influx of non-European immigrants and the real or alleged subversion of their core nationhood now prompts many European nationalists to redefine notions such as “people,” “national consciousness,” or “national spirit.” Back then it was common for all West European nationalists to define their national identity by vilifying nationalists from their neighboring European countries. Fortunately, this is no longer the case. Much more important today for all Western European nationalists and their representatives is the survival of their common bio-cultural uniqueness. Again we must point to another historical paradox here; namely, the larger the number of non-Europeans flocking to Europe, the less the chance of conflicts between once warring neighboring West European peoples. It is hardly possible to imagine the Flemings starting a war with the neighboring Walloons, or the Austrian government inciting the South Tyroleans into the secession from Italy.

By contrast, feelings of historical guilt or self-hatred, which can be daily observed in Western Europe and particularly in Germany, are unknown among East European peoples. National pride is still relatively strong and it determines to a large extent the national consciousness of all its citizens and all its politicians. The common folk in Croatia and Hungary, for instance, need not read academic papers on the dangers of multiculturalism, nor do they need to discuss the meaning of their nation’s soul. Most of them know that they are White, European, and good Christians.

Despite many advantages in terms of their ethnic homogeneity, the situation between Eastern European peoples is not good. All Eastern European peoples show a high degree of “negative” or “reactive national consciousness,” which always excludes the neighboring European Other. One should not underestimate interethnic and inter-European hatred among East European peoples as a source of new conflicts in the region. Although they have been spared so far the massive immigration of non-Europeans, internal interethnic resentments among East Europeans still run high.

Here are some examples of such “reactive” or “negative national consciousness” among the peoples of Eastern Europe, which are often difficult to grasp by nationalists inFranceor in distantAmerica. Thus, the national consciousness of a Polish nationalist, who may otherwise agree on all issues with his colleague from Germany, such as their common criticism of globalism, anticommunism and anti-capitalism, is often rooted in his strong anti-German feelings. Furthermore, one third of ethnic Hungarians — more than 2 million people — live under the foreign jurisdiction of Slovakia, Serbia and Romania, and their national consciousness is often based on a close relationship with their kinsmen in Hungary. Despite an apparent peace treaty between Serbia and Croatia, their perceptions of each other, as well as their self-perceptions, are mutually irreconcilable. These two peoples share two completely different views of contemporary history, and display two mutually hostile victimhoods. In short, Serbs and Croats, despite their astonishing racial similarity, display two radically and mutually exclusive national consciousnesses. Often, for a Croat nationalist it is hard to define himself as “a good Croat” unless he first describes himself as a “good anti-Serb.”

Who is to be blamed for such fatal and mutually hostile self-perceptions that are still alive among and between peoples of Eastern Europe? Modern historiography and modern court historians, as well as modern mediacricy share a large dose of responsibility for these negative perceptions of each other. Although East European peoples rid themselves of communism, the overall interpretation of their respective contemporary histories has not changed much since 1945. National myths and mutually negative and exclusive perceptions of each other are largely based on flawed historical memories dating back to the Second World War. Here is a glaring example:

The root causes of the break-up of the former communist Yugoslavia and the ensuing war in 1991 are to be traced to Yugoslav communist historiography, which had held out for decades the figure of 600,000 Serbs, Jews and Communists allegedly killed during World War II by the so called Nazi Croats. At the time of communist Yugoslavia, the verbiage of anti-fascism and the so-called Nazi-Croats were the two main symbols of paramount evil, but also symbols that constituted the two negative founding myths of communist Yugoslavia, i.e. the two “civil religions” that kept the communist state of Yugoslaviaalive. In 1991, a historian and the future head of state, Franjo Tudjman came into revisionist limelight. In his earlier works of the late eighties, Tudjman had significantly reduced the number of Serbs, Jews and Communists killed in the Croatian Nazi-Ustashi camps — from 600,000 down to 60,000. The consequences of this new historical narrative in a new-born Croatia were soon to be known worldwide. The ethnic Serb minority in a crumbling Yugoslavia and a new-born Croatia went literally into panic attacks in the face of what they believed was as a resurgence of fascist Croatia. And then all hell broke loose.

One might draw a parallel with Germany. Supposedly the impact of the so-called Beneš decrees and the expulsion of 3.5 million Sudeten Germans from Czechoslovakia in 1945 were to be critically addressed by the European Commission in Brussels. One can guess that this would likely lead to serious tensions not just between Germany and the Czech Republic, but would also cause serious troubles all over Europe. In short, flawed, exaggerated, surreal, deceitful, or romantic historical narratives, especially those tinkering with WWII body counts, are the main culprits of the lingering mutual fear and interethnic hatred among East and Central European peoples.

End of Part 1 of 2. Go to Part 2.

Dr. Tom Sunic (www.tomsunic.com) is a writer and the Board member of the American Third Position Party)

42 Comments to "The Future of the European peoples (Part 1)"

You can follow all the replies to this entry through the comments feed

Alice Teller

September 9, 2012 - 5:04 pm | Permalink

Thank you very much for this glimpse into a part of Europe which is not part of my direct heritage. Like many Americans, my knowledge of this part of the world is scant indeed. I look forward to the second installment.
fender

September 9, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

There are frequent marches in Russia and Ukraine against immigration, so I’m not sure that Eastern Europe is exempt from the plague of multiculturalism. Plus I’ve heard from people in Ukraine that there are a lot of black and Arab exchange students in the universities. I’m sure it’s not as bad as it is in the West, but everything I hear from the Slavic nations seems to suggest that things are getting worse.
Bobby

September 9, 2012 - 7:05 pm | Permalink

@fender: Things will continue to get worse, as long as the Western World has an elite(we know who they and their enablers are) that owns the production of images and the popular media. Or, I should say as long as people keep referring to the images that the elite put out, because they will always have the ownership of the media(s) that put those damaging images out. I dare say that i have traveled more than most people and I can tell you that no matter where you go, let’s say in Europe, east or west, you have generation after generation of youth that follow the advice and imitate the images of Hollywood and the American media. It’s a weapon for control of the minds of people in the hands of those who own it, that cannot be overestimated. That is why every single new political system that comes to power, seeks to control the content of communication.
Bobby

September 9, 2012 - 7:09 pm | Permalink

@Bobby: I made several trips to the old Yugoslavia of Tito, and I can tell you that everything, EVERYTHING, that came out of Hollywood was imitated by the young slavics, boys and girls, and still is.
Jett Rucker

September 9, 2012 - 11:34 pm | Permalink

The link to Franjo Tudjman doesn’t work.
Sanjay

September 10, 2012 - 12:25 am | Permalink

A United States of Europe including Russia with a Gold Currency, common defense and common christian heritage would be a great project.

Unfortunately, the blood sucking Jew wants a different kind of Europe. Fiat money, divided Europe, constant war between NATO and Russia and mass non-White immigration.

And the blood sucking Jew is winning so far.

Europeans better wake up from the zombie coma they are in, or Europe will be the Brown continent, and the blood sucking Jew will be triumphant.
Mark White

September 10, 2012 - 1:02 am | Permalink

Politics both in Europe and America will become more open racialized in the next 8 to 10 years… So people need to be more positive.
Tadzio

September 10, 2012 - 2:21 am | Permalink

If sunshine is indeed the best disinfectant then there should be well financed multinational survey of WWII body counts. It would require the repeal of repressive anti free speech laws hindering scholarship and would likely debunk the regnant heresy hobbling White consciousness.
Tom Sunic

September 10, 2012 - 2:47 am | Permalink

To: Jett
Re: Franjo Tudjman (1991-1999) President of Croatia, the revisionist
Try again:
1. Mark Weber’s IHR. „ Croatia’s Leader Denounced as Holocaust Revisionist, 1993
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p19_Weber.html
Also
2. The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/22/us/anger-greets-croatian-s-invitation-to-holocaust-museum-dedication.html
“Anger Greets Croatian’s Invitation To Holocaust Museum Dedication,” By DIANA JEAN SCHEMO
Published: April 22, 1993.
Norman Lowell

September 10, 2012 - 2:55 am | Permalink

Malta, this inestimable Sacred Island since time immemorial – is being invaded, overrun by sub-Saharan, primitive Blacks.
They come in boatloads by the hundreds, steadily every week.

And the corrupt Catholic Church gives the “moral underpinning” to this invasion -
infuses guilt and pity within our People, towards meekly accepting these Illegal Invaders.
Christianity in Malta, betrayed the Maltese.

Then comes the whole Liberal bandwagon:
A Zionist Media (The Times), columnists and TV hosts, many of whom fervent Communists up to a few years ago.
And the pathetic, traitorous lot of NGOs and Do-Gooders.

And yet, this small Island is about to ignite the spark that will set Europe ablaze.
Imperium Europa will be launched from Malta this Year 2012.
A planetary Imperium for Europids only – and none else!

2012: Anno Zero!
Imperium
Norman Lowell
The Sacred Island of Melitae
Karlfried

September 10, 2012 - 4:53 am | Permalink

I am a farmer in Frankfurt in Germany. I want to give some information about Europe to you.
Europe is not small. Total area is the same as the USA, European population is 750 million, double that of USA.
The most important question to both Europe and the USA is, whether their white populations (that is “us”, in the German language “wir”) shall got out of existence within the next 50 years due to incoming much-ten-millions of poor people from the Third World, plus their offspring plus mixing with the white population.

In Germany we have had for decades and up to recently a kind of strong “brain washing” from the government, saying that “Multiculti is a good thing”. Now that it is obvious that the contrary is true, the roll back in public speaking has started. Almost everyone who does openly support multiculturalism will not be taken serious by the audience.

Of course, those lines of development need their time, probably they need decades. But in Germany, a very good start has been made in the last two years.

***

By the way, here you find our German music top-star, Helene Fischer. I hope that You like it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujOIvM5wieU
Und Morgen Frueh Kuess Ich Dich Wach

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxjJFB-j5RU
Helene Fischer – Ave Maria
Mickey Meadows

September 10, 2012 - 6:08 am | Permalink

@Bobby:

yes things will get worse, but in order to gain a clear judgement on ‘how bad is bad’ we need to step outside the current ethnical paradigm we exist in, and into the paradigm our resurgents would live in.
A great clue for doing this, is the simple insight that at the core of our enemies strategy is that Whites must be prevented from Organizing. Right now, all this harm is being done because whites are just atomized individuals. In fact more than that. They are atomized individuals racked with guilt and fear and uncertainty.
That’s what it takes to defeat the White peoples, and the enemy knows it. Organized…even with one hand tied behind our backs…and we dominate. They know that. History knows that.
So we use that understanding to assess ‘how bad is bad’ and ‘how bad is the point of no return’. In reality, it can get a lot lot worse than this, before we reach that absolute point. Because that absolute point of no return can be stated simply as the point at which it is phyiscally impossible for the White peoples to organize. Not…that we are too disordered or dysfunctional or too afraid to organize, but that it is anyway physically impossible.
We are a long long long way from that. And if we can change the power equation just enough, so that we can once again become an oranized people. And by that I mean….at all social levels we can openly and explicitly organize. If we can accomplish that, then everything else can be undone and reversed.
Why? because none of it happened honestly in a proper deal between peoples. It was done coercivelly and that means organized White peoples havce the moral right to reverse all of it, by whatever means necessary.
Mickey Meadows

September 10, 2012 - 6:17 am | Permalink

@Mickey Meadows:

s’cuze massive typos
Mickey Meadows

September 10, 2012 - 6:30 am | Permalink

@Karlfried:

Good show Karlfried.
Mickey Meadows

September 10, 2012 - 7:01 am | Permalink

None of it has been a legitimate agreement between peoples, so none of it is legitimate:
told not asked:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWHPJ8hO-ZM
Telemaco

September 10, 2012 - 8:37 am | Permalink

Mister Sunic. Today Franco’s Spain even being to many including me was mediocrity, was nationalistic, religious, patriotic is pretty much dead, we are at the same level even say worse than other Western European nations, we opened 30 years destroyed, it may be that the Eastern European in about 10 or 20 years is at the same level as we are now.

Sorry for my bad English.
European

September 10, 2012 - 9:59 am | Permalink

@Karlfried:
Sehr schoen Karlfried, Danke!
European

September 10, 2012 - 10:21 am | Permalink

@ Tom Sunic,
Thank you for the link to your “Vortrag” in German. Much appreciated.
Bernadette.

September 10, 2012 - 11:51 am | Permalink

Always a good speech from you Tom….
Vlad Writes

September 10, 2012 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

@Norman Lowell: Let us just hope that the United States of Judaism doesn’t send its rockets and airplanes your way. Hopefully, you will be granted the right of self determination, free from the drag of multiculturalism.
Pierre de Craon

September 10, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

@Vlad Writes: Amen. Good luck to Malta. She needs it as much as we do.
fender

September 10, 2012 - 6:53 pm | Permalink

@Karlfried:

Sorry but you Germans are screwed. The people who rule you are never going to give up their power, and you’ll never be able to deport the millions of third worlders in your country without the jew-led US and UK declaring war on you again for turning “evil” and “fascist” once again.

You guys went all in with Hitler and the N*zis and unfortunately you lost. You won’t ever recover from what happened to you in 1945. Believe me, it wish it were otherwise, but I just don’t see Germans having the intellectual and spiritual strength required to utterly abolishing all German guilt, re-taking their country and kicking the filth out.
Bobby

September 10, 2012 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

@Karlfried: Thank you Karlfreid, beautiful.
Bobby

September 10, 2012 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

@Mickey Meadows: Great post Mickey, and I agree with much of it, but I for one, am not racked with guilt and fear. I constantly hear this about the Europeanb-American population, but have rarely encountered it. Most Americans I’ve encountered don’t seem guilty about anything short of stealing their grandma’s wheelchair.
Bobby

September 10, 2012 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

@fender: fender, what seems obvious turns out very often to be otherwise. Everyone knows the ugly, unpopular guy who married the knockout beauty and were utterly astounded when they heard of it. I heard or read hundreds of stories and talk show opinion, where it was “common knowledge” that Germany should never again be united, and indeed, never would be united again. I listened to a Southern California talk show host, a Jewish dude who claimed to be an expert on Europe and the American Civil war, rail on about how Germany is best left divided and nothing would be able to reunite it anyway. This was less than a year before it was reunited. I remember it well because I came home from work in my van, and parked under a tree at my home with a Mickey’s big mouth, being very tired and ready to down that ice-cold brew.
Alice Teller

September 10, 2012 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

@Bobby:
I agree with you Bobby. I have never felt guilt for my ancestors actions. I think the truth is that whites have learned that the ‘culture’ chooses to assign guilt and no refusal will be heard.

Jason and Pierre, in case you missed it, Joe Webb has a piece on Brazil over at AmRen.

http://www.amren.com/features/2012/09/is-brazil-a-racial-democracy/
Istvan

September 10, 2012 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

Poland has a large Vietcong population and some Africans and Pakistanis. And they lagalized their illegal immigrants.
fender

September 10, 2012 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

@Bobby:

Nice metaphors, but let’s stick with reality. Germany is still an occupied nation and Germans have no one representing their interests in their own government. That’s not too different from any other White nation, but it’s especially repressive in Germany. To the best of my knowledge German scientists are prohibited from developing military technology and they have no nuclear weapons, which makes them sitting ducks for Israel and its vassal state of the US.

Furthermore, pretty much the entire German populace is descended from the more cowardly and feminine Germans who didn’t have to be “denazified” or liquidated by the US and Soviet jew minions, which means that today’s Germans lack the racial fire of the men under people like Arminius, von Moltke, and der mustache.

True, Germans are still a relatively bright people, but it’s the liberal kind of brightness, i.e. “How do we make Germany as multicultural and tolerant as possible for all peoples.” Not the proud, aristocratic intelligence of, say, Bismarck. Those days are over.

The Immortals give us some hope, however. Clearly some Germans haven’t been fully brainwashed by anglo/jew/soviet propaganda and are well aware of the crimes that the internationalists committed against their nation before, during, and after WW2. But still, it’s not enough. If Germans are to retake their country it has to happen soon, when third worlders are still a minority and can be deported relatively peacefully. If Germans wait too long they’re going to find themselves overwhelmed and helpless against the dark hordes that their traitorous politicians have flooded their beautiful country with.
Mark White

September 10, 2012 - 8:02 pm | Permalink

@Bobby: I listened to a Southern California talk show host, a Jewish dude who claimed to be an expert on Europe and the American Civil war, rail on about how Germany is best left divided and nothing would be able to reunite it anyway.

Few things annoy me more than jewish ‘historians” or “experts”.
TyronRobertParsons

September 10, 2012 - 8:23 pm | Permalink

@fender:

If whites/Christians take over the world Government the “Jews” are errecting, they are OVER and then we could set everyone free in our home nations at the 4 corners.
Venona

September 10, 2012 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

Often, for a Croat nationalist it is hard to define himself as “a good Croat” unless he first describes himself as a “good anti-Serb.”

This calls to mind Nietzsche discussing the “anti-French and anti-Russian folly.” But I’d like to think there is a growing solidarity among European peoples because of the grave mutual threat. Perhaps just wishful thinking on my part?
TabuLa Raza

September 11, 2012 - 12:39 am | Permalink

Talk radio last Saturday night in L.A.- The national show (Coast to Coast) had a guest who broached the subject of PNAC (Project for a New American Century- mostly jewish) and AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee). AIPAC’s influence was discussed.

I could almost see the host sinking down in his chair toward the floor.

He said: “Well, we all have to die sometime.” He seemed truly shaken and stirred.
90404

September 11, 2012 - 12:42 am | Permalink

@Istvan:
good gawd
90404

September 11, 2012 - 12:46 am | Permalink

@Mark White:
are all jews experts?
Noble Lord

September 11, 2012 - 12:56 am | Permalink

FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:

Unlike the debate which took place between the three professors, i find this author either does not know what he’s talking about, or he’s comfortable leading a siccophantic brand of sheep!

HE SAID:

“Today the communist commissar is no longer an issue for Western European nationalists because the overriding issues is that all West European peoples, without exception, are exposed to a massive inflow of non-European immigrants.”

WHAT?

FREAKING WHAT?

ARE YOU DEEEF?

BLIND?

AN IDIOT?

SIT DOWN, NO SERIOUSLY SIT DOWN IN A CORNER!

As for those who agree with this author, i’ll remain silent as YOU pick up the poisoned chalice and explain!

I mean like, what the…Koolaid that’s it koolaid!

Disinfo?

Typical WN ideology and rabble rousing?

Good stuff for dim people.lol
Karlfried

September 11, 2012 - 1:54 am | Permalink

To
Mickey Meadows, European, fender, Bobby.
Thank You for giving a response to my opinion. I like this blog and I am glad about this very friendly welcome.

To Fender
”Sorry but you Germans are screwed.”
English ist not my native language, so I have to guess sometimes about the meaning of the words. I understand your sentence this way:
”Sorry, but you Germans are in a very difficult situation. It will not be easy to find a way out.”
If I did understand you right, my answer is: We know that. Germany is an occupied country since 67 years and our leaders of today are leading the country into the hell. But this situation is no obstacle for us to live our lifes, to be happy and also to do our work and to do everything that is possible to avoid this evil fate. It is no good if you hang down your head when you are in a difficult situation. The real wonder ist, that we Germans are still in existence and can live. We are thankful for this.

… If Germans are to retake their country it has to happen soon, when third worlders are still a minority and can be deported relatively peacefully. If Germans wait too long they’re going to find themselves overwhelmed and helpless against the dark hordes that their traitorous politicians have flooded their beautiful country with…
I agree with this. This problem can only be solved, if the Anglo-Saxons and the Germans do it hand-in-hand together. Besides a big solution there are many small part-solutions. A large number of foreigners leave Germany today by their own will. Many Turks, even if they have lived here for three generations and have a German passport, leave Germany on their own will because they feel inside that this is not their country. We give them a free university education in Germany and after the end of the studies they go to the homeland of their grandfathers. That is a win-win-situation for both Germans and Turks.

How do we Germans look at ourselves:
Our national symbols are the Germania and the Eagle. But a very common name is:
“Der deutsche Michel”. Michael is the saint for Germany, same as George is the Saint for England. Michel is a short form for Michael. With this word comes in mind a man with a “Zipfelmuetze”. In old times men did wear this “cap” in bed and sometimes at home during the day in winter. It is a symbol for absolute harmlessness and the wish to live in your tidy small own home. So most of the time we live as “Michels” and we do not have much heroes and geniuses. But in case of need, there will be enough of them. I cannot see a downgo of the German people. The picture of the “Michel” ist several hunderd years old. We have not changed in more than 1000 years in our “what we are”. Of course Germans are not so as they are described in Hollywood-films.

This inside-description of Germany has the aim to describe, how many options there are, how many part-solutions there are to avoid the extinction of the white race. I myself and many Germans do not wait for a big solution, but we work in one thousand little steps.
salus

September 11, 2012 - 5:33 am | Permalink

Nationalism in each nation is the building block to greater European nationalism and real union of solidarity. The author attacks ” petty nationalism”, and speaks about transcneding it. What does he mean by petty nationalism ? This reminds one of the situation on South Africa in the early 70′s, where the liberal attack on the policy of separate development begun with ” doing away with petty appartheir”. The attack succeede because without the so called ” petty apartheid” one could not have ” grand apartheid”. Nationalism is nationalism, if there is a difference between two rival nations, it is a robust difference, and it need not to translate into bloodshed and violence as long as there is a common enemy, or threat larger than their own perceived grievances. Regional nationalism can lead to a grand nationalism stemming from a common blood ,roots, tradition, history. What belongs together will come together. The author is profuse with theories. Intellectual prowess at its finest. What is missing is the elements ofr the militancy which can realize some aspects of the theory. Maybe he time is not ripe? What does make anyone think that a people can recover their nation after they have lost it ? . If we were speaking about a temporary occupation, it is understandable. Here we are speaking about a demographic occupation which is changing the demographic of the nation. The invasion which Europe is subjected started in 1945, the invasion has not been arrested, on the contrary it has grown by leaps and bounds, and now threatens the very cohesion and existence of the nation and continent as it once was.
Curmudgeon

September 11, 2012 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

@Noble Lord: ES&D.
Richard

September 11, 2012 - 6:31 pm | Permalink

Hi Fender

You wrote:

“Furthermore, pretty much the entire German populace is descended from the more cowardly and feminine Germans who didn’t have to be “denazified” or liquidated by the US and Soviet jew minions, which means that today’s Germans lack the racial fire of the men under people like Arminius, von Moltke, and der mustache.

True, Germans are still a relatively bright people, but it’s the liberal kind of brightness, i.e. “How do we make Germany as multicultural and tolerant as possible for all peoples.” Not the proud, aristocratic intelligence of, say, Bismarck. Those days are over.”

I was thinking about this earlier, and a thought came to me. I’ll try to express it.

(I should add that I don’t know much about history or maybe anything. Maybe I do — I don’t know.)

I don’t know why you wrote that the modern Germans are descended from the more cowardly, feminine Germans.

Are you saying that they avoided fighting in the war? For cowardly reasons?

(Again, I don’t know much about Germany’s history.)

Did the people who fought for Germany volunteer?

Anyway, about the thought I had earlier…

If the Germans who avoided fighting in WW2 did indeed act cowardly, that doesn’t mean that there is not some noble, fighting spirit still inside their DNA.

It might still be buried in there, waiting to come alive.

Maybe the reasons for their avoidance of fighting in the war are many and complex. It doesn’t necessarily mean their genes should be written off as cowardly or weak or feminine.

I think that, in some ways, I used to be sort of cowardly, but I’m not anymore. So genes aren’t the only thing that affect a person’s character or behavior.

Even though I asked some questions in my comment here, I’m not really expecting or needing a reply. I’m just letting you know that I’m not very knowledgeable about WW2 history. Of course if you want to reply, that’s fine too.

@Karlfried:

I know everyone here wishes the best for you. Good luck. Germany seems like such a beautiful country. Hopefully it will be great again.
ethnonationalism

September 12, 2012 - 6:15 pm | Permalink

Sunić:
“Often, for a Croat nationalist it is hard to define himself as “a good Croat” unless he first describes himself as a “good anti-Serb.””

That is a normal reaction.

People are people are still dying from landmines that these Serbs planted all over Croatia 20 years ago.

But, how would you know that?
Here's Johnny

September 22, 2012 - 4:22 pm | Permalink

Tom Sunic hasn’t seen it necessary to explain why Serbs and Croats aren’t good friends and neighbors. All he wants is that we all just get along, like Rodney King.

Ever since the Ottoman Empire started receding from Europe, Serbia, by British instigation, has tried expanding into a regional grand power. Not having the military ability to conquer her way, Serbia has tried the deception and oppression way instead. By claiming that all her neighbors “really” are Serbs and that we’re all alike, Serbia has exterminated Albanians, forced Macedonians to change their names (into Serbian ones), forcefully changed the name of the Croatian language into “Serbo-Croatian”, and generally behaved like a bully. Serbs have convinced easily gullible Americans, and trough them others as well, that it was they who defended Europe against Islam. In reality, Serb dukes instead helped the Turks (Ottomans) many times. A miniscule Serb minority in Croatia, who had arrived there as refugees, did fight the good fight, together with the real defenders of Europe, Croatians, Germans, Hungarians, and other Christian nations.

So, by trying to exterminate Croats culturally and by trying to steal their heroic history Serbs have now deserved to be the brothers of Croatians? According to Sunic, yes. According to every other Croat, who isn’t suffering from delusions, no.

The best friend of Croatia has, since five centuries back, been Germany, and that’s the way it is going to remain. Germans and Croatians speak entirely different languages and neither party claims any particular likeness or similarity with the other, nor do they wish to amalgamate into one people. This friendship comes from having been brothers in arms against the Turks for almost five centuries and has persisted to this day.

Such a Europe seems a much better alternative to me, everyone on their own and allowed to differ from the other, than the other, pushy sticky way.
Torono

September 22, 2012 - 10:34 pm | Permalink

Torono is the most multi-cultural city in the world per/capita.. and it all happened in a few decades. The irony is the country and quality of life that attracted so many 3rd worlders to come to Canada is changing rapidly. Somehow the liberal left belive the greatness that is Canada can be extracted from the peoples and cultures that created Canada. (EUROPEAN) Liberalism or its modern variants is an ideology which rejects criticism of its tenets. Sadly it is mostly European-Canadians who denigrate European culture, heritage and religous traditions while elevating the most banal amongst the other peoples. It is a strange form of perverse self loathing.

2 Trackbacks to "The Future of the European peoples (Part 1)"

Are Germans screwed « The West’s Darkest Hour
on September 11, 2012 at 1:43 pm
ANU News.net The Future of the European Peoples (Part 1)
on September 11, 2012 at 4:07 pm

Comments are closed.