Joe McCarthy and the Jews: Comments on Jewish Organizations’ Response to Communism and Senator McCarthy, by Aviva Weingarten (2008).

Kevin MacDonald

Beginning in the 19th century, liberal/leftist politics has been a hallmark of the Jewish community in America and elsewhere. The attraction of Jews to the success of the Bolshevik Revolution was an entirely mainstream movement among large numbers of Jews in America and led to one of several anti-Jewish stereotypes during the 1920s and 1930s — stereotypes that were aided and abetted by people like Henry Ford and Father Charles Coughlin. Into the 1930s the American Communist Party (CPUSA) had a Yiddish-speaking Jewish section. and Jews around the world had positive attitudes toward the USSR, at least partly because Jews had achieved elite status there.

After World War II, however, anti-Semitism declined precipitously in the US, and Jewish organizations were poised to spearhead the transformations in civil rights and immigration legislation that would come to fruition in the 1960s. By 1950 the Jewish community was part of the establishment — well connected to the power centers in the media, politics, the academic world and the construction of culture generally.

But there was a major problem that the organized Jewish community was forced to confront—a problem stemming from the long involvement of the mainstream Jewish community in communism and the far left, at least until the end of World War II, and among a substantial number of Jews even after this period. In Jewish Organizations’ Response to Communism and Senator McCarthy, Aviva Weingarten points to a “hard core of Jews” (p. 6) who continued to support the Communist Party into the 1950s and continued to have a “decisive role” in shaping the policies of the American Communist Party (CPUSA) (p. 9).


Weingarten notes that unlike other communists, Jewish communists continued to have an ethnic  identity (p. 10) and often participated in the wider Jewish community. This is a refreshing change from a long history of Jewish apologetics over this issue. The standard line, not only among Jewish activist organizations but by academic authors such as Yuri Slezkine, has been that Jews ceased being Jews when they joined the Communist Party or participated in other far left causes. As a result, the focus of Chapter 3 of The Culture of Critique is to demonstrate that Jewish radicals retained a strong Jewish identity and a sense of pursuing specifically Jewish interests. Most egregiously, the American Jewish Congress — by far the largest Jewish organization in terms of membership — continued to be associated with the far left and was formally affiliated with organizations listed as subversive by the US Attorney General. The CPUSA viewed members of the AJCongress as “democratic forces”  in their attempt to create “democratic and anti-fascist” policies in the World Jewish Congress (p. 25).

This history of Jewish involvement in communism and sympathy toward communism was now combined with the new situation of the Cold War in which the Soviet Union had become the mortal enemy of the United States.

I suppose that in the ideal Jewish world of 1950, Jewish organizations and the great majority of Jews would have smoothly transitioned to a world of what became mainstream liberal politics: the movements for civil rights, for non-European immigration, and for removing any sense that the United States had a European, Christian identity. But, as Weingarten’s book makes clear, Senator Joseph McCarthy made this transition a delicate matter because McCarthy’s investigations into communist infiltration of the government often targeted Jews — not because they were Jews but because Jews were highly overrepresented among communists. And Jewish defendants accused of communist  affiliations were typically represented by Jewish attorneys (p. 30). The result was that Jewish organizations were terrified that the public would be reinforced with the stereotype of Jewish communism.

Such fears were well-founded. A survey by the American Jewish Committee in 1948 found that 21% answered affirmatively the question “Do you think most Jews are Communists?” And an informal survey showed that more than half the people mentioned Jews in responding to the question “What do you think of the atom [spy] stories in the newspapers?,” even though the question didn’t mention Jews (p. 34).

The matter was compounded by the fact that many of the causes championed by the Jewish organizations in the area of civil rights, immigration, and globalist internationalism were also championed by the CPUSA. And throughout the period, the CPUSA viewed Jews as a group that was particularly susceptible to communist messages and recruitment and therefore actively courted them.

In particular, the CPUSA and pro-communist sympathizers continually tried to paint as anti-Semitism any targeting of Jews as communists, no matter how well founded. A paradigmatic case was the spy trial of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg. The CPUSA-inspired National Committee to Secure Justice in the Rosenberg Trial held meetings defending the Rosenbergs in Jewish community buildings. “Headlines in the Daily Worker in the form of ‘Anti-Semitism and the Rosenbergs’ were an inseparable part of this campaign” (p. 32) — a view that the Rosenbergs themselves promoted. Indeed, as Stuart Svonkin points out, the Rosenbergs saw themselves as Jewish martyrs and viewed their political radicalism as intimately bound up with their Jewish identification.

The strategy pursued by the organized Jewish community under these circumstances had several facets:

  • Education within the Jewish community aimed at decreasing sympathy for communism. The main organizations here were the ADL and the AJCommittee, with the AJCongress conspicuous by its absence due to its far-left proclivities. A main tactic was to point out the anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union after World War II — a tactic that assumed (correctly) that Jewish communists had a Jewish identity and would be motivated by it. The ADL and the AJCommittee also fought against Jews who cooperated with high-profile communist campaigns, such as the defense of the Rosenbergs. In 1954 the ADL advocated continuing old programs begun in 1950 and established new programs, indicating that they saw a continuing need for anti-communist work within the Jewish community. For example, there was great embarrassment in 1953 when a person who invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned by HUAC turned out to be a member of the Council for Jewish Community Centers in Cleveland.
  • Public condemnations of communism by Jewish organizations and Jewish leaders, such as Senator Herbert Lehman (D, NY). However, the established Jewish organizations rejected the American Jewish League Against Communism, a Jewish organization that supported McCarthy and took a strong stand in favor of ridding the Jewish community of communism. They were worried that the AJLAC would bring too much attention to the Jews-as-communists concerns of the mainstream Jewish organizations.
  • Intellectual work rationalizing the political goals of Jewish organizations in the areas of civil rights and immigration as fulfilling American ideals rather than communist ideals. Here Weingarten credits the “mostly Jewish” New York Intellectuals as developing a left/liberal ant-communist perspective that left an “indelible mark” on American intellectual life. (In The Culture of Critique, the New York Intellectuals are discussedas a Jewish intellectual movement.) Weingarten highlights the role of Commentary(published by the AJCommittee) as publicizing anti-Semitism in the USSR and Eastern European countries. Commentary also published articles on the incompatibility of Judaism and communism. Throughout the entire period the organized Jewish community continued to engage in propaganda campaigns designed to re-educate the American public along liberal lines. Both the ADL and the AJCommittee supported academic research by the Frankfurt School and the New York Intellectuals designed to promote civil rights, end the European bias of US immigration laws, and promote the idea of the United States as a proposition nation with no ethnic or cultural core.
  • It bears emphasizing that although all of these intellectuals began their careers as Marxists and continued to promote anti-White policies in areas such as immigration reform, they framed their ideas in language that was more acceptable to an American audience and often appealed to American ideals of democracy and freedom. For example,  Sidney Hook, a leader among the New York Intellectuals, argued that democracy required multiculturalism. An influential paradigm of this approach is The Authoritarian Personality, a product of the Frankfurt School that was funded by the AJCommittee — and the subject of Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique.
  • Strong opposition to McCarthy himself.


But why exactly were these Jewish organizations and the vast majority of individual Jews so opposed to McCarthy? One might think that the Jewish organizations could simply cooperate with McCarthy to rid the Jewish community of hard-core communists. One reason was that the atmosphere created by McCarthy was not conducive to the liberal/left political agenda that the Jewish organizations were actively pursuing in the areas of civil rights and immigration policy. The  McCarthy era produced an upsurge of patriotism in the US at a time when patriotism had strong overtones of supporting the traditional people and culture of America. Everything linked to communism came under suspicion. And since the CPUSA supported the domestic political agenda of Jewish organizations — an agenda entirely at odds with traditional conceptions of America, the Jewish organizations had an obvious motive to end McCarthyism as soon as possible.

Moreover, McCarthy fanned the passions of anti-communism and, because of the strong association of Jews and communism, these passions often had anti-Jewish overtones. A well-known example was the so-called Peekskill riots of 1949 in which demonstrators yelled out anti-communist and anti-Jewish epithets at people attending a scheduled performance by Black baritone and political radical Paul Robeson. Most of the concertgoers were Jewish radicals from New York City.

Jews were also vastly overrepresented in high-profile cases among those invoking the Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate oneself, so that public hearings like McCarthy’s inevitably highlighted the Jewish role in communism. For example, in 1952, of 124 people questioned by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, Weingarten identifies 79 Jews, 32 non-Jews and 13 with unknown ethnicity. All invoked the Fifth.

[adrotate group=”1″]

Even more remarkably, of the 42 people who were dismissed from their positions at the Fort Monmouth Laboratories in New Jersey on suspicion of constituting a spy ring (the same one that Julius Rosenberg belonged to), 39 were Jews and one other was married to a Jewish woman. M. Stanton Evans has an excellent chapter on the Monmouth case in his Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies — by far the best and most exhaustive survey of McCarthy’s battles. Evans shows how many of the Fort Monmouth accused invoked the 5th Amendment under questioning by McCarthy and he exposes the incredibly lax security procedures at the facility. For example, one employee “signed out at one  time or another for more than 2700 documents (not a typo)” (p. 510). Two-thirds were still missing after an investigation, but when the employee was brought up on security charges, all of this was omitted from the record on orders from above.

Evans also quotes the post-McCarthy testimony of a Soviet scientist that “in the 1940s secret U.S. material involving radar had turned up in Russia in vast amounts, and that literally ‘thousands’ of these had been identified on their face as having come from Monmouth” (p. 510). Other evidence indicated that the Monmouth spying continued into the 1950s at the  time of McCarthy’s hearings. In the end, the Fort Monmouth battle proved pivotal for McCarthy, “provoking a showdown of epic nature between McCarthy and the executive branch” (p. 513).

I also suspect there was a visceral gut solidarity with the Jewish left which made it very difficult to simply cooperate with McCarthy. Again, the AJCongress was the by far largest Jewish organization during this period and its membership was sympathetic to the left even when not explicitly pro-communist. Particularly salient was the 50,000-member Jewish Peoples Fraternal Order, an affiliate of the AJCongress listed as a subversive organization by the U. S. Attorney General. The JPFO was the financial and organizational “bulwark” of the CPUSA after World War II and also funded the Daily Worker and the Morning Freiheit. Although the AJCongress severed its ties with the JPFO and stated that communism was a threat, according to Stuart Svonkin, it was “at best a reluctant and unenthusiastic participant” in the Jewish effort to develop a public image of anti-communism—a position reflecting the sympathies of many among its predominantly second- and third-generation Eastern European immigrant membership.

The organized Jewish community consistently opposed measures intended to make it more difficult for communists to operate within the American system even as it officially opposed communism. For example, Jewish organizations objected to any infringements of civil liberties or academic freedom enacted to firm up national security. Weingarten attributes this stand to a principled Jewish respect for human rights (e.g., p. 66), particularly on the part of the AJCongress, the Jewish organization most closely identified with the far left.

But it can be easily seen that Jews and Jewish organizations have not consistently been on the side of civil liberties and academic freedom. During the 1920s and 1930s mainstream Jewish organizations and Jewish intellectuals rationalized Soviet despotism and turned a blind eye to Soviet mass murder during a period when Jews were an elite within the Soviet Union. And in the present era, Jewish organizations, most notably the ADL, have been prime advocates of “hate crime” legislation aimed at penalizing beliefs and ideas. Jewish organizations have alsoattacked the academic freedom of professors who have been critical of Israel. The ADL has also been critical of my writing and, along with the $PLC, engaged in public denunciations of my writing and associations at the university where I work. In general, perceived interests are a much better predictor of Jewish behavior than principles.

Finally, another reason the organized Jewish community opposed McCarthy was that even though Joe McCarthy surrounded himself with Jews and did his best to ingratiate himself with the Jewish community, some of his supporters and associates were well known to be anti-Jewish. Most of these people are little known now, with the exception of Gerald L. K. Smith.Weingarten interprets these associations as McCarthy using these people for his own ends, not as indicating that McCarthy was anti-Jewish.

Indeed, some of McCarthy’s closest associates were Jews, including Roy Cohn, chief counsel of McCarthy’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, and Cohn’s protégé David Schine. Cohn is portrayed as a strongly identified Jew who felt that Jewish organizations did not do enough to support Jews who were in the front lines opposing communism. Cohn was remembered by college friends as “reacting almost violently to any Jew suspected of pro-communist leanings” (p. 92); a TV producer claimed that Cohn had said that “although not all Jews are Communists, but all Communists are Jews” (p. 92).

Another Jew close to McCarthy was George Sokolsky who was a journalist for the Hearst newspapers and was associated with the “China Lobby,” a group devoted to Chiang Kai-Shek and a non-communist China. Sokolsky was the Hearst newspapers’ liaison with McCarthy and set up McCarthy’s relationship with Cohn. Sokolsky also set up a meeting of McCarthy with the ADL. There are varying accounts of this meeting, but nothing positive came of it. One observer claimed that a drunken McCarthy stated “you just write what my credo ought to be and I’ll sign it” (p. 108), but the offer was turned down by the ADL representatives.

Alfred Kohlberg, a businessman associated with the China Lobby, was also a close friend of McCarthy. Sokolsky, Kohlberg and Cohn were all associated with the American Jewish League Against Communism.

As Weingarten notes, “the fact of their being Jews and anti-communists was made full use of by McCarthy, who wanted to expand his circle of support, while doing his best to free himself of any hint of anti-Semitism” (p. 100). McCarthy also attempted to get Cohn appointed to a position on the ADL executive council, presumably, as Weingarten suggests, in order to dampen the animosity of these organizations toward him.

Indeed, McCarthy seems to have done everything he could to curry favor with Jews. Lucy Dawidowitz wrote that in the early 1950s “for anyone in public life [anti-Semitism] is the sign of Cain. So overwhelming is the disrepute of anti-Semitism that an unrestrained demagogue like McCarthy has studiously avoided the Communist provocation and has, as a matter of fact, tried to establish himself as a philo-Semite” (p. 128).

The fact that McCarthy attempted to gain Jewish allies and did his best not to offend the Jews shows quite clearly that Jews were very powerful in 1950s America. In retrospect, the campaign of the organized Jewish community and their allies in the media and the intellectual worldwas quite successful in containing the threat posed by McCarthy to the general public policy positions pursued by the organized Jewish community during this period: civil rights, non-white immigration, and the idea that America is a proposition nation with no ethnic or religious identity. All these campaigns were carried on in the teeth of McCarthyism and despite the fact that these same ideas were promulgated by communists.

In the long run, these public policy positions were far more important than the national security threat posed by pro-Soviet Jewish leftists. The general climate created by McCarthy delayed the triumph of these policies but could not ultimately hold them back. At least part of the problem was that McCarthy was not concerned with challenging the policy positions of the Jewish organizations related to civil rights, immigration, and the proposition nation, but focused exclusively on containing the internal security threat. The nexus among elites in politics, the intellectual world and the media was not threatened by McCarthy or his allies in the moribund conservative movement of the period, and indeed this elite ultimately caused his downfall.

This hostile elite — hostile to the traditional people and culture of America — is still in place. But unlike  McCarthy (and with the benefit of 50 years of hindsight), we now realize that the Jewish involvement in the transformations of recent decades must be discussed openly and honestly — even if mainstream conservatives are still terrified at the prospect.

Indeed, one might ask these conservatives, “What do you have to show for decades of not openly discussing Jewish influence?” The answer, quite clearly, is that by not discussing Jewish issues openly and honestly, mainstream conservatives are cooperating in the displacement of White America and are forfeiting any sense that conservatism ought to defend the traditional people and culture of America. As they say, with friends like these, who needs enemies?

This is a repost of an article that originally appeared in 2009. 

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

101 Comments to "Joe McCarthy and the Jews: Comments on Jewish Organizations’ Response to Communism and Senator McCarthy, by Aviva Weingarten (2008)."

  1. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    November 5, 2012 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    If you would combine welfare with sterilization you would get an even better result. Keep in mind that the present black population of the US of 40 million grew out of an original slave population of only 500,000. More welfare!(new style).

  2. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 30, 2012 - 10:07 pm | Permalink

    This site is making many intelligent arguments in favor of rightist whites. We just need to radically increase our efforts.
    Talking about the Jewish issue is good. Most are beyond redemption but their role needs to be known and debated
    without fear or intimidation.
    What is the golden dawn ?
    Also unrelenting defeatism is totally unhelpful.
    Here in San Francisco Blacks are down to 5% though they still commit half the crime. In Oakland they are down to 28% but still three quarters of the crime.
    Even DC is only 50% Black, it was 90% Black for half a century.
    California is a blue state because 4-5 million whites have left since 1990 but at least a million Blacks have left too.
    Many Hispanics are white even if anti-Anglo. Nixon created the Census Hispanic category, before that Hispanics identified as white.
    60% of all US abortions are by Black women.
    And if we could get government funding for abortions that figure would rise sharply.
    Anti-abortion is a lost cause and the US Right should join the French New Right in abandoning it.

  3. SanMan's Gravatar SanMan
    October 28, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    Anyone have any idea on how we turn this around. We already at less then 50% whites. I have seen areas cleansed of whites, a few decades ago where 90% white now its almost no whites at all. Its block by block, whites get up and leave (white flight -rather then white flight). The problem is the same process will continue until the whole world is non-white, unless we do something. The longer we wait until we do something the more difficult its going to be.

    They are not going to stop until we are all dead, this will happen over a series of decades (as it already been happening), it has been below a certain “threshold” that would spurred us into action. With each subsequent generation, they are growing up in the climate, each getting progressively worse.

    So why not go all in for something like the golden dawn.

  4. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 25, 2012 - 12:01 am | Permalink

    DK, Wikipedia is a giant lie factory. Consult them on McCarthy or David Irving for just two examples. My understanding is that Welch did graduate from Harvard at age 16, never heard a thing about the Naval Academy and Wikipedia likely made it up as they so often do.
    Snowhitey, I think you are right, can’t find much to argue with you about your comments.

  5. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 24, 2012 - 6:37 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:

    “I still think that he wrote it as he was a smart cookie who I believe was admitted to Harvard Law School at age 16.”

    According to Wikipedia, “Welch attended the United States Naval Academy and Harvard Law School but dropped out of both institutions before graduating. He would later assert this was because of his opposition to the political leanings of the instructors.” That is unsourced, so I am not vouching for its accuracy; but, if true, I think it exceedingly unlikely that Master Welch was nominated to attend Annapolis at the age of 12, or thereabouts…!?!?!

  6. Snowhitey's Gravatar Snowhitey
    October 23, 2012 - 2:44 pm | Permalink


    I think globalists have been around since the early 19th century or perhaps earlier. The modern term of it anyway. It probably originated with the Rothschilds and was facilitated by their financing throughout the world. I know that Cecil Rhodes was financed by the Rothschilds but I do not have verification if the Rockefellers and other robber barons were. Most likely they were to some degree which is why all those “capitalists” and their foundations are genuinely destroying the U.S. This is a synchronized attack throughout the Western World. Communism is a tool of the globalists and has been for a long time. My understanding is that it was created by the globalists. The left-right paradigm, communism vs. democracy, Christianity vs. Judaism vs. Islam, and the Hegelian Dialectic are all tools of the globalists. Many Jews have been used via deception to be genuine useful idiots. And, communism was not the only tool. The Rothschilds will use the Jews as much as they use the Arabs and Europeans. The destruction is intentional. It is neither an accident nor an error.

  7. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 22, 2012 - 10:52 pm | Permalink

    There were high level Gentile Communists or people so pro-Communist that it made no difference. Marshall, Hiss and Acheson come to mind. Communism has always advocated a global dictatorship.
    Yes, Forrestal was a huge influence on McCarthy.
    My boyfriend’s Mom worked for Forrestal when he was Secretary Of The Navy during WW2. He was a GOP dollar a year man who came to work for FDR in 1940 or 1941 to support his war policies. I think he lived to regret it.
    He had been a VP of Dillon, Read in NYC.
    A Jewish shrink Arnold Rogow did a smear bio of Forrestal in 1965. Mentioned that Forrestal liked Rand’s The Fountainhead and was thus probably ‘mentally ill’ !
    Incidentally a dissident Jewish shrink, Thomas Szasz, exposed the whole psychiatric racket in 28 books from 1963
    to a few years ago.
    Forrestal was crucified for opposing the creation of Israel though the leftist Marshall also did and received no condemnation.
    I think Jews were always the main foot soldiers for the internationalist Left but there was also a great deal of Anglo
    money involved too, Rockefellers, Harriman, Carnegie, etc.
    Most Ashkenazim don’t appear to me to have any 130 IQ as regards serious political-philosophical issues.
    Tabula, thanks for the Birdman link.

  8. Snowhitey's Gravatar Snowhitey
    October 22, 2012 - 11:36 am | Permalink

    I love reading the little McCarthy stories where he had incidents of genuine support. Like the lunch he had with Sec. James Forrestal:

    “In the beginning of the Cold War period, Forrestal strongly influenced the new Wisconsin Senator, Joseph McCarthy, concerning infiltration of the government by Communists. Upon McCarthy’s arrival in Washington in December 1946, Forrestal invited him to lunch. In McCarthy’s words, “Before meeting Jim Forrestal I thought we were losing to international Communism because of incompetence and stupidity on the part of our planners. I mentioned that to Forrestal. I shall forever remember his answer. He said, ‘McCarthy, consistency has never been a mark of stupidity. If they were merely stupid, they would occasionally make a mistake in our favor.’ This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since.””

    The trouble is… most people cannot differentiate between communists and globalists. Of course, the term globalist probably didn’t exist in the 1940’s and 1950’s. George Marshall was probably a globalist and not a communist. Communism has the same goals as globalism which is why it is part of the system. Most of the commie Jews were probablly just useful idiots.

  9. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    October 20, 2012 - 6:36 pm | Permalink
  10. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 20, 2012 - 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Franklin, thanks for the reference, I’ll check it out.
    The Birdman died but I’ll see if his site is still up.

  11. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 20, 2012 - 3:33 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    According to Revilo Oliver, Robert Welch was controlled by Jews and the John Birch Society a form of “controlled opposition”, which implied : never mention the Jews and don’t do anything more than talking. “Anti-Semites” and “racists” were banned from the society.
    For further information on Oliver’s opinion of the JBS, see ; Birdman Bryant : The John Birch Society Exposed.

  12. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 20, 2012 - 8:28 am | Permalink

    Hadding, thanks for the additional information.
    Professor Oliver was a great scholar and even though I was born in 1975 I read my Dad’s old American Opinions from the 60s.
    Dad was a Bircher. Oliver spoke too frankly for the JBS and they had a parting of the ways in 1966. It was really a lost
    more for the Birchers more than Oliver.
    Welch grew too defensive of his great book The Politician.
    I still think that he wrote it as he was a smart cookie who I believe was admitted to Harvard Law School at age 16.
    Of course you are right that Welch was a very wealthy and he could easily afford a ghostwriter.
    I deeply appreciate your insights here whatever the facts may be.
    The important point is that whomever wrote The Politician was right on target.
    Jimmy Roosevelt and the ADA wanted Ike for the Demo nomination in 1948 and Truman thought up until early 1952
    that Ike was a leftwing, New Deal Democrat, which he most assuredly was.

  13. October 19, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: I referred to The Politician as ghostwritten based on something that I read many years ago (from Revilo Oliver, I think) to the effect that Welch reacted to the storm following the book’s publication as if he hadn’t known what was in it. That could be a false inference but since Welch was a wealthy man he could afford a ghostwriter.

  14. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    October 19, 2012 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: I believe he had been a registered Democrat at the time he was given the (bizarre) appointment as Columbia’s president in 1948.

    In 1952, the year I first heard the word conservative, that word was used en famille only in speaking of Robert Taft, whose shoo-in candidacy had been deliberately derailed by the liberal northeastern wing of the Republican Party, which actively courted Eisenhower to switch parties and accept the nomination on a silver platter (any Republican would have beaten Truman, whose popularity was virtually in single digits). That wing, then called the Dewey wing and later the Rockefeller wing, also loathed Joe McCarthy, who had risen to popularity and fame a mere two years earlier. They were eager to get the votes McCarthy could bring, but they looked to Ike to help them keep the votes McCarthy brought once they succeeded in destroying the man who had brought them.

  15. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 19, 2012 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    McCarthy never departed from the truth, see Blacklisted By History by M. Stanton Evans for full documentation here.
    Evans’ only caveat is that he thought McCarthy’s massive expose of General Marshall was bad PR even if factually true.
    That speech was written by Forrest Davis, an interventionist liberal who supported Roosevelt’s going into WW2.
    McCarthy had been a Democrat and a member of America First before the war.
    His relationship was mainly with Joe Kennedy. He hired Bobby but Bobby’s first loyalty was to the Democratic Party and after McCarthy hired Cohn Bobby became the counsel to the anti-McCarthy Democrats on the committee, Scoop Jackson,
    John McClellan and Stuart Symington.
    I guess you could say that McCarthy brought about the Kennedy cult by not supporting the incumbent GOP Senator
    Cabot Lodge in 1952 but Lodge was even more liberal than the Kennedys.
    The Politician by Robert H.W. Welch is best book ever on Ike.
    I never heard it was ghostwritten. If true, by whom ?

  16. October 19, 2012 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: The Politician, ghostwritten for Robert Welch, has some interesting facts about Eisenhower. Apparently he was neither a Republican nor a conservative until shortly before the 1952 election. He had been a political protégé of the FDR administration, promoted from major to general in just two years if I recall correctly.

  17. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    October 19, 2012 - 9:01 am | Permalink

    @Jim: No offense meant, but you’re making a classic post hoc, ergo propter hoc case here. One needs to know and incorporate a good deal more about Eisenhower before taking as a given what you seem to posit, which is that his basic decency or at least open-mindedness was soured by McCarthy’s association with the Kennedys.

    Eisenhower’s elevation to Olympus is very much a recent phenomenon. Neither my own parents nor those of my runny-nosed schoolmates and playground companions regarded Ike as a tower of virtue. The influential McCormick newspapers (now in Tribal hands), including the old and admittedly rather downmarket New York Daily News, routinely painted Ike as soft on Communism. Given what has been revealed in recent decades about his genocidal war and postwar record and his links to the Tribe and Tribal interests, perhaps even blood ties, there is now every reason to think that the plebeian types who called Ike a traitor for acting to destroy McCarthy (who foolishly trusted the guy) were on the money.

  18. October 18, 2012 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Excellent post. I will be facing some of these issues
    as well..

  19. Random's Gravatar Random
    October 18, 2012 - 6:38 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott:

    The only way that could be a bad thing is if Taylor pretended to define the appropriate limits of racial thought for everybody — the way William F. Buckley set the limits of acceptability for “conservatism.” From what I see Taylor doesn’t do that.

    I think that’s exactly what Jared Taylor’s trying to do. He’s even explicitly stated his desire to be the Buckley of WN, if I’m not mistaken. The difference is that he’s not succeeding, because people a lot of people are pointing out exactly what he’s doing.

    I would suggest that people who think that people are being led down a dead end by Taylor attend the conferences and rub shoulders with people.

    Why not just continue to expose what he’s doing? Sounds like at the last AmRen conference, he only got about 150 people to turn up to listen to Robert Weissberg tell them how they should give up. Let’s hope that number is smaller next time around.

  20. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    October 18, 2012 - 6:25 pm | Permalink

    McCarthy was a great man in many ways – an accomplished judge, a tailgunner in WW2 (he waived a judicial deferment for military service) and a patriot who rightfully and courageously called out Communists who had come to positions of influence in America during the FDR administration. Unfortunately, great men can also have great flaws. His close friendship and dealings with the corrupt Kennedy family is emblematic of this.

    Although history has shown him to be correct in his assessment of American communists and Communism, both in level of influence and the very real danger they presented, his character flaws (such as occasionally departing from the truth in order to achieve a desired end) and his connection to the shady Kennedys kept President Eisenhower from backing him in any meaningful way. Had Eisenhower gotten behind that movement, America’s story over the last 50 years might’ve turned out differently.

  21. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 18, 2012 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

    Hadding, the Jack and Jill smear was solely initiated by leftist scum like Drew Pearson and Hank Greenspun at the time.
    They also tried to tar McCarthy with the same sleazy smear.
    Nicholas Von Hoffman’s critical bio of Cohn clears Schine of homosexual allegations. In fact Hoffman relates that 99.99% of the ‘gays’ who said they had affairs with Cohn were lying.
    It was strictly political retaliation for Cohn’s working for McCarthy. Hoffman knew how to ferret out the real homosexual encounters. See Citizen Cohn.
    By the way, Hoffman became a McCarthy supporter about 16 years ago.
    I know Schine as do many of my friends and he was never a homosexual. Cohn himself was deep in the closet until his mother died in 1969.
    While there are married homosexuals, they rarely marry former Miss America’s and sire seven kids.

  22. October 18, 2012 - 3:00 pm | Permalink


    However, I will continue to stick to my belief that Taylor is being groomed to become the ‘acceptable’ face of White Nationalism

    But Taylor always says that he is not a White Nationalist, rather a “race-realist.” If you think that some Jews are hijacking him — which doesn’t seem incredible to me — then attend his conferences and foil the attempt.

  23. October 18, 2012 - 2:54 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: I think you also don’t need me to explain that Schine’s marriage is no evidence that he wasn’t open to queer experiences. Many Jews are like that.

  24. October 18, 2012 - 2:48 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:

    Cohn’s was strictly a one way, unrequited love.

    It’s the first time I encountered that claim. They were called “Jack and Jill” at the time.

  25. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 18, 2012 - 7:21 am | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: Aside from Taylor’s refusal to permit anything other than a very superficial discussion of the jewish complicity in the white genocide war to appear in the comment section of his AmRen Website – something that we all view in a negative light, but since it is his website, he is entitled to form his own policies – aside from this effort to help run interference for the tribe – I will agree with Hadding.

    Taylor has stated on many occasions that he feels that there are other pro-White, White Nationalist / White race realist groups and leaders who do focus on the jewish issue and that he has no problem with them doing so.

    However, I will continue to stick to my belief that Taylor is being groomed to become the ‘acceptable’ face of White Nationalism – and if he is allowed to be placed in that role, and if Whites are gullible and naive enough to hitch their wagons to him – the jews will have successfully thwarted any real threat of removing them from power and taking our nations back from an enemy who lusts for our genocide.

  26. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 18, 2012 - 4:31 am | Permalink

    Hadding, Schine was and is straight. He owned the Ambassador Hotel in LA where RFK was assassinated and he married a former Miss America and sired seven children. Cohn’s was strictly a one way, unrequited love.
    Trenchant, yes in a dozen cases. But it’s very hard. This is like a religion to most Jews.

  27. Farnsworth's Gravatar Farnsworth
    October 18, 2012 - 4:11 am | Permalink

    A YouTube service especially for WNs could combine advertisement with a small fee ( say 0,50 ct per month per video) to cover all costs.

    You don’t understand what a WN video site is for. It can’t be a subscription site. We know what we believe, the point is to convert others. WN media must be free for the consumer, and ideally free for the producer of videos, audio, blogs and books. It must be subsidized at least at first. All of the giant jewish websites, Google, Facebook, Youtube, were subsidized with capital. That gave them time to grow. If one of the WN millionaires wanted to save his race he couldn’t do worse than to pay for all the costs of a WN Youtube clone for a decade, including at least one full time marketing/advertising guy to let the world know it exists and capitalize on breaking news that the mainstream jewish media won’t cover.

    WN media will only become profitable and self sustaining when jewish power is weakened enough to make their boycotts and threats against advertisers ineffective. So whoever donates to this project should expect to keep donating for years and for success to only increase the costs in bandwidth and administration.

    It can’t be done by nothing but volunteers either. You don’t get 24 hour top notch administration from a volunteer, the people who can provide that already have more paid work than they can handle.

    White men must show the same foresight in creating our own internet media that jews have. Google didn’t happen by accident.

  28. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 18, 2012 - 12:01 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Have you found it possible to have any sort of genuine dialogue with Jews in a private setting about the Holocaust lies, or is that beyond the pale, so to speak?

  29. October 17, 2012 - 11:51 pm | Permalink


    I don’t think Taylor was groomed by them, I think he looked at the WN movement in America, incorrectly concluded that the one thing holding WN back was its similarity to N*zism, and devised his own approach to the problem that involved embracing the “victims” of N*zism to show everyone that he’s really a “good” guy. He probably also believes that jews can be reasoned with.

    When Jared Taylor’s Paved With Good Intentions was published, I am not sure that the term White Nationalism had even been coined. Taylor is a conservative who decided that he would be a little more honest than most conservatives regarding racial issues. He doesn’t want to go all the way, just farther than most.

    The only way that could be a bad thing is if Taylor pretended to define the appropriate limits of racial thought for everybody — the way William F. Buckley set the limits of acceptability for “conservatism.” From what I see Taylor doesn’t do that.

    I would suggest that people who think that people are being led down a dead end by Taylor attend the conferences and rub shoulders with people. David Duke used to attend them regularly, with the effect that people who listen to Hannity and Limbaugh had to say later that they were in the same room with David Duke and strangely enough he didn’t have horns or fangs. You can fill that role.

    I would suggest to anybody who thinks that Taylor’s approach is a dead end, to go to his conferences and talk to the people there and see if you can open their minds a little more. That way it won’t be a dead end.

  30. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 17, 2012 - 11:41 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: Thanks for the Schine, Cohn information.

  31. October 17, 2012 - 11:31 pm | Permalink

    At least part of the problem was that McCarthy was not concerned with challenging the policy positions of the Jewish organizations related to civil rights, immigration, and the proposition nation, but focused exclusively on containing the internal security threat.

    He was a conservative. Conservatives don’t do radical criticism. What McCarthy did was observe and call attention to the fact that the Executive Branch was not doing some things for national security that it was explicitly supposed to do. In principle, McCarthy’s position was unassailable: he was clearly right that there were people of questionable loyalty in the government, and the people who wanted him to shut up really had no case. So, instead he was nitpicked and caricatured to death.

    It was the Jews on his own staff, Cohn and Schine, that McCarthy had taken on for the purpose of deflecting the accusation of anti-Semitism, that really ruined him. They were the ones that turned the investigations of the Army into a circus, and there was reason to doubt their motives. Cohn had only been a self-proclaimed anti-Communist for a short time before he was forced onto McCarthy by the “conservative” ex-Communist newspaper columnist George Sololsky, and Cohn and Schine even fit the definition of security-risks themselves, as homosexuals, a fact that was widely propagated and a great source of embarrassment to McCarthy.

    One has to wonder how much of the detail of McCarthy’s downfall was planned, and to what extent each of the players was either a conscious agent or just a pawn. Schine was drafted into the Army right after he and his gay lover Cohn were hired by McCarthy, which set in motion the whole embarrassing scenario of conflict with the Army, where there was some very unbecoming behavior committed not by McCarthy but by Roy Cohn.

  32. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 17, 2012 - 11:06 pm | Permalink


    Hi Mike

    “I also noticed that they had left on other posters who talked about jews but were inarticulate cranks. It is only lucid and rational commenters that they don’t want.”

    A possible, benign explanation occured to me.

    Maybe the reason their comments stayed up is that the posters are relatively new to that site.

    If that’s the case, then maybe nobody has flagged them yet. Maybe their comments haven’t been noticed by the moderators.

  33. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 17, 2012 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Franklin, you are right ! After 16 years of Classical Roman Catholic education from grades 1-12 here in San Francisco
    and a Jesuit university in Dallas, I should know how to spell ad nauseam. Thank you for correcting me.
    I agree with the rest of your remarks too.
    If I were still in high school my parents would soundly whip my behind for that kind of grammatical error.

  34. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 17, 2012 - 3:32 pm | Permalink


    I don’t think Taylor was groomed by them, I think he looked at the WN movement in America, incorrectly concluded that the one thing holding WN back was its similarity to N*zism, and devised his own approach to the problem that involved embracing the “victims” of N*zism to show everyone that he’s really a “good” guy. He probably also believes that jews can be reasoned with.

  35. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 17, 2012 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    ad nauseum > ad nauseam

    I will not blame you for not knowing Latin, but the nominative of that word is nausea which is also an English word and therefore should be known to you. Nauseam is the accusative due to the preposition ad.

    Yes, “good” Jews are very rare indeed but they do exist. The majority of the Jews however are either silent sympathizers or occasional helpers ( ” sayanim” ) or active collaborators of that ethnic Mafia which is usually called “the Jewish people” .

  36. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 17, 2012 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

    DK, you have a point there. Engelman has repeatedly praised FDR and all of his works, the New Deal, WW2, turning a blind eye to the Communists here, etc. He did write that he has always voted Democratic and he mentioned Carter, Clinton and Obama as Democrats that he voted for. Since he lavishly praised Truman, JFK, LBJ and Humphrey I assume he voted for them too. We can safely say he would have voted for FDR had he been around then. But thanks for your likely correction here.
    Luke, I agree with you about the motivations of many Jews.
    But 99% of them hated McCarthy with a passion. Jewish organization compared him to Hitler ! Roy Cohn didn’t make the slightest dent for McCarthy among Jews as a whole.
    Even though the Rand Cult is very heavily Jewish about 95%
    of Jews reject her too. Almost all of the recent spate of nasty anti-Rand books have been by Jews, Weiss, Heller, ad nauseum.
    Jews also rejected Goldwater, who was half-Jewish, by about 95%, the percentage they gave to LBJ.
    The Jewish tradition going back to Moses is a socialist-collectivism. Judaism itself is a huge inventory of laws and regulations to regulate all of life in detail,similar to Islam and is the antithesis of libertarianism despite the prominent libertarian Jews.
    There are a very few of us who dissent from the tribe here but we do exist.

  37. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 17, 2012 - 12:09 pm | Permalink

    This raises the question whether the self-professed “solid American patriot” Jewess Marcy Fleming herself is not playing this game. ( “There are a few of us Jews who are solid American patriots…” )

    Maybe I’m too suspicious, maybe not…

  38. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    October 17, 2012 - 11:34 am | Permalink

    Remember Marcy, Ayn is a hebrew word. She is advertising her jewishness.

  39. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 17, 2012 - 10:05 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Ah, but Sister Marcy is forgetting what Eustace Mullins so brilliantly taught us about jewish behavior and jewish tactics.

    Namely, that jews try to always own both sides of every coin. Whether a coin toss comes up heads or tails, the jews still win.

    In this context, i.e., Joe McCarthy and Ayn Rand – jews always strive to position members of their tribe on both sides of every issue, so as to make sure they have all the bases covered – in case and issue breaks bad for them.

    In truth, jews are always on the same side – which is whatever side is perceived to be best for the jews.

  40. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 17, 2012 - 9:57 am | Permalink

    @fender: Jared ‘jews look white to me’ Taylor is auditioning, and being groomed – by the jews – to become the ‘acceptable voice’ of White Nationalism.

    By gradually allowing Taylor’s views on racial issues to seep into the mainstream (which the jews control), I believe that the jews who are running AmRen are simply repeating their age-old, and by now – easily recognizable – tactic of trying to position stooges who they control out in front of any perceived opposition movement. Taylor then becomes the jewish approved face of what a paper trained White Nationalist leader is supposed to be – and a very clear message is sent to the remaining White Nationalist leaders that if they want mainstream coverage and respectability, they had better emulate Taylor’s subservience to jewish sensitivities.

    So concludes today’s lesson on reading the laces on jewish fastballs.

  41. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 17, 2012 - 9:48 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: Many racially healthy, racially awake Whites in the White Nationalist and/or White race realist community – who are also very jew-wise -will often give jews far more credit for being diabolically clever, devious and conniving than I personally suspect they really deserve to be viewed.

    I’ve had a long debate with myself about this whole ‘white guilt tripping’ campaign that the jews have been pushing all over the entire White Western world and my questions to myself are basically as follows: Did the jews have this campaign planned as far back as before WW I and then simply unleashed it according to some carefully thought out and studiously scheduled time-line? Or, did they simply sit down after WW II and ended, reflect back over the trouble that they had gotten themselves into by their subversive and usurious attempts to impose Communism upon Germany and to plunder the German people – and decide that they could create their ‘holocaust’ narrative and then use it for extortion and guilt tripping propaganda purposes to be aimed primarily at the Germans – but, once they saw how amazingly successful and profitable this scheme was, noting how easy it was to guilt-trip and fleece the White race, that they then decided to export it across the entire White European world?

    I still have not reached a satisfactory answer to this debate I’m having with myself, and perhaps it really isn’t important that I ever do so. What matters is that jews are clearly working to destroy every historic White European nation and reduce Whites to minority status inside our native lands – and this must be prevented at all costs, even if it must result in world record setting bloodshed at some point in the near future.

  42. mike's Gravatar mike
    October 17, 2012 - 9:31 am | Permalink

    Just today I realized that what stuckinbetween is talking about happened to me. My local newspaper used to have a lively comments section and then they used facebook commenting. Noticing that no one was answering my posts anymore, I looked it up at a library computer. They were not there. They had fooled me.
    I also noticed that they had left on other posters who talked about jews but were inarticulate cranks. It is only lucid and rational commenters that they don’t want.

  43. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 17, 2012 - 4:21 am | Permalink

    Oh, but Taylor is niggardly when it comes to criticizing the Jews. What a niggard!
    Pay the money!

  44. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 17, 2012 - 3:27 am | Permalink


    ” Personally I think he’s simply trying to avoid being called the N-word, but it doesn’t do anything. ”

    The N-word, of course, being N*zi, not the other N-word… although I’d pay good money to actually hear someone accuse him of being the latter.

  45. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 17, 2012 - 3:22 am | Permalink

    @darth vader:

    Taylor believes he can successfully navigate the stormy waters of race relations by being the “nice, reasonable” White racialist. He thinks that by appealing to reason and sensibility he can reach people. If someone can point out a single leader in all of history who won support by appealing to reason, I’ll give him or her a cookie.

    Rushton was different. Not only did he have the voice of a classically-trained Shakespearian actor, but his appeals to reason and fact worked because he himself was a scientist, and the people who attended his speeches were interested in his personal findings.

    Taylor is not a scientist or a researcher, he’s a White advocate, and the first job of a White advocate is to PERSUADE, not inform. Leave the informing to the scientists. Taylor’s speeches are so bland and uninspired they make most eulogies look like Def Comedy Jam sessions.

    And of course, there’s the J-word problem. I’ve heard rumors that his wife is a member of Team Shlomo, but no one seems to know for sure. Personally I think he’s simply trying to avoid being called the N-word, but it doesn’t do anything. Taylor gains nothing from being philosemitic; they will never allow him any kind of prestige no matter how nice he is.

  46. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 17, 2012 - 1:41 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:

    Has Mr. Engelman actually stated that he voted for FDR?!? Anyone to do so would have to have been born on Wednesday (thus, “full of woe!”), November 7, 1923, or before, which means he is getting pretty long-in-the-tooth, at this late date!?!

  47. October 16, 2012 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Yes, it’s absurd whites can simply be outgunned by paper money. However, that’s how it is, and has been I’d guess since the Bank of England, the Fed, and no doubt other outfits. There are two tiers of capitalists – something hardly anyone understands. As long as Jews stay together they can buy up any promising assets, control currency exchange, generate panics etc simply because they have an overwhelming money advantage. It’s how they have 96% of the media, and [fill in sundry other sources of money and power].

    It’s ironic that people think Jews are wonderful at business, when all they do is get money for frauds (e.g. the ‘Holohoax’) and hang on grimly to every source of money they can. If they were good at business, why would they need to?

  48. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 16, 2012 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    Darth Vader, you are right about Samuel Jared Taylor and American Renaissance. I got kicked off twice for critically discussing Jewish issues and I’m a Jew ! One ‘moderator’ even tried to dispute my Jewish background though she/he had to back down.
    They have one regular writer named John W. Engelman, who routinely goes about Ashkenazim racial superiority AND
    ‘Oriental’ racial superiority without even distinguishing the vastly differing Asian groups. He claims to be a Bible thumping Christian but voted for every Demo candidate from
    Roosevelt to Obama, considers The New York Times the Bible,
    thinks the Ivy League pinko schools are the greatest and routinely cites Gallup Polls as the fount of all wisdom !
    He routinely praises Comrade M.L. King and attacks McCarthy, HUAC, et al, and responses to THAT get censored at AmRen. Their PC goes beyond Jewish issues.
    I refuted him at every turn but that was unacceptable to Taylor and his moderators. Engelman’s Ashkenazim by his surname.
    After the last censorship of me six weeks or more ago I have stopped looking at AmRen ever.
    I was getting tired of some of the losers there always singing the doomsday scenario but there are several intelligent posters there whom I miss. They ought to wise up and not take it anymore from AmRen.

  49. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    October 16, 2012 - 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Facebook is a better example of Jews stealing a big idea than Google. With Google, Jews (Brin and Page) were responsible for the creative and breakthrough technical work from the start.

  50. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 16, 2012 - 11:49 am | Permalink

    @90404: The book is cited in the article.

  51. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    October 16, 2012 - 11:11 am | Permalink


    If even TOO can’t see Google (and its subsidiary Youtube) and all other jew businesses and orgs as the enemy we are doomed.

    If anyone is going to be doomed by such oversights (and that is debatable) then it is not “we” who are doomed; it is TOO.

  52. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 16, 2012 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    A YouTube service especially for WNs could combine advertisement with a small fee ( say 0,50 ct per month per video) to cover all costs. It is absurd that the white man makes all kinds of splendid inventions, then have them stolen from him and used against him with no possibility of defense.

  53. October 16, 2012 - 7:55 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: Why can’t there be a non-Jewish Youtube (Google… etc..)?

    Because of Jewish control of paper money. The system is: new idea pops up needing a lot of money. For you or I, this is serious. For Jews, its just paper. So they have a ‘beauty contest’ – lining up technically competent Goyim to design, build, run, and maintain the new system. It’s analogous to promoting wars, dumbing down education, taking over media, etc.

    BUT there is one bright spot: most of the competent people running it aren’t Jews, and some may even have principles. This is why these outfits have a permanently strained relationship and have occasional flashes of non-Jewish activity.

  54. Turner's Gravatar Turner
    October 16, 2012 - 5:17 am | Permalink

    On comment and video censorship. White advocates need to stop relying on jewish owned and controlled sites to spread their ideas and expecting jews to play “fair”. We also need to stop relying on jewish “services” like Google for statistics. From the source HTML it looks like even this site is running Google Analytics scripts, a feature slipped into the WordPress blogging software by someone calling himself Yoast. If the Google script is running it sends everything it learns about all who view this site back to the worst private jewish totalitarian organization in the western world.

    But I’m not accusing the operators of this site of treason. The reason is laziness on the part of the technical staff. It’s easier to outsource the hard work to our jew enemies than to lift a finger to handle these things internally.

    Laziness is a cornerstone of White pathology. Jews rule because they never leave these vital functions to chance and they correctly see all who are not of their tribe as enemies.

    If even TOO can’t see Google (and its subsidiary Youtube) and all other jew businesses and orgs as the enemy we are doomed.

  55. darth vader's Gravatar darth vader
    October 16, 2012 - 3:58 am | Permalink

    “Indeed, one might ask these conservatives, ‘What do you have to show for decades of not openly discussing Jewish influence?’ The answer, quite clearly, is that by not discussing Jewish issues openly and honestly, mainstream conservatives are cooperating in the displacement of White America and are forfeiting any sense that conservatism ought to defend the traditional people and culture of America. As they say, with friends like these, who needs enemies?”

    Hmm … makes me think about someone (Jared Taylor).

    How stupid do you really have to be to graduate from Yale and then spend the rest of your life spreading propaganda about black people, while allying with the root of the whole problem: those priestly people.

    Jared. You accomplish nothing.

    How many rooms full of rowdy African-American racists does that man have to endure before he just gives it a rest.

    What is he trying to accomplish at Towson, a school that is 60% white, when all the major schools in my area are <50% white.

    Take for instance, City College of New York, a train ride away from NJ.

    CCNY has about a 19% white student body. And considering that most of the "white" people going to CUNYs are … special white people, there is a ASTOUNDING UNDER-REPRESENTATION of our people!


    But God no. We cannot dare speak out against the priestly people in their city or at their college.

    Of course if I tried to leave this comment on American Renaissance, it would get blocked.

  56. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    October 16, 2012 - 3:09 am | Permalink

    Joe McCarthy was our greatest US Senator, he was also the most hated one as Murray Rothbard noted, because he told the absolute truth.
    Read Blacklisted By History by M. Stanton Evans which totally vindicates McCarthy. If anything he seriously underestimated the number of Communists in FedGov.
    The great majority were Ashkenazim Jews with maybe 20% WASPS of the Alger Hiss, Dean Acheson and Owen Lattimore type.
    McCarthy exposed the US Army torture of accused German POWs over Malmedy, a story that even David Irving is starting to doubt, i.e., that there was a mass slaughter US Army troops at Malmedy by the Germans.
    McCarthy’s biggest mistake was hiring Roy Cohn to dilute the bogus charges of anti-Semitism. Cohn did some great work but was a deep in the closet homosexual who caused McCarthy to be the focus of the Army hearings instead of the Communists in the Army.
    Nixon and LBJ engineered that ‘censure’ farce.
    This guy Lew at the top of this thread used the familiar Jewish Communist psychiatric smear which was exposed by a dissident Jew, Thomas Szasz. There are a few of us Jews who are solid American patriots but not too many.
    There’s a great piece at The Occidental Quarterly on the real enemies of Joe McCarthy. Check it out.
    Even Ayn Rand supported McCarthy. As did Rothbard.

  57. Alan's Gravatar Alan
    October 16, 2012 - 1:19 am | Permalink

    @Peters: This has been going on for years . As you say ‘they’ flood the comments area to muddy the waters and prevent the discussion rising higher . The more fools their are , the more likely intelligent people will turn away. Jason has been suspect from the beginning .
    Ps . Alan would you stop using my name . I was here first .
    Also Peters , I hope you are not also Lew MPD ?

  58. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    October 16, 2012 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: huh?
    I clicked the link….

  59. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    October 15, 2012 - 11:59 pm | Permalink

    The media and public schools have always tried to make us believe that Sen. McCarthy was wrong about every last thing he said and did. Then Hollywood makes a regular attempt to make heros out of the black-listed leftists who were spearheading cultural Marxism that we live with today. The Jews won’t let up on this man because like Henry Ford he has such valuable lessons for the world to learn. Whenever God’s special friends give this much attention to a person, you know they want their message buried deep.

  60. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    October 15, 2012 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:

    So Jews are paying people to spread disinformation among the kookery on “Above Top Secret” and “Godlike Productions”?

    lol. I’ll think I’ll roll my eyes now.

  61. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    October 15, 2012 - 9:57 pm | Permalink

    You may be right about the possibility of the concept of surfing in the bubble. But if that was a hint of you not getting enough responses to your posts then I happen to disagree with you. I believe that the comments section here is populated by a good portion of nutjobs of various caliber, the yet uneducated, the provocateurs, the pacemakers, and an occasional lightning rod Jew. There simply are not enough bona fide members here, and anyone who starts posting regularly will be dragged to one of those endless discussions about nothing, to the detriment of real issues.

  62. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    October 15, 2012 - 9:50 pm | Permalink

    I too have noticed the agreeable discussion, if it may be called that, among a few frequent posters. However, I do not believe they are bots. Occam’s razor would indicate that these are people who simply happen to be in agreement. They clearly are flooding the comments section. One might almost propose that they are being paid to post and to keep the discussion within certain limits. If they are indeed what I think they are then this board is much less known among the non-Jewish whites.

  63. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    October 15, 2012 - 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Admins censoring based on ideology is as old as discussion boards. Jim Robinson started Free Republic because Prodigy was be censoring his comments. I don’t use Facebook, so I don’t know what they do. I have never not had a comment appear to everyone on Disqus, LiveFrye, Open ID or any other platform. If it were to happen, my first thought would be bug or database glitch. Of course the government is always up to no good and looking for ways to control discourse. That’s why God invented encryption, proxy servers, TOR, etc. I use them myself. But, don’t be roped in trolls or head cases. That person said the government is planning on putting everyone in their own Truman Show private internet.

  64. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 15, 2012 - 9:19 pm | Permalink

    I dare say nobody who ends up on this site is genuinely ingenuous. ☺

  65. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 15, 2012 - 6:34 pm | Permalink
  66. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 15, 2012 - 2:35 pm | Permalink


    Condemning all Whites for being evil Nawtzies. If only that were actually true! Imagine how beautiful Europe and America would be.

  67. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 15, 2012 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

    @Luke: What I have observed about Jews is hypocrisy concerning the so-called holocaust. I can remember a time, when they solemnly swore that they do not believe in “collective guilt”,etc. They know that a whole nation(Germany) cannot be blamed for what some did,etc. Well, that senitment sure seemed to have gone out the window. Instead, Jewish groups(ADL,etc.) now seem to be indicting every white person on earth for the “holocaust”….and then some!!

  68. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 15, 2012 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

    @Alan: Thanks Alan. Good information.

  69. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    October 15, 2012 - 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Had to change address & name.

  70. Alan's Gravatar Alan
    October 15, 2012 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Stop using my name.I had to change it from George becaused you used that.
    Alan show some guts & share under your own.

  71. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    October 15, 2012 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    I copy that Franklin … a 10-4.
    Best regards,

  72. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 15, 2012 - 10:42 am | Permalink

    @Athling: I’ve said it before and it bears repeating: it seems as though the jews harbor a hatred for White European people that is so incredibly intense that it overpowers and consumes their own self adoration and narcissism for themselves.

    In many ways, jews are a lot like the Palestinian suicide bombers. They seem to be willing to destroy themselves, if it means they can succeed in genociding White European people in the process.

  73. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 15, 2012 - 10:05 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    It is possible that this story is in itself disinfo. Notice how this man is socalled “ashamed” of himself and yet he still believes in the justice of Israel’s cause. Here are some revealing quotes from the article ( bold by me) :

    “My task? To support Israel and counter anti-Israel, anti-Semitic posters. Fine with me. I had no opinions one way or another about Israel and who likes anti-Semites and N*zis? Not me anyway”.
    ” The funny thing was, although I started the job with no strong opinions or political views, after a few weeks of this I became very emotionally wedded to the pro-Israel ideas I was pushing.”
    ” After a while of doing this, I started to feel bad. Not because of the views I was pushing ( as I said, I was first apolitical, then pro-Israel ), but because of the dishonesty involved.”
    ” But it is a deceptive way of life, and no matter how noble the goals ( I remain pro-Israel, by the way) , these sleazy means cannot be justified by the end”.

    There is such a thing as “disinfo of disinfo” . This is probably an attempt to suggest to the subconscious of the public that whatever Israel does ( even dirty propaganda tricks), it still is basically right. ( their goals are “noble” )

    Pity for the Zhids, but it’s not working for us!

  74. Alan's Gravatar Alan
    October 15, 2012 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    @StuckInBetween: Electronic Frontier Foundation | Defending your rights in the digital world , has some similar stuff to say

    I use (and donate ) to the TOR foundation . Their anonymizing bundle comes with a stripped down version of Firefox .Just download the package and load the program , it works with minimum of effort . TOR hides your ip and route , and though it can be tracked (I tried to open a bank account using it and had ‘the system’ hacking at my router within a couple of minutes–my router sends me an email when someone is trying to gain entry (Belkin f5d5630 v2 ) , 300 or so mails were sent in a couple of minutes ) , it make life difficult for tyrannous gov .

  75. Filthy Goyim's Gravatar Filthy Goyim
    October 15, 2012 - 7:21 am | Permalink

    To address the issue of manipulation of public comments and posts, I must say it surprises me this comes as a surprise to anyone here. I have had this problem for many months now. In fact, there are few sites I can post on at all, and approximately 80% of what I’ve written is removed immediately or within seconds. I’ve been locked out of entire sites, relentlessly tracked by trolls to every site I go, and even threatened on several occasions on sites that were posing as truther sites but are actually misinformation distributors. Faceless, nameless trolls have messaged me using technology I have never seen, simply producing sentences before my eyes directly in front of material I was reading, threatening me in various ways, and once bombarding me with sick, disturbing and violent pornographic images. Often times i have watched in horror as what I had just wrote be deleted, word by word, before my eyes before I even posted it, and be sent a smiley face in it’s place for effect. This is no new tactic to me.

  76. Filthy Goyim's Gravatar Filthy Goyim
    October 15, 2012 - 6:53 am | Permalink


    Fascinating assessment.
    You discern and acknowledge spiritual forces at work. How very exciting! Tell me, how did you become aware of this? Have you any theories on the identity of these “eerie paranormal qualities”? Have you studied any form of Demonolgy? If so, did you reject the ideas within? And if so, why?

    You wrote:
    “The majority of the Jewish community never seem to get it. They have always been incredibly near-sighted failing to grasp the larger picture. When white gentiles go down they will go down right along with them if not before them.”

    That is because they literally lack the cognitive ability to do so. As they are actually psychopaths, who are particularly unable to make decisions based on future consequences, and literally only able to focus attention on immediate gratification and (rather poorly) short term goals.

    You wrote:
    “There seems to be some suicidal death-wish ever present among them seen again and again throughout history.’

    Indeed. They have no other alternative. As a parasitical group, they can only survive by stealing needed provisions for their survival from other societies. And due to the social, spiritual and financial destruction their presence brings upon their “host society” they must continually migrate from nation to nation, almost always choosing societies of great wealth and weak leadership.
    We must continue to study and contribute to the intelligence already gathered on this group, a psychopathic clan called “jews”. The work of Andrew M. Lobaczewski, who escaped to the United States where he reassembled and wrote down his research, is a priceless asset and I strongly encourage you to research his work- Political Ponerolgy. An excerpt from his book:

    Pathocracy is a disease of great social movements followed by entire societies, nations, and empires. In the course of human history, it has affected social, political, and religious movements as well as the accompanying ideologies� and turned them into caricatures of themselves�. This occurred as a result of the � participation of pathological agents in a pathodynamically similar process. That explains why all the pathocracies of the world are, and have been, so similar in their essential properties.

    You wrote:
    “This phenomenon appears at times to transcend the realm of physical reality with eerie paranormal qualities. ”

    I agree wholeheartedly. Studies on the psychopath are painfully few and countless courage men have lost their lives attempting to share what was discovered in the past, but many researchers have insisted that the psychopath is without a soul, or in some cases, a demonic being, not human at all.
    Excellent resources:

  77. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    October 15, 2012 - 6:44 am | Permalink


    The DISQUS online comment system (used by the UK Telegraph newspaper, and several US jewsmedia outlets) is also being used to enforce a similar “fire wall” on free opinion.

    They are obviously running scared. This helps explain why Rupert Murdoch shifted his London Times to paid prescription access, a year or more back.

  78. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    October 15, 2012 - 6:38 am | Permalink

    The ubiquitous and tiresome comment pairing of “Jason Squeaks” and “Mickey Meadows” … now exposed:

    Regards to all normal and genuine TOO commenters!


  79. Athling's Gravatar Athling
    October 15, 2012 - 5:05 am | Permalink

    “Civil rights, non-white immigration, and the idea that America is a proposition nation with no ethnic or religious identity.”

    The majority of the Jewish community never seem to get it. They have always been incredibly near-sighted failing to grasp the larger picture. When white gentiles go down they will go down right along with them if not before them.

    There seems to be some suicidal death-wish ever present among them seen again and again throughout history. This phenomenon appears at times to transcend the realm of physical reality with eerie paranormal qualities.

  80. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    October 15, 2012 - 4:17 am | Permalink


    The paper then changed their comment platform to Facebook. This allowed them to control visibility of comments based on IP addresses of those commenting. Now, if I make a comment, I can see it but nobody else can see it.

    I know for a fact that this is true as well. When posting the Mantra using Facebook, occasionally it will show up for me, but when I ask others to look, they see nothing. Strangely, even if I switch browsers it seems to “disappear”.

    I assume this is so I will think my post has been successful and move on.

  81. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    October 15, 2012 - 3:50 am | Permalink

    “Stuckinbetween” is not going “psycho” at all. I have personally experienced this phenomena, which is still in its early stages.

    I used to comment on articles at the online version of my local paper. They used to use a commenting system which made it obvious to anyone who could do arithmetic that comments the editor didn’t like had been “disappeared”. People began to notice this and called out the paper for being thought police.

    The paper then changed their comment platform to Facebook. This allowed them to control visibility of comments based on IP addresses of those commenting. Now, if I make a comment, I can see it but nobody else can see it. I have tested this by contacting close friends and asking if the saw a comment on an article by someone with a certain name. They didn’t see it.

    Lew is way off base if he thinks this isn’t happening. Just how far it will go is still an open question, but it’s currently a FACT that some commenting systems are both amenable to and ARE being used to manage perceptions.

    What you can’t see doesn’t exist. But “I” see it, so it must exist! Would that things were so simple in our mediated reality.

  82. Desmond Jones's Gravatar Desmond Jones
    October 15, 2012 - 3:04 am | Permalink

    Seymour Martin Lipset pointed out in 1955:

    This defense of the minority groups and the under privileged, and the attack on the upper class has characterized the speeches and writings of McCarthy and his followers. McCarthy differs considerably from earlier extreme right-wing anti-Communists. He is rarely interested in investigating or publicizing the activities of men who belong to minority ethnic groups. The image of the Communist which recurs time and again in his speeches is one of an easterner, usually of Anglo-Saxon Episcopalian origins, who has been educated in schools such as Groton and Harvard.

    Speech of Joseph McCarthy, Wheeling, West Virginia, February 9, 1950

    The reason why we find ourselves in a position of impotency is not because our only powerful potential enemy has sent men to invade our shores . . . but rather because of the traitorous actions of those who have been treated so well by this Nation. It has not been the less fortunate, or members of minority groups who have been traitorous to this Nation, but rather those who have had all the benefits that the wealthiest Nation on earth has had to offer . . . the finest homes, the finest college education and the finest jobs in government we can give.

    This is glaringly true in the State Department. There the bright young men who are born with silver spoons in their mouths are the ones who have been most traitorous. . . .

    Seymour Martin Lipset:

    Criticism of Jews or the Irish, or Italians or Negroes, would have resulted in an immediate response from members of the attacked group. Anglo-Saxon white Protestants, as a majority group, however, are not sensitive to criticism, they are not vulnerable to being attacked, nor do they expect attack. McCarthy, on the one hand, can throw out symbols and images which appeal to the minority ethnics, to the Germans, to the Irish, and the Italians, without at the same time securing the hostility of radical rightists who also are members of the D.A.R., the Sons of the American Revolution, the Patriotic Dames or any other comparable group. And in spite of his populist-type symbols, he can retain the support of these groups and the cooperation of some big businessmen. This is his peculiar power. To the status-deprived he is a critic of the upper class; to the privileged, he is a foe of social change and Communism.

  83. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 15, 2012 - 2:05 am | Permalink


    Sorry, that would be 84 Americans, not 82.

  84. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 15, 2012 - 2:04 am | Permalink

    Another reason why jews hated McCarthy was that he spoke out against the torture of German POWs, chief among them war hero Joachim Peiper, after WW2. Peiper was accused of murdering 82 American soldiers in a field despite A.) the fact that he wasn’t anywhere in the vicinity when it happened and B.) testimony from an American soldier who said that when Peiper captured him, he treated he and his men fairly. Peiper was tortured by a lunatic jew named William Perl and he eventually pled guilty to the charges. He was initially sentenced to death but it was commuted to life in prison, though he only served I think or a decade or so. Peiper was eventually killed in his home in a gun battle with French communists (supposedly) while Perl went on to become a terrorist in the JDL and later was convicted of conspiring to fire at Soviet embassy officials.

  85. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 15, 2012 - 1:39 am | Permalink

    Why can’t we have a service like YouTube entirely operated by goyim?

  86. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 15, 2012 - 1:21 am | Permalink

    By the way, Stuckinbetween , is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT about deleted U-Tube video’s. These clowns have been caught doing this I don’t know how many times!! U-tube has all kinds of excuses, bogus mostly, when they do this, and at other times, they don’t even feel they need to explain it.

  87. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 15, 2012 - 1:17 am | Permalink

    @90404: France has a street named after Mumia. I doubt Orwellian even means much to most Americans. I mean why would it? Think of it; nothing much at all is being done about foreign nationals, illegally in this country, whether they are MExicans that come across the border with impunity, Korean woman that are often well do to, fly to the U.S. on “vacation” when they are about to have a baby, and have one, who is then their legal connection here because of our worthless representatives that won’t change these laws. The head of U.S. tax issues, Timmy Geitner, is a two time tax evader. General Motors is bailed out by the U.S. taxpayer, and now becomes China motors. The administration, tries desperately to punish a U.S. State, Arizona, Mississippi,etc. for following official United States Immigration Law. AND YET, AMERICANS MIGHT BE ALARMED BY SOMETHING ORWELLIAN!!!?? First you’d have to be aware that what’s going on around you, in your own city, county,state and nation, is lunacy, before even being able to think in Orwellian terms,etc.

  88. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    October 15, 2012 - 12:59 am | Permalink

    This is like, Orwellian, but here goes:

    The Rosenbergs were guilty as hell.
    Pete Seeger is a S##t who helps Ethels 2 ‘little monsters’ with their charity. They were adopted by the Meeropols. The charity is the Meeropol Foundation [?] [for victims of witch hunts].
    Guess who they have helped ? Mumias kids. Gee, Mumias brother was there the night of the cop killing, but is nowhere
    to be found now!

  89. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 15, 2012 - 12:51 am | Permalink

    @Tom: I read about this Tom. A good buddy of mine, also pointed it out to me just a few days ago. It’s sickening how much these bastards interfere with our government in ways that are not going to help Americans in the least.

  90. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 15, 2012 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    @Aquilonia: That is correct, as demonstrated to me personally be a guy who is a master at internet technology. Passwords and any other devices to protect people from all the criminal spying by government agencies, etc., are to be taken deadly serious.

  91. October 15, 2012 - 12:47 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    If it is true, one just needs to go back on the same website using another connection like using the free wifi service from a coffee place and see by himself if his comment was recorded.

    It’s doomed to fail because people do use different connections throughout the day (from home, work, coffee place, friend’s house, etc) eventually more people will notice the “bug”.

  92. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 15, 2012 - 12:46 am | Permalink

    @Lew: Lew, I can’t prove what this person is saying as being accurate, but believe me, there is so much spying and devious stuff going on, in monitoring the people who post on the net, that I wouldn’t completely discount what he/she is saying.

  93. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 15, 2012 - 12:42 am | Permalink

    The utter, BULLSHIT, that has surrounded the Senator all of these years, including indicting him as some kind of lunatic is just that, bullshit, and evil bullshit to boot. It’s now WELL KNOWN, that he so accurately nailed the communists in Hollywood of that time, including the many Jews that were almost openly communist. Yet, worthless programs like PBS, will never admit this, let alone do a “special program” on it.

  94. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 15, 2012 - 12:25 am | Permalink

    Can you not check this out with some friends with whom you communicate by phone or who are even in the same room as you yourself? Post a comment, ask your friends whether they see it also and let them react. This system may fool only totally isolated persons.

  95. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    October 14, 2012 - 11:17 pm | Permalink

    ‘The new NSA data center going into Utah, right at the point of the mountain where parasailers drift lazily in the breeze, is the beginning of the end of freedom on the web’

    The above may be true.

  96. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    October 14, 2012 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

    In the longrun it’s the Trotskyites, that have proved more dangerous than the old time Stalinists. Heck, we have a Republican Party that has its foreign policy run by the mostly Jewish neo-cons who are descendents, literal or figurative, of radical Jew communist Leon Trotsky.

    For example, there is a Canadian Jew named Dan Senor who is in line to be a key player in the Romney administration either in defense or foreign policy. A Canadian Jew!

    This same Jew Senor, and other Jews were in Iraq in positions of authority when $17 Billion or more Dollars in cash vanished!

  97. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    October 14, 2012 - 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Ignore the trolls and the insane. Advice as old as the internet. The topic is tail-gunner Joe.

  98. StuckInBetween's Gravatar StuckInBetween
    October 14, 2012 - 7:20 pm | Permalink


    So, you’re the shill or sockpuppet the article talks about?

  99. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    October 14, 2012 - 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Go back to the psych ward. You’re overdue for shock treatment.

  100. StuckInBetween's Gravatar StuckInBetween
    October 14, 2012 - 6:19 pm | Permalink


    Just so this is not considered spam I’d like to add my comment before you read the article. I’m not sure if I’m paranoid but I see the same 4 or 5 posters in every comments section all conversing with each other and for the most part agreeing. Yes, there is nothing wrong with agreeing but these same 4 or 5 people post incessantly and I wonder if these people are bots or something. However I must give this site credit as I have increased my knowledge base to some degree just by reading the articles alone. One must hope that the articles themselves are enough to spread knowledge and end the liberal hegemony and mind control.

    There is no permalink to the article so I’ve cut and pasted it as follows, the article can be read at

    If you think your posting to forums is getting seen all the time, you are wrong. If you think what you do on the web is AS IT APPEARS, you are wrong. The ability to totally fake an internet based specifically around you, your accounts, your processor, IP, etc is fully in place. The end game is to get everyone surfing the web in their own little Truman show, so that people really are not connecting when they think they are, and their voice is forever silenced, though for all appearances online, it looks like all is well.

    They are in the first phases of this right now. It started in earnest about a year ago as far as I can perceive, with the test runs starting about three years ago. It is time to speak up about this, and get an awareness of it out there because if they manage to pull this off there will be no way to fight it.

    The deleted Youtube video scam is one aspect of this, where Youtube claims the video was removed by the user to anyone who hits a site that linked it, all the while whoever runs the site sees it acting perfectly normal on their own screen even though to others it is totally screwed. This is not the same as a locally cached file causing the problem, it is a genuine video switch on Youtube’s server that has recorded everyone’s IP and will identify the original individual who embedded the video, and serve him the video as he intended, while either showing a deleted video or one that has been switched for anyone with a different IP. This is a serious and sinister development which MUST BE ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY

    Alternate internet? How about 1.7 billion alternates, all tracked by an NSA supercomputer that we have All been told gets all of our trafic put through it and recorded already. It’s child’s play to have a system like that play switcharoo and create for everyone their own little internet universe, and THIS is how they are going to destroy free speech.

    The new NSA data center going into Utah, right at the point of the mountain where parasailers drift lazily in the breeze, is the beginning of the end of freedom on the web. It will be equipped with multiple yottabytes of data storage, enough to cache the entire internet well over 100 times, and far more than enough to create a fake little online shell world for every man woman and child on earth. Within your little world, you will be posting to forums, setting up web sites, living your life, and if you are a dissenter, it will not be seen by anyone. You will be posting to and receiving responses from shills and bots, and not even know it. All will be fine as far as you can see, and all will be irrelevant, totally unbeknownst to you.

    Even my forum can take a plug in module that remembers a poster’s IP and system configuration, and MY SERVER, not even an NSA server, can keep track of an individual, and let their posts be seen by them mixed right in with everyone else’s post, yet NO ONE other than the poster can see it. This is happening far more frequently than people realize, and I believe the attacks on my forum are using a system of this type to keep posters in the dark about what they have posted not being visible to anyone, yet being visible to themselves. They would probably wonder why NOTHING they post generates any response from anyone, and heck, there are probably shills at the ready and battles getting fought right on my own forum that I cannot see myself. This is the future we face, it is already here.

  101. SEO's Gravatar SEO
    November 6, 2010 - 5:12 am | Permalink

    Concise and well written, ty for the post

Comments are closed.