Tyrannical Elites Criminalize Opposition to Jewish Interests

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.


“The existence of a Zionist State will bring into relief the separate character of the Jew.” Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, 1922.

In the course of several articles for TOO (e.g. here and here) I have attempted to explain a slow and gradual tightening of the noose on our freedoms, and to make predictions based on current trends. Despite my close attention to these details and developments, I have to confess that organized Jewry has impressed me with the unparalleled impudence of its latest success story — the effective criminalization in Britain of non-violent protest against Israeli human rights abuses. A report in The Independent states that:

Local councils, public bodies and even some university student unions are to be banned by law from boycotting “unethical” companies, as part of a controversial crackdown being announced by the Government. Under the plan all publicly funded institutions will lose the freedom to refuse to buy goods and services from companies involved in the arms trade, fossil fuels, tobacco products or Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. Any public bodies that continue to pursue boycotts will face “severe penalties”, ministers said. Senior government sources said they were cracking down on town-hall boycotts because they “undermined good community relations, poisoned and polarized debate and fuelled anti-Semitism”.

Thus, in one stunning move, a key aspect of the autonomous decision-making processes of British local government has been abolished. The central government has arbitrarily vetoed the power of local governments and groups of private citizens to divest from trade or investments they regard as unethical. It goes without saying that the move has been introduced without any public referendum, or any public consultation. This is a diktat passed down on the people by an elite so distant from its people as to represent nothing less than the officialdom of an alien colonial power.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

It should also be clear to any intelligent observer that the measure wasn’t remotely designed to protect cigarette and oil companies. These types of businesses are only mentioned as a means of offering (poor) camouflage for the real protected special interest group — a special interest group that has sought privileged, protected status from elites for centuries. A reporter for the International Business Times has remarked: “You don’t need to be Ban Ki-moon to see this wide net has been cast to protect just one state — Israel.” The British government has even brazenly boasted of its latest victory on behalf of explicitly Jewish interests. The Independent adds:

Significantly, and underlining the main target of the ban, the formal announcement will be made by the Cabinet Office minister Matt Hancock when he visits Israel this week. … Mr Hancock said the current position where local authorities had autonomy to make ethical purchasing decisions was “undermining” Britain’s national security. “We need to challenge and prevent these divisive town-hall boycotts,” he said. “The new guidance on procurement combined with changes we are making to how pension pots can be invested will help prevent damaging and counter-productive local foreign policies undermining our national security.”

Our national security, Mr Hancock? What disdain this man must have for the citizens of his country, to feed them such a diet of empty lies. And what a sad and broken nation to accept them!

Matt Hancock: Friend of Israel, Enemy of Freedom

Matt Hancock: Friend of Israel, Enemy of Freedom

Robert Singer, World Jewish Congress CEO, has welcomed the move to restrict the freedoms of British citizens, stating:

Over the course of the last years, the UK has been a hotbed for BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) activity. We saw a number of universities and local councils adopting boycott resolutions against the Jewish state, severe actions in supermarkets, and attempts to hamper trade relations between Britain and Israel. It’s therefore important and welcome that the British government has now decided to take action.

I cannot stress enough that this move can’t be seen in isolation. The mind-set that has insidiously worked for the introduction of this measure is the same mentality that agitates unceasingly for gun control and restrictions on freedom of speech. It is the same mind-set and set of interests that both provoked Ted Nugent’s indignation, and then exacted a weak and grovelling apology from him. It is the same supremacist mentality that provoked the loathsome Jackie Mason to demand that a blacklist be made of actors who support the boycott against Israel, uttering: “If not for the Jews who created the industry in Hollywood, all these people would never have a job and would never be working.” These measures are part of an overwhelming trend throughout Jewish history:  that Jews have very often been agents and partners of the ruling elite and have often sought and acquired special protections from Big Government in the form of monarchs, politburos, and ‘democratic’ elites.

Jewish political influence thrives in tyranny, when the masses are dispossessed of freedoms. Tellingly in this regard, in Orthodox Judaism the prayer Hanotayn Teshu-ah is not said for the nation or the people of the country in which the Jews have settled, but rather for the monarch or government. Gordon Freeman explains that “In fact, a prayer for the government is a feature of every type of prayer book of every land of the Jewish diaspora irrespective of the specific religious movement of the community.”[1] This stance is ancient. The rabbinic commentary, Pirke Avot, tells Jews to “pray for the welfare of the government, because were it not for the fear it inspires, every man would swallow his neighbor alive.” What is really intended and understood by this injunction is that were it not for the fear inspired by the government, the goyim would swallow their Jewish neighbors alive. The favored Jewish position is thus to support a strong, feared, government which is capable of harnessing the resentments, real or imagined, of the gentile masses. This is most commonly achieved by stripping the citizenry of their right to bear arms, and a hard clamp down on their ability to organize through speech or assembly.

History is replete with examples of Jews benefiting from powerful, feared, governments. One of Big Government’s primary methods of instilling this fear into the populace is the slow erosion of its freedoms and the introduction of harsh and restrictive legislation. Such measures, never introduced in a truly democratic manner, are of course nothing but a subtler form of violence. And pressure upon a people’s feelings, mentality, and sense of themselves can be infinitely more effective and damaging than pressure upon their bodies. The steady drip, drip of the bleeding of their freedoms denies them the fight or flight impulse that comes with direct, instantaneous physical assault.

Rest assured that there will be further repressive measures on the horizon. Britain is merely the first nation-state to explicitly introduce such protections for Israel. We have already witnessed the introduction of very similar measures in the U.S. at state-level. In May 2015 Illinois passed anti-BDS legislation, provoking the Washington Post to warn of a “wave of anti-BDS legislation sweeping the U.S.” Recently, California introduced legislation prohibiting state government from ‘contracting with entities that support the practice of boycotts on the basis of national origin.’ The equally corrupt and treasonous Republicans and Democrats have come together in South Carolina to pass similar measures, and Florida unanimously passed ‘anti-discrimination’ legislation in the state senate just under two weeks ago. The New York state legislature has passed “a bill that would suspend funding to educational institutions which fund groups that boycott Israel,” and thirty-five more states are reportedly considering similar legislation.

The anti-BDS campaign has been heating up at the national level as well. An anti-BDS law has been introduced in Congress by four legislators well known to be owned by the Israel Lobby. The proposed law would ensure that state anti-BDS laws would not be pre-empted by federal law and would prevent entities from suing states because they had suffered damages from anti-BDS laws. Most incredibly, it would allow state and local governments to penalize entities that advocated boycott. Since boycott has been ruled as coming under First Amendment protections for free speech, this obviously raises Constitutional issues. The proposed law also fits well with an Israeli campaign to censor social media According to a statement from the Israeli Foreign Ministry, governments should require the adoption of “global terms of service prohibiting the posting of hate speech and anti-Semitic materials.” Given  that anti-BDS arguments are often framed in terms of opposition to anti-Semitism, it is easy to see where this is going.

In October 2015, The Intercept reported on the criminal convictions in France of 12 activists for advocating sanctions and a boycott against Israel. The convictions were upheld by France’s highest court. In transpired that the individuals were arrested and prosecuted for “wearing shirts emblazoned with the words ‘Long live Palestine, boycott Israel’” and because “they also handed out fliers that said that ‘buying Israeli products means legitimizing crimes in Gaza.’” Pascal Markowicz, chief lawyer of the CRIF umbrella organization of French Jewish communities, published a celebratory decree: “BDS is ILLEGAL in France.” In Canada, officials have also threatened criminal prosecution against anyone supporting boycotts against Israel.

As I have stated before when addressing this topic, I believe that such repressive tactics offer only short-term solutions for organized Jewry. Hilaire Belloc probably expressed it best when he wrote:

It dams up and enormously increases the latent force of anger against Jewish power both real and imaginary. It is like the piling up of a head of water when a river valley is obstructed, or like the introducing of resistance into an electric current. The suppression of resentment…is a fierce irritant and accounts for the high pressure at which attack escapes when once it is loosened (The Jews, 263).

Neither elites nor their allies fare well when tyranny is eventually met with revolution. The centuries-old obsessive quest for Jewish security has never produced its (unachievable and insatiable) goal, but has instead contributed to centuries of tension punctuated with expulsions and ethnic conflict. For a people obsessed with the refrain “Never Forget,” they would do well to become better students of their own history.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

86 Comments to "Tyrannical Elites Criminalize Opposition to Jewish Interests"

  1. royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
    February 29, 2016 - 4:48 am | Permalink

    I am surprised that Duke and MacDonald are not discussing the latest LSM accusations against Trump for not reflexively and immediately distancing himself from Duke and his legions of “White Supremacist” supporters!

    I firmly believe that not only does Trump know of Duke and MacDonald et al, but that he gets many of his best ideas from our group of White nationalists.

    By not distancing himself from “Us”, I believe Trump has very knowingly steered the masses in our direction in the hopes that “We” will do the “dirty, difficult and dangerous” work of exposing the masses to our ideas so as to make it easier for Trump to advance the pro-White agenda.

    Without a pro-White and openly Jew questioning narrative, Trump knows nothing can be done to fix the country, and to do the same at this point in his campaign is too risky for Trump.

    We Whites are being tasked with breaking the Taboo against pro-White and Jew-exposing behaviour in the Mainstream so as to make it safe for Trump to do so on a level commiserate with the limited intellectual capacity of a very psychotic-by-Jewish-Induction population at large.

  2. February 26, 2016 - 3:13 am | Permalink


    There’s a recent video that’s got over 200,00 views in about 10 days, titled “Why Women Destroy Nations and Other Uncomfortable Truths”.

    Despite disclaimers in the video that the author is not trying to assign blame to any group or gender the whole thing points the blame finger at women.

    For the full transcript of the video, and also my thoughts on it, please see here:
    Why Women Destroy Nations and Other Uncomfortable Truths


  3. Mr Reynard's Gravatar Mr Reynard
    February 22, 2016 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    The psychopathic criminal cabal is afraid, very afraid, this is why all those laws & psycho goons on the streets against the people ?
    This is, the beginning of the end, for the psychopathic criminal cabal !

  4. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    February 22, 2016 - 10:03 am | Permalink

    Very good comments from ;
    Veritas and James Bowery.

    It is pointless burning refugee buildings if it your leaders and their philosemitism (US/UK) or servants of Jewish interest (Europe) is the real problem.

    The British Left is indeed more resistant to Israeli interest but this is limited as they will never call a spade a spade like you say – Jewish presence in European nation is the real problem as seen by the many expulsions of Jews from European countries over the centuries even England.

    The other problem is the British Left is not nationalist but driven by a suicidal ethos of “social justice” that is anti-Darwinist and counter to European interests through sympathy for non-Europeans.

    The British Right is totally Judaised due to money that rich Jews used to buy their way into classe and privilege.

    There is room for real nationalists not pro-Jewish groups like UKIP or the defunct English Defence League. I feel the Britons lack someone who can fill this void. The destructions Jews have done lkie London that is now almost a non-European city is so huge and cannot be ignored.

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      February 22, 2016 - 10:28 pm | Permalink

      Thank you brother Europa for your kind thoughts.

      As I was just mentioning on another thread to Roy and Arch Stanton, philosemitism in the “Western” world has now reached full-blown, psychedelic, religious proportions.

      Indeed, the Religion of Philosemitism® is a complete “faith”-based system for so many in the English-speaking, Anglosphere world (America, Canada, Britain, Australia, New Zealand) … and all the colonies, er, ‘countries’ of continental Europe (especially Germany) which serve as their vassal states.

      It is a religion with it’s own sacraments, liturgy, and canon, to be sure, which corrals the ‘minds’ (or LACK THEREOF) of the goyische-golem – to trash and denigrate their collective self-esteem and self-worth – to make them duplicitously, and mendaciously, feel that nothing in life can be accomplished without a Jew’s ‘help’ – or, more accurately, approval.

      *I mean wow, just wow .. just how did White, Aryan civilization managed to survive for all the millennia, without the ‘assistance’ of the Jews, East Asians, or Asian Indians…?!?

      • February 23, 2016 - 10:08 am | Permalink

        Veritas you’re right , I did partially address this

        I find many of the comments interesting and informative
        Very Good comments

        Europa:It is pointless burning refugee buildings if it your leaders and their philosemitism (US/UK) or servants of Jewish interest (Europe) is the real problem.
        Yes! , I see your point, Thanks

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          February 24, 2016 - 5:04 pm | Permalink

          Thank you brother Rick – and if I may say, I enjoy reading your comments as well – and excellent research on your part for posting of relevant, timely, and important articles on whatever subject and topic that is being discussed.

          I especially like the way you inspire and encourage Our Folk in your commentary, particularly in the permalink you posted above.


          So then, encourage one another and build each other up, as you are doing. ~ 1 Thessalonians 5:11

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          February 24, 2016 - 6:55 pm | Permalink


          One final point I’d like to add to your commentary on the link that you posted above, is that philosemitism is hardly limited to Christian Zionists – in fact, you also find this contemptible attitude, as I mentioned before, among the CONservative Right that is barely Christian – if they are Christian at all, especially among the “rightest” parties in northern/western Europe, who can’t seem to stop fawning over any and all things Jewish and Zionist.

          Some may say that this is done as a ‘tactical’ measure, in order to get past the ‘censors’ and have a ‘voice’, bla bla bla .. but I am skeptical of this, and believe that many of these jerks, if not outright false/controlled opposition, are personally opportunistic and self-servingly ambitious, and also believing more and more that they not just ‘fear’ Jews – but many (sickeningly) fawningly admire them (perhaps this is equally motivated out of a desire not to seem so fearfully submissive .. but this behavior, rather than diminish this perception, just enhances it).

          This following article, by the superb writer Andrew Hamilton, who I believe has written for this site before, sums up brilliantly this schizophrenic attitude on the part of the philosemitic ‘Right’ – (and even among some on the antisemitic Right who drool over some, or certain aspects of the Zionist state, particularly their monstrously genocidal policies against the ‘ragheads’ and ‘Ahabs’ – and ‘if only AmeriKwa could be more like Israhell’):

          “Philosemitism and Brutality ” | Counter-Currents Publishing


          Don’t envy evil people or desire their company. For their hearts plot violence, and their words always stir up trouble. ~ Proverbs 24:1-2

          But if you harbor bitter envy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast about it or deny the truth. ~ James 3:14

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        February 25, 2016 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

        philosemitism in the “Western” world has now reached full-blown, psychedelic, religious proportions.

        Whites are biologically prone to altruism (there is scientific evidence for this), and I think this Jew-worship is an altruism thing.

        You don’t see non-whites doing this.

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        February 25, 2016 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

        philosemitism in the “Western” world has now reached full-blown, psychedelic, religious proportions.

        Take heart.

        Maybe the “Jew bubble”– just like the “housing bubble”– is about to burst.

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      February 22, 2016 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

      Again, *nothing else* in the Jewish agenda would be possible in “Western” countries if it weren’t for the abject, servile philosemitism of way too many of it’s subjects, um, I mean “citizens”.

      This is a very interesting article that brilliantly delves into the aberrant psychology of the *Stockholm Syndrome on Steroids* (SSS) that characterizes the relationship of the Ashkenazi-Anglosphere .. the unrequited school-girl love crush the AmeriKwan (and British) golem have for their ‘masters’:


      *May God help and save His remnant People in such times of stark madness and evil darkness.

      This we humbly pray.

  5. February 22, 2016 - 6:57 am | Permalink

    Jewry is to a nation’s hyper-centralization of wealth and power, as pushers are to addiction. It’s how they make a living and how they wreck their clients before moving on to new clients.

    This is the key cause and effect of the vicious cycle evolving Jewish virulence that has produced a group organism in which individuals of high verbal intelligence act autonomously, without, themselves, relying on their own centralization of coordination, swarm targets and act, stochastically, as teams.


    This kind of group organism cannot be defeated by “implicit” identity unless the identity is of a group that has gone through similar biological selection and evolved superior group adaptations.

    The best counter-strategy is to impose explicity biological selection for individual integrity on the world’s nations via sortocracy.


    This turns the tide by going on the explicit offensive against group selection, and its creatures — freeing individuals from the mockery of “individualism” promoted by adversarial groups.

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      February 22, 2016 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

      Jewry is to a nation’s hyper-centralization of wealth and power, as pushers are to addiction. It’s how they make a living and how they wreck their clients before moving on to new clients.


      In a word – USURY

      “Give me control of a nation’s money supply
      and I care not who makes the laws.”

      -Infamous Mayer Amschel Rothschild Quote

      • February 23, 2016 - 6:53 am | Permalink

        That word is much too narrow. The evolution of Ashkenazi intelligence as tax farmers for northern European royalty was not properly called “usury”. Neolibertarian philosophers that promote displacing taxes on property with taxes on economic activity is not properly called “usury”. FDR’s legal staff that rationalized gutting the 10th Amendment to centralize social policy in the Federal Government were not engaging in “usury”. The pulse of east European immigrants to Hollywood to commandeer Edison’s invention of the motion picture technology and thereby centralize the minting of the coin of myth in the West were not engaging in “usury”. Need I go on?

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          February 23, 2016 - 10:39 am | Permalink

          Usury, the illegal, or at least unethical, action or practice of lending money at unreasonably high rates of interest, is still wrong, and it has certainly enriched their tribe over ours, even if not in every way or instance you describe.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          February 23, 2016 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

          The problem is not with loaning money (or any good, for that matter) at interest (which every society, even the Islamic ones, practices), but with the charging of interest on money created ex nihilo, a privilege accorded exclusively to commercial banks by the State. This money creation is the “control” to which Rothschild refers.

          Whether it be it apocryphal or not, I agree with the message of the quote and see the Federal Reserve and its commercial banking cartel as the linchpin to Organized Jewry’s power.

        • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
          February 23, 2016 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

          Trenchant, thanks for making that point. So many people don’t get it; they try to argue that all charging of interest is inherently wrong, except for a little “handling fee” or some such. For heaven’s sake, why would I work hard for my money, and then loan some of that money to someone at no profit to myself? Any rate of interest is okay if both parties agree to it.

        • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
          February 24, 2016 - 2:13 pm | Permalink

          Well, it’s not only the money printing- but most of the problem is that.

          The General principle is called Rent-Seeking [formerly known as stealing]:

          From Wikipedia, the jewish encyclopedia

          In economics and in public-choice theory, rent-seeking involves seeking to increase one’s share of existing wealth without creating new wealth. Rent-seeking results in reduced economic efficiency through poor allocation of resources, reduced actual wealth creation, lost government revenue, increased income inequality,[1] and (potentially) national decline.

          Attempts at capture of regulatory agencies to gain a coercive monopoly can result in advantages for the rent seeker in the market while imposing disadvantages on (incorrupt) competitors. The idea was originated by Gordon Tullock and the term was coined by Anne Krueger.[2]

          More: https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=+rent+seeking

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          February 24, 2016 - 4:31 pm | Permalink

          The problem is not with loaning money (or any good, for that matter) at interest (which every society, even the Islamic ones, practices), but with the charging of interest on money created ex nihilo, a privilege accorded exclusively to commercial banks by the State. This money creation is the “control” to which Rothschild refers.


          Good point Trenchant, and this was the intent of my original point as well.

          I will say to Barkingmad’s point, however, that ‘any rate of interest is okay if both parties agree to it’ is not right in a healthy society (additionally, I doubt the lendee would agree to such a, hypothetically, high rate in the first place, in such a potential scenario).

          Economic nterest rates in a homogeneous society, an economic system that cares for the common good of the Volk – should be reasonable enough for the common man to be able to pay back such loans without staying in perpetual debt for generations (or even a lifetime for some). Exorbitantly high levels of interest is essentially loansharking – whomever is doing it.

          Contrary to popular stereotype, the history of banking as an institutionalized system, as opposed to mere money-lending, is actually Italian – Venetian, Florentine, and Genoese to be exact – not Jewish:

          Many histories position the crucial historical development of a banking system to medieval and Renaissance Italy and particularly the affluent cities of Florence, Venice and Genoa. The Bardi and Peruzzi families dominated banking in 14th century Florence, establishing branches in many other parts of Europe.[2] Perhaps the most famous Italian bank was the Medici bank, established by Giovanni Medici in 1397.[3] The oldest bank still in existence is Monte dei Paschi di Siena, headquartered in Siena, Italy, which has been operating continuously since 1472.[4]

          The development of banking spread from northern Italy throughout the Holy Roman Empire, and in the 15th and 16th century to northern Europe. This was followed by a number of important innovations that took place in Amsterdam during the Dutch Republic in the 17th century, and in London in the 18th century. During the 20th century, developments in telecommunications and computing caused major changes to banks’ operations and let banks dramatically increase in size and geographic spread. The financial crisis of 2007–2008 caused many bank failures, including some of the world’s largest banks, and provoked much debate about bank regulation.



        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          February 24, 2016 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

          Well, it’s not only the money printing- but most of the problem is that.

          The General principle is called Rent-Seeking [formerly known as stealing]:


          Another important point and perspective, T.J.

          From Wikipedia, the jewish encyclopedia

          LOL :)

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      February 25, 2016 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

      The best counter-strategy is to impose explicity biological selection for individual integrity on the world’s nations via sortocracy.

      We don’t need a counter-strategy per se— we just need to promote the truth.

      If today the public knew the truth about the Jews— then it would be OVER.

  6. Harbinger's Gravatar Harbinger
    February 22, 2016 - 4:48 am | Permalink


    Now we are told by our government (one that I don’t vote for, nor subscribe to being governed by either) that we cannot boycott Israel.
    And regardless, people will still tell us that it is the Roman Catholic Church, the Jesuits and the Christian European peoples who are behind the creation of the New World Order and its totalitarian, globalist state.
    If anyone wanted proof that Rothschild pulls the strings on his puppet world, then this is proof. There really is nothing more to say other than, we now have hard evidence that the UK government is a ZOG.

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      February 22, 2016 - 12:06 pm | Permalink


      They Want To Hog Everything

      • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
        February 22, 2016 - 9:21 pm | Permalink

        They Want To Hog Everything


        LOL – you’re on a roll as usual T.J. …

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      February 22, 2016 - 10:36 pm | Permalink

      And regardless, people will still tell us that it is the Roman Catholic Church, the Jesuits and the Christian European peoples who are behind the creation of the New World Order and its totalitarian, globalist state.


      EXACTLY brother H…

      Fallacies of the Jesuit conspiracy theory | Fitzpatrick Informer

      While agents of the Jewish-Masonic cryptocracy work around the clock spreading lies and disinformation, many sincere people are getting sucked into their traps. One of the fastest spreading fallacies of these agents is the conspiracy theory that the Catholic Church—through the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), the Pope, and/or the supposedly still-existing Knights Templars—are running the New World Order conspiracy.

      “It’s not the Jews!” these agents and their naïve dupes claim. “We have been fooled for the last 400 years into thinking the Jews are leading the NWO when it’s really the Jesuits, the Vatican, and the Black Pope!”

      The game of these agenturs is very simple. Everything that has been typically attributed to Jews for hundreds of years, for example, the creation of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the drafting of the Satanic Babylonian Talmud, and even Zionism itself, are all the work of the Jesuits. It’s a rewriting of history. Take every historical book from the last 2,000 years that names “Jews,” cross it out, and replace it with “Catholics” or some euphemistic term that indicts the Church and you have the Jesuit conspiracy meme summed up.



  7. dofornow's Gravatar dofornow
    February 22, 2016 - 3:44 am | Permalink

    I’m having trouble getting stuff on Gudenhove Kalergi and his gong.
    Is it an award for those who have made great efforts to destroy Europe as we know it?
    I cant find were and when, and by whom it’s dished out! I Know the disingenuous pavlo bitch has one. I find it most sinister that it is considered a great honour by many of our elites to receive this gong from a long dead cultist.
    Are it’s recipients at work on our June farce?
    How about a slogan for our thinking troops?
    Pick up some wind from across the pond?

    • John's Gravatar John
      February 22, 2016 - 11:00 am | Permalink


      There are five different pics there that you can click on and read.

      The English version says basically this:

      On pages 22 and 23 of his 1925 book “Praktischer Idealismus” he wrote:

      “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-N/egroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”

      and on page 50 he wrote:

      “Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. ”

      You can find a digital copy of the book here:


      The “European Prize Coudenhove-Kalergi” is awarded every two years by the European Council to “leading personalities for their extraordinary commitment in the European unification process”.

      In 2014, the prize was awarded to Jean-Claude Juncker who is the President of the European Commission. In 2012, the prize was awarded to the President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy. Other Prize winners since 2000 have included the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and Vaira Vike-Freiberga, the President of Latvia (2006).

    • February 23, 2016 - 10:20 am | Permalink

      Can I point to my own look at coudenhove-kalergi, here
      I found a reference to him in 1948 Who’s Who; and even a reference in a Bertrand Russell essay of the 1920s, where he makes a passing comment on Europe perhaps becoming black ‘with a small white aristocracy’. I found the passage baffling – why would anyone do that? – until I saw the connection; Russell must have read about it in the Jewish English-language press.

      • John's Gravatar John
        February 25, 2016 - 8:34 am | Permalink

        Rerevisionist, your page looks like a great resource on Coudenhove-Kalergi. I’ve saved it to read later.

  8. Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
    February 21, 2016 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t it highly interesting that it is the political Left in Britain – not the “Right” – that is standing up to the Zionists, and, by extension, Jewish power…?!?

    Let’s face it, the “Right-wing” in most all “Western” countries are, politically and culturally speaking a morbid joke, as are most all of their “movements” .. as are most of their followers and acolytes.

    And what is the most debilitating condition in the Anglosphere, and by extension, it’s colonies in the rest of northwestern Europe, virtually all share in common?

    You guessed it: PHILOSEMITISM

    Philosemitism is a mind and soul virus that renders it’s devotees utterly useless in the greater existential struggle for Western, Aryan man … by especially pushing the effeminate idea that social “respectability” is more important than having real self-respect for themselves and for the indigenous European folk, a self-respect with-out which genuine respect for Whites by The Other, is utterly impossible.

    This necessary self-respect, and collective White/Aryan self-esteem and tribal worth, is perhaps, irredeemably absent in so much of the European and American spokes-“men” on the “Right” – even on the putative “far-Right” – especially so in Europe with the tighty-Righty parties constantly pledging their fealty to the Zionist state, and flying and parading the flag that bears the Zionist ‘swastika’ – the HEXAGRAM, um, er, the “Magen David”.

    This goes beyond a mere case of ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ – even a severe form of it. For any sane person in the “West” to be constantly deceived by a nation and people like the ‘Eskimos’ – who utterly and enviously hate and despise the Europeans very existence – is not really normal or natural, and it points to something irrationally supernatural.

    This is why philosemitism has become the Religion of the “Western” world, again, largely thanks to the CONservative “Right”, not the Left.

    *I sincerely hope Professor Joyce does an in-depth study and examination of this extraordinary insidious phenomenon that afflicts so much of Our People’s ability to effectively and meaningfully resist our oppression – and Our People’s ultimate existential dispossession.

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      February 22, 2016 - 1:56 pm | Permalink

      Looks as if they put a HEX on us.

      • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
        February 22, 2016 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

        They certainly did brother T.J., for the longest time,

        And yes, the so-called “Star of David” is in fact a hexagram – it’s not biblical – and it has nothing to do with the King David of the Israelite Old Testament.

        It is actually has as it’s true historical roots in the 17th century as the Kabbalistic, occult star of the eastern European Ashkenazim – the non-Jewish “Jews”.

        Star of David – Wikipedia

        The Star of David, known in Hebrew as the Shield of David or Magen David (Hebrew מָגֵן דָּוִד; Biblical Hebrew Māḡēn Dāwīḏ [maːˈɣeːn daːˈwiːð], Tiberian [mɔˈɣen dɔˈvið], Modern Hebrew [maˈɡen daˈvid], Ashkenazi Hebrew and Yiddish Mogein Dovid [ˈmɔɡeɪn ˈdɔvid] or Mogen Dovid), is a generally recognized symbol of modern Jewish identity and Judaism.[1] Its shape is that of a hexagram, the compound of two equilateral triangles. Unlike the menorah, the Lion of Judah, the shofar and the lulav, the Star of David was never a uniquely Jewish symbol.[2]

        During the 19th century the symbol began to proliferate amongst the Jewish communities of Eastern Europe, ultimately being used amongst the Jewish communities in the Pale of Settlement. A significant motivating factor was the desire to imitate the influence of the Christian cross.[3] The earliest Jewish usage of the symbol was inherited from medieval Arabic literature by Kabbalists for use in talismanic protective amulets (segulot) where it was known as a Seal of Solomon.[4][5] The symbol was also used in Christian churches as a decorative motif many centuries before its first known use in a Jewish synagogue.[6] Prior to the 19th century, official use in Jewish communities was generally known only in the region of today’s Czech Republic, Austria and possibly parts of Southern Germany, having begun in medieval Prague.[7]

        The symbol became representative of the worldwide Zionist community, and later the broader Jewish community, after it was chosen as the central symbol on a flag at the First Zionist Congress in 1897.[8][9]

        The identification of the term “Star of David” or “Shield of David” with the hexagram shape dates to the 17th century.


        • February 28, 2016 - 2:05 pm | Permalink

          It bears repeating – the Star of David symbolizes the Jew’s first successful subversion of an advanced civilization i.e. ancient Egypt.

          This is why many of depictions of the star portray an upright triangle inextricably locked with an inverted triangle. The upright triangle represents Egyptian culture while the inverted triangle represents the Jews “normative inversion” and subjugation of Egyptian culture. See here: http://www.amazon.com/Moses-Egyptian-Memory-Western-Monotheism/dp/0674587391

          Note the passage:

          “The man of the future will be of mixed race. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.” – Heinrich Coudenhove-Kalergi

          From the Middle Kingdom onward, Egyptians began noticeably darkening. The last two thirds of Egyptian history show a slow decline that begins to accelerate with the successful invasion of the Hyksos (Jews). From that point on Egypt never again recovers it’s once great stature as a advanced, homogeneous nation. While its most well known Pharaohs were from the the New Kingdom era. This was the beginning of the Egyptian Empire that spelled the end of Egypt. It is very likely that the Genesis story of the Tower of Babel is actually about Egypt and not Babylon.

          The it is no accident that this heavily crossbred mutt used the ancient Egyptians as his model for the future of civilization, this is the Jew’s wettest dream. It is also no accident that there are pyramids and structures featuring pyramid symbolism popping up everywhere in western civilization.

          The Jews intend on breeding Europeans into a dimwitted, mud people just like they did the Egyptians. Considering the last indigenous Pharaoh was clearly a Negro both in appearance and habits, Obama points to the fact America’s last day is rapidly approaching.

  9. February 21, 2016 - 11:21 am | Permalink

    Organized Jewry will most certainly come out and condemn this,how dare Europeans/Whites care about their own existence,their Future, Posterity, well being and safety of their Families and Communities!!
    What nerve!!!
    I hope SPLC/ADL notices this gesture of SURVIVAL INSTINCT
    and that it ruins their whole day.

    Crowd Cheers as “RapeUgee” Center Burns to the Ground

    Crowds of locals gathered round, cheered and applauded as a refugee invader center in the German town of Bautzen, Saxony, burned down last night, horrifying local establishment politicians.

    The invader center—planned to accommodate at least 300 Jihadis pretending to be refugees—was totally destroyed in the blaze, and is now uninhabitable.

    However, what shocked Bautzen Mayor Alexander Ahrens, a member of Angela Merkel’s MUSLIM RAPEUGEE UNION (MRU) party, was the fact that hundreds of local townsfolk gathered to watch the blaze, and openly expressed their delight.

    GO U.S.A.

    • John's Gravatar John
      February 21, 2016 - 7:43 pm | Permalink

      Amen! Let’s hope there’s an awakening. I talked to a guy on Quora today and he knew the score.

  10. February 21, 2016 - 9:05 am | Permalink

    “The existence of a Zionist State will bring into relief the separate character of the Jew.” – Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, 1922.

    Many years ago, before I found my pair of Hoffmann lenses, I saw the movie “Raiders of the Lost Ark.” For some reason the name of the prime antagonist to “Indy’s” very white character was the very black character, French archaeologist, Dr. René Belloq. Naturally the Belloq character was a weaselly, sleazy, Nadzee quisling, only interested in personal gain and fame whose name Indy would virtually spit out like he was bringing forth a load of phlegm. It wasn’t until may years later that I understood the name’s allusion to the famed writer, orator, poet, sailor, satirist, man of letters, soldier and political activist quoted above. Jews are like that, once they denounce you, your name remains forever defamed. If they think you’re really bad, they make your name a verb, like “sodomy” or an adjective like “sodomite”, “philistine” or “nimrod”.

    • February 21, 2016 - 10:11 am | Permalink

      A similar but Internet-related technique is Jews using a name they hate in a lightweight film, story, or what have you. Then anyone googling the name gets vast numbers of references to the rubbish. I can’t think of examples off hand, but I’ve noticed this several times. (MacDonald is already taken, perhaps fortunately for KM).

  11. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    February 20, 2016 - 11:11 pm | Permalink

    In America and the UK it is the powerful Jewish Lobby at work but elsewhere like in the US economic colony called Germany, the tool used is “blackmail” backed up by American Hellfire missiles etc.


    There is something very destructive about the Anglosphere mindset and related peoples of the British Isles like this Mike Flanagan person in the link below. These are the same people that used to kill your soldiers in the Haganah.


  12. Arthur's Gravatar Arthur
    February 20, 2016 - 7:15 pm | Permalink


    Thanks for the article, Sir. This is quite shocking. But of course, Jewish money is behind it. The Judaists are able to bribe all 3 branches of our govt. in USA/UK/EU, etc and the crooked politicians do their bidding.

    We must fight back harder. Vote such politicians out of office. Support binding superseding national referenda (ncid.us)

    And boycott ALL Jewish businesses—Jewish papers like the New York Times, Time, Newsweek, and much of the MSM, Jewish chain coffee shops and Jewish restaurants, Jewish movie companies and Jewish Hollywood (Jollywood).

    I think somebody should make a list of all Jewish and Israeli interests online so we can boycott them all (except for a few good ones that are anti-Israel and support white interests and are against immigration, which each person must decide for himself) and their goy puppets.

    If they fight hard, we must fight harder.

    The govt. will never force me to buy Soda stream or buy Starbucks coffee or the New York Times or shop at Stein Mart or eat at Panera Bread. Never, never, never.

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      February 21, 2016 - 10:27 am | Permalink

      The most important boycott is of the money system. The grid [various monopolies/cartels] is setup so one cannot survive without it- dropping out is illegal.

      Dropping out is the only act that can save us. Refuse to use jew “money.” If you have any in your wallet, take it out and set it afire.

      Boycott all monopolies. How to boycott the roads?

      Starve the beast of White Talent. Whites need to go on strike.

    • February 22, 2016 - 5:42 am | Permalink

      Yes i like media awareness.
      This writing is not about Jewish media, it is just descriptive of editorial profile, and therefore highly defamatory.


      Burning money is a bad idea, because it allows the banks to print more, so in effect it is like giving the money to the bank.
      Instead buy other currencies which are not issued by people we don’t like. Fx Bitcoin.
      Then you transfer your value to a different holder of value, the former currency loses its value, and the money left are an excess which must be subtracted from the amount the bank can print to reach its wanted inflation level.

      • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
        February 22, 2016 - 11:22 am | Permalink

        Burning was facetious. I mean we must drop out from jew manipulation, especially by not using their so-called money. It is the information monopoly that keeps our people in the dark about money machinations [money monopoly].

        All of our problema are traceable to governmentally enforced monopolies.

  13. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    February 20, 2016 - 7:12 pm | Permalink

    “And the only person who can’t get a job for the presidency is a tall, white gentile.”

    Many a true word is spoken in jest.

    • Lou's Gravatar Lou
      February 21, 2016 - 10:36 pm | Permalink

      And the comic is, of course, a jew.

  14. February 20, 2016 - 7:12 pm | Permalink

    Without Hollyweird jews, no doubt we’d have something much better, a white and non-jewish entertainment industry, that didn’t promote the smut and race mixing garbage that the jews and Israliens do.

  15. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    February 20, 2016 - 6:44 pm | Permalink
    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      February 20, 2016 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

      Legal counsel in defending the anti-BDS action was provided by Yves Hazan, himself a Jew.

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        February 21, 2016 - 9:34 am | Permalink

        Without a Jewish attorney, he would have not won. Why? They would have denounced him for discriminating against Jewish barristers and lawyers !

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      February 21, 2016 - 8:02 am | Permalink

      “It gives the green light for many more Australians to take their own action in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle for rights and freedoms we are lucky enough to be able to take for granted,” Professor Lynch said.

      Right action, wrong reason, professor.

      Before I act “in solidarity” with anyone at all, I would ask myself if that person or group of persons would ever do the same for me if our situations were reversed. Except for throwing a few dollars into the cap of a white beggar on the street, I always ask myself that question, and act or avoid acting, accordingly.

      What do y’all say.

      • John's Gravatar John
        February 21, 2016 - 7:53 pm | Permalink

        I agree with you completely, Barkingmad. This enemy of my enemy is not my friend.

        • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
          February 22, 2016 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

          Thank you, John! But even then, I wonder if they truly are the enemy of our enemy.

  16. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    February 20, 2016 - 6:28 pm | Permalink

    Ted Nugent’s apology is a strange thing. “Oy vey!” isn’t exactly a phrase of contrition, more dismay. Some interesting comments:

  17. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    February 20, 2016 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

    Ron Paul’s “End the Fed!” was not only a more serious threat to the Levantine hegemon but also safely within the limits of political correctness (Wall St. is goyville, right?). More defensible on national interest grounds, too.

  18. Letgo Mieggo's Gravatar Letgo Mieggo
    February 20, 2016 - 3:55 pm | Permalink

    “It dams up and enormously increases the latent force of anger against Jewish power both real and imaginary. It is like the piling up of a head of water when a river valley is obstructed, or like the introducing of resistance into an electric current. The suppression of resentment…is a fierce irritant and accounts for the high pressure at which attack escapes when once it is loosened (The Jews, 263).”

    Well said and accurate. That’s their problem, they never know when to quit. The masses they try to control finally get fed up and things get ugly. It’s been repeated over and over.

    “The centuries-old obsessive quest for Jewish security has never produced its (unachievable and insatiable) goal, but has instead contributed to centuries of tension punctuated with expulsions and ethnic conflict. For a people obsessed with the refrain “Never Forget,” they would do well to become better students of their own history.”

    Yes, spot on. If they truly want IT to never happen again, then why do they never stop DOING what they do to cause IT? Mental illness?

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      February 20, 2016 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

      jew does not know the difference between mental health and mental illness.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      February 21, 2016 - 11:36 am | Permalink

      Jews are born haters. When there are no goys to hate, they hate each other. Look at Israel. Internecine hatred everywhere. The Ashkenazy hate the Sephardic and vice versa, Sabras hate immigrants and vice versa, moderates hate the settlers and vice versa, etc. etc. Ultimately, Israel will self-destruct.

    • February 22, 2016 - 9:49 am | Permalink

      It’z the nature of the parasite, ingrained into their genetic structure. This is what they claim about homosexuality and other mental aberrations, “they can’t help it, it’z how they were born”. Once again this is nothing more than Jewish projection of their debased natures onto other people. They are truly the most arrogant, egotistical race of liars on the planet. The only race that still openly proclaim they are god’s personally chosen people. How much more arrogant can one be?

      Jews cannot control their immensely overweening, arrogant nature, so it begins to openly manifest itself the moment they feel they have enough control to force it unto others suffering under their domineering socialist nanny state that micromanages every “jot and tittle” of one’s life. The only “freedoms” Jews believe in are the ones they grant the goyim. Their “Noahide laws” are a classic example of this mindset. Naturally there will eventually be a backlash against the pernicious arrogance they force upon others.

      This twisted form of Jewishness is also exhibited by their sycophants.The golden Negro has refused to honor Scalia by attending his funeral. This is conveniently being used to paint Obama as a Muslim, as Muslims are forbidden to attend the funeral of an infidel. Of course the real reason for Obama’s absence from the memorial is the same reason the Jews had for murdering him, i.e his legal and Constitutional viewpoints interfered with their agenda.

      This is perhaps their greatest downfall, they begin to assume the complete stupidity of the goyim and become careless in their actions. So far their media programming has proven them correct. After all, how many Americans still swallow the official version of the physically impossibility September 11th attack? Despite the evidence that a large number of the claims are physically impossible. In this regard, Jews are their own worse enemy

      The Jews think since the gulliable goyim swallowed their sacred Hallowedhoax, they’ll believe anything, no matter how absurd or unbelievable the claim. As with the trade tower attacks, an overwhelming number of the claims for their Hallowedhoax are again, either physically impossible e.g. blue or green corpses being pulled from the gas chambers by guards smoking cigarettes, fountains of blood spurting up from the earth, or totally unverifiable, e.g. Hitler’s personal orders for the extermination of world Jewry, or both – the six million figure itself.

      The Jews are digging their own grave, the question is when will they be pushed into it and covered over once and for all.

  19. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    February 20, 2016 - 2:48 pm | Permalink

    It will no longer be a surprise then, when people refer to the British officials as LIARS, every time one of them claims to be “concerned” about the Palestinians,etc.

  20. Hadrian's Gravatar Hadrian
    February 20, 2016 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Their end goal is the power they had the early USSR. Most people are unaware that the jews made “anti-semitism” a crime that was punishable by death under Lenin and Stalin. This is what they want across the West, and this is why these vile creatures need to be fought.

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      February 20, 2016 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

      Actually the law against antisemitism was one of the first decided by the Bolsheviks under Lenin. They were not yet in control of all Russia, but they were already busy to protect themselves and the whole Tribe.

    • February 21, 2016 - 2:55 am | Permalink

      It’s perfectly possible Jews were given Russia, in a secret agreement before or during the First World War. Everyone’s heard of the Balfour Agreement on Palestine – which was trumpeted, advertised, promoted, supported. But why should there not have been a secret agreement to award Russia to Jews? There had been a constant feed of propaganda in Europe against Russia at least since Napoleon’s time. In view of the unanimity of censorship about events in Russia as Jews took over, this is certainly highly probable.

      • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
        February 21, 2016 - 1:11 pm | Permalink

        The relative ease and speed of the jew-Bolshevik revolution in Russia certainly points to the path being eased by a secret agreement. The inept and half hearted intervention by British and French forces at Arkangel also raises suspicions.
        The Arab world has the potential, if they acted in concert, to push Israel into the sea. But they don’t , and their efforts are usually bombastic and achieve very little. I suspect that Zionists have cut a deal with the very pinnacle of Arab leadership, to guarantee Israel an increasing slice of the Mid-East in return for the Islamization / colonization of Europe. A very profitable deal for them, but a disaster for us.

        • February 21, 2016 - 9:21 pm | Permalink

          Antony Cyril Sutton … while at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution … wrote a massive three volume study ‘Western Technology And Soviet Economic Development’ ….
          The thesis of this work is basically that there was no such thing as Soviet technology, that from the very beginning, the United States – or both political and business elements within the United States – assisted the Soviet Union, and that it built it through the 1920s and 30s, and even more astonishingly through the Cold War and the arms race, including even the Vietnam War, when American service personnel were being maimed and killed by Soviet-made ordnance.

        • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
          February 22, 2016 - 11:42 am | Permalink

          Re: Rerevisionist and Antony Sutton:


          jews take all sides- as usual

  21. Andrew Lloyd's Gravatar Andrew Lloyd
    February 20, 2016 - 1:14 pm | Permalink

    I am hoping the torrent will be released sooner rather than later. Its ironic that so much of the pressure seems to be coming from Muslims, which Jews work overtime to bring to the West.

    • February 21, 2016 - 2:56 am | Permalink

      Watch for false flags attributed to Muslims. Jews have used false flags routinely, around the world.

  22. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    February 20, 2016 - 11:35 am | Permalink

    Looks like jewry has achieved its main goal- making the sucking of jewish caulk obligatory.

  23. AnotherAmalekite's Gravatar AnotherAmalekite
    February 20, 2016 - 10:38 am | Permalink

    Andrew Joyce wrote:

    Britain is merely the first nation-state to explicitly introduce such protections for Israel.

    At the national level, there has been the US Export Administration Act of 1979, which criminalizes US companies and individuals who boycott Israel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_Administration_Act_of_1979

    Additional info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boycotts_of_Israel#United_States_government_response

  24. February 20, 2016 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    In a recent Jewish Chronicle list of the top 100 ‘power players in anglo-Jewry’, David Cameron is at number 15: ‘British Jewry has few better friends than the Prime Minister. He has repeatedly expressed his support for Israel and shown his determination to protect Jewish practices in this country.’

    • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
      February 20, 2016 - 11:42 am | Permalink

      That is because David Cameron IS a jew. The admitted ancestry is something like 1/32 or1/16, but there are unconfirmed sources claiming a greater blood relation. Certainly the background of his wife warrants close examination.

      • February 20, 2016 - 11:55 am | Permalink

        In the picture captioned ‘Old friends: Lord Feldman and David Cameron have been close since university’ here, the ancestry shines through.

      • Floda's Gravatar Floda
        February 20, 2016 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

        So Cameron at 1/32 or 1/16th is part yid, he’s not exactly Robinson Crusoe. Add Messieurs Hollande, Sarkozy (Who once remarked French women could be forced to interbreed with Africans and Arabs) Frau Merkel (Die mutter eine Polnishe Judin von Galicien) who has actually enabled a Muslim invasion into Germany, The new Australian PM Mr Turnbull whose parents separated when he was a child and was raised by his (Gentile) father but once admitted, ‘My mother often told me she was raised in a Jewish household’, the New Zealand PM, Mr Key a successful Jewish businessman. They’re everywhere!

        • Ted's Gravatar Ted
          February 21, 2016 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

          The Jews have interbred with the families of both the Republican and the Democratic candidates in the U.S. election. Clinton’s daughter married a Jew. (The groom’s Jewish father, Ed Mezvinsky, did prison time for fraud). Trump’s daughter married a Jew and “converted” to Judaism.

          And of course Sanders is a Jew himself, as is the head of the Democratic Party, Debbie Wasserman.

          Flip a coin, heads or tails — a yarmulke come up either way.

        • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
          February 22, 2016 - 6:28 am | Permalink

          They are not “everywhere”.

          They only give the illusion of being everywhere so as to stifle White action against them through intimidation.

          Trump, during one of his campaign speeches threw out that within the USA there are some two hundred and twenty million (220,000,000) Christians [at least nominally if not practicing].
          Trump said he would represent “their” interests.

          Jews merely occupy “bottle-neck” positions of power through concerted, military-like, conspiratorial collusion.

          Once we White Nationalists have shifted the balance of demographic knowledge of Jewish subterfuge and collusion to the majority,
          as we have been successfully doing for the past half a decade as evidenced by the political awakenings taking place all over Europe and even the once thought lost American and Oceanic “colonies”,
          (for let us remember, that White Nationalist Movements are the heart and soul of gradual awakening taking place in the west…, We are the root agents of change! )
          the Jews will be utterly screwed once and for all.

          We need only to continue meeting Jewish threats with White Will-Power and Determination. This is the Jewish weakness…, deception unmasked becomes fear and flight.

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        February 21, 2016 - 9:51 pm | Permalink

        I don’t think 1/16 or 1/32 matters. As a rule of thumb, 1/8th or less is safely diluted. (Although maybe the standard for politicians should be stricter.)

      • Lou's Gravatar Lou
        February 21, 2016 - 10:39 pm | Permalink

        My Grandmas dad spoke Yiddish. That does NOT make me a jew.

  25. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    February 20, 2016 - 10:24 am | Permalink

    As Mr. Joyce has observed, this is one more drip of the hundreds that have preceded it.
    When I first heard of the latest anti BDS stance in Britain, I flashed back to Arthur Scargill’s battle with Margaret Thatcher. The disastrous miner’s strike over mine closures is well known, but lesser known was his unsuccessful legal struggle with the Government over the investment policies of the miner’s pension fund. Without delving deeply into the complicated world of pensions, the obligation of the pension fund managers/trustees/owners is that it be operated for the benefit of the plan members.
    The fund was investing heavily in cheap labour South African coal mines (owned by the usual suspects). The Thatcher Government was importing vast quantities of the coal making the British mines “unprofitable” therefore, fit for closure. Scargill’s legal battle was to prevent the pension fund from investing in South African coal mines. His argument was that the investment allowed the mine to undercut the cost of British coal, cause closures, and therefore was not to the benefit of the plan members. In a ruling of supreme mental gymnastics, the court ruled (simplified) that the pension plan was benefitting members, because the duty of the plan was to seek the highest rate of return.
    We all know how that benefitted the miners that lost jobs, and pensions.
    This drip, is just another drip in the stranglehold the tribe has attained on investments. They aren’t worried about us as individuals, robbing us is easy. They are worried about the “institutional” investors that are able to invest 10s of millions, and big enough to “move” markets. One would be CalPERS which reports total fund assets of $279 billion as of February 2016. Even with the restrictions placed on pension fund investments, as little as 1% of $279 withdrawn from a stock could be devastating.

    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      February 20, 2016 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

      Speaking of pension fund rip-offs, the Teamsters’ Central States Pension Fund has announced a big reduction in retiree’s pensions, effective in June, I believe. This is the fund that bought millions of dollars worth of worthless “Israel Bonds”, especially when the fat Jew Jackie Presser was wrecking the Teamsters Union, and its pension fund in the 1970-1980’s. This same fund was known for years as the “Mob’s Bank”, with Las Vegas Jews constantly stealing the Pension Fund’s assets through bad loans. It became such an outrageous scandal, that the embarassed Federal Justice Dept. (Reganite Republicans, who had been in bed with Presser) had to intervene through the courts, and put the corrupt Union and looted pension fund under strict court supervision for many years. Unfortunately, it has been said that Hoffa Jr. is also crooked as hell, and that he is now right back at it.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        February 22, 2016 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

        Most of the pension reductions of the last few years, can be traced to the collapses of 2000-2001, and 2008. Pension funds normally have an investment horizon of 20-25 years, and can overcome most market ups and downs over that long time period. The two collapses in a space of less than to years have left little to no time to recoup the losses, Israeli junk bonds or not. If the Teamsters have not cut benefits prior to this time, it would be an indication that the fund was not in crisis after the last collapse. The Plan could also be in difficulty due to declining membership, delinquencies due to bankruptcies, or demographic factors.
        Pension regulations have come a long way since the 80s. Too bad Wall Street isn’t as highly regulated.

  26. John's Gravatar John
    February 20, 2016 - 10:05 am | Permalink

    When I clicked on the link of Ted Nugent’s apology, I also saw this little gem on the Israel National News web site.

    How to Make Anti-Semitism An International Crime

  27. February 20, 2016 - 7:35 am | Permalink

    It’s just reality that most of “our people” are more conservative, pro military, patriotic etc.

    Activists aren’t going to get a lot of milage taking pro Palestinian positions with Conservative Right wing American Whites – they’ll just respond with something like:

    “The Israelis are the only ones fighting the terrorists, doing border control, resisting idiot Liberal Leftists on UC campuses”.

    It’s reality that the “boycott Israel” campus crowds looks, sounds and acts like the anti Apartheid movement that Right Wing Conservatives White Americans detested.

    Think Jimmy Carters are going to be our ideal.

    That said, there is something to be gained by pointing out the hypocrisy of Jews regarding Jews in and for Israel and Jews in the USA/Europe/UK who are for all things multi cultural, open borders immigration to the West including mass Muslim immigration, yet Israel is reserved as a racist Jewish ethno state.

    I like to show photos like these of David vs Goliath – David being the underdog Jewish Israelies in large tanks, Goliath being a little Palestinian boy throwing a rock at the tank


    • February 20, 2016 - 8:55 am | Permalink

      By now, I’d have thought many Americans might have noticed that ‘conservative, pro military, patriotic etc’ actions were not of any help to themselves.

      • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
        February 21, 2016 - 8:29 pm | Permalink

        By now, I’d have thought many Americans might have noticed that ‘conservative, pro military, patriotic etc’ actions were not of any help to themselves.


        None of the above-mentioned policies were/are of any help to themselves, or the Dispossessed American Majority.

        That is why this is all the undistilled essence of Cuck$ervativism.

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        February 21, 2016 - 10:48 pm | Permalink

        It is the downside of our racial personality.

        When we become convinced that some behavior is altruistic or idealistic, we can’t stop.

        We get drunk on idealism the way Jews get drunk on hate.

Comments are closed.