Bill Kristol prefers Hillary to Trump: What happened to all those conservative principles?

Kevin MacDonald

It’s always been obvious that Hillary as president is just fine with the neocons. After all, she voted for the Iraq war and was instrumental in the disaster in Libya. She supported sending arms to Syrian rebels and likened Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, to Hitler. She wholeheartedly backs Israel, and has her own set of rabidly pro-Israel foreign policy advisers, especially Robert Kagan who advocates military intervention and democracy creation throughout the Middle East as a moral imperative—exactly the ideology that led the US into the disastrous Iraq war. Clinton’s main donor is Haim Saban, a rabid Zionist who has said that his only issue is Israel.

Obviously, Bill Kristol and the neocons would not lose any sleep if Hillary Clinton became president.

In fact, I suspect they would prefer Hillary to any Republican candidate except Marco Rubio who has the ideal blend of subservience to neocon foreign policy and support  for liberal social policy on issues like immigration. Rubio is bought and paid for by the Israel Lobby (especially Paul Singer and Norman Braman) and is now the establishment favorite.

On the other hand, Donald Trump opposed the Iraq war, calling it a “complete disaster” and, even more amazingly, stating, “They lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction and there were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction.”  Trump has also supported Vladimir Putin’s policy of propping up the Assad government in Syria. As is well known, Assad and Putin are very high on the neocon hate list. He has told the Republican Jewish Coalition that he didn’t want their money because with their money comes control and he has pledged to be neutral on the Israel-Palestine issue.

Because of this blatant conflict with neocon foreign policy, neocons like Bill Kristol have been in the lead of floating third-party candidates to run against him should he get the GOP nomination.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Kristol’s efforts are starting to gel, the latest being a plan to deny Trump the nomination even if he has a plurality of delegates. In the aftermath of the Super Tuesday results, Kristol had this to say on the Morning Joe show with Joe Scarborough as reported by John Nolte at Breitbart:

JOE SCARBOROUGH: The fact of the matter is that you know there is no historical precedent with someone doing as well as Candidate Trump did yesterday — winning New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada, [losing the nomination] has never happened before, and as you know there is a momentum, a forward progress–

BILL KRISTOL: Right, so we have to stop the momentum, I totally agree.

SCARBOROUGH: So that’s my question. There’s no cheering here. I am looking at facts.

KRISTOL: To your credit, you have correctly seen that this was not going to be the historically normal year, and it’s not, so maybe we go–

SCARBOROUGH: So how do you beat him?

KRISTOL: You have to beat him in Florida and Ohio, the first two winner-take-all states, which means there has to be a de facto agreement between the opposition candidates — between the resistance to Trump, which I am proud to be a part of, because I think he’d be a terrible nominee and a terrible president…

SCARBOROUGH: You have the authority to broker that deal right now?

KRISTOL: Well, they need to. They need to defer to Rubio in Florida and probably to Kasich in Ohio, and say, or imply, that if you are a Cruz voter in Ohio, and if you look up the day before the primary and it’s Trump 42%, Kasich 35% — vote for Kasich. And the truth is if Trump doesn’t win Florida and Ohio, it remains very much of an open race. …

Donald Trump [so far] has 35% of the popular vote and 47% of the delegates. That’s a lot better than having 24% of the popular vote and 25% of the delegates, granted. …

JOHN HEILEMANN: Just to go a little further on this topic of what Bill’s advocating: As you talk more and more to Republicans, who will say to you privately and sometimes publicly, that they would rather vote for Hillary Clinton than for Donald Trump, [these are the] people who are going to try to stop him — their attitude is: We know that would happen at a contested convention if we took the nomination away from a Donald Trump [who has won through] a plurality of delegates.

What would happen is that we would likely alienate his supporters and we would likely lose the presidential election. But their position is that it would be better for us to lose the [general] election than to have Donald Trump tear the Party in half as the nominee.

Now you can say that’s suicidal, but that is the posture of people [worried] about the negative effects down ballot.

KRISTOL: And [Trump] would still lose the election. And shouldn’t win the election, So, yeah, I agree.

So the main thing is to deny Trump the nomination, even if it costs the GOP the election and results in four more years of the left being in charge. Four more years of not sealing the border, and four more years of maximizing legal immigration and the numbers of “refugees.” Four more years of unbridled political correctness in the media and in universities, and aggressive BLM-type protests against the police.

And four more years of liberal Supreme Court appointments, which would likely result in a revolution in the law on the First and Second Amendments and in many other areas, starting with replacing Antonin Scalia with a liberal. Intellectual rationales for curtailing speech critical of the multicultural ideal are already common in liberal academic circles, awaiting only one more liberal appointment to the Supreme Court. Hillary Clinton would be only too happy to make that appointment.

Neocons like Kristol are proud to call themselves “principled conservatives” but what kind of principled conservative could open the gates to the disaster of a Hillary Clinton presidency? What conservative principles could possibly survive a Hillary Clinton presidency? Kristol is proposing a nuclear option of denying the most popular GOP candidate the nomination—an option that would destroy the GOP as millions of Trump supporters stay home seething in anger, waiting for the next populist moment. Or they would vote for Donald Trump running as a third party candidate because, as Trump would likely argue, the machinations of the GOP elites denied him a nomination that should rightfully have been his. In either case, Hillary Clinton is the next president.

Kristol is just fine with a Hillary Clinton presidency because fundamentally the neocons do not have any conservative principles at all. It’s always been a sham and a masquerade. Since their origins in the Democratic Party, they have always been on the left at heart when it comes to social policy, and any deviation from that is only the result of strategic decisions, not principle. They are completely unprincipled, and the Trump candidacy has brought this to the fore. This is from my review of Jacob Heilbrunn’s book on the  neocons, The Knew They Were Right:

It is noteworthy that neoconservatism produced no revolutions in domestic policy, only in foreign policy. Heilbrunn’s book reflects this, since he spends a tiny percentage of the book on domestic issues, the rest on foreign policy. There is little question that from its beginning, foreign policy was the area that excited the passion of the neocons, with domestic policy pretty much an afterthought. And it’s quite clear that Heilbrunn doesn’t even believe that the neocons are sincere about many of their stated beliefs on domestic issues.

Indeed, the general impression one gets is that the neocons adopted positions on domestic policies in order to win influence within the Republican Party and then used their influence to further their foreign policy agenda. As a result, domestic policies were never the focus of the intense pressure that neocons were able to muster for their foreign policy initiatives.

For example, Heilbrunn notes that Bill Kristol “made it a particular point to attack homosexuality, even participating in a conference at Georgetown University about ‘curing’ gays of their supposed pathology. It is hard to imagine that Kristol himself harbors any real prejudice against gays. Politically, however, it remained a highly effective wedge issue” (p. 213).

Similarly, although not mentioned by Heilbrunn, the neocons jumped on the bandwagon when illegal immigration became an issue, although they certainly did not originate this issue. As John O’Sullivan noted regarding Kristol’s activism on an amnesty bill, “Kristol, representing many neoconservatives disposed to favor the bill, came out against it. He did so in part because it had serious drafting defects but, more importantly, because it was creating a bitter gulf between rank-and-file Republicans and the party leadership. That in turn was imperiling Republican objectives in other areas, notably Iraq.”[13] Peter Brimelow says it best: “Kristol will return to immigration enthusiasm once he has helped persuade Bush to attack Iran.[14]

Obviously there is a similar situation here. The GOP rank and  file are worried about immigration first and  foremost, as well as trade policy and political correctness generally. Kristol might be willing to hold his nose on at least some of this, just as he did with homosexuality and some of the times when illegal immigration became an issue. But he would only do that if Trump was absolutely solid when it comes to neocon foreign policy.

But Trump is most definitely not in solid on neocon foreign policy. So Kristol is willing to jump ship and get what he really wants all along — a president who is somewhere between radical left/liberal to cuckservative right on social policy, but gung-ho on Israel and the rest of the neocon foreign policy agenda. What he wants is a race between Hillary and Marco Rubio, and if he gets it, the only downside of Hillary compared to Rubio is that fewer of his Republican friends would get top policy positions. 

I suspect that, without saying it explicitly, Kristol has the fear of so many Jewish writers that Trump might turn out to be a fascist — i.e., specifically Jewish fears about Trump arising from his statements on Muslim immigration and refugee policy. Recent Tweets have confirmed this:

This tweet was in response to another neocon comparing Trump to Hitler, by none other than National Review editor Jonah Goldberg:

To which yet another famous neocon, Jennifer Rubin, responds:

Comparisons with the 1930s and World War II are psychological reflexes with neocons. Kristol condemns conservatives for passively accepting Trump, as Austria accepted Anschluss, while Goldberg emphasizes Trump=Hitler=invader of Poland, and Rubin compares Joe Scarborough to the collaborationist Vichy regime. A trifecta of National Socialist imagery.

No question about it, Trump elicits images of National Socialism for neocons, and many other Jews. With attitudes like that, for the neocons, literally anyone in the Republican or Democrat field would be preferable to Trump.

But this is a dangerous game. If Trump is denied the nomination and the presidency as a result of third party runs or manipulation of the convention, the anger against the establishment that Trump is tapping into will just continue to become worse — more immigration, more disastrous trade policy, more restrictions on free speech, not to mention the rest of the agenda of the  radical left. And there will be more fear and anger among Whites about their future as a minority in a society dominated by other ethnic groups — an anger that no matter what their legitimate grievances, the oligarchy always wins.

There is a morally righteous anger in much of White America that Trump is tapping into, and sooner or later this will have cataclysmic consequences. As this anger builds, Republican voters may begin to realize that the Jewish identities and interests of the neocons were the fundamental problem that destroyed the Republican Party and their chances at deliverance. And they will understand that the people who accomplished this were not at all motivated by allegiance to sacred principles of freedom and the Constitution. They will understand that their best hope to achieve their very real, very legitimate interests has been shattered by very powerful people with strong Jewish identities and a sense of specifically Jewish interests. Neoconservatism is, after all, a Jewish movement.

This is how revolutions begin.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

113 Comments to "Bill Kristol prefers Hillary to Trump: What happened to all those conservative principles?"

  1. N.B. Forrest's Gravatar N.B. Forrest
    March 10, 2016 - 7:29 pm | Permalink

    “They will understand that their best hope to achieve their very real, very legitimate interests has been shattered by very powerful people with strong Jewish identities and a sense of specifically Jewish interests. Neoconservatism is, after all, a Jewish movement.

    This is how revolutions begin.”

    It’s Trump, or war. His implicitly White nationalism/economic populism is the last chance for Whites to peacefully use the system to remain the majority in this country built by OUR ancestors for US; if the jews manage to thwart White people’s will yet again with their slimy machinations, look out.

  2. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    March 10, 2016 - 6:28 am | Permalink

    This week, Heather Mac Donald took part in her Jewish pals’ anti-Trump crusade at the NY Daily News. This is especially infuriating since she is smart and sometimes writes excellent articles (even though she obviously doesn’t name the Jews).

    She writes that “Trump would set a model of behavior, especially for boys, that would drag American civility into the gutter”. Right next to her article, you can click on the picture “Ivana Trump Photos – The worst celebrity beach bodies of 2012”.

    She blames Trump for mocking Marco Rubio’s ears, bragging about his package, and mocking Rick Perry’s eyeglasses and intelligence. She says Trump “does not even understand the immigration policy papers that have been written for him”. But for some reason, she says he isn’t a racist (“not a bigot”).

    Her conclusion: “Some things are even more important than getting control of our borders. The preservation of national character and civility is one of them.”

    As if the NY Daily News was a place of civility! And as if the third-world invaders maintained civility.

    I don’t understand what she is doing with the neocohens. Are they blackmailing her? Does she like money?

  3. March 9, 2016 - 10:46 pm | Permalink

    On the program, Mr. Turner talked about Hilary Clinton going directly to a Muslim Fund Raiser in West Beaumont, TX where she was given $500,000 for her support of Muslims and her work against “Islamophobia.” Mr. Turner described Mrs. Clinton as “Being in the pocket of Muslims”
    a cherry on top:

  4. March 9, 2016 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

    “When we get ready to take the United States, we will not take it under the label of communism; we will not take it under the label socialism. These labels are unpleasant to the American people, and have been speared too much. We will take the United States under labels we have made very lovable; we will take it under liberalism, under progressivism, under democracy. But, take it we will.” Alexander Trachtenberg at the National Convention of Communist Parties, Madson Square Garden, 1944


    Oh Dear,sometimes Donald Trump talks a little tough or gritty and pansies and sissies and the ‘micro-minded’ just can’t handle it, because after all politics is really supposed to be about no one ever being offended or annoyed and just soft cuddly teddy bears and Rainbows!!!

  5. March 9, 2016 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

    “The Most Brutal, Vicious Political Rebuke Ever Aired in US History” THE HAL TURNER SHOW
    New York City’s toughest talk radio host blasted the airwaves tonight, cleaning the shitheads out of Presidential Politics!
    Rubio & Cruz voters: RUN AWAY ! ! ! ! !

    Turner went on to say – among MUCH MORE that we won’t dare print here . . .

    You Cruz and Rubio supporters must be almost as stupid as the liberal Democrats. How does someone as asinine as a Cruz or Rubio voter even qualify to cast a ballot? Don’t we have laws against idiots and lunatics voting?

    This is what you get from parents who are pieces of shit: children who think cheating in national elections is somehow honorable. What kind of lowlife scumbags are these people that instead of supporting THEIR candidate, commit fraud by barging into the opposing Party to commit harm? Because that’s what such folks are: lowlife scumbags.

    And let’s not forget the young “progressives” Yet they not only HAVE the right to vote, they actually USE it.
    Why so much stupidity? Because the tenured teachers and professors are largely Marxists who have spent decades dumbing-down the American populace precisely for the purpose of ruining what was once the greatest nation on earth. When testing shows the kids can’t read, write, do math . . . . these same shitbag Marxists whine and cry for more education spending. What a fucking racket.

    The biggest FIENDS in this sordid Primary Election affair, however, are the leaders of the Republican National Committee, and corporate executives — plotting and scheming to subvert the will of the voters.. These people have shown themselves to be human political debris of the lowest form. Worse than fungus. They’re a virus infecting the body politic and sabotaging the Will of the voters.

    • Brandon's Gravatar Brandon
      March 10, 2016 - 10:53 am | Permalink

      @Rick That was a very interesting podcast link Brother
      Rick I am including a link as well.
      The Mexican drug cartels are at war… with Mormons. VICE founder Shane Smith went down to Ciudad Juárez, near the US border, to investigate this bizarre story.
      Here’s Part 1 of our documentary about guns, drugs, murder, and Romneys

  6. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 9, 2016 - 12:29 pm | Permalink

    In a diverse nation(ethnic or racial, and even sexual/gender/etc as new identities vying for attention-recognition-and-privilege keep sprouting like mushrooms after a rain on a dead tree trunk) like the US, the ruling elites want to make everyone believe that they represent the National or American Interest. Their interests are our interests.

    After all, consider magazines like ‘American Interest’ and ‘National Interest’.

    But the ruling elites always have their narrow class and/or ethnic interest even as they pretend that they are for the higher/broader good.

    Surely, East Coast Brahmin Wasp elites had interests that didn’t jibe with other kinds of whites. But when they controlled the government, institutions, media, and narrative, they convinced enough people that their interests were that of the nation as a whole.

    Today, the ruling elites are Jews and homos. And they wanna make us believe that their interests — unconditional support of Israel, open borders, Wall Street interests, etc., spreading homo agenda all over the world, promoting trannies, etc — are our interests.

    But a kind of executive/legislative dissonance is coming to the fore. More and more people are beginning to feel that the rulers don’t stand for us.
    That Trump denounced the Iraq War and didn’t lose in popularity shows that many conservatives now see that was as having been in the interest of the elites, not the people.

    I think many Americans felt like young Michael Corleone after 9/11. They all felt as part of one united nation. And they saw the War on Terror as being for all of us.
    Some even volunteered for the military like Michael did.
    But 9/11 was exploited to serve not the national interest but a certain tribal interest, indeed to the point where War on Terror became War for Terror in Syria where US got caught red-handed funneling arms to Alqaeda groups rebranded with new names to pass as ‘moderates’.

    We all want to believe that the US government stands for all of us, but it really stands for the interests of the ethnic or economic group that has most power over it.

    The core of patriotism must be ‘what is good for my people’, not ‘what the elites say is good for America’, especially when the elites constitute a minority elite that feels contempt for many Americans.

  7. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 8, 2016 - 7:26 pm | Permalink

    The thing is not to trust Trump. I don’t.

    Just relish the mess he’s causing in the GOP that is rotten to the core.

    Trump is helping us pull a Cucko-Demolition.

    Cucko Sucks, Cucko Sucks.

    It’s like in the movie THE LAST DAYS OF DISCO.

    Whit Stillman is a fine film-maker but an elitist. His ‘conservatism’ is about class.
    He has no explicit sense of racial identity or loyalty.

    It’s about the culture of privilege. Preppy cons. Preppies, in order to preserve their status and privilege, will sell anything down the river.

    I find Stillman’s films endearing, but people like Stillman turn up their noses at the common man, the kind who yelled Disco Sucks.

    The characters in THE LAST DAYS OF DISCO will dance the disco, hang in a club with negroes and homos, and etc IF it is hip, stylish, and fashionable. They want to be a part of whatever is trendy and exclusive.

    Conservatism Inc. turned into a club for those who are allowed in. In LAST DAYS OF DISCO, you have to stand in line, and some are allowed in and some are kept out.

    Trump comes along and Alt Right yells CUCKO SUCKS CUCKO SUCKS, and the privileged preppies of Cuck-Central is freaking out.

  8. March 7, 2016 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    Pat Buchanan: ‘Not in memory has the leadership of a party been so out of touch’

  9. March 7, 2016 - 8:17 pm | Permalink

    My Local College happens to be EXCELLENT!
    (This is an informed opinion)

  10. March 7, 2016 - 6:28 pm | Permalink
  11. March 7, 2016 - 8:27 am | Permalink

    Oh Goody, More of that Bill Kristol-Israeli-Neocon-Leftcon-Billary-Romney-Rubio-Prosperity and looking out for Americans,NOT!!

    h1b Visas,Sen. Durbin calls Abbott Labs’ IT layoffs ‘harsh and insensitive’


    “Megyn Kelly asked about highly-skilled immigration. The H-1B program is neither high-skilled nor immigration: these are temporary foreign workers, imported from abroad, for the explicit purpose of substituting for American workers at lower pay. I remain totally committed to eliminating rampant, widespread H-1B abuse and ending outrageous practices such as those that occurred at Disney in Florida when Americans were forced to train their foreign replacements. I will end forever the use of the H-1B as a cheap labor program, and institute an absolute requirement to hire American workers first for every visa and immigration program. No exceptions.”

    Hey Ted

  12. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    March 7, 2016 - 5:09 am | Permalink

    The way the title of this essay is framed is out-dated. Politics is no longer Left vs Right but about Zionists (Shrillery) vs White People (Trump).

    On many trad LR issues DT is to the left of HC. Shrillery’s top 7 donors are all Jewish despite being around 2% of the population.

    Krist is a Zionist like the entire MSM, so supports the uber PC ziopuppet Shrillery. Simples.

  13. betty's Gravatar betty
    March 6, 2016 - 5:30 pm | Permalink

    “What happened to all those conservative principles?” They never existed. Everyone has dropped their masks and we are now in a fight for the survival of European/Caucasian Christian nations and peoples. It is i.q./race and the separation of people accordingly that is the most important. The Jews most important question – is it good for us? What is our side doing? The negrophiliac shabbas goy cuck Bill Whittle at (David Horowitz-Jewish editor – has black grandkids) produced a video about Detroit If we put “conservative principles” into practice we can save the city. No mention that it was the blacks that caused the problems. The new hero of the right is Milo Yiannopoulos – a white gay man who dates black guys. Glen Beck and Breitbart are in love with him. Glen Beck wants to stab Trump.
    With him, it’s not a joke. He knows Trump is a threat. The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) – more papal excreta from cuck pope Frannie and the homosexual, Freemasonic, multi-culti lodge he runs. He is ok with the Arab invasion of Europe. Churchmilitanttv -a “traditional RCC website” run by 3 white male cucks and an annoying Asian female are ranting about going to hell if we don’t submit to the authority (OSCULUM INFAME) of the cuck pope and the bishops (48% are nonwhite). We first follow iq./race, then Christianity (I am a Christian) – then develop the new true third political way.
    There is a Scottish guy who produces Millenial Woes youtube. His latest youtube is that women should not be allowed to vote because feminism causes problems like the invasion of Germany. He is gay. Gays cannot be a part of our political movement. How are gays working out for the RCC? Since I believe in evolution, he is an evolutionary defect, degenerate – even though he talks the “right-wing” talk he “walks funny.” Ann Coulter is a good example of
    what he said – she’s yapping for affirmative action for blacks. She also believes women shouldn’t vote. She needs to set the example and give up her voting rights as she would vote for affirmative action aka slave reparations. We owe the blacks nothing!!! There were 2 articles over at AltRt – one dealing with the problem of women voting and another saying there’s too much emphasis on patriarchy and that women are not the problem. The problem is that European/Caucasians will not deal with the i.q. issue which is
    related to race. Using this standard, non-whites and non-Christians would have no voting rights in our countries and would be deported. That is issue. But as long as Caucasian Christian cucks are enthralled by the “universal church,” “Freemasonry,” or “Marxism – workers of the world unite,” nothing will be resolved.

  14. March 6, 2016 - 7:08 am | Permalink

    Now a Word from the Great One, Patrick J. Buchanan!
    Kevin MacDonald is a Great One too!

    The Neocons are just Leftists impersonating the “Right” ,
    (certainly never the alt-Right)
    except for Israel then of course the opposite applies for
    just about everything. I am tired of them meddling in our affairs! It should be clear the Neo-Cons(Conned You) are enablers of Cultural Marxists and just full of IT! They can take themselves and their ‘principles’ and go to Israel and buzz off! Including the ‘Left’ Cons.
    Glenn Beck what a Cuck! Take Romney,The Clintons, Rubio, Sanders and Glenn Beck with you.
    Don’t let the Door slam you in the back on the way
    out. Note to all ‘Cons’ : Deport yourselves! Now!

  15. PC fear and loathing's Gravatar PC fear and loathing
    March 5, 2016 - 8:06 pm | Permalink

    Humans are cultural creature , we create culture to explain our purpose and identity .This gives meaning to existence and ORDER to society .PC thinking destroys order by DEMANDING the illogical or absurd or unnatural or the servile politeness be rendered true & real .The result is not increasing harmony or happiness but the opposite as individuals are forced to cloaked natural fears and desires selfishness in a game of social kabuki that revolves around the false social paradigms . We end up with things like the USSR or Mao or Polpot or N Korea ! As the human animal seeks to work with the social rules that run contrary to human nature of survival , status and reproduction. These social constructs deliver neither food or security and cartwheel out of control murdering their citizens in a frenzy of crazed logic .
    The Taoist Masters say this in a much neater way:When intellectuals meddle in society they cause chaos . Democracy is what common sense is all about (as long as everybody votes-and should be compulsory).And the common good (sense) gives rise to the common reality and reality (of living & survival) give rise to ORDERed purpose.
    Dumping millions of people of extreme disparity of culture IQ testosterone etc can only bring disorder by anger and resentment as humans compete in social status hierarchy the result is something like Brazil , Mexico but much nastier nastier as those countries are unified by religious philosophy . Especially when PC demands that ethnic disparity doesn’t exist (only disadvantage” ) eternally stoking the fire of resentment .
    PC is destroying the West by undermining the reality on which the cultural structure sits which maintains an orderly state (of demanding that individuals be prepared to logically discuss there claims ,ideas etc and be prepared to accept to agree to disagree and NOT to demand submission by PC religion eg the holocaust) , And the maintenance of and defence of that cultural structure gives rise to Collective purpose and individuals identity .Its in a word symbiotic human tribalism–a common destiny and purpose .The politically correct (most are just weak brainwashed sheeple) demand and claim only they understand Good and any who don’t agree are bad ;such a simple psychological premise would have died long ago if it weren’t for aggressive Jewish intellectuals hateful hysterical paranoia ,that closes down any crack in the matrix.
    The NeoCons being steeped in Talmudic logic would deny this in a thousand splinters ,each given absurd weights in their argument and each given collective validity by THEIR State Tribe(bogus) Intellectuals who bring out the boogey man to defend their unbalanced logic and to justify their status niche of tribe defenders And indoctrinators ; Commissars if you will !

    We see PC makes this reasoning Vorbten in most of the Western World , the roots of the arguments is neatly hidden by law ! Jewish Intellectuals (I Stipulate ) and there self seeking flunkies have made it impossible to examine the roots of this insidious PC philosophy .
    We see it here in Australia in the debate over Racial Vilification Law 18c ; And we readers of TOO know this is prevalent all over our once ORDERED but now disintegrating societies .
    Thanks to the dogged work of Prof Mac Donald whose existent we can only subscribe to luck ; a last Western hero ,truly . For every KMac there are 10000 powerful Jews (and NWO agents)pushing in the opposite direction subscribing intellectual enslavement via PC and its guard dogs.

  16. Andrea Ostrov Letania's Gravatar Andrea Ostrov Letania
    March 5, 2016 - 6:28 pm | Permalink

    If forced-feeding and forced-marriage are wrong, forced-love is also wrong. Honest hate is better than forced love. Seek divorce from forced marriage with what you hate.

    PC is forced marriage of whites with all the peoples and things that harm them. And whites are forced to love what harms them, hates them, and mocks them. This is what Forced Integration and massive immigration are about.

    It’s like being stuck in a marriage that cannot be broken off.

    If hate is so bad, then divorce should be made illegal since it is the product of a couple coming to hate one another. But the fact is some couples really do come to hate one another.

    If love is so good, then people should be FORCED to love one another even when there is no real love.

    PC is about forced/arranged marriage that white masses cannot say NO to.

    But forced or coerced love isn’t real love.

    Also, hate can be liberating. Eastern Europeans hated being part of the Soviet-dominated Empire. They hated Russian occupation and were glad to seek divorce from it. US got its start by the hatred that the Founders felt for the British Monarchy and Colonialism.

    But globo Jews are now acting like that nut Rev. Mhoon and arranging massive weddings of Europeans and Third World masses through massive immigration and migration. Well, at least the nutty Mhoonies volunteered for these nutty pre-arranged mass weddings, but Europeans have no say in what Soros and Merkel have in mind for them. Forced love isn’t real love.

    Just like Eastern Europeans used the liberating power of Hate to say NO to Russians and told Russians to go home, it’s about time white folks around the world lit the fire of Honest Hate and told Globalists and Collaborator Traitors to go to hell and burn in hell.

    Being free to hate is million times more valuable than being forced to love. Forced love is essentially rape, and the Rape of White Race must end.

    Besides, who says you have to LOVE anyone? If a Jew is sitting over there and if a Palestinian is sitting over there, and if they hate one another, fine. I don’t want to FORCE them to love one another. Now, it’d be nice if they can learn to understand one another, but if they can’t and if they hate one another, they should be free to.
    And there is no reason why whites should be forced to love Jews, blacks, Muslims, Asians, etc.

    Lawrence O’Donnell despises Mormonism and Mormons. He hates them. He hates them as much as ‘anti-semites’ hated Jews. OKAY. I don’t say anyone should be forced to love Mormons. I find the religion pretty kooky and ridiculous myself.
    But in the US, we are not allowed to feel the same way about Jews, homos, and Negroes even though they’ve caused a lot more problems than kooky Mormons.
    We MUST LOVE Jews, Negroes, and homos no matter what to do or what they mean to us.
    But was it the Mormons who destroyed the Middle East and started new cold war with Russia? Did Mormons destroy the Palestinian people? Do Mormons go around raping and looting all across America? Do Mormons degrade public education by turning it into homo propaganda? (O Donnell attacks Mormonism for being ‘racist’ and not having welcomed blacks until 1978, but who says a religion has to accept all peoples? Jewish religion and Hinduism are exclusive too?)

    Anyway, I’m fine with O’Donnell hating Mormonism, its creed, its founders, and its followers. I say if he honestly hates that stuff, fine. But for some reason, we are not allowed to honestly certain peoples who do us great harm.

    Hate need not last forever. If a couple divorces and go separate ways, their hate may abate in time. Sometimes, hate and separation are the best cure for conflict. Once separated, they can come to respect one another again.

    It’s like there’s peace between Turkey and Greece since Turks no longer rule over Greeks. And there’s peace between Britain and India since Brits no longer rule over India. But there was hatred against British among Indians during British Imperialism, and it was this hate that led to Indian Liberation.

    Likewise, it is about time white Americans began to feel some hatred and sought divorce from the hideous globalists who’ve only duped and exploited them for nefarious interests that actually did them great harm.

    End of empire did wonders for world peace, but globalist Jews are trying to mix up entire populations once again since Jewish power is essentially globalist than nationalist, thus it is imperial in nature, and minority imperial overlords rely on using ‘divide and rule’ strategy among the diverse subjects who, in mutual conflict with one another, fail to unite against the imperial overlords.

  17. March 5, 2016 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    Mind blowing speech by Robert Welch in 1958

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      March 6, 2016 - 6:24 am | Permalink
      The link is to Revilo Olivers’ book Americas Decline: The Education of a Conservative where he explains in detail how Robert Welch was a shabbos goy controlled by Jews.
      Revilo Oliver was one of the founding members of the John Birch Society and associate editor of their magazine American Opinion. Their purpose, originally unbeknownst to Mr. Oliver, was to deflect the energy of patriotic Americans away from the Jewish plan to destroy Western civilization and onto the ‘international communist conspiracy’.

  18. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 5, 2016 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    The Stab(establishment conservatives) say Trump and his supporters are know-nothings.
    Now, it’s probably true that Trump is not an expert on all issues, and it’s also true that many Trump supporters are not the best educated.

    But what the Stab is really about isn’t WHAT you know but WHOM you know.
    The Stab is angry because Trump energized a lot of Americans who do NOT know the ‘right kind of people’. In contrast, people at National Review, Weekly Standard, Fox News, Heritage Foundation, and etc. are people who know the ‘right kind of people’. The Stab wants to keep the politics within the circle of those who know the right-kind-of-people. They don’t want to surrender any power to the masses without inner-circle connections.

    While it’s true that many Trump supporters are not the best educated, they are beginning to realize and KNOW what is most important to themselves, i.e. that the Stab serves the globalist Donor class, not the masses of Americans whose are thrown under the bus by globalism and political correctness(that is embraced by the Stab as well in a lighter version).

    For most people, politics should be about knowing their own identity and interests. They are ordinary people with ordinary lives. They don’t live for the entire world and all its problems. They live for their families, their communities, and their nation. And they vote for politicians on the basis of those considerations.

    The Stab hates Trump because he has given voice to people who’ve come to realize that the Stab hasn’t done anything for the masses of American people. The Stab has hoodwinked the people with paper symbols like ‘prayer in school’, ‘pledge of allegiance’, and other cookie-cutter issues when, in fact, the Stab has been all about serving the globalist donor class of Wall Street, Las Vegas, and etc. that feels nothing but contempt for ordinary Americans.

    The Stab has long hoodwinked the American masses by focusing on abstract principles, international affairs, and esoteric issues that mean little to the people. The simple masses, being impressed by such fancy talk, assumed they were in good hands of well-educated intelligent folks who know so much. But such talk was smoke-and-mirrors to get the masses to ignore what is most essential to their concerns. Their security, well-being, and prosperity.
    And when the Stab did focus on issues that even ordinary people could understand, it was the sort of opiates of no real consequence, such as “Is it constitutional to have Ten Commandments displayed at some court house?” Big deal!

    Most people need to demand from politics few simple things: Do the politicians represent my identity, my interests, my people, my community, my nation.
    Jews think this way, and this is why they are so powerful and rich. They are focused on “Is it good for Jews?” On every issue, Jews first and foremost ask, “Is it good for Jews?”

    But whites, especially white working class, were led astray from thinking in such manner. Furthermore, they were made to feel it’s ‘racist’ and ‘antisemitic’ to think in such terms. Jews pulled a fast one on whites. Jews convinced whites that it is WRONG and ATAVISTIC to think in national, racial, or tribal terms. So, whites must never think in terms of white identity, white interests, and white nationalism. BUT THEN, here’s the kicker… whites must think in terms of Jewish identity, Jewish interests, and Jewish nationalism. Whites must reject identity-and-interest for themselves but go all out to support identity-and-interests for Jews. Jews cleverly channeled suppressed white tribalism to serve glorified Jewish tribalism.

    This is the spell Trump has begun to break. Amusingly enough, whites who support Trump are acting more like Jews who think and act for their own interests. Paradoxically, Jews hate Trump-supporters because they are beginning to think and act like Jews.

    Jews believe ONLY JEWS should have the privilege to think tribally. Jews can think in terms of “Is it good for the Jews?” but whites better not think in terms of “Is it good for whites?”
    It’s like the white southern massuh feared and hated a Negro slave who thought like like the massuh did. The massuh thought in terms of “Is it good for me?” The massuh didn’t want the Negro slave to think likewise, i.e. “Is it good for me, the black dude?” No, the massuh wanted the Negro to think in terms of “Sheeeiiit, it be good fo’ da massuh?” The massuh lives for himself, the slave lives for massuh.
    Jews have a plantation mentality over white masses. They see themselves as the massuh class. Jewish massuhs exist to serve their own identity and interests. White gentiles exist to serve the identity and interests of Jewish massuhs. And the cuck white gentile collaborators serve as either the overseers with the whip — like the National Review and Eric Erickson who insult and berate Trump supporters — or as ‘House Honkeys’ who sneer at the cotton-picking ‘Field Honkeys’.
    People like Rich Lowry and George Will are pissed because their ‘house honkeys’ privileges within the Jewish Mansion of Power and Prosperity are threatened.

    Trump is like Nat Turner of the Field Honkeys, and this is what frightens Jews. Jews fear a Slave Rebellion. Jews are like tycoon Tyrell in BLADE RUNNER who fears Roy Trump Batty. (Actually, Trump is hardly radical and is, in fact, a good friend of Jews, but Jews are extremely paranoid and greedy, and the idea of Trump stoking any kind of white identity and interest is unacceptable to them. Just like the Jewish God could tolerate no other gods, Jewish identity/interests cannot tolerate any other identity/interests as the main obsession of Global policy.)

    Of course, Jews, being ever so clever, will say that they want the same things that white masses want. Jews will say both groups share the common interest of “Is it good for the Jews?” I mean, if Jews are for Jews and if whites are for Jews, they are on the same page, right???!!! Of course, this is like ‘Heads I win, tails you lose’.

    Now, suppose white masses said to Jews, “how about we share the same interest of ‘Is it good for white gentiles?'” Would Jews accept that? Of course not. Jews will flip out and say that is unacceptable!!! So, you see, the only common ground that Jews will accept is both Jews(who make up less than 1% of US conservatives) and white gentiles working in terms of “Is it good for the Jews?”

    Trump supporters may indeed be know-nothings on most issues, but they are becoming know-somethings on the issue that matters most to themselves: their own identity, interests, security, and prosperity. They are beginning to think in terms of “what will politicians do for me and my people?” than “what can me and my people do for the globalist super-rich class of Jews who feel contempt for white masses?”

    Jews are afraid that Trump is, wittingly or unwittingly, ‘raising consciousness’.. or race-ing consciousness.

    And this basic consciousness of politics among the white masses is what the Jewish massuhs fear most. And this is why gentile cucks and ‘house honkeys’ are fearful too since their privilege and goodies are linked to the fortunes of the Jewish massuhs.
    Trumpism represents a slave rebellion, and when slaves think in terms of ‘what is good for ourselves?’ than ‘what is good for the massuh?’, the system has begun to shake.

    Even if Trump doesn’t win(and the forces against him are too formidable for him to go all the way), the fire has been lit from this campaign that white folks must think in terms of “Is it good for OUR IDENTITY, OUR INTERESTS, AND OUR SECURITY?” Be just like the Jews who always think of their own identity, interests, and security first and foremost.

    Groucho Marx once said, “I don’t want be part of a club that would have me as a member”. Jewish elites think, “We don’t want to admit gentiles who think like we do.”
    In the Jewish-controlled world, Jews serve their own interests and guard their own identity, but NO OTHER PEOPLE better do so.
    Sure, Jews will sometimes stoke gentile nationalism if it’s temporarily useful against another nationalism. Jews encouraged far-right neo-Nazi nationalism in Ukraine against Russia. But the moment the existing regime was toppled and a new one came into place(appointed by Jews), Jews immediately began to use homo agents to spread ‘gay’ propaganda all over to make Ukraine just another spoil in their globalist empire game. If a homo flag goes up in a part of the world, it means the Jewish Globo-Empire just got a little bigger. Jews hide their globo-ambitions behind the minority-elite supremacism of the homo agenda.

    Why do Jews hide behind the homo agenda? Jews fear that if Jewish influence is too brazen, Jewish power will become overly visible, and then, it will lead to ‘antisemitism’. But if homos hide behind the homo-collaborators in every nation(as every nation has some homo activists), Jews can infiltrate and take over behind the homo-national mask. So, Jews in Ukraine hide behind Ukraine-homo mask, and Jews in Georgia hide behind Georgian-homo mask.

    Homo power is just the mask of globo Jewish power as homomania is funded by the Jewish-controlled US.

    • March 5, 2016 - 7:04 pm | Permalink

      @gubbler chechenova

      That was very well put together and you covered a lot of

  19. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 5, 2016 - 3:53 pm | Permalink

    I went to a SJW meeting, and they started the meeting with the following prayer.

    The SJW’s Politically Correct “prayer”.

    Hail Jew, anti-white race,
    Our loyalty’s with thee.
    Badass are bros with white sluts,
    Flashy are homos in men’s butts,
    and glory to the trannies too.
    Holy Jew, Master of All,
    Flood us with non-white masses,
    until our race has met its doom.

  20. March 5, 2016 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Ben Shapiro,
    Yes, You guessed right, he is a Israeli-Con
    “principles” , yeah, Sure

  21. AntiYuppie's Gravatar AntiYuppie
    March 5, 2016 - 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Pat Buchanan in Trump’s team as National Security adviser?

    • March 5, 2016 - 4:55 pm | Permalink

      I am Full on Board with Pat Buchanan as National Security adviser!!!

      It’s time to start assembling the Donald Trump Cabinet, Advisors,Staff and Appointments and some Supreme Court Justice Selections for Trump’s 2 Terms.

    • Charlotte NC Bill's Gravatar Charlotte NC Bill
      March 5, 2016 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

      He would definitely be a great presidential adviser having served in 3 administrations. WH spokesman?

  22. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    March 5, 2016 - 12:25 pm | Permalink

  23. March 5, 2016 - 10:03 am | Permalink

    Side note,

    For those in College/Vo Tech( lots of VO Tech Certifications/degrees will get you a good paying job much better than a degree in Liberal Arts,frequently,I am including A.S. degrees)For Liberal Arts get yourself a good reading list.
    Rants and raves about the mess of higher education in the United States.
    Confessions of a College Professor
    ( Yes!,you were scammed!)

    Back when higher education was cheap (1950 Harvard tuition, for example, was $650, at a time when making $40 a week was quite achievable—minimum wage was $1 an hour), a summer full time job, combined with some work during classes and some parental support, was enough to pay for tuition at a top tier school.

    All the money flowing in from the student loan scam has driven tuition prices stratospherically—milk would be over $15 a gallon if it rose in price like tuition has.

  24. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    March 5, 2016 - 5:34 am | Permalink

    Ironic that the jews who have created no culture of their own, who have been expelled from 109 counties as parasitical undesireables have the chutzpah to label Whites dumb goyim and white trash. Their sh…y little country is maintained by goyim, 1.5 billion dollars extorted from Germany in 1951 and as of three years ago 1 billion annually for the homecare of holohoax survivors. American aid to Israel totals one third of the foreign aid budget or 83.205 billion since 1949 not including loan guarantees of approx. 2 billion annually since forgiven by congress . Every candidate supports Israel, jewish media control will continue lowering moral and intellectual standards while third worlders will continue to invade White countries lowering living standards until finally, as planned, we fit the label. It will take more than an election to pull us out of this boiling cauldron.

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      March 5, 2016 - 7:46 am | Permalink

      It will take more than an election to pull us out of this boiling cauldron.

      That’s putting it mildly. I can’t imagine anyone with an IQ over 70 truly believing that it’s still business as usual – you know, find the right guy, vote for him, and he’ll clean up the mess and establish that shining city on the hill.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        March 5, 2016 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

        It will take an erection- of one’s middle finger.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      March 5, 2016 - 8:14 am | Permalink

      Karen T,

      I believe you’re correct. It will take a lot more than Mr. Trump. This will need to be a revolution from the bottom up.

  25. March 4, 2016 - 10:29 pm | Permalink
    The Israeli government is actively aiding the Third World invasion of Europe—while at the same time making sure that no Third World “refugees” enter Israel, and those who do, are locked up in camps without trial and deported.

    The shocking Jewish hypocrisy is evident when two recent news reports are compared: one in the New York Times, titled “Israel’s Chilly Reception for Asylum Seekers” (October 31, 2015), and another in the Jewish news service Israel21c, titled “To the refugees it doesn’t matter that we’re Israeli” (September 20, 2015).

  26. March 4, 2016 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

    Proof that Hilary Clinton is completely under the direction of America’s Jewish lobby has emerged with the news that all seven of her biggest political donors are liberal American Jews—who all support Israel, which has immigration and social policies directly opposite to those they seek to impose upon America.

    yeah, go figure

  27. March 4, 2016 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Hillary Clinton Aide Gets Immunity – Email Scandal – Judge Andrew Napolitano

    Oh!,This should be Fun!

  28. March 4, 2016 - 9:26 pm | Permalink

    Up from Buckleyism(Neo-Trotskyism)
    Will Trump’s Victory Spell National Review’s Demise?

    GARBAGE!!! William F. Buckley, George F. Will GARBAGE!!! !!! !!!

  29. March 4, 2016 - 9:23 pm | Permalink

    (Mod Note: “Rick”, please cease posting a lot of stuff that you subsequently want deleted. Think before posting, and post less.)

    March 4, 2016 – 8:53 pm | Permalink

  30. March 4, 2016 - 9:04 pm | Permalink

    Des Moines Speech:

    It is now two years since this latest European war began. From that day in September, 1939, until the present moment, there has been an over-increasing effort to force the United States into the conflict.

    That effort has been carried on by foreign interests, and by a small minority of our own people; but it has been so successful that, today, our country stands on the verge of war.

    At this time, as the war is about to enter its third winter, it seems appropriate to review the circumstances that have led us to our present position. Why are we on the verge of war? Was it necessary for us to become so deeply involved? Who is responsible for changing our national policy from one of neutrality and independence to one of entanglement in European affairs?

    Personally, I believe there is no better argument against our intervention than a study of the causes and developments of the present war. I have often said that if the true facts and issues were placed before the American people, there would be no danger of our involvement.

    Here, I would like to point out to you a fundamental difference between the groups who advocate foreign war, and those who believe in an independent destiny for America.

    If you will look back over the record, you will find that those of us who oppose intervention have constantly tried to clarify facts and issues; while the interventionists have tried to hide facts and confuse issues.

    We ask you to read what we said last month, last year, and even before the war began. Our record is open and clear, and we are proud of it.

    We have not led you on by subterfuge and propaganda. We have not resorted to steps short of anything, in order to take the American people where they did not want to go.

    What we said before the elections, we say [illegible] and again, and again today. And we will not tell you tomorrow that it was just campaign oratory. Have you ever heard an interventionist, or a British agent, or a member of the administration in Washington ask you to go back and study a record of what they have said since the war started? Are their self-styled defenders of democracy willing to put the issue of war to a vote of our people? Do you find these crusaders for foreign freedom of speech, or the removal of censorship here in our own country?

    The subterfuge and propaganda that exists in our country is obvious on every side. Tonight, I shall try to pierce through a portion of it, to the naked facts which lie beneath.

    When this war started in Europe, it was clear that the American people were solidly opposed to entering it. Why shouldn’t we be? We had the best defensive position in the world; we had a tradition of independence from Europe; and the one time we did take part in a European war left European problems unsolved, and debts to America unpaid.

    National polls showed that when England and France declared war on Germany, in 1939, less than 10 percent of our population favored a similar course for America.

    But there were various groups of people, here and abroad, whose interests and beliefs necessitated the involvement of the United States in the war. I shall point out some of these groups tonight, and outline their methods of procedure. In doing this, I must speak with the utmost frankness, for in order to counteract their efforts, we must know exactly who they are.

    The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, THE JEWISH and the Roosevelt administration.

  31. Ares's Gravatar Ares
    March 4, 2016 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

    Well no matter how you look at it, Trump has exposed the controlled opposition of the Republican establishment. Normal voters who faithfully voted for the Republicans all these years now see very clearly that it was all a sham. They were in the tank with the Liberals and the New World Order crowd from the beginning. And that genie will never be back in the bottle.

    • John's Gravatar John
      March 5, 2016 - 10:37 am | Permalink

      Well said and I think you are exactly right. I wonder if Merkel’s sudden invitation to millions of Muslims to invade Europe was in response to the fact that more and more people understand the role that Jews play in the destruction of the West and she was trying to accelerate that destruction before more meaningful resistance can be made against it.

      • William's Gravatar William
        March 6, 2016 - 4:44 am | Permalink

        It seems the ethnocentric Jewish fear and hatred for Whites is so pathological they will destroy themselves in getting at us. BaT’Yeor published a 2005 book “Eurabia” detailing that the EAD European Arabian Dialogue had become a full fledged program to Islamacise Europe. This would be a case of a jew being a canary in a coal mine. She was essentially warning that this could be bad for the Jews. She was ridiculed, one can see the scathing posts on the internet still, but she has been proven correct. Doesn’t really deal with organised jeweries complicity in promoting auto-genocide and blames it on White elites. Merkel was a recipient of the Gudenhov-Kalergi medal,which invesages an Eurabia and Eurafrican ideal.

        We see a small Jewish counter attack: Breitbart, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and a few bodies they’ve funded such as the English Defense League but it’s an spotty campaign that always pulls the rug out as soon as it gets moving. Trump’s Israel like border protection policies are the only sane plausible protection Jews have long term.

        But their hate is deep and irrational it seems. It’s no suprise that the neocohenservatives are reverting into Trotskyite’s for globalisation.

        At the beginning of the 90s, the representative from Bündnis90/Die Grünen (Coalition90/Greenpeace) for German-French Europe and one of the leading leftwing politicians, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, announced accordingly the following:
        “We, the Greens (Green Party), must strive to this end that as many foreigners as possible be brought to Germany. If they are in Germany, we must fight for their right to vote. Once we have achieved this, then we have the segment of voters we need to change this republic.”

  32. March 4, 2016 - 5:08 pm | Permalink
  33. John's Gravatar John
    March 4, 2016 - 12:41 pm | Permalink

    It looks like Europe is on track to receive over 3 million new bugaboos this year which would mean, what, another 66 billion dollars to accommodate the ones arriving in Germany alone?

    March 3, 2016 9:35 AM

    Between January 1 and February 29, 2016, 131,724 migrants and refugees crossed the Mediterranean Sea, of whom 122,637 arrived in EU member Greece, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

    The figure is comparable to the total registered in the first half of 2015, when 147,209 arrived on Europe’s shores.

    Nov 10, 2015

    Refugee influx could cost Germany $22.58 billion this year: Ifo

    Germany faces costs of over 21 billion euros ($22.58 billion)this year to house, feed and educate hundreds of thousands of refugees, the Munich-based Ifo institute said on Tuesday.

    The new estimate, which assumes that 1.1 million migrants will seek asylum in Germany in 2015, represents a sharp increase over a previous projection from late September which put the cost at 10 billion euros.

    • Outin Theopen's Gravatar Outin Theopen
      March 5, 2016 - 2:31 am | Permalink

      Refugee influx could cost Germany $22.58 billion this year.

      Again, I ask, on what is the money actually spent? Housing? Then construction firms and landlords benefit. Prepared meals? Then catering services benefit. Healthcare? Then doctors and hospitals benefit. And so on, and so forth. Who are the financial beneficiaries of the refugee industry?

      “Money doesn’t disappear, it just changes hands.”

      We know from who’s hands it is taken, so the question is: in who’s pockets does it end up?

      Who are these profiteers? I would really like confront them with some though questions. Who can help me find these people?

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        March 5, 2016 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

        Intelligent questions.

        Socialism is for the general interest- not for special interests. There are no special interests in Europe. . .in theory. . .

        I pointed out here recently that the head of Lutheran Social Services in the greater Michigan area was pulling down $400,000 per year. . .what is the source of this funding?

        OT- if we knew who is getting the money, what good could be done with such information?

        • Outin Theopen's Gravatar Outin Theopen
          March 6, 2016 - 2:04 am | Permalink

          There are numerous things we could do. But what do you think we should do? What does one customarily do with traitors?

          Please check out the article below. It throws a revealing light upon the refugee industry in the world’s sole “Humanitarian Superpower”. In it are mentioned several individuals and corporations (all unscrupulous profiteers) that patriots could/should target with some “direct action”.

          I hope a Swedish patriot will soon do what needs to be done.

        • William's Gravatar William
          March 6, 2016 - 4:57 am | Permalink

          This level of remuneration is very common for an executive as well as a fund raising executive in a charity. It’s a very lucrative profession. I was told by a PhD humanities graduate that most of his type will work for charities, at least in Australia. These people are part of the elite as much as any entertainment executive.

  34. JM's Gravatar JM
    March 4, 2016 - 1:31 am | Permalink

    Food for thought: The Brutal Economic Truth Behind the Rise of Trump
    By Anthony Mirhaydari | The Fiscal Times – Wed, Mar 2, 2016
    The Brutal Economic Truth Behind the Rise of Trump
    Donald Trump is inching closer to securing the Republican presidential nomination as voters cast their ballots on Super Tuesday — an outcome that has the donor/Establishment/media nexus apoplectic and social justice warrior types despondent.
    Much has been said about Trump’s look, language, demeanor, faith, fidelity to the conservative cause, stance on gun rights, women’s rights, and so much more. He has been called every name in the book — sexist, racist, bigot, fraud and fascist — and compared with Hitler and Mussolini.
    And yet his staying power cannot be dismissed. To my mind, it’s not about banning Muslims or building walls. Trump’s rise is about his unique grasp of the most fundamental economic issue that’s been hurting regular American workers for decades: the influx of foreign workers and the outflow of corporate capital expenditures that have reduced wage-raising bargaining power.
    Trump is a guy who understands leverage in deal making. And he understands that basic supply-demand dynamics have undermined the ability of middle-class Americans to extract pay raises and keep pace with the persistent increase in the cost of living. And that’s why his appeal has confounded the political pundits.
    If his appeal was based on his language and bluster, America would have elevated someone like Howard Stern or Ann Coulter long ago. If his appeal was based on foreign policy concerns, why isn’t a military general leading the charge? It’s the economy, stupid! And the fact is that real, median household income peaked at nearly $58,000 back in 1999 and has been sliding ever since, standing now at just $53,657.
    This can all be summarized in two charts: The relationship between corporate profitability and labor’s share of income shown above.
    Cheap laborers (both undocumented unskilled and skilled H1-B guest workers) and the ability to offshore production and reimport goods into the United States have boosted earnings to record highs. Yet in a mirror-image decline, the share of income going to Middle Americans has collapsed.
    Politically, the backlash against this dynamic has been burning slowly for two reasons — both of which can be traced to the ultra-easy monetary policy of the Federal Reserve over the past 20 some years.
    First, easy money has fueled asset price appreciation, allowing Americans to tap home equity and stock market wealth to supplement stagnant wages and fuel their ability to spend. We saw this in the dot-com boom. We saw it in the housing bubble. And we’ve seen it again in the current bull market.
    Unfortunately, the gain in household net worth has been largely relegated to the wealthy who overwhelmingly own the most financial assets — fueling worries about rising inequality. (Check out page 30 of the Fed’s Survey of Consumer Finances for more information.)
    Second, many have turned to credit to pad stagnant incomes. Since 1999, household credit has grown from $6.6 trillion to more than $14 trillion.
    But now, the political anger is white-hot. Trump thunders in his rallies — which increasingly resemble rock concerts in mood and tone– about Ford building factories in Mexico or IT workers from Disney being displaced by foreigners they are forced to train.
    Americans used to be content with this arrangement, buying suddenly cheaper imported goods with wealth and credit. But with homes filled with electronic toys, furniture and clothes, we now want our economic security back. Even mainstream economists are starting to concede that open trade has depressed American wages. The worm is turning.
    The surprising enthusiasm for Democratic presidential challenger Bernie Sanders can also be explained by these dynamics — especially his appeal to younger voters burdened by debts (mainly, student loans) and without the capital assets (homes, retirement accounts) needed to benefit from the Fed’s asset inflation focus. He rails against Wall Street (the creditors). He rails against the rich (benefiting the most from the Fed). And he rails against corporate profits.
    But where Sanders and Trump differs — and why Trump has had more success — is that their policy prescriptions are different.
    Sanders wants to treat the symptoms with palliatives like increased taxes and regulation, using the power of the U.S. government to redistribute wealth from the rich and the corporate sector to poor and middle-income Americans at the risk of further damaging America’s potential growth rate by reducing entrepreneurship and economic dynamism.
    Trump is talking about attacking the root cause of the problem: Elevating free trade and corporate globalism over American nationalism and “fair” trade.
    For all the looking-down-the-nose belittling of Trump supporters as low-information voters, they implicitly understand this profound truth and realize that — with Establishment candidates in both political parties beholden to the status quo — the ostentatious Manhattanite with ridiculous hair and no brain-to-mouth filter is best positioned to turn things around.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 5, 2016 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

      >>>The relationship between corporate profitability and labor’s share of income shown above.

      Cheap laborers (both undocumented unskilled and skilled H1-B guest workers) and the ability to offshore production and reimport goods into the United States have boosted earnings to record highs.<<<

      You are pushing the communist labor theory of value. This is based on the idea that the primary source of profits is underpaying workers- that is, stealing from these workers.

      I have in my hand a book- The Exploitation Theory of Socialism Communism- The Idea That All Unearned Income (Rent, Interest, and Profit) Involves Economic Injustice, by the White Austrian economist Eugen Bohm-Bawerk. I found it very trying and waaay too technical. So I developed my own theory which regular folks can understand.

      The highlights- the left critics [of capitalism] bitch and moan about profits. But isn't the market system a system of profits and losses? I see no leftists ever mention losses.

      Take company A. It was making money, but now is losing. The company thinks it can turn things around and decides to stay in business. So it continues to pay wages. Wages can be paid from incoming revenue, or from the bank balance. Company A must deplete its cash. Their workers spend their checks on winning companies. The lowering of the bank account of Company A raises the bank accounts of winning companies. Thus, profit is a transfer from losing companies to winning companies and has absolutely nothing to do with underpaying workers.

      For the entire economy the profit is a big fat zero! Subtract losses from profits, and you get zero. Ask your local commie why they don’t mention losses. [Losing firms must still pay market wages to attract workers].

      Unions: Union interests are not the same as “labor” interests. Unions get monopoly privilege from the Feds. The supply of labor is reduced in union areas, while the supply of labor is increased in non-union areas. This drives up union wages while driving down non-union wages.

      The Marxist’s claim the profits came at the expense of others is right!
      They just had the wrong “others,” Profits come out the the pocketbook of losing businesses. . .not out the the pocketbooks of workers.

      Unions steal from non-union workers- they exploit them, as it were. Unions have a great deal to do with the wreckage of the American economy.

      The Class Struggle is business vs. business, not business vs. labor.

  35. March 3, 2016 - 11:56 pm | Permalink

    Here’s what I know: Romney ripped off every person in Massachusetts to benefit medical and pharmaceutical monopolies that ought to be prosecuted under 15 USC and backed the same theft from everyone via Obamacare, turning it from a scam you could at least try to evade into a legal duty to pay enforced by government.

    Further Trump’s domestic and trade policies would, contrary to Mitt Romney and how he has made his money, bring jobs back home.

    Romney, let us remember, made his money by thieving your jobs and sending them to China while loading up the companies he “acquired” with debt that subsequently sank them, destroying said jobs.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 5, 2016 - 3:33 pm | Permalink

      You want government to deal with monopolies which were created by government?

      Surely you know that the anti-trust laws were passed by Big Business- yes, it’s true.

  36. John E. Cucklately's Gravatar John E. Cucklately
    March 3, 2016 - 11:14 pm | Permalink

    There was a letter to the editor in the corporate conservative rag I occasionally glance at remarking how so many conservative commenters these days are using the term ‘Marxism’ to describe anything they don’t like. My reply, distinguishing Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School, from traditional Marxism of the economic variety, needless to say was not published. But it got me thinking. Has any mainstream news publication, TV program or book ever addressed and defined ‘Cultural Marxism’? Or is it only a historical phenomenon explored by us… hmm what’s the best term, ‘acknowledgers of group biological differences’?

  37. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    March 3, 2016 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

    It’s really hilarious how quickly the neo cons and assorted reform leftist jews get straight to the heart of the agenda if it ever becomes seriously threatened. For jews, it’s all about the US carrying water for Israel and continuing to become a third world cesspool that offers complete cover for every form of jewish cosmopolitanism. All other positions are negotiable if they threaten the afore mentioned “big two”. The mask is starting to crumble, and I’m amazed that more people aren’t seeing this true face for what it is, but at the very least, everything I’ve ever believed to be true on this issue has just been confirmed.

  38. A Masonic State's Gravatar A Masonic State
    March 3, 2016 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    When people feel they have more to win than loss by rebelling ,then revolution threatens .
    I wonder if the reason the US didn’t go into Syia is due to instability with the fighting ranks.
    I predict that if the establishment doesn’t recognise the game is up ( luck has totally deserted them ,starting with Ed Snowden ) it will end badly for the state . The genies out of bottle.Trump has plunge a knife into the PC Brain cancer and he’s holding it up to the cheering mass AND the gobsmacked BodyPolitic.

  39. John's Gravatar John
    March 3, 2016 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

    I would like to see some Congressman stand up and explain that Jews make up less than3 percent of the US population and then sponsor a bill that would limit Jews to no more than 3 percent of the top positions in government, the Supreme Court, the mainstream media and the US Central Bank. Of course it would get no where but it might start a discussion and the MSM would, I guess, have to cover it it.

  40. March 3, 2016 - 5:12 pm | Permalink
  41. March 3, 2016 - 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Our American Prime Asshole Bill Kristol and Mitt Romney is a pathetic disloyal Oligarch,
    and the ZERO-CALIPHATE-STD Administration.
    It’s left wing Aipac or right wing Aipac, it’s all the same
    Is it Good for Jews and to hell with America
    Neo-commies / Neo trotskyites neocons / Neo trotskyites Libs it’s all the same
    They have a particular theme for each niche of the Political Arena
    Is it Good for Jews and to hell with America
    What the Jews can’t stand or endure is that a Trump Presidency might be really really good for America
    I hope our domestic Israel Amen Corner starts connecting the dots that are being shoved right in front of them and some neurons start firing!!!

    I’m pretty comfortable with Donald Trump nominating
    a couple of Supreme Court Justices but I get a feeling of nausea when I think about Billary Clinton or Aipac Sanders doing the same.

    They’re all Commies or Control freaks at Heart
    They want to get rid of the Bill of Rights and they
    will if we just take it!!
    You can legislate Hell from the legislature or Supreme
    Court if we simply allow them to drag us along.

    It is time

    Bolsheviks Cheka Stasi

  42. David W's Gravatar David W
    March 3, 2016 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Is Trump going to tell us who is truly responsible for 9/11 etc., the Jewish tribalist terrorist fanatics, then Ill celebrate. Until then this is all simply play time for the Jews.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 3, 2016 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

      Professor says Jews are behind 9/11 attacks and she’s keeping her job

      [Joy Karega, negress at Oberlin]

    • Floda's Gravatar Floda
      March 3, 2016 - 11:00 pm | Permalink


      I suspect most of us here don’t think the official account of 911 is even remotely Kosher. However, if there is one person alive who knows full well that buildings don’t collapse from office paper fires, it’s Donald Trump. He’s on record saying, ‘you’ll find out what really brought those buildings down on 911’.

      That has the Neocons sweating bullets. I have come to believe Trump is a man who will do what he says and I think he knows dam well that until that matter is exposed there is NO WAY America can ever be, ‘Great Again’.

      Trump is close to 70. He is risking his life in running for the nomination, I don’t live in America but I would love to see him win and watch what happens. I Just Hope he keeps the Kevlar vest on under the suit.

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        March 4, 2016 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

        He’s on record saying, ‘you’ll find out what really brought those buildings down on 911’.

        When did Trump say that?

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        March 4, 2016 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

        Trump might want to confer with his Campaign Manager, Michael Glassner, former Chief of Staff to the Chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, May 1998-July 2001.

  43. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    March 3, 2016 - 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Apparently, conservatives don’t put much stock in Donald Trump’s three basic over all principles that he says guides his thinking,
    1) A nations borders are important.
    2)Citizens come first.
    3)Business should be done in the U.S.
    Since these simple principles should not be objected to by either major political party, but instead are causing a hurricane of protest from both major political parties, it’s now easy to see that the concerns of traditional Main St. U.S.A., are of no concern to either of them….

  44. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    March 3, 2016 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Yep, Bill Kristol and almost all of the other phony ranting “conservatives” O’Reilly, Hewitt, Beck, etc.etc. been UNMASKED and their true face’s are now bare for all to see.

  45. Anon's Gravatar Anon
    March 3, 2016 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Someone should make a viral video of all the bad ruffian behavior by blacks and SJW at campaign rallies. The progots(‘progressive’ bigots) running loose and wild, using threats and violence, etc. And of course, ignored by the Lib Media.

    A few bad apples who support Trump are nothing compared to the thugs who really use violence, hateful rhetoric, and violence from the other side.

    This BLM phenom has been one of endless thuggery and disrespect of other peoples and voices.

    Make the video, make it go viral.

  46. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    March 3, 2016 - 2:40 pm | Permalink

    There is going to be a re-alignment of Middle East states by war and revolution. Pres. Trump might mean an option for transfers from the occupied territories of Israel during upheaval such as an ISIS takeover of Jordan, which would split Israel from the Diaspora and Lobby. There can be a Jewish State of Israel or no transfer of the West Bank Palestinians. Not both.

  47. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    March 3, 2016 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

    “Neocons like Kristol are proud to call themselves “principled conservatives” but what kind of principled conservative could open the gates to the disaster of a Hillary Clinton presidency? What conservative principles could possibly survive a Hillary Clinton presidency?”


    “Republican voters may begin to realize that the Jewish identities and interests of the neocons were the fundamental problem that destroyed the Republican Party and their chances at deliverance. And they will understand that the people who accomplished this were not at all motivated by allegiance to sacred principles of freedom and the Constitution.”


    There’s a danger with paragraphs like these that you promote conservatism or the right as our natural home.

    Trump has already beat the neocons and fuddy-duddy conservatives, by going White-wards (but crucially, not right-wards). You don’t need to be in that fight.

    Just continue to give recovering conservatives – and liberals – the language you’ve given them for twenty years to understand their enemies are Team Jew, and they need to be Team White.

    That’s the ultimate relevance of your work, summarized in a challenge to action authored independently by Alex Linder.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 3, 2016 - 6:07 pm | Permalink

      White Makes Right!

      • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
        March 5, 2016 - 9:02 am | Permalink

        Yup. All else is debatable and therefore divisive.

        Someone somewhere rubs his hands and snorts whenever a White nationalist tries to makes a certain attitude to Christianity, capitalism, the Third Reich, homosexuality or whatever a necessary component of authentic and winning WN.

  48. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    March 3, 2016 - 2:13 pm | Permalink

    What we are looking at is the mind numbing conceit of the corporate class. They truly believe we could not take breath without them.

    How dare European American voters of the middle and working classes question the narrative of near sixty years!

  49. Bernard's Gravatar Bernard
    March 3, 2016 - 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Trump had better make a Will before very long. Seriously.
    The likudniks don’t like being crossed. No sir.

    • Vincent Johnson's Gravatar Vincent Johnson
      March 3, 2016 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

      My worry too

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        March 4, 2016 - 12:54 pm | Permalink

        Perhaps this might work. If there are measures in place for the exposure of the assassin/s and connecting him/them to the neocons, then even after a successful attempt such a scandal will bring them down, thus still achieving the objective of breaking their power. If they are aware of such measures, they might not even try to attempt such a strike.

  50. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 3, 2016 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Is this like a Counter-Cuckture?

    Trump reminds me of the 70s all over again.

    It was a time of movies like


    ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST (albeit based on an early 60s book).








    Anti-Estab movies.

    They were follow-ups to 60s films like BONNIE AND CLYDE, THE GRADUATE, IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT, COOL HAND LUKE, and EASY RIDER. And maybe DIRTY DOZEN.

    The rebels were the youths, the blacks, the oddballs, the outsiders, the nutballs, the outlaws, etc.

    It was seen in relation to Nixonian Conformity and the Man.

    And yet, they didn’t simply appeal to the Liberals or the Left.
    They even appealed to rightwing populism.

    And some movies like DEATH WISH, DIRTY HARRY, and THE FRENCH CONNECTION — even PATTON — played on a combo of counterculture and right-wing themes.
    These ‘right-wing’ heroes were rebels and mavericks against the System that was increasingly seen as controlled by the Liberal Establishment. Stallone later ran with this white-man-as-underdog in ROCKY and RAMBO movies.

    Ironically, the so-called Reagan Era of the 80s did wonders for the Lib Establishment. Reagan’s pro-business and pro-order policies paved the way for super-revival of Liberal Democratic cities during the Clinton Era of high incarceration rates and pro-‘free trade’ policies that made the Liberal urban gentry and entrepreneurial class richer than ever. And the restoration of the culture of Order paved the way for Liberal use of PC and other means to make us more orderly in the ways that would please Steven Pinker.

    So, the Libs really had no more use for genuine counter-culture antics and rebellion.
    There is a lot of sex and violence in Pop Culture but they are all so industry-controlled, groomed, manufactured, and engineered. They are not genuine and real, as with Janis Joplin and Jim Morrison.
    The likes of Miley Cyrus and Nikki Minaj, gross as they are, are purely the product of the industry. They were made that way by the industry.

    In contrast, there was genuine anarchic threat in movies like THE LONGEST YARD, ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST, and BAD NEWS BEARS, huge topic of discussion among kids at school.

    Back then, many Boomer Libs(still young and idealistic and a bit rough) were willing to throw caution to the winds and let the mob run free. There was no PC though plenty of lefty politicking. But there was also good deal of un-PC stuff all over.

    But PC has seriously suppressed genuine free speech. There is SJW rage, but SJW are toy radicals manufactured and engineered by boomer and X-er college professors.
    They are to radicalism what Rubio is to conservatism. Robotic.

    The Lib Elites are no longer interested in BAD NEWS BEARS style antics since they totally rule everything. This is especially the case since the main rulers of Lib Elites are Jews, and Jews are very nervous about the gentile masses becoming restless and stampeding against Elite Power.
    So, the very Lib Boomers who might have cheered for the inmates of THE LONGEST YARD in the 1970s are probably secretly cheering for the prison authorities when they see the movie today. To them, Trump seems like the Reynolds character leading an unruly mob who are only to happy to storm the gates.

    That the white conservative middle/working class are now the face of rebellion against the Establishment of both parties goes to show how much this nation has changed.
    The Jewish Elites have been promoting ‘white guilt’, ‘diversity’, ‘open borders’, ‘multi-culturalism’, etc as the New Official Creed of America. Of course, this elitism doesn’t favor all non-whites. Instead, it just favors some token non-whites for elite world so that the elites can show off their ‘progressive’ credentials. With the likes of Fareed Zakaria by their side, they sneer at the gentile masses as low and vulgar. And even though the globalist elites are the ones lording over blacks and Mexicans, they use ‘diversity’ narrative to fool non-white have-nots into believing that they are being held back by the middle/working/lower class whites who are ending up with nothing. Divide-and-rule over gentile dummies. The fact that some blacks are beginning to listen to Trump is a sign that some are waking up to fact that their main enemies are not ‘white trash’ but the globo elites who push immigration to send blacks to the back of the bus in favor of yellows/browns and homos.

    The question is… is Trump pulling an act or does he have the gall to run the longest yard?

  51. PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
    March 3, 2016 - 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Look, jews trade both sides of the street. Trump’s appointed task is threefold; function as a debilitating safety valve, destroy the Republican Party, and ease the way for ‘Madam President Hillary’.

    • Bob's Gravatar Bob
      March 3, 2016 - 9:20 pm | Permalink


    • Hadrian's Gravatar Hadrian
      March 4, 2016 - 11:46 am | Permalink

      Trump’s appointed task is threefold; function as a debilitating safety valve,

      jews don’t need safety valves. If Trump wasn’t there, Whites would simply stay home on election day they way they did in 2012.

      destroy the Republican Party,

      Why would jews want this? They need controlled opposition. The DNC doesn’t work without the GOP.

      and ease the way for ‘Madam President Hillary’.

      More easily done by simply pitting Jeb or Rubio against her. That would give her the presidency easily.

      There’s no reason to believe Trump is a plant.

  52. silviosilver's Gravatar silviosilver
    March 3, 2016 - 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Now you can say that’s suicidal, but that is the posture of people [worried] about the negative effects down ballot.

    That is the posture of people who fear a Kristolnacht.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      March 3, 2016 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

  53. March 3, 2016 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

    One weakness of Hillary is she knows how to use the crutch but doesn’t know how to stop the bleeding.
    She is all about the Support System. She started her campaign in 2008 with the support of the System and Blacks who didn’t give Obama a chance.
    But when the support began to slip, she had no means to keep them. She just bled and bled and bled and didn’t know how to treat the wound and regain health. In contrast, Billy Boy Clinton got hammered bunch of times in 1992 — though, to be sure, he had the media on his side — , but he had the personality and will to regain balance and fight back. He could carry himself and fight on his own two feet when necessary. He was like Ali after being floored by Frazier. He could get back up and keep dancing.

    We just don’t see this in Hillary. If she had such ability, she might have won in 2008. But she just assumed that the system would be on her side and protect her. When they deserted and left her vulnerable, she just looked dazed and abandoned.
    She was cheated by Billy Boy all her life and then cheated by Democratic Party and voters. For a feminist, she sure is the cheated partner who just takes all the knocks.

    At this point, it’s Hillary’s to lose. But if she begins to lose support, she doesn’t have the means to stop the bleeding. We saw this in 2008. She just looks hurt and begs for pity. She looks weak.

    So, Trump has to make her bleed by playing up her estab connections. Trump should also point out that the GOP neocons who went to her side are the ones responsible for wars that led to so much bleeding of US economy, deaths of US soldiers, and disaster in Middle East. In fact, he might even win some Muslim support by saying he wants to leave those camel jockers alone. No more bombs on the Arabs/Muslims. Just let them mind their own business in their own world. Trump should tell the Arabs/Muslims that while he is for careful vetting of Muslim immigrants, he is also for caution and respect when it comes to foreign policy and will not, like Bush II and Obama, destroy the entire Middle East by supporting terrorists in Libya and Syria. He should Bush II and Obama turned War on Terror into War for Terror, especially as US enabled terrorists in Libya and Syria to run riot.
    He should also say the Neo-cons are working with Neo-Nazis in Ukraine.

    Trump should also mention the Princeton study that says US is an oligarchy, not a democracy. No matter what people want, they don’t get. But what the oligarchs want, they get.
    Trump should add ‘democracy, not oligarchy’ along with ‘make america great again’.
    Trump should say his election is about ‘what you(the people) want, not what the elites want’.

    He should say the GOP estab is really angry with him because he is connecting with the people than with the elites. THAT is why the likes of Romney are attacking him.
    They hate him because he is giving voice to the people, the have-lesses. He should people being what they are, not all the voices are pretty. Some are ugly and contemptible, but the main themes are save our jobs, defend our borders, preserve our culture and nation. And who can oppose that?
    Peace thru Power, not War to Weakness. Prosperity and Security for All than Privilege and Pleasure for a Few.

    Besides, it’s hardly surprising that there are gonna be some extreme voices on both sides, both parties. Why? US is a two-party system, so both sides has a huge range of views unlike European multi-party system where elections are proportional than winner-takes-all. So, it should be no surprise that there are some extremist supporters in the GOP. But then, all the commies will likely vote Democratic.

    Be that as it may, Bernie Sanders is the best choice. Vote for him.

    • celt darnell's Gravatar celt darnell
      March 3, 2016 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

      You posted this exact same comment over at Steve Sailer’s blog…

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      March 5, 2016 - 2:59 am | Permalink
      • March 5, 2016 - 7:54 am | Permalink

        Bernie Sanders as our next President?
        Please, Dear God, Have Mercy!!
        Ginsburg, Kagan, Breyer, Sotomayor on the Supreme Court
        AIPAC Ruling Congress in large measure

        Bernie will give us more of the same;
        illegal/Legal immigration invasion
        h1b h2b visas

        Is Bernie going to repeal Obama Care ?
        Can he make it worse?
        Yes, if possible

  54. Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
    March 3, 2016 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Hillary is a trusted & true war criminal for Israel — that’s why she was hired.

    Trump can’t be trusted.

  55. Vincent Johnson's Gravatar Vincent Johnson
    March 3, 2016 - 11:33 am | Permalink

    Oh my God,now you really are confusing me —lot more research needed—anyone out there with an opposing fact list—Hipster Racist is a strange if not outright offensive non de plume–one can love freedom and one’s own tribe and family without hating other race’s—we are in fact fighting racist’s —anti white racists who want our position and wealth in the world and to enslave us and ours in the here and now and the future—we fight for our families

    • Vincent Johnson's Gravatar Vincent Johnson
      March 3, 2016 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

      These comments were written to be a response to the comments of Hipster Racist but has been placed in the wrong location and therefore does not make sense please read after the Hipster Racist comment

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      March 3, 2016 - 2:38 pm | Permalink

      Well, we fight for our race, in point of fact.


      It is a malleable term, obviously, like you say, you use it differently than the establishment media.

      To them we are racists because most of us argue for the kind of equality you promote. To you, they are racist because they discriminate against your people.

      With genuinely ‘contested’ terms like that, tools or weapons are better descriptions. So wield em cautiously.

      I like ‘waycist’ sometimes for the childish, demanding, ‘it’s all your fault’ orthodox usage.

      David Duke says never admit you’re a racist. But for plenty of us most standard definitions apply and we enjoy explaining that we’re justified.

      Just do your best.

  56. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    March 3, 2016 - 10:54 am | Permalink

    How pathetic are we, or more importantly, how can a lying PNAC affiliated jew get up and say that “they” as opposed to the actual voters, are going to do everything to make the party lose the election? How can they legally get away with announcing they will strip Americans of their democracy, just so Jews can get what they want, and think we will just watch it happen? Could these Jews be anymore brazen? If these Jews succeed, it should serve as the “shot heard round the world” as Americans will truly be a subjugated nation, whose democracy was destroyed intentionally by Jews with impunity! This is tyranny! The very thing the second amendment was created to remedy! We have the power and should exercise ALL of our legal options in the event these treasonous scum succeed!

  57. James O'Meara's Gravatar James O'Meara
    March 3, 2016 - 10:31 am | Permalink

    ” Kristol is proposing a nuclear option”

    The Israelis call it the Samson Option. Like the 30s comparisons, it seems to be an obsession with a certain kind of tribal mind.

  58. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    March 3, 2016 - 10:26 am | Permalink
  59. Andrea Ostrov Letania's Gravatar Andrea Ostrov Letania
    March 3, 2016 - 10:05 am | Permalink

    Alt Right and white patriots don’t mind sharing Trump with the Jews. After all, Trump is pro-Israel.
    But Jews mind sharing any candidate with the Alt Right or white patriots. They must totally own him. Jews will not share.
    What does that tell you?

    Alt Right and white patriots don’t mind if Trump will be good for both Jews and whites. But Jews want someone who will be good for Jews only and bad for whites.

    • Facio's Gravatar Facio
      March 3, 2016 - 9:42 pm | Permalink

      Trust me.. Trump will not be good for the Jews.. Trump is proposing to end Globalization as we know it.. That is why they are going batsh&t crazy.. In my opinion, this is our last chance to get America back.. If Trump fails to get elected White people world wide will enter the new Dark Ages for a very, very long time.. and there is not telling if Whites will survive this..

  60. Andrea Ostrov Letania's Gravatar Andrea Ostrov Letania
    March 3, 2016 - 10:01 am | Permalink

    Taboos maintain the walls of power and privilege. Trump weakens taboos, therefore threatens vested interests. He opens up the narrative and inspires others to say and do like him. Power is maintained not only by what is said but by fearsome rules of what cannot be said. After all, glastnost and the overton window/wall in the USSR undermined communism in the USSR of the 1980s.

    Trump isn’t open borders on immigration but open borders on the narrative. His style and brashness are like ‘barbarians at the gates’ for the ruling Jewish elites. He is like the uppity Negro who finally looks in the eyes of his massuh and says NO. Jewish massuhs cannot tolerate the white man looking directly in the eye and saying NO to them. Jews cannot stand uppity whites. Chutzpah is reserved for them only. Ironically, Trump is like Jack Johnson, and he keeps knocking out all these ‘great goy hopes’ put forth by Jews. Romney is the latest one of the ‘hopes’.

    Open borders on immigration destroys a nation. Open borders on the narrative/discourse destroys privilege and power that maintains itself by making people feel that it is ‘bad form’, ‘sinful’, or ‘odious’ to say certain things(that usually speak truth to power). When Jews were rising and challenging Wasp power, they were for open borders or open barbs on the narrative controlled by wasps. But now that they got the power, they fear open borders discourse free of censorship and taboos. They are now for closed borders on discourse. PC is enforced through means legal, economic, cultural, and political not so much to protect the ‘weak’ but to protect the powerful Jewish elites from scrutiny and accountability.
    Trump stands before the Overton Wall and says ‘tear down this wall’. It is the one wall — along with the wall in Israel — that Jews don’t want torn down. Without taboos, Jews will be flooded with criticism of their power, privilege, and abuses since they are the kings of the hill.

    As for genteel respectable gentile conservatives, they lost all legitimacy since they lacked the guts to speak the truth about globalism and its threat to Americans. Just like German upper class sold their souls to Hitler to keep their status, gentile conservative elites sold their souls to Jewish globo tyrants to keep theirs. Respectability with integrity and courage is worthless. It is all look, no substance.

    Respectability is only as good as the real face it is masking. Conservative Establishment wears a respectable mask but its real face lacks integrity and principles. It’s all about lobbying and elbowing for privilege for themselves without any regard for nation as a whole.

    We must say ‘closed borders against invasion and open borders for speech’.

    • Vincent Johnson's Gravatar Vincent Johnson
      March 3, 2016 - 2:11 pm | Permalink

      Good comments

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 3, 2016 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

      “. . .Chutzpah is reserved for them only. . .”

      Chutzpah should not be confused with courage. Chutzpah means doing wrong- courage means doing right.

    • Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
      March 3, 2016 - 7:10 pm | Permalink

      Really well said. “Great Goy Hopes put out by Jews” is exactly right. White leaders custom designed to betray their own and fight for Israel. And the second someone like Romney starts to trash talk Trump it just looks so phony. Nobody cares what this guy thinks or says. The mainstream GOP is in serious and possibly fatal trouble.

  61. March 3, 2016 - 7:40 am | Permalink

    I’m genuinely confused at the idea that Trump is not working at the behest of the neo-cons.

    1. Trump spent the entire Obama administration promoting the “birth certificate issue,” as a proxy for Israeli Orly Taitz. This was widely seen as a way to pressure Obama to bomb Iran.

    2. Trump has made opposition to the Iran deal, one of Likud’s main priorities, the centerpiece of his foreign policy, in fact, the only foreign policy stance that seems to actually have some coherence to it. The Iran deal is widely supported by both political parties, the military, the CIA, and basically everyone except for the Israel lobby.

    3. Trump saying he doesn’t want the money of the Republican Jewish Coalition is in line with his rhetoric about being independent of lobbyists. But he’s openly courted the support of Sheldon Adelson, who is just as much of a Israeli partisan as Haim Saban. Trump has AIPAC staffers in charge of his campaign, and he name checks Carl Icahn, a Jewish oligarch, on a regular basis.

    4. Trump has said he will move the US embassy to Jerusalem, another pet issue of the Israel lobby, and one that has widespread opposition by the diplomatic establishment.

    5. Trump has grandchildren living in Israel and has done campaign commercials for Netanyahu. While most Republicans suck up to the Israel lobby for money and media, Trump’s connections to Israel are personal – he has family in Israel.

    As for Syria and ratcheting up tensions with Russia, the establishment have mostly all turned against that since Russia began their intervention; Trump is not really taking a brave stance there.

    I’m sure the neo-cons were prefer Rubio, but I cannot see how Trump would be anything but a huge win for those more interested in Israel than the USA, which would make perfect sense considering Trump’s career-long association with Israelis, his personal ties to Israel, his Israeli family, his business empire, his campaign’s staffing by high level AIPAC assets, his anti-Iran rhetoric, and essentially everything he’s ever done during his entire career.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      March 3, 2016 - 10:24 am | Permalink

      The better solution might be a brokered convention with Trump seen to be ousted by party managers. Such a humiliation might prove more incendiary than a Trump presidency itself.

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      March 3, 2016 - 10:31 am | Permalink

      But if so, why are Jews all over the Western World talking the worst about Trump? He has been ridiculised on every newspaper, TV, radio owned or heavily staffed by Jews, in UK, in Germany, in France, in Italy.
      No papers on him is accurate and realistic. If we in Europe exposed..ant to inow something about him or the Primaries, we must check an US news Agency or, even better, the Net.
      So, perhaps, I’m wrong, but if he’s an enemy of my enemies, he’s a friend to

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        March 3, 2016 - 5:43 pm | Permalink

        Didn’t the vast majority of Jews grind their teeth all through the Bush incumbency, neocon though it was?

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        March 3, 2016 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

        Hopefully he is not a Manchurian Candidate. In Germany some quearters suspect that the AfD (Alternative for Germany) might be a vehicle to catch unsatisfied voters which might run to the right wing party, the NPD (National Party of Germany). I have read the expression of “indicator lights to the right, drive to the left” for the AfD. If this is true, then there truly are professionals behind them that know how to mislead the masses.

        At the end of the day the proof lies in the eating of the pudding. At the moment it is the “speculation time” phase while the euphoria is high.

        It could also be that he has to make so many compromises, that in effect he is neutralized. The AfD is in the same position. Their leader, Dr. Frauke Petry, recently visited Israel.

    • Facio's Gravatar Facio
      March 3, 2016 - 9:49 pm | Permalink

      All the points you mentioned are either token concessions or of little value distractions to what the true Trump phenomenon represents.. TRUMP is proposing to END GLOBALIZATION if elected.. Let that sink in..

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      March 4, 2016 - 4:27 am | Permalink

      Google on-line “Haaretz”, March 3, Chemi Shalev, on how Trump threatens (his “friend”) Bibi’s influence over the Republican Party. The trouble is no-one really knows where the Donald might “stand” on anything if elected President. The “choice” between a trumpeting Elephant and a braying Donkey has at last gone from metaphor to reality. The plus factor is that he has broken the mold and given real Americans a voice – things will never be quite the same.

      Ultra-conspiracists see Trump as a Clinton stooge to destroy the GOP for ever.

    • Caryn Goddard's Gravatar Caryn Goddard
      March 5, 2016 - 11:21 am | Permalink

      Trump recently explicitly said that he would not move the US Embassy to Jerusalem but that the parties would have to negotiate it themselves. Trump doesn’t need Adelson’s money and Kristol exemplifies the Jewish establishment hysteria on Trump. Considering the alternatives Trump is the only rational choice.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        March 5, 2016 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

        The ONLY choice maybe. I wish it were more “rational”. The criticisms from Romney need to be considered on their own merits and demerits. More personal gravitas and more political nous will/should be required in the last stage to the White House, and even more so inside it. A loud voice and a large penis will not be enough.

Comments are closed.