Jewish Fear And Loathing Of Donald Trump [2]: “New York Values” vs. Muslim Immigration

Kevin MacDonald


Previously posted at

See also: Why So Much Jewish Fear and Loathing of Donald Trump?

The uproar over Sen. Ted Cruz’s jibe that Donald Trump reflected “New York Values” said a lot about contemporary American political debate.

Given New York is the deepest of blue states, Cruz was quite obviously insinuating liberalism. But commentators seized on it as veiled anti-Semitism e.g. By ‘New York values’ did Ted Cruz mean ‘Jewish’? by Mark Silk, Religion News Service, January 15, 2015.

As a child of the Heartland, I can testify that this interpretation simply didn’t occur to most Americans. And it’s particularly fantastic given that Cruz has assiduously courted the Israel Lobby, famously saying “those who hate Israel also hate America, that those who hate Jews also hate Christians, and that anyone who hates Israel and the Jewish people is not following the teachings of Christ” [Ted Cruz speech to Christian group cut short by boos after Israel comments, by Sean Sullivan, Washington Post, September 11, 2014].

But there’s a very low threshold for accusing someone of anti-Semitism.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Fortunately for Cruz, the anti-anti-Semites still have The Donald to kick around.

Indeed, we now have the anomalous situation where Trump is condemned by Jewish organizations for implicit anti-Semitism while also condemned for having the values of a typical New Yorker—liberal, and typical of the great majority of US Jews, wherever they live.

In my first report on Jewish reactions to the Trump phenomenon, I said:

The common denominator here is nothing less than that they see Trump as undermining the elite consensus on immigration … and, implicitly, on the moral imperative of euthanizing White America.

Well, even though that was only two months ago, events since then have only provided more support for the nexus between Jewish loathing of Trump and concern about Trump’s attitudes on immigration and multiculturalism—combined with a bit of neocon angst that he is insufficiently hostile to Russia and not on board with bombing Iran and deposing Assad in Syria.

The latest impetus for Trump terror: his statement “calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.” This created a deluge of apoplectic outrage, complete with comparisons to Hitler—typically without the “until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on” qualification. [Media Push Trump As Hitler Meme,, December 8, 2015]

The common denominator in many of the comments of Jewish organizations: hysteria about the singling out of a group. For example, Jeffrey Greenblatt of the ADL wailed “A plan that singles out Muslims and denies them entry to the U.S. based on their religion is deeply offensive and runs contrary to our nation’s deepest values” [What Jewish groups have (and haven’t) said about Donald Trump, by Uriel Hellman, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, December 13, 2015]

And it’s not just the US whose “deepest values” are violated. Israel, that “Light Unto the Nations” and pillar of multiculturalism, also repudiated Trump’s proposal. Israeli PM Netanyahu’s office released this statement:

Prime Minister Netanyahu rejects Donald Trump’s recent remarks about Muslims. … The State of Israel respects all religion and strictly adheres to the rights of all its citizens.

[Trump: ‘Inappropriate’ of Netanyahu to slam plan on US ban of Muslims, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, December 13, 2015]

Trump was fairly nonplussed about this, noting only that Netanyahu’s comments were “inappropriate.” But he seemed to be quite aware of the hypocrisy involved:

Of course, given that Israel is an avowedly Jewish state, Muslims are by definition second-class citizens, with very different rights under law, including especially immigration policy, which, of course, is (energetically) restricted to Jews.

Ayelet ShakedAmazingly, even Dan Shapiro, the US Ambassador to Israel, recently acknowledged the differing legal practices vis-à-vis Palestinians and settlers on the West Bank (and was robustly denounced by Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked, right.) [Shaked demands Shapiro recant comments about ‘2 standards’ in West Bank,By Yonah Jeremy Bob, Jerusalem Post, January 19, 2016

So in unsurprising fact, Netanyahu and the Israeli government go far beyond Trump by discriminating against all groups except Jews. Nevertheless, and weirdly, an Israeli NGO is actively involved in recruiting invaders to Europe—needless to say, casting its motives as entirely idealistic and humanitarian.

But I can see why Jewish organizations are upset. Singling out a group because members of the group are more likely to commit terrorist acts immediately reminds Jews that anti-Jewish attitudes have often resulted from Jews actually being likely to have attitudes or behaviors that the majority finds objectionable.

Thus ADL CEO Greenblatt continued his statement on Trump:

In the Jewish community, we know all too well what can happen when a particular religious group is singled out for stereotyping and scapegoating.

This is likely a veiled reference to the common perception among Jews (which I think is correct) that, although the 1924 Immigration Restriction Act did not refer specifically to Jews, it was motivated in part by the perception that Jewish immigrants were far more likely to be politically radical and sympathetic to Communism—at a time when the horrors of Bolshevism loomed large in public perception.

This perception was firmly rooted in reality, and commonly acknowledged by Jews and non-Jews alike. Political radicalism was then entirely mainstream in the Jewish community. Jews often made up high percentages of members in the Communist Party USA (e.g. in Philadelphia were nearly three-fourths of the membership was composed the children of Jewish immigrants who had come to the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century—here, p. 271).

In response, Jewish organizations went to great lengths to alter the public stereotype of Jewish disloyalty. Jewish publications warned that the Leftism of Jewish immigrants would lead to anti-Semitism. As often occurs now among American Muslim organizations, Jewish organizations in the 1920s engaged in what Sheldon Neuringer calls “a near-desperation . . . effort to portray the Jew as one hundred per cent American” by organizing highly visible patriotic pageants on national holidays and urging the immigrants to learn English.

Nevertheless, in the 1920s, the fact that Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe were viewed as “infected with Bolshevism . . . unpatriotic, alien, unassimilable,” contributed to restrictive immigration legislation. [American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953, By Sheldon Neuringer, 1971, p.165].

In my view, it is entirely rational and legitimate for a country to be concerned about the personal characteristics of its immigrants, including those that, as with Muslims currently, might predispose them to terrorism—but also to hostility toward the White, Christian majority, low ability for academic achievement, proneness to crime, welfare use, or even voting Democrat.

And in the case of Jewish radical immigrants in the early 20thcentury, this is especially relevant in light of the subsequent rise to intellectual dominance of the intellectual Left as an elite hostile to the White, Christian majority—the Jewish role in which was fundamental, and forms the subject of my book The Culture of Critique.

Notice that the 1924 law did not explicitly prohibit Jewish immigration. They continued to emigrate from Western Europe—for example, all-American luminaries like Nightline’s Ted Koppel and his friend Henry Kissinger. But the law severely restricted immigration from Eastern Europe, where the bulk of the Jewish population lived.

Nevertheless, let’s “interrogate” (to use a word that’sfashionable on the left) the idea that denying entry to the U.S. to a particular ethnic or religious group “runs contrary to our nation’s deepest values,” as the ADL’s Greenblatt put it.

Baloney! These “deepest values” only became enshrined in law and elite attitudes with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. That legislation repealed the national origins provisions of the 1924 law, which had attempted to create an ethnic status quo as of 1890 by placing quotas on immigration based on the representation in the U.S. population at that time.

Before the 1965 law, there were strong strains in U.S. immigration law that were entirely congruent with Israel’s current practice of fashioning immigration policy to benefit the majority—at times by excluding particular groups.

For example, the Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted immigration to “free white persons of good character.” Almost a century later, there was the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 that prohibited immigration of Chinese (and unanimously condemned by the Jewish press, as Sheldon Neuringer reports in American Jewry and United States Immigration Policy, p.165—also the case with later attempts to restrict immigration).

Then came the Gentlemen’s Agreement, an informal agreement with Japan in 1907 limiting immigration of Japanese workers, and finally the 1924 Immigration Restriction Act that favored northwest Europe, severely restricted the immigration of Africans and banned outright the immigration of Arabs and all Asians. The 1924 law was essentially reaffirmed in the 1952 immigration law, passed over President Truman’s veto.

And it should be remembered that the 1965 law was passed only because of the pretense that, as then freshman Senator Ted Kennedy famously promised, it would not change the ethnic balance of the country.

The 1965 law therefore cannot be read as an endorsement by the traditional American majority for a demographic transformation that will, if unchecked, soon make Whites a minority in the country that they established.

In fact, the “deepest values” attributed to the U.S. by ADL’s Greenblatt are recent creations, stemming entirely from the cultural revolution of the 1960s that reshaped elite culture in America. The 1965 law was fundamentally a project of the organized American Jewish community ( here, herehere ). And these “deepest values” are still not held by non-elite White America—given that Trump’s proposals on immigration are actually majority viewpoints in the U.S. [Are Trump’s immigration views out of the mainstream?,  by Byron York, Washington Examiner, August 16, 2015

Conservatism Inc. may argue that Trump is not a “conservative.” But the reality is that Trump voters are focusing on his big issues—immigration first and foremost.

Unless we win the immigration battle, none of the other battles can possibly be won.

As Ann Coulter put it after Trump released his remarkable, Jeff Sessions-oriented, immigration plan:

Kevin MacDonald [email him] is professor of psychology at California State University–Long Beach. His research has focused on developing evolutionary perspectives in developmental psychology, personality theory, Western culture, and ethnic relations (group evolutionary strategies). He edits and is a frequent contributor to The Occidental Observer andThe Occidental Quarterly. For his website, click here.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

75 Comments to "Jewish Fear And Loathing Of Donald Trump [2]: “New York Values” vs. Muslim Immigration"

  1. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 28, 2016 - 12:26 am | Permalink

    These moronic, self-serving paragraphs have to be read to be believed.

    Ms. Green evidently thinks that since she is Jewish, her mere assertion that Professor MacDonald is shortsighted, megalomaniacal, and obsessive will serve as an adequate substitute for hard facts. Come to think of it, I’m sure it will suffice for VDARE’s Brenda Walker!

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 28, 2016 - 1:06 pm | Permalink

      It’s true, in her behind oops in her mind.

      She says this: Even if so many Jews are philosophically destructive

      A pretty hefty admission.

  2. Paul's Gravatar Paul
    January 27, 2016 - 12:59 am | Permalink

    Whats wrong with being WASP if Jews can produce James Brown “Proud and I am Black” songs or openly flaunt Jewish characters in movies?

    This is the self-destruct button Jews have been using for decades. Self-loathing is the highway to suicide.

    Trump can go beyond “Proud and I am WASP” and sing about his German roots that gave us not only Audis, AMG Mercedes And VWs but also apple pie, christmas trees etc.

    I still don’t trust this guy.

  3. norm741's Gravatar norm741
    January 25, 2016 - 10:20 am | Permalink

    Trump knows how to play the game and he can’t be bought; This is why they don’t trust him.

  4. royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
    January 25, 2016 - 6:37 am | Permalink

    Given the importance of this election and amount of coverage in the social media, I was at a loss as to why Trump is not more often a topic of discussion in TOO. Good to see that Hr. Prof. Dktr. K. Macdonald has once again brought the Trump topic to the fore.

  5. royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
    January 25, 2016 - 5:57 am | Permalink

    Trump has declared, at one of his rallies, that he is a “WASP” and by doing so, albeit hidden within an acronym, he has opened another can of worms that the Jews are desperately trying to avoid…, namely “White” Identity Politics.

    Then we have the “Parable of the Snake” that he read at another rally…
    But who is it that represents this “Snake” that he was obviously alluding to?
    Most would say it is the Radical Islamics, but Islam is a Religion and a snake is a species or a geneo-typical form of life and not an ideology.
    The Snake that Trump may well have alluded to could very well have been for all intents and purposes, “the Jew”.

    Trump is doing a masterful side-winding snake limbo dance around the 10 tonne Jewish King Kong on the planet by deftly stepping on, and surviving, every land-mine in the room until the last one remaining will be the Jewish question.

    He is doing what the Jews have been doing to us for the last few hundred years, namely isolating us…, by taking us down the weakest at a time…, from our allies until the last target in their sights is the plumb cherry of their obsessive fixation.

    I find it utterly mind-blowing how over the decades, I have watched the language used to describe not only our struggle to survive as Whites but the language used to describe the Jews and how the Jews have co-opted this language, that we have by and large created, and simply projected it against us in the shrinking and slowly going bankrupt “Lame Steam” publications that are still under their control and stay afloat largely as a result of free credit from “quantitatively eased” money.
    We have provided them with the vocabulary that they use against us through the dwindling vestiges of a Mass Media which used to be the dominant vehicle through which information was disseminated.

    With regards to the Christian question, stick to the oldest versions of the Bible for occasional quotes and/or encouragement, but keep in mind that nothing beats remembering in your heart of hearts, “Christ’s message was all about seeking truth.”
    Jews rely on “deceit” as a modus operandi and the dominant sect of Sunni Islam is proxy controlled by a Turkish Jew who pretends to be an Arab!

    Innocence is is nothing less than a modus vivendi free of scheming and imbued with fulsomeness, which is something that makes life joyful and productive if all those around you are operating in the same paradigm.
    Since the Jew and Islam largely depends on usurpation, cunning and exploitation, is it any wonder that both these ideologies are at odds with Christianity.
    The fact that Christianity is at odds with Xtianity (usurped institutions that falsely represent the teachings of Christ) is no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water.

    • a foolish consistency's Gravatar a foolish consistency
      January 25, 2016 - 8:14 am | Permalink
      • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
        January 25, 2016 - 8:49 am | Permalink

        I first heard the word “fulsome” used by members of the Canadian parliament who were part of a Parliamentary Committee investigating corruption within the ranks of the RCMP (Royal Canadian Military/Mounted Police…, the equivalent of the U.S.A.’s F.B.I.).

        Liberal members of Parliament involved in this scandal who had were called to take the stand were being castigated by Conservative and NDP members of the panel for not showing “fulsomeness” in their answers in that they were obviously trying to cover up and avoid answering incriminating questions directly.

        Moreover, the two members of the panel who were using the word in the above sense were of higher than average moral fiber, and of above average intelligence and I suspect they were using the term in the classical sense.

        From the Oxford Dictionary site:

        Although the earliest use of fulsome (first recorded in the 13th century) was ‘generous or abundant’, this meaning is now regarded by some people as wrong. The correct meaning today is held to be ‘excessively complimentary or flattering’. However, the word is still often used in its original sense of ‘abundant’, especially in sentences such as she was fulsome in her praise for the people who organized it, and this use can give rise to ambiguity: for one speaker, fulsome praise may be a genuine compliment, whereas for others it will be interpreted as an insult.”

        Gotta love those “hair-splitters”…, especially when the future of the world hangs in the balance!

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 25, 2016 - 9:59 am | Permalink

      both these ideologies are at odds with Christianity.

      Under the ideologies are real, living breathing people.

      The jews and sand negroes are at odds with Whites.

  6. Silex's Gravatar Silex
    January 25, 2016 - 4:25 am | Permalink

    Jews have trained Gentiles to react as Jews want them to react. They have in effect turned Gentiles into synthetic Jews. Most of those who are hysterically attacking Trump are synthetic Jews. Meanwhile, Trump has AIPAC’s Michael Glassner as his “National Political Director”.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 25, 2016 - 10:01 am | Permalink

      Jews have trained Gentiles

      jews have trained Whites

      • Silex's Gravatar Silex
        January 28, 2016 - 7:02 am | Permalink

        How could you have missed all of the darkies screaming “racist”? Who trained them?

  7. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    January 24, 2016 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

    Ayelet Shaked is hot!

    A definite improvement over Barbara Spectre.

    • a foolish consistency's Gravatar a foolish consistency
      January 25, 2016 - 8:16 am | Permalink

      Do you have her number? I’m beginning to think, if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em!

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 27, 2016 - 9:30 am | Permalink

      Ayelet Shaked is hot!

      C’ mon. You can’t tell a Photoshopped pic when you see one? Here’s some reality:

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        January 28, 2016 - 11:14 am | Permalink

        Che brutta faccia!

        John, your “reality” photo prompts me to wonder whether she shaves with Schick or Gillette blades every day.

        • wiggins's Gravatar wiggins
          January 29, 2016 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

          We used to have purple unction put on those things when I was a nipper….Aaargh!!!!

  8. Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
    January 24, 2016 - 6:34 pm | Permalink

    @Scofield bible… King James Bible…majority Bible…Geneva Bible. Catholics… Bible- Saint Jerome translation.

    All discussions about what “Bible” is “better” are incomplete (and ultimately misleading) as long as they ignore the only authentic Greek text handed down within the Orthodox Church which has been proven consistent by 2000 years of liturgical use, represented by a huge body of ancient Greek manuscripts, known as the Byzantine text-type (also called Majority Text, Traditional Text, Ecclesiastical Text, Constantinopolitan Text, Antiochian Text, or Syrian Text), which embodies the Orthodox textual tradition. These old manuscripts and lectionaries differ very little from each other, and are indeed in overwhelming agreement with each other throughout the whole New Testament. Furthermore, they are great in number and comprise the vast majority of existing Greek manuscripts. The translations made in the various Orthodox Churches (Old Latin – prior to Vulgata-, Slavonic, Syriac, Armenian, other vernaculars), have preserved exactly, accurately, and precisely the meaning of the Greek original.
    But, beside the Byzantine text-type family of manuscripts, there is a minor collection of Greek Scripture texts which are very old, and sometimes predate the Byzantine texts by hundreds of years (such as the ‘Codex Sinaiticus’, the ‘Alexandrian Codex’, the ‘Codex Ephraemi rescriptus’), but which are at variance with the Byzantine text-type. But, although even papyrus fragments from the first century bear out the veracity of the Byzantine text, and refute the validity of the older texts, most modern translators work from an “eclectic” or “critical text, which draws very heavily from these older Codices. This eclectic text is a patchwork of readings from the various manuscripts which differ from each other and from the Byzantine text. Most editions conform more often to the Alexandrian text-type, which is actually one of the most corrupted texts.
    Besides, many new translations are based on the so-called Masoretic (Hebrew) text, which, despite the pretensions to represent the “authentic” text of the “Bible”, the “Veritas Hebraica” (tradition introduced by the translation of St. Jerome – the ‘Vulgata’, which replaced the so-called ‘Prisca Latina’, translated from the Septuagint, actually from the Byzantine text-type tradition), is the most corrupt of all.
    And make no mistake, all these “translations” which put forward the “Hebraica Veritas” are deliberately made to void the “Bible” of any real Christian meaning.
    Anyhow, the King James Version (KJV) is the most reliable and faithful English translation.

  9. Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
    January 24, 2016 - 4:06 pm | Permalink

    @He told the Samaritan woman that salvation originates from the Jews.

    This is one of the twists which falsified the message of the Christ (the Euangelion, the Good News). Salvation is “from” the Jews, not “by” the Jews. The Salvation is the Christ who was born a Judaean. But the true worship is in Spirit.

    “The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet. Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.
    Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.
    Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things. Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he…
    And herein is that saying true, One soweth, and another reapeth…
    nd many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him for the saying of the woman, which testified, He told me all that ever I did.”

    • nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
      January 24, 2016 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

      Thank you Seraphim. That was nice.
      It’s not only Jews. Many American Christians will hold their breath and even catch back tears when they listen to Iraqis speak Aramaic.
      good luck guys. I have wandered into the weeds.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        January 25, 2016 - 10:05 am | Permalink

        This war is jews vs. Whites, not jews vs. Christians.

  10. FranksandBeans's Gravatar FranksandBeans
    January 24, 2016 - 12:36 pm | Permalink

    I agree with Ann Coulter that abortion is secondary compared to this immigration problem we have now. Most conservative Christians are stupid and they do not support Trump because they believe the media lies about him being against woman, pro abortion, does not know the bible and he is against veterans. Many support Ted Cruz because he says that he is anti gay marriage and anti abortion. Many also support the negro Ben Carson because he too is “Christian”. So we can see what the problem is. Any smart thinking person will want immigration limited and then we can tackle other issues. For me if a black or non white aborts, that is a good thing because less of them to deal with and less of them on welfare and also killing us off. So white conservative Christians of all ages including baby boomers and those of the ‘silent generation’ stop thinking in term of Christian values, but think in terms of white identity. Then we can continue with Christian values after the immigration and demographics issues are sorted out. Kapisch???

  11. Jeff's Gravatar Jeff
    January 24, 2016 - 10:10 am | Permalink

    Neocons and Christians are obsessed with the Middle East. They would gladly wreck what’s left of Western civilisation in more nation-wrecking adventures in those desert hellholes. True Europeans are peoples from the woods, not the desert. Our only holy lands are the countries where we can bring up and assure a future for our White children.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 25, 2016 - 12:04 am | Permalink

      The desert people deserve their just deserts.

  12. Kyle McKenna's Gravatar Kyle McKenna
    January 24, 2016 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    The only issue I have with this accurate and trenchant analysis is that even if Trump manages to win the presidency, 1) the forces of reaction will fight him each and every step of the way, in particular in the forums of Congress and the Mass Media, both of which they control; and 2) even if immigration were to cease completely (which no one has ever proposed) the numbers of infiltrators already in residence, plus their extreme fecundity, will still render European-descended Americans a minority within a few decades.

    None of this is to state that we shouldn’t hope for — and work for — this one best, last chance at regaining our once-great nation. Just that we do so with our eyes wide open.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      January 24, 2016 - 7:56 pm | Permalink

      2) even if immigration were to cease completely (which no one has ever proposed) the numbers of infiltrators already in residence, plus their extreme fecundity, will still render European-descended Americans a minority within a few decades.

      That’s what I’ve thought. Demographically, a cut-off is just kicking the can down the road. It would create complacency among whites.

      A cut-off is a step in the right direction, but what after that? In the long-run, are we then looking at break-up and/or cantonization of the U.S.? What’s the “end game”?

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 24, 2016 - 9:56 pm | Permalink

      Kyle, you make some really good points and I have thought about the same things. Suppose, for example, that Marine Le Pen was elected in France but then only diddled around and didn’t make real and fundamental changes such as greatly reducing the number of Muslims living in France – the result would obviously be that things would remain bad in terms of crime, terrorism, no-go zones and Muslims leaching off of social welfare and people would become disillusioned with her “right wing” government because nothing would have improved. On the other hand, if she did actually move to make real changes that would improve things for France such as repatriating the non-natives back to their homelands, then the Jews would have her arrested just as they did with the Golden Dawn government in Greece. I fear that things will have to get very bad (possibly collapse) before there’s the possibility for the native French, and Europeans in general, to reverse what the Jews have accomplished in the West in the last fifty years.

  13. Tom Paine's Gravatar Tom Paine
    January 24, 2016 - 12:20 am | Permalink

    I’ve not read anything that Trump has said that even vaguely addresses reopening the 9/11 investigation but I think that yet another reason the Jews are so deathly afraid of him winning the Oval Office. Aside from the fact that he’s come out against all of their pet projects such as open borders and getting the 2nd Amendment eliminated. I’m one of many that is convinced that 9/11 was an inside job to the extent the CIA was involved with a lot of help from mostly Jew traitors within the US government, Jews in private enterprise like Larry (“PULL IT”) Silverstein and the Mossad.
    Trump is too smart and has too much knowledge of building construction from his real estate career to believe the fiction that 3 modern skyscrapers, for the first and only time in history, came down due to “fire” at free fall speed into their own footprint. That’s impossible. If the truth about what happened that fateful day were to become widely known, then the cushy and pogrom free existence Jews in America have enjoyed since they first came here would come screeching to a halt.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      January 24, 2016 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

      That’s impossible. If the truth about what happened that fateful day were to become widely known, then the cushy and pogrom free existence Jews in America have enjoyed since they first came here would come screeching to a halt.

      I believe in the official story of the building collapse. (So does Trump.)

      While I believe that the attack was planned and carried out by Arab terrorists, I believe that Israeli intelligence was monitoring the terrorists, and KNEW the attack was going to happen. And they purposefully didn’t stop the terrorists, nor warn anyone of the attack. Because Israel wanted the attack to happen— Israel wanted to generate anti-muslim hysteria in the United States, to bring the U.S. and Israel closer together, and wanted the U.S. to attack Iraq (or possibly Iran.)

      Was there Israeli foreknowledge of the attack? I think the answer is yes, but that’s what ought to be investigated/exposed.. If it came out as yes, it would be just as devastating to the Jews as an exposure of controlled demolition, IMO.

      (I don’t think Trump is going to do an investigation, however.)

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        January 25, 2016 - 12:11 am | Permalink

        Two planes- three buildings collapsed.

        • Floda's Gravatar Floda
          January 25, 2016 - 2:33 pm | Permalink

          Actually, Two planes hit Two skyscrapers causing the destruction of ALL SEVEN buildings in the Jewish owned World Trade Center (WTC) What is not widely known is the buildings were acquired about six weeks before and insured specifically against ‘Terrorist’ attack and they collapsed before the ink had dried on the insurance arrangements.

      • Tom Paine's Gravatar Tom Paine
        January 25, 2016 - 2:54 am | Permalink

        I suggest you visit the website for the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth then. Professionals from all areas are represented there as well. They all weigh in on the side of science and rationality and completely debunk the official story. Now as to the why? Try watching “9/11 Missing Links”.
        There’s no question that Israel was in the middle of this. None. At. All. They, and Jews generally have a long and sordid history of war by stealth, false flags and assassinations. Documented just against this country are the attacks of the Lavon Affair and the attack on the USS Liberty. I fail to understand why otherwise intelligent people have such a hard time believing that these evil snakes are not capable of doing this.

        • a foolish consistency's Gravatar a foolish consistency
          January 25, 2016 - 9:57 am | Permalink

          This is one of the best books on 9/11:

          Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects, by Kevin Robert Ryan, Link:

        • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
          January 29, 2016 - 3:19 pm | Permalink

          On the face of it, this conspiracy doesn’t make sense.

          The towers were so severely damaged by the plane impacts they would have been a total loss and condemned even if they had stood.

          The towers didn’t have to come down on Sept. 11— they only had to be damaged beyond repair— and the plane strikes would have accomplished exactly that. The towers would still come down on TV— not on Sept. 11, but 12-18 months later after being condemned. “Lucky Larry” would still get his insurance payout. And the psychological impact on America would be roughly the same— they’d still get their PATRIOT act and their Iraq war.

          Why would they arrange for the towers to collapse on september 11 when it wouldn’t have been necessary?

          Do you know of any links/articles that address my point here?

        • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
          January 29, 2016 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

          There’s no question that Israel was in the middle of this.

          I have no question about it either. I just don’t believe that a controlled demolition was involved.

          Once the towers were hit by the planes, they were damaged beyond repair—- the zionist conspirators would have had no reason to bring them down with explosives.

  14. Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
    January 23, 2016 - 8:54 pm | Permalink

    Professor MacDonald has already offered us the reasons of Jewish loathing of Trump in several articles. It is worth revisiting at least two of them:
    ”Tim Tebow-phobia: Jewish Fear and Loathing of Christianity
    December 15, 2011”
    “Islamization of Europe a good thing, November 10, 2015″

    Jews will always, as long as they define themselves as Jews, hate and curse the Christians and in this respect they have the same attitude as the Muslims. They don’t even bother to deny it anymore:

    ” From the Washington Post, January 19, 2016:
    Israeli defense minister: “If I had to choose between Iran and ISIS, I’d choose ISIS”…
    “ISIS is a new phenomenon, originating from al-Qaeda. This is not a threat for us,” [Yaalon] told The Washington Post’s Lally Waymouth in 2014.
    “Former head of IDF intelligence Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Yadlin on Tuesday said, “Islamic State is much less dangerous than the Islamic Republican of Iran,” in opening comments to his Institute of National Security Studies conference in Tel Aviv on the aftermath of the Iran nuclear deal.” @

    “Benzi Gopstein, leader of the extremist anti-assimilationist group Lehava, has called for the prevention of Christmas celebrations in Israel and the expulsion of Christians whom he compared to “vampires…
    Gopstein said that the “fear that every Jew felt, the disgust that we described above at Christianity – disgust that was the only thing that saved us from the dark days in Europe – has disappeared with the ‘good life’ of the democratic age…and the missionary is on the prowl for prey…
    Gopstein ends his article by writing: “I call on everyone to raise a cry and fight this corrupt phenomenon in the best tradition of Judaism, before we all, including those who observe the commandments among us, become a community of sycophants.”
    “Christmas has no place in the Holy Land,” he wrote, adding “Let us remove the vampires before they once again drink our blood.”
    “At a panel debate on an arson attack at the Catholic Church of the Multiplication in the Galilee by Judaic terrorists in June, Gopstein declared that rabbinic law mandates the burning of Christian houses of worship. He cited Rabbi Moses Maimonides as urging that churches be burned. Asked if he was encouraging the burning of churches, Gopstein replied, “Of course I am.” .

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 24, 2016 - 2:20 am | Permalink

      “Former head of IDF intelligence Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Yadlin on Tuesday said, “Islamic State is much less dangerous than the Islamic Republic of Iran,”

      The same is true for Syria and that’s why Netanyahu said last year that he’s willing to accept the consequences of Assad being overthrown (e.g., that the Christians in Syria get slaughtered) .

    • nobody imporant's Gravatar nobody imporant
      January 24, 2016 - 6:34 am | Permalink

      The majority of Israelis have no affinity with Americans. and to them British is the bad guys. And of course Germans are the very devil. They hail from Eastern Europe and Russia and the Middle East. Their collective memory, knowledge and world view stems from their experience there. Also, they have a flair for the dramatic. The history or Europe is pretty dramatic for all involved.

      The anti-Christian stuff is happening more and more. It is not a good idea because it is causing pretty hard feelings…and confusion among American Christians. The Church of the Multiplication of Loaves and Fishes was a tough one particularly. The encroachment is hard to remain calm about. those settlements are eye-sores. If you are going to build an eye-sore- why not do like in The Gulf and build it in desert? and make the desert pretty. Rather than make the beautiful Biblical scenery ugly with urban sprawl?
      Americans are still the most Christian and are footing much of the bill for Israel. It’s being done on our dime. Or partly on our dime. We are not Jews and Miss Coulter pointed out.
      We do it because it is the Holy Land….and Jesus is from Jews. and He told the Samaritan woman that salvation originates from the Jews.

      This is probably stupid but The Thing that is saving Israel and the Jews is Jesus. It is Christianity. Because without Jesus and Christianity – Judaism and Jews just get demoted to being regular people with no special significance to anyone anywhere and very little to offer the world that the world can’t get for themselves- only with less tap dancing on everyone’s head. they become a small and really troublesome folk to all comers. Not particularly special in relation to others historically or presently. Nor are they that smart or creative or inventive or helpful or charming relative to other groups in the world. Jews are very dangerous to others and not very nice a good deal of the time. They become without Jesus to protect them in the minds of the others- just a nuclear armed middle eastern belligerent tribe on the doorstep of Europe, Arabia, Egypt and Lebanon. Bad actors just like most of the rest of them over there. Without Jesus, Jews are just average schmoes. They will lose their magic. Dorothy will peek behind the curtain and Toto will start barking.

      no hard feelings.

      • nobody imporant's Gravatar nobody imporant
        January 24, 2016 - 6:43 am | Permalink

        For most Americans during the creation of Israel times- the only Jew they knew or heard about was Jesus and Mary, Jack Benny, Baby Snooks or Groucho and Al Jolson. It didn’t register that they were different. They love those guys. And The Holy Land is the place on the art at Christmas time. Associated with magic and calm and warmth.

        It’s okay to be innocent.

        • January 24, 2016 - 11:55 am | Permalink

          –“It’s okay to be innocent” — is that serious comment? Is it ok to be stupid? Is ok to be ignorant?

        • nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
          January 24, 2016 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

          I am a big fan of innocence.

        • John's Gravatar John
          January 24, 2016 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

          “I am a big fan of innocence.”

          I am too. And there’s a difference between ignorance and innocence. A homicide investigator is not ignorant of the murderous nature of some people but is innocent of being a murderer.

        • nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
          January 25, 2016 - 7:11 am | Permalink

          i just was trying to show something that was not uncommon in those times. Things like that they didn’t know why Liberace hadn’t gotten married yet. But they could build a carburetor from scratch at the machine shop, wire your house for electricity, explain to a five year old the mechanics of flight in a way so they could understand it, then go home and have a beer and build an exact replica the Cutty Sark out of tooth picks in the shed. Then play with the Ham radio after dinner they had built themselves. Different times.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        January 24, 2016 - 10:56 am | Permalink

        Christianity was altered- CZ created by- the Scofield Bible [sponsored by jew samuel untermyer]. What fraction of Christians know of this?

        • nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
          January 24, 2016 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

          The Scofield bible is just the King James Bible with study notes. repeat and rinse and repeat and rinse. It is not majority Bible. I like the Geneva Bible. Catholics use an expanded Bible- Saint Jerome translation.

        • nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
          January 24, 2016 - 1:19 pm | Permalink

          You two are going to have to forgive me. I am not educated and you guys are some kind of professionals. quick draw mcgraw.

        • nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
          January 24, 2016 - 1:46 pm | Permalink

          Christianity has various interpretations and sects, as you two know. some believe in the concept of sola scriptura, sola gratia, sola fide. While others also include the traditions of the saints, martyrs and such and ex-cathedra writings of the Popes. While still others- like the Mormons include other books with their King James Bible. Protestants will respect and learn from various teachers, popes, lay men, or pastors who will place emphasis on different aspects of Scripture or other. Some add things like the concept of rapture that not in the bible specifically. Some of us think each other is a heretic. Some fuss and tittle over every word in the Translation and make a whole new Bible translation out of it.

          I will not get into it.

          all Christians believe this: “Upon this Rock I build my Church and the gates of hell shall not overpower it”

        • nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
          January 24, 2016 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

          I’m sorry, knowing this whole mess will be gratefully moderated out. I will say that the rapture people base this idea on things they read in the Scripture.
          I love all the sects and wish to protect them because i believe they are a nice and sweet thing in the world, so it’s all ni- fu- ni- fa to me.

          (Mod Note: Nobody has yet called on me to “moderate out” this discussion. Is that what you want?)

        • nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
          January 24, 2016 - 3:03 pm | Permalink

          Mr. Moderator, I know you guys don’t like the religion discussions that much. It causes trouble on your forum. Thank you for letting me say what i wanted to say about this things.
          totally understand if you guys decide to delete it.

          (Mod. Note: Dr. MacDonald doesn’t want the comment threads devoted to religious arguments. Mentioning religion as a part of a comment referring to the article topic isn’t a problem. “Religions Wars” between commenters is a problem.)

  15. L. Austine Waddell's Gravatar L. Austine Waddell
    January 23, 2016 - 5:59 pm | Permalink

    “…Jewish immigrants were far more likely to be politically radical…”

    Just call them extremists. No one to the Left of John McCain thinks being “radical” is a bad thing.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 24, 2016 - 10:57 am | Permalink

      “Extremists” is one of their slurs. “Radical” simply means fundamental.

  16. John's Gravatar John
    January 23, 2016 - 4:12 pm | Permalink

    Trump is very close to the Jews as well.

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      January 25, 2016 - 6:31 am | Permalink

      Trump has already publicly apologized for “playing the game” while building his real estate empire, and as much as I am against “playing with the devil to get ones piece of the pie”, many of those same Jews who Trump loudly proclaims, “to be friends with” have abandoned him since his run for the presidency and his total trashing of all that was once sacrosanct in the Lame Stream Media began.
      His daughter married a Jew, but by Jewish standards, the business and financial control of assets is passed on to the sons. The daughters get a hefty dowry but not the core of the assets.
      Moreover, his name sake, Donald Trump Jr. has not yet jumped the shark and betrothed a Jewess and neither has his youngest son Baron. And before this game is over, I will bet odds that his younger son Eric will come to his senses in a few years and recognize the mistake he has made in marrying a Jew.

      TOO writes are correct, “How does one build an empire capable of fighting the Jews at their own game without being a crypto-sycophant of Jews?”

      Instead of trying to take Trump down because he has fake-loved the Jews to keep his head, I would balance this with all the good he has done for White and Christian causes.

  17. John's Gravatar John
    January 23, 2016 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    “Baloney! These ‘deepest values’ only became enshrined in law and elite attitudes with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.”

    Exactly. I tried to point out the same thing on Quora a month ago but it was repeatedly locked (surprise!) so I had to edit my post greatly.

    And the result of the endless Jewish misinformation is that most Americans believe that America was made great precisely because “it always allowed in everybody from everywhere” when in reality non-whites were largely kept out until 1965.

    • John Rolin's Gravatar John Rolin
      January 24, 2016 - 9:00 am | Permalink

      “And the result of the endless Jewish misinformation is that most Americans believe that America was made great precisely because “it always allowed in everybody from everywhere.”

      Yet this phenomenon played a significant role in my awakening. You don’t have to be a genius to see that every non-white nation has refused to mimic the mass immigration in the west and is doing better for it. Asking yourself “why” will always lead to cognitive dissonance and the likes of the occidental observer.

  18. Jeff's Gravatar Jeff
    January 23, 2016 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

    Despite all, the US is still, by far, the country with the most numerous White population, up to 200 mio. Germany, including Austria, is a distant second with ca 70 mio. We can’t afford to lose the US. Trump wall 16!

    • White Ethnostate's Gravatar White Ethnostate
      January 23, 2016 - 3:52 pm | Permalink

      Europe & Russia needs to become United States of Europe = 700 million Whites

      • Kyle McKenna's Gravatar Kyle McKenna
        January 24, 2016 - 2:04 am | Permalink

        Which tells you why our enemies are fighting tooth-and-nail to wreck Europe as well.

        • January 24, 2016 - 10:48 am | Permalink

          We white countries are in the situation of a cornered rat, we stand with the back at the wall behind us, we have no other chance than to fight for our life as white folks. I hope that we will succeed.

  19. Passer by's Gravatar Passer by
    January 23, 2016 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

    They are in love with Merkel

    “Angela Merkel is a better leader for America than Donald Trump”
    By Richard Cohen

  20. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    January 23, 2016 - 12:47 pm | Permalink

    I think the ‘west vs non-west’ dichotomy is too simple for the New World.

    I think such should apply for Europe. Europe should insist on its western identity, culture, history, and etc. Europe is Europe and should remain unique in its races, cultures, and narratives.

    But, it’s a bit more complicated in the New World, not least because it had native populations prior to the arrival of Europeans — this was especially true in the Americas of Mexico, Central America, and South America.
    Also, whites in many parts of the New World brought blacks for labor.

    So, if the West and non-West dichotomy works for Europe — or should work for Europe if Europeans get their act together and push out the darkies — , it doesn’t quite work for the Americas, especially Latin Americas; indeed, many people don’t regard Latin Americas as part of the ‘West’ but see it as part of the non-white Third World, despite the fact that most of Latin America is still ruled by white elites and some Latin American nations can be said to be majority white.

    Surely, US and Canada have been more white than the Latin Americas. So, they are usually included in the category of the ‘West’.
    But especially with the non-white immigration boom since the 60s, US and Canada have become less white and more ‘diverse’.
    So should US and Canada no longer be seen as part of the West?
    Should they be seen as extensions not only of European civilization but equally of all cultures around the world? No.

    I think the formula for US and Canada should be West+ or West Plus.
    This idea should recognize US and Canada as essentially extensions of European Civilization BUT also open, at least to a degree, to non-whites and non-Europeans.

    If we say US and Canada are ONLY Western nations, how does one account for the presence of all the non-whites who came from non-European parts of the world?
    But if we say US and Canada have no special connection to the West, then US and Canada might as well fling their gates wide open to all the world until they become flooded so much by darkies that they become just an extension of the Third World. Who wants that?

    So, US and Canada — and Australia — need to settle for something between nationalist exclusion and globo-imperialist inclusion. They are part of the West and essentially/crucially the extension of the European races and cultures, BUT they have enough room for non-white minorities who are willing to adopt Western values and appreciate the New World nations as essentially extensions of European civilizations. After all, without Europeans and their identity, culture, and ideas, the US and Canada as they came to be and currently exist would be inconceivable.

    So, there is the West(Europe), the non-West(Asia, Middle East, Africa, etc), and the West Plus(US, Canada, Australia).

    If US and Canada totally drop the ‘west’ label, they would be rejecting the crucial and essential fact about their history of having been founded and built by the brains, muscles, and vision of European settlers. The ‘western’ component of US and Canada is too important to deny, devalue, or ignore. To say that European folks, ideas, visions, values, and ways have no special place in the founding and development of US and Canada would be ludicrous, even outrageous and offensive. It would be like saying blacks have no special place in the development of blues music. Though non-blacks played a role in the development of the blues, had there been no blacks, there would have been no blues.

    Likewise, had there been no Europeans, the US and Canada would never have come into existence in the first place.
    So, there is no way to dispense with the idea that US and Canada are essentially European creations and construction.
    Therefor, the West label must be maintained and defended tooth and nail. And given the laws of demographics and history, US and Canada need to have large numbers of white people because humans naturally identify and judge things on the base of race and appearances. For example, if US were to become 80% Hindu or 80% Chinese or 80% Mexican, the majority of the population would no longer identify with the West EVEN IF they adopted western ways. It’s like Japan is a westernized nation, but it is still an Asian nation. Adopting Western ways doesn’t make you western. It’s like adopting Christianity didn’t make Europeans Middle Eastern even though Christian mythology originated among Middle Eastern peoples.

    But the ‘West’ label ALONE no longer works for US and Canada. US brought in too many blacks. Canada could have been a strictly Western nation but embarked on the stupid policy of bringing in lots of non-white immigrants. Canada is now saddled with ‘diversity’.
    So, even as Western-ness is crucial and essential to American-ness and Canadian-ness, it no longer works as a sole label.

    Given their diversities, should US and Canada then totally junk the ‘western’ label and declare that all races and cultures are equally crucial and essential to their histories and identities?
    But that would be crazy.
    After all, if a single Hindu, Chinese, or Muslim had NOT settled in Canada, Canada would still be Canada. But suppose not a single European had settled in Canada. Canada wouldn’t exist at all.

    Suppose there is an empty island. Suppose Japanese find it first and do most to settle it with their folks, ideas, and ingenuity. Suppose this land comes to have 50 million Japanese-originated settlers. Suppose the people of this nation see themselves as Japanic, or extension of Japanese civilization.
    Then, suppose this nation changes its immigration and brings in people from other places. Suppose, this nation now has 10,000 Hindus and 10,000 Turks. Suppose this nation grants citizenship to the Hindu and Turkish arrivals.
    Does that mean that this nation is no longer Japanic since it has Hindus and Turks too?
    In order to accommodate ‘diversity’, should this nation, which was founded and created as a Japanic nation, totally reject Japanic-ness as the essential core of what it had been and stands for?

    But that would be crazy. Surely, any honest person would acknowledge that Japanic people, culture, and ideas have been the essential components in the development of this nation.
    So, this nation should never forgo Japanic-ness as its core identity, history, and culture. But given the presence of non-Japanic minorities, it can say the nation is about Japanic-Plus. It is core Japanic but has room for minorities too.

    The problem with the discourse in US and Canada is everything is discussed as a zero sum game.
    Some insist US and Canada must only be Western. Now, this might have been possible IF US had given blacks their separate territory and if US had been maintained itself as a white-only nation by allowing ONLY white immigrants. And Canada could have done the same thing. Indeed, such policies would have been ideal. But it is now too late.

    There are now too many non-whites in US and Canada. So, it isn’t enough to say that they are solely ‘western’ or ‘European-ish’ nations. Also, all those with citizenship deserve the same rights under the law.

    But that doesn’t mean that US and Canada should go whole hog and declare that, just because they now have ‘diversity’, they are no longer essentially or crucially Europeanic.
    Given the history, culture, and demography of US and Canada, those two nations must be seen, appreciated, and preserved as essentially Western nations with roots in Europe.
    And to maintain this, immigration policy must be geared to prevent the inundation of US and Canada by unlimited numbers of non-whites who will make US and Canada look more like Latin America or North Africa than Europe. US and Canada must culturally and demographically resemble Europe more than the Third World.

    The case of Latin America has proven that it is not enough for a nation to be ruled by white elites in for it to be ‘western’. This is also true of South Africa, whose political system was created by whites and where most of the economic elites are still white.
    If the great masses of the nation are non-white, it is not a Western or Europeanic nation even if ruled by whites and/or influenced by Western culture and ideas.
    The white Spanish ruled over Philippines for centuries, and most Filos are Catholic and speak Spanish(or English), but Philippines is NOT a Western or European nation. In the end, the masses are more important than the elites who rule them.
    Poland, along with Russia, was once under Mongol rule, but it remained a white nation because the masses were white.

    For US and Canada to remain Western or Europeanic, the majority must be white.
    Hong Kong was ruled by the white British elitse for over a century, and the Chinese there adopted many Western/European ways, but that didn’t make Hong Kong part of the Western world. Despite Westernization, it remained a part of the East because most Hong Kongese are Chinese.
    In contrast, Australia became part of the Western World because the overwhelming number of its inhabitants became white or European.

    Anyway, when it comes to US, Canada, and Australia, the most realistic formula is Western+ or Western Plus-ness. We need to acknowledge that their Core must remain Western… but there is room enough for non-whites who, though assured of equality under the law as individual citizens, should remain as racial/ethnic minorities because if white were to lose majority status, their core essential character of US and Canada will be lost and altered forever.

    PS. What is truly sad is that Europe, which should be ONLY EUROPEAN, has opted for the PC formula of the US and Canada that total ‘diversity’ to the point where the Anglo/European component is said to have been no more crucial and essential to their history and identity than the other identities and cultures have been.
    But this is ridiculous.

    While there are surely Burmese and Yemenese Americans, imagine an America that had never had a Burmese or Yemenese immigrant. America would still be America in terms of history, language, race, culture, science, technology, etc. But imagine an America where Europeans, especially Anglos, had never arrived. It would just be wilderness with little more than red childish savages shooting arrows at ‘buffaloes’. And if Europeans hadn’t ‘discovered’ and built up the Americas, all the other folks around the world would know nothing about it since they lacked the imagination and skills to navigate around the world, find new lands, and build new civilizations.
    So, Europeans are the indispensable peoplesof nations like US, Canada, and Australia.
    In contrast, Burmese and Yemenese have been peripheral to the creation and development of US and Canada. Sure, there can be decent Burmese-Americans and nice Yemenese-Canadians, and they can contribute to American and Canadian society in the present and the future, but they, as a people, have not been essential to the founding and development of US and Canada.

    Just like Jews insist that Israel has a special place for Jews because the Holy Land was made holy by Jewish Narrative and History, it would be justifiable for whites in US and Canada to insist that European peoples and cultures have a special place in US and Canada since both nations came to existence as extensions of Western folks, ideas, and cultures.
    If Israel can be a Jewish Plus nation — core Jewish nation with non-Jewish citizens with rights under the law — , then US and Canada can be Western Plus nations, or essentially Europeanic nations with room enough for non-white minorities.

    Under this system, while white citizens of US and Canada wouldn’t have privileges over non-whites as individuals, they would and should havce special recognition as a Core People and Culture.
    It’s like what they have in Israel. Under the law, a Jewish individual must be judged by the same laws that apply to everyone, Jews and Arabs alike. So, if a Jewish individual kills an innocent Arab, he would be just as guilty as an Arab who kills an innocent Jew.
    But as a people and culture, Jews do get special recognition in Israel whose policies are geared to keep it a Jewish State or Jewish+ State.

    In the US and Canada, whites-as-individual citizens shouldn’t be favored over non-white citizens, but whites-as-a-people-and-culture should be favored over other peoples and cultures in immigration policy and historical narrative in order to preserve the core identity of those nations.

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 23, 2016 - 3:55 pm | Permalink

      North American Indians didn’t even have a written language. Every institution in America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand was built by Europeans. When the third-world started to flood into the West in the 1960s it wasn’t because they were looking to build (they could have done that in their own countries) they wanted to take advantage of all that the Europeans had built.

      The natives were defeated at what they did best.

      • gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
        January 23, 2016 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

        “The natives were defeated at what they did best.”

        That is true. But I still feel for them because they had been in the Americas since time immemorial.

        See it this way. There had once been a time when Europeans were like the American Indians. They were barbarians or even savages without written language. They used primitive weapons. And they lived by hunting and gathering.
        Now, suppose the Chinese or Hindus had been far more advanced in civilization and reached Europe when white folks were like red savage Indians.
        Suppose, with their superior organization and weapons, the Chinese or Hindus mowed down the white barbarians and took over Europe and settled it for their own people.

        While we can understand such historical process, it would still be sad for indigenous white folks.

        So, even though I see what happened to the Americas and Australia as inevitable and even necessary, I do recognize the tragic narrative of how American Indians may feel about their land.

        • John's Gravatar John
          January 24, 2016 - 7:21 am | Permalink

          It did happen in Europe with the Romans defeating most everyone and giving them among other things paved roads, a calendar and even written language. Natives from all over the world have flooded into formerly white countries by the tens of millions looking for a better life and I suspect the Amerindians would have done the same thing if they were isolated from whites. They are no longer willing to live the way their ancestors did.

          From last year:

          A British Columbia First Nation ordered the evacuation of its roughly 700 residents after heavy snowfall in Kitimat knocked out power for more than three days.

          Haisla First Nation Chief Councillor Ellis Ross called for the evacuation early Sunday morning of Kitamaat Village, one of the only areas near the northern B.C. town that remains without power.

          What the Jews have in mind for us is not for the better – Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote that the future race of mankind would resemble ancient Egyptians and that is clearly a huge step down from Europeans.

  21. nobody important's Gravatar nobody important
    January 23, 2016 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

    “ted” Cruz who does not have Theodore in the name Raphael Edwardo held a duel Canadian citizenship up until a year and a half ago. It may be legal but it is unseemly for a US public servant or military personnel- especially a Senator, Congressman or someone who wants to run for President. Donald Trump may not be the greatest orator but his instincts have been impeccable. We have a very serious problem in USA with people who have divided or confused loyalties, or just plain hate USA. We also have the issue that George Washington wanted us to know about in his Farewell Address. About entangling alliances. Being a friend to all, and the problem of the little country orbiting the big one. In his day- we were the little country. but the Truth He spoke is the same either way and has not changed. Absolute Truth is just as real as relative truth.

    Almost Everyone in that room that evening including Cruz himself was a version or other of 5th columnist. All living here but with their hearts elsewhere. Even undermine our own country- or taking advantage of Her and Americans. Yes, anti- Israel activist types are viciously and frighteningly Anti- American. He’s right. but he’s a smooth and fast talker and wrong to equate America with Israel.

    the stuff Jews in Israel say about America is just as scary as the things the anti-Zionists say. Both are threat to MY people and my country…only in different ways.

    Americans don’t know the things that Jews say and think about them. If they did, it would break their heart. Especially the Evangelicals.
    Jews in Israel and here are celebrating the end of Europeans. They are passing out candy at the invasion of Europe by expansionist Islam.

    there is a story called Gimple the Fool that comes to mind. Americans are being badly misused…

    Christians of the Holy Land and the South and East Mediterranean and Middle East are in Their Home. We hope to see those who left return and fix the place up beautifully and be the oil that keeps the gears of that troubled region from grinding.

  22. Avi Marranazo's Gravatar Avi Marranazo
    January 23, 2016 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

    During the last few election cycles I’ve supported Ron Paul and toed the libertarian line more generally. I’m all in this year with Trump, as everything else seems to amount to “deck chairs on the Titanic” at this point. This is our moment. If it doesn’t work out we can then begin to work on secession and a White homeland.

  23. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    January 23, 2016 - 11:36 am | Permalink

    The Chinese Exclusion Act and Gentlemen’s Agreement were not just about banning Asian labourers, they were about stopping mass 3rd world immigration that would change the nature of the nation. China and Japan were the principal source of unscrupulous labour contractors, but India was also a huge source. It was not a US phenomenon, but an early exercise, world wide, to flood the new “White” countries with non-Whites. Canada had similar legislation, implemented only after riots in Vancouver early in the last century. Post Boer War, South Africa received Indians. It was only the remoteness and of Australia and New Zealand that saved them in earlier days.
    On another note, the debate in Congress, and the stated intentions of the Bill ought to go a long way in the legal interpretation of any legislation. Ought to, but won’t, in the corrupt and morally bankrupt countries in which all Whites now reside.

  24. Blenda Richter's Gravatar Blenda Richter
    January 23, 2016 - 11:05 am | Permalink

    The “left” and “right” of Jewdom is out to get him.
    Trump doesn’t need their money nor their media. Imperfect as he is for White America, they already know and dread he would be hard to control (like the imperfect JFK was)

    • Floda's Gravatar Floda
      January 23, 2016 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

      ‘Like the imperfect JFK’ Let us hope Trump has looked at what happened to JFK and has made sure his security people are trustworthy. The Tribe are sitting up nights worried he just might blow the whistle on the mass murder of 3,000 which was 911.

      If he does we can be certain he’ll do it properly. I cannot see how America can ever become ‘great again’ while such a monstrous crime remains concealed, covered up by the Jewish controlled MSM.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        January 23, 2016 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

        I think Trump Tower will be about as close to (((Ground Zero))) as Trump dares to venture.

        • Floda's Gravatar Floda
          January 23, 2016 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

          Call me obsessed with 911, but I am certain that America will never become great again so long as you have the grinning, murderous wallet lifters behind that crime in any position other than a berth in a jail cell or firmly seated on an electric chair.

          It is a gigantic blot on America’s escutcheon and to fix it requires an out and out revolution, a total cleansing, extreme measures. How can America claim to be seated at the table while murderers and criminals are, not just at large, but are inside the organs of the state, inside the courts and have total control of the Media?

          America needs to clean this up.

        • Luke's Gravatar Luke
          January 24, 2016 - 5:35 am | Permalink

          I bet the Israeli Mossad and the neo-cons are sorry now that they didn’t plant explosives inside the Trump Tower instead of the WTC towers on Sept 11, 2001.

        • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
          January 24, 2016 - 11:24 am | Permalink

          “. . .and to fix it requires an out and out revolution, a total cleansing, extreme measures. . .” Floda

          I concur. The government is “of the special interests, by the special interests, and for the special interests.” Stopping this- stopping them- requires getting the government out of the economy. The choice is free economy, or Mafia economy. Too many of our own are into the system up to their eyeballs.
          The specials would literally go ape-shit [yes literally] if their privileges were removed. You could see the spectacle of whites chimping-out. . .

          Real remaking requires leaders like we had in ’76. The people are dead in mind and body- a fresh start cannot happen with such shitty raw material.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      January 23, 2016 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

      His media persona is that of the “villain”. This present role sees him up the ante, and there is much genuine booing and hissing by the commentariat. At the same time he’s still building brand goodwill amongst the broader public and clearly some in the inner sanctum find him useful at this juncture. “Mike-on” means tacit support.

Comments are closed.