Chancellor Adenauer on Jewish Power


“The power of the Jews even today, especially in America, should not be underestimated.” – Konrad Adenauer, 1965.

A recurring theme in my writing is documenting the comments of mainstream European statesmen on Jewish power and influence. Given my background, this has primarily focused on French leaders. In general, as these figures approach retirement or indeed death, their tongues loosen somewhat.

In the aftermath of the Six Day War, General Charles de Gaulle publicly called the Jews “an elite people, self-confident, and dominating” and, almost in passing, noted that the Israelis enjoyed “vast support in money, influence, and propaganda [. . .] from the Jewish circles of America and Europe.” Though largely forgotten today, Jewish groups then widely attacked De Gaulle, claiming his comments would lead to “discrimination,” and even Raymond Aron, the otherwise unflappable critic of Jewish ethnocentrism, lost his composure.

Other top French politicians have complained of suffering from pressure and defamation at the hands of ethnocentric Jewish media-political networks. This is, in a word, the unmentionable “lobby-which-doesn’t-exist. Prime Minister Raymond Barre, nearing the end of his life, spoke out on the radio: “The Jewish lobby, not only concerning myself, is able to organize operations which are disgraceful. And I want to say it publicly!” President François Mitterrand spoke in private, on his last day in office, of “the powerful and harmful influence of the Jewish lobby in France.”

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

These are not marginal figures. De Gaulle led “Free France” during World War II and laid the founding myth for the nation’s emergence as a nominal victor from that conflict; he founded the Fifth Republic which is still in place. Mitterrand was one of principal founders of the European Union.

And now I discover that the situation appears to be similar with our German neighbors across the Rhine. I was watching an interview (text here) given by Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and was astonished by the following passage (roughly translated):

Now concerning the Jewish question — I may perhaps understand your question as: Why was the Jewish question always referred to and acted upon as an extremely important issue [by my government]? First, from a sense of justice. We had done to the Jews so much wrong, we had committed such crimes against them, that they had to be somehow expiated or had to be made good if we ever again want to win repute among the nations of the earth. And furthermore, the power of the Jews even today, especially in America, should not be underestimated. And therefore I have very deliberately and very consciously — and that was always my opinion — put all my strength, as best I could, to bring about a reconciliation between the Jewish people and the German people.

Adenauer makes this statement purely in passing — in between an exhortation on Franco-German reconciliation and another question from the reporter — as though it were unremarkable and indeed assumed by all-knowing individuals. He gave the interview in 1965, when he had been a few years in retirement and was indeed very old.

Adenauer, like De Gaulle and Mitterrand, is a founding figure in the current German regime, the Federal Republic of Germany. He was the postwar Federal Republic’s first chancellor for 14 years and was responsible for “rehabilitating” the country in the eyes of Western governments. Adenauer was supposed to be the living proof that Germany had overcome its National Socialist past and had become a true democracy (in fact, the Federal Republic continues to be an extremely authoritarian regime when it comes to stifling the Right).

Adenauer’s comments on Jewish power are thus very significant. His key observation — “the power of the Jews even today, especially in America, should not be underestimated” — led him to advise reconciliation. Adenauer recognized that getting on good terms with Jews and in particular with the American Jewish community, was a sine qua non for Germany to be redeemed in the eyes of the Western powers and thus be allowed again into the “civilized world.”

Adenauer’s observation leads to further questions: How has such a tiny group, only 2% of the U.S. population, acquired power “power [which] should not be underestimated”? How is it fair for such a small group to hold disproportionate sway over the destiny of the country? How is that fair for the 98% of Americans who are not Jews and are thus relatively powerless in their own country? The grip of ethnic lobbies over the U.S. government is also extremely important for non-Americans, given the enormous influence of the U.S. as a uniquely multifaceted superpower both during and after the Cold War, particularly in Western Europe and the Middle East.

A successful politician is nothing if not a realist. Adenauer’s statement implies the following: That the submissions of many European politicians — whether in affirming the moral supremacy of the Shoah as a kind of civil-religion and the relative secondary importance of European suffering, the defense of the Jewish ethno-state of Israel despite the latter’s constant violations of international law and human rights, the enforcement of anti-nationalist and anti-revisionist censorship, the marginalization and criminalization of nationalist parties, and ultimately the promotion of displacement-level immigration and multiculturalism — are not motivated by some moral principle, but merely submission to the powerful forces that make or break “democratic politicians,” including the Western world’s most powerful ethnic lobby. Today still, one can see very clearly how new and still-insecure Western-oriented regimes (one thinks of Poland or Romania) face enormous reputational and political costs in the West and in particular the United States if they do not submit to Jewish lobbyists’ desiderata (particularly concerning Shoah remembrance, persecution of nationalist groups, and immigration/multiculturalism).

The most intolerable and neurosis-inducing thing about Jewish privilege and ethnocentrism is that one is expected to not only to tolerate and even cater to it, but also to never even mention it!  Anyone who does will be shouted down, defamed, ostracized, persecuted, and ruined, justified by labels such as “anti-Semite,” “neo-Nazi,” “conspiracy-theorist,” and so on. And yet, even the most foundational figures of our current, most politically correct order — figures like De Gaulle, Mitterrand, and Adenauer — could plainly see and had to work with the reality of Jewish cultural, financial, and political power.

Gilad Atzmon has argued that the omertà on Jewish privilege and ethnocentrism is the central aspect of Jewish power.

Such an enforced taboo is particularly intolerable given that the privilege and ethnocentrism of any group — and particularly one as privileged and ethnocentric as Jews — is liable to undermine the interests of other groups. This is evident particularly the case for white gentiles — who are often systematically demonized in the reigning culture, are massively underrepresented in many key institutions like the Ivy League universities, and are ultimately losing their homelands — but also for other groups, such Muslim nations being destroyed by Israel and its Western collaborators.

We like to hope that the Internet is breaking the censorious stranglehold that Jewish and/or liberal media outlets have had on these issues. YouTube videos featuring Adenauer’s statement on Jewish power have accumulated over 200,000 views. Such an “anti-Semitic” statement, pronounced by anyone else, would no doubt be grounds for imprisonment under Germany’s draconian censorship legislation (recall that in “democratic Germany” the 87-year-old grandmother Ursula Haverbeck was recently sentenced to 10 months in prison for thought crimes). But, presumably, it is not yet illegal to quote the founder of the Federal Republic.

The truth therefore has a way of trickling out, bit by bit. Even in Germany — with the incredibly rapid rise of the anti-immigration and anti-Islamization party Alternative for Germany, which may well overtake the Social Democrats to be the country’s second-largest party — at least a first breakthrough is occurring.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

36 Comments to "Chancellor Adenauer on Jewish Power"

  1. June 7, 2016 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Jewish Control of the British Media
    (May 2002 Update)

    by Thomas Sparks


    The Jews have an almost total grip on the media in Britain, systematically, constantly and intensely feeding their propaganda and example to almost everyone in Britain, which is nothing new. With this media, they are uniformly, deliberately, systematically, constantly and intensely promoting both the transformation and permanent destruction of Britain into a multiracial, “multicultural” state, and also the interests of the so-called “state of Israel”, against the wishes and interests of the native British people. The television medias that they control broadcast into almost every home in Britain, all day, every day. BBC television under the Jew Alan Yentob broadcasts into almost every home all day, every day. Likewise ITV, which is controlled by Carlton Communications plc under the Jew Michael Green and by Granada plc under the Jew Steve Morrison, each of which broadcasts to regions of 26 million, half of the population, or more, all day, every day. Daytime television across the ITV network, which broadcasts to the whole of Britain, every day, is mainly provided by Anglia Television under the Jew Graham Creelman, while the rest of the time it is controlled by the regions controlled by Carlton Communications plc and Granada plc. Likewise ITN, which provides the news for the ITV network every day, is controlled by the Jew Michael Green and its programmes are broadcast to the whole of Britain, while Carlton and Granada jointly own the London News Network. Further, BSkyB controlled by the Jew Rupert Murdoch broadcasts to over 10 million subscribers and their families every day. Meanwhile, the main two production studios in Britain, and the largest in Europe, are controlled by Pinewood-Shepperton Limited, controlled by the Jew Michael Grade. The situation is similar in radio, with all BBC radio stations controlled by the Jewess Jenny Abramsky, alone accounting for 49% of all radio listening in Britain, every day. Further, in total, over 85 million copies of Jewish controlled newspapers are sold in Britain every week, controlled by the Jew, Richard Desmond, the Jew Rupert Murdoch, the Jew Guy Zitter, the openly Shabbat Goy and rabidly Zionist Conrad Black and Mrs Black, who is the Jewess Barbara Amiel. They deliberately, constantly, systematically and intensely use this media to promote the multiracial and “multicultural” transformation of Britain against the wishes of the British people. That is treachery, treason, of a terrific magnitude. Along with mass, coloured immigration, they are also deliberately encouraging mass inter-racial marriage, race-mixing, which will mean the extinction of our race. It is genocide. We must break the Jewish yoke if our race is to survive.

    We shall first consider their control of television and of radio, and then of the press; finally we shall give a summary of our findings. All data contained in the study are accurate as of May 2002.

    For what it’s worth:
    New Order of the Barbarians

  2. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    May 31, 2016 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

    KA was a devout Catholic and his German clerical peers arrived at Vatican II in 1962 and basically wrecked the joint. They were assisted by sympathetic European and American theologians. In his autobiography, the English Cardinal Heenan admitted to being baffled by the spectacle (he was Irish enough to smell a rat) but the damage had been done.

    To this day, so called Catholic conservatives peddle the “Rhine flows into the Tiber” meme seemingly oblivious to the destruction of Germany as a coherent nation during WWII and the consequences for the Church as a whole in its aftermath.

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      June 1, 2016 - 2:38 pm | Permalink

      Not every traditional Catholic ( the only true Catholic, Catholicism being Tradition) is unaware of the fate of Germany.
      We know, we know…

  3. May 31, 2016 - 9:39 am | Permalink

    Thank you for the article and for the comments on chancellor Adenauer. In Germany we see him similarly. He is called the “Chancellor of the West-Allies”, to a lessser extent the chancellor of the Germans. But he had to fulfill an act of difficult balancing and he did this well. — His straight words abouts the power of the Jews in the USA are remarkable. In many circles this sentence of Adenauer is common and well known. From this starting point many Germans come to starker conclusions. —

    Now I want to show how strongly the new world order is coming. I take the farming sector in Germany as an example. We have had for decades a system, where milk and sugar beets had quotas in order a) that there would not be a surplus production and b) that farmers in hilly regions with only grass but not wheat-farm-land could survive by producing milk and therefore holding the production and also the population in the mountains of Germany.
    Now this systems has come to an end because “it was against free trade”. Of cause it was against “free trade” that was the very aim of that construction.
    The German farmer organisation opposed against the end of the quota-system for years, but in vain.
    The German government opposed at the EU-level, but without result.
    The EU claimed that it had been forced by the higher “World trade organisation” to stop the quota system in order to fulfill the “Rules of the World trade Organisation”.

    Yesterday we had a farmers meeting about this topic and our organisation boss explained these things very carefully and clearly: Not we German farmers, not our German government in Berlin, not our Eu-government in Brussels decides over the way we German farmers work and live, but an organisation “WTO”. I think that speech of our farmer-organisation-boss was clear enough to make some of the 200 listening farmers start or go on thinking. — That is the official part. And in private discussions that go on the people speak about more details. Also the connection to jewish influence. That way of thinking is more or less common among German farmers: We are confronted every day with the results of the “WTO-regulations”.

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      June 1, 2016 - 3:05 pm | Permalink

      Are you aware of the TTIP and the CATE ?

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      June 3, 2016 - 12:29 pm | Permalink

      In Canada, we have Marketing Boards for a number of agricultural products, dairy being the oldest. For some products, the daily or weekly price for farmers are determined through analysis of many factors. The political “conservatives” have always been opposed to these structures, because it interferes with “the market”.
      As you have pointed out, these systems keep populations and production in place, but as a “bonus” are much more environmentally friendly. If the quantity of milk is known to you, you don’t have to have the maximum number of cows you can jam into pastures. If the price of hogs is relatively constant throughout the year, there is no cycle of glut and not enough.
      In the WTO scheme of things, the farmer may feed us, but the middlemen take the profits. The concentration of food processing has squeezed out family farms and brought us corporate farming and Monsanto seeds. You don’t have to dig very deep to discover who is or controls the middlemen.
      Starvation is something these people keep practicing.

      • June 4, 2016 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

        To Rosa and Curmudgeon
        Thank you for adding things and thoughts into this topic. First of all I want to mention that there is nothing new and little unknown about the New World Order or about the influence of rich men or members of the the Jewish religion/tribe/race or about the said entity as working as an organismen.
        Among those authors are Douglas Read, Henry Ford, Alexander Solshinytzin, William Luther Pierce, Henrich von Treitschke and many more. Please see the clickable world map where you can find many authors.

        To Rosa: I know not much about this. I know something about “Cross-Border-Leasing”.
        To Curmudgeon: It is interesting, that the situation in Canada is somehow similar to the situation in Germany.

  4. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    May 31, 2016 - 6:34 am | Permalink

    De Gaulle himself did little or nothing to liberate France from Jewish dominantion that exists to this day.

    De Gaulle and Adenauer plus the so-called Franco-Germany reconciliation was more to do with realisation of a Europe sandwiched between the American Empire and Soviet Union.

    As for Adenauer he is the architect of the Stockholm syndrome in Germany post WWII. His efforts to appease Jews and Israel were not tempered when Menachem Begin later Israeli Prime Minister schooled in killing British soldiers with piano wire graduated and sent five ex-Irgun members to kill Adenauer with a letter bomb. Despite catching the five and one death, the reaponse was to send them back to Israel with no charge and keeping the matter from the German public for fear of “anti-Semitism.”

    Begin was even given the Nobel “Peace” Prize and later went on to say in rebuke of Helmut Schmidt in 1981, “The German debt to the Jewish people can never end…”

    Schmidt another puppet was a close “friend” was Henry Kissinger who is Jewish. You see where Merkel is coming from. History shows America with or without Jews will never consider Europeans equal. In 1902/03 Even before WWI Theodore Roosevelt (a relative if the other one) threatened Germany with war over Venezuela. Germany was trying to collect debts owed.

    As for Alternative for Germany, I am sceptical. It will just end up serving Zionist and anti-Muslim interests like the Freedom Party in Austria or UKIP in Britain. The only issue of note is opposition to one Jewish/Muslim custom. Don’t forget the US military in Germany. At least France pulled out of NATO for a time.

    • Armoric's Gravatar Armoric
      May 31, 2016 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

      “De Gaulle himself … “

      Guillaume Durocher wrote a good article about that in two parts (1 & 2).

      “Schmidt” / “Kissinger”

      Schmidt had a Jewish father. So, he was unlikely to confront the Jews.

  5. May 31, 2016 - 12:56 am | Permalink

    Jews go for DIVIDE & RULE. By creating 50 or 70 ‘gender’ identities, Jews can divide & rule over the next generation among so many identities.

  6. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    May 30, 2016 - 6:38 pm | Permalink

    Adenauer was a puppet of the Judeo-Anglo occupying powers, and obviously knew who he was serving and genuflecting to. A little off topic, but genetically, he looked like a descendant of a member of Attila’s central Asian invasion horde.

    • pandahugger's Gravatar pandahugger
      May 31, 2016 - 9:25 am | Permalink

      Adenauer was rightly called “chancellor of the Allies” by
      Kurt Schuhmacher, the head of the German Socialist Party (SPD). He did immeasurable harm to Germany which he tied
      without quid pro quo on to the US -Israeli political train. He initiated the policy of flooding Germany with cultural aliens. He was responsible for the persecution of the remnants of patriotic groups. When he died Germany had been spiri-
      tually transformed into a society of consumers. During his
      last years in office he lamented the fact, that the German
      youth did not show any more patriotism, meaning there
      were too few volunteers for the armed force. Adenauer himself had never been a volunteer for anything. German
      schoolboys were taught his proud words: “I am very proud
      of never having touched a rifle”.

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        June 1, 2016 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

        Strange, he was imprisoned twice or thrice by the III Reich for short periods and went out safe and sound. When the White Rose conspiracy was built, no one contacted him, it seems, and, it seems, he was a prominent figure in the Catholic movement against Adolf.
        An agent, perhaps ? An informer ?

  7. Mari's Gravatar Mari
    May 30, 2016 - 11:26 am | Permalink

    It was the Kurdish Calvary that genocided the Armenians more than 100 years ago. And who was in charge in Istanbul at the time? Jews who had recently overthrown the Sultan’s government


    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      May 30, 2016 - 2:41 pm | Permalink

      And now Erdogan wants a EU visa-waiver for all Turks, including his ca. 16 million Kurds, pursuant to Merkel’s deal for babysitting several million Syrians. Let’s remember, that it is common knowledge, that scores of Mossad agents were active in Iraqi Kurdistan.

    • Awakened's Gravatar Awakened
      May 30, 2016 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

      The Kurds not only genocided Armenians but also Assyrian Christians, the constant pro-Kurdish propaganda in the media is because of Zionist Jewish interests in reshaping the Middle-East at their image.

  8. Mari's Gravatar Mari
    May 30, 2016 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    Netanyahu just announced that the Israeli army will open a liaison office in NATO headquarters in Brussels.

    He bragged that NATO needs the Israeli army’s superior technology expertise etc
    Israeli army officers already have the entree to most offices in the pentagon and free access to American military information So now Israel will control NATO as well as as well as the American military

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      May 30, 2016 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

      Mari, the actual truth about the cross-border attack by Polish irregulars on the German radio station in Gleiwitz is still unclear. What about yet another [USS Liberty] Israeli false flag operation, as a NATO member, swept by the MSM before Tehran’s door ? WW III, and then some !

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      May 30, 2016 - 4:20 pm | Permalink

      Mari, apologies for being back again, but this entire topic is badly in need of some comic relief. ” He bragged that NATO needs the Israeli army’s superior technology, expertise etc.”
      But not of the fearsome, infallible Mossad.
      As reported by the German media: Last autumn, two armed, more or less clandestine Mossad agents broke a lock to a restricted area adjacent to a canal, to observe the transfer of Germany’s fifth gifted or at least heavily subsidized Dolphin Class U-Boot to Israel; designed to carry nuclear cruise missiles. Their non-off-road, rented Ford Focus got stuck in the anti-Semitic mud. They walked back to the main road. Not John Wayne, but an alert, seaside-wise female pensioner challenged them, but failed to buy their story, that they were surveying [the exceptionally narrow] canal for an upcoming regatta. She notified the police. In turn, they called their mayor, who dispatched his volunteer fire department response team to pull their car and the somewhat clandestine, infallible agents out of their respective mud holes. No success, until a local farmer, with an oversized tractor got them out. The undaunted mayor sent a ca. 3,000 Euros bill to the Israeli Embassy in Berlin for his town’s services. The envelope of the Embassy’s letter assuring the mayor to pay said bill was scanned into the media coverage.
      Whether the farmer himself was reimbursed, remained the only state secret. Yes, without their expertise, we are nothing.

    • Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
      June 1, 2016 - 1:53 am | Permalink

      Haven’t you heard rumors (just rumors) that Israel is slated to become a member of NATO? And of EU?

      • wiggins's Gravatar wiggins
        June 1, 2016 - 10:09 am | Permalink

        Well….why not. They have been entrants to the European Song Contest for years, actually won it one year with some dirge. ;-)

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        June 1, 2016 - 2:46 pm | Permalink

        The State of Israel has opened its Offices in the NATO Headquarters several days ago.

  9. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    May 29, 2016 - 3:47 pm | Permalink

    “getting on good terms with Jews and in particular with the American Jewish community, was a sine qua non”

    The Franco-German reconciliation also depended on Jews allowing it to happen. The idea of reconciliation makes it sound as if the French had a grudge against the Germans because of the war. But it is France that declared war to Germany in 1939. And it is only the Jews who forbid French people to say that the German occupation wasn’t that harsh. After the war, I guess most French people had a preference for the USA over Germany, but it’s unlikely they saw the Germans as criminals. The moral condemnation of Germany and Nazism came from the official veterans of the “resistance” movement. And those people were managed and manipulated by the government, the Jews, and the communists, with help from the media. From listening to them, you would think that the French “resistance”, during the war, had been fighting against Nazi gas chambers, which is absurd. Reconciliation is great, but I don’t think most people had a grudge in the first place.

    About the Jewish interference between White nations: Today, I caught a glimpse of a short program on Arte, which is supposed to be a Franco-German TV station, but is just another anti-White TV station run by the Jews. This time, they were making fun of the Völkerschlachtdenkmal, a German monument. They showed a cartoon of the monument with a Hitler moustache: they cannot help themselves. I don’t watch much TV but I’m sure it’s like that everyday. Mitterrand named Bernard-Henri Lévy chairman of the “Conseil de Surveillance” of Arte France in 1993, and he’s been there ever since.

    “one is expected not only to tolerate and even cater to it, but also to never even mention it!”

    Jews like things to remain implicit. About WW2, for example, we know we are not allowed to stray from the “official narrative”, but there is no official “official narrative”. They won’t say what we are supposed to believe exactly: how many casualties, and so on.

    “labels such as “anti-Semite,” “neo-Nazi,” “conspiracy-theorist,”

    I wish someone would translate into English this webpage from the French government:

    (On te manipule = They are manipulating you.)

    That webpage was created last year, obviously at the request of the Jews to make fun of people who think we are ruled by the Jews. But they won’t even admit what their goal is. In England too, last year, in his speech against extremism, Cameron criticized ideas based on conspiracy: “Ideas – like those of the despicable far right – which privilege one identity to the detriment of the rights and freedoms of others. / And ideas also based on conspiracy: that Jews exercise malevolent power”.

    The Jewish theory is that there are no conspiracies, except the worldwide anti-Jewish conspiracy. Everything that happens happens in a void. Nothing has an explanation. They want us to believe in fortuity. When half the government and media positions are occupied by Jews, it’s just random chance.

    • May 29, 2016 - 9:47 pm | Permalink

      “Put all my strength, as best I could, to bring about a reconciliation between the Jewish people and the German people.”

      “The Franco-German reconciliation also depended on Jews allowing it to happen.”

      Why does it ALWAYS depend on the Jew’s goodwill, when the fact is, the race of NFNF are total psychopaths and psychopaths not only do not have any goodwill, the concept is totally alien and unimaginable to them.

      The first question of the psychopath is, will this be to my advantage and if so, how? If there is no perceived advantage, then the psychopath is oblivious to any other consideration. So any seeming goodwill the part of the Jew is nothing more than a manipulation to gain something for themselves. Jews are truly a parasitical race that intentionally impoverishes others merely to enrich themselves.

      Apparently the psychopath never moves beyond the infant worldview that there is nothing here but me, me, me! I am everything, therefore everything must serve me. Jews are truly a sick race shot though with mental illness. Their TV shows and movies provide overwhelming evidence of this fact.

      *NFNF Never forgive never forget. Nifnif, perhaps this would be a good identifier code for Jews.

      • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
        June 2, 2016 - 9:54 pm | Permalink

        I absolutely agree with you they are psychopaths and I don’t mean in a calling them names way. I mean clinical. Not all certainly but a very high percentage compared to most human populations. This is why they are so successful. Psychopaths have great courage, little fear and a uncanny ability to read and manipulate the emotions of those with empathy. They don’t have typical tells that humans use to tell if someone is lying so they confuse us.

        Having no loyalty they can immediately switch to whoever or whatever has the most power at the moment. Their contempt for the norms always runs them into trouble though. 9-11 they really screwed up.

        We need a strategy to get them in the open. One way is telling every one you know about building #7, not hit by a plane, on 9-11 falling the same speed as a rock for roughly 108 feet from a few fires on 3 or 4 floors. It’s just impossible.

        Another is take away their protectors. Without the sabbos goy they would be doomed. It’s very likely that their biggest promoters are being blackmailed. By watching those who watch us we can move these people out of office. The Jews got them in office over decades. We can get them out the same way. This is already happening in England with all the abuse of little boys and girls being publicized. In the USA it’s also becoming known about Jews similar behavior in Hollywood.

        Don’t lose heart. They’ve been thrown out of every single country they’ve ever been to in any numbers.

    • Awakened's Gravatar Awakened
      May 30, 2016 - 9:58 am | Permalink

      You mentioned the pseudo-intellectual Bernard Hanri Levy, he was never elected to anything in France but has a great influence in the French political class, he just did a movie about the Kurds:

      Make no mistake, Kurdistan is a Zionist project to create a “second israel” in the Middle-East, the Kurdish lobbies in Washington and Europe are handled by Zionist Jews, this is why there só much pro-Kurdish propaganda in the MSM.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      May 30, 2016 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

      Many years ago I saw a documentary interviewing high profile persons in former German occupied western countries. The female owner of Paris’ famed Maximes nightclub, was asked, ” which of the successive occupying powers’ clientele behaved best in her establishment ?. Her unqualified answer: ” The Germans “. The same was true for King Leopold of Belgium; except for some additional remarks regarding the hooligan behavior of too many of the allied soldiers. Of course we all remember more recent disclosures on rape in France, and the US Army leadership’s reluctance to curb or prosecute it. I still suspect, that France as a whole, with its then government, was not altogether unhappy with the Germans cleaning up their politics. Bikes against Panzers was only one reason for their easy defeat.

  10. May 29, 2016 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

    ‘YouTube videos featuring Adenauer’s statement on Jewish power have accumulated over 200,000 views.’ — It’s attractive to believe that Internet is reaching large numbers of new people. I have sites myself. But checking on the ground (asking people, chatting in chatrooms etc) shows most ordinary people still have no clue. Fewer than 1% of Germans have clicked on that video; a large proportion will not have watched till the end. I fear Jewish media owners still have huge advantages.

    • PB's Gravatar PB
      May 30, 2016 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

      People all over the West still seem to believe that Mainstream media is the source of all truth, and somehow regulated to protect their gentle little minds from contamination.

  11. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    May 29, 2016 - 1:46 pm | Permalink

    The great Conrad Adenauer. He had to create a delicate balancing act between those who would still have wanted Germany totally destroyed and those who had always been supportive. This kind of role is not easy. One must sometimes work beneath their capacity to satisfy the new masters ego, yet keep enough self-respect and dignity in keeping with one of the great nations on earth. He did his best.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      May 30, 2016 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

      Perhaps Mr. Durocher could help out here, because, as a historian, I am not in favor of spreading falsehoods. Too many years ago, I read, that Adenauer, during the run up to the Federal Republic, was drafting the Grundgesetz. A German-Jewish member of the Social Democrats took the draft to a group in Paris, whence it was redirected to Israel: only to be returned to Adenauer, all marked up with red pencil marginalia and changes.

      • pandahugger's Gravatar pandahugger
        May 31, 2016 - 12:12 pm | Permalink

        The essential principles of the Grundgesetz were drafted by the western Allies in 1947 and handed over for filling in the
        legalese to the German socalled Parliamentary Council whose
        president was Konrad Adenauer. This body worked under close surveillance of the Allied military commissioners whose
        approval was necessary for the final text and who had set a
        military-style target date for its finalization. The purpose of the Allies was to set up sort of an administrative body with
        specific autonomous rights enabling it to perform certain
        tasks in the US-program for the recovery of Europe. German
        constitutionalists called this “constitution” a “local statute
        of a higher order” and denied it the term of constitution. The
        real political constitution was laid down in the socalled
        “Occupying Statute” decreed by the Allies at the same time.

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          June 3, 2016 - 7:35 pm | Permalink

          pandahugger, you second sentence makes my remarks more, rather than less likely: given all those post-war positions filled by “German-speakers”.

  12. May 29, 2016 - 1:37 pm | Permalink

    “…the enforcement of anti-nationalist and anti-revisionist censorship, the marginalization and criminalization of nationalist parties, and ultimately the promotion of displacement-level immigration and multiculturalism…”

    Without the slightest criticism of that listing of their crimes, may I suggest that future lists include “pluralism.” Those of us with long memories (at least to the late Forties and early Fifties) can easily recall the hailstorm of media hate that would fall on pastors, politicians, and pundits who resisted the demand for “pluralism” and sought to support generally demands by presidents like the first Roosevelt that this be a unified nation by ideology as well as in fact.

    It was one of those epic campaigns of defamation against the diverse white Americans who chose to support unification as a reigning ideology, and it was one of the first successful carvings-out ideological assaults on the public. It has since been copied in similar fashion by other demographic groups, all to the detriment of the nation.

    Multiculturalism grew directly out of wicked “pluralism” without which it could not have grown into a dominant ideology. Ironically, “pluralism” as the name of an ideology was first applied by Southern statesmen pre-Civil War days in arguments for having a kind of “pluralism” in recognizing slave states and free states. That brand of “pluralism” was defeated in the Civil War, of course.

  13. FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
    May 29, 2016 - 12:30 pm | Permalink

    An interesting thing about Adenauer I was wondering about, got, I think, confirmed through your blog post, Mr. Durocher.

    I was researching Bonn recently and how Adenauer insisted, that it should be the ”provisional” capital of Germany instead of Frankfurt in the allied-occupied territories:

    Following World War II, Bonn was in the British zone of occupation, and in 1949 became the de facto capital of the newly formed Federal Republic of Germany (the de jure capital of the Federal Republic throughout the years of the Cold War division of Germany was always Berlin). Such “provisional” capital cities have been common in history; for example, the “official” capital of the Republic of China is still Nanjing on mainland China, with Taipei considered the provisional capital.[3] The choice of Bonn was made mainly due to the advocacy of West Germany’s first chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, a former Cologne Mayor and a native of that area. This was despite the fact that Frankfurt already had most of the required facilities and using Bonn was estimated to be 95 million DM more expensive than using Frankfurt. However, Adenauer and other prominent politicians intended to make Berlin the capital of the reunified Germany, and felt that locating the capital in a major city like Frankfurt or Hamburg would imply a permanent capital and weaken support in West Germany for reunification.

    I first thought, that he just wanted Bonn to be the capital for personal and sentimental reasons, which also played a major role I think, but had the temporary capital been established in American-occupied/controlled Frankfurt, Jews would have had even more influence on German affairs than already.
    I think by insisting on Bonn Adenauer tried to curtail/mitigate Jewish influence in West Germany.

    Also, Adenauer was devoutly Catholic, and Bonn is part of the Archdiocese of Cologne, which is considered to be the most powerful diocese in Europe

    Cologne, the largest (in terms of inhabitants non-Catholics included) and reportedly richest diocese in Europe, announced in October 2013 that “in connection with the current discussion about Church finances” that its archbishop had reserves amounting to 166.2 million Euro in 2012.

    By locating the capital in Bonn ( which is right next to Cologne), it even further increased the powerful influence of the Vatican in Europe and in the ”new” Germany, i.e. article 140 of the German Basic Law of 1949 :

    About 70% of church revenues come from church tax. This is about €9.2 billion (in 2010).

    Article 137 of the Weimar Constitution of 1919 and article 140 of the German Basic Law of 1949 are the legal basis for this practice.

    Article 140 [Law of Religious Bodies]
    The provisions of Articles 136,
    137, 138, 139 and 141 of the German
    Constitution of 11 August 1919 are
    integral parts of this Constitu-
    tion. p. 103

    • Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
      May 31, 2016 - 10:09 pm | Permalink

      FKA MAX, very interesting post.

Comments are closed.