Er Ist Wieder Da: The Joke is on You

M. Jaggers

Look Who's BackIn this humorous film about Hitler’s return to modern-day Berlin, Er ist Wieder Da (English title: Look Who’s Back), Germans are caught on camera saying true things about Germany that are not what our elites want to hear.  And it happens in the current year.   They are so desperate to speak the truth that they are even willing to do so to an actor playing Hitler, Oliver Masucci (Italian and German heritage).  This is remarkable, and it speaks to the desperation of German society.  There must be such an infinite longing when one cannot dare utter the most commonsensical social observation, without reasonable fear of prosecution or at least censorship; and then to proclaim it for a film crew!  It is ironic, and yet also somehow poetic.  One cannot whisper the truth, yet one may broadcast it for millions, so long as they are willing to be cast as the fool in a masque of Cultural Marxism; a fool in the Shakespearean sense, which is to say, one who utters unspeakable truisms to an otherwise intolerant authority.

At times the viewer may cringe, insofar as these civilians are being made fun of, but also the viewer may exalt, in that there is man and frau in Deutschland still capable of rational thought.  Likewise, the character Hitler is capable of speaking to taboo themes in film that would not otherwise be permitted in that diversity-whipped country.   As Gavriel Rosenfield notes in his review of the 2011 bestselling novel on which the film is based, it risks “glamorizing what it means to condemn”: readers can “laugh not merely at Hitler, but also with him.” One may call it artistic license, but in any case, it does make for interesting art.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

One of the best examples of this truth-in-satire is a woman who works in a small restaurant. She responds to Hitler’s prompt as to whether she has “a say in democracy”:

No. And honestly, I don’t vote.  Out of principle.  I still think the elections are manipulated.  Nothing changes.  I come from the former east.  And we had to put our X where it belonged.  I think somebody puts the X somewhere else afterwards. Really…You can’t say anything either.  If you do, they’ll call you xenophobic.  The immigrant kids around here are just awful.  They throw things at the window.  If I say anything, the parents might stab me.

Hitler concludes, “During my absence, democracy had only left a minimal impact on people.”  Keep in mind that these are real interactions with the German public.  Now honestly, are we to think the woman is making this up in some diabolical attempt to slander immigrants?  What exactly are we to glean from this anecdote other than to take it at face value?  In this sense, the film backfires in its transparent quest to further the leftist narrative.

The plot is that Hitler has been inexplicably transported straight from the Führerbunker circa 1945 to modern Berlin.  The returning Hitler is offered a TV show after having gone viral on Youtube.  He gives an amusing and impassioned performance to the television executives.  The director admonishes Hitler, “We do agree, the topic of Jews is not funny.”  “You are completely right,” Hitler responds.  Hitler later meets an elderly Jewess with dementia whom he mistakes for a gentile, and therefore affords her misplaced cordiality: “I wasn’t harsh enough with that old Jewish hag.”  Also, contemplating the prospect of Hitler being on primetime, another executive speculates, “The Jewish Council will be all over us.”  Yet the JQ is hardly considered in all its implications.  As is the standard practice, Hitler is portrayed as having an animus against Jews as an effect without a cause.

The movie begins with withering mockery and disdain. This means slapstick humor at the level of slipping on banana peels.  We see Hitler bring in his stinky uniform to the dry cleaners.  We see Hitler being called a retard by some kids whom he mistakes for Hitler-Jungen, being zapped by an electric fence, stung by bees, und so weiter.

Because a bit of time has elapsed since its release—the film recently became available with English subtitles on Netflix, we’re able to gauge the reaction from the Lügenpresse (lying press).  The Hollywood Reporter quips that Hitler is back to “make Germany great again” (written by Euro-cuck  Boyd van Hoeij).  Yes, the timing could not be more perfect for those hoping to make fresh Trump-Hitler comparisons.

Hitler Engages the Modern World

If you can sit through that, you reach the more interesting aspects of what a Hitlerean perspective of modern day Germany would be; and that is an interesting gedankenexperiment, similar to ruminating on how the Founding Fathers would look on with contempt at America in 2016.  What would George Washington’s reaction be if he woke up in 2016 America and was brought up to speed on transgender bathrooms?  I would contend that he would not be indignant and give a well-reasoned argument against transgenderism; rather, he would be completely bemused and at a loss for words, which is how the transported Hitler reacts here.

“Turks in Berlin?” he exclaims, exasperated to find so many Arabic newspapers.  The tone is not anger; it is disbelief at a stark reality with which we are all too familiar.  In fact, Hitler interprets the presence of Turks as evidence of a resurgence of the Ottoman Empire; but still, his tone is one of befuddlement rather than rage.  So both Hitler or the Founders encountering their respective modern day countries is not a pretty thought.  When we consider the revulsion these historical figures would have towards our current societies (however hypothetical), we must take this as a repudiation of the direction we have taken.  For in divining the intent of the founders, or divining the sensibilities of other historical figures, we need only to imagine their reaction to where their countries have gone, were they placed in a comedic situation as premised in Er ist Weider Da.

Hitler’s amazement at the technology of a modern television is quickly followed by his disgust at what is actually on television.  This leads him to a profound insight into what is ailing us as a society: we are being distracted by bread and circuses while we are engulfed in utter depravity and spiritual (and ethnic) ruination. Hitler expands upon these thoughts for a studio audience during his stint as a reality TV star.  The audience is enraptured (just as they were back in the 1930s; he has not lost it).  He comes to the stage to the tune of Wagner, and gives one of his signature pauses, the anticipation growing, and after a “breathless silence”:

The television in my hotel is … a marvel of human ingenuity.  But what is shown on that television?  Just trash.  When times are bad people need light entertainment.  That’s why, in 1944, we broadcast light comedies.  But how bad can times get for the people to be bombarded with such idiotic nonsense! What kind of country is this?  Child poverty, old-age poverty, unemployment, birthrate lower than ever.  No wonder!  Who wants to have a child in this country? We are racing towards the abyss.  But we don’t see it.  Because on TV you cannot see the abyss.  You see … a cooking show.  I will keep fighting against TV until we only see the abyss, but until we overcome it!  (rapturous applause, Die Valkyrie music).

The Public Reaction

We don’t know whether the Germans who posed for selfies with pseudo Hitler giving the Roman salute were being ironic or earnest, or perhaps some combination of both.  But it is inevitable that we seek some meaning in the public reaction to Masucci as Hitler, which was much more positive than negative.  According to actor Masucci, “I didn’t really have to perform—people felt a need to talk, they wanted to pour their hearts out to a fatherly Hitler figure who was listening to them.”  He claims to have been horrified by the reaction.  Hitler also met with Alternative für Deutschland and NPD members, though it’s hard to imagine why they would agree to such a bad photo-op, given the MO of these right-wing German parties is to disassociate themselves from Nazism.  To all appearances, the NPD members gave Hitler a respectful hearing in a spirit of irony.

There are also, however, some Euro-cucks who are simply too triggered to countenance a Hitler impersonator on the loose. (Keep in mind these are real-life public interactions with the actor playing Hitler.)  Says one such gutmensch while Hitler has, in a nod to his early career aspirations, set up a business drawing portraits on the street:

And today, in the year 2014, if someone comes to the central square in Bayreuth, impersonating Hitler, and if that is tolerated by the general public, then I have to say: That is bad for Germany.  And if it were up to me, I would have chased you off.

Yes, he actually said, “in the current year.”  The gutmensch  gets himself so worked up that all he can manage to utter is this is bad for Germany” (Das ist Schlecht fur Deutschland).  Even his condemnation is weak and flabby.  He puts himself forward as a potential vigilante hero, implying that if he were around in the 1930s, things would have gone quite differently.  And we all know how much moral courage is required to oppose Hitler these days.  But if one is so eager to follow the current zeitgeist unquestioningly, does that not prove in fact that he would not have opposed National Socialism in its zenith?  We all would love to ascribe to ourselves such moral heroism, but somehow I really doubt very many have it.

On the other hand, most of the public seems either amused or openly grateful for encountering pseudo Hitler.  One soccer enthusiast youth yells, “Deutschland ich liebe dich” (“Germany, I love you”), before hugging Hitler affectionately, whereas another youth says, “Fuck Germany, you’re all Nazis.”  Hitler asks the patriotic soccer fans, “Are you going to take that?”  They quickly accost and assault the anarchist.  “That’s what happens to parasites,” comments Hitler.  An Aryan-looking blonde in a camouflage jacket with a German flag patch looks on with a look of near ecstasy at the escalating fracas.  Reportedly this is all real and spontaneous, even the violence.

If so, the filmmakers were willing to go far in order to make a point — their point being, apparently, that German patriotism equals Nazism and vice versa.  I’m not sure what else one is supposed to get out of the movie thematically.  As the Daily Mail put it, the film “cast uncomfortable light on tensions and growing support for far right-wing extremism in Germany.”  While ‘extremism’ is obviously a weasel word, the film does in fact show that on the street, your average German is much more amenable to right-wing policies than you would otherwise be inclined to believe by the manufactured consensus of the media.  And though the intent is to raise alarms among more “moderate” and “sensible” citizens, in fact, one may draw the opposite conclusion, which is that the same elements which made Germany fertile for Nazism are once again manifest.  In other words, it’s not the “right wing extremists” that should raise alarms in and of themselves; but rather the conditions to which those individuals are reacting, i.e., a media and political class hostile to the interests of the German people.


From the filmmaker’s perspective, the joke is on the average Germans who articulate right wing views. Caught on film, they prove that the Nazi bogeyman is real.  It’s the old Jon Stewart routine of heaping scorn and derision on those with non-liberal opinions in order to “make the white gentry feel morally superior,” to quote John Derbyshire.  In this metaphor, the actor playing Hitler can be seen as a Jon Stewart correspondent who entraps his interviewees into saying something shockingly unacceptable in the current year.

Yet the situation on the ground is such that mockery cannot contain it; the horrible truth bubbles up to the surface and blows up in the face of the conniving filmmakers and audience alike.  The resentment of immigrants expressed by these average Germans is so visceral, and so self-evidently justified, that they defy this snarky satire altogether.  The closing credits feature footage of various PEGIDA demonstrations and other skeptics of mass Islamic immigration such as Marine Le Pen and Geert Wilders, with a kind of Clockwork Orange symphony happening in the background, as if to say, “Behold: fascism is happening once again.”

One clip shows the PEGIDA protestors chanting, “Wir Sind Das Volk.”  We’re taken back to Hitler, and he comments, “I can work with this.”  Couldn’t they just as easily put together a montage of the dastardly acts of immigrant crime and made the opposite appeal?  If the point of the film is that that the public is infinitely malleable to propaganda, they were correct, but in the opposite direction.  To ferret out that truth requires more than the Daily Show style of spurious analysis to which this film aspires.

So the joke is on the filmmakers themselves because they fail to realize that the common sense views expressed by these people, and the scathing analysis provided by the farcical Hitler, hit much closer to home than they might have suspected.  They did not smear PEGIDA by associating them with National Socialism; they merely associated Hitler with a righteous backlash currently percolating in Germany.  This could be a classic case of unintentionally creating a hero out of a character meant to be the villain.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

41 Comments to "Er Ist Wieder Da: The Joke is on You"

  1. June 14, 2016 - 4:32 pm | Permalink

    Turks in Berlin? Reading ARABIC newspapers? Newspapers for Turks are printed in Latin letters (same as German, and this comment), and have been since well before Hitler’s time.

  2. T.A.'s Gravatar T.A.
    June 14, 2016 - 12:15 am | Permalink

    As a native speaker, I feel the reviewer missed the most important point of the movie… the fact that it is anti-German hate propaganda.

    Towards the end of the movie, Hitler meets an old Jewish woman who still remembers the holocaust and flips out (because he “exterminated millions of innocent Jews”)

    A few minutes after this, Hitler says the following to the other protagonist of the movie (the journalist):

    “You don’t get it. In 1933, the German people was not tricked by some propaganda. The people voted for a Führer who revealed his plans in all clarity. The Germans voted for me.
    Am I a monster? But then you also have to condem the people who voted for this monster. Were they all monsters? Those were ordinary people who decided to vote for an extraordinary person and to entrust him the fate of their nation.
    Have you never wondered why the people follow me? Because deep down, they are exactly like me. They share the same values.”

    So the moral of the story is:

    1. Hitler was in fact evil enough to kill millions of civilians just because of irrational racism and hatred
    2. All Germans are like that at the core

    This is part of the closing scene of the movie, i.e. the movie’s final message to viewers.

    • M. Jaggers's Gravatar M. Jaggers
      June 14, 2016 - 6:30 am | Permalink

      I agree that scene was important in driving home the theme/propaganda of the inherent evil of Germans, which is pretty consistent with my analysis actually. As a native English speaker, I feel it is possible that you may have missed something important in the review. Just kidding of course, thanks for your feedback.

      • T.A.'s Gravatar T.A.
        June 18, 2016 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

        Lol… nice one. And my apologies for the wording, it was not intended at a criticism at all, just as an addition. I really enjoy your work on this site, keep it up!

    • June 14, 2016 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

      The “intended” moral of the film, as you said:
      1) Germans are similar to each other like a big family.
      2) Germans are similar to their Chancellor Hitler.
      3) Hitler was a bad man.
      4) Therefore Germans are bad.
      This simple logic works only in case that you believe in the truth of point three. That point has the character of a dogma or religion among Jewish influenced circles or states. But for independent Germans the logic goes just the other way, the opposite direction. The first two points are the same, than comes the other direction of thinking:
      1) Germans are similar to each other like a big family.
      2) Germans are similar to their Chancellor Hitler.
      3) I myself am German and I know and feel that Germans are a good folk.
      4) Therefore the stories about our Chancellor being a bad man are lies.
      You can see, that the grade of logic in both chaines of thoughts is the very same. It is a question whether you believe in the “Hitler-is-bad-religion” as the ground-pilar of your world view or if you choose your daily observations of many real things in the real world that shape your world view. —

      • M. Jaggers's Gravatar M. Jaggers
        June 14, 2016 - 5:56 pm | Permalink

        Interesting syllogism. The winners write the history, which as you know, is portrayed as the triumph of good versus evil. This film is definitely in that vein, yet it leaves room for a smidgen of ambiguity, which is perhaps why it is interesting almost in spite of itself…

      • T.A.'s Gravatar T.A.
        June 18, 2016 - 3:16 pm | Permalink

        I agree, and that is a good point. Unfortunately, 99.9% of Germans believe the narrative. Even most Pegida and AfD supporters do… they see the problem with Islam, but most don’t see the problem with Jewry.

        Just recently an AfD member of parliament was excluded from the AfD for “antisemitic” remarks. (He merely pointed out a few basic facts that anyone on this site will be very familiar with).

        The narrative about WW2 in particular is practically never questioned in Germany. I grew up there… we got brain washed 3 times with it throughout my school years, for about 3-4 months each.

        It is hammered into German heads to the point where even saying “Hitler wasn’t ALL bad, he built the highway system (Autobahns)” is likely to get you evil looks or even ostracized in most German circles.

        The idea that Hitler didn’t gas the Jews, that he wasn’t both evil and crazy, is still very, very far outside the German overton window. To Germans he’s just another one of the crazy dictators that countries get sometimes, just like Mao, Stalin, etc…

        Of course the fact that questioning the official narrative is highly illegal and can lead to 5 years in prison under holocaust-denial laws isn’t helping… makes it hard to redpill people on a large scale.


  3. Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
    June 13, 2016 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

    A propos Hitler: a centre-right newspaper, Il Giornale, owned by Berlusconi’s family, has decided to print in these days a new and commented edition of Mein Kampf to buy together with the newspaper. Outrage! A couple of days of frenzing MSM, how they dare! the Jews of Italy outraged, the Leftists ready to go on rampage…and then Orlando has happened and above all the European Football Championships has started.
    Mein Kampf in Italian translations have been available in our country since its first appearance, and there is also a ” leftist” publishing house, Feltrinelli, which has it as an ebook. But of course it’s leftist, so it can. Oh, the hypocrisy !

  4. Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
    June 13, 2016 - 12:58 pm | Permalink

    I read the book two years ago, when it was published
    (translated). I found it hilarious, but also insightful. I think the subject, the main character, has escaped his author’s intentions, and in the end one asks himself : – What if he would really, actualy, come back? – and this thought is not frightening, but fascinating. I mean, so we finally would know him live, not in a book or in a movie. Real, living, talking, getting things done…

  5. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    June 13, 2016 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    There is no free speech in America.

    It is just different methods. Here in Europe the methods are direct in the US it is indirect.

    Professor MacDonald and his team have documented Jewish influence in the media.

    The topic of Jewish influence is a taboo in the main media i.e. CNN, BBC etc. Even MacDonald has been attacked many times. They cannot lock him up just make his life difficult i.e. boycotts, sanctions etc.

    The Internet is just a parallel media due to anonmity but there is lot of tracking and monitoring unless you use a proxy server or TOR.

    Apparently the topic of Jewish control is not a taboo in China.

  6. June 13, 2016 - 12:36 am | Permalink

    “This could be a classic case of unintentionally creating a hero out of a character meant to be the villain.”

    I guess that this will be the outcoming of the reception of this film. Because the decades-old Jewish description of world history and the role of Germany within that history is from now on counterbalanced by people who want to know the truth. By people who do not believe in stories that act aginst reality. — In the Germany of today you will go into prison if you put questions about history openly. In one case an old man, Horst Mahler, is sentenced for 12 years. In the USA there is free speech, but not here. But even this backfires to the government: Because this suppression has worked for decades, but now more and more Germans just do not care about it. —

    Germany is not lost. Germany is awakening. Germany is strong and getting stronger by the day. I give some examples. Because it is good to have positive examples.
    We have slow internet-connections, slower than in many modern parts of the world. Half a year ago there was a plan to improve it. Within six month all over the country the pedestrian walking lanes were digged up, the new internet cable put in and the lanes were renewed. Each several hundred meters you see a box for the technical hubs. If you drive through our country, you can see these new boxes as signs of that work at every corner.
    Germany has had an influx of one or two million third-world invaders within the last 12 month.
    Of cause that will be killing our folk in case that there will be not remedy in the future. But at this time my topic is German strength: We took them, gave them beds and eating and medical service. This happened within weeks without former planning or former thinking. We have so much reserves in all kind of things, including manpower and organsation including ad-hoc self-organsation.
    German industry is going to modernize itself. If you drive along the Autobahn you can see a farmer harvesting wheat and half a year later there is an industrial center for hundreds of emploees.
    Seldom it is one large factory, in most cases there are several smaller and medium sized ones, according to the structure of German industry.
    If we older ones look at our German youth, young men and women going hand in hand and being happy to live in peace and do their work and their hobbies (for example car-tuning), you yourself will feel tears of joy about their innocent happieness. And that emotion gives to you incredible strenght to do your duty and to work and fight for the future of these innocent two people, for my own folk and race and for the whole world: We all have the same aim, to preserve our countries for our own folks.

  7. June 12, 2016 - 5:32 pm | Permalink

    We gotta do something about the word Hall of Cost. It must absolutely suffer inflation. Personally I am prepared to continue debate long after I’ve been clubbed with Hall of Cost. The problem is, it still works, old and tired 75 years old as it is.

    How about we ourselves use it so much that it comes to mean nothing?

  8. June 12, 2016 - 4:21 pm | Permalink

    I was thinking. It is high time to mark ((())) everybody who deserves it, including professionals, dentists and the like. Having so much choice, would largely choose my own people. Nothing against ((())), but my people are better. Will make a difference.

  9. KSA's Gravatar KSA
    June 12, 2016 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

    This is just slightly more clever, and slightly more insidious, jew/leftist propaganda. It portrays Germans as just one step away from following another Hitler as opposed to the weak, pathetic cuckolds that they are; a people so weak they aren’t even allowed to mourn their war dead or talk about allied atrocities. And of course there’s no sign of the misery that Muslims have brought to Germany, or that Germans are losing their country to their enemies. Not recommended.

  10. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 12, 2016 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

    Americans who might be gloating about the state of Germany, should not. We are a hairs breath from being in the exact same situation here. Whether one likes, hated, or is indifferent to Trump, no one has done more to bolster this assertion.

    • June 12, 2016 - 9:30 pm | Permalink

      Actually, a cynic would say, and rightly, that it was “the Americans” who put Germany in the state it is in.

      And they have also kept them there ever since Eisenhower attempted to starve a few million more helpless Germans in Rhine Meadows during 1945-46.

      The wrongs you have repeatedly done to others tend to come back to bite you very hard. If you cannot even manage to rid the world of vile scum like Hillary Clinton — the type of inhuman garbage your nation has produced or succored with regularity since the late 19th century — then what use are you?

      I don’t wish to make you feel personally responsible or guilty, Bobby … but it’s surely important to understand the USA has no authentic civic or racial identity. And that presents a very serious problem for all White people, everywhere.

      The buck has to stop somewhere. Right?

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        June 13, 2016 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

        America may not have a specific civic and racial identity but it does have an identity, Judaism. From the time Alexander Hamilton, agent of English Jewish bankers, pushed through the Assumption Act in 1791 creating the first Bank of America and Joseph Seligman financed the Union during the Civil War, to the early 20th century when the Federal Reserve Act was passed and Eastern European Jews stole Thomas Edisons motion picture invention and subsequently the minds of America through movie propaganda to the present where Jews control all American media including the publishing industry, not to mention congress and Washington, is it any wonder that most Americans are addle-brained and clueless? Blame the clueless, the brainwashed, women, dumb negroes, anybody to take the culpability off of the Jews.

        • June 13, 2016 - 10:21 pm | Permalink

          Spot on @ Karen T. As I usually do, I appreciate your above comment. But I was already aware of all of its referenced content except for the Assumption Act of 1791. Not that I am complaining, because I’m not!

          The Jewish project known as the United States of America is already known to many of us. Although quality people like you should definitely continue to “spread the gospel” so that we are either reminded, or others (i.e., new converts to the occluded reality) can finally get to be “Red Pilled”.

          My basic (previous) point to Bobby is that the Brits, Germans, wide-awake Italians, Australians, etc., etc., cannot sort out America for you. To make any meaningful attempt would be interpreted as an invasion, or as subversive activity, or even terrorism … blah-blah-blah.

          Those born in the USA are the ONLY ones with any legitimate ability to turn things around in America. But you never do. Apart from the Trump Phenomenon (and grass roots activities like Prof. Mac’s TOO) there is little sign anyone is trying to organize anything really meaningful; anything that might soon threaten the ugly status quo.

          Too few came to the aid of Robert ‘LaVoy’ Finicum when he tried to make a symbolic stand against tyranny.

          Your State Assemblies are the weak link. Individual States have immense powers, including powers over and above Washington DC, but they have not been enacted … or utilized only as token measures. Not so long ago Texas threatened to seceded. They are the only State that has the legal right (and the independent electrical grid) to do so. But even that soon fizzled out. It is this kind of feebleness that really makes me angry. You Americans are always talking big, but whenever put under pressure, you never do anything significant without someone from the outside holding your hand.

          Meanwhile, those many Federal Institutions + the World Bank Group — many of them illegal, and maintained only by bluff and empty threats — are being left untouched. Using the correct legal procedures, Washington DC could be neutralized inside one month.

          All that criminal scum are left untouched even while they continue to cause havoc, in places like Germany, the Ukraine, Belgium (NATO and the EU), Syria, Iraq, etc … and also in Australia (Pine Gap). This then causes the rest of the world to speak ill of ordinary Americans. We are steadily losing all respect for you.

          When was the last time a manly, determined, unmerciful, and well-funded attack on the very existence and legitimacy of the ADL and the SPLC was mounted?


        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          June 14, 2016 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

          Anglo Saxon, thank you for your reply disheartening though it is. It appears that nothing short of a catastrophe will shake the Americans, not that we Canadians are entitled to throw stones, out of their jew induced trance. The only alternative, barring this catastrophe, is to take Guenons’ and Evolas’ advice and ride the tiger while waiting for this cycle to play itself out. “The Jewish project known as the United States”…so much said in so few words.

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          June 15, 2016 - 10:44 am | Permalink

          Anglo Saxon, yes, occasionally a woman can ride the tiger, only we ride side saddle.

        • DAR woman's Gravatar DAR woman
          June 17, 2016 - 1:29 pm | Permalink

          When my German and Swedish ancestors fought in the Revolution it wasn’t for Jews or their currency. In fact, I was taught that the main reason we were here in the colonies in the early 1600s was to get away from Jews and their control of the European continent and economy/society.

          Maybe your colonial American ancestors had a different experience and passed it down to you? Or are you just inventing things?

          The banking system of which you speak traces back to Mesopotamia, many years before Abraham left Sumeria in a snit. It is a highly effective system for managing credit in a way that allows trade to flourish. It is not a Jewish invention, though Jews developed it and made it their religion.

          Jewish moneylenders didn’t get hold of our sovereign currency till 1913. They kept trying…and this is the main reason that Andy Jackson is being removed from the $20 in favor of an invented melanistic heroine. He successfully kept the nation’s currency sovereign.

  11. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    June 12, 2016 - 1:09 pm | Permalink

    “Yet the situation on the ground is such that mockery cannot contain it.”

    One has to wonder!

    • June 12, 2016 - 4:28 pm | Permalink

      Not much to wonder. What is the education of that minister? At best he has a sound education in economy. Even that, I suspect. These guys are not even chosen to be nice technocrats, they’re chosen to be nice yes-men. He doesn’t know what he is talking about. I know enough biology to know that he’s talking crap. A vast population of 60 million Germans (the rest are invaders) could live forever and ever without inbreeding. They can populate the planets and the stars all alone, without inbreeding. How is it that nobody bothers to bring this issue up for (((the chosen people)))? Ashke-nazis descend from a group of some 300 people in 1200 AD. Basically, anytime that two Ashke-nazis marry, they commit incest.

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        June 13, 2016 - 12:51 pm | Permalink

        And apparently, according to some source, there were only five women at the beginning of all this Ashkenazi crap.
        When a man is reduced to a wheel chair for life, his brain can remain safe and sound for ever. And perhaps he’s fallen in love with some Black or Brown
        “beauty” , who knows ?

        in sfe and aound for ever.

  12. Joxer's Gravatar Joxer
    June 12, 2016 - 11:26 am | Permalink

    In 1994 at the height of the Bosnian war B-92 a pirate radio station dressed an actor up as marshal Tito and followed him around Belgrade the film “Tito for the second time among the Serbs” records the interaction with normal people. As he walked around Belgrade women gave him flowers, old guardsmen spoke to him as an old friend, some accused him of betraying the Soviets for the Americans. All spoke to him as if he was actually Tito.
    Slobodan Stupar the deputy director of B-92 thought the reaction was a terrible reflection of contemporary Serbs, ” It shows that the common people have lost touch with reality. Everything you tell them through the media they absorb like a sponge. So you have a situation where Tito is resurrected and people believe that. It is obvious that today for the majority of people, there is a strong need to compare Tito’s time and today, but people are not looking so much at Tito as a symbol as at their own past”
    Interestingly the people in Germany hold diametrically opposite opinions on the Luegenpresse than the former communist Yugoslavia where the media were some of the main players in whipping up tensions, both methods seem equally destructive.

  13. Goy Wonder's Gravatar Goy Wonder
    June 12, 2016 - 9:37 am | Permalink

    This one is a candidate for further research: how is that great music can be used to promote a rather sick degenerate story line.

    The libretto was written by Henri Meilhac and Ludovic Halévy

    Ludovic Halévy (1 January 1834 – 7 May 1908) was a French author and playwright. His father, Léon Halévy had converted from Judaism to Christianity prior to his marriage Alexandrine Lebas, daughter of a Christian architect.

  14. HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
    June 12, 2016 - 9:07 am | Permalink

    This brings to mind (Jewish) Norman Lear’s Archie Bunker in the TV program “All in the family”. Lear intended Archie to be an object of contempt for the viewers: a tool for instructing the gullible goyim in enlightened attitudes. In the event more viewers than not came to identify with the “bigoted” and old fashioned Archie.

    • wiggins's Gravatar wiggins
      June 14, 2016 - 2:42 pm | Permalink

      Yep ….we all loved Alf Garnett in the UK also..played by a Jewish actor – Warren Mitchell.

  15. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    June 12, 2016 - 7:40 am | Permalink
    • Tom Paine's Gravatar Tom Paine
      June 12, 2016 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

      Churchill and FDR would have found exactly what their Jewish handlers had in mind for their respective countries. Of the three, Hitler was the only true patriot. For further reading, start with “The Bad War” by Mike King.

      • DAR woman's Gravatar DAR woman
        June 17, 2016 - 1:34 pm | Permalink

        Exactly. My own father, grandfather and GGF were very precise about this. They hated Churchill and FDR, though they did not consider Hitler a very nice man. An effective champion of his people, yes. A ruthless politico, yes also.

        My grandfather and GGF were very strongly isolationist for the whole 40-year white-on-white civil war of the 20th century. My father had to serve in the South Pacific (drafted), but he and GF always told me that our nation would live to rue falling prey to the bankers and their industrial handmaidens–many of the latter being men of Anglo-Saxon ancestry. The problem with Jews is that they offer a certain kind of white man something he covets above all things, even his own people. Jews can’t do what they do without help, just as they need blacks to push their “racial victimization” agenda of white genocide.

  16. June 12, 2016 - 7:31 am | Permalink

    This reminds me of what happened in the American created and supported USSR in the 1930’s.
    There was a Tsar in the 1700’s who had the same family structure as Stalin. A poem was wrtten about this Tsar:
    He was a lunatic, his wife was a slut, his son was a stupid coward promoted by Generals scared stiff by his father. The Tsar’s ugly fat little daughter deserved pity. The family were loathed by Russia and cursed by God.
    These poems began to appear more often and poets began to disappear into the Lubyanka more often.
    Salin used to read books of poems, if a poem angered him the author was totured to death. Stalin was annoyed by poets for the rest of his is life.
    Those brave men still alive in the Lubyanka were murdered in 1953 I believe.

  17. peter's Gravatar peter
    June 12, 2016 - 5:20 am | Permalink

    This German AfD state member does the formal Honourable chairman , ladies and gentleman and then greets the rest of the culturally Marxist sexual groups , from non gender binary to women going through to men .

  18. June 12, 2016 - 1:37 am | Permalink

    I saw the opera Carmen last night. Good music but what a strange freak show centered around weak male cuckoldry for a story. I thought- is this some kind of joke the composer Georges Bizet is pulling off? At least the end was happy when the poor cuck Jose finally shanked the evil black magic gypsy witch Carmen.

    Well further research reveals Bizet’s wife was Jewish and his father-in-law a major theater kingpin. Bizet (non-Jew- 25 October 1838 – 3 June 1875) was his main protegee. This shabbos goy Bizet obviously had musical composing talent, but the opera script seems corrupted and Jew written.

    From Wikipedia: The production of Bizet’s final opera, Carmen, was delayed because of fears that its themes of betrayal and murder would offend audiences. After its premiere on 3 March 1875, Bizet was convinced that the work was a failure; he died of a heart attack three months later, unaware that it would prove a spectacular and enduring success.

    So here is the kicker:

    After years of neglect, Bizet’s works began to be performed more frequently in the 20th century. (((Later commentators))) have acclaimed him as a composer of brilliance and originality whose premature death was a significant loss to French musical theatre.

    This one is a candidate for further research: how is that great music can be used to promote a rather sick degenerate story line.

    Carmen with English subtitles;

    • June 12, 2016 - 7:43 am | Permalink

      Opera revisionism? Well, why not. Many of the experts, or alleged experts, on opera were/are Jews.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      June 12, 2016 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

      I had to “go to Singapore” to get access to this video. A message came up saying “this video originates from Columbia and is not available in your country.”

      I switched IP numbers on my Browsec VPN- instantly- and chose Singapore on a lark. Instant change. Video works. The amazing thing is this VPN works on a browser only and does not mess with your network connections at all. I have TWO IP numbers – one for privacy, and the regular number. The first is thru Chrome- the regular IP number can be used with other browsers. This latter is for normal actions such as banking which tend to get fouled up with the privacy IP number. So I use Explorer for these.

      Most VPNs raise havoc with internet connections and can be very tricky. Browsec [highly rated] , by working thru browser only, does not touch basic connectivity. New IP numbers are instantaneous. Speed seems to be unaltered.

      Browsec is free, although they have a paid version. I still use the free.

      • Tom Paine's Gravatar Tom Paine
        June 12, 2016 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

        I’m a big fan of VPN software too but more for privacy considerations than anything else. I’d been using paid versions of VPN for the last 3 years from 2 different companies until I found that the free VPN I had on my cell phone was available for PC too. Using Psiphon, I have the best performance ever using VPN. Downloads and uploads are almost as fast as without and that was unheard of with the other companies.

      • June 16, 2016 - 6:47 am | Permalink

        Gentlemen, please continue to use caution as the topic of VPN is rather more complex than meets the eye.

        Free VPN services — such as Browsec — only make use of the PPTP protocol, which stands for “Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol” — which started out as a “lowest-common-denominator” Microsoft product.

        The disadvantage of PPTP is that it does not provide encryption and it relies on the PPP (Point-to-Point Protocol) to implement security measures. Sure, you can use it to get past firewalls (in order to access Netflicks, and other geographic-region-specific services, etc.) but that’s about it. But your data traffic can still be read, if someone with the knowledge wishes to do that.

        Only when you pay for a real VPN service can you then make full use of what is called the OPEN VPN protocol.

        OpenVPN is the real deal. This protocol encrypts all of your Internet traffic so it cannot even be read by security services, unless they throw lots of money and their best people at you!

        Never trust anything that is offered for free!

        Check out — and purchase an account.

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      June 13, 2016 - 12:42 pm | Permalink

      Well, I knew this Opera from my childhood, but never seen it as such. Carmen is attracted by Escamillo, the toreador, very manly, but also by the Captain Don Jose’. He is not a weak man, but he becomes so because of love. And in the end he’s not a cuckoo, ke kills Carmen in the open and restores his honour. Nothing “Jewish” here. Mediterranean, Latin yes, Semitic not.

  19. Joe Six Pack's Gravatar Joe Six Pack
    June 11, 2016 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

    Its on Netflix, I saw a couple of months ago. Hitler like you have never ever seen him. He’s human, he’s funny and there are flashes of what he must have been like to get the most literate nation on earth(at the time) to like him and follow him to Hell. I am amazed our betters let this movie out of its cage. Where is the hue and cry about evil?

    In our media world Hitler is on TV every night, a caricature, screeching to the heavens, bringing Ragnarok to all. In our world there is absolutely nothing good about the guy(ask Marge Schott). But the guy who plays him(Oliver Masucci) has the right combo of incredulity about the ways of the modern world combined with certainty of what is right for the German Volk to seem to be eerily like what I would imagine Hitler would have been like.

    And its a comedy so you don’t finish watching it with ashes in your mouth.

  20. June 11, 2016 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    I hope a Churchill equivalent may be made in Britain. A fat short boy-buggering cigar smoker, wanting everyone else to get killed, while he’s paid to keep his ridiculous country house solvent.

Comments are closed.