“It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going
into a multicultural mode.”
Barbara Spectre, 2010.
“Migration and radical Islamism are changing Europe now.”
Nick Cohen, 2015.
Tunisian-born Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel was a 31-year-old delivery driver and father, and until a few days ago he was just another tiny cog in the multicultural machine. Other than a minor scuffle with a work colleague, Lahouaiej-Bouhlel’s relatively unblemished record would have been marketed by liberals as an immigration success story. Leaving for work every morning from his modest Nice apartment, paying his taxes, and giving neighboring girls the eye, he was every inch the affable prospective citizen — proof, surely, that nationalities and identities are fluid and interchangeable. In keeping with the principles of modern multicultural France, the former Tunisian was entitled to participate in French society on an equal footing with those who can root their sense of nationhood in their Gaulish and Frankish forefathers. And by act of bureaucratic magic, through the issuance of a new passport, a social security number, and registration on the tax system, our affable Tunisian was transformed into a Frenchman — heir, it was argued, to the same French spirit that animated Voltaire, Rousseau, and Hugo.
On the night of July 14th, this facile understanding of national belonging collapsed when the French spirit departed from Lahouaiej-Bouhlel as rapidly and mysteriously as it had allegedly descended on him. Motivated by the aspirations of his co-ethnics in distant, desert climes and armed with guns and grenades, the adopted ‘Frenchman’ boarded a large truck before making his way to the epicentre of Nice’s Bastille Day celebrations. Gathering speed, he drove with determination and calculation into crowds of men, women and children, swerving in pursuit of his victims, pulling their mangled limbs beneath his vehicle. Before he was shot dead by police, Lahouaiej-Bouhlel left in his wake a macabre trail of broken lives and bodies; little girls lying as lifeless as the fallen dolls beside them.
In a chaotic world in which such violence is numbing in its frequency, I was jarred by this event and left aghast at the world that will be passed on to my children. I was particularly angered and saddened by the above image. Perhaps because of its obvious power, I noticed an immediate social media backlash against the publication of images from Nice. The hypocrisy was stunning. Although the victim of his father’s negligence, images of the drowned ‘refugee’ toddler Aylan Kurdi have served as a rallying cry for multiculturalists and pro-invasion forces within our society for almost a year now. Most recently, a 1,300 square foot mural of the child’s corpse had been painted on a Frankfurt bridge in an attempt to “have people emotionally rethink their selfish fears of refugees coming to Germany.”
While images of dead children are evidently fair game for Marxist propaganda, a different set of rules appears to be in operation if the dead children in question are the undeniable victims of the hybridized interests of foreigners and the Left. Social media was awash almost immediately on the night of the 14th with pleas to delete images from Nice and ‘respect victims’ privacy,’ often from the kind of ‘refugees welcome’ types who wave posters of beached African corpses at candle-lit rallies. Our enemies do not want the kind of social action that might be provoked by the image of our young French child, and we can thus be sure that it will rarely feature in mainstream press coverage, and certainly never ‘go viral’ like that of the young Arab.
Liberal Hypocrisy in Action
Liberal hypocrisy aside, events in Nice revealed more novel aspects about our current situation. Although it would have been no real comfort to hear the French authorities parrot familiar nonsense about ‘doing something’ and ‘tackling radicalism,’ I was left speechless by the immediate official response to the latest catastrophe associated with the invasion of France. Following the crushing of innocent French citizens on their own soil, Prime Minister Manuel Valls’ statement that France is going to have to “learn to live with terrorism” was breath-taking in its coldness and its cynicism. More than that, it marked a break with decades of pretense that the liberal worldview is based on optimism, ‘progress,’ and the achievement of a wonderful and peaceful new society. In a France that has been in a consistent state of emergency for 19 months, the message, in that brief moment, was crystal clear: There is nothing ‘progressive’ about modern liberalism. Your society is regressing into violence and chaos. Your nation is slipping into the abyss. And you will have to learn to live with it.
When I was a little younger I used to daydream about living in an earlier time; one where world-changing events were taking place. It’s a temptation a lot of us can succumb to because we only intimately know our own lives and we have a curious tendency to assume that those in previous eras were somehow more exciting or significant. However, if we focus on what is going on in Europe and White nations globally at this time, it is difficult to deny that we are in fact living in the most rapid global transformation in history, and certainly the most volatile and precarious period in the history of our race. The transition of Europe into what Barbara Spectre described with sinister glee as ‘multicultural mode’ is both momentous and, for us, extremely dangerous. All signs in Europe, and indeed across all White nations, now suggest that even within this multicultural mode we are entering a new, more violent phase. Its ideological foundations laid in previous decades, we are now witnessing a rising tide of unrest and skirmishes that presage more significant future civil conflict. But do we, as Valls’ claims, have to ‘learn to live with it’?
Liberals inform us that we have to ‘learn to live with it’ because they offer us a very limited menu of social and political possibilities. Just as we were never consulted on whether or not we wanted mass immigration in the first place, we are never presented with the option of abandoning multiculturalism, and thus the ideological and demographic cancer that is slowly eating our nations alive. The menu of options is kept limited through strict liberal definitions of the problems we face.
For example, terrorism in France is now very frequently presented mainly as the result of French foreign policy. By locating the heart of the problem outside France, controllers of the narrative convince the public that changing anything in the domestic sphere is pointless. Even when domestic circumstances are taken into account, they are perversely skewed and then used to berate and blame the French for the violence being inflicted on them.
Take, for example, Pierre Haski’s diabolical charge that the French haven’t been generous enough to their newcomers and that France is “paying the price for allowing the development of ghettoes in its suburban areas and disenfranchised youth who do not feel welcome in mainstream French society.” All of these arguments and interpretations push conceivable actions and outcomes into an intellectual bottleneck that preclude more comprehensive solutions.
By way of contrast, ethnically-based nationalism is the only ideology and worldview that insists that we do not have to learn to live with the current fractured and violent nature of our societies. I don’t deny that the intervention of the French in the affairs of foreign nations has been counter-productive and in many cases senseless. The resultant clash between native European ideals (human rights, free speech, democracy) and more primitive societies with radically collectivist, kinship-based histories has not been conducive to international harmony.
However, people are not being killed in the streets of France because of French foreign policy. People are being killed in the streets of France because the perpetrators are Muslim and France has the largest proportion of Muslims relative to its general population in Europe — the result, as Islamic terrorism expert Jason Burke points out, of France importing “large numbers of labourers from former or existing colonies to help with post-war reconstruction.” In an ethnically homogenous France, the French could pursue any range of foreign policy options, with the only repercussions falling on the nation’s adventuring soldiers. Modern terrorism is thriving because multiculturalism obliterates national boundaries and with it the frontline of any conceivable war. The foreign and domestic spheres become one when human geography becomes liquid. Our people comfort themselves too often with the thought that Islam is based in ‘the Middle East,’ without realizing that multiculturalism has brought ‘the Middle East’ to their doorstep. Multiculturalism is the security equivalent of an army inviting its opponent to cross the field of battle and commence hostilities in its own trenches.
Multiculturalism has also fuelled new and evolving micro-cultures built on minority aggressions, and the outright rejection by minorities of the liberal fantasies of assimilation and integration. This is partly connected to the manifest inability of some minorities, predominantly those with a low IQ, to attain social and economic success even when the balance is tipped in their favor by liberal efforts at social engineering. Their resultant frustrations gradually fuel an evolution from the rejection of assimilation and integration to attacks on White society as a whole.
Although the process has been accelerated among Arabs because of religion, the same pattern may also be observed among African populations in White nations. Despite a substantial Black middle class (significantly the result of affirmative action policies), the great majority of the Black population throughout the West is unable to adjust to a contemporary society demanding impulse control and cognitive competence. The cross-over of mutual frustrations has manifested itself in the emergence of what Burke describes as “gangsta jihad” — the cross-pollination of Black subculture with Islam, resulting in “debased, ultra-violent culture” that along with rapidly increasing Black militancy will surely form the spearhead of eventual mass-violence against Whites. This in-built and inevitable failure of multiculturalism has been particularly acute in France, but has been observable in every Western nation.
While the multicultural cancer slowly metastasizes, to date France has been in a state of media-induced sedation. A Pew Research Centre study earlier this year reported that only “24 percent of French people were found to believe that diversity made France a worse place to live. A higher proportion, 26 percent, said it made France better, while 48 percent said that it didn’t make much difference.”
To what extent these results are attributable to cultural fears about appearing ‘racist, or to genuine blindness to the collapse of French society, is difficult to determine, but the muted French reaction to their social collapse is likely to continue. Already the narrative is being disseminated that the Nice attacker “radicalized his views very rapidly,” as if such an occurrence could mitigate the underlying problem of his alien ethnicity and identity. ‘Rapid radicalization’ also appears to have been part of the background to the recent shooting in Dallas of several White police officers by a militant Black possessing his own ethnic grievances and aspirations. While one can interchange religions, locations and liberal interpretations, the result inevitably involves White deaths at the hands of low IQ, ethnically distant groups pursuing their own vision of “gangsta jihad.”
As long as the masses remain blind to these developments, and as long as the absurd and now surely redundant charge of Islamophobia retains a hold on popular opinion, Marine Le Pen’s Front National is likely to make only very modest gains. This is despite a clear and unambiguous official party stance on multiculturalism and immigration:
Uncontrolled immigration is a source of tension in a Republic which is no longer able to assimilate the new French. Ghettos, inter-ethnic conflicts, community demands and politico-religious provocations are the direct consequences of mass immigration which is undermining our national identity and brings with it an increasingly visible Islamization, with its attendant claims. Communitarianism is a poison against national cohesion.
In any sane and healthy society, the Front National’s goals of eliminating illegal immigration and removing criminal and unemployed legal foreigners would be seen as necessary and reasonable, particularly in light of the threat to France currently posed by those of foreign origin. In next year’s French presidential elections, the choice must be clear: Do you want to a better nation and a viable future for your children, or do you want to learn to live with the ever-rising costs of multiculturalism?
I close with Rudyard Kipling’s The Stranger. Perhaps its most incisive stanza in the wake of Nice deals with the author’s inability to determine what powers may control ‘the Stranger’ and what “reasons sway his mood,” nor when “the Gods of his far-off land shall repossess his blood.” Such concerns don’t occur to liberals because they assume that the modern state and its attending Marxist dogma on race, nationality and identity have vanquished the hold any such ‘powers,’ ‘reasons’ or ‘Gods’ may retain over their imported darlings.
The Stranger within my gate,
He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk—
I cannot feel his mind.
I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
But not the soul behind.
The men of my own stock,
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wonted to,
They are used to the lies I tell;
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy or sell.
The Stranger within my gates,
He may be evil or good,
But I cannot tell what powers control—
What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the Gods of his far-off land Shall repossess his blood.
The men of my own stock,
Bitter bad they may be,
But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes
They think of the likes of me.
This was my father’s belief
And this is also mine: Let the corn be all one sheaf–
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.
Can Trump red-pill America?
Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees?
Moral Paragons Need No Facts: The Pathetic Apologetics of Jonathan Sacks, Part 2
Moral Paragons Need No Facts: The Pathetic Apologetics of Jonathan Sacks, Part 1
The Face of Revolution: Reflections on Red Rosa
The Real Obama Legacy, Part 4: Chicago as a case study of liberal failure in American cities
Get it into the heads of People injured by the INVADERS, that the deep-pocket Politicians & Priests OWE THEM MONEY. Then see whta happens. Get some hungry LAWYERS after the assets of the churches and politicians…….
Screaming, and learned discussions do NOTHING. When People start going after the bastards who are bringing the INVADERS in, THEN change will occur.
Quit letting the Politicians & Priests create chaos and bloodshed and walk away.
Politicians and Priests that open “the Gates of the City” to raping pillaging INVADERS, should be treated like any TRAITOR.
TAKE all their possessions to pay REPARATIONS to the VICTIMS of the Refujihadis THEY let in..
NOTHING speaks LOUDER to a priest then the silence of an empty collection plate. Stop all donations to any church and “get after” anyone that does. The Lutheran, Catholic, and Jewish “Social Services” are being given YOUR tax dollars to import these savages, which makes them FINACIALLY RESPONSIBLE for them. Check out their web pages, they BRAG about what they are doing. Cut off ALL “churches” and those not involved will pressure those who ARE —- Dry up the MONEY of those JUDAS ISCARIOTS that are betraying us.
Just do a search on “Catholic, Lutheran, or Jewish social services refugee” you will be sick.
https://www.cssalaska.org/our-programs/refugee-assistance-immigration-services/
http://lssnca.org/programs/refugees_immigrant/resettlement.html
https://jfsannarbor.org/programs-services/international-services/resettlement/
https://pjmedia.com/blog/u-s-conference-of-catholic-bishops-bring-us-more-jihadis/
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/03/07/u-s-catholic-bishops-raking-in-millions-in-tax-dollars-to-to-colonize-american-towns-with-muslim-migrants-posing-as-refugees-from-middle-eastern-and-african-countries/
That’s why I say just cut off ALL of them …. nothing gets a priest’s attention like EMPTY collection plates and “word” will get around very quickly IF People will STAND UP.
The Politicians assume PERSONAL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY for the crimes of ILLEGALS that they “sponsor” through their “sanctuary” laws and by importing them from abroad.
By WHAT authority are they manipulating Society? Where in the Constitution are they allowed to “SOCIAL ENGINEER”?
“our” politicians take oaths to uphold the LAW and the Constitution. When they REFUSE to, when they openly DEFY and circumvent the LAW, they FORFEIT their “Governmental Immunity”. Every Politician who goes on record as supporting ILLEGAL INVADERS should be held financially responsible for PAYING REPARATIONS for the crimes done by the ILLEGALS.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/city-rips-secret-planting-of-syrian-refugees/
ALL immigrants must have SPONSORS who will be accountable for the actions of the immigrant. Supporters of ILLEGALS are ASSUMING SPONSORSHIP of all Illegals and therefore are FINANCIALLY responsible for CRIMES and LIFE SUPPORT of ALL illegals. NO illegals should be on TAXPAYER DOLE, they should be living on the wealth of their SPONSORS and in THEIR HOUSES.
http://investmentwatchblog.com/muslim-refugees-causing-rape-epidemic-in-the-u-s-this-is-why-we-need-a-fcking-wall/
Start CIVIL FORFEITURE on the assets of Politicians that cover for ILLEGAL INVADERS. Since their “Government DUTIES consist of securing the Border” and they not only failed but REFUSE to secure the border they are no longer protected by “immunity”
You don’t “live with terrorism”. You die from it – unless you defeat it.
Richard Gutjahr, the man who filmed the drama is a German gentile married to Mossad asset and Knesset member Einat Wilf (official website: http://www.wilf.org/English/).
Einat Wilf [remember, in Judaism the female is worshiped] is a member of Ehud Barak’s breakaway HaAtzma’ut or Independence Faction in the 18th Knesset.
Look again! Can you see any? No, there wasn’t a drop of blood on the truck. When it finally came to a stop it still looked fairly clean. Strange choice of colour, right? A white truck as a murder weapon that ends up looking clean white at the end.
If a truck really did ram into “hundreds” of people as officially claimed, there would be body parts and blood everywhere (with at least some of the street littered corpses dismembered).
And if the alleged driver was actually shot in the truck’s cabin, then surely blood would be splattered on the headrest and over much of the rest of the seat. Where did “Mohammed’s” brains go while his head was being shot out by at least 8 x large caliber bullets?
There is no way 84 people died in this Nice incident.
Just like 9-11 with the alleged “suicide hijackers” still alive, the real “Mohammed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel” was not even on French soil during the time of this “event”. He was actually residing in Sousse, Tunisia. He uploaded a self-recorded cell-phone video online claiming his absolute innocence on July 15th 2016.
The white truck was most likely unmanned and guided by remote control. This would help to explain why there is no footage from the beginning of the “terrorist attack” … despite the fact that entire street in Nice has CCTV cameras on every junction.
The bullet “holes” shown on the front screen of the driver’s cab are probably stick-on decals, of a kind used by some flat-bed drivers in the USA — they are stuck onto the rear of vehicles for fun.
If those had been real shots, the front screen of the driver’s cab would have been blown into tiny glass fragments. Yet in the media photos, it is still intact and in-place. This is total nonsense, and the dumb public are again falling for a major and quite transparent hoax.
The company in charge of all CCTV cameras in the city of Nice — trading as “Nice Systems” — has its headquarters in Tel Aviv, Israel.
Wikipedia (sorry!) describes “NICE Systems” thus:
This comment has been compiled from re-written excerpts taken from the original article: http://henrymakow.com/2016/07/zioist-fingerprints-nice-hoax.html
NOTE: The Black Pigeon video that I posted earlier (scroll down) — http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/07/learn-to-live-with-it-nice-and-the-ever-rising-cost-of-multiculturalism/#comment-283550 — has, in consequence, now been negated. It has lost all journalistic value, because the Nice incident has since been established as a hoax.
No Muslim terrorists were involved in NICE. The terrorist is once AGAIN the international crooks operating with impunity out of the Rothschild Fiefdom of Israel.
loquendo laxe
Key point:
Please do your own Critical Analysis of this lengthy, and very self-indulgent article published (recently) by England’s Daily Mail. Realize that all major English (and UK) newspapers are owned by the same incestuous people ~ stake-holders who include in their numbers disproportionate numbers or exclusive memberships of: Jews, Zionists, “Friends of Israel”, fat-cat Corporatists, and other ‘Chancers’.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3701122/Kalashnikov-rifle-ammunition-French-police-basement-man-Bastille-Day-attacker-sent-text-messages-minutes-massacre-five-suspects-appear-court.html
Note that the photo shown (in this article) of the van used in the “attack” is show in this Daily Mail article with its front panel removed. Whereas initially, all images showed the front of this same van completely intact.
Note also that all the front-screen bullet holes are shown on the passenger side of the cabin. And that the driver’s seat headrest appears unmarked.
Through these lengthy, magazine style articles, they (the Zionist masterminds of this entire psy-op) are attempting to build the same kind of emotion-laden narrative that was first used to sell all the stupid/irrational memes surrounding 9-11 … those childish and unscientific assumptions that are still believed by so many dupes today.
The ‘Nice F/F incident’ just keeps getting ever more blatant! Interior Ministry orders the city Mayor’s office to destroy all the CCTV evidence:
https://twitter.com/TonyGosling/status/756264941166952448
Europe needs to invade Israel and literally wipe out all those deeply involved in every False Flag / public murder for political gain event staged since 9-11 … including the ‘Jew’/Israeli supervised 7/7 outrage.
But the city authorities may have (with luck) refused this request:
https://twitter.com/breakingnewsie/status/756412323531816960
“Anglo-Saxon”, were eye-witness reports of body parts, and of casualties in hospital, part of an Israeli psy-op? What was the real purpose of the event supposedly stage-managed by Israel? To create more hostility towards Muslims? Please explain in more detail, or are we all living inside some kind of virtual reality matrix?
Like the actors/attresses that pop up in similar (((events))) as convenient witnesses?
Truman Show!
(((Some people))) exist simply to waste everyone else’s time with their profound stupidity OR ALTERNATIVELY their calculated and cynical interference with normal online dialogue. Fortunately, and after 17+ years of online experience, I can spot the (((calculated/cynical alternative))) from a mile away.
(((Such creatures))) reek of irredeemable poison, and for the sake of humanity should be chased down and squelched like we would do to sewer rats.
For the benefit of the majority of )))normal people((( attending TOO, I shall now append a crucial historical video to @Trenchant’s excellent choice seen above; one which helps inform all decent persons what they really need to understand about all “terror” events since September of 2001 … including this pre-planned outrage in Nice:
And for the sake of all (((dimwits))) here’s another related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM
The “planes” (the images) were created (added) using video compositing … a man-made stream of overlaid images being digitally inserted into “live” news-feeds … while these apparent “live” feeds were being re-routed through the compositor and thus delayed from broadcast by about 5 seconds.
SOURCE: The Ugly Truth blog
Loquendo Laxe statement: We all have a duty to correct our own misinterpretations … whenever it is possible to do so. I have just found graphic footage of when this truck first hit a crown of revelers in the street in Nice. IT IS GRAPHIC FOOTAGE, AND NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART. Therefore, with this new evidence to hand, I will now have to retract some of my assumptions found elsewhere in this thread.
Even so, I still have many reservations about this entire incident. There are elements of it … which I have already highlighted in my commenting elsewhere on this page … which are not adding up. But for sure, people were indeed killed outright by this truck, and in a very horrible and cowardly way.
Personally, I have never met a Muslim who would do this kind of thing. Inconceivable. Whoever created the action plan for such a macabre attack has a Satanic mind … not an Islamic mind. They do say that Talmudic Judaism is the equivalent of Satanism.
Why the body of that truck lacks tell tale blood stains and traces of body internals and brain matter has got me baffled. I just cannot resolve that puzzle at this time.
Anyway, by watching this relatively short clip, you will see that this incident cannot be a total hoax, or a staged event using actors. Although I would be happy to argue that Actors have been recruited to help with the follow-up narrative. Otherwise, this video shows that a heavy vehicle truly did make contact with innocent people, and in a very horrible way. See for yourself.
N.B. In case this video is removed by YouTube, I have already downloaded a copy.
Seems that the people actually “squelched like sewer rats” were the adults and children actually found dead or taken to hospital.
“The sheer number of children coming in…serious head trauma and broken limbs” (Frederic Sola, surgeon at the Foundation Lenval children’s hospital). “There are awful stories that children are telling” (Stephanie Simpson, team-head for the hospital special response unit). “Victims had suffered multiple trauma, breakages and haermorrhages” (Philippe Babe, intensive care physician).
Extras from the CNC or Hollywood? “Talmud students”? “Masters of the Universe”? Lizards from the Ickean True Reality? Or just loads of ((()))s with waxwork dolls wrapped in their false flags?
Maybe I too should be “chased down” like a “sewer rat” for this “interference” with your “normal” on-line “dialogue”?
The haughty, faux-moralistic posturing of these (((Anglo SJW Crusaders))) is about as sincere as a gift of snow shoes to a Fijian fisherman.
A life of vapid finger-pointing (between sips of Gin & Tonic) qualifies nobody for preacherhood. Twisting what others have written in order to negate or misrepresent their original meaning is another cheap characteristic of such empty individuals.
Judging by the number of times this (((David Ashton))) character has hysterically complained about being (((‘outed’))) in most of his TOO comments — an addiction to indignant hysteria he has spread over several different pages — I am beginning to question the value of tolerating any more of his pathetic viewpoints.
Moderators: Either give us back the “Ignore Button” or agree to push the Ernst Stavro Blofeld remote destruct button on his IP address.
I don’t mind criticism, and I don’t mind opposing viewpoints … so long as they are backed up by at least something of substance.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I don’t recall this whining (((English Bitch))) contributing anything of genuine substance since he made his sudden and noisy arrival here … during the post Jo Cox psy-op period.
Glen adds:
It is now imperative that all citizens of the world believe absolutely nothing from either (((mainstream print or televised media))). Every damn bit of it is lies and deception, cooked up to further strip us of rights and lead us into enslavement.
I thank God for sites like Henry’s and all the others who do real investigations into the never ending psyops we are exposed to and are able to get at least some truth out through the internet. My only hope is the average Joe blow will awaken from his/her slumber and actually do something to stop the mass slide into a (((Satanic elitist))) controlled one world government.
– See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2016/07/zioist-fingerprints-nice-hoax.html#sthash.1f6DKrOW.dpuf
[((())) added by TJ]
Same guy – Richard Gutjahr – was on hand to film the Munich (((event))), too. Just a (((coincidence))), of course.
“I noticed an immediate social media backlash against the publication of images from Nice. The hypocrisy was stunning.”
Now the government has ordered the Nice city hall to destroy every trace of the attack filmed by their security cameras. (source)
Doubtless because close scrutiny of the images raises questions about the veracity of the (((event))).
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/18/what-next-could-france-be-facing-a-civil-war.html
The government, perhaps, is right to be most worried about the autochthonous French.
It’s difficult to assess these incidents accurately. Apparently at least some of these are staged events. I have heard much the same about the Boston massacre, Sandy Hook and other events of this nature.
It stands to reason if these were staged events, then all the variables could be controlled for the maximum desired effect such propaganda is designed to generate.
Were it not for the incredibly effective, monstrous lie of the totally faked Hallowedhoax, I would tend to dismiss these accusations. However if the Jews can put one over on the goyim on the magnitude of the Hallowedhoax for over 70 years, then anything of this nature is is possible.
The obvious false flag event of September 11th further shores up the highly suspicious nature of these later apparent hoaxes.
We live in a world of illusion where reality is beginning to show through to anyone caring to look.
Church Of Satan High Priest Spills The Beans On The Police Force And The US Military https://youtu.be/8BsAOaD_tzI
News is created the same way as “money” is created.
The only reason I can see for the (((French ))) government wanting to stage these atrocities is to drum up support for a serious attack on Syria, but the perpetrator of the massacre in Nice wasn’t a Syrian or even much of a Muslim.
According to the reports a few Muslims were also killed in the attack. Could the intention be to discredit political Islamism and encourage secularism within the Muslim population? Either way the occupation government installed in France is totally committed to multiculturalism and the eventual destruction of France as a White nation. Terrorist attacks are the last thing the French elites want, they want to lull the White population into hypnotic obeisance while encouraging the resident Muslims to pop out more brown babies.
I think the main priority was to extend the state of emergency for another six months. The (((terrorist threat))) offers a credible pretext for so doing, allowing the government to selectively crack down on white dissidents. White nationalists presumably will begrudgingly support these measures even though the whole exercise is to designed to stave off any autochthonous rebellion.
Unless the elite want to encourage more division. The old “divide and conquer” adage comes to mind.
The elite want to rule, play one side off against the other. Politicians want that too as it gives them the pretexts to suggest more control and centralisation. Remember most of them are power hungry psychopaths.
Brown babies are already a given. But totalitarian society is a bit more tricky to exert without the hapless masses being manipulated into it.
@Arch Stanton
How unfortunate that your very reasonable perspective is seemingly so rare. On my best days I remember to reject virtually everything reported by our Lügenpresse. It is to the point where we can even be manipulated and mislead by video. A narrative with subtle undertones can be carefully crafted with a headline, a few quotes, an action clip, some eyewitness account, et voila! Magnifique! I suspect we hardly realize how far from reality we are being led.
Most people will never witness any major disaster or large outbreak of violence but have been conditioned to think they know what these things look like. The classic is the Hollywood car crash, followed inevitably by the fire-ball explosion. So commonplace is this image that The Simpsons satirize it.
Actually, the terrorists are welcome in my view.
At least they wake white Europe up and make people think twice.
The real problem is not that too many migrants commit terror. The problem is not enough do. Because most immigrants don’t commit terror, they are ‘welcomed’ as ‘new Europeans’.
How nice if every migrant were a terrorist. Europeans would wake up and kick them all out.
Now, let’s suppose all migrants are not terrorists. Suppose none raped. Suppose all just want to settle and find work.
Actually, such people would be more dangerous because there would be no justification for stopping them… unless you are a true nationalist whose primary reason for opposing immigration is racial and cultural than scaremongering about terrorism.
Too much of anti-immigrant/migrant rhetoric is invested in fears of terrorism and rape. In truth, the MAIN ARGUMENT should be that each ethno-nation state has a right to preserve its uniqueness in blood, culture, history, and soil… just like Israel.
After all, if the argument is ‘we must oppose migration cuz of terrorism’, there is no good argument against those who are not going to commit terror.
Chinese and Asian-Indians in Australia don’t commit terror. But that is why they are dangerous. They arrive as ‘peaceful’ immigrants and, in time, may take over the entire nation and reduce whites to minorities.
Chinese in Canada are nice enough, but they are displacing whites just the same in whole swaths of cities.
So, migration must be opposed primarily because too many foreigners change the character of the nation. Look what too much Jewish immigration did to Palestine. Of course, Jews know this, which is why they only allow Jewish immigration.
Also, national identity is cheapened when a nation says ANYONE can become part of the nation. Take Frenchness. It used to be linked with race, history, culture, roots, ancestry, soil, and etc. It was more than an idea.
So, French people had a deep and rich sense of being French. It wasn’t just about ink on paper but about blood in their veins, soil under their feet, remembrance of history, and etc.
Now, ANYONE can become French. So, a recent arrival from Nigeria with NO ROOTS in French blood and history is just as French as a Frenchman whose ancestry goes back many centuries in France. Frenchness has become just ink on paper. Just a t-shirt anyone can put on. Something you can buy in a souvenir shop. The 1000 yrs of Frenchness in your blood and culture count for nothing in making you more French than a newcomer from Africa, Asia, or Middle East with zero roots in French soil and history.
Now, imagine if Black-American-ness was turned into a universal thing. We are used to thinking that black-american-ness is about identity based on blood and history that involves slavery, Jim Crow, and civil rights movement.
But if black-americanness is turned into ink on paper, than an Iranian or Rachel Dolezal can apply for black-American-ness and claim to be just as black as any black-American even though he or she has zero blood or roots in black American history. Identity made interchangeable is cheapened beyond measure.
Also, this kind of globalism is arrogant. It is a kind of suicidal neo-imperialism. Instead of old imperialism of invading other nations, it tells the people of world to come to France, abandon their identity and become ‘French’, and serve France.
Such globalism is an attack on both Frenchness and the culture of the migrants/immigrants. It tells real Frenchmen that Frenchness is just ink on paper, and it tells newcomers to abandon their own roots(that goes back centuries and millennia in their ancestral lands) and become ‘French’. It is a double attack on identity and culture. It is based on neo-Americanism where ‘global citizenship’ is the only allowed identity for all.
Look at both white Americans and immigrant Americans in the era of globo neo-Americanism. White Americans have lost their identity and roots since Americanism is now all about ‘diversity’. White American identity is turning into a matter of how many tattoos one has.
And immigrant communities have lost their own identity and roots and live for MTV and McDonalds. Having lost roots and identity, their idea of culture is listening to rap and watching TV sitcom that worship homos.
To Andrea Ostrov Letania
” …Too much of anti-immigrant/migrant rhetoric is invested in fears of terrorism and rape. In truth, the MAIN ARGUMENT should be that each ethno-nation state has a right to preserve its uniqueness in blood, culture, history, and soil…”
The main argument is, as you told, that a large number of foreigners will distroy the original folk.
And if the foreigners are peaceful und hard-working and clever, than they will distroy also.
For example, if we would have many Chinese here in Germany who can play the violin in a good way, than they would come into the German orchestras and Germans would not have this place to work or perform art. To a very small number, you can accept foreigners. But with a number, that disturbs you or that distroys you, you cannot accept them.
” … each ethno-nation state has a right to preserve its uniqueness in blood, culture, history, and soil …”
I agree and I put it this way: We have that right. But also we have the duty towards our children and grand-children to make this right became the reality within our states. — We have the right to do it, but we have not the right to throw away (or not use) that said right. — If I have 1000 Dollars, I can throw them away or give them to foreigners. That is my right as the owner. — But if I am German, I own my country, I am a part of it, but I am not allowed to distroy it or to give it towards foreigners. Because I am in the duty towards my children, my folk, my race.
To preserve our families, our blood, our folk, our race is our foremost right, and also our foremost duty, that we have in life.
In the founding laws of our state (Germany=Deutschland) the same thing is said in the following words, which each German chancellor has to swear: “I swear, that with all my power I will improve the advantages for the German folk …”
“Because I am in the duty towards my children, my folk, my race.
To preserve our families, our blood, our folk, our race is our foremost right, and also our foremost duty, that we have in life.”
I agree, but German males (European males) have no reproductive rights. At this time they remain “studs” for the corporations to use as they will.
Of course you are right from beginning to the end.
In fact I have put it in a slightly different way, that “Terrorism” legitimates the fundamental issue, mainstream “migration” , because, the “solution” is projected as being that (Mainstream Invasion – “Terrorism” = OK). No wonder that the Tribe like “Terrorism”, including that which is (they?) synthesise/d, because it is eminently usable to legitimate the invasion as well as to create the conditions for widespread empathy with the “problems” of their synthesised state.
To JM
I agree. Also in Germany the state wants to build up a two-side-scenario. One side should be Germans, Europeans and “well-integrated non-Europeans” which should be welcomed, and the other side should be the “non-law-abiting-non-europeans” which should be rejected.
But to our luck this play does not work.
Firstly because even the “good integrated” of the Pakistanis, Arabs, or Turks in a sudden can change to attackers and mass murderers. The axe-man in Würzburg was such a “young, integrated and promising foreigner from Afghanistan or Pakistan”. He lived within a German familiy together with their own children (=completely crazy German parents). He was friendly. Then he took an axe and hit several people in the face, crying “Alluakbar”.
In the film he poses with a knife, but in the train he used an axe. He hacked several people in the face (four of them a family of Chinese tourists), than left the train and hacked a female pedestrian twice in the face. The German police got him and shot him to death.
The German public sees this and thinks: “I do not like it”.
And so the situation in Germany swings into the “we” and “them”-modus, but with “we” we mean Germans (=ethnic Germans, Germans by blood and heritage) and nothing else.
See the film: Bekennervideo des Attentäters von Würzburg – Ein Zuwanderer aus Afghanistan – Flüchtling?
h***ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6W91ChUT3s
We do not want to have this in Germany.
My aunt’s old shop in Walthamstow, England, which I visited some Saturdays as a boy, became an Islamist bookshop and later a base for the 2006 sky-bomb plot. My once-white town now reportedly has the third largest single Muslim community in western Europe.
As someone who has publicly, continually and consistently opposed both multi-cultural mass-immigration and its leftist exploitation, from student years to my more sedentary present, well before Dr MacDonald entered the fray with his special angle, I welcome neither terrorism nor the pretext it provides for a “political class” to impose further selective controls on rational and factual free speech.
Thank you, Mr. Joyce. An absolutely accurate analysis.
I grew up in the Rhine-Ruhr area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhine-Ruhr in the late 1990s and early 2000s during the early stages of the forming of ”gangsta jihad” culture, so I am very familiar with it and its origins.
During my teen years it was more a petty crime and hip-hop culture, which appealed very much to young, lower-class Muslims, who wanted to be seen as tough and masculine. I personally never experienced the Islamist influence on this culture – because I moved to the United States – which was introduced in later years, probably most strongly in the early 2010s. Once most Muslim petty criminals’ hip-hop music career ambitions and dreams were disappointed and crushed, some of these guys turned to other areas of interest to find meaning and recognition in their lives, and some of them were recruited by Salafist preachers, financed by Petro-Islam: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petro-Islam
This is just speculation on my part, but I am sure the Salafist recruiting intensified, once the civil war in Syria broke out, and the Sunni Petro-Islam-backed factions in that conflict needed more cannon-fodder.
This is all incredibly concerning and an absolutely certain recipe for disaster ,as you rightly pointed out.
But on a lighter note, and to document the patriarchal, hierarchical clannishness of Arab culture, here is a very funny video of security specialist and bouncer Michael Kuhr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Kuhr dealing with an obnoxious Arab/Turk who is trying to get into the club Mr. Kuhr is bouncing at for the night, to see the concert of an African-American hip-hop artist. Mr. Kuhr’s recommendation to deal with and deescalate heated confrontations with young, obnoxious Muslims is to appeal to their ”manliness” and ”family honor”. Very funny, but also very educational, as a tutorial to avoid and to elegantly get out of a potentially dangerous confrontation with young Muslims.
Mr. Kuhr knows the Arab culture so well, that he has been helping and advising the German security forces, and he must be very successful in his advising capacity, because Arab organized crime families in Berlin tried to assassinate him:
Bouncer (kickbox world champion) vs loudmouth – Vol. 01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWfetF1jCO4
Uploaded on Aug 9, 2008
A guy wants to get into the club, and is not let in. What he doesn’t know is: the bouncer he is annoying is Michael Kuhr – a 5x kickboxing world champion. And the bouncer has got a very important mobile number: the number of loudmouths brother.
(English subtitels)
This is one of the examples of Salafist preaching and recruiting efforts in Germany, which started in earnest in 2011/2012:
Germany: A Koran in Every Household
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3007/germany-koran
The guy heading this operation used to be on welfare in Germany, and now suddenly his group/foundation has the funds to print 25 million Korans and pass them out for free!?
Printing 300.000 copies of Koran translated into German cost the Salafists 300.000 Euros according to the following article, and they paid the bill up front. German security services suspect, that the money is coming from Saudi Arabia and Qatar (in German):
– http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/vorab/a-827550.html
Another funny thing about this project is that their motto and slogan ”Read!” translates into German as ”Lies!”.
I mean this goes way beyond a ‘Freudian slip’, especially considering that most younger Germans speak and read English quite well.
I guess this type of marketing campaign and choice of slogan is just another confirmation that Arabs are not awfully competent in the cognitive department. Without their oil money these guys would be absolute nobodies.
No wonder the Ashkenazi Jews in Israel with their higher IQs – courtesy of Northern European admixture – are running intellectual circles around their inbred, low IQ Arab neighbors.
– https://thechosenites.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/refutation.pdf
Here is the website of the Salafists’ ”Lies! Stiftung” (Read! Foundation): http://diewahrereligion.eu/hausdesqurans/
The Salafists are especially dangerous. Could some wealthy benefactor provide an antidote for every household commenting on (a) the dubious origins of these Arabian scriptures, and (b) the more noxious passages?
What would you think if some Zionist millionaire of the Pamela Geller “School of Islamophobia” offered to do so?
The secularist EU “Left” won’t do it!
Why should Gentile Euro-Americans, who are also against “wars for Israel”, leave all the hard anti-Islam work to e.g. Ibn Warraq, Robert Spencer, Sebastian Gorka, Peter Hammond, Andrew Bostom, M. A. Khan, and various Hindu writers?
——–
(Mod Note: GENTILE Euro-Americans? Are there any other kind of Euro-Americans? Are you implying that there is such a thing as “non-gentile” European Americans? Why are you using jew-centric terminology here? Why do you enclose “wars for Israel” in sneer-quotes? You are skating on very thin ice now.)
(Mod Note: Mr. Ashton, please note the banner at the top of the site. It says “White Identity, Interests and Culture”. That, along with the principles in the Mission Statement, is the focus of TOO. The topic isn’t “not all jews are evil”, or your qualifications and identity. If you wish to comment here, keep your comments in line with those objectives, and relevant to the essay under which you comment.)
I’d like Herr Kuhr to advise on confrontations with young, obnoxious Jews – and middle-aged, old, mixed-race, male and female, obnoxious Jews. Do you think their manliness and family honor should be appealed to?
This is an interesting and tricky question, Rerevisionist.
I cited Professor Robert Hare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Hare on this matter a while back:
– http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/06/spotlight-on-double-standards-at-the-boston-globe/#comment-281449
I am open to other and new suggestions.
In my personal opinion, the best deterrent against obnoxious and psychopathic Jewish behavior is, to warn Jews that it will lead to an increase in real anti-antisemitism and a potential persecution of the entire Jewish community.
An appeal to their self-interest, as Professor Hare suggested, might be the best approach.
Mr. Joyce said on one of the radio programs he was interviewed on, that Jews in the past used to be punished collectively for crimes, especially financial crimes, committed by individual Jews, and that this kind of punishment seemed to be very effective in curtailing white-collar Jewish crime. See ‘Sippenhaft’: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sippenhaft
Makes perfect sense to me. If they hold together, they are all guilty. It’s significant that Jewish apologists offload the idea onto whites: “they are all guilty”. Law in (((the modern era))) naturally doesn’t include the idea.
Meanwhile, elsewhere in France, more vibrancy:
https://www.rt.com/news/352066-france-stab-woman-daughters/
Remarks such Manuel Valls’* should make it clear to French men and women that they are “collateral damage only” for their government.
And Europeans living in our Diaspora in the United States should by now be aware of the “hate” that Hilliary Rodham Clinton has forward white working class males.
*His rhetoric isn’t as good as the poorest rederijker, although he may have talent as a pimp.
Again, predictably as ever, the letters to my conservative rag are all: Islam, Muslims, radicalisation, the spineless PC left, shut them out because ‘they hate the women and the gay rights’, blah blah blah…
The current generation of terrorists make some pretty bizarre Muslims, given their:
– petty crime and antisocial behaviour
– pot smoking
– womanising
– visiting strip clubs
– gay sex / dating apps
– western style of dress
Islamists? More like a bunch of dazed, postmodern leftovers who went postal.
Exactly – this is “gangsta” jihad.
Where did the OAS go?
Indeed! They, or rather their descendants are likely to have some members within the French officer corps. Why have they been sitting on their hands since 1968? Are they playing the ‘long game’, intending to act only when confident of total victory? Perhaps even at this late stage they are wiping the dust off some old dossiers and are interviewing prospective ‘Jackals’ in some seedy hotel. We can muse and hope.
I’m curious what the average, white-nationalist, Western European thinks Europe would be like had Hitler won the war? We are lead to believe that Europe and the world would have been doomed had Germany won the war but I do not believe that Hitler would have gone around slaughtering Western Europeans in some crazed bloodlust. I think he would have left non-belligerent countries alone like he did Sweden, Switzerland and Spain. I’m under no delusions that Hitler was a good guy but I now understand much better why he did some of the things he did.
Very simple. Who led us to believe so? Hitler maybe was not a good guy, but he certainly was much better than these guys who want to exterminate one billion whites, and are very hard at work at it. Everything we know about Hitler, we learned it from those who want to exterminate us. They wanted so even long before WW2.
@John … Clearly you fear (or are nervous about) learning the real truth. But at least you are tentatively beginning to digest pieces of it. We must all take baby steps before we learn to walk and run.
The defeat of Hitler (and more importantly, of National Socialist Germany) was a clear victory for International Judaism.
Ergo, every negative thing that has happened since early 1945 … through to the present day … is a direct result of that disaster.
It would be a lot better. Fascism is the only ideology that can preserve the White race in the modern world.
This whole story sounds like more from the team that fleshed out the Mohamed Atta action character.
Lawrence Murray , I suspect that you are correct indeed to think the real population figures for Muslims in France are much higher. I spent a month in Paris in 1985 and even then there was a huge Muslim population. My guess is that Muslims are chronically undercounted both because many are undocumented and perhaps because the govt. has an interest in obscuring the true figures.
It is actually ILLEGAL in France to count persons based on their racial background. That law has been in place for many decades. The only ‘accurate’ population counts available for France are compiled by independent (non-official) sources.
Pioneering bloggers from the early ‘noughties’ — such as Fjordman and The Brussels Journal — were among the first to disclose that several arrondissements and communes (especially in and around Paris + Marseilles) were effectively NO GO areas for White men.
http://www.lost-in-france.com/living-in-france/life/517-french-departments?tmpl=component&print=1
So yes, it is at least 90 percent certain the ‘apparent’ Muslim population in France (chiefly North African in origin, but also Sub-Saharan) is indeed chronically undercounted.
“It is actually ILLEGAL in France to count persons based on their racial background.”
French nationalists keep repeating that it is illegal to do so even though it isn’t. They stupidly help the government to intimidate White people. ZOG has only made it illegal to keep lists of people’s names with a mention of their race. They make exceptions in the case of the police and the hospitals, among others.
Olivier Schrameck, the Jewish chairman of the authority regulating TV in France, actually pays people to count how many Whites and non-Whites they see on French television. That’s what he calls “barometer of diversity”.
Robert Ménard, the anti-immigration mayor of Béziers, has published statistics about the number of muslims in his city’s schools based on the first names of the children (result: 65 %). He’s been the target of a lot of intimidation for doing that. He’s been heard by the police and denounced by the media and the government, but I don’t think the government actually sued him. But you never know. They care less and less about following the law.
Your impressions of Paris, 1985 are irrelevant. Nobody has ever denied there were plenty of non-whites in France in 1985. It’s simply not possible to eyeball national estimates. End of conversation.
Jacques Brel is weeping a dirge in Folkvangr.
Another thoughtful article by Mr. Joyce. Healthy societies are homogeneous ones. Common sense suggests that immigration should be reduced if not halted altogether, particularly involving foreigners who are the most incompatible (racially or ideologically) with the host culture. Similarity facilitates cultural compatibility. Dissimilarity creates alienation.
But allow me to respectfully dissent from Mr. Joyce’s claim that “people are not being killed in the streets of France because of French foreign policy”. Are we really so sure? These Muslim ‘terrorists’ aren’t targeting Switzerland, after all. The ‘terrorists’ are targeting China either. How come?
The so-called ‘Muslim’ terrorists are targeting Israel, the US and NATO countries. Mere coincidence?
Let’s not forget that France played a central role in NATO’s recent destruction of Libya. France’s deplorable and decades-long occupation of Algeria is also well known. Tunisia (where our latest terrorist was born) is sandwiched right between these two North African countries. This fact is irrelevant?
Let’s bring the Empire’s troops home. Perhaps NATO should be abolished altogether. In any event, the West has slaughtered far too many innocents to play victim. There must be self-determination for all. End all wars of aggression for Empire and global Zionism. Only then will we regain the moral authority to declare: NO TRESPASSING.
“immigration should be reduced if not halted altogether”
In France, JM Le Pen used to talk about the need to “reverse the migratory flows”. I don’t know how that sounds in English, but the idea is to avoid saying that the parasites have to go: you just say we need to reverse the flow.
“But allow me to respectfully dissent from Mr. Joyce’s claim that “people are not being killed in the streets of France because of French foreign policy”. Are we really so sure?”
As noted in the article, French people are being killed because the government has brought in and continues to bring in millions of Arabs into the country.
As for the motivations of the killers, I think the French foreign policy is used as a mere pretext. I guess the Islamic State doesn’t like the French foreign policy, even though the (((French government))) has taken sides against Bashar al-Assad and the Christians of Syria. But the Islamic State, like most islamists, have other reasons to dislike White people, Western civilization, and even modernity.
The Islamic State has given terrorist training to a number of Arabs born in France. This could be seen as retaliation for France’s foreign policy. But those young people who come from North Africa , have French citizenship, and have fought for the Islamic State, have their own motivations that are mostly anti-French and anti-White. I think it has little to do with the war in Syria. They took part in the war because they are anti-White. They didn’t become anti-White because of the war in Syria. As for the Tunisian driver of the truck in Nice, he didn’t even go to Syria.
Since Germany didn’t take part in Syria, Libya or Iraq, they can put Hans on the border with an MG3 and declare NO TRESPASSING, correct?
Are you able to justify that assertion with supporting facts? Was it always “deplorable”? When did it start being “deplorable”?
Do you know that all North African littoral nations (with the exception of Egypt) were essentially established by Europeans? Or is that fact new to you?
And as regards Egypt … there exists DNA evidence (mostly officially suppressed) that some of the better Pharaohs were actually of European lineage. The premier example being Ramesses II, also known as “Ramesses the Great” … the third pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt.
And the great Ptolemaic Dynasty of Egypt was of course GREEK. Last time I checked, Greece had some major historical and cultural significance for ALL of Europe, and also for the USA.
Over to you …
Good overview of the German situation at Breitbart:
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/18/why-germany-is-doomed/
Black Pigeon Speaks … about the Nice Attack:
A useful footnote to Andrew Joyce’s excellent article.
A man claiming to be Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel of Tunisia contests the State/MSM’s accusation of his culpability.
“I noticed an immediate social media backlash against the publication of images from Nice. The hypocrisy was stunning.”
The double standard is obvious too in the way ZOG keeps racial crime statistics out of newspapers even while they keep talking all the time about “antisemitism” and their “holocaust”. The cover-up of the Cologne rape attack and of the Pakistani “grooming” in Rotherham was part of the same standard policy of concealing racial attacks against White people, whether it is murder, rape, torture, or simply the speed of our racial replacement.
Just the other day, the blog Fdesouche.com published a long list of newspaper website articles about incidents that happened between July 13 and July 15. It ran like this :
– Achères (department 78) : Three youths arrested while preparing Molotov cocktails.
– Angers (dept 49) : Trash cans on fire in an apartment building, 50 people evacuated.
– Argenteuil (dept 95) : A number of cars and trash cars burnt down, a bus shelter vandalized.
And so on. There were 75 lines like that. A number of police stations were attacked with mortars. Policemen, firemen and buses were pelted with stones, and who knows how many hundreds of cars were burnt.
Those incidents are only reported in the local pages. There is no mention of it on TV. The job of the media should be to add it all up and warn the population there is a big problem. But they are hiding it instead.
“The times have changed, and France is going to have to live with terrorism.”
The words of France’s prime minister Manuel Valls are almost unbelievable. Almost. But in a way he is right. France is estimated to be somewhere between 7-9% Muslim as of 2015 according to the CIA World Factbook. In 2004, the Institut Montaigne estimated that 10% of the population in metropolitan France was North African and 3% black African, meaning it was likely over 10% Muslim then and certainly over 10% now. And based on testing of newborns for sickle-cell disease, a third of babies born in French hospitals were inferred to be of African origin in 2012, which again, could have only gone up since.
https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/07/15/living-with-terrorism/#more-3544
“You have to learn to live with it” was also something said by a senior ‘police’ official in Britain, at some sort of meeting discussing Muslim sex crimes. I suppose it’s now part of the training; or maybe a ‘Common Purpose’ thing.
And so is America as we shudder at the prospect of a Clinton presidency that will welcome hundreds of thousands of potential Jihadis in here. Collateral damage is the accepted norm that the liberals would have us embrace for the sake of maintaining our “ideals.” When I have to choose between these ideals and my life I’ll go with the latter every time. Even with a Trump presidency we are not safe, will never be safe again and neither will you.
The mega problem with most White populations in the West is that they are ideologically poisoned, and clueless about it. The media and the entire social system is under the corrosive influence of the hostile ruling alien elites, which has the average, duped person in a state of race denial, and intellectual lock down. Mr. Joyce obviously notices this as well, especially when he mentioned the effects of the ‘media induced sedation’. This ugly ethno-masochistic death spiral has been building for a long, long time. Gregory Hood pretty well summed it up in his latest book Waking Up From The American Dream when he wrote: “The French author Jean Raspail noted that his French Fatherland was betrayed by those who confused Republican values with the nation itself. In America, the process is far worse, because the nation was a flawed ideological experiment from the beginning.” Indeed, the duplicity and hypocrisy of many Whites living in their momentarily protected make-believe world is astounding!
Whites really do seem to have a tendency to want to dwell in a surreal world of fantasy and delusion. This illusory state-of-mind is a very lethal place to be in the real racial world. Whites had better snap out of it, and soon, or our genetic extinction, if current trends continue, is likely to prove to be a brutal, bloody and murderous one.
The racial denouement is now here, so definitely get involved in the Trump, Tyler and Duke political campaigns. Our survival depends on it!
Barbara Lerner Specter said that “without that transformation, Europe will not survive”.
And what Valls is saying is that White people must learn to live with the idea they won’t survive anyway.
Shee[t]s talk about Europe, i don’t hear nothing about white people, ;)
Inversion and projection.
Anna Freud’s book on defense mechanisms is a window into the Jewish psyche.
Do we really need to read this book to understand the Jews? I’m sure it’s interesting but largely superfluous. There is an abundance of “evidence” ready to be absorbed by anyone with an open mind who has overcome the brainwashing that is political correctness.
“Learn to live with it”
Manuel Valls delivered the same message again in an interview published yesterday in the “Journal du Dimanche”.
His message :
– Other lives will be cut short
– Terrorism will remain part of our daily life for a long time
As for the idea of stopping Muslim immigration to France:
– The answer to the Islamic State can not be the Trumpization of people’s minds.
(“La réponse à l’Etat islamique ne peut pas être la Trumpisation des esprits“)
An Antidote To Xenophobia
I see him coming down the hill,
Who he is I know not,
Nor do I know from whence he comes,
Or how he finds his lot.
He may have had a lengthy trek,
I can’t tell from this distance,
But if he needs a helping hand
I’ll offer him assistance.
I don’t know his religion,
I can’t yet tell his colour,
But he’s a man like me,
And I will greet him as a brother.
Yes, I will greet him as a brother,
And a friend most true,
For everybody is the same:
White, black, Gentile and Jew.
I go into the house, put on
My heavy boots and coat,
But as I move towards him,
A lump comes into my throat.
For now he’s nearly here,
I see my brother is a goat.
“…While images of dead children are evidently fair game for Marxist propaganda, a different set of rules appears to be in operation if the dead children in question are the undeniable victims of the hybridized interests of foreigners and the Left.”
A different set of rules indeed! In that case, if I may be permitted, allow me to not only make my own rules as I go along, but to change them whenever I see fit.
1) I sit here in Iceland, away from the gang-stalking, backstabbing, Jew-lead, Canadian society in which I was born and grew up in and away from the country I should have been born in due to the fact that…;
French, English, American, Russian and a whole host of other (formerly?) WHITE nations turned their backs on Germany and on Adolf Hitler in OUR attempt to rid not only Germany of its filthy, conspiratorial and culpable Deformed Jewish Criminal Establishment,
but most of Europe as well.
Yes, Iceland has thrown me a bone.., so I shouldn’t complain. I have been allowed to keep a job that puts me about half way between being penniless and the official poverty line. Yet I am thriving.
Nevertheless, how do people expect me to feel when seventy years after the end of the Second World War, –
which saw my family lose everything they had due to the same malignant filthy Jewish Criminal Cohort, –
the eggs of treason against the Germanic Fatherland…, the defender of the People no less…,
have hatched and now the off spring of the very same Jews,
whom Hitler tried to reign in,
have now succeeded in literally “hatching” in the middle of the “French Bastille Day celebrations” and killing and maiming hundreds.
I will be chastised for saying;
“Let them eat cake!” and
“You may now reap what you have sown.”
The administrators of TOO will probably not agree with me and think that I am some kind of hater for my opinions, but I say to them that they are living in a state of fear and denial.
What does one expect when, like a child, one refuses to face the reality that Hitler was indeed largely correct in his assessment of the problem.
Hitler’s failure lay in the fact that instead of being ruthless and killing every last Jew he could lay his hands on,
he was stupid enough to allow them to leave to neighbouring countries,
countries that may now reap the rewards of “Bastille Day-like celebrations”.
It’s not that I am particularly gleeful that this Jewish “import-engineered”, standard deviation of a nut-job North African went and spread his version of “good Bastille Day tidings” amongst the French but,
after the life my family has lead partly because of the a Jew-lead, stupid French public
(not to mention the other White Backstabbing nations who will also surely reap what they have sown)
do you really expect me to feel pity?
Let the French continue to defame the name of the one leader that could have saved them the ignoble North African version of Bastille Day celebrations…, and I will continue to look on and think…,
“It could not have happened to a more deserving lot.”
Please don’t blame all Frenchmen of the WWII era, many supported Marshal Petain.
(Mod Note: Good catch Pierre. Typo fixed. Thank you.)
http://nodisinfo.com/nice-zionist-islamophobic-plot/
no blood on the truck either – some seem to have q’s about photographs bad enough to look authentic
they can’t all be fakes but – in the case of Orlando- no stretchers, no ambulances –
who knows
Why Staged Deceptions Are Used More Than Pure False Flags
http://www.newnationalist.net/2016/07/19/why-staged-deceptions-are-used-more-than-pure-false-flags/
Observations on the Nice Truck Attack
http://www.newnationalist.net/2016/07/16/observations-on-the-nice-truck-attack/
Can’t wait for Simone Rivera (Geraldo’s daughter) to emerge as a Fox eyewitness to the (((event))).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5g4yan44OE
It’s almost as though our masters delight in teasing us.