What’s the connection between chess and peacock feathers? For most of human history, there was no sensible answer to a question like that. Today we can reply: “They can both be analysed using the branch of mathematics known as game theory.” Games like chess are about competition, about strategies for improving success and avoiding failure. So is evolution. Genes compete in ever more complex ways.
Camouflage and deception
Peacock feathers are a good example of advanced evolution. You can’t understand them without reference to the eyes and brains of peahens, whose mating preferences down the millennia have selected for ever more dazzling male plumage. Males send signals, females read them. Similarly, you can’t understand flowers without reference to the nervous systems of insects. Flowers send signals, insects read them.
Lunar Hornet Moth (Sesia bembeciformis) by Ian Kimber. False signal: Wasp-mimic moth
Or misread them, because biological signals can be deceitful. Some species of orchid trick male bees with flowers that mimic the appearance and odour of female bees. The males pollinate the orchids by trying to mate with the flowers. False signals can also repel or conceal: some harmless insects mimic wasps, others mimic leaves or sticks. Like parasitism, camouflage and deceit are found everywhere in the natural world. All three aspects of biology can shed light on human behaviour.
Wall of Words
After all, humans also compete. Like animals, we send and receive signals, but some of our signals have a new form: we are the only species that has full language. Indeed, language defines us as a species and sits at the heart of all social behaviour. But it can do so in a negative sense, by excluding strangers. There’s a fascinating theory that linguistic diversity — the number of distinct languages spoken in a given region — is driven by parasite diversity in the same region. That would explain why languages are most numerous and diverse in the tropics. The more parasites, the more important it is for a tribe to keep potentially infected strangers away. Whether or not parasites are drivers of linguistic diversity, separate languages are excellent barriers not just against infection, but also against freeloading.
However, language can also be an aid to freeloading and other forms of predation. Criminal languages and slangs are found all over the world: they strengthen bonds within the group and shield the group’s business from outside scrutiny. But criminals don’t need to invent new languages when they operate far from their homelands. The fatuous liberal slogan “Diversity Is Our Strength” is the opposite of the truth, because fighting crime becomes far more difficult when criminals are using dozens of different languages. In London or New York, the police have to gather intelligence in everything from Albanian and Russian to Turkish and Arabic. Foreign criminals can also delay and complicate justice by pretending not to know English when they’re arrested and prosecuted (as I suggested in “When with Roma”).
Maxwell’s Minority
In short, a minority with its own language can have a distinct advantage in its interactions with the majority. The American army exploited this advantage when it used native speakers of Navajo as so-called “code talkers” during the Second World War. Intercepted messages in Navajo were impossible for Japanese cryptographers to crack, but Allied cryptographers were able to crack the Enigma code because the underlying messages were in highly familiar German. Navajo-speakers had an advantage precisely because they were few in number.
Polyglot crook: Robert Maxwell
A similar advantage is enjoyed today by Israel, which is a small nation with famously effective intelligence services. One big factor in Israel’s success is linguistic: it can spy much more easily on the US, France or Russia than those countries can spy back. Very many Jews speak English, French and Russian, but few non-Jews speak Hebrew, particularly in its modern form. Indeed, a spy agency like Mossad must find it easy to find Jewish speakers of any important language. Look at this extract from a fascinating book called The Assassination of Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy (2003), written by Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillon:
All told, some twelve hundred persons worked at the headquarters, making Mossad one of the smallest global intelligence agencies. But in support there was an operation no other agency could match. It was known as sayanim, a derivative of the Hebrew word lesayeh, to help. Throughout the Diaspora there were tens of thousands of these “helpers”, a striking example of the cohesiveness of the worldwide Jewish community, “proof that no matter the allegiance a sayan has to his or her country, in the end there is a more emotional and mystical one, an allegiance to Israel and need when called upon to help protect it from its enemies”. (Op. cit., ch. 3, pg. 11)
The quoted words are from Meir Amit, “the most ruthless and innovative director-general of Mossad.” The polyglot fraudster Robert Maxwell was a super-sayan, moving easily across national and linguistic boundaries in the interests of himself and Israel. He’s also an example of linguistic camouflage or crypsis, because he was born Ján Binyamin Hoch in Czechoslovakia. Jews who want to hide their Jewish identity often adopt non-Jewish names. The Bolshevik leaders Leon Trotsky and Grigory Zinoviev were born Lev Bronstein and Hirsch Apfelbaum, respectively. Trotsky’s British disciple Tony Cliff was really an Israeli called Yigael Gluckstein. The race-denying anthropologist Ashley Montagu was born Israel Ehrenberg.
Ján Hoch was following a long tradition when he changed his name to Robert Maxwell. His financial crimes were also in a long tradition: Anthony Trollope wrote about a fraudster called Augustus Melmotte, widely regarded as Jewish, in The Way We Live Now, which was first published in 1875. The book quoted above suggests that Maxwell was assassinated by Mossad because he threatened them with exposure unless they helped him as his frauds began to collapse. Humans compete not just by using language, but also by preventing the use of language. Censorship is the rule, not the exception, in human history.
Monitoring the Majority
And censorship is another Jewish tactic in their linguistic competition with non-Jews. In Israel, Hebrew allows Jews to exchange information and opinions freely as they pursue their own best interests, but that’s precisely what they try to prevent among non-Jews outside Israel. Recall Meir Amit’s comments about the primary loyalty of Jews being to Israel, not to the non-Jewish countries in which they were born. A non-Jew who said the same would be called antisemitic and might be prosecuted for hate-speech. The organized Jewish community has tried to forbid discussion of certain topics in the modern West: not just Jewish power, but racial differences and non-White criminality too. Indeed, this Jewish campaign has deep roots. Charles Dickens was strongly criticized for his portrayal of the Jewish villain Fagin in Oliver Twist (1838). In response, he may have invented crypto-Jewish villains for later novels: Daniel Quilp in The Old Curiosity Shop (1841) and Uriah Heep in David Copperfield (1850).
He had to use crypsis because he was writing in English for a general readership. That wouldn’t have applied if he’d been writing in Hebrew or Yiddish for a small Jewish audience. The minority can monitor the majority, but not vice versa. In other words, there’s a linguistic asymmetry that works in the minority’s favour. Dickens’ Jewish critics also insisted on a moral asymmetry: it was wrong, they argued, for someone from the powerful majority to criticize a vulnerable minority. Since Dickens’ day, the organized Jewish community has extended this moral asymmetry to cover other minorities: Whites must not criticize non-Whites, but non-Whites are openly encouraged to criticize Whites.
Jewish networking
Non-Whites are also implicitly encouraged to harm Whites physically. After all, as Susan Sontag said: “The white race is the cancer of human history.” Sontag was glib and overrated, like her friend, the part-Jewish Christopher Hitchens, but they could rely on a vast, heavily Jewish literary network to promote their work. So could the Jewish Marxist Stephen Jay Gould, who was not highly rated by his fellow biologists but became the standard authority on intelligence testing and the non-existence of race. He specialized in the production of what Steve Sailer has called “sonorous imponderables.”
Page from the Torah
Jews are specialists in words and symbols, with a long history of literacy and matrimonial rewards for good scholars. Unlike the non-Jewish majority, which followed livelihoods at all cognitive levels, Jews were concentrated in professions that demanded literacy or numeracy, whether they earned a living as rabbis or shopkeepers. And Jewish scriptures are not merely complex and voluminous: they are written in Hebrew, whose vocabulary, grammar and alphabet are quite distinct from those of Indo-European languages such as German, French and English. Would intellectual competition, and cognitive evolution, have been as intense among Jews if their religion had used a simpler and more familiar language?
Hebrew vs Arabic
Hebrew is unfamiliar partly because it is archaic: it has stayed in the same place as other languages have moved into new linguistic spaces. It’s interesting, and possibly instructive, to compare the Hebrew alphabet with the Arabic. The Hebrew alphabet has evolved little from its Phoenician progenitor and there is no strong tradition of calligraphy and decorated manuscripts in Judaism. There is a dazzling tradition of calligraphy and decoration in Islam and the Arabic alphabet has evolved greatly from the same progenitor.
The same creative impulse and aspiration to beauty can be seen in Muslim architecture, which I would count among the glories of human achievement. For example, what have Jews given the world to match the Taj Mahal? I’m an Islamophobe, of course, but I find Islam far more sympathetic than Judaism. It has certainly created far more beauty: Korans and mosques can be works of art in a way that Talmuds and synagogues never are.
The Taj Mahal
Judaism seems to serve utilitarian ends, not aesthetic or spiritual ones. The Hebrew language and its alphabet have walled Jews off as a minority throughout their history, even when Hebrew ceased to be a language of everyday speech among Jews. Its revival as the national language of Israel was a masterstroke of game theory, whatever the justifications were on other grounds. If Israel used German or Russian instead, its secrets would be far more vulnerable to spies from outside and its national life far more open to outside scrutiny.
Instead, Israel uses a minority language and gains a special advantage. It’s common for philosemites and hasbaras to scoff at the idea that a tiny minority like the Jews could exercise the influence ascribed to them by publications like the Occidental Observer. This scepticism is rather like arguing that wolves and elephants must be much more dangerous to human beings than bacteria and viruses. Small groups, like small creatures, can have special advantages in their competition with the majority. Those advantages didn’t disappear when human beings evolved language and began to compete in new and even more complex ways.
Cowboy Kali Yuga: A Review of "Hell or High Water"
European or Ethnic Identity?
Sully, the Movie
The Wisdom of the Ancients, Part 3: Nature and Nurture; Socrates as Moral Exemplar for the Alt Right
The Wisdom of the Ancients, Part 2: Piety, Aristocratic Values and Necessary Inequality
The Wisdom of the Ancients, Part 1: Greek City-States as Ethnostates
Excellent article! We can see this two ways. One as a hindrance or two as an opportunity to use our many linguistic talents.
“Language, by and large, is a tool used to conceal the truth.” – George Carlin
The fight at Berkeley over Yiannopoulos drew a withering criticism from “veterans” of the 60’s free speech movement. Their criticism of M. Y. is predictable. What catches the eye, however, is the list of names of these 60’s movement people:
Robert Cohen, Bettina Aptheker, Susan Druding, Lee Felsenstein, Barbara Garson, Jackie Goldberg, Lynne Hollander Savio, Steve Lustig, Anita Medal, Jack Radey, Gar Smith, Barbara Stack are the Free Speech Movement Archive Board of Directors.
Damn near every last one!
Languages have within them innate lifestyle paradigms that are, to various degrees, transferred to those who use a particular language in question.
Speaking about the competitive advantages or disadvantages of knowing specific languages according to “game theory” contains within it the innate “adversarial paradigm” that sets people/Races/different forms of life against one another.
A kind of…; “It’s either you or me” mentality.
However, it is just such a mentality that has the entire world at the brink of war or at the very least, in a state of constant fear of loss and,
as a consequence,
in a constant rat race to acquire more.
This kind of mental paradigm is, in the long term, less productive and possibly even counter productive to a global paradigm that strives to compliment other life forms in their quests to better themselves.
Instead of a “game theory” that presupposes adversarial conduct from the outset, would it not be better to find a language that has within it a paradigm that encourages mutual cooperation in fulfilling each others goals?
I know this sounds rather utopian and to a certain degree…, liberally in La-La land…,
but if one examines nature in its elemental forms, one might just realize that the mutually exclusive paradigms although seemingly the norm, are actually not indicative of the nature of life.
Life functions more on a “niche paradigm” that not only tries to fulfill it’s own needs without confrontation whenever possible but tries to do so by maximizing the growth potential of the particular niche it depends upon in a mutually inclusive way.
For example, elephants will wait to eat the avocadoes that fall from the tree on their own if possible and after eating walk several kilometers to a place that offers the best circumstances possible for a an avocado sapling to survive and grow to a mature tree before defecating.
Wolves eat weak and/or diseased caribou to keep the herd healthy before risking a confrontation with a full grown healthy male.
The present confrontational and self-consumptive paradigm, IMO, has been deceptively thrust upon all life by Pathological Mutants who usurp power and Stewardship as a means to satisfy their own addictions to the flesh.
Even though nobility and Knowledge of the Spirit are not part of their life-paradigm, these deceivers have managed to swindle most higher organisms by killing off the best and replacing them with crippled mutations.
There is however a language that, if relearned by Aryan life, can put an end to the Deceptive Semitic Consumptive Paradigm.
Sparta knew this language and the Samurai also knew it. It is a language that, IMO, no matter how crafty, the Crippled and Deformed Jew is incapable of learning.
This, or something like it, seems true to me, too. When languages evolved for the first time, presumably over millennia, they may have encapsulated in themselves genetic attitudes of their hosts/ users/ inventors. I don’t mean grammar or inflections or proper names, but something much more fundamental. Maybe Jews have/had an inherently vicious streak, encoded in their language in some way, and presumably with neural links to their whole system of perception and action. Jewish-controlled media may show, by their persistent and unremitting lies and deception, something encoded into their language. Try a thought experiment: imagine other species developed language. What might such languages be like?
The language of the Spirit is The Will. If the Spirit wishes to move to another place, it simply “…wills…”, or wishes it was there. The will is itself the vehicle by which “…Spiritual Action…” is carried out.
Communication between individuals always revolves around wants, needs and descriptions that inevitably lead to fulfilling either wants or needs.
Spirits, by their very existence, already know what is needed and wants are not a function of the Spirit.
Hence, Spiritually Enlightened Individuals within a realm…, in our case an Earthly one…, intuitively know what is required without needing to speak.
They act in complementary harmonic unison to achieve the required result without ever having to utter a single word.
In cases where Enlightened Individuals are required to terminate Crippled and Demented Life Forms that have acted in unison to spoil the niches and complementary modes of existence of entire worlds, it becomes necessary to formulate more detailed plans.
In such cases, because one is acting on a gross material plain in sometimes complex situations, one must occasionally, out of necessity, resort to using the spoken or written word.
The Jew on the other hand uses language to complicate the very simplistic and straightforward nature of life in order to confuse and thereby gain control over material.
In Sparta, Leonidas merely glanced at his queen to feel the “…Communicated Agreement…” in her eyes as to what “…needed…” to be done with the Persian messengers before kicking them into the bottomless pit.
Do we really need to talk about what “…needs…” to be done with the Eternal Jew?
Speaking of the languages of Hebrew and Arabic, I find it very interesting that both languages are similar to Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese.
We often talk of Jewish people having a small population of 15 million but in fact the reality of it that people that follow Jewish values are 10 times to 100 times as many from 150 million to 1.5 billion similar to the population of German people to Chinese people.
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/queen/whiteman.html
Why the hell one like this comes to live among evil White men?
All players in the struggle for life (Lebenskampf) are forced to use every tool and every chance that they have. If they do not act in this way, they will loose and that means: they will disappear as a group. That is, plain and simple, the rule of nature, the rule of life and survival.
Therefore I am not surprised in case that a minority uses all tricks, deceit, false promises and other things. I exspect them to do so, because I think they must do so. Also I understand that the smallness of a minority has some advantages and some disadvantages for them and in the reverse way for the majority folk.
As said in the above article, the foreign language of the small group gives them protection against being spied. Also their smallness gives them protection against being spied because they know all each other by face and therefore it is difficult to place a spy within their group.
Their smallness tends to make them to have a parasitical life: The main group builds the country, keeps the country running, makes the military defense, the small group takes all this for granted and tries to make the most of it.
Given the numbers 2% for the smallgroup and 98% for the majoritygroup, than in “sucking (financially) from the other group” each member of the smallgroup has 49 potential victims within the other group.
In case the majoritygroup wanted to do the reverse thing, 49 members would have to try to suck alltogether form one single member of the smallgroup. That would not give any net result, it is worthless.
From this calculation, the economic advantage to suck from the other group is for the single member of the smallgroup by the factor (49 times 49=2401) higher than for the single member of the majoritygroup in the reverse situation. Therefore the smallgroup tends to have a sucking existence, and the majoritygroup tends to have a working existence. This mathematical calculation is easy to understand.
From the above said it is understandable, that the majoritygroup cannot copy the way to success of the smallgroup. The majoritygroup must find its own way to secure its own survival.
I think we must diffuse the following meme.
Globalists want to turn the whole world into one big Yugoslavia.
Yugoslavia broke up into many ethnic states, the opposite what the globalists want for the whole world. On the contrary, the globalists want to unite the whole world into one big super state that they control, while the various races mix into one brown mass. In short, the globalists want to turn the whole world into one big Brazil.
Did you get the point? Yugoslavia too was proclaimed as the union of brotherly nations. Diversity was supposed to be its greatest strength. It wasn’t. This is the not-so-subtle point. Brazil is a bad example because it holds together. They do want to turn the world into one big favela. You can tell it like this in a meme with Brazil.
I just asked this question on Quora:
“Country A has a large number of terrorists per 100K pop. Country B has a small number per 100K. What happens when u move lrge nmbrs ppl from A to B?”
—
It will most likely be flagged as insincere because Quora stops most of these kinds of discussions. The answer is that the number of terrorists per 100K population in country B increases.
Muslim, Jewish, Black and Latino and Asian immigrants are just natures way of telling us that a multi-ancestral, multi-historical, multi-mythological, multi-linguistic, multi-racial-identity society, is a very, very, very bad idea.
There are millions of Arabs that know modern Hebrew. We must encourage them to learn it even better, as a means of defeating their enemy. More modern Hebrew classes must be offered in our universities.
We must encourage Arabs to translate everything from Hebrew. Now it’s cheap, and can spread as pdf files.
Jews probably do the best translating from Hebrew, despite the conflict of interest. Note Yael Lotan’s masterful translation of Shlomo Sand’s “The Invention of the Jewish People.”
She died, in Israel, not long after her translation was published. Odd, that. Sand continues alive, and has since written “The Invention of the Land of Israel,” translated to English by someone else. I wonder if that person is alive.
What age was she? Her wikipedia page was obviously deleted. Nothing to see here. I do think that Israel castigates and eliminates troublemakers. Even Ariel Toaff, the son of Elio Toaff, the chief rabbi of Italy for some 50 years, was castigated for “Blood Passover”.
There is a lot more linguistic diversity in Europe than East Asia. I do not think linguistic diversity is driven by parasite diversity per se. I think it just has to do with ingroup-outgroup identification. It ought to be noted that language influences sexual behaviour, therefore evolution. People who have a commnon language tend to be much more likely to mate with each other than those who do not. Language is an important aspect of human procreation that is often ignored. For all the liberal warnings against conflating language and ethnicity, I do really think that people who speak a common language are ultimately destined to become one ethnicity or start speaking different languages along ethnic/racial lines. See how Ebonics emerged. There are many variants of English now, and they are associated with different racial/ethnic backgrounds. I believe these may eventually become languages of their own…. Languages derived from English like different languages were once derived from Latin.
Even though written Chinese is incredibly consistent across the vast breadth of China, SPOKEN Chinese can be unintelligible from one village to the next.
I think literacy is kind of new among the Chinese, generally. The difficulty of attaining literacy may bear on this, though it is being overcome at great expense and effort.
I have studied this as well, but generally linguistic diversity (spoken or otherwise) is lower than in Europe. There is a lot more linguistic diversity among Whites than East Asians. Europe has a higher concentration of linguistic diversity than China. I speak Cantonese myself. I am familiar with linguistic diversity in China.
Stupidophobe = islamophobe
The probability of an event occurring in the future is equal to the relative frequency at which the event occurred in the past. Have Muslim terror attacks in the West occurred pretty frequently in the last few years? We are not likely to go another quarter without another Muslim terror attack in the West.
—
It’s interesting that I happened upon that quote because all week I’ve been thinking how the Democrat party is the party of freaks. The UNODC data shows that blacks are the most murderous people on earth and Latin Americans are just a tick behind and those two groups are the biggest supporters of the Democrat party. And most every gay or transgender freak supports the Democrats as well. I bet most bearded circus ladies vote Democrat as well. And, yes, I understand the Republicans today are not much better.
“The UNODC data shows that blacks are the most murderous people on earth and Latin Americans are just a tick behind and those two groups are the biggest supporters of the Democrat party. And most every gay or transgender freak supports the Democrats as well. I bet most bearded circus ladies vote Democrat as well. ”
Of course, “data” would show homosexuals to be entirely the opposite of “those two groups,” peaceful, intelligent, an asset to any movement, yet the Jew has taught you to consider them “freaks” so that they vote entirely Democratic. What a good goy you are!
Is it allowed here at TOO to note simply the strange fact that the Enigma Code somehow failed to notice that particular industrial scale genocide happening on its watch?
I can’t speak for the moderator but I suspect he/she will give you a pass on your oblique hint; which is, may I say, a study in subtlety.
There were Jewish organizations in New York that pointed out that 6 million Jews were being killed. Nobody listened to because… 6 million Jews are always being killed, like by Tzar or by anybody else.
The leaders of England, USA, France and Russia and most of each of these countries’ top military commanders wrote autobiographies a full 10 years after WW2’s end.
Between them all, one would be hard pressed to come up with a couple of pages that even mention a so called “Event” that effectively wiped out a population nearly equivalent to the combined population of both Norway and Denmark!
One would think if Hitler wiped out the equivalent of the every man woman and child in both Norway AND Denmark within a 5 year period that they might write a little more that 2 pages between them no?
If Putin, lets just say for arguments sake, turned Norway and Denmark into virtual “Ghost Towns” during his second term in office, one would think that the leaders of the USA, GB, France, and Germany as well as their military commanders would write more than two pages between them about the event no?
One could go on forever listing the holes in the story…
No offence, but I doubt if the (((leaders))) of England, USA, France and Russia mentioned other events, notably the (((USSR))) wiping out tens of millions of whites.
How can a code fail to notice anything? I didn’t think codes noticed.
“I’m an islamophobe of course” as if it’s a casual topic such as liking sugar in your coffee. I’m sorry to hear you are fearful, although I understand why you may feel that way as the western media has not painted an accurate image of Islam at all. I highly recommend you reach out to a local mosque and start asking questions so you may learn what a peaceful religion it really is (whether or not you agree with its beliefs is not relevant), it’s important to educate ourselves as much as possible about the things which scare us as that’s usually the cause of the fear, misunderstanding. Terrorism and backward societies which treat women as second class citizens are not a part of Islam but a product of people who have used religion as a tool for their own power gain and political reasons. The more you learn, the more you will see that these are cultural and political issues.. which have nothing to do with Islam. Interesting article nonetheless thank you for sharing.
What? You mean there’s not going to be another mass killing of westerners by Muslims in the next couple of months or so? Wanna bet?
Well, there’s just been a sort-of “mass” shooting of 5 men in a mosque in Canada by a white French Kanuckistanian boy, and the entire population from what I read is having a complete mental breakdown (out of sympathy).
my local mosque produced two famous terrorists in the last few years. And the JDL got in trouble for wanting to bomb the offices of one of our representatives to congress.
and even as i type this the Jewish Pastors connected to that outfit are teaching that USA is Egypt or Rome and so we are the bad guys. And the local mosque Pastor is doing the same.
But i dont see them as the biggest threat to my country. There’s an even bigger one. They are the symptoms.
What, just like the MSM says happened? News in Studio # 4, drama in #5; ne’er the two shall meet.
There are reasons other than fairy tales to object to Middle Easterners in Christendom.
Can you tell us what the calligraphy says? Either the Arabic or the Hebrew?
Your handle pretty well determines your identity and what you will allow yourself to see. If you define yourself as “a person who wants peace,” then you’ll edit out anything that threatens your self-definition. The Koran, the Hadith, the life of Mohammed and 1400 years of history do not support your desire, however.
This was a fascinating article. Very insightful. Crypsis, camouflage and deception are key tools in the Jewish arsenal.
With respect; and I hope this point doesn’t seem too trifling — but flowers e.g. don’t ‘mimic’ bees, or moths ‘mimic’ wasps. Each species evolves in a way largely dependent on food and predators etc. If one individual has an advantage, it may have more offspring. Mr Langdon’s wording suggests a deliberate, conscious purpose. In fact it’s entirely unconscious, and that is a very important point, suggesting that even in human beings adaptations may be entirely unconscious. Rather worryingly, prey may be entirely unaware of being potential prey, and blithely play on, oblivious to the possibilities of doom.
.
NB very good point on languages. I’d more or less assumed a common language must be a good thing, and that languages diffuse to the extent that travel allows at the time; but of course cryptic communications open up more possibilities.
Are the jews aware of their evil?
No. Nobody believes themselves evil, nobody. I had this Jewish colleague. I was standing idle and decided to help her. She sneaked, went and talked to the Muslim professor, and slapped me with 5 more hours of work. Good intentions gone wrong, with Jews.
Then, in a matter of days it became clear that she was my student next semester. She told me, I will take your class only if you promise me A. She insisted on it. I didn’t promise anything, she still took my class. She is completely unaware of what she did me few days earlier. Only this can explain why she took my class. Story ongoing.
As I started to become racially/culturally/spiritually aware, I noticed a curious “coincidence” regarding Hebrew and Arabic script. The form of the Hebrew characters seems to resemble flames, while the form of the Arabic characters seems to resemble swords/scimitars. (Not so much in the Arabic sample shown above, but in many other examples I’ve seen.)
Could there be a spiritual component to this? Arabs/Muslims are spiritually motivated by war and butchery, while Jews are spiritually motivated by the fires of Hell.
Although graphology, the study of stylistic nuances in writing, is regarded as a pseudo science, the careful study of the handwriting of various individuals can provide psychological insights otherwise obtainable only by psychometric testing. The pressure, loops, extensions, and connections within words and general character of cursive scripts are windows to the writer’s attitudes and motivations. So yes, your observation is largely correct.
My understanding is that Arabic is less developed, i.e. purer and less simplified, than Hebrew, bec. Arabic did not become a written language until the Koran. Rich urban Moslems would have their children spend time among the Bedouin, to absorb the purer language, like our British elites used to send kids to Scotland. Hebrew is like Italian vs Arabic being Latin. Is it “simplified” or “rationalized” and so advanced or “dumbed down” and so decadent?
Philip Roth has one of his characters, a boy in Hebrew school, say that the letter reminded him of “squashed bugs” which is pretty accurate I think. The overworked student in Hesse’s Beneath the Wheel has some interesting observations on the differences btw reading the OT in Hebrew vs Luther’s German.
“Arabic did not become a written language until the Koran.”
— I’ve seen several suggestions that Islam was invented by Jews, and palmed off onto Arabs, under the pretence that Mohammed wrote (or co-wrote) it. Any view on that? Could Arabic script, and the way it’s used, be based on Hebrew (or of course some other Semitic language)? It wouldn’t surprise me. For example, both are right-to-left.
— NB Max Beerbohm though Greek letters looked irregular and disorganised, like flies – as opposed to the solidity of Latin letters (which may have been formed by incisions from stone).
Hi Mo Farah.
When you accuse DJT of being ignorant, you might want to compare the average German & Scottish IQ (possibly the two smartest races on earth) versus the Somali IQ. Google Scottish inventors… German engineering / car companies.
Re “Muslim” architecture. The taj mahal is not beautiful because of the religion of the designers any more than the great baroque and gothic cathedrals of Europe were magnificent because of the Christian affiliation of those involved in its creation. “Muslim” architecture was not invented from the ground up in the area where Islam originated. It copied heavily if not completely from the architecture of white and far eastern peoples. Religion is generally proxy for race.
Mr. Langdon:
You have stated “I’m an Islamophobe, of course,…”. What fear do you have of Islam that is irrational?
According to Anthropology 101, the first thing you must have for a cohesive society is a common language. Minorities speaking in their native tongue should be considered the same as whispering in front of someone.
Diversity is our greatest weakness.
Justin Trudeau disagrees with you. Justin Trudeau is a moron.
—
Could Susan Sontag, when making her infamous anti-White screed, possibly been projecting ? ?
No, she was not projecting. She was applying chutzpa, deliberately. Same as in Germany now. Thousands of Muslims rape German women in the main square. A film comes out that describes the rape of a Muslim woman by 2 Germans. They know what they are doing. They lie with a straight face. They call us racists while they are weaseling the life out of us. Deliberately, not by projection.
Projection is often a form of unmitigated gall, true. Ironically, her slanderous exclamation about Whites is, however, obviously more applicable to her own breed. As in the Anglo folk saying: the pot calling the kettle black.
It’s absurd to say there is no tradition of calligraphy among the Jews!
Does the author even know what is a Sofer?
That too minimalist.
Linguistics, yes, but secondary to the historic economic role and its logical conclusion in the form of the ‘Rothschilds’ is both the crowning achievement and the sine qua non of existence of the Tribe in the modern world.
Thank you for this interesting piece. This a much needed debate. Someone once said that Hebrew was a secret language for criminals. A lot more could and should be said about the rabbinical art of word-manipulation and word magic…