Zionist Extremism as Product of the Internal Dynamics of Judaism, Part 4: Toward a “Greater Israel”

Kevin MacDonald


Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

Given the tendency for Jewish radicals to carry the day, it is worth describing the most radical Zionist fringe as it exists now. It is common among radical Zionists to project a much larger Israel that reflects God’s covenant with Abraham. Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, maintained that the area of the Jewish state stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.”110 This reflects God’s covenant with Abraham in Genesis 15: 18–20 and Joshua 1 3–4: “To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates, the land of the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.” The flexibility of the ultimate aims of Zionism can also be seen by Ben-Gurion’s comment in 1936 that

The acceptance of partition [of the Palestinian Mandate] does not commit us to renounce Transjordan [i.e., the modern state of Jordan]; one does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today. But the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concern of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them.111

Ben-Gurion’s vision of “the boundaries of Zionist aspirations” included southern Lebanon, southern Syria, all of Jordan, and the Sinai.112 (After conquering the Sinai in 1956, Ben-Gurion announced to the Knesset that “Our army did not infringe on Egyptian territory… Our operations were restricted to the Sinai Peninsula alone.”113 Or consider Golda Meir’s statement that the borders of Israel “are where Jews live, not where there is a line on the map.”114

These views are common among the more extreme Zionists today— especially the fundamentalists and the settler movement—notably Gush Emunim—who now set the tone in Israel. A prominent rabbi associated with these movements stated: “We must live in this land even at the price of war. Moreover, even if there is peace, we must instigate wars of liberation in order to conquer [the land].”115 Indeed, in the opinion of Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky, “It is not unreasonable to assume that Gush Emunim, if it possessed the power and control, would use nuclear weapons in warfare to attempt to achieve its purpose.”116 This image of a “Greater Israel” is also much on the minds of activists in the Muslim world. For example, in a 1998 interview Osama bin Laden stated,

[W]e know at least one reason behind the symbolic participation of the Western forces [in Saudi Arabia] and that is to support the Jewish and Zionist plans for expansion of what is called the Great Israel…. Their presence has no meaning save one and that is to offer support to the Jews in Palestine who are in need of their Christian brothers to achieve full control over the Arab Peninsula which they intend to make an important part of the so called Greater Israel.117


Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

To recap: A century ago Zionism was a minority movement within Diaspora Judaism, with the dominant assimilationist Jews in the West opposing it at least partly because Zionism raised the old dual loyalty issue, which has been a potent source of anti-Semitism throughout the ages. The vast majority of Jews eventually became Zionists, to the point that now not only are Diaspora Jews Zionists, they are indispensable supporters of the most fanatic elements within Israel. Within Israel, the radicals have also won the day, and the state has evolved to the point where the influence of moderates in the tradition of Moshe Sharett is a distant memory. The fanatics keep pushing the envelope, forcing other Jews to either go along with their agenda or to simply cease being part of the Jewish community. Not long ago it was common to talk to American Jews who would say they support Israel but deplore the settlements. Now such talk among Jews is an anachronism, because support for Israel demands support for the settlements. The only refuge for such talk is the increasingly isolated Jewish critics of Israel, such as Israel Shamir118 and, to a much lesser extent, Michael Lerner’s Tikkun.119 [or sites like Mondoweiss]. The trajectory of Zionism has soared from its being a minority within a minority to its dominating the U.S. Congress, the executive branch, and the entire U.S. foreign policy apparatus.

And because the Israeli occupation and large-scale settlement of the West Bank unleashed a wave of terrorist-style violence against Israel, Jews perceive Israel as under threat. [In Netanyahu’s critique of the UN Security Council resolution, he emphasized Palestinan terrorism as the main reason preventing a two-state solution.] As with any committed group, Jewish commitment increases in times of perceived threat to the community. The typical response of Diaspora Jews to the recent violence has not been to renounce Jewish identity but to strongly support the Sharon government and rationalize its actions. This has been typical of Jewish history in general. For example, during the 1967 and 1973 wars there were huge upsurges of support for Israel and strengthened Jewish identity among American Jews: Arthur Hertzberg, a prominent Zionist, wrote that “the immediate reaction of American Jewry to the crisis was far more intense and widespread than anyone could have foreseen. Many Jews would never have believed that grave danger to Israel could dominate their thoughts and emotions to the exclusion of everything else.”120 The same thing is happening now. The typical response to Israel’s current situation is for Jews to identify even more strongly with Israel and to exclude Jews who criticize Israel or support Palestinian claims in any way.

This “rallying around the flag” in times of crisis fits well with the psychology of ethnocentrism: When under attack, groups become more unified and more conscious of boundaries, and have a greater tendency to form negative stereotypes of the outgroup. This has happened throughout Jewish history.121

Several commentators have noted the void on the Jewish left as the conflict with the Palestinians has escalated under the Sharon government. As noted above, surveys in the 1980s routinely found that half of U.S. Jews opposed settlements on the West Bank and favored a Palestinian state.122 Such sentiments have declined precipitously in the current climate:

At a progressive synagogue on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, Rabbi Rolando Matalo was torn between his longtime support for Palestinian human rights and his support for an Israel under siege. “There is a definite void on the left,” said Matalo…. Many American Jewish leaders say Israel’s current state of emergency—and growing signs of anti-Semitism around the world—have unified the faithful here in a way not seen since the 1967 and 1973 wars…. These feelings shift back and forth, but right now they’re tilting toward tribalism.123

Note that the author of this article, Josh Getlin, portrays Israel as being “under siege,” even though Israel is the occupying power and has killed far more Palestinians than the Palestinians have killed Israelis.

“I don’t recall a time in modern history when Jews have felt so vulnerable,” said Rabbi Martin Hier, dean and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles…. This week, the center will be mailing out 600,000 “call to action” brochures that say “Israel is fighting for her life” and urge American Jews to contact government leaders and media organizations worldwide…. Rabbi Mark Diamond, executive vice president of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California, said debate over the West Bank invasion and the attack on the Palestinian Jenin refugee camp is overshadowed by “a strong sense that Israel needs us, that the world Jewry needs us, that this is our wake-up call.” He said he has been overwhelmed in recent weeks by numerous calls from members of synagogues asking what they can do to help or where they can send a check…. “I have American friends who might have been moderate before on the issue of negotiating peace, but now they think: ‘Our whole survival is at stake, so let’s just destroy them all,’” said Victor Nye, a Brooklyn, N.Y., businessman who describes himself as a passionate supporter of Israel.

In this atmosphere, Jews who dissent are seen as traitors, and liberal Jews have a great deal of anxiety that they will be ostracized from the Jewish community for criticizing Israel.124 This phenomenon is not new. During the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, Richard Cohen of the Washington Post criticized the Begin government and was inundated with protests from Jews. “Here dissent becomes treason—and treason not to a state or even an ideal (Zionism), but to a people. There is tremendous pressure for conformity, to show a united front and to adopt the view that what is best for Israel is something only the government there can know.”125 During the same period, Nat Hentoff noted in the Village Voice, “I know staff workers for the American Jewish Committee and the American Jewish Congress who agonize about their failure to speak out, even on their own time, against Israeli injustice. They don’t, because they figure they’ll get fired if they do.”126

Reflecting the fact that Jews who advocate peace with the Palestinians are on the defensive, funding has dried up for causes associated with criticism of Israel. The following is a note posted on the website of Tikkun by its editor, Michael Lerner:

TIKKUNMagazine is in trouble—because we have continued to insist on the rights of the Palestinian people to full self-determination. For years we’ve called for an end to the Occupation and dismantling of the Israeli settlements. We’ve called on the Palestinian people to follow the example of Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela and Gandhi—and we’ve critiqued terrorism against Israel, and insisted on Israel’s right to security. But we’ve also critiqued Israel’s house demolitions, torture, and grabbing of land. For years, we had much support. But since Intifada II began this past September, many Jews have stopped supporting us—and we’ve lost subscribers and donors. Would you consider helping us out?”127

Another sign that Jews who are “soft” on Israel are being pushed out of the Jewish community is an article by Philip Weiss.128 The refusal of liberal American Jews to make an independent stand has left the American left helpless. American liberalism has always drawn strength from Jews. They are among the largest contributors to the Democratic Party; they have brought a special perspective to any number of social-justice questions, from the advancement of blacks and women to free speech. They fostered multiculturalism…. The Holocaust continues to be the baseline reference for Jews when thinking about their relationship to the world, and the Palestinians. A couple of months ago, I got an e-mail from a friend of a friend in Israel about the latest bus-bombing. “They’re going to kill us all,” was the headline. (No matter that Israel has one of largest armies in the world, and that many more Palestinians have died than Israelis). Once, when I suggested to a liberal journalist friend that Americans had a right to discuss issues involving Jewish success in the American power structure—just as we examined the WASP culture of the establishment a generation ago—he said, “Well, we know where that conversation ends up: in the ovens of Auschwitz.”

Because of Jewish ethnocentrism and group commitment, stories of Jews being killed are seen as the portending of another Holocaust and the extinction of the Jewish people rather than a response to a savage occupation—a clear instance of moral particularism writ large.

The same thing is happening in Canada….

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

18 Comments to "Zionist Extremism as Product of the Internal Dynamics of Judaism, Part 4: Toward a “Greater Israel”"

  1. Florian's Gravatar Florian
    January 5, 2017 - 1:13 am | Permalink

    Coming Soon – The Wrath of Moses

    Has Mr. Obama seen that film “Munich?”

    http://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Democrats-join-Senate-to-condemn-Obama-backed-UN-Israel-resolution-477479

    I know Charles Schumer, Michael Bennet and others are members of the golden club but what about Joe Donnelly, Bob Casey, Chris Coon and Bill Nelson or are these usual English/Irish/Scottish servants of the golden club?

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      January 6, 2017 - 6:25 pm | Permalink

      Florian, those Palestinians who annihilated the Israeli team at the M Olympics, initially flew into East-Berlin’s Schoenefeld airport, after which, they were hosted by East-Berlin for some time. Third down from their Minister of State Security, Erich Mielke, was one {{{Marcus Wolf}}}, head of Foreign Intelligence for the STASI. This man was able to slide his agent, Guenter Guillaume, not only into Chancellor Brandt’s own Office, but into his closest family as well; obtaining top-top secrets of NATO.
      These Palestinians then entered West-Berlin, likely through Checkpoint Charlie, where they would have been checked by US MPs, from where they flew to M.
      {{{Marcus}}} stated in an interview in Israel, that they had no involvement in that affair, countering any suspicion, that this was another false flag operation. Doing so he couldn’t suppress a smile. A M-E Embassy chauffer from among that E-B crowd, was alleged to be the bomber of West-Berlin’s La Bella disco, frequented by US personnel, killing three; two Americans. Yet another in a long list of false flags ? Gaddafi got the blame. Participating local police investigators scoffed at their superiors’ conclusion, as in line with their Government’s official US-directed propaganda position. I saw Hollywood’s fable rendition years ago, but doubt it included the above raw facts.
      Zionists in their own writings declared, that a few million dead of theirs, in the interest of creating Israel, were expendable. What about their small team in Munich being expended to now maintain Israel ? Entirely within their “rationality”.

  2. January 4, 2017 - 4:15 pm | Permalink

    I’m not convinced there has been any real change at all. Jews have always prayed/sung about returning to Jerusalem, and presumably to all territories ‘promised’ in their self-written books. As for the “void on the Jewish left” there is no Jewish left: socialism at least in the white sense was aimed at the world, with national socialism a poor second. There’s nothing like that in Judaism. And it’s amusing to see some Jewish magazine asking for money; and “… follow the example of Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela and Gandhi…”, all notorious phoneys. I won’t comment on the nuke material, beyond saying it’s fake and the fakery is becoming better known. However as always Jews lie and deceive all the time, on and on.

  3. RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
    January 4, 2017 - 11:51 am | Permalink

    The leading Jews, IMO, must have some understanding of Spiritual Transcendentalism.
    They use language and “…other projections…”, –
    that naturally seem to fit within the paradigm of a Spiritual Enlightenment Movement, –
    and then twist the meanings to satisfy their pathological desire to over-ride life’s natural proclivity to aspire towards Freedom and Nobility and redirect this life force against itself to foster a kind of “Broke’ Back” Subservience.

    I do not have the resources to produce a “peer reviewed and bibliographed Proof” of the
    “…on balance manifest obviousness…”…,
    that the Rothschild Family of Banksters and (((their))) most closely related, criminally and pathologically inclined behaviorally sycophants work together to orchestrate Jews on a global level but…,
    given (((their))) comparatively smallish but growing numbers, relatively weak (and in many cases what I would go so far as to call “…crippled…”) physical dispensation and,
    black-hearted cowardice when confronted by a True Aryan Warrior Spirit,
    (((they))) addictively rely upon centralized control to project a multiplied image of their actual power.

    The reason Hitler was/is hated so much by Jews was that he knew the above and simply stopped playing by their rules.
    When (((they))) project images of immaculately and uniformly dressed Jews, some rich and others undoubtedly not so rich, sitting smugly and securely at bountifully laid harvest tables in hallowed halls of opulent oak and mahogany, by the hundreds or even thousands, –
    (((their))) impression of seeming omnipotence can be daunting to say the least.

    But the truth could not be further from the visual image than imagined.

    Yes…, the conference room full is of Jews being lectured to by a possibly singularly rich thieving, murderous “philanthropic” Jew but, wearing a rabbi’s attire or posturing like a self-important Jew does not mean the majority of those in attendance are either rich or powerful.
    Most likely…, what you see in the conference room is all there is. They probably scraped every nook and cranny of the immediate neighbourhood to fill that room up.

    And since (((their))) [as opposed to our White] community has the benefit of being unilaterally both in the know as to their collusive and murderous designs, but also functions as a de facto military force in carrying these designs out, (((they))) can apply the talents of those in the room to produce a multiplier effect.
    (i.e. stage props, table settings/arrangements, mirrors, “cinematographics”, speech writing [projection through lies], etc…) upon the hapless Goyem who are duly impressed with the scope of (((their))) power is multiplied if presented in unison.

    Statements to the effect that:

    “… the borders of Israel “are where Jews live, not where there is a line on the map.”114”

    are actually quite correct when applied to all life.

    The similar argument can be made by Whites:

    How easy it would be, if only whites would finally begin talking amongst themselves about how Jews operate, for a REAL FORCE of not 600, but 6,000, well armed American Aryans to simply enter that building, turn those tables,
    laid so eloquently with the proceeds of Organized Jewish Crime,
    over and then kick the living sh!t out of each and every one of those self-important pompous Jews before burning their assembly hall, mahogany book shelves and all, to the ground.

    The same could be said for every area (i.e. Hollywood, Wall Street, Miami, etc…) where Jews have usurped and maintain power by keeping the Aryan Spirit in a “…Broke’ Back…” condition.

    Jewish power, as Hitler so practically demonstrated, albeit nearly a century before his time
    (imagine what Hitler would have achieved in the era of the modern digital social network?),
    is a mile wide and an inch deep.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      January 5, 2017 - 5:31 am | Permalink

      In Adolf Hitler the Jewish community simply met an individual with an ego as big as their own.

      • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
        January 6, 2017 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

        “His ego” got him and millions of others into trouble and the grave, because he had the audacity to “moon” Wall Street. He blew them off, re-creating the Reichsmark, ” backed not by your Jewish gold, but by the industriousness and knowhow of my people “. His international barter system obviated the necessity for countries to run to Wall Street for foreign exchange to pay for imports, at 5-6 percent commission. His social policies were anathema to British and US capitalism. Parliament itself had debates on how to forbid the docking of German “Strength through Joy” luxury liners, crammed with working-class passengers; disembarking and telling the inquisitive, that their children are at home in state-funded Kindergarten, that they had free medical services and twice annually two weeks paid vacations. His policies had to be stopped from infecting the world. Had he never even insulted a Jew, he had to go, and millions of us as well; damned near including me on several occasions. Saddam and Gaddafi as well repeated Hitler’s unforgivable sins. They are dead, along with hundreds of thousands of their people.

  4. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    January 4, 2017 - 11:09 am | Permalink

    It is important to recognize that not every Jew in the cosmos is a Zionist, and those that are not should not be driven into that camp by antisemitic suspicion, insult or harassment.

    • Bob's Gravatar Bob
      January 4, 2017 - 6:42 pm | Permalink

      It is important to recognize that not every Jew in the cosmos is a Zionist, and those that are not should not be driven into that camp by antisemitic suspicion, insult or harassment.

      I see it far more simply…Anyone who self-identifies as a “Jew” IS a Jew and should be regarded as such by everyone else regardless of what particular political positions they may or may not espouse. Their political positions are irrelevant to the matter. This is really basic stuff…you are part of this group, or that group, but you cannot be part of both.

      Those who may have some Jewish heritage, but who self-identify with the White majority (meaning that they have actually assimilated) fall under a different classification, IMO. But then, anyone who is really assimilated into the majority culture, cannot be “driven” into the Zionist camp by by anything “anti-semitic” any more than a native born WASP.

      Your entire premise is faulty in that you seem to ascribe suspicion of Jews to “anti-semitism” rather than to a rational reaction to the activities of Jewish organizations and people.

    • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
      January 4, 2017 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

      What’s wrong with Zionist? I’m a White Nationalist and I’m a Zionist. I want all the Jews in Israel not here in the US. My fondest wish is that all Jews be driven into the Zionist camp, pack up and move to Israel.

      “…antisemitic suspicion…”

      Why shouldn’t we be suspicious? Our counties political hacks are largely funded by Jews, the major TV stations are run by Jews, the magazines are run by Jews, the newspapers are run by Jews and every one of these insist that we need more diversity. That we need to chase down the last White Man in the last White neighborhood and diversify it. Why shouldn’t we be suspicious when a war that, to my eyes only supported Jewish aims in the middle east, was started by an odd destruction of American buildings. The oddest being building #7 that fell the same speed as a rock dropped in mid-air. If the building fell the same speed, and it did, as a rock dropped in air that means that the building was held up by the same element that the rock was…air. Gravity acts EXACTLY the same on all materials. Well we know the building wasn’t hovering in the air so the reasonable assumption is the bottom was somehow taken out from under it. My guess is some sort of demolition. Now please inform me why we shouldn’t be suspicious.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      January 5, 2017 - 2:05 am | Permalink

      Why should it be up to us, antisemites or not, to prevent Jews from being driven into the Zionist camp?
      Although not every White in the cosmos may be an antisemite, those that are not should not be driven into that camp by anti-white propaganda, degradation of white culture, and promotion of mass 3rd world immigration into white homelands by Jews.

    • Ash Davidson's Gravatar Ash Davidson
      January 5, 2017 - 4:31 am | Permalink

      That’s precisely the point of the article. While not all jews are zionists it is the zionists who inevitably end up in charge. Read it again.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      January 5, 2017 - 5:22 am | Permalink

      David Ashton,

      I suggest worrying about you and yours. Don’t worry about the Japanese or Jewish communities; they doing very well without you.

    • another reader's Gravatar another reader
      January 5, 2017 - 6:09 am | Permalink

      Here’s a quote from part I of this series:

      I am the God who created heaven and earth. I shall increase you, and multiply you exceedingly; and kings shall come from you and shall rule wherever the foot of the sons of man has trodden. I shall give to your seed all the earth which is under heaven, and they shall rule over all the nations according to their desire; and afterwards they shall draw the whole earth to themselves and shall inherit it forever.

      Here, the goal of Judaism is stated in plain words: the enslavement and eventual extermination of the rest of mankind. In fact, “the rest of mankind” here is inappropriate, since Jews don’t even consider us non-Jews to be humans. A quote from the second part of this series:

      As Mendel of Rymanów put it, ‘A Gentile does not have a heart, although he has an organ that resembles a heart.’ ”24 All nations exist only by virtue of the Jewish people: “Erez Yisreal [the land of Israel] is the essence of the world and all vitality stems from it.”25 Similar attitudes are common among contemporary Jewish fundamentalists and the settler movement in Israel.

      So, Jews certainly don’t bother to distinguish between Gentiles. To them, we are nothing but animals, fit only for exploitation and extermination. Given this, we Gentiles are under no obligation to distinguish between “good” and “bad” Jews. Our primary obligation is to ensure the survival and flourishing of our own peoples. Since the Jews have openly declared their desire to exterminate us, our only logical response is to remove them from our midst. Anything else would mean transfering the problem to our descendants. And this would be the height of immorality.

  5. January 4, 2017 - 10:28 am | Permalink

    “Consider Golda Meir’s statement that the borders of Israel ‘are where Jews live, not where there is a line on the map.’”

    Funny thing, this was the same “evil” sentiment that marched the world off to war. In the late thirties, Hitler was incensed at the manner in which Germans were being tortured and murdered by the Poles. Like Meir, he made a clear statement that Germany would commit its support to Germans, no matter where they lived.

    When the Poles refused to back off from their horrific treatment of Germans, Hitler marched into Poland from the west, while Jewish commissars marched in unopposed from the east. These were the same Jewish commissars that would later execute some 22,000 ruling class Poles in the Katyn forest. This horrendous, cold-blooded massacre would remain unmatched by any later act or “atrocity” carried out by German National Socialists.

    However, there was a major difference between Germany’s actions and current Israeli actions. Unlike the situation in Israel, where Jews have committed outright theft of land in the disputed region, the Polish region where Germans were being persecuted had been part of Germany until the then recent Versailles Treaty ceded it to Poland.

    Once again Jewish duplicity and hypocrisy are glaringly evident to anyone seriously studying these historical matters.

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      January 5, 2017 - 5:09 am | Permalink

      As usual, you hit the nail on the head, Arch Stanton. I would claim that duplicity and hypocrisy are the Jewish genius race’s characteristics as naivety seems to be the case with ethnic Poles. Poland is now pursuing exactly the same kind of (pathological) patriotism that the moron called marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly bestowed on the Poles in 1939, which led to further destruction of the newly re-established Polish nation-state – and to the World War II. The “patriot” who appeared from nowhere, president Andrzej Duda, and Jaroslaw Kaczynski (the commy coat turner who became the head of the governing party, PiS) dutifully serve as agents provocateurs against Russia. I doubt neither of these treacherous policies would be possible to embark on without major support/push from the special (((minority))). Officially this minority is because of the Shoah and the Polish anti-semitism close to non-existent. Even if so, omnipresence in person is not needed in a bankster-cracy.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      January 5, 2017 - 6:07 am | Permalink

      (Mod. Note: Mr. Ashton, please don’t ask questions of other commenters which lead to conflict, ie. “flame wars”. Many of your posts in the last few months were never approved, due to this propensity to insert comments and questions which can only be seen as aggressive toward other commenters. We want commenters here to comment on the topic of the article, and not start fights. Try to follow that, if you can.)

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        January 6, 2017 - 11:57 am | Permalink

        Impossible to access TOO directly during January 6 – until 8 PM GMT via David Irving’s site. No wish to “start fights”, though I never mind anyone debating my arguments with the polite “Reply” facility already provided. Happy New Year!

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      January 7, 2017 - 10:16 am | Permalink

      Arch, for years I had an exceedingly well-informed Albanian friend. His father, a medical doctor, was a member of the large forensic team investigating Katyn. Heart-rending details. Western Allies officer POWs as well; Red Cross, etc.. I forget whether Katyn was one of the counts at Nuremberg, or was omitted for fear of even a merely pro-forma defense.
      That undulating North German Plain is too inviting for cavalry and tank charges in both directions. “Fortress Schengen” appears a good solution. Virtually impossible to distinguish the physiognomies of those Katyn victims on photos submitted by family survivors from those of the Luftwaffe and RAF. Genocide.
      I was privileged to attend the formal installation of a Katyn memorial in Toronto, by Lake Ontario. Ca. 25,000 Poles and others from mostly between Buffalo and Chicago. Several in WW II uniforms, sabers and all. The PM had to explain to Moscow, that he was powerless to force Toronto not to permit the memorial.
      A hello to Alicia as well – spring is not that far off.

Comments are closed.