Rober Kagan: Trump’s Endgame Is Surrender
Neocons like Kagan be pissed. Of course, this will unleash incredible pressure on Trump for boots on the ground, nuclear weapons, etc.
Trump’s Endgame Is Surrender
…
General
Neocons like Kagan be pissed. Of course, this will unleash incredible pressure on Trump for boots on the ground, nuclear weapons, etc.
…

What was not true in the interview Tucker Carlson gave to Israel’s Channel 13? He told interviewer Udi Segal Segal that he was living in a country that had recently murdered thousands of children. What was wrong about that? It’s obvious that Israel ‘is not a democracy in any sense,’ as Carlson said.
It’s been a long time since such an interview has been aired here: It contained only truths. There wasn’t one word that Tucker Carlson said in a conversation with Channel 13’s Udi Segal that wasn’t true. It was the distilled truth, a perfect mirror, which is why it evoked such a furor here.
The eloquent American media personality proposed an alternative agenda to Israeli media: Speak the truth; try it for once. Carlson’s truth is painful, shaming, oppressive, but it’s the truth. It was framed as “an interview with America’s big mouth,” with the “Israel-hating antisemite.” Social media screamed that he shouldn’t be interviewed. They were right. There is no place on Israeli TV networks for the truth, but Segal dared, regrettably with some redundant sanctimoniousness.
What was not true in what Carlson said? It’s obvious that Israelis have no right to talk about other terror regimes such as Iran. Tucker told Segal that he was living in a country that had recently murdered thousands of children. What was wrong about that? It’s obvious that Israel “is not a democracy in any sense” as Carlson said. “There are millions of people who live under Israeli control who cannot vote.”
What in hell was incorrect in this? Tucker said that Israel had murdered thousands of children, so why was he, who had called it genocide, to blame? What was antisemitic about this? Segal tried using the hackneyed excuse of “self-defense,” and Carlson reminded him that the murder of babies has nothing to do with that.
Only one moment of untruth managed to creep in anyway. That was when Segal, without a facial muscle twitching, defined Israel as “a democratic country that abides by international law.”
The year is 2026. It’s hard to believe that there still is an Israeli interviewer with a reputation for integrity, not a self-righteous one like Yonit Levi or an artist like Danny Kushmaro, who would dare utter such a baseless and ridiculous statement. Maybe he was joking? There are no clauses in international law that Israel has not violated.
Have you seen the Gaza Strip, Segal? Have you visited the West Bank? Perhaps the total destruction of villages in southern Lebanon is your international law? Perhaps the 1,000 babies that we killed in Gaza? The deliberate starvation? The population transfer? The settlements?
Viewers were probably happy to see the all-Israeli Segal “give it” to Carlson. But this interview was too important to make light of or fun of. Carlson placed the definitive mirror in Israelis’ faces, devoid of makeup or of soft lighting, without lies or propaganda, without making any allowances. This is what we look like, no different. This is how we are. Israel is the most violent country in the world, Carlson said.
Segal tut-tutted in shock. Are you serious, he asked, his feelings hurt. Obviously, Tucker is serious. Much more than his interviewer. There are other countries that murder, Carlson said, but there is no other country that boasts and takes pride in the murders it commits like Israel does.
When Carlson said that the United States should have no commitment to Israel, and that its aid makes it an accomplice to Israel’s crimes, Segal pulled out the doomsday weapon. Even if the price is the annihilation of Israel? Carlson did not fall into this trap of victimhood.
Gaza is in ruins, southern Lebanon is under occupation, the West Bank is under apartheid – and Israel is at risk of being annihilated? I don’t want Israel to be destroyed, he answered.
Carlson may have a big mouth, but it’s a truthful one. He represents a new and dangerous stream, Segal said. Indeed, a new stream, but not necessarily a dangerous one. I wish more Israelis would listen to him. This stream wants a different Israel.
What is dangerous is the fact that Israelis want their present Israel. One that dispossesses millions of people from their homes, one that kills tens of thousands of innocent people, erasing towns and villages from the face of the earth, while discriminating against one-fifth of its own population.
And when someone comes along who is unimpressed by all the mendacious clichés, telling us and Americans that the emperor who dragged the U.S. into a bad war with Iran has no clothes, he is branded as an antisemite. Maybe he’s a Nazi? Thank you, Tucker Carlson.

From that point on, the race card simply stopped working, like a subway card that won’t open a turnstile anymore. Fuhrman’s obituaries didn’t explain his part in helping secure this brief respite, so I thought I’d write my own.
The evidence that O.J. — a star football player, actor, sportscaster and product spokesman — had murdered his ex-wife Nicole and her friend Ron Goldman was overwhelming. O.J.’s blood was found on the ground next to the mutilated bodies, on a walkway from Nicole’s house, on her driveway and on her back gate. Blood from all three was inside O.J.’s white Bronco and on a pair of gloves, one at the murder scene and its match on O.J.’s property. Nicole’s blood was in O.J.’s foyer, master bedroom, driveway and on a pair of socks in his bedroom. All samples were collected before police had a sample of O.J.’s blood and showed no one else’s DNA.
For the icing on top, O.J. had a documented record of beating up Nicole, and, within hours of his arrest warrant being issued, attempted to flee in his white Ford Bronco with cash, a passport, a disguise and a gun.
But none of that mattered to the jury because Fuhrman, a Los Angeles police detective, had used the N-word nine and a half years earlier. He was the investigator who first spotted — but did not touch — the glove on O.J.’s property, a tiny pebble in a mountain of incriminating evidence. That was the fig leaf used to explain why a mostly black jury acquitted O.J. on all counts, for an attack so brutal he nearly decapitated Nicole.
Despite its monumental irrelevance to O.J.’s guilt or innocence, the judge allowed defense attorney F. Lee Bailey to ask Fuhrman if he had — I quote — “addressed any black person as a [the N-word] or spoken about black people as [N-words] in the past 10 years.” A normal person would understand that question to mean, “Do you call black people the N-word?” not, “Has the word ever passed your lips, including the way I — F. Lee Bailey — just used it?”
Fuhrman said he had not. A year later, his denial was pretty well corroborated in a New York Times article quoting his many black partners, colleagues and friends. The Los Angeles public defender’s office investigated the detective “aggressively,” but found “virtually no complaints” against him, and not a single accusation of racial misconduct. To the contrary, the investigation turned up “compliments paid to Fuhrman by arrestees,” including minorities.
The main witness against Fuhrman on the vitally important question of whether he’d ever used the N-word — in what was, again, a double-murder trial — was a woman he’d had a sexual relationship with, Laura Hart McKinney. She had tapes of Fuhrman using the N-word in 1985, nearly — but not quite! — a decade before the O.J. trial. The reason she had tapes was that they were working together on a screenplay, and he was playing the gritty,
racist cop. Hollywood producers, he explained, were not going to want “a nice, warm and fuzzy movie about good cops.” He said he was trying to make the screenplay “dramatic and commercially appealing.”
Coincidentally, almost the same week that Fuhrman was testifying, in March 1995, Quentin Tarantino’s “Pulp Fiction” was winning “Best Original Screenplay” at the Oscars for a movie that uses the N-word, on average, once every 7.5 minutes.
But Fuhrman’s fictive use of the N-word provoked O.J. defense lawyer Johnnie Cochran to thunder that he was “this perjurer, this racist, this genocidal racist,” compare him to Hitler, and tell the jury that Fuhrman wanted to “take all black people out and burn them, or bomb them. That’s genocidal racism.”
It seemed unremarkable that in the trial of a black man for slaying two white people, the only person called a “genocidal racist” was a cop who’d used a bad word for a screenplay.
Cochran added that Fuhrman was “America’s worst nightmare.” Whereas having a hulking 6-foot-2 running back sneak up to your house late at night and cut your throat down to the cervical vertebrae is more of a nocturnal disturbance.
The defense needn’t have bothered with all the theatrics. There was no way the jury was ever going to convict. When jurors came back after about 6 minutes of deliberation, 150 million Americans stopped whatever they were doing to watch the reading of the verdict. Not guilty on all counts. One juror, a former Black Panther, gave O.J. the Black Power salute.
Across the nation, black people erupted in cheers. There was dancing in the streets, horns honking, tears of joy. Howard University Law School students “whooped and clapped like they had won a national championship,” as put by one black reporter. At a McDonald’s in Clayton, Missouri, the all-black staff burst out in cheers and high-fives, while the mostly white customers watched in disbelief. At one high school in St. Louis, being filmed for TV, black students cheered for 5 solid minutes. Three days before Cochran’s summation, the black congressional caucus, seeing the writing on the wall, had given him a standing ovation.
White Americans took it all in and said, That’s it. The white guilt bank is closed. When it was considered a graver offense to use “the N-word” than to cut off a white woman’s head, the “legacy of slavery” crap had run its course. (But if you’re black, you can use the N-word nonstop, risking only the possibility of winning a Grammy or an NAACP Image Award.)
Liberals gamely tried to continue their role as Chief Patronizers of Black America. Well, of course he mugged the old lady! You didn’t give him a cookie. But even they didn’t have their hearts in it.
OJ’s acquittal, followed by Fuhrman’s conviction for perjury, stamped out white racial guilt for more than a decade. It was one of the best things that ever happened to black people. They were finally welcomed into the circle of adults, accountable for their behavior. But liberals never quit; they just lie in wait. Memories faded, and now we’re right back to infantilizing this one group of our fellow Americans.
COPYRIGHT 2026 ANN COULTER
|
|
A day after Israel’s Foreign Ministry said that “all 430 activists” from a flotilla headed for Gaza “are making their way to Israel,” far-right police minister Itamar Ben-Gvir posted a video showing them being dragged through an Israeli port with the caption: “That’s how we welcome the terror supporters. Welcome to Israel.”
The video showed masked police officers pushing activists to the ground and forcing them to stand on all fours before being lined up face-down inside a warehouse with their hands zip-tied behind their backs. Ben-Gvir then walks in, waving an Israeli flag while yelling, “Welcome to Israel. We’re the landlords.”
In another shot, the activists are kneeling on a metal floor, surrounded by barbed wire, as armed Border Police officers keep watch and Israel’s anthem plays in the background. The video concludes with Ben-Gvir telling the camera, “Don’t be bothered by their screams,” while a woman can be heard pleading and screaming in the background.
Shortly after the video was posted, both Italian PM Meloni and French FM Barrot called Ben-Gvir’s conduct “unacceptable” and said they summoned their Israeli envoys for clarifications. They were joined by several other countries, including Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
In a rare public rebuke, both Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar condemned Ben-Gvir’s actions. The premier said that while “Israel has every right” to prevent the flotillas from reaching Gaza, “the way that Minister Ben Gvir dealt” with the activists “is not in line with Israel’s values and norms.”
Netanyahu said he had instructed Israeli authorities to deport the activists “as soon as possible.” Sa’ar, for his part, said Ben-Gvir “is not the face of Israel,” adding that he “knowingly damaged the country with this horrendous charade, and not for the first time.”
However, Pentagon officials have told The New York Times they urged halting of strikes because of intelligence shows Iran has grown more effective at tracking US air operations and strengthening its air defenses, making the potential for significant aerial losses by the US a greater likelihood in any new major campaign in Iran’s skies.

“Based on my respect for the above mentioned Leaders, I have instructed Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, The Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Daniel Caine, and The United States Military, that we will NOT be doing the scheduled attack of Iran tomorrow, but have further instructed them to be prepared to go forward with a full, large scale assault of Iran, on a moment’s notice, in the event that an acceptable Deal is not reached,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Trump described that the Arab states requested the delay because “serious negotiations are now taking place, and that, in their opinion, as Great Leaders and Allies, a Deal will be made, which will be very acceptable to the United States of America, as well as all Countries in the Middle East, and beyond.”
But in a fresh report titled “Trump Threatens Iran and Then Pulls Back, All in the Same Day” – The NY Times pushed back with the following:
Iran has used the ceasefire to successfully dig out all bombed ballistic missile sites, making them fully operational again. Iran also moved a large number of new mobile launchers across the entire country and adjusted tactics for any resumption of strikes, per a US military official. Iranian commanders studied US fighter jet and bomber flight patterns with close Russian and Chinese help. The recent downing of an F-15E and groundfire striking an F-35 revealed American flight tactics had become “too predictable.”
While kinetic operations have been paused since Trump declared a ceasefire on April 8, Tehran was apparently treating the diplomatic timeout as a massive engineering and re-arming window. US officials have on several occasions hinted at this reality, as has Trump himself at times.
To complicate any future American target lists, the Iranian military has also reportedly dispersed a massive fleet of new mobile missile launchers across the entire country, completely overhauling their deployment tactics ahead of any potential resumption of US strikes.
In essence, despite the US touting total aerial superiority in the 38-days of initial bombing, Tehran has effectively neutralized the impact of the initial air campaign. If or when the ceasefire officially collapses, Washington could be looking at a heavily upgraded, highly adaptable adversary.
Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesperson for Iran’s Parliament National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, has this week declared that Iran was “prepared for all scenarios,” as cited in state IRIB.
“The Americans must either submit to diplomacy and our conditions or submit to the power of our missiles,” he added.
When the White House first initiated Operation Epic Fury, it was hyped as presenting the opportunity for a clean tactical victory likely to result in swift regime change; however, it has officially morphed into yet another classic, grinding Washington Mideast dilemma. President Trump now finds himself boxed into a high-stakes corner with no easy exit ramp in sight — he can appear ‘weak’ through inaction, or pursue escalation and potential quagmire with likely disastrous economic and political consequences at home.
By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.
CloseLearn moreWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.
Privacy Policy