How the Media Preys upon our Values

M. Jaggers

The Cultural Marxist media adorns their arguments with “holy relics” which cannot be criticized. This diabolical strategy is deployed to persuade normal Americans to act contrary to their own self-interest.   It entails playing upon our inherent respect for certain institutions and principles, which are held in uniquely high esteem by Western/Anglo-Saxon peoples.  This unique foible of ours is actually a good thing while it stays within a basically White society—but it becomes a huge liability when it is exploited by those who hate us. Unfortunately for them, they have tried to tap this emotional reservoir too many times, and so their strategy is currently yielding diminishing returns.

First of all, our media elites do not even believe their own pieties, though perhaps some credulous liberals lower down on the food chain are in fact foolish enough to believe them.  For example, we saw via WikiLeaks that John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager, is perfectly aware of the disaster that the refugees in Europe have created.  He received intel that “Muslim immigration and Multicultural Madness have left a trail of mayhem across Germany—with far worse to come because of demographics.”  He was almost sociopathic, however, in his enthusiasm to wreak this same havoc on the US, should Clinton have won.  Woe to the liberal dumb enough to actually believe in the benefits of bringing in Middle Eastern and African refugees.

What should we consider more deplorable: the sociopathic cynicism of Podesta and Clinton, or the naïve stupidity of liberals who actually believe in their own professed values?  The elites are certainly counting on the American public’s naiveite.  And all too often, the American public has obliged.  As such, every time they try to play on our emotions, I ask myself, “Are people actually going to buy this?” I have some trepidation in answering that question.

Surely Blacks are a holy object in leftism; John Derbyshire has long expounded upon this droll metaphor.  But there is an ever-shifting array of entities which our media seeks to exploit for their perceived symbolic significance among the American public.  This process is based on a subtle psychology of what the media divines to be held as sacred by your average White person.  Hence this is an insidious psy-ops campaign, meant to pull at our heart-strings and enlist us in causes we would otherwise have nothing to do with.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

This campaign was on display with regards to the CIA shenanigans, leaking scurrilous intel reports on President Trump filled with the most salacious material imaginable.  When Trump naturally hit back at the CIA leadership, the media asked, incredulously, is he attacking the CIA?  You see, the CIA is sacred now, beyond reproach.  Wouldn’t you like to have one of those jobs where you’re not allowed to be criticized?  How many working stiffs have that kind of immunity? Are you attacking the (insert normal profession)? Why (insert normal profession) are the bedrock of our democratic blah, blah, blah.

Apparently journalists conceive of themselves as also having professions which are quite beyond reproach.  Hence every attack on one of them is an attack on another sacred principle. “Freedom of the Press” is their hysterical cry each time the veil is lifted and we note their perfidy.  Surely your average American will rally under the flag “Freedom of the Press,” when, for example, the AP feels as though it is not called upon quickly enough during daily White House Press Briefings. This undermines their ability to set the tone in their interactions with the White House.  In an interview with Jake Tapper, neocon shill and failed presidential candidate Evan McMullin gave the talking point for this particular dialectic:

I think Mr. Bannon and Mr. Trump’s attacks on the media are highly dangerous. The media, the press, plays a significant role in our democracy, and in any democracy they are highly critical. You can have disputes and disagreements over bias, and even over points of fact; but to continually attack and try to erode the credibility of the media, when it’s doing its job, and doing its job well I would say in the past week especially, challenging Trump, I think is dangerous.

The elite media quite blatantly professes values it doesn’t hold in order to impede the advancement of White interests.  Take the forthcoming Wall on our Southern border.  The media is now very concerned that “taxpayers will have to pay for the wall.”  As your average White media consumer, I’m supposed to think, “Why, when you put it that way, I don’t like the sound of my hard-earned tax-dollars being used for the wall after all.”  But the fact is that, if there is one thing for which I would happily part with my exorbitant tax dollars, it is the Wall.   Liberals suddenly get all worried about money and budget deficits that they cheerfully ran up during Obama’s presidency.

We resent taxes, yes; but we resent open borders much more, despite the media’s new-found concern for the allocation of our tax money.

Most shamelessly, recall the Khizr Kahn farce, in which he baited Trump with his ridiculous Democratic Convention speech, sanctimoniously waving his pocket Constitution while warning us in a thick foreign accent about the dangers of a Muslim ban.  When Trump responded rather wittily by noting the wife’s silence, the media again asked with feigned indignation, “Are you attacking a Gold Star parent?”  We are supposed to believe that prior to this media narrative, any of these journalists knew of, let alone cared about Gold Star parents. And Trump was merely pointing out the obvious: women are second-class citizens in Islam. Not speaking in a context like that is the least of it.

It’s amusing how quickly these issues can be completely off their radar, to moving them to righteous indignation without skipping a beat.  I suppose that is the very quintessence of hypocrisy.

If we reflect upon the highly likely prospect of illegal aliens voting Democrat to advance their own interests, why then the press is absolutely scandalized because now, “Our democratic process is being questioned.”   It was routinely called a flat out lie in the New York Times and Washington Post, despite studies pointing to a significant number of illegals voting (here and previous link). Again, it’s funny how every time we seek to defend ourselves and assert our rights, we somehow end up “attacking democracy.”  What kind of “democracy” is this?

Our elites perceive that the average White-guy has a special reverence for the military, and has therefore tried to manipulate us on that basis too.  We saw this when Trump infamously mocked John McCain’s war-hero status (‘I like people that weren’t captured’).  The sacredness of the military was likewise played upon in order to criticize Trump’s statement that he “know[s] more about ISIS than the generals do.”  Are you attacking the military?

Finally, let’s not forget “civil rights icon” Congressman John Lewis, the leftists’ favorite pet, who has disrespected President Trump in the most childish terms, calling his presidency “illegitimate” because “I think the Russians participated in getting this man elected.”  Unfortunately, Lewis is too dumb to realize that the still unconfirmed propaganda about “Russian hacking” was meant to delegitimize Trump, and it didn’t really matter if it was true.  When Trump responds, as is his wont, the media is astounded, “How can you attack this living legend, this holy man?”

Notice that the ways of “darkness” and “fear” always seem to be associated with measures which would actually benefit us.  On the other hand, our most worthy institutions are called to mind when they can be used to extinguish any hint of nationalism.  Let’s just hope that the previously naïve American public has begun to wake up to this insidious campaign to prey upon our otherwise laudable values.

Contact Malcolm Jaggers, follow him via @malcolmjaggers


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

29 Comments to "How the Media Preys upon our Values"

  1. futuret's Gravatar futuret
    February 3, 2017 - 8:40 am | Permalink

    (Mod. Note: “futuret”, TOO will not publish comments which are only links to whatever, unaccompanied by a comment which tells readers why you are offering the link. Please say something, something which relates to the article, and use the link for illustration. Tell us WHY you are offering this link, in at least a few words, and be sure it’s “on topic”. TOO comments are not a place for “link dumping”. Feel free to re-submit your comment.)

  2. Sir Charles Pipkins's Gravatar Sir Charles Pipkins
    February 3, 2017 - 9:32 am | Permalink

    ‘Taxpayers will have to pay for the wall.’

    Better than spending it on foreign aid or AA diversity hire retards!

    • Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
      February 3, 2017 - 6:07 pm | Permalink

      I did a little mental calculation on the “expensive wall” thing too. It’s thought that the mid-east and these other conflicts have cost the U.S. something like 2-3 trillion dollars!!! Let’s see now, one trillion is one thousand billion!!! And according to professor Jorge Borjas of Harvard University, illegal immigration has cost the U.S. around 370 billion or so dollars a year. In the light of these numbers, a sixteen billion dollar wall seems like pocket change…lol

      • HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
        February 4, 2017 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

        That’s right 16 billion is small potatoes: the Department of Agriculture spends 80 billion dollars a year on food stamps.

  3. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    February 3, 2017 - 9:40 am | Permalink

    Another argument of this kind is that opposing immigration of Muslims or other Third Worlders into the US equals “going against what we are as Americans”, i.e. “a nation of immigrants”. As if Third World immigration was always part of the American saga. This is using false interpretations of a people’s institutions and history against that same people.

  4. charles Frey's Gravatar charles Frey
    February 3, 2017 - 10:13 am | Permalink

    If readers click on Der Spiegel, Germany’s foremost and Europe’s influential news-magazine, they will encounter on its current front page, the figure of Trump, holding a ca. 20 inch bloodied butcher knife in his left hand and the decapitated, blood- dripping head of the statute of Liberty in his right. The caption reads: America First. Read in any language = This ISIS-like killer will do in the US first.
    Not an opportune time to relent in our efforts to re-educate the MSM.

    • Malcolm Jaggers's Gravatar Malcolm Jaggers
      February 3, 2017 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

      Yes, an outrageous image which is apropos of the subject. It seems that other MSM outlets in Germany are somewhat less hysterically anti-Trump than Der Spiegel; they are the worst. Perhaps Trump threatens not only the Cult-Marx values of the German elite, but also the business interests. That is my impression anyway.

      • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
        February 6, 2017 - 7:16 am | Permalink

        Germans businesses do not FEAR competition… What they take EXTREME PRECAUTION AGANST is industrial espionage.

        German industries, in general, devote a larger than globally average amount of their budgets into R&D.

        When the 2008 downturn hit the world, German businesses increased R & D, infrastructural maintenance and upgrading budgetary amounts by a few extra percentage points while simultaneously ratcheting back the hourly work week of all employees.
        This avoided whole sale shut downs and job losses.
        The result was that in 2011, when the recessionary bottom hit and things started picking up again in the world economy, Germany hit the ground running with full…, no…, over-employment, higher productivity, modernized and improved infrastructure and new or improved product lines while the rest of the world had to first of all start a rehiring process.

        There is a reason why German industries resist hiring non-Germans…

        Germans have learned that non-Germans simply steal the hard earned ideas that Germans have devised and use them against the Germans themselves.

  5. Jason's Gravatar Jason
    February 3, 2017 - 11:17 am | Permalink


    Most white liberals, such as the ones who support 3rd world immigration and affirmative action and call conservatives names do so because they FEEL better when they do that.
    So how do we change their minds?

    First, of course, we have to confront them with facts and logic, including exposing their ill-logic, such as immigration causes more crime, causes water shortages, destroys the environment, increases pollution, unemployment, inflation, etc.

    But after that, I found that most do not change their mind, because they FEEL better about themselves having these liberal ideas.

    So the next step to use is to attack that FEELING of pride that liberalism engenders in them, in 2 ways:

    1. That they are scammers and fraudsters for claiming 3rd world immigrants have “right” to enter white nations, blacks have rights to jobs they are not qualified for, homosexuals have a “right” to marry, etc.

    2. It shows a LACK of culture to support blacks, and 3rd world aliens, most of whom are crooks and criminals,

    My common response to liberals is: “Good scam you are running!”

    In other words, liberalism is a scam that works because the victims do not tell the scammer that it is a scam and they will not buy it, and the scammer thinks his scam is working, so he keeps scamming. Once the scammer knows his victims are not buying his scam, the scam stops.

    • BlackedOut's Gravatar BlackedOut
      February 3, 2017 - 3:33 pm | Permalink

      I gave up arguing with them. People are born hardwired to predisposed views that are only changed from experiencing a direct shocking conflict with their beliefs such as being a crime victim, losing a loved one to in a neocon war. Sometimes not even a shock will do it, particularly if they are very religious.

    • February 3, 2017 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

      I gave up arguing with them, too. I try to avoid the contact with them. Many years I tried to speak with them, but it was not possible. They just stopped to speak as soon as I tried to speak with them about the big danger of our destruction in case we will have tens of millions of non-Europeans within Germany. They just did not hear this. They actively stopped each and every word about this.
      But after decades I decided to stop these contacts. I feel free now. My mind is clear. I do not loose time and “nerves” anymore.

    • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
      February 5, 2017 - 1:50 am | Permalink

      Jason,”…But after that, I found that most do not change their mind, because they FEEL better about themselves having these liberal ideas.

      So the next step to use is to attack that FEELING of pride that liberalism engenders in them…”.

      Great idea. I don’t if it will work as the post right after yours says but it will annoy them and that’s good enough for me.

      • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
        February 6, 2017 - 6:35 am | Permalink

        I recently met a “small brained, ‘Polish looking’, German” young woman (mid-20’s) over breakfast and she did not like Trump because of…, wait for it…, Fracking!

        I told her that without “Fracking” she would not be able to fly to Iceland (diesel being dependent on Fracking), so in effect…, SHE was responsible for Fracking!

        That shut her up pretty quickly.

        These liberals are largely untalented, stupid, weak willed, low level, Orks…

        They know that their entire livelihood depends on the liberal mindset and the perks that they derive therefrom…, be they employment or benefits.
        THAT stupid they are NOT!

        Theirs is not so much an argument of logic in favour of an ideology, but an argument based on desperation and a fear that their comfortable life would come to an end with the wide spread acknowledgement of their scam.

        It is we Whites who are the fools for actually giving them, not only the time of day, but more importantly…, ending the lives of their enablers.

    • Glen's Gravatar Glen
      February 5, 2017 - 8:23 am | Permalink

      Acquainting the LibCuck with FACTS and attacking the FEELzies he offers in rebuttal leads to another rendition of the same FACTS followed by more of his FEELz. These people don’t argue in good faith. They are not “simply mistaken.” They are parrots that see themselves AT WAR with you. The only time they back off is when the tide is against them – that is, they are outnumbered or some authority they respect comes out against them.

  6. charles Frey's Gravatar charles Frey
    February 3, 2017 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    ” The Cultural Marxist media adorns their arguments with ‘holy relics’ which cannot be criticized “. Wish that were all. On May 4, 2013, Die Oper am Rhein, in affluent Duesseldorf, featured a production of Wagner’s Tannhauser, set in the early 13th century. It was directed by {{{Kosminski}}} and during its first part featured uniformed SS and Gestapo shooting “inmates” and in sexual contact with one another.
    Dozens of elderly among the audience had to be taken to hospitals; dozens more were treated on the spot by responders.
    From the next evening on the audience had to be satisfied with a mere musical rendition: without actors or scenery or neck-shots, or ‘typical’ Nazi groping and ecstatic moans. On the Opera Director’s orders. This ” renascent censorship of German art ” raised the ire of the entire world-wide art scene, with the notable absence of the Israeli Embassy and local Jewish organizations, with an eye on resurfacing anti-Semitism. WHAT TO DO ?
    I wrote a scathing letter to the Director, with the understanding/recommendation, that Kosminski himself should be commissioned to write an opera on Israeli genocide of the Palestinians and its costly, general warmongering in the ME , with a sequel to the immigration problem, in the spirit of objectivity and balance of Art, which would not curtail his right to freedom of artistic expression.
    Again Der Spiegel Online featured a letter by two Israeli artists, answering to whether one may direct Wagner with associations to Nazism. [ In this case set in the 13th century ]. I’ll spare you the letter and conclude with their own conclusion to it:
    ” We therefore beseech the Director of the German Opera on the Rhine, Prof. Christoph Meyer, to reinstall this [particular]rendition. Not only for the freedom of opinion or the right for the audience to boo or fete a piece – but also for the entitlement of Art, not to offer mere entertainment “.
    One is left with the question whether these two Jewish libertarian artist letter writers would support a piece on the Nakba in Tel Aviv, or whether such mere entertainment would have to be held in a tent of a not yet relocated Bedouin in the Negev.
    Mark Weber expressed his hope, that my contemporaneous letter to Meyer would neither be the first nor the last.

  7. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    February 3, 2017 - 6:02 pm | Permalink

    I have looked at the illegal immigration issue from so many angles, that I can honestly say I’m sick of the whole issue, or the fact that nothing substantial has been done to deal with the issue for probably 45 years or more by now.

    Having been so steeped in trying to understand the truths involved in the immigration issue for as long as I have, I can say without the slightest doubt, that M Jagger’s main thesis in this essay, is ONE HUNDRED PER CENT TRUE—hell yes the media prey’s on our values in exactly the way the author described.

  8. Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
    February 3, 2017 - 10:01 pm | Permalink

    “cultural Marxist media”
    “dumb liberals”
    “Muslim immigration”
    “multicultural madness”
    “hysterical journalists”
    “neocon shill”

    All fine and dandy, of course, but why no mention of the underlying cause?

    Who controls the media? Who undermines Western values? Who corrupts the young? Who incites street riots? Who demands open borders?

    M. Jaggers, a question for you: why do you never mention the Jewish nature of what you correctly identify as “an insidious psy-ops campaign”? Have you not noticed it? Seriously, I would like to know and I’m sure others would too.


    Nice Guy Eddie <<<

    • Malcolm Jaggers's Gravatar Malcolm Jaggers
      February 4, 2017 - 10:43 am | Permalink

      Nice Guy Eddie,
      I don’t think it’s in the TOO style-guide to just say “the Jew media” or some such thing without substantiating that with abundant evidence. Since that’s not the focus of the essay, I don’t provide the evidence; hence I don’t make the claim. That said, the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, and I can tell you that I am on board with the editorial opinion of TOO on that front.

      • Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
        February 4, 2017 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

        Malcolm, thank you for your kind reply.

        I understand that Jewish power was not the focus of your essay but it irritates me that many writers, here as elsewhere, criticize political correctness and the mainstream media and the neocons, etc without drawing attention to the clear Jewish thread that runs through so many of these issues – of which there is indeed abundant evidence.

        I’ve made this point a few times here and no doubt sound like a stuck record, so I shall now shut up about it and in future look for positives rather than negatives. :)

        Best wishes,

        Nice Guy Eddie <<<

  9. Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
    February 3, 2017 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

    (Mod. Note: I see your screen name as “Nice Guy Eddie”, the name you say you wanted. What’s the problem?)

  10. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 3, 2017 - 10:57 pm | Permalink

    Der Speigel is a CIA construct.

    Trump’s pick as ambassador to the EU is threatening the EU likening it to the Soviet Union. How come his DNA doesn’t drive him to a more benign view of the European tribes?

    • February 4, 2017 - 8:07 am | Permalink

      The EU is largely Jewish. It’s not tribal European. — When analyzing modern politics, pick out the Jewish component and treat it as a separate thing

      • charles Frey's Gravatar charles Frey
        February 5, 2017 - 10:30 am | Permalink

        R, with respect. The EU is not largely Jewish; yet. Though they are obsessively working on it, with their ever-new European-Jewish Committees on this, that and everything; including their office at NATO. In the aggregate an entirely Jewish shadow government, to be replaced, when their hoped- and worked-toward situation finally arises, as simply as you replace your car fuses. [ The Democrats-Constitutionalists’ February, 1917 Revolution, high-jacked by Lenin/Trotsky, already demonstrated the efficacy of this MO ].
        The EU is still tribal, less in Germany – more so in Hungary; overall diminishing.
        It is impossible to analyze ‘modern politics’ by excising the Jewish leitmotif. After totally unthreading a 12 x 18 ft medieval woven wall-hanging, you would end up with a pile of fibers and a blank wall.

        • February 5, 2017 - 8:54 pm | Permalink

          Well, they award prizes regularly for their Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize. The leaders of the EU such as Manuel Barroso are often ex-(((communists))). France, Germany, and Britain are largely jew-run; Eastern Europe, e.g. Hungary and Poland, have a past dominated by Jews, and I doubt it’s changed much. Policies on ‘immigration’ are supported by (((Europeans))) of the EU; and for example, Shatter of Ireland, a Jew who was in charge of (((immigration))). The European Court has a ‘human rights’ branch following the Jewish policy of allowing any number of (((immigrants))) and paying them benefits with net effect of getting more than the locals. Greece and Italy get no help and are being flooded by (((immigrants))). The ‘Barcelona Accord’ was a secret agreement to flood Europe with Africans. The Euro is mysterious, like of course most currencies, but if you’d like a bet with me that it’s not Jewish-controlled, I’d stake a lot. MEPs are all members of parties, under the voting system, and parties are heavily funded by Jews. Soros is assumed to be behind much of the destabilising of European countries. As you say, there’s a new Jewish interest group representing ‘European Jews’. And so on.
          — I don’t know what your final paragraph means You seem to be saying ‘modern politics’ needs awareness of Jews, which of course is true. Then you seem to be saying it’s impossible.

        • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
          February 8, 2017 - 8:16 am | Permalink

          charles Frey,

          By reason it seems that if Israel were to become a member of NATO it should as Jordan (4,289,994) accept refugees from conflict areas. If Israelis encourage multiculturalism in Europe and European Diasporas they should allow their country to be the same.*

          Also, the question of Israelis building walls around Israel brings to mind an effort to ghettoize the population; only this time they are doing it to themselves.

          *This should apply to the Japanese community as well.

    • charles Frey's Gravatar charles Frey
      February 4, 2017 - 9:13 am | Permalink

      buckle, Der Spiegel in addition to dozens more. Very recently Udo Ulfkotte died. He had been a reporter for Germany’s prestigious Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, covering the Iraq-Iran war. He wrote, or tried to write of Iraqi poison-gas artillery missiles being unleashed on Iran. On the frontline a change in the wind caused his initial illness. At some point, facing pre-mature death, he had the WILL, unlike Faust, to wrest his soul back from the devil: the CIA. They ensnared him bit by bit with repeated, all expenses paid trips to the US, where he was introduced to certain people; enabled by The Atlantic Bridge.
      With his good, open face, he admitted publicly, that in the end, as FAZ editor, he published CIA-written articles above his own name.
      [ Net videos ]. Following his manly example dozens more abandoned the MSM and coalesced around alt-Right KOPP ONLINE, with its own, peripheral, well-attended national conferences.
      While the provenance of these poison-gas projectiles is still being argued over, as being of German or Anglo-French origin, it is a matter of record, that Rumsfeld and his holocaust-survivor Yeshiva at the DOD, with its several
      ” Special Offices “, had given orders/permission and delivery to evil Saddam, accompanied by that famous handshake by Rumsfeld, to deploy them.

  11. John's Gravatar John
    February 4, 2017 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    I saw Charles Krauthammer on Fox just a couple of days ago talking about the consequences of “Our European imperialism” and “Our values”. Btw, Jake Tapper is a Jew as is Jeffrey Toobin and Dana Bash and of course CNN president Jef Zucker is too. Not sure about Wolf though. Lol.

  12. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 4, 2017 - 9:44 pm | Permalink

    An American has written that the EU is Jewish. 28 countries are all Jewish? The new ambassador is threatening the EU because it is Jewish? DNA has driven the ambassador to this conclusion?

  13. John's Gravatar John
    February 5, 2017 - 9:38 pm | Permalink

    Hollywood has recently churned out a couple of Jesus movies and documentaries which has me suspicious as hell about their real motives.

Comments are closed.