The BBC’s “Denying Jihad” Playbook

The BBC is the opposite of this meme.

Why, oh why is the BBC routinely called fake news these days? One of the main reasons is their ludicrously overprotective treatment of Muslims, which leads them down the path of ridicule, along the lane of absurdity, and into the parking lot of incredulity.

Everybody, including Joe Public, the BBC’s intended audience, knows that Muslims have problems fitting into the West, and that because of this a LOT of them are attracted to Islamic Jihad.

Usually, these types prefer guns and bombs as their passport to Muslim Nirvana, but Europe clearly saw this coming, and has imposed some pretty hard and heavy gun regulations (American gun lovers please remember this connection between a large Muslim population and the possible abolition of Second Amendment rights).

Because of Europe’s limited availability of firearms, jihadis have to be inventive, and the easiest way now to kill lots of kufars is to drive a vehicle, preferably a giant truck, into a crowd of innocent people.

Not surprisingly, when there is news that another vehicle has been driven into a group of people, the public automatically wonder if it is another Muslim attack. This is only natural, and it is something that people are wondering now about the attack that just happened in Heidelberg Germany, where one man was killed and two people injured (one of them a Bosnian women intriguingly).

Usually there is a bit of a gap between such incidents being initially reported and the identity and motives of the attacker being confirmed. During that time respectable news organizations tend to stick to the known facts and report nothing more, although they might point to a pattern of similar incidents in the past.

The BBC, however, before anything is definitely known, immediately tag such stories with four things that I have seen repeatedly in their reporting of attacks where the public has reason to suspect an Islamic-inspired attack.

Let us use this short update story from the BBC website as an example: “One dead, two injured in Heidelberg car attack”

First, they speak of death in the passive sense, not the active. Basically someone “has died” or “been hurt,” rather than someone “killed” or “hurt” someone, etc.

Second, unless there is clear and immediate evidence of Islamic involvement, they will include a statement of some kind saying there is no Islamic involvement. This is usually derived from an early non-committal police comment of “Um, don’t know yet, mate.” This is not so difficult to get, even in cases where Muslim involvement is obvious, because policemen nowadays can lose their job even for a true statement that might be construed as “politically insensitive.”

If it turns out that, actually, there was a lot of Islamic involvement, then this statement can easily be redacted, or the police blamed if need be.

Thirdly, they drop in the idea of mental illness, again well before there is any chance of anyone knowing about this. They usually cover this suggestion with weasel words or phrases, like “It is thought…” “It appears…” “allegedly…” or even the absurd “…unable to confirm that…” which, although technically negative, still manages to plant the thought in people’s minds.

Fourthly, before they or anyone else in the media can know this, they emphasise, that the perpetrator acted alone, also usually covering this assertion with weasel words.

In the BBC’s short initial web article on the Heidelberg attack, the junior BBC hack charged with penning this piece, who may or may not have acted alone, has stuck very closely to the guide book…or at least it is thought that he has. 

A man has died and two other people were hurt after a man drove into a pedestrian area in Heidelberg, Germany. The attacker, said to have been armed with a knife, was shot, injured and arrested by police in a brief standoff after fleeing the scene on foot. His motives are unclear, but there are no indications this was a terrorist attack, police say. In December an Islamist attacker drove a lorry into a Berlin Christmas market, killing 12 people and injuring 49. In Heidelberg the attacker, described as a 35-year-old German, drove what is thought to be a rental car into pedestrians in one of the city’s central squares, injuring three people. One of them, a 73-year-old German man, later died in hospital. The attacker then left the car but was tracked down, shot and seriously injured by police near an old swimming pool. Police were unable to confirm local media reports that the attacker was mentally disturbed. He is thought to have acted alone.The two injured people were a 32-year-old Austrian national and a 29-year-old Bosnian woman, police said. Their injuries are said to be minor and they have been discharged from hospital.”

Of course, this attack could turn out to be a non-Muslim incident, but that is not the point. The point is how the BBC clearly has a working methodology in place right from the start, designed to downplay any possible Muslim attack.

Addendum: The German police have stated that the attacker was a German of non-migrant background.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

22 Comments to "The BBC’s “Denying Jihad” Playbook"

  1. February 27, 2017 - 10:40 am | Permalink

    The BBC is dominated by Jews, as are most countries. Jewish policy is to flood white countries (not Israel) with low IQ people, to ruin whites. That’s all anyone needs to know.

    • I.W.'s Gravatar I.W.
      February 27, 2017 - 1:17 pm | Permalink

      Spot on.

    • March 1, 2017 - 9:23 pm | Permalink

      The Union of Babel – Genesis 51

      1 And the whole of Europe was of one race, one color.

      2 And it came to pass, as the war ended in the east, that their countries were devastated and many died in allied death camps where they dwelt.

      3 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and concrete had they for morter.

      4 And they said, Go to, let us rebuild our nations once again as a beacon to the world of our accomplishments, and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

      5 And the Jews came down to see the nations, which the children of war had builded. And the Jews said, Behold, the European peoples have too much financial autonomy. If this they do, we will forgo immense profiteering.

      6 So the Jews came down and imposed a fiat monetary system that encompassed all the European nations, enslaving all the European peoples to their banking cartel monopoly. They then renamed the nations the children of war had rebuilded the European Union.

      7 And the Jews said, Behold, the European people is still one, and they have all one color; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, not even anti-semitism which we have imagined they do.

      8 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their cultures, that they may not understand one another’s customs. Let us create an invasion force of young men and give these invaders their women, support miscegenation and have kebob stands builded on every corner in every city and hamlet.

      9 So the Jews began another war in the near east that displaced whole populations there and scattered them abroad from thence throughout all Europe and the face of all the earth: and the Europeans left off building their nations in favor of welfare programs and they did builded hovels for the alien immigrants.

      10 Therefore is the misnaming of the European Union; because the Jews did there confound the customs of all the nations with the mass immigration of foreign peoples from abroad: and from thence did the Jews destroy all the remaining white racial solidarity upon the face of all the earth.

  2. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    February 27, 2017 - 1:59 pm | Permalink

    Mentioning playbooks, on a YouTube video while debating Matt Heimbach, Tim Wise said Europeans in the United States should become a minority because it was good for democracy. If that is the case then it should follow, naturally, that Jews in Israel and Japanese in Japan should become minorities in their nations because it’s “good” for democracy. Correct?

  3. Rever Leo's Gravatar Rever Leo
    February 27, 2017 - 2:42 pm | Permalink

    The BBC saw the potential of digital media 25 years ago and spent a fortune to ensure dominance of this area. This spending, and the necessary economies elsewhere, caused massive upheaval amongst the programme makers and stars. Their protests were ignored, and today it dominates the UK internet. Dissent is marginalised to obscure blogs and US sites. These brainwashers are certainly masters of their craft.

    • March 1, 2017 - 8:24 pm | Permalink

      (((They))) oughta be, (((they))) have had three thousand years of practice.

  4. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    February 27, 2017 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Taking a woefully fanciful Official Narrative as Gospel seems to be quite common on the Alt-Right, and redirects focus to the proximate but not ultimate problem. Planes, Trains and Automobiles certainly wasn’t scripted by Muslims.

  5. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    February 27, 2017 - 11:49 pm | Permalink

    The “Muslim Problem” is apparent aka the emperor has no clothes.

    The real problem are simpletons of the realm who fund the vile corporation that is hostile to its own people. I don’t have a DumbTube and don’t pay BBC Dangeld aka licence.
    I hope Trump aides are reading this. The BBC is far worse than CNN or the New York Times even natives have been cleansed and can be seen on Al Jazeera. Trump should also put Britain on a watchlist. Due to appeasement Britainistan is as dangerous to America as Somalia e.g. one Jamaican nutter released from Gitmo went and joined ISIS and blew himself up. All Al Shabab needs are Britainistan passports to blow up Americans since the establishment is now knighting Somalians.

    If Bannon is really serious about revolution, Trump shoud deal with May and her appeasement policies with with a firm hand e.g. threaten tax on Rolls Royce engines for Boeing 787s in exchange for May dealing with the Muslim menace. It is far better than Bannon employing a Pakistani for Breibart’s Londonistan office.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      February 28, 2017 - 10:18 am | Permalink

      “Muslim problem” is a redundancy.

    • March 1, 2017 - 3:25 pm | Permalink

      With respect, the US media are even worse than the BBC, since they influence a far larger and more powerful group of people. Consider US war crimes abroad which the BBC of course supports, but can’t cause Britons to emulate.
      .
      On Trump, I’m coming to feel he may be able to draw Jewish fangs without even mentioning Jews, just by targeting ridiculous Jew-promoted legislation and reversing it. Consider for example such possibilities as: changes to the Fed, opposition to NAACP and ADL and Jewish pressure groups, removal of funding by Soros and his like, taking action against synagogues, and clamping down on Jew-funded pseudo-demonstrations.

  6. Derek's Gravatar Derek
    February 28, 2017 - 12:20 am | Permalink

    The BBC Director of News James Harding is Jewish and he claims to be of “German” ancestry.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Harding_(journalist)

    The original fake news escalated under Helen Boaden who sent a memo instructing staff not to refer to attacks as terrorist actions. I suspect Boaden is a lesbian or bisexual like Alan Johnston the BBC correspondent who was once captured and held in Gaza who is a faggot.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Boaden

  7. San Fernando Curt's Gravatar San Fernando Curt
    February 28, 2017 - 7:46 am | Permalink

    No terror. No migration background. But… What was the attacker’s name? Still a blank.

    • HelenChicago's Gravatar HelenChicago
      March 2, 2017 - 11:28 am | Permalink

      Exactly. He was probably second-generation. They’re often more rabid and resentful than their immigrant parents.

  8. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    February 28, 2017 - 10:16 am | Permalink

    It’s not just the BBC that uses ridiculous headlines like “Heidelberg car attack”.
    The car didn’t attack anyone, it was the weapon. We see it all the time “gun attack”, “knife attack”, and every other kind of attack except “Knee-grow attacks” or “Ay-rab attacks”, etc. If it is Whitey, it will always be a neo-Nazi/White supremacist/racist identified.

  9. Vehmgericht's Gravatar Vehmgericht
    February 28, 2017 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

    The BBC will simply bury stories that cannot be massaged in this manner, leaving its sister organisation, the Guardian newspaper, to cover with some cursory reporting and maybe a ‘compassionate’ op-ed.

    To obtain a full and accurate picture of what is going on in Britain and elsewhere it is necessary to eschew the BBC and use a variety of other sources, not excluding Russia Today.

  10. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    March 1, 2017 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    All in the clear contextual cloud of 9/11, where the BBC and everyone else blamed Muslims. Can Liddell or anyone else at TOO provide the evidence for Muslim culpability that Colin Powell at the UN said would follow shortly? It was 16 years ago. And whatever story Liddell is writing about today is surely a mere shadow of that event.

    Can Muslims make planes glide seamlessly into buildings without, slowing down, self-destructing, or damaging the face of the building until they had passed thru’ like the Jewish owned media said they did on 9/11? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJhGlohdWhY

    Can Muslims have leaked to the BBC that a building that had no possible cause to fall down had fallen down before it actually did? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI

    If you do not just as aggressively challenge obvious media lies against Muslims you’re on weak grounds anywhere else.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      March 1, 2017 - 2:03 pm | Permalink

      Muslims are an ill-fit for our societies because they are not White. Likewise Jews. They’re not ‘us’, either genetically or culturally, neither of them. But if we make nice with one, like Lidl would have us do with the Jew, we kinda have to make nice with the other, like Alain Sorel argues we should for the other. The same BS arguments are employed.

      But why either one over the other, except the power either have expressed over particular ZOMBIE Whites? Busioness as usual. “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même.”

      Ditch both these phoney advocates for Whites, and just be for us! The Jew and the Muslim both have their spaces already!

      • March 3, 2017 - 2:46 pm | Permalink

        I think you miss Nick Dean’s point: TOO is a bit weak on many topics.

        • March 4, 2017 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

          I must have misread something – sorry – as both posts are from Nick Dean

  11. stephan_b's Gravatar stephan_b
    March 2, 2017 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

    In Europe there is a huge problem with challenging the official narrative of any political event. The US really does have free speech, in comparative terms. Arguing with the BBC/Government line on any incident in the UK where identity politics is a factor is almost impossible.

    Although “racism” is not technically illegal in the UK any comment that makes explicit reference to race as a factor is likely draw an extreme reaction from the authorities, unless of course you’re saying something negative about whites. Active discrimination and “hate crimes” are severely punished and people are hounded and imprisoned for things that seem minor.

    This climate of fear and uncertainty about making any statement that includes the word “race” has suppressed white ethno-nationalist narratives almost completely. I can listen to a different entertaining podcast every day that originates from activists in the US. NOTHING is happening in the UK. No community is being built, on-line, or otherwise because people are frightened of the “Thought Police”, (aided and abetted in the UK by the BBC who dictate the globalist party line) coming round and arresting them. The situation appears to be similar, if not worse, in most of Europe.

    Another major obstacle to the growth of a pan-European ethno-nationalist on-line community is language. There are lots of languages and people like there own language. This is fine but it makes communication too difficult for most people. I don’t know what the solution is.

    • March 3, 2017 - 2:40 pm | Permalink

      [1] Free Speech has been a slogan in the USA, mainly because Jews can publish any rubbish (including porn) under its umbrella. But now there is a huge push against it (as in the Supreme Court) and this will probably increase to attack Trump. Fingers crossed.
      [2] The UK, Canada, ANZ are more problematical, but they all have activists: Canada had the first trials of ‘deniers’, and the first-ever court appearances, and demolitions, or professional Holocaustians. Australia has ‘The Adelaide Institute’ and others; there has been some effect, and it’s increasing. I’m in the UK and haven’t had much opposition. One of my techniques is to include, in articles, comments which look irrelevant at first sight, but in fact are issues which official policy is to hide. My 1997 ‘Holocaust revisionism and free speech’ article starts with a rather anodyne comment on US war crimes: most readers still have no idea about this, so (I think) the piece is cold-shouldered. My whole site has mention of nukes as a fraud: probably most readers here have no idea how strong the evidence is, and of course the authorities, such as they are, want to keep it that way, and do not want to draw attention to it, pending some exit strategy. My book reviews include material on race which is unquestionably sound; so do my videos. Of course, who knows, really. Just my suggestion: include sound material they want to hush up but can’t challenge.

      • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
        March 4, 2017 - 2:09 pm | Permalink

        Free speech if valued is a responsibility of the owners of host sites. In the age of anonymous cryptocurrency webhosting local laws are not an issue for those who value free speech and intend to reach large audiences.

        In pro-White circles the biggest issue we have is controlled opposition and self-censorship: minimally people who say we cannot demand for ourselves what the Jews they insist we include in our movement demand for themselves, an ethnostate discriminating on the Jew/White line.

        Izzy doesn’t need the FBI to come crashing thru your door at 2AM if you side with Spencer, Taylor, Liddell. Izzy is fine and will keep doing what he’s doing.

Comments are closed.