Review: The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam by Douglas Murray

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam
Douglas Murray
Bloomsbury Continuum, 2017

I finished reading Douglas Murray’s The Strange Death of Europe just 24 hours before a Libyan Muslim detonated an explosive device at the exit of an arena in Manchester, sending arrows of shrapnel into dozens of concert-goers and confirming, in an instant, every one of Murray’s arguments. Timely, erudite, and needed, The Strange Death of Europe is the story of European cultural and racial ‘assisted suicide,’ with a focus on the effects of ongoing mass immigration from Africa, the Indian sub-continent, and the Middle East. This is a book that, in terms of its central arguments and pool of facts, will say nothing new to those on the Alt Right. In this movement we live our lives with the burden of truly painful knowledge. We know that our current course will lead only to dispossession and destruction. Everything about the contemporary world suggests that we are a generation born either to witness the end of our great race, or to orchestrate its most stunning and earth-shattering rebirth. This book offers nothing in terms of assisting the latter, but in terms of its contribution to an understanding of the former, its unique strength may be said to lie in the concise, compelling, and clear-headed manner in which it advances the thesis that multiculturalism is a death sentence on Europe. Murray’s book is a forceful refutation of the lie that we are ‘progressing’ to a better European future, taking the theme of impending European death to a mass audience, particularly in Britain where the book climbed to number three in both the Sunday Times and UK Amazon bestseller lists, and sold out in numerous branches of the country’s largest high street book merchant. Despite ubiquitous socio-political conditioning, there is clearly a hunger for dissenting speech.

Murray opens with the stark statement: “Europe is committing suicide,” soon refined into the more nuanced argument that Europe’s political leaders, together with a complicit media, are in the process of taking their populations down the road of ethnic and cultural annihilation. The apparent acquiescence of European populations in this diabolical journey is ascribed by Murray to a number of factors. Europe has lost faith in its beliefs, traditions and legitimacy. It is in the midst of an “existential tiredness.” At the heart of this loss of direction and sense of self is the imposition of a cult of guilt — a cult that has grown weed-like from the fertile soil of Holocaust and slavery narratives advanced by the enemies of our people. Murray remarks that “More than any other continent or culture in the world today, Europe is now deeply weighed down with guilt for its past.”

While such a situation could itself be viewed as a civilizational crisis, Europe’s fate is made doubly precarious because of the simultaneous mass influx of non-Europeans. Under the current socio-political dispensation, Europe has been designated not as the home of the Europeans but as a home for all who wish to claim it. European nations, and those outside the continent that have historically been dominated by Europeans, are unique in being subjected to this form of international land-grab. Murray writes that “we know that we Europeans cannot become whatever we like. We cannot become Indian or Chinese, for instance. And yet we are expected to believe that anyone in the world can move to Europe and become European, …The world is coming into Europe at precisely the moment that Europe has lost sight of what it is.”

The first chapter focusses on demographics and the lies that politicians and ‘think tanks’ have employed to cloak this land-grab from the public. Choosing ten-year periods, Murray demonstrates the rapidity of the non-White influx. Between 2002 and 2012, for example, Whites became a minority in London, and England and Wales became home to an additional three million immigrants. There are now nearly three million households in England where not a single adult speaks English. Between 2001 and 2011 the number of Muslims in England and Wales rose from 1.5 million to 2.7 million — a figure that still doesn’t take into account illegal immigrants or non-responders to the census (of whom Muslims comprise the largest element). Murray writes that Britain is a nation “altered completely,” and adds that “by 2011 Britain had already become a radically different place from the place it had been for centuries.” Political and media reaction to such wholesale population changes was permitted to be expressed “in only one tone of voice” — “solely in the spirit of celebration.” Politicians and journalists lined up to champion every evidence of increasing “diversity.”

A key plank of the platform of such multicultural cheerleaders has been the “pretence that this was nothing new.” Assisted by a host of shadowy academics and unelected advisers, the false narrative was disseminated that Britain, and indeed other European countries, had always been “diverse.” Murray dissects this lie, pointing out that prior to the 1950s, “and certainly for the previous millennium, Britain had retained an extraordinarily static population.” The most significant influxes into the island of Britain in the entirety of the last two thousand years had been those of the Saxons, the Normans, and the Irish — all fellow North-Western Europeans, and close genetic cousins of the native Britons. The static nature of the British population was finally destroyed with a succession of Acts of Parliament that were hurriedly pushed through with no consultation with the British public. The 1948 British Nationality Act and the 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act enabled the first significant waves of Africans and Indians to enter Britain under the pretext that they would fill labor shortages.

Between 1948 and 1952 between around 2,000 Blacks entered Britain each year — undesirable, but a figure that tragically seems minute by today’s standards. By 1957 the figure had climbed to 42,000, and the lies began to crumble. Government investigations into this new population revealed that the idea that Blacks were helping fill a labor shortage was grossly ill-founded. In one report, completed in December 1953, civil servants stated that the new population found it difficult to secure employment not because of prejudice among Whites, but because the newcomers had “low output” and their working life was marked by “irresponsibility, quarrelsomeness, and lack of discipline.” Black women were “slow mentally,” and Black men were “more volatile in temperament than white workers … more easily provoked to violence … lacking in stamina,” and generally “not up to the standards required by British employers.”[1] Murray’s treatment of this period of British history is unfortunately weak and lacking in broad historical context. He opines that the passage of these immigration-facilitating Acts of Parliament were part of a succession of blunders and under-estimations in the sphere of immigration legislation, which were later followed up with a series of Race Relations Acts intended to try to repair some of the damage.

Such an argument is weak to say the least. While I agree to some extent with his central thesis that elements of the European population are complicit in this ongoing ‘suicide,’ I simply cannot agree with the premise that our present situation is for the most part the result of miscalculation and political blunder. His treatment of the Race Relations Acts is an excellent example of flawed thinking and poor appreciation of the wider historical context. In 2014 I presented findings uncovered during my own research into the historical context of the Race Relations Acts. Rather than being ‘accidental’ or ad hoc pieces of legislation, these laws were demonstrably part of a long tradition of Jewish attempts to alter the racial make-up of Britain and move towards the outlawing of ‘group libel.’ Indeed, Murray is quite aware that Jewish organizations are an important component of the pro-immigration forces, noting “it genuinely shocks me to discover […] [that] many Jewish groups and Jewish leaders have been taking a conspicuous lead in welcoming refugees.” Murray, of course, is no expert on Jewish history and, as far as I can tell, appears to style himself as the quintessential anti-Islamist philo-Semite — a type that unfortunately remains quite common on the Right. His failure to grapple with this theme leaves a yawning gap in the logical progression of his argument.

Because of the nature of the subject he is discussing, Murray nevertheless finds himself indirectly discussing Jewish influence. For example, he refers to Barbara Roche, “a descendant of East End Jews,” as a chief architect of the multicultural state under Tony Blair. Roche dismissed all her critics as “racists,” “criticised colleagues for being too white,” and “believed that immigration was only ever a good thing.” After ten years of her highly influential immigration reforms, Roche beamed to an interviewer: “I love the diversity of London. I just feel comfortable.” Although Murray cites this quote from Roche, he seems entirely unaware of the research of Kevin MacDonald and others, who have shown that Jews in many White countries have sought to alter their demographic surroundings precisely in order to “feel comfortable.” Another Jew who features prominently in Murray’s account of the death of White Britain is the Jewish academic, novelist, and journalist Will Self. Self may be regarded as the quintessential cultural support act for his political counterparts, telling one television audience that British identity was nothing more than “going overseas and subjugating black and brown people and taking their stuff and the fruits of their labours.” One another occasion, Self told a BBC audience that those who oppose multiculturalism are “usually racists with an antipathy to people, particularly with black and brown skins.” Self isn’t acknowledged as Jewish in Murray’s text, appearing solely as a particularly malicious left-liberal.

Although he fails to make the necessary logical connections, Murray rightly portrays such comments as sounding “the authentic and undisguised voice of revenge.” Indeed, confronted with such a stark realization, Murray appears momentarily to contradict his own ‘suicide’ thesis: “The repercussions of the argument are striking to consider. For if [revenge] is even partially a spur for the recent transformation of our country, then what we are going through is not an accident, or a mere laxness of the borders, but a cool and deliberate act of national sabotage.” Despite flirting with this perfectly defensible, though more controversial, thesis, Murray inexplicably leaves the idea hanging and returns to the suicide narrative for the remainder of his text. There is no further mention of sabotage, or saboteurs like Roche and Self. They disappear into the shadows. This was one of the most frustrating aspects of the book, and one that, despite its merits, it doesn’t ever quite recover from.

Murray’s jarring change of direction is made clear in the title of the third chapter — “The excuses we told ourselves.” The chapter is an extended musing on the apparent justifications for multiculturalism that ‘we’ convinced ourselves with. By ‘we’ Murray refers to the European masses, all of whom have been force-fed lies for decades about multiculturalism, and who are placed on this diet of falsehood as soon as they can verbally communicate. Murray fails to acknowledge that the European peoples never concocted the lies that cloak the multicultural murder project. He fails to attribute this responsibility to the alien saboteurs and treasonous elites that it rightfully rests with. Despite this misattribution, Murray’s treatment of the fallacies of the multicultural narrative is very good. The fallacies are familiar to us all: the argument that Europe is ageing, that immigration is an economic benefit, that immigration makes a society more cultured and interesting, and that globalization makes mass immigration both inevitable and unstoppable.

Murray’s rebuttals to these contentions are piercing and succinct. Using a range of statistics he proves not only that immigrants are a massive drain on national finances, but also that government statisticians have been massaging their figures in order to produce politicized narratives of social ‘progress.’ One instance cited by Murray, in which a government report used the example of a French tech entrepreneur as ‘typical’ of immigrant economic contributions, is breathtaking in its deceitfulness. Cutting his way through endless government propaganda, Murray argues that mass immigration cost the British people around £160 billion between 1995 and 2011. Multiculturalism isn’t just killing us as a people; it is bankrupting us.

The argument that Europe is ageing and needs an influx of younger people is also dealt with thoroughly. Murray points to surveys suggesting that Europeans want to have more children but are finding it difficult due to economic, social and cultural pressures. Murray further argues that multiculturalism itself has a depressing impact on the desire of Europeans to have children because it reduces the sense of security and makes couples less optimistic about the future, even if on a sub-conscious level. Murray criticizes the argument that reduced European birthrates should be so superficially and dangerously ‘solved’ with mass immigration, and suggests that European governments should instead introduce policies that encourage procreation. Breaking down the “ageing continent” argument even further, Murray produces statistics showing that, contrary to propaganda, Europe does not have a labor shortage, but rather has a problem with an ‘over-educated’ youth that looks down on manual labor. According to Murray, the solution to Europe’s alleged ‘age problem,’ rather than importing a new population, is to turn to policies encouraging reproduction and the family, and the re-education of our young away from overly-materialistic life expectations.

Murray also skewers the idea that ‘diversity’ is culturally enriching. He begins by critiquing the very basis of the argument, because it implies that “European societies are slightly boring or staid places.” In reality, Europe has an “already existing proliferation of languages, cultures and cuisines.” The ‘enriching’ argument also rests on the false premise that you can learn about other cultures not by travelling to experience them, but “to encourage the world to come to you.” A further fallacy is the implication that “the value of migrants continues to increase as their numbers increase.” Describing the “embarrassing” but oft-cited example of food, Murray points out:

The amount of enjoyment to be got from Turkish food does not increase year on year the more Turks there are in the country. Every 100,000 extra Somalis, Eritreans or Pakistanis who enter Europe do not magnify the resulting cultural enrichment 100,000 times. It may be that Europe has already learned what it needs to learn from cuisine, and accordingly gained all that it needs to gain, and that in order to continue enjoying Indian food it will not be necessary to keep on importing more Indians into our societies.

Murray also stresses that the ‘diversity’ allegedly brought by multiculturalism is demonstrably false since most immigrants come from only a small number of countries. In the case of Britain, there are relatively few immigrant populations who haven’t originated in Pakistan, India, or Africa. Since most were former colonies, the British had already learned everything they needed to know about these cultures by the late nineteenth century. Their presence in modern Britain for some kind of putative ‘educational’ or enlightening cultural purpose is doubly absurd.

Perhaps Murray’s most forceful argument against the ‘enrichment’ hypothesis is his extended commentary on immigrant crime, scattered throughout the text. Although much of the material will be familiar to readers of The Occidental Observer, Murray’s reflections on Rotherham and similar instances of mass sexual exploitation of European children by immigrant gangs are worth reading. Of particular interest is his exploration of the stunning impact of political correctness in neutering the responses of local police and local government, causing an inertia that enabled the sexual abuse of European girls to continue unchallenged for years.

One of the more interesting chapters of the book is that titled ‘Multiculturalism.’ Here Murray points out that the term ‘multiculturalism’ has resisted firm definition, meaning a number of different things to different people — and in its malleability becoming an extremely useful tool for its agents. For example, great swathes of the public may understand multiculturalism as no more than a kind of mild pluralism, and that it would be the ‘polite’ position not to mind people of a different cultural background living in their country. Thus, even when they say that they do support multiculturalism, this definition is what they have in mind. But, as Murray points out, there is a deeper layer to ‘multiculturalism,’ and this is the definition that traitors and ‘saboteurs’ hold to: that the future of European societies is “to become a great melting pot,” in which White Europeans steadily dissolve into oblivion. While the European masses think they are consenting to the first proposition, they have instead been contributing to the furtherance of the second.

As well as involving subtle manipulation, multiculturalism is also openly aggressive and anti-European. Murray cites the American political philosopher Samuel Huntington as writing: “Multiculturalism is in its essence anti-European civilization. It is basically an anti-Western ideology.” Murray writes that in order to become multicultural, European societies have “had to do themselves down, particularly focussing on their negatives.” Thus, even when states are suicidally open and liberal to the point of encouraging large-scale migration, they are nevertheless “portrayed as countries which are uniquely racist.” European societies prostrate themselves while even the most minor achievements of immigrants are celebrated and their myriad faults ignored. Murray employs the example of the Swedish Minister of Integration, Mona Sahlin, who spoke at a Kurdish mosque in 2004. Sahlin told her audience that many Swedes were jealous of them because “the Kurds have a rich and unifying culture and history, whereas the Swedes only had silly things like the festival of Midsummer’s Night.” More common examples include the alarmingly ubiquitous claim (like that made by Swedish Parliamentary Secretary Lisa Bergh) that the Swedes, British, Germans etc. “have no culture.”

Murray roots this self-denial and self-hatred in “the tyranny of guilt” — the title of the tenth chapter. Beginning with the case of the drowned Syrian boy Aylan Kurdi, the author comments at length on Europe’s “unique, abiding and perhaps finally fatal sense of, and obsession with, guilt.” Murray highlights the importance of historical and cultural representations of the 1930s and 1940s in promoting and enforcing a sense of guilt among Europeans, leading ultimately to a contemporary insistence “that Europe had absolutely no choice other than to take in everybody who wanted to come. To not do so was to be a Nazi.” But this particular historical period is merely a root, and many branches of guilt have sprung from it. “Today’s Europeans expect themselves, long before anybody else raises it, to bear specific historical guilt that comprises not only war guilt and Holocaust guilt, but a whole gamut of preceding guilts.” Australian children are taught that their national culture is founded on genocide and theft, a narrative reflected best in the country’s annual “Sorry Day.”

European guilt has been incredibly useful for the enemies of our people. Murray points out that “embedding the idea of original sin in a nation is the best possible way to breed self-doubt”; this has been “helpful to everyone other than those of the guilty nation.” While not all Europeans are susceptible to the guilt narrative, some, notably concentrated on the Left, are particularly prone to it. Murray describes these types as self-loathing masochists, and cites the example of the male Norwegian leftist Karsten Hauken who, after being beaten and sodomized by a Somalian migrant, wrote a public letter expressing his “sense of guilt and responsibility” that his attacker would be deported back to Somalia where he would experience a “dark uncertain future.”

Perversely, it is Europe that faces a dark and uncertain future, as revealed in Murray’s overwhelmingly pessimistic text. In the penultimate chapter Murray offers and explores policy suggestions that might yet see Europe survive (deportations, cultural shifts, and making the shaming of the nation a criminal offense as it is in countries like Turkey). But with candid realism, he locates these proposals within the sphere of wishful thinking.

The book’s final chapter “What Will Be,” is an apocalyptic vision of a future that is all too close to becoming contemporary reality. “By the middle of this century, while China will probably still look like China, India will probably look like India, Russia like Russia, and Eastern Europe like Eastern Europe, Western Europe will at best resemble a large-scale United Nations. … It will not be Europe anymore.” Through rhetorical cultural devices based on guilt and insidious systems of ‘morality,’ our homeland has been convinced that it owes a debt to humanity — a debt that can only be paid through self-denial and self-dispossession.

Although flawed, this book is an important (and apparently popular) warning about the decline of the European peoples. The text is at times hampered with neocon and philo-Semitic tendencies, but these feel labored, disjointed, and strained within the broader narrative. At times one suspects that Murray himself feels torn between these ‘grafted’ inclinations and deeper cultural, and probably racial, affinities with his own people. I am often suspicious and disregarding of those on the Right who flirt with our ideas and yet are among the first to condemn our movement. Murray can probably be placed in that category. Murray is also a homosexual — another demographic that is both undesirable in our movement and overwhelmingly unhelpful to our politics. However, it remains the case that The Strange Death of Europe is a useful text worthy of study and a modest place in your bookcase. Coming from the relative mainstream, it can also be used as a conversation starter, or left in a staff room for the perusal of others. It is probably the only mainstream, ‘respectable’ text in English that discusses the impending catastrophe, and therefore should be discussed and promoted.

The awakening of others must be our priority — the alternative is an endless nightmare.

[1] K. Paul, Whitewashing Britain: Race and Citizenship in the Postwar Era (Cornell University Press, 1997), p.134.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

97 Comments to "Review: The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam by Douglas Murray"

  1. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    May 30, 2017 - 7:30 am | Permalink

    Anybody for comparative cultures and religions? Why don’t Asians have the same vulnerabilities and masochistic suicide impulses as we Caucasians. Could it partly be the result of Buddhsm, Confusianism, and Japanese animist religions?

    I, for one, believe it so, havng spent time in Asian and the Orient since 1965 as a high school student. We are missing the tools and weapons to save ourselves that have been bequeathed us by our forebearers. We must look to supplement them by humility and open-mindedness in the Orient.

    And BTW, Mr. Moderator: I don’t see my short posting on Buddha and mashed potatoes (acknowledgement to Little Eva).

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      May 30, 2017 - 7:41 am | Permalink

      Oops! I have made an egregious error. Dee Dee Sharp was the lead singer on “Mashed Potatoes”. Just substitute Buddha for Mashed Potatoes, and this short treatise is a concise case for a superior path for the spiritually inclined.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      May 30, 2017 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

      Could be that rather than religion or an innate masochism, a Jew would have a hard time passing himself off as a Chinese or Japanese, as he has in the Occident, subverting their culture all the while claiming to be helping them as one of them.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 31, 2017 - 7:21 am | Permalink

        Karen, it is not about appearance, it is rather about culture, milieu, social contract, mores, and the “internals”. There is very little accommodation or vulnerability to the Jewish influence in the Oriental collective consciousness. No leverage, no entry point, nothing to suck off of, human resources to live off.

        We Whites do not know where we are; we have lost all continuity with the past, and do not even think about the future. The Jewish Worm/Parasite/Virus/Foreign Body has resided in our collective neural network and controls the PROCESSING of information.

        Secession is the only option for us. Please read my comments above and on Disqus/Occidental Dissent for more clarity and detail.

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          May 31, 2017 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

          Sidney Rittenberg, a Jew from South Carolina headed the Chinese Broadcasting Administration prior to, and during the Chinese Cultural Revolution, which like many Jewish sponsored events, inverts the true meaning/truth (hence ‘satanic’) as the Cultural Revolutions purpose, aside from installing communism, was to destroy Traditional Chinese culture. Over 50,000 Chinese, the best intellectually, like in Russia, were murdered. Russian Jew, Grigori Voitensky, was sent to China to help set up the communist state. Back to Rittenberg, he resettled in the U.S. where he set up a lucrative business profiting as an advisor for companies looking to expand in China, now a Capitalist. The Japanese, not addled by the Jewish opium business, would have none of it, and so were firebombed and practically annihilated. Today the Chinese are barbarians while the Japanese have retained their dignity and their humanity.

          • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
            May 31, 2017 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

            @ Karen T.:
            50 million, I believe. On the residual effects of Chinese communism, see Nolen’s blog post (“The Chinese Century”):

          • Lou's Gravatar Lou
            May 31, 2017 - 8:46 pm | Permalink

            Over 50,000 Chinese, the best intellectually, like in Russia, were murdered.
            50k? I read 80 million.

          • m's Gravatar m
            June 1, 2017 - 4:01 am | Permalink

            @ Karen: Chinese have not changed as a result of the Cultural Revolution. It is difficult for a people to change their nature in a few years, or ever. In the scheme of Chinese history the CR is not important, per se. What we saw was the effects of technology used in conjunction with political power on a mass scale. There are instances of this in Western history, too.

            In fact the CR was an aberration, and in any case the “Criticize Lin, Criticize Confucius” political agenda has long been abandoned. One can easily view the machinations of the CR more simply as a scheme to solidify power by Mao when faced with Party rebellion (Lin Biao, Lui Shaoqi, and even Deng Xioaping) . Once the Emperor died his clique was quickly removed and a sense of normalcy began to return.

            Today, the CCP recognizes that Confucian theory is a must in order to maintain social harmony, a harmony that cannot be maintained via Marxism (however you want to take that theory). This harmony begins with the family. What Chinese (and other East Asians) have is an Oriental sensibility that values family and the clan first. Unlike white folk in the West, Chinese are not deracinated. Chinese will always be Chinese first, and as such do not speak the international Jewish and universal Christian language. “Face” is important, but it is different than misplaced guilt. For example East Asians cannot be swayed into submission by the Jewish “H.” In fact, Chinese might even believe it happened as Jews want to claim, but Chinese are not guilty over it and cannot be exploited because of it.

            Also, to say (as some do) that however many millions of Chinese were “murdered” by the Communists is ridiculous, if we take murder to mean the usual definition of the word. What happened was a combination of idiotic political-economic decisions (especially the Great Leap disaster) coupled with famine, etc. It wasn’t like death squads of Red Guard went out and shot 50 million people. To use language loosely is to be guilty of intellectual weaseling, if not dishonesty. And we want to be honest.

            One last point, about Japanese. We recall how they are under the thumb of the Americans in a way mainland Chinese are not. For its part, Japanese civility has been known to turn savage, quickly.

          • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
            June 1, 2017 - 9:14 am | Permalink

            Karen, excellent report. These types were directly under the control of Stalinist CCCP, with registration numbers. They were agents. And they were numerous, e.g., Frank Marshall Davis, mentor and surrogate father to Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama-No Mama or Papa-and very likely child molester to the homo/bisexual little turdling. He had a registration number, as had so many others, like Pete Seeger, Woody Guthrie, Gus Hall, Paul Robeson, etc, etc, were all under Moscow control and were primarily allegiant to this foreign potentate.

            Unfortunately, they all lived, squatted, and defecated on Amurka all their lives. And we let them (Why wasn’t Susan Sontag executed?).

            They were Commies, but we were and are pussies; White Causcasians, sloppy sentimental furballs born with our eyes closed, which open upon death.

          • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
            June 1, 2017 - 6:31 pm | Permalink

            Seeing as how we want to be honest here… “To say (as some do) that however many millions of Chinese were murdered by the Communists is ridiculous if we take murder to mean the usual definition of the word.”
            Murder, you seem to be saying, must not be defined as murder if it’s committed for the greater glory of Communism. I suspect however that you would not claim that the deaths attributed to the National Socialists ridiculous if labelled murder.
            The CCP admits to 712,000 executions. The Black Book claims that 65 million Chinese were, I can’t think offhand of the Communist euphemism for murder, so lets say ‘disappeared’ and The Nine Commentaries swears to 115 million souls ascended to Chinese Heaven for The Greater Good.

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          May 31, 2017 - 2:09 pm | Permalink

          Not only is secession ignoble and defeatest, it’s suicidal…

          Our forefathers settled our lands. To leave our culture and achievements to parasitical Jewry and under achieving Third Worlders, retreating to a “Savage Reservation” as depicted in Brave New World is worse than death.

          • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
            June 1, 2017 - 12:28 am | Permalink

            50,000 was a simple typo

          • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
            June 1, 2017 - 7:08 am | Permalink

            @Karen. Maybe some sort of scorched earth is in order, then. In any event, they would not know how to manage what they receive and ultimately would not benefit. JMO.

          • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
            June 1, 2017 - 9:21 am | Permalink

            Karen, very sentimental and emotionally stirring. Strategically defeating before after the same day. You work with what you have. MacArthur had to leave the Philippines, as did the British. You pick the battles you can win.

            After we restore and regenerate and recharge, then we will be able to BUY the rabble out of their lands, passively. They will be broke, starving, and indebted up to their Venezoouela-like cabezas. We are too weakened now to speak without permission.

            Take a sounding; we are in shallow water. Study some military history.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            June 2, 2017 - 11:56 am | Permalink

            Just so, Karen: secession is suicidal—notably albeit not solely in that were there to be any attempt at secession, our (((government))) wouldn’t wait for something as innocuous as a latter-day Fort Sumter event to employ lethal force against secessionists and any deemed sympathetic to them.

            Anent m’s comments, it’s my hope that when he wrote “the CR was an aberration” and the sentences that followed, the aberrational context he had in mind was historical rather than moral. Put otherwise, there was just one Cheng Ho in Chinese history and, equally, just one emperor (a name I can’t recall in the Ming dynasty) who backed that admiral’s adventures and exploits. The emperor’s successor burned the entirety of Cheng’s fleet, and with that action Chinese policy with regard to the rest of the world, after briefly being naval, returned to its navel norm.

            So in sum, I think m is saying that that’s what we’re seeing now—China reverting to the historical-cultural-psychological Chinese norm. As I see this norm as a thing almost preternaturally resistant to change, I am left to wonder whether all the politicians’ breast-beating about the threat posed by a China that aspires to be the new world hegemon is an example of willful distraction or historical ignorance.

    • May 30, 2017 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

      An interesting comment from a Filipino on Mindweapon’s moribund blog : “….. the thing about Filipinos and Asians in general is that we are very un-trusting even when we are being friendly….Shake hands with your right and carry a knife with your left. That pretty much sums up that part of our worldview.” More Here

  2. Ben Balmer's Gravatar Ben Balmer
    May 30, 2017 - 7:43 am | Permalink

    Is Europe a race or a culture? If it’s a race, it’s being done in by the culture which tells it not to defend itself, but also to rid itself of the elements that made it worth saving, such as Christianity, the family, patriotism, the traditional virtues. Is it really so important that Amsterdam be saved? Some on the Alt Right have internalized 90% of the decadent values foisted on us by subversives, while sterner souls continue to spit on those values and even refuse to condemn Islam when Islam spits on them. Should we defend feminism against sharia? I would rather see Hollywood subjected to “white sharia.” It would be very cathartic. Miley Cyrus and Katy Perry in burkas! Who wouldn’t want to see that??

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      May 31, 2017 - 11:38 am | Permalink

      @ Ben Balmer

      Naked Miley (“Sex, Drugs & Rock”) Cyrus is to support Posed-for Pedophiles Ariana (“Deal with the Devil”) Grande in a Manchester “Charity” Re-run. A target for those with the perspective of Sayyid Qutb, “Milestones” (q.v.) on western decadence, and another invitation to repressed Islamist young males to slaughter their preteen “worshipers” and their gullible parents.

      • Ben Balmer's Gravatar Ben Balmer
        June 1, 2017 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

        Not sure I’m catching your meaning but it sounds plausible. I join the Muslims in opposing western decadence, as did Patrick Buchanan in some past columns and Daily Stormer in a brilliant rant against a Boomer who argued that we should avoid treating women in ways that Muslims would approve. Repression seems a healthy practice. The burka desexualizes women for men who are not married to them. If a man can’t have the candy why wave it under his nose?
        Our contrary practice reflects not so much concern for women’s rights as a degenerate expectation that adultery is always on the menu. In olden times a glimpse of stocking was looked on as something shocking but now, God knows, anything goes. As long as we forbid women to bare their breasts “we’re just arguing over the price.” Burkas may be closer to the golden mean than bikinis. And Hillary would look a lot better in one.

    • Walraven's Gravatar Walraven
      June 4, 2017 - 4:28 am | Permalink

      WHite sharia is bullshit. I see in this another example of the weak west taking the foreign words and with it the culture, like christianity before. You don’t use the language of the enemy. We use Kek, pepe and cuck. Call it white order or The European Merit System, which has a positive message.

  3. May 30, 2017 - 9:52 am | Permalink

    Once whites get the law on their side this defensive posture will go away overnight. If the law is factor in behavior, especially, of whites who are trained to respect and obey the law, then, we have to get the law on our side to survive. Anything else is not effective. New techniques to get the law on our side must be achieved. How about a review of the Alpine Union?

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      May 30, 2017 - 2:37 pm | Permalink

      The Negroes say more and more that they want their country. Look how THEY are demanding segregation in every institution and venue. The Hispanderics, Latinos, or whatever they call themselves want their separate country and have named in Ixtlan, or some bofo nostalgic Aztec name.

      This is GREAT News. We Whites will take our secession part of the old Amurka and finally have control over our destiny and our wealth. We can rebuild our stock and restore our greater genetic qualities before it is too late.

      White Nationalism, which is Supremacist because of Reality, will be our opportunity to restore the herd and cull out the lame. Most folks envisage such a society based on nostalgia, “Nordic, Alpine, Aryan”, and other dead end useless titles.

      Using logic, reasoning, and facts, I have a different conception.

    • Ben Balmer's Gravatar Ben Balmer
      May 31, 2017 - 12:13 am | Permalink

      To get the law on your side you need to make your point of view seem within the ballpark of acceptability. To do that you need to express it persuasively and persist in the face of condemnation and expose a lot of people to it, and to do that you need to use the internet, because MSM is going to do everything in its power to shut you down. Since the left will try to censor the internet you need to be thinking about that and what you can do about it beyond stockpiling canned goods and buying gold. The right never seems to get anywhere, which doesn’t speak well for some people’s claims to racial superiority. Maybe the young’uns will improve on the breathtaking ineffectiveness of their elders.

      • Walraven's Gravatar Walraven
        June 4, 2017 - 5:40 am | Permalink

        Don’t think in therms of right left. National socialism was left as well. Think about constructing a merit system an order based on family. First the welfare state has to fall and then we can reorganize. The welfare state is beating us down, as well as the education and the media.

  4. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    May 30, 2017 - 10:12 am | Permalink

    Murray is neither a practicing “heterosexual” nor an obsessional “antisemite”. But let’s not look an unexpected gift horse in the mouth.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      May 30, 2017 - 6:09 pm | Permalink

      I take it “obsessional” means a dogged fixation on the primary cause rather than secondary effects of the demographic changes?

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        May 31, 2017 - 11:44 am | Permalink

        @ Trenchant.

        Murray is well aware of the Jewish aspect, and has said more than most, but he also knows that (1) not all Jews in Europe are happy about the Muslim and anti-Israel immigration & its influence, and (2) he has concentrated on the reasons for opposing alien settlement, rather than straying into other “issues” such as are flagged up here like killing Christian babies or inventing Christianity.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          June 3, 2017 - 10:28 am | Permalink

          @David Ashton: I believe that here and elsewhere you have been improperly generalizing from specific instances. To my knowledge, no one has suggested that “killing Christian babies” is an everyday event or even an annual Passover ritual. To imply that it has been is to denigrate honorable men past and present and, not coincidentally, to do thereby the Tribe’s work for it, however unintentionally.

          The issue, rather, is whether, at various times during the past thousand years, a dozen or so carefully investigated cases of this abomination—investigated, I grant, by people who lacked any certification of kosherness by the present-day organs of Jewish narrative authenticity or their latter-day equivalents—took place.

          Certain commenters at this site and others regularly complain that throughout the centuries after the fall of Rome, the Catholic Church failed to use its influence to eradicate the Jewish presence in Europe. Let me declare for the record that those who say this are correct. Put otherwise, genocidal extermination, even of the largely criminal and unassimilable Jewish community, was never viewed by the Church as a morally acceptable response to the Jews’ usually undesired and always undesirable presence in a Christian society. Even less so, however, was the “manufacture” of saints through plainly falsified evidence or temporizing submission to localized ill feeling. The examiners of evidence and, later, the formalized advocatus diaboli knew full well that any such falsification would lead to their own eternal damnation. This, need I add, is the sort of fate that concentrates a believing Christian’s mind wonderfully.

  5. May 30, 2017 - 10:13 am | Permalink

    One young woman who they said died in the Manchester, UK “bombing” had died in December 2013. Here mother was so angry and dismayed that she tweeted the truth. Therefore, this incident is just another in the long line of false flag operations that the powers-that-be have undertaken in the last several years.

    • May 30, 2017 - 5:04 pm | Permalink

      Could you please be so kind as to identify the mother and if possible, direct me to the tweet ? This fact needs to be widespread. Thank you.

      • Kenaz Filan's Gravatar Kenaz Filan
        May 31, 2017 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

        There were a number of false tweets about people who died in the Manchester bombing. Some used pictures of people who had died earlier: some used pictures of people who were still alive. Instead of a “false flag” operation (or, more precisely, a “Potemkin Village bombing” — a false flag involves combatants wearing the other side’s uniforms while committing atrocities, while the Sandy Hook/Manchester “Truthers” appear to think that said atrocities were staged by “crisis actors” for reasons which remain unclear), this appears to be the work of attention-seeking Internet trolls.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      May 30, 2017 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

      Indeed, the Clash of Civilizations narrative can be seen as a neo-con project useful to the realization of Greater Israel. The book’s popular success and its omission of the J.Q. meshes nicely with the Manchester event.

      One wonders, by contrast, how many The Culture of Critiques are sold in the U.K.

      • Ben Balmer's Gravatar Ben Balmer
        May 31, 2017 - 12:25 am | Permalink

        Exactly. We never had any problem with Muslims until we started running all over the middle east trying make it 100% safe and cozy for “our only reliable ally and fellow democracy.” I shudder when I read comments from hard-right types ranting at Islam since there was a very deliberate neocon attempt to create from nothing a “new Cold (sic) War” with Islam in the name of “spreading democracy” via the Project for a New American Century. This project has been a disaster in every way and in particular has been a great gift to those out to vilify Christianity via the argument that “religion” is the source of the world’s problems.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          May 31, 2017 - 11:47 am | Permalink

          There are TWO “mistakes” not just one or the other:
          (1) Admitting millions of Muslims for permanent settlement in Europe. (2) Attacking Muslims outside Europe to further the interests of Zionism.

          • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
            May 31, 2017 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

            Those two strategies are complementary and contemporaneous, benefiting both the Diaspora and Israel.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            June 1, 2017 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

            What Trenchant wrote.

            A decade or more ago, someone at VDARE—Peter Brimelow, Steve Sailer, or someone else—coined the expression Invite the World / Invade the World for this two-pronged (((Establishment))) strategy. It fits the situation to a T.

            A while ago, Sailer appropriately expanded the locution into the economic sphere thus: Invite the World / Invade the World / In Hock to the World.

          • Ben Balmer's Gravatar Ben Balmer
            June 1, 2017 - 11:46 pm | Permalink

            I’m not an expert on the problem but I can’t imagine all those Muslims being invited in without the blessing of the bankers and globalist elite. But I don’t understand why they aren’t nervous about the nationalist backlash. Possibly they want to excite anti-immigrant violence and use that as an excuse to ban nationalist parties and anti-immigrant speech. Once these bans are in place they can be exploited to make further gains. Or maybe they just think the gain from diluting ethnic European populations will exceed the cost of exciting a disorganized opposition. But I am open to theories.

          • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
            June 2, 2017 - 6:32 pm | Permalink

            @ Ben Balmer:
            The New Caliphate hysteria allows for the introduction of Police State legislation without too much resistance from the natives, the real targets from the very outset.

          • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
            June 2, 2017 - 6:35 pm | Permalink
    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      May 31, 2017 - 11:58 am | Permalink

      @ Arlene Johnson & Eonic

      The Manchester bomber may or may not have been a Mossad agent or whatever (I think not) but the bomb damage was real and so were the dead and maimed, despite some initial confusion. It was not just an internet hologram broadcast from Tel Aviv or a Ghoulish Theatrical with waxworks from Elstree.

      The event was confirmed by one if my brother-in-law’s (Christian) daughters, who lives nearby and whose son, by the way, is the only white kid in his class.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        May 31, 2017 - 7:43 pm | Permalink

        I didn’t see any convincing evidence from the MSM of casualties, except the truth. Do you know this couple, too?

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 1, 2017 - 6:15 am | Permalink

          @ Trenchant

          I don’t know personally anyone connected with the Manchester atrocity, but the UK TV & MSM gave sufficient coverage to victims, some of whom were visited in hospital by the Queen who in my opinion is neither a Jew nor a Lizard from Lost Lemuria. It seems to ridiculous to suppose that the entire event was some totally imaginary Grand Guignol – beamed down upon a hypnotized population, presumably, from Planet Zog or wherever.

          There are of course many cases of “false flag” crimes. But a better comparison for skeptics might be 9/11. It ACTUALLY HAPPENED. Who was “behind it” is another matter.

          Mainstream Islam recommends many undesirable things, but not the murder of innocent women and children, even infidels, though some Sayings can be read as justifications for a war on all collaborators with House of Conflict immoralities which would include promiscuous and perverted behavior by young girls, the consumption of alcohol and almost all “music”. Some Islamists attribute much of the corruption to Jewish influence (no comment).

          “If the family is the basis of society…and the upbringing of children is the most important function of the family, then such a society is indeed civilized… If the relationship between man and woman is based on lust, passion and impulse…and if woman is freed from her basic responsibility of bringing up children…then such a ‘civilization’ is backward [i.e. regressing to animalism] or ‘jahili’ in the Islamic terminology…. It is not the function of Islam…to co-exist in the same land together with a jahili system” – Sayyid Qutb.

          • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
            June 1, 2017 - 5:53 pm | Permalink

            “Ridiculous” is the order of the day.

          • June 4, 2017 - 5:48 am | Permalink

            You should make up your own idea instead of copy paste the islam or jewish teaching. The native German had one wife, strong relations with the tribe. This everything foreign is better attitude is destroying us.

    • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
      May 31, 2017 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

      Even if that were true, how does that make the Manchester Moslem atrocity itself a “false flag” operation ?

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        June 1, 2017 - 10:22 am | Permalink

        A false flag is an event that happened, where obvious false evidence (the flag) points to a desired perpetrator and away from the actual perpetrator.
        If this event actually happened, and the desired Libyan was not the actual perpetrator, it is a false flag.

        If the event did not actually happen, it would be a psy-op. Something staged to provoke a desired response (like Sandy Hook), or to create a scapegoat (Boston Marathon).
        As I have no contacts with first hand knowledge of the events, my conclusion as to what happened in Manchester is not at hand.

    • May 31, 2017 - 5:22 pm | Permalink

      Arlene Johnson,
      You imply that “they” were the MSM and UK government. Actually they were random people on social media who posted the picture of the murdered woman.

  6. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    May 30, 2017 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the well balanced review of this new book, Andrew. The induced White suicidal miasma that currently has the West in its thrall has one relentless, implacable driving force, and that is international Jewry. A much better book on the theme of White extinction is Patrick Buchanan’s book State of Emergency.

  7. May 30, 2017 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

    “Murray also skewers the idea that ‘diversity’ is culturally enriching.” There is a moribund site The UK Enrichment News which kept some track on immigrant crime and filthy food takeaway stores.

  8. Floda's Gravatar Floda
    May 30, 2017 - 5:58 pm | Permalink

    The problem is and always has been, that the MSM is not in our hands. We are doomed if we do not control it.

    • Occidental Fan's Gravatar Occidental Fan
      May 31, 2017 - 1:24 am | Permalink

      No, we are not. And while I can understand a Soros-shill or hasbara making a claim like that, I cannot understand a genuine white nationalist making it. You’re trying to encourage defeatism, i.e helping the enemy.

    • Ben Balmer's Gravatar Ben Balmer
      May 31, 2017 - 1:48 am | Permalink

      The MSM is on its way out. The internet is a lot easier to use and a lot of people get their news from the net. The left is working on ways to censor it so the task is to counter that and make sure it can’t be shut down. That requires looking at legal issues, political issues, and hard core tech issues. We might even dream of developing entertainment channels to compete with Hollywood.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        May 31, 2017 - 8:17 pm | Permalink

        The Right Stuff’s phenomenal growth points to an enormous demand for media without ((())). Very encouraging.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      May 31, 2017 - 3:13 am | Permalink

      Control of the narrative is already slipping away from the MSM. This is being actively countered, naturally.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 31, 2017 - 8:12 am | Permalink

        You are dreaming and imagining, Trenchant. You evidently base your statement that the MSM is motivated by ratings and marketshare. They are not. They are propaganda channels for NWO, International Jewish and Shabbas collaborators. Among them, they have private fortunes totalling over 300 billion dollars, not even including the Rothchild and extended Jewish Banking Families.

        It simply does not matter if they run deficits or not. Even George Soros could cover all the deficits just from interest on his money.

        Please shift gears from tactical thinking to strategic planning. Take a snort of the lyrics and spirit of the song, “Great White Buffalo” by Ted Nugent:

        I said above the canyon wall
        Strong eyes did glow
        It was the leader of the land, baby
        Oh my God
        The great white buffalo!
        Look out!!!! Look out!!!!!!!
        Well, he got the battered herd
        He led ’em ‘cross the land
        With the great white buffalo
        They gonna make a final stand
        The great white buffalo
        Comin’ around to make a final stand”

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          May 31, 2017 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

          You are dreaming and imagining, Trenchant.

          @Poupon Marx: In what way is your reply a response to the content of Trenchant’s comment and linked article? Despite what you say, there is no “evident” connection whatsoever. How does an “imaginative” rant about something unsaid and unlinked-to further discussion or elucidate anything at all?

          Please shift gears from tactical thinking to strategic planning. Take a snort of the lyrics and spirit of the song “Great White Buffalo” by Ted Nugent …

          According to the usual sources, Ted Nugent is a rock star of some sort, a man who loathes Obama and Hillary and is (or was) a Trump supporter. Certainly, few hereabouts would consider these ipso facto negative character traits or reasons to automatically disinvite Nugent from Grandma’s 85th birthday party—so long, that is, as he promises not to “sing”! But how is a mere reader of words to comprehend how Nugent’s behavior or stunningly silly lyrics stand as exemplars of a shift from “tactical thinking” to “strategic planning”?—unless, that is, the strategic planning under consideration is to train a million or so bison to locate and mass-attack World Antifa Headquarters, reputedly still located in a nondescript barn half a mile away from Antioch College, in Yellow Springs, OH.

          To shift the focus back to bipeds, no one ought to be so foolish as to imagine that the Establishment—represented in the linked article by the formidable albeit dyspepsis-inducing Theresa May—will be sporting enough to roll over and play dead when it notices that forces outside itself are working to wrest narrative control from it. Anyone who does so imagine ought to be viewed as radically unfit for any position where the ability to think, either tactically or strategically, is a sine qua non.

          • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
            June 1, 2017 - 9:32 am | Permalink

            Pierre, get some air. That’s a lot of words to do such a limited job. This is like brushing one’s teeth 100 times to many. Are you a stranger to allegory, abstract relationsim (I don’t know what that means), analogy, metaphor, parallelism, and concrete imagery?

            I give you a high mark on usage and form, but lower on content. Question to you: is content king?

            That’s what I have so appreciated about my Chinese/Asian past: the ability to see similarities and concrete connections between and among other phenomenon in the real world.

            We vulgarians and carnivores and sheepdogs of the world have to stick together. “Chinese people very practical”. My expanding Buddhism influences more and more of my thinking and evaluating.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        May 31, 2017 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

        Reader/viewer numbers are down. Supply is all very well, but demand? In the USSR, Pravda boasted healthy circulation right till the end. Did it continue to control the narrative?

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      May 31, 2017 - 7:27 am | Permalink

      Floda, error in axioms and assumptions. “We” will never be able to control it, just as the Olympic water sports athletes could not control the fecal matter and sewage off the coast of Rio De Janeiro.

      Separation, secession, apartheid, the ethnic nation state is the ONLY option. You are wasting energy and time on ineffectual TACTICS instead of a STRATEGY that is the only vehicle and road to restoration and saving our assess.

  9. May 30, 2017 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for the excellent review. I am looking forward to reading the book myself. If it is indeed reaching the best seller lists in the UK that is hopeful in and of itself. Also re: the question of ‘sabotage’ vs ‘suicide’ – I think there is plenty of both (not just in Europe but America/Canada/Australia too) to account for our nations’ current plights, but if Murray’s book at least “gets the boat close to the dock” then hopefully readers can make the jump onto it themselves and realize the*echoing* ‘sabotage’ side of the equation, even if he regrettably does not discern that side himself or will not go down that path within the book.

    • May 31, 2017 - 4:49 pm | Permalink

      “… reaching the best seller lists in the UK that is hopeful in and of itself.”

      The German writer Thilo Sarazin wrote this book for Germany in 2010: “Deutschland macht sich ab” (Germany is doing away with itself). It went straight to the best seller lists and stayed there; everywhere it was talked about. A few years later, Merkel invited a million muslims into Germany and most Germans cheered.

      Following his first book, Sarazin wrote two more books on the same topics; they also went on the best seller lists. I think now he’s written a fourth. Well, they sell well and he makes money on them, but writing, or reading, books is not political power.

      • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
        May 31, 2017 - 7:34 pm | Permalink

        The correct title of Sarazin’s book is “Deutschland schafft sich ab”.
        Writing bestsellers is never enough. Sarazin should have gone into politics.

  10. mark green's Gravatar mark green
    May 30, 2017 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    Thank you, Mr. Joyce, for another balanced and insightful exploration of an important book. And thank you for examining its typical oversights. These familiar omissions remind us of how far we still have to go.

    Indeed, in order to make real political headway (and preserve our civilization) Europeans need to reclaim their genetic and cultural heritage. This process will require the re-introduction books like Murray’s into college classrooms. This will not be easy. The guardians of political correctness will fight us every step of the way.

    Unfortunately, there can be no victory until dissident authors like Murray are seen on TV and treated fairly by the ‘respectable’ press. Sadly, the enemies of our people have achieved dominance in broadcasting as well as the general dissemination of information as well as ‘news’. And they show no interest in sharing the stage.

    Until we re-enter these ‘mainstream’ institutions (now dominated by our adversaries) we will be slandered as ‘racists’ and relegated to the political wilderness.

  11. Forever Guilty's Gravatar Forever Guilty
    May 31, 2017 - 12:05 am | Permalink

    Cultural Enrichment

    Like what? Cut out girls sex organs? Stone people to death? Beheading, raping, Defecating and urinating in Public spaces? Sexual Intercourse with goats and donkeys ? Rejection to use toilet paper? Its religious requirement that Muslims should wipe themselves with two fingers.

    I really would like for ms Roche to be married to Somali husband, convert to Islam and move to Africa for ”Cultural enrichment” . Where he will continuously beating her , impregnating her and make her to do all hard manual work.

    In very short time her skin will become wrinkled, her teeth will fall out, boobs will sag down to the waistline. Because of non stopping pregnancies and no access to medical help her pelvic organs would-be infected and inflamed, her sexual orifices will discharge foul smelling fluids and slime.

    Because of bad water and food she would have numerous parasites crawling inside her body… And lets not forget the AIDS and Ebola. Some cultural enrichment…

  12. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    May 31, 2017 - 9:51 am | Permalink

    Interesting review. I suggested to my local library that they buy the book. It’s in a consortium of about fourteen in a metro area of 2 million. Perhaps, if purchased the title may open some minds.

    I guess the author is saying two things-

    To quote Foucault:

    And that ultimately what presides over all these mechanisms is not the unitary functioning of and apparatus or an institution, but the necessity of combat and the rules of strategy.

    And as far as we are concerned as a movement:

    Want to hold territory? Build and army.

    Robert M. Citino

  13. R. Smith's Gravatar R. Smith
    May 31, 2017 - 11:43 am | Permalink

    Charles Murray is hated by British nationalists and deemed a traitor because he is seen as a front man for the Jews. It is understandable for someone in the public arena to refer only obliquely to the Jewish problem which is the most serious issue for the UK as they are behind mass immigration, moral and societal degeneration but to be a total philosemite is another. unlikely any British nationalist will read this book.

  14. May 31, 2017 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Dear Dr. Joyce,

    Nice try, but why not simplify the situation and admit that none of this would be happening if Adolf Hitler had been allowed to win the European war, before the US managed to get the triggering event it needed to enter into it. The person most responsible for that is Britain’s celebrated hero, Sir Winston Churchill (may he be roasting in hell right now). His whole strategy was to hold off from signing a peace agreement with Germany (which would have allowed Hitler to focus all his forces on the Soviet Union) in expectation of Roosevelt coming in to save the day.

    This is where it all went wrong. What Churchill got away with is a measure of the gullibility of the British people. Only a Nazi Germany-ruled Europe could have prevented all this grief – Franklin Ryckaert’s usual crocodile tears on behalf of the Russians and Poles notwithstanding. A German-led Europe by the Germans of that day would have been a big improvement, especially with Germans who came in friendship.

    I think it’s sad that this cannot be said at TOO. We need real history, not American-flag-covered history.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      May 31, 2017 - 7:27 pm | Permalink

      Perhaps most Europeans wouldn’t like to live in a “Nazi Germany-ruled Europe”, especially the Slavic peoples, deemed to be “racially inferior” by the infallible Führer. It was not all the fault of Churchill, there is such a thing as nationalism, reason why in all Nazi-occupied countries there existed resistance. A league of independent European nations would have been possible, but that would have required the little Austrian failed artist would have to give up his lust of power. Given his megalomania, exemplified in the super-sized architecture of the Third Reich, that would have been asking too much.

      • May 31, 2017 - 9:41 pm | Permalink

        You don’t know what kind of “rule” would have been set up – certainly better than what the Soviets did with what they took over after they won. Look what Stalin did to your precious Slavic people. (Are you married to one?) And the point is not how well everyone would have liked it at the time, but how Western Europe would have remained White, and it takes a strong hand to keep it that way. National Socialism also would not look the same today as it did back then.
        You are such a hater – you belong with the jews in your attitude toward the Nazis. I don’t know why, but it’s a disease of the Dutch.

        • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
          May 31, 2017 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

          “Either Hitler or Stalin” is a false dilemma. You don’t need National Socialism to reject non-white immigration. The Labor Party of Australia had the White Australia Policy on its program without being National Socialist. The problem is not a lack of National Socialism (which is discredited anyway), but a lack of normalcy against the onslaught of Cultural Marxism.

          • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
            June 1, 2017 - 10:32 am | Permalink

            The nationalist White Australia Policy by the socialist Labour Party of Australia was national socialism, but not National Socialism.
            The problem is the same with “Labour” parties everywhere. They were infiltrated by (((globalists))) who seized control and have never relinquished it.

          • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
            June 1, 2017 - 11:42 am | Permalink

            ‘National Socialism’ was precisely and merely a restoration of normalcy in Germany, FR. But it’s also clear that a more rigorous antisemitism and pro-Europeanness will be necessary this time, CY.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            June 2, 2017 - 11:12 am | Permalink

            “Either Hitler or Stalin” is a false dilemma.

            Whether dilemma or dichotomy, amen to that sentence and to your comment in its entirety, Mr. Ryckaert, and to Curmudgeon’s, too.

            If writing such things makes one a hater, I’d like to apply for admission to your club.

          • June 3, 2017 - 9:05 am | Permalink

            “The problem is not a lack of National Socialism (which is discredited anyway) …”

            Sez who, Mr. Ryckaert? Or by whom?

      • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
        June 1, 2017 - 9:28 am | Permalink

        @Carolyn. If you are a sound nationalist, you hardly can mean that one needs to be married to a Slav to harbour sympathy for the Slavic people’s plight. Since the Occidental Observer is a forum that provides genuine information on the Jewish influence, you hardly can be ignorant on the subject of the Jewish domination in the Soviet Union – and Poland. Do you believe that a true Polish patriot would have shouted him hoarse – as marshalk Edward Rydz Smigly actually did – about Poland’s prospects to defeat Adolf’s powerful Germany? He was nothing else than a puppet in the true (((masters’))) hands.
        The Polish Slavs are in fact not so very different from the “precious” Westerners, but they did not realise who their real enemy was. I know that because I was born (1950) and bred in Poland (I live in Sweden since 1973). As I nowadays ( after the scales finally have fallen from my eyes) follow Russian alternative information fora, I even do know that most of the ordinary Slavic Russians are decent people. With regard to the fact that much of our European not only cultural inheritance must be attributed to the German people, I find it horrible that Germany was flooded with hordes from MENA. Germany was enough “enriched” by the big number of illiterates even before the mass influx took place, by Turks and Slavs of suspect origin (a diversity of half-breeds and of “racially pure”gypsies).

        • June 3, 2017 - 8:50 am | Permalink

          Alicia – I only ask Franklin if he’s married to a Slav because Hitler’s supposed low opinion of them is the main and first gripe he always expresses against Hitler. Franklin never answers though.

          Hitler certainly knew that most ordinary Russians and Poles were “decent people.” FR’s characterizations of Hitler as deeming all Slavs “racially inferior” as if he planned to genocide them, is not in line with the facts. It’s Jewish propaganda.

          However, I have no sympathy for the Slavic people’s plight since they brought it all on themselves, and later they make the excuse, as you’re doing, that it’s all the fault of their many Jews. The Germans had many Jews among them too, but also had a brilliant leader in Adolf Hitler with the courage to speak the truth about Jews and an intelligent populace willing to listen Was there ever such a leader anywhere else in Europe? No. That’s why I say, only if Hitler had won would things have been changed enough in Europe to bring about a healthy political/racial climate. A few unhappy Slavs be dammed!

          It is not an accident that after the great Allied victory over ‘Fascism,’ Europeans today prefer to disappear than be seen as not judging all people as equal and equally worthy. Look at the country you’re living in, Sweden, when today your native Poland is pro-White. This only proves that I am right.

          • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
            June 3, 2017 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

            “…A few unhappy Slavs be dammed..!”

            Those “few” would be millions. Search on the Internet about Hitler’s plan for the Slavs under the terms General Plan Ost and Lebensraum or read in Hitler’s Table Talk what he had in store for the Slavs (hint : no education or medical care for them. Slavs should be actual “slaves”). For the Nazi’s actual behavior toward the Slavs, see :
            Nazi crimes against the Polish nation.
            Nazi war crimes in Ukraine.
            War crimes of the Wehrmacht.

            There may be one-sided propaganda against the Nazis now accepted as history, but not everything was a myth, and that explains why Nazism is “discredited” by the general culture of today.

          • June 4, 2017 - 9:57 am | Permalink

            What we’re talking about, Franklin, is the undisputed perilous situation we’re in today and what would have prevented it. Certainly NOT your recipe for more of the same failed leadership. You have no answers and you also do not read history right.

            “Nazism is “discredited” by the general culture of today.”
            Today’s culture, wow. Great recommendation!

            Millions of Slavs would not have been marginalized. All worthy people would have been enlisted into the work to be done. A “league of independent European nations” does not work when serious problems need to be solved and you know it, or should know it. Give it a break with your internet sources.

          • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
            June 4, 2017 - 1:34 pm | Permalink

            (Mod. Note: This petty squabble comes to an end now. Stop sniping at each other over “history”, or neither of you will have comments approved. Grow up, kids.)

  15. May 31, 2017 - 6:26 pm | Permalink

    “Europe has lost faith in its beliefs, traditions and legitimacy. ”

    Indeed it has. But the question is ‘why?’. And it’s here that Murray becomes uncharacteristically coy. Not surprisingly because his employers, The Henry Jackson Foundation, are ZioCon Central. Still, (((they))) must be twitching nervously when the ‘suicide’ (‘murder’ is more apposite) gets subjected to forensic examination such as that by Murray.

  16. William H McCarty's Gravatar William H McCarty
    May 31, 2017 - 11:36 pm | Permalink

    Is this the same Douglas Murray who wrote “Neoconservatism: Why We Need It,” recommended to me by amazon when I placed this book (temporarily) in my cart? Jeez.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      June 1, 2017 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

      William H. McCarty

      Murray has improved since he noticed the “Barbara” Spectre haunting Europe like Marx’s communism and mentioned it publicly. Give the boy a chance.

  17. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    June 1, 2017 - 8:29 pm | Permalink

    re Grey Poupon comment 6/1 9:14

    “. . .He had a registration number, as had so many others, like Pete Seeger, Woody Guthrie, Gus Hall, Paul Robeson, etc, etc, were all under Moscow control and were primarily allegiant to this foreign potentate.

    Unfortunately, they all lived, squatted, and defecated on Amurka all their lives. And we let them (Why wasn’t Susan Sontag executed?).

    They were Commies, but we were and are pussies; White Causcasians, sloppy sentimental furballs born with our eyes closed, which open upon death. . .”

    The same commies were in charge of the US government, AND INFORMATION- so they would not act. Should private citizens have done something drastic? MLK was one of them- somebody acted.

    How many folks knew exactly what Pete Seeger, Woody Guthrie, Gus Hall, Paul Robeson and so on were up to?

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      June 2, 2017 - 9:37 am | Permalink

      Excellent and perspicacious, T. J. I was a college freshman in 1966 at the U of Hawaii Manoa. Then the U of Houston, and finally the U of Texas Austin. In between was a year at San Antonio Junior College. Even in Texas, the Frankfurt School was pushing the buttons and pulling the levers. At SJC, we were assigned Eric Fromm’s “The Art of Loving”, and marinated in the Shabbas lies of Margaret Mead, Freud, Irving Goffman, and many other Frankfurt School acolytes and and principals. I never had a clue, as I guarantee not one student out of tens of thousands realized the indoctrination, direct lies and lies of omission, manipulation, and grooming for good little future Shabbas Goyim Zombies.

      I was a zombie, Other-Directed my entire 5 years in Jewniversity-and never knew or had an inkling. “Duped” is the operative word here for My Generation and succeeding ones, right up to the very moment.

      ONLY when I left the Mesmotron of the academy, did I begin to realize what I was subjected to and internalized. And it took years and sites like THIS ONE to completely excise these viral implants from that era and the lesser intensities of the media, etc., afterward.

      Remember the Moonies? Bhagwan the Swami and his followers? Who were the dominant cross-section of those adherents? Rich, upper middle class, family trust, AND above the mean IQ. In Bhagwanville, a pre-condition of joining was to sign over all inherited and personal wealth to the Swami. Almost all the kids were White. Most of the Jim Jones Jonestown mass suicide were Black.

      We NEVER DID a self examination, a forensic review, collectively, of what vulnerabilities and weaknesses did we possess to fall for and believe such inanities and subsumed personalities lost in the “Collective”, “The Hive”.

      We Caucasians are obviously, “NOT ALRIGHT”; in fact, we are sick, weak, empty vessels with varying degrees of vacuum inside our personalities, personas, spirits and consciousness. To some degree, this is genetic, I believe. Centuries of war, horrendous losses of the flower of our manhoods (think of the Roman Centurians. What men of courage, intelligence, adeptness could they have had marching halfway across the continent and demolishing defensive armies on their own turf. That genetic legacy did not make it forward to the present. We have too many cucked and pussified males, stupid, cheap females who have lost their sense of biological destiny and hereditary gender qualities-that you can observe in infra-human mammalian species all day long.

  18. Peter George Stewart's Gravatar Peter George Stewart
    June 2, 2017 - 4:40 am | Permalink

    Rather than attributing cases like the raped Norwegian (and its milder but more widespread analogues) to “masochism”, I’d rather atttribute it to “holiness spiralling”, i.e. to one-up-manship in moral terms, which is a feature of the European identity, and most clearly shown in Protestantism, particularly Puritanism. IOW it’s not due to a lack or flaw, but rather to a positive (in the non-moral sense) trait. Also related to “virtue signalling.”

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      June 2, 2017 - 10:43 am | Permalink

      I believe we Causcasians should abandon Christianity inanity and absorb Buddhism, Confucius, and other Asian religions and practices. For me, this incarnation was preceded by previous lives in the Orient. Christianity is the wound into which the (((Parasite/Virus))) entered and bloomed. Perhaps it was designed to do just that. But I must say, as an Eastern Orthodox, the best of the Christian breed, I just could not feel part of it. It, and the Western Eco-System, tutto il resto, produced a feeling of being the “outside” and not belonging, a stranger. At present, from here, I feel no connection, obligation, or desire to be part of the West and its dilapidated, quavering, decaying state.

      Each has to find their own path, and consider ALL the options.

      • June 4, 2017 - 5:53 am | Permalink

        Why adopt another foreign religion. Haven’t we learned anything? We have to go back to our own gods, our forefathers who where like gods. Julius Caesar, Cato the Elder, Charles Martel, Windukind, Boudica and the list goes on.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 5, 2017 - 11:08 am | Permalink

          @ Walraven

          Good idea to remember and reverence the “Dead White European Males” despised by our enemies, not only military heroes but philosophers, scientists, poets, musicians, &c. Meanwhile, we should resist the obliteration down the memory hole of Rhodes, Franco, Robert E. Lee and others who are not attacked for the same reasons that we might find fault with them.

          Those of us who think that Odin and Zeus are as imaginary as celestial Jesus and Mary need some “role models” to celebrate.

          This would be a welcome development for young whites people to “idolize” than (say) Busta Rhymes or Ariana Grande.

  19. Walraven's Gravatar Walraven
    June 3, 2017 - 3:32 am | Permalink

    Murray has stated in several interviews that he is pro-immigration not mass-immigration. Disgusting.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      June 5, 2017 - 11:30 am | Permalink

      @ Walraven

      Let’s look at his Oxford Union debate speech online. He puts an emphasis on the diminishing “White British” percentage, giving up identity and culture, watering down values, the reduction of “Britishness” to being “nice”, robbing the Afro-Asian world of both its cheap labor and its best people, and the loss of place in the world of Britain and other European countries.

  20. ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
    June 3, 2017 - 10:28 pm | Permalink

    Would it be fair to describe the problem as one being compared to the Pied Piper of Hamelin (one that offers strong but delusive enticement)?

    What I observed in South Africa (my forming years) during the transition to black rule, was that the narrative became complexer and complexer, so that comprehension of what really was happening shifted more and more to the right of the bell shaped curve. People could not discern fact from fiction anymore. Very few people could still recognize the patterns which the propaganda followed. They became convinced, and started following the Pied Pipers of media lies and deception.

    The same pattern I see the world all over today. People do not see the wood for the trees. The day they discover some truths, they are shocked into inaction out of fear. They recognise what they could loose, and that the odds are very high, and do not know how to neutralize these Pied Pipers, and thus rather stick their heads into the sand. Not everyone is born a suitable soldierly caliber.

    One must not underestimate the level of knowledge one has gained over the years. The average John Citizen does not have the insights of the readers of this and similar websites. This is pretty priviliged information which took quite an effort over a number of years to acquire.

    I believe if one had the means to counteract these lies and gain control over the media, one could turn around the situation within one generation.

    And I see that a whole generation of these Pied Pipers have now reached old age and the end of their natural life span. This opens a new window of opportunity, provided there is a younger generation that has acquired the insights of the older generation, so that that the knowledge of cause and effect is not lost.

  21. Dan marotta's Gravatar Dan marotta
    June 4, 2017 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

    The awakening of others is happening all right and fast, The use of the Internet has the power to transform our movement in no time at all and we already see explicit and implicit ( White Identity/ European Nationalist ) parties and leaders on the move and that is In spite of the MSM and our treacherous elites being lined up against us. The MSM/ Elites are losing the control of the discourse and words like racist no longer have the power to stifle debate which is leading more and more European and people outside of Europe of European descent to literally question more and inevitably more are coming over to our side particularly as the problems facing us aren’t going away, The EU is in decline and Europeans will look to alternatives indeed Central Europe is already looking at those now ( OBOR & Enlarged Visegrad ) Also Throughout East & Central Europe Nationalism is part & parcel of political life and it is emerging now in the West too, Despite Le Pen losing she did well with young voters and FN popularity will only increase after 4 years of Macron, Hoffer in Austria and Wilders in the Netherlands are not going anywhere and we’ve seen how The WN community in the US played it’s part in the election of Trump last year. I am sure Europeans World wide are waking up and momentum is on our side.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      June 7, 2017 - 6:34 am | Permalink

      @Dan Marotta. ” I am sure Europeans World wide are waking up and momentum is on our side.” I am not, because the data do not support it. The birthrate for Caucasian Whites is less than the replacement rate, while China and India struggle to DECREASE the added population each year. No one should have to tell you that the Negro and Amerindian populations are increasing.

      Besides the demography, there is the set of ideas, ideals, collective thoughts and beliefs of White Caucasians. Thought precedes action. Therefore, we need to examine EVERYTHING historically and presently that contributed to our dystopia, delusional condition.

      Christianity, past Gods, glory, and all the rest deserve this critical analysis. I personally have left Eastern Orthodoxy and now revert to my previous incarnation as a Buddhist. If White Caucasians cannot and will not think clearly, ruthlessly, and profoundly for answers and formulate strategy, Nature will sweep us aside like popcorn on the floor of a movie theater, like any non-viable, defenseless, weak, and sheep-like creatures.

      There are tactics and there are strategies. The only salvation for WCs is a separate nation state-and soon before it is too late.

  22. Mark R's Gravatar Mark R
    June 5, 2017 - 3:48 am | Permalink

    Busted. Policeman filmed putting on camouflage trousers to play role of shot terrorist!AljzA-3D_GVL3j77a8yUZdYJmyGN

    • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
      June 5, 2017 - 12:26 pm | Permalink

      In the old days, one could still falsify attrocity photos by means of pencil scetches, and a careful observer could still see that the falsifier forgot to draw the shadows correctly, for instance the topic of mass graves.

      But in this day and age of nearly perfected computer graphics and photoshop tools, one needs supporting evidence in addition to this film for something like this to stand up in a court of law.

      I remember the controversies during the Iraq invasion, how some people exposed major falsifications of battle scenes and deception of who actually was the perpetrator and the victim. It was impossible for a layman to distinguish between fact and fiction, so expertly some scenes were planned and executed and then shown on the national broadcasters.

Comments are closed.