Eric Turkheimer: Jewish Ethnic Interests Masquerading as Ethical Concerns

Kevin MacDonald


Recently behavior geneticist Eric Turkheimer participated in a commentary on Charles Murray and the issue of race differences in intelligence. Since I am not a behavior geneticist, I won’t argue the point that there is no present methodology to test for group differences in traits like IQ, although the recent method of estimating group IQ on the basis of the frequencies of the all the known genes associated with IQ seems promising. I focus here on Turkheimer’s claims on the ethics of studying race differences.

In previous comments on the science of race differences, Turkheimer noted:

Why Race Science is Objectionable

If I may address my fellow Jews for a moment, consider this. How would you feel about a line of research into the question of whether Jews have a genetic tendency to be more concerned with money than other groups? Nothing anti-semitic, mind you, just a rational investigation of the scientific evidence. It wouldn’t be difficult to measure interest in money and materialism, and it wouldn’t surprise me if as an empirical matter Jews scored a little higher on the resulting test than other groups. As a behavioral geneticist I can assure you without reservation that the trait would be heritable, and, if anyone bothered to take the time to find out, specific genes would have small associations with it. Of course, this research program has already been carried out, at least to the extent the relevant technology was available in 1939. While we are at it we could open a whole scientific institute for the scientific study of racial stereotypes, and finally pull together the evidence on sneaky Japanese, drunken Irish, unintelligent Poles, overemotional women and lazy Italians.

This is a naked appeal to the ethnic interests of his ethnic group — exactly the problem with the “scientists” reviewed in The Culture of Critique. Race realists associated with the Alt Right, on the other hand, have tended to go with the data. They accept the findings that the IQs of Ashkenazi Jews and East Asians are higher than White means. The main issue, after all is White identity and White interests in being able to construct their own societies as other groups around the world have done and continue to do — whatever their talents or deficiencies compared to other groups.

Turkheimer continues:

Hopefully I am beginning to offend you. Why? Why don’t we accept racial stereotypes as reasonable hypotheses, okay to consider until they have been scientifically proven false? They are offensive precisely because they violate our intuition about the balance between innateness and self-determination of the moral and cultural qualities of human beings. No reasonable person would be offended by the observation that African people have curlier hair than the Chinese, notwithstanding the possibility of some future environment in which it is no longer true. But we can recognize a contention that Chinese people are genetically predisposed to be better table tennis players than Africans as silly, and the contention that they are smarter than Africans as ugly, because it is a matter of ethical principle that individual and cultural accomplishment is not tied to the genes in the same way as the appearance of our hair.

The reason we must not delve in to race science thus depends on “intuition.” Unfortunately, we all have different intuitions. Perhaps he is talking about the intuitions of liberal university professors. Or activist Jews.

But why should that hold any weight? My own intuitions are quite different, based on the persistent racial differences in IQ and academic achievement despite very expensive ameliorative efforts over the last 50 years, as well as finding similar race differences in other societies, and consequences of dramatic changes in the racial composition of a city like Detroit.  Moreover, even though we don’t have a methodology to nail down genetic influences on race differences conclusively, it is certainly plausible that some of the differences are genetic in origin given that intelligence is highly heritable in all groups and that the races were separated for thousands of years and subjected to very different environmental selective pressures. And adoption studies, which represent the strongest evidence for environmental effects, cannot be replicated on a mass scale to improve the IQ and academic performance of the vast majority of Blacks; indeed, adoption, because it gets rid of natural parent-child passive genotype-environment effects, prevents the natural course of biological parent-child interactions which, as has been seen in a multitude of studies, result in low average IQs among Blacks..

In particular, Turkheimer claims that race science “violate[s] our intuition about the balance between innateness and self-determination of the moral and cultural qualities of human beings.” This is odd coming from a behavior geneticist whose field has found substantial  heritabilities of pretty much all psychological traits. The idea that people can rise above their innate limitations is appealing, and to some extent we can, by practice and hard work, maximize our potential (although the psychological trait of conscientiousness, which involves perseverance and striving to achieve goals, is also substantially heritable). No one is proposing that practice or environmental enrichment are not beneficial. But it doesn’t follow that just anyone can become a professional athlete or musician or mathematician, and in fact, the contrary proposition is absurd. Nor does it follow that striving and practice could make a child with a low genetic potential for IQ into a math whiz.

In his more recent comments, Turkheimer essentially repeats his previous ideas on a possible genetic propensity for Jews to be materialistic, noting:

One could try to avoid the question by hoping that materialism isn’t a measurable trait like IQ, except that it is; or that materialism might not be heritable in individuals, except that it is nearly certain it would be if someone bothered to check; or perhaps that Jews aren’t really a race, although they certainly differ ancestrally from non-Jews; or that one wouldn’t actually find an average difference in materialism, but it seems perfectly plausible that one might. (In case anyone is interested, a biological theory of Jewish behavior, by the white nationalist psychologist Kevin MacDonald, actually exists.)

This reference to my work may be misleading. I have indeed thought about the selective pressures on different traits stemming from Jewish cultural traditions, with the implication that this may indicate that these selective pressures resulted in group differences. (Nevertheless, as described below, the extent of genetic influence on behavioral differences between Jews and non-Jews is not an important issue apart from scholarly interest.) In particular, in Chapter 7 of A People That Shall Dwell Alone (see also here), I discuss the cultural tradition whereby scholars able to master the voluminous body of Jewish religious writing were given preferential marriages and business opportunities and that these people had more children. To an evolutionist, this means that any genetic basis for mastering this body of writing would be selected for in subsequent generations — the fundamental and indisputable basis of eugenics (assuming the trait is influenced by additive genetic variation, as IQ certainly is). I also mention historical eras, such as the early Christian era, when Jews self-consciously became dedicated to developing an educated elite by not only stressing education and literacy but also by discriminating against unlettered Jews and expelling them from their communities. Wealth always mattered in traditional Jewish communities as it did for all groups, and — at least until the nineteenth century in Europe — wealthier individuals tended to have more children. This isn’t proof, but it’s certainly reasonable. And yes, it would apply to materialism as well. Although I have never made this argument, it would have to be shown that materialism is heritable and that traditional Jewish cultures emphasized economic success and rewarded it with better marriages and more children — a highly plausible scenario.

Using similar logic, ethnocentrism would have been selected for within Jewish communities because less committed Jews would be more likely to convert during hard times or do other things that violated the strict collectivist ethos of traditional Jewish communities. My view is that the phenomenon of martyrdom among Jews is a marker of selection for ethnocentrism:

We see examples [of martyrdom] periodically in modern times, and there are many historical examples, ranging from Christian martyrs in ancient times to a great many instances of Jewish martyrdom over a two thousand-year period. Persecution of highly collectivist groups does not typically result in defections, but rather an increase in collectivist tendencies. …
For example, Josephus, the first-century Jewish historian and apologist, stated that [we face] death on behalf of our laws with a courage which no other nation can equal. (Against Apion, 2:234) “No other nation can be shown to have fought so often in defence of its own way of life, and the readiness of Jews to die for their cause is proved by example after example” (Sanders, 1992:239). [Stories of Jewish fathers killing their families rather than be converted to Christianity in the Middle Ages are a staple of Jewish religious lore.] Examples of martyrdom are theoretically important because it is very difficult to suppose that such people have an algorithm that calculates individual fitness payoffs by balancing the tendency to desert the group with anticipated benefits of continued group membership. The obvious interpretation of such a phenomenon is that these people are obligated to remain in the group no matter what—even to the point of being martyred. Such examples suggest that there are no conceivable circumstances that would cause such people to abandon the group, go their own way, and become assimilated to the outgroup. …

At one extreme end of this variation [in ethnocentrism], it appears that there are a significant number of humans who are so highly prone to developing a sense of shared fate that they do not calculate individual payoffs of group membership and readily suffer martyrdom rather than defect from the group. It should also be noted that the existence of significant
numbers of people for whom desertion of the group is not a psychologically available option shows that between-group selection must be presumed to have occurred among humans. (see also Chapter 1 of Separation and Its Discontents, p. 18ff)

Obviously, a Jewish activist like Turkheimer wants to avoid discussing such possibilities because such research could fit into anti-Jewish stereotypes. This is understandable from his point of view. However, it is not necessarily in the interests of other groups that these topics be relegated to the fringes. This is less obvious in the case of Jewish traits perhaps than it is in the case of Blacks. This is because what really matters is Jewish phenotypes. It matters far less whether there is a genetic basis, say, to Jewish ethnic networking than that it exists and is critically important for understanding many aspects of Jewish power, from admission to elite universities to dominating Hollywood and the media (here, p. xlvi ff).

On the other hand, the persistent failures of Blacks and other low-IQ groups now inundating the West are typically blamed on some variant of White racism (lack of school funding, stereotype threat, poor neighborhoods, the legacy of slavery, micro-aggressions — the list is endless). In the case of Jewish phenotypes, there is no massive effort being expended to change Jewish phenotypes for the better at the expense of the White population, but in the case of Blacks there is. So the refusal to countenance research on race differences is not a zero sum game. Whites lose.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

73 Comments to "Eric Turkheimer: Jewish Ethnic Interests Masquerading as Ethical Concerns"

  1. George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
    June 16, 2017 - 12:30 pm | Permalink

    I detect a strong ideological basis for a rejection of genetic explanations of group differences. The ideology in question assumes that genetic differences among groups and the sexes are trivial and that learned behavior can be transmitted genetically. The combination of the two allows social planners to create an environment which has the power to create a new species of human without the anti-social baggage which has plagued humanity for thousands of years. This idea functions as a religious dogma, the destruction or refutation of which would throw believers into deep depression and psychological catastrophe.

  2. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    June 16, 2017 - 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Why should anyone fear discovery of a possible genetic aspect to the long reported aptitude of Jews for “making money”, any more than for their supposed notable ability at theoretical physics, chess, or disdaining alcoholic inebriation except at Purim? These traits, like disease susceptibility and visible physiognomy, are not absolute but “average”.

    No doubt clannishness and cleverness, along with traditional practice, work together to raise self-declared Jews to eminence in e.g. high-level international banking and the Hollywood box-office.

    Macron-patron Jacques Attali’s “Economic History of the Jewish People” (2011) – despite the foreword from the ubiquitous Alan Dershowitz and an ignorantly hilarious howler about Jesus – and Jerry Muller’s “Capitalism and the Jews” (2015) are reasonable starting-points for horse’s-mouth research.

    Unscrupulous trading methods, especially undercutting prices and take-overs, are well advertised, and defended, in books by Jews themselves. Their use of money for personal power or political objectives is already accurately well-documented; e.g. “Levy is estimated to have raised some $60 million dollars for Blair [Holocaust Day & Iraq] and much of it channeled through a blind trust to shield the identity of the donors and protect Blair from scandal” (JTA, February 10, 2000 online).

    Instead of energy being put into important and accurate publications amassing all such data, too much is spent on old and empty “antisemitic” obsessions that divert attention from where it matters today, enabling the worst elements of the money-power to discredit their critics. Not all Jews are antisocial racketeers, and not all antisocial racketeering is Jewish.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      June 16, 2017 - 5:06 pm | Permalink

      @ David Ashton:
      “old and empty “antisemitic” obsessions” – meaning what, for example?

    • another reader's Gravatar another reader
      June 16, 2017 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

      Ashton:

      Not all Jews are antisocial racketeers, and not all antisocial racketeering is Jewish.

      Not all Pakistanis are antisocial racketeers. Does that mean Pakistanis can freely colonize America (or Britain, or Germany, or …) and change American society as they see fit?

      Not all Africans are antisocial racketeers. Does that mean Africans can freely colonize America and change American society as they see fit?

      Not all Chinese are antisocial racketeers. Does that mean Chinese can freely colonize America and change American society as they see fit?

      If your answer to the above questions is “no”, why do you make exception for Jews? Jews themselves are a clannish people (the most clannish of them all) and certainly don’t have any qualms about treating non-Jews collectively.

      Demanding from the native population of any country to distinguish between “good” and “bad” Jews implies the following:

      – Jews have an inherent right to reside in that population’s homeland;
      – The natives must treat the Jews like they treat their own and must open all their institutions to the Jews;
      – Jews, on the other hand, can freely organize for their own purposes and can exclude the natives from their own organizations;

      Obviously, such an arrangement puts the native population at a severe disadvantage and guarantees the eventual Jewish takeover of the host country, with disastrous consequences for the natives, as has happened many times throughout history.

      So, demanding from any people to distinguish between good and bad Jews effectively amounts to demanding from that people to voluntarily destroy the future of its children. I can hardly imagine a more immoral demand.

      • Luke's Gravatar Luke
        June 17, 2017 - 5:32 am | Permalink

        This is a incredibly outstanding and utterly brilliant comment.\

        You should adopt a new name for your postings. May I offer a suggestion?

        Needle Threader.

        • another reader's Gravatar another reader
          June 17, 2017 - 5:07 pm | Permalink

          Thank you, Luke.

          Let me emphasize again: demanding that a population needs to distinguish between “good” and “bad” Jews (with the implicit understanding the good Jews must be left to dwell among that population because “they’re just like us”) is just a stealthy way of destroying that population’s protective barriers and, ultimately, the population itself. Excluding an alien group isn’t an expression of hatred, it’s simply a necessary condition for the maintenance of the host population’s identity.

          In chapter 1 of “People that shall dwell alone” Prof. MacDonald defines group evolutionary strategy as follows:

          A group is defined as a discrete set of individuals that is identifiably separate from other individuals (who themselves may or may not be members of groups) … Groups actively maintaining separation between themselves and other groups are defined as engaging in group evolutionary strategies.

          It’s that simple. Engaging in an evolutionary group strategy requires that a population actively maintain barriers between itself and the outside world. A people that fail to do so is virtually guaranteed to lose its identity over the generations.

          Of course, there are gradations. Mixing up closely related tribes, similar in physical and mental characteristics, can still produce a successful nation, as Karlfried pointed out below. On the other hand, mixing widely different tribes will lead to the development of a society where the more productive but more honest groups will be taken advantage of by groups that have specialized in exploiting others.

          I think there are three crucial components that form the minimal basis for the maintenance of a population’s identity – its gene pool, its economic activity (the basis for its sustenance), and its language and culture (the basis for its self-awareness). If a population loses control over any one of these three components it risks losing control over the other two as well. For example, Jews took over White societies first by establishing control over their economic activities, then proceded to deconstruct White culture (“Culture of critique”), and are now engaged in the degradation of the White gene pool.

          So, it’s not immoral on the part of Whites to fail do distinguish between good and bad Jews (or good and bad Chinese, etc.) On the contrary, it’s immoral to deny the Whites the right to privacy and to exclude whomever they see fit.

          As for the Jews, if they want to have a meaningful conversation with Whites, they must unconditionally recognize that Whites have the right to maintain their own genetic separateness, to associate freely between themselves (and therefore to exclude others), to have their own monetary system(s), their own universities, and yes, even their own golf clubs.

      • June 17, 2017 - 11:59 am | Permalink

        Hello, another reader, June 16, 2017 – 7:02 pm ….
        I agree with you. I case, that a homogenous folk has one or more minorities within its land and in case it will give “equal rights” to the minorities, what will be the result, in clear words, maybe not grasping the truth by 100%, but giving an indication of the future:

        —>I case that the minorities are not competitive by brain or the will to hard work, then these minorities will take money from social benefits and they will breed quicker and more and therefore sooner or later will kill the original folk by their sheer numbers (an example may be: gypsies, Turks, Negroes, other non-whites in Germany).

        —>In case that they are similar in physical size, face, brain, attitude to the world to the original folk, they might assimilate over time (an example may be Hugenotten in Germany).

        —>In case they are as clever as the original folk (or even, in parts, more clever), but they are different in other parts than cleverness, for example religion, physicals traits, physical beauty (maybe they are in an other way beautiful or may be that they are ugly): that will make assimilation not easy or not possible. Anyhow: Assimilation of large numbers would destroy the original folk. Assimilation is only wishable and only possible in very small percentagenumbers (foreigners as percentage of the of the original folk).
        So the outcome with a high possibility of realization is that these said minority will stick together, help each other and towards the public they claim. “You and we, we are all the same. Do not discriminate us!” In case the original folks believes this, than it gives an advantage to the children of the minority over its own children. Just in the way that you have described. Within decades the children of the small minority will be the rulers. (An example may be the Jews in the USA).

        In Germany many people think: Best thing is to have no minorities. Each kind of minority will make trouble or be a deadly competitor in one way or another. —Time will tell us, nature will tell us what the future will be.

      • Armor's Gravatar Armor
        June 18, 2017 - 9:51 am | Permalink

        Ashton: “Not all Jews are antisocial racketeers, and not all antisocial racketeering is Jewish.”

        Other Reader: “Not all Africans are antisocial racketeers. Does that mean Africans can freely colonize America?”

        My addition: Not all Blacks are criminals. Does that mean Black criminals should never be arrested?

        There’s the suggestion in Ashton’s comment that we shouldn’t try to stop Jewish anti-White activists at all, because some of them are less virulent than others.

        Each time you talk about the Jewish problem anywhere, a Jewish troll comes up and says “it’s not all Jews”, with the implicit suggestion that not even the Jewish mafia at the top should be dealt with! (but YOU should be dealt with). The discussion then shifts to the persecution of the poor Jews by people like you.


        Right now, my computer screen is invaded by the Jews. The advert says: “Take a stand. Stop the Hate. Every two minutes a new lie about Israel is shared online. You can put an end to this. Influence the conversation.” And it is illustrated by the picture of a Black woman with light eyes.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          June 18, 2017 - 11:26 am | Permalink

          My reply to these alleged implications of my comment was deleted. Anyway I think ALL “anti-White activists” should be opposed, whether they are Jews or not.

  3. Tom Paine's Gravatar Tom Paine
    June 16, 2017 - 1:31 pm | Permalink

    “They accept the findings that the IQ’s of Ashkenazi Jews and East Asians are higher than White means.” I refuse to accept this. Nobody has ever satisfactorily explained why Ashkenazi Jews in the US score so high on IQ tests when their literal cousins in Israel score so much lower. The national IQ of Israel is about 95 if my memory serves me correctly. Non Jews are such a small percentage of the Israeli population that they can’t be blamed for the lower scores. Jews in the US “claim” and average of 115. I’m convinced they’re “sexing” up the scores. Blacks got away with this in Atlanta for six years. It’s not so hard to believer that a much smarter group that has years of practice, much better organization and access to how things work could get away with it for decades. For this one particular group, it wouldn’t be all that hard. Just either not allow those Jews that don’t score well in academics from the age of 6 or so on to take any tests that measure intelligence, or if they do take such test, not to ID themselves as Jews. I believe that admission has been voluntary for years anyway.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      June 16, 2017 - 5:30 pm | Permalink

      Non-Jews make up around 20% of Israel, and the non-Ashkenazi a significant percentage of Israeli Jews. Aggregating IQ results of disparate groups might account for the difference.

    • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
      June 17, 2017 - 7:11 am | Permalink

      Are IQ tests of Ashkenazi Jews tests of racial Jews or of Kazars?

    • June 17, 2017 - 8:26 am | Permalink

      Ashkenazi Jews are I believe a minority of the Israeli population now.

      • June 17, 2017 - 8:32 pm | Permalink

        But who is located at the “choke points” in the Israeli economy and has the whip hand, so to speak? I have heard that the Ashkenazis look down on the Sephardis. It’s not easy to do that obviously if you aren’t the ones with the power.

    • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
      June 21, 2017 - 10:08 pm | Permalink

      “…Nobody has ever satisfactorily explained why Ashkenazi Jews in the US score so high on IQ tests when their literal cousins in Israel score so much lower. The national IQ of Israel is about 95 if my memory serves me correctly…”

      Maybe they’re lying. They lie about everything else why should you trust the test score data they give you? I don’t?

  4. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    June 16, 2017 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Well, I think that non-whites have to keep on insisting that the obvious discrete variability in humans, either as individuals or as groups, is entirely non-genetic and totally environmental simply because the notion gives them a measure of some, or total, equality in the face of the still manifest European domination in those areas that advance civilization, science, and general well-being. In the technical arenas of life, the highest measures of accomplishment are still provided for by whites. And to therefore effectively compete with whites, non-whites feel obligated to promote the ruse that white accomplishments are and have been entirely accidental over the centuries.
    The mitigation ruse has worked remarkably well; to the point where white societies are in drastic psychological, spiritual, and demographic decline. Once whites cease being a force to be reckoned with on the world’s stage, the ruse will cease and non-whites will be happy to abandon their equality nonsense and vigorously promote their genetic interests without constantly referencing the ideological mask of anti-racism. Whereas non-whites currently advance their racial interests beneath a pious veneer of a humanist universalism supposedly devoid of any racial or ethnic discreteness, the mask will fall when whites are perceived to be a dying and ineffective breed.

  5. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    June 16, 2017 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

    Hai Kev

    Maybe “we” need back to look older racial anthropology of European subraces: European Jews seems a combination of Mediterranean, alpine and armenid subraces. The psychological descriptions of European subraces seems quite fittable with national stereotypes even we know some of this stereotypes are more related with certain subraces than overall/national subracial proportion for example Italian stereotype, that is more related with southern Italians (predominance of Mediterranean and alpine types) than with northern Italians ( higher proportion of central European types than with southern Italians).

    Greeks and seems Armenians tend to be good merchants. Seems eastern Mediterranean types are more prone to be good on “make money” than any other group or at least they have higher motivation to engage in materialistic life style, namely men. Many of this east med have armenid admixtures. Pure arabids also seems good to this motivation but Islam usually inhibit this habit or select against, indeed Islam look very socially egalitarian in some instances despising inter-sexual egalitet. Maybe a found effect among MENAS specially those on “Mesopotamia surrounds” if “Greeks”, Jews, lebaneses, Arabs have worked as merchants since a long time. Merchants usually tend to have specific psychological and cognitive profiles specially the most talented. Jews not just have worked as merchants but also in foreigner lands just like a extractive multinationals this days. Seems Jews taken their disproportional capitalistic talent during this ancient times.

  6. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 16, 2017 - 10:23 pm | Permalink

    @ The Editors:
    Someone really should cast an expert eye on the massive YouTube Kids phenomenon that is Bad Baby Colors and the Elsa, Spiderman, Joker themed videos. Elsa, the only racially identifiable character – blue-eyed Caucasian – subjected to Caesarian-section deliveries, injections, spiders in the mouth, finger removal and other indignities. There seems to be some quite sinister programming going on.

    Decide for yourself. 72 million hits for this chilling clip:

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      June 17, 2017 - 8:13 am | Permalink

      What I find chilling is that 72 million viewed this, unless of course there are 72 million pre-schoolers active on youtube.

  7. George's Gravatar George
    June 16, 2017 - 11:32 pm | Permalink

    I test a couple standard deviations higher than the average Ashkenazi. There are more of us gentiles so there are probably more of us that are as smart or smarter. We have the inhibition of Christian ethics and an inclination to conformity, to want to be good. Ruthless ambition and ethnic cooperation are evil we are told so we’ve been talked out of it. We don’t believe that only we have souls or that it’s OK to rip off anybody who isn’t a WASP. We need to level the playing field or to realize the ruthless game we’re in.

    • m's Gravatar m
      June 17, 2017 - 4:38 am | Permalink

      Perhaps the “inhibition of Christian ethics” is a large part of the problem. Prior to a Semitic oriented Christian ethical infusion, early classical thought always understood that family, clan, and race were the foundational basis for any coherent polity. You can most see this decidedly non-Christian idea in their distinction between Greek and Barbarian.

      For example, classical ethics understood the need for economics, but economics was never primary. Plato argued that foreigners could be allowed in to the City for a definite period as long as they followed the rules and provided a service. But once their time was up, they had to leave. Now, the merchant class is the highest and most coveted rung in our capitalist social hierarchy.

      As far as your idea of “leveling the playing field” goes, modern Christianity is itself a leveling force that self-justifies and embraces the other to the detriment of the organic community. You can see this in the recent Southern Baptist convention which passed a resolution against the “racism” of the Alt-Right, but there are too many examples one can cite.

      • Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
        June 18, 2017 - 12:17 am | Permalink

        One can hardly say that the Semitic ‘Christian ethics’ is ‘part of the problem’ (of Jews parasiting on non-Jewish societies, white or otherwise).
        Christian societies have erected effective barriers specifically against Jews. The example of Byzance comes to mind. As Eustace Mullins put it, the Jews were not able to exercise any influence, precisely because it was a Christian civilization. Nor did the Orthodox priests bewilder their congregations with any vicious lies about Christ being a Jew. He reminds us the explanation of Ezra Pound: “Keep them out of banking, out of education, out of government.” In Byzance the supposed egalitarianism of the ‘Christian ethics’ did not extend to the non-Christians.
        It was the ‘West’ which lowered the barriers when it let itself be corrupted by the Jewish money, when it replaced the Christian Scriptures with the Hebrew ‘Bible’ and when it allowed Maimonides to become its instructor in ‘philosophy’. And last, but not least, when it allied itself with Islam in the destruction of Byzance.

    • Lou's Gravatar Lou
      June 18, 2017 - 8:27 pm | Permalink

      Is 1 Sd 10 IQ points? I also think Jews are not so smart. They are nepotistic and have high aggression and high verbal IQ, as well as being very materialistic.

  8. Rob Bottom's Gravatar Rob Bottom
    June 17, 2017 - 6:15 am | Permalink

    The truth will out, if not in the West then the East. Besides, it will be hard to argue that any ethical concerns are more important than the data when the world is forced to confront (the estimated) 4 billion strong sub-Saharan African population by the turn of the century.

    The Chinese will be learning what a horror show that would be both in their genetic research labs and daily life in their African colony (see the documentary “Empire of Dust”).

    China will be uniquely positioned to save the world from the time-bomb currently under construction courtesy of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others. And best of all, Turkheimer and his ilk will be hardpressed to demand that China do otherwise, when it has implemented population controls on its own people for decades (unlike with Jews and Israel, there’d be no apparent double-standards there!).

    • June 17, 2017 - 9:15 am | Permalink

      “The truth will out….”

      Sorry, but this is a bromide with little empirical evidence to support it. Even in recent times – to give just a few examples – the truth about the origins of the two World Wars, the Holocau$t™ and 9/11 remains occluded.

      • Rob Bottom's Gravatar Rob Bottom
        June 17, 2017 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

        The second half of that sentence should give you the reasoning. The Chinese have no qualms about studying the genetic components of intelligence, or any other factors. Thus regardless of whether Jewish intellectuals manage to steer us away from making these discoveries, someone else will.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      June 20, 2017 - 4:41 am | Permalink

      “China’s lack of diversity – it does not encourage long-term immigration, and the UN says it only hosts 150 refugees in a population of over 1.3 billion – can spill over into overt discrimination, particularly for people of colour.” – Emma Graham-Harrison, “The Observer”, May 29, 2016, p.24.

      See also e.g. Frank Dikotter, “Imperfect Conceptions: Medical Knowledge, Birth Defects & Eugenics in China” (1998), and Google entries under “Chinese Eugenics 2017”.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      June 22, 2017 - 4:48 am | Permalink

      yes, the Chinese are in Zimbabwe. They helped Mugabe into power as they were his backers (and the lefty British government traitors helped him into power also). Now the Chinese exploit the minerals (ie take them and give Mugabe his cut) in a way that is real exploitation. But none of the left say anything about is as they do not mind. They only minded when the British ‘exploited’ them by giving the blacks the best standard of living they have ever had (jobs, schools, medicine, infrastructure). A difference between the Jews and Europeans is that traitors to the race like these British politicians helping Mugabe into power to oust Ian Smith – these types get to the top in Europe in politics, but this does not happen in Jewish communities. The Jews do not elect politicians who want to harm Israel, but they do elect politicians who want to harm the host country (eg Jews in Prestwich England voting Labour). But once these gentile traitors get to the top they are happy to collaborate and protect any other groups or tribes that also wish to harm/change their country.

  9. June 17, 2017 - 8:09 am | Permalink

    “Jewish Ethnic Interests Masquerading as Ethical Concerns”

    Wow, hard to believe. /s

  10. June 17, 2017 - 8:18 am | Permalink

    I can never understand why Jews are so opposed to linking ethnicity with intelligence. Their superior ranking could be used to explain away their vast over-representation in the more rewarding positions while by denying the link they lay themselves open to the charge that their success is due to (cough) other factors.

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      June 17, 2017 - 9:55 am | Permalink

      Because their main intention is to pass hidden, so all attempts to “normalize” in the eyes of others, as if they were like any other group. As a sort of ” occult elite ” that manipulates the masses in the darkness of ignorance they perpetuate.

      • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
        June 17, 2017 - 11:51 am | Permalink

        It’s precisely because Jews are basically abnormal, that they are always trying to normalize the abnormal. It is most likely an instinctive genetic survival trait.

        • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
          June 17, 2017 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

          Jews are operating in high risk strategy but with many big advantages. It’s high risk because they are totally dependent on majority condescendence so it’s at priori easy to the masses become aware and start to threat them physically. This strategy have great advantages because when well executed they can parasite above the masses. Everything or nothing. The fundamental play is deceive gentiles that they are just like any other gentile. Indeed even now majority of whites still think like that, that Jews are as any other white people, that because they are overproportionally in power (indeed they are full in the power) it’s a normal thing. Jews are more abnormal because their untrustworthiness than any other thing. Whites obey also because they believe those on the power are as them. Many whites libs are the most delusional about it. Exactly like that infected rat that is manipulated by a parasite to go near to cat/muslims–blacks–. Exactly what joos has done with whites with their all historical enemies or discontents.

          • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
            June 19, 2017 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

            The parasite deceive rat to believe that who is forcing him to go to cat is himself. Jews play pretend to be spontaneous event and we know something appear to be natural tend to be more acceptable.

          • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
            June 22, 2017 - 3:54 am | Permalink

            santoculto
            “This strategy have great advantages”
            Maybe it is not a strategy at all. Maybe they are programmed to feel hostile to the host nation even when there is no benefit – even when IT IS TO THEIR DISADVANTAGE, especially in the long run (see Jew expulsions). We do not have to look for benefits when we observe strategies followed by a race. Some aspects of a race’s behaviour/wiring are a burden (‘behaviour/wiring’ in the sense that the behaviour comes from the wiring, which in turn comes from the genes).

            Natural selection does not always give the perfect solution. A spade with a hole in it is a very useful tool and much better than using a stick to dig with, but nevertheless it has a significant fault. Part of the reason that natural selection often fails to find the best solution in humans is that natural selection does not work alone – it works in conjunction with intense random sampling.

            This is made even ‘worse’ (as regards getting natural selection to actually take place) in humans than in mice, for example, as humans live for 40 plus years – compared with mice that live for a few weeks. This makes it harder to change the gene pool. Living longer in a species correlates with having fewer young (to prevent conflict between breeding adults and the new young – in mice the numerous new young find that the adults considerately all die off and leave room for them to rapidly take their place), and this (living longer and having fewer young) leads to a strategy of parents protecting faults in their young. A powerful/’wealthy’ human in prehistoric times could have 10 children all with very bad eyesight, but because of family protection they all end up married and having children. In fact look at the inbreeding in Pakistan which causes a considerable level of disability. These families are preventing natural selection from occurring.

            This is why we are programmed to die – the population where no-one died would end up with a family that kept on producing children with very bad genes due to family protection, where all natural selection virtually stops. On the other hand, mice populations have excellent natural selection ability, but zero ability to conquer their environment and from this to be able to pass on any advantages to their children or family that helps them to better compete with other mice.

            The point of all this is that in mice you can easily get rid of bad genes, or easily introduce good genes (immunity to a disease) and these changes can rapidly spread in the population. With humans this ability has been lost – traded off in return for the huge advantage of living longer that confers an ability to conquer the environment and make it into a place where their (few) children can be safe and acquire and pass on knowledge, something that can take decades to do. So long-living species can become very successful in the sense that their children survive, but the trade-off is that they have lost the ability to get rid of bad genes to a very large extent. If you only have one child as a couple you make sure that child has success in society, even if the child is short sighted and has asthma and teeth that all drop out and a low IQ. They can still end up with a house and job and children – but we see that family is more important than having good genes. Parents cancel out what natural selection would like to do if family protection was absent.

            So it is not appropriate to think of humans as highly-selected perfect outcomes of thousands of years of fine tuning. It is more appropriate to think of them as carrying burdens of bad genes that cannot be eliminated, as so long as the population as a whole is successful, it will protect the bad genes. Indians have genes that make them think only of group loyalty and no merit is attached to individualism. This burden gene makes the population corrupt, poor and prone to deformities in their children. The non-corrupt individuals are soon turned on by the others. It is like a ball bouncing around in a trough or valley called group-loyalty-is-all-that-matters. There is another valley over the mountain that is a much more successful place to be, called individualism. But the ball cannot leave the bad state and go to the good state, as any individual who tries to make the journey violates the rules that the others follow and they make sure he has no offspring, by persecuting him. (eg notice how they treat anyone who disobeys the community in Pakistan – family members even stab their daughters in honour killings).

            In this context we see that populations do not after all have worthy strategies to follow (it is a very bad strategy to only marry cousins in Pakistan, but they cannot get out of this valley). Populations are destined to follow the hand that they have been dealt with even if it leads to their own destruction – including Jews with their hostility to the host tendency. Eg say the genes are spades diamonds hearts and clubs. If the population has a lot of clubs then this is how they have to be, and they will live or die as a whole due to their clubs. Mice could get rid of their clubs, but humans cannot.

            When the Jews departed from other arabs they must have discarded some burdensome genes, as Jews are successful and other arabs are not. Eg they might have abandoned excessive loyalty to cousins and immediate family that is so intense it makes races that follow it destined to never appoint the best person for any job, just a relative or connected person instead. This keeps their societies backwards as they are chronically corrupt. Jews do not have this particular burdensome gene in its full form that the arabs do, they have a less intense form that allows them to appoint the right person for the job. But this gene has not gone to the low levels that it is in white populations. In Jewish populations it is still at the level where there is intense loyalty to the tribe as a whole. In white populations it is even lower. It so low that the societies become what Kevin MacDonald calls ‘individualistic’. Sometimes it can be so low that it becomes negative, and the owners of these manifestations of the individualism genes end up favouring OTHER groups over their own. Missionaries to Africa and India are examples of this. They use their undoubted abilities to help other races to breed and be more successful, instead of favouring their own families and race. How many Somalians would have inner urges to leave the group and to travel to another part of the world just to be virtuous and help some other race poorer than their own? Ie with nothing in it for themselves except the reward of being super-virtuous.

            This is why Kevin MacDonald’s emphasis on individualism as a human trait with a genetic basis is very important. It explains so many things that are happening in the world. We are animals and our animal behaviour is from our genes, and different races have different levels of genes that in the end result in HUGE differences in behaviour and strategies. Eg Pakistani families stab their daughters in honour killings FREQUENTLY – this has NEVER happened ever in any individualistic society ever. Such HUGE differences can ONLY be explained by significant genetic differences.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      June 17, 2017 - 7:00 pm | Permalink

      From memory, the Unz article on Ivy League admissions showed Jews to be over-represented after adjustment for intelligence. This exposes them to accusations of ethnic nepotism.

      • Jack Highlands's Gravatar Jack Highlands
        June 18, 2017 - 10:39 am | Permalink

        Your memory is correct, and the over-representation was about 50% merit and 50% nepotism: Jews were about 3.5 times over-represented when matched for IQ, and that number was about 3.5 times higher than their proportion of the population. (At Harvard, they were 25%, when by IQ they should’ve been 7%, and by general population, 2%.)

        Of course, the whole merit issue begs the question of why we would allow a foreign element to parasitize the institutions our ancestors built for their posterity, regardless of merit.

        At the time of this work by Unz, who is Jewish, I found it very galling that he couched it in pro-Asian terms, rather than pro-White. When I think about it now, however, he has done enough for one portion of our movement, that we should cut him some slack. All the ‘Nixon going to China’ Jews, like Dalrymple and Cole at Takimag, still bother me a lot, but I’m willing to grant that they may be a necessary phase in a hoped-for awakening.

  11. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    June 17, 2017 - 9:06 am | Permalink

    As long as the Abrahamic religions control the reproductive lives of European men and women all our rhetoric won’t change a thing.

    • Bon's Gravatar Bon
      June 18, 2017 - 7:27 pm | Permalink

      Michael Adkins

      Could you please explain what you mean by the “Abrahamic religions control the reproductive lives of European men and women”? I don’t understand what you mean

      • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
        June 22, 2017 - 8:16 am | Permalink

        What I mean is that until there is a clear pronouncement by the Abrahamic religions that there is wide support within their movements for the genetic continuance of the European peoples using such technologies as CRISPR we will need to look to our indigenous religions for morality.

  12. JRM's Gravatar JRM
    June 17, 2017 - 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article as always from the Professor. One thing that interests me is the perhaps counter-intuitive triumph of “race equality as cosmic fairness” trope that has risen as real belief in a creator God has fallen.

    Theoretically, a post-Deity West (yes, I know there are putative holdouts, but let’s face it, the greater powers of science, media and government in the West are atheistic) would be prepared to grapple with issues in a scientific way- in fact it would seem to be the only viable recourse.

    But instead we have a new secular faith of racial equality. It is not only not “moral” to value one race above another-bolder thinkers have pushed the frontier into territory where it is also not “true” to acknowledge racial differences, particularly ones which tend to impact realistic “quality of life” areas such as future time-orientation and impulse control.

    So, paradoxically, our post-Theism West has a more difficult job for faith and belief to do, as opposed to retiring faith and belief as no longer necessary.

    I have striven to understand “why” we have such strong faith-based beliefs urged on us with ever increasing fervor, as well as attempting to understand the evidences of this faith, or the ontology from which it irradiates through every modern discipline.

    I have yet to find more than the two following bedrock principles: 1. it wouldn’t be fair if the races were unequal; and 2. The Holocaust shows what happens if people pay very much attention to racial and group differences, therefore the road to another “Holocaust” must be blocked by a great social collective agreement that we are just going to act *as if* all races were equal; among true devotees, this is also stated as “race is a social construct”.

    In spite of all the important people agreeing that race may not exist, and that it (if it did exist) certainly provides no value as a yardstick with which to measure man, most of these same actors seem to agree that White people do bear a guilt of sin which may only be expiated by silent assent to disappear from the world stage.

    If anyone can show where the principles of racial equality have been claimed to possess a veracity that is *not* based on wishful thinking and the “Holocaust” (or other examples from History of people being mean to each other based on group differences), I’d love to hear about it.

  13. June 17, 2017 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    As I think of possible martyrs for the cause of the independence of the North American colonies from Britain, the main one that comes to mind is Ethan “I regret that I have but one life…” Allen.
    What a crock.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 20, 2017 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

      It’s Nathan Hale, not Ethan Allen, Jett. You’ve mixed up your Revolutionary War figures!

      Ethan Allen, the leader of the Green Mountain Boys, a well-disciplined citizen militia, survived the war. Nathan Hale, who was executed by the British for espionage at the age of 21, is reputed to have uttered the sentence you quote in part. Given that the Jews have worked at blackening this young man’s reputation for the past fifty years, you might consider cutting him a bit of slack. Besides, he was once also famous for saying, “Shun all vice, especially card playing.” Would anyone except a casino owner or cardsharp regard that advice as anything but sound?

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 20, 2017 - 5:24 pm | Permalink

      Apropos martyrs and martyrdom, I wonder whether Professor MacDonald would still formulate the following words in quite the same way:

      … there are many historical examples, ranging from Christian martyrs in ancient times to a great many instances of Jewish martyrdom over a two thousand-year period. …

      In writing the passage in question, did KM mean to suggest that the number of genuine Jewish martyrs surpasses the many, many thousands who suffered death in, for example, the Western Roman Imperial persecutions alone? My own distinct impression is that martyrdom is a dirty job that Jews prefer others to do for them.

      Given that nowadays there is no shortage of “deeply suffering” Jews who proudly describe themselves as being of Marrano descent—why would anyone, even a Jew, be proud of getting ahead through perjury?—might it be that martyrdom, like the number six million, has acquired an unprecedented and very un-white degree of flexibility?

      Turkheimer-like substitution of ethnic interests for ethical interests may also be seen by anyone who compares this (((ethically oriented))) article with this woefully shortsighted and “insensitive” one.

  14. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    June 18, 2017 - 4:10 am | Permalink

    Another point is that If a race has lazy genes in higher proportion this will inhibit the development of intelligence and take the IQ down further. Just as I am no good at the violin as I have never played one before. If you never use your mind it cannot develop skills, and IQ and thinking are skills that can be developed and trained. I have no violin skills, and those who are lazy / (or, to put it another way, have no interest in reading or thinking work and prefer hanging about in groups) will never develop critical thought skills.

    Taxi drivers who memorised thousands of steets were found to have increased activity in part of their brain. The brain is not fixed and responds to being ‘exercised’.

    If you are in a prehistoric tribe that lives in a place where food is available all the year round just for the taking, a lazy attitude is no disadvantage, as all you need to do is fight off others to guard your food supply. Those with an interest in fighting and sitting around when not fighting can have plenty of power and offspring in such a situation.

  15. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    June 18, 2017 - 4:13 am | Permalink

    Also, if a culture believes strongly in education, this will make them force their children to study, and this will raise the IQ of the group even if the base material to start with is no better than for other groups.

    • Lou's Gravatar Lou
      June 18, 2017 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

      Jews use education to advance their Career$.
      I went to a very jewish branch of CUNY_SUNY.
      I didnt sense much ‘love for learning’ amongst ‘them’.

  16. Art's Gravatar Art
    June 18, 2017 - 7:24 am | Permalink

    @Tom Paine
    Quote:
    “Nobody has ever satisfactorily explained why Ashkenazi Jews in the US score so high on IQ tests when their literal cousins in Israel score so much lower”.
    ——–

    It was explained.
    Only the most intelligent Jews from Russia had the money to move to the USA.
    Less intelligent Jews remained in Russia and then moved to Israel.

    The real Semitic Jews lived in Oriental Countries, and their IQ is not much higher than the IQ of Semitic Muslims or Christians.

    As we see, the High-IQ-Jews are just an exception among Jews, and this phenomenon is the best prove, that these High-IQ-Jews are not Semites: they have more European genes, than Semitic genes.

    If you compare all Jews to all European Christians, then European Christians have a higher IQ.

    But if you compare the Jewish elite to the non-Jewish European elite, then you must admit that the Jewish elite (less than 1% of all Jews) is smarter, than the European elite. And that explains why they manage to control the West, because tribalism cannot be the only explanation.

    Why is the Jewish elite smarter?

    Gilad Atzmon offers an interesting explanation. In the Middle Ages the most intelligent people usually studied religion.

    The Jewish elite was subjected to a eugenic process during many centuries. The children of a Rabbi could marry the children of a successful Jewish merchant (who may have been a non-Semitic European convert to Judaism).

    In other words, Jews did not have any aristocracy that could not mix with Jewish non-aristocrats, the Jewish ghetto was very cohesive collective, and there was a gene flow between the elite and the Jewish Normies, most of which were European converts.

    During the same period the Catholic elite was subject to a dysgenic process, because of the celibate. The Christian aristocracy could not mix with successful Christian merchants or other intelligent non-aristocrats, and therefore the Christian elite became stupid and inbred, and eventually these degenerates were to a large extent absorbed by Jews (via marriages with the daughters of their Jewish financiers).

    That is the reason why the modern Western elite is de facto a Jewish elite.

    But there are signs, that this elite is degenerating very rapidly: they still have their nepotism, but they are becoming more and more stupid, because they are becoming a kind of modern self elected “inbred aristocracy”, that is not under the pressure of competition any more, and therefore subject to a dysgenic process.

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/

    • Lou's Gravatar Lou
      June 18, 2017 - 8:47 pm | Permalink

      Maybe the riche escaped russia, and they were crooks and liars?
      But thanks for your interesting post.

      Christians have been sacrificing their most masculine and tallest men, for centuries, in horrid wars.

      and
      Meanwhile.
      SHRIEKS OF PAIN AS TRUMP TRIMS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM BUDGET BY 5%
      Because everyone on this planet except rabid anti-Semites who need to burn in ovens believes that we can never, ever hear enough about the Holocaust, a “bipartisan group of 64 members of Congress” is rending their shirts and gnashing their teeth and beseeching Yahweh, Lord God of Israel to persuade Donald Trump to reverse his decision of decreasing next year’s budget for the US Holocaust Memorial Museum by an astounding $3 million.
      Yes, you heard that right. Three million. So instead of the $57 million that the museum got this year, they will only get $54 million next year. That’s a decrease of a robust FIVE percent.
      No one is quite sure why there is a Holocaust museum in the United States, since to our knowledge no one has ever alleged that this event occurred in America.
      Neither is anyone quite sure why American taxpayers need to be bled of over $50 million yearly just to be beaten over the head with guilt about it.
      If you’re going to have a museum, how about a few more dedicated to the 400,000+ American soldiers who died in World War II?
      And a couple more movies? And maybe a museum or five dedicated to the 60 million people who died in World War II overall?
      Or about twenty movies and four hundred museums dedicated to the 100+ million victims of communism? Or maybe even one museum dedicated to the over 600,000 white soldiers who died in the Civil War, and make sure the museum is fireproof?

      Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki’s Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don’t get paid for their work. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights. http://takimag.com/article/the_week_that_perished_june_11_2017/print#ixzz4jlD2cAbo

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      June 20, 2017 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

      @ Art & Santoculto

      The contrast between medieval Christian celibate priests and Jewish rabbis, for instance, regarding reproduction of intelligent offspring was first strongly argued by Nathaniel Weyl (Gentile mother), but its long-term demographic significance may be exaggerated; see e.g. Nicholas Wade, “Before the Dawn” (2010) pp.255-256 in twelve pages on Jewish origins.

      That many Ashkenazim manifest very high IQ levels can hardly be disputed, though the data and analysis of TOQ Editorial Adviser Richard Lynn, “The Chosen People” (2011) may need some updating, especially in view of subsequent DNA research. The character or application of intelligence seems focused in areas requiring calculation, notably of a “mathematical” nature, from theoretical physics to commercial dealing, and acute social observation. Scott Shane, “Born Entrepreneurs….” (2010) cites research that 36% of interest in “finance jobs” is genetic (p.54).

      Most self-identified Jewish communities share a broadly recognizably similar “appearance” (Carleton Coon), but the majority “section”, i.e. the Ashkenazim, although genetically mixed, have been traditionally classified by phenotype as largely Assyriod (Deniker) = Hither Asiatic (Guenther) = Near Eastern (Lenz) = Armenid (Baker), different names for the same “thing”. This taxonomy indicates a definite, albeit historically complex, relationship to Armenians. Doron Behar & others in a “Human Biology” (2013) article, accessible online, while refuting the Khazar Origin hypothesis acknowledge genome links with Armenians.

      Armenian global trade networks have a long history; commercial negotiation is commonly said to be “in their blood”; Armenian names in various “rich lists” are today well-known. Close comparison between Armenian and Jewish business practices, by no means wholly favorable to either, was made in the past by Maurice Fishberg and Arthur Ruppin.

      “The Jews prefer to be active in commercial occupations, not as a result of an external compulsion but as a result of an inner nature; that has been frequently demonstrated. By selection of marital partners and the selective process involving life and reproduction tied in with occupation selection, an ‘enrichment’ of such traits comes about and thus a stronger emphasis of the original character” (Otmar von Verschuer, 1938).

  17. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    June 18, 2017 - 10:03 am | Permalink

    The Jews are waging war on us. It doesn’t come from a character flaw like materialism. It is something more serious.

    “sneaky Japanese, drunken Irish, unintelligent Poles”…

    White people don’t care being called names. There’s only a problem when non-whites are criticized. But how is it worse to criticize people with black skin than people that have a black car (or people that were born in January)? Why the focus on race if you think race doesn’t matter? How is it more unfair for people with black skin to have a lower income, than for people with a black car? In fact, the only reason Blacks and Jews think what happens to them is so important is that they are not neutral at all.

    If DNA researchers find that Jewish professors have a gene for talking BS, how would that be more disturbing than simply finding that 2% of the population carries the gene? If you think racial differences don’t matter, why would you object to people learning more about it?

    “the persistent failures of Blacks and other low-IQ groups now inundating the West are typically blamed on some variant of White racism”

    The reason why Blacks resent doing less well than Whites is that they have a strong racial awareness. But if one takes Turkheimer’s official view that all races are the same, it’s absurd to complain about one particular race being less well off. Blacks are just people. It doesn’t matter that they are Black. Their failure shouldn’t be more worrisome than the failure of people born in January.

    Jewish antiwhite activists who pose as high-ground moralists are double-tongued. We are told that race doesn’t matter when we get replaced or otherwise victimized, but race is suddenly all that matters when Blacks do poorly, or when nonwhites have the nerve to complain that, following their ground invasion of our countries, they find themselves under-represented at the top of our society.

    I’m sure that Turkheimer himself doesn’t fret about the Jewish over-representation in colleges. That’s because he is not a racist. He doesn’t even notice all the Jewish networking and nepotism taking place around him. In that particular case, he may agree with the idea that counting Jewish professors is just as silly as counting how many college professors were born in January. On the other hand, because he is not a racist, Turkheimer cannot help noticing that Blacks are under-represented in many places.

    In other words, he is a fraud working for his tribe. In the beginning, many people were too polite to notice Jewish shenanigans. By now, Jewish power has consolidated and it has become dangerous to expose the whole thing.

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      June 18, 2017 - 11:17 am | Permalink

      Higher verbal intelligence may correlate positively with pathological liar disorder.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        June 19, 2017 - 6:19 am | Permalink

        This is a good point – that there is correlation between traits. Being deceitful as a tactic to get on is only of any use to you if you have high verbal intelligence to go with it. You need to be able to present a false persona and act out a lie. And you need to be able to keep up the lie for years. In the end you completely enter a world of deception, and completely forget what truth means.
        This is the state of mind of some cultures, and applies to everyday life and business, and it is also the state of mind for left-wing people in the West, who know all along that their aim for their own societies is to destroy them for the ‘crime’ of being better, whilst pretending all the time that all they seek is justice and compassion.

        Such cultures, who cheat and lie and bribe all the time as the default position, never admit to doing so as that would be a loss of honour. Eg if their child does something wrong the truth of the matter has no bearing on the matter – the parent will deny everything and feel their honour has been insulted if their child is accused of being a cheat for example. There is no real honesty, but a parallel set of morals based on honour.

        In other words, proper morals have been ousted (at the genetic/wiring level) and replaced with an alternative set based on honour and group loyalty. Telling lies does not matter, as this is part of the other ‘western’ morals. But insulting their group (or religion) does matter, as this is part of their alternative morals.

        This attitude enables the cultures with these genes to do bad things to the host nation that reaches out the hand of friendship to them. If they had proper morals, they would repay friendship with friendship.

        These difference must be at the genes/wiring level, as demonstrated by the way such cultures will readily stab their own daughters/sisters to death in a family murder, to protect their family honour. No Western people ever would contemplate doing this in a family group – never once in Western history has it happened – yet it is commonplace in other countries. Only genetic differences can explain such profound differences in moral-related behaviour.

        Arabs are renown in history books for smiling in your face for years and acting like your friend when this is just a big lie (the ‘smiling assassin’ – so I am quoting history, not saying this as an original thought).
        Jews and arabs have related genes.

        To get on in India or Pakistan or arab countries, it is not your skills or ability that counts, it is what is your family influence and who do you know. In the same with arab cultures and those related to them, although in the case of the Jews this favoritism or group ethnocentrism has not held back their success for some reason, whereas in the other arab countries it has.

        • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
          June 19, 2017 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

          I have a pathological liar uncle and he clearly no have higher psychometric verbal intelligence. What must define pathological liar is its emotionally verbal skills, similar with manipulation skills of psychopaths and sociopaths.

  18. Royalbrecht's Gravatar Royalbrecht
    June 18, 2017 - 11:32 am | Permalink

    “… The reason we must not delve in to race science thus depends on “intuition.” Unfortunately, we all have different intuitions. Perhaps he is talking about the intuitions of liberal university professors. Or activist Jews.”

    I beg to differ with the esteemed Hr. Prof. Dktr K. MacDonald’s on the statement;

    “…Unfortunately, we all have different intuitions. …” .

    From my experience,
    “Intuition”,
    wherever it exists…, –
    from protozoa escaping hungry viruses,
    to fruit flies fleeing in a frenzied swarm of flight at the first hint of a by-passer’s possible disturbance or,
    in lower animals (or [redacted]) on the lookout for predatory opportunists(ies) as well as
    in human beings…, –
    is a universal constant.

    Intuition is either a manifestation of one’s own “Spirit” sensing the “Spiritual (in/)Compatibility” of either “Spiritually (deviant/)Enriching Behaviour” or sensing the “Inner Intentions” of “other” beings
    or
    it may be other “Spiritual Beings” exerting an as yet immeasurable “Force” or even a “Spiritual-tug-of-war” upon those who chose to either suppress those intuitions (Jews)and deviate into aberrant behavior or
    “listen to” those intuitions and follow the Aryan path.

    As much as I hate to admit it, –
    because it contradicts my sarcasm laden,
    often regarded as obsessive insistence,
    that Jews are not really [Redacted], –
    Jews no doubt have the same instinct that other life forms possess.
    The prime difference between Aryans and jews being that the [Redacted] and “its” ancestors have…, to borrow Hr. Prof. Dktr K. MacDonald’s phrase; –

    “…[brought] about the selective pressures on different traits stemming from Jewish cultural traditions, with the implication that this may indicate that these selective pressures resulted in group differences … In particular … the cultural tradition whereby scholars able to master the voluminous body of Jewish religious writing were given preferential marriages and business opportunities and that these people had more children….but also by discriminating against unlettered Jews and expelling them from their communities.”, –
    or in the case of WW2,
    one must not forget the 200 odd thousand Jews during the Exemplary Nazi Era, –
    some of whom may have started to adopt presciently prudent Aryan characteristics of altruism,
    that were left behind to be rounded up by the Germans as a precautionary measure against standard Jewish Terrorist behaviour,
    and eventually ended up being killed as a result of Jewish orchestrated Allied bombing of the civilian infrastructure used to keep Nazi “Spiritual Healing Centres”, like Auschwitz, from receiving the basic supplies required to rehabilitate the mentally ill and genetically deprived(Jews).

    The fact that most Jews alive today have given into threats of being culled or shunned by the Apex of Jewish Power on down,
    should they deviate from “Spiritually Retarding Behaviour”,
    say by adopting Aryan norms of “Über-Altruistic Behaviour”,
    has resulted in the plethora of psychological disorders clearly visible in almost all Jews no matter which ray of the philosophical “spectro-sphere” they adhere to.

    IMO, Jewish forced breeding toward aspirations of base material gratification,
    as opposed to innate Aryan aspirations toward ascetic nobility,
    have resulted in the present day pan-psychosis in the Jewish Genotype.

  19. Royalbrecht's Gravatar Royalbrecht
    June 18, 2017 - 11:57 am | Permalink

    “…In the case of Jewish phenotypes, there is no massive effort being expended to change Jewish phenotypes for the better at the expense of the White population, but in the case of Blacks there is. ”

    Again, I beg to differ with the good professor.

    The influx, release and eventual Black-White cross breeding (White genocide), is a massively incentivized and jew driven operation that jews,
    in their present state of genetically, self-induced, psychosis, have come to obsessively and compulsively cling to as a means of “bettering” (((their))) lot at the expense of Whites.

    IMO, one ought to look at things from the top down instead of the bottom up.

    • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
      June 19, 2017 - 6:19 am | Permalink

      I did not read that in my local paper or see it on the history channel. Please supply some sources elucidating the plan to massively cross-breed blacks and whites.

      • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
        June 19, 2017 - 9:32 am | Permalink

        You can see suggestions for Black & White cross-breeding all the time in advertisement, TV and films.

        Watch this video : Anti White Messages in Mainstream Media :
        https://youtu.be/-4Ojbi6lXQI

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        June 20, 2017 - 4:27 am | Permalink

        In “England” you cannot miss the promotion of black x white crossing, and are not meant to miss it. It is not only a prominent feature of television drama characterization (along with homosexual partnerships) and especially dating shows, but very obvious, and increasingly so, in advertising, usually black males x white females, including children in friendly embrace. It is more than a mere “reflection” of social reality.

        • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
          June 20, 2017 - 7:05 am | Permalink

          Who controls the content of tv programs and movies in England?

          • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
            June 21, 2017 - 3:11 am | Permalink

            @ George Kocan

            How could accurate conclusions of detailed research in answer to this question be USED effectively in current circumstances to arrest the miscegenation process in England?

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            June 21, 2017 - 7:59 am | Permalink

            I like to have answers for persons who ask questions.

        • June 24, 2017 - 7:29 am | Permalink

          Pure Brechtian Theatre. A revolutionary artist is not required to reflect the world as it is. Rather, he should show the world he he would like it to be.

          Propaganda is not intended to convince anyone of anything. It is put out there to test the response of potential dissidents.

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          June 26, 2017 - 2:47 am | Permalink

          David Ashton – a curious feature of all this is that the companies paying for the adverts do not mind falling sales for their own companies that result from adverts that are made less effective in this way, ie fewer sales result that result from a certain proportion of customers not liking the ads and being turned off the product. The company executives KNOW that sales will be fewer by pushing a politcal agenda of multicultural mixing in their ads, but even falling sales does not stop them sticking to this line. Kelloggs and Lego have been in the news in the last year for seeming to deliberately go out of their way to antagonise the conservative part of their customers, which in the case of Lego is to annoy all the grandparents who actually buy the Lego. It is as if once the left take over a company, then the goal of pushing their agenda is more important to them than their own profits. Same with Hollywood – foreign countries outside USA do not like black lead heroes, but this does not stop Hollywood making films like this, even as revenues slide down. They simply cannot put down their politcal agenda, even if it makes their own company bankrupt. (In the same way that bankers and politicians cannot stop themselves making their own country head towards disaster and bankruptcy).

  20. Ricki's Gravatar Ricki
    June 19, 2017 - 11:32 am | Permalink

    “It matters far less whether there is a genetic basis, say, to Jewish ethnic networking than that it exists and is critically important for understanding many aspects of Jewish power, from admission to elite universities to dominating Hollywood and the media .”

    Exactly…

    Jewish IQ doesn’t matter, because whites outnumber Jews by probably 35 to 1. Even if Jews have an average IQ ten points higher than whites, it’s irrelevant because there are so many more of us than there are of them. There are probably five times the number of Gentile geniuses than Jewish geniuses, yet the Chosen Ones dominate in the elite universities and in all the important industries.

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      June 19, 2017 - 2:03 pm | Permalink

      I don’t think it’s a resistant argument because we have many other examples of bright minorities among comparatively less bright (avg) majorities and many them seems no have significant nepotism to explain their successes. For example Japanese descendents in Brazil or Parsees in India. Two cases where seems ethnic nepotism is not a fundamental explanation for their respective successes even being so demographically tiny. Of course it’s not a general rule: every smart minority among not so smart majority must operates in nepotistic ways to be successful over the late. Indeed what signalize ethnic nepotism of Jews in the west it’s not because they are well successful but because they take over the control of some key-nations, literally. But even in this case.

      So only because white Americans are massively bigger than Jews still don’t mean without nepotism they will not able to be successful and even taken the power. What also signalize ethnic nepotism is that they were imposing their corrosive agenda and working collectively from the federal lawyer to the social worker and vote en bloc.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        June 26, 2017 - 2:36 am | Permalink

        Santoculto – Re the Japanese in Brazil. These are not a random subset of the main group. They are a subset of those who wanted to leave the main group. The ones who were in a stable job, stable family, stable life – they would not be the ones volunteering to leave everything. The ones leaving would be those who had nothing or who were trying to get away from enemies. I am not disparaging everyone who has nothing at some stage in his life – far from it as I have been in that position myself – but those with nothing and who are outcasts also tend to also include many who are in this position due to criminal behaviour or bad behaviour. As I say, others are there due to misfortune, but nevertheless there is a significant number who have bad genes in this group. It is the same with a prison population – on the whole quite a bad lot of genes, but there will be some there with good genes – eg you can go to prison in many western countries for Thought Crime, such as posts on Farcebook that are critical of muslims. So we cannot say all prisoners have bad genes, but we can say there is a significantly higher level of bad genes in a prison population compared to the main population. They are certainly not a random subset of the population, and neither are the Japanese who left Japan to do menial jobs abroad.

  21. NostalgicNationalist's Gravatar NostalgicNationalist
    June 21, 2017 - 6:46 am | Permalink

    I just got banned from an Orchid Forum full of boomer normies. I think it goes beyond just ethical concerns. I think the White race is fatalistic. No other peoples refuse to talk about race like we do. I can’t believe I got banned for ‘hate speech’. All I did was mention the Jewish intellectual origins of the left and Detroit. The admin of the forum was from California so I should have known. I give up. I think you have to get to a point where you realize you can’t save Whites with reason. You can’t save Whites at all. The clipping of the young American man from 1865 looking for a wife really brought home what we have lost, the innocence, and culture, we have lost. And to think the loss has been completely unnecessary. You people in America are the ONLY free peoples of the world, owing to the large proportion of your population who keep your government accountable via gun ownership, and with a high standard of living, you are a marvel of nature. To lose all that, knowing it can be reversed if we act now, is such a tragedy. Professor McDonald you are a beacon of sanity in a world gone mad. I won’t annoy you again by posting anywhere online or here. I think the problem is non-Whites are simply inflexible on their positions, and their culture consequently dominates the more flexible White culture. If you could use the corporate media’s anti-Muslim message to highlight the similarities between Jews and Muslims via similar cultural practice such as the animal cruelty they perpetuate by their sacrificial slaughter, you might have a chance at enacting similar restrictive laws to what we see Trump enact against Muslims. One last thought. I found this online and thought I would post the exchange here. Gentile: People need to put aside practicing religion in politics, business, and education. Jewish people have pushed the first day of school for UC students 2 years ago because it fell on a religious holiday. Yet, the majority of student body (Asians), don’t get time off for lunar new year which is the most important holiday for Asians. Jew: Nope. That’s never going to happen. We’ve remained faithful to the job God gave us for over 33 centuries, and we aren’t about to stop because it’s inconvenient for you.

  22. Kilo 4/11's Gravatar Kilo 4/11
    June 22, 2017 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

    What a nerve of Turkheimer to say something like this:

    … “it is a matter of ethical principle that individual and cultural accomplishment is not tied to the genes in the same way as the appearance of our hair”,

    when Jews’ entire world view and grotesque level of self-esteem is built on their being convinced that their genes are superior to everyone else’s!

  23. Thoth's Gravatar Thoth
    June 23, 2017 - 8:43 am | Permalink

    Keep in mind that ‘disadvantaged jews’ looking for grants and handouts always get theirs as reported in the past few years by American Free Press. Jewish private schools generally lead in fed handouts as well. As for education, if the wealthier jewish families of say suburban Chicago send their children to private schools, they will be ahead of the majority of public school students as they don’t have to deal with idiots slowing down the learning process and/or their schooling can be better – more focus on math and real history versus the political correctness indoctrination taught in public schools. Sort of like a Rhode Scholar is streamlined into international business/law/finance, ie, made into a one world govt stooge.
    As for the dna history of the euro jewish aristocrat, well that will go back the very days compound interest was invented in Sumer. They have held power since and even wrote stories telling future people they are the chosen. See this for a unique perspective – http://www.bamboo-delight.com/raxbiljo/Sumerian_Swindle_V1_2nd_Edition.pdf

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      June 26, 2017 - 2:23 am | Permalink

      Thoth – but you have to agree the Jews are well-behaved and civilised in behaviour. They do not riot and they do not go to prison hardly. This will lead to a higher IQ simply because they are co-operating with the adults in their lives – teacher, parents, and so on who are telling them to behave and study.
      Suppose there is an Antifa/lefty march. There will be some at the front throwing bottles and fighting – the foot-soldiers – the ones who get arrested. But behind them in the background are law-abiding other lefties who never get into trouble themselves, but who make and print all the posters for the march, and who supply the lawyers to help the foot-soldiers when they are arrested (and who ARE the lawyers).

      So a campaign against our society requires money and organisers as well as the ones causing the trouble directly. The ones in the background cause the trouble indirectly and are law-abiding themselves, just like our traitor politicians who open the door to the third world. They do the most damage to the country, but never break a single law.

  24. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    June 25, 2017 - 3:58 am | Permalink

    Kevin MacDonald: “The main issue, after all is White identity and White interests in being able to construct their own societies as other groups around the world have done and continue to do.”

    If whites are individualistic then this makes this more difficult to achieve. The only way it would be possible is for whites themselves to separate out to get rid of their own sub-set who carry the harmful genes of self-destruction. They will have to separate out into one area (continent eventually after war, but states within a continent to start with) for those who are ethno centric and another for those who are not (who would in the end initiate conflict with the other group). People could choose the country/state that suits them. This is the ‘natural way’ that natural selection is ‘meant to work’ ie did work in the past more readily, but no longer does so readily, as when you get to millions in one group it is harder to separate out than it was in prehistoric times when you just packed your bags and marched north, possibly to places where it was harder to survive, so that lazy, low intelligence groups could not follow to rape and plunder.

    You can hardly set off on a trek from the main group in modern society with your subset of different genes to form a new colony, even though this clearly happened in the prehistoric past as shown by appearance differences alone, (and whatever behaviour differences also occurred). There are no empty lands to got to. Even empty areas of desert in Africa are ‘unavailable’ as that entire continent of Africa as we all know all belong to Africans only (‘Africa is for Africans’). Even empty parts. Probably they own the moon also as they looked at it first.

    Having said that, people in America do tend to move from one state to another to be with similar political types.

    The modern version of a subgroup leaving and emigrating and forming a new colony, if it happened. might be after a civil war as for the present both sides are trapped together, unlike in prehistoric past where emigration to empty lands was an option. When they tried this (to separate) in Bosnia/Serbia recently, NATO intervened to stop it. Another example is the Pakistan/India partition where millions from each group emigrated past each other to get to their own kind.

    Perhaps we would find that 15% of whites are strongly ethno-centric, 15% are strongly hostile to their own race (this 15% is currently dominant in the authorities, the media and education) and the other 70% are quite malleable and plastic in their views – very susceptible to what the TV/school tells them to think. In this context you only need to get rid of the whites’ 15% self-haters for the 70% to easily swing over to the ethno-centric way of thinking. To get the 70% to shift their views, it all depends on who controls the culture and media (after a civil war this might happen).

    In fact you probably would find that it takes a very short time for the 70% to swing to being patriotic, ie a few years, AS THIS IS A MORE NATURAL STATE – ie in harmony with inner thinking, and the current state of young people (to hate their own race) is an UNNATURAL state that has taken decades of on-message brainwashing at school and on TV to achieve, and which the internet is now undermining. It is like a balloon – hard to contort into an unnatural shape (as it is now when the young hate themselves) and when the pressure on the balloon is taken off, the balloon can easily and quickly revert to its natural state. This is why the TV bias is so intense – one hour of the truth from the right can easily cancel out hours, days, weeks, years of on-message lefty bias from the left. But for the 15% true left/true self-haters/globalists – this lot can NEVER be educated out of their thinking as, being in the 15%, they are destined by their genes/wiring to think like this. An example is the father who was pro-immigrant in Germany, and then after his daughter was raped and killed by them, was STILL pro-immigrant and wanted donations at the funeral to go to some immigration group. This type cannot change their views as they are wired like this. They are the true 15% enemy within. Sikhs and Buddhists and Japanese are more our allies than this 15% enemy within are. This is why it is no use trying to change the views of the 15% – they are based in wiring not in logic.

    Another factor in getting the 70% to stop following the 15% globalists/white-haters and instead to switch allegiance to the 15% patriots, is the effect of comfort and security. When this goes, people might switch readily to being more ethno-centric/patriotic. For now the youth are rich and pampered. They will think differently when not only deprived of their expensive trainers and phones (the very idea!) but also of electricity and food and safety.

    We have to observe the way the whites react in S.Africa in the coming years to judge whether other whites under racist attack will submit or fight back – the number of whites murdered in S.Africa in two weeks is greater than all murders in the troubles in Ireland in 30 years according to this presenter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHzVeEB1I-4
    It is twice as hazardous being a farmer there as being a policeman.

  25. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    June 25, 2017 - 4:09 am | Permalink

    Kevin MacDonald: “(although the psychological trait of conscientiousness, which involves perseverance and striving to achieve goals, is also substantially heritable).”
    This is a very important point. If geneticists just look for intelligence genes they might miss out on other genes that are more significant in determining IQ. Perhaps the following genes all combine to produce the IQ:

    (1) intelligence genes as referred to above

    (2) genes that give the owner an interest in a subject, in the same way that boys and girls have innate different interests in cars and dolls. Maybe an interest in finding out about the world, ie an enquiring mind, has a genetic basis. Ie an interest in academic subjects. Low interest leads to low practice leads to low IQ.

    (3) level of compliance in an individual versus level of defiance. The word the Blacks use is relevant – to ‘dis’ someone or ‘disrespect’ them. This tendency to ‘dis’ might have a genetic basis. This feature in a person;s character determines the level of disregard for what adults around you are telling you to do, including telling you (as a child) to do your homework – does an adult telling you (as a 10 year old) to do your homework, does this admonition, coupled with being told off and expression of strong adult disapproval, does all this pressure from your parent/ teacher, does it have ANY IMPACT? If the answer is ‘no’ and this type of child in effect has a high level of immunity from adult disapproval, then this will have an impact on IQ. Those who tremble when the teacher merely gives a sad shake of the head and says ‘I am disappointed that you made little effort’ – this person is at the opposite end of the spectrum. This trait of not caring can be summed up as ‘lack of shame or remorse following adult disapproval’. It can also be called ‘having no guilt’ or ‘having no fear’ – both of which we should expect to also lead to a tendency to be more criminal in behaviour. Surely such a gene would strongly inhibit the development of IQ.

    There are children who tremble when the teacher says a few words of gentle disapproval, and other children who can withstand a ton of bricks falling on them with ease. (My teacher used to say to the class ‘I will come down on you like a ton of bricks’, and we were all scared, but as an adult I have met many children for whom a ton of bricks on their head is not problem to withstand and they come out smiling and unaffected).

Comments are closed.