Hypergamy, Affirmative Action and Today’s “Diverse” Workplace: The Replacement of White Males

Brent Mason

Going through boxes of old family records I came across a picture (see below), which was part of a Sunday supplement to the March 22, 1964 edition of Memphis’s local newspaper. The purpose of the supplement was to celebrate the grand opening of First Tennessee Bank’s new skyscraper headquarters on Madison Avenue in downtown Memphis.

The picture is the assembled managerial staff of the entire bank, including all of its branches. Note the lack of “minorities” and women. The photograph, taken at the main banking lobby of the new facility, looks like a casting call for the iconic 1950s era movie starring Gregory Peck, The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit. What struck me most about the picture was how times have changed. I currently bank at three different banks and out of the three there is only one White male working in a position visible to the public. All the rest are women and minorities — predominantly Black women, then Black men, and an occasional White woman. Back then, almost all the bank managers were White males. Today, almost none are.

What to make of this? Some might regard this as poetic justice, but the so-called Civil Rights Movement was sold to the American public on the premise that it was to eliminate discrimination and prejudice based on race. Are we to believe that no White males are better qualified for managerial positions than the current diverse managerial staff, or that no White males want those jobs? Obviously diversity doesn’t mean diversity at all, but rather the elimination of White males from the workplace.

To my mind this is emblematic of the transparent falsehood upon which all liberal equality movements are based. Pursuing the rubric that “Diversity is our Greatest Strength,” White males have been systematically purged from positions of leadership and prominence in large institutions and businesses throughout America, and replaced by “Affirmative Action” hires. White males are no longer wanted or welcome at select colleges and universities, professional schools, or large business enterprises like First Tennessee Bank.

Every enterprise and initiative launched by the Left since the Brown v. Board decision in 1954 has had the effect of reducing White birthrates. With Brown and public school integration, Whites reacted by sending their children to private schools and limited the number of children they had to the number they could afford to send to private school, which almost always meant fewer White children born in such diverse locales. The Sexual Revolution, Drug Culture and the No-fault Divorce initiative were as much a part of liberal agenda as the so-called Civil Rights, feminism and “Gay Rights” movements, and all not only caused but were designed to reduce White birthrates and displace Whites, particularly White men, from positions of power, prominence and authority.

How is this displacement linked to the picture featured below? F. Roger Devlin, in his excellent book Sexual Utopia in Power  (see Red Ice interview) makes the point that women are sexually attracted to alpha males which, at least in advanced first world societies such as modern day America, mean men who are socially dominant and wealthy and therefore better able to provide the resources needed to sustain the prosperity required to live well and support the successful raising of children. In 1964 the men in this bank lobby photograph would have represented a happy hunting ground for White women seeking an alpha male husband. Such White men are now becoming an endangered species, thanks to liberal policies like workplace and educational affirmative action. Women who out-earn and out-prestige their husbands due to affirmative action in the workplace often come to feel that they’ve “outgrown” their husbands, who then find themselves in divorce court despite living blameless lives. Women simply don’t respect men who earn less than they do. Any man who is a so-called “house-husband” is destined for a quick divorce based on my observations. Meanwhile, the White children of such marriages often become what Dr. Andrew Fraser of Occidental Observer calls, “the collateral damage of the divorce industry,” and as such are denied the high-investment parenting which is necessary for high achievement in a First World economy such as ours. This is the Left’s way of evening the scales of child rearing which they feel unfairly favors Whites. Our current opioid epidemic is filled with such children. The newly “liberated” wife, now free to pursue her heart’s desire, sets her cap for an alpha male who is willing to have sex with her but balks at marriage. Net result? Fewer White children and those who do survive being denied their birthright of high investment parenting and thereby leading diminished lives.

A photograph of the White male managerial staff at First Tennessee Bank today would be an almost empty page. Affirmative action has drastically diminished the supply of White men with good jobs and promising careers, as has the outsourcing of middle class sustaining manufacturing jobs, thereby making White men less attractive to White women. Love may be a many splendored thing, but in today’s America, a long term “til death do you part” marriage is becoming rarer and rarer by the day. Affirmative action leads to higher divorce rates and lower White birthrates.

Some of the men pictured in the photograph below were personally known to me. They were, to a man, good providers – straight and strong men, faithful to their wives and attentive to their children. Many were church elders and community leaders – social lions, so to speak, and leaders in every good way. They typically had large families of three or more children and stable marriages. Divorce was unusual and a career buster back in those better days. The changes in family life since then aren’t the result of coincidence, but are part of the Left’s planned program and assault on the nuclear family and, ultimately, the White race. The relentless reduction in White birthrates continues apace, and on the very moment that Whites become a minority in this country I predict that minority rights from that moment forward will be a thing of the past.

We need to stop mouthing platitudes about equal opportunity and start thinking about our multicultural mess. I have done all the thinking that I care to do on the subject and I don’t care a fig about how Blacks react to the well deserved outlawing of affirmative action. Unless they are the most qualified candidate for any given position, they don’t deserve the places and privileges obtained through affirmative action. Why should anyone care if a thief regrets returning his ill-gotten gains? If you’re one of us, where’s your sympathy for the lives and careers of White men who have been sacrificed on the altar of political correctness? It is a widely known propensity for White elites to lavish beneficence on those at the bottom of society, while regarding with thinly veiled contempt fellow Whites one rung down the social ladder from themselves. This, as Marc Anthony observed in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, is “the unkindest cut of all.” This lack of empathy and racial solidarity is at the heart of everything that ails us as a race. Affirmative action is wrong for many reasons, not the least of which being because it violates the explicit language of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, upon which it is supposedly based. It was largely done through executive (presidential) orders and it can be undone the same way.

What about the White men and women whose careers and livelihoods have been lost to affirmative action? Affirmative action gained real traction around 1969 under the first Nixon term (so much for relying on Republicans to protect the interests of White people). This would have been the same year that an early baby boomer, born in 1951 and aged 18, would have graduated high school and entered college. His college admission prospects would undoubtedly have been diminished by affirmative action admission policies then in place unless he was extremely well-connected. In other words, if his daddy had been an extremely wealthy liberal alum of the college of his choice. Four years later, in 1973, his graduate or professional school admission prospects would have been similarly diminished. He likely would have to attend a lesser law school or shut out of medical school entirely (like Alan Bakke in the famous early 70s U.S. Supreme Court case) due to affirmative action. Later, in the mid to late 70s, after graduation, his job prospects would have been similarly diminished due to affirmative action hiring policies. That hypothetical baby boomer is now 66 years old. We’re not talking about a lost weekend here. We’re talking about a lost life with negative intergenerational consequences. He and his families upward social mobility has been sacrificed so our elites can feel better about themselves, while the children of White elites, like the Bushes or the Kennedys or the Gores, still manage to go to Harvard or Yale.

Meanwhile, as American Whites continue to suffer officially sanctioned, legal racial discrimination called affirmative action at the hands of a regime nominally run by Whites, more American Blacks live in poverty today than in 1955. Apparently liberalism was tougher on Blacks than segregation. Working class and middle class Whites are the primary victims of racially discriminatory laws and a regime that hates them, while Blacks are the collateral damage of Leftist policies. Whites need advocates as dedicated to the advancement of our interests as Blacks and Jews have. We deserve them and we will no longer accept half-hearted, pastel leadership. Whites, particularly working class and lower middle class Whites are fed up with being sold out by our elites. We need strong advocates and we reject all other. The good news is that all it takes to reverse this miscarriage of justice is leadership with the courage to beard the lion. Those men will rise. Until then, the future of our race hangs in the balance. Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

Brent Mason is a longtime fan of The Political Cesspool Radio Program.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

42 Comments to "Hypergamy, Affirmative Action and Today’s “Diverse” Workplace: The Replacement of White Males"

  1. July 31, 2017 - 7:26 am | Permalink
  2. July 31, 2017 - 7:29 am | Permalink

    See my recent article on the fantasy of the gender pay gap:

  3. Rickie's Gravatar Rickie
    July 31, 2017 - 7:50 am | Permalink

    The type of white man who rises up in today’s corporate world is the so-called “new male” – a man who is sensitive and gets along well with liberals and non-whites even when they are spitting in his face. I think white males should just forget about the college route altogether and focus on learning trades and running their own small businesses. If there is a total economic collapse, those skills will be much more valuable than being a pencil pusher. My brother has the so-called “good life”, meaning a wife, kids and a white collar corporate job, but his boss is a butch lesbian and he lives next door to two married gay men. It’s just a ridiculous world we are living in now.

    • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
      August 6, 2017 - 2:31 am | Permalink

      Rickie, I bet your brother has to be very nice and careful what he says around that butch lesbian and also be nice and accommodating to those two gay neighbors. How many kids does he have? I hope he is not allowing his kids to think that being gay is cool or bedding down with blacks is great or progress.

  4. July 31, 2017 - 8:44 am | Permalink

    I worked commercial construction in the nineteen eighties. My company built and installed bank vaults and equipment, e.g. vault doors, SD boxes, pneumatics etc. We provided a full service operation that could turn a former convenience store into a drive up banking facility.

    The majority of our clients were S&Ls (remember Silverado? http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3330.htm) When my partner and I met with a banker to finalize the deal for construction, we invariably met with a male owner. Yet, virtually everyone working in the bank from the president down was a woman.

    One day during a meeting we asked an owner, “what is it with women? We find banks are invariably staffed with females at all levels. Typically the only males we see are low level clerks, why? The owner replied, “There are two reasons, women are more honest and they work cheaper.” I always felt the latter reason provided the true explanation.

    These were the same “neckties” that used to open a conversation with the comment “we’re in this for the long haul!” Yet our business was based on the fact that the steel vaults we sold were depreciated on a five year schedule, versus the thirty year schedule for a concrete vault. Not to mention the fact our vaults could easily be installed in existing structures with no major alterations in the structure.

    Long haul? A couple of years later, the Savings and Loan debacle put us out of business. Turned out the S&L banker’s idea of “the long haul” was fast track retirement to their Caribbean island.

    • Thorgrun's Gravatar Thorgrun
      August 1, 2017 - 10:48 am | Permalink

      “the long haul was the fast track to their Caribbean island”. The (((Milkens))) et al of the junk bond kings took out a lot of construction business’ and jobs along with decent tradesman wages, with the demise of the S&Ls along with14% Prime Rate from the Federal Reserve. Depression level unemployment in the construction trades for years, left a void of competent skilled workers. So, in the late 90’s through the easy money boom years until 2007 this void of workers was filled with low skilled, low wage workers from Mexico, until the Bubble burst and took with it, this time, white collar jobs and a lot of debt transferred to the next generation. So, “fast track to a Caribbean island” is an appropriate destination for (((Pirates))).

  5. July 31, 2017 - 8:47 am | Permalink

    The purpose wasn’t to “elevate” women and “minorities,” the purpose was to disenfranchise “white males.”

    Ivy League universities like Harvard positively discriminate in favor of Jews and negatively discriminate against “white males.” The “diversity” spots are given to women and “minorities” while Jews get all the “white” spots. That is exactly how the system was designed.

    “White males” were the competition to the Jewish males and females. For a while, the Jews teamed up with Irish and Italian Catholics to attack the “WASPs” but the Irish and Italians have outlived their usefulness so they are now just “white males.”

    Women have always worked, both inside and outside “the home.” Getting white women to postpone marriage and motherhood for as long as possible has the added benefit of suppressing white birth rates, thus necessitating even more women and “minorities” in “the workplace.”

    Affirmative action policies were not designed to help black people, they were designed to disenfranchise white men.

    All of these affirmative action policies are blatantly “racist” against white men, but the real definition of “racism” is not “discrimination against someone based on race.”

    “Racism” = prejudice plus privilege. Everyone has prejudice, but only white people have white privilege. Therefore, only white people can be “racist” and in fact ALL white people are “racist” by definition.

    Therefore, “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.” The word “racist” is just a racial slur for “white people.” Calling a white person a “racist” is no different than calling a black person “the n word” or using a slur for Chinese, Mexican, or Jew.

    “Racist” = “the R word.”

  6. Robert Bloch's Gravatar Robert Bloch
    July 31, 2017 - 9:28 am | Permalink

    I think this is a powerful article but as a white male of 1956 vintage I can attest that affirmative action was not a particular problem in the 70s or indeed the 80s. In fact, in the 70s & 80s it had the effect of elevating working class white males over some elite white males through the application of holistic criteria that were not yet maliciously applied. I was one of those working class white males and standards were initially broadened in a way that worked to my benefit.

    In fact I am convinced that affirmative action for blacks, which drew concentrated fire from conservatives, was a bit of a red herring. During the 70s, 80s & 90s Jews came to utterly dominate academia and as they consolidated power standards were applied in a maliciously anti-white, anti-white male way. The problem was never the 12% black student wuota in the law school; it was the 75% Jewish law faculty.

    One result is mediocrities like Justice Kagan and even more sinister, Professor Tushnet of Harvard, a 1st Amendment “scholar” who hates the first amendment and produces no significant scholarship yet blogs about treating whites in this country as defeated enemies using the occupation of Germany as a model.

    Black AA is not the problem Jewish infiltration is the problem.

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      August 1, 2017 - 7:41 am | Permalink

      I agree. Because it’s so dangerous to criticize Jewish power most writers on the right jump on softer targets such as blacks and Muslims. There would be no Muslim problem if there were no neoconservative foreign policy and related globalist machinations. Indeed it was the neoconservatives who called for a “new Cold War” against Islam, by which they meant that we should invade every Muslim country that made Israel nervous. I’m old enough to remember when no one gave the Muslims a moment’s thought. The war on Islam is very bad for Christianity because it drenches us in the meme of religion as irrational and oppressive. Sooner or later we have to cut the Gordian knot. All the race-IQ stuff is at best an excuse to say things that challenge the party line.

    • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
      August 1, 2017 - 11:18 am | Permalink

      I agree. Then, Tushnet and Barbara Lerner Spectre do us a favor by letting us know. The point is, until now they could go unnoticed.

      Jews then register as Whites for the purposes of AA, further eroding the White share. I am in the university, and know for a fact that Jews get all positions through tribal nepotism, not through merit.

    • Rich's Gravatar Rich
      August 3, 2017 - 6:51 pm | Permalink

      Have to disagree with you there. In the late 1980’s while working in the construction and building maintenance industries, I saw hardworking White males with seniority laid off before black and hispanic workers. When I tried to put a stop to the practice, I was quietly told by senior management that if I made too much noise, I’d never advance in the industry.

  7. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    July 31, 2017 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    Nobody explained to me why diversity is not our second-greatest strength. Why is it the greatest strength? Does diversity have competition? What comes in second place?

    One thing invented by Black males is… microaggressions. Now a satirical site, The People’s Cube, has invented… nanoaggressions. Forget about microaggressions. Nanoaggressions are smaller. You can’t see them, but you can feel them.

  8. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    July 31, 2017 - 10:56 am | Permalink

    I am myself bitter victim of affirmative action. So many times I was asked in job interviews, “what would you contribute to our diversity?” A Black woman asked me this question at Valencia College, Osceola campus. I bet everything that she was super-unqualified and didn’t deserve her job. But then again, teaching in college nowadays is reduced to just filling rosters with the needed grades. Everybody complains about Black professors as many steps down the ladder as corresponding to the positions that they hold. This leads to less-prepared students. I have blatantly observed that Black professors greatly favor Black students. No need to talk about Jewish professors. They are not blatant, they are very subtle, but they systematically favor Jews, then minorities. At the bottom of their ladder? Whites. I have 2 PhDs (mathematics and chemistry), a BSc (aerospace engineering), speak 5 languages, learning my 6th language (Russian) and am still too much down in the ladder. Just imagine a Jew or a Black with my qualifications…

    I think that our liberal elite is very happy with the displacement of Whites. They think they’re keeping barbarians out of the gates, the barbarians being fellow Whites. They don’t perceive Blacks as a threat. Then look at the Democratic Party where minorities have displaced Whites at every position. There our White elite feels the pinch.

    I know as a biological fact that if the population is dumbed down, so are their elites. The only thing that I didn’t realize is how fast that happens. Look at how dumb our elites have become. Think Macron, Gordon Brown, George Bush Jr, John “Kirzakstan” Kerry. Too many others. It’s obvious that they are stupid. How do I know? By the fact that the elites are jetting Henry Kissinger all around the world, wherever there are problems. Who will take his place when he dies? John Kerry?

    But that is a blessing. Our elites are stupid enough that their genocidal intentions are apparent, but not smart enough to carry them out. US army often complains that the lower IQ of the incoming ranks costs them too much in the battlefield with their stupid but costly mistakes.

    Now I think that the best thing that happened to White man and mankind was… Soviet Union. US would have continued in the line of the man-made disaster that 1933 recession was, weren’t it for fear of URSS. WW2 was designed to destroy both Germany and URSS, while culling the White herd. It failed in the second task, and they came up with Unthinkable. Thanks God that it remained Unthinkable. Should they have carried that out, they might have won or lost, but more White men would have been culled. Should they have lost, that would be ultimately good for White man, looking how things went. Khrushchev was an imbecile. Stalin was a genius, Brezhnev was fair for his position. Anybody after Brezhnev and before Gorbachev was geriatric. Gorbachev was a thug, deliberately handpicked by the West to destroy URSS. Guess why our Jewish hostile elites are so obsessed with Stalin. He is second only to Hitler in their hate.

    Also, elites would have started the invasion of White countries one century earlier without URSS. The technological revolution would have never taken place and we would be in the dark of everything, and helpless while our genocide carried out. Look at how bad things are now. Would have been worse without URSS.

    • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
      July 31, 2017 - 11:01 am | Permalink

      1933 Depression
      URSS = USSR, in another language.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        July 31, 2017 - 5:35 pm | Permalink
        • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
          July 31, 2017 - 7:41 pm | Permalink

          Then why did Ukrainians massively side with Stalin and not with Hitler? Maybe because Stalin was a better idea than Generalplan Öst. Also, in charge of Ukraine during famine was… (((Lazar Kaganovich))). Most of rank and file of the administration was Jewish as well. Same in today’s anti-Russian Ukraine.

          • pj's Gravatar pj
            August 1, 2017 - 11:28 am | Permalink

            A lot of those Ukrainians who sided with Stalin were actually ethnic Russians whom Stalin had relocated there earlier, the same ones who recently broke away from Ukraine in Crimea and eastern Ukraine to join Russia.

            Hitler eventually felt he couldn’t trust the Ukrainians who did join with him and he feared they would turn on him to establish their own state while Germany was preoccupied fighting Russia-he was probably correct but these Ukrainians never sided with Russia-they drove the Reds and jews, and unfortunately the Poles, out of Ukraine only to have the Reds and jews return and massacre hundreds of thousands of them.

            If you read Hitler’s War by Irving it looks like Hitler wasn’t going to genocide any of the people in the conquered countries-jews and asiatics and nationalists were going to be relocated to the other side of the Urals and the rest were going to be subjects that were probably eventually going to be Germanized as full citizens.

          • F88's Gravatar F88
            August 3, 2017 - 9:21 am | Permalink

            Generalplan Ost is just another Jewish lie.

        • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
          July 31, 2017 - 8:04 pm | Permalink

          There is NKVD everywhere, which means that the events took place in 1934-1946. NKVD had 4 leaders, (((Genrikh Yagoda))), Nikolai Yezhov, Lavrentiy Beria, Sergei Kruglov. Rank and file was chock full of Jews. The names mentioned in the site that you indicate are… Jewish.

          I come from Albania and I know that it was not about enemies, it was about slave work. That said, still compare with Generalplan Öst.

  9. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    July 31, 2017 - 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Despite workplace policies and cultural agendas deployed, I’m not at all sure the vast, vast, vast majority of White women do not choose White men and together they do not raise White children. What are the actual stats and why aren’t they presented in this article?

    Despite massive levels of propaganda, economic coercion, psychological bullying, and media-modelling of how we should behave differently than our natures would tend, White men AND White women overwhelmingly make healthy choices on the big, family, race and nation issues. It is quite simply wrong to say we don’t.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      July 31, 2017 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

      I would like to put this in a constructive way, not only so it will get thru comment control, but also that it might be pondered or I might be corrected …

      It may not have been helpful on balance when Devlin and his publishers who are, quite factually, unusually gay-friendly (open to the notion that gays are the very best of us, unusually manly, and essential to White survival, for instance) introduced into WN circles the Jew-authored idea of waging a sex-war between Whites.

      I hope it’s not too controversial a question to ask, whether we ought not be blaming White women for things they don’t do, just coz Jews and gays like to watch us fight?

  10. Milton Alexander's Gravatar Milton Alexander
    July 31, 2017 - 3:21 pm | Permalink

    To Robert Bloch-I was a victim of Affirmative Action in the early 70’s. I had a 3.6 GPA and a 170 on the LSAT. A black classmate had below a 2.5 GPA and below a 150 LSAT. He got into a 2d tier law school that I wasn’t even waiting listed on. How do I know?-I worked in the college registrar’s office, where I had access to all of this information. Since then the guy has gotten one plum government job after another, but he can’t keep a private sector job. He had jobs I could never get even though I was a law review editor at the 3d tier law school I did get into.

    • Robert Bloch's Gravatar Robert Bloch
      July 31, 2017 - 11:57 pm | Permalink

      I went to graduate school and law School in the early 80s. I had an unusual trajectory: grades were inconsistent but I tested through the roof and interviewed well. My point was that my candidacy benefitted from the reevaluation of standards that was not yet openly anti-white in that period. I knew other unconventional white candidates who benefitted. You obviously would have been better served by a conventional meritocratic standard. I sincerely respect that.

      That said, blacks simply didn’t take up that many spaces. AA has been somewhat more punishing in elevating less productive women. (Paradoxically, this is also a vice of conventional meritocracy – their grades & scores are fine but they lack the drive to perform in the marketplace). But that pales next to Jewish infiltration. We have seen massive and coordinated pro-Jewish discrimination in an era that has demonized and deracinated white gentiles. The 12% black spots represent a distraction – the WSJ is willing to fulminate against that. At the risk of offending you, I wonder if you lost out because they put a black guy in your place or because some kosher admissions officer thought you might be a competitive threat to the real protected minority.

      There weren’t that many blacks in law school; a fraction could do the work; and a fraction of that fraction could do the job. Jews were and are the threat and, like Tushnet, they are not even troubling to conceal their blood hatred at this late date.

      • Rich's Gravatar Rich
        August 3, 2017 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

        The 12% black spots still take positions away from Whites. If your child was kept out of a job or school because of that 12%, would you still dismiss it as a “distraction”? Blacks should stick to their “traditionally black universities” and leave normal people alone.

  11. Joe's Gravatar Joe
    July 31, 2017 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    A good article, but as usual, the writer fears to tell the whole truth. All he had to do was to replace the word “Jew” everywhere he had the word “Left”. THAT is the truth that we must all face and rectify before it’s too late.

  12. BOMFOG's Gravatar BOMFOG
    July 31, 2017 - 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Have you noticed who works in the branches at Bank of America? They are almost entirely populated by immigrants. The whitest men they have are Latinos.

  13. Riley DeWiley's Gravatar Riley DeWiley
    July 31, 2017 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    If you are ever in downtown Seattle,stop in to the Arctic Building (3rd and Cherry) and take a stroll around the lobby. Gaze at the collection of portraits of Seattle’s power elite ca. 1890 mounted on the walls therein. Note anything that these people have in common.

    • August 3, 2017 - 4:34 am | Permalink

      If you’re talking of white males, you’ve been taken in. They were just as much subject to Jews as the present puppets.

  14. White Devil's Gravatar White Devil
    August 1, 2017 - 4:28 am | Permalink

    Good article. Aside from speaking out when it’s safe to (not at work) , throwing a few shekels to Alt Right organizations and trying to find a decent female to marry, what else can we do?

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      August 1, 2017 - 8:35 am | Permalink

      The “litmus test question” is a very effective tool in terms of its risk to reward ratio. Find opportunities to ask politicians questions that ‘out’ them by forcing them to choose between a politically correct answer and an obviously true or morally viable answer. The person asking the question does not commit himself but instead lets his ‘victim’ make his point. E.g,
      1) Should it be illegal to deny the Holocaust? If not, should the US condemn countries that jail deniers?
      2) Would terrorists leave us alone if we abandoned the middle east (or: abandoned Israel)?
      3) Does the army hold women to the same physical standards as men?
      4) In your view does a fetus feel pain during an abortion?
      5) Is it good that Christianity is reviving in Russia? Is that a reason to be friendly to them?
      6) Do our wars in the middle east benefit Israel?
      I’m sure readers can think up other ones and better ones. It’s a great concept.

    • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
      August 1, 2017 - 10:44 am | Permalink

      We need a boots on the ground, fists to (((their))) jaws, White revolution.
      To achieve that we will need to decend to the level that Jews have bred Whites to…, namely; a degenrate semi-illiterate, hedonistic, mindless, emotion based vehicle that they can comprehend and respond to.
      I am most probably a bit behind the times but as an example; A “…Wigger Nazi Rapper…” who uses the “..beat and style of “…Nigger Rap…” infused with we are in favour of here using lyrics in the “…language of Eubonics…” and a wardrobe of crass in your face German national socialism…, including Swazi, Hitler Moustace and brown suits that are recut to reflect a more modern “…Retarded Jew Look” of pants bearly hanging on to your pelvic bone and plunbers crack in full view.
      It needs to be shocking yet truthful and definitely “…cool…” in some contorted and twisted way.
      Thhinking for the White masses…,
      as in thoughtful and serious youtube videos, radio programs or essays are just not going to go viral…,
      which is an essential element if we are to effect any substantial awakening in the todays nearly mentally retarded by Jew-induction, mainsteam White culture.

      Think out of the box and down 30 to fifty IQ points from where we here at TOO regularly converse at.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        August 3, 2017 - 5:03 am | Permalink

        (Mod.Note: Mr. Ashton, your (((concern trolling))) and (((shit-stirring))) comments are quite amusing to read. Nice try! Too bad other TOO readers will never see them.)

        • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
          August 6, 2017 - 8:21 am | Permalink

          I do not know what he said…, seeing that you redacted his comments…, but it is acts like this by the moderator…, that actually defend my comments…, that make me feel especially welcome around here !!

          Thank you so much TOO.

          Although Iceland is a step up from Canada in that there is no more gang-stalking,
          I am actually allowed to hold a regular job and,
          the general intelligence level of the population is a full 10 points higher than in Canada…,
          which makes for some remarkably interesting conversations, if only for the unexpected times of their occurrences…,
          in the most profound sense, I am still largely alone.
          So, support like this, even though it is from a site half a world away leaves a warm feeling in my heart…, thank you TOO !!

  15. Milton Alexander's Gravatar Milton Alexander
    August 1, 2017 - 8:46 am | Permalink

    Robert-My observation from down South is that most of the beneficiaries of Affirmative Action in these parts are black women and gay black men. The primary victims are white gentile men.

  16. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    August 2, 2017 - 5:58 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps whites in general need a new ethos, based on our ancient ethos, the one that served us so well until this modern age; strength. Perhaps the new definition of success is not a high paying job and a garage full of cars, but instead, a self sufficient lifestyle on one’s own private land, building a modest home and growing as much of one’s own food as possible.

    The system has been the enemy of the common white folk since long before AA ever became a thorn in our sides. Even when times were supposedly good, an entire underclass of white people toiled to death in obscurity making humiliating wages whilst being the unseen backbone of society. There were no law degrees for families of coal miners.

    Forget about reforming an old, dying system. Walk away from it. Reinvent yourself in the model of our ancestors; strong, self sufficient, independent of systems. We must recapture the beast within us in order to find the strength that has been sacrificed on the altar of meaningless consumerism and hedonistic living. That will make you an alpha male beyond any six figure job and fancy car.

    • Walteress's Gravatar Walteress
      August 3, 2017 - 4:09 am | Permalink

      Well said. This is what we have done- are doing- including homeschooling, and being honest about what’s happening and who is behind it (euphemistically at this stage).
      He will learnt to shoot at 10yrs old, and to cook what he kills. I wish I could find others who share the same vision/ethos, but perhaps they, like us, keep a low profile.

    • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
      August 6, 2017 - 8:32 am | Permalink

      I concur. These days, the Agro-industrial complex’s output and offerings are not only largely tasteless and rudely expensive.., they are down right toxic !
      They are a major contributing factor to the decrease in
      “…manliness…” as well as the increase in chronic illness and underdeveloped intellect and physique.
      Anyone who has had the good fortune to grow their own food not to mention source their own wild game, can attest to the incredible flavour and vigour associated with these foods. These things alone will be major draws for any female wishing to have children and raise a healthy family.

  17. Deep North's Gravatar Deep North
    August 5, 2017 - 4:27 pm | Permalink

    It angers me that many white Millennial women who graduate college won’t date white men who make less than them or don’t have a degree. These women had fathers who were blue collar workers and paid their tuition and suddenly they graduate college and are too good to date blue collar men! These women are going to become 40 year old spinster cat ladies since they waited forever for Mr. Right to come along.

  18. HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
    August 6, 2017 - 5:32 pm | Permalink

    A a subset of white women are already on the road to extinction: professional American women i.e. doctors, lawyers, engineers, (largely whites) average only 1 child per couple.

Comments are closed.