If Elected Party Leader, Zionist Anne Marie Waters Will Sound UKIP’s Death Knell, Part 1

Jack Sen



Within the next few months, United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) members will be asked to elect a leader to replace Paul Nuttall, the Catholic conservative, mildly pro-Zionist Member of European Parliament for North West England, who resigned after leading the party off a cliff at the last General Election.

It’s fair to say that Nuttall was neither intellectually equipped, nor politically astute enough to lead a defanged UKIP into the Brexit negotiation period, as evidenced by his inability to achieve the slightest electoral success in 2017.

UKIP’s share of the vote, which reached a staggering 4 million when I stood as a prospective Member of Parliament for West Lancashire in 2015, collapsed at this year’s General Election — with both the Labour Party, from whom UKIP had previously siphoned off hundreds of thousands of voters from disenfranchised White working class communities in the north, and fiercely patriotic English Conservatives, whom UKIP had targeted down south, hacking large swathes of support back from Nuttall’s party.

In fact, Nuttall’s inability to put his personal stamp on the populist party resulted in UKIP losing over 80% of its vote (from 12.6% in 2015 to 2% in 2017), its membership rumored to have dropped by more than half, and the party Farage had built from scratch all but relegated to a footnote in the annals of British history and dustbin of British politics.

Most UKIP supporters I know who blame Nuttall for the Party’s cataclysmic implosion fault the MEP’s incoherent, often schizophrenic message.

Would Nuttall’s UKIP be genuinely anti-Islam or simply happy to carry on pandering to the litany of extremist religious groups Farage pandered to?

Farage campaigning in Mosques as well as with Lubavitcher Rabbi

Was Nuttall going to utilize his working-class roots to target the dispossessed White working class northern vote – Nuttall is in fact conspicuously working class in his manner and speech patterns – or was he going to dress up like the aspiringly aristocratic Farage to try to attract the same sorts of landowning libertarians and disenfranchised Eurosceptic Tory voters, Farage had successfully courted?

Unlike Farage, who was successfully able to market himself as a man for all people, Nuttall couldn’t successfully court both.

Two peas in a Tweed pod

Was Nuttall the Catholic conservative who stood for traditional values — the platform on which he campaigned, or the moderate that sold out to the likes of Pink News the moment he was grilled over his stance on homosexuality.

Paul Nuttall with UKIP Deputy, and former London Mayoral Candidate, Peter Whittle

No one really knew where Farage’s replacement stood on anything. In all fairness, I am not convinced Nuttall himself knew where he stood.

Nuttall’s political positions compatible with traditional nationalist values
– Nuttall has called for the establishment of an independent English (as opposed to British) Parliament — a position taken by the English Democrats and other English Nationalist groups.
– He is seen as anti-abortion and has shown support for the reintroduction of the death penalty, both unpopular positions in Britain.

– He’s been an outspoken critic of political correctness and laws that stifle free speech.
– He opposed the Labour Party’s 2015 plans to mandate the teaching of LGBT-inclusive sex education in schools. This education requires that schools discuss homosexuality and alternative lifestyle choices, with primary/elementary school children.
– He is an outspoken critic of mass immigration and against the free movement of people within the EU.

– He opposes global warming legislation, due to the fact it stifles GDP and imposes an unfair burden on British business. Nuttall contends that such legistlation enables Brussels to sink their regulatory fangs into British commerce.

– He is in favour of a ban on burqas in public places, and has been a far more vocal opponent of Islam than Farage.

Although Nuttall once penned an article on the devastating impact of Cultural Marxism for a major British newspaper — that has since been deleted from their official site — it is fair to say that Nuttall failed to present a cogent ideological position on anything, nor did he offer the British electorate anything in the way of political substance. In fact, the failed leader appeared as if he was hoping to ride Farage’s name, their association, as well as the former commodities trader’s cheeky-chap style all the way to Westminster.

Unfortunately it’s been his decision to amplify the rhetoric on the genuine threat to Western civilization Islam poses that has enabled a far more insidious danger to slip into UKIP’s sphere. This is a strategy he adopted after visiting Israel and one he assumed would slow down the Party’s death spiral and attract genuine nationalist voters. Nevertheless, this decision has enabled a far more insidious danger to slip into UKIP’s sphere.

Enter Anne Marie Waters, Tommy Robinson and their North American Zionist backers

Although UKIP has had Jewish supporters in the past and punished candidates who dared to critique organized Jewry’s impact on the West (see here), I’ve come to the conclusion that Farage is more of a political opportunist when it comes to supporting Jewish issues than anything more sinister. Despite paying lip service to UKIP’s support for Israel (the party does in fact have a Friends of Israel Society), Farage has always been about maintaining power, generating fame and fortune, “chasing skirts,” remaining in the public eye, and seeing Britain sever relations with the autocratic European Union. Farage is, at the end of the day, the consummate showman.

There’s no doubt that Farage benefited from deals he cut with Zionist media magnate Rupert Murdoch, and Jewish smut king turned newspaper and tabloid owner, Richard Desmond, as well as the disproportionately Jewish state-funded British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), with which he conspired to harm the anti-Zionist British National Party, which had two MEPs elected in 2009 — Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons.

However, it is fair to say that Farage’s relationships with Zionist organizations and organized Jewry have been driven by the opportunities they afforded him, rather than anything ideological in nature. I doubt the former UKIP leader has even heard of the Yinon Plan or has the faintest idea that the Neoconservatives he serves when he appears on American Fox News are even Jewish.

Although Farage is as slick as British politicians get politically, colleagues of mine who know him personally, claim that his grasp of geopolitics is weak due to his lack of formal education, and is further attenuated by his self-deceptive political thinking, which enables him to selectively block out truths that interfere with his political aspirations.

In fact, Farage found himself in hot water in the mainstream Zionist Press due to his expressed admiration for Vladimir Putin and — more importantly — his open hostility to the idea of Britain interfering in Syria. If Farage thoroughly understood what his Zionist masters thought about Messrs Putin and Assad, I doubt he would have been so bold. Predictably though, these topics were never broached during his appearances on Fox News or the BBC.

Therefore, it is fair to say that UKIP has been run by sycophants that pander to the wealthy Jewish elite but who nevertheless are not entirely on board with a Zionist foreign policy. To claim the party’s raison d’être is the advancement of the same Zionist and globalist agenda that the American Democratic and Republican Parties unashamedly advance, as some Nationalists claim, would be unfair and untrue.

However, All That Is About To Change…

Over the past few years an Irish-Lesbian identitarian by the name of Anne Marie Waters has advanced upon the British political scene.

Waters first entered the fold as the spokesperson for the National Secular Society. It was during her stint with this far left organization, linked to several British Marxist groups, that she campaigned against the Pope being invited to Britain — acting as a co-signatory of a letter drafted by left wing extremists opposing the Pope’s State Visit.

Along with Waters, the letter was signed by Jewish homosexual extremist, Stephen Fry, Zoe Margolis, and a troop of other left wing anti-Christian atheist zealots and deviants whose hatred of Western civilization rivals that of the Bolsheviks.

Unlike the vast majority of her Leftist comrades, Waters also aligned herself with organizations that were openly hostile to Islam, while simultaneously promoting Israeli interests and defending its appalling record on human rights. (For American readers, think Pamela Geller.) Ms. Waters:

Support of, or sympathy to Israel can make you an immediate enemy to many (on the Left). Israel is the untouchable issue; the consensus from which you can not veer.

I was approached recently by a trade union group which is supportive of Israel (such things do exist but are widely maligned) and asked my opinion on what is labelled on the left as the “Pinkwashing Campaign”. This is a campaign which is represented at ‘Pride’ parades, has vast numbers of supporters among trade unionists, and which aims to highlight what it calls a “PR tactic used by Israel which cynically exploits support for LGBT people.”

The fact that Israel is the only country in the Middle East in which gay people enjoy anything resembling freedom or human rights is apparently a fraud — because the anti-Israel left demands that it be so.

The “No Pinkwashing” campaign explains that “Israeli groups have adopted a strategy which aims to defend Israel by presenting it as modern, democratic and LGBT-friendly, and by demonising surrounding countries.” The truth, it claims, is that Israel is in fact a vicious human rights abuser and of course, an “apartheid state”.

The “No Pinkwashing” campaign essentially wants us to disregard Israel’s human rights record when examining its human rights record. None of it matters anyway because Israel is an “apartheid state” and anything good or democratic in Israel is simply a rouse (quite an elaborate one at that).

Waters’ blind and egregiously hypocritical support of the Jewish ethnostate, as well as what can only be defined as a sheer hatred of Islam (and Christianity for that matter), didn’t sit well with Waters hard-lined Leftist Brighton comrades. So it was at this juncture that Waters launched her foray into mainstream British politics.

But the media-described right winger didn’t join the BNP, the National Front, even the Tory Party or centrist Lib Dems. The Marxist atheist LGBT advocate joined Britain’s traitorous Labour Party, where she immediately began criticizing it for Antisemitism.

Although Waters is now the female face of Britain’s far right, she originally opted for the Labour Party as they were simply the best fit. After all, it’s Ann Marie’s Lesbianism, strident atheism and adherence to Marxist feminist ideology that underpins her identity.

It was while representing the Labour Party that Waters made two failed attempts to be selected as a parliamentary candidate: first in South Swindon for which she gave a member of the Central Committee of the Worker-Communist Party of Iran as her personal reference, and then more recently in 2013, when she attempted to be selected as a Labour prospective Member of Parliament for Brighton.

There are literally dozens of examples of Ms Waters’ support of hard-line left wing causes, ranging from her demand that the Labour party support work strikes, even when they damage the country, to her pathological pursuit of egalitarianism. She’s an ardent supporter of Gay marriage legislation — which she utilized when marrying her (female) partner — has shown extreme hostility towards organised Christianity, taken part in pro-abortion activism in her native Ireland (where it is still illegal to have an abortion), etc.

Bearing all this in mind it’s fair to say that Waters is not the ‘neo fascist’ flag-waving Joan of Arc type, she’s been ludicrously described as in the mainstream media.

In fact the accusation that UKIP is about to be taken over by right wing extremists, has resulted in widespread panic within the party, which was undoubtedly part of the plan.* Things have gotten so bad that 18 of the party’s 20 MEPs, including Farage, have threatened to resign and create a new party if Waters is victorious.

Guardian writer, Danny Cohen, who has about as much grasp of what it means to be a traditional nationalist as Waters, had this to say:

It sounds like the start of a bad stand-up routine. An Irish lesbian feminist walks into Ukip’s HQ and… And the Kippers walk out. Or at least three-quarters of Ukip’s members of the European parliament say they will walk out if Anne Marie Waters becomes their new leader.

Ukip’s politicians are not threatening to resign because Waters is Irish or a lesbian or even a feminist. Despite Nigel Farage’s cloying friendship with Trump and admiration for Putin, despite Ukip’s naked use of racist scaremongering in the Brexit campaign, Ukip politicians are not objecting to Waters because she is left wing, but because she is not nearly left wing enough. Waters has managed a feat many thought impossible — she is too reactionary for Ukip’s leaders to stomach.

When Cohen refers to Waters as left wing as opposed to right wing or nationalistic, he is conflating Zionist-funded single issue nationalism (opposition to Muslim immigration) with genuine nationalism.

Anne Marie is not anti-immigration; she is anti-Muslim immigration. She is not anti-society-destroying social and sexual reengineering. In fact, she supports it! She just dislikes Muslims. She has no issue with the ideological Leftists and Globalists moving other non-Western people into the West, such as non-Muslim Africans. Nor is she opposed to the wars propagated by the same Zionists now funding her, which result in the conditions many Muslims are in fact leaving their homelands.

Waters has in fact said as much: “There is one issue on which Ukip really should now step up to the plate — Islam and Muslim immigration,” Waters’ manifesto, which was launched on Ezra Isaac Levant’s Rebel Media, explains. “The party must publicly acknowledge that Islamic culture is simply not compatible with our own.”

Neither is yours, Ms. Waters. Neither is yours.

Although there are many supporters of the Alt-Right who also unfortunately adhere to left-wing positions on abortion, the EU, and homosexuality — there has always been a homosexual element on the far right — Anne-Marie Waters has about as much in common with genuine European nationalism as the notorious Barbara Spectre. On every last issue — abortion, non-Islamic immigration, gay rights, mandated teaching of homosexuality in schools, etc. — Ms Waters is a dogmatic Bolshevik to the core.

True nationalists, as well as the sorts of people that vote UKIP, have one thing in common with Ms. Waters — a healthy aversion to Islam. Anne Marie Waters has ridden concerns over the dangers posed by the religion of peace—concerns shared with PEGIDA and Tommy Robinson’s English Defense League (EDL)—right to the very top of the United Kingdom Independence Party.

Tommy Robinson taunting Syrians with Israeli military

Unlike genuine nationalists, Waters is in bed with an array of suspicious characters and organizations. From dissident Iranian Marxists who I have reason to believe are funded by hardline Wahhabi backers in the Gulf and Israel, to homosexual action groups based in Britain.

And unlike her political opponents within UKIP, whom I will discuss in Part Two of this essay, Waters is cozy with well-known British Zionist, Tommy Robinson, who has championed her cause on social media, as well as lesser known British based Zionists linked to US Jewish organisations, Paul Weston, Jack Buckby; and most alarmingly, it appears Waters has successfully enlisted the help of Ezra Isaac Levant’s, Rebel Media, the online propaganda outlet from which she launched her UKIP campaign and Manifesto.

I’ll conclude part one by proposing that if Anne Marie Waters had abandoned the relativist left because of its complicity in terrorism, the grooming-gang rapes, Islamic oppression of women, its refusal to oppose misogyny unless blame can be pinned on a White heterosexual capitalist boogeyman, I’d understand her position, perhaps even support her work.

The fact that she literally resigned from the Labour Party due to her unflinching support of Israel — a state with an egregious record on human rights — should tell us all we need to know about Ms. Waters and the hypocrisy rife in her brand of pseudo-nationalism.

End of Part 1

Jack Sen is the cofounder of Resistance Radio. His on-air discussion with former Member of European Parliament, Nick Griffin, on Anne Marie Waters and the Zionist attempted takeover of British politics can be found here.

* There is a belief that UKIP has served its purpose and therefore needs to go. Without a genuinely Eurosceptic party in the fold, there’s literally no one left to fight for a hard Brexit — i.e.,  a Brexit that ends the free movement of people within Europe — is successfully negotiated. If an extremist like Waters is elected leader, the mainstream media will have an excuse not to involve UKIP in its coverage of Brexit negotiations. Without UKIP there would never have been Brexit. Without UKIP remaining relevant, there might not be a proper hard Brexit.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

38 Comments to "If Elected Party Leader, Zionist Anne Marie Waters Will Sound UKIP’s Death Knell, Part 1"

  1. jr's Gravatar jr
    August 25, 2017 - 4:35 pm | Permalink
  2. jr's Gravatar jr
    August 25, 2017 - 5:41 pm | Permalink
  3. David's Gravatar David
    August 25, 2017 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    Is there anyone with whom I do not have significant differences? Thus the elites’ cleverness in encouraging (and funding) a multitude of dichotomous issues. Everyone has sufficient cause, in their minds, to divide themselves from anyone with whom they actually might ally themselves with. Then everyone can lazily put the feet up, turn on the tellie, and shamefully comfort themselves that it always was hopeless anyway.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      August 26, 2017 - 4:09 am | Permalink

      “Is there anyone with whom I do not have significant differences?” – this applies to most on the right in my opinion. I differ from most here in that I cannot take the Palestinian muslim’s side against Israel. I see the muslims as the greater enemy – whilst I would guess that most of the readers here see the Israelis as the greater enemy. But I do not get angry about it, as it is a lesser issue. For me the main issue is: why is the West committing suicide?
      … and once the reason is identified (I cannot accept it is all the Jews, and I regard them merely as willing facilitators who can be told to desist at any time the West decides to stop committing suicide and votes for a different elite) then we can answer the questions (1) is there anything that can be done to stop the suicide? (2) what is the possible scenario for what is going to happen next?

      We live in fast-moving times as people who used to stay out of politics (right-wing individualistic genetically, and with no natural interest in politics, who outnumber those who are left wing genetically and have ALWAYS been totally driven by politics, and so cannot increase their numbers as they are already all fully committed, unlike the genetically-right/individualistic who in the main stayed away from politics) are now being awakened and are taking sides in the coming civil strife.

      It seems to me the key to answer these questions lies in Kevin MacDonald’s theories about our genes controlling our political behaviour, and these genes are different in different races, and they make some races tribal and others individualistic. It is the interplay of these factors (genes determining individualistic or tribal behaviour, plus: the wealth of the nation, the internet weakening the left’s control of the narrative, Islam awakening the political side of the apolitical, the left becoming more extreme) , with Jews having a big say – but not the last word – that will determine what happens next.

      So as David says, in the end we all disagree. That is why we must not be harsh on Tommy Robinson. (1) He is a single -issue campaigner – he does not want his country to become Islamic – is this not a good cause? (2) He highlights the way the elite have made the police turn against the people and have been taken over by the far-left is this not a good cause? Today in his Twitter he writes: “The police are being used as a political tool against our people” And he has 369K followers. (3) He is awakening the apolitical into realising that they are actually right wing types. He has therefore done more for ‘the right’ than those who insist on having such a pure and narrow and rigid definition of ‘right’ that they end up small in number and successfully demonised by the MSM. (4) TR is not an academic, but nevertheless, due to being expert at one thing only (takeover of Britain by Islam) he can successfully defeat on live TV J Paxman and Piers Morgan – two of the elite’s hit men for attacking the Right. So he is very clever and articulate and LIKEABLE and working class, and good at speeches, but please do not also add more for him carry on his shoulders by expecting him also to be a historian and expert on the Jews.

      TR has been taken to Israel and treated like an honoured guest – why should he not be sympathetic to them? See it from his point of view. And the ‘far right’ whatever that means have threatened him and his family, so why should he not respond by opposing them? The Jews have been more friendly to him than the ‘far right’ have. What utter fools these morons in the ’Far Right’ are to behave like this towards him, ie to drive him away from their cause. Is that what they have learned in life – if someone disagrees with you, you threaten to rape their mother (as they did to TR), and this will make him ponder your arguments then perhaps come around to their way of thinking? Really? Punch someone and they will then agree with you? The far-right are sometimes their own worst enemy. (As are the Left and the muslims also – The MSM such as the DM are finding it increasingly hard to portray Antifa in a good light and the Right in a bad light, and to convince their readers to support traitor May and her open border policy. As also are the muslims their own worst enemy, and cannot stop themselves kicking off now instead of waiting until they have twice the number or 10 times. The politicians and BBC are finding it increasingly difficult to portray them as a ROP).

      I doubt TR actually knows the extent to which Jews such as in the ADL in particular are trying to censor the internet – which in the end will include TR’s Twitter and Facebook and youtube videos also! I am sure he has no idea of their ultimate intent.
      But the man has enough on his shoulders already without asking of him to become an expert on Jews also and see through their scheming. I can see his point of view, as I myself until recently always stood up for the Jews. Only my experiences on Breitbart opened my eyes to the way they are actually to a large extent hostile to the West, even to Jew-friendly gentiles in Breitbart offering the hand of friendship (rarely reciprocated), where the Jews cannot stop themselves blurting out their grievances over things that happened 2000 years ago. The eye opener for me was another poster linking to a website showing the Board of Deputies endorsing immigration (non-Jewish immigration) to the West, which I had no idea about. (I kept referring to this from then on in BB to torrents of abusive language completely against the house rules whilst I was always polite and reasonable and logical, then surprisingly the website with the Board of Deputies endorsement disappeared, and I was banned, and the abusive posters not so). I realised that many of the Jews there were hostile and thought ANYTHING and EVERYTHING they did against gentiles was justified. Eg someone mentioned the Bolsheviks and one of them said ‘do you blame them?’ One of them started going on about something the Romans did and I was aghast that others joined in and really did want revenge against ‘somebody’ about it 2000 years later. Something has to account for this strange thinking mode. Then I found Kevin MacDonald’s website and it all made sense – they were like this due to their tribal genes. Their thought patterns are actually different.

      So this is why I sympathise with TR – he is where I was recently. Also, he has loads of black friends from childhood, so he genuinely is the opposite of racist. This is his trump card to protect him from the attacks of the MSM/elite and why he is so useful to the Right – the MSM and the elite cannot pin the ‘racism’ card on him. So he is in fact your biggest ally. Let the Jews take him to Israel and put him on a tank, as on the other hand he is making the people wake up to realise the current elite and MSM are the enemy. So he is helping to guide the people to voting for a different elite – a right wing one. When that is done, then at that stage those Jews who are hostile can be told to desist. But first of all get the new elite in place, and TR is helping to do this. Do not insist that you have everything at once and end up with nothing at all.

      Same applies to Waters – if she gets UKIP voters back to 4 million or more, she will have prevented us sliding back into having all Parties identical in Britain. When UKIP are ‘back in the game’, another leader can replace her. I do not care if the price of this is that all the police cars are painted pink and all the police wear LGBT badges and toilets become M/F/Other. Save the country from mass immigration first. If UKIP get into parliament, their voters will not tolerate her opening the door to Africa – if this is in fact her intention. I accept she is very single issue (Islam) but this is the issue that is awakening the people, and once awake they will turn on the elite and perhaps enable us to get a different elite and that has to be a good thing.

      • Daisy's Gravatar Daisy
        August 26, 2017 - 7:56 pm | Permalink

        Hi Pterodactyl, nice to see you around :-)

        I think the issue with Tommy is that Stephen Yaxley Lennon (his real name) has stated he is Jewish on Twitter. He can be considered controlled opposition: have the West turn on Islam and keep us fighting desert wars for Israel.

        Also, the aim of a war on terror is to usher in the idea of central monitoring and control into the hands of a few, furthering the agenda of the “elite”. During peace time, it’s difficult to reduce civil liberties and protections. But during a “war on terrorism”, it is fairly easy for the PTB to gain massive new powers under the guise of protecting the homeland.

        Last year Israel demanded worldwide internet censorship. After the recent attacks in the UK, Theresa May said “We need to regulate cyberspace.” Coincidence?

        The War on Terror is brought to us by the same criminal gang that brought us WMDs in Iraq among other things. Why are there so many ties between Israel and Isis?

        For starters, Israel provide medical aid to ISIS fighters, then sending them back to fight, maim and whatever else they do.

        Why have Jews in Europe joined ISIS – a supposed Islamic terror organisation?

        Why does ISIS never attack Israel its supposed enemy? Actually, ISIS once fired into the Golan Heights by accident and apologised to Bibi.

        Why does Israel buy most oil from ISIS thus funding it?

        Why were IDF troops found embedded with ISIS including an Israel intelligence colonel in Mosul? Why were Israel-supplied Weapons retrieved from ISIS positions? Why did a Senior Israeli Minister say the West was making a big mistake in attacking ISIS? Why did the Israeli Ambassador to the UN say they preferred ISIS over Assad? Syria accused Israel of helping ISIS and the UN confirmed it.

        ISIS could be destroyed today if the PTB wished, but clearly they don’t, as ISIS is their weapon of choice to unseat Assad, undermine Iran and destroy Israel’s enemies from within.

        It’s also their weapon of choice to strike terror into the West to further introduce elements of a police state. Why was ISIS given an English acronym rather than an Arabic one?

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          August 27, 2017 - 3:45 am | Permalink

          Hi to my friend Daisy who was backing me up on BB at the time (as I did in turn to her!). These days I ‘do my bit’ by placing comments on Youtube.

          I agree that TR is being ‘controlled’ but I suggest that more accurate wording is ‘befriended and guided along by his ‘friends’ in such a way that he sees what they want him to see’ In other words, kept ignorant. But in his heart he is on our side, ie not genetically lefty. He is a recruiter for the Right. For 100 people he brings over to the right, a certain number will end up agreeing more with you than with TR.

          The Jews befriend him and ‘support him’ just as BB has ‘befriended and supports’ the New Right. In other words, they want to be in the middle of it so they can control the narrative, and this means to stop the New Right mentioning the Jewish involvement in our demise. (A task on which they are failing, and one day the indicator of complete failure will be the loss of Holy status for the H-word).

          Which is more likely to win over TR to get him (one day) fully aware of who his real friends and enemies are? (a) attacking him (b) leaving him alone? If the Alt Right use (a) against him it will drive him more and more into his Zionist ‘friends’.

          “Also, the aim of a war on terror is to usher in the idea of central monitoring and control into the hands of a few”

          – And there are other outcomes to ‘the war on terror’ in Afghanistan etc that are all to the harm of the West – Inviting over the populations of these countries into the West after making enemies of them, turmoil and unrest in the world, and stirring up conflict between white Christian countries (Russia and the USA). Many assume the motive of the wars is oil, but it is not worth spending trillions on the Wars to ‘get oil’ – and at the same time opposing fracking and coal mining back home.

          It seems that the enemy within is in charge in all the West (except Poland and Hungary), but we cannot be too harsh on Trump or TR or anyone else that is fooled by the enemy into doing what the enemy wants, for some of the time. Such people are being manipulated against us (Trump/Afghanistan) but deep down they are one of us, which means the motive for the things they do is NOT a hatred of the West, and they do these things from ignorance and manipulation. On the other hand, types like May and Cameron really are against us.

          • Daisy's Gravatar Daisy
            August 27, 2017 - 12:34 pm | Permalink

            Hey Pterodactyl, thanks for your reply and of course your support on BB – you are missed there.

            “And there are other outcomes to ‘the war on terror’ in Afghanistan etc that are all to the harm of the West”.

            Absolutely. As you mentioned, one strategy is to invade the world/invite the world.

            Another consequence of ISIS is that it drives Arabs out of the ‘Greater Israel’ region into the West, and drives ‘Jews’ out of the West into ‘Greater Israel’. A remarkable cohencidence.

            I wish I saw TR in the same light you did, but he did admit he is Jewish on his twitter feed – for which he got rather a lot of stick. I can’t help being concerned that beneath the facade of “one of us” he is helping inflame the West into a clash of civilisation with Islam. Serving as yet another gatekeeper for Jewry.

            Good luck on YT and hope to see you around BB again one of these days.

  4. jr's Gravatar jr
    August 25, 2017 - 6:34 pm | Permalink
  5. Forever guilty's Gravatar Forever guilty
    August 26, 2017 - 1:49 am | Permalink

    “Anne Marie is not anti-immigration; she is anti-Muslim immigration.”

    What’s wrong with that? Honestly, I think Muslim migration its not about Islam, its about the race. Muslim migration = Non White migration. And main danger is: how fast things are changing.

    The racial changes in UK in 15 years is bigger then in previous 50000 years. So, the main danger is actually non White migration. Because its irreversible. Nobody expect these people will be somehow removed from UK.

    So stopping non White migration, it is the most important task, because everything else could be fixed in time.

    • Clare's Gravatar Clare
      August 26, 2017 - 11:18 am | Permalink

      So you are fine with Nigerian Christian immigration? A major part of non-white migrants entering the UK are still non-Muslim.
      How about AMW’s desire to see abortion extended into the third term? Are you fine with that, as well? How about her hatred of Christianity and desire to see tradition stripped from the country, her hard lined feminist and LGBT activism. Anne-Marie Waters is a Marxist. There’s nothing even remotely conservative or pro Western about her ideology. In fact, she condemned the Labour Party for not encouraging more strikes a few years back. If it is only about Islamic immigration for you, then Ben Shapiro’s site is probably a better bet than sites that aim to expose Zionist hegemony over nationalist movements.

      • Forever guilty's Gravatar Forever guilty
        August 26, 2017 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

        “So you are fine with Nigerian Christian immigration? “
        Absolutely not

        “A major part of non-white migrants entering the UK are still non-Muslim.”
        I didn’t know that.

        I also think LGBT activities are part of anti White Agenda. But there are priorities, if the Ship is sinking, the first, what should be done its trying to patch a hole, to prevent flooding of the ship.

      • Jude's Gravatar Jude
        August 27, 2017 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

        Great point about Nigerian immigration Clare. As with the UK a huge proportion of immigration to Ireland is non Muslim: Nigerian (and other sub-Saharan Africans, Hindu, Chinese, Mongolian, Mauritian etc). I believe the same is true of many western countriesd Focussing on Muslim immigration carries the danager of tacitly implying that other forms of immigration are fine. As I understand it the same is true of many western countries.

        Also the EDL has made it clear that it does not object to Islam as such, but to “extremism”. In modern Neocon parlance “extremism” translates as oppostion to the Greater Israel project, the surveillance state, and Antifa style “anti-racism” – not to mention children having their gentitals chopped off in obeissance to the LGBTQ agenda. So EDL style “anti-extremism” is a way of luring unsuspecting opponents of mass immigration into the big tent of cultural Marxism

  6. Clare's Gravatar Clare
    August 26, 2017 - 4:16 am | Permalink

    Intelligent analysis of a crucially important topic. The mainstream media does not give the public such in-depth information, and the public should be informed of this destructive woman’s aims and motives. Well-researched and most informative. Thank you for your continued efforts to give us real news.

  7. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    August 26, 2017 - 8:14 am | Permalink

    I don’t think any Zionist can ever be any kind of nationalist other than a Jewish nationalist. To call a British nationalist, American nationalist, French nationalist or any other nationalist a Zionist nationalist negates his claim to be anything else other than a Zionist in my opinion. I don’t think he/she has to be anti-Zionist necessarily, although it would remove any questions of dual-loyalty. I’ve never heard of British, French or American nationalists for instance, explicitly stating that they are Icelandic, Latvian or Palestinian nationalists (God forbid) for instance.

    In my opinion, Zionists have the weakest claim of anyone to be nationalists. The land they live on was stolen from Arabs not very long ago on the weakest of claims (Biblical claims) and Jews hostility, attitudes and policies towards Europeans (leading multiculturalism) may cause Europeans to become extinct in the next few decades if things don’t change soon. More than anyone else, Great Britain allied with Jews and created Israel and the only thing that has gotten them is a great reputation around the world (as opposed to their German opponents). It lost them several soldiers to Jewish terrorists in 1948, lost them their bankrupted empire at the end of WW II and since then they’ve lost most of their manufacturing, and despite the Jews often praising them for “standing up to Hitler” (a stupid statement since they were the aggressors), they’re still called anti-Zionists, anti-Semitic or something similar if the Jews don’t like what they say or do. And like other Europeans, under Jewish pressure are forced to send their children to Auschwitz so the next generation will bow down to every Jewish wish also.

    Any British, German or any other European nationalist that calls himself a Zionist is a traitor in my opinion, because Jews have hurt the European peoples tremendously. I’m not sure exactly what kind of policy I advocate for Israel, but it does not include an alliance or any favoritism against their Arab enemies. It would be the position of a disinterested party and neutral negotiator whose number one interest is to secure peace in the middle east. This would require Israel and Jews to give up land and also to open their nuclear arms facilities to international inspection, like every other country in the world. Until that happens, Europeans and other peoples will not be in charge and the facts demonstrate Jews continue to rule

    • August 26, 2017 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

      Thanks for your comment. Agree with everything you’ve written.

      • Peter's Gravatar Peter
        August 27, 2017 - 5:26 am | Permalink

        You’re welcome.

      • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
        August 28, 2017 - 12:22 am | Permalink

        Hi Jack, I saw your interview with Brian Ruhe earlier today and it was an eye opener. Nice to learn about your experience and that you had to come all the way to NYC to experience DIE-versity and also to become very jew conscious. I look forward to hearing from you in the future, which I am sure is very promising. I have a friend who is Indian but mostly of Euro blood, a Catholic and he is more pro white than the other pure whites I know. You remind me of him. He is more interested in preserving western civilization than other whites. He too had to have a bad experience with jews and blacks to realize that they are all interested in destroying western civilization.

        • Jack Sen's Gravatar Jack Sen
          August 29, 2017 - 5:20 am | Permalink

          Hi Frank, Thanks for your kind words and taking the time to read my article. I am also glad you were able to catch my interview on how I “became Jew Wise” on Brian Ruhe’s YT channel. Although I am part Indian, it does not define me in any way. Apart from enjoying the occasional plate of samosas, I have no ties whatsoever to India, and although non-Muslim Indians are as you’ve noted far better than Mexicans and Blacks, if I had my way I’d shut all immigration down-apart from perhaps what’s needed to satisfy skills voids. Growing up in NY was a real eye opener for me. I distinctly recall my mother pining for her homeland, a place I sadly had little connection to, apart from the glorious summers we spent in rural England. I recall dreading to have to go back to NY when we were nearing the end of our summer holidays. I loathed living in ‘melting pot’ NY and within a year of graduating university, I left. Sadly hostile Jewish elites have infected the minds of people to such an extent, most folks would rather sacrifice their homelands than appear ‘racist’. It’s now our job to bring them back from the dark side. We live in dark times. Thanks again for your kind comment.

          • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
            August 30, 2017 - 2:08 am | Permalink

            Hi Jack, Thanks for the reply. I appreciate you taking the time to do so.
            I really hate NYC. Such a cesspit. I like looking at the old pics of NYC when it was a white city and people dressed nicely. Thanks to the immigration act of 1965, NYC has changed from a white city into a multiculti cesspit. I am just surprised that living in London did not make you jew wise or aware of DIE-versity. Maybe you should have become a US citizen. Then you could have run for political office here if the UK did not work out. I love rural England. Glad that such places still exists. I like old pictures of England as well. When I went to London many years ago, it was a nice city, but certain parts were bad. I can see from recent pics it has become terrible.
            I too love ethnic food. So maybe one day we can share a plate of samosas. Oh btw, I wasn’t saying that non muslim indians are nice. i meant even the Indian/non white professionals were liberal and support anti white parties like the democrats. So if you think there is a void in job skills, first look to white people from white countries to fill the position, then get a non white, but no bringing the family or tribe along. Also no birthright citizenship or chain migration.
            If you get a chance, please let us know what your parents and sister or other family members think of your work. I guess the comments to this article will be closing soon. If I have any ideas to help you with your work, i will find some way to get them to you. God Bless and Cheers!!!!

      • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
        August 28, 2017 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

        Jack, I saw your interview with Dr. Kevin MacDonald and I just had one thing to say besides it being a very insightful interview, what I feel is that we do not need anymore third worlders in the west. You said you were not talking professional line IT workers from Bombay or rich arabs from where ever, but these are people who will ever assimilate and if you research these so called highly intelligent IT workers and educated non whites, they tend to vote for the parties that are very anti white and anti western. Here in the US they mostly vote for the Democrats or for RINO republicans. Even my Euro indian friend who is like you is of the opinion that no more non whites should be allowed. Educated or uneducated we do not need them . If whites were to come into another white country like Canada, USA, Australia or NZ, they need to prove that they are not anti white or liberal. We cannot have more liberals in our midst that will undermine us from within and mostly importantly no jews. If you would like to talk further I can always send you my email. My other email, not the one listed here.

        • Jack Sen's Gravatar Jack Sen
          August 30, 2017 - 11:16 am | Permalink

          Hi Frank, Thanks for your kind words. I flirted with the idea of becoming a US citizen after I discovered Colorado in between my freshman and sophomore yr at Syracuse due to how fabulous the place and traditional people were but I have no regrets at this juncture…although I will say that the US is an exciting, albeit troublesome, place to live right now. I would have loved to have gotten involved in American politics and am sure if I had, youd have seen me in Charlottesville standing up for those glorious Confederate statues and free speech. Several close friends of mine in fact were there on the day. Thanks for your supportive words and if you want to stay in touch and are on Facebook please just send me a message. I have several like pages as well as a personal page. please just reference this communication….
          And my sister loathes my politics, refusing to even speak with me, while my mother is 100% on board. Thanks again

          • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
            August 31, 2017 - 2:32 am | Permalink

            Hi Jack, Nice to hear from you again. If your Green Card is still current, then you could probably move here and become a citizen, after 5 years, but then would you want that hassle of being away from the UK for 5 years is the question.

            If you were in Charlottesville on a Green Card, you would have been deported. That is why many non whites become citizens and then they start their nonsense because they cannot be deported unless they do something really bad like joining ISIS.

            Colorado is a beautiful place, but it is filled with illegals and also the white liberals that fled California, are now destroying Colorado by electing liberals and supporting liberal policies. So that beautiful state is going down. The UK has a lot of history and is also an exciting place. I am an Anglophile. I am not ashamed to say that.

            Just cannot understand why Queen Elizabeth-2 cannot put an end to all this nonsense. You know Henry VIII or QE-1 would not put up with all this multicultural nonsense. She better take a stand against this or a black or muslim will be sitting on her throne instead of Prince Charles. Pity that Harry is dating Meghan Markle.

            I am on Facebook and I just saw your page. You have a lot of friends from all round the world. Even as far as India, South Africa and other places. Did not know you were popular there. Funny thing is why some non whites (like Hindus and blacks) would support a British Nationalist. Maybe they know that they need to be grateful for British colonialism for making their lives better.

            I wish I could add you there, but I have to be careful since for jobs they monitor people’s facebook and also who their friends are. If you are fine, i can make another facebook page and add you , so that it is independent from my personal
            fb page. If you have an email where fans can email you, I can email you there. I looked but you do not have any email listed. So which do you prefer email or FB???

            Frank and Beans is just a moniker, so when i email or facebook you, i will reference this communication so that you know it is me.

            BTW, you have a beautiful family and you need to have more kids. I am almost finished listening to your Red Ice interview along with Nick Griffin ‘The Battle for the Future of Europe.’ Nick says that native brits are not having kids and so nationalists like you need to lead by example and have more kids.

            I am glad that you mum is on board. I guess she knows what the UK was like before this mess came into being. Too bad your sis is not on board with you. I guess the liberals in the American Colleges must have got to her. Hope she is married to a European guy and has kids. At least that would be a blessing. Maybe she will come around one day. What does your dad say?
            I too have family members who are so stubborn that I would rather talk to a brick wall. Also, I do not talk to one liberal cousin. Sometimes it is for the best.

            God Bless and Cheers. You have my support 100%. Western civilization must be saved.

  8. Rupert Umpleby's Gravatar Rupert Umpleby
    August 26, 2017 - 11:25 am | Permalink

    Anne-Marie Waters appears prominently on “Real Clear Israel Radio”, a hasbara outfit designed to promote a positive image of Israel and to infiltrate, corrupt and instrumentalize nationalist movements in Europe.

    http://therealclearisrael.org/tag/anne-marie-waters/

    • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
      August 31, 2017 - 2:33 am | Permalink

      Too bad she is a Israel supporter.

  9. Buddy Rojek's Gravatar Buddy Rojek
    August 26, 2017 - 2:40 pm | Permalink

    I would not mind working in UK , but as an Australian with 50% British ancestry, I can’t get a work visa. I have to be a black muslim transvestite to get a working visa.

    So why is the Queen of England also the Queen of Australia, and we can’t get working rights?

    • Edwin's Gravatar Edwin
      August 27, 2017 - 2:38 am | Permalink

      Hi, I have worked with a number of Australian’s, in Britain.
      They claim to be of British descent but struggle with the name of the village their great granny came from.
      Unfortunately I have found them poor technically and rather slippery, can’t help feeling their careers had come to an end in Oz.
      If you r good at your job, I am sure you could get in.

      • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
        August 30, 2017 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

        Edwin, you are right. Aussies I have met are rude and mostly uncouth. They are also slippery as you have rightfully noted. If they want to be with us, they need to shed off their bad points and get on the bandwagon. I guess when their country becomes more DIE-verse that will happen.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      August 27, 2017 - 2:55 am | Permalink

      Buddy – because the people of Australia and the people of Britain have voted for traitors who hate their country to be in charge, and when traitors who hate them are in charge of immigration, they do everything they can to stop white immigration. The people of Holland have also voted for politicians who refuse to give any preference to white S.Africans of Dutch descent returning to Holland – even when the racist black tribes in S.Africa are persecuting them and many intend full genocide against them – while the white West looks on and says ‘I hope none of those whites being stabbed to death say anything racist against their attackers whilst they are being stabbed’. The current leaders of Holland would rather see their own people in S.Africa killed in genocide than let more whites into Holland.

      This is essentially the reason for the suicide of the West – stupid selfish voters who cannot see beyond either (a) their welfare payment if they are poor or (b) the value of their property if they are rich – these stupid selfish voters stupidly voting for people who HATE them and their country to RULE them. Basically, the majority are letting their left wing minorities trample all over them, and even seeing their historic statues being torn down does not waken them from their stupidity.

    • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
      August 27, 2017 - 4:21 pm | Permalink

      For your information: The Queen is NOT the “Queen of Australia”, and never has been, but only the nominal Head of State – which is a completely different political title and function. For Australia, the title is, and will certainly continue to be, a completely powerless, symbolic and figurehead role only – in accordance with the expressed voter/survey wishes of a majority of Australians for many years past. Therefore the question of “working rights” is one decided entirely by the joint economic and diplomatic agreements of the British and Australian governments, and has no relevance whatever to the role of the Royal Family in the UK.

      • August 31, 2017 - 3:25 pm | Permalink

        Some years ago, a news item stated that the Queen intervened in Australia, I think to ensure a politician – I’d guess probably a crypto-Jew – must not be removed from his anti-white post. (My gloss). Completely powerless?

  10. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    August 26, 2017 - 11:57 pm | Permalink

    The one thing that Waters, Nuttall, Robinson and MacDonald have in common is that all have quit the Catholic faith.

    This is something that the post-Vatican II Church doesn’t seem to grasp. When Catholics lapse today they don’t just leave and sit patiently in a docile state waiting for a nice Pope like Francis to welcome them back. No, they double down. The result is Mr Robinson playing banjo on an Israeli tank singing doggerel penned by yet another lapsed Catholic, Noel Gallagher from Manchester, England.

    Is there a gene to explain all of this?

  11. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    August 27, 2017 - 2:56 am | Permalink

    Jack Sen (or others) – who should we vote for as UKIP leader?

    • August 27, 2017 - 6:08 am | Permalink

      That’s the tragedy in all of this. There is literally no one with a reasonable chance of winning that deserves our vote. The front-runner, Peter Whittle, is only marginally better than Waters, also gay and although not directly beholden to Jewish interests, is just as driven by his homosexual identity as AMW. John Reece Evans is probably the best of the bunch due to the fact he is a proponent of the right to keep and bear arms, and his aversion to the LGBT agenda and military background interests.

  12. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    August 27, 2017 - 8:00 am | Permalink

    Simply put, the Jewish controlled left destroys our homelands and culture while the Jewish controlled right uses our young men to fight wars for Israel.

    • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
      September 1, 2017 - 2:05 am | Permalink

      So true Karen, They are all over the place. A few are good though.

  13. Ron Kukal's Gravatar Ron Kukal
    August 28, 2017 - 6:40 am | Permalink

    As a USS Liberty survivor I appeal to the British people to hear Jack Sen’s voice. He certainly knows of our dilemma, that has lasted for fifty years now. Wake up Britain to the real truth, Jack has it.

    • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
      August 30, 2017 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

      Ron Kukal, That is great. Maybe you should write an article for TOO and have them put it on their website. We all would like to hear what really happened on the USS Liberty.

  14. celt darnell's Gravatar celt darnell
    September 1, 2017 - 4:53 pm | Permalink

    Whatever my reservations regarding Farage, no-one deserves more credit for getting us out of the EU than him — and for that he has my gratitude and respect.

    The reservations, however, still remain:

    1) UKIP never managed, under Farage’s leadership, to get beyond being a single-issue party.

    Yes, I’ve read their manifestos — there was good stuff in them — but in the end, they found themselves identified with one issue and one issue only. Thus, when the referendum was won and both the Tories and Labour ran on a promise to honour the referendum’s result, UKIP was left high and dry. That was a failure on the part of Farage.

    2) Farage was too keen on cultivating a cult of personality.

    Before I get attacked for this, I know UKIP party members and I know a lot of long-time Brexiteers (people who voted ‘no’ in 1975 and never gave up the fight) who walked away from UKIP because of Farage’s behaviour in this respect. The author points out that Farage was a showman. Indeed, and that was the problem, it meant UKIP was never a genuine political party but a celebrity cult. Again, when Farage stepped down as leader, we saw the results.

    Both of the above led to 3) Because it never became a political party proper, UKIP was all over the shop on issues such as immigration, Islam, homosexuality, the economy, local government, etc. A genuine political party has a broad platform to which it consistently adheres — at least for a couple of decades. UKIP could barely manage ten weeks.

    I actually believe there’s still a massive opportunity for a genuine British national party to make significant inroads — especially given the state both the Tories and Labour, thanks to their respective leaders, are in.

    Alas, I doubt very much said party will be UKIP.

Comments are closed.