If Elected Party Leader, Zionist Anne Marie Waters Will Sound UKIP’s Death Knell, Part 2

Jack Sen

Over the past few years Ann-Marie Waters, an Irish LGBT activist, backed by Ezra Levant’s Rebel Media, Tommy Robinson and a cabal of Jewish nationalists with irrefutable ties to American Neoconservative organisations, has advanced upon the British political scene.

Waters, an ardent Marxist, first entered the fold as the spokesperson for the British-based left wing National Secular Society (NSS), attacking her host nation’s traditional mores, Christian faith and British values. Waters pushed the usual litany of aggressive LGBT demands that Cultural Marxists routinely package as genuine civil rights grievances from her position with the NSS.

Recognising the fact that she needed the backing of an established political organization, to make any real headway in British politics, Waters then joined the Labour Party where she set her sights on standing in Britain’s parliamentary elections.

Things progressed until Waters’ dogmatic allegiance to the advancement of LGBT causes and hostility towards Islam (the latter quite sensible but unusual on the left) eventually proved to be fatal her chances of becoming part of the Party’s inner circle.

Waters’ refusal to embrace every last aspect of society-destroying liberalism ultimately resulted in resounding electoral failure, and in her being pushed out of the Party.

After two failed attempts to be selected as her party’s parliamentary candidate – first in Britain’s Gay capital, Brighton, and then in South Swindon in Wiltshire, South West England, relying upon a reference she procured from an Iranian Marxist dissident – Waters quit the Labour Party.

In an Open Letter on the Dispatch International website Waters explained her decision to leave the Party.

I joined the Labour Party because I believed that all people should have equal rights, and should never be disadvantaged as a result of characteristics that they cannot change. I believed that people should have the same rights and protections irrespective of their gender or skin colour. I believed in fairness and in justice. I believed in civil liberties and a government run by the people for the people.

I still believe in those things, which is why I cannot, in any good conscience, remain a member of the Labour Party.

Although Waters attempted to pinkwash her actual reason for leaving Labour with “gender” this, “skin colour” that, and other leftist tosh and twaddle, her problematic relationship with the Labour Party brass had far more to do with how their street activists view Israel than anything else.

Waters, in fact, discussed her fall from grace with the Left in her own private blog in a piece entitled, ‘Israel and Gay Rights’.

It is said that while it is hard to stand up to your enemies, it is even harder to stand up to your friends. I spent many years at the heart of left wing politics and discovered, to my cost, what can happen when you begin to take a different view, when you do your research and realise that the accepted consensus isn’t necessarily correct; speaking out on this can result in rejection, expulsion from the club.

There is no area where this so robustly applies among the hard left than that of the state of Israel. Support of or sympathy for Israel can make you an immediate enemy to many. Israel is the untouchable issue; the consensus from which you cannot veer.

The fact that Israel is the only country in the Middle East in which gay people enjoy anything resembling freedom or human rights is apparently a fraud — because the anti-Israel left demands that it be so.

As far back as 1963, Israel declared that it would not apply any of the homophobic laws on its books — much of them in existence due to British mandate [further evidence of Waters’ contempt for traditional Britain]. This was four years prior to the decriminalisation of homosexuality in Britain. In 1992 LGBT people were protected from discrimination in the workplace — also, before it happened in Britain. In 1994 same-sex partners were given the same benefits as straight couples in the private sector, and three years later in the public sector. The Israeli military rescinded any discrimination against gay people serving soon afterwards, and in 2002 the age of consent was equalised at 16. Lesbian couples were given the right to adopt each other’s children (conceived through artificial insemination) in 2005. There are openly gay judges, Members of Parliament (the Knesset), and many LGBT public personalities and celebrities. Dana International, a transgendered woman, represented Israel in the Eurovision contest in 1998, and won. In 2012 Tel Aviv was voted (in an online poll) as the world’s number one destination for gay travellers.

Contrast all of this with the Palestinian territories and their leadership, so beloved of the hard left. In the Gaza Strip, ruled with an iron fist by Hamas, not only are women subject to appalling treatment, but homosexuality can result in death. In 2011 Hamas cofounder, Mahmoud Zahar, said, “You in the West do not live like human beings. You do not even live like animals. You accept homosexuality. And now you criticize us?” Attacks are frequent in the Gaza Strip and gays live in fear; so much so that LGBT Palestinians commonly flee to Israel.

Why is there no civil marriage in Israel?

A common theme at the Occidental Observer, and one that I also try to explore in my writing, is one that exposes duplicitous hypocrisy. And I can think of no more egregious example than Ms Waters’ nonsensical claim that Israel is the Middle East’s bastion of human rights and personal freedom. Quite clearly she is interested in the the rights of only one group — gender non-conformists. In her eyes, Palestinians are worthy of any sort of mistreatment by Israel, including apartheid and ethnic cleansing regularly condemned by the UN, if they do not hold liberal views on LGBT issues.

In response to the United Nations Economic and Social Commission’s decision to officially refer to Israel as an ‘apartheid-state’ Ms Waters chose to ignore Israel’s grotesque record on human rights and instead admonished South Africa’s former nationalist government who have now been out of power for almost a quarter of a century!

The Pinkwash campaign slogan is “No Pride in Israeli Apartheid”. Perhaps it should be, “There is no Apartheid in Israel” (which is not as catchy, I grant you). Apartheid made its name in the appalling regime of South Africa from 1948 to 1994; a regime not remotely comparable to that of Israel today. In South Africa white people enjoyed rights and privileges that black citizens were denied. Racist laws forced black and white to live in separate areas, attend separate schools, and discriminated in terms of ownership, the holding of public office, and voting.

The fact that international condemnation of Israel is due to the ethno-state’s barbaric treatment of the indigenous Palestinian population — most of whom are Muslim — and not the oppression of the nation’s vibrant LGBT community, is the obvious explanation of Waters’ improbity.

Waters, Robinson, Weston regularly appear on a Canadian radio station linked to Leftist turned NeoCon, David Horowitz.

Ms Waters, as one would expect from a Marxist feminist and secularist, actively campaigned for marriage equality in Great Britain and native Ireland — equality that enabled her to marry her lesbian partner — yet remained curiously silent on Israel’s strikingly egregious record on marriage. In fact Israel is the only democratic nation on earth where civil marriage is unavailable due to the monopoly the Rabbinical Courts have on the institution. Every time a bill has been proposed that would implement civil marriage (one that would still forbid Jews marrying someone from the nation’s non-Jewish population, mind you) it’s been rejected by the Knesset plenum, meaning Israeli Jews cannot even marry one another, unless the union is sanctioned by the Rabbinical Courts.

Hiddush, a left wing Israel-based NGO whose mission is “promoting religious freedom and equality in Israel,” ranked the Jewish ethno-state as “the only Western democracy that is on a par with Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and other Wahhabi Islamic states when it comes to freedom of marriage”, due to the fact that it remains a criminal offense for Jews in Israel to marry outside the state’s religious authority. Doing so can result in incarceration for up to two years.

I wonder if Ms Waters knows this or if she has noticed that the sovereign Islamic nations her beloved Israel regularly threatens — Syria, Lebanon etc. — are NOT on that list.

Based on statistics it tabulated from reports conducted by Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics, Hiddush claims that that there are 364,000 immigrants from the former Soviet Union that cannot even get married in Israel. And they are predominantly Jews!

In fact, after spending several hours reviewing halakha (Jewish religious law which legislates marriage in Israel), I think it’s reasonable to say that Israeli Orthodox Rabbinical Courts have more in common with the Sharia Law Courts Ms Waters claims she fights against than the English Common Law that’s afforded her the ability to arrive on British soil as an immigrant and attack our values and Christian beliefs. (see Part 1 of this essay for Ms Waters’ position on abortion, gay marriage and adoption, her contempt for the Church, etc.)

Although one will struggle to find mention of the inhumanity of Israel’s marriage laws in the Western media, tales of discrimination are rife and easily sourced when one looks at left -Jewish newspapers. It took me literally one Google search and a few clicks on resulting links to find dozens of stories of blatant discrimination perpetrated against Sephardic Jews, Arabs, and other gentiles of all denominations by Israel’s Rabbinical courts. One need only look at what Ivanka Trump had to go through just to wed Jared Kushner to get an idea how strict these people are.

Haaretz’s, Amiram Barkat writes:

Irina Plotnikov (an Ashkenazim from Russia) cannot marry the man she loves, Shmuel Cohen (member of Israel’s Rabbinical class), even though she is Jewish according to halakha (Jewish religious law). A Rabbinic court in Jerusalem ruled recently that even though Plotnikov is Jewish she is not eligible to marry a Cohen since her father is not Jewish. According to Jewish tradition, people with the surname Cohen are descendants of the priests that served in the Temple in Jerusalem 2,000 years ago.

When the couple registered at the rabbinate, the marriage registrar referred Plotnikov to a Rabbinic court for a process for ascertaining Jewishness. This is a procedure which all immigrants from the [former Soviet Union] are required to undergo if they want to marry. After presenting documents and hearing testimony from witnesses on Plotnikov’s behalf, the Rabbinic court confirmed that Plotnikov is Jewish and single, and ruled that “she can be married in accordance with Jewish tradition, except to a Cohen. Since civil marriage and non-Orthodox religious marriage in Israel are not legally recognized, the sole option remaining to the couple is to wed overseas.

Israeli restriction on marrying a Cohen makes the Nuremberg laws look lax. Perhaps the happy Jewish couple should have traveled to Britain, even Syria or Iran, where they would in fact have been permitted to marry! Yes, Jews can in fact marry in Iran.

I wonder if Ms Waters is aware that Iran is home to the largest number of Jews anywhere in the Middle East outside Israel? And that they can marry there!

Whether Anne-Marie Waters’ contempt for anti-Semitism in the Labour Party was behind her decision to leave the party, or something she simply manufactured once Jewish support started pouring in, we will never know.

One thing we can be sure of though, and that is that Ms Waters cares little about human rights or genuine marriage equality, especially when it’s being violated by Israel.

It was somewhere during this murky period of her transformation from Marxist Lesbian identitarian and Labour parliamentary candidate to media-ordained leader of the British far right, that Waters first publicly teamed up with Tommy Robinson — the openly pro-Zionist street protester covered relentlessly by the establishment and controlled alternative press.

Robinson Rebel Media

It was also during this period that Waters wandered into UKIP meetings in Croydon, held by the right-wing populist party’s former Commonwealth spokesman, Winston McKenzie, where she immediately asked to be granted the opportunity to run for office. Within 6 months of standing for the left-wing Labour Party on a platform that prioritized extending abortion limits, railroad nationalization and advancing LGBT causes, Waters was seeking the right-wing UKIP parliamentary nomination, by promising her predominantly conservative constituents she’d curtail Islamic immigration and shut mosques.

I set-up and ran the new UKIP Branch of Croydon North & Lambeth. As we had many new members arriving, I recall initiating training courses for potential candidates on behalf of the Party. Anne-Marie Waters was one such local resident who arrived at my monthly meetings.

After a couple of months, I began to tutor Waters on media and presentation. Although she was a natural, I encountered a point during this intense period of training, where she seemed to exhibit an unnerving bias and hostility against men … . Her delivery, in my personal opinion, was aggressive and spiteful. She was a bitter woman and not a patriot for England.

McKenzie, who is himself an outspoken critic of London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Islam, noted that “other than her policy on Muslim immigration, Waters seemed to talk about little else.”

That’s because apart from her stance on Islam, Marie is a left wing ideologue….

Since infiltrating McKenzie’s Croydon meetings, Anne-Marie Waters has twice been deselected as a candidate by UKIP — first for appearing on stage with proscribed Zionist troublemakers and interlopers while launching PEGIDA UK (see picture above), and then again this June by party leader Paul Nuttall, who realized he’d opened Pandora’s box by allowing Waters into the party in the first place.

The prospect of having an anti-immigration Lesbian Labour defector who ticks all the right rainbow-colored boxes representing your party at the London Assembly will cloud sound judgement. In all fairness, no one could have predicted that within a year of entering the party Waters would be in a position to lead it. Even the top legal minds of UKIP are not geopolitically astute enough to recognise the power and influence media outlets like Rebel Media wield.

Sadly, in spite of her antics and the dangerous people and organisations she is connected to, there’s absolutely nothing in the party’s bylaws that prohibits Waters from standing for the leadership election.

And the rest as they say is history….

Ms Waters is now but a few weeks away from hijacking UKIP from the genuine patriots who still support it, and the men and women that built it.

If victorious, Ms Waters will receive loads of free airtime to proclaim how badly Jews are treated in Britain, how wonderful Israel is on human rights, and most importantly, how the West must continue to give the Jewish ethno-state its unwavering financial support, even if it means militarily backing Israeli aggression towards Iran and Syria.

This, at the end of the day, is why the Rebel Media and Zionist organisations based in North America and Israel, who have absolutely no business meddling in our domestic political affairs, fund shills like Anne-Marie Waters.

Jack Sen is the cofounder of Resistance Radio (link www.resistanceradio.tv). Resistance Radio unabashedly confronts Zionist hegemony over Western civilisation, featuring regular recordings from Jack Sen, former MEPs Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons, as well as readings from Dr Kevin MacDonald, interviews with Jared Taylor, John de Nugent, Edward O’Sullivan, Dr Andrew Joyce, Paul Rimmer and nationalists from around the globe.

Additional notes

Although I have known Winston McKenzie for some time and count him as a friend, initially when writing this story, I had no idea he even knew Ms Waters. It came up organically during a conversation we were having on a separate issue.

The front-runner, Peter Whittle, who currently serves as UKIP’s Deputy Leader, is only marginally better than Waters, also Gay and although not directly beholden to Jewish interests, is just as driven by his homosexual identity as Waters.

Former UKIP leader, Nigel Farage, who earlier ruled himself out of the contest, warned that candidates like Waters and Whittle would “take the party to a dark place” from which there’d be no return.

Ideologically, candidate, John Rees-Evans, is UKIP’s best bet as he is a proponent of the right to keep and bear arms, is widely viewed as someone who says what he feels and has been criticized in the Press for being insensitive to the LGBT community, and has somewhat of a military background. Rees-Evans, in fact, owns a bunker and shooting range in Bulgaria and would put a bit of personality and masculinity back into the Party.

Currently, there are two single issue anti-Muslim parties, three if you include political organisations like the English Defence League. Between them their leadership spends more time in the back of a police car than they do in the political conversation. A third party will divide their vote and support even farther.

Le Pen’s Front National succeeded as they were politically sound on an array of issues, combined with the fact that they were the sole electable party pushing the notion that Islam is culturally incompatible with the West. Conversely, none of the aforementioned parties have a legitimate chance of electoral success, due to the fact they are single issue parties run by politically inconsequential figures.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

31 Comments to "If Elected Party Leader, Zionist Anne Marie Waters Will Sound UKIP’s Death Knell, Part 2"

  1. Jason's Gravatar Jason
    September 12, 2017 - 10:27 am | Permalink


    This is an excellent article. Thanks for the great job you have done, Sir.

    She did not decide to infiltrate the UKIP on her own. I am sure her Jewish paymasters paid her and told her to infiltrate the UKIP to try to destroy it from within, as UKIP is the only mainstream party a bit to the right of the tories in UK, the latter having already been hijacked by the Judaists.

    So this article needs to be spread far and wide so the British people wake up and realize this.

    Jewish plan: “Defile, then destroy” – O’ Connor.

    • September 13, 2017 - 4:05 am | Permalink

      A sincere thanks for your kind words. Infiltrators the media promote at our expense like Waters need to be exposed. Although many genuine patriots know what Ms Waters is all about, the vast majority sadly have been thoroughly hoodwinked.Her arrival in UKIP is about as organic as Robinson’s in the EDL and PEGIDA. Hopefully this article, which illustrates her hypocrisy, will reach enough people to make a difference in the forthcoming leadership election. Thanks again for your comment.
      Note- the link to my radio channel in the article appears not to work. It should be http://www.resistanceradio.tv
      Thanks, Jack

      • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
        September 15, 2017 - 1:51 am | Permalink

        Hi Jack, it is Frank again. I added you on FB. I sent you a message, but you have not replied. Did you get it? Also, just wanted to ask all those non whites in your list, are they really your supporters? I am Franeric on your FB friend’s list. Also, i saw the video of you and Nick griffin with Red Ice and you were talking about people not having kids in the UK. I am hoping you will have more. 1 is not enough. You should be having kids by the boatload. BTW, you have a lovely family

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      September 13, 2017 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

      “this article needs to be spread far and wide”

      I was wrong about Waters, initially intending to vote for her until I read Jack Sen’s earlier article. What I have done since then is go to Tommy Robinson’s Twitter, and when he endorses Waters I write a few Twitter replies to other Twitter users, saying, for example:

      “in 2013 she attempted to be selected as a Labour prospective Member of Parliament for Brighton”



      As LABOUR candidate S Swindon she gave a member of the Central Committee of the Worker-Communist Party of Iran as reference

      OCC article

      For some Twitter users they will get indignant at first that I should question someone endorsed by TR, as if somehow that makes me a supporter of Sharia Law in Britain, but then after one of the quotes above they go silent. And some of them retweet my comments to their own followers. If they do, the quote can reach their own thousands of followers (as oppose to my 20 or so!)

      Incidentally, I do not think TR has thought deeply about this issue and is not really an expert on the JQ. Basically he is a single issue expert ie Islam. Therefore he approaches it from a position of ignorance and not from a deep inner commitment to the JQ. Basically they are befriending him and financing him (so they can control the narrative Breitbart style – and perhaps some might even want to get something on him that can be used against him if he ever ceases to remain loyal to their cause) – so they are befriending him whilst at the same time some fools in the far-right use different tactics: namely, threatening him with violence – thereby alienating him. It is hard to say to someone who threatens you with physical violence ‘okay I will consider your views’. Threatening is not how to ‘win friends and influence people’. All these types who threaten TR have done is drive him into the arms of others like Rebel Media. I just hope that when his eyes are opened he will not be in their power. Note how the Scientologists befriended Tom Cruise, and now I would guess have a few secrets about him that means he is vulnerable if he ever wants to leave them.

      TR overall helps the alt-right, as a recruiter, as it is a journey that he puts people on, but they can carry on one or two bus stops after his. The issue of Islam is awakening the people to force them to think about politics, and nearly all awakened people are on the right – as they are RELUCTANTLY getting politically aware. Being right-wing is associated (genetically) with having little interest in politics (more interested in their mortgage and family and hobbies), and being left wing is associated with political interest, therefore the left wing genetic types are already fully committed, and cannot increase their numbers.

      One other point – the MSM are against TR, which suggests he is good for the right, as they are against the right. Eg the DM coverage (Daily Mail is the largest readership online paper) – they always refer to him as ‘far-right’ and in the same article describe Antifa etc as ‘anti-fascists’ and never ‘the far left’. So the DM definitely do not like TR – UNLIKE THEIR READERS who always support him in reader comments under the DM hit pieces.
      So I see TR as being duped by Waters and his other friends, and just hope that they do not end up having power over him.

  2. Clare's Gravatar Clare
    September 12, 2017 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

    This is an excellent article which gives in-depth information about this woman who is attempting to be leader of UKIP. This woman is a traitor, she doesn’t care about the future of our country, she isn’t even British-she is an Irish Republican, an anti-monarchist, hates Christianity and is utterly beholden to Israel. If she is elected leader she will destroy UKIP once and for all and UKIP membership will fall dramatically. It is very sad that UKIP, once a great, well-supported party is doomed when the likes of this woman can blatantly infiltrate. Mr Sen does great research and informs the public where the mainstream media does not. Keep up the good work, Mr Sen.

  3. Buddy Rojek's Gravatar Buddy Rojek
    September 12, 2017 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

    I will back this woman if she advocates 1. Open Borders for Israel, i.e. Israel takes it’s fair share of Sub Saharan African refugees from Libya, 2. Cohen surnamed Jews are permitted to marry and have children with non Jews.
    Ashkenazi Jews make the Hollywood “White Supremicist” Narrative look tame. If the world is going to be one big happy mixed race, mixed cultured peoples, so should the Ultra Orthodox Jews be part of this mix.

    • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
      September 13, 2017 - 1:47 am | Permalink

      Buddy, she will never do that. Israhell only for the Jews. Goys be dammed. I contacted the UKIp many years ago and all I got was literature and video on how die-verse their party is. Nigel has done some good to help with Brexit, but in terms of preserving the white race, he is just helping to destroy it.

  4. Buddy Rojek's Gravatar Buddy Rojek
    September 12, 2017 - 12:23 pm | Permalink

    Good work exposing the hypocrisy Jack Sen

  5. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 12, 2017 - 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Not beyond using homosexuality to extract intelligence, Israel.

  6. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    September 13, 2017 - 3:52 am | Permalink

    We are living in Bizarro World. Israel is the size of New Jersey and its population of around 8 million is comparable to that of Togo or Tajikistan. Those who identify as LGBT make up less than 4% of the U.S, population and 6% of the European population. It’s sad enough that unless we unplug and live like hermits and monks we can’t escape their self-importance ..Israel ! Gays! Israel! Transexuals! Israel! Lesbians! Israel!…. the concerns of the majority are ignored in favor of gender dysphorics, queers, dykes and the denizens of Yid Land.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      September 14, 2017 - 5:36 am | Permalink

      Karen T,

      I see two parts, (1) there is always need for the Jewish community to keep the attention of the population – hence bread and circuses (2) It’s the first ‘public’ attempt to control genetics.

      Please see Kevin MacDonald’s review of John Glad’s book, “Jewish Eugenics.”


      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        September 14, 2017 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

        Thank you for the link. The Jewish community needs to keep our attention as it is they who are going to lead us to This Perfect Day.

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        September 14, 2017 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

        Male on female intercourse is no longer necessary, and, in the opinion of some, even desireable for reproduction….. https://singularityhub.com/2016/10/03/designer-babies-and-the-new-technology-of-having-children/ …but what I have difficulty wrapping my head around, is why then, these same people not only do nothing about the exploding black and brown populations, but foist them onto White populations.

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        September 14, 2017 - 4:15 pm | Permalink

        I’m aware that Jewry regards Whites as the biggest threat to their ‘kingdom on earth’ which of course explains the push for miscegenation and immigration, but good lord, what do they intend to do, once we are (hopefully, in their misbegotten view) extinct, with the billions of ‘coloreds’?

        • Floda's Gravatar Floda
          September 14, 2017 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

          The Jews know they can control IQ of 90 or less populations with ease. But in a 100 average IQ community they can only do so with great effort and subterfuge, ownership of MSM and means of Entertainment, Education, Law and much else. Then there is always the prospect of the unexpected rise of a Putin, for example who kicked them out of the assets they confiscated during the collapse of the USSR. It’s now quite clear they are set on destroying the ethnicity of Europeans using as a weapon the availability of an unlimited supply of low IQ Muslim Arabs and even far lower IQ Black African males. Our racial enemy has declared War against us.

        • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
          September 15, 2017 - 8:42 am | Permalink

          That is to say, there may be a ‘knowledge’ of the body that is not exactly the science of its functioning, and mastery of its forces that is more than the ability to conquer them: this knowledge and this mastery constitute what might be called the political technology of the body.

          From, “The Body of the Condemned” by Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

          The Blacks and Brown will live under the “Stalin boot” no doubt. What is of interest to us is the fact that our enemy wants to manipulate our genes at his or her will (example the many biracial we see daily on the television) that is our immediate problem in my opinion.

  7. Aitch's Gravatar Aitch
    September 13, 2017 - 8:32 am | Permalink

    Why did UKIP recommend a New Testament-burning orthodox rabbi for mayor of Manchester?

    • Aitch's Gravatar Aitch
      September 14, 2017 - 11:34 am | Permalink

      Answer came there none.

      • Aitch's Gravatar Aitch
        September 16, 2017 - 5:34 am | Permalink

        Come on, UKIP supporters. I want to know.

  8. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    September 13, 2017 - 9:40 am | Permalink

    Actually, I agree with Waters when she says “There is no Apartheid in Israel”.
    – Non-Jews can vote in Israel, like Jews in Israel do.
    – Under Apartheid, non-Whites came to South Africa to work, and were allowed to stay.
    – The Blacks that came to South Africa had it better than Blacks elsewhere in Africa, non-Jews in Israel don’t.
    Under Apartheid, Blacks weren’t removed from ancestral homelands, they were granted a right to them. Not so for Palestinians in Israel.
    In short, Israel gives Apartheid a bad name.
    As for the Israeli occupied territories, well that’s a whole different kettle of fish.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      September 13, 2017 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

      Very good response to this question. But in defense of apartheid, which also I think can be justified, the response might be something like:

      Apartheid means, simply, apartness. Those who wish to live separately from some others doing so. The term used in other contexts is freedom of association.

      When we understand that to not allow freedom of (dis)association, or apartheid/apartness for those who desire it, and that this (not being wage-employed by someone else, or sleeping in dormitories) is the proper definition of slavery – we can see that anti-apartheid means pro-slavery.

      Americans might reflect that their Civil War, properly conceived, might then have been a victory for slavery over runaway Whites.

      • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
        September 13, 2017 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

        I adopted this line of strict reasoning and clever argument from James Bowery, btw.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        September 14, 2017 - 1:52 am | Permalink

        Apartheid is self-defense of the minority who will otherwise be outvoted by hostile and racist majority. So it is a defence mechanism of non-racist races against real racism of racist races. Now that the defence mechanism is no more in S.Africa, the racism of the black majority has been unleashed and is plain for all to see. This racism makes the hearts of the white left (both inside S.Africa and everywhere else) very happy, as they love to see racism against the race they hate – their own.
        This is why we cannot have peace in white countries even until we recognise that there is a section of whites who are the enemy within, and who cannot be allowed to practise their treachery if we want to have peace and survival and to defend ourselves from the racism of the third world tribes and other tribes who hate us. The solution is for the white enemy within groups to go and live in the third world that they admire so much.

        • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
          September 15, 2017 - 3:39 pm | Permalink

          Apartheid may be a minority or majority tactic. In Israel and formerly in the US it was a majority tactic.


          And insofar as leftist or rightist Whites are OK with aggression against Whites because they are Whites, it is not because they are leftists or rightists, it is because left vs, right is a Jewish script, or clockwork mechanism, or software program, designed to divide Whites against ourselves, and to promote in either case for aggression against Whites.

          Left and right is one thing – it is the mechanism by which Jews have controlled public politics in White countries for 300 years.

          It is people who continue to fall into this trap who must be educated to be just pro-White, and that implies trying to understand how they were led astray by silly ideas and bring them back around to our way of thinking.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        September 14, 2017 - 5:08 am | Permalink

        I have no problem with apartheid. The Flems and Walloons had/have a self imposed form of it for a very long time, as did Quebec in Canada. In the case of SA, they understood the time bomb of the Black womb and moved to mitigate the circumstances. In that regard, Israel and SA were on the same page.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      September 18, 2017 - 1:53 pm | Permalink

      Also of interest, apartheid South Africa had more Black university graduates and millionaires than the rest of Africa combined. And had an illegal-immigration problem from neighbouring Black-run countries, desperate to flee to a White run country.

  9. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    September 13, 2017 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Nigel Farage wanted to reduce the numbers of Europeans settling in Britain in favour of Africans and Asians from the Commonwealth. This has been UKIP policy forever.

    Why is a pro-White site running propaganda for the traditionally anti-White UKIP party?

    Yes, Waters is hostile and stupid – but so have always been UKIP and Farage.

    Who cares about these clowns and their internal arguments? Not the British voter and not anyone pro-White.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      September 17, 2017 - 4:47 pm | Permalink

      Nick – whites like Merkel, Google bosses, Youtube bosses, Paypal bosses, British Labour MPs, most MSM journalists, Twitter bosses, Hillary Clinton, CNN News etc – they are genetically wired to be the enemy within and nothing will shift their views. They are the white types who persuaded the white S.Africans that the ‘right’ thing to do was to vote to hand their country over to a black racist tribe. These people are wired to undermine and hate their own as they hate anything they perceive as superior.
      In ‘the left’ I do not include whites who watch TV and then absorb the message obediently and then vote left but are not really left. The true left enemy within is perhaps 15% in my view.

      • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
        September 18, 2017 - 10:09 am | Permalink

        Nobody is genetically wired for genocidal disloyalty to his own people. No-one could be. And when a few Whites do submit to Jewish authored policies that would unchanged lead to our eventual death, they do it without thought of the end, or with the expectation that ‘we’re all going to be mixed up’ – not just Whites mixed-out. None are seeking or desiring that Whites and only Whites will be killed off.

  10. quackademic's Gravatar quackademic
    September 15, 2017 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

    “…I believed that all people should have equal rights, and should never be disadvantaged as a result of characteristics that they cannot change.” Well, with such beliefs I guess Anne Marie Waters would have no problem electing a Prime Minister disadvantaged by Down Syndrome, provided of course that he or she be pro-LGBT.

  11. car.'s Gravatar car.
    September 20, 2017 - 2:13 am | Permalink

    Ronald bola of 12764 newport ave #d Tustin ca 92780 married and paid Albina Danganan to obtain a green card. He is now a naturalized citizen. His son Aaron got a free ride in Buffalo University of medicine and likes having sex with boys.

Comments are closed.