Ted Gold and the Jews of Weatherman, Part 1

Karl Nemmersdorf


Townhouse explosion in Greenwich Village, 1970

Ted Gold was a Jewish member of Weatherman, the Communist terror group of the late 1960s and 70s, which was a radical spin-off from the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Gold is best known for perishing in the dramatic explosion in the New York townhouse caused by Weatherman’s ignorance of how to build a powerful bomb that explodes when desired and not before. His real importance, however, lies not in his spectacular demise, but rather in his frank public call for a communist dictatorship in this country, run by a revolutionary committee from the Third World. Consistent with the thesis that Jews place a high value on group interests, Gold worked unwaveringly within a mainstream Jewish subculture against Whites and White power, the enemy whose destruction many Jews thought would advance their own influence and power.

Gold’s Early Years

Gold was born in New York City in December 1947. His father was a doctor and his mother a professor at Columbia University. His parents were classic liberals of the era; his father worked for civil rights in the South and volunteered his medical services on behalf of the poor on the East Side. The family lived on the Upper West Side, and were generally considered as upper middle class.1

As a child, Ted played stickball with his father and became an avid sports fan. He earned his way into a top high school, Stuyvesant, where he graduated 212 in a class of 699, with an 89% average. (The Weathermen are fond of describing each other as “brilliant,” but 89% is a bit removed from brilliant.) He joined the track team, the Stamp Club, and the History and Folklore Society and was also “politically active” in the civil rights movement, helping to set up a chapter of “Friends of SNCC” (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee), which provided material support for civil rights workers. (Have you ever heard of a gentile who was so politically active in high school?) Gold’s parents also sent him to summer “camp,” Camp Webatuck, whose clientele was basically red diaper babies. I send my son to camp, where he exerts himself physically and comes home enthralled with the joys of athletic competition and boyish camaraderie. Camp Webatuck was for socialization in Leftist ideology, complete with Woody Guthrie music: “labor songs, unstructured hours, muted Marxist rhetoric.”2

By 1963, Gold was very pro-Castro. He was sixteen. He loved the Yankees, the Knicks, and a Communist dictatorship.

University Years: SDS

Gold entered prestigious Columbia University in the fall of 1964. There he became even more politically active. He and his new friends, including David Gilbert (also Jewish), were inflamed about the civil rights movement, the Vietnam War, and U.S. imperialism. He helped Gilbert “educate” and “organize” other students about these issues. Gold joined SDS, the largest American left-wing organization after the steep decline of the Old Left. The leadership of SDS, especially in Columbia, was heavily Jewish, of course.3 Thus, Gold left his Jewish home to enter Columbia University, where most if not all his friends were Jewish, where a large number of faculty were Jewish, and he joined a leftist political organization whose leadership was almost wholly Jewish.

In 1967, Gold became vice-chairman of the Columbia SDS chapter. The chairman was his friend and roommate, Ted Kaptchuk (also Jewish). Gold, Gilbert, and Kaptchuk were moderates intent on building up the organization through education and patient work. They, with most other SDS members, wanted to build a large movement that could force change on America and end the Vietnam War. However, Mark Rudd’s more radical group within the Columbia chapter, dubbed the “Action Faction,” aggressively pushed Gold and his compadres aside in the winter of 1967–68, and took control of the chapter. In the spring of 1968 Rudd—also Jewish; original name Rudnitsky—proceeded to lead a brazen student takeover of the University. Gold played a role in the takeover, but was not yet among the hardline militants. In the course of the revolt, however, Gold reportedly grew attracted to Rudd’s flamboyant revolutionary style, and became convinced of the political value of violence. His transformation from mild-mannered leftist “organizer” to (literal) bomb-throwing Communist revolutionary had begun.4


In the summer of 1969, the radical leaders of the Columbia strike, along with like-minded SDS agitators from the Midwest—among them the now-famous Bill Ayers—forced a break with the more moderate mass of SDSers. They dubbed themselves “Weatherman” after a Bob Dylan song. John Jacobs (who wrote their manifesto “You Don’t Need a Weatherman to Tell Which Way the Wind Blows”), Mark Rudd, and Bernardine Dorhn were the most prominent leaders of the new faction. Jacobs was a Jew and Dohrn had a Jewish father, original name Ohrnstein. Gold never became a leader of the group, being overshadowed by the dominant trio, yet he wholeheartedly threw in his lot with them.

The Weathermen were angry about what they saw as U.S. imperialist rule over much of the world, and in particular about the Vietnam War, which they labelled an unjust war against the Vietnamese people and another facet of U.S. imperialism. The salient point of U.S. imperialism, they held, was its racism: Whites were dominating much of the world and living the good life off the stolen resources of the non-Whites. Moreover, it was not just the White power structure: all American Whites, even blue-collar workers, were complicit in this racist system, benefiting from it and essentially supporting it. The Weathermen hated Whites with a virulent intensity, and they campaigned against—perhaps you have encountered this term—“White privilege.” (The modern theory of “White privilege” derives from Theodore Allen, a Communist non-Jew, and the Jew Noel Ignatiev, whose work was very influential with the New Left.5) The Weathermen conceived their role as working to initiate a struggle on U.S. soil to join the worldwide revolutionary struggle against White colonial domination, with the goal of overthrowing the U.S. government and establishing a communist state.

Ah, sweet utopia! The Weathermen thought that provocative, violent street actions would win them adherents and lead to a successful revolution. This strategy was almost wholly rejected even by the larger world of the New Left, but a few hundred Weathermen embraced it fanatically.6

Weatherman, while operating within the larger Marxist worldview of “oppression,” “imperialism,” and “exploitation,” transferred their agent of revolution from the proletariat (which was too White and satisfied to participate in their program) to the Blacks and coloreds of the world — to the groups they considered most likely to rain destruction down upon the hated Whites. Of course, all the “victim” groups that the Left agitates for are merely means to the end, which is, seizing power. This point was openly conceded by various radical groups in the New Left, with their slogan, “the issue is not the issue.” Rudd says of the results of the Columbia University student strike: “most important, thousands of people had become radicalized. That was our biggest victory, the goal SDS had set for itself years before we even knew about IDA [Institute of Defense Analysis documents] and the gym [the two issues he used as a pretext]. We wanted to build the movement, and we succeeded.”7 The New Leftist Mike Goldfield wrote, “You have to realize that the issue didn’t matter. The issues were never the issues. You could have been involved with the Panthers, the Weatherpeople . . . SNCC, SDS. It didn’t really matter what. It was the revolution that was everything.”8

It is easy to see what advantages the Weathermen saw in destroying the U.S. government (the “White power structure”): total, unrestricted revolutionary power. It would also provide opportunity for revenge. The unbridled anger of Weatherman at “White privilege” clearly reveals this motivation. Moral theology teaches that anger is an emotion that demands external expression in revenge or punishment. Kevin MacDonald testified that among the leftist Jewish coterie he experienced at the University of Wisconsin in the 1960s there was “a strong desire for bloody, apocalyptic revenge against the entire social structure.”9 This desire for revenge has a long history in Jewish relations vis-à-vis the outer world.

In any case, the Weathermen launched their program with an ill-considered (to put it mildly) “National Action” slated for October 1969 in Chicago. They planned to muster thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of angry young people to revolt in the streets of the Windy City. Mayor Daley’s city. He of the muscular police force. Weatherman printed thousands of leaflets announcing their plan, and then blew up a statue dedicated to policemen on the eve of the action. Mayor Daley and his police reacted accordingly. When the Weathermen mobilized in Lincoln Park with helmets and clubs, they were badly shaken at the sight of the pitiful few who marshalled with them. Most of the Weathermen were present, but only a few score of outsiders. After months of agitating and leafleting, virtually no one had joined them. Practically everybody was repulsed by their arrogance and over-the-top militancy. Nevertheless, after speeches by Dohrn and others, they raced out of the park smashing windows and attacking the police. They were shot, beaten, and arrested for their pains. They had to fork out a fortune in bail money and face indictments for rioting. Everybody but Weatherman could see it was lunacy, but they carried on, labeling it a victory because they showed their bravery (true), and because the example of their fanaticism would draw crowds of recruits (false).

They did draw the conclusion that such street actions were unsustainable. The leaders met and decided to go “underground” and begin guerrilla warfare. In America. To bring down the state. A state that spent billions a year on its military. One explanation for this decision—which needs explaining—might be that they were reading a lot of Marx and Mao and consuming a good deal of acid. Not a great combination, for sure.

To prepare for their guerrilla campaign, Weatherman held a “war council” in Flint, Michigan, in late December 1969. The freaks dubbed it a “wargasm.”10 The gathering became notorious for Bernardine Dorhn’s disgusting acclamation of the then-recent Manson murders in California. The reason for her glee? White people had been slaughtered. She assumed they were guilty of profiting from White “imperialism.” She lauded the killers’ stabbing a fork into a victim’s stomach, and the Weathermen walked around for weeks giving each other the “fork salute,” four fingers held aloft. At this council, amid other bizarre scenes—mass karate exercises, frenzied hopping and chanting in unison, sexual orgies, discussions concerning the revolutionary value of killing White babies— the Weatherman made speeches and cavorted before the assembly. In a little-remarked oration, Gold bluntly described Weather’s vision for the future of America: when the revolution succeeded, the Weathermen would erect an “agency of the people of the world” to exercise power here.

At this point, someone in the audience exhibited some seeming good sense; he or she confronted Gold: “In short, if the people of the world succeed [in making the revolution], then the Vietnamese and Africans and the Chinese are gonna move in and run things for White America. … There will have to be more repression than ever against White people.” Chillingly, Gold replied, “Well, if it will take fascism, we’ll have to have fascism”11 — i.e., a repressive regime: in this case, a communist dictatorship. How ironic. Gold had now reached the culmination of his career, having passed from the “participatory democracy” of early SDS, to the fundamental societal change of generic revolution (the Stones’ Street Fightin’ Man of 1968), to the maximum overthrow of the government and communist dictatorship. Yet the enemy had remained fixed through each phase: White people

Gold and the other Weatherman leaders understood that such an international dictatorship over the United States would entail massive repression of Whites. The supposed evil of White “imperialism”—and the impossibility of White redemption, another Weather doctrine—was the whole reason for the revolution. Mark Rudd later commented, “we had determined that there were no innocent Americans, at least no White ones.”12 Once the revolution was enthroned, ipso facto the next step was liquidation, repression, and mass internment. Larry Grathwohl, who infiltrated Weatherman for the FBI, described Weather’s plans as including “education camps,” liquidation of all those who had held power in the “imperialist” power structure, and total thought control.13 A Weather triumph would have followed the exact pattern of Bolshevik Russia: massive expropriation and repression, followed by massive resistance, followed by even more massive repression. Cue the return of leather-jacketed coke-snorting Jewish secret police rounding up the gentiles for rape, torture and murder in dank abattoirs. It happened, look it up.14

Go to Part 2.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

69 Comments to "Ted Gold and the Jews of Weatherman, Part 1"

  1. September 14, 2017 - 7:55 am | Permalink

    Where are the endnotes, please ?

    • Mary Minshall's Gravatar Mary Minshall
      September 14, 2017 - 11:18 am | Permalink

      It appears that this article was, indeed, written with end- or footnotes which were not at the link. Perhaps they will appear in Part 2?

    • kikz's Gravatar kikz
      September 14, 2017 - 11:40 am | Permalink

      yes, please, citations would be nice for pt 1…. ……… they spin that dreidel, unceasingly. taught to spin their enemies into oblivion frm a very early age.

  2. September 14, 2017 - 9:00 am | Permalink

    Analysis of the Jewish dominance of 20th century intellectual/political activism needs more synthesis.

    This is nowhere more apparent than in the examination of what the “right” and “left” extremes have in common beyond, simply, the fact that both were (and are) dominated by Jews who identify as Jews and see their activism as of specific benefit to Jews.

    While it is true that has been — at least to some degree — pointed out by many in the case of, say, the support for open borders among the heavily Jewish Austrian School of Economics as well as Frankfurt School, this really fails capture to depth of their intellectual bankruptcy.

    I’m thinking, specifically, of the contrast between 19th century white “progressives” such as Henry George, but also earlier, more seminal, authors in political economy, anthropology, and social psychology that, during the 20th century, were either ignored or “debunked” by “more sophisticated” scholarship. Nowhere is this made more apparent than in the tectonic shift in “human nature” caused by bioinformatics from DNA sequencing. The bioinformatics revolution — the curves of technical advances for which leave Moore’s Law in the dust sometime in the early ’00s. This has, despite the lack of synthesis by scholars of Jewish 20th century influence, resulted in the instauration of scientific fields of vital interest to Euromen after over a century of suppression by Jewish interests. Not all vital fields of science are enjoying such a dues es machina instauration. Most notably, the social sciences and, in particular, the subdiscipline of political economy where so-called “Libertarian” Jews have penned libraries of polemics that confound any attempt to even think about the early “liberal” thinkers — let alone subject those thinkers to the kind of intellectually honest critique that would avoid throwing the Euroman baby out with the bathwater. Instead, what we are treated to is a virtual autoimmune response, among Euro identitarians, to the very idea of “liberty” including the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence due to their flawed support of the “individual”. Without recognizing these documents and the Euroman intellectual movements associated with them as primitive attempts to unearth paleolithic evolutionary psychology essential to founding European civilization, we’ve permitted ourselves to accept the Jewish travesty of them as the real thing and cut ourselves off from our true character, hence any hope of genuine social science and statecraft.

    This is profoundly tragic.

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      September 14, 2017 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

      Re “dues es machina”. I think maybe that should be “deus ex machina”. Just trying to be helpful. Some of us here like the Latin language even though (in my own case) my knowledge isn’t all that advanced. :)

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      September 14, 2017 - 11:01 pm | Permalink

      Every school of economics has a heavy Jewish representation. So does pediatrics, if it comes to that. Austrian economics has zero to say about immigration. Some subscribers to the doctrine – especially Jews – may favor open borders, others not. The latter have a harder struggle in making themselves heard or pay a price in terms of career or personal life.

      • September 15, 2017 - 12:10 pm | Permalink

        I made reference to the 18th century — and earlier — political economists because the relatively attenuated Jewish influence, such as it was, made it possible for saner voices to be heard above the din. My evaluation of a school of economics is not whether it has individuals within it that may say, on occasion, the right thing — but on its influence. Ron Paul, for example, could have had a far greater impact than he did in 2008 if he’d been influenced by Henry George as much as he had been by the Austrian School, and by the Austrian School as much as he had been by Henry George.

        Henry George sold more copies of “Progress and Poverty” than any other book in the late 1800s, except the BIble. While Henry George was not particularly restrictionist on immigration, he struck at the root of the economic rent seeking that motivates private capital to import cheap labor while also striking at the root of public sector rent seeking by disintermediating government with a citizen’s dividend which has the salutary side effect of motivating citizens to shut down immigration with the same enthusiasm with which they now defend their pseudo-entitlements.

        • Bob's Gravatar Bob
          September 16, 2017 - 11:05 am | Permalink

          Thank you for introducing “Progress and Poverty” into the discussion. From the author’s preface:

          “Investigation reveals that differences in civilization are not due to differences in individuals or races, but rather to differences in social organization. Progress is always kindled by association. And civilization always declines as inequality develops.”

          Of course, there is no equality in the non-abstract universe.

          • September 16, 2017 - 2:46 pm | Permalink

            I’m not sure what pointing to a very non-distinguishing feature of Henry George’s world view does to advance the discourse. The many egalitarian fallacies that infected many Enlightenment empiricists and 20th century intellectual movements can do more or less damage in the hands of more or less virulent intellects. What George and much of the American school of liberty got right in the late 1700s and 1800s that the 20th century libertarians and egalitarians got wrong was that forceful control of land is key to sovereignty. If there is to be any notion of “equality” that makes sense in “the non-abstract universe” it is rooted in the allocation of land which, after all, is what male intrasexual selection is largely about. Jefferson’s yeoman farmer settling the frontier had a natural limit on how much land was defensible by the head of a nuclear family. George’s focus on land rents as the sole source of government revenue and on a citizen’s dividend to distribute those rents makes perfect sense from the perspective of an individual male of northern European heritage being approached with a non-coercive offer of a contractual relationship upon which civilization may be founded:

            “You give up your natural right to initiate force (ie: individual sovereignty in a non-abstract universe) in male intrasexual selection, with which males of virtually all sexual species acquire access to land, and you get a land rent stream of value large enough to rent land sufficient for Jeffersonian yeoman farmer status.”

            The only _major_ 20th century economist to broach the land tax and anything approximating a citizen’s dividend was Milton Friedman. In both cases, he basically brought them up and stuffed them in the bottom drawer. In the case of the land tax he merely pointed to its “non-distorting” character because of the inelastic supply of land. His travesty of a “citizen’s dividend” was his “negative income tax”.

            An appropriate “progress” in 20th century political economy would have recognized liquidation value of net assets as the proper backing for sovereign currency, and the demurrage of those assets as the compensation to military aged males “equally” distributed, in exchange for their relinquishing individual sovereignty to found civilization.

          • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
            September 16, 2017 - 7:52 pm | Permalink

            Taxes and “non-coercive approach” don’t belong together, as you seem to concede (“relinquishing individual sovereignty.”)

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          September 16, 2017 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

          I’m not swayed by argumentum ad populum. Georgism’s levying of land tax is completely unworkable. To boot, who says equality is either desirable or achievable?

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      September 14, 2017 - 11:36 pm | Permalink

      Jews do not dominate “the far right.” While libertarians sometimes define the spectrum in terms of attitude to capitalism, there are other perspectives from which capitalism itself is on the left. The Jacobins, the original “leftists” had the Church as their primary enemy and secondly the monarchy and aristocracy. The left condemns both religion and nationalism and is congenial to dictatorship by intellectuals. The right condemns atheism and internationalism and views intellectuals as degenerate or at least an unruly element. Liberty is fine but people sensibly turn to fascism when the alternative is totalitarianism of the left.

      • September 15, 2017 - 12:15 pm | Permalink

        Actually, “liberty” as defined by “libertarians” is _not_ fine since their “leadership” inevitably dispense with material entitlement due men that agree to abrogate their natural right to initiate individual on individual aggression. Since this is a right enjoyed by males of all sexual species for 600,000,000 years anyone who utters the phrase “natural rights” without placing it in the most prominent position of the exchange between individual and the collective, is gibbering nonsense. The failure to properly respect this — and in particular the northern European selective pressures that molded sexual relations up until 1000 years ago — is the rot in the foundation of Western civilization.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          September 16, 2017 - 8:11 pm | Permalink

          A right to aggression doesn’t make sense. Perhaps if you said a right to wrong it would be clearer.

    • Patrick Little's Gravatar Patrick Little
      September 15, 2017 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

      Your comment blew me away.
      Can you recommend some books to read?

  3. AWB's Gravatar AWB
    September 14, 2017 - 9:27 am | Permalink

    Footnotes in pt 2??

    Interesting article, thanks!

  4. September 14, 2017 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    Vat?! We’re Jews already? (I knew it all along)

    Jews a Race, Not Religion, New DNA Breakthrough Proves

    Jews are a race, and not a religion, a new DNA test breakthrough in Israel has proven – and the test is currently under consideration for use by the Jewish ethnostate’s authorities to help prevent non-Jews from immigrating to that country and from marrying Jews, in line with its already existing anti-miscegnation laws.

    (New Observer Online)

    The DNA breakthrough was announced at a special conference held by Israel’s Puah Institute, the official body which “works with Jewish couples with fertility problems” around the world.

    The research was carried out by the Eretz Hemdah Institute for Advanced Jewish Studies in Jerusalem, and was presented by that organization’s head, Rabbi Yosef Carmel, who also sits on the Gazit rabbinical court—one of the religious courts which controls Israeli citizenship and marriage eligibility rules.
    Stay Connected With Us
    Subscribe to our mailing list

    Carmel told the Israeli news service Ynet News that the “Jewish gene,” can help prove one’s “Jewishness” in line with Jewish religious law.

    The test—for female descended mitrochondrial DNA (which passes down unbroken ) can be undertaken with a simple saliva swab.

    Ynet news enthusiastically told its Jewish readers that the “breakthrough study by Israeli experts on genetics and Jewish Halacha (the religious law) claim that the so-called ‘Jewish gene,’ can be identified by ‘using a sample of saliva, and can save a long and complicated conversion process.’”

    Rabbi Dov Popper, an adviser at the Puah Institute, added that researchers in Israel and the world have been studying mitochondrial DNA—structures within the cells— which a person receives only from his or her mother.

    “We can find the gene with a simple blood or saliva test. As soon as you find the mitochondrial gene in a person, this serves as a considerable piece of evidence in proving his Jewish roots,” Rabbi Popper said.

    The Eretz Hemdah Institute is preparing a paper to submit to the Chief Rabbinate n Jerusalem, detailing the Halachic-scientific breakthrough that claims: anyone whose Judaism can be proven genetically is legally (in the Jewish legal sense, that is) Jewish, Ynet news went on to say.

    “People who wish to get married in the State of Israel via the Chief Rabbinate must be recognized as a Jew and prove own Jewish dynasty,” the Ynet article continued, confirming the already well-known fact that in Israel it is illegal for a non-Jew to marry a Jew.

    Ynet News went on to explain:

    According to the Jewish law, one considers as a Jew only if he was born to a Jewish mother. Otherwise, he has to provide proof of Judaism several generations back in the form of documents—such as birth and marriage certificates.

    This has already made a problem for over 400,000 immigrants especially from the former Soviet Union, who couldn’t provide all family files.

    Jewish people without the proof for their Jewish roots called “undefined,” and must undergo a long, hard and toilsome religious conversion according to the “Halacha.” This frightening process many trying to avoid.

    “If the Chief Rabbinate accepts the gene research, this would be a significant change” for the hundreds of thousands who considered “undefined,” Rabbi Carmel said.

    Rabbi Menachem Burstein, the head of the Puah Institute added “We began researching this because of the issue of egg donation and the ramifications that would have on the Jewishness of the newborn baby.”

    * Although Jewish lobby pressure groups such as the ADL and SPLC which operate in white countries in Europe and North America, are always the first to condemn any suggestion that genes and race are interconnected, they also all fanatically support Israel which actively uses genetics to help keep the Jewish racial strain pure.

    There is, of course, nothing wrong with using the science of genetics for racial improvement, and it is a field of study which should in fact be mandatory across the board for all races.

    However, under the current hypocritical modern Jewish-lobby dominated societal structure, only Jews are allowed to practice the science of racial purity, and any white person who dares suggest following the same ideas is attacked as a “bigot” or “racist” by that same Jewish lobby.

  5. Harvey's Gravatar Harvey
    September 14, 2017 - 10:40 am | Permalink

    Pleasant reading! This group appears in the obscenely flattering, ethnically occluded, 2002 documentary ‘The Weather Underground’. I watched it a few years ago out of a tangent musical interest in the oldey timey hard rock Detroit group MC5 and the already silly, already betrayed by jewish/black marxists, White Panther Party (1960’s-80’s).

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      September 14, 2017 - 11:16 pm | Permalink

      Jewish lacuna notwithstanding, I found that documentary quite fascinating. In the hagiography stakes, it’s the appalling Running on Empty (1988), the hands down winner.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        September 16, 2017 - 1:13 am | Permalink

        An appalling movie it may be, my friend, but I still think enviously of the scene where Christine Lahti’s character gets free dental care from the movement-affiliated dentist. I’d consider paying a retired FBI or NSA agent several thousand bucks to run me up a professional-looking revolutionary-on-the-lam legend just to get equivalent care.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          September 18, 2017 - 12:48 am | Permalink

          Hmm, those agencies would like to know “Is it safe?” before getting down to work. Oil of cloves, thanks.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            September 19, 2017 - 8:00 pm | Permalink

            I can dream, can’t I?

            Otherwise, point taken.

      • Harvey's Gravatar Harvey
        September 16, 2017 - 7:39 am | Permalink

        Thanks. Will check that.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          September 18, 2017 - 12:34 am | Permalink

          Along the same lines but slightly less nauseating is The Company You Keep (2013).

  6. George's Gravatar George
    September 14, 2017 - 11:20 am | Permalink

    “Yet the enemy had remained fixed through each phase: White people.”

    This has not changed, indeed it is even more obvious today throughout Western Civilization (or what is left of it) than ever before. But, they have developed new tactics, such as jihad by invitation. As a race, they were never happy with the status quo, and even today although they constitute the privileged few they foment revolution, destruction and chaos. During Roman rule of Judea, they had their radical elements that harassed the local government to the point that eventually their temple was destroyed by the Romans in retaliation in AD 70. Maurice Samuel said it succinctly; ” we are the destroyers” and “we want a world of our own”.

  7. RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
    September 14, 2017 - 11:36 am | Permalink

    “…As a child, Ted played […emphasis mine…]… with his father … became an avid sports fan … (((earned))) his way into a top high school, Stuyvesant, where he graduated 212 in a class of 699, with an 89% average. (The Weathermen are fond of describing each other as “brilliant,” but 89% is a bit removed from brilliant.) He joined the track team, the Stamp Club, and the History and Folklore Society and was also “politically active” in the civil rights movement, helping to set up a chapter of “Friends of SNCC” (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee), which provided material support for civil rights workers. (Have you ever heard of a gentile who was so politically active in high school?) Gold’s parents also sent him to summer “camp,” … Webatuck, whose clientele was basically red diaper babies … for socialization in Leftist ideology, complete with Woody Guthrie music: “labor songs, unstructured hours, muted Marxist rhetoric…”

    This is typical of upbringing of young, future, Jewish Diaspora Terrorist or “…Sayanim…”
    [the Hebrew word for helpers, whom the Mossad relies upon across the globe to provide shelter, money, and logistical support for Infiltrators and Terrorist Acts].

    Moreover, this adolescent training is a continuation of “…early fetal deformation…” within Jewish society.

    By the time “…Jewish Terror-Tots…” begin public school,
    they have already been thoroughly instructed on the “…All-round Objective…” of the implementation of a Jew World Order.

    They have already been informed that both;
    the History lessons the stupid Goyem receive are largely composed of Jewish Lies and…,
    they have also been given a general overview of “…Real History…”…,
    replete with what Whites would call;
    Crimes against Humanity that Jews have Committed throughout the Ages.

    The Talmud clearly states ALL these objectives and stresses the need for Jewish Secrecy in Sabotage in order to succeed.

    Now imagine the “…head start…” Jewish kids have compared to the Goyem, whom they practically lead by the nose in getting them to do what (((they))) want.

    So of course Young Jews support Sports,
    because (((they))) fully realize that Jews largely own everything there is worth owning that surrounds almost every (((professional sports league and team in many White Nations))).

    (((They))) understand how spectator sports provide both an outlet for the implicit White need to cheer and show solidarity.
    In that vane they have channeled this need into both a largely useless pass-time that plays a huge role in partially lobotomizing Whites by the end of early adulthood…,
    (alcohol, TV, advertised poisons like coke etc…, gateway into other propaganda [i.e. (((documentaries))), sitcoms that promote the Homo-Fem-Abort-Pedo-Drug-Crime-Rap-Game sh!t, Fake news, reality shows, etc…)
    as well as providing (((them))) with a huge income and employment pool to further Cripple Whites with and invest in their own Jewish Spawns’ future.

    Stamp collection,
    as well as being a monetarily lucrative activity
    (used stamps used to be mostly free for the collecting and can today be resold at quite a profit or used as a way to launder the proceeds of crime),
    is also an excellent tool to use for learning the overview of the (((internationalized))) nature of “…Fake Goyish Political History…”.
    [Postal systems throughout the West and…,
    I would venture to say in any nation that has at one time been a Western colony…,
    are today almost totally proxy controlled by Jews]
    that is taught to the Goyem in tandem with the plethora of Jew Proxy Controlled Information and News Organs.

    It is a great way for “…Jewish Spawn…” to learn from an early age which (((Histories))) are acceptable for the Goyem to publically adhere to and
    which ones are “…Anti-Semitic…”.

    The ultimate in Optimization Theory applied as malevolently and clandestinely as possible.
    The Mathematics of Training/Crippling the Goyem.

    The only way to overcome such a clandestine and covert mechanism…,
    that is IMO directed from the Top Down…,
    is for Aryans to seek Spiritual Enlightenment so Jewish Psychosis becomes “…Instinctively Apparent…” and the beneficiary of “…Compassionate Decapitation…”.

  8. Roland Maruska's Gravatar Roland Maruska
    September 14, 2017 - 1:19 pm | Permalink

    A late friend used to say that the average American father prefers it if his son is an athlete rather than a scholar. The result? We have all those athletic sons getting shot, maimed and killed in Iraq, while the scholars pull the strings. Our entire culture has been perverted by the scholars. I have just finished again Stuart Lake’s biography of Wyatt Earp, probably the most fearless lawman of the west. “Doc” Holliday was also fearless, if crazy. Remember Audie Murphy? But whom do Americans drool over today? Chris Kyle. I am certain that Earp and Holliday would have called him a back shooter. Shame on Clint Eastwood for that movie about Kyle that he made. And shame on all of our soldiers who went charging off to Iraq, shouting, “It’s payback time! Gonna kill me some ‘raqis!” I wonder what it feels like to have the Zionist ring in one’s nose. Shame on Rush Limbaugh for ridiculing Pat Buchanan while praising the Zionist-loving Donald Trump. I guess those shekels Limbaugh earns mean more to him than his country. But no one forces people to listen to him. No one forces people to watch dreadful television shows like All in the Family, Diff’rent Strokes, or Webster. Shame on all of them.

    • Seek's Gravatar Seek
      September 14, 2017 - 8:18 pm | Permalink

      What does Clint Eastwood have to feel ashamed of? “American Sniper” was a great movie.

      • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
        September 14, 2017 - 11:48 pm | Permalink

        The argument is that it celebrates an immoral war fought by poor whites at the behest of the Israel lobby. I would prefer an invasion of Cuba, Vietnam, or Mexico, but peace most of all.

        • Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
          September 15, 2017 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

          Your first sentence carries a lot of freight. Love it.

          • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
            September 21, 2017 - 6:19 am | Permalink

            Thanks! I rarely achieve pithiness.

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        September 15, 2017 - 4:46 am | Permalink

        By the looks of it, Clint Eastwood seemingly goes there where the money is.

        Today patriotic, tomorrow he creeps up to a certain party’s behind. But I won’t blame him, it seems this is the only way one can still move forward in Hollywood:


        This party which in the 1980’s and 1990’s wheathermanned white South Africa, and of which I nearly became a victim (SPM limpet mine), but luckily the police discovered it first (language Afrikaans, but easy enough to understand by looking at the pictures):

        • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
          September 15, 2017 - 8:47 am | Permalink

          Today patriotic, tomorrow he [Eastwood] creeps up to a certain party’s behind. But I won’t blame him, it seems this is the only way one can still move forward in Hollywood.

          Why on earth does he need to move forward, at his old age and with all those millions?

          • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
            September 16, 2017 - 12:32 am | Permalink

            Also true, you’re right. Then he was not very politically educated about South Africa. Hopefully he reads this website, although I would not bet on it.

      • September 15, 2017 - 5:18 am | Permalink

        “A great movie” – you just have to laugh.

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          September 18, 2017 - 1:09 am | Permalink

          In “American Sniper” the US army were portrayed as the goodies (forget about them being in Iraq for the moment – the rights and wrongs of the war were not part of the film) and this is why it was the exception. If this had been a standard Hollywood film, then there would have been some high up ‘right wing’ white person doing a bit of betrayal or corruption – as in the current film ‘Amercian Made’ where the high ups release the photo of their agent Tom Cruise for his enemies to see, deliberately betraying him, with the message being that we must never trust Ronald Reagan types or his friends as they are just corrupt liars and betrayers, and will hand their agents over to the enemy as soon as it suits them.

          (The irony is that this is indeed the way the authorities are going once they are infiltrated and taken over by the left – the Clinton types)

          The film that best sums up Hollywood is ‘Avatar’ where the whites are evil rich imperialists destroying the planet, and the ethnics are living peacefully in harmony with nature, and the only good white is the one who betrays his own.

          Just because the TV and film industry is 99% controlled, it does not follow that they can block everything they would like to block.

          ‘Green Beret’ with John Wayne is another exception.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            September 18, 2017 - 11:22 am | Permalink

            I respectfully suggest that you take a gander at IMDB or the Turner Classic Movies website. The US army is virtually always portrayed positively when it’s fighting Jewry’s wars. Films about evil officers or enlisted men are never more than exercises in Bad Apple theory: there’s always a higher-up who is shocked, shocked, that someone wearing the sacred uniform is cutting corners—or cutting throats.

            Apropos the dreadful Green Berets, an expensive distraction aimed at the more brain-dead among US deplorables, the Vietnam war has long been viewed as an exception to our (((media masters’))) love of war—recall that war was termed “the health of the state” by the long-dead leftist Randolph Bourne—but was it really? I no longer think so. Certainly it was not a war that media Jews said was good or desirable, but it did serve as splendid cover for a Gramscian streamlining of centralization in the corridors of Washington power. Nor did the really hard-nosed opposition to the war emerge until Richard Nixon, the only major US politician of the twentieth century to have more (((mainstream))) detractors than admirers, took the reins from the heroic Yiddishe cowboy, LBJ. Nor again, please recall, did “opposition” to war in Southeast Asia keep a lot of non-goy guys from getting filthy rich off the bloodshed.

            Nowadays, of course, the likes of Ken Burns get allotted damn near as much airtime to celebrate the posthumously redeemed Vietnam vet class* as they did, in the pre-Internet days, to tell us all a thousand times that Ty Cobb was a racist.

            In sum, as I suggested to the commenter Seek, think again, look again.
            *A club of which I’m an anointed member. I’ll be setting up a FundMe page soon for donations from fans of American war heroes. Word to the wise and all that.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        September 15, 2017 - 9:10 am | Permalink

        With respect, Hollywood doesn’t produce great movies. Hollywood produces pro-Jewish, anti-white, Christophobic propaganda. Punkt. No exceptions.

        If the reaction to American Sniper or any other manipulative flick is “I think this is an exception to your rule, Pierre,” my response is “think again.” Most important, look again—look beneath the surface glitter of nude, sex-hungry babes, explosions, and time travel until what comes into view is what is actually being peddled: the Jewish agenda, whose components include, inter alia, a narrative of black superiority, white subservience, and Jewish control of all thought, speech, and action. And did I forget wealth?

        No one denies that life’s tedium can become overwhelming without the odd bit of make-believe to leaven it. One just needs to be wary of what’s crawling about in any given sandbox before he jumps in.

        • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
          September 15, 2017 - 11:39 am | Permalink

          ” No one denies that life’s tedium can become overwhelming without the odd bit of make-believe to leaven it. One just needs to be wary of what’s crawling about in any given sandbox before he jumps in. ”

          Does the enemy ever stop attacking? Even during their “…celebratory periods…” (i.e. Purim.), they never stop thinking about killing Aryans.

          It is a nasty business that Aryans can not live in peace amongst themselves and actually take the time to celebrate life because we are dealing with an enemy that eats, breaths, sleeps and sh!ts murder theft and mayhem upon those it has labeled the enemy.
          We are that enemy.
          This must be internalized.
          Under such circumstances can we afford to, ‘…make-believe to leaven… ” life even for a moment?
          When we let our guard down the Jew moves in to kill.

          Once the Jew has been subdued, and life on the planet can resume its upward path, then I would agree to a celebration.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            September 16, 2017 - 11:45 am | Permalink

            Once the Jew has been subdued, and life on the planet can resume its upward path, then I would agree to a celebration.

            For the record, Roy, I’m not proposing a celebration, nor do I myself do celebration. I’m an old guy who weeps rather more than he laughs and prays rather less than he might. I’m also living a life balanced on the knife edge of impoverishment—a situation whose implications you of all folks should readily understand.

            All I was doing in writing what I wrote was to try to cut a lot of guys some slack. Wouldn’t you agree, Roy, that for reasons of mental and physical health alone, people need to play, probably as much as they need to sleep? Both sleep and play sometimes occur at times and places and in amounts that are less than ideal. And happily, few people over the age of thirty understand their own functioning so poorly that they need to have these facts brought to their attention. Yet reading the two parts of Karl Nemmersdorf’s subtle and thoughtful article, I can’t help wondering whether the ontological distortion that characterizes every aspect of the thinking and action of the Weather Underground, of Ted Gold, of Dohrn, of Ayers, and of everyone else associated with it and them doesn’t find its mirror in the way they all clearly mutilated play and sleep to serve their warped and degraded and murderous purposes. But enough said along those lines.

            On the other hand—speaking here for myself alone—I find that as reminders to act and think sensibly tend to come along too seldom rather than too often, I still welcome them.

            Be as well as you can be, Roy.

          • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
            September 16, 2017 - 1:57 pm | Permalink


            I have been reading most of your comments here,,,. especially after that first abrasive encounter we had…,
            and I have realized that you are indeed a very brilliant man and that almost all of the time I agree with you and learn a lot from your posts.

            As for the need for play…,
            classical forms of play were more often than not based on ways to improve classical means of combat.

            Unfortunately for stupid Whites…, We have lost the connection between, for example,
            throwing a Javelin for sport and throwing a spear into a [redacted] Jew or …,
            kicking a soccer ball into a net and kicking a [redacted] Jew in the [redacted] or,
            working a pommel horse or a vaulting horse and riding a flesh and blood horse into a field of Jews deserving of [redaction].

            So yes…, play or sport are necessary but unless they are taken to the next level and transferred into actual useful deeds we may as well just give our work to the Jew without bothering to ask anything in return.

            As for the,
            “… I’m also living a life balanced on the knife edge of impoverishment…”,
            I had no idea you were in this situation.

            Be that as it may, no one is perfect.
            I am sure everyone indulges now and again in their own backsliding way…, including, God forbid, me!
            My comment regarding play, or the need to forgo it, was more meant for those readers who are new here and are trying to find their bearings in the quagmire of Jewish Created Confusion.

            I think it is better to project an image of what we should be doing rather than concede to what we ourselves may, from time to time, succumbed to.

            But I can tell you one thing…, I am supremely happy that you bear me no ill will after the way we first met!

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            September 16, 2017 - 8:03 pm | Permalink

            Thanks for the very kind words, Roy. I’ve been regularly reading your comments, too, and I’ve come to see that in many ways you are your own toughest critic. As I have no desire to add to your troubles, I’m glad to shake hands so that we can direct our combined energy—what’s left of it anyway!—against the common foe.

            God bless.

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          September 16, 2017 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

          Pierre, here in Canada we jaded seniors have marijuana coming this summer to help deal with the ennui. It’s healthier than alcohol and more “mind-expanding” than movies.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            September 16, 2017 - 8:21 pm | Permalink

            You’re absolutely right about movies, Karen—they are, if anything, meant to contract the mind, not expand it—and you may well be right about pot vis-à-vis alcohol. I’m simply too old and too square to begin smoking anything at this point in my life.

            Perhaps if I lived in Canada anything new and different might seem a blessing. … Kidding aside, your country, not least in that it has you and Curmudgeon in it, has to be a damn sight better place to live than Hymietown on the Hudson.

        • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
          September 20, 2017 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

          A prime example is Independence Day, where a nerdy Jewish genius and a black wide receiver — I mean fighter pilot — save the earth from aliens and at the end we are told how wonderful it is that in the future “Independence Day” will celebrate a day of triumph for the whole world instead of just the crappy old USA.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      September 16, 2017 - 2:07 am | Permalink

      “And shame on all of our soldiers who went charging off to Iraq, shouting, “It’s payback time! Gonna kill me some ‘raqis!””

      Nothing activates the pleasure center in the white brain like a shallow, ill-conceived, altruistic crusade.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      September 16, 2017 - 2:20 am | Permalink

      “But no one forces people to listen to him. No one forces people to watch dreadful television shows like All in the Family, Diff’rent Strokes, or Webster. Shame on all of them.”

      While the white race deserves to survive, there is a certain type of white individual— the altruistic imbecile— which does not.

  9. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    September 14, 2017 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

    And the most interesting of all this is the GIGANTIC (supposed) SELECTIVE MORAL BLINDNESS of this so-called “idealists”, as if no Jews had participated and benefited of so-called “white privilege” and/or western “civilization’. This narrative seems too spontaneous to be true.

  10. tadzio308's Gravatar tadzio308
    September 14, 2017 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

    Gold’s mother was a professor at Columbia University. He was not even in the top 10% of his high school class. An elitist school like Columbia does not take students from the second 10%. Gold hated White Privilege but was a willing product of Jewish Privilege. Without mommy he would not have made it into Columbia.

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      September 14, 2017 - 11:52 pm | Permalink

      If you had very high SATs and good references you would have had a shot at an Ivy. Back in those days under-achievement was much more common and more tolerated. An 89 average at Stuyvesant is respectable enough not to rule you out. Of course, Mom being on the faculty doesn’t hurt.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        September 15, 2017 - 10:14 am | Permalink

        For my money, it’s tadzio who has hit the mark here.

        As I’m just two years older than Ted Gold, I know for a fact that there was no across the board tolerance whatsoever for underachievement in “those days,” certainly not at the Ivies, least of all at Columbia, which was one of the earliest beachheads of Jewish co-optation of US higher education.

        Big-donor privilege, paternal- or fraternal-alumnus privilege, faculty-parent privilege—yes, these were real things, and they got weighed in the admissions balance. A high school diploma from Stuyvesant or Bronx High School of Science was a major plus, too, but less for those schools’ prestige and academic demands than for the fact that 75 percent of those admitted and 90 percent of those graduated were Jewish kids.* Regis High School, for instance, had academic performance requirements and educational standards that left both those joints in the dust, but its grads enjoyed no comparable leg up.

        I pass over in silence the affirmative action / “diversity” joker that was also concealed in the Ivies’ and big state universities’ deck even in the early sixties. One might hear the occasional pious admissions-officer comment about the need to expose city-bred scholars to the sons of Midwestern farmers, but in practice, for every farmer’s son, Columbia admitted three Harlem kids with juvenile rap sheets.
        *Today’s Asian presence has dropped each of the Jewish numbers by twenty percentage points or more, but the early sixties were the halcyon days before the Yellow Peril arrived en masse.

  11. September 14, 2017 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    [Sigh] I think non-Jew Americans still haven’t come to terms with their past and present. Part of the clue is that phrase “They had to fork out a fortune in bail money.” The genocide in Vietnam was loved by Jews – as govt debt went up, whites died, many more ‘gooks’ died, weapons were made and sold, experimental weapons of the most disgusting sort tried out. The ‘weathermen’ presumably did all this. Their role was to pretend something was being done, while war rolled on, and Jews made money.
    @Arch Stanton – Jews have announced many ‘breakthroughs’. You sound just a bit naive in accepting DNA ‘breakthroughs’, especially since there is no way of getting DNA from a few thousand years back.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      September 14, 2017 - 11:58 pm | Permalink

      “…especially since there is no way of getting DNA from a few thousand years back…”

      “The oldest ever human nuclear DNA to be reconstructed and sequenced reveals Neanderthals in the making – and the need for a possible rewrite of our own origins.

      The 430,000-year-old DNA comes from mysterious early human fossils found in Spain’s Sima de los Huesos, or “pit of bones”.

      The fossils look like they come from ancestors of the Neanderthals, which evolved some 100,000 years later. But a 2013 study found that their mitochondrial DNA is more similar to that of Denisovans (see video, below), who also lived later and thousands of kilometres away, in southern Siberia.”

      New Scientist, March 14, 2016

      • September 15, 2017 - 7:24 am | Permalink

        Yes. That’s what they claim.

        • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
          September 15, 2017 - 9:57 am | Permalink

          I’m afraid you need a re-rerevision to regain your vision on reality.

          • September 15, 2017 - 1:53 pm | Permalink

            [1] Even if their age etc determination was true, the individual(s) identified might have been wiped out next year.
            [2] If you’re serious about ‘Jewish’ DNA, you’d need a real sample, preferably from Abraham and/or Moses and (to get some feel for what diversity they had) their surrounding tribe.
            [3] You’d also need something that reliably distinguished from all other human groups. However, the way DNA works remains mysterious, not surprisingly, and there’s no way to pick out DNA for cunning, fanaticism, reading/writing, persuasiveness… or, rather, the ways these manifest themselves in the brain and its related systems – might be brain size, electrical processing, biochemicals etc.
            [4] The good news might be that the ‘scientists’ in Israel pick on some processing, no doubt of cell fragments, and *publish* their criteria. With luck many tribes or what have you will qualify, and with more luck flood into Israel and improve it. But of course the ‘scientists’ will find they’d made a mistake.

    • John Walton's Gravatar John Walton
      September 14, 2017 - 11:58 pm | Permalink

      Perhaps I’m deluded but it has always seemed to me that if the right had properly vilified Communism it would have done a world of good. Sometimes I think the right is made up entirely of nincompoops and Quislings. All the raw materials for vilification are there even now. I am so sick of seeing conservatives coo over former Communists who have “seen the light.” Do you think the left would give the time of day to a former Nazi who had seen his error? No, they would jail him none the less.

      • September 15, 2017 - 7:24 am | Permalink

        You are deluded. Both the so-called ‘left’ and so-called ‘right’ were and are controlled by Jews.

      • September 15, 2017 - 10:00 pm | Permalink

        “Sometimes I think the right is made up entirely of nincompoops and Quislings. ”

        Are you sure you understand what Quisling and “Quislings” are all about?
        Vidkun Quisling is still revered by present day National Socialists.

    • September 15, 2017 - 8:49 am | Permalink

      I’m just observing and reporting my observations. As the old saying goes: “Don’t shoot the messenger!” Why not target the Jew instead?

  12. Sheila's Gravatar Sheila
    September 14, 2017 - 10:40 pm | Permalink

    The content of this article (part one) is simply true. As far as the indication to the end notes they are easily supplied by anyone willing to take half an hour or less looking them up and most are substantiated by the material supplied by the individual radicals themselves.

  13. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    September 15, 2017 - 8:04 am | Permalink

    It is ironic that the Marrano, Lyndon Johnson, was responsible for the fiasco of the Vietnam conflict (not war), yet the chosenites refer to it as the White man’s doing. I have never understood how so many failed to grasp this.

    • September 15, 2017 - 2:01 pm | Permalink

      It’s kept secret. Many people think Johnson was a Southern Baptist, not an ugly corrupt Jew channeling money with presumably Kissinger’s advice. It’s a standard Jewish practice to hide behind patsies, and conceal Jews whenever possible. (This is the reason I’d take a hefty bet that May turns out to think she’s a ‘Jew’). I mentioned this in a chat with A H Hitchcock (e.g. should be here; youtube has started nibbling big-lies.org/media/2017-08-03-rae-west-andrew-carrington-hitchcock-spot-the-jews.mp4 )
      It’s also standard practice not to have enquiries, as the Vietnam War shows. NB people interested in real America might read Miles W Mathis on Manson and others. Search for something like Miles Mathis Manson — well worth a read.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      September 15, 2017 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

      I believe you’re right on Johnson (Golda Meir’s doppelgänger), but the evidence, as I understand it, is circumstantial.

  14. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    September 17, 2017 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    Were can I find info on coke snorting Jews raping people.
    (Mod. Note: I thought this one was too funny to simply throw in the trash.)

  15. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    September 18, 2017 - 1:27 am | Permalink

    “which provided material support for civil rights workers. (Have you ever heard of a gentile who was so politically active in high school?) ”
    This is an important point. Having political thoughts probably has a genetic basis. The left have a tendency to take an interest in politics, and the right do not. Although the left are a minority, they end up dominating politics and the media. They were not able to do this in past centuries or millennia, as when life was hard and the wealth revolved around land ownership (and ability to defend it), a different type rose to positions of power and authority. That is why in past centuries the West was not ruled by those whose main motive was a hatred of their own race – or ‘the host race’ in the case of hostile guest races.

    In the past these types who are now activists of the left would have had to be a butcher or baker or candlestick maker. Now they can get on with gravitating to those professions where they can act on their political urges.

Comments are closed.