Polarization is good

Kevin MacDonald


The assault by the left on pretty much every shred of traditional American culture is speeding up dramatically. Just in the last few months there have been well-publicized attacks on Confederate statues that quickly morphed into attacks on Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and Christopher Columbus. Inviting anyone remotely associated with conservative ideas — much less the Alt Right or even the Alt Light — to give a talk at a college campus is an invitation for protests and rioting. Going to an NFL game has suddenly become a political act, as fans are treated to protests against symbols of America still deeply revered by a majority of Americans: the flag and national anthem. And much more.

There are several likely reasons for this dramatic acceleration in attacks on White America, its history, and its culture. First, Hillary Clinton lost the election. The left was on the cusp of going into end-game mode, so losing was incredibly frustrating, especially since she was expected to win easily. Clinton would have been able to appoint a replacement for Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, which would have been the death knell for the First Amendment. There is now a rich body of academic literature by leftist academics (but I repeat myself) on reining in speech related to diversity: “We won the intellectual war. It’s all over, so anyone disagreeing with our pronouncements on race and gender can and should be shut down — muh feelings.” And liberals like Elena Kagan would love to use these ideas in majority opinions — indeed, she has already written on this.

Clinton would have continued Obama’s DACA policy (or actually pushed to make them citizens) and she would have promoted a Gang-of-Eight-like “Comprehensive Immigration Plan” that would have dramatically increased legal immigration, given amnesty to illegals, etc. All the dates for Whites becoming a minority would be pushed up, to the great delight of the entire establishment.

Secondly, Donald Trump won. Whatever you think of Trump’s actual performance, the fact is that throughout the campaign and since taking office the media and pretty much the entire left has been labeling him a Nazi and White supremacist (I wrote 5 articles for Vdare on this).

This had the effect of mobilizing the left, and when Trump won, they were apoplectic — on the verge of complete victory with a “sure thing” Hillary victory, to having “White supremacists” in the White House. The tears that flowed after Trump won have been replaced by anger and sheer hatred.

And because this was framed from the beginning as a contest between the forces of good (our glorious multicultural future) versus evil (the “White supremacist” American past being promoted by the Nazi in the White House), anything was justified. The media ought to throw out normal standards of journalism and do everything they can to destroy Trump’s image. Violence against Trump supporters and certainly against the Alt Right is entirely justified. Etc.

The result is a level of political polarization not seen in this country probably since the Civil War. But the polarization is what had to happen for any possible movement in the direction of the Alt Right. The absolute worst thing would have been a Hillary-vs.-Jeb-type election where America keeps sleep-walking to Armageddon. The mobilization of the left has made clear the fault lines. This is about removing the traditional culture of America, and it is about removing Whites from the center of the American story. It is about replacement — first the monuments, then the people.

Solid majorities of Americans oppose removing the statues, and at least a plurality oppose the NFL protests — the percentages would sure be much higher if only Whites were polled. This means the traditional American majority is moving down the road toward being explicitly aware of what the game is. Reasonable White people watching this unfold cannot possibly believe that the glorious multicultural future will be anything but a disaster for White America. The hatred for White America that has been so obvious to Alt Right activists is inevitably seeping through to “just plain White folks.” The hatred will only intensify when Whites have less power. And when the 2018 and 2020 elections happen, there will be tremendous pressure on candidates to take stands on these issues.

This means that the racialization of politics that we have emphasized so much here will accelerate. The ~60% of White America that votes Republican will increase.

But that will happen only if the GOP is seen as a genuine alternative to the anti-White hatred that is so apparent on the left.  Trump has to push the envelope on diversity-related issues rather than endorse establishment GOP types like Luther Strange. He has to build the wall and push for lower legal immigration. And he has to stand strong on cultural issues like the monuments and BLM protests.

Even if he is unable to accomplish his diversity-related policy goals because of opposition from Dems and cucked Republicans in Congress, he gains nothing by abandoning these goals. His only chance is to make these issues into campaign issues where candidates are forced to take sides.

Political polarization means that emotions are the name of the game. When politics are polarized as intensely as they are now, the road to victory is by exploiting the emotions generated by the leftist mobilization.

Polarization is good in and of itself, but it is also obviously good for the Alt Right. The Alt Right was pushed into the mainstream by Hillary Clinton and media intent on damaging Trump. But polarization means that very substantial percentages of White America are getting very emotionally engaged with issues that the Alt Right has championed all along. Polarization means that Americans are gravitating to extremes, and the Alt Right will be there to greet them.

The big picture is that the program inaugurated by the Frankfurt School and promoted by the organized Jewish community is reaching a critical stage. It was a short step from the theory that White ethnocentrism was the fundamental problem (as opposed to the class struggle of classical Marxism) to promoting White guilt and massive non-White immigration. The new hostile elite encouraged minority identity politics and hostility toward traditional Americans and their culture. It was inevitable that there would be a strong negative reaction to this by a substantial percentage of White Americans —  even with all the propaganda — as the hatred becomes increasingly obvious. We are seeing it now. And it’s just the beginning.

Polarization not seen since the Civil War. Hmmm, perhaps a harbinger of the future.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

68 Comments to "Polarization is good"

  1. George's Gravatar George
    September 30, 2017 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

    “The hatred for White America that has been so obvious to Alt Right activists is inevitably seeping through to “just plain White folks.”
    – Yes, and I see and can even feel the hatred from blacks locally here in PA. Little things in daily transactions like a black woman who comes into the pizza shop and gives the white teen behind the counter a hard time while he is trying to serve her:
    “I don’t want that slice, I want the other slice there” as she orders a slice of pepperoni pizza on which there is NO difference whatsoever between any two slices among them. And as she leaves she is glaring at all the white patrons sitting in the (small) country pizza shop and enjoying their food. Blacks cross the streets in the towns and cities (like Philadelphia) at ANY point along the length of the streets and shuffle across slowly… ever… so… slowly whilst grinning at the white folks in the cars and DARING you to say anything or complain. Small things like this are daily occurrences, but wait, just you wait you white devils (you can picture them thinking this) until WE are in charge!

    “Trump has to push the envelope on diversity-related issues rather than endorse establishment GOP types like Luther Strange. He has to build the wall and push for lower legal immigration. And he has to stand strong on cultural issues like the monuments and BLM protests.”

    Trump’s election bought us a reprieve from the left’s agenda and saved us from Hillary, but he has flip-flopped on every issue that was a part of his political “platform” since the day of his inauguration. He promised to “drain the swamp”, but instead has populated his cabinet with (((them)))- even so far as to bring his (((son in law))) into the mix. He has been POTUS for more than 6 months and not a brick of that “wall” has been laid in place. He has exceeded his stated quota of 45,000 “refugees” for this year already (53,695 for FY 2017 according to Ann Corcoran’s website Refugee Resettlement Watch:
    https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/)

    I will believe that Trump will push the issues that you enumerate when I see Trump actually doing so. What I do see, is that the Oligarchs are now in overdrive trying to bring communism to the forefront and drive the world’s white populace into extinction. They have taken a page from history in the form of “Antifa” and modernized it for 2017 (Hitler’s brown shirts fought both Antifa and the communists back in the late 1920’s and those two groups ended up in his concentration camps when AH took power). They know that they can count on America’s modern populace to be ignorant of history to the point that they think nothing of using the very same symbol that Antifa used in Germany during the late ’20s. The only change made was to reverse the direction of the black and red flag on their circular emblem.

    At most, we have 3 and 1/2 years left to effect a reversal of our political fortunes- assuming that Trump is not impeached and booted from office prior to that. There is literally nothing more important for us at this point in time. The assault on whites encompasses the whole of what is left of Western Civilization now; most of Europe, Britain, Canada and the US. Of the remaining (mostly) white nations left only Russia, Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia are resisting the program due to their understanding of what is in store for them if they do not resist.

    • Zaida's Gravatar Zaida
      October 1, 2017 - 12:18 am | Permalink

      Your comment was good until the last five lines. We here on the European continent are under the onslaught of uncontrolled immigration invasion from Eastern Europe.
      The hatred e.g. of Poles or Russians toward Germans and Westerners has the same nature of Blacks’ against White Americans: Poles and Blacks have contributed nothing to modern civilisation so they want to destroy it, out of envy and hatred against its creators.
      Slavs who didn’t mix with Asians are White, but they are a small minority.

      • October 1, 2017 - 11:16 am | Permalink

        Poles were (((infested))) for centuries and had little help.
        .
        It it in fact true that most Poles are ‘part-Asians’? It seems hard to believe, and hard to believe they contributed as little as blacks. There were/are Polish cities, Polish musicians, Polish scientists and so on.

        • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
          October 1, 2017 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

          Mongolian admixture in Poles is a myth. See :
          No Mongolian Admixture in Poland. Polishness Blog. March 24, 2013.
          http://www.polishgenes.blogspot.com/2013/03/no-mongolian-admixture-in-poland.html Excerpt :

          “The lowest levels of the East Eurasian component are carried by Latvians, Poles, Germans, Czechs and Italians. But this looks like noise anyway, because the Chinese carry a reciprocal amount of the West Eurasian component. In other words, it’s most likely not a real signal of recent admixture from East Asia, but shared prehistoric Eurasian ancestry. If it’s not noise, and actually represents admixture from an East Asian source like the Mongolians, then it’s difficult to explain why it appears at a clearly higher level in Italians than Poles.”

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          October 1, 2017 - 6:33 pm | Permalink

          No black or jew could compose music as beautiful as Zbigniew Preisner.

      • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
        October 2, 2017 - 6:11 am | Permalink

        Polish people are not unique in hating their neighbors. The Irish hated the English and vise versa. The English hated the French and the Dutch and the Germans and so on. Poles did not hate the English because they lived so far away. Aside from that, Poles became the victims in a centuries old propaganda campaign of hate, probably starting with the Jews who lived in Poland, after other countries in Europe kicked them out. The Jews developed a particular animosity for Polish peasants, probably because they looked down on peasants in general, since they, themselves, concentrated on occupations which avoided manual labor. Americans, of course, know little of Polish history, since English speaking historians have written from their own biases. This animosity grew greatly during and after WWII because of Polish stubbornness regarding the evils of Russian communism. This stubbornness became an critical factor in bringing down the Soviet empire during the Reagan years. Commies have long memories and they do not forgive. I suppose we all know about Copernicus and his contributions to the science of astronomy. Wawrzyniec Goslicki, a Polish bishop, wrote a political treatise which influenced Thomas Jefferson’s writing of the Declaration of Independence. We are also well aware of Frederick Chopin’s contributions to music. Perhaps, not so well known is the work of pioneer anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski. Let us also not forget Marie Sklodowska-Curie who discovered radium. Henry Sienkiewicz won the Nobel Prize for literature for his historical novels. Going back in history, King Jan Sobieski led German, Polish and Lithuanian armies against the Ottoman Muslims and stopped them from invading Europe at the gates of Vienna. Poland was the first country on the continent of Europe to institute a government under the authority of a written constitution. That did not last long because German, Austrian and Russian Empires invaded and partitioned the nation three ways. That is not a good way to make friends.

      • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
        October 2, 2017 - 6:26 am | Permalink

        Let’s make it clear. We’re not interested in fighting among ourselves.

        “For those who boast of their “purity,” you have 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents and so on. Go back 500 years or so and you have a million ancestors. A few more generations and everyone who ever trod the lands of Europe is your ancestor, including Huns, Mongols and Moors. There are no 100% pure Aryans as per 10,000 years ago. But we still do exist as a distinct and unique biological entity. The cultures and civilizations we create are beyond comparison. The beauty of our women, blondes, brunettes, redheads, green-eyed, blue-eyed, brown-eyed, is the desire of all men and the envy of all women. So, we do not want to be derailed by gossip or speculation on who may be 1/16th Indian or have some Italian, Spanish or Portuguese blood. We are not going to debate over whether the collective remaining White gene pool is 95% or 97% pure Aryan.

        Surely it would be a tragedy if the various divisions of our race lose their distinctive traits and beauty. And after we have secured the existence of our people and a future for ALL our children, hopefully we can take steps to preserve this diversity. But for now, we are going to accept the facts and circumstances as they exist. We are going to work together for the holy cause and we will not tolerate provocateurs, divisions or dissension. If someone looks White, acts White, fights White, then until their actions prove otherwise, they are our Folk. On the other hand, regardless of pedigree or appearance, those who oppose, criticize, hinder or fail to support our cause are no friends of ours.”

        David Lane (From, Who is White?)

        • Stefania Says's Gravatar Stefania Says
          October 2, 2017 - 10:40 am | Permalink

          I agree with this quote 100%. We’ve got to stop arguing over minor differences and get down to the business of securing our people’s future.

        • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
          October 4, 2017 - 4:05 am | Permalink

          I agree with the sentiment here however not with the banal use of statistics concerning genetics such as 95% or 97% “Aryan”. I for one have had my DNA tested and I am 100% white. I come from Croatia. I have had academics tell me that my people have mixed with Moors, Turks and Mongols. Academics who actually do not realise that occupation does not necessarily lead to miscegenation. Thankfully, DNA and haplo group testing in particular has proven what we know by just looking at ourselves in the mirror or talking with our neighbours. We are white. I am white. 100%. Same testing has shown Poles to be European as well.

        • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
          October 4, 2017 - 12:20 pm | Permalink

          Thank you so much for this. Perfect, moving, timeless words for clarification, inspiration and moral support, in the struggle now and the fight which is eventually to come.

        • Eric's Gravatar Eric
          October 5, 2017 - 12:46 pm | Permalink

          You wrote: “A few more generations and everyone who ever trod the lands of Europe is your ancestor, including Huns, Mongols and Moors.”

          That’s utter rubbish.

          • October 7, 2017 - 6:32 am | Permalink

            This line of thought was present in H G Wells. But not in a developed form. There are problems, I think mostly to do with the simple difficulty of trying to imagine very long time intervals and very large numbers of ancestors.

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            October 7, 2017 - 8:04 am | Permalink

            “Utter rubbish” seems provocative–but unsupported. Does an argument exist behind it?

      • Stefania Says's Gravatar Stefania Says
        October 2, 2017 - 10:38 am | Permalink

        I am of Polish descent and I can tell you that any Pole that I have ever met has not had any noticeable Asian characteristics. I myself look 100% European and certainly think of myself as White. From what I can see when looking at photos of Poles in Poland, I think that only a minority of Poles look mixed. Most look European and I am sure think of themselves as Europeans.

        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          October 3, 2017 - 5:04 am | Permalink

          It’s a non-issue. I personally would not care if any member of my family married an individual from a group of 100 IQ normality, whose ethnicity produced an independent and autonomous civilization. This is with regression to the mean in mind. Excluded would be all Muslims, Jews, Aboriginal People. In fact, I would prefer that thet candidate came from a TRADITIONAL society, one of continuity and centeredness.

          As Jared Taylor, old Japanese Hand, said about Asians : “They’re just like us”.
          We should be more “K” like them. See Ruston (search) on Amren. Instead, we seem to have been “Slouching Toward Gomorrah” (and gonorrhea) for over two generations. Less politely, we are becoming more like Negroes, than Asians.

        • October 4, 2017 - 2:32 am | Permalink

          Some of the most beautiful women I’ve met came from Poland, if they aren’t the arch type “white”, I don’t know what is.

      • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
        October 3, 2017 - 1:12 am | Permalink

        hahaha! By year 2100, there will be far more pure White East than West Europeans. Poles are among the Whitest peoples on Earth.

  2. anarchyst's Gravatar anarchyst
    September 30, 2017 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

    The term “racism” was invented by communists, and is used to destroy cultures and defuse (and render impotent) those with differing points-of-view on “racial” issues.

    That being said . . .
    True “racism” is desirable as it merely cements cultural and social bonds that are necessary for a society to function and flourish.

    True “racism” merely denotes commonality of purpose and advancement within each respective racial group.

    Blacks have the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanics have La Raza and Mecha, Jews have the $PLC, ACLU and ADL. These are all “racist” organizations that serve to promote the interests (and political power) of their respective races.

    It is only whites who are castigated and threatened for attempting to show any signs of racial solidarity.

    Let’s look at what us “evil, privileged” whites have done for Western society and the world:

    1. “Civil-rights (for some)” laws (that effectively destroy “freedom of association” for whites, but not for other races) and do not apply to whites–only “people of color” are covered by these so-called “civil-rights (for some)” protections, (Ask “Attorney General” Loretta Lynch about that).

    2. “Affirmative action” policies (that push better qualified whites out of positions and jobs that they would ordinarily qualify for) in favor of lesser-qualified minorities. In fact, “affirmative action” policies actually damage those minorities who are quite capable of “making it on their own” because they get “lumped in” with the groups that cannot make it on their own without “help”,

    3. “Contract set-asides” (that are specifically targeted for minorities (that white people are prohibited from bidding on) and immigration policies (that specifically exclude whites, most of who have skills that would benefit the USA) in favor of those from the third-world (with no marketable skills).

    4. Scholarships that specify particular ethnic groups are looked upon favorably by most people, save one–scholarships that are intended for whites only are looked upon as being “racist”, and therefore impermissible and improper in today’s racially-charged climate of “political correctness”.

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

    Whites are imbued with an externalized altruism possessed by no other race. This externalized altruism that “looks out for the other guy” will be the demise of the white race. This altruism needs to be internalized and focused inward, just as other races have done. There is NO SHAME in looking out for one’s own kind.

    “Multiculturalism” and “diversity” are code-words for white genocide.

    Since whites comprise approximately 6% of the world’s population, it is whites who are the true minority, on a worldwide basis. Being a true minority on a worldwide basis, it is whites who should be the most cherished and protected of minorities.

    I blame those of the “greatest generation” for selling out our birthright with the passage of the “Civil-Rights Acts” of 1957 and 1964, and the “Hart-Cellar immigration act of 1965”.

    It turns out that the old-time segregationists were right, all along…

    • October 1, 2017 - 11:10 am | Permalink

      I hate to carp, but I think you’re claiming more resistance from whites than they’ve shown. They haven’t ‘BENT OVER BACKWARDS’ – they’ve been defeated by (((aggressors))). And your ‘externalised altruism’ is in my view a mistake, too: whites have been as lethal with each other, usually I like to think under (((hostile))) pressure, as any other groups– just ask survivors, if any, of Germans after WW2, or Russians/Slavs etc forced by (((Stalin))) to be killed by Germans. Whites have just crumbled, as the “greatest generation” did under (((propaganda))) and (((money))). And as far as I know ‘old-time segregationalists’ didn’t put anything like enough emphasis on the (((real enemy))). It’s necessary that whites have some sort of solid, tough, firm, international mutual organisation, as (((Jews))) and their puppets have.

    • Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
      October 1, 2017 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

      I agree. The so called greatest generation of Americans, were in the main, totally clueless, almost willfully so.

  3. Peter Baggins's Gravatar Peter Baggins
    September 30, 2017 - 6:28 pm | Permalink

    Yes Kevin, polarization is good and quite necessary at this stage of the struggle. People need to speak out on the left’s most extreme positions, most hypocritical one-sided diatribes, and most hateful and violent actions. Fox and Breitbart and others do a pretty good job. But the critique can’t just come from angry old white men, as the leftist media often likes to charge.So new voices like Tomi Lauren are most welcome.
    http://insider.foxnews.com/people/tomi-lahren

    The best stance for us is to repeatedly show the left as being extreme, unfair, hypocritical, hateful and anti-American and not be any of these things ourselves. Trump seems uncanny and adept at baiting the left to come out swinging, further alienating many Americans except the diehard left. Hopefully these tactics will continue to shrink their political influence and control. They may not be winning many elections lately, but they still have an iron grip on the mainstream media, Hollywood, our Universities and our educational system in general.

  4. September 30, 2017 - 8:17 pm | Permalink

    Very good piece (though I like to hope there was a bit of polarization over WW1, WW2, and plenty of other wars). And there is nothing more important.

    • September 30, 2017 - 8:21 pm | Permalink

      NB the descriptions of barely-hidden hate are one of the identifying marks of Jews and their divide-and-try-to-rule. Germans and Russians for example must have felt the same hatred from British and US soldiers and their commanders. And of course there are innumerable variations. And blacks and the low-IQ are far more easily led, at least before real trouble starts.

  5. Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
    September 30, 2017 - 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Polarization can help us, but it also radicalizes the enemy. I do not believe that any electoral victory can save the White cause, either. Look at the strength of the establishment. It has the media, an extremely powerful mind-control mechanism; academe and public schools; the courts on the whole (which as we have seen can hamstring the executive power); and most of both political parties. Above all, over the minds of the populace. There is no way the enemy will permit a defeat of their agenda without ultimate measures, and they have the military and the police. They will continue to tighten the screws, at each step carefully dehumanizing the opposition. Look at the narrative they have fashioned over the events at Chancellorsville! Whites will not organize until it’s too late, in my opinion; I hope I am wrong. They will only fight when faced with personal and familial destruction. The enemy will cleverly reduce the opposition until it is isolated and demoralized. The only thing that can save the Whites is a peerless and fearless leader, a genius and courageous orator (sound familiar?). Nothing else will unite the Whites. At this late stage there doesn’t even exist a bona fide White movement. IF the government totters in the coming civil war and the Whites can obtain the help of elements of the police and armed forces, then there will be hope, but only on a regional basis. If whites get a fighting chance, historically they could dominate. Can they now, after so long a course in deracination? God help us!

    • Fred Mertz's Gravatar Fred Mertz
      October 1, 2017 - 11:33 am | Permalink

      The first priority is to save the First Amendment. Very important who Trump nominates to fill the next vacancy. Apart from that not so important if Trump welshes on promises. What we need is time and freedom from harassment to organize a movement. The GOP has been a ‘controlled opposition’ for decades thanks to the influence of billionaire donors who do not even hide their liberalism on everything that doesn’t affect their tax rates. The Alt Right is a good sign because for the first time ever we have a right-wing movement that is young and hip rather than senescent and timid. Their ethic of taboo-breaking must be encouraged and we must make it a central concern to minimize the costs of being ‘doxed’ or punished for being a right-winger. The huge question is this: blacks, Latinos, Muslims are poor and powerless. Treating them as evil enemies is a hard sell, but pointing the finger of accusation where it belongs is an even harder sell. Or is it? Remember Thomas Watson who united white and black against the Yankee overlords? The anti-white agenda is carried out in the name of non-whites and other minorities, but the people behind it do not belong to those minorities. So framing the resistance before the public eye takes more than a little skill.

      • Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
        October 1, 2017 - 1:28 pm | Permalink

        At this point I think that preserving the First Amendment on paper will do nothing for the right to free speech in the streets. The Left will never give us the “time and freedom from harassment” to organize a movement. Only a highly motivated, cohesive organization will be able to defend itself and fight to win adherents. And only a charismatic leader can bring this into being. Such a leader must cleverly appeal to as broad a swath of Whites as possible, then unite them around a clear, simple goal. He must also inspire fanatical devotion, for his followers will be called upon to actually fight in the streets.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          October 1, 2017 - 8:41 pm | Permalink

          Whites finance the System. As disenchantment among whites grows, their willingness to contribute will diminish. As the System starts to show its more diabolical side, it will also start to lose economic vigor.

          Maybe instead of one grand leader (too easy to be picked off), one hundred thousand great ones.

        • Fred Mertz's Gravatar Fred Mertz
          October 2, 2017 - 5:12 am | Permalink

          Free speech in the streets will be easier to come by if the First Amendment is functioning. Apart from that, it has been pointed out that any charismatic leader would be killed or arrested for something or other, so it’s going to be a grapevine movement for a while. Get enough bodies on board and the streets may yield. Always remember that Trump won the white male vote decisively. Now who holds the power in society (other than Jews)? How many Trump voters are okay with all the BS that’s been going on lately? It’s just a matter of somehow getting them off the sidelines, if only to write a letter to the editor.

      • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
        October 3, 2017 - 1:27 am | Permalink

        No, that is the second priority. The first is always preserving the 2nd Amendment. Beyond that, what is needed is mass mobilization of disaffected Whites into a formal organization, that we might have a mechanism to support each other, as well as merely to recognize our own potential power. In unity there is strength. I believe there are many millions of Whites who could be easily mobilized if they could somehow recognize their latent, collective economic power. Why is it always rightists who have to fear for our careers if we should get doxed (I am one of them)? There are 170 million Whites in America; if only 30 million are “down” with the Alt-right (with say 60 million neutral, stupid, ignorant, beyond worldly cares, etc, and another 20 million unreachable liberals – the rest being minors), that is still enough to create its own internal economy. An alt-rightist gets doxed; well, he just moves from his leftist-owned job to one with an alt-right-sympathetic business.

        We must have real world networking (the same as the Jews have), or we will never get off the internet and really preserve our ace and civilization.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          October 3, 2017 - 11:04 pm | Permalink

          Gentlemen:

          It’s well past time to face the fact that neither the First nor the Second Amendment is anything but a dead letter. Indeed, the entire Constitution is a dead letter. It affords US citizens, whites pre-eminently, no more protection than (((our masters))) deem appropriate to their purposes at any given time. When they decide it’s time for these parchment fragments to shrivel up and blow away, that’s precisely what will happen. The deck is stacked and the dice are loaded against us.

          As Joseph Sobran (1946–2010) wrote, “[T]he U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.”

          Apropos Sobran, KM wrote a touching eulogy of Sobran shortly after his death that included a great many quotes wherein wit is surpassed only by wisdom—especially wisdom about the shell game called democracy.

          • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
            October 10, 2017 - 12:41 am | Permalink

            Pierre, I forget the reason for calling for a Constitutional Convention decades ago, in order to make it a better and improved product [ like a detergent ].

            An uproar was engendered by the fear and procedural possibility to also bring unannounced changes about, once it convened; [ which prevented it ].

            As I regretfully commented and predicted last year, during the general euphoria on the right, after Mr. T declares manufactured political bankruptcy in 2020, the circumvention of these two vital, mutually interdependent Amendments will advance to their formalized recall, by a majority in both chambers.

            PS I’d rather share a bottle of wine than this morose outlook, but the handwriting on the wall is indelible. Responded to your Dreyfus query; though inconsequentially. Stay well youngster.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            October 10, 2017 - 11:24 am | Permalink

            Amen to all, Charles.

            I recall well the matter of the new convention away back when. Oddly, one of those who made the point you refer to—viz., the distinct possibility of rather more change than anyone bargained for—was Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Given Pat’s general pusillanimity, I long wondered whether his saying what he did was an instance of wandering off the script or merely an expression of his certainty that (((his guys))) were already holding all the aces.

            Happily, good sense finally got the better of me, and I ceased caring.

    • Livonia's Gravatar Livonia
      October 2, 2017 - 1:12 pm | Permalink

      When the Whites will start speaking up of the TRUTH, they will free themselves. Not until then.
      No Tucker Carlsons or Hannities with 1/10 of the Truth etc. It styes as a LIE anyways.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      October 2, 2017 - 1:29 pm | Permalink

      Karl Nemmersdorf,

      Please keep in mind that as a European man or woman each of us is a potential revolutionary.

  6. Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
    September 30, 2017 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the excellent summary of the current position. I have experienced creeping, low-level horror over the accelerating anti-White campaign over the past several years. I didn’t expect this so soon, but they are really pushing the issue. You illustrate why this is happening very well. I think the enemy’s militancy shows that they feel that now is a good time to push for a final showdown, and that really makes me nervous. What won’t they try at this point? They are pushing for the endgame. One question I have is, do White websites have an alternative platform if the enemy shuts them down? Also, can anyone explain the extent of Israeli penetration of the Internet? The capabilities of their surveillance?

    • Fred Mertz's Gravatar Fred Mertz
      October 2, 2017 - 5:15 am | Permalink

      We really need to learn a few ABCs of politics from those other guys …

  7. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    September 30, 2017 - 10:20 pm | Permalink

    I’m trying to look back to see any previous period where so many existential threats were looming over a people, and you have to look a long long way back. Perhaps to the end of the Roman Empire.

    We seem to be on the brink of economic catastrophe, demographic catastrophe, political collapse and nuclear destruction all at the same moment in time… It is difficult to be optimistic about the future. But when you begin connecting the dots, all of these pending disasters have their root cause in one single (((problem))). If people can find the gumption and where-with-all to physically sweep this tiny hostile minority from our lands, all things become possible again.

    The only true political power of the masses is their willingness and ability to form angry mobs that storm the comfortable homes of the elites that presume to rule over them. This is a lesson learned over and over throughout history. This time will be no different. We have the power, but do we have the will to survive necessary to act? This remains to be seen, but things are looking up from what I can see.

    • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
      October 2, 2017 - 8:22 am | Permalink

      “…But when you begin connecting the dots, all of these pending disasters have their root cause in one single (((problem))). If people can find the gumption and where-with-all to physically sweep this tiny hostile minority from our lands, all things become possible again. ”

      Fear not…, as Trump gathers (((“…this tiny hostile minority …”))) around him to help him govern, one can rest assured that the old adage will hold true…,
      “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer”.

      Do not be surprised if one day Trump has these Jews all lined up like the smug little criminal ducks in a row that they are and in one fell swoop makes duck soup out of all of them.

      Swamp Drained, Case Closed.

  8. Raymond Caruso's Gravatar Raymond Caruso
    October 1, 2017 - 9:11 am | Permalink

    If it comes to an armed conflict—and everything points in that direction—our goal must be an all-White America from sea to shining sea and extending to the furthermost reaches of Arctic Canada. There are already too many black cesspool states in Africa and Caribbean as well as mestizo ones south of the border; there is no point in allowing the enemy to create yet more in North America, as those would be a perpetual source of banditry, illegal immigration, and strife of all types—and that’s to say nothing of the fact the creation of these entities would deprive many Whites of their homeland. How can we in good conscience cede the state of Mississippi to a New Africa when Mississippi Whites voted for Trump at a higher rate than any other Whites? If anyone thinks mass expulsion of non-Whites is somehow “not nice” or “unfair”, they should remember the fate they have in mind for us. It is nothing but humiliation, dispossession, brutalization, and finally extinction.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      October 6, 2017 - 2:02 am | Permalink

      And there is that HUGE continent of Africa. The Africans in America seem so proud of it, so let them live in the place they are proud of (Africa) and not in Western countries where they keep complaining about the whites, and keep attacking them. The way to make this happen (emigration to Africa) without bloodshed is to simply pay their benefits in Africa, ie their bank card with their free money every week works in Africa and not in America. The bank card would work for their lifetimes and perhaps retain 1/4 of its value for one generation after that. Watch them follow the money. A lot of dollars would end up in Africa but offset this against the huge toll that black crime and welfare takes on the nation’s resources, and overall the tax payers would still be better off despite this huge bribe to emigrate.

  9. October 1, 2017 - 11:46 am | Permalink

    In the past, both the USA as well as Germany needed a “wake-up-signal”. Without that signal both folks would have slept into their disappearance from our earth. — But: In Germany Frau Merkel invited one million non whites to come in the year 2015. And they came. From that time on the German folk is awaken from a 50 year long sleep. We have had our wakening call. We stand at the edge of extinction. Our fate would have been to be extinguished in the coming decades, due to the the number of Turks and so on, which had come slowly into Germany for 50 years, each year increasing their number a medium bit more.

    But now there is a great mass coming. A million or two per year of Negroes, Arabs and Asians (Afghans, Tchetchens and others). And the German state encourages this. This is the wakening call for the German folk and it has been heared very well. We stand up and we know that we have to fight “like a cornered rat”. It is them or we, all or nothing, to be or not to be. It is our survival and that of our children.

    We Germans know that we can not do this task alone. Even in case we would suceed in our country at the first place, there would be a defeat in the second place, you can compare that to the German history in the first half of the 20th century.
    So we want to do this great task of the survival of the white folks together with the other white folks, hand in hand with European folks and folks with European heritage and ancestors.

    • John's Gravatar John
      October 1, 2017 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

      Karlfried, this is their plan.

      1) http://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/en/the-council/

      “The Council has been established in 2001 and is an advisory body to the German Government. Its 15 members are nominated by the Chancellor for a (renewable) term of three years. The current members have been nominated in November 2016. The Council’s mandate is the following:
      It advises the government on its sustainable development policy and, by presenting proposals for targets and indicators, seeks to advance the Sustainability Strategy as well as propose projects for its realization. A further task is to foster social dialogue on the issue of sustainability. The objective here is to increase the level of awareness among all concerned and the population as to what sustainable development actually means by demonstrating the consequences of social action and discussing possible solutions.”

      2) A document that you can download from their web site:

      RNE_Visionen_2050_Band_2_texte_Nr_38_Juni_2011

      From page 90 of that pdf document:

      “nicht mehr benutzt seit etwa welchem Jahr
      2040
      Grund der nicht weiter erfolgten Nutzung
      Nicht mehr benötigt, da Menschen so ‘gemischt’ sind, dass jeder einen Migrationshintergrund hat.”

      Google translation:

      “No longer used since about what year
      2040
      Reason for discontinued use
      No longer needed because people are so ‘mixed’ that everyone has a migration background. ”

      https://i.imgur.com/KHezPyZ.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/PBuam6X.jpg

    • Vigilante Jesus's Gravatar Vigilante Jesus
      October 1, 2017 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

      No more internecine strife. The next time we fight, we fight together.
      https://twitter.com/Winston1984_101/status/914192712831787010

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      October 2, 2017 - 3:43 am | Permalink

      Karlfried: “Without that signal both folks would have slept into their disappearance from our earth”

      This is an important point (the signal, the wake-up, in this case, Merek’s invasion of immigrants), giving a practical example of the people needing some change of factors in their lives (economic or otherwise) to waken them up from what Kevin MacDonald describes as ‘sleep-walking into Armageddon’.

      We should not imagine that the left and their allies always use the best tactics, just because they are managing to set the culture narrative for now and so far have successfully persuaded the people to vote against their own interests. To wake up the people is always going to be a bad tactic for the left, for the reason that the message the left sell to the majority (via the people accepting the prevailing culture) – the message the left sell is one that is contrary to many fundamental animal behavioural urges (it is not natural to self-hate and self-destruct).

      The best tactic of the left (and allies) regarding immigration would have been to carry on slowly, slowly with the immigration from the third world that Karlfried refers to, but they could not help themselves and they increased it so much that it woke up 14% in Germany.

      Kevin MacDonald: “The mobilization of the left has made clear the fault lines. ”
      On again, the best tactics of the left would have been to pretend they fully embrace democracy and pretend to be peaceful and caring and just wait until Trump leaves.
      This revealing of their true natures by becoming more extreme is a bad tactic of the left. It would have been much better to carry on pretending to be simply ‘caring’ and ‘compassionate’, especially when selling your message to the young.

      In the same way, Hollywood’s best tactics would have been to keep the anti-white message more subtle, but they too could not help themselves and are so blatant now that it has affected their profits.

      Another example of bad tactics is muslims setting off bombs in the West.
      Today’s news: DM paper “At least 20 people have been killed and 24 injured after at least one gunman unloaded hundreds of rounds of ammo on a Las Vegas country music festival on Sunday night. There were 30,000 people in attendance at the event.” We all know that this will make 30,000 people and their friends and relatives MORE inclined to vote for a closed border. How the left must be in despair over this attack. Not because they care about white people being shot, but because they fear it will make the voters less inclined to accept their narrative that the West must open their borders and invite the third world over.

      In Britain, our muslim-friendly prime minister and her muslim-loving government are spending 9 billion a year (and cutting the rest of the police service) just to monitor the most extreme 3000 muslims and stop them from kicking off too soon and turning the population against the government’s open-door immigration policy that it also supported by various Jewsish websites. The government are keen that the muslims stop showing their true natures until there are more of them, but the muslim extremists (however you define this) cannot help themselves, and this is making the indigenous resentful, and beginning to actually consider the government’s immigration policy when they vote, instead of voting without thinking as per usual.

      It is the same with the Jews. Their insistence that no-one questions the H word or even criticises them is making the people resentful, and as more time passes after the War there will be less inclination for the people of the West to cling to a wartime propaganda version of events just so they can convince themselves that they had a good reason for willingly sending off their sons and husbands to wars that killed off the country’s best men. Better tactics for the Jews would be to act friendly instead of aggressive.

      Basically, there is a struggle for the hearts and minds of the ignorant 80% majority in the middle. At present they are accepting the self-hate narrative of the left (and allies) but this is actually a hard sell for the left. The cultural narrative that the people are currently obeying is not one that sits well with their other inner instincts such as self-interest.

      This suggests that it can easily switch to a new narrative when certain events prompt this to happen. And the massive invasion arranged by Merkel is such an event.

      However I fail to understand how only 13% so far in Germany have woken up. I suppose the people are more sheep-like and politically unaware and following the MSM more than I imagined. I suppose we have to wait until the effect of the millions of invaders spreads a little more. Once the ball starts rolling more will switch sides.

      Another scenario is that significant numbers of whites (rich and poor) actually agree with the far left and their allies and really do keenly want the third world to come over and join them (eg see the comments under this DM article about a white man and his black girlfriend: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4938786/Former-neo-Nazi-swastika-tattoos-removed.html#comments). Are these people in the comments section who are jumping up and down for joy at this marriage, are they representative of a small proportion of the people or a large one?)

      If there are significant numbers of whites fully devoted to making their own country like S Africa, perhaps the future will not be one of simply ‘waking up’ where the whites remain united and change immigration policy, and maybe instead different sub-populations of whites will migrate (ie self-sort) to different states or countries according to their politics. This could happen with or without actual civil war. (Already this self-sorting happens, as people move to red or blue states).

      But bear in mind that even if the patriotic whites went to live on the moon and could not be accused of ‘depriving’ anyone on earth, still their very existence would still antagonise the left and arouse the intense hatred of the white left (plus allies) on earth.

      • October 2, 2017 - 6:52 am | Permalink

        Good article, with fascinating comments. But – and again I hate to carp – but your calm identification with ‘waking up’ and voting isn’t accurate. The parties are controlled by Jews; other parties do not get free paper money, free advertising by state organisations, and can easily be fakes in any case. They receive no publicity, and any truths from them (for example, costs of ‘immigration’) are kept hidden. And this is quite apart from practical issues, which make any decision difficult. For example it’s obvious that Jews have to have money-printing taken from them, but how should this be done? It’s obvious that invaders should not have a vote or passport, but how should this be done? The whole situation is analogous to people fighting wartime censorship: virtually no Americans do anything about overseas wars and would have found it difficult in any case, with the systematic lying of departments and bureaucracies. People may awake, but clearing up ‘Jewish’ filth and ruin needs more than just votes.

        • October 2, 2017 - 1:48 pm | Permalink

          In Germany we have harvest festival. Our local farmers` magazine has this frontpage:
          http://www.probonocontramalum.de/Laufendes-2017-525-110.jpg
          It is a fresh young woman with rosy cheeks. Please look at the picture, maybe enlarge it, and you will understand without further words what we Germans fight for: for her life, for her and our future.

          Now some remarks towards some of the commenters above.

          John, October 1, 2017 – 12:38 pm: John, thank you, I did not know this. I checked it and there is a film (two minutes). From second 23 to 35 Frau Merkel visited this company, made a speech and she praised in that speech that very book that you have quoted.
          h***ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVpeHVhJT_Y
          – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
          Vigilante Jesus, October 1, 2017 – 2:19 pm, Thank you. Please see at this well known picture: Next time we fight it will be side by side. A British and a German soldier.
          h***ttp://i.imgur.com/uFpDtUU.jpg
          – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
          pterodactyl, October 2, 2017 – 3:43 am, you made a very long and extremely interesting comment. – – – The term “awakening” I have taken from David Duke “My awakening”, years ago.
          – – – – –
          You write: ” … Basically, there is a struggle for the hearts and minds of the ignorant 80% majority in the middle. At present they are accepting the self-hate narrative of the left (and allies) but this is actually a hard sell for the left. The cultural narrative that the people are currently obeying is not one that sits well with their other inner instincts such as self-interest. …”

          I think that about 80% of a folk are cowards or silly and that is a given fact, neither good nor bad, but a given fact. We can take that for granted and we can make use of this fact. In case we wanted to change the masses, we would run against a wall, we would give our momentum away, we would gain nothing. But: If we accept our folks the way they are, we can predict how they will behave and we can draw advantages for our cause. – – –
          Our adversary is a small group of less than 2% of the population and we should not allow them to be hidden behind the masses. – – – The masses will always have an excusion for doing nothing. They will go along with the winner, that is the only thing that they will do. We do not need the masses, because our adversary or competitor is a tiny group. If we wait for the masses to act, we will loose time. It is the other way round: In the very moment that the masses see that we have success, they will follow.

          From that point of view there is little value in arguing about our right to live: “We want to live and that is all! No further words! Those who do not like this can go away, they can step aside.
          – – – – – – – – –

          rerevisionist, October 2, 2017 – 6:52 am: Your comment itself is fascinating. I quote: “… but your calm identification with ‘waking up’ and voting isn’t accurate. …”
          In case that this quote refers to my comment above, I can say that I agree with you.
          The awakening will not reach 51% of the folk, and the task cannot be solved by political means and votings alone. There must be a big “plus” of other activities from our side. If the awakening will reach 10% of the folk, that is the active part, than that part will bring the success. 10% is 5 times more than our competitors are.

          • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
            October 5, 2017 - 4:02 am | Permalink

            Karlfried: “They will go along with the winner, that is the only thing that they will do.”
            Maybe this is the explanation as to why the Germans continue to vote for Merkel and why in Britain the people continue to vote for open borders and why in America open-borders Hillary nearly won, ie the explanation is perhaps that they are just going along with the dominant narrative as a result of some inner animal behaviour instinct that just tells them to follow the current winning narrative/culture and don’t think deeply about it. By ‘think about it’ perhaps most people do not have the mental capacity to think about political matters. I do not mean they are stupid in other ways, just that when it comes to politics they are.

            In my view the way that explains most things going on is to follow Kevin MacDonald’s approach, which is to see humans as an animal species where the behaviour is in our wiring, that in turn comes from the genes plus environment. We like to think of ourselves as spiritual creatures who can disconnect from our animal side and rise above it and think logically, but in my view the opposite is the case.

            The wiring we have today in the West was selected over thousands of years and was selected under different ‘terms and conditions’ ie the factors were different, including the ‘ability’ for a group of similar people (ie a subset of the main gene pool) to just emigrate away from the main group. Now we (western humans) have been suddenly transposed into a different environment. Many of the genes of the population can no longer change. This changing happened in the prehistoric past for some genes but is no longer taking place for some genes. This is because the number of offspring per adult is very small therefore all adult effort is put into guaranteeing that their one or two children will grow to adulthood whatever faults they have. (Being short sighted or having bad teeth or being vulnerable to flu are not selected against). An example of a gene that is NOT being selected against is the gene for anti-social behaviour such as criminal or psychopathic behaviour. In fact, you could say the left have used the wealth of the state to encourage such types to breed. The government now pays them per child produced. And an example of a gene that IS being selected against is the gene for not wanting children. In the past social pressures meant that whether or not a woman or man wanted children they would still marry and have them. Today if you have this gene you can remain childless (and make your partner childless, thanks to individualistic types accepting the moral code of one woman per man via the marriage vows ‘in sickness and health and if one of you does not want children and is dominant, then you will remain childless’ This was not part of the arrangement before contraception).

            Our politics comes from our wiring, but for the 80% their politics can easily shift as in their case the wiring for translating their views into political voting is weak and they are using culture-following rather than logical thinking to decide who to vote for. These are the kind of people the MSM were appealing to in Europe when they showed the picture of the dead baby on the beach so the Europeans would accept the mass immigration via Italy and Greece, just because one baby drowned. And the same MSM would not even show the bomb that the Manchester bomber used. The real reason was they knew it would antagonise the people against the bombers, but the reason they gave was to ‘not upset the victims’.

            But this ‘going along with the narrative’ is more than just shrugging the shoulders and saying ‘I will go along with any narrative’. It is more than this, as if it was just submission to whoever is in charge, this would be limited to making people never question the narrative at work, but it would not extend to the secret environment of the polling booth. If it was ‘I disagree with the narrative but will say nothing’ then such a person would submit to the narrative in public but not when voting. The fact that they also submit when voting shows that in their minds they have switched into not only nodding and saying ‘okay’ to the narrative, they have actually gone further and embraced or at least accepted it. But as the narrative they embrace is actually in conflict with all their other inner animal behaviour instincts (self-hate is not natural, inviting over hostile other races who are racist against you is not natural, and the way the left encourage crime is also something most people are not comfortable with) – this suggests that when a new narrative arrives one day in the West (perhaps after economic collapse or civil unrest) that is actually in harmony with their instincts, then the people will quickly switch to embracing the new one. Groups that we can no longer criticise will suddenly have their protection removed.

            Perhaps the switch to a new narrative will not happen while the people remain wealthy and will not happen while the rich and the middle class can still live in safe neighbourhoods and therefore shielded from the crime and immigration that they vote for. For example, there is a place in Britain called Eastbourne where there is very low crime and you rarely see a non-white face, and where house prices are very high as it is a place where the wealthy white retire with all their money. The place is spotless and I have never seen any graffiti. Guess how they voted at the last election. LIBERAL ie for the far-left party most in favour of bringing over the third world, and most in favour of criminals and their rights. These selfish people would soon vote differently if they had to personally experience what they vote for. I despise them more than the white working class who vote for the far-left LABOUR to get the welfare bribe. At least these left-wing voters have a motive for their treachery – ie wealth redistribution their way, whereas the middle class left have no possible motive apart from (a) stupidity in accepting the narrative (ie ‘they will go along with the winner’) or (b) inner hatred to whites from lefty instincts. But I cannot believe that (b) are significant numbers and your 2% is somewhere near the level, although I would put it a bit higher at 5%.

      • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
        October 2, 2017 - 8:46 am | Permalink

        pterodactyl,

        “see the comments under this DM article about a white man and his black girlfriend:”

        This is a very common tactic used by the left (and others). They “pack” the audience or comments with their supporters. Just look at the old Phil Donahue shows from the 60’s and 70’s on YouTube – they are laughable!

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          October 5, 2017 - 4:13 am | Permalink

          Michael Adkins – this is true, the DM never print my comments on ANY article where it says ‘this article is moderated’. In other words, they put me on a list of people not allowed to post on such articles. They have not technically banned me as I can still comment on articles on how cute a particular cat is.

          There is also another effect – certain people tend to flock to certain topics. Eg when two men marry ostentatiously and the photo is shown in the DM (Daily Mail is the most read British newspaper website I understand) the top comments are ‘how wonderful’ but this is because a certain type is interested in such articles. (The ones critical are vague and hidden in meaning showing that open criticism comments must have been removed).

          And when the DM has an article about what they call ‘the far right’ the top comment is always something like “DM – why are you calling people who are concerned about their country ‘far right’?” so although they ban me they are still allowing (for now) this sort of comment. In other words, still more free than most other places where we are still allowed to comment.

  10. John's Gravatar John
    October 1, 2017 - 11:56 am | Permalink

    This is slightly off topic but check out this beautiful song called “White Blood” from the group Oh Wonder. There’s probably no political intent with this song but it’s still very beautiful and I know what I read into it.

  11. October 1, 2017 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

    “Polarization” is a nice euphemism suggesting social, racial, economic, intellectual divisiveness with a potential of a civil war. Always a first step toward the breakup of a country, which, as a rule, must be downplayed by the ruling class. The term “Balkanization” could be used as a synonym, although this word carries a far more serious meaning and yields far deadlier political consequences. There are plenty of historical examples of the failure of “multicultural” aka multiracial states. Yesterday it was Yugoslavia, today the simmering Spain or the fake entity or a big joke known as the EU. The Left-Right divide is way too big now in America, which may result in far bigger balkanesque scenarios. Time to think about erecting big walls and creating ethno-states.

  12. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    October 1, 2017 - 2:52 pm | Permalink

    The primary weapon of the Left in recent years has been the use of the relativistic notion of “hate” as a term of opprobrium against all opponents. And admittedly it’s been a very effective weapon given that it has disarmed even superior intellects on the Right. The main problem is that those on the Right have merely reacted to the notion and therefore have unwittingly given credibility to it. Unfortunately, mere reaction to an accusation is tantamount to an affirmation of its moral legitimacy.

    Those on the Right need to simply ignore the Left’s ridiculous and childish relativisms and attack it with a moral narrative and a political ontology steeped in western civilization – namely, Life, Liberty, Property. On such an unassailable foundation, it would be quite easy to smear the Left and unmask its true totalitarian intentions. It’s perfectly okay to sling mud at one’s opponents if one is sitting on higher moral ground.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      October 2, 2017 - 3:54 am | Permalink

      Tom – agreed – the left are full of hate and are racists against their own race and love other races that are racist against their own race also. They also are responsible for introducing a lack of compassion and actual cruelty into any profession that they take over, eg social services, education. (Eg in schools the left always favour the disruptive and bad elements in their schools and the removal of discipline, so that these bad elements can have more influence in the schools they run).

      Therefore they are used to speaking in opposites, so whilst being hateful and racist and lacking in compassion themselves, they speak in lies where they accuse others of their own characteristics. The only reason they don’t just come straight out and say ‘we just hate better people’ is that they live in a world where they have to communicate to a majority using words that will appeal to the majority. (Having said that, they often come close to those words)

      • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
        October 4, 2017 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

        they are used to speaking in opposites, so whilst being hateful and racist and lacking in compassion themselves, they speak in lies where they accuse others of their own characteristics

        In other words, precisely what their cultural and political exemplars, masters and mentors – hypocritical and utterly morally bankrupt middle-eastern Jews and all their international relatives and descendants – do and have always done.

        • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
          October 5, 2017 - 6:04 am | Permalink

          Jews do not have a monopoly on such deception. The Democrat Party is full of such practitioners from all sorts of peoples. It is not hard to learn to accuse others of your own sins.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            October 5, 2017 - 11:15 am | Permalink

            Jews do not have a monopoly on such deception.

            How fortunate for us white Christians, then, that Jewish people and money have so little influence on the Democratic Party! Nothing, then, stands in the way of our policing our own without serious opposition from outsiders—right?

            As for transference of one’s own sins, the point, morally speaking, is to accuse oneself of genuine sins, not “sins” that are literally nothing more than fabricated transgressions against degenerate standards and phony norms imposed by the (((Establishment))). For instance, I’m not holding my breath till some retired or soon-to-be-retired senator or congressman publicly recites the Confiteor for decades’ worth of failure to warn his constituents against Jewish sabotage and predation.

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            October 6, 2017 - 12:09 pm | Permalink

            I propose a thought experiment. Imagine that Jewish people all migrated to a new Israel on Mars. Would that change the behavior of gentiles such as Dick Durbin, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, the Kennedy Klan in Massachusetts, the Daley Klan in Chicago, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Michael Moore, etc. ? I think not. They know they have a good racket going and they will not give it up.

  13. October 1, 2017 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Dr. MacDonald discerns and articulates the exigencies well, as always. However, the publicization of polarizing events reaches that preponderance of our fellows through the mainstream tv shows, not through the alternatives. They haven’t been frightened yet, and NPR etc didn’t tell them about the rapes, beatings, killings we heard of at the daily kenn and AR. At the rate we influence people, this accelerating polarization will still probably be too late. The critical reaction is going to come from us, not from those feeling some cognitive dissonance. Other commenters listed every institution except the titans of the internet, who have expelled Paul Kersey. Most of us cannot afford to come out into the public forum and call out to others. But under the gun that’s what’s got to happen.

  14. Marius Apostol's Gravatar Marius Apostol
    October 1, 2017 - 4:48 pm | Permalink

    Trump won the elections but it feels like Hillary is in the White House. America is in coma and need to be disconnected from the life support machine. What is going on now is in our benefit, but it will be a toss at the end where few will benefit and most will not. This is controlled demolition, same like 9-11, can’t be stopped. This decision was taken long time ago.

  15. HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
    October 1, 2017 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Yes polarization is a good thing. It is also an inevitable thing: all the multiracial empires in history disintegrated. It is like a fever to be endured before the infection is overcome. Alternatively, it is reminiscent of mitosis; when the chromsomal material divides and moves to two polar position in the cell. The hopeful fact is that the raw materials to permanently crush the left do exist: white men make up the largest and most gun savvy cohort of combat aged males in America. Only a fraction of their numbers would make the “million man march” small potatoes in comparison.

  16. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    October 2, 2017 - 5:23 am | Permalink

    Polarization left vs right, nah!

    And with the self-proclaiming right gesturing anti-Nazi and anti White-supremacist, nah!

    And with the self-proclaiming right not being right at all but just honestly liberal – so like David Duke always says at the start of his shows, supporting the right of all peoples to live according to their own natures and desires, even if they happen to be White, nah!

    Our attack has to be strictly racial because we’re fighting genocide not some trivial thing that engages Repubritats. It cannot even tolerate the encroachment right/left divisions in particular because we know that divides only Whites.

  17. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    October 2, 2017 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

    We live under a religious and military dictatorship, but history has showed neither can fight better ideas. Freedom for the European man and woman is the greatest idea of all.

  18. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    October 3, 2017 - 4:35 am | Permalink

    I am both fatigued and bored by Western Indo-Europeans expressing false and faint hope that their salvation is at hand or in sight because there has been a raised pimple of protest, a bump up of a few hundred at an Alt Right conference or gathering, or some such “indication, that we will triumph in the end”.

    Let me break it to you all brutally, as one who has lived a while, travelled very extensively, resided outside Amurka for years, and who was trained and developed the skills of PATTERN RECOGNITION, the linking with meaning of various events in time and space. Without complete separation into a Western Indo-European, non-Black, non-Chew, non-Islam, autocephalous governing entity, we will be vanquished, dissolved, and disappear. All the shallow wells drilled and expounded on a Nazi, Nordic, Christian, retro-Confederate, will end up just as the Crusades did.

    All that matters to establish such an independent republic is the inclusiveness of the World’s 100+ IQ, High CQ (Civilized Quotient), and the exclusion of everyone else. This a priori references the exclusion of aboriginal peoples, Africans/Blacks, Amerindians, in effect those groups who have never ascended BY THEMSELVES to an “economic takeoff” above subsistence existence.

    • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
      October 3, 2017 - 9:13 am | Permalink

      Secrecy is their weapon of choice.
      How does one act against an (((enemy))) that is acting in orchestrated collusion, behind a wall of Freemasonic secrecy, whose leader is unknown and undetectable?

      It requires no less than the utilization of an even greater amount of instinct to detect infiltrators and saboteurs and then larger amounts of fearlessness to terminate these disruptors.

      IMO, it will eventually all come down to bloodshed, no?

      Does anyone see a way to avoid bloodshed by promising the Prime Movers of the Race of Malignant Jews that if We catch them in their mole like disruptive behaviour they will merely be sent into exile and not immediately executed?

      At the rate we are going We end up dead and (((they))) control the mess that is left behind.

      It is such a conundrum because I love life and if I could, I would just as soon become a vegetarian to avoid killing animals, but these hideous Jews and their secret society helpers are capable of murder on a scale so massive that I am not able to see any other choice but to meet force with even greater amounts of force.

  19. Charlie's Gravatar Charlie
    October 3, 2017 - 6:31 am | Permalink

    Bolsheviks are using the same play book from the Bolshevik Revolution in which 65 Million White Russians were butchered by the Jewish Bolsheviks. Stay tuned – the butchering of White Christian Americans won’t be televised it will be replaced with ad naseum “Po Blag Man kant git paid”

  20. steven clark's Gravatar steven clark
    October 3, 2017 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

    I enjoyed Mr. McDonald’s comments as always, but I think Trump is only a stopgap. He’s much like Reagan was…make the economy better, give us jobs, and all will be right…and the racial struggle is put off until later. Then the left gets back in, and believe me, they’ll want revenge on us.
    The difference now is the GOP is Trump’s enemy. They want no recovery until he’s gone. I think we’re past the point of elections doing much good. Democracy is a means of control the deep state uses to keep change from happening. As Lampedusa observed of elections in his novel The Leopard. ‘if things are going to stay the same here, they’ve got to change.’
    You should visit Hagen Grell on German Ambassador to get a view of things in Germany. The problem there is stifling, complete state control. Europe is trapped by the EU, and it’s determined to destroy the continent.
    As for Poland, they aren’t asiatics. Hungarians do have Hunnish blood, which I’m told they’re proud of. But Poland stole Pomerania, Silesia, and East Prussia from Germany. Thievery, and they should give those lands back. The Poles expelled Germans from there. They destroyed any vestige of German culture, plowed under cemeteries, and this is a crime. Poland, give back those lands. I don’t hate Poles, nor do I see them as inferior, but as Hans Schmidt said in SS Panzergrenadier, the Poles should make accommodations with Germany and Russia. Instead, they keep seeking foreign allies like France and Britain, who dumped them, and now seem to be cozying up to America, and we’ll use them and we’ll flush them away when they become inconvenient.
    Sure, we need to bury our differences. The German writer Teodor Fontane, in Vor der Sturm, showed Prussians and Poles mixing and cooperating , but Poland needs to give back what isn’t hers.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      October 9, 2017 - 11:26 pm | Permalink

      Poland was extended westward after WW II, purportedly for territorial ‘ restitution ‘, [ though handsome Stettin was simply stolen ] partly for reparations and partly because of its encroachment in the East by the West’s Allied SU; which, in turn, was rationalized by it, for having its own territory conquered by Poland in the 20s, during its momentary weakness.

      Versailles ” Lite ” ; with perhaps the same intentions as those behind the creation of Czechoslovakia, described by a Jewish historian as: “the insertion of an aircraft carrier aimed at Germany “.

      Preludes to Israel’s active participation in the Kurdish Referendum. Itself predictable, since it reportedly maintained almost one hundred Mossad agents there right after its surrogate US-lead war on Iraq.

      While the SU alone submerged A-bombs off the southern English coast, to be triggered remotely, Israel remains the grand-master at laying political bombs with remote and time delayed detonators.

  21. Dante marotta's Gravatar Dante marotta
    October 9, 2017 - 8:04 am | Permalink

    Ignorant comments about any ethnic Europeans are simply irrelevant nonsense and are indeed a non issue in the real world. I support All European Nationalists and White Nationalists around the world and yes polarization is good for White Americans as it is waking them up just as the so called migrant crises has stirred many Europeans to to do exactly the same hence the rise in nationalist or nationalist inspired parties indeed nationalist parties are alive and well in Eastern Europe with populations that are racially aware and explicit in their identity. Europeans are beginning to take our own side

Comments are closed.