• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Comparing ‘insurrections’: J6 vs. George Floyd riots

April 25, 2024/2 Comments/in General/by David Boyajian
Corporate media describe the Jan. 6, 2021, (“J6”) assault on the U.S. Capitol – sparked by claims of fraud in 2020’s presidential election – as an insurrection. But was it?

Yet they never describe 2020 riots – sparked mainly by the Minneapolis police’s killing of George Floyd – as insurrections. Then again, they should.

Though insurrection is defined nowhere in the U.S. Code, it’s a federal crime (18 U.S. Code §2383):

“Whoever incites … assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against … the U.S. or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined … or imprisoned … and shall be incapable of holding any office under the U.S.”

Interestingly, Special Counsel Jack Smith hasn’t charged former President Trump or any J6 participant with insurrection.

J6, consequently, wasn’t an insurrection.

The Constitution’s 14th Amendment, Section 3, is similar to federal law. But it bars only past/present officials who’ve committed insurrection – possibly including presidents – from occupying any federal/state/city public office.

Colorado and Illinois courts and a Maine official cited that section in seeking to dump Donald Trump from their states’ GOP primaries.

On March 4, the U.S. Supreme Court shot them down: States cannot use Section 3 to disqualify federal candidates.

As to whether Trump had perpetrated insurrection, SCOTUS was silent.

The 2020 insurrections

Webster’s defines insurrection as “an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.” Others say an insurrection must involve violence.

Regardless, given their countless thousands of anti-government acts/instances, 2020’s coast-to-coast, typically left-of-center George Floyd and similar riots qualify as insurrections:

Assaults on police and others, property and business destruction, vandalism, looting, arson, firebombings, laser attacks, blockades, occupations, shootings, and homicides.

Among the targets: The White House and other federal buildings.

Bloodbaths aptly describes 2020’s clashes.

In 1992, then-Attorney General Bill Barr used the Insurrection Act and National Guard to quell riots that followed Rodney King’s beating by L.A. police. If those were insurrections, so were 2020’s riots.

Though the 2020 uprisings occurred chiefly from May 26 through early June, sporadic violence persisted for months. Most George Floyd protesters, nevertheless, were nonviolent.

So were the vast majority of J6 protesters.

2020 versus January 6

While J6’s losses topped out at $2.7 million, 2020’s toll rivals that of a war: $1-2 billion.

2020’s mega-mayhem also eclipsed J6’s invasion as measured by the numbers of violent individuals, arrests, injuries and deaths.

Comparing 2020 to J6, RealClearInvestigations found “15 times more injured police officers, 19 times as many arrests.”

Yet, “authorities have pursued … Capitol [J6] rioters with substantially more vigor than [ 2020 rioters].”

Moreover, “In most of a dozen major jurisdictions, 90%+ of [2020’s] citations/charges” were dropped/dismissed/not filed.

New York and other cities allowed hundreds of 2020’s alleged looters/lawbreakers to escape prosecution.

In contrast, more than three years later, the feds remain consumed with hunting down J6 lawbreakers.

Why hasn’t Jack Smith prosecuted J6 persons for insurrection?

One possibility: The feds and even states might then feel compelled to slap insurrection charges on 2020’s lawbreakers.

That would trigger meltdowns among the rioters’ media backers and, possibly, more bloodbaths.

Our politically venomous justice system resembles that of a third-world you-know-what.

Giving aid and comfort

Those who equipped the 2020 insurrectionists with bricks, bats, bottles, bolt cutters, blinding lasers and Molotov cocktails unequivocally gave them “aid or comfort.”

Among others vulnerable to the same charge:

  • DAs who rapidly and recklessly released arrestees back onto the streets.
  • Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan. She hailed the illegal, destructive CHAZ/CHOP occupation of the city’s Capitol Hill as a “Summer of Love” and “block party” and let it remain.
  • Massachusetts attorney general, now Gov. Maura Healey. The day after Boston’s riots, she seemingly encouraged more lawlessness: “Yes, America is burning, but that’s how forests grow.”

U.S. Code or the 14th Amendment would bar such individuals, if convicted, from holding federal, state, and/or city offices.

But didn’t J6 spring from appalling election lies whereas 2020 was prompted by police brutality against, and social justice for, blacks?

Questioning is not a crime

Activists in 2020 were entitled to be angered by images of Officer Chauvin’s knee on George Floyd’s neck. Indeed, a jury convicted Chauvin of murder in 2021.

Objective observers also know that police abuse, crime, coverups and corruption occur too often.

J6 demonstrators and many Americans were similarly entitled to believe that 2020’s presidential election and race were marred by extensive fraud and government misconduct. Just ask Hillary Clinton and Georgia’s Stacey Abrams about their own election critiques.

Electoral mischief is, after all, an American tradition. And voter rolls are intentionally out-of-date and thus illegal.

Some states rushed to adopt mail-in ballots during the COVID scare. That added to the skepticism. 2005’s Jimmy Carter-James Baker Commission had cautioned about mail-in voting.

J6 protesters were trying to pressure Vice President Pence to decline certifying Joe Biden’s win. Suppose Pence had done so.

The inauguration was just 14 days away, and incontrovertible evidence of a Trump win was seemingly lacking. Congress or SCOTUS would undoubtedly have intervened and affirmed Biden’s win.

True, the Oath Keepers and some others were convicted of trying to overthrow the election and government on J6.

They were going to hold off the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines, National Guard, Homeland Security, Marshals Service, ATF, FBI, and police? Impossible.

More differences

J6 was confined to one day and one locale. And it copied a mere snippet from 2020’s encyclopedia of lawlessness.

But aside from peaceful protests and, perhaps, targeting law enforcement, 2020’s nationwide attacks, arson, looting, destruction of minority businesses and deaths were simply criminal anarchy. These bore no rational relation to Floyd’s murder or social justice.
The Senate held hearings for SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh from Sept. 4-7, 2018.

Backed by feminist and progressive organizations, women repeatedly entered the hearing. They interrupted it with shouts and other unruly activity.

One leader’s goal: “For this nomination not to go through.” Sounds a bit like January 6.

Another leader declared: “I came to put my body on the line.” Like J6 protesters?

It’s difficult to know the final disposition of the Kavanaugh hearing’s 227-plus arrests.

But most were charged with “disorderly conduct, crowding or obstructing,” reported NPR. They paid $35 or $50 fines.

It seems unfair, therefore, that many J6 participants received harsher sentences for similar charges of Obstruction of an Official Proceeding and/or Disorderly/Disruptive Conduct.

So was the action of Jan. 6, 2021, an insurrection? Only if corporate media and their allies describe 2020’s riots that way, which they’ll never do.

Reposted from World News Daily, with permission.

David Boyajian’s usual focus in the Caucasus. His work can be found at https://www.armeniapedia.org/wiki/David_Boyajian.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 David Boyajian https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png David Boyajian2024-04-25 07:21:142024-04-25 07:21:14Comparing ‘insurrections’: J6 vs. George Floyd riots
2 replies
  1. WCH
    WCH says:
    April 25, 2024 at 9:16 pm

    “It seems unfair” sounds like something a child would say. Politics is all about who weilds power. Trump is a puppy up against wolves.

  2. Fritz
    Fritz says:
    April 29, 2024 at 12:33 am

    “What comes to us is more valuable than gold. An enrichment for us all. We must see this as an opportunity.” The subject of skilled workers: a colorful Merkel guest at the quality inspection in the REWE supermarket chain. https://media.gettr.com/group4/getter/2024/04/25/08/a6b588c2-0536-dc8f-a776-0e3929144fef/out.mp4

Comments are closed.

RSS Feed Logo RSS Feed Logo Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • American Free Press
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles Magazine
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Raven's Call: A Reactionary Perspective
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • VDare
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Link to X
  • Link to Dribbble
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only