Tucker Carlson Backpedals Once Again
Thoughts and Observations of the Spectacle That Is Turning Point USA
As most readers are doubtlessly well aware, the first day of the Turning Point Convention on December 18, 2025 was a notable event for the way that Erika Kirk and above all Ben Shapiro made spectacles of themselves. Vivek Ramaswamy also saw fit to tell Americans what their identity is and how it includes him and his kind. In that speecch he insisted that “There is no American who is more American than somebody else,” replete with more “magic dirt” nonsense. He even made the obligatory allusion to Martin Luther King, Jr” with talk about “content of your character.”
Watching Shapiro in particular was a most unenviable task. Concentrating on his speech is made all the more difficult because of the intrusive but utterly correct utterance from any sensible internal monologue: “how do you do, fellow whites?” That spectacle, replete with a devastating confrontation about the USS Liberty in the question and answer portion, was overshadowed by Tucker Carlson’s speech. Shapiro of course denounced Tucker Carlson for not in turn denouncing Candace Owens and more particularly for daring to have Darryl Cooper aka Martyrmade and above all Nick Fuentes on as guests. Shapiro’s speech seems part of a desperate bid to counteract the discrediting that has occurred over the past few weeks. Time will tell if it reverses that trend, but so far things seem to be turning against the Israeli shill. The very next evening, Steve Bannon skewered both Shapiro and America being beholden to Israeli and Jewish interests, culminating with the declaration that “Ben Shapiro is like a cancer that metastasizes.” Megyn Kelly then lambasted Shapiro in a sit-down with Jack Posobiec, even stating she no longer considers Shapiro a friend.
While Shapiro’s bold provocations and the reaction to it are certainly interesting, comments by Tucker Carlson are likely of far greater interest to this publication and its readers for various reasons, above all because this speech was part and parcel of Carlson’s propensity to hedge controversial comments with statements that negate, qualify, or “backpedal” from these statements, either in the same presentation or in the context of recent statements and presentations. Carlson’s speech is of course in the context of having the guests that Shapiro denounced, as well as the interview with Piers Morgan for which the foppish British twit has been rightly excoriated, including—among many other things—forsaking his nation and its posterity “for a good curry:” a particularly contemptible utterance for many different reasons, not least of which that curry of course originated from Britain and because, as Rowan Atkinson quipped in a famous skit, “now that we [have] the recipes, is there really any reason for them to stay?”
Carlson begins with a stern rebuke of Shapiro’s comments. His reproach of Shapiro’s denunciation of Carlson reads in pertinent part:
I watched [Shapiro’s speech]. I laughed. I laughed. that kind of bitter sardonic laugh that emerges from you and like upside down world arrives when your dog starts doing your taxes and you’re like, “Wait, it’s not supposed to work this way.” To hear calls for. . . DEPLATFORMING AND DENOUNCING PEOPLE AT A CHARLIE KIRK EVENT. . . “WHAT? This is hilarious.” [laughter] Yeah, this is hilarious.
That Carlson laughed at Shapiro (both as he delivered his comments and in the account of his immediate reaction) cannot be emphasized enough. Carlson commented further, urging that Shapiro’s rant was antithetical to what Charlie Kirk himself stood for:
I really thought that the impulse to deplatform people or even to use the word platform as a verb, which it’s not. It’s a noun. Don’t steal my nouns. Deplatform and denounce. Why haven’t you denounced somebody else? The whole. . .. red guard cultural revolution thing that we so hated and feared on the left that we did everything we could to usher in a new time where you could have an actual debate. I mean, this kind of was the whole point of Charlie Kirk’s public life. . . . I think that he died for it. I really believe that.
After this brief foray, Carlson focuses much of his attention mitigating or even disclaiming earlier sentiments in past presentations discussed above and doubtlessly others as well. These comments operate from the basic underlying “universal principle” against “hating” people for how they were born, that “it is immoral to hate people for how they were born.” These comments admonish against “hating everyone in a group.” He stressed that it is immoral to punish a people for crimes individuals in that group did not commit. He even asserts that this is a commandment under the Christian religion and morality: “[Y]ou are prohibited by. . . Christianity from hating people for how they were born because God created them with his spark in his image because they have souls.”
From these other assertions he condemned so-called “Islamophobia” and antisemitism. He did however use these admonitions as a vehicle to condemn prejudice and discrimination against white males, particularly in relation to college admissions practices and even hiring practices in recent years and even over the past several decades. As important as this message is, it is needlessly hampered, neutered even by talk about this supposed universal principle discussed above. Carlson unequivocally denounces (in this speech and elsewhere) in-group preferences for whites, a necessary ethos to protect white, European posterity for the evils he confronted Piers Morgan about as just one example. It is impossible, for example, to rectify and prevent The Great Replacement in Britain and Europe in any meaningful way without measures such as remigration which necessarily entails enacting policy based on group identity.
Carlson of course buttressed such rhetoric by absurd off-the-shelf appeals to civic nationalism. Such appeals include the ridiculous assertion that “Most Americans have more in common” than they do not, a demonstrably false assertion. He also asserted that racially conscious commentary should be denounced because “they are trying to divide the country,” a mindless slogan about as stupid as “The Democrats are the real racists.” None of this should be persuasive to anyone, but the crowd reaction suggests otherwise.
Many of these assertions and contentions require the firmest, most vehement repudiation, even as so much of this counterproductive rhetoric relies heavily on various norms and mores deeply embedded in the American tradition and traditional mainstream conservatism more particularly. To some limited extent, judging individuals as such is fine as far as it goes (not far at all, really). Such musings notwithstanding, to only judge individuals only as individuals without looking at the larger picture from the collective whole is to embrace willful ignorance at its worst. No society can function without making group judgment based on various criteria that define a group. Consider for example age requirements for things like driving, voting, and what not. There are doubtlessly youngsters under 16 who possess the maturity, skill, and even height necessary to drive responsibly and safely, and yet society nonetheless operates on a rule requiring an age of 16 because those youngsters who defy this general rule are outliers. Up until recently, society correctly precluded women from traditional male roles such as combat duty in the military, on-the-beat law enforcement and so on because humanity is a sexually dimorphic species and is so despite certain outliers such as women like Brigitte Nielsen being 6’1 that defy, to some limited extent, general differences between the sexes such as strength and height. There are black individuals who defy certain trends, such as an aggregate, collective IQ gap between one-to-two standard deviations, or who defy the collective racial resentment, even racial hatred that defines much of the black populace, or who are not part of “a racial commitment to crime” that characterizes and defines wild overrepresentation of blacks in crime statistics. The existence of such individuals—who are indeed outliers—does not negate the overall trend that defines a majority of the black population. Nor does it give cause to ignore these overall trends or to refrain from policy considerations based on these trends.
In very real, important ways, Carlson deludes himself and his audience by insisting that we are all just individuals. Innate characteristics that are inherent to any individual, most particularly race, matter a great deal. Differences in race are real—they are not just a social construct—just as race is a core, fundamental component of culture, identity, and any cohesive polity defined by common race, language, and history.
External factors such as cultural milieu, religious upbringing, and myriad others further dispel such naïve notions about individual autonomy. Even a cursory review of history and human nature demonstrates that individuals are profoundly determined and influenced by a variety of external factors, including the time and circumstance one is born into, just as they are influenced by what others do in a variety of ways that one can scarcely fathom. Consider as just one example that people often mimic what others do. This is reflected in various phenomena associated with social contagion, from suicide clusters, to transgender nuttery and bulimia rubbing off on a small group of individuals to others, to how a married couple is far more likely to divorce if other couples in the same social circle have divorced or are considering divorce. There are other phenomena, such as the “mere exposure effect,” which dictates that a critical mass of people will like music, cinema, and other expressions of culture merely due to exposure to these cultural expressions.
Carlson makes an even worse error, conflating in-group preference for hatred and asserting that whites advancing white, European interests on a collective basis—that is, having an in-group preference at all—is tantamount to hating individuals in a different group. Implicit in this statement is the absurd idea that such supposed hatred or what might be better described as animus in the context of very legitimate grievances is hatred for each and every individual in that group. Doubtlessly, more and more whites are harboring animus for other groups, and not without good reason. “Black fatigue” is real, and the phrase (as well as a more virulent variant with one racial epithet in particular) has become a familiar adage in Internet parlance for very good reasons: namely, that whites have legitimate grievances about the black collective, involving wildly disparate black involvement in violent and other forms of crime, the racial resentment if not ancient hatred that a critical mass of blacks harbor against whites, and a whole host of other grievances that render black people as a collective irredeemable and incompatible with white society. The same principle applies to Pakistanis, Indians, and other imposters and their role in the reverse colonization of the British Isles and the columns of black and brown hordes in Germany and Europe at large who have no right to even set foot on the sacred continent, let alone seek “refuge” there. A person can rightly hold very negative views about these and other groups collectively while still acknowledging there are outliers to these groups. That there are outliers to these trends, as there are for almost any phenomenon under the sun, does not negate the requirement for collective action, nor does it negate sensible observations and conclusions about the group as a whole. To save British and European posterity will require remigration and resettlement of all such imposters, or at least the vast majority of them. And this is true even if some of them are otherwise nice and decent people. The number of decent, upstanding black individuals does not negate the overall general trend at hand, easily observed and reinforced through centuries of experience and history, that the multiracial experiment has failed, is doomed to fail, and that there are irreconcilable differences between whites and blacks that cannot be solved except by divorce and separation, preferably on a mutually amicable basis.
These and other such utterances, including how Carlson stupidly deflated his confrontation with Piers Morgan about The Great Replacement with silly, pointless disclaimers that he likes Pakistanis and there are many nice individuals who are part of this or that group, demonstrates once again that figures like Carlson are of limited utility. Although some insist they serve no purpose, writings and presentations such as those by Tucker Carlson can be used to help persuade others on those matters they get right, leaving the work of others to explain how and why this sort of senseless pandering and equivocation is wrong. The principal utility of figures like Carlson is that they have helped normalize formerly scandalous topics like anti-white discrimination, The Great Replacement, and other topics that Carlson himself has emphasized but that were taboo even a couple short years ago. That utility must however be harnessed in a way that is separated and bifurcated from these sorts of cowardly, simplistic, and self-defeating qualifications and other sorts of “back-pedaling.”
This unfortunate propensity to backpedal—in comparison and contrast to more sensible utterances—again demonstrates how essential the vital faculties of reason, discernment and discrimination are. Ultimately, to what extent Tucker Carlson will be a net benefit by interviewing figures like Darryl Cooper or even the somewhat unsavory Nick Fuentes will depend on to what extent the larger audience possesses and utilizes these faculties, or more particularly how writers, streamers, and other thought leaders use these faculties and then apply them in any discussion or analysis about events like these. These faculties, used in concert, allow both the individual and a group to discern that Carlson’s denunciation of evils such as The Great Replacement anti-white discrimination, and even his repudiation of Ben Shapiro’s naked Zionism are laudable, but are of limited utility unless such pointless and counterproductive qualifications such as those discussed above are discarded and repudiated outright. The application of these essential faculties in turn allow both the individual and the white collective to discern that such comments against in-group preference, appeals that we are“all God’s children,” admonitions that people can only be judged as individuals are both preposterous and harmful. This underscores the vital role the new populist right has in highlighting when figures like Tucker Carlson “get it right,” while also undertaking the most vital task of arguing and persuading how and why this backpedaling could not be more erroneous or harmful.
Other articles and essays by Richard Parker are available at his publication, The Raven’s Call: A Reactionary Perspective, found at theravenscall.substack.com. Please consider subscribing on a free or paid basis, and to like and share as warranted. Readers can also find him on twitter, under the handle @astheravencalls.
Americans confront Europeans with their self-image as the “ultimate representatives of capitalism.” This incredible nonsense can be quickly refuted by pointing out that their idea of “fortune” is not based on productivity, but rather on a tradition of speculation, outbidding, and borrowing. Instead of economic freedom, dependency.
However, I would like to introduce an argument against the illusion of their productive innovation on a racial basis: A country that has just 60 or 70 percent (so-called) white members of society cannot, purely in organizational and mathematical terms, be a “capitalist” country, but rather a kind of neo-Soviet republic in glossy disguise.
Of course, it is very embarrassing for Americans to hear such a thing. But it’s just too obvious: their “multicolored,” low-IQ members of society can’t generate any boost in innovation and productivity! What they call “capitalism” is one person exploiting another for selfish gain. The production of valuable goods requires centuries of tradition.
Glad the power is back on in Idaho. A Riverside County Sheriff– not a Deputy but the elected Sheriff is running against Newsome among other things recognizing that Californians want heating, ventilating and air conditioning instead of rolling blackouts.
What an enjoyable read. We were just awakened and read the mail on by a dramatic earthquake on the eve of forecast torrential rain and debris flow from California malfeasance, non-feasance, and misfeasance in fire and watershed management. Such insights at this holiday season are particularly encouraging.
For those who haven’t discovered Mark Weber’s work of timely mass media aggregation, what we also just received is a particularly good issue. It begins with elder statesman Ron Paul, M.D. and provides hope for peace for young people including sources for solid numbers on what is driving debt, inflation, and offensive war. Visit the INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW for their December 23rd, their latest links at the instituteforhistoricalreview.com. For example:
A Christmas Gift to the War Machine
Ron Paul
https://ronpaulinstitute.org/a-christmas-gift-to-the-war-machine/
Late last week, Congress passed and President Trump signed the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The bill marks the first time the US military budget officially passed the one trillion dollar mark. Of course, when you add in other military-related spending such as interest on the debt, veterans’ affairs, and military components of other government agencies, the true number is at least one and a half times that amount … Each of these dollars spent on military offense and the maintenance of the US global empire rather than on defense of our own nation is taken from the mouths of the hungry and off the backs of hardworking American families.
How at the Turn of the Century, American Jews Really Did Wage a ‘War on Christmas’
JTA
https://www.jta.org/2025/11/16/culture/when-jews-really-did-wage-a-war-on-christmas
On a frigid winter’s day in 1906, tens of thousands of Jewish parents in New York’s Lower East Side and Brooklyn kept their children home from school. It wasn’t a snow day, but a protest: Activists and the Yiddish press had called for a boycott of the Christmas assemblies and pageants that they knew Jewish children would be obliged to attend on the day before the holiday. “Jews Object to Christmas in the Schools,” blared the New York Times. The Brooklyn Eagle warned that “agitators” sought to rob Christian children of their traditions. The boycott was, depending on the source, a valiant cry for religious freedom, or the first shot in the 100-year-plus “war on Christmas.” The episode is the subject of historian Scott D. Seligman’s new book, “The Great Christmas Boycott of 1906” …
President Trump Laments Decline of ‘Powerful Jewish Lobby’ in Washington
https://www.jns.org/trump-decries-decline-of-jewish-lobby-at-white-house-chanukah-party/
Donald Trump has lamented the decline of what believed to be Jewish influence in Washington, referencing the so-called “Jewish lobby” – a label widely understood to be derogatory, and with antisemitic undertones, but which the US President apparently viewed as complimentary. Speaking at the White House Chanukah party on Tuesday, Trump … claimed the influence of this “powerful lobby” was waning, and had failed to stop the rise of anti-Israel members of Congress. He also cited the influence of his father, Fred Trump, for inspiring his own self-professed philosemitism. “I’m not Jewish, but my father was very friendly with many, many Jewish people,” Trump said. “He was honoured by the Federation,” he continued, referring to the UJA Federation of New York.
The US Congress ‘Is Becoming Antisemitic,’ President Trump Warns at White House Hanukkah Gathering
Daily Mail
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15390559/donald-trump-hanukkah-laura-loomer-ilham-omar.html
President Donald Trump marked the third night of Hanukkah by celebrating at the White House with conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer and other, less controversial, allies in the Jewish community. ‘I will always be a friend and a champion to the Jewish people,’ he told a crowd gathered in the White House’s East Room … Trump twice told a story to the crowd about how the strongest lobby in Washington was previously the Jewish or pro-Israel lobby. ‘That’s no longer true. You have to be very careful. You have a Congress, in particular, which is becoming antisemitic,’ he said.
At White House Hanukkah Party, Trump Says Congress ‘Is Becoming Antisemitic’
JTA
https://www.jta.org/2025/12/17/politics/at-white-house-hanukkah-party-trump-says-congress-is-becoming-antisemitic
President Donald Trump said Congress “is becoming antisemitic” and warned about what he said was the fading influence of the “Jewish lobby” and “Israeli lobby” in an address to his Jewish supporters at a White House celebration marking the third night of Hanukkah … “My father would tell me, the most powerful lobby that there is in this country is the Jewish lobby. It is the Israeli lobby,” Trump mused. “It is not that way anymore. You have a lot of people in your way. They don’t want to help Israel.” Trump celebrated his own Israel policies… He also warned the room, “You have a Congress in particular which is becoming antisemitic.”
Jewish-Zionist Power in America
Mark Weber – Video
https://altcensored.com/watch?v=XNLIy7gckro
A factual, reasoned 16-minute talk on the immense power and influence of the “Jewish lobby” in the US, and its harmful role, especially in directing US Middle East policy. As long as this power remains entrenched, says Weber, there will be no end to the Jewish-Zionist domination of American political life and the mass media, Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the Israeli threat to peace, and the bloody conflict between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East.
Racial Trouble in the Vietnam Era
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/racial-trouble-in-the-vietnam-era/
… Germany was a hotbed of racial violence [in the US military] in the 1970s, with soldiers afraid to go out at night due to rampant attacks … “White soldiers were being randomly attacked under cover of darkness,” Bailey writes … Bailey’s book [Army Afire] is the most comprehensive study yet published on military race relations during this period … The U.S. Navy prides itself on having never had a mutiny. The race riot that took place on board the USS Kitty Hawk in 1972, where black sailors roamed the passageways beating white sailors with wrenches and pipes, must be downplayed in order to preserve that record. The black soldiers who made German bases such a hell cannot easily be depicted as civil rights heroes by even the most politically motivated historian.
Plurality of Republicans Say End US Aid to Israel, New Poll Shows
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/us-aid-to-israel-2674403728/
A plurality of Republicans oppose extending an agreement that would give $38 billion in U.S.-funded weapons to Israel over the next decade, according to a new poll from YouGov and the IMEU Policy Project. While 35% of Republicans would renew the arrangement, 42% say they would rather see it lapse. Support for ripping up the deal is particularly high among Republicans between 18 and 44, with 53% of these respondents calling for an end to the aid packages.
Younger Republicans Break With GOP Orthodoxy on Israel, New Poll Shows
American Conservative
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/poll-younger-republicans-break-with-gop-orthodoxy-on-israel/
A new poll of Republican voters further confirms the generational divide on Israel policy among conservatives, with majorities of younger Republicans favoring cuts to U.S. weapons transfers, opposing renewal of the decade-long $38 billion aid memorandum with Israel, and supporting independent U.S. investigations into the numerous cases where Americans have been killed by the Israeli military … Among Republicans under 45 years old, 51 percent say they would prefer a 2028 candidate for president who supports reducing taxpayer funded arms to Israel, while only 27 percent prefer a candidate who wants to maintain or increase those weapons transfers.
“Americans” (i.e., white people) are desperately searching for a foothold in formal identity. It almost pains me to see them asking, “What is American?” It’s really mean what has been done to them. But who or what is this “they”? Since, according to American doctrine, Jews can never be considered, it must have been other villains. Their pseudo-identity, which has lasted for centuries, is now proving to be a nightmarish curse, because every non-white in the world wants a bite of them.
If the Jews are calling all Jews to Israel, it seems high time to call all Europeans back to Europe. This narrowness, unbearable at first for Americans accustomed to the wide open West, is what their ancestral homeland looked like: small, cramped, oppressive. In America, the white man’s frontier has overextended itself in many ways. America is ultimately an outpost, an outsourcing of white genes, which unfortunately mixed with all kinds of genetic g*rbage there, resulting in such racial failures.
The term “American” alone is extremely presumptuous and, as a marker of specific meaning, is completely overstretched in terms of its scope. Unfortunately, German geographers have contributed to this, just as their “dollar” comes from the German Taler. Imagine if Germany called itself “Europe” and its inhabitants “Europeans”! Inconceivable exaggeration of concrete meanings and racial-identity boundaries. Our American racial relatives need our help – and we need theirs.
Please suggest an appropriate name fit this huge geographical entity located between Mexico and Canada and the Atlantic and pacific oceans with one offshore island state, one separated from the mainland by Canada and some offshore island territories.
Columbia is taken America is named after the early explorer amerigo Vespucci who drew the first Atlantic map of the American continents.
Perhaps United States of Gilbert after the half brother Humphrey of Walter Raleigh who established an English colony in what’s now Maine in the late 1500s. Or United States of Roanoke after the English colony established in what’s now N Carolina at the sane time late 1500s. Or United States of Albany after the Dutch city established in 1614 in what’s now New York. United States of Plymouth or Jamestown????
America all three continents is named after Amerigo Vespucci the Italian who explored the Atlantic coast drew his map in the very early 1500s shortly after Columbus and Cortez.
I’ve made a few suggestions based in historical figures who explored and or settled in what’s now the USA
Please be so good as to suggest an appropriate name for the geographical entity presently known as the United States of America.
I doubt Western Europe could accommodate 350 million new people. Central Europe with the exception of Germany and Eastern Europe would probably agree to an influx of Hispanics. But Somalians Muslims blacks both African and American I truly doubt it..
I liked Carlson better when he was on Fox. It was more scripted, bullet-point like in the show’s narrative(s). Since then we see a free-wheeling style that really just exhibits Carlson’s egotistical nature. We see him framing everything he says from self-referencing verbal excursions that demand you agree with all that right thinking Carlson is providing for you as well as your avoiding all the “just wrong, it’s just wrong” thoughts you might be indulging. As if that isn’t all just off-putting enough he seems to have graduated recently from some seminary as he let’s us know the Christian theology that underpins all his pontificating.
Very good Richard. One of your better ones, thanks.
I love Tucker. We need him now. Then one day, instead of “Israeli’s” this, “Zionists” that, it will be Jews this, and Jews that. But you have to start somewhere, you know.
Watch Tucker’s new interview with Matt Gaetz. Gaetz tells this crazy, fascinating story about how “Israelies” tried to shake him, and his family down.
Despite tireless efforts by the world’s leading interdisciplinary committees to conclusively prove that history is now purely a matter of feelings, the infamous Odinist documentarian Thomas Rowsell insists on embarking on a “fact‑finding mission.”
Undeterred by the existence of Twitter, he dares travel to the enchanted hinterlands of “Germany,” now rebranded as “Schland” by international consensus, to explore the alleged origins of a fictional tribe known only to racists and medieval chroniclers as the “Saxons.”
Wielding a microphone and several dangerously old books, Rowsell consults a local archaeologist — presumably unaware that all archaeology predating 2020 has been retroactively decolonized. Together, they stare at mounds of dirt and confidently announce that people once lived there. The audacity.
Throughout this journey, the camera lingers over mossy fields, ancient forests, and suspiciously Nordic‑looking puddles — clear evidence of cultural appropriation by the landscape itself.
Historians watching at home clutch their citation indexes, whispering the sacred mantra: “Correlation is not ethnicity.” Meanwhile, the algorithm quietly recommends three cooking videos and a conspiracy about Atlantis.
In the end, Rowsell concludes that the Anglo‑Saxons might actually have existed — a claim so shockingly pre‑postmodern that it could only be made while standing in front of a Bronze Age barrow and quoting Tacitus without irony.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCciXiHIH-A
Jew-operated self-appointed “Maori thought police” (NZ) has tracked down the shameless and unscrupulous activities of this (seemingly harmless) “Nazi wolf in sheep’s clothing” in order to warn the unsuspecting public, which has been deliberately deceived by him! https://archive.is/9t4PV
In an extraordinary act of intellectual bravery, former high‑ranking Washington official turned global metaphysician Catherine Austin Fitts journeys to the misty shores of Friesland to decode humanity’s most pressing question: what if history wasn’t written by the victors, but by their bookkeepers?
Across from her sits the calm and unflappable Jan Ott — translator, philologist, and accidental heretic — who has devoted years to proving that the Oera Linda Book is either an ancient chronicle of pre‑Christian freedom or the 19th‑century Dutch equivalent of a fan‑fiction forum. Together, these two prophets of contrarian reason dare to question official historiography, armed only with linguistic intuition and a deep mistrust of university funding sources.
As the conversation unfolds, viewers find themselves transported into a parallel universe where Atlantis was in Friesland, Freya was an early libertarian, and the collapse of Western civilization began when someone first charged interest. Fitts, fresh from her career navigating the labyrinth of bureaucratic finance, nods knowingly as Ott explains the perils of usury — a topic she treats with the same composure that once guided government budgets and now fuels YouTube prophecy.
The pair discuss freedom, metaphysics, and matriarchy with the serene confidence of people who clearly know something the rest of us don’t. Somewhere between sacred law and alternative linguistics, they discover that the Oera Linda’s ultimate teaching is simple: civilizations collapse when they start fact‑checking the myths instead of living them.
By the time Fitts solemnly declares that no true people can stay free unless they first stop shopping for peanut butter varieties, it’s unclear whether this is an interview, a séance, or the pilot episode of an ancient‑wisdom sitcom. Either way, one thing’s certain: history just got another version, and this one comes in hardcover and ePub.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Lo8bZIacgA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Austin_Fitts
PS https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/hoax-confirmed-mein-kampf-on-the
“Urk”: What sounds like an extraterrestrial invading race from a fantasy series turns out to be the name given to itself by a tiny island in the IJsselmeer, which even has its own language called “Urkers.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urkers_dialect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8FhQlar8gA
“Traditional costumes are hardly worn anymore. Singing is popular, however: Urk has several well-known male choirs. Urk also spends more per capita on charity than any other place in Western Europe.
There is said to be a high level of organized crime in Urk. The Dutch Ministry of the Interior has described the municipality as a ‘hotbed for drug smuggling, money laundering, and illegal employment’ in particular. [sic]
During the coronavirus pandemic, the Calvinist-influenced inhabitants of the former island were among the most bitter opponents of government restrictions to contain the disease and had by far the lowest vaccination rate in the country.”
With their “Urker Day,” this last Aryan Nazi paradise even celebrates its own national holiday – and this completely without any oversized, neon-lit pink menorah commemorating the Holocaust! This has to go, it’s unbearable!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBsXG4tXvZE
All of this must be completely destroyed once and for all in order to wipe out the Amalekites and Edomites, the arch enemies of the tribe of Judah, and establish a multiracial and multicriminal world empire with Yerushalayim in Greater Israel as its capital. Don’t give the harmful anti-Semitic Nazi racists any peace!
PS
“Urk” has the highest Dutch birth rate
(alongside Faroe Islands, highest in Eu-
rope) with 2.6 children per woman (be-
fore 1988 over 4), and that without any
Afro-Oriental parallel society! Only Men-
nonites & Amish can keep up with that.
An unteachable “Thirdreichist” from the
“Rainbow Nation” seriously believes that
legalized methods a la Adolf can not only
halt the fatal downward trend towards to-
tal Caucasoid extermination, but also rever-
se it and increase the population twelvefold.
https://rumble.com/v73cgtw-guest-jan-lamprecht-of-history-reviewed.html
I knew of the (that time not unusual)
fate of pirate slave Olufs, but not of
the tragic Christmas story of his tribes-
man Evers over a hundred years later.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hark_Olufs
(Activate Judentube’s auto-subs for translation)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-2x9nMnZTM
That there are monuments still be-
ing built for Whites instead for drug-
addicted black criminals like George
Floyd is worth mentioning in itself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tjark_Evers
https://i.ibb.co/84Y5gTG4/last-words.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Nyt8rt1G-k
Unfortunately, the short film does
not offer a transcript for translation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdN0USzD_Lc
One of the people responsible for protecting the German Wadden Sea is, listen and be amazed, an American named Roger Staves. He has his headquarters in Wilhelmshaven, where Peter Behrens, “stand-up drummer” of Trio, also had his home.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jR5SjlvKiE
Despite his fame, Behrens died in poverty, dependent on charity. He never got to know his American GI father. His bandmates did not share their wealth with him, but pocketed everything themselves. Peter went off the rails, drugs, divorce, etc. Last interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nnHq-_KI7Y
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Behrens_(musician)
AI tells about Staves:
Roger Staves is an American marine biologist who moved to Germany around 1980 and settled in Wilhelmshaven on the North Sea coast. His academic and professional focus on marine biology and coastal nature conservation led him to this region, which is an important center for research and protection of the Wadden Sea World Heritage Site.
## Background and Education
– Roger Staves is American and holds a Bachelor of Science in Marine Biology from North Dartmouth, Massachusetts (USA).
– He later obtained a Master of Science and additional qualifications in nature education and health-related fields, such as alternative health practice and health-oriented guided walks.
## Path to Wilhelmshaven
– He has been living in Germany since about 1980, and his search for professional opportunities as a marine biologist brought him to the German North Sea coast.
– Wilhelmshaven offered access to marine research and Wadden Sea conservation institutions, which made it a logical place for him to settle and build his career.
## Current Professional Role
– In Wilhelmshaven he works as a marine biologist focusing on environmental education and nature conservation related to the Wadden Sea UNESCO World Heritage Site.
– He is active in public education through lectures, guided tours, and projects at local institutions such as the Wadden Sea visitor center, helping people understand and appreciate the coastal marine environment.
Vancouver’s Fisgard Lighthouse named
after Welsh Fishguard (from Old Norse
Fiskigarðr), was designed by a German.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5pn5D-I7-I
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisgard_Lighthouse_National_Historic_Site
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishguard
https://bcbooklook.com/211-b-c-s-first-professional-architect/
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Tiedemann_(Adelsgeschlecht)
I highly object to Religion getting such attention here these days. Carlson is a Christian Pastor to the flock of Presbyterians et alwho march to the tune of We Shall Overcome….yes some day, I do Believe, ad nauseam, and I am Somebody!
Yes Tucker, you are useful vis a vie The Jews but your tenure is about timed out but for the evangelicals slot on late nite TV.