Hitler, Germany, and the Jews: Context Is Everything Part 3

Go to Part 1.
Go to Part 2.

While Hitler wanted Jews to leave Germany for the reasons outlined in parts 1 and 2, until 1942, they were well treated and protected by law. The Germans encouraged them to leave freely or allowed them to stay as long as they complied with the Nuremberg race laws, similar to the laws that serve as a template for Israel’s present Nation State-Law.[1]

They were against physical violence towards Jews and other races. To paraphrase Harvard historian Claudia Koonz, attacks against Jews were seen as bullying of the weak by the strong. Instead of smashing windows and scribbling graffiti on walls, they insisted on draining the resources that allowed other races to live in Germany in order to make them leave on their own. Hermann Goering, like most of Germany’s intelligentsia, did not sanction the destruction of property and street demonstrations against the Jews. [2]

Even the SS men were not at all as evil as depicted. As reported by mainstream historian Claudia Koonz this elite force was required to set an example for the “little guy”; SS Führer Himmler’s second-in-command Reinhard Heydrich, for example, openly deplored vulgar tactics. Boycotts and physical violence were castigated as counterproductive. Crude anti-Judaism backfired, in the opinion of SS analysts. Agents abroad reported their distress at seeing Nazis caricatured as brown-shirted bullies. And members of the Gestapo police saw themselves as facilitators and not as dictators.[3]

In the concentration camps, the SS had an internal security police force whose mission was to prosecute German camp personnel involved in corruption or brutality. Hundreds of delinquents were arrested, tried, and punished by the Germans with sentences ranging from prison to execution. In September 1944, Amon Göeth of Schindler’s List fame, for example, was arrested and imprisoned for bribery and murder of prisoners by the SS HaupAmt Gericht, the central office of SS justice. Göeth’s arrest (he was executed after the war in 1946) came after an investigation by German military judge Georg Konrad Morgen and officers of the Reich Security Office.[4]^{, [5]}

Hitler, the most demonized man in all history, the absolute embodiment of all evil, was adored by his people. Within two years of assuming power, Germany had no more debt or inflation and its currency was solid and stable. After the ordeals of the Treaty of Versailles and the hunger blockade (which killed as many children, women and old people as the Iraqi blockade initiated by U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright), the entire German people had regained their pride, dignity, and happiness. It is no exaggeration to say that the good, the true, and the beautiful reigned supreme in the National Socialist kingdom of the pre-war period.[6]

Voted “Man of the Year” in 1938 by Time Magazine, which featured him on its cover in 1936, Hitler was admired by many, including Winston Churchill, who said of Hitler in 1935: “…One may think what one likes about these achievements, but they are undeniably among the most remarkable in the history of the world.”[7]

Even after the war, in 1945, there were still people who could speak well of Hitler. This is notably the case of the future president of the United States, John F. Kennedy, who wrote in his diary:

Within a few years, Hitler will emerge from the hatred that now surrounds him as one of the most significant figures that ever lived. … [H]e had a mystery about him in the way he lived and in the matter of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.[8]

As author Laurent Guyénot points out in his book The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, as a young man,

Kennedy never saw Hitler as an evil man, let alone as a man responsible for WW2. … In 1946, in his book, Profiles in courage, John praised Senator Robert Taft, for having at tremendous personal cost, denounced in 1946, the hanging of eleven Nazi officials as motivated by the ‘spirit of vengeance’ and as ‘a blot on the American record that we shall long regret.’[9]

In 1957, twelve years after Adolf Hitler’s death, his sister Paula issued a defiant statement condemning the sea of lies spread against him by the Regime and its lying press.

Gentlemen, never forget this; your names will be forgotten even before your bodies have rotted away in the earth, but the name Adolf Hitler will still be a light in the darkness. You cannot murder him by drowning his memory in your sick buckets, and you cannot strangle him with your filthy, ink-stained fingers.

His name exists forever in hundreds of thousands of souls. You are far too insignificant to even touch him. He loved Germany. He fretted over Germany, and when he fought for honor and respect, he fought for German honor and respect for Germany. And when there was nothing left, he gave his life for Germany.

What have you given so far? Which one of you would give his life for Germany? The only things you care about are riches, power, and never-ending luxurious living…

German elites, and Germans in general, were not thugs or the embodiment of evil. This demonic image was carefully built by Jewish Hollywood and Jewish Britain. Atrocity or Black propaganda started during WW1 and was massively amplified when Hitler came to power. Movies, books, and articles by the Jewish-controlled information outlets spent years stigmatizing Hitler and his people. It hasn’t relented since, and atrocity propaganda of this type is what sustains, in part, Jewish power in the West. Hence, every year, Hollywood produces at least one movie dirtying Hitler and his volk.[10]

If National Socialist Germany wanted Jews to leave the country, no Jew ever had to run away at night, on foot, with his suitcases to get away from the Gestapo. No Jew ever had to hide for months or years in obscure basements or hideouts.[11] Anne Frank’s case, for example, is pure fabulation. She was sent to Auschwitz where she wasn’t gassed or killed, then transferred to Bergen-Belsen where she died of Typhus in a hospital. If Auschwitz was a death camp, why would Germany waste resources transferring and keeping her alive when they could have gassed her on arrival?

Her story lines up exactly with what revisionists say in that many Jews died in concentration camps at the end of the war from the spread of disease and starvation. As such, the diary of Anne Frank, the high priestess in the pantheon of Holocaust martyrs is a fake. “Not a single word in [the diary] contains her truth. It is merely a prison for Annelies’ soul, covered by a thick wall of falsehood in the name of a legend” says Ikuo Suzuki, the author of a new analysis on the Anne Frank fraud, Unmasking Anne Frank. Her Famous Diary exposed as a literary fraud, Clemens & Blair Publishers, 2022. Karl Hamers, who reviewed this book for the August 27, 2022, on-line issue of The Unz Review, states the following about the actual author of Anne Frank’s diary:

Many speculate that Anne’s father Otto Frank was the actual author all along, but Suzuki excludes Otto as lacking the character, ability, and motivation to forge the diary. He says: “There was at least one person in Otto’s vicinity who definitely possessed those qualities.” Suzuki’s in-depth profile and examination of this one person — Jewish playwright and journalist Meyer Levin — I found compelling. For instance, Levin’s relationship with Otto Frank included Frank appointing Levin his copyright agent in 1952. Levin’s history involved him working in the “Office of War Information” in the US, producing propaganda movies. Thus, Levin had the presence and ability to invent the diary as ongoing war propaganda.

In fact, many Jews stayed in Berlin until the end of the war. When the Holocaust was beginning to be promoted in the 1960s, recalls Heinz Weichard, a Jewish supporter of Hitler who had to leave Germany as an unwanted non-Aryan, he couldn’t believe what he was hearing in the media about his once-beloved Germany: “I went to school with those fellows in the SS. I knew that they were simply not capable of behaviour which the Jews were ascribing to them.”[12]

Hitler even signed a pact on August 25, 1933, with representatives of the Zionist Jewish Agency to help the Jews emigrate peacefully with all their possessions to Palestine? This pact called the “Haavara Agreement” or “Transfer Agreement” (haavara in Hebrew means “to move” or “relocate”), which operated until 1942, allowed approximately 60 000 Jews from the German and Austrian populations to leave the country, taking their wealth with them. In fact, between the years 1933 and 1939, more than 60% of the investments in Jewish Palestine came from Hitler’s Germany.[13]

According to Lenni Brenner, the Jewish author of the book Zionism in the Age of Dictators, without Germany’s help, it is highly likely that Israel would not exist.[14] And according to Edwin Black, the Jewish author of the not-so-popular book The Transfer Agreement (which Brenner’s book mentioned above tried to gloss over):

The Zionists even proposed ways to speed up the transfer out of Germany, including the wearing of the yellow star by all German Jews. According to the Zionists, the more pressure that was put on them, the more likely they would be to leave the country.[15]

To sum up:

• Legal emigration was officially banned in October 1941 when Germany preemptively invaded the Soviet Union, by which time about 360,000 German Jews had been left out of a population of 522 000 in 1933;[16] after this period, Jews were forced to emigrate to Byelorussia and other Eastern countries through transit camps;[17] up to this time and even later, there was no language of “extermination” in Nazi official communications. They did use the term “final solution” but in their language it meant a “territorial solution,” not “extermination.”

• Hitler did speak of “extermination” in one of his speeches given at the Reichstag, January 30, 1939, but in a rhetorical way meaning “extermination by education.” This quote is taken out of context by the advocates of the official post-war version. In the next sentences, Hitler explained that he meant deconstructing Jewish influence worldwide by informing everyone of their evil natures: “Today I will once more be a prophet: If the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation [Vernichtung] of the Jewish race in Europe, for the time when the non-Jewish nations had no propaganda is at an end. National-Socialist Germany and Fascist Italy have institutions which enable them when necessary to enlighten the world about the nature of a question of which many nations are instinctively conscious, but which they have not yet clearly thought out.”
• According to revisionist Carolyne Yeager, and based on information obtained from various sources, including The Hoax of the Twentieth Century by Arthur R. Butz: “The very first unconfirmed reports of mass shootings of Jews came from the World Jewish Congress, as well as the first unconfirmed reports of gas chambers and mass cremations also came from the WJC.”[18] These unconfirmed reports were etched in stone by the Nuremberg Trials that took place from 1945 to 1947. Every mainstream historian since, presupposes in his analysis of WW2 that the Holocaust is a fact. Accordingly, when one hand writes something positive about Hitler and the Germans, the other hand, in the same breath, feels obliged, because reality is different from the accepted version, to systematically deny it by writing that Hitler and the Germans were actually playing a game of deception, a façade, to trick the public and the press. This gives rise to a stained analysis difficult to read for someone who knows the truth. In other words, presentism being the norm, all pre-1945 events are interpreted through the prism of the official post-war narrative.
• To this day, no authentic plans for the construction of homicidal gas chambers—but lots of fakes or plans for disinfection chambers; no written orders commanding the extermination of Jews in gas chambers or by bullets were ever found. It happened by “an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy,” i.e., telepathy, as the most prestigious Holocaust specialist Raul Hilberg—thoroughly discredited during the 1985 Zundel trial—puts it in what is considered the bible of the Holocaust: The Destruction of the European Jews. [19]

In the end, notions about race started to shift with the advent of pseudoscientist and fraudster Franz Boas at the beginning of the 20th century. As a German-Jewish anthropologist, he was deeply influenced by his background and personal experiences with anti-Judaism. Although, he was committed to challenging prevailing race-based aideologies, his scientific approach was not grounded in empirical evidence. His main goals were to decrease anti-Judaism and abolish the immigration laws that were harmful to his tribe. In other words, under the guise of social reform and humanitarian goals, he was driven by “what’s good for the Jews.”[20]

After World War II, following the Nuremberg trials, the global scientific community—based on Boas’s work on race as a social construct—reclassified Darwinian ideas on race and genetic determinism as pseudoscience and an ethical failure.

Jewish power, which had been severely defeated and humiliated by Hitler’s nationalist Germany had to make sure this kick in the face would never happen again. Racial realism, genetic determinism, and national sovereignty were banned from the discourse of all non-Jews, but defended and promoted by Jews in their own country Israel.

Never Again. The Magic Wand of Democracy

[1] Susan Abulhawa, “Israel’s ‘Nation-State Law’ Parallels the Nazi Nuremberg Laws,” Al Jazeera, July 26, 2018.

[2] Claudia Koonz, “Racial War at Home,” The Nazi Conscience, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003, pp. 253-274.

[3] Claudia Koonz, “Racial war at Home,” book cited, pp. 253-274.

[4] K. Prenger, A Judge in Auschwitz – Konrad Morgen’s Crusade Against SS Corruption & ‘Illegal’ Murder, Pen & Sword Books, 2021.

[5] Konrad Morgen, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[6] Richard Tedor, Hitler’s Revolution. Ideology, Social Programs, Foreign Affairs, Castle Hill Publishers, 2021.

[7] Benton Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, Money Tree Publishing, 2^nd edition, 2022, p. 148.

[8] John F. Kennedy, Prelude to Leadership: The Post-War Diary of John F. Kennedy: Summer, 1945, Quoted in Benton Bradberry, work cited, p. 171.

[9] Robert Taft, quoted by Laurent Guyénot in The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, 22021, p.99.

[10] Frank L. Britton, Behind Communism, River Crest Publishing, 2021 (first published in 1952), pp 116-118.

[11] Ingrid Weckert, Jewish Emigration from the Third Reich, Holocaust Handbook N^o 12.

[12] Heinz Weichardt, Under Two Flags, a free PDF is available on-line. A book is also available under the title, Nazi Terror. A Short Autobiography of a Jewish National Socialist, The Heretical Press, Hull, 2004.

[13] Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of Dictators, Croom Helm Ltd, 2014.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement, Dialog Press, 1984.

[16] Information obtained from LEO AI of the Brave navigator.

[17] Steffen Werner, The Second Babylon Captivity. The Fate of the Jews in Eastern Europe since 1941, Castle Hill Publishers, 1991.

[18] Carolyne Yeager, “The Hoax That Won’t Die. How the World Jewish Congress invented the Holocaust,” The Unz Review, October 1, 2021.

[19] Robert Faurisson, “Raul Hilberg Now Explains that the Genocide of the Jews Was Carried Out by Telepathy,” Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust, Sept. 1, 1988.

[20] Kevin MacDonald, PhD, “The Boasian School of Anthropology and the Decline of Darwinism in the Social Sciences,” The Culture of Critique. An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, 3^rd Edition, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2025, pp. 31-92.