A sure sign that Jews control the media is that someone like Alan Dershowitz can get away with trotting out totally lame arguments in the mainstream media against the idea that Jews control the media. (Do Jews Control the Media?) It’s an example of Orwell’s idea of blackwhite: ”a loyal willingness to say that black is white when Party discipline demands this. But it means also the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary.”
Dershowitz’s basic point is that yes, there are “individual Jews” with influence in the media, as well as the law, finance, and academia. His phrase “individual Jews” is meant to indicate that they are people “who happen to be Jewish.” They do not “act together in a conspiratorial manner.”
If he means that Jews in the media do a Protocols-of-the-Elders-of-Zion thing where they get their marching orders from Abe Foxman, I would have to agree with him. But the fact is that in general Jews do not act simply as individuals. There is a shared vision that influences the attitudes and behavior of individual Jews. As I note in summarizing J. J. Goldberg, “There is a great deal of consensus on broad Jewish issues, particularly in the areas of Israel and the welfare of other foreign Jewries, immigration and refugee policy, church-state separation, abortion rights, and civil liberties” (see Jewish Power, p. 5). Indeed, the consensus on these issues among Jewish activist organizations and the Jewish intellectual movements reviewed here despite a great deal of disagreement on other issues is striking.These attitudes typify the entire Jewish political spectrum, from the mainstream Jewish left to the neoconservative Jewish right, and in general, the Jewish profile on these issues is quite different from other Americans. Massive changes in public policy on these issues coincide with the period of increasing Jewish power and influence in the United States.
Philip Weiss points out that Dershowitz himself has emphasized general Jewish goals, particularly the defense of Israel. And he presents examples of Jews in the media who see themselves as promoting Israel or who actively exclude points of view critical of Israel. To which I would add the comment by Eric Alterman about Martin Peretz, publisher of The New Republic: “It is not enough to say that TNR’s owner is merely obsessed with Israel; he says so himself. But more importantly, Peretz is obsessed with Israel’s critics, Israel’s would-be critics, and people who never heard of Israel, but might one day know someone who might someday become a critic.”
Dershowitz gives the New York Times as an example of a Jewish-owned media, noting that is critical of Israel. But in general, the Times’ coverage has been highly skewed toward Israel, as documented by Alison Weir’s If Americans Knew. Weiss gives the well-known quote from former editor Max Frankel: The NYT’s former executive editor Max Frankel wrote, “I was much more deeply devoted to Israel than I dared to assert … Fortified by my knowledge of Israel and my friendships there, I myself wrote most of our Middle East commentaries. As more Arab than Jewish readers recognized, I wrote them from a pro-Israel perspective.”
A recent Forward article recounts the firings of Rick Sanchez, Octavia Nasr, and Helen Thomas for their comments on Jewish issues. It points out that “Jews have done more than other groups to make it clear that they will not suffer lightly the public slights like those made by Sanchez — let alone by those with even bigger mouths, like Mel Gibson. As Foxman put it, ‘We are a community that is sensitive, and — have no doubt — we’ll respond.’ ‘
Right. But at least we know what the game is. The truth will be suppressed with all the power that the Jewish community can bring to bear. The message is out that anyone who wishes to have a career in the media must play by these rules or look for another line of work.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
A recent Forward article recounts the firings of Rick Sanchez, Octavia Nasr, and Helen Thomas for their comments on Jewish issues. It points out that “Jews have done more than other groups to make it clear that they will not suffer lightly the public slights like those made by Sanchez — let alone by those with even bigger mouths, like Mel Gibson. As Foxman put it, ‘We are a community that is sensitive, and — have no doubt — we’ll respond.’ ‘
Ha, more like “Ashkenazis have done more than any other group to make it clear that they will not suffer lightly the public slights they’ve heaped on others since the day they gained media control, academic influence, political power, etc.”
The 21st century, with its instant, decentralized, global communications, will not be as kind to Ashkenazis as the 20th. It’s going to be much, much, much easier for people to find out who’s running a crooked game, and much, much, much harder for people to escape their reputations.
Given their tendency for inhumanity and cruelty toward their rivals, Ashkenazis project their behavior onto us and paint lurid pictures of persecution, but in the increasingly information-rich society we’re moving toward, my guess is they’ll wind up more like Jews in Muslim societies; personas non grata – simply not eligible for positions of trust or power over anyone but their fellow Jews..
Jews exercise power the same way that the Know Nothing party did in the early nineteenth century. They quietly agreed to vote in a certain way but when questioned would reply that they knew nothing of the agreement. Discussion of their issues was thus suppressed. They advanced their cause without a debate that they could possibly lose.
Jews today carry this one step further. They demand that no one be allowed to comment on their Know Nothing agenda. The much condemned Nativist movement never attempted to silence their opponents. They believed in democracy and considered their tactic compatible with it. Jewry has no history of democracy and has never supported it. Democracy is alien to their values.
Perhaps those interested in maintaining traditional American values should start to quietly boycott anything and all things Jewish. Never go to a Jewish lawyer, doctor or shop. Never promote a Jew in business. Never vote for a Jew. Always belittle the quality of anything from Israel. And if asked, simply declare ignorance of any such behavior. The immediate case is free standing.
It is what Jews do. Jewish media control is Know Nothingism on steroids. It is a long step closer along the continuum towards totalitarianism.
Does anyone know of a single instance of a Jew giving a dime’s worth of business to a Christian if a Jewish competitor is on the scene? Return the favor.
It’s ‘funny’ to think about Alan Dershowitz penning this article- does he really believe it? of course not.I wonder what he really does believe – are jews even aware of this hypocrisy and lying?
For example often they don’t think its ‘ethnic nepotism’ but, well, jews are just so much better than everyone else . so how else would it turn out but jews being 60% of harvard law faculty ( i am just guestimating here)
|
RT and PressTV Declared Enemies of the Main Stream Media:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtyemTT8fXY
|
I submit that the “shared vision that influences the attitudes and behavior of individual Jews” is to be found in the Talmud. Twenty five hundred years of applied eugenics focused on mastery of the convoluted, legalistic intricacies of the talmud, (63 volumes) and it’s historical predecessor, the oral “Traditions Of The Elders”, has produced a solidarity of outlook unmached by any culture in the world.
Rabbi Abraham Hirsch Rabinowitz, The Study Of Talmud, Jason Aronson Inc. 1996: The versatility and achievement of the Jewish mind is proverbial. There is hardly a field of human contemplation and endeavor in which Jews have failed to excel. Precocity and originality have usually marked the contribution of Jews to knowledge, as also a striking ability to improvise. of the main factors that together created the Jewish mind, there can be little doubt that the conrtibution of the age long precoccupation of the Jew with talmud and halachah is formidable. the study of Talmud, undertaken at an early age, and persued assiduouslly, nurtured alertness, discernment, and acumen and cultured the ability to weigh situations and opinions. It encouraged debate and individual research, rewarded initiative, and lauded brilliance”.
“There is hardly a field of human contemplation and endeavor in which Jews have failed to excel.”
Pity the “brilliant” Jewish mind can’t contemplate itself or even Jewish history objectively. There is nothing brilliant, original or even self-respecting about ceaselessly whining about eternal victimhood and the failure of the goyim to recognize their superiority.
Not only does the Talmud nurture The positive qualities of mind; it also teaches the purpose, methods and tactics of specious dissembling and agressive, circular and meaningless argumentation. Talmud is a vast labyrinth of arcane minutia, and self serving claptrap. Talmud teaches how to lie, and when and why to lie. The young man who can navigate this sea of meaninglessness and master it’s hermeneutic of deception, gets his pick of the prettiest and smartest of the girls. After twenty five hundred years it is in the very marrow of Jewish bones. And Talmud is makeing a big comeback in American “secular” Jewish circles.
The Jewish mind can’t “contemplate itself or even Jewish history objectively” because Talmud creats it’s own world of objective justification and logic; is complete within itself, and correlates with nothing outside this insular universe. Talmudism engenders the ultimate tribal mindset: The “Ingroup” is all. the “outgroup” is nothing. there is no compassion reserved for the “other”; they are cattle, created to serve God’s Chosen. No matter how long or how cruelly the Jew might depredate his neighbor he is blind to the suffering he brings about, so long as it is “good for the Jews”. When the inevitable moment of retribution comes the Jew is ever surprised. Any damage done to the Jews by rampaging cattle is always seen as “persecution”, and they really believe it. Talmudic tribalism is unique in the world in that Talmudic teaching assigns the status of Holyness itself to the Jews, as a people: “When Moses ascended Mount Sinai…earth and heaven came together in a unique way….For the first time in creation, physical objects could be infused with actual holiness….the Children of Israel themselves became holy”. The Path Of The Righteous Gentile, An Introduction To The Seven Laws Of The Children Of Noah (the Noahide laws)
““There is hardly a field of human contemplation and endeavor in which Jews have failed to excel.””
The reality, of course, is that 2500 years of Talmud study produced nothing but … Talmud “scholars.” After Napoleon “emancipated” the Jews, they poured out of their self-constructed ghettos and parasitically attached themselves to European culture, which they have been exploiting and subverting ever since.
The European Jew can “conduct” Wagner but not compose a note.
The Israeli Jew does nothing at all.
Even in Solomon’s day, the “brilliant” Jews had to import architects to build their “magnificence” Temple; apparently they could make bricks in Egypt but couldn’t design a mulit-story building without YHVH-1′s help.
Who Controls Big Media?
CBS Corporation:
Sumner M. Redstone(Jew) – Executive Chairman
Leslie Moonves(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
NBC Universal:
Jeff Zucker(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
John Eck(Jew) – President, NBC TV Network and Media Works
News Corporation:
Rupert Murdoch(White European) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Chase Carey(White European) – Deputy Chairman, President, and Chief Operating Officer
Time Warner:
Jeffrey L. Bewkes(Jewish spouse: Peggy Brim) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Gary L. Ginsberg(Jew) – Executive Vice President, Corporate Marketing and Communications
Viacom:
Sumner M. Redstone(Jew) – Executive Chairman of the Board and Founder
Philippe Dauman(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
The Walt Disney Company:
Robert A. Iger(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Alan Braverman(Jew) – Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
Of the twelve(12) senior executives of the six largest media corporations, ten(10) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the six largest media corporations by a factor of 41.5 times, or 4,150 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the senior executives of the six largest media corporations cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance.
Who Controls Hollywood?
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios:
Harry E. Sloan(Jew) – Chairman
Stephen F. Cooper(Jew) – Vice Chairman
Charles Cohen(Jew) – Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Paramount Pictures:
Brad A. Grey(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Rob Moore(Jew) – Vice Chairman
Adam Goodman(Jew) – President, Paramount Film Group
Sony Pictures Entertainment:
Michael Lynton(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Amy Pascal(Jew) – Co-Chairman
Jeff Blake(Jew) – Vice Chairman
Twentieth Century Fox:
Thomas E. Rothman(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
James N. Gianopulos(Greek) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Hutch Parker(Jewish spouse: Rebecca Pollack) – President
Universal Studios:
Ron Meyer(Jew) – President and Chief Operating Officer
Adam Fogelson(Jew) – Chairman, Universal Pictures
Jimmy Horowitz(Jew) – President, Universal Pictures
Walt Disney Studios:
Rich Ross(Jew homosexual) – Chairman
Alan Bergman(Jew) – President
Sean Bailey(White European) – President, Motion Picture Production
Warner Bros. Entertainment:
Barry M. Meyer(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Alan F. Horn(Jew) – President and Chief Operating Officer
Jeff Robinov(Jew) – President, Warner Bros. Pictures Group
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences:
Tom Sherak(Jew) – President
Sidney M. Ganis(Jew) – Immediate Past President
Bruce Davis(Jew) – Executive Director
Directors Guild of America:
Taylor E. Hackford(White European) – President
Steven A. Soderbergh(Jew) – National Vice-President
Jay D. Roth(Jew) – National Executive Director
Producers Guild of America:
Mark Gordon(Jew) – Co-President
Howard “Hawk” Koch, Jr.(Jew) – Co-President
Vance Van Petten(Jew) – Executive Director
Screen Actors Guild:
Kenneth J. “Ken” Howard, Jr.(White European) – President
David P. White(Mulatto) – National Executive Director
Duncan Crabtree Ireland(White European homosexual) – Deputy National Executive Director and General Counsel
Writers Guild of America, West:
John M. Wells(Jew/White European) – President
Tom Schulman(Jew) – Vice President
David N. Weiss(Jew) – Secretary-Treasurer
Creative Artists Agency:
Richard Lovett(Jew) – President
Kevin Huvane(White European homosexual) – Managing Partner
Bryan W. Lourd(White European homosexual) – Managing Partner
International Creative Management:
Jeffrey S. Berg(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Chris Silbermann(Jew) – President
Richard B. Levy(Jew) – Chief Business Development Officer and General Counsel
United Talent Agency:
Jim Berkus(Jew) – Chairman
Peter Benedek(Jew) – Chief Executive Officer
Jeremy Zimmer(Jew) – Founding Partner
William Morris Endeavor Entertainment:
Ariel “Ari” Zev Emanuel(Jew) – Co-Chief Executive Officer
Patrick Whitesell(Jew) – Co-Chief Executive Officer
David Wirtschafter(Jew) – Co-Chief Executive Officer
Of the forty-eight(48) senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies, forty(40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies by a factor of 41.5 times, or 4,150 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance.
Who Controls Television?
A&E Television Networks:
Abbe Raven [Ravnitsky](Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
David Zagin(Jew) – Executive Vice President of Distribution
Steve Ronson(Jew) – Senior Vice President, Enterprises
Comcast:
Brian L. Roberts(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Stephen B. Burke(Jew) – Chief Operating Officer
David L. Cohen(Jew) – Executive Vice President
CBS Corporation:
Sumner M. Redstone(Jew) – Executive Chairman
Leslie Moonves(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Nancy Tellem(Jew) – President, CBS Network Television Entertainment Group
CW Television Network:
Dawn Tarnofsky-Ostroff(Jew) – President, Entertainment
John Maatta(Jew) – Chief Operating Officer
Thom Sherman(Jew) – Executive Vice President, Drama Development
Discovery Communications:
David M. Zaslav(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Peter Liguori(Italian) – Chief Operating Officer
John S. Hendricks(White European) – Founder and Chairman
Disney-ABC Television Group:
Anne Sweeney(Jewish spouse: Phillip Miller) – Co-Chair, Disney Media Networks; President, Disney/ABC Television Group
Paul Lee(Jew) – President, ABC Entertainment Group
Barry Jossen(Jew) – Executive Vice President, Studio Creative and Production, ABC Entertainment Group
Fox Entertainment Group:
Gary Newman(Jew) – Co-Chairman, 20th Century Fox Television
Dana Walden(Jew) – Co-Chairman, 20th Century Fox Television
David Madden(Jew) – President, Fox Television Studios
Hearst Entertainment & Syndication:
Scott M. Sassa(Jewish spouse: Ellen G. Sassa) – President
George Kliavkoff(Jew) – Executive Vice President & Deputy Group Head
Wendy Goldberg(Jew) – Vice President of Business Development & Strategy
Home Box Office:
Bill Nelson(White European) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Eric Kessler(Jew) – Co-President
Richard Plepler(Jew) – Co-President
ION Media Networks:
Brandon Burgess(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Stephen Appel(Jew) – President, Sales and Marketing
Marc Zand(Jew) – Executive Vice President, Digital Networks & Business Affairs
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Television:
Bruce Tuchman(Jew) – President, MGM Worldwide Networks
Gary Marenzi(White European) – Co-President, Worldwide Television
Jim Packer(White European) – Co-President, Worldwide Television
NBC Universal:
Jeff Zucker(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Jeff Gaspin(Jew) – Chairman, NBC Universal Television Entertainment
Marc Graboff(Jew) – Co-Chairman, NBC Entertainment and NBC Universal Television Studio
Public Broadcasting Service:
Paula Kerger(Jew) – President & Chief Executive Officer
Michael Jones(Mulatto) – Chief Operating Officer
Geoffrey Sands(Jew) – Chairman
Rainbow Media:
Joshua Sapan(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer, Rainbow Media Holdings LLC
Charlie Collier(Jew) – President and General Manager, AMC
Evan Shapiro(Jew) – President, IFC tv and Sundance Channel
Jonathan Sehring(Jew) – President, IFC Entertainment
Showtime Networks:
Matthew C. Blank(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
David Nevins(Jew) – President, Entertainment
Sony Pictures Television:
Steve Mosko(Jew) – President
Andy Kaplan(Jew) – President, Networks
Jamie Erlicht(Jew) – President, U.S. Programming and Production
Turner Broadcasting System:
Philip I. Kent(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew T. Heller(Jew) – Vice Chairman
Steve Koonin(Jew) – President, Turner Entertainment Networks
Viacom:
Sumner M. Redstone(Jew) – Executive Chairman of the Board and Founder
Shari Redstone(Jew) – Non-Executive Vice Chair of the Board
Philippe Dauman(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Warner Bros. Television:
Bruce Rosenblum(Jew) – President, Warner Bros. Television Group
Peter Roth(Jew) – President, Warner Bros. Television
Ken Werner(Jew) – President, Warner Bros. Domestic Television Distribution
Academy of Television Arts & Sciences:
John Shaffner(Jew) – Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Nancy Bradley Wiard(White European) – Vice Chairman
Kevin Hamburger(Jew) – Treasurer
International Academy of Television Arts and Sciences:
Bruce Paisner(Jew) – President & Chief Executive Officer
Fred Cohen(Jew) – Chairman
Larry Gershman(Jew) – Vice Chairman
National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences:
Darryl Cohen(Jew) – Chairman
Malachy Wienges(Jew) – 1st Vice Chairman
Norman Felsenthal(Jew) – Secretary
Of the sixty-six(66) senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies, fifty-nine(59) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 89%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies by a factor of 44.5 times, or 4,450 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance.
Who Controls Radio?
ABC News Radio:
Steve Jones(Jew) – Vice President, ABC News Radio
Andrew Kalb(Jew) – Executive Director, Programming
Jeff Fitzgerald(White European) – Executive Director, Operations
CBS Radio Network:
Dan Mason(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Scott Herman(Jew) – Executive Vice President, Operations
David Goodman(Jew) – President, CBS Interactive Music Group
Citadel Broadcasting:
Farid Suleman(Arab) – Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Judy Ellis(Jew) – Chief Operating Officer
John L. Sander(Jew) – Chairman, Board of Directors
Citadel Media:
John Rosso(White European) – President
Carl Anderson(White European) – Senior Vice President, Programming and Distribution
Edwin Rivera-Searles(Jew) – Senior Vice President, Advertizing Sales
Clear Channel Communications:
Mark Mays(White European) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Randall Mays(White European) – Vice Chairman
John Hogan(White European) – President and CEO, Clear Channel Radio
ESPN Radio:
Traug Keller(Jew) – Senior Vice President, Production, Business Units
Morris Davenport(Mulatto) – Senior Vice President & General Manager, ESPN Radio
Tim McCarthy(White European) – Senior Vice President, ESPN Radio Group
Fox News Radio:
Kevin Magee(White European) – Executive Vice President, Fox News Radio
Mitch Davis(White European) – Vice President, News Programming
Mike Elder(White European) – Vice President, Talk Programming
National Public Radio:
Vivian Schiller(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Mitch Praver(Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Debra Delman(Jew) – Senior Vice President, Strategic Operations and Finance
Premiere Radio Networks:
Charlie Rahilly(White European) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Julie Talbott(White European) – President, Content and Affiliate Relations
Daniel M. Yukelson(Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Radio Disney:
Carolina Lightcap(Jew) – President, Disney Channels Worldwide
Ray de la Garza(White European) – Vice President, Programming
Kelly Edwards(White European) – Executive Director of Music
Sirius XM Radio:
Mel Karmazin(Jew) – Chief Executive Officer
Scott Greenstein(Jew) – President and Chief Content Officer
James E. Meyer(Jew) – President, Operations and Sales
Talk Radio Network:
Mark Masters [Obermeister](Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Phil Boyce(White European) – President, Programming and Syndications
Triton Media Group:
Neal Schore(Jew) – President & Chief Executive Officer
Mike Agovino(White European) – Chief Operating Officer
Richard Wolff(Jew) – Chief Financial Officer
United Stations Radio Networks:
Nicholas J. Verbitsky(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
James M. Higgins(White European) – President and Chief Operating Officer
Andy Denemark(Jew) – Executive Vice-President, Programming
Westwood One:
Norman J. Pattiz(Jew) – Founder and Chairman Emeritus
Rod Sherwood(Jew) – Chief Financial Officer and President, Westwood One
Steven Kalin(Jew) – Chief Operating Officer and President, Metro Networks Traffic Division
David Hillman(Jew) – Chief Administrative Officer, EVP, Business Affairs, General Counsel, and Secretary
Of the forty-five(45) senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners, twenty-six(26) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 58%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners by a factor of 29 times, or 2,900 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance.
Who Controls Music?
EMI:
Roger Faxon(White European) – Chief Executive Officer, EMI Group
Ronn Werre(White European) – Chief Operating Officer, North America & Mexico; President, Music Services
David Kassler(Jew) – Chief Operating Officer, Europe and Rest of World
Live Nation Entertainment:
Michael Rapino(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Irving Azoff(Jew) – Executive Chairman
Arthur Fogel(Jew) – Chairman, Global Music; Chief Executive Officer, Global Touring
Sony Music Entertainment:
Rolf Schmidt-Holtz(Jew) – Chief Executive Officer
Kevin Kelleher(Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Clive Davis(Jew) – Chief Creative Officer
Universal Music Group:
Doug Morris(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Lucian Grainge(Jew) – Co-Chief Executive Officer
Zach Horowitz(Jew) – President & Chief Operating Officer
Warner Music Group:
Edgar Bronfman, Jr.(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Lyor Cohen(Jew) – Vice Chairman and Chairman and CEO, Recorded Music – Americas and the U.K.
Michael Fleisher(Jew) – Vice Chairman, Strategy and Operations
Alliance of Artists and Recording Companies:
Linda R. Bocchi(White European) – Executive Director
Mike Stern(Jew) – Director of Royalties
Bree Dietrich(Jew) – Deputy Director of Royalties
American Association of Independent Music:
Jim Cooperman(Jew) – Member, Board of Directors
Dan Hoffman(Jew) – Member, Board of Directors
Tom Silverman(Jew) – Member, Board of Directors
American Federation of Musicians:
Ray Hair(White European) – International President
Bruce Fife(White European) – International Vice President
Bill Skolnik(Jew) – Vice President from Canada
American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers:
Paul Williams(White European) – President and Chairman of the Board
James M. Kendrick(White European) – Treasurer
Kathy Spanberger(Jew) – Secretary
Broadcast Music Incorporated:
Del Bryant(Italian) – President and Chief Executive Officer
John E. Cody(White European) – Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
Marvin L. Berenson(Jew) – Senior Vice President & General Counsel
Harry Fox Agency:
Gary L. Churgin(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Maurice Russell(Black) – Senior Vice President, Licensing, Collections, and Business Affairs
Michael Simon(Jew) – Senior Vice President, Business Affairs, General Counsel, and Chief Strategic Officer
National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences:
Neil Portnow(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Kristen Madsen(Jew) – Senior Vice President
Scott Goldman(Jew) – Vice President
National Association of Recording Merchandisers:
Jim Donio(Jew) – President
Holly Rosum(Jew) – Director of Membership & Public Affairs
Rachelle Friedman(Jew) – Chairman, Board of Directors
National Music Publishers Association:
David Israelite(Jew) – President & Chief Executive Officer
Leeds Levy(Jew) – Member, Board of Directors
David Renzer(Jew) – Member, Board of Directors
Recording Industry Association of America:
Mitch Bainwol(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Cary Sherman(Jew) – President
Society of European Stage Authors & Composers:
Stephen Swid(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Freddie Gershon(Jew) – Co-Chairman
Ira Smith(Jew) – Co-Chairman
SoundExchange:
John L. Simson(Jew) – Executive Director
Barrie Kessler(Jew) – Chief Operating Officer
Michael J. Huppe(Jew) – Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Of the fifty(50) senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations, forty(40) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 80%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations by a factor of 40 times, or 4,000 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance.
@ James O’Meara: With all due respect, I must disagree with your assertion that “2500 years of talmud study produced nothing but … Talmud “scholars.” Your post begins with a quotation, not of me, but of Rabbi Abraham Hirsch Rabinowitz, whom I quoted. I think you might have missed my main point. The practice of eugenics, with mastery of the Talmud being the focal point for success in breeding choices led, over the course of many centuries, and in isolation enforced by the rabbis, to the development of a group mind of great cunning, and ingenuity. Not introspective, or contemplative; but a mind geared to success in the art of material gain, and let loose in a world of inferior beings. The Talmud is no ordinary book, or set of books. The Talmud is a direct conduit back to the original apostacy of Nimrod and his wife Semiramis; the first deified humans, the founders of the ancient Chaldean Mystery Religions, and subsiquent polytheistic, pagan mythologies of all the world. There is no literature on the face of this planet more toxic than the Talmud, and Talmudic law is being implimented, bit by insinuated bit right before our eyes. Elena Kagan?
@ James O’Meara: With all due respect, I must disagree with your assertion that “2500 years of Talmud study produced nothing but … Talmud “scholars.” Your post begins with a quotation, not of me, but of Rabbi Abraham Hirsch Rabinowitz, whom I quoted. I think you might have missed my main point. The practice of eugenics, with mastery of the Talmud being the focal point for success in breeding choices led, over the course of many centuries, and in isolation enforced by the rabbis, to the development of a Group Mind of great cunning, and ingenuity. Not introspective, or contemplative; but a mind geared to success in the art of material gain, and let loose in a world of inferior beings. The Talmud is no ordinary book, or set of books. The Talmud is a direct conduit back to the original apostacy of Nimrod and his wife Semiramis; the first deified humans, the founders of the ancient Chaldean Mystery Religions, and subsiquent polytheistic, pagan mythologies of all the world. There is no literature on the face of this planet more toxic than the Talmud; and Talmudic law is being implimented, bit by insinuated bit right before our eyes. Elena Kagan?
Jewish media ownership produces two very poignant conclusions. First, it points out the superficial racism of the general public, because if Jews appeared as foreign to European descendants as , say Asians, or Africans, then whites in America would know that the media is controlled by people not their own. Secondonly, we are always treated in counter arguments with the same hot button word, “individual” Jews (Jews know that they are not individualistic). So one can conclude that Jews know that whites are less ethnocentric than other ethnic groups in America, though in their media whites are portrayed as the only racist group.
What most Jews never mention is the degree tribal loyalty and nepotism play in getting ahead. Most real Westerners have been taught that such behaviours are bigotted and jingoistic and often dismiss them when they see them among their jewish “countrymen,” drily noting that they’re “just acting Jewish.”
As others have noted, it is long past due to begin looking after Western European/American interests in the same way Jews first look after their own.
If “Is it good for the Jews?” is an acceptable yardstick against which to measure decisions, then it’s perfectly legitimate to start asking “Is it good for us real Americans?” to do the same.
The Walt Disney Company:
Robert A. Iger(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer
Alan Braverman(Jew) – Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
notice once the once gentile, and congenial disney company was taken over by jews – nearly all non jews were kicked out – the company started selling porn) the children’s tales turned anti white and anti american – and when Michael Eisner (jewish) left he was replaced by a jew.
This is a classic example of jews taking over and using the reputation built by Anglos to subvert Anglo Saxon america – people, unfortunately still associate disney with wholesomeness while disney is busy putting out ‘pocohantos’ and having gay pride days at disney world.
“There is hardly a field of human contemplation and endeavor in which Jews have failed to excel.””
let;s see – have they ever produced a mother theresa or st. francis assisi? have they ever produced one authentic humanitarian – is it any wonder that any that do have such inklings convert?
Look at their ‘humanitarians’ Elie Weisel – an ardent zionist who said that all jews should hate germans.. look at their ‘humanitarian’ organizations – the ADL..
not to mention its rather funny and sad how they wildly promote second rate rubbish jewish ‘artists’ and ‘architects’ as if the fields didn’t exist before jews came – any real comparision, of course, renders their work horribly fourth rate- that is why the so viciously attack traditoinal western art and architecture.
lastly, back to the subject of this piece- its almost as big a lie as their biggest lie – that non jews accuse them of the ‘dual loyalty canard’ – alan dershowitz and abe foxman say this with a straight face while calling for Jonathan pollard’s release – he will be released, eventually – and return to a hero’s welcome.
Media influence seems laughable when you see stories like this one today.
SPLC is now part of the DHS.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/10/08/its-official-southern-poverty-law-center-is-now-part-of-dhs/
me said:
“let’s see – have they [jews] ever produced a mother theresa or st. francis assisi? have they ever produced one authentic humanitarian – is it any wonder that any that do have such inklings convert?
Look at their ‘humanitarians’ Elie Weisel – an ardent zionist who said that all jews should hate germans…”
The only famous humanitarians that have anything remotely to due with judaism are those who rescued jews during the holocaust…Wallenberg or Anger (non- jewish.) Elie Weisel is the greatest holocaust denier of all, not recognizing the millions of non-jews killed by the nazis as holocaust victims.
Mother Theresa was called “Hell’s Angel” by Hitchens (part jew) because he didn’t like her hospice in Calcutta. I guess he’ll do better when he starts HIS hospice in Calcutta.
All jews who have made meaningful contributions to society have been well paid (Einstein, Salk, etc.)
I meant “do’ of course
Salk was a fraud. A German Aryan and his team did the work. Links page:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=salk+jew+fraud&btnG=Google+Search
Einstein’s “meaningful contribution to society” was atomic weapons, which terrorized the world for half a century. (But I didn’t mean it! he postured after the damage was done.)
Hey, we’re not to be categorized as antisemitic, or “white boys,” or racists. We’re “just individual whites”….
More on Salk and polio:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:qDL_y30XdxAJ:www.eaja.us/polio.htm+salk+jew+fraud&cd=12&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Also, when jews make up their lists of the “world’s most important jews” or “most influential jews” they never include the Manhattan Project team, the majority of whom were jewish.
Yes, the Manhattan Project was started with a letter to Roosevelt from Einstein greatly overstating the threat of nuclear weapon development by Germany.
The jews have also stopped trying to claim Christopher Columbus as one of their own since he’s fallen out of favor with the politically correct.
“Einstein’s “meaningful contribution to society” was atomic weapons, which terrorized the world for half a century. (But I didn’t mean it! he postured after the damage was done.)”
Actually, nuclear weapons would almost certainly have been invented without Einstein (quantum and statistical mechanics were far more important than relativity there). On the other hand, Einstein fleshed out a substantially new way of looking at the universe…a way that turns out to be totally inconsistent with Talmudic metaphysics. The repercussions of that have not yet emerged, but are very real.
By the way, 3D has a point.
The White race needs its own “Talmud”, its own metaphysical framework that is superior to the Talmudic metaphysics which provides the Jews with their convictions of moral superiority and the basis of their multi-millennium eugenics program.
PC-laced secular scientism, the current religion of preference in academia, is unsuitable for this purpose. Why? Because
(1) Being quite indifferent to race and racial utility, academic scientism offers no support whatsoever for White survival (as we see by the fact that so many academic Jews approve of it);
(2) After “natural selection” has shot its wad, this “religion” ultimately subscribes to cosmic and evolutionary randomness. emasculating itself in the face of an ancient teleological and psycho-behavioral schema according to which God designed the universe so that Jews would naturally end up on top of it in every way.
Obviously, this new metaphysics would have to incorporate several hard-to-reconcile ingredients. But properly constructed by some real genius, it could go a long way toward solving our problems.
“Actually, nuclear weapons would almost certainly have been invented without Einstein…”
Nukes would’ve also been developed without the looming urgency of WW2, it just speeded up the process by 15 or 20 years.
I think an important reason for jewish influence in American government and with American leadership is often overlooked by white advocates. That influence started with the Manhattan Project.
Jews played such a critical role in the development of the A-bomb that American “leadership” is terrified of being on the outs with jewish brain power, more so than jewish money power or media power. Who knows what the next atom bomb will be? America is selling it’s soul so we won’t be left behind in strategic weapons and defense.
It would be interesting to know how critical jewish scientists were in developing the Soviet nuclear program.
It would be interesting to know how critical jewish scientists were in developing the Soviet nuclear program.
well considering the rosenbergs turned over the info, I’d say pretty important.
Jewish influence on US government started long before WWII /manhattan project- jewish influence is why we got involved in WWII
me:
You’re quite right. What I was saying is that the Manhattan project introduced a new and different aspect of influence, one that didn’t quite exist before.
There is no doubt that Roy Disney sold his soul to the devil (metaphorically) when he brought in Michael Eisner to save the Disney Studios. Walt Disney made wholesome family and kid pictures, bringing children’s classic literature to life and also enlightening yesterday’s kids about great white American folk heroes like Davy Crockett and about the wonders of nature in outdoor documentaries. The original Mickey Mouse Club TV show taught kids important lessons in coping and getting along. Adult white males with elan served as role models. No “valley” girls or boys were in evidence.
However, Walt Disney himself, was no angel. He was a hard-nosed businessman, almost Jew-like. The tragic story of Disney’s most important child star, Bobby Driscoll, who was literally escorted out of the Disney Studios because of teenage acne is a case in point. Driscoll never got over the shock of that parting and died at age 31 in a cold-water flat in New York City and is buried in a common pauper’s grave in the city’s potter’s field.
TGD-umm who wrote that book with that story… Mark Eliot.. jewish perhaps?
In any event if the worse you can come up with is that he fired a kid with acne (what was he to do ? film him w/ acne? ) compared to Jewish moguls and their casting couch, etc he is an angel- and he was on our side – not theirs. THAT is why jews hate him are always trying to smear him -he opposed communism – he opposed entry into WWII -
Driscoll’s story is sad but many a child actor have suffered the same fate- there is no evidence that Disney caused that – many child actors – for reasons other than acne – are no longer marketable when older- sometimes cute ‘kids’ turn out to be no so attractive adults.
Jim: “Jews played such a critical role in the development of the A-bomb that American ‘leadership’ is terrified of being on the outs with jewish brain power, more so than jewish money power or media power.”
Jewish brainpower isn’t nearly what it’s cracked up to be. It’s just that people don’t always realize the extent to which Jewish academics favor their own and function as their own hyperbolic PR agents. Instead, they get snowed by all the PR and academic favoritism and end up thinking that without Jews, we’d be up the river without an intellectual paddle.
This is very strange indeed, given that the finest scientific, mathematical, and philosophical geniuses in history – the ones who discovered the basic principles that modern Jewish scientists merely study and develop – were almost 100% White and non-Jewish. How quickly people forget their history when their faces are filled 24/7 with shameless Jewish self-promotion and self-aggrandizement!
As any high school physics student is well aware, atomic structure and radioactivity were discovered by Whites. The Jews didn’t get conspicuously involved until Enrico Fermi (Italian-American) and Ida Noddack (German) disagreed on the interpretation of certain experiments performed by Fermi in which uranium (a White discovery) was bombarded by neutrons (another White discovery). While Fermi thought that he had created a heavier element, Noddack suggested the possibility that atoms were being split into smaller chunks … i.e., atomic fission. The dawning realization that uranium atoms could be struck with energetic neutrons and split apart to release intense radiation and further energetic neutrons suggested the possibility of a fast chain reaction, and it took no special genius to infer the destructive possibilities.
Possibly smelling a weapon that could feed the insatiable Jewish lust for power and revenge, Jewish scientists quickly got involved in the development of nuclear theory. Thus, when the Jews managed to embroil the US in WWII, they were in a position to promise the US a devastating superweapon in return for a generous transfer of money, prestige, and political clout.
But others might easily have done the same. Given the immense resources allocated to the Manhattan Project by the US government, a single American scientist of the caliber of Werner Heisenberg and a few talented White grad students could probably have pulled it off without a single Jewish participant. (Of course, they might not have felt the same level of urgency as did the Jews, given their lust for vengeance after they had ruined Germany and been run out of the country like rats.)
Bottom line: what terrifies the American leadership is not necessarily being deprived of “Jewish brainpower”. It is the destructive force of moderately above-average Jewish brainpower when harnessed to intense Jewish greed, vengefulness, and tribal nepotism. The White political elite live in terror of it, and understandably so.
I’m not saying jews actually possess the brain power (to that extent), but the perception in America is that they do.
Expanding Eurodele’s point a bit, jews seem threatened by any form of non-jewish genius, as evidenced by Disney, the preeminent commercial artist of the 20th century. The preeminent industrial genius of the 20th century was Henry Ford, and he’s also despised by jewish historians.
And what did these two geniuses have in common? A deep distrust of jewish influence, not out of hatred, but because both had experienced first hand jewish hostility towards their singular brilliance – Disney in jewish controlled Hollywood and Ford in other ways.
Ford was a dedicated pacifist…he said publicly that he never wanted to build machines that would kill people, but knew that involvement in European wars would require him to do just that. He tried to use his influence to keep America from jumping into WW1, and that’s were the conflict between Ford and the jews really started.
Neil Baldwin ["Henry Ford and the Jews"] is a real distorter of the truth. His writing has the signature style of vengeful jew, but I don’t know for a fact that he is. I’m guessing he is. Correct me if I’m wrong.
“Jews seem threatened by any form of non-jewish genius.”
Then they’re in bad trouble, because Whites have a near-monopoly on genius. Forget the Nobel Prizes that go to undeserving Jews; that’s a function of pure Jewish nepotism and Jews displacing Whites in elite universities and academic research programs. White brainpower is what we should be afraid of losing, given that these creatures are trying their very best to extinguish it and arrogate all of its fruits to themselves.
I don’t know much about Walt Disney – that Bobby Driscoll story sounds pretty hideous (even though it pales compared to the rampant crime and immorality of Jewish Hollywood). Ford, on the other hand, was a hero. I recall hearing that he used to include a copy of “The International Jew” with every new car he sold. Ford Motors should resume doing so.
Disney would ask job applicants if they were jewish before deciding whether to hire them or not. This was actually out of necessity, fearing infiltration by the rest of Hollywood.
Ford had no deep seated hatred of jews. Many people have a hard time believing that, given the publication of the Dearborn Independent. He gave cars as gifts to jews, and openly admired others. Still, his DISTRUST of jewish influence was unsurpassed…he personally had been targeted and deceived by jews on at least one occassion.
When the price of the Model T got down to about $600 (about half of what other comparable vehicles cost) his staff couldn’t believe he still wanted to reduce it’s price even further. He did this only because he didn’t want “his people” (white midwestern farmers) to have to borrow money from jewish banks or lenders. Ford had bad traits, too. He wasn’t good to his son, Edsel, for example, but Ford was a HARD man, not a hateful man. “Hero” describes Ford accurately.
(The lowest priced Model T was $395)
Professor Alan Dershowitz is doing damage control on the Rick Sanchez controversy. Sanchez is, of course, the CNN anchor who got fired for making pointed comments on the Jewish control of the media. Dershowitz takes the familiar line that although many in the media are Jewish, that these are merely individuals who represent no tribal agenda. Jews are “diverse” in their thinking, like everyone else. There is certainly no pro-Israel lobby controlling the news, or so the good professor asserts. One might begin by noting that this apologetic is very similar to “explanations” of the Jewish Communist charge. Yes, there were a lot of Jews involved in Communism in the pre-World War Two days. But those were non-Jewish Jews who had repudiated their Judaism. They were in no way representative of the majority of the world’s Jews.
Professor Dershowitz makes much of Jewish critics of Israel in the media. But they are only a tiny minority. The vast majority of the media’s Jews strongly support Israel. Perhaps Professor Dershowitz has heard of Israel Asper and his son Leonard, who founded the Cam West chain of newspapers in Canada? It has always been official policy at Cam West to forbid any criticism of Israel in Asper owned newspapers. Such criticism is a firing offense. That the New York Times once upon a day opposed Zionism is about as relevant as the fact that Jewish scholars like Alan Weinstein and Harvey Klehr have been busy confirming the charges of Joseph McCarthy regarding Communist infiltration of the United States. Jewish dislike of McCarthy remains a known fact, just like Jewish media support of the state of Israel remains a known fact.
Alan Dershowitz, in short, is disingenuous. He wishes the reader to believe that Jewish support or lack of support for Israel is a matter of individual differences of opinion, rather like disputes between conservatives and liberals. To see that this is not so one need merely look at the small minority of Jewish organizations that oppose Zionism and Israel, such as Jews For Justice in the Middle East and the American Council For Judaism, versus the infinitely greater number of Jewish organizations that support Israel, such as AIPAC, the World Zionist Organization, Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization, the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress and many others. The difference in funding of these organizations is probably about 99-1 in favor of the pro-Zionist organizations. If there is no deliberate pro-Zionist Jewish cabal in the media, as Professor Dershowitz pretends, then the omission of certain information on the evening news is rather difficult to explain. In all the propaganda about Arab terrorism, the terrorist background of the state of Israel is rarely, if ever, mentioned. Thus, there is no mention of the Zionist terror against the British mandate administration that included, among other things, the bombing of the King David Hotel, the assassination of Lord Walter Moyle, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, the break out at Acre prison, the hanging of the British sergeants, Clifford Martin and Mervin Pace and the booby trapping of their bodies and the assassination of the United Nations mediator Count Folk Bernadotte and French Colonel Serot, among other incidents. Nor is there any discussion of the deliberate attack on the U.S. intelligence ship “Liberty” during the 1967 war. Such consistency of suppression of information detrimental to Israel’s interests belies Professor Dershowitz’s pretense that there is no Jewish cabal in the media.
It would be idle to extend the proof of Jewish agendas in the media by bringing up the extreme pro-Communism of the media in the 1930’s. The Jewish enthusiasm for the workers paradise in the Depression decade was just as pronounced as the Jewish enthusiasm for Israel in the media today. But Professor Dershowitz, already irate over allegations of pro-Israeli control in the media, would erupt in volcanic fury if the well documented Yiddish Communist press of long ago were brought into the discussion.
Alan Dershowitz is exercising damage control. He knows full well that, as in the case of Rick Sanchez, more and more people are noticing the Jewish media strangle hold and are speaking out against it. Deshowitz cannot deny the Jewish prominence in the media; he can only try to deny the implications as best he can. His effort is understandable; his conclusions cannot be sustained by the facts.
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com
The Jews are enablers. We want them because they allow us to rationalize all of our worst instincts, even if we wouldn’t know what those instincts were if they were not around. Seriously, could you imagine a white guy coming up with the idea of nuking a country and a bunch of other white guys going along with it? No way. Can you imagine them being sucked in by a Jewish rationalization of why it’s necessary? Absolutely. There’s something intoxicating about being bad, seeking power and turning against God. Jews and Jewish culture allow us to do that. Which is why a culture of sacrifice is the only culture that can defeat Jewish influence. Violence of any sort doesn’t do it. It only makes them stronger. And when was the last time you saw a purely selfless leader in America?
The only person on the national stage at this time that even remotely resembles the caliber of person necessary to lead us in this struggle is Pat Buchanan. It’s all in the language. The counter-discouse, as it were. And he has it. Ron Paul doesn’t have it, Alex Jones definitely doesn’t have it and nobody else has it either. Obviously Ford and Disney didn’t have it. Although Ford was definitely a great man. Neither man changed the course of history insofar as our discourse is concerned. They gave us better toys and pretty things to look at. But given where we stand, not the proper tools to fight the curse of the world.
The future is profoundly grim.
“Alan Dershowitz is exercising damage control.”
The extent of any damage control by this notorious liar, fraud, and Zionist pawn will naturally be confined to the Kosher choir to which he specializes in preaching.
Frankly, I’m surprised the obnoxious little imbecile wasn’t squished out of existence during his stay in OJ Simpson’s hip pocket. “Dream team” indeed! More like “walking proof that with a sufficient load of sheer chutzpah, brains and integrity are unnecessary”.
DAMAGE CONTROL
Professor Alan Dershowitz is doing damage control on the Rick Sanchez controversy. Sanchez is, of course, the CNN anchor who got fired for making pointed comments on the Jewish control of the media. Dershowitz takes the familiar line that although many in the media are Jewish, that these are merely individuals who represent no tribal agenda. Jews are “diverse” in their thinking, like everyone else. There is certainly no pro-Israel lobby controlling the news, or so the good professor asserts. One might begin by noting that this apologetic is very similar to “explanations” of the Jewish Communist charge. Yes, there were a lot of Jews involved in Communism in the pre-World War Two days. But those were non-Jewish Jews who had repudiated their Judaism. They were in no way representative of the majority of the world’s Jews.
Professor Dershowitz makes much of Jewish critics of Israel in the media. But they are only a tiny minority. The vast majority of the media’s Jews strongly support Israel. Perhaps Professor Dershowitz has heard of Israel Asper and his son Leonard, who founded the Cam West chain of newspapers in Canada? It has always been official policy at Cam West to forbid any criticism of Israel in Asper owned newspapers. Such criticism is a firing offense. That the New York Times once upon a day opposed Zionism is about as relevant as the fact that Jewish scholars like Alan Weinstein and Harvey Klehr have been busy confirming the charges of Joseph McCarthy regarding Communist infiltration of the United States. Jewish dislike of McCarthy remains a known fact, just like Jewish media support of the state of Israel remains a known fact.
Alan Dershowitz, in short, is disingenuous. He wishes the reader to believe that Jewish support or lack of support for Israel is a matter of individual differences of opinion, rather like disputes between conservatives and liberals. To see that this is not so one need merely look at the small minority of Jewish organizations that oppose Zionism and Israel, such as Jews For Justice in the Middle East and the American Council For Judaism, versus the infinitely greater number of Jewish organizations that support Israel, such as AIPAC, the World Zionist Organization, Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization, the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress and many others. The difference in funding of these organizations is probably about 99-1 in favor of the pro-Zionist organizations. If there is no deliberate pro-Zionist Jewish cabal in the media, as Professor Dershowitz pretends, then the omission of certain information on the evening news is rather difficult to explain. In all the propaganda about Arab terrorism, the terrorist background of the state of Israel is rarely, if ever, mentioned. Thus, there is no mention of the Zionist terror against the British mandate administration that included, among other things, the bombing of the King David Hotel, the assassination of Lord Walter Moyle, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, the break out at Acre prison, the hanging of the British sergeants, Clifford Martin and Mervin Pace and the booby trapping of their bodies and the assassination of the United Nations mediator Count Folk Bernadotte and French Colonel Serot, among other incidents. Nor is there any discussion of the deliberate attack on the U.S. intelligence ship “Liberty” during the 1967 war. Such consistency of suppression of information detrimental to Israel’s interests belies Professor Dershowitz’s pretense that there is no Jewish cabal in the media.
It would be idle to extend the proof of Jewish agendas in the media by bringing up the extreme pro-Communism of the media in the 1930’s. The Jewish enthusiasm for the workers paradise in the Depression decade was just as pronounced as the Jewish enthusiasm for Israel in the media today. But Professor Dershowitz, already irate over allegations of pro-Israeli control in the media, would erupt in volcanic fury if the well documented Yiddish Communist press of long ago were brought into the discussion.
Alan Dershowitz is exercising damage control. He knows full well that, as in the case of Rick Sanchez, more and more people are noticing the Jewish media strangle hold and are speaking out against it. Deshowitz cannot deny the Jewish prominence in the media; he can only try to deny the implications as best he can. His effort is understandable; his conclusions cannot be sustained by the facts.
Zionist Jewry and its media apparatus engage in most self-serving and vicious ethnocentrism themselves, prescribe “sensitivity” for the rest of us
http://www.judeofascism.com/2010/10/zionist-jewry-and-its-media-apparatus.html
Gentile defenders, advocates and useful idiots for the Judeofascist “community” will argue: “So what? Jews have a right to survive. They are going to take extraordinary measures, and go to extraordinarily hypocritical lengths, to do so.”
The problem with this line of thought is that Judeofascists define “survival” as the totalitarian subordination and subjugation of all non-Jews to organized Zionist Jewry, using a totalitarian state as their mechanism.
Indeed, the “survival” of Jewry has already been assured to the same extent as any other nation around the world with the existence of Israel; in fact, even more so than most other nations, in that Israel is nuclear armed and has one of the top five most powerful armies on earth. So what’s an example of a people or nation whose survival is even more in jeopardy than the Jews’? Why, the Persians/Iranians, whom the Judeofascists seek to exterminate for allegedly posing a threat to the Jewish nation/people.
Yet to hear the Judeofascists and their Big Media apparatus tell it, anyone who poses even the remotest threat to “the Jewish people” — today, tomorrow or 100 years from now — has to be summarily terminated.
Engendering this state of mind into the masses via the indoctrination and brainwashing administered by “secular,” Judefascist-dominated and intimidated Big Government and Big Media is exactly how the Judeofascists intend to enslave or kill us all.
Orwell eventually recognized this himself, but lacked the courage to explicitly name the Judeofascist Moloch as the psychotic threat to the entirety of humanity that it is. But at least he provided hints.
Today, not only have so many Western elites of both Left and Right proven to be cowardly and ambiguous about the threat posed by the Judeofascist Moloch, but they’ve actually enlisted in its cause. These, along with their pharisaic Judeofascist leaders, are the definition of evil on earth.
But we mustn’t point this out, because “a loyal willingness to say that black is white when Party discipline demands this, [and] also the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary,” is the reigning ethos of today’s Western elites, so many of whom worship at the altar of the Judeofascist Moloch.
To hell with them all, literally.
“The problem with this line of thought is that Judeofascists define “survival” as the totalitarian subordination and subjugation of all non-Jews to organized Zionist Jewry, using a totalitarian state as their mechanism.”
Precisely. In light of which, Jewish “survival” is not a rational priority for anyone but a Jew; for everyone else, it is completely irrational and therefore cannot be tolerated. In other words, Jews cannot be allowed to “survive” under this twisted Jewish definition of survival.
If this sounds dangerous to Jews, it is an unavoidable logical implication of the Orwellian abuse of language so highly prized by Jews themselves.
It is time my friends to stop going to the movies, stop buying retail movies, stop paying for cable movie channels. A boycott of anything strictly jewish as hollywood. We need to move toward making our own movie industry, with tech this shouldn’t be too hard. YouTube has so many good people making videos, telling it the way they see it, giving advise on just about everything under the sun. That’s why lieberman and the zionist government wants to so bad to control it. We are making progress there, here on the internet. You reading this is you now watching some crap on tv right now!
Check out Howard Kurtz’s coverage of the Rick Sanchez affair, on CNN’s “Reliable Sources” show on October 3. Click on (or paste in your browser’s window) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7-7Q-IRwEk
You really had me going there for a minute, Spook.
Spooky: “The Jews are enablers. We want them because they allow us to rationalize all of our worst instincts, even if we wouldn’t know what those instincts were if they were not around.”
I thought that was very insightful and was about to praise you. But then you followed it up with this.
Spooky: “Seriously, could you imagine a white guy coming up with the idea of nuking a country and a bunch of other white guys going along with it?”
Um, yeah, Spook, I can. Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Check into it.
Spooky: “There’s something intoxicating about being bad, seeking power and turning against God. Jews and Jewish culture allow us to do that. ”
Turning against God? WTF, Spook? Yer losin’ me.
“Which is why a culture of sacrifice is the only culture that can defeat Jewish influence. Violence of any sort doesn’t do it. It only makes them stronger. And when was the last time you saw a purely selfless leader in America?”
Violence changes everything. Unlike other methods, violence ALWAYS works. Therefore, it’s no coincidence that the course of history all over the world is written in blood. In the final analysis, violence is, quite simply, the only way anything ever gets done.
Einstein gets far too much credit, even from ‘aware’ whites. He flat out stole the work of Paretto, Lorentz, FitzGerald, Poincare and others. Flat out. No credit given to them, none of them cited in his ‘work’ on relativity. He’s as much a jewish myth as say Zuckerberg is for ‘inventing’ Facebook, which he didn’t. The jew’s biggest weapon is the media.
Jewish brainpower? If whites were pushing their children and if they had a 100% chance of receiving aid for schooling/college (whether by nepotism, cronyism or the race card) as jews and in fact all non-whites have if they pursue it, you’d see a lot more white brains at the top. They keep forcing their hand, and that’s ok. It’s forcing whites into a corner they’ll have to fight their way out of.
Hey, if Germans are capable of committing a “holocaust” purely through a “meeting of minds”, telepathy iow, surely Jews don’t require a list of protocols to make themselves fatal to western civilization. Am I wrong that Foxdersh & Co. accuse the Germans of such a conspiracy but claim that Jews couldn’t pull it off? Or wouldn’t pull it off, nice folks that they’ve been, according to all those they’ve lived amongst.
eurodele: “Jews cannot be allowed to “survive” under [their] twisted Jewish definition of survival.”
When it comes right down to it, in the most important areas, the Judeofascists and their staunchest supporters on the “secular” misanthropic Left, on the atheist-materialist, money-worshipping Right, and in the cult of “Christian” Zionism, are all apparently latently suicidal sociopaths. They all know their psychotic ideology can only end in epic conflict and oceans of blood, likely their own as well as everyone else’s, yet they proclaim themselves to be the agents of history and destiny. This all suggests that deep down, they crave death.
If they ultimately don’t survive, it will be due to their own proclivities and volition as opposed to anyone else’s. They’re like a cult of serial killers who expect the whole of humanity to bow down in worship before their increasingly narcissistic, sadistic, and blatant mass slaughter. They can hardly act surprised when they’re the ones with nooses around their necks.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were Japan’s two biggest Catholic cities. Nothing Jewish about nuking them. Nevertheless, I didn’t say violence didn’t work. I said violence against Jews never works.
By turning against God I mean rationalizing bad behavior.
Spooky: “Hiroshima and Nagasaki were Japan’s two biggest Catholic cities.”
Catholics have only ever been a tiny fraction of one percent of Japan’s population. To call them “Catholic cities” is an absurd exaggeration. Further, it’s true that Nagasaki was a locus of Catholic activity in Japan, but not Hiroshima. It didn’t even have its own diocese until 1959, well after the war.
I think you’re grasping at straws here Spook, but entertain us. What’s your proof that those cities were targeted because they contained a relative handful of Cat-licks? Which Jews paid off or otherwise forced Truman to target them? Make your case. Inquiring minds want to know!
Spooky: “Nothing Jewish about nuking them.”
Exactly.
Spooky: “Nevertheless, I didn’t say violence didn’t work. I said violence against Jews never works.”
Violence ALWAYS works, Spook – at least, for the victor. At the same time, it’s clear that the loser is always beaten because he wasn’t willing or able to employ ENOUGH violence. If he had been, he would have emerged the winner.
To be thorough and see the struggle through to its completion – this is what we should learn from the mistakes of the Assyrians, of Alexander, of Titus, and of Hitler. There is a final solution to the Jewish question. In order to work, it just needs to be carried out.
For an interesting treatment of the instant cancer epidemic, apparently caused by contamination of the polio vacines, using http://www.scroogle.org, have a look at references to “DrMarysMonkey.com”
There will never be a final solution to the Jewish question that involves vioence. There will always be conversos to carry their cursed world forward.
Regardless, I thought it was agreed that the atomic bomb would not have been created but for the Jews. It is certainly agreed that Jews got us into WWII. Are you saying using the A bomb was bad for the Jews? Of course it was good for the Jews, because it compromised the West.
Were all the Jews gone from the Washington power structure when the decision to drop the bomb was made? If dropping the bomb was a strictly gentile decision without any Jewish influece, it will have been the only strictly gentile decision made in Washington in the last 100 years.
Instead of saying “two largest Catholic cities” I should have said the two cities with the largest Catholic populations. Regardless, if the bomb was created by Jews and Jews were intimately involved in pushing the US through the war, wouldn’t the burden of proof fall on you to prove that Jews had nothing to do with the final decision to drop the bomb or its targeting?
Now it’s time for you to answer a question. How do you know who is Jewish?
Spooky: “… wouldn’t the burden of proof fall on you to prove that Jews had nothing to do with the final decision to drop the bomb or its targeting?”
No. The burden of proof falls on the one making an affirmative claim, and here, that’s you. Having asked “Seriously, could you imagine a white guy coming up with the idea of nuking a country and a bunch of other white guys going along with it?”, you (apparently) are claiming that the Jews came up with the idea of nuking Japan, and further, that the Whites who carried out the bombing needed Jewish prodding to do it. If so, we are entitled to ask you for proof.
Spooky: “How do you know who is Jewish?”
Research has shown that this can be established by genetic testing alone to a very high degree of reliability. When you add in such things as public and private records, identification of Jews could be made almost perfect.
“Many of these individuals are Jewish only in the sense that their parents or grandparents happen to be Jews. ”
Huh? I thought Jews defined “being Jewish” as having a Jewish Mother. Are we supposed to ignore this fact?
If this is true, why is having Jewish Parents Not relevant, or only incidental, to the Jewish identity?
Certainly we have all known Jews who claim that their ethnic Identity as Jews is more important than their religion. In fact this is true for most Jews I have ever known.
Dershowitz is the classic word-smith manipulator with zero conception of truth other than the immediacy of what is good for “his people” (or I guess in law, his clients, such as “OJ”)
Take any reasonable sounding (at first) proposition he makes, turn it 180 degrees, and one might be somewhat close to the truth.
One of his standard tricks is to start with a false premise and then manipulating the reader into ASSuming along with him to whatever conclusion he would like to present.
One of the most important things that must be done is to recapture the meaning of words such as, “Merit”.
How Merit is defined is critical, because buzzwords like this represent a moral principle that many people equate with fairness.
If “others” define the word for their own benefit, we can be sure they will have plenty of “merit” to justify their domination of whatever it is that they are justifying.
For example:
Is contemporary art fueled by Merit? (Or slipshod salesmanship and greasy profiteering?)
Is our financial sector merit driven? (If so, why did it just explode and take down the entire economy? Why did so many AAA securities created by “those with merit” lose all their value?
Is the film industry fueled by merit? Well, by my definition it certainly is not. That if those running the studios had any genuine “merit” most films would never have never been made. Pandering to the lowest common denominator does not represent merit, but crass profiteering that is destructive to the fabric of society, much like a corner drug dealer.
It comes down to values. If “others” continue to define the morality and meaning of words, we are lost.
Angel’s link
“…it is clear that the genomes of individuals with full Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry carry an unambiguous signature of their Jewish heritage, and this seems more likely to be due to their specific Middle Eastern ancestry than to inbreeding.” Why of course, we couldn’t have the Jews being genetically linked because they were inbreed hillbillies, that wouldn’t do at all for such an intelligent race. This is all just psuedoscience and it is obvious Angel dearest that you push the jewish agenda in a backhanded way. Shall we test you Angel?
Please note that it was the Jewish physicist, J. Robert Oppenheimer, the head of the Manhattan Project, who opposed a demonstration over Japan of the atomic bomb before actually dropping it on a population center. If Oppenheimer had lobbied for a demonstration first, you can be sure that is what would have happened. “Oppy” as he was affectionately called held such sway over his scientific colleagues, that they would have refused to complete the bombs if he told them to.
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/do_history/decisions/hiroshima.html
TGD: “Please note that it was the Jewish physicist, J. Robert Oppenheimer, the head of the Manhattan Project, who opposed a demonstration over Japan of the atomic bomb before actually dropping it on a population center.”
That was no surprise, given that the young Oppenheimer had tried to murder one of his university instructors by poisoning.
Yet amazingly, all was forgiven!
“In the fall of 1925, Oppenheimer poisoned an apple with chemicals from the laboratory and put it on Blackett’s desk … As Robert’s parents were still visiting Cambridge, the university authorities immediately informed them of what had happened. Julius Oppenheimer [Robert's father] frantically – and successfully – lobbied the university not to press criminal charges. After protracted negotiations, it was agreed that Robert would be put on probation and have regular sessions with a prominent Harley Street psychiatrist in London. This Freudian analyst diagnosed dementia praecox, a now archaic label for symptoms associated with schizophrenia. He concluded that Oppenheimer was a hopeless case and that ‘further analysis would do more harm than good’.”
In short, Oppenheimer was a psychopathic freak, and ever-so-special a little Jew that with the help of his Jewish daddy, a few Jewish university administrators, and a Freudian quack, he was officially excused of blatant attempted murder.
Academia is full of Jewish sociopaths, psychologically differing from Oppie himself only in IQ (his IQ was reportedly considerably higher than that of the average Jewish academic). Along with nepotism, this competitive advantage is one reason that so many Jewish academics “outcompete” their White intellectual superiors.
@ TGD
TGD: “Please note that it was the Jewish physicist, J. Robert Oppenheimer, the head of the Manhattan Project, who opposed a demonstration over Japan of the atomic bomb before actually dropping it on a population center.”
Yes, that’s the sort of evidence I was looking for. It would be better though if you could provide some proof that Oppenheimer overruled the Whites on the committee, rather than just adding that as your insinuation. Otherwise, it’s just a guess. For all we know, he could have been in the minority. Also, Oppenheimer wasn’t actually the head of the Manhattan Project, just its scientific director. As the passage you cite itself states, (White man) General Leslie Groves was the actual Director of the Project. We should note, too, that the fact that an all-White committee (just judging from the names), including Project Director General Groves, first came up with the recommendation to drop the bomb on military targets, evidently disproves Spook’s assertion that Whites were incapable of thinking this up on their own. It’s also interesting that it says the group led by James Franck, a German Jew, opposed using the weapon on the Japanese people, favoring instead a demonstration.
@ Helvena
Referring to the article I linked to in the journal Genome Biology:
Helvena: “This is all just psuedoscience …”
LOL. Then what, to you, is science? Only Jeebus and the Holy Bibble?
eurodele, Thank you for your post commenting on TGD’s comments on Oppenheimer. It led me to an afternoon’s worth of fact-finding jaunt through the world according to Oppenheimer, his adherents and his enemies – at least those pieces of his world the Internet is privy to.
I HAD NO IDEA the Myth of the man was so at odds with the Facts!
I left the following comment @
http://onionesquereality.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/american-prometheus/#comment-1746
I don’t know how long it will stay up. heh heh
arthurdecco
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Mr. Trivedi said: “Oppenheimer knew he was kept track of and that people in the Govt and the intelligence were looking for evidence to destroy him.”
Think about the meaning of these words for a minute, Mr. Trivedi.
“…looking for evidence to destroy him”????? (As if to suggest they were looking to manufacture evidence to unfairly accuse him of acts he was innocent of committing?!?)
Oppenheimer destroyed himself and his reputation by acting as he did. Period. He was almost certainly guilty of treason. Full Stop. No one else is responsible for what happened to him – certainly not those who discovered the truth about him!
It was only the undue influence of his so-far unidentified fellow travellers high within the Power Hierarchy of Roosevelt’s Presidency that saved him from real disgrace and/or even from the very real possibility of execution. He was a Traitor protected by those powerful people within the Roosevelt administration. He wasn’t a “hero” by any stretch of imagination or a “father” of anything, except in the minds of his biased biographers and the propagandists who had convinced them earlier that he was something he wasn’t. In fact, based on his earlier behaviour during his post-graduate years in England, he was a sexually confused, jealous failure and fraud with murderous tendencies – a severely crippled individual who deserved institutionalization, not respect.
It’s best to remember his opponents didn’t invent the evidence gathered against him. They simply assembled facts into a convincing narrative that forced his defenders to stand aside while he was deservedly stripped of his security clearance in the early 50′s, years after he should have been removed from his positions based on the evidence that had been readily available to his mentors for years.
And the spin put to his attempts to have nuclear energy administered by the United Nations should be recognized for what it was too – a brazen attempt to make it easier for his real masters to acquire the information held at that time exclusively by the American military. It was never the beneficent dream of a man concerned about the future of mankind as spun by his propagandists and enablers.
Identified Sociopaths like Oppenheimer don’t do “concern for their fellow man”. They do whatever is best for themselves and their own private interests with every breath they take.
So why doesn’t someone write the book this man’s factual history is screaming out for? Does America really need another fawning, dissembling, mythological rendition of invented history designed to turn a sociopathic traitor into a hero simply because of his ethnicity?
Get real.
I apologize, Der weiße Engel. I attributed your post to another. It was your comments on Oppenheimer that sent me on my Quixotic journey into an alternate universe I’ve just returned from.
Could the fact I’ve just returned have led to my confusion? LOL
Ahhh…to have the power to remove our own inopportune posts!
I now have to apologize to the 2 of you for my all too hasty correction which wasn’t a correction at all but was instead, a wrench in the side of the conversation.
I’m going to start drinking wine now and stop typing. (grin)
DER-SHOW-WITZ
Does not the name indicate the game.Israel is a reflection of the people who formed it,live in it,and support it.
Of course the News Media is controlled by the jews.Rense.com has article 96% News Media owned by jews.This is not to infer that other influences
are not at work.CIA is dominant in News Media.CFR also.They seen to be
factions of the same order.
Dershowitz is a jew and he supports jewish interest as jews of his faction do,and it is a huge fortress.AIPAC,etc.Special relationship
with U.S. of Israel as our State Dept. illustrate.Jordon Maxwell-Queen
of England Exposed-You Tube-Leo Zagami in the 2012 Armageddon-
You Tube indicate interconnection with jews and Israel.For a matter
of fact they are involved in relationship as they support each other.
Exclude Leo Zagami because of his propaganda in the red.
Benjamin Freedman Speech-You Tube is profound as it is impossible to
counter on logical bases with legitimate evidence.The Founding Myths
Of Modern Israel Book By GARAUDY cannot be countered,so it has been suppressed in many countries outlawed.This is to protect gentiles and
jews who committed TREASON in WW 11 past present tense.
Kevin MacDonald has done extensive research on the jews as Michael Hoffman on the Talmud-You Tube.The jews and Israel can no longer cover up their actions.They are exposed as the eyes of the world now
know Israel is racist nation with policies of Hitler toward Palestine.The
influence of jews world wide is exposed as they control FED and
international banking with the compliance of gentiles and their shares
in investment of these ventures.Gentile elite and status quo support
actions of Israel.(Of course there are gentiles and jews who do not.)
The evidence is conclusive gentile,jew collusion for NWO at expense of the Western Nations.The U.S.Establishment is totally corrupt.The U.S.
Constitution has been aborted for fascism.The two parties are one
using Hegel Dialectics for social engineering of the sheep and world
domination by elite and their cloned puppets.Tavistock Institute,Rand,
universities research,corporate madness for NWO.
The Satanic Central Banksters’Monetary Enslavement System 3 Sept.
09 Search Google.com Walter E. Haas 100 comments for references.
TREASON-THE NEW WORLD ORDER-BY GURUDAS
THE FOUNDING MYTHS OF MODERN ISRAEL-ROGER GURAUDY
LEO ZAGAMI IN THE 2012 ARMAGEDDON-YOU TUBE
BENJAMIN FREEDMAN SPEECH1/5-YOU TUBE WW 1 2 3
JORDON MAXWELL-QUEEN OF ENGLAND EXPOSED-YOU TUBE
Walter E. Haas Search Google.com God Bless America
Oath Takers.com
LOL, Angel is your name, not mine. It’s you that believe in holy books and chosen people and that’s why your so dedicated to this site, trying as you do to twist and spin the words of the rest of us…you’ve *chosen* to do it. Is it in your genes angel?
The psychopath’s credo: “It ain’t a lie if you believe it.”
Golly, that wasn’t very hard at all.
Helvena: “LOL, Angel is your name, not mine. It’s you that believe in holy books and chosen people and that’s why your so dedicated to this site, trying as you do to twist and spin the words of the rest of us…you’ve *chosen* to do it. Is it in your genes angel?”
Okay. I’ll interpret your lack of belief in “holy books” as saying you are not a disciple of the rabbi Jeebus, and I’ll take your word for it. But if that’s not it, then what exactly is your psychosis, lady? What causes you to think genetics is a pseudoscience? Explain. I’m curious about the mental processes that underlie such a bizarre claim. :-)
“If Oppenheimer had lobbied for a demonstration first, you can be sure that is what would have happened.”
Unfortunately, the emperor of Japan wasn’t all that concerned about the welfare of his people…I’m not sure a demonstration would’ve accomplished much. More people were killed in the Tokyo firebombings than by A-bombs. Hirohito and Tojo were far more concerned with the what the rest of the Axis powers (and Eastern Europe) were concerned with towards the end of the war – Occupation by the Soviet Union – and this is probably the main reason WW2 came to a conclusion. It was better to surrender to the US than to Russia.
Japanese leaders were quite prescient in this regard, or at least they were paying attention to what had just happened in Eastern Europe. Their wise decision lead to a phenomenal post-war rebirth (as opposed to decades of communist enslavement.)
Now, keeping all of this in mind, this is what Wiki says about “Oppy”:
“When he joined the Manhattan Project in 1942, Oppenheimer wrote on his personal security questionnaire that he [Oppenheimer] had been ‘a member of just about every Communist Front organization on the West Coast.’ ”
Truly, to defeat the devil called Hitler, we made a pact with a far greater Satan.
Why do you tolerate so many quacks, Dr. Mac?
But Chapman says that former KGB official Yuri Kolesnikov told him in Moscow this summer that “Oppenheimer and other top scientists cooperated with us.” They weren’t Soviet agents, Kolesnikov said. But they “gave us information about the atom bomb,” first because they were fearful that Hitler might defeat the Soviet Union in World War II and later because Oppenheimer and the other scientists wanted to create a balance of power between the United States, which had the bomb, and the USSR, which didn’t.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/711735/posts
Jim: “… to defeat the devil called Hitler, …”
How can anyone who is pro-White call Hitler a devil? That seems to me quite crazy. Didn’t he merely advocate and take steps to obtain what most of the posters on this web site claim they want? E.g., if Germany had won, do you think there’d be a problem with Jewish influence in the media or much of anything else? Would we still have had a mestizo invasion problem here or a Muslim invasion problem in Europe?
I’m geniunely curious. What’s your beef with der Führer? In what ways would Whites be worse off if Germany had won?
If I believed for one second that Jews control the MSM and skew it totally toward Israel I would probably become anti-semitic. However I do not believe that. I do think however that Zionists control the US MSM. Zionists can be of any religion and race (but probably not Islam or Arab) including right wing Christians whom Im’ sure outnumber the people of every other religion holding such political views. Zionists are the problem then, not Jews. Please remember that.
THE MATRIX and THE GREATEST HUMAN HISTORY NEVER TOLD
Albert Einstein was a fraud. In his Special Theory of Relativity he expects us to believe that of two identical clocks each one can run faster (or slower) than the other. This is impossible and the theory is easily refuted. In his General Theory of Relativity we are expected to believe that mass can warp a completely fictional entity known as “space-time”. This again is complete nonsense – how can you warp NOTHING? And why do academics toe the line?
It most definitely is a conspiracy. Overlooking blatant mistakes and ignoring obvious illogicalities (euphemism: “paradoxes”), that a child laughs at, is not human nature – unless the human intellect has been coralled, dumbed down and irretrievably stunted. How does one explain academical adherence to nonsense? Maybe, for those not in-the-loop, it’s pensions, grants, salaries, peer group pressure and herd-mentality, or worse: shut up…or else.
All those “proves Einstein right” experiments have been questioned by a few brave heavyweights in the field but no satisfactory answers have been given. And nearly all the results have been manipulated to fit the model or have used downright fraudulent data. Anyway, none of the phenomena needs to invoke Einstein for explanation. If time dilation is possible in the real world, then it is in no way explained or even described correctly by Einstein’s special and general hogwashes, where he confuses reality with observer-perceived reality (i.e. illusion). Read Professor Herbert Dingle’s “Science at the Crossroads”, and how he was defeated by the Matrix.
It’s not only in cosmology and astronomy. It’s the same in archaeology, geology, history, religion, economics, etc…etc, where the truth is systematically being denied us and covered up to be replaced by laughable absurdities. You may wish to learn who is imposing the Matrix, and how and why.
When a brain-dead newsreader tells you your country has x zillions of debt, have you never asked “Gee, who do we owe all that money to?” The International Bankers (IBs) with their global network of central banks is the correct answer. So how do they create this credit to loan to governments at interest for which we have to pay taxes? The correct answer is: it’s a scam.
“The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin … The Bankers own the earth … if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and control credit.”
- Sir Josiah Stamp, Director, Bank of England (the UK’s Central Bank), in the 1920s
Basically, by using fractional reserve banking, if the central banks loan a government y millions (by swapping government bonds for credit), they can then loan commercial banks and other financial institutions 10y millions at a discount rate. These 10y millions are not covered by their assets and deposits, they’re covered by the taxpayers – as we and our descendants will find to our cost. This is money/credit created out of thin air. The commercial banks, et al, can then do likewise and charge us any interest.
The present – completely unnecessary – global recession and “credit crunch” (hahaha) are all about the IBs calling in their loans (on money they have created out of nothing) and owning the entire Earth. The elite IBs are, almost to a man, of the same tribe as Einstein: Khazar-Jews. The latter also own or control nearly – if not – all of the major global media. These are our Matrix imposers, with millions of their minions (including elite Gentiles) being the Matrix enforcers.
The Universe is not driven by the weakest force in Nature known as “gravity” – some ten to the power of 39 times weaker than proton-proton or electron-electron repulsion, or electron-proton attraction – but by electromagnetism and plasma physics. It’s an Electric Universe, maybe infinite and eternal. Gravity is probably electrical – you don’t think the most massive dinosaurs could have been able to stand up, let alone walk and run or fly, in the Earth’s present-day gravity and atmosphere, do you?
If the universe were driven by attraction-only gravity, it would have collapsed long ago. It most surely stands to reason that for the very big jobs, Nature would use the strongest attractive and repulsive forces at its disposal – the electric forces. The Big Bang, Black Holes, neutron stars, dark matter, dark energy, warped spacetime and other fancy gobbledygook are impossible, laughable absurdities. Without Einstein, but with a Maxwell-Lorentz ether, a gravity-driven universe would never have got off the ground.
Admitting an electric universe opens the door and could lead (as Nikola Tesla well knew) to free energy. To the Matrix imposers who want to own us by monitoring, tracking, metering and charging us for everything: That is Forbidden!
In order to understand what our ancestors were trying to tell us, we have to understand how the Solar System really formed. The Earth has experienced major, literally earth-shattering and terra-forming, catastrophies in the past – it was one hell of a ride for our ancestors some 5,000-10,000 years ago. Why do you think the planet Venus was obsessively monitored worldwide and made, among many motifs, a ravaging witch-on-a-broomstick and a beautiful virgin goddess by nearly all cultures? Why was the planet Mars made the god of war? Why was the planet Saturn described as an ancient sun?
There is only one answer: the Solar System we see today is radically different from the one our ancestors saw; and almost all major myths, worldwide, are describing the life and violent death (Armageddon; Ragnarok; etc.) of the longlived Saturnian Golden Age (The Otherworld) and the creation of the present Solar System (The Apocalypse: New Earth, New Heaven, New World). But they are not myths: they are a true record of what our ancestors actually experienced, up close and personal.
For our ancestors, this – the creation of the Solar System as we know it – is when time began; and it could be measured, for they could now see the present metronomic Sun, Moon and the stars; and it was also the time of a massive leap in human consciousness – literally shocked into a higher level – with the consequent birth of civilizations: the Earth and all its inhabitants became fully plugged into the Electric Universe. Let there be Light.
The archetypical Red Dragon symbolizes the planet Mars. The planet Mars – to countless cultures worldwide – was the saviour of mankind, god of war, redeemer, healer, pest and disease bringer, destroyer of worlds, miracle worker, fertility god, etc…etc, who sacrificed himself to save the Earth by being crucified on the Axis Mundi, Tree of Life, Navel or Mountain of the Earth, World Tree, Pillars of Hercules (Atlantis, anyone?), etc…etc. These were probably all descriptions of the Birkeland currents connecting Earth and Saturn, where Mars and Venus (and other satellites of Saturn) interacted physically and electrically with this gigantic “serpent” or “whale” or “dragon” or “behemoth” or “leviathan”, etc…etc, a.k.a. Typhon (Greek) or Tiamat (Babylonian) or Set (Egyptian) or Vritra (Brahman) or Kukulkan (Mayan) or Quetzalcoatl (Aztec), etc…etc. This coiled, crooked, hurricane-like, milky (later blood-red) column or whirlwind (i.e. a typhoon – derived from Typhon; and probably the original Milky Way) churned out the Arctic Ocean and at sometime caused the arctic fauna to be electrocuted and flash-frozen. The Earth was flooded when these Birkeland currents (and all the water, plasma, gas, dust, boulders, rocks, stones and debris they contained) collapsed – “slain” by Mars (Babylonian: Marduk) – and so severing Earth from Heaven. The Earth, Mars and the comet Venus (and maybe the Moon and Mercury) were now free to migrate to the inner Solar System – a perilous Four-Horsemen-of-the-Apocalypse journey with the Earth being continually terra-formed by electric arc-discharge machining carried out principally by Mars and Venus on their frequent close encounters with the Earth.
Mars took a battering – wounded in the side, thigh or heel, scarred on the face, incinerated, melted, and in some cultures had his “skull shattered to pieces” – which may well explain the creation of the Asteroid Belt. For our ancestors, the planet Mars was also their leader or shepherd who brought them out of the Saturnian half-darkness (The Twilight of the Gods) into the present Solar System, out of Egypt into the land of milk and honey, as it were.
All ancient societies, tribes, nations boast of the planets Saturn, Venus or Mars, under countless names, as being their creator, first ancestor, founder, protector, father, mother, saviour. And they believed that one day the Red Dragon will return to free his people and restore goodness to the world. Many buried their dead with red ochre and facing North where the Saturnian system, and that of course includes Mars, was once located. The Egyptians went much further in that their Pharoahs were expected to actually recreate or at least rejoin the Saturnian system – The Golden Age – in their afterlife.
To the ancient priests of Judah, YHWH was the planet Saturn. Israel never existed on Earth – only in the Saturnian sky. Abraham, Moses, Joshua, David, Solomon, Samson, Jonah, etc…etc, were different aspects of the planets Saturn or Mars; Miriam, Esther, Ishtar, Astarte, Asherah, et al, were the planet Venus. God, Father, Elohim, El Shaddai, Jehovah, Lord of the Mountain are also the head-honcho planet Saturn. Hell, even today, their holy day – Shabbat – is the planet Saturn’s day.
Whoever wrote the New Testament gospels (probably the Romanized Maccabees) were indeed smartasses – the main character, Jesus Christ, is the planet Mars; the Virgin Mary, Mary Magdalene, Salome, and probably other Meri/Marys, are all different aspects of the planet Venus. The whole purpose of the NT is to remind Christians to pay taxes lovingly on time (and turn the other cheek, sucker) and to unwittingly (or wittingly for some, come to think of it) worship the god of war.
The major gods of the Egyptians were: Osiris/Atum/Amun/Amen/Ra/Re – Saturn; Isis/Meri/Sekhmet – Venus; and Horus – Mars. The same trinity/triad is found in countless cultures, worldwide, eg. to the Sumerians they were Shamash, Inanna and Nergal. This triad is also depicted on the national flag of Wales. (The classic Celtic Cross symbolises the Saturnian system, depicting the Axis Mundi with Saturn, Venus and Mars atop it).
To the ancient Welsh (Britons), the planet Saturn (in the Otherworld, located way above the North Pole) was The Holy Grail, the magic cauldron, the head on a platter, Caer Gwydyon; Arthur (“not a king, a warlord”) of legend is the planet Mars; Branwen (White Crow), Arianrhod (Silverwheel), Olwen (White Track) and many other Welsh characters are different stages in the life of the newly-born planet Venus: Athena (Venus) did indeed come “out of the head of Zeus” (Saturn).
And our ancestors saw it all.
[See: The Saturn Theory: http://www.maverickscience.com/saturn.htm ;
and Thunderbolts of the Gods: http://www.thunderbolts.info ]
THE TRUTH WILL OUT … SOON.
Der weiße Engel:
What I think of Hitler is irrelevant.
America, the WHITE CHRISTIAN SEGREGATED America of WW2 (that all of us white advocates long for), thought he was a devil. To believe that they didn’t would be absurd.
My point was to frame my statement from the perspective of WW2 America in an attempt to understand why they would even CONSIDER putting someone like Oppenheimer in charge of such a monumental (and monstrous) project. Or why the Brits would just give away Poland and eastern Europe to the Soviets when they had signed a treaty to protect the Poles from Hitler just prior to the war.
Apparently they thought Hitler was a devil, because those were NOT good/smart/righteous things to do. They apparently saw Hitler as worse than the Soviets and communism. I don’t share that view.
Archie1954: “Zionists are the problem then, not Jews.”
But if not for Zionist Jews, there would probably be no Christian Zionists.
That is, if Zionist Jews were not applying financial pressure to Christian churches and buying jets for gaseous holy-rolling whores like despicable little porker John Hagee, Christian Zionism would never have gotten off the ground. Instead, Christians would still be voicing their traditional disdain for Jewish iniquity and Hebraic “Christ killers” and worrying about other Christians instead of the Chosen.
After all, Christians are still spat upon in Zion even though their taxes and donations support it; nobody has anything to gain from the place but the Jewish bankers who paid for it, the freeloading Russian Jewish squatters who populate its illegal settlements, and the Jewish political terrorists who run it for fun and profit … in short, Jews.
Hence, the problem comes down to Jewish Zionists after all. (If what you mean is that not all Jews are Zionists, then I would merely observe that they should stop supporting Zionist, anti-White causes lest they be mistaken for what you seem to think they are not.)
Archie1954 says: “Zionists are the problem then, not Jews. Please remember that.”
Zionism aside, what about the other social problems that many here attribute solely or principally to the action of Jews? Problems like pornography, or the mestizo and Muslim invasions, or the control of academia, or financial corruption on Wall Street, or control of international banking? Are you saying that Jewish influence in these areas wouldn’t be a problem if Israel didn’t exist? That you have no objection per se to Jews dominating these areas of public discourse and policy?
Bad news for Saturn: the Bomb worked. “E” really does = “MC-squared”. And I don’t hold Jews responsible for it. I do intend to hold to hold them responsible for
1. Anti-White race replacement via the immigration rackets and radical,
feminoid anti-reproduction propaganda aimed at our women.
2. The whole Hollywood/NY kosher Culture of Death: abortion, porn,
homosex, stem cell, euthanasia, drugs, pedophilia, bestiality.
3. The kosher crime lobby, litigation factory legal system, riddled with
Dershowitz’s from top to bottom.
4. Our bloody, warmongering, neo-conned, Zionist stooge foreign policy;
forced on almost all of our politicians by the Jewish lock on Big Media
and Big Money, i.e., electoral traction and campaign finance.
5. And the Wall Street globalist-bankster-forced transformation of our
economy from one based on work and wealth to one consisting of debt,
speculation, bubbles, and pyramid schemes with clots of Hebrews raking
off at the top.
Actually, I’ll thank the Jews for #5. It will be their downfall.
The jewish Talmud is the problem,that book was written by satan himself,the most disgusted,horrible,sinful book on the face of the earth.No wonder the Bible call those Ashkenazi ,Khazar jews that adopted this satanic religion in 740 black see kingdom of Khazaria(THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN,,REVELATION 2:9,,3:9).
http://www.realzionistnews.com
Angel there are no pure races in the physical sense which is what the gene theory is at bottom. There are no hard and fast boarders to race. The gene theory implies there is. I take more of Evola’s view that race involves attitude/spirit/culture. Personality and physical traits are greatly effected by genes and it can be argued that Jews as a group tend toward the extreme of personality but this in and of itself doesn’t make them Jews because personality extremes can be found in all peoples. In other word in a material sense all Chinese people have black hair but not all black haired people are Chinese.
Jewish leadership is worried about Jewish assimulation (Dershowitz’s The Vanishing American Jew) and so by maniputalting the most resent science on genes they’ve come up with the material proof that Jews are separate and beyond all *others*. It’s a guilt trip to put Jews on. If they produce children outside the race then they might not be Jews, lack the gene. It puts Jews back in the ghetto, a gene ghetto. Jews need to be free of the supersition that they are apart, that they can cheat the rest of us and not be effected in a negative way themselves. They need to embrace the old scorpion and frog tale. The Jewgene give them a way out of taking responsibility for their actions. The actions that they choose.
THE ‘INCORRECT’ SIX MILLION
Alexander Solzhenitsyn in a speech in Washington in 1975 had this to say of the Soviet system which was deemed worthy of recognition as one of ‘our’ Allies fighting ‘for Democracy’ against the ‘Dictators’ in WW2:
“This was a system which, in time of peace, artificially created a famine causing SIX MILLION PERSONS to die in the Ukraine between 1932 and 1933. They died on the very threshold of Europe. And Europe and the world didn’t even notice it. SIX MILLION PERSONS!” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn Speaks to the West (1978) p 16)
Why are these people and their fate generally unknown in western countries?
Roosevelt’s ally Joseph Stalin was supreme dictator of Russia for almost a quarter of a century, from 1929 until his death in 1953. Soviet Russia under Stalin was a despotic police state that relied on internal espionage and terror.
Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan, before WW2, sought to bring about the ‘collectivization of agriculture’ in accordance with Marx’s Communist Manifesto. When Communism was imposed on Russia, the small farmers known as kulaks, as private property owners, stood in the way. In 1929 Stalin called for ‘the liquidation of the kulaks’, and their small family farms, animals, implements and crops were declared to belong to the state. “Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev (all Jews) had always argued that the peasant would never surrender enough food voluntarily and must, if need be, crushed” (Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p 268). The army and secret police were used to enforce the policy. All peasants who resisted were treated with violence – an enormous number were killed or sent to exile in remote areas in the frozen north or the desert steppes. Rather than give up their animals, many peasants killed and ate them. As a result, the number of farm animals in the Soviet Union was catastrophically reduced. The peasants stopped farming.
After a while, the cities started running out of food. Orders were given for grain to be confiscated from the peasants. Those caught trying to reserve food for their families were ‘severely dealt with’. By the winter of 1932-3, virtually no food was left in the countryside. By early March 1933, ‘death on a mass scale really began’. The main farming areas of Russia, particularly in the Ukraine, were utterly devastated. It was a time of great and terrible hunger, a catastrophic man-made famine.
Eugene Lyons was sent to Russia in 1928 as United Press chief correspondent. Arriving as an enthusiastic communist, he experienced the catastrophe at first hand. He described the ‘famine’ in his book Assignment in Utopia (1937):
“Hell broke loose in seventy thousand Russian villages.. A population as large as all of Switzerland’s was stripped clean of all their belongings.. They were herded with bayonets at railroad stations, packed indiscriminately into cattle cars and freight cars and dumped weeks later in the lumber regions of the frozen North, the deserts of central Asia, wherever labor was needed, there to live or die..”.
The famine alone is estimated conservatively to have caused 6 million deaths, almost half of them children. Other millions died from the killings and sickness as a result of the deportations.
Lyons, himself Jewish, credits the Jewish commissar Lazar Kaganovich with the major portion of responsibility for this major crime against humanity:
“Lazar Kaganovich… it was his iron hand that applied Bolshevik mercilessness.” (Lyons, p 578). The Encyclopaedia Britannica says tersely, “(Kaganovich) was one of the small group of Stalin’s top advisors pushing for very high rates of collectivization after 1929.. Within the Politburo, Kaganovich.. led the opposition to Kirov’s proposed concessions to the peasantry and to his attempts to relax the harshness of Stalin’s control..”
Kaganovich died at the ripe old age of 98 in 1991 (Encl. Brit.), ethnically safe from pursuit by the Israeli secret service, the Simon Wiesenthal organization and the New York media-intelligentsia. Shhhh!!!
Elie Wiesel vs Encyclopaedia Britannica
Wiesel has been one of the most prominent spokesmen for the very sizeable group of people known as Holocaust survivors. [According to Norman Finkelstein of the City University of New York in his book The Holocaust Industry published in the year 2000, ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million’ (p.83)]. Wiesel has chaired the US Holocaust Memorial Council and has been the recipient of a Congressional Gold Medal and Nobel Peace Prize..
Time Magazine, March 18 1985:
‘How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? “I will never know” Wiesel says. “I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”
Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under ‘Buchenwald’:
“In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions.”
Interesting arithmetic – the incredible numbers
Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number of survivors: Olga Lengyel’s Five Chimneys: a woman survivor’s true story of Auschwitz (Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).
According to Lengyel, ‘After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews and Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was all the time it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency, functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits, which could destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well for German industry.’ (Paperback edition, pp80-81). [No trace of any remains of or in ‘death pits’ has been found.]
This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million in 40 days, or six million in 240 days (eight months). Notice the bald precision of the figures without any explanation, the utter confidence in the reader’s credulity.
The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune: “Passionate, tormenting”. Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US construction of the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering “You have done a real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten speak.”
Could this claim be a misprint?
Kitty Hart, in spite of her name a Jewish survivor born in Poland, fully confirms these figures:
‘Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of about 18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a further 8,000 in the same period.’ (p 118; Return to Auschwitz – paperback edition by Granada (1981, 1983).
According to the cover blurb, ‘The subject of the award-winning Yorkshire television documentary of the same name.’ ‘Both engaging and harrowing…an important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of which conveys so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive’ – Martin Gilbert, The Times.
‘Sir’ Martin Gilbert, indefatigable Jewish campaigner on behalf of the ‘Holocaust’ and biographer of Winston Churchill, adds to the rich flavour and makes his own numerical claims, certainly not without chutzpah:
In his book Auschwitz and the Allies (1981) he states
‘The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe’s Jews was unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period during which it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka.’ (p.26).
If we assume a minimum figure of 200,000 per day, this amounts to say a million a five-day working week, or 6 million in six weeks, and this does not include the amazing claims for Auschwitz put forward by Hart and Lengyel with Gilbert’s blessing.
I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.
In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.
Churchill and Hitler and history and stuff..
Winston Churchill was knighted after World War 2 and buried from Westminster Abbey, perhaps the highest tribute that could be paid to him, while Adolf Hitler has been accorded the status of perhaps the most evil politician in human history.
WINSTON CHURCHILL in July 1940
“When I look around to see how we can win the war I see that there is only one sure path. We have no Continental army which can defeat the German military power.. Should [Hitler].. not try invasion [of Britain].. there is one thing that will bring him back and bring him down, and that is an absolutely devastating, exterminating [NOTE THIS WORD!] attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland. We must be able to overwhelm them by this means, without which I do not see a way through. We cannot accept any aim lower than air mastery. When can it be obtained?” [Extract from Winston S Churchill The Second World War (Volume 2 Their Finest Hour Appendix A), Memo from Prime Minister to Minister of Aircraft Production, 8.July 1940].
ADOLF HITLER in May 1940
Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler actually wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order of 24 May 1940 at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:
“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).
According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).
David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”
A major awkwardness concerning Churchill’s conduct of the war lies in the secret British policy of so-called ‘area bombing’, adopted early in 1942 and outlined by (Lord) CP Snow in the 1960 Godkin Lectures at Harvard University (published in his book Science and Government, Oxford University Press 1961). Snow had an insider’s view of the development of this policy. He outlines how the sinister Professor FA Lindemann (later to become Lord Cherwell, Churchill’s chief scientific adviser), persuaded the British Cabinet to adopt the policy of directing bombing campaigns primarily against German working-class housing. ‘Middle-class houses have too much space around them, and so are bound to waste bombs; factories and “military objectives” had long since been forgotten, except in official bulletins, since they were much too difficult to find and hit’ (p 48). Snow asks, ‘What will people of the future think of us? Will they say.. we were wolves with the minds of men? Will they think that we had resigned our humanity? They will have the right.’ (p 49). Fortunately, Snow needn’t have worried. There have been and remain such powerful vested interests committed to preserving the myths of World War II that even the history departments of universities have in most cases assisted with the cover-up.
The respected British military historian Martin Middlebrook says, ‘In some ways, Area Bombing was a three-year period of deceit practiced upon the British public and on world opinion. It was felt to be necessary that the exact nature of R.A.F. bombing should not be revealed. It could not be concealed that German cities were being hit hard, and that residential areas in those cities were receiving many of the bombs, but the impression was usually given that industry was the main target and that any bombing of workers’ housing areas was an unavoidable necessity. Charges of ‘indiscriminate bombing’ were consistently denied.. The deceit lay in the concealment of the fact that the areas being most heavily bombed were nearly always either city centres or densely populated residential areas, which rarely contained any industry.. The vital links in the dissemination of this view were the press and the radio upon which the public depended for all wartime news.. Neutral reports [of the campaign against the residential areas of the German city of Hamburg, for example] that 20,000 or 30,000 people had been killed were dismissed as ‘Nazi-inspired stories’.. The military historian Sir Basil Liddell Hart [after the Thousand Bomber Raid on Cologne with its claim of so many acres of city destroyed] wrote: “It will be ironical if the defenders of civilization depend for victory upon the most barbaric and unskilled way of winning a war that the modern world has seen.” ’ (Middlebrook, The Battle of Hamburg (1980) pp 343-4]. In his foreword, Middlebrook notes ‘I am likely to be criticized.. for choosing a series of raids which produced such extremes of horror on the ground. But I must point out that a large proportion of the raids carried out by R.A.F. Bomber Command in the Second World War were devoted to this type of bombing. What happened at Hamburg was when Bomber Command ‘got everything right’ (p 12). In reality many of these raids consisted of initial attacks using high explosive bombs to break up the buildings, followed with attacks using thousands of incendiary bombs to set alight all the fabrics, furnishing and upholstery exposed by the explosives. In this way firestorms were created under the right conditions which burned tens of thousands of people alive, especially the women and children at home while the men were at the front.
Churchill himself ordered the firebomb raid on the city of Dresden (David Irving The Destruction of Dresden (1966) pp. 96-100), Alexander McKee Dresden 1945 (1982) p 300, 306, 310) in the last months of the war, producing the most spectacular deliberate firestorm in the history of Europe. This action was probably the major war crime committed in Europe – Dresden was not in any way a military target, and was packed with refugees fleeing the advancing Russians, mainly women and children and the elderly who were unfit to fight. It is therefore understandable that it has been necessary to distract attention away from this viciously and appallingly barbaric act by fabricating war crimes afterwards and attributing them to the other side, a procedure that is finally starting to come unstuck. The Bush-Blair attack on Iraq at the behest of Zionists in the US administration such as Paul Wolfowitz has demonstrated before a world audience the lies that can be used to start wars, and in fact usually do. The transparency and scale of Bush Administration lies, together with the support given to the lies by a diverse array of other governments, is producing a revulsion for professional politicians and their handlers and spin doctors and sponsors.
At the Nuremberg trials, captured German leaders were convicted of ‘crimes against humanity’ and ‘war crimes’ as defined in the London Charter signed on August 8 1945 by the Allied powers. The judicial procedures that were followed remain interesting. The Trials were judicial in appearance only. The judges were not neutral. The victors in the war commissioned their own judges, who were under pressure to provide justification for Allied policies. The Allies themselves were guilty of major war crimes, the most outstanding of which were
# the fire-bombing of the civilian residential areas of Dresden (no military significance) under Winston Churchill’s orders (David Irving The Destruction of Dresden (1966) pp. 96-100), Alexander McKee Dresden 1945 (1982) p 300, 306, 310); and
# the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9 1945, in spite of the fact that Japan had signalled her willingness to capitulate some weeks previously (Robert Junck Brighter than a Thousand Suns (1958) pp. 189-191, Martin J Sherwin A World Destroyed (1975) pp. 235-237).
To summarize the sequence of the important dates concerning the atomic bombing:
* Mid-July 1945: Japanese government communicates to US government their willingness to negotiate capitulation;
* August 6 1945: US drops atom bomb on Hiroshima;
* August 8 1945: US signs the ‘London Charter’, or Charter of the International Military Tribunal defining war crimes, including Principle 6 (b) ‘wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.’
* August 9 1945: US drops atom bomb on Nagasaki.
With reference to the atomic bomb, Admiral William Leahy – Chief of Staff to both Roosevelt and Truman – commented, ‘My own feeling was that, in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Age. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.’ (Liddell Hart, History of the Second World War (1970) p725-6, JFC Fuller, The Decisive Battles of the Western World, 1792-1945 (1970) p584). Awkwardly enough, for the sake of judicial impartiality, Churchill and Truman should themselves have been executed at Nuremberg for these undoubted crimes. In addition to finding ways to justify their own conduct, Britain and the US also needed to distract attention from two other aspects.
There were the major crimes committed against humanity by their ally the Soviet Union (including the Katyn-related cold-blooded massacres of 15,000 Polish officers). There was the characteristic decision of Franklin Roosevelt and his New York advisors to hand over Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union at the Yalta conference. This was in spite of Stalin’s pre-war record of show trials, liquidation of his enemies in the armed services and his outstanding crime against humanity, the ‘collectivization of the kulaks’. This caused the deaths of millions of Stalin’s own citizens, not in war but in a time of peace, through hunger and police action. The US, through its support of the Soviet Union during the war, effectively assisted, set up and established its own powerful adversary for the 40-year-long Cold War with the associated arms race and third-world proxy wars. This was in spite of Stalin’s history, well known to both the US and UK governments before the war began.
The role of the ‘Holocaust’ has been absolutely and critically essential to distract attention away from these issues and preserve (ironically enough) the racist myth of an ethical war fought by the good clean cowboys against the congenitally and incorrigibly evil, filthy injuns. The Holocaust allegation has been not only the ‘hoax of the twentieth century’ [Professor Arthur Butz of Northwestern University in The Hoax of the Twentieth Century] or ‘the greatest robbery in the history of mankind’ [Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York in his book The Holocaust Industry, p 139] but also, ironically enough, a fundamentally and radically racist blood libel by the most stridently anti-racist people in the entire world.
For example at Nuremberg (understandably, in view of Hiroshima and Dresden etc) the absolutely fundamental legal principle of tu quo que was denied. ‘In the course of the trial, the Tribunal showed itself to be very receptive to prosecution pleas that tu quo que arguments (i.e., that the Allies had committed the same acts as the defendants) should be inadmissible.’ (Bradley F Smith Reaching Judgement at Nuremberg (1977) p 102). During the Nuremberg Trial the German general Alfred Jodl petitioned for certain documents related to wartime crimes committed by the Allies. ‘This request set off an amazing flurry of excitement among the prosecutors and on October 30, Jackson and Maxwell Fyfe (US and British prosecutors) had a worried discussion on how to deal with this incident, which they held to be the beginning of the long-dreaded Nazi ‘attack on the prosecution’. The two prosecutors agreed that the best way to deal with Jodl’s request and any other such ‘attacks’ was for each prosecutor to narrow the case as much as possible so that Allied actions would not be touched upon and then to urge rejection of all defense petitions like Jodl’s on the grounds that they were not relevant to the case.’ (Smith p 210.) Needless to say Jodl amongst others was executed by hanging.
Thanks for that Jumbold. Of course, you’re preaching to the choir. But it was a good summary.
Helvena: “Angel there are no pure races in the physical sense which is what the gene theory is at bottom. There are no hard and fast boarders to race. The gene theory implies there is.”
True, there are no hard borders to race. But that doesn’t mean that race doesn’t exist, or that race is unimportant. In the same way, there is no hard dividing line between physical dimensions like being tall or short, or fat or thin, but that doesn’t mean that these categories don’t exist or are unimportant. The paper I cited dealt with hybridity, which is what you are talking about. Even hybrid Jews with only one Jewish grandparent can nowadays be identified via genetics. Try that with Catholics, or Buddhists, or any other religion! This fact alone proves false the claim that being a Jew is only a matter of religion.
Where you want to draw the line, between fat and thin, or tall and short, or Jew and White, is indeed a judgment call. But it’s a judgment that is necessary.
Helvena: “Personality and physical traits are greatly effected by genes and it can be argued that Jews as a group tend toward the extreme of personality but this in and of itself doesn’t make them Jews because personality extremes can be found in all peoples.”
So, because a few Whites, say, can be found with Jewy characteristics, that means that Jews don’t exist as a race, or that their genetics are unimportant? Sorry, I don’t buy it. The most that could be said is that not all genetic Jews are equally poisonous to Whites. But this does not imply that a little poison is tolerable.
“The Jew is the most astounding instance of racial solidarity ever offered by world-history. Without a fatherland, a mother-tongue, midst every people’s land he finds himself again: even commixture of blood does not hurt him; let Jew or Jewess intermarry with the most distinct of races, a Jew will always come to birth… he has no religion at all — merely the belief in certain promises of his god — whereon his race is ensured dominion over all that lives and lives not… The Jew is the plastic demon of man’s downfall in triumphant surety…”
– Richard Wagner (Know Thyself, 1881)
Well Angel, here is an article where the Jews are claiming they are white as in white race:
http://genomebiology.com/2009/10/1/R7
So now I suppose you want me to believe that they are a subcategory of white, a slightly different shade of white then other Europeans. Look, the twisting and turning to fit whatever happens to be their need at any particular time is what the Jews do best – shapeshifters. The only people that a Jewgene matters to are the Jews. I identify Jews by their actions and attitudes because that is what affects me.
Sorry, I had your article up as well. Here is the link I meant:
http://ethnicgenome.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/the-race-of-sephardic-jews/
@ Helvena
Your article concludes with this line:
“The lack of significant non-Caucasian haplogroups makes people white. By that standard, Sephardim are white.”
However, note that above, I am using “White” in the sense of “of European, as opposed to Middle Eastern, origin”. By that standard neither the Sephardim nor Ashkenazim are White, since they are clearly separable from Whites by DNA testing.
It is certainly possible to argue that Jews are a type of Caucasian, which seems to be what your author is saying. Nevertheless, I would argue that their differentiation at the genetic level from non-Jewish “whites”, how ever you want to define “whites” (or Caucasians), marks them as a separate race.
Also note that the significance, i.e., the importance of a genetic difference is not merely a function of genetic distance. Two populations can be almost identical genetically, and yet, depending on the environment, the difference between them can still be a matter of life and death. When trying to decide whether or not to distinguish a difference in a population by according them the rank of a separate race, a number of factors have to be taken into account. For example, do the members of the proposed subgroup form a separate breeding population? In the case of Jews, they most certainly do; notoriously so, in fact. In the case of a group based on lactose tolerance, or the sickle cell gene which confers a certain resistance to malaria, they don’t. So just using that criterion, the Jews are a race, and lactose tolerant or malaria resistant people are not. Another question might be, are the members of the proposed subgroup regularly distinguishable from the rest of the group in a number of characteristics, either in appearance or behavior? In the case of the Jews, the answer is yes. They can be distinguished from Whites (and “whites”) in a number of ways: higher average IQ, much higher psychological aggressiveness, much higher ethnocentrism, and many more.
If neither of those two conditions were true, then you’d certainly have good reason to say there’s no basis for assigning them a separate race of their own. But they are true. The Jews form a separate breeding population from Whites, and the differences in average appearance and behavior between Whites and Jews are easy to document. It should come as no surprise then to learn that they are differentiable by genetic testing as well.
Praxis says:
October 12, 2010 at 4:49 PM
Why do you tolerate so many quacks, Dr. Mac?
I’m with Praxis. KMac needs to put the capper on the ridiculous posts and posters who carry on with endless arguments and almost endless posts on minutiae that have no bearing on the current situation of whites, on how whites can clean up this horrible mess. All these phonies, these wannabe intellectuals do is rehash and repost, repeat, copy, paste, over and over again thinking they’re impressing someone, anyone. Or they’re cluttering up the site on purpose. Dr. Mac, tell them to cut it out or ban them. For the sake of your site’s future growth. These clowns, and we all know who they are, are worse than the JDL’s hired guns who run around to pro WN sites posting under the moniker of “Apollonian”.
Der WeiB Engel, here is some entertainment for your
viewing pleasure that you will not find in the “respectable”
mainstream media. Happy hunting, but sorry, no sex or
violence, peversity or profanity, or septic tank humor that’s
the standard fare in our “respectable” media where Dershowbiz
makes his showings:
http://www.iamthewitness.com
There is a book there by Eustice Mullins about why and who
dropped the bombs on Japan. Of course, since it’s not from
a “respectable” source, we know that the facts won’t matter
to you, and so you will probably neither read the book nor
do any checking up for yourself. It’s so much easier to sit
on your duff and think your well-informed by reading the
Jew York Times.
Angel if “The Jews form a separate breeding population from Whites” then I assume they form a separate breeding population from other races which makes them imbred. I’m sure you’re going to split some more hairs to make your argument as any rabbinical student would but I maintain that the Jews are a race in their heads (and yours) and only truly in their heads.
It is a few individual Jews acting on their own who have turned our nation of laws into a nation of group-think (God’s chosen people vs. non-Jews and\or human-Jews vs. sub-human, little different than cattle, “species,” of the Talmud, that I am and\or Us against them).
On page 38, MEMORY: SURPRISING NEW INSIGHTS INTO HOW WE REMEMBER AND WHY WE FORGET, 1980, Elizabeth F. Loftus: “As to the complaints that he [Freud] was a victim of anti-Semitism, these too covered up another fact; namely, his [Freud's] inability to tolerate non-Jews. He [Freud] could not admit, especially to himself, that he found the non-Jew “irksome, difficult, a stranger, and an irritation.” He dealt with this conflict by coming to believe that it was they who were rejecting him.”
We all acknowledge and admire Freud for the great extent to which he’s influenced Western thought. So, blame Freud, the man, the individual. He’s admittedly done more than any Jewish conspiracy. Or blame Dershowitz. I’ll see you in therapy.
@spooky. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were Japan’s two biggest Catholic cities.
I’ve read but cannot recall the book where it stated that the actual target area (I believe it was Hiroshima) of the first atom bomb was just above a Catholic church.
-N
CompassionateFascist:
Get real. The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc2. Einstein’s biographers categorize this as “his most famous and most spectacular conclusion.” Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein’s earlier relativity paper, it was not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J. J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré‚ had shown that there was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein’s plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era.
Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenöhrl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc2 was the logical result of Maxwell’s work, they just did not believe it.
Get educated, pal.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/einstein.htm
Helvena: “Angel if “The Jews form a separate breeding population from Whites” then I assume they form a separate breeding population from other races which makes them imbred.”
Yes, that’s a fair assessment. It’s true of Whites as well. Any race is a partially inbred extended family, to use Steve Sailer’s metaphor. Conversely, the way to destroy a race is to induce it to cease to be a separate breeding population. That’s what’s occurring now in Whites, with the tremendous uptick in miscegenation.
Helvena: “I’m sure you’re going to split some more hairs to make your argument as any rabbinical student would but I maintain that the Jews are a race in their heads (and yours) and only truly in their heads.”
If that were true, then they’d be like Catholics or Buddhists. You wouldn’t be able to reliably pick the Catholics or Buddhists out of the room using DNA alone. But as the paper I linked should have shown you, with Jews, you can.
Think of it this way: Put 100 people in a secluded room. 10 of them are of Jewish descent (i.e., 1 or more Jewish grandparents), 30 of them are Christians, 30 are Muslims, and 30 are Buddhists. Let’s posit further that the last three groups have no substantial Jewish ancestry, i.e., less than one Jewish grandparent. Knowing nothing else about the people and using only DNA analysis, it would be possible to pick out the Jews. You couldn’t do that with the other groups (though you might be able to hazard a guess at their religion based on their race, which would also be revealed by your DNA analysis), and this difference arises because of the differences in behavior I mentioned; primarily the mostly closed nature of the Jewish gene pool.