Chapter 14 of Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together (available here) recounts the events of 1917, a pivotal year in Russia. The main impression conveyed throughout the chapter is the sheer energy of the Jews—what I have elsewhere (pp. 24–26) labeled the psychological intensity of Jewish activism.
1917 in Russia was a year of rapid change, uncertainty and chaos—exactly the situation where even a relatively small but well-organized, energetic and highly motivated force may have a very large impact. As an analogy, consider how relatively easy it would have been to influence the structure of the U.S. government in the unsettled period after the Revolutionary War than it is today.
Jews developed a huge range of organizations of all types. Politically, they ranged from the center to the far left.
From the very first days after the February Revolution, central newspapers published enormous number of announcements about private meetings, assemblies and sessions of various Jewish parties, initially mostly the Bund [a socialist-labor party with a strong Jewish identity], and later of Poale Zion, Zionists, Socialist Zionists, Territorialist Zionists, and the Socialist Jewish Workers’ Party (SJWP). Already by March 7 we read about an oncoming assembly of the All-Russian Jewish Congress.
The various Zionist groups were the most popular among Jews; these groups tended to support socialist candidates in the Russian milieu. As an aside, one can’t help but notice the irony in the fact that Jacob Schiff, who had bankrolled Jewish revolutionary groups in Russia (see here, p. 36), announced that he had decided to join the Zionists “because of fear of Jewish assimilation as a result of Jewish civil equality in Russia. He believes that Palestine could become the center to spread ideals of Jewish culture all over the world.”
Would that he had directed all his financial support to Zionist causes rather than at attempts to topple the Czar. Wasn’t it obvious that Jewish civil equality would make assimilation and intermarriage more likely?

There was a blossoming of Jewish culture, particularly in Petrograd which already by 1917 had a “substantial and energetic” Jewish population. (Noteworthy because Petrograd, the seat of Russian politics and culture during this period, was not in the Pale of Settlement reserved for Jews during the Czarist period.) Yiddish newspapers were started. Schools at all levels were established. Artistic and cultural organizations were founded. Jewish culture had been unleashed.
This frenetic energy of Jews in Petrograd reminded me of Henry James’ comment, written in 1907, on the newly arrived Jews in New York:
There is no swarming like that of Israel when once Israel has got a start, and the scene here bristled at every step, with the sights and sounds, immitigable, unmistakable, of a Jewry that had burst all bounds. … The talk of the hour gave me, across the board, facts and figures, chapter and verse, for the extent of the Hebrew conquest of New York…. Who can ever tell . . . what the genius of Israel may, or may not, really be “up to”? (Henry James (1907). The American Scene. London: Chapman and Hall; see here, p. 37)
Substitute Petrograd for New York, and you have the situation as described by Solzhenitsyn. And, as he notes, “These Jewish activities are all the more amazing given the state of general governmental, administrative and cultural confusion in Russia 1917.”
Jews also eagerly entered into Russian institutions, including the military. However, exhibiting a pattern that Solzhenitsyn also noted during WWII, Jews were much more likely to be found in the officer corps rather than among common soldiers. He recounts a very striking incident of ethnocentrism among Jewish officers who had the soldiers under their command sing “ancient Jewish songs.” Solzhenitsyn asks incredulously, “Did they not understand that Russian soldiers would hardly follow such officers?” Whereas separate battalions were organized for a variety of ethnic groups, only Jews were integrated into the army. Jews were “the only nationality not demanding national self-determination in military. And every time it was suggested that separate Jewish regiments be formed in response to complaints about the poor acceptance of Jewish army officers, such proposals were met with a storm of indignation on the part of Jews and the Left and with accusations of a spiteful provocation.”
This is interesting because Jews often insist on separation from non-Jews, so this opposition to separate units for Jews is certainly not based on principle. Solzhenitsyn may well be hinting that this is a bit of strategizing on the part of Jews, realizing that the army is a very important institution to influence, especially during a period of unrest and confusion, and that Jews would have more influence if they were not segregated into their own units.
Solzhenitsyn has a section on the “highly energetic” Jews who returned to Russia after the February Revolution, including Trotsky who “travelled not with flimsy Russian papers, but with a solid American passport, inexplicably granted to him despite his short stay in the USA, and with a substantial sum of money, the source of which has remained a mystery.” Particular mention is made of “two famous trains that crossed hostile Germany without hindrance and brought to Russia nearly 200 prominent individuals, 30 in Lenin’s and 160 in the train of Natanson and Martov [both Jews], with Jews comprising an absolute majority. …They represented almost all Jewish parties, and virtually all of them would play a substantial role in the future events in Russia.”.
Solzhenitsyn shows an understated anger at the attitudes of some of the Jews who came to power and influence during this period. For example, he mentions an article by a Jewish writer who stated that
Jews must secure the gains of revolution by any means … without any qualms. Any necessary sacrifice must be made. Everything is on the stake here and all will be lost if we hesitate…. Even the most backward parts of Jewish masses understand this.” “No one questions what would happen to Jews if the counter-revolution prevails.” He was absolutely confident that if that happens there would be mass executions of Jews. Therefore, “the filthy scum must be crushed even before it had any chance to develop, in embryo. Their very seed must be destroyed…. Jews will be able to defend their freedom.”
Solzhenitsyn’s comment is well worth pondering:
Crushed in embryo…. And even their very seed…. It was already pretty much the Bolshevik program, though expressed in the words of Old Testament. Yet whose seed must be destroyed? Monarchists? But they were already breathless; all their activists could be counted on fingers. So it could only be those who had taken a stand against unbridled, running wild soviets, against all kinds of committees and mad crowds; those, who wished to halt the breakdown of life in the country — prudent ordinary people, former government officials, and first of all officers and very soon the soldier-general Kornilov. There were Jews among those counter-revolutionaries, but overall that movement was the Russian national one.
In other words, Solzhenitsyn sees the writer as seeking the annihilation of the Russian national movement that was attempting to tame the excesses of the period, and he is analogizing it to the genocidal accounts of the Old Testament: “So Joshua smote all the land, the hill-country, and the South, and the Lowland, and the slopes, and all their kings; he left none remaining; but he utterly destroyed all that breathed, as the Lord, the God of Israel, commanded” (Josh. 10:40). The Jewish writer is advocating a genocidal war (crushing their very seed) on the Russians on the basis of Jewish religious thinking— a war actually carried out by the Bolsheviks with Jews as willing executioners.
The success of Jews in not being segregated in the army (noted above) indicates that Jews had considerable influence. Similarly, Jews often avoided being drafted into the military by having a sick person show up at the recruitment instead of the person who had been drafted, so that the person was rejected for military service. A proposed policy of insisting on photo identification for Jewish recruits was scrubbed as a result of an outcry by Jews.
However, the most important indication of Jewish influence is that Jews were a critical ingredient in the success of the movement by the left to “expand the revolution”:
The favorite slogan of 1917 was “Expand the Revolution!” All socialist parties worked to implement it. I. O. Levin writes: “There is no doubt that Jewish representation in the Bolshevik and other parties which facilitated “expanding of revolution” — Mensheviks, Socialist Revolutionaries etc. — with respect to both general Jewish membership and Jewish presence among the leaders, greatly exceeds the Jewish share in the population of Russia. This is an indisputable fact; while its reasons should be debated, its factual veracity is unchallengeable and its denial is pointless.”
Although as this quote indicates, Jews were important among the Bolsheviks, they were even more important in the other parties of the left, including the Mensheviks, right and left Socialist Revolutionaries and the Anarchists. An energetic group indeed!
Solzhenitsyn pays particular attention to the composition of the Executive Committee of the Petrograd Soviet and its successor, the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (CEC): “It was they who had in fact ruled over Russia.” In the nine-member Presidium of the CEC, there were five Jews and only one ethnic Russian. While emphasizing the ethnic composition of the CEC, Solzhenitsyn hesitates to attribute ethnic motivation to the Jews involved:
Of course, the actions of the executive committees could not be solely explained by their ethnic composition – not at all! (Many of those personalities irreversibly distanced themselves from their native communities and had even forgotten the way into their shtetls.) All of them sincerely believed that because of their talents and revolutionary spirit, they would have no problem arranging workers’, soldiers’ and peasants’ matters in the best way possible. They would manage it better simply because of being more educated and smarter than all this clumsy hoi polloi.
By using the word ‘solely’, Solzhenitsyn leaves room for at least some ethnic motivation. And his other comments certainly do not preclude ethnic motivation. As he is well aware, Jews, and prototypically Jews on the left, have often had a strong sense of ethnic identity even though they have abandoned the traditional Jewish community. And their own self-perceptions as acting solely on behalf of the interests of soldiers and peasants need not be based in reality. Indeed, the story of Jewish involvement in the left is filled with ambivalences and complexities about Jewish identity, and egregious examples of self-deception, as noted in Chapter 3 of The Culture of Critique.
But it is certainly not surprising that Russians would notice Jewish preeminence: “For many Russians, from commoners to generals, this sudden, eye-striking transformation in the appearance of those among the directors and orators at rallies and meetings, in command and in government, was overwhelming.”
Thus it is equally unsurprising that there was an upsurge in anti-Jewish attitudes. Solzhenitsyn emphasizes the lack of anti-Jewish attitudes in most of pre-Revolutionary Russia, due to the fact that Jews were banned from living in most areas. However, “after just a few months following the February Revolution, resentment against Jews had suddenly blazed up in the masses of people and spread over Russia, growing stronger with every passing month.” There was hostility at the sudden success of the Jews, not only because they were prominently involved in the government, but because they appeared to have easy access to scarce consumer goods while everyone else stood in line: “They accuse Jews of political stranglehold, of seizing parties and soviets, and even of ruining the army … of looting and hoarding goods.”
Given that Solzhenitsyn is attesting to a firm foundation in reality of these perceptions, he is perhaps too hard on his own people when he writes, “Any revolution releases a flood of filth, envy and anger from the people. The same was happening with the Russian people, with its weakened Christian spirituality.” As the events during the Soviet period clearly showed, being ruled by non-Russians had dire consequences for the Russian people. Developing hostile attitudes toward being ruled by ethnic aliens is an entirely healthy response.
Anti-Jewish attitudes were exacerbated by prominent revolutionary Jews concealing their Jewish names:
Name concealment was incomprehensible for the ordinary man of that time: only thieves hide and change their names. Why Boris Katz is ashamed of his name, instead calling himself “Kamkov”? … Many had aliases originating in their past underground life because of necessity, but what had compelled the likes of Shotman, the Socialist Revolutionary from Tomsk (and not him alone) to become “Danilov” already in 1917?
The result was that most people were unable to figure out who their new leaders were. The reason for what Solzhenitsyn labels this “odd secrecy” is obvious: Jews as a tiny ethnic minority were a highly visibly alien elite in a situation where ordinary Russians were suffering horribly, so efforts were made to lower their visibility. Indeed, Solzhenitsyn notes that several prominent Jews urged Jews to not accept positions in the new regime for this very reason. The same strategy of name concealment happened in Poland after WWII as Jews were actively recruited into the security forces and other branches of the Polish government, and it was common in the Communist Party USA as well (see Chapter 3 of The Culture of Critique). Name concealment may be seen as a form of crypto-Judaism that has been a Jewish strategy in many times and places throughout history.
Solzhenitsyn has an interesting quote from G. Landau indicating that despite the reasonable expectation that their behavior would result in hostility toward Jews, they did it anyway:
Jewish participation in the Russian turmoil had astonishingly suicidal overtones in it; I am referring not only to their role in Bolshevism, but to their involvement in the whole thing. And it is not just about the huge number of politically active people, socialists and revolutionaries who have joined the revolution; I am talking mainly about the broad sympathy of the [Jewish] masses it was met with…. Although many harbored pessimistic expectations, in particular, an anticipation of pogroms, they were still able to reconcile such a foreboding with an acceptance of turmoil which unleashed countless miseries and pogroms. It resembled the fatal attraction of butterflies to fire, to the annihilating fire…. It is certain there were some strong motives pushing the Jews into that direction, and yet those were clearly suicidal.
This aspect of Jewish behavior bears pondering. Many people have noted that Jewish involvement in promoting massive non-White immigration may be bad for the Jews in the long run. Most famously, Stephen Steinlight has called attention to the danger to Jews of Muslim immigration, and Abe Foxman has agonized about the fact that Latinos are unlikely to be deeply attached to Jewish issues, such as the Holocaust and Israel. Moreover, if the Western media was more attuned to White interests, knowledge of Jewish promotion of non-White immigration would doubtless lead to anti-Jewish attitudes.
By any measure, Jewish behavior during the revolutionary period in Russia and in pursuing their ethnic aims in the U.S. and throughout the West has been aggressive—far different, for example from the behavior of the Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia. Indeed, aggression is one of the four critical features of Jewish activism in general (see here, pp. 26–30, which also deals with the relative lack of aggression of the Overseas Chinese).
However, ‘suicidal’ is far too strong a word here. Jews certainly survived and prospered in the USSR and in the contemporary West despite their aggressive tactics (One might also mention their aggressive behavior in the U.S., not only regarding immigration, but also in opposition to Christianity in the public square and in their support of Israel, often at the expense of national interests.) There is certainly no widespread, politically effective anti-Jewish force in the U.S. or elsewhere in the West. Aggression can and does pay off. Nevertheless, the jury is still out on the long term effects for Jews of their behavior as a hostile, aggressive elite in the West.
Solzhenitsyn, as always, is particularly angry about the lack of feeling for Russian culture and the Russian people among Jews. Here he calls particular attention to an “artless” patriotic plea expressed in religious language by General Lavr Kornilov, who became a leader on the side of the White forces in the civil war. Commenting on a prominent Jewish critic who ridiculed Kornilov, N. Gimmer (Sukhanov), Solzhenitsyn calls attention to the hostility and disdain that the new rulers of Russia had toward “the entire Russian historical heritage”:
And what about Sukhanov’s heart – did he feel any pain at all? He did not have any sense of a living land and culture, nor he had any urge to preserve them — he served his ideology only, international socialism…. Note that he … derogatorily referred … to Russian history, ancient art and sanctity. And with such disdain to the entire Russian historical heritage, all that internationalist scum – Sukhanov and his henchmen from the malicious Executive Committee that steered the February Revolution.
And yet, despite these attitudes of alienation from Russian culture typical of now-powerful Jews, Solzhenitsyn does not blame them entirely:
We saw similar attitudes on the part of the Provisional Government too … with its quite Russian ethnic composition. Yet did it display a Russian worldview or represent Russian interests if only a little? Not at all! The Government’s most consistent and “patriotic” activity was to guide the already unraveling country … to victory in war! To victory at any cost! With loyalty to the allies! … They had no concern about the consequences for Russia of the ongoing war. And this failure, this lack of a sense of national self-preservation could be observed almost at every meeting of the Provisional Government cabinet, in almost every discussion.
Here Solzhenitsyn gives some blame to America which threatened the provisional government with loss of financing if Russia made a separate peace with Germany. But clearly, his point stands: The Russians themselves made horrible decisions during this very critical period of their history.
Indeed, Solzhenitsyn’s portrayal of the Provisional Government is reminiscent of the numerous non-Jewish politicians in the contemporary West who eagerly promote the interests of ethnic minorities with no concern for their own people. The Provisional Government “demonstrated constant anxious bias against any conservative circles, and especially – against Russian conservatives.” It threw money away on the “cultural needs of ethnic minorities” while ignoring Russian institutions like the Great Russian Orchestra which could have been preserved for a pittance.
These traitors to their people doubtless came to regret their high-mindedness after the Bolshevik victory resulted in the destruction of the former Russian elites, presumably including them. It is a wonderful object lesson in the deadly folly of not acting in one’s own ethnic interests.
Finally, Solzhenitsyn does not blame the Jews for the October Revolution that brought in the Bolsheviks. Notice, however, that he implies that Jews, given their energy, organization, and influence that he details throughout the chapter, could have done more to stop it except that doing so would have violated their socialist sensibilities; and he does make an important qualification regarding Trotsky and Grigory Chudnovsky:
The closer it was getting to October coup and the more apparent the Bolshevik threat was becoming, the wider this realization spread among Jews, making them opposed to Bolshevism. It was taking root even among socialist parties and many Jewish socialists during October coup were actively against it, yet they were debilitated by their socialist views and their opposition was limited by negotiations and newspaper articles — until Bolsheviks shut down those newspapers.
It is necessary to state explicitly that the October coup was not made by Jews (though under general command of Trotsky and with energetic actions of young Grigory Chudnovsky during the arrest of Provisional Government and the massacre of the defenders of the Winter Palace). Broadly speaking, the common rebuke, that the 170-million-people could not be pushed into Bolshevism by a small Jewish minority, was justified. Indeed, we had ourselves sealed our fate in 1917, through our foolishness from February to October-December.
Solzhenitsyn’s comments on Trotsky and Chudnovsky suggest that individual Jews may have been a necessary condition for the Bolshevik coup. In any case, the foolishness of the ethnic Russians who dominated the Provisional Government had catastrophic consequences for the Russian people.
The events of 1917 presaged the most important chapter of the story of Jews and Bolshevism. In the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution Jews flocked to join the new government and became a pillar of the new regime, the most murderous regime in European history.




Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?




Jews and other low-cunning types always flock to the victor — even if it betrays them as utterly without principle. Hence even though they weren’t fully on board Bolshevism early on, they flocked to it once the Bolsheviks became victorious.
Today, there’s even the specter of Jews flocking to the anti-zionist movement as a means of both hedging their bets and attempting to influence the outcome, although thankfully many of them are being exposed as the self-serving frauds they are.
Also interesting from this is that Jewry tapped into the Old Testament to marshal its communist ranks, just as it’s done with its zionist ranks. It’s clear that the Jewish supremacist religious doctrine is the organizational principle at the core of whatever ideology they embrace as a Trojan horse, be it communism, socialism, zionism, neoconservatism, neoliberalism, globalism…and because influential individual Jews can be traced first back to a cohesive Jewish clique and secondly back to Jewish supremacist doctrine, this is their Achilles heel, because it proves they were serving their own particularistic, ethno-supremacist agenda all along (for example, Soros can be traced back to the Rothschilds), and see themselves as some kind of royal lineage destined to rule over humanity (and communism and zionism both demonstrate exactly how they rule over non-Jews when allowed the power to do so: murderously.
Nearly all factions of organized Jewry should be identified in the West as a murderous, treasonous, supremacist, criminal conspiracy, and treated as a hostile element and hobbled and harrassed relentlessly, as was the mafia in the U.S.
Speaking of the Jewish “anti-Zionism” movement, Gilad Atzmon has released a video of a fascinating panel discussion on the topic of “Zionism, Jewishness and Israel”.
http://vimeo.com/23452051
Thanks Gregor. And here’s a little taste of Atzmon’s position from an article he wrote on the event titled Britain’s Jewish “anti-Zionist” pretenders lose another battle :
“One of the panelists in the 3 May event told me that was hounded for three days by 12 different Jewish “anti-Zionists”. He also told me that all my detractors repeated the same line : “Gilad is not good for Palestine”. Yet, one stark fact is that not one single Palestinian and/or Gentile joined in the Jewish campaign against me. Once again, this highlights a crude manifestation of Jewish exceptionalism: some Jews in the “anti-Zionist” movement clearly feel that they “know better” what is good for the Palestinians. But how is it that they “know better”? Is it that they are slightly cleverer than the rest of us? Or is it that they are just chosen – which sounds pretty Zionist to me…”
AND
“However, with me, these tactics have failed completely: frustratingly enough for my detractors, I am neither an activist nor a campaigner, and I am certainly not a politician. In fact, I am not a member of any club at all. I am an independent truth-seeker. I am not afraid of being alone. In fact, I prefer to be on my own and say what has to be said without inflicting damage on anyone. Clearly, this is a unique state of mind that our “kosher Trotskyites” cannot handle. The more pressure they mount on me, the more they prove my argument. The more they attempt to harass me, the more they prove my clear theories regarding their own duplicity and affiliation. They are in a limbo. They are in a no-win situation.”
Indeed they are. And that is the position of all unpatriotic Israel-firsters, be they Jews or their political bootlickers and collaborators in the various “secular” internationlist ideologies controlled by Jewry: It’s only a matter of time before they are exposed as the unpatriotic, treasonous, Judeofascist sock puppets they are.
Bolshevism, like Communism, Zionism, Socialism and Capitalism were all creations of Jewish elites to serve their world domination agenda.
Atzmon and Tucker are Jewish of rare kind. We communicate with each other through our blogs. I have dedicated several post on my blog to them. I also wrote on Gilad Atzmon’s latest London adventure entitled: ‘Jewishness and Israeli criminality’.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/05/08/london-panel-jewishness-and-israeli-criminality/
My inner Nazi agrees with you Chris, but what can you do when you wake up and realize they ARE the Government? When they control, the Police, the Military, the Courts and they OWN the mass media and means of entertainment?
It will take some enormous ‘catalyzing event’ to dislodge these terrible creatures. The Jews have they sunk their grappling hooks very deeply into our societies. Of course we here know unless we find some way of er……….’terminating’, at least their influence, we’re finished in a few decades. I think it was the Scandinavian countries who after refusing them residence, finally let them in but they were forbidden to occupy positions in Government. Imagine that in America?
I keep coming back to the Madagascar solution. They knew it was coming and went all out to stop the Germans, who would certainly have sent them to that place had they prevailed. What a pity!
Great article Dr. MacDonald. This kind of content is why I keep coming back to this site.
Also, thanks for the video link Gregor. I’ve heard of this guy before, interesting to hear him talk.
While this article is very interesting and informative (to those whites who are already “racially aware”) most of it can be summarized by one short quote from Maurice Samuel’s “You Gentiles” : ” We are the destroyers”. There, in two short words you have the essence of Judaism handed to you on the proverbial silver platter, what more do you want or need? I understand the need that whites have to continuously quote chapter and verse from this or that publication in order to underscore their argument that Jews; 1) intend to rule the world, 2) hate whites with a black passion, 3) are anti-Christian (as if this needed verification!) 4) are occupying postions of power in every government and industry worldwide, 5) and are intensely ethnocentric and “energetic”.
Yes, no argument against any of the above is ever going to come from “the choir”, Dr. MacDonald! The rest of whites world-wide are either firmly in the enemy’s camp, or are so intimidated that they will never step out from behind the anonymity that their computer provides to do anything to alter the situation in the REAL WORLD (caps for emphasis, not for “shouting”). All websites such as this, rather than being a force for good for our people are probably the opposite in that they provide a safety-relief valve for the pent-up frustrations of whites who might, just might, if they had no such outlets take action in the real world instead of being merely internet philosophers and internet warriors.
Curt, I appreciate your honesty and realistic viewpoint.
-But in turn, I would ask, what then is the answer? My own journey of awakening started with Fox news. However it wasn’t long before I grew tired of Fox’s inability to explain my experiences as a white minority in America. For instance, if white Americans had any type of power, as claimed by the left, why would we initiate myriad anti-white government policies against our interests? Why would we allow Hollywood a clear monopoly in regard to the production and promotion of a marxist, anti-white, anti-Christian cinema? Why are ethnic minorities encouraged to celebrate their ethnic backgrounds while whites are demonized over the mere mention of a “white identity?” Why is attending college as a white male as about as comfortable as sitting in the congregation of Rev. Jeremiah Wright dressed in blackface?
- Fox’s failure to address these questions prompted me to conduct further research. Of course the web and site’s such as this readily answered my questions and served a vital role in revealing the true nature of power in America and the West. I can honestly say that I can never go back. I have developed a healthy mistrust that will influence the rest of my life. So kudos to this website as the utility to provide answers for misdirected whites is an honarable undertaking.
-This site is a great starting point for any white person who has experienced the hostile, anti-white environment in America and throughout the world for that matter.
-However, I agree with your analysis that more can be done. White college students have taken enough abuse and need to hear the truth. Where is the activism to take back the minds of our own kind? This website could be more effective via an ad-campaign to reach disenfranchized college students.
Curt,
What counts as “action in the real world” ? I have broken with a friend of 45 years standing because he is only able to see the world through a tribal lens, I have made my skepticism plain to my lawyer and one of my doctors, and, short of hurling a brick at some passing rabbi, this seems to be the extent of available direct action; I cannot see that it does much good.
I am convinced that the most important thing we can do is spread information and hope that the official media will be beaten back and that organization will follow.
Does anyone recall Gramsci’s line? Something like, Pessimism of the intellect, but optimism of the spirit!
@ Enigmatic and dc:
“What counts as “action in the real world”
– Yes, pardon my frustration with the situation, you are both undoubedly correct. Nothing can be done. An unrealistic answer would be that we should emulate the very qualities of our enemy that allowed them to rise to world dominance, but that would be unrealistic and unattainable- simply not in our genes, after all. No “ethnocentrism” in white people, no cohesiveness, very little inter-group cooperation no charitable organizations for the promotion of the welfare of whites and our average IQ is not up to their level, never mind that every techno-tool that we have as a race invented,and they have used against us. Yep, the deck is definitely stacked high against us. And we all know what awaits any white man or woman who “steps out of line”. So let the status quo continue, and I will simply watch as my race dwindles and vanishes from the face of the earth. I at least am old enough that I won’t be around to see it when the US becomes the Western equivalent of modern Zimbabwe (“Rhodesia” many yesterdays ago), or at least I hope not.
Oh, do buck up.
Whatever the averages, it is certain that there are far more clever Whites than jews at any level. And of course there are other traits of personality quite as important as intelligence, a sense of reality and commitment to honesty for one (or two?).
More, as long as the internet is up, things are improving. Twenty years ago the number of people who would doubt what they read in the press was minuscule.
We don’t need a committed majority, just majority awareness; we don’t need majority agreement, only the rejection of conventional taboos. :-)
DC good comment :
We don’t need a committed majority, just majority awareness; we don’t need majority agreement, only the rejection of conventional taboos. :-)
In Australia we are a lot more cynical as people, due to the head kicking from Convict times. And I do smell that the “Penny has dropped! ” and aggression is rising amongst the thinking classes and thinkers. There is a big rat sitting right in the middle of the GFC and only a complete imbecile can pretend it isn’t directly connected to our Jewish leaders ; this together with the ‘Hate crimes” legislation driven by the same group can only point to one thing , “They are conning us , Big time !” Our Jewish controlled media system in Aust is already reacting with lots more shots of Ethnic minorities on TV etc ;The Multcults response is aggressive but at the same time very very cunning .Mel Gibson and others transgressors are given lots of good press lately , as if to say , look see hes forgiven ! So don’t hold an angry heart in these directions….But still the media will run out of the crowd like an angry communist and spit on a transgressor .
The State media continues to dribbles out their rubbish day in day out but no intelligent / interested person can really believe in this.One can see the somewhat tortured doubtful expression of system esteemed Journalist (once leftwing , none drifting in Non mans land) as they have to repeat , American Lies , as if they believe them .So ironic that Jews have led us straight back into this new from of Communist structure , where the party lines has to be repeated by the citizens !
The Leftwing delusion and their very fragile IDENTITY is based on victimhood and compassion (the new brainwash word) and Zionist/Jews having promoted themselves as the ultimate victims , which then produces a type of psychological panic in these “Compassionate” Left wing suckers (good company otherwise) when Jewish questions are asked ; it is nothing short of total brainwashing in the true sense of the word ! ; the psychological identity goes on the line and they of course bailout in a panic . Its not unlike cross questioning a Christian about their beliefs except that at the base, a Religious person just has to say ” I believe” but when you cross question a Lefty or God forbid a Jew (!) ,the “Lefty” needs a priory factual condition , that is the information I base my beliefs on is a factual truth , IS TRUE . Thus the paniced shutdown we intelligent people are so often confronted with by just mentioning , say this Solzhenitsyn’s Book , 200 years Too Long ” wasn’t it?
Anyway its only when the lefty has their coconuts are being kicked , say they loose their Job and their identity takes a beating they they would listen or if you offer up in argument of another victim of greater worth then our brainwash lefty can trade their way out of this artificially constructed maze–The Brainwash.
Does that make sense? Or do I have to read the manual again .
We free thinkers really have to call a spade a spade and say “They are BRAINWASHED” , just as completely as any poor soul that entered an NKVD dungeon in Solzhenitsyn’s times under Jewish Rule would have been , though the freedom of their spirit has no less been taken away! Brainwashed on Chardonnay and horse shit!
If you watch Gilad Atzmon’s video, and like what he’s doing, may I suggest you go to ….
http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/panel-event-zionism-jewishness-and-israel-is-now-online-must.html
and use the web form to give Gilad a hearty thumbs up!
Even a prominent leftist like Bertrand Russell, who might be assumed to sympathize with the Communists, could not deny the obvious, as demonstrated in this letter written June 25th 1920:
“I have got thus far on my return, but boats are very full and it may be a week before I reach England. I left Allen in a nursing home in Reval, no longer in danger, tho’ twice he had been given up by the Doctors. Partly owing to his illness, but more because I loathed the Bolsheviks, the time in Russia was infinitely painful to me, in spite of being one of the most interesting things I have ever done. Bolshevism is a close tyrannical bureaucracy, with a spy system more elaborate and terrible than the Tsar’s, and an aristocracy as insolent and unfeeling, composed of Americanised Jews. No vestige of liberty remains, in thought or speech or action. I was stifled and oppressed by the weight of the machine as by a cope of lead. Yet I think it is the right government for Russia at this moment. If you ask yourself how Dostoevsky’s characters should be governed, you will understand. Yet it is terrible. They are a nation of artists, down to the simplest peasant; the aim of the Bolsheviks is to make them industrial and as Yankee as possible. Imagine yourself governed in every detail by a mixture of Sidney Webb and Rufus Isaacs, and you will have a picture of modern Russia. I went hoping to find the promised land.”
- from ‘The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell’
Yet I think it is the right government for Russia at this moment.
That’s the only part that matters. Elitist scum like Russell have been selling us out for centuries now.
The Russians were fooled by the Jews even though it was 1917 and the Jews did not have movies and TV to work with.
I am so energized by this article that I think I will sing:
“C’est l’internationale, let’s all go get circumsized…”
Many people have noted that Jewish involvement in promoting massive non-White immigration may be bad for the Jews in the long run. Most famously, Stephen Steinlight has called attention to the danger to Jews of Muslim immigration, and Abe Foxman has agonized about the fact that Latinos are unlikely to be deeply attached to Jewish issues, such as the Holocaust and Israel.
This seems particularly stupid on the part of Jewish activists. It seems like they are thinking with their “grudge against Whites” more than their intellect. Watering down the White population may have been good for giving Jews a competitive advantage, but they are now on the verge of created an environment that will be unpleasant for Jews themselves.
The truth is, Jews like nice stuff and nice stuff is not found in areas with tens of millions of Mestizos. And the influx of Asians, Mexicans and Muslims does not augur well for a sympathetic ear to Jewish issues.
In almost every case where Jews run into trouble historically, they have overplayed their hand. They seem to be doing the same thing now.
Another brilliant essay Kevin. However, after plowing my way through your trilogy I was left with the impression that our main competitor was somewhat brilliant too and then you let slip that, “Many people have noted that Jewish involvement in promoting massive non-White immigration may be bad for the Jews in the long run.” I don’t know whether to laugh or cry so I’ll just go and have a wee dram while I think about it.
Promoting non-white immigration isn’t bad for Jews. They’re a migratory people; if things get unruly in Europe and the US, they’ll move some place else.
No–there is no place else for them.
|
China’s Brand-New Empty Cities:
http://lithobolos.net/content/chinas-brand-new-empty-cities-what-are-these
|
Chinese culture is immune to Jewish infiltration. There may be physical space, but it is otherwise unappealing to them. It is no surprise that neocon Jews are well represented in the emerging anti-China crowd. Chinese power and culture is something they fear, not something they celebrate.
Someday
“The Russians were fooled by the Jews even though it was 1917 and the Jews did not have movies and TV to work with.”
The Russians weren’t fooled. There was a collapse after a disastrous war which was followed by a coup. TV and movies made it possible to the same thing by stealth.
.
“They’re a migratory people; if things get unruly in Europe and the US, they’ll move some place else.”
I think that’s all there is to it. They relentlessly seek to undermine, divide and destroy the majority or plurality population because they’re wired that way. They couldn’t stop themselves if they tried.
They’re like an ultimately vastly more destructive, white collar version of gypsies. It’s why when they became the business elite they immediately started off-shoring America’s economic capital instead of re-investing in America.
The exceptions to the rule either assimilate or perhaps go to Israel.
.
I still wonder if Jews will have the worldwide power they enjoy now if China and Asians become dominant. I know some believe Jews will be able to handle the Chinese as adroitly as they have played White Gentiles, but somehow the Asians seem wired a bit differently.
One issue with Jewish people is that I’m not aware of a case where they lived among non-Caucasoids for an extended period of time while staying in any meaningful sense Jewish.
There are some people in southern Africa called the Lemba who seem to have some Jewish dna and some Jewish religious practices, but in terms of overall genetics they aren’t Jewish at all.
In fact they’re less like Jews than all Europeans and all Middle Easterners are.
So unless everyone in Europe and the Middle East is a Jew, the Lemba ain’t Jewish!
And even to the extent that the Kaifeng Jews of China haven’t been completely assimilated into the general Chinese population, I doubt they’re Jewish anymore either.
Just look at how Chinese the Kaifeng Jews in this picture from the 19th Century looked:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jews_of_Kai-Fung-Foo,_China.jpg
Unless their the majority themselves, Jews NEED a Caucasoid gentile majority of some kind to survive because that’s the only main subgroup of humanity similar enough to Jews that a low level of gene flow from them doesn’t of necessity lead to the complete transformation of the Jew into something else.
I still wonder if Jews will have the worldwide power they enjoy now if China and Asians become dominant.
I doubt it. It’s possible they’ll get China to be pro-Israeli, but it’s at least as likely Chine will be pro-Arab given the oil issue and given Israel’s extremely close association with the China’s power rival America.
I know some believe Jews will be able to handle the Chinese as adroitly as they have played White Gentiles
Even if the Jews do manage it, it seems quite possible that it would come at the expense of diaspora Jewry going extinct over the long term.
Let’s say millions of Jews go to China. Sure, maybe they could get a lot of power, but over the long term the huge genetic distance between Jews and Chinese will lead the Jews in China to cease being Jewish in any meaningful biological sense.
They’d become cut off from the rest of Jewry in genetics, and if history repeats itself they’ll eventually give up on Jewish religion and culture as surely as the Kaifeng Jews did.
It’s important to understand that if Jews were the only Caucasoids, if Europeans, Middle Easterners or North Africans didn’t exist, then the World today wouldn’t have a single Jew in it.
The tiny group called Jews would’ve been absorbed with no difficulty by various non-Caucasoid races.
“Broadly speaking, the common rebuke, that the 170-million-people could not be pushed into Bolshevism by a small Jewish minority, was justified.”
I don’t think that’s entirely true. Russia at the time was very backward with only a few cities with any industry and limited communications except between those few cities so controlling Moscow and St Petersburg was a huge advantage imo and a brief google gives a population of 2.5 and 1 million for those two cities. It was a fight over the head rather than a fight over the whole body.
Jason
“I still wonder if Jews will have the worldwide power they enjoy now if China and Asians become dominant.”
Yes, i wonder. They’ll lose a lot of institutional power that came from working through American institutions but at the same time will have gained such a lot of wealth it’s hard to judge. I saw a clip the other day of Peres talking about how they’re buying Poland, buying Romania, buying Manhattan etc.
To my mind they could only come out ahead of their peak position if sacrificing the American pawn led to the creation of a Chimerican Queen and it currently doesn’t look like they’ll achieve that as the Chinese can just buy America for a song now without any more of their help.
However if America does collapse or gets bought up by the Chinese then they’ll still be left with a fantastically larger amount than they had when they arrived so they’ll still be ahead by that measure – although America itself will be a ruin.
I’d say the big question is whether the n/asians have been watching this unfold. This isn’t like the Moorish invasion of Spain or even Weimar. There are lots of witnesses this time.
Wandrin,
Interesting points. The Jews are definitely much better off for their American experience and will remain wealthy.
The Chimerica gambit seems like the bet most of the elite wanted – combine both countries and rule it all. But methinks the Chinese will have their own plans. Nial Ferguson has talked about the growing nationalism inside China and believes Chimerica will fall apart.
The truth is, when people become richer and more powerful, they don’t want to share power, they just want more of it, which seems to be the Chinese reaction.
China needs oil and natural resources, which means it needs a working relationship with Africa and Arab countries. Israel doesn’t have much to offer in terms of natural resources. And yes, the US is in the same boat, but we have 6 million Jews living here and China barely has any.
I sense some unease in Jewish circles about China’s rise.
Real wealth is national produce. The jews and Chinese only have paper that must eventually be repudiated. America and Europe will recover as soon as they unload the foreigners and start producing for themselves.
There is zero unease in Jewish circles about the rise of China. Jews created the Chinese Communist Party and had a great deal of influence in the KMT. What there is is an increase of Chua-Rubenfelds.
Jews are preparing to branch out from the soon to be exhausted husk of their spent US host for new ones, notably China, Japan, and India. The US expiry date, according to jews? 2030. Steve Sailer drew attention to this in his piece here: http://www.vdare.com/sailer/100712_demography.htm
Some excerpts:
“This report is written by the staff of the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, a thinktank devoted to maximizing the long-term welfare of “the Jewish People” (which, by the way, it always capitalizes in its publications). An intellectually serious effort, 2030 can serve as a template for anybody thinking about improving the demographic prospects of their own peoples or parties.”
“Jewish-American heavyweights who participated in brainstorming sessions for this book included: Lawrence Summers (the Obama Administration’s top economic advisor); Elliott Abrams (Bush’s main man on the Middle East); Charles Krauthammer (Washington Post and FoxNews); Abe Foxman (Anti-Defamation League); and Alan Dershowitz (the O.J. Simpson Dream Team).
Despite this American participation, the JPPPI is an offshoot of the Israeli government’s immigration arm, the Jewish Agency for Israel. (The JPPPI’s #2 man is a former boss of Israeli military intelligence). It makes an annual presentation to the Israeli cabinet. And, because the JPPPI’s publications are not intended for non-Jewish audiences—this book has not, so far as I know, previously been reviewed in America outside the Jewish press—it suffers less from the timidity that emasculates intellectual discourse in America.
For example, the JPPPI’s 2030 observes:
“World Jewry today is at a historical zenith of absolute wealth creation. …
The United States will likely continue to be the most powerful state for at least the first part of the 21st century but its relative power will diminish. …
“The rise of Asian states, particularly China and India, may be very significant from a Jewish perspective since Asian countries do not share the Biblical religions and traditions, and therefore, have a radically different view of Judaism and the Jewish People than Christian and Islamic countries. Also, they do not have significant Jewish communities. This provides unprecedented opportunities for a Jewish global grand-strategy, as proposed in a JPPPI paper on upgrading relations between the Jewish People and China.”
In case you are wondering whom the JPPPI sees as coming out ahead in the second part of the 21st century, it has prioritized its position papers on “Enhancing the Standing of Jewish People in Emerging Superpowers without Biblical Traditions” as China first, then India, and Japan at a later date. A major strategic paper on relations between the Jewish people and China has been published, including a set of operational proposals which are in part being implemented by relevant Jewish organizations.”
http://www.jpppi.org.il/JPPPI/Templates/showpage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=84&FID=346
According to the JPPPI, who ought to know, you can stick a fork into Uncle Sam by 2030. That is plenty of time to get your affairs in order. The kosher betting money’s on China, and they don’t lose. Hebrews, to China!
Athanasius, I can see that the early Chinese Communists looked to the Soviet Union and to the Left in general for ideological guidance, which meant a lot of Jewish influence, in that sense, but I can’t see that they have taken orders from the Soviet Union/Russia or anyone in decades.
The ruling elite of China don’t seem interested in “worldwide revolution” so much as they just want more power for themselves. And China appears to be very nationalistic and ethnocentric from what I hear. They are not kind to minority populations – again from what I hear.
How widespread are Jewish-Chinese marriages? Are there any numbers on this? I’m open to the idea that Jews think they can handle a world dominated by China, but I’m not convinced.
I’m not sure what happened to my last post…
@Matthias: The JPPI’s report should be required reading for all Americans…especially Christian Zionists. To prevent contributors to the report from making its predictions a self-fulfilling prophecy, Americans should stop putting Jews into positions of government and political power. History has shown time and time again how deadly for the host nation having Jewry in charge has been.
Matthias, that report by Steve Sailer was very good. Everyone should take a look at it. But I’m still not sure how the Jews can hope to gain the power position in China that they have in the West. They are hoping that they can make inroads, but this is all aspirational. I still think it may be an impossible challenge.
Jews have had centuries learning how to play Europeans with various forms of manipulation. The Chinese temperament is different. For example, I don’t get the sense that they can use guilt on the Chinese.
Also, as a side note, I have seen two Jewish news guys as well as Jon Stewart (another Jew), interview John Yoo (from the Bush Administration – “torture” memo guy). They all three wanted to nail him but were unable to. Why?
Because he simply didn’t react in the normal manner that White Gentiles do (guilty, eager to please, defensive, etc.). He was just too stoic and calm for them to deal with. It wasn’t like he was fighting back any anger or any other emotion … it was more like he simply didn’t have those emotions.
I think Jews will have a bigger problem with the Chinese than they realize.
Check out the contents of the Kosher Battle Plan for China:
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. The Emergence of China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2. China and the Jews: Assessing the Current State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3. New Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4. Jewish Policy Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Policy Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1. Background and Aims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1. Origin and Purpose of this Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2. Jewish People Policy Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3. Cultural Policy as a Means to Strengthen Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
2. The New Context: China’s Re-emergence as a Great Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
1. The Power of Culture in China’s Long History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2. Long-Term Conditions for Great Power Status: A “Knowledge-Based” Economy . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3. Chinese Policy Challenges of the Twenty-First Century Affecting the Jewish People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
1. China’s Energy Security and Middle Eastern Oil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2. Trends Towards Increasing Islamic Militancy in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3. Growing Interdependence between China and the United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4. The Evolution of China’s Relations with Israel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4. Beginning Chinese Awareness of the Jewish People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
1. Jewish Encounters with China: A Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2. Awareness of the Jewish People in Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-century China . . . . . . . . . 48
5. Present Judaic Scholarship and its Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
1. A Narrow Academic Base with a Broad Outreach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2. Who is Advising the Leaders of China? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
6. Current Chinese Views of Jews and Judaism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
1. The “Jew” in Chinese . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
2. Important Chinese Perceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
7. New Areas of Interest and Old-New Dangers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
1. The Relationship with Christianity and the Danger of New Misconceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
2. The Relationship with Islam and New Moslem Hostility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
3. The Growing Shadow of the Intifada and the Chinese Public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
4. Western and Japanese Anti-Semitism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
8. Chinese Dilemmas and Expectations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
1. Chinese Policy Dilemmas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
2. The Trouble with Kaifeng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
3. Other Echoes of Policy Conflicts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
4. Chinese Expectations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
9. Jewish Policy Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
1. Possible Policy Dissonances with China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
2. Chinese Opportunities and Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
3. Jewish Policy Shortcomings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Annex 1. Questions Asked by Students following S. Wald’s Conferences in Chinese Universities,
October and November 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Annex 2. Titles of Essays on Jewish History and Culture Submitted by Students of the University
of Henan in Kaifeng in Summer 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Annex 3. Beijing College Students’ Understanding of Judaism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Still don’t think they’ll prevail? They’ll prevail, even if they have to give the Chinese all of America and sacrifice all of us in the process. Oy vey, how they’ll prevail.
The Jews are trying to put together a plan, but that doesn’t guarantee any success. But I will say this: That is how you accomplish things. Note how much time and energy they have put into this report, look how much detail. And they are planning decades out!
We need more of that kind of thinking on the part of White people. Too many Whites – I know I’m being offensive here – are hoping for a big ol’ fight in the next 3 or 4 years like the Hatfields and McCoys to settle this whole thing once and for all.
Life doesn’t work that way. While WNs are hoping for some Mad Max scenario, the Jews are thinking 20-30 years ahead, at least.
But anyway, all this report shows is that Jews are aware of a problem. I’m sure many nations prepare reports like this, it doesn’t mean they are going to be successful at all. And I bet the Chinese are quite aware of the Jewish influence in the world, Jewish intentions for China, and how to counter it.
Jason, I made two posts. The first did not appear, although the second one did. The first contained brutally boiled-down summaries of each. I’ll try again.
The link to the 2030 report is here:
http://jppi.org.il/news/20/58/2030-Alternative-Futures-for-the-Jewish-People/
Summary:
Jews have never been richer or more powerful than we are today. Half of all adult jews in the US own all the gravy jobs compared to 20% of the goyim. These trends will continue until the wheels come off around 2030. Jews will probably be blamed for this because we control the economy. Globalization must not be stopped. The US will fade and China will rise. As Whites disappear along with their political power we will replace them with, well, muds. We must prepare to infiltrate the new hosts. Too much info to list here. Yada yada yada. A must-read.
Excerpt:
“World Jewry today is at a historical zenith of absolute wealth creation. With the vast majority of Jews living in countries that are among the world’s wealthiest, and with the majority of those Jews belonging to the middle and upper socio-economic strata of those countries (excluding Israel) the Jewish People as a whole enjoys access to wealth as never before. On average, the social and economic status of Jews in most Diaspora communities is better than that of the general population.”
The link to the “China and Jews” paper is here:
http://jppi.org.il/news/33/58/Policy-paper-China-and-the-Jewish-People/
Summary:
How are we going to infiltrate this new host? Chinese love Holocaust movies, we’ll give ‘em plenty. Chinese think we can make them rich. Encourage this. Although China spends more on R&D than practically the whole world combined, their innovation rate is zilch. They are copy-copy-copy people. We can help them with this, for a price. Call in the favours they owe us (US military tech transfers). Getting our noses into other peoples’ tents is our historical specialty. We will persevere. Too much info to list here. Yada yada. A must-read.
Excerpt:
“But this JPPPI paper is not simply about China’s emerging interest in the Middle East. It calls attention to the history of Jewish-Chinese relations. It observes that the Chinese reflect little or none of the traditional forms of anti-Semitism. Ironically, it is Wald’s contention that as China opens more to the world and as trade tensions potentially increase, there is a risk that a resurgence of “the old canard of a Jewish world conspiracy” could seep into China. To date, it has not. On the contrary, Wald notes that many Chinese often tend to see the Jews as a mirror of their own history, they admire Jewish wealth and successes, they respect the great contributions that Jews have made to Western civilization (citing most often Marx, Einstein, and Freud), and they perceive themselves and the Jews as representing the “two oldest living civilizations.”
I would love that there were a comparable White organization that looks out for our interests the way the JPPPI does for the ‘brews. The bottom line is that they see the writing on the wall and are taking the appropriate steps to adapt, even if it means spending every last penny, and shedding the last drop of blood we, the goyim, have, to achieve it.
Solzhenitsyn captured perfectly the essence of God’s chosen people with the character Lev Grigoryevich Rubin in “The First Circle.” Despite being wrongly imprisoned in the vast Soviet prison system, Rubin remained an ardent believer in the society his tribe was so instrumental in creating.
The philologist Rubin spent his free time memorizing a Finnish-Mongolian dictionary. An image of Rubin will occasionally come to mind when I am addressed in a condescending manner.
Felix:
My sentiments exactly. Imagine the audacity of elite jews like Obama’s economic advisor Laurence Summers. While the cameras roll they insist the future of the US is very bright indeed. Nothing to worry about! However, once the cameras shut off, they form a kosher huddle, the JPPPI, and discuss how the US is finished as the world leader by 2030, pick the next host, and engage in a kosher “global-concerted-effort-grand-strategy” to get their tribe’s hooks into the backside of the new leader, China. All behind your back, behind the scenes, lying to your face. And the next day, when the camera is on, back to the old “everything is just swell” BS. What Chutzpah!
No retribution, no matter how cold-blooded or barbarous, could ever be too severe as punishment for this kind of treason, IMO.
Let’s foil their plans, shall we?
For once I agree with Jason Shrieks. North Asians are extremely skeptical about their holocaust claims. Also given the Jews appearance, it’s going to be much harder for them to conceal their identity by name changing, like the criminal tribe of baby murdering shysters has in European nations for centuries.
But what a terrible foe the Jews are. It seems we are almost entirely defenseless against them. Their grip on our people in Western nations seems to be even tighter than it was on the Russians a century ago. Just look at what they have done! Never mind the Bernie Madoff scandal and the fact that every big, and I mean really BIG financial scam, like ENRON and in particular the FED, that it is always a Jewish scam. They have also murdered millions of people and do it to this day, by way of their control of America’s mighty military.
It will take something enormous to dislodge the Jews. I’m thinking maybe along the lines of a general exposure of their undeniably (IMO) direct involvement in 9/11. Or even a military takeover of the US Government, who would be advised to immediately plant carefully chosen Officers into every TV Newsroom in the country. Who knows ? There may well be a few senior Military types reading TOO and perhaps watching David Duke on You-tube who are waking up.
Whatever it is it will take a serious revolt, perhaps along the lines of what happened in Romania some years ago. There ordinary people rose in a sudden rage and physically dragged the Dictator Chaucescu and his missus out of their Palace. After a short ‘trial’, they took them out back to a waiting firing squad where the boys gleefully emptied their weapons into him and his wife, still in a Fur Coat. That was back about 1989. I thought it was rather brutal at the time, but I wasn’t quite so wise to the Jews back then.
Floda:
How is Enron a jewish thing? The top guys weren’t jews.
How is the Fed a jewish scam?
“… digging through the rubble of Enron’s collapse and turning over a very large flat stone at the bottom of the heap, what do we find but another Jewish “financial genius” blinking at the light and trying to scurry away like a startled cockroach, a bulging suitcase full of money in each hand. Sound familiar?
Enron’s chief financial officer was Andy Fastow. He went to work for Enron in 1990 and was given the position of CFO in 1998 at the tender age of 36, because his fast talk had convinced Enron’s Gentile officers that he was a financial genius and could make a lot of money for them. Over the next two years, in fact, Fastow made a lot of money for himself, squirreling away more than $50 million in personal gain. He did that with a lot of fast sleight-of-hand and intricate financial deals that eventually brought about the collapse of Enron and the pauperizing of thousands of Enron’s employees, who had all of their retirement money tied up in the company. Not Fastow, though: he had sold his Enron stock just before the collapse.
Fastow made most of his personal gains during the time he was the CFO of Enron by using his position to engage in private dealing on the side, often at the expense of Enron, the company whose interests he was supposed to represent. He was able to get away with this and other financial shenanigans by “cooking the books” as they say, so that it was very difficult for anyone but himself to know what was going on or what Enron’s true financial situation was. But certainly he knew that his creative financing had gotten Enron into very serious trouble when he unloaded his own shares in the company at a substantial profit. He continued to tell other shareholders that the company’s future was very rosy, however, even though he knew that the collapse was imminent. As in the case of Michael Milken, Andy Fastow is described by the rabbi of his synagogue as a nice Jewish boy who gave generously to Jewish charities in Houston.
(…)
There’s a lesson in all this. It’s not that Jews are the only crooks who steal from the American people. George Bush is a crook, and he’s not a Jew. Bill and Hillary Clinton are crooks, and they’re not Jews either. Other Enron executives, who aren’t Jews, collaborated with the chief financial officer in bringing about the ruin of the company. In fact, Jewish crooks such as Milken and Rich and Fastow would have a hard time stealing anything if they weren’t able to play on the greed of Gentile crooks and enlist Gentile collaborators, such as the Bushes and the Clintons. There probably are more Gentile swindlers in America than Jewish swindlers, simply because Gentiles outnumber Jews 40 to one in the overall population.
No, Jews aren’t the only crooks, but they’re certainly the biggest crooks. If you hear about a 100-thousand-dollar swindle, it could be anybody. If you hear about a 100-million-dollar swindle, then you know that it has to be a Jew. Why is that? Why are most of the biggest swindlers Jews?”
-Dr. William Pierce
@Matthias: Warren Buffett, “The Oracle of Omaha,” recently found himself in embarassing straits because of a fast-talking Jewish wheeler-dealer acting as his right hand man, who was working for his own gain at the expense of Buffett and shareholders in Berkshire-Hathaway.
“How is the Fed a jewish scam?”
Surely you jest, Scooter? There are a number of books on the subject, but one of the best is “The Creature from Jekyll Island” by G. Edward Griffin. The book is named for the island on the East coast off Georgia where the plan was hatched to ramrod legislation through Congress during Christmas recess (yes, they really did call it that in 1910 !) of 1913. One of the objectives of the establishment of the Fed was “to obtain a franchise to create money out of nothing for the purpose of lending”. The men who met on Jekyll Island (which was at the time owned by J.P. Morgan and several of his associates and was a private resort of theirs) were:
Nelson W. Aldrich (Chairman of the National Monetary Commission and business associate of J.P. Morgan), Abraham Piatt Andrew (assistant Secretary of the Treasury), Frank A. Vanderlip (representing William Rockefeller and the international investment banking house of Kuhn, Loeb and Co.), Henry P. Davison (senior parner of J.P. Morgan), Charles D. Norton (president of J.P. Morgan’s First National bank of New York), Benjamin Strong (head of J.P. Morgan’s Bankers Trust Company) and of course, Paul M. Warburg (Jewish, if you need to ask!) a partner in Kuhn, Loeb and Co. and representative of the Rothschild banking empire of England and France nd also the brother of Max Warburg who was head of the Warburg Banking Consortium in Germany and the Netherlands). This entire meeting, which lasted for weeks was held in the strictest secrecy, but did not remain a secret forever, of course. Eventually when the Fed was established it was a corporation whose stockholders number about 600 (many of whom are Jewish, naturally). It prints money for our goverment and charges interest to do so (as if the government were not capable of doing so on its own). You might also be interested to know that J.P. Morgan had ties to the Rothschild banking empire of his own. Griffin’s book runs 588 pages and has an extensive biliography and index at the end. There is much more to the story of the Fed than this little summary, of course but reading the book is worth the effort.
The truth shall set us free!
Jason Speaks = Jew Speaks
Scooter, How was Enron a Jewish scam, you ask?
Below is a piece from the late Dr William Pierce at the time:
“And now we have the collapse of Enron, the huge gas-pipeline and energy conglomerate in Houston. When it went down it took the life savings of thousands of employees with it. Sound familiar? Members of George Bush’s family had their hands in Enron’s operations up to their elbows. Sound familiar? And, digging through the rubble of Enron’s collapse and turning over a very large flat stone at the bottom of the heap, what do we find but another Jewish “financial genius” blinking at the light and trying to scurry away like a startled cockroach, a bulging suitcase full of money in each hand. Sound familiar?
Enron’s chief financial officer was Andy Fastow. He went to work for Enron in 1990 and was given the position of CFO in 1998 at the tender age of 36, because his fast talk had convinced Enron’s Gentile officers that he was a financial genius and could make a lot of money for them. Over the next two years, in fact, Fastow made a lot of money for himself, squirreling away more than $50 million in personal gain. He did that with a lot of fast sleight-of-hand and intricate financial deals that eventually brought about the collapse of Enron and the pauperizing of thousands of Enron’s employees, who had all of their retirement money tied up in the company. Not Fastow, though: he had sold his Enron stock just before the collapse”.
reginald
“One issue with Jewish people is that I’m not aware of a case where they lived among non-Caucasoids for an extended period of time while staying in any meaningful sense Jewish….Unless their the majority themselves, Jews NEED a Caucasoid gentile majority of some kind to survive because that’s the only main subgroup of humanity similar enough to Jews that a low level of gene flow from them doesn’t of necessity lead to the complete transformation of the Jew into something else.”
Yes, i’m thinking the same except i don’t think it’s just looks. I think White people are the only group with a low enough level of ethno-centricity for Jews to completely function in their dual-identity twilight zone. With other clannish groups they’ll either be treated as an overt competitor group or as you say they’ll have to physically assimilate so much trying to be covert they stop being Jewish.
.
“I sense some unease in Jewish circles about China’s rise.”
Maybe, personally i wouldn’t expect it as they’ll be too busy gloating over how clever they were betraying yet another country that let them in as refugees.
.
dc
“Real wealth is national produce. The jews and Chinese only have paper that must eventually be repudiated.”
Yes and that’s what they’ve been doing. Closing down productive capacity in the West, monetizing it and then re-building the same thing in the BRIC countries.
Personally i think it’s all going to go wrong for them except maybe in India but who knows.
.
“But what a terrible foe the Jews are. It seems we are almost entirely defenseless against them.”
Yawn. There’s nothing to it. White people are partially ethnically blind that’s all. It’s nothing to do with them.
.
“Real wealth is national produce. The jews and Chinese only have paper that must eventually be repudiated.”
“Yes and that’s what they’ve been doing. Closing down productive capacity in the West, monetizing it and then re-building the same thing in the BRIC countries.”
It would be a mistake to blame this all on Jews. Bush Sr was the man who pushed for GATT and global free trade. This is a class thing also, ie the holders of large amounts of capital and their flunkies. Targetting Jewish greed and acquisition of white American wealth is one thing, but capital has its own internationalist dynamic also, and most rich people are going to think of money and profits before they think of their ethnic brethren, and for them the world’s peoples are merely cogs of varying degrees of interchangeability in their production and consumption machinery. We will not be free of economic subversion and dispossession until both Jewish power and capitalism are finished. Both are threats to us on fundamental levels. All we have to do is think of something better than communism/state capitalism and we will be in the driver’s seat when it comes to economic control and creation of prosperity and the creation of a non-Jewish antithesis to capitalism. Further, end capitalism and substitute something better and we will destroy a major center of Jewish power.
wandrin,
You’re probably right that Whites are the only group with a low enough level of ethno-centricity for Jews to completely function.
But what I was talking about was survival.
The thing is that Jews haven’t just survived over the long term among Europeans, they’ve also survived over the long term among Middle Easterners.
Middle Easterners are quite clannish, and of course this has caused all kinds of problems for Jews in Middle Eastern societies, but Jews still persisted in those societies far better than they ever did in non-Caucasoid societies like China.
For example it looks like Iraqi Jews persisted for over two millenia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_jews
Now it is true that today there are less than 50 Jews left in Iraq today, but this is actually because of events related to the creation of Israel circa 1948.
From 586 BC to 1948 AD is quite a long run when you get down to it, and to me it indicates that though a clannish host population is dangerous for Jews, it’s still a far smaller danger than admixture with non-Caucasoids.
Note:
Since the genetics of the earliest Jews is not known, there’s no way to know whether it’s European Jews or Iraqi Jews who are more like their ancestors.
But even if Iraqi Jews are somewhat less well preserved relative to the ancestral Jewish population than Ashkenazi or Seraphic Jews are, the genetic tests I’ve seen still show meaningful commonalities between Iraqi Jews and other Jews, indicating that Iraqi Jews are still Jewish in a biologically meaningful sense.
Also it should be noted that even after being kicked out of Iraq about 1948, Iraqi Jews continued to survive as Jews in Israel, and to a lesser extent in America and the United Kingdom, down to this day.
In contrast of the Jews who went to China, none of them survived as Jews to this day.
Yes, there is a difference between mere survival (and even thriving of Jews) on the one hand, and their ability to achieve the kind of dominance they have today in the West on the other. I have no doubt Jews will survive for many centuries into the future (as will almost every other ethnic group at least in some numbers).
But in a world ruled by China, it would seem that the power of Jews would be very much diminished; or at least that is what I am curious about. I am tempted to say that it is among Europeans that Jews are able to most effectively rise to the top. However, it is my understanding that they did quite well in the Ottoman Empire as well, although just how well seems murky.
But as far as I know, there is no record of Jews dominating an Asian culture.
Jewish survival in Europe is a smack on the face of zealot Christians who expelled Jews from almost every European country – and finally dumped half of world Jewish population on to Arabs to resolve their ‘Final Solution’.
Jews in the Middle East, like Christians and Muslims in that region – are NATIVES. They’re not Asiatic Khazarian Jews in the West.
Both Jews and Christian survied in the Muslim world because Holy Qur’an is 101% against racisim of all kind. Turkey is still home to the largest Jewish community (120,000) within Muslim world followed by Islamic Iran (30,000). Even after the western plantation of Jewish virus in Palestine – no Muslim country expelled their Jewish community. Zionist terrorists scared the hell out of them by attacking Jewish businesses and Synagogues as the did during their collaboration with the Nazis.
And finally a free advice – Wikipedia is as much Jewish lies as is their Talmud.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/history-of-the-arabs/
An interesting paper on the internet called Chinese Communists and Chinese Jews (something like that) by an author with the last name Bakony. It will answer any questions about jews and China.
There are millions of Chinese jews.
Jews are everywhere, interbred in every race. There are black African jews, white Ashkenazi German jews, British jews, Mestizo-Latin American jews. Marano (Catholic) and Donmeh (Muslim) crypto jews.
Who do you think are the communist party bosses in China? Who do you think are China’s new wealthy capitalist elites? Jews rule China just as they do Britain, Germany, America and everywhere else. The Saudi royals are jews. In China jews look, act, speak Chinese.
After whites are eliminated, if an ethnic minority (such as muslims or mestizos) prove to be a threat to jews they’ll simply set minorities against each other, provide arms, and sit back and watch on satellite tv.
Is Solzhenitsyn a jew. I find his writing very disturbing. He constantly wimps out excusing evil jewish behavior and blames the victim, the Russians.
Of course Solzhenitsyn isn’t a Jew. Why do you think that the Saudi royals are Jews?
Athanasius,
I “suspect” Solzhenitsyn is a jew, a crypto, but I don’t know and we need conclusive research one way or the other. I admit I’ve not read 200 Years Together but have read enough to think it’s a whitewash. He pulls one punch after another and is not telling the whole story: It was one big long bloody rampage against white Russians. If there are ANY unmixed white people left in Russia and the Soviet block countries it’s truly a miracle when you consider these “energetic” organized white Christian-hating Talmudists had free reign for over 70 years to wipe out the white Russian male population and rape white females. Of course they’re still at it only now they’re using non-white Caucausus “muslim” immigrants just as they use non-whites to genocide indigenous whites in Europe and America. The “resurgence” of Christian Orthodox nationalism is a jewish soviet propaganda operation that is probably funded by American taxpayers through AIPAC.
What about the mass graves, at least a thousand in and around Moscow alone, that the “Russian” government continues to cover up. No international forensic investigations, no DNA tests, no nothing. Strange, I think, how a gulag prisoner managed to avoid becoming one of Stalin’s “statistics” and instead rose to international acclaim and fortune. Kinda of a Soviet Horatio Alger.
Saudi Royals are jews.
http://sigmundcarlandalfred.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/the-arab-conspiracy-theorists-the-saudi-royal-family-are-really-jews-and-al-qaeda-is-a-jewish-organization/
I looked for the article I read and couldn’t find it. Though this jewey site (sigmund, carl, and alfred) dismiss it as an “Arab conspiracy theory” it is basically a short version of the story I read earlier. That version was more extensive and went into the development of the fraudulent Saudi dynasty and their creation of the Wahabbi sect of Islam. Wahabbism was a vehicle the Sauds used to create religious wars and divide the previously co-existing Arab tribes against each other, eventually allowing the jewish Sauds to take over “Saudi” Arabia.
PS the researcher who discovered and tried to publish this information was murdered by the “Sauds.”
Cute satire “remain”. Because after all, there couldn’t possibly be such a thing as a legitimate critique of Jewish power, right?.
Jews have spearheaded every form of attack or “critique” against Whites, WASPs, Catholics, Protestants, etc., and you think that is all fine. But the moment the lens is turned on Jews themselves, all the alarm bells go off and you try to undermine it.
Why don’t you go mock Jews for their overzealous diatribes against virtually the entire body of non-Jewish mankind?
Well, I’d have to read 200 Years Together in its entirety. I’d certainly be disappointed if he were a Jew, because he’s someone I admire. I don’t think there is anything wrong in pointing out how we non-jews often enable their profligacy–after all, if we don’t know what we’ve been doing wrong, how can we change our behavior?
As for how Solzhenitsyn survived the gulag–I think “Cancer Ward” sums that up in way that’s believable as far as I’m concerned. I have trouble believing that the power of the Jews is omnipotent and comprehensive.
As for the Sauds, I have no love for them, but I’d have to see actual evidence of a 1200 year old conspiracy. Certainly the Hashemites (their enemies) would know of this, and would have tried to publicize it to discredit the Sauds?
The Chinese are already on to the Tribe. Although Jewry flatters themselves (itsefl? )that they are using the Chinese – they are wrong. The Chinese are using THEM.The Chinese have looooooooooooong memories. They are still cheesed about the Opium Trade. They know that Jews (Sassoon et al) ran the drug trade behind the skirts of that moronic cow Victoria. They will have their revenge.
Chinese don’t actually hate White people. They just think it’s Their Turn. They apparently are right. More than anything, the Chinese seem to be utterly confounded and dismayed by mass White lunacy, and racial suicide. They can’t understand why the White Race is so determined to immolate Itself. They rightfully see this as a profound…..degeneracy. Perhaps the death of the White Race would be a mercy, at this point, considering the way we seem to be so determined to embarrass and humilate ourselves. Present company excepted.
I would agree that most Chinese don’t hate whites. Though the Cantonese kind of see us as smelly ogres.
You are exactly right about Sassoon. Look at the names on all the old buildings of the Bund in Shanghai–all Jewish. But I don’t think that most Chinese are aware of that. Most Chinese I’ve met are in awe of Jews and think that they rule us.
Jews impute exploitative and boorish behaviors to us goys. Because the best Mandarin speakers (and in many cases the ONLY Cantonese, Min Nan (Taiwan/Fujian), and Shanghainese speakers are Jews, THEY are the interlocutors for Western Civilization to the Chinese. You’d better believe that the version of our history/society that the Chinese get is just as kosher as our American universities dish out. And Chinese aren’t going to come to a site like this. We need our own people to learn Chinese and counter the propaganda.
I am not a believer in a chosen people, but if there really were one, it would have to be The Chinese. Their contributions to civiliaztion have been many and real (vs. the tribe’s alleged ones), and they really are as countless as the stars in heaven. While the tribe claims to be an ancient people but can only prove their existence to about the end of the second millenium BC, (and then only sketchily), the Chinese really have existed as a distinct culture and people for several thousand and years and have an archaeologic record to prove it.
Curt’s kind of spineless defeatism and attitude of resignation that really does piss me the heck off. Makes me wonder if he is working for the demoralization branch of the jewish White Genocide Engineering battalion.
Granted, this suicidal obsession that the white race is infected with, this mental sickness of radical ‘individualism’ and how this particular enemy has that suicidal characteristic of ours programmed into their ethnic weapons system for our destruction, knowing that the longer we stubbornly cling to it, the less we feel the need to organize ourselves as a RACE and start fighting as a RACE of organized and determined white men and white women, the sooner our complete and final defeat and destruction will arrive at the enemy’s feet – today, this is the case. But, this notion that this weakness of individualism is somehow permanently embedded inside our genes is pure bull manure. Our ancestors didn’t act or think or behave as radical individualist fanatics when they settled the frontier and had to fight and survive encounters with the savage Indian tribes. They wore their skin as their uniform and stuck together, fought together, and either lived or died together, as a GROUP, as a RACE. Hence, this curse of ‘individualism’ is another disease of the mind that our enemy controlled media has instilled inside us in order to keep us divided and unorganized.
Case in point: Can you recall the endless numbers of Hollywood movies that featured the ‘Lone Gunslinger’ theme? Or, the unmarried, single, loner Private Detective or loner Cop theme? Or how about the types of roles that Paul Newman, Steve McQueen, Clint Eastwood, even John Wayne routinely played? Always a loner, a drifter, the prototypical ‘individualist’ model that the jews were presenting to the white male viewing audiences. Same thing applies to Sylvester Stallone, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Burt Reynolds or Kurt Russell in most of their most popular action-movie roles. Can anyone think of any leading white male actor in the last 40-50 years who didn’t fit that stereotype? Wake up, Curt. Wake up, White man!
We can cure ourselves of this jewish injected spider venom of radical individualist thinking and behaving! Open your eyes, engage your freaking brains – and understand what the jewish media agenda is trying to do and which it has been doing to our race for the last 100 years. Kill your TV. Refuse to bankroll Hollywood movies that contain subversive, anti-white, racially and culturally destructive themes and messages.
Great post, Luke!
“Curt’s kind of spineless defeatism and attitude of resignation that really does piss me the heck off. Makes me wonder if he is working for the demoralization branch of the jewish White Genocide Engineering battalion. ”
Luke, evidently you did not understand that, in part, I was parodying the attitude’s of many of White’s in general and those on sites such as this in particular where there is much talk of “what we should do” (as in the case of Enigmatic and dc’s question to me) when the answer is blatantly obvious, but only one person “Floda” above had the intestinal fortitude to touch on that sensitive subject. The answer? Force, naturally. Things will only change when events take on a physical nature. Revilo Oliver wrote a small book on the subject back in the 1980′s that he titled “The Jewish Strategy”. His answer was the same; only the application of force would make a difference, and at this point I wonder if even a full-out revolution can make a difference, since as I pointed out in my post above, how many Whites would collaborate in any such venture?
As to my “spineless defeatism”, well Sir, if it be such, then it is born of many years of experience with regard to “the spinelessness” of my fellow Whites. I was the only one in my entire high school class that I know of who questioned the “6 million figure” ALOUD, in class to a history teacher who was giving us the “official doctrine” in those days (this was in the late 1960′s, if you are wondering). You cannot imagine the backlash, my friend. I had no friends in that school after that day. I questioned other matters historical in college and in my day to day interactions with acquaintances and “friends”. I watched the White people I love decline with each decade, eating up the pablum that the Jewish Oligarchy that actually runs this country had fed them. Now I watch as they cannot find employment, even though more qualified because some H1-B import from India got the job at 1/4 salary or because some Negro got it because he or she is a quota-hire. Just lately I watch the story of Edgar Steele being railroaded to jail for a crime he did not commit. Where is the support for such as him?
You seem to imply that we are this way because the Jewish media emphasized “rugged individualism” in their films and television? What then, convinced millions of White men in WW1 to kill Germans in yet another war against our own race? Or WW2 for that matter? Are Whites so easily led and so politically unsavvy that they can be worked into a frenzy against their own kind IN SPITE of a remnant of ethnocentric instinct or is it as I said above that Whites simply do not have such? There are countless historical examples of Whites fighting other Whites over differences in religion and ideology. I defy anyone to point out just one example of the same where Jews are concerned. You will never have Jews actually battling other Jews. They may quarrel amongst themselves and disagree, but in the final analysis, no race stands together as they have done and always, always help each other financially and politically. It is the only admirable quality they possess, imo.
And by the way Luke, in answer to this quote from you:
“Wake up, Curt. Wake up, White man!
– Unless you have been “racially aware” since the 1960′s, I would say that I have been “awake” longer than you and many others here. And also that phrase; “we need to wake up” is about as worn out as “dibersity be are strempf!”
There is a lot in that. Although it may be designed to make money rather than actively mislead, successful mass entertainment is necessarily an escape from reality; it gives people a completely false impression about how the world actually works. How many High Noon style gunfights actually occurred in the Wild West? ; there is one doubtful case . How many leading organised crime figures have been shot dead by a cop ?; has that ever happened ?
Numbers, numbers, numbers. All talk of “what we will do” is empty until we have numbers. Then, all things will be possible. So long as it’s just a tiny group of guys, they can be as forceful as they want, and it will just end tragically for them (and actually set things back for the cause of Whites).
Get numbers. Get more people to understand what is happening. Get more Whites aware of what is happening. Get millions of Whites explicitly aware of it, including Whites from all levels of society, then you can talk further strategy. Until then it is just empty talk.
I’ve been reading that Chinese Jews paper. ‘Zounds. Must cross-reference – but the situation sounds very bad for us. Oh well.
This [immigration] seems particularly stupid on the part of Jewish activists. It seems like they are thinking with their “grudge against Whites” more than their intellect. Watering down the White population may have been good for giving Jews a competitive advantage, but they are now on the verge of created an environment that will be unpleasant for Jews themselves.
Stupid? If so, then why did Jews play a significant role in bringing about the racial destruction (white) of Rhodesia and South Africa? Jews probably knew then – and certainly know now – that their promotion of open immigration, inter-racial breeding, and “equality” resulted in a situation or condition that is adverse, at first blush, to Jewish interests. The phrase “at first blush” suggests that Jews believe that the promotion of these destructive policies will benefit Jewish interests, if only in the end.
It is no surprise that neocon Jews are well represented in the emerging anti-China crowd. Chinese power and culture is something they fear, not something they celebrate.
Jews an anti-China crowd? Please explain the transfer of the technologically advanced weapon systems to Communist China by the State of Israel?
Money alone fails to supply the answer because Jews – at least in the end – adhere to policies that advance tribal interests (and especially the State of Israel, as opposed to individual Jews). In addition, the promotion of Jewish immigration from China (as with the former Soviet Union) cannot possibly explain the transfer of the technologically advanced weapon systems. So again, the promotion of these destructive policies will benefit Jewish interests, if only in the end.
What the Jews have done to the Slavs of Eastern Europe is precisely the reason why Ukrainian, Polish, Lithuanian and Romanian citizens hunted down and killed them where ever they could. Often they did so as members of the Waffen SS.
The SS was a very disciplined force. They did not kill Jews for being Jews they did kill partisans who were mostly Jews. Stalin bragged about have over a million partisans under arms.
“What the Jews have done to the Slavs of Eastern Europe is precisely the reason why Ukrainian, Polish, Lithuanian and Romanian citizens hunted down and killed them where ever they could. Often they did so as members of the Waffen SS.”
The Waffen SS (and the Wehrmacht in general) hunted down and killed far more Slavs than Jews. The primary reason National Socialism was soundly defeated and destroyed is because of Adolf Hitler’s view of Slavs (that they were untermenschen) and his plan for them (to treat Slavs with extreme brutality, to kill all of their intellectuals and religious and cultural leaders and use the remaining Slavs as serfs).
Simple truth — just saying.
Organisms can and do heal from wounds, injuries.
Others succumb.
Organizations, peoples, and nations can and do “reinvent themselves”.
Others decline and fall.
A group or culture of “whites” can and are healing, recovering from: mental, emotional, and physical misuse, abuse, disease, psychosis…dying a slow, unnatural death before their time.
Not all, but then dead and dying cells are replaced in a bleeding wound that closes and heals. There may be scarring, but the organism lives, and may be the stronger and wiser for it.
We do NOT need to become the enemy, or adopt his ways, to survive. What kind of recovery or existence is that?
I will not renounce my deepest beliefs, feelings, experiences, motivations.
Whites experience problems because they have fallen ill, and out of temptation or laziness have strayed from their traditions which make them great.
Those who claim we must adopt the ways of the enemy or else die, engage in yet more restrictive Hegelian discourse.
There is nothing inherently wrong with “white” attitudes. It is not perfect. But we didn’t get to our pinnacles in the past overnight. We improved. We need still to improve.
But we need far more whites to BE white, again. Not supremacist. Not guilty. Not pandering. Celebrating our uniqueness and respecting ourselves and those different. Cooperating.
Reject the arguments, constraints, dialectics of the enemy. Seek truth and justice. Stand alone for what is right if that is what is required. March not down the wide and comfortable path of conformity.
Value that which is high and noble and beautiful in this life, not mere wealth and possessions.
You are greater than that, and have far greater heights to achieve.
Well said Liam. No guilt and no supremacy sounds good to me. In fact with our current numbers in America, being supremacist is out of the question. Demographics is destiny. We need to make aliances with other ethnic groups rather than turn them into enemies due to a rigid outlook. Even Hitler had the intelligence to forge an alliance with the Japanese. I would argue whites need to forge an alliance with Asian Americans. Together we can combat the blacks and Latinos who tend to encroach upon tax dollars via government assistance. I grew up a white minority in an Asian city and have concluded that Asians share white interests like no other ethnic group. So lets think strategically here, we are all goyim compared to a chosen status. We can forge alliances with any gentile group and have an effective outcome by showing tribe racism against ALL Goyim. But I would wager an Asian alliance to be the most productive for obvious intellectual reasons as well as a shared interest in the protection of our respective peoples.
If we get to the point we need to form an alliance, the asians would be the best bet. You could form a KKK chapter with most of the asians I’ve known. We would have to request that they respect our intellectual property, though.
Jews developed a huge range of organizations of all types. Politically, they ranged from the center to the far left.
From the very first days after the February Revolution, central newspapers published enormous number of announcements about private meetings, assemblies and sessions of various Jewish parties, initially mostly the Bund [a socialist-labor party with a strong Jewish identity], and later of Poale Zion, Zionists, Socialist Zionists, Territorialist Zionists, and the Socialist Jewish Workers’ Party (SJWP). Already by March 7 we read about an oncoming assembly of the All-Russian Jewish Congress.
WHEN CHAOS COMES TO THE STREETS OF AMERICA, WHICH GROUP WILL BE THE BEST ORGANIZED? THE ANSWER IS OBVIOUS. THE NUMBER OF CURRENTLY EXISTING JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS IS VIRTUALLY COUNTLESS, AND THERE ARE NO EXCLUSIVELY WHITE ORGANIZATIONS OF ANY NOTE.
Never mind “exclusively white”. NRA/GOA are predominantly white, and that will be sufficient. That is the reason why Jew globalist plutocrats and politicians – Soros, Bloomberg, Schumer, Feinstein, etc. – are desperate to grab our guns. If they fail to do so before their PonziEconomy collapses, they are doomed. And they know it.
If chaos ever comes to American streets, the most organized large scale group will probably be the US military. And it will be able to deal with any other group in short order.
Isn’t great living here in usa where jews use jewish names! Every tv channel, movie, we get to see the chosen rat army at work.
Believing in a Jewish Bible of fairy tales wherein it states Jews are God’s chosen makes Christians “Jews for Jesus” without knowing it.
99 % of the Goyim have no idea what the Torah has to say & don’t even realize the “Jewish Vote” in the MSM is a euphemism for Jewish political donations.
It is absolutely unbelievable state of events & the only remedy seems to be for a real 9/11 investigation & openly questioning the “dual loyalty” of so many politicians. .
Many years ago a Rothschild’s “take over” of the “Bank of England” was followed by a successful repeat in the USA.
A total success story in all fields for the 80 % of Jews who like Helen Thomas said are Ashkenazi who’s origins are in Eastern Europe.
Jews realize all this & are presently “over playing their hand” to the extreme in the “West” as they did in Germany years ago when Jews actually declared war on Germany in 1933.
Scoots – How is the Fed a jewish scam?
One way to find out would be to remove all the Jews and see what happens.
Since that unfortunately cannot happen – what would be the result if we could?
The scam would go away.
The amount of money/credit in circulation would correspond to the productivity of the nation and responsible banking would return. A real live example Scoots is what happened in Germany under national socialism. The NS got rid of Jewish influence, implemented responsible Banking instead of speculative and the German standard of living rose above all other European nations. Germany was out of the depression before the States. Prior to NS take over Jews controlled Germany’s Banking, and all but one bank was owned by the Jews. The boom and bust cycle is caused by the Banksters Scoots, not by some magical economic force.
I wonder how bad the red terror really was ? I have an old book that describes a Bolshevik ” terror train ” that would go from town to town and in order to liquidate reactionaries by the thousands . The details were beyond gruesome .
Jews are masters at exaggeration of any suffering they have incurred . ( as if anyone did not know that already ! )
I would like to know the truth on Bolshevik terror , with out propaganda .
That would make a great TOO article .
Given that they believe they’re the master race/”God’s” chosen, it makes sense that they’re convinced that there’s no suffering that compares to Jewish suffering. As I came to know them, in time, when I realized they cared little about the suffering of others or how they treated others if it worked to their advantage, I stopped giving a rat’s backside about the “holocaust” or other tragedies of bygone days.
In other words, if the suffering of non-Jews isn’t their concern, then their suffering (real or imagined) is of no concern to me, a non-Jew.
john hearns
asks:
I wonder how bad the red terror really was ? I have an old book that describes a Bolshevik ” terror train ” that would go from town to town and in order to liquidate reactionaries by the thousands . The details were beyond gruesome . I would like to know the truth on Bolshevik terror , with out propaganda .
Answer:
The Gulag Archipelago
I Was A Slave in Russia
@ mathew
[ Believing in a Jewish Bible of fairy tales wherein it states Jews are God’s chosen makes Christians “Jews for Jesus” without knowing it. ]
That is simply not true . God chose the people of the old testament to prophesize that Christ was on his way . When what we know as the jews had Christ killed , they pissed God off royally and now they are damned .
Christianity is centered on the trinity , father – son – and holy spirit .
Christ said to the Jews .. ” if you know not me then you know not my father ” . So jews God is ceritified as not the Christian Gog , by God himself !
Christ also called jews Satan’s children and nice things like that .
So , it is only through jewish intrigue and manipulation and subversion that Christians buy in to the chosen thing . It could not be less true !
Not that I am a devout Christian , But I very much dislike how Christianity has been made kosher .
Because , with out the manipulation , it sure ain’t !
Reginald,
“You’re probably right that Whites are the only group with a low enough level of ethno-centricity for Jews to completely function. But what I was talking about was survival. The thing is that Jews haven’t just survived over the long term among Europeans, they’ve also survived over the long term among Middle Easterners.”
Yes, agreed. As you say “completely function” is the key i think. Among similarly clannish populations they can’t fully express and so they can remain as reasonably successful OVERT merchants long-term without ever getting to the point where they collapse the economy through sucking all the capital out (or being expelled before that happens). White people’s lower ethno-centricity allows them to keep going into the red leading to the tit for tat of the last 2000 years.
That’s what i mean about them hitting their peak in the US. They might swarm to the BRIC countires with their transplanted loot and be rich and successful but they’ll never be as powerful as they are now because they need a white host for that but at the same time they can’t have a white host without destroying it.
.
“We do NOT need to become the enemy, or adopt his ways, to survive. What kind of recovery or existence is that?”
Agree. The reason this is happening is because the way White people are makes us very powerful at EXTERNAL ethnic conflicts but very weak at INTERNAL ethnic conflict. The clannish populations are the opposite.
Balthasar Nordstrom,
“It would be a mistake to blame this all on Jews. Bush Sr was the man who pushed for GATT and global free trade. This is a class thing”
Well you always have to look behind the scenes to see who’s advising but generally yes, agreed. They don’t create the natural divisions in society they magnify and exploit them. When they arrived in America most of them were at the bottom and they magnified the class divisions from that end via the communist party and now they’re at the top they magnify the divisions from that end with their open borders, global capitalism party. Same sh*t, different shovel.
For those interested in the shady origins of the Federal Reserve, here’s the book cited by Curt.
http://www.4shared.com/document/XfcraKi4/Creature_From_Jekyll_Island_by.htm
My two cents worth: Hülsmann’s The Ethics of Money Production deals with the incremental institutional steps that have been engineered to transfer control over money from the common man to the power elites. (PDF, 897KB).
http://is.gd/irWjFX
Sound money is essential for a free society, of which the Founding Fathers were well aware.
remain
“I “suspect” Solzhenitsyn is a jew, a crypto”
I don’t suspect it for a moment.
.
“I admit I’ve not read 200 Years Together but have read enough to think it’s a whitewash. He pulls one punch after another and is not telling the whole story”
That’s because he’s white and trying to be “fair” which under the circumstances is insane but you can’t fight your nature.
.
“If there are ANY unmixed white people left in Russia and the Soviet block countries it’s truly a miracle when you consider these “energetic” organized white Christian-hating Talmudists had free reign for over 70 years to wipe out the white Russian male population and rape white females.”
They didn’t have 70 years. They had about ten years just killing millions of white people then another ten where they killed millions more but at the same time started to cannibalize themselves through communist party in-fighting and purges which weakened them to the point where Stalin could conduct his stealth counter-Jewish reconquista.
So thirty years tops and most of it too busy murdering 30 million white people to focus on anything else.
.
Do you think “remain” is playing it straight? He called 9-11 families sellouts, he calls the Saudi family Jews, he claims there are millions of Chinese Jews … I think he is pulling our leg. He is mocking this site, if I had to guess.
Jewson speaks…constantly. Like an annoying child he doesn’t know how to shut up. How old are you jewson, 11? 12?
Here is something just for you.
http://www.rense.com/general94/fairy.htm
What do you think, Jewson? Conspiracy or pure coincidence?
Read between the lines of this article. Jews have been trying to gain a foothold in Japan for 150 years with little success. There are only 1000 Jews in Japan today.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/Japan.html
How truly fortunate for Japan.
Jews have run up against the brick wall of Japanese ethnocentrism. In most White countries a Jew has a good shot at winning an election against a White opponent, especially given the fundraising advantage Jews enjoy. In Japan this never happens. Anyone who isn’t Japanese is dismissed without a hearing. They don’t hate Jews, they just class them with all other aliens. This deep racial consciousness is impervious to jewish bribery.
Call it the Virtue of Prejudice.
Curt, I think comments should be kept straightforward and to the point. If you are going to use satire in a comment go ahead but don’t be surprised if it gets misunderstood; I’ve lost all sane track of what some satirically inclined commenters actually believe.
I see your point and agree.
EHUD OLMERT’s grandparents are from China, he visited their town a few years ago.
Dr Mac has a chapter on NS as a reaction to Jewish Power in Germany. As I recall it was quite interesting.
ANYONE, anyone, calling Solzhenitsyn a Jew is a troll, ANYONE.
Well, i guess I’m a troll then. The god Shiva has spoken. Thanks for letting me know.
“ANYONE, anyone, calling Solzhenitsyn a Jew is a troll, ANYONE.”
Well said!
@ Bertrand Russell’s ….” If you ask yourself how Dostoevsky’s characters should be governed, you will understand. Yet it is terrible. They are a nation of artists, down to the simplest peasant; the aim of the Bolsheviks is to make them industrial and as Yankee as possible….”
This is so the plight of the previous Americans, also.
To look back on the Agrarian America and agrarian south, the plains, the pioneer traditions, at the art, the books, the music, the traditions, the sense of growing things, families, futures, and hand crafts, then look at the cheesy shows they are given for entertainment, the six-boxes of talking heads all jabbering at once.
Is this really right for Emily Dickinson and Mark Twain? The Americans are still the same people— the saga of demoralization, the hammering especially at the waps, at their ethnicity, religion, every single possible bad blemish gone over and over, in books, radio, t.v., films.
Later history is coming that will bear this out. What is said here, will be said time and time again—- it will be a testimony to what the other populations out of hate, fear, envy, greed, (and sometimes righteous anger, very true), did TO them.
Pictures will be shown of the “fat” confused Americans, strung out on drugs (just today I heard “zoloft” now is said to cause “side effects”— oh really?) Of course it does!
but later, people will look at these pictures, will look at what has been done—and they will look for the DOERS.
This is just the way history works. No matter how much attempt to silence that question of “who DID THIS TO THESE people”=== it will be answered. And in full. As there are many culprits.
interesting discussion, everybody seems to agree, that at least the Western World is fully controlled by the Jews. Jew Gilad Atzmon is basically confirming this assumption in the video shown on this page, jew Mark Bruzonsky is doing the same being interviewed on PressTV’s Autograph. Atzmon is claiming, “there is no jewish conspiracy, the jews are controlling the world with the help of gentiles under their control”. Are there really no “supernatural/cabalistic” tricks involved, when the jews are manipulating the gentiles, at least on a very personal level… Jews controlled Europe in the medieval ages without modern media and finance tools… From experience in normal life it appears to me, that some persons (mainly women??) can read my thoughts about family business and society matters extremely well, completely incomprehensible … Do the jews employ a scheme in that direction?? Jordan Maxwell is hinting, that the world is controlled by “Sex, drugs and RocknRoll”, is this just empty phrase or is there some truth to it???
There is no zero evidence that any human has the ability to read thoughts in any psychic or supernatural sense. MacDonald explains how Jews exercise power. It isn’t through some mystical means. Here is a great article on it:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/UnderstandJI-1.htm
My view is that the Talmud and Kabbalah keep Jewry contemptuous, hostile, and cohesively xenophobic and outright racist towards non-Jews, and imbue them with their low ethics and hostile orientation towards “the other.” The Old Testament provides them delusions of racial continuity dating back to the biblical era. I’m not sure where their money and power-worshipping characteristics originate, but it may be a survival mechanism that has mutated into an obsessive-compulsive (mental) disorder, similar to their fanatical drive for control of government and its purse strings.
There’s really no getting around the fact that they suffer from a hostile, group psychosis that manages to serve them fairly well for periods until they either meltdown from the weight of the psychological pressure of the scam, or non-Jews discover their treachery and do something about it.
The problem for non-Jews right now is that so many of them suffer from their own psychosis (itself largely imbued by Jewry via mass media and political and cultural influence) that Jewry is NOT a hostile enemy within, and is NOT working tenaciously against American interests on behalf of its own interests and agenda. This is a delusion.
So in some ways, one could say they do indeed have large factions of society in some kind of a delusional “trance,” that may or may not involve psychological trickery originally learned from kabbalah, transmuted through the Jewish community, and practiced upon non-Jews.
Can anybody deny that Jewry has a propensity and talent for playing mind games? Where does this originate?
But most modern Jews don’t seem to have much knowledge of the Talmud or Kabbalah or even the Bible. This is true for most Jews living in the West and even more true of Jews in elite positions.
How many Jews working for Goldman Sachs know anything about Kabbalah? Does Alan Greenspan study the Talmud? Does Larry Summmers or Ben Bernake even believe in a supernatural realm? Probably not.
It seems like religion often expresses ethnic traits more than creates them. For example, blacks in Haiti reverted back to a form of Voodooism after White Christian rule was overthrown, because it is a religion that fits their intelligence and temperament. Haitian religion is Christian on the outside but actually primitive Voodoo on the inside. If blacks weren’t a minority in the US, they would probably revert to something primitive as well.
So Judaism seems to be this overly technical legalistic religion that endlessly argues fine points and tries to find loopholes – just the kind of religion that would fit the personality of Jews.
As far as the trickery displayed by Jews, it seems more in line with that of a used car salesman cheating gullible customers, just on a higher level.
When I view the news reels of the early communist period, 1917 onwards, and the purported personalities of the era, Stalin, Lennin, Trotsky, Derzhinsky, Kagnovitch, Rader, and the others, many of whom were later liquidated, I cannot help but suspect that these guys were all, each and every one of them, puppets for a really powerful force. They were not independent men, they followed orders.
I once read that , when all is said and done , every system of authority /government always boils down to one individual calling the shots .
So that you could have a entity the size of the UN , as example , and when there were a major decision made , if you were able to see the actual workings of the entire process , it would be one person who made that decision .
caveman
“Are there really no “supernatural/cabalistic” tricks involved, when the jews are manipulating the gentiles, at least on a very personal level”
No. They do it by creating and promoting harmful ideologies which leads White people to self-harm.
.
“Jews controlled Europe in the medieval ages without modern media and finance tools”
No they didn’t. They controlled trade and finance in a stagnant europe from the collapse of Rome until they were expelled from England in 1290 and other western european countries followed suit (leading almost immediately to the European renaissance btw). After that they were mostly penned up in eastern europe and Turkey until the 17th century when western europeans had forgotten what the original problem was.
.
chris moore
“Can anybody deny that Jewry has a propensity and talent for playing mind games? Where does this originate?”
They’re adapted to us. White people are less ethno-centric on average which makes us relatively more ideal-centric.
If you’re an ethno-centric minority living among a volatile majority population that is less ethno-centric but more ideal-centric then learning how to manipulate the majority’s ideal-centric nature would be a useful survival mechanism.
Wandrin,
your reply doesn’ t sound too convincing to me.
With “promoting harmful ideologies and controlling trade and finance” one can not normally manipulate people the way the jews are manipulating gentiles..
Do you think, the so called “cabalistic system” employed by some jews is for self entertainment and fun only???
now to “Sex, drugs and RocknRoll..”
What is your take on the allusion that the kind of sex used to “politically take out” Eliot Spitzer is a typical tool of the dark forces behind the western governments??? (the Spitzer affair could be called a domestic intrigue, Eliot is obviously also from the tribe)
Opium was used by East India Company (to corrupt and exploit the chinese society), today companies like Eli Lilly peddle “medication”, (e.g. Zyprexa) prescribed by corrupt doctors, with a very similar effect on the victims like the opium did at the time in China… (the background of both companies referred to is well known)
“Can anybody deny that Jewry has a propensity and talent for playing mind games? Where does this originate?”
Which is precisely why Freud had to invent psychoanalysis. If you and your entire culture have been taught that playing mind games is normal and healthy, it’s only a short matter of time before you’re unable to distinguish reality from famtasy.
When their cultural ethos of playing mind games has been imposed on the host coutnry at large, the collapse of the host country and its society becomes a foregone conclusion. Their rise in a society is a harbinger of the host society’s imminent collapse.
That is why we would most likely be better off under a monarchy , at least it would be honest and ” transparent ” .
Or perhaps a benevolent dictator .
Anything would be better than this ” democracy” nonsense .
When you examine Judaism critically, it becomes obvious that it’s really a cult that predisposes its adherents to group psychosis. It’s an entire people suffering from borderline personality disorder.
[ So Judaism seems to be this overly technical legalistic religion that endlessly argues fine points and tries to find loopholes – just the kind of religion that would fit the personality of Jews.
As far as the trickery displayed by Jews, it seems more in line with that of a used car salesman cheating gullible customers, just on a higher level. ]
Well , that is where the ” end justifies the means ” comes in . If your religion tells you that you are chosen by god , then it is your right to do anything you please to support /fulfill your god’s wishes .
[ But most modern Jews don’t seem to have much knowledge of the Talmud or Kabbalah or even the Bible. This is true for most Jews living in the West and even more true of Jews in elite positions. ]
Yes , but , 100 % are influenced by their religion/culture , to a greater or lesser extent .
So many might not literally believe that there are supreme for religious reasons , but they can’t help but to be a part of it .
Yes, this is exactly what I mean about their religious doctrine transmuting or shaping even non-practicing Jews via Jewish ethno-culture. Non-religious Jews may not say: “I’m supreme because my religious doctrine tells me so.” But the rabbis and other leaders who DO subscribe to and comprehend the supremacist religious doctrine form the core of the ethnicity, and set its tenor, which then radiates to the entirety of the Jewish people through group culture, which then becomes a general attitude of supremacy and entitlement.
For frame of reference, think of that scene in “The Devil Wears Prada” where Meryl Streep is talking about all of the fashion background that went into shaping the simple sweater that the female protagonist is wearing, totally unbeknownst to her. Well, there are layers upon layers of background Jewish supremacist religious doctrine that go into shaping the average Jew’s attitudes, identity and consciousness often totally unbeknownst to him or her. They are essentially “programmed” from an early age.
Of course, so are, for example, Catholics, but in not so malign ways.
[ Well, there are layers upon layers of background Jewish supremacist religious doctrine that go into shaping the average Jew’s attitudes, identity and consciousness often totally unbeknownst to him or her. They are essentially “programmed” from an early age. ]
I have had disputes over this same issue .
Someone might say :
” yeah , but they aren’t all bad ! you can’t paint them all with the same brush . ”
I would reply :
” I agree that not all jews are bad . Jews are only as bad as their religion , and their religion is very bad and very influential “
I just wanted to expand on this …
Well , that is where the ” end justifies the means ” comes in . If your religion tells you that you are chosen by god , then it is your right to do anything you please to support /fulfill your god’s wishes .
As an example …
If blowing up some buildings with a few thousand people in them , in order to start a war that you feel will save your people’s world head quarters , then that is very much ok for jews do … and they did .
I suspect it’s an innate genetic quality of Jews that drives most of their behavior, not their religionh. I think their religion is an expression of their biology. Even when they are not religious, they create a culture for themselves that is distinctively Jewish.
So, some might argue that if the Talmud or Judaism or Kabbalah was done away with, Jewish behavior would change. I doubt that is true. There would just be a new expression of their basic ethnic/genetic personality in another form, another religion, another culture.
This is important, because if it is driven mainly by genetics, then focusing on Judaism itself as the source of our problems may take us off course … it’s not the Judaism, it’s the Jews.
.
[This is important, because if it is driven mainly by genetics, then focusing on Judaism itself as the source of our problems may take us off course … it’s not the Judaism, it’s the Jews. ]
It is their religion that has been the explanation for them having remained separate .
You can’t tell me that Jews actually prefer another jew over a gentile en mass and that being natural . Their religion has been essential in combating assimilation . They make “holy” days and festivals around the theme of historical revenging and killing goyim and those who would have them assimilate.
There’s a nice Easter video on TOO on just this theme .
It’s hard to separate genes and culture for sure. And culture plays a role, but I wouldn’t downplay the role of genes. About half of personality comes from genetics, according to studies.
Germans tend to be hard working people. Some of that is their culture but some of it is in their genes. With Africans, no culture or religion could make them nice, sober, intelligent people that saved money, developed technology and took care of their kids properly. That’s the error Europeans made long ago – thinking they could “educate” the African out of his primitive behavior. As we know, that didn’t work so well. (Some of that is low IQ for sure, but some of it is their personality traits).
So critiquing the religion of Jews is important, but that cannot be the only factor involved, as far as I can see, in their modern day behavior. In a way, their religion has shaped their genes over the centuries.
There is a whole theory that the reason Jews excel in finance, law and other abstract fields, is because it was only those areas they were allowed to enter in – those Jews naturally good at banking had the most kids. Also, Rabbis (who have to to be good at “book learning”) were able to have children – lots of them. Whereas for centuries, priests (some of the smartest Gentiles) didn’t have any (well not too many)
You can’t tell me that Jews actually prefer another jew over a gentile en mass and that being natural . Their religion has been essential in combating assimilation .
Their religion played a role but I think they do have a natural preference for each other. Don’t you prefer the company of other Whites? And especially Whites like yourself? I know Irish that always help other Irish out. I know Italians that hang mostly with Italians. Religion doesn’t seem to the primary factor.
Einstein, who was not religious in any serious way, is supposed to have disliked the personalities of most Gentiles he met.
Their religion played a role but I think they do have a natural preference for each other.
That isn’t what makes Jews an unusual ethnicity. What make Jews unusual is their Orthodox core’s resistance to intermarriage with Europeans, and their pattern of being extremely antagonistic towards Europeans, Christianity, and especially European Christians.
All these traits that make the Jews unusual go back to their religion’s central edict to remain separate from the non-Jews.
Jews who have most of their ancestry going back to Jews in Europe have a distaste for Christianity and Europeans because for thousands of years European Christians sought to assimilate Jews into European Christendom.
The ones who went along with being assimilated now have descendants who aren’t Jews, instead just Europeans with very small amounts of Jewish admixture.
The ones who didn’t go along with being assimilated were the ones who had more distaste for Europeans and/or Christianity than the other Jews.
The Jews of today are the way they are because they have the concentrated blood of the Jews in the past who disliked European Christians so much that they were willing to suffer a great deal of persecution just to remain separate from them.
There probably wouldn’t be any Jews in the West today if it wasn’t for Judaism, and even if a few survived they wouldn’t have the intense drive to subvert European societies Kevin MacDonald writes about if it wasn’t for Judaism.
In that sense Judaism is at the root of all troubles caused by Jews.
It is true that the Judaism caused concentration of anti-European genetics and culture remain in the Jews of today after they give up on Judaism.
But over the long term the loss of Judaism leads to the loss of the concentration of those anti-European genetics and culture, meaning that the anti-European attitudes of the Jews were both caused in the first place and are perpetuated into the future by Judaism.
JS: “In a way, [Jewish] religion has shaped their genes over the centuries.”
Yes, so this is possible. Which means the right religion can shape genes in the right way, and the wrong religion can shape genes in the wrong way.
As far as Blacks go, think of a guy like, say, Tony Dungy, who is a dedicated Christian. A lot of intelligent Whites would probably prefer his company over many of their dumber, pure White cousins.
I recognize the problem this poses for some White nationalists who want to believe genetics are completely set and are destiny, entirely. But would Blacks really bother you that much if they behaved more or less like Tony Dungy, and more importantly, could be shown to culturally and even genetically evolve?
And a corollary: would Blacks really bother you that much if so many weren’t perpetually manipulated by Jews and leftists into hating Whites and voting like it; weren’t kept on the public dole by Jews and leftists to control their voting patterns; weren’t raised in a culture of criminalism?
Manipulative, self-serving Jews and leftists (and certain money-worshipping White crypto-Jews) have been poisoning the wells in America for decades, preventing healing and Black evolution, both genetically and culturally.
Tony Dungy is an example of the kind of American Black that would be far more common but for these saboteurs in the woodwork.
I don’t know who Tony Dungy is, but I have certainly known decent black folk. But, the problem is, we don’t run into a whole lotta Tony’s … we run into a whole lot of ICE T’s. And it’s not just culture causing it, it is inborn traits, like low IQ, little impulse control and an inability to think long term. It was the mistake of White Gentiles to think Africans could be educated into being nice White people.
And yes, religion and culture can shape genes in a positive way, but we are talking about many generations, probably centuries to have an impact.
IMO …
Genetics has strong influence over religion/culture .
Religion/culture has strong influence over people .
[ Their religion played a role but I think they do have a natural preference for each other ]
They may be different but they are not blind .
I think the conflict between the lure to gentile beauty and their in group pressure against assimilation is very much famous .
I really do not think that it is a natural preference .
Well yes, if you are referring to the ugly factor, I see what you mean. But I’m not sure that has much to do with their ethnocentrism. People stick up for their family, even when their family is not the best in the world. People make sacrifices for their country, even if it isn’t the greatest or most beautiful.
They can be ugly and still be hostile to the rest of the world – maybe more so. They may wish they looked like beautiful Aryan gods, but that just makes them resent the world all the more.
In some ways, they may have the feelings of outcasts in high school that happen to be smart. They intensely envy those with popularity and beauty – wishing secretly to rule them, hurt them and embrace them – all at the same time.
Judaism as a religion is an expression and also a tool of Jewish hostility against non-Jews. Jews as a group possess the values of a primitive nomadic tribe combined with a high rate of literacy. They have the ethics of a biker gang and the brains of accountants. The Old Testament and the Talmud give Jews the rationale to continue being usurious misanthropes, but their genes made their religion in the first place. Chicken or the egg. But the real mystery is how gentiles, despite being the object of Judaism’s contempt, refer to the Jews as “god’s chosen people”.
I would agree with the above post. The religion is created by, and a tool of, the genes. When they don’t have Judaism, they simply create another culture to accomplish the same thing (Communism, Multiculturalism, etc.) Also, this sums up the problem with Jewish populations:
They have the ethics of a biker gang and the brains of accountants
[ When they don’t have Judaism, they simply create another culture to accomplish the same thing (Communism, Multiculturalism, etc.) ]
Communism , multiculturalism , secular humanism , human rights , radical feminism , animal rights , globalism , radical environmentalism , etc …….. Is the ideals of Judaism !
It is all about all the world being the same lower raceless godless sexless level and jews on top through global governance of the goyim .
That is the aims of Judaism .
To be orthodox is to be even stronger in this agenda with a religious fervor .
That is why it is not less so with non-religious jews as you have asserted .
make that …
That is why it is not less so with religious jews as you have asserted .
yup , clear as mud . it is .
As to the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution, and to the origin of the idea of Lenin-ism, be so kind as to read
http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/pearson/pearson_index.html
Michael Pearson, The Sealed Train; the one and only book on the subject
An eye-witness to the Revolution in 1917:–
http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/tyrkova/tyrkova_index.html
Ariadna Tyrkóva, Liberty to Brest-Litovsk
It was the German High Command that financed the Bolshevik Revolution, as a war measure; and provided uniformed officers to carry it out